Copyright © Pascal Neis | Map data © OpenStreetMap contributors | ResultMaps | Latest OSM discussions | Autoreload 5:00 min | Page limited to max. 500 changesets
27 changesets created by CENTRALHUB have been discussed with 15 replies of this contributor
Participated changeset discussions | More details | Discussions (Include blocked users) | Discussions without answer | Discussions without own answer | RSS feed
Changeset # Tmstmp UTC Contributor Comment
163639935
by CENTRALHUB
@ 2025-03-15 08:15		12025-03-16 12:58Qinyile
♦1		 终于有人处理这片树林了👍
112768267
by CENTRALHUB
@ 2021-10-21 01:59		12025-01-29 14:45Jyunhou
♦130		 🐮🍺
51851445
by CENTRALHUB
@ 2017-09-08 16:23		12024-09-25 15:37Taksine
♦105		 你怎么给那条路加了自行车道标签……那顶多就是个普通村道
147084607
by CENTRALHUB
@ 2024-02-05 09:10		12024-05-04 16:45科技骏马
♦14		 "Shaoxing Yangming Middle School" already exists on map, why add again?
绍兴市阳明中学已经存在了，为什么重复添加？
- old: [绍兴市阳明中学 (240452731)](https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/240452731)
- your's: [绍兴市阳明中学 (1246257584)](https://www...
130538780
by CENTRALHUB
@ 2022-12-27 04:27		12023-01-01 11:21pitscheplatsch
♦5,393		 Hi. May we know the source of your mapping activity? Thanks.
130736644
by CENTRALHUB
@ 2023-01-01 02:04		12023-01-01 08:27pitscheplatsch
♦5,393		 Hi, may we know the source of your mapping activity? Thanks.
100558799
by CENTRALHUB
@ 2021-03-07 01:38		12022-10-28 00:42异生君
♦1		 优美的曲线，好评一个！
71154905
by CENTRALHUB
@ 2019-06-11 19:24		12022-07-28 04:54Mateusz Konieczny
♦7,645		 Can you look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3283343 ?
108179981
by CENTRALHUB
@ 2021-07-18 06:16		12022-01-03 13:12Tình ca du mục
♦10		 https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=108179981 ?
113751744
by CENTRALHUB
@ 2021-11-14 05:30		12021-11-15 15:04Lepuse
♦29		 我们已经使用place:CN替换了china_class，请您留意，详见：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hans:Key:place:CN
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113751744
90677125
by CENTRALHUB
@ 2020-09-10 05:32		12021-11-07 07:28琉璃百合
♦50		 您好，我是大陆的编辑者，最近在浏览北京周边以及中国的标注规范，注意到燕郊镇的边界非常零碎，有一些小线区，如：
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/704301626
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/704301621
这个镇由您最后编辑，所以希望您...
22021-11-07 08:32CENTRALHUB 这些并不是我加上去的。我也几乎没有编辑过燕郊镇的边界。Thx.
32021-11-10 17:09Lepuse
♦29		 原燕郊镇的城市化地区析置了街道管辖，而城中遗留的村落辖权未变更，仍由现燕郊镇管辖。
91260516
by CENTRALHUB
@ 2020-09-22 04:49		12021-05-24 11:43快乐的老鼠宝宝
♦514		 Hey guy! According to the multi language tagging guideline of China Mainland, you've made wrong edit with administrative-villlages' name.
Such as this, n7852000028
You can find more details in this osmwiki page.(https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Multilingual_names#China)
22021-05-24 14:56CENTRALHUB Hi. Thanks for your comment but would you like share more detail about why it's wrong?
32021-11-07 07:37琉璃百合
♦50		 您好，您这个编辑中为很多中国村镇添加了英文名，但为什么要带上“cun”或“zhen”这样的后缀？他们是作为专名出现的，而不是作为通名，按照现有的中国命名规范，您不应添加通名。（上面快乐的老鼠宝宝之回...
42021-11-08 04:58CENTRALHUB 1. 镇一级的英文名按照OSM习惯的确不需要加上zhen，除非只有两个字。
2. 关于地名翻译，现在最大的问题是标准的缺失。国家只有一些笼统的指导方针，没有一个详细的标准。Multilingual names中的规范既不详细也不完美，有很多特...
112893572
by CENTRALHUB
@ 2021-10-24 05:30		12021-10-25 07:15ff5722
♦214		 Hello, where possible, could you try to use replace instead of deleting the old object? It only takes one shortcut in JOSM and it also saves not having to carry over the tags manually.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JOSM/Plugins/utilsplugin2#Replace_geometry_.28Ctrl.2BShift.2BG.29

