jleedev participated in the following changeset discussionsjleedev participated in the following changeset discussions| Changeset | # | Tmstmp UTC | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 56594499 by jleedev @ 2018-02-22 23:00 | 1 | 2025-06-22 14:59 | jleedev | I am amused to learn that PennDOT does in fact refer to the bathtub as such. https://www.pa.gov/agencies/penndot/projects-near-you/district-11-projects/sr-376-a69-bathtub-floodwall-reconstruction-project.html |
| 167138205 by Fugly16 @ 2025-06-03 14:21 | 1 | 2025-06-18 01:41 | jleedev | Got a source for these? |
| 166650964 by GeoKitten @ 2025-05-23 11:24 | 1 | 2025-05-23 11:26 | GeoKitten ♦16 | And if I did break anything, please explain what I did wrong so I can get it right next time. |
| 2 | 2025-05-25 21:26 | jleedev | Well, the `sign` node being _on_ the highway way feels a little silly, but it looks correct :) | |
| 166668658 by Alyssa Chance @ 2025-05-23 18:16 | 1 | 2025-05-25 21:15 | jleedev | Features that exist should not be deleted. Add access=no if they are closed. |
| 166452331 by Jason McCullough @ 2025-05-19 00:19 | 1 | 2025-05-25 20:55 | jleedev | Reverted for spam/vandalism/trolling/flamebaithttps://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166751623 |
| 165940262 by You3njoyMys3lf @ 2025-05-07 13:50 | 1 | 2025-05-18 20:48 | jleedev | This was unnecessary, reverted.https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166448550 |
| 165940221 by You3njoyMys3lf @ 2025-05-07 13:49 | 1 | 2025-05-18 20:48 | jleedev | This was unnecessary, reverted.https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166448550 |
| 165125039 by RaptorHunter @ 2025-04-18 18:02 | 1 | 2025-04-22 01:09 | jleedev | Please don't do this — railway=abandoned is appropriate when the route still physically exists in the form of tunnels, bridge piers, and the graded way.https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165262435 |
| 163734129 by navismaps @ 2025-03-17 14:09 Active block | 1 | 2025-04-19 01:41 | jleedev | Reverting imaginary mappinghttps://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165135931 |
| 163712013 by navismaps @ 2025-03-17 01:47 Active block | 1 | 2025-04-19 01:41 | jleedev | Reverting imaginary mappinghttps://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165135931 |
| 163712091 by navismaps @ 2025-03-17 01:54 Active block | 1 | 2025-04-19 01:41 | jleedev | Reverting imaginary mappinghttps://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165135931 |
| 163712082 by navismaps @ 2025-03-17 01:54 Active block | 1 | 2025-04-19 01:41 | jleedev | Reverting imaginary mappinghttps://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165135931 |
| 163712042 by navismaps @ 2025-03-17 01:49 Active block | 1 | 2025-04-19 01:41 | jleedev | Reverting imaginary mappinghttps://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165135931 |
| 163712221 by navismaps @ 2025-03-17 02:03 Active block | 1 | 2025-04-19 01:41 | jleedev | Reverting imaginary mappinghttps://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165135931 |
| 163712174 by navismaps @ 2025-03-17 02:01 Active block | 1 | 2025-03-17 07:03 | NeisReview ♦909 | #HighwayChangesHello, welcome to OSM.In this changeset, some types of highway are being added or modified by you. In particular the ref-tag.Could we know the sources that you used? Thank you. |
| 2 | 2025-03-17 12:29 | navismaps Active block | Comment not displayed. To view it, please select the "Include blocked users" option. | |
| 3 | 2025-03-28 20:24 | NeisReview ♦909 | Thank you for your reply.Which "map ressurces" do you mean exactly? | |
| 4 | 2025-04-19 01:41 | jleedev | Reverting imaginary mappinghttps://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165135931 | |
| 163712116 by navismaps @ 2025-03-17 01:57 Active block | 1 | 2025-04-19 01:41 | jleedev | Reverting imaginary mappinghttps://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165135931 |
| 165127891 by navismaps @ 2025-04-18 19:27 Active block | 1 | 2025-04-19 01:36 | jleedev | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165135792 |
| 164644827 by jleedev @ 2025-04-07 17:09 | 1 | 2025-04-07 17:31 | jleedev | Partial revert of 162913083; mistakenly deletes and undeletes some OK geometry because I don't know how conflict resolution works. |
| 163709765 by cigazze @ 2025-03-16 23:13 | 1 | 2025-03-22 00:57 | jleedev | Emerald View is pretty interesting in that it combines multiple existing named parks — Olympia, Grandview, and Mt. Washington, plus some others — with a large unimproved wooded space. It would be quite reasonable for the parks to be leisure=park while the whole multipolygon is a nature_r... |
| 163737369 by apires @ 2025-03-17 15:24 | 1 | 2025-03-17 15:29 | jleedev | https://osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments |
| 163628347 by DNEN @ 2025-03-14 21:41 | 1 | 2025-03-14 21:48 | jleedev | https://osm.wiki/good_changeset_comments |
| 163465472 by RaptorHunter @ 2025-03-11 01:17 | 1 | 2025-03-12 17:48 | jleedev | The wiki and standard tile layer have suburb as more or less equivalent to village. I will change them to neighbourhood. https://osm.wiki/Tag:place=neighbourhood does mention homeowners association specifically as a possible use. Ideally there should be a landuse=residential area with no place node. |
| 163375060 by IvaLedinščak @ 2025-03-08 18:24 | 1 | 2025-03-11 18:59 | jleedev | The sign says "except local deliveries". |
| 2 | 2025-03-12 10:12 | MarkoŠatrak ♦30 | Hi @jleedev,I’m writing here as the leader of our team’s OSM editing activity.Thank you for bringing this up. Our team has already recognized the mistake of modifying existing tags and has reverted the changes where hgv=destination values were previously present in subsequent cha... | |
| 3 | 2025-03-12 10:23 | IvaLedinščak ♦31 | Reverted because of unnecessary modification of previously existing tags #OptimoRoutehttps://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163520881 | |
| 161215045 by Pcoxjhkjhkjh @ 2025-01-10 17:52 Active block | 1 | 2025-01-21 17:18 | jleedev | revert vandalismhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161609066 |
| 158283680 by GeoKitten_import @ 2024-10-24 07:36 | 1 | 2024-10-24 13:02 | jleedev | I _think_ I found all of the demolished ones in the path of the turnpike now :) |
| 157726009 by jasonmiller2008 @ 2024-10-10 17:23 Active block | 1 | 2024-10-16 03:27 | jleedev | Please stop writing nonsense. |
| 2 | 2024-11-13 21:05 | woodpeck_repair ♦33,903 | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 159107632 where the changeset comment is: revert un-trustworthy/fictional golf mapping | |
| 157927411 by chrishent @ 2024-10-15 15:51 | 1 | 2024-10-16 01:30 | jleedev | Which software doesn't implicitly use a highway=footway or highway=steps by default? |
| 157755276 by Balooog @ 2024-10-11 12:36 | 1 | 2024-10-11 12:53 | jleedev | I'd probably go with `name=Welcome to Mount Washington`. |
| 2 | 2024-10-11 13:22 | Balooog ♦3 | Sounds good. I pulled the name off the Allegheny County Parcel Viewer, but I see on street view that the sign doesn't include "garden." I updated the name | |
| 157726448 by jasonmiller2008 @ 2024-10-10 17:33 Active block | 1 | 2024-10-11 00:54 | jleedev | https://osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments |
| 2 | 2024-11-13 21:05 | woodpeck_repair ♦33,903 | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 159107632 where the changeset comment is: revert un-trustworthy/fictional golf mapping | |
| 157652982 by Dark_Valor @ 2024-10-09 04:05 | 1 | 2024-10-09 16:11 | jleedev | w364155655 was an "inner" way originally; at some point it became the sole member of a multipolygon so the validator presumed it should have been "outer". |
| 2 | 2024-10-10 00:56 | Dark_Valor ♦4 | I did check that. No, the area without natural wood but surrounded by that is what OSM Inspector said should be an outer. That is part of the same relationship. I wondered why that should be that way but no issue was created in OSM Inspector. I did not map the area west-southeast of downtown. I... | |
| 3 | 2024-10-10 03:20 | Dark_Valor ♦4 | Oh, two areas actually exist to the west-southwest of downtown Pittsburgh (south of the Ohio River). I switched to my laptop for this. I used my phone for the other.This relates to OSM Inspector if you might share some knowledge. If the issue there is Ways (Context), what might be the typical i... | |
| 4 | 2024-10-10 13:30 | jleedev | OSM Inspector describes "Way (context)Member ways of defect multipolygons and closed ways with defects."For instance, "ring not closed" appears as two pink dots, and all of the relation's ways are included for context. Screenshot: https://gist.github.com/jleedev/dc8cf8... | |
| 5 | 2024-10-10 21:16 | Dark_Valor ♦4 | That makes sense. I should be good. Thanks | |
| 157274687 by Cody Karcher @ 2024-09-30 00:29 | 1 | 2024-10-08 22:48 | jleedev | Does the name "Hoppy Field" have a source? |
| 157153095 by Dark_Valor @ 2024-09-27 04:08 | 1 | 2024-09-27 15:43 | jleedev | Tags on a multipolygon go on the relation only, not the member ways, e.g. w1318588741 and w376907057 should have no tags. |
| 156932617 by (Turgay) @ 2024-09-22 00:41 | 1 | 2024-09-22 00:51 | jleedev | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments |
| 156838160 by GustavoMedrano1982 @ 2024-09-19 19:53 | 1 | 2024-09-22 00:23 | jleedev | https://osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments |
| 155307468 by RaptorHunter @ 2024-08-16 03:21 | 1 | 2024-09-16 14:24 | jleedev | https://www.observer-reporter.com/shl/2019/mar/03/immigrants-once-flocked-to-the-five-towns-of-thoms-run/ “Built in 1900, the Presto Hotel, which sits along Thoms Run Road in Presto, is still a working tavern today.” |
| 156668821 by Supposedly_Bacon @ 2024-09-16 02:04 | 1 | 2024-09-16 13:00 | jleedev | https://osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments |
| 156530567 by Polythene Pam @ 2024-09-12 14:10 | 1 | 2024-09-12 18:35 | jleedev | In case you haven't read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:bicycle=yes, it says "roads and paths where cycling is legal". Trespassing on a railway is not that. |
| 2 | 2024-09-23 02:40 | Fizzie-DWG ♦32,122 | Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16702 | |
| 154848917 by Polythene Pam @ 2024-08-05 12:34 | 1 | 2024-08-30 19:52 | jleedev | Please don't add fiction to the map. |
| 154978217 by Polythene Pam @ 2024-08-08 13:00 | 1 | 2024-08-30 19:34 | jleedev | Are you sure that's a real name? |
| 155804244 by ticklebear93 @ 2024-08-26 22:00 | 1 | 2024-08-27 01:43 | jleedev | https://osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments |
| 154373974 by RaptorHunter @ 2024-07-25 03:30 | 1 | 2024-07-29 21:40 | jleedev | This closed several years ago. |
| 154137336 by smikhnouski_lyft @ 2024-07-19 10:35 | 1 | 2024-07-20 21:44 | jleedev | Reference — https://files.paturnpike.com/production/docs/ptcconstructionsiteslibraries/mon-fayette---section-53a1/december-4-2023-mfe-weekly-construction-update.pdf“Drivers traveling to southbound PA Turnpike 43 will experience a lane shift at the ramp on Jefferson Boulevard. Traffic... |
| 2 | 2024-07-22 12:32 | smikhnouski_lyft ♦23 | Hi, jleedev!My name is Stepan and I’m a mapper on the OSM team at Lyft. On the changeset I modified the geometry of the motorway according to the Lyft-owned background, GPS tracks, and street-level images. The access to the Mon/Fayette Expressway (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1302... | |
