| Country | Changeset | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|
 | 166587354 (Comments: 4) | DaveF (Discussed changesets: 181) | You, telling me my edits were incomplete, were "aggressive". commented 2026-09-26 21:14:22 UTC by DaveF ♦1,688 |
| 189595282 (Comments: 1) | MagicPocketbook462 (Discussed changesets: 10) | Just to mention that I'm not staunchly against a "West Barnham" being mapped! I do believe though it should be not tagged as a "suburb" and linked to Wikipedia if that is to happen though. It should be a smaller way/r... commented 2026-09-26 16:02:14 UTC by MagicPocketbook462 ♦19 |
| 185046227 (Comments: 1) | NTKillerton (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi. While mapping farmyards to the north of Exeter, I noticed that there is a series of permissive tracks and footways over fields to the south of Columbjohn Farm. They don't obviously show on current Bing imagery. Some do appear to follow some... commented 2026-09-26 15:26:14 UTC by Adrian Shobrooke ♦29 |
| 97224889 (Comments: 2) | hofoen (Discussed changesets: 73) | I am referring to https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8306848437 commented 2026-09-26 14:03:47 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,822 |
| 169672176 (Comments: 1) | Robert Whittaker (Discussed changesets: 158) | How do I correct this entry? The business is now Mekong. A alfresco Thai Fusion cafe. commented 2026-09-26 13:39:12 UTC by Chester Fester ♦1 |
| 189534439 (Comments: 1) | euro_maps_2026 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM All GB railway stations are tagged as nodes. There's a bug in the rendering software which means platforms require the area tag. commented 2026-09-26 12:32:39 UTC by DaveF ♦1,688 |
| 189573661 (Comments: 1) | Semolinajoe (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. You're quite right; it's not a PRoW, but it is a ground feature clearly visible on imagery and to all who may pass by. Therefore, I've reinstated it. I've amended the tags to access=agricultura... commented 2026-09-26 10:51:24 UTC by BCNorwich ♦5,381 |
| 189547535 (Comments: 1) | RyanBush (Discussed changesets: 28) | Thanks! commented 2026-09-26 10:08:58 UTC by jayaddison ♦52 |
| 111764385 (Comments: 1) | Rublistoi (Discussed changesets: 12) | Hello! You used surface=woo on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/14867480/history Have you maybe meant surface=wood ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects w... commented 2026-09-26 06:53:59 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 189318712 (Comments: 1) | Tsibu336 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello and welcome to OSM! Thank you for taking the time to contribute to the map. I've marked these good though they could definitely do with some improvement. When mapping buildings the goal is to map the footprint of the building, not t... commented 2026-09-26 01:49:18 UTC by CanopyFalls ♦122 |
| 189319977 (Comments: 1) | lanroamer (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! Thank you for taking the time to make this edit! Unfortunately I've reviewed this as bad due to the road you mapped being inaccurate. I've updated the road and added some more details to the area based on Esri imagery which se... commented 2026-09-26 01:40:51 UTC by CanopyFalls ♦122 |
| 189335959 (Comments: 1) | Metris Party Wall Solutions (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! Welcome to OSM and thank you for contributing to the map. I can't see any problems with the edits you've made but I do have a few small notes. A source wasn't listed for this changeset but I assume from your account name the sou... commented 2026-09-26 01:31:11 UTC by CanopyFalls ♦122 |
| 189338833 (Comments: 2) | davidoclubb (Discussed changesets: 2) | Agree with @trigpoint if you want to add details about who operates this consider using the `operator=*` key and it's many subkeys. The wiki page for the `amenity=drinking_water` tag includes a list of tags it may be worth considering adding as ... commented 2026-09-26 01:21:10 UTC by CanopyFalls ♦122 |
| 189339671 (Comments: 1) | Mattymooz (Discussed changesets: 1) | Can't find any reason for a stop being here either, ty for the contribution! --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/189339671 commented 2026-09-26 01:17:21 UTC by CanopyFalls ♦122 |
| 189336644 (Comments: 2) | NikWd (Discussed changesets: 1) | Looks like all of the problems with this changeset have been cleaned up by that partial revert. Thank you for contributing to the map and welcome to OSM! --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: h... commented 2026-09-25 22:13:07 UTC by CanopyFalls ♦122 |
| 189554109 (Comments: 1) | Draykill (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! Welcome to OSM and thank you for contributing to the map! This is a very good start for mapping a waste centre and even having a named building on the map will help people to find the place. I've ended up making a few changes inclu... commented 2026-09-25 21:57:08 UTC by CanopyFalls ♦122 |
| 189560446 (Comments: 1) | okwithmydecay (Discussed changesets: 41) | I accidentally entered the wrong description for this edit, it should have been: "Align benches with imagery and add openbenches:id" commented 2026-09-25 21:53:14 UTC by okwithmydecay ♦43 |
