| Country | Changeset | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|
 | 167800753 (Comments: 4) | AlwynWellington (Discussed changesets: 72) | On your last suggestion, I can only say I am most susceptible to joining others for a beer. My work with Shropshire Way is part of finding a workable and walkable route that would join my forebears arriving in these climes between 1850 and 1924 fr... commented 2025-06-21 21:46:12 UTC by AlwynWellington ♦57 |
| 166879850 (Comments: 1) | Hansiepanzie (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello Hansiepanzieand welcome to OSM! You added some not quite correct values here: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/26un You added operator:wikidata=https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q1241260. Instead it should be operator:wikidata=Q1241260. Would y... commented 2025-06-21 21:00:24 UTC by os-emmer ♦335 |
| 164288466 (Comments: 1) | marsbar28 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Please ensure you tag correctly. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/683218820#map=19/51.300344/-0.615254 commented 2025-06-21 20:52:46 UTC by DaveF ♦1,560 |
| 167861880 (Comments: 2) | mstrbrid (Discussed changesets: 8) | Cheers, the news came through right after I'd left for the weekend. Will cast an eye over it when I'm back 👍 commented 2025-06-21 20:24:29 UTC by mstrbrid ♦24 |
| 167918283 (Comments: 1) | jonnywindows (Discussed changesets: 2) | I've squared up the buildings commented 2025-06-21 17:24:45 UTC by BCNorwich ♦4,828 |
| 167917823 (Comments: 1) | jonnywindows (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. I've removed '1 Swinley Close' from the name tag as it's not a formal name. Regards Bernard. commented 2025-06-21 17:13:59 UTC by BCNorwich ♦4,828 |
| 167912679 (Comments: 1) | RedAuburn (Discussed changesets: 158) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4814862 commented 2025-06-21 12:57:41 UTC by RedAuburn ♦219 |
| 167801325 (Comments: 1) | NTTrailsMEE (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hello, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1396460767 was newly added in here, and looks like it should be added to the western bit of the C2C. When adding new ways via Vespucci I don't know of an easy way to check what relations they "... commented 2025-06-21 09:43:32 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,355 |
| 167500204 (Comments: 2) | NTTrailsSW (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, Can you please rectify or remove the stile. commented 2025-06-21 08:18:07 UTC by BCNorwich ♦4,828 |
| 167883400 (Comments: 1) | BANS_MAPS (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. The buildings look much better when squared up, the shortcut to square up is 'Q'. Regards Bernard. commented 2025-06-21 05:31:17 UTC by BCNorwich ♦4,828 |
| 166515288 (Comments: 1) | Cameronmabe (Discussed changesets: 1) | Please take care when adding tags, you have managed to tag a woodland and a boundary as 60 mph commented 2025-06-20 21:41:58 UTC by Nathan_A_RF ♦219 |
| 167817518 (Comments: 1) | MYCOnline (Discussed changesets: 1) | What is going on here, this seems to be completly the wrong location? commented 2025-06-20 19:48:47 UTC by Chris Fleming ♦369 |
| 167815280 (Comments: 1) | jfml (Discussed changesets: 3) | It's curious East Coast Cured show the location, show an address of 109/C; The gaurage address isnb 109/C and siuspect this is now East Coast Cured. Putting the note on is the right thing to do.. Best option is for someone to survey here... commented 2025-06-20 19:42:49 UTC by Chris Fleming ♦369 |
| 167883299 (Comments: 1) | tswsl (Discussed changesets: 2) | I've found lots of odd building geometries and weird overlaps that don't seem to line up with any available aerial imagery while trying to make this update. I've tried not to make anything worse, but needs a bit more attention and s... commented 2025-06-20 18:22:45 UTC by tswsl ♦2 |
| 167839215 (Comments: 2) | ist410 (Discussed changesets: 5) | For the other cases, it makes sense, since there are probably other things on upper floors of the same building. commented 2025-06-20 11:03:14 UTC by gmar5 ♦66 |
| 166205352 (Comments: 1) | Simon Hobeck (Discussed changesets: 21) | Hi Simon, do you know if Bunker Bikes still operates elsewhere? I see he was at Temple Meads for several years. I just deleted the node there after finding the shop gone, but now I've learned he used to operated from here, I'd be interested... commented 2025-06-20 10:13:34 UTC by mstrbrid ♦24 |
| 165819300 (Comments: 1) | Iwerne (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi Iwerne, did you mean to change ways https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/516833636 & https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1043781881 to a guideway? The guideway only starts on the bridge as I see it. commented 2025-06-20 08:45:37 UTC by mstrbrid ♦24 |
