ralley participated in the following changeset discussionsralley participated in the following changeset discussions| Changeset | # | Tmstmp UTC | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 167852506 by ralley @ 2025-06-20 05:03 | 1 | 2025-06-20 05:15 | ralley | Source was "survey;Mapillary" |
| 167375824 by ralley @ 2025-06-09 02:25 | 1 | 2025-06-09 02:28 | ralley | Correction: source was LINZ NZ Aerial Imagery |
| 166885132 by Shawnster @ 2025-05-28 16:55 Active block | 1 | 2025-06-05 20:04 | ralley | "dirt path" appears to be an (un-needed) description not a name, https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166885132 |
| 2 | 2025-06-18 05:47 | Fizzie-DWG ♦32,121 | DWG revert - poor quality mapping & unresponsive userhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167765259 | |
| 166884884 by Shawnster @ 2025-05-28 16:50 Active block | 1 | 2025-06-05 20:02 | ralley | Were you trying to map a building here? Tagging as name=building is not the correct way to do this, please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166884884 ... |
| 2 | 2025-06-18 05:47 | Fizzie-DWG ♦32,121 | DWG revert - poor quality mapping & unresponsive userhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167765259 | |
| 158646418 by peanuthole @ 2024-11-02 06:57 | 1 | 2025-06-05 05:25 | ralley | Is the reference that you added for the bridge or the road? If for the bridge it should be tagged bridge:ref (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:bridge#Bridge_numbers). See also https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4703942 |
| 2 | 2025-06-18 16:28 | peanuthole ♦2 | It was in fact for the bridge! Thank you for correcting it and bringing this to my attention so I don't make the same mistake again | |
| 166555473 by moving1970 @ 2025-05-21 08:08 | 1 | 2025-05-27 00:26 | ralley | Manukau Harbour has been correctly tagged as relation 8534169 for 7 years. This looks more like tagging for the renderer. Also is "Second-hand Books" the actual name (looks to be a description) or is it "The Open Book" as per https://theopenbook.co.nz/ ? --- ... |
| 165702205 by mapnerd🤓 @ 2025-05-02 05:38 | 1 | 2025-05-02 20:18 | ralley | Hi the changeset mapped cycle-way lanes as separate ways, this should only be done where there is a physical barrier between the lanes |
| 165356847 by mapnerd🤓 @ 2025-04-24 01:50 | 1 | 2025-04-30 00:26 | ralley | Instead of tagging areas of the school as 'landuse=grass' recommended practice is to use 'landuse=recreation ground' and 'surface=grass' as per https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dschool#Single_school_on_one_site. Also instead of drawing multiple adja... |
| 165508295 by mapnerd🤓 @ 2025-04-27 14:23 | 1 | 2025-04-29 19:35 | ralley | This changeset added a cycle path (way 1381663352) but this is an un-separated cycle lane on the road, which by convention is not drawn as a separate way. Instead such lanes are simply tagged on the road which was already done |
| 165599015 by ❤️🔥 @ 2025-04-29 15:56 | 1 | 2025-04-29 19:29 | ralley | Your changeset has show the section linking the Waterview Shared path and Laurel Street as reopened and yet only has the LINZ NZ Aerial Imagery as a source. This was updated because this section was fenced off and closed (as per Mar-2025 Mapillary imagery). Can you confirm it has really been reope... |
| 2 | 2025-04-30 08:23 | ❤️🔥 ♦364 | oh sorry, i didn't notice that https://osm.org/way/1372532705 was tagged differently to the rest. fixed now, thanks for noticing | |
| 164611707 by McBeeFace4935 @ 2025-04-06 23:43 | 1 | 2025-04-07 01:06 | ralley | From the aerial imagery this appears to be a residential house and I can find no such branch at https://mcdonalds.co.nz/find-us/restaurants. Can you confirm this really exists? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164611707 |
| 2 | 2025-04-08 00:33 | ralley | Reverted for fantasy mappinghttps://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164656616 | |
| 163511908 by daniyyy @ 2025-03-12 05:25 | 1 | 2025-03-13 00:14 | ralley | Please use descriptive changeset comments as per https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_commentsAlso the name field should be for proper names only: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Publishe... |
| 158439187 by ralley @ 2024-10-28 04:33 | 1 | 2025-03-06 09:34 | SimonPNZ ♦1 | Sneaky Snacky donuts is definitely still here in March 2025, I walked past it today, and have purchased from there within the last month.They are however closed at least on Mondays and when closed the window blinds are fully closed, which may give the visual impression of permanent closure. I'... |
| 2 | 2025-03-07 05:37 | ralley | Thanks, reverted | |
| 161294110 by ralley @ 2025-01-13 03:21 | 1 | 2025-03-05 10:20 | ❤️🔥 ♦364 | hey, https://osm.org/way/1350825473 has no tags, do you remember what this line was supposed to be? |
| 2 | 2025-03-05 17:29 | ralley | Some accidental arifact from editing, I've removed it | |
| 3 | 2025-03-06 08:53 | ❤️🔥 ♦364 | thanks :) | |
| 163152838 by Basu38 @ 2025-03-03 09:38 | 1 | 2025-03-03 23:34 | ralley | This duplicates the node you created in changeset #163152569 --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163152838 |
| 163180795 by Ritesh2025 @ 2025-03-03 23:06 | 1 | 2025-03-03 23:28 | ralley | Why have you tagged this section of road as a ford? It does not match the changeset description or the aerial imagery --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163180795 |
| 162874415 by adlay16 @ 2025-02-24 02:50 | 1 | 2025-02-24 02:59 | ralley | Please use meaningful changeset comments: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162874415 |
| 162635294 by Zumlina @ 2025-02-17 21:09 Active block | 1 | 2025-02-17 23:46 | ralley | What do you mean by "The triangle is not valid" that you keep using in your changset descriptions? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162635294 |
| 162521013 by Zumlina @ 2025-02-14 22:41 Active block | 1 | 2025-02-15 23:37 | ralley | Your changeset comment says "wrong name" but all you did was delete the name, what is the correct name? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162521013 |
| 162482313 by Zumlina @ 2025-02-13 21:49 Active block | 1 | 2025-02-14 03:27 | ralley | What is your source for the name "Bikanervala Indian Sweets, Restaurant & Takeaway"? Their website certainly makes it seem like the previous name of "Bikanervala" is correct and the new name appears to have been edited to include descriptive elements, which you have been ask... |
| 162472526 by Zumlina @ 2025-02-13 16:09 Active block | 1 | 2025-02-14 03:18 | ralley | Please use descriptive changeset comments - you have been asked multiple times to do this and you continue to create changesets with either very brief or non existent comments. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_commentsAlso this changeset abbreviated a lot of bus stop names, ... |
| 162367176 by McNs @ 2025-02-10 20:40 | 1 | 2025-02-10 23:49 | ralley | Why have you removed the highway tag from way 1214443204? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162367176 |
| 2 | 2025-02-11 01:28 | McNs ♦3 | Editing error - thanks for the catch - have reverted the highway tag | |
| 3 | 2025-02-11 04:58 | ralley | Thanks for fixing. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162367176 | |
| 161438322 by Zumlina @ 2025-01-17 00:24 Active block | 1 | 2025-01-27 06:30 | ralley | According to AT (https://data-atgis.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/ATgis::bus-stop/explore) bus stop 7528 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3337444706) is named "Jellicoe Road". The roundabout was replaced years ago |
| 161693695 by Zumlina @ 2025-01-24 00:05 Active block | 1 | 2025-01-27 06:18 | ralley | Please use meaningful changeset comments |
| 161644289 by Zumlina @ 2025-01-22 16:10 Active block | 1 | 2025-01-27 06:16 | ralley | As per the comments on 161467298 the labs are named Awanui Labs (plural). Additionally please use descriptive comments for your changesets.You have created a slew of edits and notes that people have been commenting on and you don't seem to be heeding the comments or replying. Please take ... |
| 161467298 by Zumlina @ 2025-01-17 18:53 Active block | 1 | 2025-01-20 23:17 | ralley | The labs are in fact named "Awanui Labs", see their web site and image showing signage: https://www.mapillary.com/app/user/ralley?lat=-36.8703532&lng=174.7109301&z=19.69030299353181&panos=true&focus=photo&x=0.7845504542610783&y=0.49733972741841753&zoom=1.8963337... |
| 161350748 by Zumlina @ 2025-01-14 16:08 Active block | 1 | 2025-01-15 05:58 | ralley | You are continuing to add phone numbers in the wrong format and edit numbers that were in the correct format. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:phone |
| 161127702 by Zumlina @ 2025-01-08 10:28 Active block | 1 | 2025-01-14 04:35 | ralley | Is this really concrete? It looks more like asphalt in the LINZ and Bing aerial imagery |
| 161187296 by Zumlina @ 2025-01-09 23:04 Active block | 1 | 2025-01-10 11:47 | pitscheplatsch ♦5,393 | Hi 475538.Please have a look at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_commentsThanks! |
| 2 | 2025-01-14 04:32 | ralley | Additionally in this and many other of your change sets you are wrongly changing the phone number format from E.164. Please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:phone | |
| 161043993 by Zumlina @ 2025-01-06 04:37 Active block | 1 | 2025-01-08 23:14 | ralley | It looks like for this and other edits you are appending "halal" in the name field to indicate that the amenity caters for halal diets. Looking at https://kebabseraibirkenhead.co.nz/ it seems the actual name is "Kerab Serai" and the halal should be tagged as "diet:halal=yes... |
| 161127700 by Zumlina @ 2025-01-08 10:28 Active block | 1 | 2025-01-08 19:30 | ralley | Is the service road (WAY: 297477811) really concrete? It looks like asphalt from aerial imagery --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/161127700 |
| 160850285 by TheLoyalOrder @ 2024-12-31 23:14 | 1 | 2025-01-08 19:03 | ralley | Why have you removed the service road within the carpark (WAY: 1110654367)? It still appears in the aerial imagery you refer to --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160850285 |
| 2 | 2025-01-08 21:01 | TheLoyalOrder ♦1 | Kia ora, I forgot to add it back | |
| 160456497 by ralley @ 2024-12-21 02:36 | 1 | 2025-01-01 04:26 | Colemagoo ♦5 | Hi, I don't think that adding seperate ways to Carrington Rd is - these are painted bike lanes on the main carriageway, not a seperate way (and the rebuild of Carrington Rd is years away.)See the wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dcycleway#:~:text=Cycling%20infras... |
| 2 | 2025-01-01 04:27 | Colemagoo ♦5 | *is correct, sorry | |
| 3 | 2025-01-06 22:53 | ralley | Thanks for addressing this, sorry I didn't reply earlier --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160456497 | |
| 160015074 by ralley @ 2024-12-07 04:00 | 1 | 2024-12-07 04:08 | ralley | Source was actually survey, see Mapillary imagery |
| 158475197 by BTX07 @ 2024-10-28 21:36 | 1 | 2024-10-30 23:45 | ralley | Hi, steps=yes is an actively discouraged tagging style, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dsteps --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158475197 |
| 158475355 by BTX07 @ 2024-10-28 21:40 | 1 | 2024-10-29 00:09 | ralley | You have added a park and removed a building here with only the LINZ NZ aerial imagery and no source listed. The change does not appear in the imagery - what is the actual source? |
| 2 | 2024-10-29 00:12 | ralley | Bing maps show the house to the south of here appears to be gone. | |
| 3 | 2024-10-29 07:57 | BTX07 ♦1 | The latest google street view shows that the area does in fact look like a park | |
| 4 | 2024-10-29 07:58 | BTX07 ♦1 | The street view is from January of 2024. The google satellite view also shows this | |
| 5 | 2024-10-29 07:59 | BTX07 ♦1 | Sorry It was from July | |
| 6 | 2024-10-29 08:05 | ❤️🔥 ♦364 | this was also discussed in https://osm.org/note/3518823 , it's now fixed | |
| 158360616 by ralley @ 2024-10-26 03:21 | 1 | 2024-10-26 03:33 | ralley | Also Puhinui details from visit. Sources also survey and Mapillary (still uploading) |
| 158319653 by ralley @ 2024-10-25 03:05 | 1 | 2024-10-25 03:06 | ralley | Changeset description was wrong, actually updated completed apartments |
| 157899766 by adssadsad @ 2024-10-15 00:01 | 1 | 2024-10-15 23:55 | ralley | Please use meaningful comments in your changesets: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157899766 |
| 155976483 by City Katt @ 2024-08-30 14:15 | 1 | 2024-09-02 00:41 | ralley | Review as requested: Adding the building for the store looks good but the store is now mapped as both a node and a polygon (the building). The node shpould instead be replaced by the building so that the principle of "one feature, one OSM element" is followed: https://wiki.openstreetmap.o... |
| 154252618 by HeyHiHello123 @ 2024-07-22 09:17 | 1 | 2024-07-23 00:57 | ralley | You have changed the name of Clarence Street West to Calrence Street yet as seen in this June 2024 imagery (https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=-36.8288956&lng=174.7928306&z=17&pKey=1655430748603131&focus=photo&x=0.6564028295139888&y=0.3780451361608255&zoom=1.1264080100125... |
| 148791850 by Pasindu_Anthony @ 2024-03-17 22:01 | 1 | 2024-03-18 10:18 | CoyKoi ♦228 | Welcome to OSM, thanks for adding a missing path. Note that the path should connect to the road feature for Bute Road, in order to be connected to the wider network |
| 2 | 2024-04-04 00:14 | ralley | This change also dragged the address node for 25 Hugh Green Drive. (Node 5513377408). Fixed. | |
| 134750030 by Joshua Merriam @ 2023-04-10 21:40 | 1 | 2023-04-11 00:23 | ralley | You have changed way 102297848 from a building to a park which appears from aerial imagery to be wrong, was this deliberate? --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/134750030 |
| 2 | 2023-05-04 00:33 | Joshua Merriam ♦1 | I added the park boundary, didn't mean to change any building | |
| 134515853 by Syed Shubair Naqvi @ 2023-04-04 22:48 | 1 | 2023-04-06 00:45 | ralley | Thanks for adding the driveway but once again you have added a made up name. As per https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only the name tag is for genuine names only. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/cha... |
| 57280475 by ralley @ 2018-03-18 02:49 | 1 | 2023-03-16 13:26 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,630 | Hello!Is it intentional that https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/570568270/history has surface=timber and nor more standard surface=wood?See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:surface for listing of commonly used values |
| 2 | 2023-03-16 16:07 | ralley | Not intentional, fixed | |
| 128750531 by AlwynWellington @ 2022-11-10 20:42 | 1 | 2022-11-10 21:47 | ralley | As per comments on changeset 128320877 to which you did not reply again you have performed a mass deletion of precisely mapped residential areas. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/128750531 |
| 2 | 2022-11-10 23:55 | AlwynWellington ♦58 | My edits for residential areas are in accordance with a discussion on NZ-Talk a year or so ago.Be pleased to discuss further.Nga Mihi | |
| 3 | 2022-12-04 20:23 | CoyKoi ♦228 | Hi Alwyn can you please direct to the discussion you mention, I can not find it. It is unclear from your changeset comment what you are achieving by undoing the detailed mapping of landuse areas along road corridors. Especially if you plan to continue these mass modifications this will need further ... | |
| 4 | 2022-12-11 22:38 | AlwynWellington ♦58 | 2021 08 01 @ 20h34\tjames@tfg.nz[Talk-nz] Format of land use areas. Trace around all roads or just the main drags?Hey all,After making updates to the Jville/Newlands/Tawa/Welly area over the past couple weeks. I’ve wondered what opinions there are on drawing out land use areas like resid... | |
| 5 | 2022-12-11 22:42 | AlwynWellington ♦58 | My apologies, I attempted to edit and ended up doubling up.Please ignore the long message above. I will resubmit the final version | |
| 6 | 2022-12-11 22:46 | AlwynWellington ♦58 | 2021 08 01 @ 20h34 james@tfg.nz[Talk-nz] Format of land use areas. Trace around all roads or just the main drags?Hey all,After making updates to the Jville/Newlands/Tawa/Welly area over the past couple weeks. I’ve wondered what opinions there are on drawing out land use areas like reside... | |
| 128018642 by Incognitionz @ 2022-10-25 01:01 | 1 | 2022-10-26 19:32 | ralley | Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits, looks good except please don't use the name field for generic names like "house" it is reserved for proer names only https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Don't_use_name_tag_to_describe_things. In this case replacing building... |
| 86095890 by ralley @ 2020-06-02 19:47 | 1 | 2022-10-05 05:08 | ralley | Do you have a source for your change? The meta data show only "LINZ NZ Aerial Imagery" which does not show a name or lack therof where as the mapillary imagery referred in version 3 shows the name as "Snows Lane" --- Published using OSMCha... |
| 2 | 2022-10-05 05:11 | ralley | Abovencomment wrongly made to V3 instead of V4 --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/86095890 | |
| 127023930 by rj_buchanan @ 2022-10-05 02:42 | 1 | 2022-10-05 05:10 | ralley | Do you have a source for your change? The meta data show only "LINZ NZ Aerial Imagery" which does not show a name or lack therof where as the mapillary imagery referred in version 3 shows the name as "Snows Lane" --- Published using OSMCha:... |
| 2 | 2022-10-05 05:34 | rj_buchanan ♦5 | The change is based on personal sight - it's simply a driveway without any road signage. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127023930 | |