| 189562696 (Comments: 1) | Anupa K (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverting this changeset, from what I can see on the Bing Aerial imagery here these buildings appear disconnected from one another so joining them like this is incorrect. The building that you moved also seemed correctly aligned using the OSMUK cadas... commented 2026-09-25 21:21:51 UTC by CanopyFalls ♦122 |
| 163023987 (Comments: 1) | Merkades Vito (Discussed changesets: 5) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12623837953/history - is this very unusual use of line_attachment tag deliberate? maybe it was supposed to go into other tag? see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:line attachment commented 2026-09-25 20:26:07 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 188607707 (Comments: 1) | Albert radley (Discussed changesets: 16) | This new road hasn’t been built yet but is due to be completed by Feb 2027 commented 2026-09-25 19:52:46 UTC by Joshua_Brighton ♦1 |
| 189553939 (Comments: 1) | SomeoneElse (Discussed changesets: 478) | The name was added a couple of months ago in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153230909 by a new user in one of their only 3 changesets. I've walked quite a lot of this and in no cases can I think of any that "Beacons Way" is t... commented 2026-09-25 16:53:32 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,881 |
| 64231295 (Comments: 1) | DHP11 MDS (Discussed changesets: 18) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/641577319/history has building:levels = 0.75 that was added in this edit building:levels= is for how many above-ground non-roof levels the building has, so this always should be an integer. Here it has some... commented 2026-09-25 16:42:21 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 189529555 (Comments: 2) | confusedbuffalo (Discussed changesets: 123) | It has! I did announce on the forum a while back, but jump in, there's still plenty that needs fixing commented 2026-09-25 16:05:49 UTC by confusedbuffalo ♦471 |
| 189185333 (Comments: 2) | a_n_w (Discussed changesets: 2) | I think the end of Honeywell has re-opened, I'll have to check exactly what form. That said, I'm not convinced the south end of Brook Lane is open because that's now the boundary of Northern Roots so might be fenced. Needs scouting out... commented 2026-09-25 14:58:14 UTC by a_n_w ♦2 |
| 189537017 (Comments: 8) | RLlE (Discussed changesets: 4) | Thanks, I'll take another look at it tonight Rhys commented 2026-09-25 14:36:50 UTC by RLlE ♦4 |
| 189535397 (Comments: 5) | RLlE (Discussed changesets: 4) | Oki diolch am eich gwyboddaeth lleol, dwi'n deall. Felly, os ydych chi neu'r weithwyr fferm angen access i'r safle (ac y ffordd), mae'n safle a ffordd preifat, felly `access=private`. Mae'n jyst eitaf "nitpicky&qu... commented 2026-09-25 14:07:22 UTC by Preben Vangberg ♦11 |
| 189401800 (Comments: 3) | Adam Edwards (Discussed changesets: 37) | Happy to help. I tend to focus on places I have visited. I'm always looking for places where cycle paths are shown as unsurfaced when actually they are surfaced as this has a massive impact on cycle routing software. I must check out mapillar... commented 2026-09-25 13:53:18 UTC by Adam Edwards ♦27 |
| 189419161 (Comments: 1) | Adam Edwards (Discussed changesets: 37) | I've added https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1561436762 to the local NCN1 and EV12 relations. commented 2026-09-25 13:50:57 UTC by SomeoneElse2 ♦505 |
| 189351911 (Comments: 1) | WECATransOps (Discussed changesets: 2) | Welcome to OSM and thank you for contributing to the map. This kind of detail is very much needed. Can't find any imagery to confirm these changes as the newest Mapillary images in august still show construction here. Unfortunately in this chang... commented 2026-09-25 13:49:47 UTC by CanopyFalls ♦122 |
| 189508933 (Comments: 1) | FlamingoOSM (Discussed changesets: 45) | Change looks good from what I can see! Ty for contributing to the map! --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/189508933 commented 2026-09-25 13:38:15 UTC by CanopyFalls ♦122 |
| 189514236 (Comments: 1) | Watchman8210 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! Thank you for contributing to the map and welcome to OSM! I've made some changes based on the comment you left in this changeset, you can see the changes I have made here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189545442 Please le... commented 2026-09-25 13:36:59 UTC by CanopyFalls ♦122 |
| 176874993 (Comments: 1) | vogelfreier (Discussed changesets: 109) | The Bing maps aerial imagery used in this changeset for the skate park is out of date and surroundings, ESRI (used in the previous version) shows the correct outline commented 2026-09-25 13:33:41 UTC by An Kerdher ♦2 |
| 189535908 (Comments: 3) | RLlE (Discussed changesets: 4) | There is a cut feature in the editor to split areas. commented 2026-09-25 13:27:47 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,822 |
| 189535702 (Comments: 3) | RLlE (Discussed changesets: 4) | My change is https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189543187 commented 2026-09-25 13:20:19 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,822 |
