philam48 have been discussed with 5 replies of this contributorphilam48 have been discussed with 5 replies of this contributor| Changeset | # | Tmstmp UTC | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 157562320 by philam48 @ 2024-10-07 02:06 | 1 | 2025-03-12 10:40 | aharvey ♦1,750 | Hi, this track you edited has been recently deleted, did you have any local knowledge you can add?https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/12555742 |
| 114440811 by philam48 @ 2021-12-01 11:49 | 1 | 2024-10-04 06:17 | Tomaussie_17 ♦7 | Hi Phillip. Despite its historical accuracy, I was wondering if Bullen's Drain is the best name for that creek?Bracken Creek seems to be the most common contemporary name for the waterway. With the Friends of Merri Creek, a subgroup organisation (Friends of Bracken Creek) and the Merri Cree... |
| 2 | 2024-10-04 10:31 | philam48 | Hey Tomaussie_17,That makes sense to me! Honestly I don't think I altered the name of the waterway, from memory I just extended it a bit. Happy to remove the name, I've had a quick look on Vicnames and nothing is showing up there- that's the authoritative source as far as I know.T... | |
| 3 | 2024-10-04 10:42 | Tomaussie_17 ♦7 | Heya Phil, thanks for the super duper speedy reply! My mistake if it wasn't you who added the name! Will change it now...Regards,Thomas! | |
| 67215079 by philam48 @ 2019-02-15 04:33 | 1 | 2023-03-20 13:52 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,666 | Hello!In unlikely case that you still remember or can visit this place...https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/192587815/historysurface=cobbled? What you meant by that? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:surface=cobblestone ? |
| 2 | 2023-03-27 06:36 | philam48 | Hi!You're absolutely right, it should be surface=cobblestone. Not sure why I tagged it was surface=cobbled.Thanks | |
| 118801948 by philam48 @ 2022-03-23 04:47 | 1 | 2022-07-03 04:27 | CloCkWeRX ♦343 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1042811149 isn't abandoned railway, it's completely removed. The only trace remaining is a path, which is mapped separately. |
| 2 | 2023-02-07 12:33 | CloCkWeRX ♦343 | I'm removing https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1042811149 | |
| 124072815 by philam48 @ 2022-07-26 00:35 | 1 | 2022-11-09 09:48 | Ewen Hill ♦407 | Good work PhilAM - Can confirm although it does look very much like a footpath if the southern sign wasn't there. |
| 122604564 by philam48 @ 2022-06-20 06:46 | 1 | 2022-06-22 01:18 | Warin61 ♦2,666 | Hi,Those warnings you got for crossing ways should have been fixed before you up loaded. I have already fixed one of them .. but you now are ignoring them in other changesets.. See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=145.04502&lat=-37.82386&zoom=18 |
| 2 | 2022-06-23 02:43 | philam48 | Hi Warin61, thanks for letting me know! I do miss some of them sometimes as you can see but I will pay more careful attention in the future. | |
| 74154565 by philam48 @ 2019-09-06 02:02 | 1 | 2022-05-09 02:02 | Warin61 ♦2,666 | Hi,Nit picking ...The sport pitches Way: 722379788 and Way: 722379789 don't look to have any physical existence? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dpitch#How_to_map suggest using a node in such situations. I have mapped the 'recreation_ground' that surrounds the ar... |
| 2 | 2022-05-09 10:01 | philam48 | Thanks Warin61, good point! I'll switch that over now | |
| 112774557 by philam48 @ 2021-10-21 06:32 | 1 | 2022-04-06 06:13 | adamh ♦25 | Are you sure the parking north of Casey Indoor Leisure Complex is 'private'?I don't recall seeing any particular restrictions in that area. It might possibly be 'customers'? |
| 113934819 by philam48 @ 2021-11-18 09:11 | 1 | 2021-11-18 23:58 | Bob42nd ♦6 | Heya, I was wondering if the geometry was imported, or approximated? I can't quite find a dataset on the source listed. |
| 2 | 2022-01-09 10:50 | philam48 | Hi Bob42nd sorry I missed your comment. The geometry is based on the EES here, including the station locations which are in separate documents for each precinct: https://bigbuild.vic.gov.au/projects/suburban-rail-loop/planning/ees Sorry I should have been more specific. | |
| 112898380 by philam48 @ 2021-10-24 09:35 | 1 | 2021-11-21 11:48 | kimo ♦26 | What is your source for changes to way 49075481? A gravel path that does not have signs allowing cyclists. |
| 90504009 by philam48 @ 2020-09-07 05:17 | 1 | 2021-05-22 03:24 | Warin61 ♦2,666 | Hi,For some of this you have sport=basketball, it is actually sport=netball. I have corrected 2 courts. |
| 76779233 by philam48 @ 2019-11-07 22:20 | 1 | 2019-11-10 07:51 | Warin61 ♦2,666 | Hi,Building way 743137692 self intersects .. see https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=144.96696&lat=-37.79913&zoom=17 |
| 74697966 by philam48 @ 2019-09-19 23:02 | 1 | 2019-09-20 05:00 | Warin61 ♦2,666 | The warning you are getting are things you can and should fix. Seehttps://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=144.97049&lat=-37.81152&zoom=18https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=144.96187&lat=-37.80920&zoom=18 |
| 65797352 by philam48 @ 2018-12-26 22:46 | 1 | 2018-12-27 21:51 | Warin61 ♦2,666 | Hi,Ways should not self intersect. JOSM would have warned you of this when you up loaded. Way: 594050399 needs to be fixed. See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=145.00448&lat=-37.73134&zoom=18&opacity=0.70 |
| 47831097 by philam48 @ 2017-04-16 07:00 | 1 | 2017-04-17 06:08 | Warin61 ♦2,666 | HI,Way 487105547 - residential has a shared segment where you go to/from a section of Harrison Reserve. Shared segments are not good in OSM.. some renders get confused by them. It is not necessary to exclude other landuses inside residential areas ... one of the few less picky things in OSM.... |