| 3 | 2024-07-22 13:01 | jleedev | Thanks for the images! For weird changes like long term construction, I try to add detail to my own changesets explaining what's happening and when, but that's hard to do consistently. | |
| 4 | 2024-07-22 13:59 | smikhnouski_lyft ♦23 | Thank you for your feedback and for sharing your approach! I agree that detailed explanations help clarify the situation, but it can indeed be challenging with complex edits. However, we are always ready to share our evidence if needed. | |
| 153352105 by Mattiyu @ 2024-06-30 00:58 | 1 | 2024-06-30 03:02 | jleedev | https://osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments |
| 152992472 by Polythene Pam @ 2024-06-21 13:03 | 1 | 2024-06-24 19:07 | jleedev | Just to clarify, do you ride your bike on the train tracks over the parkway or do you fall through the open bridge deck and cross the stream below?More to the point, is this path based on reality in any way? |
| 152937570 by whammo @ 2024-06-20 10:46 | 1 | 2024-06-20 13:31 | gpserror ♦221 | Are these all really closed? I spot checked https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/185707011 and KFC's website still indicates one here -- and coupled with the shops that share a KFC and a TB (I know of one locally, also a KFC that shares a building/cash register with an A&W) -- just wanted t... |
| 2 | 2024-06-20 14:54 | jleedev | The web page at https://locations.kfc.com/md/elkridge/6281-washington-blvd gives opening hours of `Mo-Su closed`, which suggests that it's closed. It's not obvious from the armchair whether this is temporary or permanent. There are several *hundred* of these. | |
| 3 | 2024-06-20 17:08 | whammo ♦84 | Yeah, not sure if the closure is permanent or temporary, hence the lifecycle prefix and not deletion, but being closed every day suggests to me some state of disuse. If you have on-the-ground insight that would be great! | |
| 4 | 2024-06-20 18:45 | gpserror ♦221 | Fair enough, just wanted to make sure someone didn't add a new restaurant but the old one was still there, as much as I dislike two restaurants sharing the same cash register... but they are both the same parent company franchiser... | |
| 144878779 by jleedev @ 2023-12-07 19:53 | 1 | 2023-12-07 19:56 | jleedev | Straighten out the WV/PA line. TIGER is off by about 300 feet. There are two houses with mailing addresses in the "wrong" state, which I'm guessing is the source of TIGER's shape here. Add some addresses along the PA side explicitly. Various state and county sources disagree *sli... |
| 143834473 by Alyssa Chance @ 2023-11-09 18:27 | 1 | 2023-11-09 22:52 | jleedev | Definitely seems to have a sidewalk. |
| 143017629 by Alyssa Chance @ 2023-10-23 12:59 | 1 | 2023-10-23 23:32 | jleedev | If it actually exists it should be given service=driveway, not deleted. |
| 142054252 by ticklebear93 @ 2023-10-02 19:34 | 1 | 2023-10-02 23:45 | jleedev | Reason for deleting these? |
| 2 | 2023-10-03 20:22 | jleedev | Reverted in 142117162 | |
| 142066016 by ticklebear93 @ 2023-10-02 23:16 | 1 | 2023-10-02 23:44 | jleedev | Looks like you already fixed it, but please try to heed the warnings; JOSM should have run the validator and yelled at you. |
| 141608829 by Alyssa Chance @ 2023-09-22 14:53 | 1 | 2023-09-22 19:53 | jleedev | That is not a reason to delete it. Change it to a driveway (highway=service, service=driveway). |
| 141439782 by Alyssa Chance @ 2023-09-18 19:45 | 1 | 2023-09-19 19:18 | jleedev | You shouldn't add `access=no` to indicate pedestrian access. It should be `foot=no`. |
| 141301815 by Alyssa Chance @ 2023-09-15 12:47 | 1 | 2023-09-17 01:21 | jleedev | Hi, `access=no` is incorrect as it means nobody may use the way, this should be `foot=no`. |
| 141161946 by Pulkit Rathi @ 2023-09-12 12:44 | 1 | 2023-09-15 12:59 | jleedev | Reverted in 141302478 |
| 141161248 by Ganesh Bhardwaj @ 2023-09-12 12:29 | 1 | 2023-09-15 12:58 | jleedev | Reverted in 141302425 |
| 140728288 by _caleb @ 2023-09-02 16:55 | 1 | 2023-09-03 16:09 | jleedev | Since the cycleway is physically separated, it's cycleway=track, yes? |
| 2 | 2023-09-04 17:09 | _caleb ♦7 | You're right, missed that stipulation on the wiki. I'm fixing it later today when I'm back at a computer | |
| 140416394 by jleedev @ 2023-08-26 15:12 | 1 | 2023-09-03 10:05 | mueschel ♦6,568 | Hi,could you explain the tag internet_access:hostileThis hasn't been used in any other place yet. |
| 2 | 2023-09-03 11:28 | jleedev | The wifi was blocking certain sites, using a device or software which generated a certificate on the fly to generate a message (if I chose to click through the error).I think that this is a factual, mappable scenario but did not see anything under https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=inter... | |
| 139940016 by JaniceG @ 2023-08-16 01:20 | 1 | 2023-08-25 18:27 | jleedev | If this is being demolished, you should change `building=garage` to `demolished:building=garage` (and remove most of the other tags). |
| 137149339 by lelizbradley @ 2023-06-09 18:37 | 1 | 2023-07-06 20:11 | jleedev | Any reason these driveways needed to be removed? |
| 2 | 2023-07-06 20:30 | lelizbradley ♦1 | They aren't streets! I noticed that other homes don't show driveways... | |
| 3 | 2023-07-12 18:43 | jleedev | Yes, that's why they're highway=service as opposed to highway=residential or other. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dservice | |
| 128898139 by hri0905 @ 2022-11-14 15:41 | 1 | 2023-06-21 19:56 | jleedev | This change removed a number of addresses and locations along Grandview. Please don't do that -- it is rarely necessary to completely delete something and redraw it. Also, press Q to make corners square. |
| 137251915 by Polythene Pam @ 2023-06-12 16:32 | 1 | 2023-06-13 01:14 | jleedev | These `name` tags are not really names and might be better in `description`, or simply omitted, e.g. ‘church parking loop’ is presumably not written on a street sign nor does it give any information that isn't self-evident. |
| 2 | 2023-06-13 01:19 | jleedev | The name of an object is inherently a proper name and is usually capitalized; if not then it might not actually be a name. | |
| 3 | 2023-06-13 13:00 | Polythene Pam ♦2 | Thanks for the tips! | |
| 132169993 by jleedev @ 2023-02-06 18:28 | 1 | 2023-05-28 19:29 | clay_c ♦489 | Were you a bit overzealous here? Movements between K-96 and 127th Street East are not tolled. |
| 2 | 2023-05-28 20:35 | jleedev | I think you're referring to this region? https://files.slack.com/files-pri/T029HV94T-F059V35MUBD/image.png?pub_secret=a2a558144fYeah that makes sense. In my defense, the map was already wrong, I was just filling in the gaps. | |
| 3 | 2023-05-28 22:11 | clay_c ♦489 | Yeah, that's what I meant. I went ahead and fixed it: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/136673568 | |
| 122301508 by Bellaboo15 @ 2022-06-13 00:47 | 1 | 2023-03-19 20:56 | jleedev | What is this supposed to be exactly? |
| 128575349 by Allen1975 @ 2022-11-07 01:04 | 1 | 2022-11-07 15:42 | jleedev | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments |
| 128411050 by Designer1 @ 2022-11-02 21:19 | 1 | 2022-11-03 21:12 | jleedev | Can you explain your use of `office=yes` here? |
| 2 | 2023-01-03 12:16 | woodpeck_repair ♦33,903 | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 130822479, 130823603, 130822659, 130821821, 130822156, 130821684, 130823808, 130823423, 130823995, 130823041, 130821981, 130818753, 130822310, 130822822, 130823241 where the changeset comment is: revert all edits by Designer1 because th... | |
| 127798315 by Jeremyah Lanum @ 2022-10-19 17:53 | 1 | 2022-10-24 15:12 | jleedev | Reverted in 128001917 |
| 126951884 by Bill Herstine @ 2022-10-03 18:03 | 1 | 2022-10-19 15:05 | jleedev | Was there a reason for this change? |
| 125985696 by schulf @ 2022-09-09 15:13 | 1 | 2022-09-09 15:23 | jleedev | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments |
| 125910913 by Космический Ветер @ 2022-09-07 17:16 | 1 | 2022-09-07 17:30 | jleedev | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments |
| 125910365 by otis19 @ 2022-09-07 17:00 | 1 | 2022-09-07 17:30 | jleedev | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments |
| 2 | 2022-09-16 16:27 | otis19 ♦2 | Увидел, исправлюсь. | |
| 124633778 by miroslavuzice87 @ 2022-08-08 10:58 | 1 | 2022-08-11 13:50 | jleedev | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/124777665I hope it's safe to assume that tagging the Gulf of Panama as an office building was accidental. |
| 2 | 2022-08-31 06:44 | miroslavuzice87 ♦35 | Hello jleedev and thank you for noticing this. Yes, your assumption was good, and thank you for good work correcting this accidental mistake. Happy mapping. | |
| 124617756 by Chincha1 @ 2022-08-08 02:13 | 1 | 2022-08-08 15:35 | jleedev | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments |
| 2 | 2022-08-20 16:56 | Chincha1 ♦11 | Thank you jleedev for providing good changeset comment link | |
| 124524950 by numide @ 2022-08-05 13:48 | 1 | 2022-08-05 13:56 | jleedev | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments |
| 2 | 2022-08-05 17:32 | numide ♦29 | Thanks for sharing. I started mapping in 2013. I know how to map, the local knowledge and how to call amenities. | |
| 3 | 2022-08-05 17:46 | jleedev | That's good, it means you don't need anybody to explain to you why "mapping" is a useless changeset description, and you can figure it out all on your own. | |
| 4 | 2022-08-05 19:16 | numide ♦29 | I do not need to justidfy to you the modificxations. There is a difference between Unité de protection civile from Protection civile. It is not useless because you ignore french or arabic. | |
| 124500155 by Mapping with coffee @ 2022-08-04 23:29 | 1 | 2022-08-05 15:13 | jleedev | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments |
| 124524968 by intruder100 @ 2022-08-05 13:49 | 1 | 2022-08-05 14:00 | jleedev | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments |
| 124475437 by Dion Pahlevi @ 2022-08-04 11:11 | 1 | 2022-08-04 18:33 | jleedev | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments |
| 124382603 by GeoKitten @ 2022-08-02 09:45 | 1 | 2022-08-03 23:50 | jleedev | I really don't understand the point of including hospitals, churches, parks, schools, and stores in a "residential" landuse. |
| 124282259 by Jeremyah Lanum @ 2022-07-30 20:32 | 1 | 2022-08-03 13:10 | jleedev | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/124436606 |
| 124109201 by Kuptsov Igor @ 2022-07-26 18:45 | 1 | 2022-07-26 18:46 | jleedev | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments |
| 124108858 by Virtho @ 2022-07-26 18:36 | 1 | 2022-07-26 18:45 | jleedev | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments |
| 123850682 by theurbanexploringman @ 2022-07-20 13:01 Active block | 1 | 2022-07-20 15:11 | jleedev | At a roundabout, make sure that two roads don't connect at the same node, so that routers understand. |
| 2 | 2022-07-20 15:15 | jleedev | In the linked video it appears to be a dogbone interchange — rather than two distinct roundabouts it's actually one long one. | |
| 123819062 by jleedev @ 2022-07-19 17:50 | 1 | 2022-07-19 17:55 | jleedev | According to https://www.aaroads.com/guides/i-269-west-tn/, a lone secondary shield exists: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=430030268683517But it's safe to assume that's a fluke, and this is all primary given its interstate aspirations. |
