| Changeset | # | Tmstmp UTC | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 13655572 by johanemilsson @ 2012-10-27 23:34 | 1 | 2025-06-01 14:25 | os-emmer ♦338 | Hello johanemilsson,you added a ferry route here:https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/187999677It is currently ending in the middle of the ocean. Do you know where it goes?https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4582442 |
| 160113920 by johanemilsson @ 2024-12-10 03:42 | 1 | 2024-12-10 05:52 | Vonter ♦71 | Hello, thank you for the contribution! As this playground is within a residential "gated community", would it be more appropriate to tag it as `access=private`, rather than `access=yes` like it is currently tagged? |
| 2 | 2024-12-11 18:17 | johanemilsson | Good catch. I'll update. | |
| 148212247 by johanemilsson @ 2024-03-04 15:24 | 1 | 2024-03-07 17:02 | Privatemajory ♦31 | Hi there. This split is inaccurate! As per the decree 2021-012, the commune of Namorona should be part of Fitovinany which is not the case in your edit. (See https://www.assemblee-nationale.mg/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/LOI-n%C2%B02021-012-CTD.pdf) |
| 2 | 2024-03-07 17:10 | Privatemajory ♦31 | The license might be OSM incompatible but you can download the last update here just to have a look : https://salb.un.org/en/data/mdg (published by Madagascar's National Geospatial Information Authority) | |
| 3 | 2024-03-07 17:15 | Privatemajory ♦31 | Also found out that a bunch of other communes belonging to the district of Manakara (Analavory, Mitanty, Ampasimanjeva, Betampona, Vohimasina Nord) -- are all now in Vatovavy! Damn, where did this boundary come from? | |
| 4 | 2024-03-12 09:26 | johanemilsson | Hi! That is completely incorrect south-east of the Ifanadiana boundary when compared to https://salb.un.org/en/data/mdgI look into alternate source. Sorry for the inconvenience. | |
| 5 | 2024-03-14 13:41 | johanemilsson | Fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/148642081 | |
| 35939729 by johanemilsson @ 2015-12-14 08:14 | 1 | 2019-09-01 16:17 | mariotomo ♦1,895 | hola, thank you for mapping Panamá.there's something we do not understand, and have been discussing in the Panama Telegram group, and mentioned in the Panama wiki page, and it finally boils down to this single changeset and the following question:why did you extend the provinces into... |
| 2 | 2019-09-16 12:54 | johanemilsson | Hello Mariotomo,I extended it into the sea to avoid adding the province relations to every single islet, island or coastline there is. Seemed like more work then if the end-user of the data used a coastline dataset and clip all sea.Doesn't the province administrations also handle water ... | |
| 3 | 2019-09-16 17:29 | mariotomo ♦1,895 | we do not know what is the official rule, but we assume that the province only has authority on "internal waters". that's how they mapped Colombia, based on their national rules. can you confirm that your mapping decision is not based on factual data or knowledge, but simply on ease... | |
| 4 | 2021-11-28 21:26 | mariotomo ♦1,895 | Hi, I checked again and I feel obliged to update and correct: the Panamanian provinces (level 4), districts (l:6), and "corregimientos" (l:8) all extend into the sea, up to the national border (l:2). | |
| 5 | 2021-11-29 12:10 | johanemilsson | Hi! Nice work either way! It looks much better now then version #1, were I had traced an old map. | |
| 6 | 2021-11-29 12:31 | mariotomo ♦1,895 | yep, just recently someone updated the international boundary line, I didn't check what their sources and logic were, but I don't particularly care about borders … as long as people don't invent rivers to support a copied border.it's unfortunate that all levels of admini... | |