| 189539886 (Comments: 1) | thechelsuk (Discussed changesets: 1) | Looks good! Seems like this has been an issue for a while. Thank you for contributing to the map and welcome to OSM! I've also removed the note that referenced the hotel. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA ... commented 2026-09-25 13:12:55 UTC by CanopyFalls ♦122 |
| 189535819 (Comments: 1) | Tom Nevill (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, are you sure this (way/700104246) is best tagged as highway=pedestrian? I think highway=service and motor_vehicle=permissive would be better tags - access=private and motor_vehicle=permissive are conflicting with regard to access. Also (was alrea... commented 2026-09-25 13:06:15 UTC by Car Tographer ♦24 |
| 189529296 (Comments: 1) | Jordan Thomas (Discussed changesets: 1) | Change looks good! Can't see this on aerial imagery yet but I assume it's v new. Welcome to OSM and thank you for contributing to the map! If you have any way to capture imagery here that would be incredibly appreciated! ... commented 2026-09-25 13:04:56 UTC by CanopyFalls ♦122 |
| 189536049 (Comments: 1) | Tom Nevill (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thanks for your changes. FYI, I've removed the height=n/a tag from the gate as it didn't contain information about the gate's height - if you aren't sure of the height it's better to leave it blank - and changed the road acce... commented 2026-09-25 12:54:36 UTC by Car Tographer ♦24 |
| 189396050 (Comments: 3) | preschoolglitter (Discussed changesets: 1) | Nice nice! And ye lifecycle tagging is very useful, we also use it a lot when stuff shows up on aerial imagery to stop other mappers re-mapping the same feature. Well worth checking out the wiki page: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_pre... commented 2026-09-25 12:37:09 UTC by CanopyFalls ♦122 |
| 189537893 (Comments: 1) | Dave Venables (Discussed changesets: 125) | https://osm.mathmos.net/addresses/post-towns/NG.html commented 2026-09-25 10:52:15 UTC by Dave Venables ♦185 |
| 189514227 (Comments: 1) | Richard Carden (Discussed changesets: 13) | Hi again Please add meaningful changeset comments to describe what you are doing to your fellow mappers. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments Cheers Phil. commented 2026-09-25 09:40:36 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,822 |
| 189519651 (Comments: 1) | Falsernet (Discussed changesets: 110) | There was a minor error on Thorley Lane southbound exit from the roundabout with the oneway set the wrong way preventing exit from the roundabout which I've corrected in changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189530014#map=19/53.38862... commented 2026-09-25 07:27:14 UTC by Trafford_Mapper ♦21 |
| 151195732 (Comments: 1) | PeterMapit (Discussed changesets: 14) | May I ask what addr:number=1 on house 7 (Barn End) is supposed to signify? commented 2026-09-25 06:00:19 UTC by MagicPocketbook462 ♦19 |
| 189501503 (Comments: 1) | Chris Fleming (Discussed changesets: 20) | It looks like the shop=* tag was added here by mistake? (formerly from a disused:shop=* lifecycle tag) commented 2026-09-24 21:21:57 UTC by jayaddison ♦52 |
| 141907183 (Comments: 2) | Kabads (Discussed changesets: 2) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5537810 commented 2026-09-24 21:19:02 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 164436991 (Comments: 3) | LordGarySugar (Discussed changesets: 53) | I agree it's an overreaction. You were mapping verifiable features. If others have a problem, they can help map missing features too. commented 2026-09-24 18:30:32 UTC by jacobwhall ♦51 |
| 189249910 (Comments: 3) | chimchimchim (Discussed changesets: 2) | No worries, I understand it’s easy to get carried away when editing! Happy to answer any questions or clarify on the points above. Happy editing :) commented 2026-09-24 16:42:35 UTC by gurglypipe ♦1,120 |
| 189366434 (Comments: 1) | NumberniaNorth149 (Discussed changesets: 10) | Changes look good, the source tag is useful but could be potentially more specific as 'list_of_streets' doesn't actually tell me much. Maybe link to a website or alike? --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA ... commented 2026-09-24 15:02:59 UTC by CanopyFalls ♦122 |
| 189498240 (Comments: 1) | Christine Soboyede (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello and welcome to OSM! Thank you for requesting a review on this changeset. I've unfortunately had to revert this change but please don't let that put you off contributing to OSM. `highway=footway` was the correct tagging here and... commented 2026-09-24 15:00:56 UTC by CanopyFalls ♦122 |
| 189500946 (Comments: 1) | guy4159 (Discussed changesets: 13) | All of the tags look good! If it houses the library but is not only one you could add a separate node for the library itself? --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changeset... commented 2026-09-24 14:54:14 UTC by CanopyFalls ♦122 |
| 189501176 (Comments: 2) | guy4159 (Discussed changesets: 13) | Leaving a comment under the changeset so people know it is wrong is the correct way to deal with getting the changeset comment incorrect! Thank you for adding these details! I've updated the `contact:facebook=*` to the URL for their profi... commented 2026-09-24 14:52:22 UTC by CanopyFalls ♦122 |