| 167689803 (Comments: 4) | Tom267 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hey Chris, No need to apologise at all and good question about the signs on the ground etc. Some of the area are fire breaks rather than paths and some are garden/cut grass areas that arean't paths at all. There are 'private' t... commented 2025-06-19 19:25:07 UTC by Tom267 ♦1 |
| 167820453 (Comments: 2) | Robert Whittaker (Discussed changesets: 120) | If you want any more tips nearby, then you might be interested in my tool at https://osm.mathmos.net/survey/#14/51.7528/-1.2853 commented 2025-06-19 18:15:47 UTC by Robert Whittaker ♦271 |
| 79786177 (Comments: 2) | drspa44 (Discussed changesets: 2) | I don't know if there is any trace remaining of this particular segment. This part was mapped solely using Out of copyright OS Map, Hertfordshire XXXIX.NE, Revised: 1896, Published: 1899 commented 2025-06-19 10:12:57 UTC by drspa44 ♦3 |
| 116146009 (Comments: 2) | Mauls (Discussed changesets: 126) | is there any trace remaining of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/764899747 nowadays? Or at time of mapping? is it mapped solely based on old maps? commented 2025-06-19 09:56:28 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,564 |
| 167612217 (Comments: 2) | YourLocalBrit (Discussed changesets: 1) | I had a look and have found some C roads (Class III) are unpaved maintained and a very small stretch of the A848 (Class I) in Salen is unpaved for about 100 metres before it's ending at the pier. This is the only B Road (Class III) that is u... commented 2025-06-18 19:19:02 UTC by YourLocalBrit ♦1 |
| 167790269 (Comments: 1) | JamJar II (Discussed changesets: 18) | Source was survey. commented 2025-06-18 16:28:59 UTC by JamJar II ♦12 |
| 167746211 (Comments: 1) | Figandhoneycatering (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello. Are there any restaurant premises at this address? If not, I think it should be tagged as craft=caterer, not amenity=restaurant. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:craft=caterer Thanks. commented 2025-06-18 15:55:46 UTC by gmar5 ♦66 |
| 167716846 (Comments: 1) | Mw96 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for the edit - for general reference, there is no need to specify oneway=no; that is the default assumption. commented 2025-06-18 11:31:36 UTC by Chris Fleming ♦369 |
| 167759894 (Comments: 1) | MorahT (Discussed changesets: 5) | thanks! commented 2025-06-18 09:52:09 UTC by RedAuburn ♦219 |
| 167744742 (Comments: 3) | SmithyScotland (Discussed changesets: 15) | Tagged as selling maps in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167771810, thanks commented 2025-06-18 09:01:40 UTC by gurglypipe ♦862 |
| 139364694 (Comments: 2) | CjMalone (Discussed changesets: 108) | Another? This changeset was so long ago, but it doesn't look like I added any bus stops in it, just added the refs. I don't know of NaPTAN including planned bus stops, but it does include stops without active routes, and it in... commented 2025-06-17 23:54:52 UTC by CjMalone ♦233 |
| 167694341 (Comments: 1) | zuzak (Discussed changesets: 9) | Thanks, this looks good to me. I added a tide_guage to this as well as this part of the Clyde is tidal. Otherwise the tagging looks good to me. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:monitoring:tide_gauge. Cheers Chris commented 2025-06-17 23:09:27 UTC by Chris Fleming ♦369 |
| 167669232 (Comments: 1) | Linfietst (Discussed changesets: 2) | Welcome to OSM, and thanks for adding the track. Edit looks great, I added some access tags to the tree trunck. The only other thing that I can see is that it would be good to know how the track crosses the stream and mark this properly. But... commented 2025-06-17 22:52:42 UTC by Chris Fleming ♦369 |
| 158813213 (Comments: 1) | arakeen (Discussed changesets: 2) | I changed name=The Vicarage to addr:housename=The Vicarage, now it renders correctly with the housename and housenumber both showing commented 2025-06-17 21:44:04 UTC by LordGarySugar ♦67 |
| 160595865 (Comments: 1) | arakeen (Discussed changesets: 2) | Just a note - if a long footpath has multiple surfaces you should split the way, I corrected a footpath here that was tagged with surface=asphalt when in fact the entire length from Pie Gardens to Delmer End Lane was mostly dirt and grass. commented 2025-06-17 21:43:48 UTC by LordGarySugar ♦67 |
| 167691594 (Comments: 2) | Vas111 (Discussed changesets: 45) | Hi, not sure. I will merge it back commented 2025-06-17 21:22:35 UTC by Vas111 ♦84 |
| 167283164 (Comments: 3) | mstrbrid (Discussed changesets: 8) | You're right, but it does have implications for the design of the way. Often the shared ways are pavements (sidewalks) and are designed for pedestrian use. They are then frequently condoned for cycling by adding signage, but not necessarily rede... commented 2025-06-17 16:26:28 UTC by mstrbrid ♦24 |
| 167737237 (Comments: 1) | Andrew Chadwick (Discussed changesets: 24) | footway=link is appropriate for routing, but it also tends to be rendered. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:footway%3Dlink It's hard to map this kind of long, walkable traffic island / mid-road footway refuge prettily, and i... commented 2025-06-17 12:58:36 UTC by Andrew Chadwick ♦54 |