| 7 | 2021-12-01 13:32 | mariotomo ♦1,895 | replying to my last above comment, johanemilsson pointed me at this resource: https://osmdata.openstreetmap.de/data/water-polygons.html(thanks Johan!) | |
| 109738843 by johanemilsson @ 2021-08-16 09:33 | 1 | 2021-08-21 09:28 | danieldegroot2 ♦674 | Hey johanemilsson,If you would like to map anything not specified in a HOT task, please do so outside of said task.This makes it faster for mappers to map the task and easier for validators looking at changes.Regards,Daniel |
| 2 | 2021-08-27 07:27 | johanemilsson | Hi,Sure, I'll make sure to do that in the future./Johan | |
| 109690942 by johanemilsson @ 2021-08-15 07:41 | 1 | 2021-08-24 10:37 | danieldegroot2 ♦674 | Hey Johan,Most of this forest doesn't look that maintained and is located on a steep hillside. It may be better to use natural=wood here.Regards,Daniel |
| 2 | 2021-08-27 07:23 | johanemilsson | Hiya,Sounds like a good idea to go with natural=wood instead./Johan | |
| 100447840 by johanemilsson @ 2021-03-04 21:44 | 1 | 2021-03-08 16:19 | mueschel ♦6,570 | Hi,could you check this area, it doesn't have valid tags:https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/913664048 |
| 2 | 2021-03-18 08:45 | johanemilsson | Hi Mueschel,Thanks! Fixed it./Johan | |
| 98771243 by johanemilsson @ 2021-02-05 13:24 | 1 | 2021-02-05 14:54 | johanemilsson | Sorry about the wrong description. Fixed the Azad Kashmir relation in Pakistan. |
| 75137917 by johanemilsson @ 2019-10-01 09:13 | 1 | 2019-10-01 09:26 | archie ♦1,304 | Jag har tillåtit mig att revertera detta. Vad är det som är så märkvärdigt med denna mp? Även större mp går att hantera. Den här har många före dig arbetat med och lagt ner tid med. Vad exakt är det - förutom att den är s... |
| 2 | 2019-10-01 09:27 | archie ♦1,304 | En - mera konstruktiv - åtgärd hade varit att dela upp mp längs elkraftledningen, t ex. | |
| 3 | 2019-10-01 10:54 | archie ♦1,304 | Den "stora" skogsmp #2192104 har nu delats upp - längs elkraftledningsgatorna - på 4 nya mp. Inners har förts över till resp ny mp: - 10101498- 10101497 - 10101353- 10101376 | |
| 4 | 2019-10-01 19:05 | emailsson_import ♦1 | Jag agerade på ett önskemål i facebookgruppen. Personen i fråga kunde inte ladda hela relationen i ID och han hade som plan att göra om den i mindre istället. Så här i efterhand så skulle jag ha kontrollerat detta nogrannare. Hoppas att det inte orsa... | |
| 5 | 2019-10-01 19:56 | archie ♦1,304 | Det var så lite. Hoppas att det blev till belåtenhet och att han (Skinfaxi) kan jobba vidare på detta. | |
| 52878185 by johanemilsson @ 2017-10-13 06:07 | 1 | 2019-06-29 18:57 | Maiic ♦8 | Ik twijfelde enorm aan dat Roemeense consulaat in Berkel-Enschot (waar ik woon), maar zie hier: http://haga.mae.ro/en/node/845 voor het bewijs! |
| 68327897 by johanemilsson @ 2019-03-20 10:04 | 1 | 2019-03-20 10:24 | archie ♦1,304 | Hej, bara som tips, jag har nyss taggat om en del ställen liknande Erikshjälpen (alltså inte auktionshallen) som shop=charity + second_hand=yes. Vad tycker du om detta? |
| 2 | 2019-03-20 11:03 | johanemilsson | Tja! Låter rimligt. I fix | |
| 53361562 by johanemilsson @ 2017-10-30 09:08 | 1 | 2018-11-03 01:24 | Warin61 ♦2,665 | Hi,Node: Visalink Germany (4362535595) is not an embassy/consulate. It is a commercial firm that 'assists' people to apply for a German visa... |
| 2 | 2018-11-04 03:29 | johanemilsson | Hi, Good catch. I just added country=de. I've removed that and embassy and added shop instead./Johan | |
| 53268895 by johanemilsson @ 2017-10-26 17:19 | 1 | 2018-10-14 08:48 | apm-wa ♦256 | A consulate is not an embassy. I am changing all amenity=embassy tags to amenity=consulate in Istanbul. The embassies are in Ankara, the capital of Turkey. |