| 189501552 (Comments: 1) | guy4159 (Discussed changesets: 13) | The comment regarding local library is not correct for this building, but I don't see how to delete it. commented 2026-09-24 14:28:30 UTC by guy4159 ♦4 |
| 189489927 (Comments: 2) | tobych (Discussed changesets: 18) | LordGarySugar you wanted more buildings mapped here, and this changeset maps buildings - so it's as good as your work in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164436991 commented 2026-09-24 14:11:47 UTC by LivingWithDragons ♦60 |
| 189496652 (Comments: 1) | David Wyn (Discussed changesets: 24) | Hi David, I'm assuming you've removed the Wikidata tag as it prevented you from editing the name. Please don't do this. If you scroll down, there's a little table where you can edit fields and keep the tag. I've... commented 2026-09-24 13:21:50 UTC by ceirios ♦148 |
| 189468711 (Comments: 1) | MonsieurSloth (Discussed changesets: 2) | Unfortunately this change glued an admin boundary to the bridge you added. I've fixed this now. Thank you for contributing to the map and welcome to OSM! --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMC... commented 2026-09-24 11:43:37 UTC by CanopyFalls ♦122 |
| 189393897 (Comments: 2) | guy4159 (Discussed changesets: 13) | Removed the `phone=*` key as well and updated the building to `building=commercial`. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189492064 All of the edits you made were good though. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA ... commented 2026-09-24 11:18:13 UTC by CanopyFalls ♦122 |
| 189393844 (Comments: 1) | guy4159 (Discussed changesets: 13) | Change looks good! Thank you for contributing to the map and welcome to OSM! --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/189393844 commented 2026-09-24 11:15:34 UTC by CanopyFalls ♦122 |
| 189487587 (Comments: 1) | ohmanger (Discussed changesets: 29) | Please make sure to split terraces into their individual buildings, it's not very useful if houses are clumped together like this and is extra work for other editors later down the line when they want to add addresses and have to split them. Tha... commented 2026-09-24 11:06:32 UTC by LordGarySugar ♦388 |
| 185537766 (Comments: 1) | Aberhangie (Discussed changesets: 1) | Can you possibly tell me what the source of the name "Jane's Hill" is? I can't find reference to it online. commented 2026-09-24 10:48:43 UTC by andrum99 ♦25 |
| 189400189 (Comments: 1) | Nyzthie (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM and thank you for adding these details to the map! From what I can tell this change looks good! Seems like @Ayyayo has already added opening hours using street complete as well so you're already helping others to survey! ... commented 2026-09-24 10:47:25 UTC by CanopyFalls ♦122 |
| 189403496 (Comments: 1) | sleet2412 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hello! Just been reviewing this changeset, ended up making some changes to what you've done but generally this changeset is good: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189490016 A few small notes, try to be a little more descriptive in ... commented 2026-09-24 10:43:56 UTC by CanopyFalls ♦122 |
| 189387944 (Comments: 4) | Car Tographer (Discussed changesets: 8) | Had a trawl through Instagram. Be-Rad took over ownership of the Kitesurf Centre in around Feb 2025 and held a closing-down sale in Pevensey Bay at the same time, so while I'm not clear why they have two distinct websites, I think you're ri... commented 2026-09-24 10:25:21 UTC by amosharper ♦63 |
| 189460625 (Comments: 1) | freshline (Discussed changesets: 1) | V depressing that this is now paid for but thank you for adding this information to the map! Also welcome to OSM! I've added Hooplr as the operator and added the operator:type as private as I saw you added `operator=private`. The `operato... commented 2026-09-24 10:05:40 UTC by CanopyFalls ♦122 |
| 189469645 (Comments: 3) | Dezza (Discussed changesets: 22) | Makes sense! I ask not because I’m hoping you’d do all the mapping, rather that it would be nice to set a shared direction we can both move towards with whatever edits we make here in the future :) commented 2026-09-24 08:57:21 UTC by gurglypipe ♦1,120 |
| 188713874 (Comments: 4) | therealzakie (Discussed changesets: 6) | Thank you for checking and correcting commented 2026-09-24 08:22:43 UTC by ⇄ john paul jones & gringo ♦37 |
| 189483225 (Comments: 1) | ancienthunter321 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thanks! - And happy mapping. commented 2026-09-24 08:20:39 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,933 |
| 189446916 (Comments: 1) | Blase_Marshall89 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Wherever 36 Belmont Street is, it is not in the middle of a service road. Addresses on Belmont Street and the Denton Estate could be better mapped, but that requires a survey. It is also extremely unlikely that... commented 2026-09-24 08:14:15 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,933 |
| 189470078 (Comments: 2) | ancienthunter321 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Appreciate the feedback, thank you - I have applied the recommendations now. commented 2026-09-24 08:05:40 UTC by ancienthunter321 ♦1 |