| 125385141 by Chris Werry @ 2022-08-26 03:32 | 1 | 2022-08-26 20:16 | ralley | Please do not use the name tag to mark life cycle stages - it is for proper names only. Please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix instead --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125385141 |
| 124880453 by patrick_lane @ 2022-08-14 09:48 | 1 | 2022-08-14 10:55 | nevw ♦1,977 | Please don’t vandalise place names. I have fixed the damage. |
| 2 | 2022-08-14 22:55 | ralley | Instead of adding POI's you edited existing suburb entries and changed them from suburbs to places of worship, this is not the correct way to edit --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124880453 | |
| 124663902 by Hontas @ 2022-08-09 03:46 | 1 | 2022-08-10 21:26 | ralley | Your edit has resulted in overlapping buildings. Is the building itself really named "Fonterra Co-Operative Group Ltd" or is this merely one of the businesses contained within? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124663902 ... |
| 2 | 2022-08-11 21:54 | ❤️🔥 ♦364 | Fonterra moved out of this building 6 years ago... reverted.https://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/fonterras-ex-hq-to-be-apartments/K6TRKOROCN46OUGDMN5EMM4NLE/ | |
| 124702925 by Hontas @ 2022-08-09 20:43 | 1 | 2022-08-10 21:21 | ralley | Your description mentions yellow pages but you seem to have added no applicable tags, I would expect a name= and something like office= based on the description --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124702925 |
| 124332042 by Natalya @ 2022-08-01 08:23 | 1 | 2022-08-02 20:36 | ralley | Thanks for the edits. One thing, please use ITU format for phone numbers: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:phone#Usage I've corrected this one. |
| 124322224 by AYAB @ 2022-08-01 01:20 | 1 | 2022-08-01 19:48 | ralley | Please don't edit the name to include the branch details, instead the branch should be put in a separate branch tag: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:branch --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124322224 ... |
| 2 | 2022-08-01 19:48 | ralley | Please don't edit the name to include the branch details, instead the branch should be put in a separate branch tag: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:branch --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124322224 ... | |
| 123581257 by Mckenzie_AT @ 2022-07-13 21:06 | 1 | 2022-07-14 00:48 | ralley | Would this not be better tagged as amenity=clinic instead of amenity=hospital? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123581257 |
| 2 | 2022-07-14 00:53 | Mckenzie_AT ♦1 | Good point, let me change this | |
| 122658537 by linsd @ 2022-06-21 09:58 | 1 | 2022-06-23 02:04 | ralley | It appears as if you are making changes made my local editors with local knowledge based on outdated LINZ aerial imagery. The Innovation Complex construction (way 226696411) that you have deleted was added in 2021 by a local mapper and matches the latest Maxar Imagery. You have also added a non-e... |
| 2 | 2022-06-23 02:35 | linsd ♦4 | Sorry for the mistake made, please revert the changes I made based on outdated satellite imagery. | |
| 122598603 by linsd @ 2022-06-20 03:19 | 1 | 2022-06-20 08:22 | ralley | Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits, however this is a driveway and not a residential road --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122598603 |
| 2 | 2022-06-23 02:36 | linsd ♦4 | Noted, I had changed back to driveway. | |
| 122599802 by linsd @ 2022-06-20 04:23 | 1 | 2022-06-20 08:21 | ralley | Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits. The ways you are adding appear to be driveways and not residential roads and should be tagged as highway=service and service=driveway --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122599802 |
| 2 | 2022-06-23 02:38 | linsd ♦4 | Noted, I had changed to driveway. | |
| 122391833 by callum_AT @ 2022-06-14 22:28 | 1 | 2022-06-16 00:49 | ralley | Birdwood Road does have a sidewalk on one side, visible in mapillary imagery: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=-36.859739720556&lng=174.59459203278&z=17&pKey=506922997332088&focus=photo --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changeset... |
| 122329187 by Fruskon @ 2022-06-13 14:53 | 1 | 2022-06-14 04:33 | ralley | Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits. One thing, please don't use the name field to tag descriptions like "Driveway of Budden Road" https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions --- Published using OSMCha: https:/... |
| 122015553 by 36wish @ 2022-06-06 09:49 | 1 | 2022-06-07 00:06 | ralley | Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits - just a point of caution you have tagged node 9208508589 as a tree but it is part of the building way 997267243. The tree should be added as a separate node instead. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: ht... |
| 2 | 2022-06-10 11:26 | 36wish ♦1 | Thanks for reviewing it for me have fixed it as changeset #122206364 | |
| 3 | 2022-06-11 01:31 | ralley | Thank you for coming back and resolving. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122015553 | |
| 121232597 by Cornerstone and Compass @ 2022-05-20 09:19 | 1 | 2022-05-20 10:10 | ralley | This edit has dragged the address node for 90 Beach Road onto Castor Bay Road --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121232597 |
| 120245552 by ralley @ 2022-04-27 07:51 | 1 | 2022-05-14 13:04 | user_5359 ♦19,369 | Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/way/1055301997. what s the meaning of the foreign tagsfeat_type = river_clmacronated = Nname_ascii = Onehunga Streamriver_sect = 1106919? |
| 2 | 2022-05-14 22:12 | ralley | Thanks, cleaned up. | |
| 120519514 by Lovan Lake @ 2022-05-03 23:53 | 1 | 2022-05-04 00:44 | ralley | Why have you removed the building tag? --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120519514 |
| 120371739 by ralley @ 2022-04-30 05:19 | 1 | 2022-04-30 09:46 | CoyKoi ♦228 | Hi ralley, something went strangely wrong with this edit: all of the features were created as new duplicate features instead of edits to the existing features. I haven't seen this before, but I guess it will need a revert to fix it. --- Published using OS... |
| 2 | 2022-04-30 09:52 | ralley | Thanks for the heads up. Weird, might be related to network issues I was having. I'll sort it out | |
| 119928427 by arley 060403 @ 2022-04-20 00:02 | 1 | 2022-04-20 02:37 | ralley | Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edit, how ever there appear to be multiple problems with this changeset:1) It spans a huge geographic area which makes QA difficult, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets2) The changeset comment (translated) does not ... |
| 2 | 2022-04-22 08:07 | ❤️🔥 ♦364 | Hi, based on aerial imagery the village you mapped in Colombia does not exist. Could you please confirm whether it is a real place? If not, you can map imaginary places using https://OpenGeoFiction.net, but please don't do this in OpenStreetMap. Thanks.---Hola, basado en imágenes... | |
| 119345569 by borovac @ 2022-04-05 13:47 | 1 | 2022-04-05 21:44 | ralley | Why have you added Wiri as a neighbourhood? It is already tagged as a suburb which is what the wikidata link you added refers to it as. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119345569 |
| 2 | 2022-04-06 06:04 | borovac ♦102 | Hi ralley, thanks for the info, I have missed that completely. I will double check from now on. | |
| 119330033 by dave simpson @ 2022-04-05 07:23 | 1 | 2022-04-05 18:23 | ralley | Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edit. Looks good to me. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119330033 |
| 119274951 by rj_buchanan @ 2022-04-03 18:35 | 1 | 2022-04-03 20:33 | ralley | Again you have changed a road to a drive way but left th name tag which is inconsistent --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119274951 |
| 119256678 by rj_buchanan @ 2022-04-03 08:51 | 1 | 2022-04-03 18:35 | ralley | You have changed this to a drive way but left it tagged with a street name --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119256678 |
| 119256249 by rj_buchanan @ 2022-04-03 08:33 | 1 | 2022-04-03 18:34 | ralley | You have changed this to a driveway but left a street name tagged, that seems wrong --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119256249 |
| 2 | 2022-04-03 22:37 | rj_buchanan ♦5 | Thanks for advice, have made the change. Will correct others too | |
| 118713809 by Hayden Thorn @ 2022-03-20 23:46 | 1 | 2022-03-21 17:51 | ralley | You have tagged this layer=-1, I don't think it is underground --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118713809 |
| 2 | 2022-03-21 20:59 | Hayden Thorn ♦2 | My bad, fixed. | |
| 118723717 by Haoze Li @ 2022-03-21 08:12 | 1 | 2022-03-21 08:14 | ralley | Please just stop - this is vandalism |
| 2 | 2022-03-22 06:23 | mavl ♦76,060 | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 118763010 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/118724781]. | |
| 118721604 by Haoze Li @ 2022-03-21 07:16 | 1 | 2022-03-21 08:06 | ralley | What is your source for the cafe? It does not match the aerial imagery --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118721604 |
| 2 | 2022-03-22 06:23 | mavl ♦76,060 | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 118763010 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/118724781]. | |
| 118723176 by Haoze Li @ 2022-03-21 07:58 | 1 | 2022-03-21 08:05 | ralley | What is your source for the fast food outlet you added? It does not match the aerial imagery and the name does not look genuine. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118723176 |
| 2 | 2022-03-22 06:23 | mavl ♦76,060 | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 118763010 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/118724781]. | |
| 118240966 by comptonchiro @ 2022-03-08 15:23 | 1 | 2022-03-08 18:03 | ralley | Please use meaningful changeset comments as per: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments#:~:text=A%20good%20changeset%20comment%20should,have%20edited%20on%20the%20map. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118240966 ... |
| 106696552 by ❤️🔥_import @ 2021-06-21 07:02 | 1 | 2022-03-04 21:18 | ralley | The conflation strategy used with this import has not worked - it has introduced many duplicate address nodes. E.g. Node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8660691512 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3208511029This is repeated on many address nodes along Mangere Road |
| 2 | 2022-03-05 01:10 | ❤️🔥 ♦364 | Thanks for noticing this, the automatic conflation can't detect addresses with only addr:housenumber and no addr:street. Since this is a relatively rare situation, I manually merged most of them as I noticed them. There were a few hundred across the country which were missed, but I merged most ... | |
| 117975272 by wp88mapgeek @ 2022-03-01 10:58 | 1 | 2022-03-01 17:44 | ralley | Please do not "test" changes like this in OSM - it is a live map in use by many people and your change has tagged a cycleway that does not exist - reverting --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117975272 ... |
| 117897165 by ralley @ 2022-02-27 04:48 | 1 | 2022-02-27 04:49 | ralley | Correction, source was Mapillary (Feb 2022 imagery) |
| 116942919 by ralley @ 2022-02-03 03:24 | 1 | 2022-02-15 21:07 | CoyKoi ♦228 | Hey ralley just FYI this changeset added some buildings which no longer exist. Unfortunately the building import dataset is built from fairly old imagery (~2017) predating the busway --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116942919 ... |
| 2 | 2022-02-15 21:35 | ralley | Arghh sorry about that, I've been checking against the Maxar imagery and somehow missed that these were in the construction area. I will clean up --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116942919 | |
| 3 | 2022-02-15 21:43 | ralley | Cleaned up with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/117452512 --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116942919 | |
| 117030651 by rj_buchanan @ 2022-02-05 03:39 | 1 | 2022-02-05 07:57 | ralley | Please do not delete the wrongly tagged driveway - instead tag it as highway=service and service=driveway --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117030651 |
| 2 | 2022-02-06 03:56 | rj_buchanan ♦5 | Thanks for your advice - please advise how I can undo the deletion and I will fix it. | |
| 3 | 2022-02-06 04:52 | ralley | I see you worked out how to fix - thank you. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117030651 | |
| 116892654 by McNs @ 2022-02-02 02:55 | 1 | 2022-02-02 05:13 | ralley | "Not Specified" is not used with the bicycle key anywhere else in OSM: https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/?key=bicycle#values Whilst you are generally free to use what ever values you want, no data consumers will likely use this value so the default of not specifying at all, as it was... |
| 2 | 2022-02-02 06:46 | McNs ♦3 | Thanks for the feedback. Am I better simply removing the bicycle tag in the Tags box? I had been using the dropdown options. Most paths in the area have no bicycle tags which is what I was trying to replicate | |
| 3 | 2022-02-02 08:08 | ralley | Yes just leave tags of in this case. | |
| 116833708 by tenzul @ 2022-01-31 17:59 | 1 | 2022-01-31 18:54 | ralley | Google maps is copyright and may not be used as a source for OSM edits: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Google --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116833708 |
| 2 | 2022-02-01 11:07 | tenzul ♦56 | Thank you for the hint. I thought checking for signs might not count as copying. But you are right, wont do it again. | |
| 116487751 by McNs @ 2022-01-23 05:31 | 1 | 2022-01-27 21:41 | ralley | Are these paths signposted as being legally not for bikes? As per https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:bicycle this key is for legal access, not suitability which is what your changeset comment refers to. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/chan... |
| 116636544 by tirohia @ 2022-01-26 19:52 | 1 | 2022-01-26 20:45 | ralley | Avondale station already exists as https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/61845866 and has done for 11 years. Also you have tagged this with building=yes and layer=2 which are both incorrect to the best of my knowledge --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMC... |
| 2 | 2022-01-26 21:10 | tirohia ♦1 | okay. So I'm probably doing this wrong then. The thing that I was trying to fix was that when I search for "Avondale Station" or "Avondale Train Station" I get results in Wales, Nova Scotia and New Brunswick, but not in Auckland. | |
| 115626943 by diepes @ 2022-01-01 04:27 | 1 | 2022-01-01 09:09 | ralley | If this is a drive way it should be tagged as highway=service and service=driveway and does not need the addr tags, those go on the address nodes (as already done) --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/115626943 ... |
| 115232420 by Jackmin @ 2021-12-22 03:41 | 1 | 2021-12-22 19:24 | ralley | Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits. Just a pointer that might make your life easier: in NZ the majority of buildings consist of mostly 90 degree corners. You can easily make all corners 90 degrees in the Id editor by selecting the building, right clicking and choosing “Square”.... |
| 114904246 by Isaac_Lindroos @ 2021-12-14 03:41 | 1 | 2021-12-14 06:08 | ralley | There is no need to add a residential area here it already exists: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/49164942 --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114904246 |
| 114904170 by Isaac_Lindroos @ 2021-12-14 03:36 | 1 | 2021-12-14 06:04 | ralley | Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits. Just a pointer that might make your life easier: in NZ the majority of buildings consist of mostly 90 degree corners. You can easily make all corners 90 degrees in the Id editor by selecting the building, right clicking and choosing “Square”.... |
| 114749812 by mcgirkke @ 2021-12-09 15:52 | 1 | 2021-12-09 19:07 | ralley | You seem to be using the same changeset comment for almost all your changes, can you please use a comment that reflects your actual changes: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/1... |
| 113382083 by Neil Richard @ 2021-11-04 19:11 | 1 | 2021-12-01 18:25 | ralley | This changeset added names that appear to be personal. Do you have evidence of these being the common on the ground names? |
| 2 | 2021-12-12 19:47 | aleph_null ♦18 | I think some of the named houses might be holiday homes. Those can be captured with tourism=chalet, right? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dchalet | |
| 3 | 2021-12-12 19:59 | Neil Richard ♦1 | Cheers for the comments guys,Not so much personal names, more local names, by which I mean names that the locals would know these houses/baches bythey are not all tourist baches.Some of them have formal name signs and some don'thappy to revert the changeI also wanted to mark ... | |
| 4 | 2021-12-18 21:19 | aleph_null ♦18 | If you’re local then you’re a much better authority of how the place should be named then we are :)If some of the names are directly based on a family’s name that’s living there then it might be better to not map them (mostly for their privacy, but also because they might... | |
| 114311113 by cjhond @ 2021-11-28 01:32 | 1 | 2021-11-28 06:08 | ralley | This is Newmarket Station bus stop #7400 as it was correctly tagged before NOT the train station, see https://at.govt.nz/bus-train-ferry/timetables/find-my-stop-or-station-on-a-map/ --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets... |
| 2 | 2021-11-28 20:22 | cjhond ♦9 | Yes apologies | |
