| Changeset | # | Tmstmp UTC | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 161511168 by skgrange @ 2025-01-19 01:37 | 1 | 2025-01-30 09:55 | ❤️🔥 ♦366 | hey, https://osm.org/way/1333424683 still has no tags, do you remember what this was supposed to be? |
| 2 | 2025-01-30 21:08 | skgrange | This looks like a cemetery to me, but I have been unable to confirm that that is indeed the case. I am happy to drop the untagged lines if that is the best option. | |
| 3 | 2025-01-31 01:59 | ❤️🔥 ♦366 | no worries, then I'll add a fixme tag so there's some information for anyone who runs into it | |
| 4 | 2025-01-31 02:03 | skgrange | Great, many thanks. | |
| 59713004 by skgrange @ 2018-06-10 14:25 | 1 | 2023-03-20 06:30 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,659 | Hello!What you think about subclassing shop=trade for https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/162941710/history and tagging it as shop=trade trade=survey_equipment ?Especially as shop=survey is really rare and large chunk of it is from various tagging mistakes |
| 2 | 2023-03-20 15:39 | skgrange | Hello. Sure, that seems like a reasonable enhancement to me. | |
| 128901198 by skgrange @ 2022-11-14 17:01 | 1 | 2022-12-19 09:53 | pitscheplatsch ♦5,393 | Hi, I guess this is a data import, correct? |
| 2 | 2022-12-19 13:07 | skgrange | Yes, that is correct. | |
| 128901497 by skgrange @ 2022-11-14 17:09 | 1 | 2022-11-21 18:56 | pitscheplatsch ♦5,393 | Hi skgrange,I'm curious, is this a building import? |
| 2 | 2022-11-22 03:33 | CoyKoi ♦228 | Hi pitscheplatsch,Yes this user has been importing buildings en-masse directly, outside of the documented RapiD import. See my comment on the changeset here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/113376212 | |
| 3 | 2022-11-22 06:42 | skgrange | Hello. It looks like my contributions have not followed the community guidelines that have been set. I will read the resources that have been linked in a previous comment (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/New_Zealand_Buildings) and see what needs to be done to change up processing. If my c... | |
| 4 | 2022-11-24 06:16 | pitscheplatsch ♦5,393 | Thanks for your answers. | |
| 128901508 by skgrange @ 2022-11-14 17:09 | 1 | 2022-11-21 18:56 | pitscheplatsch ♦5,393 | Hi skgrange,I'm curious, is this a building import? |
| 128901623 by skgrange @ 2022-11-14 17:12 | 1 | 2022-11-21 18:56 | pitscheplatsch ♦5,393 | Hi kgrange,I'm curious, is this a building import? |
| 113376212 by skgrange @ 2021-11-04 16:07 | 1 | 2021-11-05 23:37 | CoyKoi ♦228 | Hi skgrange,This LINZ building outlines dataset is currently being imported through a process documented on this wiki page https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/New_Zealand_Buildings |
| 103952317 by skgrange @ 2021-05-01 11:21 | 1 | 2021-05-03 17:34 | user_5359 ♦19,390 | Hello, you add many unknown keys building_i. Did you mean ref:linz:building_id? |
| 2 | 2021-05-04 07:17 | skgrange | Thanks for letting me know about the issue. You are correct, the tagging is incorrect. I will revert the changes and reinsert the data with the correct tags. Thanks again. | |
| 43326938 by skgrange @ 2016-11-01 14:20 | 1 | 2021-04-03 22:06 | SomeoneElse ♦13,389 | Re the Jorvic Way, this changeset added it going through the farmyard at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/377960435 (see https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/15KI ), but it doesn't (that's clearly gated off from the west and marked as private). Presumably it actually goes north of the sewage work... |
| 43355549 by skgrange @ 2016-11-02 15:44 | 1 | 2021-04-03 21:54 | SomeoneElse ♦13,389 | The route you've picked for the Jorvic Way here isn't borne out by the signs on the ground. There are signs west of Holtby, but none East. This was from 2011 through to June 2018 at least. |
| 47573359 by skgrange @ 2017-04-08 17:05 | 1 | 2020-12-28 23:03 | SomeoneElse ♦13,389 | Hello,Should Dunstable Downs https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/485544020 be an AONB in its own right? It's part of the area of Chiltern Hills AONB https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7129946 anyway.Best Regards,Andy |
| 65078438 by skgrange @ 2018-12-01 17:51 | 1 | 2018-12-02 18:07 | SomeoneElse ♦13,389 | Hello,Any reason why you've deleted the name from Dalby Carr farm and create a separate node for it? It's not really any sort of "place" - just a farmyard.Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2018-12-03 11:00 | skgrange | Hello. I have been doing a lot of naming lately and the place point is generally how I have been doing it. Fair enough for your case. I can revert the edit, or you can edit it for your preference? No problems. Stuart. | |