| 189467364 (Comments: 1) | millstonebarn (Discussed changesets: 1) | @millstonebarn: What are you trying to do here? A majority of your edits contain some removal of information from speed cameras (guised as the creation thereof, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189418895) and the deletion of enforcement re... commented 2026-09-23 22:00:47 UTC by Aethonatic ♦91 |
| 189466057 (Comments: 1) | philbow16 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Please do not map duplicate buildings, 6 Carter Avenue was already mapped here. commented 2026-09-23 20:19:34 UTC by Aethonatic ♦91 |
| 187966364 (Comments: 6) | LordGarySugar (Discussed changesets: 53) | I would definitely caution against moving any address info off buildings and onto plots, so as not to break from the usual method of mapping addresses. Presumably someone interested in using plot data could automatically associate addresses with plot... commented 2026-09-23 18:52:38 UTC by LordGarySugar ♦388 |
| 188818500 (Comments: 2) | mueschel (Discussed changesets: 1023) | fixed commented 2026-09-23 18:39:37 UTC by mueschel ♦7,364 |
| 189262471 (Comments: 6) | RyanBush (Discussed changesets: 28) | Hello, Thanks, and fair enough — that page does say what you say it does, and I hadn't given it enough weight. I take the point that there's guidance behind you and that some areas have gone that way. Where I've end... commented 2026-09-23 18:35:17 UTC by RyanBush ♦12 |
| 189305245 (Comments: 4) | DerMario (Discussed changesets: 5) | Thanks for the explanation! commented 2026-09-23 18:22:24 UTC by DerMario ♦5 |
| 189461567 (Comments: 1) | Fgjgdrou (Discussed changesets: 16) | This was meant to be normalising the access tagging across the Pentre Jane Morgan & Fferm Penglais accommodation areas, but it seems the changeset naming got amended by accident with the intervening changeset. commented 2026-09-23 18:15:14 UTC by Fgjgdrou ♦19 |
| 189421015 (Comments: 1) | NumberniaNorth149 (Discussed changesets: 10) | Also looks good! --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/189421015 commented 2026-09-23 15:13:33 UTC by CanopyFalls ♦122 |
| 189421256 (Comments: 1) | NumberniaNorth149 (Discussed changesets: 10) | Edit looks good though you haven't added the road, just the `highway_authority_ref=*`. Glad to see more of your mapping! --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changeset... commented 2026-09-23 15:13:08 UTC by CanopyFalls ♦122 |
| 182243791 (Comments: 2) | MichaelCollinson (Discussed changesets: 96) | Yep. Corrected commented 2026-09-23 15:10:39 UTC by MichaelCollinson ♦59 |
| 189453921 (Comments: 1) | Alex_457 (Discussed changesets: 65) | ...named Trinity commented 2026-09-23 14:52:37 UTC by Alex_457 ♦85 |
| 189433209 (Comments: 1) | JulietNovember96 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Changes look all good! Thank you for making the map better and welcome to OSM! --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/189433209 commented 2026-09-23 14:30:35 UTC by CanopyFalls ♦122 |
| 189439825 (Comments: 1) | MattClegg (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! Thank you for contributing to OSM and welcome to OSM! Unfortunately I've marked these edits as bad and you can see my updates here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189448142 The problem is that the club is already a node on... commented 2026-09-23 12:55:58 UTC by CanopyFalls ♦122 |
| 189441491 (Comments: 1) | rosshuggett (Discussed changesets: 1) | Looks good! Thank you for adding this information to OSM! And welcome to OSM! One minor note is that generally `access=yes` is not required for things like `amenity=bicycle_parking` as public access is implied. It's not wrong to tag it th... commented 2026-09-23 12:34:42 UTC by CanopyFalls ♦122 |
| 82879231 (Comments: 4) | MrLusignana (Discussed changesets: 10) | No problem - many thanks for drawing my attention to the issue. commented 2026-09-23 10:47:11 UTC by MrLusignana ♦9 |
| 189390049 (Comments: 6) | Dezza (Discussed changesets: 22) | 😍 commented 2026-09-23 09:48:14 UTC by Dezza ♦35 |
| 151853741 (Comments: 2) | Davidus2000 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi! Just fixed it. commented 2026-09-23 08:08:30 UTC by Davidus2000 ♦3 |
| 189418609 (Comments: 3) | embok (Discussed changesets: 6) | Thank you :) Yeah it's hard enough even knowing it. So long as there are no glaring issues it hopefully is okay commented 2026-09-23 07:14:53 UTC by embok ♦5 |
| 189418620 (Comments: 1) | pctq (Discussed changesets: 1) | Looks good! Welcome to OSM and good luck with mapping! --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/189418620 commented 2026-09-22 20:34:54 UTC by CanopyFalls ♦122 |
| 185819927 (Comments: 1) | Sofia_111 (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hi, where are these paths still named? I can't see any evidence for them having the names of the old roads, and indeed don't even exist as footpaths anymore but just parts of a pedestrian area. commented 2026-09-22 20:06:08 UTC by mstrbrid ♦67 |
| 189346367 (Comments: 1) | wheelmap_visitor (Discussed changesets: 121) | Why was the wheelchair tag set to no? There are no steps at both doors so it should be accessible to wheelchair users. commented 2026-09-22 18:57:02 UTC by Aethonatic ♦91 |