| 114252940 by cjhond @ 2021-11-26 08:43 | 1 | 2021-11-26 20:01 | ralley | Welcome to SOM and thanks for your edits. Please use changeset comments to describe your changes: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments Also please use full names rather than abbreviations like "St" for Saint: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Abbreviation_.... |
| 2 | 2021-11-28 19:17 | cjhond ♦9 | Thanks and apologies for process errors as a total beginner and still learning. Did not know about changeset and comments. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114252940 | |
| 114195726 by mcgirkke @ 2021-11-24 20:05 | 1 | 2021-11-24 22:25 | ralley | Why have you removed the golf course? The change set comment "Remove block" is not very descriptive and certainly doesn't describe why this change was made. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114195726 |
| 113964802 by SylvieJ @ 2021-11-18 21:46 | 1 | 2021-11-18 22:02 | ralley | Is this really a residential road (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dresidential) or a driveway https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:service%3Ddriveway? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113964802 |
| 2 | 2021-11-18 22:27 | SylvieJ ♦1 | yes, shared driveway is more appropriate as it is a private shared access road | |
| 3 | 2021-11-18 22:35 | SylvieJ ♦1 | can a driveway have a street name? | |
| 4 | 2021-11-19 04:43 | ralley | I've never seen a driveway have an official name, the LINZ road DB is the place to confirm: https://data.linz.govt.nz/layer/53383-nz-roads-subsections-addressing/data/ --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113964802 | |
| 113796380 by Mathieu Apers @ 2021-11-15 09:34 | 1 | 2021-11-15 21:08 | ralley | Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits. Just a pointer that might make your life easier: in NZ the majority of buildings consist of mostly 90 degree corners. You can easily make all corners 90 degrees in the Id editor by selecting the building, right clicking and choosing “Square”.... |
| 112140988 by callum_AT @ 2021-10-05 21:02 | 1 | 2021-10-05 21:11 | ralley | If you see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/95324620 this name was added from signage observed on the ground. As per https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name the name is "The most prominent name on a sign posted on the feature itself", i.e. the name OTG. Have you observed your... |
| 111850757 by Qwerzy @ 2021-09-29 07:24 | 1 | 2021-09-29 20:47 | ralley | Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits. Just a pointer that might make your life easier: in NZ a large proportion of buildings consist of mostly 90 degree corners. You can easily make all corners 90 degrees in the Id editor by selecting the building, right clicking and choosing “Square&rdq... |
| 111520819 by rajkumar ch @ 2021-09-22 04:04 | 1 | 2021-09-22 20:20 | ralley | this changeset has added two very close parallel tracks that cross each other and other highways and are not visible in the Maxar imagery you reference as a source. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111520819 |
| 2 | 2021-09-23 07:49 | rajkumar ch ♦6 | Hi ralley,Thank you for the feedback. I assume the two parallel tracks have got created mistakenly, probably the Way 965289249 got copy pasted. I have corrected the issue now. Hope this helps.Happy mapping! | |
| 111427069 by Daniel Palenski @ 2021-09-20 00:10 | 1 | 2021-09-20 19:54 | ralley | OSM imports require the import guidelines at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines are followed. Part of this requires a dedicated user account is used which is not being done here. Please ensure all the guidelines are followed. --- Publishe... |
| 111080266 by ce29unlabeledone @ 2021-09-12 00:22 | 1 | 2021-09-12 19:51 | ralley | Please don't use abbreviations like MoE in names: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Naming_conventions --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111080266 |
| 111013975 by PaulHNZ @ 2021-09-10 09:15 | 1 | 2021-09-10 20:35 | ralley | Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits. Rather than using the description field to tag this as a playground it should be tagged with leisure=playground See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dplayground --- Published using OSMCha: https://osm... |
| 110883921 by falk @ 2021-09-08 01:23 | 1 | 2021-09-08 02:56 | ❤️🔥 ♦364 | It is perfectly acceptable to map driveways. I've reverted this. If you don't like the look of it, use a map style that doesn't render driveways --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110883921 ... |
| 2 | 2021-09-10 02:38 | ralley | You have been asked multiple times to please stop deleting driveways. Just because you don't have a use for them does not mean they are useful. There are many different renderers for OSM data, if you don't want to display driveways choose or configure a renderer that does not display the... | |
| 110716898 by mapmakerdavid @ 2021-09-04 13:33 | 1 | 2021-09-06 22:58 | ralley | A protest site should not be tagged as tourism, also your changeset comment specifically calls out that this is tagging for the renderer: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmc... |
| 2 | 2021-09-07 03:51 | mapmakerdavid ♦1 | Thanks for the feedback, ralley. I'll revise the tagging. | |
| 110602955 by AlwynWellington @ 2021-09-02 07:56 | 1 | 2021-09-03 01:33 | ralley | Please do not delete the land use areas just because you feel it will make things easier for something you may do in the future. Detailed mapping of residential areas like this is the accepted approach in NZ . See the recent discussions on the talk-nz mailing list --- #RE... |
| 2 | 2021-09-10 03:47 | AlwynWellington ♦58 | ralley, kia oraI was simplifying the residential areas I was working in. With so much more information, such as building outlines and street addresses some residential areas are becoming quite crowded with info.I have now read the recent discussion (mainly 1 August 2021) and noted no consen... | |
| 110274301 by ZhenyaBarashko @ 2021-08-26 09:10 | 1 | 2021-08-26 19:40 | ralley | You have misspelled the name and Gilmours is a chain of wholesalers, not a supermarket --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110274301 |
| 2 | 2021-08-26 20:42 | ZhenyaBarashko ♦5 | Thank you for your attention. I fixed an error https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9037391381. Hope for future cooperation! | |
| 108896728 by NeeravD @ 2021-07-30 14:35 | 1 | 2021-08-20 00:45 | ralley | House numbers don't go in name field --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/108896728 |
| 108896840 by NeeravD @ 2021-07-30 14:37 | 1 | 2021-08-20 00:43 | ralley | House numbers don't go in name field --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/108896840 |
| 108899044 by NeeravD @ 2021-07-30 15:32 | 1 | 2021-08-20 00:43 | ralley | House numbers don't go in name field --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/108899044 |
| 108899176 by NeeravD @ 2021-07-30 15:35 | 1 | 2021-08-20 00:43 | ralley | House numbers don't go in name field --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/108899176 |
| 108899310 by NeeravD @ 2021-07-30 15:39 | 1 | 2021-08-20 00:42 | ralley | House numbers don't go in name field --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/108899310 |
| 2 | 2021-08-20 00:42 | ralley | House numbers don't go in name field --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/108899310 | |
| 109304235 by NeeravD @ 2021-08-07 10:32 | 1 | 2021-08-20 00:42 | ralley | House numbers don't go in name field --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109304235 |
| 109304560 by NeeravD @ 2021-08-07 10:41 | 1 | 2021-08-20 00:42 | ralley | House numbers don't go in name field --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109304560 |
| 109304613 by NeeravD @ 2021-08-07 10:42 | 1 | 2021-08-20 00:42 | ralley | House numbers don't go in name field --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109304613 |
| 109305818 by NeeravD @ 2021-08-07 11:13 | 1 | 2021-08-20 00:41 | ralley | House numbers don't go in name field --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109305818 |
| 109305898 by NeeravD @ 2021-08-07 11:15 | 1 | 2021-08-20 00:41 | ralley | House numbers don't go in name field --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109305898 |
| 109306089 by NeeravD @ 2021-08-07 11:20 | 1 | 2021-08-20 00:39 | ralley | House numbers don't go in name field --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109306089 |
| 109564179 by NeeravD @ 2021-08-12 10:17 | 1 | 2021-08-20 00:38 | ralley | House numbers don't go in the name field --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109564179 |
| 109565644 by NeeravD @ 2021-08-12 10:39 | 1 | 2021-08-20 00:36 | ralley | House numbers don't go in the name field --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109565644 |
| 109862264 by Zaphod Harkonnen @ 2021-08-18 09:38 | 1 | 2021-08-18 22:05 | ralley | If these are footpaths then the correct way to tag separate ways is with footway=highway and footway=sidewalk, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Sidewalks Alternatively tagging the parent road with the sidewalk tag instead of drawing a sperate way may be easier to maintain. This described un... |
| 2 | 2021-08-25 00:00 | Zaphod Harkonnen ♦2 | @ralley, cheers. I'll look at fixing up things in a few days. | |
| 109858613 by LilKiwi @ 2021-08-18 08:41 | 1 | 2021-08-18 21:40 | ralley | Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits. Many buildings in NZ consist of 90 degree corners, this can be enforced in Id by right clicking and selecting "Square" --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109858613 |
| 109563747 by NeeravD @ 2021-08-12 10:09 | 1 | 2021-08-13 01:58 | ralley | What are you attempting to achieve here? The changeset comment says walkway but the edit removed the name for a cafe. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109563747 |
| 2 | 2021-08-13 01:58 | ralley | What are you attempting to achieve here? The changeset comment says walkway but the edit removed the name for a cafe. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109563747 | |
| 109564517 by NeeravD @ 2021-08-12 10:23 | 1 | 2021-08-13 01:56 | ralley | Please don't put address information in the name key, there are separate addr:housenumber and addr:street that should be used instead. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109564517 ... |
| 109294632 by BrentNZ @ 2021-08-07 06:21 | 1 | 2021-08-08 07:24 | ralley | Why have you deleted way 411173270? It is visible in the aerial imagery you refer to --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109294632 |
| 2 | 2021-08-10 05:06 | BrentNZ ♦1 | It is a farm track on private property that people keep trying to use to access Mt Karangahake. | |
| 3 | 2021-08-10 08:13 | ralley | Correct action is to tag as access=private to mark legal access, not delete the trace. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:access%3Dprivate | |
| 109235140 by bruno_brasil_nz @ 2021-08-06 05:50 | 1 | 2021-08-08 07:34 | ralley | Please use meaningful changeset comments: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments Do you have a source for this manor? A name? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109235140 |
| 109328059 by MaxL @ 2021-08-07 22:55 | 1 | 2021-08-08 07:20 | ralley | This changeset has marked a huge portion of O'Farrells Track as a culvert, I suspect what you wanted to achieve would be tagging the portion of the stream that passes under the track with tunnel=culvert and layer=-1 --- Published using OSMCha: https://osm... |
| 2 | 2021-08-08 22:53 | MaxL ♦2 | Error corrected :) | |
| 108776687 by ralley @ 2021-07-28 19:13 | 1 | 2021-07-28 19:24 | Ze0zohk1 ♦286 | Maybe we can add replace building=yes by building=toilets? Or something like building=sanitary or building=sanitary_facility?Just an idea...Cheers |
| 2 | 2021-07-28 20:34 | ralley | Without local knowledge I cannot determine if the building is entirely used for sanitary purposes or if the tag just represents a toilet in a building. | |
| 3 | 2021-07-29 06:03 | Ze0zohk1 ♦286 | good point | |
| 108470262 by freddyfrank @ 2021-07-23 07:04 | 1 | 2021-07-23 07:22 | ralley | This is not supported by the imagery and appears to be vandalism. Reverting --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/108470262 |
| 108450719 by corwinbikes @ 2021-07-22 20:54 | 1 | 2021-07-22 23:15 | ralley | The new builds appear to be visible in the Bing, ESRI and Maxar imagery which is available i the Id editor. Just beware that the imagery mat itself be offset, not sure how to correct for that in Id, easy in JOSM --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/... |
| 2 | 2021-07-22 23:21 | corwinbikes ♦1 | Thank you for the tip, I'll investigate. | |
| 107970691 by friendlymapper @ 2021-07-14 10:27 | 1 | 2021-07-14 19:47 | ralley | You have tagged the roof as flat but from the LINZ aerial imagery it appears to be hipped whilst the adjacent roof is flat --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/107970691 |
| 107989967 by NeeravD @ 2021-07-14 15:52 | 1 | 2021-07-14 19:42 | ralley | You have tagged a forest polygon with name=Main Road, is this really the name of the forest? What is the source for this? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/107989967 |
| 107980446 by jfjfjflks9014 @ 2021-07-14 12:30 | 1 | 2021-07-14 17:28 | ralley | Vandalism, reverted --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/107980446 |
| 107980615 by jfjfjflks9014 @ 2021-07-14 12:33 | 1 | 2021-07-14 17:25 | ralley | Vandalism, reverted --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/107980615 |
| 107853530 by NeeravD @ 2021-07-12 17:04 | 1 | 2021-07-13 06:32 | ralley | You've put a Cafe name on the moving walkway object, instead you should create a new node tagged amenity=cafe and name=Pier Cafe --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/107853530 |
| 107573538 by twinkle13 @ 2021-07-07 15:09 | 1 | 2021-07-08 05:54 | ralley | Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits. A few points: 1) Please use meaningful changeset comments "map updates" is too generic, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments. 2) Please limit changesets to a smaller geographic area, this one spanned from Turkey to Ne... |
| 107528527 by Adrian McCambridge @ 2021-07-07 03:34 | 1 | 2021-07-07 04:28 | ralley | Name should presumably be "The Frameless Glass Company" and not the generic "Head Office", see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name Also there probably be some sort of entity tagging, perhaps "office=company"? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Aoffice%3... |
| 98265002 by belqui @ 2021-01-28 05:04 | 1 | 2021-07-06 23:28 | ralley | Please don't put descriptions like "Great view" in the name field - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98265002 |
| 99405963 by belqui @ 2021-02-16 21:16 | 1 | 2021-07-06 23:26 | ralley | Please don't put descriptions like "only by boat" in the name tag, there is a dedicated description tag for this --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/99405963 |
| 107408139 by NBegg @ 2021-07-04 22:05 | 1 | 2021-07-05 00:07 | ralley | There is no need to add a node as well as the building way - this has resulted in two objects for the entity. Rather just add any tags that were missing to the existing way. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/107408139 |
| 2 | 2021-07-05 00:15 | NBegg ♦1 | The reason for having it as a point and polygon (building) is that these are made into separate layers that feed into different mapping systems. Some maps will require petrol stations shown as points, others will be interested in it from the building perspective. | |
| 3 | 2021-07-06 07:21 | ❤️🔥 ♦364 | Hi NBegg, I agree with ralley, nothing should be mapped twice. If a system you're using only looks at nodes, that's a major flaw with that system and you'd be better off trying to fix that issue, since 173,000 petrol stations are mapped as areas vs ~291,000 as nodes - https://taginfo.... | |
| 107375028 by MarianLytt @ 2021-07-04 04:54 | 1 | 2021-07-04 19:22 | ralley | Please do not delete objects just because they are private access - if they physically exist they can be mapped and tagged with access=private (as the footway was) to designate the legal access rights. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access --- Pu... |
| 2 | 2021-07-19 18:57 | MarianLytt ♦1 | this is private property and should not have been mapped - someone has trespassed | |
| 3 | 2021-07-19 19:19 | MarianLytt ♦1 | ...it is creepy to have private access mapped | |
| 107233890 by rickarhayd_nz @ 2021-07-01 02:13 | 1 | 2021-07-01 19:01 | ralley | Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits. A quick pointer: many buildings in NZ consist only of 90 degree corners. You can enforce this in the Id editor by selecting the outline, right clicking and choosing "Square" (shortcut "Q"). --- Publ... |
| 107245888 by robinvant @ 2021-07-01 07:58 | 1 | 2021-07-01 08:55 | ralley | Do you mean highway=footway? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dfootway --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/107245888 |
| 106985814 by olive666 @ 2021-06-25 22:20 | 1 | 2021-06-26 05:00 | ralley | Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits. Please note as OSM is an international project phone numbers should be in ITU-T E.164 format as per https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:phone --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/106985814 ... |
| 106867594 by Michael Simek @ 2021-06-24 03:48 | 1 | 2021-06-24 18:53 | ralley | status=draft is unlikely to work for what you intended, have a look at tagging this as proposed instead: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:proposed --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/106867594 |
| 106817592 by willisturm @ 2021-06-23 07:12 | 1 | 2021-06-23 19:18 | ralley | NZ uses metric speed limits --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/106817592 |