| 123733063 by Kuptsov Igor @ 2022-07-17 19:32 | 1 | 2022-07-17 19:38 | jleedev | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments |
| 121256016 by Jeremyah Lanum @ 2022-05-20 18:02 | 1 | 2022-07-11 14:07 | jleedev | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/123477317 |
| 121254522 by Jeremyah Lanum @ 2022-05-20 17:17 | 1 | 2022-07-11 14:07 | jleedev | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/123477317 |
| 123094716 by albertoq @ 2022-07-01 17:18 | 1 | 2022-07-01 17:26 | jleedev | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments |
| 122517563 by DuhC0mmunity @ 2022-06-17 17:16 | 1 | 2022-06-21 17:11 | jleedev | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments |
| 122303761 by Jeremyah Lanum @ 2022-06-13 03:50 | 1 | 2022-06-14 14:12 | jleedev | Vandalism, reverted. |
| 122232264 by Jeremyah Lanum @ 2022-06-11 00:50 | 1 | 2022-06-14 14:12 | jleedev | Vandalism, reverted. |
| 122349177 by Jeremyah Lanum @ 2022-06-14 03:06 | 1 | 2022-06-14 05:01 | jleedev | Vandalism, reverted. |
| 121950873 by theurbanexploringman @ 2022-06-04 19:23 Active block | 1 | 2022-06-05 18:08 | jleedev | It seems that Pleasant Ridge Manor East was demolished, but Edmund L. Thomas Juvenile Detention Center was not. |
| 2 | 2022-06-05 18:42 | theurbanexploringman Active block | Comment not displayed. To view it, please select the "Include blocked users" option. | |
| 121812167 by theurbanexploringman @ 2022-06-01 13:08 Active block | 1 | 2022-06-02 13:18 | jleedev | landuse=brownfield specifically exists to indicate that something was demolished, also it appears that Quick Mart's parking lot still exists. |
| 121477485 by Flight777 @ 2022-05-25 13:56 | 1 | 2022-05-25 13:58 | jleedev | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments |
| 121477326 by Mukesh Thapa @ 2022-05-25 13:52 | 1 | 2022-05-25 13:57 | jleedev | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments |
| 121445283 by avi32 @ 2022-05-24 20:57 | 1 | 2022-05-24 20:59 | jleedev | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments |
| 121438049 by Jeremyah Lanum @ 2022-05-24 18:06 | 1 | 2022-05-24 18:17 | jleedev | Vandalism, reverted. |
| 121375597 by derpytord @ 2022-05-23 15:26 Active block | 1 | 2022-05-24 15:44 | jleedev | Vandalism, reverted. |
| 121431424 by derpytord @ 2022-05-24 15:38 Active block | 1 | 2022-05-24 15:44 | jleedev | Vandalism, reverted |
| 121430544 by derpytord @ 2022-05-24 15:20 Active block | 1 | 2022-05-24 15:31 | jleedev | Vandalism, reverted. |
| 121341241 by derpytord @ 2022-05-23 01:40 Active block | 1 | 2022-05-24 15:02 | jleedev | This is vandalism. |
| 121340781 by derpytord @ 2022-05-23 01:10 Active block | 1 | 2022-05-24 15:01 | jleedev | This is vandalism. |
| 121339786 by derpytord @ 2022-05-23 00:08 Active block | 1 | 2022-05-24 15:01 | jleedev | It looks like these roads still exist, so there was no reason to delete them. |
| 121282750 by derpytord @ 2022-05-21 13:40 Active block | 1 | 2022-05-24 14:59 | jleedev | What is your purpose in deleting these driveways? Why delete the residential area? Why delete the path across the pond?This is not an appropriate way to map. You know this already. |
| 121260502 by derpytord @ 2022-05-20 20:51 Active block | 1 | 2022-05-24 14:56 | jleedev | Restored road in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/121429223 |
| 121259500 by derpytord @ 2022-05-20 20:04 Active block | 1 | 2022-05-24 14:53 | jleedev | Hello, in this changeset you deleted lots of roads that seem to still exist.Do not do this. |
| 121281515 by Bruh1 @ 2022-05-21 13:03 | 1 | 2022-05-21 13:42 | jleedev | Please try to save changes in one spot before moving to a different spot, and it's good to be at least a little more specific in your changeset description. |
| 121246131 by Jeremyah Lanum @ 2022-05-20 13:49 | 1 | 2022-05-20 13:59 | jleedev | Can you provide a source for any of this? |
| 121217579 by Stadtbahnfan1985 @ 2022-05-19 23:39 | 1 | 2022-05-19 23:44 | jleedev | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments |
| 120845171 by Jeremyah Lanum @ 2022-05-11 14:50 | 1 | 2022-05-19 23:17 | jleedev | Is this a real restaurant? |
| 120842822 by Jeremyah Lanum @ 2022-05-11 14:01 | 1 | 2022-05-19 23:14 | jleedev | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/121217061 |
| 120842616 by Jeremyah Lanum @ 2022-05-11 13:57 | 1 | 2022-05-19 23:11 | jleedev | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/121217008 |
| 121206890 by Jeremyah Lanum @ 2022-05-19 17:57 | 1 | 2022-05-19 22:04 | jleedev | Care to explain why this is trunk? |
| 120769401 by Jeremyah Lanum @ 2022-05-10 00:40 | 1 | 2022-05-19 21:43 | jleedev | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/121214685 |
| 121207609 by Jeremyah Lanum @ 2022-05-19 18:15 | 1 | 2022-05-19 21:34 | jleedev | Please use actual words in changeset comments. |
| 121208716 by paleshukgeo @ 2022-05-19 18:48 | 1 | 2022-05-19 18:51 | jleedev | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments |
| 121208664 by Bratananio @ 2022-05-19 18:46 | 1 | 2022-05-19 18:49 | jleedev | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments |
| 121197688 by cantece @ 2022-05-19 13:59 | 1 | 2022-05-19 14:06 | jleedev | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments |
| 121100503 by Flight777 @ 2022-05-17 13:18 | 1 | 2022-05-17 13:19 | jleedev | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments |
| 120805046 by Jeremyah Lanum @ 2022-05-10 17:53 | 1 | 2022-05-16 19:21 | jleedev | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/121066451 |
| 120942918 by Jeremyah Lanum @ 2022-05-13 15:41 | 1 | 2022-05-16 19:17 | jleedev | Don't add imaginary places to the map. Such changes will have to be reverted. |
| 121064115 by Jeremyah Lanum @ 2022-05-16 18:13 | 1 | 2022-05-16 19:15 | jleedev | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments |
| 119991255 by stadiaarcadia @ 2022-04-21 09:31 | 1 | 2022-04-21 17:27 | jleedev | Baseball field is the entire area which is already mapped. This is the infield. |
| 2 | 2022-04-21 21:02 | stadiaarcadia ♦109 | I've read the infield should look the same as the outfield. Both grass or both part of the sports field. Is there another way to fix this? | |
| 3 | 2022-04-21 21:08 | jleedev | It would be OK to extend the grass multipolygon for all the grass that you see. However, there should be one leisure=pitch that includes the entire area, grass and sand without any holes. | |
| 4 | 2022-04-22 07:52 | stadiaarcadia ♦109 | I agree. | |
| 119486411 by Melodicad @ 2022-04-08 21:55 | 1 | 2022-04-12 02:02 | jleedev | It seems unlikely that you can drive a car from Lawn Street to Mackey Street, so I've changed this back. |
| 119521556 by Melodicad @ 2022-04-10 02:13 | 1 | 2022-04-12 01:48 | jleedev | All names should be unabbreviated: St → StreetAlso, please use words in changeset descriptions, thanks. |
| 118167526 by Scharf Energy Systems @ 2022-03-06 17:09 | 1 | 2022-03-14 18:40 | jleedev | Are you adding fictional turn restrictions to try to prioritize a certain route? Please don't do that. |
| 2 | 2022-03-14 19:14 | Scharf Energy Systems ♦9 | Ok. I can remove those if they are a problem, or if it hasn't already been done. It was because it seemed like many applications didn't use the roads correctly. Is there a better way to do that? | |
| 3 | 2022-03-14 19:21 | jleedev | Generally speaking, this is controlled by the value of highway=*, and possibly by other tags such as maxspeed or lanes.Highway classification is a fairly involved topic that sparks lots of discussion, see https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Highway_classification as well as #highway-classification on http... | |
| 4 | 2022-03-14 19:27 | Scharf Energy Systems ♦9 | Ah ok. Ya I've been trying to map all these back roads as I drive them to correct their road type, surface, lanes, speed, etc. That probably makes a difference. I still see a lot of problems where sometime applications will avoid fixed roads because the real speed is less than whatever the d... | |
| 118257409 by theurbanexploringman @ 2022-03-09 01:09 Active block | 1 | 2022-03-09 01:13 | jleedev | Please explain your reasoning for deleting this driveway: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/548627289/history |
| 2 | 2022-03-09 06:05 | Trevor_1 ♦270 | I just reverted this changeset. I think we're going to have to keep doing this until he gets the message. | |
| 3 | 2022-03-15 13:09 | theurbanexploringman Active block | Comment not displayed. To view it, please select the "Include blocked users" option. | |
| 118257295 by theurbanexploringman @ 2022-03-09 01:01 Active block | 1 | 2022-03-09 01:08 | jleedev | This edit deletes houses and driveways. Why? |
| 2 | 2022-08-06 09:50 | Intrinsical ♦87 | reverted in changeset #124554307 --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118257295 | |
| 118256480 by theurbanexploringman @ 2022-03-09 00:05 Active block | 1 | 2022-03-09 00:39 | jleedev | Again, stop deleting roads. |
| 117926198 by theurbanexploringman @ 2022-02-28 01:01 Active block | 1 | 2022-03-08 01:40 | jleedev | What was the purpose of deleting these roads? |
| 117926625 by theurbanexploringman @ 2022-02-28 01:51 Active block | 1 | 2022-03-08 01:39 | jleedev | What was the purpose of deleting these roads? |
| 2 | 2022-03-09 00:08 | theurbanexploringman Active block | Comment not displayed. To view it, please select the "Include blocked users" option. | |
| 118142771 by theurbanexploringman @ 2022-03-05 22:43 Active block | 1 | 2022-03-08 01:35 | jleedev | What was the purpose of deleting these roads? |
| 118214210 by theurbanexploringman @ 2022-03-07 21:53 Active block | 1 | 2022-03-08 01:32 | jleedev | What was the purpose of deleting these roads? |
| 118199644 by theurbanexploringman @ 2022-03-07 14:27 Active block | 1 | 2022-03-08 01:31 | jleedev | What was the purpose of deleting these roads? |
| 117707646 by Dblcut3 @ 2022-02-22 03:28 | 1 | 2022-02-23 03:48 | jleedev | This is not a bus_guideway, reverting. |
| 117660756 by mitchmccoy34 @ 2022-02-21 03:19 | 1 | 2022-02-21 11:49 | jleedev | Does the building still exist? |
| 116641084 by Jerry_J @ 2022-01-26 22:06 | 1 | 2022-02-03 15:11 | jleedev | Why did you delete these driveways? |
| 88185290 by mwilliamsbc10 @ 2020-07-18 19:56 | 1 | 2022-01-04 14:20 | jleedev | Hello, do you have a source for this change? Parts of this don't seem to align with any of the imagery I can see, for example the geometry of the water, fairways, and paths.If you're using any other source, it's best to reference it so that other mappers can understand what's... |
| 2 | 2022-01-04 15:39 | mwilliamsbc10 ♦1 | Sorry, was using OSM for an unrelated project and I forgot to change the edits back after completion. I will work on it. Thanks for reminding me | |
| 3 | 2022-01-04 16:09 | jleedev | Thank you for the quick response. It's not a good idea to upload fictional edits. | |
| 110645179 by rolwirth @ 2021-09-03 02:21 | 1 | 2022-01-04 12:28 | jleedev | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments |
| 84716014 by mwilliamsbc10 @ 2020-05-05 20:01 | 1 | 2022-01-04 02:09 | jleedev | What's the meaning of this? |
| 115342141 by Polythene Pam @ 2021-12-24 16:53 | 1 | 2021-12-24 19:25 | jleedev | Seems to me that Fitch Way exists between Edgebrook Avenue and Whited Street. |