| 165720959 (Comments: 3) | DrNRC (Discussed changesets: 2) | Yeah, I remember thinking that it'd be a pain to edit when I walked them a while ago! If you do end up splitting further, try to keep the way history in the most prominent (longest, maybe?) way, and I'd suggest including an incline tag on t... commented 2025-06-17 07:11:35 UTC by mstrbrid ♦24 |
| 160674306 (Comments: 2) | Rigi03 (Discussed changesets: 20) | No response so tahgged as grass and amend relation commented 2025-06-17 04:45:10 UTC by BCNorwich ♦4,828 |
| 167635707 (Comments: 1) | BCNorwich (Discussed changesets: 229) | Thank you! commented 2025-06-16 20:42:53 UTC by nivek101 ♦1 |
| 167653699 (Comments: 3) | SmithyScotland (Discussed changesets: 15) | I think the POI is in the right place. It was probably the door you saw — it’s a gig bar which is only open in the evenings, so unless you were surveying then it won’t have been obvious. Marked as open again in https://www.op... commented 2025-06-16 11:53:27 UTC by gurglypipe ♦862 |
| 167665766 (Comments: 1) | AnaVrbica (Discussed changesets: 4) | Reverting an accidental node creation #OptimoRoute https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167685384 commented 2025-06-16 09:57:51 UTC by MihaelIvanjek ♦10 |
| 167505062 (Comments: 1) | IvaKraljić (Discussed changesets: 29) | Reverted because no reliable source was found #OptimoRoute https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167684916 commented 2025-06-16 09:46:58 UTC by MihaelIvanjek ♦10 |
| 167572115 (Comments: 1) | John Stanworth (Discussed changesets: 41) | Hello, please be more careful with your edits. Apparently you had offset a section of Buxton Road far past its actual location. commented 2025-06-16 06:51:12 UTC by Aethonatic ♦9 |
| 167598764 (Comments: 2) | BCNorwich (Discussed changesets: 229) | Alright, nevermind. Seems like your edit is an attempt at fixing the issue I've described which was apparently caused by previous edits. Sorry, I'll revert my revert. commented 2025-06-16 06:46:56 UTC by Aethonatic ♦9 |
| 167629311 (Comments: 2) | Garnwenshared (Discussed changesets: 1) | There were problems with ways with the same position and gaps in hedges were missing. commented 2025-06-16 05:34:28 UTC by BCNorwich ♦4,828 |
| 167667862 (Comments: 1) | Welsh Mullet (Discussed changesets: 1) | Just realised the crossing of the a456 by an access road at Nant-hir has actually moved about 250m south west. I do have that on the gps data, I just lazily "un-under construction-ed" the road that was already on the map. Will have to corre... commented 2025-06-15 21:44:08 UTC by Welsh Mullet ♦1 |
| 167647744 (Comments: 2) | Dan Hatton (Discussed changesets: 4) | Oof. In that case I'm going to have to revert a *lot* of my recent changesets. Still, all a good learning experience. (For the rest of this post, I'm kind of thinking out loud - don't feel under any obligation to answer my ann... commented 2025-06-15 21:41:09 UTC by Dan Hatton ♦8 |
| 167651641 (Comments: 3) | Dan Hatton (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi Dan OSM derives the relationship from level 10 being inside a level 6 or 8 inside a level 4 up to being inside a level 2 UK. Cheers Phil commented 2025-06-15 20:00:53 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,368 |
| 167650856 (Comments: 5) | Dan Hatton (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi Dan I was atlking about your additions to the higher admin boundaries. Reverting does just create a new version. We (the data working group) can redact but we only do that for thing that need tags be not seen. The review requeste... commented 2025-06-15 19:53:24 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,368 |
| 167581854 (Comments: 1) | sarukwa (Discussed changesets: 6) | I now realise that the access=destination tags should be changed to motor_vehicle=destination, because foot and bicycle through traffic is allowed. I will do this later. commented 2025-06-15 15:45:05 UTC by sarukwa ♦9 |
| 167441092 (Comments: 7) | Adam Edwards (Discussed changesets: 21) | Yes, that makes sense although that relation needs editing. NCN61 ends officially at Rye House, not Hoddesdon. I'll have a go sorting that. Off to ride the route tomorrow. commented 2025-06-15 13:00:18 UTC by Adam Edwards ♦13 |
| 167639585 (Comments: 3) | SmithyScotland (Discussed changesets: 15) | Yup joules has expended. The way I walked I didn't spot the bit round the corner. Did wonder about the odd shaped shop on my next lap. commented 2025-06-15 12:35:21 UTC by SmithyScotland ♦11 |
| 167640153 (Comments: 1) | springkraut (Discussed changesets: 1) | Jane Austen's last days - House commented 2025-06-15 08:21:41 UTC by springkraut ♦1 |
| 165691739 (Comments: 1) | JamesCPrentice (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hi, I see you added layer= tags to houses on West Hill Road. Do you realise that layer=-10 or any minus layer is underground? Thus I've removed the layer=-? tags. commented 2025-06-15 05:38:32 UTC by BCNorwich ♦4,828 |