| 2 | 2021-06-25 07:04 | willisturm ♦55 | Hi Ralley,thank you for the hint. Now it's fixed | |
| 106701007 by Tulley Gray @ 2021-06-21 08:22 | 1 | 2021-06-21 19:12 | ralley | Looks like you have a type in the name. Also consider adding tags to specify what the named object is, https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:office may be helpful. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/106701007 |
| 106560488 by marcosabil @ 2021-06-18 04:03 | 1 | 2021-06-18 04:55 | ralley | Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits. Instead of using Bing imagery you are better off using the LINZ Aerial Imagery - it is much higher resolution and not so offset. Many buildings in NZ consist of only 90 degree corners this can be enforced in Id with the "Square" command (short cu... |
| 2 | 2021-06-18 08:00 | marcosabil ♦1 | Hey ralley thanks for the feedback, I have updated with your suggestions, thank you very much! =] --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/106560488 | |
| 3 | 2021-08-20 11:11 | markbegbie ♦28 | Hello from me too - good work, and great to have more folk adding to the map around Tauranga.One thing I've only just discovered this week is MapWithAI. Through this you can access a dataset of NZ building outlines, through either the RapiD editor (http://mapwith.ai/rapid) or JOSM plugin &... | |
| 106494580 by Numbergod @ 2021-06-17 01:18 | 1 | 2021-06-17 01:22 | Numbergod ♦10 | Yeah, I'm a newbie at this and it hasn't come out correctly. If someone could tidy it up and make it a cul-de-sac, that'd be great thanks. |
| 2 | 2021-06-17 03:45 | ralley | I've extended Norwich Street slightly and added a non-exit (cul de sac) tag to match the CCC image. | |
| 3 | 2021-06-17 04:52 | Numbergod ♦10 | Awesome. Thanks Ralley. | |
| 106181030 by ce29unlabeledone @ 2021-06-10 23:12 | 1 | 2021-06-10 23:57 | ralley | Please don't abbreviate road as Rd, OSM practice is to use full names: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Naming_conventions#Don.27t_use_abbreviations --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/106181030 |
| 106148190 by ruseurope @ 2021-06-10 10:21 | 1 | 2021-06-10 10:30 | ralley | What is the source for the name "Adams Path"? A lack of signs banning cycling on a path does not make it a cycleway and bicycle=designated, it is more likely to be bicycle=permissive --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/1061481... |
| 106146759 by ruseurope @ 2021-06-10 09:58 | 1 | 2021-06-10 10:12 | ralley | What is the source for this name? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/106146759 |
| 2 | 2021-06-10 10:38 | ruseurope ♦10 | Hillpark trail connects these paths, oficially.How to downlaod the image proof? | |
| 3 | 2021-06-10 21:36 | ❤️🔥 ♦364 | could you explain where you got the name "Walpole Avenue Reserve Path" from please? You must not make up names. We can only include signposted names or official names in OSM.also, why did you delete the residential area around this park? | |
| 106062682 by Kokako24 @ 2021-06-09 02:22 | 1 | 2021-06-09 23:41 | ralley | As part of this change you should remove the construction=residential tag as well. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/106062682 |
| 2 | 2021-06-10 07:11 | Kokako_Nikau ♦2 | Thanks for the tip. I’m still learning the ropes but being as cautious as I can. | |
| 106118583 by Kokako24 @ 2021-06-09 21:56 | 1 | 2021-06-09 23:39 | ralley | Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits. One minor point to note, many buildings in NZ consist of only 90 degree corners. You can enforce this in Id by right clicking and selecting "Square". --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changeset... |
| 2 | 2021-06-10 07:12 | Kokako_Nikau ♦2 | Thanks again Ralley. I must have missed that helpful function in the tutorial. Appreciated. | |
| 106089297 by callum_AT @ 2021-06-09 10:56 | 1 | 2021-06-09 18:03 | ralley | Are way 952632976, 95263978 the sidewalks/footpaths? If so they are missing the footway=sidewalk tag. Generally though the approach in NZ is to just add sidewalk tags to the parent road as in: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Sidewalks#Sidewalk_as_refinement_to_a_highway as it is much easier to... |
| 2 | 2021-06-10 04:39 | callum_AT ♦6 | Yes, I appreciate that, but for some routing tools, including our (Auckland Transport) journey planner, it doesn't always provide a correct walking route when it assumes that the road has footpaths, particularly when determining crossing points. --- Publi... | |
| 106069732 by ruseurope @ 2021-06-09 05:41 | 1 | 2021-06-09 05:58 | ralley | Are these names signposted or are you making them up? Why are you tagging the paths as cycleways and naming them Walkway - this is an obvious contradiction. If walkways where cycling is allowed they should be tagged as highway=footway with bicycle=permissive. You have recently made many similar e... |
| 2 | 2021-06-10 09:56 | ruseurope ♦10 | These walkways are designed to be used for both cyclists and pedestrians, there is no any sign that prohibit cyclists to use these pathways | |
| 3 | 2021-06-10 11:34 | ruseurope ♦10 | officially they called paths or bush tracks | |
| 4 | 2021-06-10 21:41 | ❤️🔥 ♦364 | you have been using the tag 'bicycle=designated'. Please carefully read the documentation for this tag: https://wiki.osm.org/Tag:bicycle=designated it should only be used if it the path is explicitly signposted as a "Shared Path" or "Cycleway" (these are the words u... | |
| 106066282 by ruseurope @ 2021-06-09 04:32 | 1 | 2021-06-09 05:02 | ralley | Why have you tagged way 173225434 with layer=-1? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/106066282 |
| 2 | 2021-06-10 10:04 | ruseurope ♦10 | there was a problem with buildings overlap. Now it is solved. No more -1 layer | |
| 106066913 by ruseurope @ 2021-06-09 04:46 | 1 | 2021-06-09 04:50 | ralley | How can this be a cycleway if it is named ....Walkway? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/106066913 |
| 2 | 2021-06-10 09:58 | ruseurope ♦10 | why not?These paths are intended for use by both cyclists and pedestrians, there are no signs prohibiting cyclists from using these paths. | |
| 3 | 2021-06-10 21:33 | ❤️🔥 ♦364 | just because there are no signs, doesn't mean you can tag it as bicycle=designated. That tag should only be used if it is 𝘥𝘦𝘴𝘪𝘨𝘯𝘢𝘵𝘦𝘥 as a cycle path. That means there are signs that say "Shared Path" or "Cycleway". In this case it should not be ... | |
| 106065081 by theGradyConnell @ 2021-06-09 04:02 | 1 | 2021-06-09 04:23 | ralley | Why is way 951827070 tagged with layer=-1? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/106065081 |
| 2 | 2021-06-09 04:28 | theGradyConnell ♦3 | Looks like it was a hangover from an old change have adjusted now :D --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/106065081 | |
| 105952583 by ruseurope @ 2021-06-07 07:45 | 1 | 2021-06-07 11:02 | ralley | Does this source have a licence compatible with OSM? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/105952583 |
| 2 | 2021-06-10 10:32 | ruseurope ♦10 | It can be googled partly, but cannot be published without the permisiion | |
| 105959695 by ruseurope @ 2021-06-07 09:26 | 1 | 2021-06-07 11:00 | ralley | Why are you naming this walkway and tagging as a cycleway? --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/105959695 |
| 2 | 2021-06-10 10:06 | ruseurope ♦10 | why not?Can I name it path?There is no oficial name but locals usually call all these paths as walkwaysThese paths are intended for use by both cyclists and pedestrians, there are no signs prohibiting cyclists from using these paths. | |
| 3 | 2021-06-10 21:51 | ❤️🔥 ♦364 | "Can I name it path?" - No, you cannot add fake or made-up names to OSM. If there no official name, nor a signposted name, the 'name' field should be blank.You've said that "these paths are intended for use by both cyclists and pedestrians" - unless you have se... | |
| 105954239 by ruseurope @ 2021-06-07 08:10 | 1 | 2021-06-07 10:45 | ❤️🔥 ♦364 | What is the source of the name 'Adams walkway'? Do not add made-up names to OSM --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/105954239 |
| 2 | 2021-06-07 10:59 | ralley | Seconded, makes no sense to be named Adams Walkway and tagged as a cycleway --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/105954239 | |
| 105946879 by ruseurope @ 2021-06-07 06:19 | 1 | 2021-06-07 07:50 | ralley | Please use meaningful changeset comments: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments#:~:text=A%20good%20changeset%20comment%20should,have%20edited%20on%20the%20map. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/105946879 ... |
| 2 | 2021-06-07 10:51 | ❤️🔥 ♦364 | Do not add fake names to OSM. According to LINZ the name of this creek is Oira Creek, not "Eastern Karaka Creeks", nor "West Karaka Creeks" --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/105946879 ... | |
| 105947001 by ruseurope @ 2021-06-07 06:21 | 1 | 2021-06-07 07:50 | ralley | Please use meaningful changeset comments: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments#:~:text=A%20good%20changeset%20comment%20should,have%20edited%20on%20the%20map. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/105947001 ... |
| 2 | 2021-06-07 10:47 | ❤️🔥 ♦364 | This mud covers a much larger area than just the Puhinui Creek, so it is not correct to add name=Puhinui CreekSee https://osm.org/relation/3005500 --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/105947001 | |
| 105937929 by theGradyConnell @ 2021-06-07 02:38 | 1 | 2021-06-07 03:11 | ralley | Why is way 951850890 tagged as layer -1 is it really underneath other mapped objects? Also rather than drawing sidewalks separately consider adding sidewalk tags to the parent roads, it is much easier to maintain and generally the preferred option in NZ --- P... |
| 2 | 2021-06-07 04:38 | theGradyConnell ♦3 | Hey Have updated the -1 zones(Working my way back through them, my bad new to this didn't realise that would be an issue.I didn't know that was an option, I did try to add a tag before but had no luck, also sidewalks aren't always constant in NZ so hence why I was adding them origin... | |
| 105915115 by ruseurope @ 2021-06-06 12:33 | 1 | 2021-06-07 01:14 | ralley | These are not access=private, it should be customer --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/105915115 |
| 105903084 by ruseurope @ 2021-06-06 04:37 | 1 | 2021-06-06 04:57 | ralley | Please do not use the name field to tag descriptions like "informal crossing area" - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/105903084 |
| 105802127 by Tobie Ueckermann @ 2021-06-03 21:47 | 1 | 2021-06-04 00:24 | ralley | Please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dretirement_home and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix#Stages_of_birth on how to properly tag retirement villages and planned developments --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using O... |
| 105603953 by ruseurope @ 2021-05-31 07:25 | 1 | 2021-05-31 08:13 | ralley | Please dont put made up names like "a path through" in the name field : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/105603953 |
| 105151935 by ShakyIsles @ 2021-05-23 03:29 | 1 | 2021-05-23 05:50 | ralley | Please use meaningful comments on changesets |
| 105073498 by ralley @ 2021-05-21 08:10 | 1 | 2021-05-21 08:12 | ralley | Correction - Henderson, not Te Atatu South |
| 104853350 by markgd @ 2021-05-18 01:44 | 1 | 2021-05-18 01:58 | ralley | You've tagged this as a turning_circle (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dturning_circle) but described it as a roundabout - they aren't the same. If truely a roundabout it should be tagged as a mini_roundabout (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dmini_rounda... |
| 104539155 by tntn2 @ 2021-05-12 00:53 | 1 | 2021-05-12 02:05 | ralley | Please use meaningful changeset comments as per: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments#:~:text=A%20good%20changeset%20comment%20should,have%20edited%20on%20the%20map.Also if this is a vaccination centre then the tags used seem wrong, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/... |
| 104414691 by nawramm @ 2021-05-10 00:29 | 1 | 2021-05-10 00:51 | ralley | Please use changeset comments as per: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments#:~:text=A%20good%20changeset%20comment%20should,have%20edited%20on%20the%20map. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/104414691 |
| 104386065 by ShakyIsles @ 2021-05-09 07:01 | 1 | 2021-05-09 07:41 | ralley | Can you please use meaningful changeset comments? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/104386065 |
| 2 | 2021-05-10 00:29 | Warin61 ♦2,663 | What is the source for the name and extent of Rerekino Forest??? | |
| 104279125 by Tim45 @ 2021-05-07 00:35 | 1 | 2021-05-07 01:16 | ralley | Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edit. Can you please use desciptive changset comments as per: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments#:~:text=A%20good%20changeset%20comment%20should,have%20edited%20on%20the%20map. Also why have you changed the campsite to a park? The (uncha... |
| 104147190 by Jim T R @ 2021-05-04 21:37 | 1 | 2021-05-05 02:07 | ralley | This changeset also moved node 5262962590 for 6/161 to the NorthEast of it's previous location which seems wrong, was it intentional? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/104147190 |
| 103322520 by 20speechlayl @ 2021-04-21 08:29 | 1 | 2021-04-22 00:04 | ralley | Way 933228563 has been tagged with layer=-1 but is not tagged as a tunnel, is it really unde rthe other features? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103322520 |
| 2 | 2021-04-22 07:19 | 20speechlayl ♦2 | I don't understand where it is. Could you point it out for me? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103322520 | |
| 3 | 2021-04-22 07:22 | ralley | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/933228563#map=17/-43.47601/172.61973 --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103322520 | |
| 4 | 2021-04-22 07:36 | 20speechlayl ♦2 | Oh found it. It runs under a block of shops (i.e the footpath is placed where it should be with the shops having a roof that extends further out). I'm sorta new so unsure if this is correct. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103322... | |
| 5 | 2021-04-22 18:56 | ralley | Based on the LINZ aerial imagery only the SW corner of the way appears covered so if mapped this way it should be split and only the actual covered area tagged as such. A more correct tagging is I believe to leave the way with no layer but covered=yes and tag just the overhanging portion of the bui... | |
| 103301625 by hugoreeves @ 2021-04-21 02:41 | 1 | 2021-04-21 23:22 | ralley | Is the swimming pool missing a location=indoor tag? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dswimming_pool --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103301625 |
| 102910208 by mannux @ 2021-04-14 07:34 | 1 | 2021-04-14 19:46 | ralley | Imports must use a dedicated user account as per https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines#Use_a_dedicated_user_account --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102910208 |
| 102896166 by karthikreddy andru @ 2021-04-14 03:46 | 1 | 2021-04-14 04:42 | ralley | Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits. A few questions and issues: 1) Please use desciptive changset comments as per: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments 2) You have dragged node 623667975 of residential area way 49164877 into the road way 7633293 3) Way 930486806 with ... |
| 101293203 by TonyShi_NZ @ 2021-03-19 03:00 | 1 | 2021-03-19 07:13 | ralley | Book store name should not be in all capitals --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101293203 |
| 2 | 2021-03-24 20:04 | ralley | Fixed | |
| 101293471 by TonyShi_NZ @ 2021-03-19 03:13 | 1 | 2021-03-24 06:00 | ralley | This path does not exist, the LINZ NZ Aerial Imagery for here is outdated. Removing |
| 101594923 by Parnell Business Association @ 2021-03-23 19:14 | 1 | 2021-03-24 01:58 | ralley | This changeset has dragged a node of way 578981428 --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101594923 |
| 2 | 2021-03-24 02:03 | ralley | Fixed --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101594923 | |
| 101311342 by Bamboo1988 @ 2021-03-19 08:41 | 1 | 2021-03-19 19:46 | ralley | Please don't remove the building tag --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101311342 |
| 2 | 2021-03-24 01:54 | ralley | Re-added | |
| 101235686 by ralley @ 2021-03-18 07:16 | 1 | 2021-03-23 14:05 | mueschel ♦6,565 | Could you check this way, it got some strange tags:https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/918518119 |
| 2 | 2021-03-23 23:35 | ralley | Thanks for that, removed extraneous tags | |
| 101432955 by hyungjin9067 @ 2021-03-21 10:24 | 1 | 2021-03-21 18:15 | ralley | Please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dpitch for how to properly tag sports pitches and please use changeset descriptions as per https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/ch... |
| 101432682 by hyungjin9067 @ 2021-03-21 10:17 | 1 | 2021-03-21 18:13 | ralley | Is this a public footway? You have tagged it as such. Also re: name, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101432682 |
| 101432491 by hyungjin9067 @ 2021-03-21 10:10 | 1 | 2021-03-21 18:12 | ralley | Please see comments for https://osmcha.org/changesets/101432439 --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101432491 |
| 101432439 by hyungjin9067 @ 2021-03-21 10:08 | 1 | 2021-03-21 18:11 | ralley | Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits. Please don't use the description field to tag address information - there are dedicated addr keys for this, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr. Also please don't put address information in the name field: https://wiki.openstreetmap.... |
