bhavana naga have been discussed with 2 replies of this contributorbhavana naga have been discussed with 2 replies of this contributor| Changeset | # | Tmstmp UTC | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 52432412 by bhavana naga @ 2017-09-28 06:13 | 1 | 2020-01-24 22:09 | kli_lyft ♦5 | Hi bhavana naga,My name is Kelvin and I work on the OSM editing team for Lyft. While editing the area in question, I came across this way segment https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/401480904 in OSM. Per OSM wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Destination_details middle segmen... |
| 57175402 by bhavana naga @ 2018-03-14 11:36 | 1 | 2018-11-10 14:23 | gdt ♦39 | Please do not remove landuse=conservation in massachusetts. It is in local use, despite global opinions. Also please do not make changes like this in changesets with descriptions that are inaccurate. This has nothing to do with service roads. This kind of tag removal by non-locals borders on v... |
| 56997760 by bhavana naga @ 2018-03-08 12:27 | 1 | 2018-09-25 17:45 | gdt ♦39 | This changeset was not ok - it added service roads that are duplicative and right next to existing tracks. I have fixed some of the resulting problems. |
| 60680501 by bhavana naga @ 2018-07-13 09:19 | 1 | 2018-07-17 14:56 | bbmiller ♦104 | Are you sure this is a roundabout? It's a circular road, but that doesn't necessarily make it a roundabout. I'd be surprised if this actually was. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/60680501 |
| 2 | 2018-07-24 09:26 | bhavana naga | Hi bbmiller,Thanks for the update. Looked into the issue and fixed it. Going forward will avoid roundabout tags for similar cases. | |
| 53632294 by bhavana naga @ 2017-11-09 08:36 | 1 | 2017-12-07 07:35 | carciofo ♦186 | Hi, might I ask why your team seem to be replacing destination:street tags to destination? I wasn't able find any public guidelines from Mapbox that this is established practice. From my point of view you're taking more specific data which is already disambiguated and making it less specif... |
| 53010219 by bhavana naga @ 2017-10-17 12:22 | 1 | 2017-10-18 09:13 | DaxServer ♦115 | Hi Bhavana!It seems you forgot to update the Changeset comment! |
| 52403625 by bhavana naga @ 2017-09-27 06:06 | 1 | 2017-09-29 17:42 | Harald Hartmann ♦827 | Hello bhavana naga. At http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/59399596 you have tagged `ref_left` instead of `ref:left`, right? #typo |
| 50228830 by bhavana naga @ 2017-07-12 12:24 | 1 | 2017-07-12 13:34 | Janjko ♦86 | This changeset made a mess of this way:http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/30790330I'm not sure what was the intention, so I'm not going to try and fix it. |
| 2 | 2017-07-13 04:25 | bhavana naga | Thanks for reverting back the issue. I made the necessary changes as per the imagery. | |
| 48264240 by bhavana naga @ 2017-04-29 19:02 | 1 | 2017-05-01 08:50 | saikabhi ♦159 | Hi Bhavana,Thank you for contributing to OpenStreetMap. I have noticed that you have tagged the entire building along with the nodes with building=yes tag. You dont need to tag building nodes with building tag. Only the way needs to be tagged with building=yes. For now to fix your errors, run JO... |