| 3 | 2018-12-03 12:25 | SomeoneElse ♦13,389 | Hi,I wouldn't use a "place" where somewhere is just a farm name. An example that probably is deserving of a place tag is Witherholme (currently just a farmyard at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/641236564 ), as that is signed on the Whenby Road. Maybe place=hamlet half-way betwe... | |
| 4 | 2018-12-03 12:55 | skgrange | Hello Andy,Sounds fair enough to me. It feels like a rather subtle issue. I would say that a farmyard is primarily a landuse classification (which may be named), but a farm is a named place, especially so in rural areas. The issue around farms which are no longer named can be handled with an isola... | |
| 5 | 2020-01-11 13:24 | SomeoneElse ♦13,389 | Hi,I just stumbled on the previous discussion of thise on talk-gb (while looking for something else, as tends to happen), so mentioning it here:https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/2016-September/019181.htmlBest Regards,Andy | |
| 64613658 by skgrange @ 2018-11-18 08:19 | 1 | 2019-05-16 22:39 | SomeoneElse ♦13,389 | I suspect https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6070109345 was the name of the quarry, not the house. |
| 64600792 by skgrange @ 2018-11-17 16:47 | 1 | 2019-04-27 17:27 | SomeoneElse ♦13,389 | Hello,"move names of farms to place tag from farmyard polygons around scakleton" really makes no sense on e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6068993944 - it's basically just duplicating every object and mistagging it. That one is a farmyard, but it's not in any sense a _pl... |
| 62830640 by skgrange @ 2018-09-22 16:32 | 1 | 2018-09-22 19:03 | trigpoint ♦2,373 | Hi, what is the source of this import?Cheers Phil |
| 2 | 2018-09-23 00:09 | ndm ♦889 | Bristol Temple Way isn't on Temple Way. | |
| 3 | 2018-09-23 12:24 | trigpoint ♦2,373 | Seems to have been reverted by originator without comment or explaination | |
| 4 | 2018-09-23 13:05 | skgrange | Hello. The source of these data are the air quality documents submitted to the European Commission (here: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/gb/eu/aqd/d/envwyeohg/). I have dropped the points now after the question on Bristol's location which I need to ask others to confirm. I will reinsert once this ... | |
| 52598567 by skgrange @ 2017-10-03 15:04 | 1 | 2017-10-06 10:14 | Harald Hartmann ♦827 | Hello skgrange. Why do you have tagged`disused=yes``disused_1=bank` (new key!)instead of`disused:amenity=bank`?Please have a look athttp://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix |
| 51883246 by skgrange @ 2017-09-09 15:31 | 1 | 2017-09-11 14:33 | Robert Whittaker ♦274 | Did you make a mistake in the postcode for https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/522940857 in this changeset? It currently has addr:postcode=RG8 98P. (The final three characters of a postcode should be a a number followed by two letters.) |
| 2 | 2017-09-11 14:57 | skgrange | Hello. Yes, it looks like it. I have just committed a fix. Thanks. | |
| 47968230 by skgrange @ 2017-04-20 11:15 | 1 | 2017-04-20 22:07 | Yorvik Prestigitator ♦151 | You've not added Jupiter to the UofY Solar System relation |
| 42913064 by skgrange @ 2016-10-15 08:16 | 1 | 2016-10-15 14:55 | Yorvik Prestigitator ♦151 | I thought your tag of flood_prone was quite appropriate for the ings |
| 2 | 2016-10-15 20:35 | skgrange | Hello. I agree. I made the change because the MapBox services were rendering the Ings as water. So it is a work-around. I can revert the change if desired. | |
| 3 | 2016-10-15 22:04 | SomeoneElse ♦13,389 | Sounds like a bug with Mapbox's rendering to me (although over the next 6 months or so it'll be likely as wrong as right!). | |
| 37800655 by skgrange @ 2016-03-13 14:10 | 1 | 2016-03-20 12:18 | Mike Baggaley ♦630 | Hi, The Ridgeway is the name of a route, and should not be added as the name of a highway (path).Regards,Mike |
| 29445149 by skgrange @ 2015-03-13 10:34 | 1 | 2015-11-05 12:47 | Владимир К ♦1,775 | wrong opening_hours tag. You entered it twice "opening_hours=opening_hours=Mo-Su 11:30-20:00", but should only "opening_hours=Mo-Su 11:30-20:00". Please, read the wiki http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours . OSM works with key=value, and there opening_hours is the ... |
| 33916282 by skgrange @ 2015-09-09 18:26 | 1 | 2015-09-09 21:54 | Socks ♦12 | Hi - I'm just looking at Iffley Lock. This was already in OSM (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/355542242) but now there's a new way with some additional tags (http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/369908987). Did you mean to double this up, or is it an accident that needs correcting?Cheer... |