| 101293397 by TonyShi_NZ @ 2021-03-19 03:09 | 1 | 2021-03-19 07:10 | ralley | There is no car park there - cars would have to drive over the shared path to access. I run this route near daily. It is also not in the aerial imagery you used as a source. Please remove --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101293397... |
| 2 | 2021-03-20 01:48 | ralley | Removed | |
| 101293662 by Anusha_Saribali @ 2021-03-19 03:24 | 1 | 2021-03-19 07:16 | ralley | As previously requested, please use more descriptive changeset comments: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments; Most buildings in NZ consist of 90 degree corners, this can be enforced in Id by right clicking and selecting "Square" --- ... |
| 101220814 by TonyShi_NZ @ 2021-03-18 02:53 | 1 | 2021-03-18 03:25 | ralley | Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits. Please don't put object names in the description, there is a dedicated name tag (I see you added this later); addr:city is just Auckland, the suburb (Mount Eden) is already tagged in the seperate addr:suburb tag. Also please note abbreviations like Mt... |
| 101220947 by Anusha_Saribali @ 2021-03-18 02:59 | 1 | 2021-03-18 03:21 | ralley | Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits. Review as requested: Please use more descriptive changeset comments: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments; Most buildings in NZ consist of 90 degree corners, this can be enforced in Id by right clicking and selecting "Square"... |
| 101183805 by alexstewart74 @ 2021-03-17 11:14 | 1 | 2021-03-17 22:41 | ralley | When changing the tag from highway=construction to residential on way 816573192 you should also remove the construction=residential tag --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101183805 |
| 101117976 by fijiice @ 2021-03-16 11:39 | 1 | 2021-03-16 19:46 | ralley | This change is misusing the name field: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101117976 |
| 101116000 by fijiice @ 2021-03-16 11:08 | 1 | 2021-03-16 19:43 | ralley | This edit has multiple issues: a way tagged coastline that is clearly not; what appears to be a residential houses garage tagged as the clothes shop; fake names ("House of pain") added. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.... |
| 101016485 by omenzzz @ 2021-03-15 03:56 | 1 | 2021-03-15 20:07 | ralley | Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits. Do you have a source for the name "Burnes Ford Road"? LINZ in both the road and address databases uses "Burns Ford Road" as do NZ Post, Fish And Game NZ and every other reference I can find. I found no references to "Burnes Ford R... |
| 2 | 2021-03-16 02:03 | omenzzz ♦1 | Hi, thanks for your review.See NZ Road Subsections (Addressing) here: https://data.linz.govt.nz/layer/53383-nz-roads-subsections-addressing/ and NZ Street Address points here: https://data.linz.govt.nz/layer/53353-nz-street-address/ for sources. Road name has only recently been updated by Rangitī... | |
| 3 | 2021-03-16 03:28 | ralley | Thanks for that. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101016485 | |
| 100528792 by virlgil van @ 2021-03-06 10:12 | 1 | 2021-03-06 19:17 | ralley | Despite multiple discussions on your changesets requesting otherwise you are still making huge changesets and not using meaningful comments. Please break your changsets up into smaller geographical areas and use meaningful comments as per: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comment... |
| 2 | 2021-03-06 22:48 | ralley | Blocked by DWG, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4798 | |
| 3 | 2021-03-29 14:07 | virlgil van ♦3 | ok thanks for the head up | |
| 4 | 2021-04-02 14:36 | virlgil van ♦3 | can i reply to singel messages | |
| 5 | 2021-04-02 18:51 | marczoutendijk ♦2,755 | User virlgil van is talking about this:https://www.dofe.org/do | |
| 100376809 by Daniel Palenski @ 2021-03-03 22:15 | 1 | 2021-03-04 01:45 | ralley | Re: Z Wairou you have removed the building tag from the building and replaced it with amenity tags when there is already a node with more detailed amenity tags --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/100376809 |
| 2 | 2021-03-04 01:59 | Daniel Palenski ♦7 | Didn't really give much thought to that one. You can revert it if you want | |
| 100377722 by Henry Crum @ 2021-03-03 22:57 | 1 | 2021-03-04 01:42 | ralley | Please dont tag descriptions like "R.O.W." in the name key: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/100377722 |
| 100377156 by shxurong @ 2021-03-03 22:30 | 1 | 2021-03-03 23:44 | ralley | Welcome to SOM and thanks for your edit. I've drawn in the area of the childcare centre and added the amenity=kindergarten tag. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/100377156 |
| 100203391 by IvoPa @ 2021-03-01 11:58 | 1 | 2021-03-01 23:04 | ralley | Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits. Just a pointer that might make your life easier: in NZ the majority of buildings consist of mostly 90 degree corners. You can easily make all corners 90 degrees in the Id editor by selecting the building, right clicking and choosing “Square”.... |
| 100077490 by JoMoMap @ 2021-02-26 22:33 | 1 | 2021-02-26 23:57 | ralley | Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits. Why have you tagged the schoold building with layer=-1? That would indicate it is underground. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/100077490 |
| 2 | 2021-02-26 23:58 | ralley | Also please don't put personal information like "John Home" in the name field: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/100077490 | |
| 3 | 2021-02-27 07:34 | CoyKoi ♦228 | Thank you for adding AGE school to the map. I've updated the school by tagging the area as amenity=school, rather than on the building itself.I've also remedied the issues raised by ralley (private info on street address and un-needed layer tag) | |
| 4 | 2021-02-27 11:41 | JoMoMap ♦1 | Thanks for the feedbacks and CoyKoi for corrections.I had a Senior Moment with personal detail forgetting that this is not like my GPS for setting my 'Home' | |
| 99273006 by alanlapthorn @ 2021-02-15 02:18 | 1 | 2021-02-15 02:27 | ralley | Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edit, looks good to me. The only thing I noticed was that you added the address when there is already a node with that address. It's not a major problem but you could have merged the existing node with your building outline or just left the node inside the o... |
| 2 | 2021-02-15 02:53 | alanlapthorn ♦1 | @ralley - thanks for the info. I've merged the two and have found https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice - I think I wanted to get an edit in so quickly after doing the tutorial. | |
| 99224106 by AlwynWellington @ 2021-02-13 18:07 | 1 | 2021-02-13 19:43 | ralley | Please don't use the name field for descriptions like "shopping precinct", it is for proper names: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Don.27t_use_name_tag_to_describe_things --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https:/... |
| 98594304 by Pitounz @ 2021-02-02 18:02 | 1 | 2021-02-02 19:27 | ralley | Glacier Burn Track is alrady mapped as way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/755484272 --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98594304 |
| 98479028 by 20speechlayl @ 2021-02-01 04:53 | 1 | 2021-02-01 05:11 | ralley | Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits. The normal practice in New Zealand is not to add sidewalks as seperate ways but instead use the "refinement of highway" approach where sidewalk tags are added to the parent road instead. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:sidewalk Using... |
| 98464314 by Auckland Insider @ 2021-01-31 19:50 | 1 | 2021-01-31 22:30 | ralley | Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits. When adding phone numbers please use ITU-T E.164 format as per https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:phone --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98464314 |
| 98264555 by Warren Gleeson @ 2021-01-28 04:56 | 1 | 2021-01-28 06:56 | ralley | Please don't edit the underlying map in an attempt to create personalised routes. There are applications which use OSM as a base map with which you can create routes instead. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98264555 ... |
| 97924961 by Hayden Thorn @ 2021-01-21 19:43 | 1 | 2021-01-21 21:34 | ralley | Why have you put layer=-1 on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/898090359 ? It is visible in aerial imagery so is not underground. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/97924961 |
| 2 | 2021-01-24 02:52 | Hayden Thorn ♦2 | That's my bad will fix in an update. Thanks for the feedback. | |
| 97923397 by ingoratsdorf @ 2021-01-21 18:55 | 1 | 2021-01-21 21:06 | ralley | Mokoroa Stream Track is closed according to DOC (see https://www.doc.govt.nz/parks-and-recreation/places-to-go/auckland/places/muriwai-and-te-henga-area/tracks/mokoroa-stream-track/) but you have added back foot=yes which marks it as open. Is it truely re-opened? --- ... |
| 2 | 2021-01-21 21:09 | ralley | Also Mokoroa Falls Track is still closed according to DOC (https://www.doc.govt.nz/parks-and-recreation/places-to-go/auckland/places/muriwai-and-te-henga-area/tracks/mokoroa-falls-track/), and Goldie Bush Walkway (https://www.doc.govt.nz/parks-and-recreation/places-to-go/auckland/places/muriwai-and-... | |
| 3 | 2021-01-21 21:42 | ingoratsdorf ♦1 | Updated in changeset #: 97928827 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/97928827)set various tracks to closed due to kauri dieback. Thanks to @ralley for the pointers on "access" field. Set "access" back to none and added a note re kauri dieback instead as area cannot be set ... | |
| 97801227 by ralley @ 2021-01-20 03:09 | 1 | 2021-01-21 20:01 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,630 | Do you have any idea what waterway=soakhole, imported as part of LINZ import, means?See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/6750217 |
| 2 | 2021-01-21 21:03 | ralley | Eliot has cleared this up in the comments on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/6750217 | |
| 97726494 by JenTreg @ 2021-01-19 00:26 | 1 | 2021-01-19 18:57 | ralley | Why have you removed the building tags from these? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/97726494 |
| 2 | 2021-01-19 19:28 | JenTreg ♦6 | Sorry, when I selected climbing gym I didn't realise it removed the building tag! Have rectified it now :) | |
| 97691052 by Dexton Green @ 2021-01-18 10:35 | 1 | 2021-01-18 16:26 | ralley | Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits, please don't add generic descriptions to the name field: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/97691052 |
| 2 | 2021-01-18 18:06 | ralley | Sorry I just realised tagging the ditch (way 459979616) with name="Water Race" was done in a previous changeset by another user. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/97691052 | |
| 97590515 by Mappo99 @ 2021-01-16 04:20 | 1 | 2021-01-16 07:51 | ralley | Please dont put descriptions like "Access track (approx only)" in the name fields - it is for genuine names only: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/97590515 ... |
| 2 | 2021-01-17 00:31 | Mappo99 ♦4 | Thanks for your comment. I have moved this information to the description tag. | |
| 3 | 2021-01-17 19:43 | ralley | Thanks for addressing that. | |
| 97525656 by hugoreeves @ 2021-01-15 03:53 | 1 | 2021-01-15 23:57 | ralley | Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits. One thing instead of the service road and the track connecting to the car park polygon they should be extended to meet inside the polygon. in this way routers will make the connection. --- Published using OSMCha: htt... |
| 97402934 by svendhhh @ 2021-01-13 01:39 | 1 | 2021-01-13 04:51 | ralley | Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits - unfortunately a POI for a park run does not belong in OSM. As a map only physical entities that can be verified on the ground should be added. See the on-the-ground rule at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_We_Map --- ... |
| 97246105 by LAX24R @ 2021-01-10 12:46 | 1 | 2021-01-10 20:08 | ralley | Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits. A quick pointer: many buildings in NZ consist only of 90 degree corners. You can enforce this in the Id editor by selecting the outline, right clicking and choosing "Square" (shortcut "Q"). --- Pu... |
| 97248502 by LAX24R @ 2021-01-10 13:51 | 1 | 2021-01-10 18:16 | ralley | Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits. Please be careful and look out for warnings from the editor - this change dragged a node of Fernham Way to the South, I've fixed it. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/97248502 ... |
| 96563317 by Jimmysaaan @ 2020-12-28 23:42 | 1 | 2020-12-29 00:25 | ralley | The Caltex fuel station is already tagged and has been for over 4 years, please don't create duplicates --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/96563317 |
| 95782577 by AucklandEditor @ 2020-12-14 05:13 | 1 | 2020-12-14 06:54 | ralley | Some of the footways are tagged with layer=-1 but they are visible in aerial imagery. Please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:layer --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95782577 |
| 2 | 2020-12-23 06:16 | AucklandEditor ♦2 | How do I find in a simple manner which footpaths this is? I'm using the web client currently, since I'm a new editor. | |
| 3 | 2020-12-23 06:27 | AucklandEditor ♦2 | I've cleaned it up as best as I can in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/96298599. I hope this helps. | |
| 4 | 2020-12-23 07:48 | ralley | That looks better, thanks for that | |
| 96030844 by JenTreg @ 2020-12-17 22:57 | 1 | 2020-12-17 23:19 | ralley | Rather than adding sidewalks as seperate ways the preference in NZ is to add a sidewalk=left|right|both to the assocaited road way. This makes maintaining consistent topolotgy a lot easier. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:sidewalk --- Published... |
| 2 | 2020-12-17 23:24 | JenTreg ♦6 | Thanks - is that the case for any footpath, ie even when it is somewhat separated from the road by a decent grass verge and thus aren't 'connected' to the road? | |
| 3 | 2020-12-17 23:33 | ralley | Then it gets a bit fuzzy. My approach is to map as a seperate way if the gap is roughly >4m or not strictly parallel but it's a value judgement. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/96030844 | |
| 4 | 2020-12-17 23:37 | JenTreg ♦6 | Sweet, thanks for the advice :) | |
| 95022314 by ToxicLiving @ 2020-11-30 06:57 | 1 | 2020-11-30 07:07 | ralley | Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits. Please don't use generic names/descriptions like "Commercial area" in the name field: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Names&uselang=en#Names_are_not_for_descriptions --- Published u... |
| 2 | 2020-12-16 19:29 | ralley | Thanks for fixing --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95022314 | |
| 93451880 by Caleb Milne @ 2020-11-03 04:42 | 1 | 2020-11-03 08:06 | ralley | Is this a sign posted business visible from the road? Do you have a source for this edit as I can find no record of such a business. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93451880 |
| 2 | 2020-11-03 08:21 | Caleb Milne ♦1 | Hello sir,I am not totally sure how to answer your question but, no there is no sign which is visible from the road. However, this is a business which brews from home and trades it’s good so therefore is obviously a business of some sort, and there’s no reason it can’t have publi... | |
| 3 | 2020-11-03 08:21 | Caleb Milne ♦1 | Hello sir,I am not totally sure how to answer your question but, no there is no sign which is visible from the road. However, this is a business which brews from home and trades it’s good so therefore is obviously a business of some sort, and there’s no reason it can’t have publi... | |
| 4 | 2020-12-16 01:45 | ralley | Can you please point out an additional source (online, photo, business registration etc) that confirms this business name and location? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93451880 | |
| 95892694 by webuyproperchrch @ 2020-12-15 18:00 | 1 | 2020-12-15 18:59 | ralley | This does not appear to be the actual name of the business, please use the name tag for actual names only. Also please look at the wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/) for guidance of the format for opening hours and phone number as these are not correct. --- ... |
| 95869328 by upHillRider @ 2020-12-15 10:45 | 1 | 2020-12-15 17:51 | ralley | Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits. One thing - as well as changing the highway tag to cycleway you should also remove construction=cycleway. Thanks --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95869328 |
| 94757272 by ralley @ 2020-11-25 08:21 | 1 | 2020-12-14 09:48 | ❤️🔥 ♦364 | i think way 843363858 should still be oneway=alternating? it has a one-lane-bridge sign where the 2 lanes+median+cyclelanes go down to 1 lane that's barely wider than a driveway |
| 2 | 2020-12-14 09:52 | ralley | Yes, that sounds correct | |
| 3 | 2020-12-15 07:23 | ❤️🔥 ♦364 | cool i've added it | |
| 95733146 by _Pax_ @ 2020-12-12 18:50 | 1 | 2020-12-12 23:15 | ralley | Why have you moved Flax Point? The original location matches the LINZ Topo 50 maps --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95733146 |
| 2 | 2020-12-13 01:46 | _Pax_ ♦5 | Wow, you are of course right... And I thought that I can trust signs on the Island... How do I revert that? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95733146 | |
| 3 | 2020-12-13 04:35 | ralley | Thanks, for replying. Not sure how to revert in Id but JOSM has a revert tool. Otherwise just move the new node back to the original position. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95733146 | |