| 114895242 by matthewjacob3 @ 2021-12-13 19:23 | 1 | 2021-12-13 23:23 | jleedev | Verify whether the step_count will be the same or different. |
| 114682775 by stevea @ 2021-12-08 02:59 | 1 | 2021-12-11 21:26 | jleedev | What is "GAP Temp" supposed to be? |
| 2 | 2021-12-11 22:12 | stevea ♦304 | Whoops, thank you for catching this error of mine! It was a "holding container" for the Great Allegheny Passage trail portion in Pennsylvania. But I made an error with this and you caught it.I have corrected this by deleting the relation as some leftover elements during the creation ... | |
| 113784414 by NorthwestPAmapper @ 2021-11-15 02:55 Active block | 1 | 2021-11-15 22:06 | jleedev | These driveways seem to still exist:https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/909896174/historyhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/way/909896175/history |
| 2 | 2021-11-15 23:01 | NorthwestPAmapper Active block | Comment not displayed. To view it, please select the "Include blocked users" option. | |
| 3 | 2021-12-10 05:57 | ElliottPlack ♦926 | Hi there NorthwestPAmapper / urbanexplorermanPlease do not delete driveways just because doing so would make it easier to update a road. You have been blocked before (https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5366) for deleting items like this. Before resuming mapping, we'll need you to res... | |
| 112856953 by theurbanexploringman @ 2021-10-22 21:06 Active block | 1 | 2021-11-10 15:49 | jleedev | FYI, "Fine Wine & Good Spirits" only exists in Pennsylvania. Please double check the names of these.https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9194503430https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9182824406https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9180216256https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/916321... |
| 2 | 2021-11-10 16:13 | bhousel ♦278 | Good catch @jleedev - in the NSI project we should scope these to PA only, now that we have the ability to do so. | |
| 113373273 by ms1999021 @ 2021-11-04 14:48 | 1 | 2021-11-04 15:28 | jleedev | So all of these neighbourhoods don't have names? |
| 2 | 2021-11-05 12:56 | marczoutendijk ♦2,755 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5428Marc Zoutendijk OpenStreetMap Foundation Data Working Group | |
| 113336895 by ms1999021 @ 2021-11-03 15:04 | 1 | 2021-11-04 15:25 | jleedev | Why was this parking lot deleted? https://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=41.64625&mlon=-81.38868 |
| 2 | 2021-11-05 12:56 | marczoutendijk ♦2,755 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5428Marc Zoutendijk OpenStreetMap Foundation Data Working Group | |
| 113331711 by ms1999021 @ 2021-11-03 13:04 | 1 | 2021-11-04 15:18 | jleedev | Do these driveways not exist anymore? |
| 2 | 2021-11-05 12:56 | marczoutendijk ♦2,755 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5428Marc Zoutendijk OpenStreetMap Foundation Data Working Group | |
| 113241616 by theurbanexploringman @ 2021-11-01 15:09 Active block | 1 | 2021-11-01 18:05 | jleedev | Do these deleted roads not exist anymore? |
| 2 | 2021-11-01 19:14 | theurbanexploringman Active block | Comment not displayed. To view it, please select the "Include blocked users" option. | |
| 3 | 2021-11-01 19:33 | jleedev | Specifically right here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit#map=19/41.71483/-81.18743There were two driveways at the end of the cul-de-sac. Why did you delete them? | |
| 4 | 2021-11-01 19:55 | theurbanexploringman Active block | Comment not displayed. To view it, please select the "Include blocked users" option. | |
| 113249136 by Happy Hobo @ 2021-11-01 18:15 | 1 | 2021-11-01 18:22 | jleedev | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments |
| 113248219 by JJA57 @ 2021-11-01 17:47 | 1 | 2021-11-01 18:21 | jleedev | Please use words in changeset descriptions. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments for some explanation of why this is required. Thanks. |
| 112669978 by theurbanexploringman @ 2021-10-18 20:45 Active block | 1 | 2021-11-01 18:16 | jleedev | What is the purpose of this change? Many features were deleted: parking, landuse, corridor, barrier, hydrant. Are they all gone?It's not a good idea to delete things without an explanation. |
| 2 | 2021-11-01 19:15 | theurbanexploringman Active block | Comment not displayed. To view it, please select the "Include blocked users" option. | |
| 3 | 2021-11-08 21:08 | ZLima12 ♦252 | Can you please explain why you made these roads tertiary? | |
| 113117206 by dxperformance @ 2021-10-29 10:19 | 1 | 2021-10-29 13:20 | jleedev | Your office is located inside a parking garage? |
| 113034152 by spookypgh @ 2021-10-27 11:39 | 1 | 2021-10-27 14:41 | jleedev | Select the node and push X, or right click and choose Split.Also, you refer to ‘El Paso’, but w72650873 has no name, so maybe you can add it. |
| 112860807 by MVEMJSUNP @ 2021-10-23 01:46 | 1 | 2021-10-23 02:09 | jleedev | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments |
| 112421011 by panosfan @ 2021-10-12 14:33 | 1 | 2021-10-12 14:34 | jleedev | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments |
| 112044347 by NorthwestPAmapper @ 2021-10-03 18:18 Active block | 1 | 2021-10-07 14:48 | jleedev | Mass deletions like this continue to be an inappropriate way to map. |
| 2 | 2021-10-08 18:11 | NorthwestPAmapper Active block | Comment not displayed. To view it, please select the "Include blocked users" option. | |
| 112093729 by NorthwestPAmapper @ 2021-10-04 20:04 Active block | 1 | 2021-10-07 14:47 | jleedev | Mass deletions like this continue to be an inappropriate way to map. |
| 2 | 2021-10-08 18:11 | NorthwestPAmapper Active block | Comment not displayed. To view it, please select the "Include blocked users" option. | |
| 112099357 by NorthwestPAmapper @ 2021-10-05 01:23 Active block | 1 | 2021-10-07 14:45 | jleedev | Mass deletions like this continue to be an inappropriate way to map. |
| 2 | 2021-10-07 15:15 | DUGA ♦548 | Hi,Please tell me the reason that you removed everything within this area. | |
| 3 | 2021-10-07 18:33 | ElliottPlack ♦926 | This changeset has been reverted in full in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/112229801You cannot simply delete everything in an area and say sorry. The address nodes deleted were imported with full community agreement, as were the parking lots surveyed. It is fine to update something if i... | |
| 4 | 2021-10-08 18:11 | NorthwestPAmapper Active block | Comment not displayed. To view it, please select the "Include blocked users" option. | |
| 5 | 2021-10-08 18:13 | woodpeck ♦2,427 | I have reverted three other deletions by the same user, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5366 | |
| 111783143 by EchoesWhyNot @ 2021-09-27 18:43 | 1 | 2021-09-27 21:46 | jleedev | Already exists https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1371543275 |
| 111606392 by jrh31990 @ 2021-09-23 16:40 | 1 | 2021-09-23 16:59 | jleedev | Generally speaking, the ‘name’ tag should almost never contain a generic description of the feature. natural=water + water=pond is sufficient. |
| 2 | 2021-09-23 17:03 | jrh31990 ♦8 | ok, thank you. | |
| 111606097 by jrh31990 @ 2021-09-23 16:35 | 1 | 2021-09-23 16:57 | jleedev | Better would be highway=construction, construction=residential. |
| 2 | 2021-09-23 16:59 | jrh31990 ♦8 | ok, will adjust this next time. | |
| 111346851 by jrh31990 @ 2021-09-17 17:12 | 1 | 2021-09-18 14:20 | jleedev | Hello, I have some comments:1) I don't see the name "Hayden Run" on the USGS map, but I do see "Peggs Run". Unfortunately, the GNIS forms are offline and their list of names and citations are unavailable.Can you provide a source for the name "Hayden Run"?... |
| 2 | 2021-09-18 15:27 | jrh31990 ♦8 | Hayden run is the local knowledge name for the stream. I will log into my computer and do some more research on this. Thank you, moving forward I will not make These mistakes | |
| 111340593 by jrh31990 @ 2021-09-17 14:24 | 1 | 2021-09-17 17:09 | jleedev | I suspect that the Ohio River is more than 1.6 meters wide. |
| 2 | 2021-09-17 17:16 | jrh31990 ♦8 | I`ll update it thanks. | |
| 111317285 by Funnynick @ 2021-09-17 04:39 | 1 | 2021-09-17 16:25 | jleedev | It would appear that these roads are visible in Esri Clarity but are absent from more recent imagery including Bing, Esri, and PEMA, which suggests to me that they no longer exist. Can you explain what's going on here in more detail? |
| 2 | 2021-10-27 13:03 | DUGA ♦548 | Hi,The road you added as Cochran Ave was removed since 2014 when the new building came up.Several of your edits are completely nonsense and they cannot be verified. | |
| 3 | 2021-11-05 13:39 | SomeoneElse_Revert ♦70,576 | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 113409877 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly fictional edits where the editor has refused contact with the US community. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5410 and https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-di... | |
| 111169210 by mahahahaneapneap @ 2021-09-14 00:34 Active block | 1 | 2021-09-14 00:45 | jleedev | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments |
| 110734666 by pghb @ 2021-09-05 01:57 | 1 | 2021-09-05 12:10 | jleedev | Hello, if necessary please also update the relation https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5632798 to follow this segment. |
| 110478746 by bevalim @ 2021-08-30 20:11 | 1 | 2021-08-31 21:20 | jleedev | Again, it would be better to use amenity=atm for these, not amenity=bank. |
| 2 | 2021-09-04 20:10 | bevalim ♦3 | Ok, got it, I will use amenity=atm instead | |
| 110359051 by bevalim @ 2021-08-27 20:58 | 1 | 2021-08-27 22:10 | jleedev | These should all be amenity=atm not amenity=bank. |
| 2 | 2021-09-04 20:12 | bevalim ♦3 | Ok, done | |
| 110350023 by Ksushas @ 2021-08-27 16:14 | 1 | 2021-08-27 20:37 | jleedev | Both the bing and mapillary images show several plaques mounted with the no left turn sign, suggesting that this is a conditional restriction. Watch out for those. |
| 2 | 2021-11-02 07:06 | Ksushas ♦1 | Hi, thank you for your comment. We will be more attentive --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110350023 | |
| 107370594 by SteveKHayes @ 2021-07-03 22:06 | 1 | 2021-07-31 20:52 | jleedev | There's no toll gantry here either. |
| 2 | 2021-07-31 21:01 | SteveKHayes ♦6 | hi, are you looking at imagery as reference? maybe dated- cashless tolls were implemented and the gantry is in that location now. | |
| 3 | 2021-07-31 21:09 | SteveKHayes ♦6 | We can remove until image sets are current. | |
| 4 | 2021-07-31 21:19 | jleedev | The toll booth was demolished and it's an open highway.The toll gantry was constructed elsewhere: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/69653984#map=18/42.30835/-79.63377 | |
| 105456181 by bardny @ 2021-05-28 02:41 | 1 | 2021-07-31 17:17 | jleedev | Toll booths were demolished and not changed in-place to toll gantries. Toll gantries were constructed in a different spot. |
| 108849695 by jkoether @ 2021-07-29 22:51 | 1 | 2021-07-30 17:36 | jleedev | If these are steps, then they should be tagged with `highway=steps`. |
| 108500288 by Polythene Pam @ 2021-07-23 15:02 | 1 | 2021-07-23 20:10 | jleedev | Bessie Way is pretty visible in aerials between Lobinger and Price, but not between Price and Cherry. |