| 189368804 (Comments: 1) | CameronSW (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! Thank you for adding this to OSM! However this change came with a lot of problems, thank you for requesting a review as I've been able to fix a lot of it. Unfortunately you missed a few segments along the road you mapped so the spe... commented 2026-09-22 17:49:29 UTC by CanopyFalls ♦122 |
| 189222371 (Comments: 3) | trigpoint (Discussed changesets: 79) | I've opened an issue, so we'll see if individual terraced houses can be added as an option https://github.com/streetcomplete/StreetComplete/issues/7143 commented 2026-09-22 17:39:32 UTC by confusedbuffalo ♦471 |
| 188389203 (Comments: 1) | NumberniaNorth149 (Discussed changesets: 10) | Thank you for these, they are indeed detailed building outlines. Just noting that I have fixed the building type for the terraces though, building=terrace is for when there is a whole row of unsplit houses, since these are individual houses I&... commented 2026-09-22 17:06:09 UTC by confusedbuffalo ♦471 |
| 189374798 (Comments: 2) | eastender (Discussed changesets: 35) | Hi gurglypipe, Thank you for the question. To put my edit in context, Royal Mail originally installed Business Boxes, that we tagged in OSM as post_box:type=meter. Over the years, those Business Boxes have generally transitioned to Parcel Boxe... commented 2026-09-22 15:57:53 UTC by eastender ♦40 |
| 178098096 (Comments: 1) | Adam43245 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello! You used shop=game_shop on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13006050833/history Have you maybe meant shop=games ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some obje... commented 2026-09-22 15:06:36 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 178447705 (Comments: 1) | FensterGlazing (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! You used craft=glazier on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13545593742/history Have you maybe meant craft=glaziery ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some o... commented 2026-09-22 14:59:13 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 188983687 (Comments: 2) | mcsteven (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ah streetcomplete does have descriptions for "house" and "terraced house" exactly as you stated, my mistake (I assumed it was a looser specification, as with "residential"). Thanks for the clarification. commented 2026-09-22 13:41:05 UTC by mcsteven ♦1 |
| 189111872 (Comments: 1) | dzidek23 (Discussed changesets: 15) | Hi, thanks for this, I just spotted https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1261873505 and wanted to point out that building=terrace is for a whole row of an unsplit terrace. The individual houses should be building=house + house=terraced, which I've ... commented 2026-09-22 12:58:47 UTC by confusedbuffalo ♦471 |
| 172665910 (Comments: 1) | ClarSco (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hi ClarSco, About a year ago, you added various information to a number of railway stations in the Glasgow area. This included adding brand=Scotland's Railway and brand:wikidata=Q136406287 . The wikidata entry for Q136406287 has si... commented 2026-09-22 12:51:55 UTC by Robert Whittaker ♦344 |
| 189395028 (Comments: 1) | guy4159 (Discussed changesets: 13) | Mostly looks good - I've corrected the spelling of Guinness. commented 2026-09-22 12:41:15 UTC by Car Tographer ♦24 |
| 189394511 (Comments: 1) | guy4159 (Discussed changesets: 13) | Interesting! Changeset looks good, I've just removed the full stop from the end of the name. commented 2026-09-22 12:36:49 UTC by Car Tographer ♦24 |
| 189393041 (Comments: 1) | guy4159 (Discussed changesets: 13) | It looks like you changed the entire car park into a charging station here, so I've turned it into a car park again with a separate node inside the car park tagged as a charging station. commented 2026-09-22 12:33:49 UTC by Car Tographer ♦24 |
| 189345688 (Comments: 2) | confusedbuffalo (Discussed changesets: 123) | It had seen some use before but has recently been documented on the wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Ahouse%3Dback-to-back I've recently found a lot more examples of existing houses which were missing a house tag and where th... commented 2026-09-22 12:08:24 UTC by confusedbuffalo ♦471 |
| 187841972 (Comments: 1) | SalliSiiri45 (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hi, here too, their website includes "Catholic" in their name, is that not how it's signed on the ground? commented 2026-09-22 11:30:54 UTC by confusedbuffalo ♦471 |
| 188161855 (Comments: 1) | SalliSiiri45 (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hi, thanks for your update. I'm interested in this because on the school's website they have their name as "Robins Lane Community Primary School" and their street as "Kinmel Street", even though "Robins Lane" w... commented 2026-09-22 11:29:52 UTC by confusedbuffalo ♦471 |
| 189390746 (Comments: 1) | dotty lottie (Discussed changesets: 1) | Looks good! Welcome to OSM! --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/189390746 commented 2026-09-22 10:42:25 UTC by CanopyFalls ♦122 |