| 91733907 by Bat-arts @ 2020-09-30 01:16 | 1 | 2020-12-11 03:15 | ralley | The restaurant exists already, you may have been using an old map --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/91733907 |
| 95644198 by Bat-arts @ 2020-12-10 22:31 | 1 | 2020-12-11 03:11 | ralley | Is that genuinely the name of the shop or your opinion? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95644198 |
| 95629178 by Taktaal @ 2020-12-10 16:21 | 1 | 2020-12-10 16:46 | ralley | Why are you coalescing all of the reidential areas into one large area that includes the roads? This is not the pattern generally used in NZ where residential areas are split at roads. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95629178 ... |
| 2 | 2020-12-10 16:48 | Taktaal ♦55 | The other areas around Pisa Moorings were all wrong, and excluded some areas that shouldve been included as well as included some that didnt make sense. | |
| 95595814 by 1001010 @ 2020-12-10 07:20 | 1 | 2020-12-10 07:29 | ralley | Stop adding "Church of Pedophilia" this is vandalism --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95595814 |
| 95593515 by 1001010 @ 2020-12-10 06:44 | 1 | 2020-12-10 06:58 | ralley | Again, this is vandalism, stop --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95593515 |
| 95532904 by 1001010 @ 2020-12-09 07:17 | 1 | 2020-12-09 16:55 | ralley | This appears to be vandalism, please revert --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95532904 |
| 95532686 by 1001010 @ 2020-12-09 07:14 | 1 | 2020-12-09 16:54 | ralley | This appears to be vandalism, please revert --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95532686 |
| 95532529 by 1001010 @ 2020-12-09 07:12 | 1 | 2020-12-09 16:54 | ralley | This appears to be vandalism, please revert --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95532529 |
| 95444535 by Hayden Thorn @ 2020-12-07 20:25 | 1 | 2020-12-07 23:15 | ralley | Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits. Generally the preferred way to map sidewalks in NZ is to add sidewalk tags to the associated road as per https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Sidewalks#Sidewalk_as_refinement_to_a_highway --- Published using OSMCha: ht... |
| 95443923 by Hayden Thorn @ 2020-12-07 20:08 | 1 | 2020-12-07 23:12 | ralley | Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edit. You have changed the wagiing on way 328914342 to building=no. Are you trying to indicate there is no building there? If so the correct way is to remove the way itself rather than change the tagging. Alternatively if it is just not a building then the tagg... |
| 95443869 by Hayden Thorn @ 2020-12-07 20:07 | 1 | 2020-12-07 23:10 | ralley | Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits. When adding pgone numbers please use ITU-T E.164 format as per https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:phone#Usage --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95443869 |
| 95079081 by DGK42 @ 2020-12-01 05:55 | 1 | 2020-12-01 06:49 | ralley | Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits but this changeset has multiple issues: You have removed the building tag and added an area tag to a building which is not how buildings are tagged in OSM; you have used a long hand description tag instead of amenity=doctors; you have dragged an address node... |
| 95017177 by Connect Clean Limited @ 2020-11-30 05:24 | 1 | 2020-11-30 05:38 | ralley | Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edit, unfortunately it has multiple issues: a node for 16 Shropshire Ave already exists; add ress nodes shouldn't be placed on the road way; address nodes aren't tagged like this, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr --- ... |
| 95008104 by Romain Meteyer @ 2020-11-30 01:35 | 1 | 2020-11-30 02:48 | ralley | Please do not put generic names/descriptions in the name field: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Don.27t_use_name_tag_to_describe_things --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95008104 |
| 88952921 by AlwynWellington @ 2020-08-05 01:52 | 1 | 2020-11-22 20:43 | CoyKoi ♦228 | Names should not be used for descriptions, eg "path between Epsom Ave and gillies Ave".If a path doesn't have a name, it doesn't have a name. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/88952921 ... |
| 2 | 2020-11-23 22:01 | AlwynWellington ♦58 | @CoyKoi, I fully understand the point you are trying to make.The bigger question what motivates whoever to name a highway?And what signage is sufficient to constitute a name?And a bigger picture here is where any of this fits into giving users directions.In this case the various bits between... | |
| 3 | 2020-11-29 19:02 | ralley | Concur with coykoi, these are descriptions not names: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name | |
| 4 | 2021-01-10 09:37 | myfanwy ♦2 | yeah, i agree with coykoi too. This is low-grade vandalism. And any amount of "whataboutism" will not change that. I've found about 20 of these across auckland, which probably means 100s over the country. That's not OK, continue and I will ask OSM to block your account and IP add... | |
| 5 | 2021-01-10 22:59 | CoyKoi ♦228 | It was done in good faith I so I would not call it vandalism.There is an ongoing conversation about naming parallel ways (eg footpaths and cycleways alongside named roads), but the consensus is quite clear about not using descriptions as names. | |
| 6 | 2021-01-11 01:03 | AlwynWellington ♦58 | Kia oraI think there is a need to look very carefully at each and every instance.I am a long distance walker and names of highways came up in route lists. Names of highways tie back to online tools. such as WayMarkedTrails and OSMand.Where a highway doesn't have a name the name... | |
| 7 | 2021-01-11 08:23 | AlwynWellington ♦58 | Kia oraSince my post above I have found two more signs for the Coast to Coast Walkway in the driveway beyond the northern end of Saint Andrews Road. These are official signs and, in my view comply with the wiki in respect of name giving.I could not see any other identifying signs.I conti... | |
| 8 | 2021-01-11 10:14 | CoyKoi ♦228 | In my opinion, it doesn't make sense for a minor urban path through a park to share the name of the long walking route which passes over it. The Coast to Coast Walk route is already well represented by the relation 30023: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/30023The issue is well articul... | |
| 9 | 2021-01-23 23:33 | AlwynWellington ♦58 | CoyKoi, kia oraMy concern is not about Coast to Coast or Te Araroa or any (walking) route.Rather my concern is that, so far as possible each element in any route is named. My concern springs from the directions that comes from apps.For example, when driving, you might be perplexed if the in... | |
| 10 | 2021-01-23 23:49 | AlwynWellington ♦58 | Continuing the discussion:The question still arise as to where any name comes from.There are several signs saying Carlton Gore Road posted by Auckland Council. I assume we can be quite safe from criticism if we name elements within that road reserve that are highways tagged as highway=cyclewa... | |
| 11 | 2021-01-23 23:56 | AlwynWellington ♦58 | Coming back to the section between Epsom Avenue and Gillies Avenue:So the user knows where, and guided by the wiki, and the Q&A you referred to, I propose the names:a) "Melville Park" for the elements from Saint Andrew's Road to Gillies Avenue;b) "Auckland University&qu... | |
| 12 | 2021-01-23 23:58 | AlwynWellington ♦58 | I would appreciate your thoughtful consideration that assists all users, as I understand this to be the purpose of OSM. | |
| 94973960 by Seagnoid @ 2020-11-29 07:52 | 1 | 2020-11-29 10:00 | ralley | Why are you removing driveways? They are perfectly valid mapping --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/94973960 |
| 94860858 by Auckland Insider @ 2020-11-26 21:54 | 1 | 2020-11-27 04:22 | ralley | Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits. There are some problems with this changeset: 1) Highwic is already mapped as a building way and tagged historic; 2) historic=Historic_mansion is a non standard tagging, typical use would be historic=building (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:hist... |
| 94800441 by kwizzy @ 2020-11-25 22:19 | 1 | 2020-11-26 16:24 | ralley | Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits. Generally the practice in NZ is to map sidewalks by adding sidewalk=both|left|right tags to the road way rather than drawing as seperate ways. This make it much easier to maintain a topology suitable for routing. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Ke... |
| 2 | 2020-12-08 04:43 | CoyKoi ♦228 | To illustrate how the network topology can become broken by mapping separate sidewalks, see what a routing engine does when the sidewalk isn't well connected to the road network: https://i.imgur.com/TJlWMGT.pngI'd suggest that all the footpaths added/edited in this edit should be reverse... | |
| 94666033 by AlwynWellington @ 2020-11-23 23:03 | 1 | 2020-11-24 01:42 | ralley | Please don't use descriptions like "Coast to Coast path (Epsom Ave thru Auckland University and Melville Park to Gillies Ave)" in the name field. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only --- Published using OSMCha: ht... |
| 94307585 by Spyname149 @ 2020-11-17 20:56 | 1 | 2020-11-22 00:53 | ralley | This changset wrongly dragged a node of Lower Domain Drive onto Wellesly Strteet. Please look out for warning from the Id editor - there are 20 for this changeset |
| 94411013 by Subike @ 2020-11-19 05:34 | 1 | 2020-11-20 07:05 | ralley | This changeset has moved an address node into the road and dragged another node, reverting --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/94411013 |
| 94411639 by Subike @ 2020-11-19 05:45 | 1 | 2020-11-20 07:02 | ralley | Winchester is already properly mapped as an area, removing |
| 94401304 by Daniel Palenski @ 2020-11-19 00:33 | 1 | 2020-11-19 03:11 | ralley | Why have you added layer=1 to the two buildings? Is it an attempt to correct warnings about crossing the river? Because it appears the river is position wrongly --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/94401304 |
| 94014310 by Nick Brooker @ 2020-11-12 19:03 | 1 | 2020-11-12 23:46 | ralley | Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edit. There is no need to add a POI for the Fresh Choice supermarket here as it has been on the map for ~5 years, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3436746945 Also in OSM the convention is not to put the location ("Mangere Bridge") in the name: https:/... |
| 93734844 by Noddy65 @ 2020-11-08 11:10 | 1 | 2020-11-08 16:24 | ralley | Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits. One thing, please don't put descriptions like "Re-Generated Bush" in the name feild, it is for proper names only: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Names&uselang=en#Name_is_the_name_only --- ... |
| 93581036 by McNs @ 2020-11-05 06:43 | 1 | 2020-11-05 07:24 | ralley | A driveway should be tagged as highway=service and wouldn't have a name --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93581036 |
| 93343325 by s81909 @ 2020-10-31 16:10 | 1 | 2020-10-31 19:52 | ralley | Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits. A couple of points: most buildings in NZ consist of 90 degree corners, pressing `q` in JOSM will enforce this. Also please don't use descriptions like "Parking and camping" in the name field: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is... |
| 93270316 by falk @ 2020-10-30 06:20 | 1 | 2020-10-30 07:01 | ralley | Mapping driveways in OSM is perfectly acceptable and common place, as per the wiki page: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:service%3Ddriveway and the 8 million plus already in OSML https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/service=driveway. Please revert this mass deletion/ --- ... |
| 93189523 by OTPBBAYLAC @ 2020-10-28 16:07 | 1 | 2020-10-29 07:25 | ralley | Node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8059569896 has ended up in the ocean off NZ --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93189523 |
| 93009281 by gbo7 @ 2020-10-25 08:53 | 1 | 2020-10-25 20:04 | ralley | UCOL is already on the map and there is not a turning circle at an intersection. Reverting. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93009281 |
| 92714129 by enzedder @ 2020-10-19 14:02 | 1 | 2020-10-20 04:19 | ralley | What is the source for this change? The changeset lists only the LINZ aerial imagery in which the name is not visible. Both the Auckland Council website (https://www.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/rubbish-recycling/Pages/recycle-organisation.aspx?ListItemId=113) and the sign OTG spell it "Waitākere... |
| 2 | 2020-10-20 05:53 | enzedder ♦1 | I based this on the sign posted at the entrance (that's what "OTG" means) | |
| 3 | 2020-10-20 07:20 | ralley | https://openstreetcam.org/details/3165222 | |
| 91259111 by callum_AT @ 2020-09-22 04:23 | 1 | 2020-09-23 09:28 | ❤️🔥 ♦364 | Hi, the AMETI shared path has already been mapped. You've added another shared path next to the existing one. It's confusing in the iD editor because the shared path and the busway are rendered the same, but one has construction=cycleway and one has construction=unclassified. If yo... |
| 2 | 2020-10-19 18:51 | ralley | The tagging of this is also wrong, as per https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dconstruction it should be tagged highway=construction and construction=cycleway --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/91259111 | |
| 92683995 by callum_AT @ 2020-10-19 06:35 | 1 | 2020-10-19 07:22 | ralley | Way 860567624 is tagged as layer=-1 but has no tunnel tag and shares nodes with roads on the surface layer --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92683995 |
| 92671629 by Peter5671 @ 2020-10-18 23:05 | 1 | 2020-10-19 03:44 | ralley | Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits. Can you please use more descriptive changeset comments that describe what your are trying to achieve: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments Also can you please give a source for this change? --- ... |
| 92650584 by Chanel Muir @ 2020-10-18 08:54 | 1 | 2020-10-18 19:07 | ralley | Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits. One minor thing, they way tagged bridge=yes should also be layer=1, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:bridge#Layers --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92650584 |
| 92541795 by Parnell Business Association @ 2020-10-15 19:57 | 1 | 2020-10-16 18:33 | ralley | Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits. Unfortunately this changeset looks to have dragged a node of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/857492004 and merged it with the yoga studio node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5425997346 which is an error --- Pub... |
| 92438739 by 45 Sox @ 2020-10-13 21:09 | 1 | 2020-10-14 04:51 | ralley | This changeset has changed a wood polygon into a cycling track, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mountain_biking for guidelines on how to map MTB tracks --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92438739 ... |
| 69103605 by Shengnan Song @ 2019-04-11 05:57 | 1 | 2020-10-11 18:43 | ralley | This changeset has created a building over the top of an exisisting building: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/266236503 |
| 91194148 by callum_AT @ 2020-09-21 03:01 | 1 | 2020-10-08 18:18 | ralley | This is a cycleway, both according to Auckland Transport (see https://data-aucklandcouncil.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/4ebe4795243146ad930ff51bc07a6ea1) and local knowledge - I as do many others personally ride it. The fact it is gravel does not make it only a footway and any router should be capa... |
| 2 | 2020-10-08 21:13 | callum_AT ♦6 | Good point, I hadn't considered that properly. Have corrected this - thanks for raising! | |
| 92006016 by Lorelle @ 2020-10-05 20:12 | 1 | 2020-10-06 02:42 | ralley | Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edit. You should probably tag this as leisure=fitness_centre as per https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dfitness_centre --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92006016 |
| 91691952 by ralley @ 2020-09-29 08:42 | 1 | 2020-09-29 08:44 | ralley | Correction: aerial imagery used was Maxar not ESRI |
| 91605276 by 1 Naomi 1 @ 2020-09-28 03:23 | 1 | 2020-09-28 23:43 | ralley | Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits. For the service_times key can you please use the syntax as described in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:service_times and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours Thanks. --- Published using OSMC... |
| 91269488 by KenZed @ 2020-09-22 07:05 | 1 | 2020-09-23 00:07 | ralley | Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits. Just a pointer that might make your life easier: in NZ the majority of buildings consist of mostly 90 degree corners. You can easily make all corners 90 degrees in the Id editor by selecting the building, right clicking and choosing “Square”.... |
| 90949295 by Steffh @ 2020-09-15 22:47 | 1 | 2020-09-16 00:10 | ralley | Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits. Please don't use the name field for address information, there are addr:* fields for this, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90949295 ... |
| 2 | 2020-09-16 00:12 | ralley | Also "fixme" is for items that need further attention, you don't need to add one if you have fixed the problem. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:fixme | |
| 3 | 2020-09-20 19:34 | ralley | Removed both tags | |