| 108456645 by roshanparajuli @ 2021-07-23 03:06 | 1 | 2021-07-23 14:10 | jleedev | This change removed the amenity tags. |
| 108456719 by roshanparajuli @ 2021-07-23 03:09 | 1 | 2021-07-23 14:10 | jleedev | This change removed the amenity tags. |
| 108456981 by roshanparajuli @ 2021-07-23 03:20 | 1 | 2021-07-23 14:10 | jleedev | This change removed the amenity tags. |
| 108457776 by roshanparajuli @ 2021-07-23 03:48 | 1 | 2021-07-23 14:09 | jleedev | Streets should be spelled out in full — "West Hersheypark Drive", not "W Hersheypark Drive". |
| 2 | 2021-08-04 01:35 | roshanparajuli ♦10 | Thank you for your feedback, i will implement this. | |
| 108319486 by spookypgh @ 2021-07-20 12:38 | 1 | 2021-07-21 15:36 | jleedev | This also changed Dornestic Street from residential to steps, which looks like an error, so I'm changing it back. |
| 107931534 by NorthwestPAmapper @ 2021-07-13 19:42 Active block | 1 | 2021-07-13 19:52 | jleedev | Please explain why all these apartments should be deleted. |
| 2 | 2021-07-13 20:05 | NorthwestPAmapper Active block | Comment not displayed. To view it, please select the "Include blocked users" option. | |
| 3 | 2021-07-13 20:09 | jleedev | That should be done in a single changeset. Anything else reads as vandalism.Besides, apartments as areas is pretty sensible. | |
| 4 | 2021-07-13 20:11 | NorthwestPAmapper Active block | Comment not displayed. To view it, please select the "Include blocked users" option. | |
| 107931405 by NorthwestPAmapper @ 2021-07-13 19:38 Active block | 1 | 2021-07-13 19:53 | jleedev | Please explain these deletions. |
| 2 | 2021-07-13 19:53 | jleedev | This school sure seems to exist: https://www.euclidschools.org/bluestoneelementary_home.aspx | |
| 3 | 2021-07-13 20:05 | NorthwestPAmapper Active block | Comment not displayed. To view it, please select the "Include blocked users" option. | |
| 4 | 2021-07-13 20:07 | jleedev | You should not have deleted the apartments without creating the nodes. | |
| 5 | 2021-07-13 20:09 | NorthwestPAmapper Active block | Comment not displayed. To view it, please select the "Include blocked users" option. | |
| 107747691 by NorthwestPAmapper @ 2021-07-10 13:22 Active block | 1 | 2021-07-13 20:03 | jleedev | All these deletions need an explanation. |
| 2 | 2021-07-13 20:07 | NorthwestPAmapper Active block | Comment not displayed. To view it, please select the "Include blocked users" option. | |
| 107589140 by DrDisaster @ 2021-07-07 20:50 | 1 | 2021-07-09 18:13 | jleedev | Please use meaningful changeset comments. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments |
| 107719914 by DuhC0mmunity @ 2021-07-09 18:00 | 1 | 2021-07-09 18:06 | jleedev | Please use meaningful changeset comments. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments |
| 107719896 by Mapvic @ 2021-07-09 17:59 | 1 | 2021-07-09 18:06 | jleedev | Please use meaningful changeset comments. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments |
| 106642498 by SteveKHayes @ 2021-06-19 18:29 | 1 | 2021-07-08 14:30 | jleedev | Can you describe what you're trying to do here? I have two suggestions:1) The slip roads should be `highway=primary_link` for the benefit of routers.2) I think the intention here is that this is a 'turbo' roundabout, i.e. where the driver must be in the correct lane to access ... |
| 2 | 2021-07-08 17:35 | SteveKHayes ♦6 | thank you for the review. traveling north on rt 60 to make a right turn to rt 20 requires the driver to take a “right turn only” lane that parallels the outer ring of the main roundabout. as long as tags place the driver in that righthand lane of rt60, (versus the primary roundabout ent... | |
| 106927462 by zandasmith @ 2021-06-25 00:23 | 1 | 2021-06-29 14:44 | jleedev | If you can, please provide a source as well as an estimated date that it will reopen. |
| 106600167 by colgza @ 2021-06-18 16:50 | 1 | 2021-06-23 13:59 | jleedev | I-579 should be highway=motorway all the way up to where it joins I-279. Similar to how the junction of I-79 and I-279 does not have any motorway_link. I'll change this. |
| 2 | 2021-06-23 14:03 | colgza ♦32 | Thank you. This mess of roads is extremely confusing. | |
| 106597411 by colgza @ 2021-06-18 15:51 | 1 | 2021-06-18 17:23 | jleedev | Why is the entire I-279 HOV a motorway_link? |
| 2 | 2021-06-18 20:42 | colgza ♦32 | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dmotorway_link#Parallel_carriageways | |
| 3 | 2021-06-18 20:43 | colgza ♦32 | > A parallel motorway carriageway (US: parallel lanes) such as a collector/distributor road or physically separated HOV lanes / reversible lanes should be tagged as motorway_link. If the major road is classed as trunk or principal, then that class of _link shall be used instead. | |
| 4 | 2021-06-18 20:48 | colgza ♦32 | In short, physically-seperated HOV lanes are supposed to be tagged as a motorway-link. | |
| 5 | 2021-06-18 21:55 | jleedev | Got it, thanks. | |
| 106132232 by rojganes @ 2021-06-10 06:29 | 1 | 2021-06-10 11:46 | jleedev | This road is certainly named "Lysle Avenue". Some street signs omit the suffix, but that's not the proper name. |
| 2 | 2021-06-11 09:42 | abvincen ♦34 | Hi,Thank you for providing the information.Apologies for editing the suffix of the Roadname,I've made the necessary changes in the changeset (#106203600).Looking forward to learn more from you!Regards,abvincen --- Published using OSMCha: htt... | |
| 105958393 by payelgh @ 2021-06-07 09:08 | 1 | 2021-06-07 15:53 | jleedev | I find this change unlikely. While it's common in certain areas for street signs to omit the name's suffix, TIGER, USPS, and Allegheny County GIS are all in agreement that the street's proper name includes the suffix here. I've added it back. |
| 2 | 2021-06-08 10:45 | payelgh ♦15 | Hi,Thank you for providing the information and correcting the edit.I've edited the suffix of the Road name based on Driver feedback and streetsign imagery available on OSM.But going forward I'll keep the learning and add suffix as per Tiger data.Looking forward to learn more from... | |
| 105958698 by mubbasa @ 2021-06-07 09:13 | 1 | 2021-06-07 15:49 | jleedev | I find this change unlikely. While it's common in certain areas for street signs to omit the name's suffix, TIGER, USPS, and Allegheny County GIS are all in agreement that the street's proper name includes the suffix here. I've added it back. |
| 2 | 2021-06-08 10:44 | mubbasa ♦5 | Hi,Thank you for providing the information and correcting the edit.I've edited the suffix of the Road name based on Driver feedback and streetsign imagery available on OSM.But going forward I'll keep the learning and add suffix as per Tiger data.Looking forward to learn more from... | |
| 105958276 by govvala @ 2021-06-07 09:07 | 1 | 2021-06-07 15:49 | jleedev | I find this change unlikely. While it's common in certain areas for street signs to omit the name's suffix, TIGER, USPS, and Allegheny County GIS are all in agreement that the street's proper name includes the suffix here. I've added it back. |
| 2 | 2021-06-08 10:45 | abvincen ♦34 | Hi,Thank you for providing the information and correcting the edit.I've edited the suffix of the Road name based on Driver feedback and streetsign imagery available on OSM.But going forward I'll keep the learning and add suffix as per Tiger data.Looking forward to learn more from... | |
| 105807429 by mariotomo @ 2021-06-04 02:58 | 1 | 2021-06-04 03:05 | jleedev | Note that layer=-1 doesn't mean "underground" |
| 2 | 2021-06-04 14:05 | mariotomo ♦1,895 | hola jleedev! thanks for commenting. I checked the wiki regarding the 'underground' and my bad, you're right. the case in question is/was a highway=service marked as layer=-1, running under a roof, part of a larger building.the wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:lay... | |
| 3 | 2021-06-04 15:53 | jleedev | Well, in this case it would be appropriate to add `covered=yes` to the highways (or just the covered portion), which is what the wiki page is hinting at.This can be useful, for example it will prompt StreetComplete to ask for the maxheight.I think the wiki page could be reworded, to indicate... | |
| 4 | 2021-06-04 16:10 | mariotomo ♦1,895 | some time ago I authored the third change to this object: http://osm.mapki.com/history/way.php?id=241387973 (a service road with a short section going under a roof / porch in front of a building.)having examples on which to rely, and good consistent documentation will allow us map uniformly. :-) | |
| 5 | 2021-06-04 16:15 | mariotomo ♦1,895 | possibly check the three ways included in this changeset: 810060918, 805801663, 613850311 | |
| 98076129 by jleedev @ 2021-01-24 21:47 | 1 | 2021-05-11 04:29 | DUGA ♦548 | What exactly is this?https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/38502925/history#map=15/40.0491/-77.5123&layers=N |
| 2 | 2021-05-11 09:58 | jleedev | Was likely broken by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/100323463 | |
| 104149443 by PasseroRoads @ 2021-05-04 23:36 | 1 | 2021-05-05 00:59 | jleedev | A road that physically doesn't exist shouldn't be tagged as highway=primary. Use abandoned:highway or demolished:highway. |
| 103869515 by colgza @ 2021-04-29 20:55 | 1 | 2021-04-30 18:47 | jleedev | Should the stop ids not simply be `ref=*`? It's in common use for bus stops and whatnot, and it's not particular to the GTFS feed, they are posted on the signs. |
| 2 | 2021-04-30 18:51 | colgza ♦32 | Perhaps, I just copied from the GTFS feed.I'm not sure if I'll continue to do that, however. | |
| 103209145 by swimdb @ 2021-04-19 15:40 | 1 | 2021-04-22 15:58 | jleedev | Can you please cool it with the inflammatory changeset descriptions? They are not relevant to anything. |
| 103074600 by kylebakerpa05 @ 2021-04-16 17:44 Active block | 1 | 2021-04-16 18:10 | jleedev | Why delete the parking lots? |
| 2 | 2021-04-17 15:00 | kylebakerpa05 Active block | Comment not displayed. To view it, please select the "Include blocked users" option. | |
| 3 | 2021-04-17 15:19 | jleedev | That's not an acceptable way to map. I have restored them in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/103107644 | |
| 4 | 2021-04-17 15:23 | jleedev | To be more clear: You should not be deleting features that really exist on the ground and are properly formatted. If you're remapping something it should be done as a single change so it does not look like you are deleting things. | |
| 103062493 by kylebakerpa05 @ 2021-04-16 13:11 Active block | 1 | 2021-04-16 15:59 | jleedev | "SR" is correct. |
| 2 | 2021-04-16 16:04 | kylebakerpa05 Active block | Comment not displayed. To view it, please select the "Include blocked users" option. | |
| 103068939 by kylebakerpa05 @ 2021-04-16 15:26 Active block | 1 | 2021-04-16 15:51 | jleedev | service=parking_aisle seems appropriate for those roads, and that sure looks unpaved in the imagery -- if you have a source that says otherwise please include it. |
| 2 | 2021-04-16 16:05 | kylebakerpa05 Active block | Comment not displayed. To view it, please select the "Include blocked users" option. | |
| 103069048 by kylebakerpa05 @ 2021-04-16 15:28 Active block | 1 | 2021-04-16 15:42 | jleedev | Elevation should be given in meters, not feet. |
| 2 | 2021-04-16 16:05 | kylebakerpa05 Active block | Comment not displayed. To view it, please select the "Include blocked users" option. | |
| 103061742 by kylebakerpa05 @ 2021-04-16 12:57 Active block | 1 | 2021-04-16 15:40 | jleedev | "SR" is correct. |
| 2 | 2021-04-16 16:05 | kylebakerpa05 Active block | Comment not displayed. To view it, please select the "Include blocked users" option. | |
| 3 | 2021-04-16 17:18 | clay_c ♦489 | No big deal. Each state has its own conventions for how it signs roads. ODOT is pretty consistent in signing them as "State Road" and mappers in Ohio have come to the consensus that refs should match signage. Likewise in Indiana. | |
| 103062858 by kylebakerpa05 @ 2021-04-16 13:19 Active block | 1 | 2021-04-16 15:37 | jleedev | "SR" is correct. |
| 2 | 2021-04-16 16:06 | kylebakerpa05 Active block | Comment not displayed. To view it, please select the "Include blocked users" option. | |
| 102893517 by Polythene Pam @ 2021-04-14 01:54 | 1 | 2021-04-14 02:32 | jleedev | The barrier at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/106057698 should be adjusted too, if this is to be a bicycle=permissive route. |
| 94948981 by chrishent @ 2020-11-28 15:29 | 1 | 2021-04-13 14:44 | jleedev | I added a `barrier=gate` node at the location of the gate. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/94948981 |
| 102540583 by Kevin McCutcheon @ 2021-04-08 08:14 | 1 | 2021-04-08 12:38 | jleedev | This changeset deleted McCormick road. iD would have shown a warning prior to saving. Please be careful.Repaired in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102565199 |
| 102149599 by colgza @ 2021-04-01 21:36 | 1 | 2021-04-01 23:29 | jleedev | This area definitely includes three large apartment buildings (Cork Factory, The Yards at 3 Crossings, The Pennsylvanian), which might be good to detour around. I'd also stick to Liberty Ave and stay off of the busway/railway corridor. --- Published using... |
| 2 | 2021-04-02 00:04 | colgza ♦32 | I don't know how to draw borders for `landuse=*`. Perhaps I should stop. | |
| 3 | 2021-04-02 13:27 | colgza ♦32 | Please fix this for me. | |
| 4 | 2021-04-02 14:03 | jleedev | Sure thing. | |
| 101892683 by teknivil @ 2021-03-28 23:38 | 1 | 2021-03-29 13:18 | jleedev | What is the purpose of attaching a railway=abandoned to a road? |
| 2 | 2021-03-29 13:50 | teknivil ♦4 | sorry can you undo this | |
| 3 | 2021-03-29 14:09 | jleedev | Done | |
| 101854832 by teknivil @ 2021-03-27 21:23 | 1 | 2021-03-29 13:27 | jleedev | Please stick to changeset descriptions that have something to do with what it is you're mapping. |
| 100867500 by colgza @ 2021-03-11 22:42 | 1 | 2021-03-22 18:42 | jleedev | > Does `amenity=bus_station` imply that this is a bus terminal?The wiki says "A bus station consists of several bus stops, usually allowing people to travel in many different directions."This is true of all the East Busway stops in a very narrow sense: Each stop consists of two ... |
| 2 | 2021-03-22 18:48 | jleedev | It also may constitute tagging for the renderer, but I would find it perfectly reasonable to give the Busway stops more prominence than bus stops on surface streets. There's some value in distinguishing these from regular bus stops. | |
| 3 | 2021-03-23 15:45 | colgza ♦32 | BRT systems in general seem to do a great job at raising edge cases for OpenStreetMap. I was going to try to write a proposal for `station=busway`, but I ultimately gave up on that idea when I could not come up with a distinctive way to differentiate between a busway station, and a big fancy bus sto... | |
| 4 | 2021-03-23 15:49 | colgza ♦32 | Luckily for me, `public_transport=station` exists, and is general enough to include busway stations.However, iD automatically wants to add `amenity=bus_station` whenever I already have `public_transport=station`+`bus=yes`, so I don't completely know how to handle it. | |
| 100852443 by swimdb @ 2021-03-11 16:06 | 1 | 2021-03-22 15:04 | jleedev | Does the linked article have any use as a source or are you just pushing an agenda of some sort? |
| 100959860 by swimdb @ 2021-03-13 16:21 | 1 | 2021-03-22 15:02 | jleedev | The passive aggressive commentary is not called for. |
| 100102292 by swimdb @ 2021-02-27 15:20 | 1 | 2021-03-22 15:01 | jleedev | Please stop with the aggressive commentary. |
| 101439575 by swimdb @ 2021-03-21 13:34 | 1 | 2021-03-22 15:01 | jleedev | Please stop adding abrasive commentary that has nothing to do with what you are actually mapping. |
| 100913757 by p5TdmrV2UT @ 2021-03-12 14:08 | 1 | 2021-03-18 17:47 | jleedev | Did you intend to make the Wendy's drive-through horse-only? |
| 100508217 by PasseroRoads @ 2021-03-05 18:04 | 1 | 2021-03-12 14:28 | jleedev | I don't think motorways have businesses directly off of them. |
| 100076223 by Scharf Energy Systems @ 2021-02-26 21:51 | 1 | 2021-02-27 20:04 | jleedev | Was https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q7586774 incorrect? |
| 2 | 2021-02-28 00:34 | Scharf Energy Systems ♦9 | I may have deleted the wikidata accidently, but I don't think I was able to edit the info with it there. I'll see if I can re-add it. | |
| 3 | 2021-02-28 12:09 | jleedev | Thanks! | |
| 99840230 by kylebakerpa05 @ 2021-02-23 15:58 Active block | 1 | 2021-02-26 13:37 | jleedev | The OSM 'place' key generally goes by population, so given 3185 for Wesleyville and 3813 for Lawrence Park it would be reasonable to tag them both as place=village or both as place=town. The borough/township distinction isn't relevant. See: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:plac... |
| 2 | 2021-03-01 14:00 | kylebakerpa05 Active block | Comment not displayed. To view it, please select the "Include blocked users" option. | |
| 99695443 by RaptorHunter @ 2021-02-21 19:24 | 1 | 2021-02-22 14:50 | jleedev | Somehow this change introduced a lot of overlapping/repeating nodes, e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/909374974It would be good if they can be fixed. |
| 72897322 by jleedev @ 2019-08-01 12:48 | 1 | 2021-02-15 16:35 | recent changes ♦1 | Great work, but what about https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5891091/history ? |
| 2 | 2021-02-15 16:55 | jleedev | Fixed, thanks.It seems the existing relation doesn't go quite as far upstream, so that might have misled me. | |
| 98675735 by boopington @ 2021-02-04 03:59 | 1 | 2021-02-04 14:00 | jleedev | Why was this trailhead deleted? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8001839083 |
| 2 | 2021-02-05 03:22 | boopington ♦66 | is that what i deleted? my bad | |
| 3 | 2021-02-11 22:02 | jleedev | Corrected in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/98935376It goes without saying that you should be more careful. | |
| 97721915 by swimdb @ 2021-01-18 21:16 | 1 | 2021-01-18 21:24 | jleedev | Please use changeset descriptions that have something to do with what it is you're mapping instead of writing the same thing every time. |
| 89277960 by RaptorHunter @ 2020-08-12 04:37 | 1 | 2021-01-16 22:23 | jleedev | Do you have a source for *any* of these beach names? |
| 97539914 by rojganes @ 2021-01-15 07:38 | 1 | 2021-01-15 11:04 | jleedev | The bing streetside imagery indicates that North 4th Street is oneway all the way to Hamilton Avenue, so I've replaced the turn restriction. |
| 2 | 2021-01-18 06:05 | rojganes ♦10 | Hi,Thank you for reviewing and correcting the edit, Apologies for the miss in bing streetside imagery. Will ensure not to repeat such mistakes, Looking forward to learn more from you.Regards,rojganes. | |
| 97327920 by kylebakerpa05 @ 2021-01-11 20:01 Active block | 1 | 2021-01-12 14:25 | jleedev | Source: https://www.goerie.com/story/news/2020/12/31/state-pays-million-18-acre-gateway-presque-isle-state-park/4102026001/ |
| 2 | 2021-01-12 14:38 | kylebakerpa05 Active block | Comment not displayed. To view it, please select the "Include blocked users" option. | |
| 94956242 by kylebakerpa05 @ 2020-11-28 18:59 Active block | 1 | 2020-12-24 17:16 | jleedev | "PA 1006" is not how this ref is written — there are never four-digit "PA" routes. The correct tag is `ref:penndot=SR 1006`. See: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key%3Aref%3Apenndot |
| 95502526 by kylebakerpa05 @ 2020-12-08 17:26 Active block | 1 | 2020-12-09 13:54 | jleedev | Do you have a source for this change? It sure looks like this road exists. |
| 2 | 2020-12-09 13:55 | kylebakerpa05 Active block | Comment not displayed. To view it, please select the "Include blocked users" option. | |
| 3 | 2020-12-09 14:07 | jleedev | Then you leave the road and remove the name tag. | |
| 95376106 by NorthwestPAmapper @ 2020-12-06 18:07 Active block | 1 | 2020-12-06 21:27 | jleedev | Please be careful with the tags -- there was a wikidata tag that was lost in this edit.When editing with iD, you can press 'E' to extract a POI from a way into a node, and it will preserve the tags.You can also use 'Q' to square the corners of an area, which this building... |
| 95375387 by NorthwestPAmapper @ 2020-12-06 17:47 Active block | 1 | 2020-12-06 21:21 | jleedev | Roundabouts are not named with the name of the roads that they connect. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:junction%3Droundabout#Naming |
| 94714644 by eriepennsylvanianative @ 2020-11-24 15:13 Active block | 1 | 2020-11-24 20:58 | jleedev | For a smaller waterway such as this one (it appears to be about 10 feet wide at the mouth), `waterway=stream` might be a better fit than river. |
| 94721173 by eriepennsylvanianative @ 2020-11-24 17:39 Active block | 1 | 2020-11-24 20:54 | jleedev | Do you have a source for this address? It's not listed at https://www.dcnr.pa.gov/StateParks/FindAPark/ErieBluffsStatePark/Pages/default.aspx |
| 94710539 by jleedev @ 2020-11-24 13:48 | 1 | 2020-11-24 13:57 | eriepennsylvanianative Active block | Comment not displayed. To view it, please select the "Include blocked users" option. |
| 2 | 2020-11-24 13:57 | eriepennsylvanianative Active block | Comment not displayed. To view it, please select the "Include blocked users" option. | |
| 3 | 2020-11-24 14:04 | jleedev | Have you read the wiki yet? I'll provide yet another link in case you've forgotten. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr | |
| 4 | 2020-11-24 14:08 | jleedev | Specifically, addr:city is for "The name of the city as given in postal addresses" and has no relationship to the administrative boundaries. | |
| 5 | 2020-11-24 14:44 | eriepennsylvanianative Active block | Comment not displayed. To view it, please select the "Include blocked users" option. | |
| 6 | 2020-11-24 15:27 | jleedev | Thank you for responding.In many cases you can click on a tag or key to jump to the wiki page. Some things might seem self-explanatory, but have certain quirks that are agreed upon by the community.Another useful reference is https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice. In particular, ... | |
| 7 | 2020-11-24 15:36 | clay_c ♦489 | addr:city typically indicates the post office that is assigned to serve a particular address. Not every municipality has its own post office. In this case, Erie's post office seems to serve smaller neighboring municipalities. | |
| 94517834 by ZenithTheFox @ 2020-11-20 18:24 Active block | 1 | 2020-11-23 23:44 | jleedev | Partially reverted in 94666899 |
| 94656264 by eriepennsylvanianative @ 2020-11-23 18:54 Active block | 1 | 2020-11-23 20:28 | jleedev | More vandalism. |
| 94557081 by ZenithTheFox @ 2020-11-21 18:44 Active block | 1 | 2020-11-23 20:26 | jleedev | More road vandalism. |
| 94552666 by ZenithTheFox @ 2020-11-21 16:46 Active block | 1 | 2020-11-23 20:24 | jleedev | More inappropriate road deletions. |
| 94517368 by ZenithTheFox @ 2020-11-20 18:12 Active block | 1 | 2020-11-23 20:18 | jleedev | More vandalism. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/94517368 |
| 94512605 by ZenithTheFox @ 2020-11-20 16:31 Active block | 1 | 2020-11-23 20:13 | jleedev | More vandalism. |
| 94516482 by ZenithTheFox @ 2020-11-20 17:52 Active block | 1 | 2020-11-23 20:12 | jleedev | Another improper mass deletion. |
| 94654622 by eriepennsylvanianative @ 2020-11-23 18:15 Active block | 1 | 2020-11-23 18:38 | jleedev | I repeat myself: Zip code 16509 is Erie, PA. For example, the web page for Wegmans at https://www.wegmans.com/stores/erie-peach-st-pa/ says Erie, PA 16509. I will be correcting these.Please read the wiki and understand that tags are used in certain ways https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:ad... |
| 94641805 by ZenithTheFox @ 2020-11-23 13:42 Active block | 1 | 2020-11-23 14:19 | jleedev | Deleting everything inside the park is an unacceptable way to map. |
| 2 | 2020-11-23 14:52 | ZenithTheFox Active block | Comment not displayed. To view it, please select the "Include blocked users" option. | |
| 94642540 by ZenithTheFox @ 2020-11-23 13:59 Active block | 1 | 2020-11-23 14:17 | jleedev | This changeset deleted all of the roads inside the park. |
| 2 | 2020-11-23 14:39 | ppjj ♦56 | Not just the roads, it deleted everything... | |
| 3 | 2020-11-23 14:56 | ZenithTheFox Active block | Comment not displayed. To view it, please select the "Include blocked users" option. | |
| 4 | 2020-11-23 16:18 | iandees ♦723 | ZenithTheFox: please feel free to fix the existing data. Don't delete the whole thing and replace it. There's a lot of data there and most of it is correct. | |
| 5 | 2020-11-23 16:19 | iandees ♦723 | I reverted this and similar changesets in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/94645781 and have since been adding details since. | |
| 94070948 by Polythene Pam @ 2020-11-13 15:29 | 1 | 2020-11-17 12:41 | jleedev | Could you add more detail? Is it posted as private, is there a barrier, or does the road not exist? With these tags it's still a public foot path, which might be a little odd. |
| 2 | 2020-11-17 12:52 | Polythene Pam ♦2 | We tried to bike down this road, but there are a lot of abandoned cars on it that completely block the roadway, and the road surface is covered with leaves, sticks, and small trees growing. It basically does not exist any more. | |
| 94111442 by buildingroadfixer12 @ 2020-11-14 16:00 Active block | 1 | 2020-11-16 13:21 | jleedev | A railway=abandoned should *often* be simply left alone. It can provide a visual clue as to the state of the tracks on the ground, or the path of the right-of-way can be useful for other mapping, and in longer cases might become a rail trail. |
| 93944622 by buildingroadfixer12 @ 2020-11-11 17:55 Active block | 1 | 2020-11-12 10:52 | jleedev | For instance, if you go to their website https://whisperingwoodsgc.com they give their address as "Erie, PA 16506". You'll find this to be true for all of these addresses. |
| 93941992 by buildingroadfixer12 @ 2020-11-11 17:12 Active block | 1 | 2020-11-11 17:50 | jleedev | Again, you are using addr:city incorrectly. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr has the details. |
| 93941439 by Jakethedog2004 @ 2020-11-11 16:58 Active block | 1 | 2020-11-11 17:10 | jleedev | Please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr before you continue down this road. Tags have certain meanings, and addr:city goes along with addr:postcode. It's not correct to use the enclosing administrative boundary here. |
| 93940834 by Jakethedog2004 @ 2020-11-11 16:44 Active block | 1 | 2020-11-11 16:58 | jleedev | What exactly does "fixed bus stop" mean? This essentially amounts to vandalism.Please respond. |
| 91188783 by ZenithTheFox @ 2020-09-20 21:07 Active block | 1 | 2020-11-11 15:15 | jleedev | I'm very curious if there's a source for these names. |
| 92433834 by Jakethedog2004 @ 2020-10-13 18:39 Active block | 1 | 2020-11-11 14:57 | jleedev | Just to be clear, are these neighborhood boundaries based on any real source or are they your own invention? |
| 87866727 by ZenithTheFox @ 2020-07-12 01:10 Active block | 1 | 2020-11-11 14:03 | jleedev | As far as I can tell, both the names "South Kearsarge Community Park" and "Village of South Kearsarge" have no basis in reality. Please, do you have a source here? |
| 92063221 by Jakethedog2004 @ 2020-10-06 17:41 Active block | 1 | 2020-11-10 23:30 | jleedev | Don't create fictional places. |
| 92063248 by Jakethedog2004 @ 2020-10-06 17:41 Active block | 1 | 2020-11-10 23:29 | jleedev | Do not create fictional places. |
| 93874161 by Jakethedog2004 @ 2020-11-10 16:49 Active block | 1 | 2020-11-10 23:19 | jleedev | Don't add fictional places! |
| 92542016 by boopington @ 2020-10-15 20:03 | 1 | 2020-10-16 17:35 | jleedev | Re: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/547059780/historyIt can be preferable to keep a demolished building around if new features have not yet been mapped on top of it.And please use more descriptive changeset comments. |
| 2 | 2020-10-16 19:39 | boopington ♦66 | There have though, parking | |
| 90330256 by Fluffy89502 @ 2020-09-03 03:04 | 1 | 2020-09-04 21:18 | jleedev | Millers Road is 55mph and divided for a good 4.5 miles here. Never mind the questionable mass edit in the first place, why should this not be trunk? |
| 2 | 2020-09-04 21:24 | Fluffy89502 ♦34 | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dtrunk#International_equivalence | |
| 3 | 2020-09-04 21:34 | iandees ♦723 | Fluffy89502, please stop making large scale changes without feedback from the community. The wiki is a set of guidelines and is not necessarily agreed-upon. If you feel strongly about these changes, please post to talk-us and the OSM US Slack before continuing. | |
| 89815584 by maptasticvoyage @ 2020-08-23 16:54 | 1 | 2020-08-23 18:53 | jleedev | You have already been asked to use descriptive changeset comments. |
| 89596341 by ottwiz @ 2020-08-18 21:07 | 1 | 2020-08-19 20:36 | jleedev | Generally speaking a landuse=residential should not cover the entire city including commercial areas, schools, cemeteries, etc. but should be limited to just the areas "having predominantly residential buildings such as houses or apartment buildings". https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Ta... |
| 2 | 2020-08-20 06:58 | ottwiz ♦385 | Oh okay, i'll modify it then (when i can, because my eyes are a bit red now). I actually know where the commercial area is, the schools in my opinion are inside the residential area, that's what I did in Rákospalota, Budapest. "Iskola" means school in hungarian. so by this... | |
| 3 | 2020-08-20 07:12 | ottwiz ♦385 | (btw red eyes here means i stared the screen too much yesterday) | |
| 4 | 2020-08-20 14:11 | jleedev | Including schools in a residential area seems to have some traction with other mappers. I'm personally not a fan but would not object to it. | |
| 5 | 2020-08-20 14:16 | ottwiz ♦385 | It's weird, because actually I gotta told that I can freely put schools in a residential area. But see this: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/838564036This school is in the middle of a warren (lots of soviet blocks). In Moundsville, the school is clearly not in a residential zone. | |
| 89546968 by TheAdventurer64 @ 2020-08-18 04:19 | 1 | 2020-08-18 14:08 | jleedev | Please try to use changeset descriptions that have at least a little bit to do with what it is you're mapping. |
| 2 | 2020-08-18 16:30 | TheAdventurer64 ♦107 | Noted. Will do!Thanks,TheAdventurer64 | |
| 88789310 by Polythene Pam @ 2020-07-31 15:24 | 1 | 2020-08-04 20:22 | jleedev | `service=alley` is generally appropriate for roads that provide access to garages and rear entrances, please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:service%3Dalley |
| 88943192 by Polythene Pam @ 2020-08-04 18:32 | 1 | 2020-08-04 20:10 | jleedev | Cemetery roads are not highway=residential, they should be highway=service.Nodes that make up a road should not be tagged with the name of the road. |
| 88942506 by Polythene Pam @ 2020-08-04 18:08 | 1 | 2020-08-04 20:08 | jleedev | Please don't do this.- It's fine for roads to be unnamed. It's spatially obvious what the road is inside of, and it would make turn-by-turn navigation annoying, especially for fake names such as these.- The names you've used here are purely fictional unless you can provide so... |
| 85579710 by boopington @ 2020-05-22 02:51 | 1 | 2020-07-30 18:01 | jleedev | This changeset removed a fixme tag. Did you verify the name? |
| 2 | 2020-07-30 18:38 | boopington ♦66 | yes | |
| 3 | 2020-07-30 20:07 | jleedev | Thanks, do you have a source for it? The signs say North Morganza Road, and the county data is out of date. | |
| 4 | 2020-07-31 19:57 | boopington ♦66 | it is? it was fine for me. | |
| 88152913 by RaptorHunter @ 2020-07-17 16:40 | 1 | 2020-07-22 18:26 | jleedev | This is a stream, not a river |
| 84730984 by RaptorHunter @ 2020-05-06 05:06 | 1 | 2020-07-22 16:13 | jleedev | From the wiki: "This area should envelop the full grounds of the school including all the buildings, sports facilities and grounds." https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dschool |
| 87215935 by OrdinaryScarlett @ 2020-06-27 00:12 | 1 | 2020-07-19 17:51 | jleedev | Hello, according to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:junction%3Droundabout, a roundabout should not be named with the name of the road it connects. |
| 86995702 by user_5359 @ 2020-06-22 19:15 | 1 | 2020-07-08 13:51 | jleedev | Do you have a source for the movie theater not being closed? |
| 2 | 2020-07-08 15:31 | user_5359 ♦19,376 | The version before says amenity=cinema, you add a disused:amenity=theatre and I corrected you error (it isn‘t a good idea to a have amenity and a disused:amenity key). Why you didn‘t add the correct disused:amenity=cinema? | |
| 3 | 2020-07-08 16:10 | jleedev | I didn't make any edit, someone else did, and they clearly wrote in the changeset comment that the movie theater is permanently closed. "Correcting" tag errors like this is not something that should be done. | |
| 84446581 by RaptorHunter @ 2020-05-01 01:59 | 1 | 2020-05-28 23:04 | jleedev | Gas station pumps are usually building=roof. |
| 84128177 by RaptorHunter @ 2020-04-26 04:36 | 1 | 2020-05-14 20:40 | jleedev | Do you have a reason for deleting the school grounds? |
| 78934743 by Patrick Breiner @ 2019-12-27 16:49 | 1 | 2020-03-10 11:49 | jleedev | Do you have a source for the name "Green Tree Road"? |
| 2 | 2020-03-11 14:47 | Patrick Breiner ♦2 | thanks for scoping this. i got the name (which i now believe is erroneous) from google maps. the municipality provided a PDF map to Roadbotics. upon further investigation the PDF map provided by Scott Township has this road listed simply as "Alley" | |
| 80916044 by Bri Bond @ 2020-02-12 17:00 | 1 | 2020-02-13 18:36 | jleedev | This changeset contained some accidental node drags. Please heed the warnings that iD shows before saving. |
| 80504621 by rahuzod @ 2020-02-04 02:23 | 1 | 2020-02-05 04:06 | jleedev | Commercial parking lots generally don't have access=private. |
| 2 | 2020-02-06 03:15 | rahuzod ♦3 | Hi,Thanks for reviewing and correcting the edit.Apologies for the incorrect access tag.I will ensure not to repeat the mistake again.Regards,rahuzod. | |
| 77579329 by baigzake @ 2019-11-26 13:56 | 1 | 2020-01-01 14:36 | jleedev | 1) Firwood Drive is very close but not connected to Bower Hill Road. Please be careful as this changeset broke routing.2) This change is based on outdated imagery. North Wren Drive and Firwood Drive connect at a point, and the parking to the west no longer exists. My prior edit to North Wren Dri... |
| 2 | 2020-01-03 06:12 | baigzake ♦2 | Hi,Thanks for your comment and correction of edit. I've edited this based on mapbox and assumed it to be latest, apologies for the edit. I shall be careful while editing hereafter. Regarding the other comment (they moved north wren"", would you help me with the changeset so that we ... | |
| 3 | 2020-01-03 14:49 | jleedev | Sure, it was this: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/67162631I appreciate that it's not feasible to look at the changeset description for every object in view before making changes. I'm looking for ways to clearly express when on-the-ground features diverge from aerial imagery, s... | |
| 4 | 2020-01-07 04:46 | baigzake ♦2 | Hi,Thanks for understanding that. I totally agree that it would confuse the next person editing through the same area. Looking forward to learn better practices from you.Regards,baigzake | |
| 67162631 by jleedev @ 2019-02-13 13:10 | 1 | 2020-01-01 14:35 | jleedev | 1) Firwood Drive is very close but not connected to Bower Hill Road. Please be careful as this changeset broke routing.2) This change is based on outdated imagery. North Wren Drive and Firwood Drive connect at a point, and the parking to the west no longer exists. My prior edit to North Wren Dri... |
| 2 | 2020-01-01 14:36 | jleedev | (I'm an idiot and comment on the wrong changesets) | |
| 75064398 by rkkarnee @ 2019-09-29 14:52 | 1 | 2019-10-19 15:12 | jleedev | This only applies to trucks over 44' long. |
| 2 | 2019-10-23 10:33 | rkkarnee ♦8 | Hi,Thanks for reviewing and correcting the edit. It's a mistake from my end. I missed adding lenght restriction in the syntax. I will make sure to check the syntaxes before uploading changes. We are always happy to engage with the OSM community and learn form them.Regards,rkkarnee. | |
| 74572807 by jleedev @ 2019-09-17 11:11 | 1 | 2019-09-17 11:11 | jleedev | municipality * |
| 73730828 by N50 @ 2019-08-26 02:43 | 1 | 2019-09-06 12:19 | jleedev | What's the point? There's no harm in having a human-readable link, and iD adds them automatically. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/73730828 |
| 62881267 by ekkakkas @ 2018-09-24 13:47 | 1 | 2019-08-26 12:40 | jleedev | This doesn't reopen for another week. What's your source for this change? |
| 54086041 by GeoKitten_import @ 2017-11-26 03:37 | 1 | 2019-07-22 12:29 | jleedev | One more multipolygon that landed on top of other buildings :) |
| 68959201 by jleedev @ 2019-04-06 18:48 | 1 | 2019-04-06 18:49 | jleedev | ideally someone should import the official data with leisure=nature_reserve, and tag specific areas as natural=wood or leisure=park as appropriate. |
| 61806194 by kyl416 @ 2018-08-19 23:19 | 1 | 2018-08-23 10:39 | jleedev | pennsylvania's townships are 8, not 7. |
| 2 | 2018-08-23 10:52 | kyl416 ♦1 | In Monroe County our townships are not the same thing as individual towns. They're one step above that, while the individual towns/villages/etc that you would put on your mailing address are part of those townships.i.e. Pocono Pines is in Tobyhanna township, while the village of Tobyhanna, ... | |
| 3 | 2018-08-23 11:42 | jleedev | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/United_States_admin_levelAs far as I know, Pennsylvania is pretty uniform. What's different about Monroe County?Cities, boroughs, and townships are [boundary=administrative][admin_level=8][border_type=whatever][place=whatever]. They should subdivide t... | |
| 4 | 2018-08-23 11:46 | jleedev | The main point here is that unincorporated communities and census-designated places — even though they are locally known as towns and villages, and have post offices and addresses — are not "administrative boundaries" and therefore don't have a value for admin_level at all... | |
| 61699468 by jleedev @ 2018-08-15 23:16 | 1 | 2018-08-16 02:45 | jleedev | Importing townships from TIGER 2017. The existing data was from TIGER 2008, but only included cities and boroughs. Generally speaking this replaces geometry on the existing boundaries with the newer data. The county boundaries in some cases are glued to the rivers, in which case I tried to leave the... |
| 58015869 by thetornado76 @ 2018-04-11 19:39 | 1 | 2018-04-11 19:52 | jleedev | Looks like at least one multipolygon goofed up here: https://osm.org/go/ZWsernWUk |
| 2 | 2018-04-15 09:51 | thetornado76 ♦162 | Thanks for remove the duplicate building | |
| 53319346 by Karthoo_import @ 2017-10-28 14:31 | 1 | 2018-02-25 21:43 | jleedev | It looks like a large number of nodes without ways were added here. |
| 55536843 by Roadsguy @ 2018-01-18 01:03 | 1 | 2018-02-24 21:03 | jleedev | Hello, was the label node on Elizabeth Township deleted for any reason? |
| 56040557 by GeoKitten_import @ 2018-02-03 21:42 | 1 | 2018-02-04 00:40 | jleedev | Looks like a duplicate here: https://osm.org/go/ZWtaPCDl~ |
| 2 | 2018-02-09 16:30 | GeoKitten ♦16 | Good eye. I was about to fix it but it looks like you already did. Thanks. | |
| 3 | 2018-02-09 16:32 | jleedev | I've caught several of these actually — are you properly searching for multipolygon buildings that are already mapped? | |
| 4 | 2018-02-10 19:42 | GeoKitten ♦16 | Actually, I might not be. Maybe JOSM's validator doesn't work for multipolygon buildings. I will investigate the issue and manually inspect the data I upload for multipolygon building-releated issues. | |
| 54654518 by Karthoo_import @ 2017-12-15 14:16 | 1 | 2017-12-16 14:33 | jleedev | 547060418 looks pretty bogus to me. |
| 53085017 by Yaten_import @ 2017-10-20 00:19 | 1 | 2017-10-20 12:05 | jleedev | Way 533697829 overlaps an existing building |
| 2 | 2017-10-20 20:18 | Yaten_import ♦1 | D'oh, thanks! Thought I grabbed them all. | |
| 46743306 by Roadsguy @ 2017-03-10 16:44 | 1 | 2017-03-14 16:06 | jleedev | I would argue that putting multiple SR numbers on a roadway is complete nonsense here: The entire premise is that it refers to the whole roadway itself, not any particular direction. In particular, if a traffic route continues in an uninterrupted straight line, it's pretty clear that the roadwa... |
| 2 | 2017-03-15 02:10 | Roadsguy ♦43 | I only did that in this one case because internally PennDOT keeps track of that portion of road as two separate one-way roads as if it were dual-carriageway, with one being SR 0011 and the other SR 8027. However, the road has no actual physical divider and is thus a single-carriageway road for purpo... | |
| 3 | 2017-03-15 12:43 | jleedev | WOW that's confusing. Their interchange diagram does point at that segment, and the distances given are perfectly consistent. It just didn't look right to me. Forward/backward is probably right. | |
| 46384485 by amaikiba @ 2017-02-25 02:38 | 1 | 2017-02-28 16:14 | jleedev | I'm tempted to delete this, since a large footway area does not adequately describe this feature, and the default tile layer does not seem to like it. However, a retail/commercial landuse doesn't seem right to me either. Thoughts? |
| 45247739 by Roadsguy @ 2017-01-17 16:58 | 1 | 2017-01-25 04:49 | jleedev | Oil City to Titusville is incorrectly under Business. |
| 2 | 2017-01-25 15:36 | Roadsguy ♦43 | D'oh! Fixed... | |
| 45065400 by miluethi @ 2017-01-11 00:08 | 1 | 2017-01-16 18:15 | maxerickson ♦234 | Are you researching the administrative boundaries here? I really doubt that a town ends on the centerline of one side of the Long Island Expressway.The goal should be to make the boundaries legally accurate, which will frequently conflict with merging them with convenient nearby features. |
| 2 | 2017-01-21 14:36 | jleedev | +1. Welding a boundary to a road or waterway is dubious and brittle at best, but using a divided highway is obviously incorrect. | |
| 3 | 2017-01-24 05:08 | miluethi ♦312 | If you think I should move it back in the center between the two highways, I can do it. No problem. | |
| 4 | 2017-01-24 15:06 | maxerickson ♦234 | I would say don't worry about it unless you go find the legal documents incorporating the town and set the boundary from that.My main concern is the structural one, I don't see merging other features into the sloppy Tiger boundaries as "cleaning up boundaries", it's most... | |
| 44699589 by miluethi @ 2016-12-27 07:24 | 1 | 2017-01-16 16:05 | jleedev | Can you please explain what you're doing in changeset comments? It's not obvious to me why, for example, the Edgeworth-Coraopolis border should be moved to the south to lie on the Dashields Lock and Dam. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:boundary says to avoid connecting boundar... |
| 44713231 by miluethi @ 2016-12-27 18:54 | 1 | 2017-01-11 18:47 | jleedev | Pittsburgh neighborhoods do not extend into the rivers. |
| 44062167 by durin42 @ 2016-11-30 15:14 | 1 | 2016-11-30 15:39 | jleedev | the tiger: keys don't actually do anything and should mostly be deleted. change the name instead. |
| 32486592 by rickmastfan67 @ 2015-07-08 03:03 | 1 | 2015-12-21 21:43 | jleedev | Has this reopened? |
| 2 | 2016-01-30 11:51 | rickmastfan67 ♦234 | I assume so. I haven't been able to go out there to check. And sorry for the late response. I've been having major computer problems the last 2+ months. | |
| 35220991 by jleedev @ 2015-11-10 17:20 | 1 | 2015-11-11 10:50 | rickmastfan67 ♦234 | Just so I understand, both sides of Marlin Dr must turn right onto Bower Hill Rd with an 'All Traffic Must Turn Right' sign, correct? Then you should use the 'Only Right Turn' relation instead ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:restriction#Mandatory_restriction ). S... |
| 2 | 2015-11-11 10:51 | rickmastfan67 ♦234 | If I'm correct, let me know and I can fix this up for ya and eliminate the unnecessary relations. | |
| 3 | 2015-11-11 14:16 | jleedev | Yes, that's right. | |
| 4 | 2015-11-15 01:26 | rickmastfan67 ♦234 | So, would you like me to fix up the relations here to properly reflect that? | |
| 5 | 2015-11-15 20:07 | jleedev | Ok, I did it in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/35335797It's tough with iD but not impossible. :/ | |
| 35209137 by MCollar @ 2015-11-10 08:09 | 1 | 2015-11-12 14:07 | jleedev | This looks really nice. |
| 2 | 2015-11-12 18:24 | MCollar ♦5 | Thank you. =] | |
| 34824288 by jleedev @ 2015-10-23 16:45 | 1 | 2015-10-24 01:26 | rickmastfan67 ♦234 | Just so you know, when a road has 'two' names for a segment like this, you should use 'name:right' & 'name:left' depending on which direction the way itself in OSM is going. See: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name |
| 2 | 2015-10-24 01:31 | rickmastfan67 ♦234 | So, I would in this case per your changeset comment, leave just 'Washington Road' in the 'name' tag, and add 'West Liberty Avenue' to the 'name:left' tag, and also add Washington Road to the 'name:right' tag (just for clarity) on Way 376546213. | |
| 3 | 2015-10-24 01:32 | rickmastfan67 ♦234 | If you would like me to do this, please let me know here in the comments and I'll get to it as soon as I hear back from ya. :) | |
| 4 | 2015-10-24 17:17 | jleedev | Done. |