| 189390853 (Comments: 1) | Dedham Pharmacy (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! Thank you for contributing to OSM and welcome! Unfortunately I've marked this changeset bad and fixed some problems. See this changeset for updates I've made: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189391632 The `building=hos... commented 2026-09-22 10:36:55 UTC by CanopyFalls ♦122 |
| 189385618 (Comments: 2) | guy4159 (Discussed changesets: 13) | Changes look good! Updated the alignment using the OSM UK Cadastral parcels. If there is charging here could be worth adding a `amenity=charging_station`? Welcome to OSM and feel free to reply with any questions or concerns. ... commented 2026-09-22 10:23:47 UTC by CanopyFalls ♦122 |
| 189384736 (Comments: 3) | guy4159 (Discussed changesets: 13) | I've done a partial revert of this changeset, undoing the tree movements (changeset/189391149). commented 2026-09-22 10:20:10 UTC by Car Tographer ♦24 |
| 189350045 (Comments: 1) | Madx321XLR (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189390880 commented 2026-09-22 10:16:03 UTC by ajmat ♦556 |
| 189385791 (Comments: 1) | HVF-Stu (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ty for adding these details! Mapping community resources like this is really important work! I've updated the name to remove the C.I.C. from the end of the name as it seems that isn't on any of the branding. The name tag is for what ... commented 2026-09-22 10:16:01 UTC by CanopyFalls ♦122 |
| 189385261 (Comments: 2) | guy4159 (Discussed changesets: 13) | Thank you. commented 2026-09-22 09:48:00 UTC by guy4159 ♦4 |
| 182335993 (Comments: 1) | azteckat (Discussed changesets: 13) | Hey, it seems when a shop changes you are deleting the object in OSM and creating a new one. This isn't ideal because it can lose data and metadata. In this case you deleted "Hidden Beauty" and added "vacant shop". In ... commented 2026-09-22 09:05:46 UTC by CjMalone ♦256 |
| 189385124 (Comments: 1) | guy4159 (Discussed changesets: 13) | Changes look good! commented 2026-09-22 08:57:12 UTC by Car Tographer ♦24 |
| 189383557 (Comments: 1) | Mateusz Konieczny (Discussed changesets: 651) | delete roads not fix poi ops commented 2026-09-22 07:44:12 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 189349213 (Comments: 3) | abbii (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thanks, I've tidied it up and sorted out the Opening Hours formatting. commented 2026-09-21 23:13:12 UTC by Chris Fleming ♦388 |
| 189330535 (Comments: 1) | RyanBush (Discussed changesets: 28) | According to the wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:drinking_water, drinking_water=no means the water is obviously unsafe to drink. That’s not the case here, it’s a resurgence spring where the water has filtered through moss and... commented 2026-09-21 23:04:22 UTC by gurglypipe ♦1,120 |
| 189349372 (Comments: 1) | abbii (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thanks, looks good. commented 2026-09-21 21:53:49 UTC by Chris Fleming ♦388 |
| 189370274 (Comments: 1) | Aethonatic (Discussed changesets: 19) | Not sure why iD removed house=terraced, I feel like it shouldn't do that when changing shop type. commented 2026-09-21 21:41:15 UTC by Aethonatic ♦91 |
| 189345739 (Comments: 1) | guy4159 (Discussed changesets: 13) | Edit looks good - can confirm this through research. commented 2026-09-21 17:15:18 UTC by Car Tographer ♦24 |
| 189344915 (Comments: 1) | guy4159 (Discussed changesets: 13) | Edit looks good to me. I've drawn a building around the shop and added the node you created to it as per how the other shops along here have been mapped. commented 2026-09-21 17:13:30 UTC by Car Tographer ♦24 |
| 183355515 (Comments: 2) | Xcm81 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thank you. I have learned something new! commented 2026-09-21 16:17:56 UTC by Xcm81 ♦3 |
| 189342350 (Comments: 1) | Chris_Gage91 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bore da What streetlevel imagery did you use for this edit and I am wondering what inspired you to make this edit as the road has not had a 40 mph limit for a number of years? Diolch Phil commented 2026-09-21 16:12:20 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,822 |
| 189344465 (Comments: 5) | Dave Venables (Discussed changesets: 125) | I agree Lower Bloomsgrove Road makes more sense considering how it's spelt elsewhere. I've attached alt_name with "Lower Blooms Grove Road" with an explanative note. commented 2026-09-21 14:09:15 UTC by Aethonatic ♦91 |
| 189171182 (Comments: 3) | Nar_ach (Discussed changesets: 14) | Cool, I think it is fixed now (looking the Geofabrik OSM Inspector validator) commented 2026-09-21 11:55:01 UTC by ramthelinefeed ♦94 |
| 189331234 (Comments: 2) | Sforzando9500 (Discussed changesets: 27) | Sorry, I was baffled by multiple sites saying different things. Am pretty sure the touring side has unfortunately gone. Cheers Phil commented 2026-09-21 11:32:17 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,822 |
| 187211878 (Comments: 2) | MichaelCollinson (Discussed changesets: 96) | Yep, thanks, typo. Fixed commented 2026-09-21 10:36:29 UTC by MichaelCollinson ♦59 |