| 91073728 by BerghanConcreteLimited @ 2020-09-17 22:37 | 1 | 2020-09-17 23:04 | ralley | Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edit. The description says you added the concrete firm but you also deleted the building outline. Was this deliberate? Has the building been removed in real life? Can you also resolve https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2353125 now the business has been added. ... |
| 2 | 2020-09-18 06:59 | ralley | Thanks for fixing that | |
| 90972510 by PDXBud @ 2020-09-16 08:44 | 1 | 2020-09-16 18:51 | ralley | Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits. Instead of using the name key please tag this as amenity=toilets. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dtoilets --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90972510 |
| 2 | 2020-09-18 04:50 | ralley | Fixed | |
| 91002631 by PDXBud @ 2020-09-16 18:36 | 1 | 2020-09-16 18:48 | ralley | Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits. Please don't use the name key for descriptions: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Don.27t_use_name_tag_to_describe_things In this case since the tennis courts are removed just delete way 520203785 --- ... |
| 2 | 2020-09-18 04:50 | ralley | Fixed | |
| 91019989 by Nij4t2 @ 2020-09-17 05:32 | 1 | 2020-09-17 10:39 | ralley | Thanks for fixing up the building outline but why have you removed the hospital tag? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/91019989 |
| 2 | 2020-09-17 11:39 | Nij4t2 ♦3 | From aerial / satellite imagery I could see it was a building but I could not find a source for it being a hospital... ok... I now see the reference to the hospital at: https://www.selwynfoundation.org.nz/villages/residential-care/selwyn-village/living-options/My apologies! | |
| 3 | 2020-09-17 17:53 | ralley | No worries, thanks for fixing | |
| 90961187 by CoderThomas @ 2020-09-16 05:54 | 1 | 2020-09-16 18:49 | ralley | Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits. Generally in NZ sidewalks are mapped by adding sidewalk tags to the roads rather than creating seperate ways as it makes routing easier --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90961187 |
| 2 | 2020-10-03 02:18 | CoderThomas ♦7 | Thanks for your feedback I have removed the spread sidewalks as suggested. | |
| 90950163 by rodders1nz @ 2020-09-15 23:51 | 1 | 2020-09-16 00:08 | ralley | Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits, the residential area way 847808825 looks like it has a dragged node. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90950163 |
| 90950213 by rodders1nz @ 2020-09-15 23:55 | 1 | 2020-09-16 00:08 | ralley | Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits. Youve set the name to "lake dunstan cycle trail" but the highway type is footway. Should it be a cycleway? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dcycleway. Also please use capitalisation in the name --- ... |
| 90832563 by SummitNelson @ 2020-09-13 22:10 | 1 | 2020-09-14 05:59 | ralley | Welcome to OSM and thanks for you edit. If you are looking to add a real estate agent you probably want to add a shop=real_estate tag as per https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Destate_agent You can also add the name and contact details. --- Publis... |
| 90690860 by MysticSeal @ 2020-09-10 09:21 | 1 | 2020-09-10 09:44 | ralley | Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits, please use descriptive changeset comments instead of hashtags: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments Also instead of deleting and recreating objects please edit the existing object so the history is not lost. --- ... |
| 90690255 by Zacharm @ 2020-09-10 09:12 | 1 | 2020-09-10 09:41 | ralley | Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits, please don't use the name field to describe things, e.g. "Caravan Site and Dump Station", instead use tags like tourism=caravan_site and amenity=sanitary_dump_station. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Don.27t_use_name_tag... |
| 90336621 by Aleksplew @ 2020-09-03 05:36 | 1 | 2020-09-03 06:56 | ralley | Please dont put personal information such as names in name tags: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Limitations_on_mapping_private_information --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90336621 |
| 2 | 2020-09-07 00:42 | ralley | Additionally this is not visible in the LINZ aerial imagery referred to from the original changeset, what is the actual source? | |
| 90460182 by Wr0nk @ 2020-09-05 17:36 | 1 | 2020-09-06 02:29 | ralley | Why are you adding fake features not present in the imagery you claim as a source? Reverted --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90460182 |
| 90343430 by purpleIsmycolour @ 2020-09-03 07:20 | 1 | 2020-09-03 08:31 | ralley | Your changeset comment says your just correcting the boundary but you also deleted a building. Has it really been removed? It is still there in the aerial imagery from LINZ/ESRI/MAXAR --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90343430 ... |
| 2 | 2020-09-04 03:45 | ralley | Is the deletion of this building outline also due to the protection orders you mention in the changeset discussion for https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/90343430? --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90343430 ... | |
| 90343063 by purpleIsmycolour @ 2020-09-03 07:14 | 1 | 2020-09-03 08:28 | ralley | Has the actual building been removed or is it just not a place of worship? If the later please don't delete the way, just remove or correct the amenity tag. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90343063 |
| 2 | 2020-09-03 16:08 | purpleIsmycolour ♦1 | This building has never been a place of worship and is private property. The owner s of this property has asked that this boundary be corrected and the worship tag/identifing outline be removed to better aid their privacy. We believe the original edits which led to this were mallicously entered orig... | |
| 3 | 2020-09-03 17:47 | ralley | Then please remove the tag but restore the building outline. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90343063 | |
| 4 | 2020-09-03 21:08 | purpleIsmycolour ♦1 | As stated above, due to privacy and security reasons (Including outstanding legal protection orders) this data has been removed at the request of the land owners. There are no visible building outlines in the nearby surrounding area, and the inclusion of this building outline only further degrades t... | |
| 90220120 by Aleksplew @ 2020-09-01 04:37 | 1 | 2020-09-01 08:42 | ralley | Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits. A tip - since most houses in NZ consist mainly of 90 degree corners in the Id editor you can select the outline and right click and select "Square" to square the angles. --- Published using OSMCha: https://o... |
| 89797238 by jwd146 @ 2020-08-23 03:37 | 1 | 2020-08-23 05:34 | ralley | Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits - but this one is wrong, the motorway here is represented by 3 parallel ways. The one you have edited represents the southbound clip on so was correct as one way and 2 lanes. Please undo your change as you have now made the bridge 14 lanes in total. ... |
| 2 | 2020-08-24 19:48 | ralley | Reverted with change set 89875621 | |
| 89754703 by robert rozee @ 2020-08-21 15:59 | 1 | 2020-08-21 22:20 | ralley | Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits. This edit looks good but please don't use Google maps as a source - they have an incompatible licence. LINZ is the canonical source for road names in NZ and they have given OSM permission to use the data. See https://data.linz.govt.nz/layer/53383-nz-... |
| 2 | 2020-08-22 00:49 | robert rozee ♦1 | Didn't know about the LINZ site, will use it to check in future :-)But a funny thing, the LINZ maps are in error! While the segment in question identifies as 'Lake Terrace Road' when clicked on, on the visual map it is labelled as 'Burwood Road' - ie, the map data held... | |
| 3 | 2020-08-22 03:31 | ralley | That's not the LINZ map that's in error, it is using tiles from OSM (see the attribution in the bottom right) and it's that (which you've now corrected) that was wrong. It will take a while for your fix to filter through to the tiles. | |
| 88808466 by Maryluba @ 2020-08-01 07:24 | 1 | 2020-08-01 07:53 | ralley | Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edit. Where did you find the name for this peak? It does not have a name according to LINZ. Also "start-date" is not used for peaks - see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:start_date --- Published using OSM... |
| 88702704 by james H @ 2020-07-30 00:51 | 1 | 2020-07-31 20:05 | ralley | Review as requested: opening hours look good to me. You can also check with https://openingh.openstreetmap.de/evaluation_tool --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/88702704 |
| 88394908 by JHay0112 @ 2020-07-23 09:40 | 1 | 2020-07-23 09:56 | ralley | Why have you removed the building tag? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/88394908 |
| 2 | 2020-07-23 10:00 | JHay0112 ♦1 | I believe the sports centre tag is more appropriate for this building | |
| 3 | 2020-07-23 18:51 | ralley | But it is still a building so should be tagged as both - they are not mutually exclusive | |
| 4 | 2020-07-23 19:22 | JHay0112 ♦1 | Oh okay, I wasn't aware that was an option, my mistake. | |
| 87161567 by ❤️🔥 @ 2020-06-25 23:18 | 1 | 2020-07-23 00:31 | ralley | Does this mean https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1785099 can now be resolved? |
| 2 | 2020-07-24 06:23 | ❤️🔥 ♦364 | nah, all i did was map the helipad. couldn't easily figure out where "Sentinel Rock" is supposed to be (if not where it current is) | |
| 87545629 by Tony Springford @ 2020-07-05 03:47 | 1 | 2020-07-05 06:41 | ralley | Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits. This looks good for me but you could also add the tag shop=swimming_pool as per https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dswimming_pool --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/87545629 ... |
| 2 | 2020-07-05 07:47 | Tony Springford ♦1 | Thank you. I'm finding my way around. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/87545629 | |
| 87325378 by ChookMan @ 2020-06-30 05:40 | 1 | 2020-06-30 07:38 | ralley | Hi, whats the source for this being a regional park? It doesn't appear in the Auckland Council list at https://www.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/parks-recreation/Pages/search-index.aspx --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/87325378 ... |
| 2 | 2020-07-03 23:01 | ChookMan ♦7 | Source: https://data-aucklandcouncil.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/02f8f2fea2224b70896122de4d1943fe_42?geometry=174.686%2C-36.978%2C174.803%2C-36.954 | |
| 3 | 2020-07-04 01:16 | ralley | Thanks for confirming that. | |
| 87218936 by gladys_foster216 @ 2020-06-27 06:31 | 1 | 2020-06-27 07:27 | ralley | Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits. Generally most buildings in NZ consist of mainly 90 degree angles. In the ID editor you can enforce this by right clicking and selecting "Square" or using the Q short cut key. Cheers, Rob. --- Published us... |
| 87104732 by Gaston Senac @ 2020-06-24 21:34 | 1 | 2020-06-25 00:41 | ralley | Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits. A tip for you: many NZ buildings consist of only 90 degree corners you can easily do this in the Id editor by right clicking and selecting "Square" or use the Q short-cut. --- Published using OSMCha: https:/... |
| 86338867 by borovac @ 2020-06-08 07:53 | 1 | 2020-06-08 08:14 | ralley | It looks like you have mistakenly duplicate the road name in the highway field --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/86338867 |
| 2 | 2020-06-08 09:00 | borovac ♦102 | Thanks for pointing it out, it wasn't on purpose so it's fixed now. All the best | |
| 86103561 by stevestevebitch @ 2020-06-03 02:11 Active block | 1 | 2020-06-03 02:18 | ralley | Why are you performing mass deletions and not using proper changeset comments as per https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments? Please respond. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/86103561 ... |
| 2 | 2020-06-03 11:36 | CoyKoi ♦228 | I have reverted this changeset, with #86133611 | |
| 3 | 2020-06-05 14:44 | marczoutendijk ♦2,755 | User blocked:https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3741Marc Zoutendijk OpenStreetMap Foundation Data Working Group | |
| 86102461 by stevestevebitch @ 2020-06-03 01:01 Active block | 1 | 2020-06-03 01:28 | ralley | Why have you changed the Hauraki Gulf from a Bay to a pedestrian highway? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/86102461 |
| 2 | 2020-06-03 11:50 | CoyKoi ♦228 | Reverted with 86134424 | |
| 3 | 2020-06-05 14:44 | marczoutendijk ♦2,755 | User blocked:https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3741Marc Zoutendijk OpenStreetMap Foundation Data Working Group | |
| 86067724 by Xirolyte @ 2020-06-02 01:06 | 1 | 2020-06-02 01:16 | ralley | Please do not add descriptions like "Climbing Rock" as the name - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/86067724 |
| 86067423 by Ian128 @ 2020-06-02 00:34 | 1 | 2020-06-02 01:13 | ralley | Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edit. Is that a typo in the phone number? "+64 94 639 0888" seems to have an extra digit --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/86067423 |
| 2 | 2020-06-02 01:55 | Ian128 ♦1 | Yes, it's been corrected. | |
| 86067716 by Xirolyte @ 2020-06-02 01:04 | 1 | 2020-06-02 01:11 | ralley | Why is the tree religious? Is it really named "The Tree" or is that just a description? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/86067716 |
| 85998944 by Edward Ritchie @ 2020-05-31 05:56 | 1 | 2020-05-31 09:25 | ralley | Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edit. One thing to note is that buildings in NZ generally consist of 90 degree corners. You can use the Q short cut in the Id editor to square up buildings and ensure all angles are 90 degrees. Cheers, Rob. --- Published u... |
| 85705566 by Wichid @ 2020-05-25 06:56 | 1 | 2020-05-26 07:01 | ralley | Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edit, but please don't use the name key for descriptions like "Settlement Pond", see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/857... |
| 2 | 2020-05-28 01:34 | ralley | Fixed | |
| 85403328 by MapFanNZ @ 2020-05-18 21:04 | 1 | 2020-05-19 00:40 | ralley | Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits. Instead of generic changeset comments can you please use something more descriptive as per https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments. Thanks --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets... |
| 85126991 by Srikanthvadlakonda9 @ 2020-05-13 07:28 | 1 | 2020-05-13 11:38 | ralley | Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits. Leaving the address as 146 should be sufficient but you could also just tag it as addr:housenumber=144-146. |
| 84957712 by ChookMan @ 2020-05-10 04:26 | 1 | 2020-05-10 07:35 | ralley | Please don't delete features and re-draw them - rather edit the existing feature so the history is not lost. Thanks --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84957712 |
| 84924482 by Arweth @ 2020-05-09 03:59 | 1 | 2020-05-09 05:12 | ralley | Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits. Most houses in NZ consist mainly of 90 degree corners. In the Id editor you can "square" a polygon to use 90 degree corners with the 'Q' shortcut. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/ch... |
| 84721888 by nz-fantail @ 2020-05-06 00:06 | 1 | 2020-05-06 00:59 | ralley | Hi, welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits. One thing, please don't use the name field for descriptions like "Batting cage", see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/ch... |
| 84027953 by DrCheese @ 2020-04-24 00:57 | 1 | 2020-04-24 09:45 | ralley | Please don't use the name field for descriptions, it is for genuine names only --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84027953 |
| 83962412 by smoke08 @ 2020-04-22 21:19 | 1 | 2020-04-22 22:30 | ralley | Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits. Review as reuested: looks good to me, only thing is a large percentage of NZ houses consist of 90 degree corners. You can make all corners 90 degrees in Id by selecting the outline and pressing 'Q' or right click and select 'Square'. ... |
| 2 | 2020-04-23 01:45 | CoyKoi ♦228 | Welcome! Further to the comment above - I would suggest using the JOSM editor if you want to add many buildings, as it makes the process MUCH faster and easier for you, check out this video to learn more: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DcKewl94jR4 --- Publish... | |
| 83782672 by Richard Norton @ 2020-04-19 19:02 | 1 | 2020-04-20 00:50 | ralley | Why are you removing layer=1 off segments tagged as bridges? Those should be there. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83782672 |
| 83757709 by Richard Norton @ 2020-04-18 22:57 | 1 | 2020-04-19 01:22 | ralley | Why have you tagged paths as layer=-1 when they don't appear from the aerial imagery to be below other objects and are not tagged as tunnels? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:layer --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/837... |
| 83734529 by ❤️🔥 @ 2020-04-18 07:59 | 1 | 2020-04-18 08:45 | ralley | Please don't tag MOTAT as a theme park, as the name suggests it is a museum, not somewhere for rides etc: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dtheme_park --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83734529 |
| 2 | 2020-04-18 08:51 | ralley | Also please don't tag every piece of open green space a park. In Auckland if they don't appear in the AC Park Extents data sets they should not be tagged as parks. See https://data-aucklandcouncil.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/02f8f2fea2224b70896122de4d1943fe_42 --- ... | |