For examp...
110319464
by CENTRALHUB
@ 2021-08-27 06:13		12021-08-28 11:16Jyunhou
♦130		 xd你这把修改名称的回退了，删除地方的没回退啊
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110319464
22021-08-28 15:58CENTRALHUB 理论上不少删除的地方应该是回退了，至少我核实了好几个被删除的地方都恢复了。不过因为之前那个用户短时间内制造了大量的changeset，可能回退会有一些问题。
100672509
by CENTRALHUB
@ 2021-03-09 04:17		12021-03-17 09:49mueschel
♦6,568		 Hi,
these nodes got a tag that looks like it is a mistake: CACHE_NAME \t
Could you check and fix this?
22021-03-17 16:29CENTRALHUB Fixed. Thanks for your comment.
92735726
by CENTRALHUB
@ 2020-10-20 03:35		12020-10-29 22:08Firemix
♦17		 Hon'able Centralhub,
which type of features were fixed here?
84663240
by CENTRALHUB
@ 2020-05-05 05:11		12020-10-06 11:01Logic_map
♦1		 膜拜
85996294
by CENTRALHUB
@ 2020-05-31 00:50		12020-06-26 08:33ff5722
♦214		 Hi, I would recommend to draw a line (or preferably even 2 parallel lines [SHIFT+P tool]) and tag them with highway=construction + construction=motorway. This allows it to be easily upgraded once the road is completed.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/810100006
22020-06-27 15:53CENTRALHUB Hi, if the road is being constructed (you can see the from imagery), I will map in that way. However if I can only see the construction area (at the very early stage of road construction), I will map them with construct area because I don't want to guess how the road will go. And, this tries to...
85996512
by CENTRALHUB
@ 2020-05-31 01:10		12020-06-01 19:00user_5359
♦19,383		 Hello! What is the meaning of the key IN_OSM?
22020-06-02 16:39CENTRALHUB It's added during my mapping work and it's useless. I will try to delete all of them.
32020-06-03 18:00user_5359
♦19,383		 Hello! Please have a look on https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/UFC.
42020-06-03 18:47CENTRALHUB Thanks. I will try to remove this tag
82454587
by CENTRALHUB
@ 2020-03-21 08:55		12020-03-21 15:04user_5359
♦19,383		 Welcome to OSM! You added a bigger number of unknown tags
cadc:2019=131124102204
in this change set. Please explain the source of this information and the meaning of the keys.
22020-03-22 18:16CENTRALHUB It's the China Administrative Division Code in 2019. With this code it's possible to join the OSM data with other sources. Source website: http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj/tjbz/tjyqhdmhcxhfdm/2019/index.html.

Wikidata: https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Property:P442
32020-03-22 19:21user_5359
♦19,383		 Is the license of this source compatible with the OSM license and has the import been arranged? In any case, a corresponding Wiki entry is useful. Why is the year necessary? Does it change for a range between years? Otherwise the default value for the key ref:cadc.
42020-03-22 20:05CENTRALHUB No license info is listed but the code is in public use in Wikipedia/Wikidata and elsewhere, since it's the only official data released by the state authority. And it's not imported because no geo-location info is available. All the data is manually input. It's possible that the code ...
79182097
by CENTRALHUB
@ 2020-01-04 07:27		12020-01-04 10:25mueschel
♦6,568		 Please make sure you don't upload your internal QA markers ('conn') to the OSM database!
78871650
by CENTRALHUB
@ 2019-12-26 08:42		12019-12-27 15:23mueschel
♦6,568		 Please make sure you don't upload your internal 'dupe' QA tags!
56140205
by CENTRALHUB
@ 2018-02-07 07:16		12018-02-07 08:40Aleks-Berlin
♦482		 Hi CENTRALHUB, I fixed a typo in key at way/559268841. regards, Alex
55180071
by CENTRALHUB
@ 2018-01-05 08:28		12018-01-06 17:13Aleks-Berlin
♦482		 hi CENTRALHUB, you added 3 strange tags ( ' = DigitalGlobe␣Premium␣Imagery ). Please fix this typo.
Thanks Alex
22018-01-06 18:08CENTRALHUB Already fixed. Thanks for telling me.
54171055
by CENTRALHUB
@ 2017-11-29 09:03		12017-11-30 08:13Aleks-Berlin
♦482		 Hi CENTRALHUB, please do not enter problematic keys, like " ' ".
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/reports/characters_in_keys#problem
Thanks, Alex
22017-12-04 02:34CENTRALHUB Sure. It's caused by accidentally pressing the wrong key when using JOSM
52582130
by CENTRALHUB
@ 2017-10-03 01:31		12017-10-04 07:21VlIvYur
♦149		 http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/529583924
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/529583922
What is it: '=ESRI ?
22017-10-08 22:30CENTRALHUB It's a mistake. Feel free to fix it. Thanks
51706889
by CENTRALHUB
@ 2017-09-04 04:49		12017-09-16 11:41mueschel
♦6,568		 Hi,
could you check this way? Something went wrong with the ref tag.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/521142317
"X622=S285"

Thanks, Jan
22017-10-03 08:41CENTRALHUB The secondary road (X622 you mentioned) should be the old S285.

The new S285 (the primary road) is newly built, but is not fully completed on the map yet.

Several online map in China tag both of them as S285.

Once we finish the primary road I believe that we can remove the ref tag from th...
32017-10-03 09:52mueschel
♦6,568		 Thanks for replying,
If I understand right, we can change the tag ""X622=S285" to "old_ref = S285", "ref = X622"?
42017-10-03 16:46CENTRALHUB I think we should only do "old_ref=S285", because we cannot confirm that it's X622.