| 2 | 2018-10-17 09:23 | johanemilsson | Hi! I'm on the clear that a consulate is not an embassy. Most use the tag diplomatic=* to indicate which type diplomatic mission it is.https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:diplomatic/Johan | |
| 3 | 2018-10-17 10:44 | apm-wa ♦256 | Nevertheless, amenity=consulate is correct and amenity=embassy is not. I’ve been a diplomat for over three decades and have served in a consulate as well as multiple embassies, and had the difference drilled into me. Please refer to the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations, which is the in... | |
| 52817169 by johanemilsson @ 2017-10-11 09:18 | 1 | 2017-10-15 10:01 | SomeoneElse ♦13,389 | Hello johanemilsson,This is geographically a very large change with no comment explaining what was changed. Can you explain what you were changing and why?Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2017-10-16 12:52 | johanemilsson | Hi Andy,It sure is a large area. I forgot to add comment but it should be some like "Embassies missing representing country #maproulette-2791". Feel free to pitch in if you have any interest in foreign missions and some spare time :)/Johan | |
| 3 | 2017-10-16 13:12 | SomeoneElse ♦13,389 | Are you sure that all the locations are correct? Many in the list seem to have been created by MAPS.ME users, who tend to use lesser-used tags (such as "embassy") to create personal markers. http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4697076691/history in particular seems odd; it was previously t... | |
| 4 | 2017-10-16 13:25 | SomeoneElse ♦13,389 | For info:https://github.com/maproulette/maproulette2/issues/348 | |
| 5 | 2017-10-17 06:24 | johanemilsson | Thanks for raising this issue! Will need to review my latest embassy edits. | |
| 46896925 by johanemilsson @ 2017-03-16 12:28 | 1 | 2017-03-17 12:09 | mueschel ♦6,570 | Hi,this area doesn't have any valid tag. Could you check this?http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/480839466Cheers, Jan |
| 2 | 2017-03-17 14:38 | johanemilsson | I placed the leisure tag in a relation. I should probably just remove the other tags as they are not really necessary. | |
| 3 | 2017-03-18 12:49 | mueschel ♦6,570 | The relation is fine, but those tags should be deleted if they are not needed. Maybe you want to keep one tag with an ID to be able to match this object again with your external data source.Jan | |
| 36812621 by johanemilsson @ 2016-01-26 09:36 | 1 | 2016-01-26 12:34 | mueschel ♦6,570 | Hi,I would like to point out that the key you are using here is not defined in the wiki and is not used anywhere else. According tohttp://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:healthcarethe accepted tagging is healthcare:speciality=intensive(Please also note the second 'i' in specialit... |
| 2 | 2016-01-27 08:05 | johanemilsson | Hi,The problem with Key:healthcare is that I can't list a hospitals specialities and separate them with a ;-sign because of the 254 character limitation. So I used https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Healthcare_2.0/Specialties for a list of specialities. Although I can easi... | |
| 3 | 2016-01-27 08:16 | johanemilsson | But looking at the discussion on the above page it looks like "specialty" is the correct medical british english term. Taginfo also leans more heavily in favor for health_specialty:* than health_speciality:* | |
| 4 | 2016-01-27 10:17 | mueschel ♦6,570 | You linked to a proposed feature for which there was a no voting. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Healthcare on the other hand was accepted by many people several years ago and covers exactly the same.I personally would prefer the latter one, but that might not be consensus... |