| 176195557 (Comments: 2) | philipcullen (Discussed changesets: 50) | Hello, do you have an example to hand? I generally split buildings where there are separate footprints and addresses (for example a semidetached house), but add to building parts for parts of a complex building (such as a hospital, with wings ... commented 2026-09-21 09:53:49 UTC by philipcullen ♦42 |
| 189243107 (Comments: 4) | Wiggers42 (Discussed changesets: 1) | The two Hapstead Halls and the former British Legion building are all one complex connected by link structures, if you look at the aerial and website photos. They're still deciding the name of the British Legion, probably the Village Club. I don... commented 2026-09-21 07:39:56 UTC by Wiggers42 ♦1 |
| 189036663 (Comments: 1) | LordGarySugar (Discussed changesets: 53) | Hi LordGarySugar, I’ll split up Fforest Fawr along the roads. However, since the area is huge, this will take quite some time, and I’ll have to leave some temporary lines without tags in the area for the time being. Furthermore I w... commented 2026-09-20 22:09:23 UTC by Beau Jonckers ♦28 |
| 189077657 (Comments: 3) | kirelagin (Discussed changesets: 2) | Huh, do you know where that documentation is? The main access page explicit warns against using `access=designated`: > Using this value with the plain access key, `access=designated`, has no meaning, and should not be used. https://wiki.... commented 2026-09-20 21:05:03 UTC by CanopyFalls ♦122 |
| 189063610 (Comments: 1) | andrum99 (Discussed changesets: 30) | Thank you for adding those paths; that resolved note: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5353310 commented 2026-09-20 20:08:57 UTC by jayaddison ♦52 |
| 189237741 (Comments: 4) | Rogers A (Discussed changesets: 3) | I emailed InstaVolt rather than phoning them, but all I can do is record what they say if different. I have just been busy tidying up the map with roads and grassed areas, tidying up buildings according to the map. Just making it look tidier and make... commented 2026-09-20 17:03:38 UTC by Rogers A ♦2 |
| 189225415 (Comments: 1) | LukasM04 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Looks good! Thank you for adding this info to the map! --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/189225415 commented 2026-09-20 16:43:06 UTC by CanopyFalls ♦122 |
| 189223505 (Comments: 1) | Rogers A (Discussed changesets: 3) | Nice nice! --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/189223505 commented 2026-09-20 16:39:41 UTC by CanopyFalls ♦122 |
| 189301747 (Comments: 1) | NumberniaNorth149 (Discussed changesets: 10) | Generally looks good! Few minor problems but not enough to mark bad. Is there any specific reason you chose to use Mapbox imagery rather than the Bing imagery here? The Bing imagery looks like it shows the same features and is higher resolutio... commented 2026-09-20 16:37:07 UTC by CanopyFalls ♦122 |
| 189206024 (Comments: 4) | Abharsair (Discussed changesets: 2) | I didn't mean you to delete it, just remove the tags you added! commented 2026-09-20 15:35:33 UTC by DaveF ♦1,688 |
| 189246352 (Comments: 3) | Stu Bacon (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi CanopyFalls, thanks for your time reviewing my changes, I've made another edit to add the entrance/exit features from your other feedback, I also found the footway tag and swapped it onto the boardwalk. Good idea about attaching a footpath to... commented 2026-09-20 11:16:57 UTC by Stu Bacon ♦2 |
| 189257001 (Comments: 2) | RushMM (Discussed changesets: 1) | Amazing, glad that worked out fine! Thanks for checking, much appreciated --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/189257001 commented 2026-09-20 11:14:01 UTC by RushMM ♦12 |
| 189245910 (Comments: 2) | Stu Bacon (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi CanopyFalls, thanks very much for reviewing my edit. I've now made another to correct my error with the hide, attach the paths and add the suggested entrance/exit features. Thanks again for your time :). commented 2026-09-20 10:59:41 UTC by Stu Bacon ♦2 |
| 189288019 (Comments: 1) | Mefus Wyllt (Discussed changesets: 2) | Bore da Please don't delete valid objects from the database. If they are private then the correct approach is to tag them as such. I have reverted this edit and added access=private to the car park and access road. Diolch Phil commented 2026-09-20 10:34:42 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,822 |
| 189243917 (Comments: 1) | ilos14 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Change looks good! Welcome to OSM! --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/189243917 commented 2026-09-20 10:19:00 UTC by CanopyFalls ♦122 |
| 189273316 (Comments: 1) | NumberniaNorth149 (Discussed changesets: 10) | Nice work! This all looks good! --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/189273316 commented 2026-09-20 10:03:40 UTC by CanopyFalls ♦122 |
| 153810594 (Comments: 1) | Andrex88 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1231152074/history has building:flats = 137, 138 that was added in this edit What this tag means? Integer value is expected here with info how many flats are here If that was intended to express addr... commented 2026-09-20 07:13:34 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |