| Changeset | # | Tmstmp UTC | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 143642796 by Helmchen42 @ 2023-11-05 10:02 | 1 | 2024-03-30 12:36 | qugeb ♦81 | Hallo Helmchen42,mit diesem Changeset wurden in Tremersdorf zwei Salinen hinzugefügt, was unwahrscheinlich ist und auf der Karte auch fragwürdig aussieht. Kann es sich hierbei um einen Fehler handeln?Die entsprechenden Flächen:https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1221245243http... |
| 2 | 2024-06-15 13:03 | qugeb ♦81 | Haaaaaalloooooooooooooo? | |
| 3 | 2024-08-08 18:38 | Helmchen42 | Ja, offensichtlich eigentlich. Hätte es niemandem übel genommen, spätestens vor zwei Monaten selbst die Sache in die Hand zu nehmen - ist jetzt erledigt. | |
| 4 | 2024-08-09 08:20 | qugeb ♦81 | Danke dir :) | |
| 103952526 by Omegatherion @ 2021-05-01 11:27 | 1 | 2021-05-05 13:25 | seawolff ♦14 | Was sollen die häufigen, inkonsistenten Änderungen der Veloroute 10 bezwecken?Es ist keine Straße sondern im Mittelteil teils Radweg teils Fahrradstraße.Warum löscht du Railway=razed obwohl der Bahndamm, Teile der Schotterauflage und einige Signale erhalten sind? |
| 2 | 2021-05-06 06:13 | Helmchen42 | Hallo,der highway=unclassified hat jetzt ein paar Lücken. * Der städtisch von der B76 gelegene Teil des Christinenweg* Die Brücken über Olshausener, Gutenberg und Eckernförder Straße sind wohl vergessen worden* Warum ist die Querung vom Kronshagener Weg jetzt n... | |
| 3 | 2021-05-09 20:25 | Omegatherion ♦132 | Die Veloroute 10 ist auf keinen Teilstück ein Radweg.Mir war nicht bewusst, dass ich irgendwo ein railway=razed gelöscht habe.Den Überweg Hasseldieksdammer Weg hatte ich falsch als reinen Radfahrerüberweg in Erinnerung. | |
| 101458062 by Omegatherion @ 2021-03-21 21:25 | 1 | 2021-03-27 09:35 | Helmchen42 | Hallo,über die Art wie Straßenbegleitender Verkehrsraum zu erfassen ist mag man streiten - Durch die Löschung von Bürgersteigen in Hassee ohne Ersetzung durch Tags an den Verkehrsstraßen ist die Information jetzt aber komplett verlustig gegangen.Ein anderer Punkt im ... |
| 2 | 2021-04-10 14:34 | Omegatherion ♦132 | Straßenbegleitende Fuß- und Radwege sollten nur dann separat erfasst werden, wenn diese getrennt von der Fahrbahn verlaufen. An großen Teilen gibt es keinen Radweg mehr sondern nur noch eine Radspur.Der von dir angesprochene Weg war als service und ist nun als path erfasst. Bei... | |
| 3 | 2021-04-11 18:41 | Helmchen42 | Und wie scharf definiert man getrennt? Der Radweg auf der Rendsburger Landstraße stadtauswärts verläuft ab dem Fußgängerübergang hinter der Gärtnerstraße als Spur auf der Fahrban, der Gehweg ist "immerhin" noch von einem Bordstein (und physisch vo... | |
| 80860844 by Helmchen42 @ 2020-02-11 16:33 | 1 | 2020-12-09 00:58 | blackboxlogic ♦458 | I'm curious, do you mean for https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/44632030 to be underground? |
| 2 | 2020-12-09 09:46 | Helmchen42 | nah, the level tag is superfluous I think, it was already there when the way's version #1 got created 11 years ago. I just didn't notice it else I would probably have deleted it. | |
| 87228784 by Helmchen42 @ 2020-06-27 15:08 | 1 | 2020-06-27 21:49 | Heinz_V ♦296 | Please explain me why you added the tag multipolygon = river_basn! I do not find any information in the wiki. |
| 2 | 2020-06-29 15:04 | Helmchen42 | Yes, its not in the wiki.Why? Without any such a tag it is not possible to easily search for this group of polygons by taginfo or overpass. So it was just wrapping the tag to the preexisting relations and hoping it sticks. | |
| 3 | 2020-07-29 18:07 | Saikat Maiti ♦24 | Adding to Heinz_V's point, everything is documented here (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India/Rivers). Adding multipolygon=river_basn is not making any sense here. If I consider your point that community members should get it through the overpass or taginfo, mappers will look for "ri... | |
| 4 | 2020-07-29 18:50 | Helmchen42 | eh "basn" is a typo, you are completely right it should be "basin". | |
| 5 | 2020-07-31 16:51 | yogi_ks ♦24 | @Helmchen42 - Can you please document this mulitpolygon tag on the wiki first and then fix the typo here.Also I'm entirely sure if multipolygons are proposed to be used or are in currently use to map River basins. Can you please share any existing relations? Couldn't find them on taginfo... | |
| 87552597 by Helmchen42 @ 2020-07-05 11:25 | 1 | 2020-07-05 16:33 | rivermont ♦221 | Hi,please check your changeset comments before submitting; this is no longer Peru unless I'm mistaken. |
| 2 | 2020-07-05 22:56 | Helmchen42 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/153754270 Peru, IL would have been more clear though. | |
| 3 | 2020-07-05 23:38 | rivermont ♦221 | All good, I saw La Salle first and got confused. | |
| 59768015 by Helmchen42 @ 2018-06-12 08:34 | 1 | 2020-04-29 12:46 | letihu ♦800 | Hierhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/way/596813103/historyhast du ein Haus gemappt. Was ist denn mit diesemhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2555534291/historyBaum, mitten im Haus? |
| 2 | 2020-04-29 18:02 | Helmchen42 | Uff, das muss ja schon zwei Jahre her sein, dass ich da vorbei gekommen bin. An der Stelle war vorher ein Spielplatz, der Baum dürfte ein Überrest davon sein. Das Gebäude ist relativ neu, sollte aber eigentlich mittlerweile fertig sein. Wenn da mal jemand vorbei kommt kann er die die ... | |
| 81591402 by Helmchen42 @ 2020-02-28 13:02 | 1 | 2020-03-15 05:57 | joeybab3 ♦24 | Are some of these buildings meant to be completely untagged? From the imagery they appear to be houses so I’ve been updating them with that tag, but if you are holding off in tagging them for some reason let me know and I won’t update any more of these. |
| 2 | 2020-03-16 07:46 | Helmchen42 | My modus operandi is switching between the "b" tool for simple building shapes and the usual line tool for more complex buildings. As the former adds building tags automatically it does happen that I forget adding the tags for the latter, usually the JOSM validator warns about those case... | |
| 3 | 2020-03-16 08:35 | joeybab3 ♦24 | Understood, going forward if there’s no note on it I’ll just add the missing tags. | |
| 44233309 by Helmchen42 @ 2016-12-07 11:59 | 1 | 2019-04-01 01:24 | vani_paru ♦5 | "Hi Helmchen42,Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Aceh, I have come across way 458267064way 458267070way 458267083way 458267065 classified as 'Unclassified'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around, this seems to be 'Residential... |
| 2 | 2019-04-02 17:24 | Helmchen42 | Yeah, =residential should be correct, though #070 and #083, at least the southern part, might be debatable. #083 also seems to continue to the north - but I am just an armchair mapper from overseas :D | |
| 67371618 by Helmchen42 @ 2019-02-19 23:24 | 1 | 2019-02-20 02:34 | stevea ♦304 | Why are you changing Natural Reserve boundaries? These are official university shapefile polygons and are correct by definition (or at least they were when they were originally uploaded). |
| 2 | 2019-02-20 03:17 | stevea ♦304 | Please read https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Santa_Cruz_County,_California#Local_Conventions | |
| 3 | 2019-02-20 07:56 | Helmchen42 | "assume it is wooded except where it is tagged otherwise" is the problem. The Natural Reserve areas were/are also tagged with "natural=wood" - and I think I can see why it was supposed to be like that, they are in large parts covered by trees and is probably considered a forest a... | |
| 4 | 2019-02-20 18:40 | stevea ♦304 | Not a forest, that's where there is logging activity and the natural reserves are certainly not that. There are no tagged forests at UCSC.The polygons which ARE tagged forest in this county are "Zoning=TP" (timber production), which matches the OSM defenition."More accur... | |
| 5 | 2019-02-20 18:45 | Helmchen42 | As far as Iunderstood it till now:landuse=forest --> logging activity et cetera This is not what I changed and not what I wanted to specify.natural=wood --> originally any area littered with trees that is specifically not landuse=forest.If the campus is "wooded except where tagg... | |
| 6 | 2019-02-20 19:10 | stevea ♦304 | Right, I know you didn't want to change forest, but you said "forest as a whole" (in your text above). It is crucial that we understand that in OSM, "forest" means "logged land." The campus and parks are not that.However, they are wooded and then we begin the... | |
| 67366898 by Helmchen42 @ 2019-02-19 20:36 | 1 | 2019-02-20 02:35 | stevea ♦304 | Why are you editing wheelchair accessibility relations? These are from official university data and are correct by definition. |
| 2 | 2019-02-20 08:35 | Helmchen42 | Damn - lost a lengthy answer...I disagree, various paths that were used in these relations are pretty far from being usable.Sometimes the geometry is rather off: The connection to the parking lot between Science and Engineering Library and ISB would have gone across a wall.Sometimes t... | |
| 62739818 by Garmin-User @ 2018-09-19 18:27 | 1 | 2018-09-26 11:08 | Helmchen42 | Hey, you created a relation for administrative boundaries with the admin level 3 in this changeset. Is there a reason for this? Especially since it's area is completely inside the AL4 Pomeranian Voivodeship?What I found when searching for "Kaszuby" was a region which should rather... |
| 2 | 2018-09-26 11:43 | Garmin-User ♦335 | There is no special reason. I found a closed way around this region with overlap almost the whole way. So I have created this relation from existing boundary segments and have accepted the tags from the closed way and deleted him).See also at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/62844411Your ... | |
| 58787117 by Helmchen42 @ 2018-05-08 12:22 | 1 | 2018-05-09 15:59 | apm-wa ♦256 | What is the value of identifying Balkanabat as a residential area? It is a city, and is already identified as such. |
| 2 | 2018-05-09 17:26 | Helmchen42 | Outlining the area that is used for housing.The label itself doesn't show the extent of the city at all, one might use the mapped streets to get a grasp, but that might also be misleading (weak example, south west of Ashgabat ;))I've seen that there was another outline of the city ... | |
| 58416394 by robsei @ 2018-04-25 17:41 | 1 | 2018-04-26 07:07 | Helmchen42 | Pokemon GO-Vandalismus in Änderungen in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/58432534 revertiert. |
| 58403100 by robsei @ 2018-04-25 10:03 | 1 | 2018-04-26 07:07 | Helmchen42 | Pokemon GO-Vandalismus in Änderungen in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/58432534 revertiert. |
| 58416561 by robsei @ 2018-04-25 17:46 | 1 | 2018-04-26 07:06 | Helmchen42 | Hallo, und willkommen beim OpenStreetMap-Projekt. Unser Ziel ist es eine detailgetreue und wahrheitsgemäße Karte dieser Welt zu erstellen. Deshalb bitte ich dich keine erfundenen Orte und Gebäude einzutragen.Nach einer kurzen Überprüfung mit den selben Luftbildern bin... |
| 2 | 2018-04-26 14:20 | gerhard81 ♦20 | Robsei scheint für Pokemon zu Mappen. Seine ersten edits würden revertiert, da Fantasiegebilde eingetragen wurden. Ich kenne mich in der Gegend etwas aus!Ich werde den User melden | |
| 55924383 by Helmchen42 @ 2018-01-31 08:56 | 1 | 2018-01-31 11:07 | Gumeg ♦169 | Hello! Thank you for the edit!Which validator or service you use to find such mistakes in boundaries? |
| 2 | 2018-01-31 19:00 | Helmchen42 | I am looking at the relations listed in wambachers missing boundaries analysis: https://wambachers-osm.website/index.php/10-osm-reports/1119-countries-compare-2018-01-31Current thread (german): https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=61207 | |
| 34362664 by 15Tr @ 2015-10-01 08:34 | 1 | 2017-09-28 23:07 | FTA ♦201 | Hi, do you have any information about where you got this village name data? Is it from personal experience, word of mouth, some online source? Thanks! Ethan aka FTA(automatizované) Ahoj, máte nějaké informace o tom, kde jste získali toto jméno? Je to z osobn&i... |
| 2 | 2018-01-27 15:35 | Helmchen42 | I fear the names were copied from the 38north digital atlas (http://38northdigitalatlas.org/ - copyrighted) as claimed by one of the authors Curtis Melvin. (https://twitter.com/CurtisMelvin/status/952947641058516992)See also history of: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3723463569/history#map=1... | |
| 54384571 by KERL0N @ 2017-12-05 22:50 | 1 | 2017-12-06 13:37 | Helmchen42 | Hello,thanks for your contributions and welcome ot the OpenStreetMap project.However there are two problems with this changeset.First, you deleted several roads (including their history) and created new lines instead. Please do not do that, we won't be able to connect those new lines to... |
| 50223068 by Talal Alsubaie @ 2017-07-12 08:57 | 1 | 2017-07-12 11:25 | Talal Alsubaie ♦2 | I have made a correction to part of the border between Saudi Arabia and Iraq, please accept the change. |
| 2 | 2017-07-13 11:28 | Helmchen42 | Hello, welcome and thanks for your contribution to the OpenStreetMap project.Given the delicate nature of country borders. I'd like to ask you for your source of the "exact" location of the boundary line.Also for your information, the changes broke the polygons of the bounda... | |
| 3 | 2017-08-03 07:24 | Talal Alsubaie ♦2 | Dear Helmchen,The Source of the location of boundary, It's a KML file by:http://geoportal.sa/GCS/WebPages/Map/FundyViewer.aspx?THEME=Sapphire#about my changes broke the polygons, it's was my first editing by this site.Regards. | |
| 48616659 by Marina Kudryavceva @ 2017-05-12 08:34 | 1 | 2017-05-13 10:32 | Helmchen42 | Hello,your changeset introduced a large amount of leisure=playground north of Vladivostok. Those playgrounds seem to be duplicated with one of the duplicates slightly displaced to the northeast/southwest. A few of the playgrounds I've checked with bing imagery also seems to be plain wrong as ... |
| 2 | 2017-07-13 04:56 | Eduard Popov ♦18 | We are sorry. It was a mistake. We shall check these playgrounds. | |
| 41977740 by Helmchen42 @ 2016-09-07 12:07 | 1 | 2016-09-18 10:23 | Harald Hartmann ♦827 | Hallo Helmchen42, so rein aus Neugier würde ich gerne wissen, wie du dazu kommst, in diesem Changeset noch nicht vorhandene landuse=residential (auf welcher Grundlage/Quelle) einzutragen? V.a. der Bereich Brattendorf (http://osm.org/go/0D~aN8Pq--?layers=N) sieht für mich schon ziemlich zer... |
| 2 | 2016-09-19 08:00 | Helmchen42 | Wie Ich dazu komme: Eindeutigere Abgrenzung von örtlichen Bebauungen. Letztenendes würde ein landuse=residential hauptsächlich Gebiete ausfüllen die nicht landuse=farmland/meadow/forest natural=scrub/wood geschweigedenn landuse=industrial/commercial sind.Als solches habe ich ... | |
| 30618421 by Helmchen42 @ 2015-04-29 12:46 | 1 | 2016-08-03 22:34 | SomeoneElse ♦13,390 | Hello,I'm writing to you on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group. Questions have been raised about the accuracy of the boundaries of Morocco, and I'm sending this message to many of the mappers who have edited in the area or expressed an interest, including you.We're aware t... |
| 2 | 2016-08-05 05:30 | Helmchen42 | This changeset was just a fix for broken boundaries listed in Wambacher's "International Boundaries" thread.I have neither an opinion nor knowledge about the AL2 or Morocco in those disputed regions. |