| Country | Changeset | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|
 | 179846591 (Comments: 2) | rtfazeberdee (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks.These are my first edits so not really sure what that means, the link does not show it at all. I did make a mistake of selecting an Area first to site the buillding, not sure I backed out of it properly before selecting the correct function to... commented 2026-03-15 11:39:26 UTC by rtfazeberdee ♦1 |
| 179876044 (Comments: 1) | onthegomap (Discussed changesets: 3) | Thanks for spotting and fixing that, I missed it when I removed the access restrictions from the path. commented 2026-03-15 08:00:24 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,776 |
| 179461786 (Comments: 2) | Pete Owens (Discussed changesets: 117) | That discussion appears to be between a single scofflaw cyclist who thinks cyclists ought to be allowed to ride on pavements and a shedload of other posters pointing out how he is wrong. UK traffic law is clear and unambiguous that cycling on pavemen... commented 2026-03-15 01:31:56 UTC by Pete Owens ♦77 |
| 179232015 (Comments: 2) | Pete Owens (Discussed changesets: 117) | I have not reverted anything - just tagged cycle access on pavements consistent with UK traffic law. commented 2026-03-15 01:02:15 UTC by Pete Owens ♦77 |
| 157829963 (Comments: 5) | Pete Owens (Discussed changesets: 117) | If you approach northbound (and at every crossing) then what you see is a large upside down cycle symbol and double dashed line give way marking across the whole width of the cycleway. If it was a two-way route then what you would see would be the ab... commented 2026-03-15 00:59:05 UTC by Pete Owens ♦77 |
| 178389048 (Comments: 1) | Gorger (Discussed changesets: 13) | Hi, is the B9993 definitely open to traffic connecting to the A9? commented 2026-03-14 23:38:54 UTC by GinaroZ ♦1,297 |
| 179571048 (Comments: 1) | pierop1980 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Was it approved? commented 2026-03-14 19:32:19 UTC by pierop1980 ♦1 |
| 175662721 (Comments: 2) | ubegxj (Discussed changesets: 2) | Good catch, thanks :) commented 2026-03-14 18:39:59 UTC by ubegxj ♦1 |
| 179719132 (Comments: 3) | Bangsadrengur (Discussed changesets: 1) | No worries. Given you were only editing two features I wouldn't worry about changing or reverting. Just keep in mind for future changes. Nevertheless, thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap! commented 2026-03-14 14:05:53 UTC by JackGilmore ♦4 |
| 150356653 (Comments: 2) | Elizabeth Statham (Discussed changesets: 8) | As you didn't reply, I've reverted this. I should have done it in May 2025. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179854059 commented 2026-03-14 12:06:54 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,776 |
| 177734584 (Comments: 4) | b-unicycling (Discussed changesets: 315) | No prob, we've all done it 😊 do please keep an eye on the other sets of imagery if you see a discrepancy though. I think I've restored it to how it was. Worth displaying the Notes data too, as a pointer for any known issues. commented 2026-03-14 07:39:54 UTC by LateNightTone ♦67 |
| 179776293 (Comments: 1) | Tom Irving (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap. This section of road was already tagged with access=private which applies to all transport modes, so motor_vehicle=private is implicit. Adding motor_vehicle=no means that all motor vehicles are legally p... commented 2026-03-13 12:15:46 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,776 |
| 179781932 (Comments: 1) | Kraeson (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, Thanks for all the updates to the map, very useful info. Just a quick tip regarding the houses, if you click q on the keyboard or right click, then square, the houses will be adjusted to have square corners which will make them looks nicer ... commented 2026-03-13 12:07:25 UTC by RushMM ♦8 |
| 179783091 (Comments: 1) | philipcullen (Discussed changesets: 40) | This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/179805865 commented 2026-03-13 11:56:58 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,621 |
| 172811183 (Comments: 1) | Paul Flo Williams (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hi Paul, I'm thinking that addr:substreet=Eastwoods + addr:parentstreet=Ditchling Road would be more applicable here. Otherwise we are sort-of stating that 9 adjoined buildings are all individually named 'Eastwoods'. It could be a terr... commented 2026-03-13 08:01:57 UTC by Jez Nicholson ♦74 |
| 142145649 (Comments: 1) | sirorezka (Discussed changesets: 67) | The updated start_date tag on this confused me for a few moments - thank you, though - it seems accurate. commented 2026-03-12 23:17:24 UTC by jayaddison ♦8 |
| 141942125 (Comments: 2) | Taya_S (Discussed changesets: 79) | Hi, if you believe that the names I added are not correct, feel free to correct them. I'm not a local and I don't recall where I got them from. Best regards, Taya Snijder commented 2026-03-12 19:18:10 UTC by Taya_S ♦2,525 |
| 178995107 (Comments: 4) | Fjana (Discussed changesets: 23) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179769897 . If anyone wants to make a map with this in they can use Overpass and date the query to yesterday. commented 2026-03-12 17:54:43 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,693 |
| 179682023 (Comments: 1) | SouthWestTrains1 (Discussed changesets: 2) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/212502530 Libary or Library? Also, about this one. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/212502532 A building for which "Shelter" is the official name? If, instead, shelter is the description o... commented 2026-03-12 17:45:56 UTC by bxl-forever ♦2,771 |
| 179766809 (Comments: 1) | thebrad1111 (Discussed changesets: 12) | Also used streetside commented 2026-03-12 16:45:42 UTC by thebrad1111 ♦16 |
| 179764878 (Comments: 2) | agilenewt21 (Discussed changesets: 11) | I set service:bicycle:retail=yes on The Myton Hospices because it seems quite unique within the town in selling used bicycles in addition to the usual charity shop stuff, so thought it was worth tagging. commented 2026-03-12 16:05:23 UTC by agilenewt21 ♦11 |
| 179762225 (Comments: 1) | agilenewt21 (Discussed changesets: 11) | I decided to add the details anyway, in case anyone is willing to do any deeper digging to work out whether it still exists or not. commented 2026-03-12 15:03:00 UTC by agilenewt21 ♦11 |
| 179761048 (Comments: 1) | agilenewt21 (Discussed changesets: 11) | Photo survey, see Flickr album linked below. https://flic.kr/s/aHBqjCMVmi I'll leave the photos online for as long as I can but it probably won't be forever. commented 2026-03-12 14:40:46 UTC by agilenewt21 ♦11 |
| 179703261 (Comments: 1) | speps (Discussed changesets: 1) | Great addition, great use of the planning paperwork and mapwarper, thanks commented 2026-03-12 12:33:49 UTC by dzidek23 ♦71 |
| 179703069 (Comments: 1) | SouthWestTrains1 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Partially reverted in changeset id: 179745495 commented 2026-03-12 09:36:31 UTC by ajmat ♦68 |
| 179622014 (Comments: 3) | Tinetto (Discussed changesets: 35) | Many thanks - I've added it in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179744455 commented 2026-03-12 09:17:33 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,776 |
| 179321792 (Comments: 2) | Mr Alexander Ewan Frost (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179733810 (No visible changes after review v1) commented 2026-03-12 05:33:12 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,369 |
| 179658207 (Comments: 1) | RedAuburn (Discussed changesets: 164) | Thanks. commented 2026-03-11 10:57:37 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,776 |
| 179307071 (Comments: 2) | ramthelinefeed (Discussed changesets: 53) | thanks! I haven't edited the Ring of Gullion for many months, so that gap could have been there a long time :) Good to have it fixed. commented 2026-03-11 09:15:47 UTC by ramthelinefeed ♦77 |
| 179008451 (Comments: 1) | therealzakie (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi, it looks like this changeset might have invalidated the bus routes that are tagged along the Northway (the Geofabrik OSM Inspector tool has started complaining) - could you check? commented 2026-03-11 09:14:22 UTC by ramthelinefeed ♦77 |
| 179604743 (Comments: 3) | Railwayfan2005 (Discussed changesets: 43) | Ok. I'm not 100% certain, but I believe that Organic Maps has recently added an -- unreleased -- feature to enable display of public_transport=platform as lines on the map: https://github.com/organicmaps/organicmaps/pull/12245 Similarly,... commented 2026-03-11 00:23:03 UTC by jayaddison ♦8 |
| 178994520 (Comments: 1) | Chris Fleming (Discussed changesets: 18) | Thanks! (this resolved addition of a bike shop for note https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5153243 ) commented 2026-03-10 23:12:25 UTC by jayaddison ♦8 |
| 179596629 (Comments: 1) | SmithyScotland (Discussed changesets: 19) | Thank you! (re: figuring out whether Seeds for the Soul or Confelicity is the current business on the premises here). commented 2026-03-10 22:48:25 UTC by jayaddison ♦8 |
| 167280349 (Comments: 2) | PharmaWP (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thanks for your vigilance. I know this tool is not made to be followed automatically and I do my best to handle every case with as much discrenment as possible, I may sometimes be fallible commented 2026-03-10 22:30:49 UTC by PharmaWP ♦2 |
| 179357645 (Comments: 4) | Rowland (Discussed changesets: 45) | It's only the verge parking that's verifiable on street though - maybe the answer is to take it off entirely, and let people refer to local signage commented 2026-03-10 20:24:46 UTC by Rowland ♦8 |
| 179652573 (Comments: 1) | Alpha Movers (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-10 18:09:59 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,152 |
| 179454252 (Comments: 5) | smsm1 (Discussed changesets: 10) | I got a reply from LCC who say there was a mistake with the two Costas and it'll be updated with the FSA this week. commented 2026-03-10 16:48:48 UTC by rtwbike ♦2 |
| 177470392 (Comments: 1) | Chris Parker (Discussed changesets: 13) | Not sure why you decided to add a bunch of duplicate nodes for churches etc based on OS 2016 data, but I've removed them all. Please take care editing in future. commented 2026-03-10 16:42:52 UTC by GinaroZ ♦1,297 |
| 179606747 (Comments: 2) | jgower (Discussed changesets: 3) | It's looks like a private garden, and also there is a fence in the way so even if not private, it wouldn't be possible. commented 2026-03-10 13:53:37 UTC by jgower ♦2 |
| 179608176 (Comments: 2) | Ghostwalking (Discussed changesets: 2) | Track reconnected in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179638642 commented 2026-03-10 13:06:52 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,776 |
| 168961853 (Comments: 1) | webmonkeyuk (Discussed changesets: 2) | Please don't use copyrighted sources for OSM. The End User Licence for FindMyStreet expressly forbids redistribution: "3.3 This End User Licence does not give the End User the right to sub-license, distribute, sell or otherwise make avai... commented 2026-03-10 12:55:07 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,776 |
| 179593601 (Comments: 1) | hoooooo (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. There's more than 1 building level, but I don't know how many, level=1 is removed. commented 2026-03-10 06:19:01 UTC by BCNorwich ♦5,110 |
| 179403466 (Comments: 1) | davebon (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in changeset id:179528000 commented 2026-03-10 05:21:33 UTC by Wildsharky ♦118 |
| 157349702 (Comments: 2) | flierfy (Discussed changesets: 122) | These tracks might not be sidings as you understand it. But they are to be marked service=sidings according to the current tagging scheme (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OpenRailwayMap/Tagging). With best regards, Stephan commented 2026-03-09 22:30:24 UTC by flierfy ♦63 |
| 179505756 (Comments: 2) | Andrew Walsh (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks! I'll have a look at that. That might be better than what I did. commented 2026-03-09 20:32:35 UTC by Andrew Walsh ♦1 |
| 179089469 (Comments: 3) | connie_lm (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thank you commented 2026-03-09 20:03:56 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,621 |
| 179308006 (Comments: 7) | Patrick Harper (Discussed changesets: 8) | There are indeed such signs. I'll leave the issue for now, but my position remains unchanged commented 2026-03-09 20:01:01 UTC by SeasnaiIs ♦2 |
| 175847222 (Comments: 4) | philipcullen (Discussed changesets: 40) | Thanks for teaching me something new :) commented 2026-03-09 11:59:29 UTC by ExoMal ♦44 |
| 179397158 (Comments: 1) | Numac (Discussed changesets: 29) | Doncaster Road, the A19, appears to have become a Service Road... commented 2026-03-09 11:14:23 UTC by NorthIsland ♦19 |
| 179514880 (Comments: 1) | advagroup (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Thanks for updating this, although you may have misunderstood the access tagging. The sign at the start of the bus lane on the A33 southbound after the junction with Bennet Road is TSRGD diagram 959B, with only... commented 2026-03-09 10:00:24 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,776 |
| 177006798 (Comments: 1) | Yaradru12 (Discussed changesets: 5) | delighted to see the Braes of Angus getting filled in! thank you! commented 2026-03-09 09:56:12 UTC by smeòrach ♦34 |
| 179525938 (Comments: 2) | Rostranimin (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi ExoMal - It wasn't the gorse that was the problem here. The bridge has been closed off with a well-built welded-on section of fencing. I think I remember some discussion around this walkway/viewpoint a while ago, but this was very much now in... commented 2026-03-09 09:53:57 UTC by Rostranimin ♦17 |
| 163456250 (Comments: 3) | John Grubb (Discussed changesets: 38) | I'm not sure as I only noticed the missing properties when checking the Foden Close name and post code via: https://osm.mathmos.net/addresses/pc-stats/TA/TA1/3/ commented 2026-03-08 21:34:47 UTC by UKChris ♦48 |
| 154405523 (Comments: 1) | Ards Man (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hi, Older changeset here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/617770527/ The tag building:flats is the quantity of flats in the building, not the address of the individual apartments. So building:flats=11121314151617 is a reaaalllly big b... commented 2026-03-08 17:29:38 UTC by VictorIE ♦1,039 |
| 179539422 (Comments: 1) | Mystic North (Discussed changesets: 2) | Class 3 seemed the most appropriate, looking at the Tag:protect_class=1b wiki page. commented 2026-03-08 15:43:27 UTC by Mystic North ♦2 |