| Changeset | # | Tmstmp UTC | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 136229307 by mountainmonkey @ 2023-05-17 21:10 | 1 | 2023-10-25 14:26 | tomhukins ♦217 | Thank you for your improvements to OpenStreetMap. This change adds the name "Mull of Kintyre" to https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9798021785 but there's already a "Mull of Kintyre" with the same wikidata tag at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6572722269 - it seems wron... |
| 122182132 by mountainmonkey @ 2022-06-09 20:18 | 1 | 2022-06-09 20:21 | Danchev ♦11 | Hi MM,what about https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/529639181 inside the forest? |
| 2 | 2022-06-11 10:16 | mountainmonkey | Sorry, missed that - now sorted | |
| 116887238 by mountainmonkey @ 2022-02-01 21:50 | 1 | 2022-02-03 15:42 | DaveF ♦1,562 | HiThere's no requirement to add highway tags to platforms. Their raison d'etre is to be walked on. |
| 116726757 by mountainmonkey @ 2022-01-28 23:12 | 1 | 2022-01-29 08:54 | James Derrick ♦78 | Hi Mountain Monkey,Can I ask that as well as splitting forest relations, that you also check heath relations as well please?This change removed a chunk of relation 13417952 in the NE corner near Rowantee Hill ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/116734954#map=14/55.3243/-3.0160&layers... |
| 74454428 by mountainmonkey @ 2019-09-13 20:29 | 1 | 2022-01-04 19:53 | mapbear66 ♦25 | Hi,You changed way 241710612 from a track to a cycleway. it's not a paved cycleway it's just a rough track. So I'm wondering why? Thanks. |
| 2 | 2022-01-05 17:21 | mountainmonkey | Hi,Yes I remember this one (2 years ago). When I walked this 2 years ago it was mostly too narrow to drive a car/landrover along so no longer a track. It had recently been resurfaced about 5ft wide with a good quality gravel surface - that would make it a path. But it is signed at either end as pa... | |
| 3 | 2022-01-05 18:18 | mapbear66 ♦25 | Yeah, no bother. I'd maybe have gone for path if I felt like it needed updating, since that doesn't discount cycle use. But not fussed. Just wondered the rational. Cheers. | |
| 113292521 by mountainmonkey @ 2021-11-02 16:17 | 1 | 2021-12-05 09:20 | Mike Baggaley ♦630 | Hi, I believe that the Sutherland Trail is an unmarked route that just exists in a guide book and as such do not believe it should be in Open Street Map. Can you please review?Thanks,Mike |
| 2 | 2021-12-06 21:48 | mountainmonkey | Hi, I moved the name from https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/48076622/history to a new route relation because that's a better way to tag a route name, I don't know anything about the Sutherland Trail itself, didn't see any signs when I was in the area and have no objection to you delet... | |
| 3 | 2021-12-07 11:17 | Mike Baggaley ♦630 | Thanks, I have examined the originator of the way. He/she only made two edits back in 2015, so I have deleted the relation. | |
| 89429222 by mountainmonkey @ 2020-08-14 20:29 | 1 | 2021-10-04 17:26 | SomeoneElse ♦13,362 | Hello,Is https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11505560 really a hiking route? It looks a bit odd, especially with that name: https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/map/map.html#zoom=16&lat=60.1543&lon=-1.16324 .Best Regards,Andy |
| 109284380 by mountainmonkey @ 2021-08-06 21:00 | 1 | 2021-08-06 22:20 | GinaroZ ♦1,280 | Is the gate still there on top of the cattle grid?I added it based on this and made them two separate nodeshttps://www.geograph.org.uk/photo/6759596 |
| 2 | 2021-08-08 10:02 | mountainmonkey | Apologies, assumed it was a mistake and gate not visible in air photo - have now restored the gate too. | |
| 105857129 by mountainmonkey @ 2021-06-04 19:20 | 1 | 2021-06-30 12:09 | ChrisHodgesUK ♦9 | I think, but could be wrong, that this was the changeset that broke the B852 through Inverfarigaig - it no longer connects. I'd fix it, but I'm wary of doing so in case there's something I'm missing |
| 2 | 2021-07-01 20:42 | mountainmonkey | fixed | |
| 82760648 by mountainmonkey @ 2020-03-28 18:13 | 1 | 2020-03-31 22:36 | Mike Baggaley ♦630 | Hi, I'm assuming that Symington, Biggar & Peebles Branch is the name of the abandoned railway along which various tracks and roads run. I don't think the name should be applied to the roads as this suggests it is the name of the road, and probably not to the other highways. I suggest t... |
| 2 | 2020-04-01 08:43 | mountainmonkey | Good point, agreed, done. | |
| 71541448 by mountainmonkey @ 2019-06-23 21:04 | 1 | 2020-01-02 15:25 | GinaroZ ♦1,280 | I assume this razed line wasn't meant to be tagged as a path since it goes through Tesco, so I removed the tag - free free to update https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/300398934 |
| 72989818 by mountainmonkey @ 2019-08-04 13:22 | 1 | 2019-10-05 19:49 | giggls ♦104 | You tagged this campsite access=private what is THW reference for that? Might be permanent camping only though. |
| 2 | 2019-10-07 17:08 | mountainmonkey | I visited in person and discovered that camping was not possible - it is only open to people renting a pitch long term. Can you suggest a better tag combination? | |
| 3 | 2019-10-08 07:40 | giggls ♦104 | OK you should likely add permanent_camping=only and an optionaldescription tag stating the fact.Both tags are supported in opencampingmap.orghttps://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:permanent_camping | |
| 75383897 by mountainmonkey @ 2019-10-07 15:49 | 1 | 2019-10-07 17:55 | GinaroZ ♦1,280 | Assuming the hotel is meant to have a name? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/732389836 |
| 63626328 by mountainmonkey @ 2018-10-17 21:45 | 1 | 2018-10-17 22:12 | GinaroZ ♦1,280 | Thanks for adding the cycle path, saw construction photos on fb. I've marked it as lcn=yes to complete the route to Kilrenny. Did you notice if there was a path alongside the road here? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/908836830 |
| 2 | 2018-10-25 11:10 | mountainmonkey | No sorry, I didn't have time to go down Windmill Road. | |
| 63659599 by mountainmonkey @ 2018-10-18 20:21 | 1 | 2018-10-19 22:25 | GinaroZ ♦1,280 | I think https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/635792335 would be better tagged as a breakwater? |
| 49758202 by mountainmonkey @ 2017-06-22 22:30 | 1 | 2018-09-08 16:00 | SomeoneElse ♦13,362 | Hello,There seems to be a bit of duplicate here - presumably https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/514599377#map=19/56.09583/-4.37056&layers=H and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/113081869#map=18/56.09578/-4.37026&layers=H are the same thing? You can see them both rendered at https://map.at... |
| 2 | 2018-09-09 16:26 | mountainmonkey | Yes you're right, all I did was re-tag 113081869 to put it underground. Feel free to delete one. | |
| 3 | 2018-09-10 19:55 | tms13 ♦77 | Okay, I've unified these: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/62465706 | |
| 58185761 by mountainmonkey @ 2018-04-18 00:06 | 1 | 2018-04-21 12:24 | BCNorwich ♦4,848 | Hello mountainmonkey,You've somehow mapped a lot of these ways in duplicate, paths,tracks,fences and walls. Placing one way (path) directly and exactly on top of another (path).Thus grossly bloating the database and confusing routers over paths and tracks. I started removing some duplic... |
| 2 | 2018-04-22 20:35 | mountainmonkey | Oops. JOSM crashed during upload, I thought I had resolved conflicts correctly but clearly not.Think I have fixed most of the duplicates now. | |
| 55187185 by mountainmonkey @ 2018-01-05 13:40 | 1 | 2018-01-05 15:14 | GinaroZ ♦1,280 | Did you notice if the canal path was now tarmac as per this note?https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/894708 |
| 54159348 by mountainmonkey @ 2017-11-28 20:00 | 1 | 2017-11-28 21:31 | GinaroZ ♦1,280 | Noticed there was a fixme here https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/92654858 - is this a cave entrance as well? |
| 2 | 2017-11-30 19:50 | mountainmonkey | Didn't spot that when I was there because OsmAnd doesn't render natural=cave. I don't think there is a cave there, it's up a steep wooded bank, but I can't be sure. | |
| 46992198 by mountainmonkey @ 2017-03-19 19:58 | 1 | 2017-03-19 22:48 | GinaroZ ♦1,280 | Shouldn't this road https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/221196402 be highway=service instead? It seems to primarily serve houses |
| 2 | 2017-03-22 10:21 | mountainmonkey | Thanks for comment - I've checked http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Tag:highway%3Dtrack and I think you're right. Have fixed this one and some others nearby. | |
| 46448064 by mountainmonkey @ 2017-02-27 18:07 | 1 | 2017-03-13 23:15 | Mike Baggaley ♦630 | Hi, I think your change adds way 297059390 to the coast path, however, this way is marked as private. Can you please review the access to this way? Please accept my apologies if I have misinterpreted your change.Cheers,Mike |
| 2 | 2017-03-15 11:45 | mountainmonkey | Well spotted, thanks. These roads are open for non motorised users so I have corrected the access tags to reflect this. |