| Changeset | # | Tmstmp UTC | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 47895813 by Kate Diaz @ 2017-04-18 07:38 | 1 | 2017-04-18 11:57 | SomeoneElse ♦13,390 | Hello,As explained previously (see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44699065 ) Bing imagery may be out of date or offset. Can you explain what steps that you took here and in your other changesets in order ensure that this was not a problem?Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2017-04-19 01:28 | Kate Diaz | Hi Andy,Thanks for the comment. Do you have any resources that indicate that Bing is offset here or that the island has changed? https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=47895813 I believe that the island now better reflects reality due to my edits and that these changes improve the map incre... | |
| 3 | 2017-04-19 03:13 | TheSwavu ♦544 | Bing imagery in this area is off by 4 to 5 m. | |
| 4 | 2017-04-19 07:39 | SomeoneElse ♦13,390 | Re "resources that indicate that Bing is offset here" I'd offer "experience".Various things can be used to determine a Bing offset - underlying GPS traces and other imagery layers among them. I've certainly used the AGRI imagery together with GPS traces (my own and o... | |
| 46457953 by Kate Diaz @ 2017-02-28 04:33 | 1 | 2017-04-15 14:52 | apm-wa ♦256 | The Bing imagery is about five years out of date. You have not "fixed" the buildings; you have restored buildings that were torn down about three years ago. Please refrain from doing this. There is more up-to-date imagery available for Ashgabat at http://hiu-maps.net/hot/1.0.0/ashgabat-... |
| 2 | 2017-04-18 00:47 | Kate Diaz | My apologies for these edits in Ashgabat. If I edit in the city again I will use that imagery and consult with you before doing anything. Please point me to anything in particular that I can fix (using the word properly this time, with the newer imagery). | |
| 47114722 by Kate Diaz @ 2017-03-24 05:19 | 1 | 2017-03-28 22:07 | woodpeck ♦2,430 | You have moved the nodes making up this island http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/224776118 but neither Bing nor Mapbox imagery actually are good enough to even see that island. Your source specification ("Bing") must have been a mistake. Can you clarify your source? Have you made this edit ... |
| 2 | 2017-03-30 02:22 | Kate Diaz | You are right, I should not have moved the nodes making up that island. It is simply not visible in Bing or Mapbox. Please observe that I made these edits 6 days ago, and since then I have avoided making similar edits when no imagery is available. I certainly won’t any more. I am finding these... |