| 83501479 by kiwirick87 @ 2020-04-14 02:02 | 1 | 2020-04-14 08:34 | ralley | Please don't abbreviate road as RD, the standard in OSM is to expand abbreviations: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Naming_conventions#Don.27t_use_abbreviations --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83501479 |
| 83510016 by Nij4t2 @ 2020-04-14 06:05 | 1 | 2020-04-14 08:29 | ralley | Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits, they look good to me. In answer to your question, merging the address nodes with the building is fine. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83510016 |
| 83112223 by Ratestopo @ 2020-04-05 20:49 | 1 | 2020-04-06 00:50 | ralley | Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits. Rather than tagging as building=yes and description="Boat Shed" you could just tag with building=boathouse. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Abuilding%3Dboathouse --- Published using OSMCha: htt... |
| 2 | 2020-04-12 04:46 | ralley | Done --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83112223 | |
| 83262906 by Jaredap @ 2020-04-08 15:56 | 1 | 2020-04-09 00:25 | ralley | Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits. A few questions/problems. 1) Why did you change the area containing the velodrome and rugby field from a park to a building? Also it shouldn't be layer=1 as it is not above anything. 2) Please don't put descriptions like "Staff/Delivery Ac... |
| 2 | 2020-04-12 04:44 | ralley | Fixed --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83262906 | |
| 3 | 2020-04-12 08:17 | Jaredap ♦3 | Sorry I'm still learning, didn't realise I changed it to a building --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83262906 | |
| 83262439 by Jaredap @ 2020-04-08 15:44 | 1 | 2020-04-09 00:27 | ralley | Why have you tagged the entire ambulance grounds as a building and added layer=1? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83262439 |
| 2 | 2020-04-12 03:57 | ralley | Fixed --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83262439 | |
| 3 | 2020-04-12 04:31 | Jaredap ♦3 | Ah I see , it was not meant to be a building just as an area. Apologies --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83262439 | |
| 83302089 by ScoutBagginsNZ @ 2020-04-09 10:32 | 1 | 2020-04-09 20:11 | ralley | Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits. One thing, scout halls should be tagged as club=scout instead of having sport tags added. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:club%3Dscout --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83302089 ... |
| 2 | 2020-04-12 03:47 | ralley | Fixed | |
| 83331075 by ralley @ 2020-04-09 23:41 | 1 | 2020-04-10 00:14 | CoyKoi ♦228 | Hi ralley, first time I've seen this key being used, I'm curious!How - are you manually mapping colours or using some detection algorithm first?Why - The OSM Wiki says this is "Mostly used for 3D mapping' - is that the reason you're adding this detail? ---... |
| 2 | 2020-04-11 22:02 | ralley | Just completely manual based on ESRI imagery. For 3d mapping, see https://demo.f4map.com/#lat=-36.8739459&lon=174.6962537&zoom=19 | |
| 82234548 by bushno3 @ 2020-03-16 03:36 | 1 | 2020-04-10 01:51 | ralley | Removed this vandalism --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/82234548 |
| 82893994 by Rao1 @ 2020-04-01 00:04 | 1 | 2020-04-01 04:45 | ralley | Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edit - just a couple of things: a driveway should be tagged highway=service and service=driveway and please don't put descriptions like "driveway" in the name field, https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only I've cleaned t... |
| 82656356 by Asha12 @ 2020-03-26 10:58 | 1 | 2020-03-26 23:41 | ralley | What is the source for this change? I haven't heard that Bullock Track has been reduced to one way (I live locally). --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/82656356 |
| 2 | 2020-03-26 23:45 | ralley | See https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=-36.86352613185185&lng=174.73015449324072&z=17&focus=map&pKey=tEgaqrXRvId7Td3NoFKZmw showing two way traffic --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/82656356 | |
| 3 | 2020-03-28 05:36 | ralley | Ah I see, oneway=yes just added to a small section of turning lane. All good | |
| 4 | 2020-04-03 13:11 | Asha12 ♦3 | Hi Ralley,We are using Aerial Imagery & Mapillary evidences along with local inputs to make the changes.Based on the AI and Mapillary we are seeing cars coming opposite way.Hence made the changes.Thanks,Asha | |
| 82494798 by kar_akl @ 2020-03-22 21:21 | 1 | 2020-03-23 00:30 | ralley | You have tagged a node as a park (when the park already exists) but then added a name that indicates it is a lookout which sounds like it should be tagged as tourism=viewpoint as per https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dviewpoint. It is also tagged as source=tree where the source tag i... |
| 82474690 by kar_akl @ 2020-03-22 05:06 | 1 | 2020-03-22 05:49 | ralley | Please note: playgrounds are not parks, they are different entities; "Small Childrens Playgound" is not the name, it is a description and redundant. An entity cannot be a cliff and steps, they would be two different ways tagged differently (and probably orthogonal) --- ... |
| 82474788 by kar_akl @ 2020-03-22 05:20 | 1 | 2020-03-22 05:40 | ralley | According to the AC Park Extents data set the only park/reserve here is Alan Tanner Reserve which is already on the map. I'm deleteing the park named "Intersection of Dakota Ave..." --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/82474... |
| 2 | 2020-03-22 05:42 | ralley | Thank you for your other corrections in this changeset - they are appreciated. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/82474788 | |
| 82473919 by DZMalik @ 2020-03-22 03:01 | 1 | 2020-03-22 04:44 | ralley | This is vandalims - there is no militray checkpoint here, removing --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/82473919 |
| 82474230 by kar_akl @ 2020-03-22 03:58 | 1 | 2020-03-22 04:42 | ralley | School zones are not tagged in OSM as they are not independently verifiable on the ground --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/82474230 |
| 82474292 by kar_akl @ 2020-03-22 04:08 | 1 | 2020-03-22 04:41 | ralley | Why did you delete tyhe building for Mrs Wah Laundromat and leave the shop tag? The building appears to be there in latest aerial imagery and deleting it without removing the shop is non-sensical --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/82474... |
| 82474375 by kar_akl @ 2020-03-22 04:20 | 1 | 2020-03-22 04:38 | ralley | Why are you deleting address nodes? Also please dont create nodes with just the shop name, also add the type of shop, eg. amenity=restaurant etc. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/82474375 |
| 82474434 by kar_akl @ 2020-03-22 04:30 | 1 | 2020-03-22 04:36 | ralley | Why have you placed a cliff in the road (see aerial imagery)? Also please don't put descriptions in the name field - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/82474434 ... |
| 82460069 by DZMalik @ 2020-03-21 13:52 | 1 | 2020-03-22 04:13 | ralley | Please watch out for dragged nodes, you dragged 8 Killybegs Drive onto the road North of its actual position --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/82460069 |
| 82459822 by DZMalik @ 2020-03-21 13:39 | 1 | 2020-03-22 04:05 | ralley | Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edit - just one thing please don't use the name field for decriptions like "Path through park". https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/c... |
| 82450656 by CyrusL @ 2020-03-21 01:25 | 1 | 2020-03-21 08:29 | ralley | Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits. You have added multiple buildings and a road named "Living House" do you have a source for these changes? OSM is only supposed to reflect on the gound verifiable reality and uses common names not personal names. --- ... |
| 82451026 by Yvonne 567 Li @ 2020-03-21 02:18 | 1 | 2020-03-21 08:25 | ralley | This edit has dragged street nodes and created all sorts of other issues with roads - fake names, sections tagged living street etc. Reverting. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/82451026 |
| 82410666 by Joshua Xu @ 2020-03-20 01:53 | 1 | 2020-03-20 03:00 | ralley | Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits - from the aerial imagery I believe what you have tagged here is a driveway and not a residential road. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:service%3Ddriveway and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dresidential --- ... |
| 2 | 2020-03-20 08:03 | ralley | I've fixed this | |
| 82367063 by Eithney @ 2020-03-19 00:18 | 1 | 2020-03-19 03:05 | ralley | Please don't use the name fields for descriptions like "Personal House", https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only. Also please use more meaningful changeset comments: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments --- ... |
| 2 | 2020-03-20 08:01 | ralley | I've fixed this | |
| 82367200 by Eithney @ 2020-03-19 00:31 | 1 | 2020-03-19 03:03 | ralley | Appears to be a driveway not a footway. Tagging a footway with motor_vehicle=yes in contradictory --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/82367200 |
| 2 | 2020-03-20 07:59 | ralley | I've fixed this | |
| 82367240 by Eithney @ 2020-03-19 00:37 | 1 | 2020-03-19 03:01 | ralley | From the aerial imagery this appears to be a driveway not a path --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/82367240 |
| 2 | 2020-03-20 07:56 | ralley | I've fixed this | |
| 82367471 by Eithney @ 2020-03-19 00:58 | 1 | 2020-03-19 02:58 | ralley | Why did you delete the parking iasle? Also you added a dangling footway also tagged as a crossing which is not required - there was already a crossing node. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/82367471 |
| 2 | 2020-03-20 07:55 | ralley | Reverted | |
| 82326855 by Meetjyoti @ 2020-03-18 03:56 | 1 | 2020-03-18 04:26 | ralley | Please don't use the name for descriptions --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/82326855 |
| 2 | 2020-03-20 07:53 | ralley | I've fixed this | |
| 82327211 by Meetjyoti @ 2020-03-18 04:07 | 1 | 2020-03-18 04:25 | ralley | This just appears to be vandalism, i.e. a house tagged as a highway rest area --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/82327211 |
| 2 | 2020-03-20 07:53 | ralley | Reverted | |
| 82327398 by Meetjyoti @ 2020-03-18 04:13 | 1 | 2020-03-18 04:23 | ralley | Please don't use the name field for descriptions like "Soccer field" --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/82327398 |
| 2 | 2020-03-20 07:52 | ralley | I've fixed this up - multiple issues | |
| 82327512 by Meetjyoti @ 2020-03-18 04:16 | 1 | 2020-03-18 04:23 | ralley | Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits. There are a few problems: 1) IT should not be tagged as a ford; 2) It appears to be a driveway not a footway; 3) If it was a footway it should not be tagged motor_vehicle=yes; 4) An address should not be used as a highway name; 5) I doubt horse=yes is corr... |
| 2 | 2020-03-20 07:46 | ralley | I've cleaned this up | |
| 82317480 by hpjjphhpj @ 2020-03-17 20:25 | 1 | 2020-03-18 00:02 | ralley | Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits. You have added parking=carports to the whole parking area but that is for covered parking (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:parking). From the aerial imagery it appears as if the majority of the car park is uncovered. I think you should just add an... |
| 2 | 2020-03-20 07:42 | ralley | I've cleaned this up | |
| 82418904 by Gordan Zhang @ 2020-03-20 06:59 | 1 | 2020-03-20 07:14 | ralley | What is the source for these changes, none of the names seem reasonable --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/82418904 |
| 82418972 by Gordan Zhang @ 2020-03-20 07:01 | 1 | 2020-03-20 07:14 | ralley | Do you have a source for these changes because none of the names seem correct. Also please use descriptive changeset comments --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/82418972 |
| 82367630 by Eithney @ 2020-03-19 01:10 | 1 | 2020-03-19 02:55 | ralley | Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits. Instead of amenity=marketplace (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity=marketplace) Countdown should be tagged as shop=supermarket (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dsupermarket) --- Published us... |
| 2 | 2020-03-19 03:00 | ralley | Additionally Countdown was already tagged as a node, you should edit that to add the additional details rather than add a new entity | |
| 82327753 by Meetjyoti @ 2020-03-18 04:24 | 1 | 2020-03-18 05:56 | ralley | There is already a park here "Windy Ridge Reserve" which is the correct name according to the Auckland Council park extents data set - reverting your change --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/82327753 |
| 82246726 by simonking717 @ 2020-03-16 08:33 | 1 | 2020-03-16 08:42 | simonking717 ♦1 | Sorry Guys, when I created this point the browser had a problem, this one is not correct one, you can check the other one which I made. |
| 2 | 2020-03-17 16:59 | ralley | This changeset also dragged a node from the Massey Uni car park onto Albany Expressway - fixed. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/82246726 | |
| 82291217 by Aditya_Belgoankar @ 2020-03-17 08:05 | 1 | 2020-03-17 16:41 | ralley | This changeset has overlayed a highway (tagged crossing) on top of the existing highway (tagged footway) which is an error. Instead I've tagged the nodes where the existing footway crosses the Albany Express way as a crossing and use "crossing=traffic_signals". Please look out for w... |
| 82275238 by zwan074 @ 2020-03-16 21:48 | 1 | 2020-03-16 23:35 | ralley | These changes are not supported by aerial imagery and based on the names used and description appear to be vandalism and are being reverted. Please note that OSM is meant to reflect real world verifiable details only and should not be used for fantasy mapping --- #REVIEWED_... |
| 82275160 by zwan074 @ 2020-03-16 21:44 | 1 | 2020-03-16 23:33 | ralley | These changes are not supported by aerial imagery and based on the names used and description appear to be vandalism and are being reverted. Please note that OSM is meant to reflect real world verifiable details only and should not be used for fantasy mapping --- ... |
| 82245545 by simonking717 @ 2020-03-16 08:12 | 1 | 2020-03-16 09:09 | ralley | Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits - this change has created a duplicate for Springvale Drive that has existed in OSM since 2010. I will merge your new tags with the existing way and delete the duplicate. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/c... |
| 82233464 by bushno3 @ 2020-03-16 03:01 | 1 | 2020-03-16 04:41 | ralley | Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits. Unfortunately there are multiple problems with your changes: 1) You appear to have added a driveway tagged as a residential road; 2) You tagged a residential building as a courthouse (subsequently removed in another changeset) 3) You deleted the address nod... |
| 82207564 by Aditya_Belgoankar @ 2020-03-15 02:14 | 1 | 2020-03-15 04:36 | ralley | Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits. Rather than putting the bus stop number in the name field the typical system in NZ is to put it in the ref field. Typically name is used to hold the descriptive name if there is one. --- Published using OSMCha: https... |
| 77757020 by steveb-online @ 2019-11-30 12:38 | 1 | 2019-11-30 17:43 | ralley | Review: Looks good now, thanks --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/77757020 |
| 2 | 2019-11-30 17:50 | ralley | Oh hang on, lloks like that section was disconnected due to a road closure. Seems it may still be closed: https://www.journeys.nzta.govt.nz/manawatu-whanganui/traffic-update/741257 Have you confirmed this is actually open again? --- Published using OSMCha: h... | |
| 3 | 2019-12-04 21:14 | ralley | Can you please confirm if this section of road is actually reopened? | |
| 4 | 2019-12-05 09:09 | steveb-online ♦1 | You are correct thee road is closed temporarily. https://www.journeys.nzta.govt.nz/traffic/roadclosures/275912?layers=road-closures . Difficult to manage these temporary effects I guess. Is there a way (on Openstreetmap) to have a continuous road but have it flagged as closed? | |
| 5 | 2019-12-05 16:35 | ralley | I've reverted this changeset. The way it was done (and is again) is correct. It is topographically connected but tagged as access=no etc. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/77757020 | |
| 6 | 2020-03-10 12:17 | Cretti ♦2 | This road was re-opened just before Christmas, these changes need someone brighter than me to revert them again to re-open the road please. | |
| 7 | 2020-03-10 12:25 | Cretti ♦2 | Road was reopened on 20th Dec 2019 - https://www.nzherald.co.nz/north-island/news/article.cfm?c_id=1503932&objectid=12305793 | |
| 8 | 2020-03-10 18:29 | ralley | Thanks Cretti, I've re-tagged as open as per your reference and https://www.journeys.nzta.govt.nz/traffic/areawarnings/275912 | |
| 9 | 2020-03-11 02:09 | Cretti ♦2 | Thank you, that was a very quick response! | |
| 81936930 by leemillerau @ 2020-03-09 01:19 | 1 | 2020-03-09 03:08 | ralley | Review: Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits. I think for a shared way you should tag this with both bicycle=yes and foot=yes as well as segregated=yes|no as sppropriate. Cheers, Rob. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/81936930 ... |
| 81568735 by correip @ 2020-02-28 01:37 | 1 | 2020-02-28 07:03 | ralley | Thanks for the edit but please don't repeat the object description/attribute in the name field: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/81568735 |
| 81293972 by Jacque Jonson @ 2020-02-20 23:51 | 1 | 2020-02-22 11:50 | ralley | As discussed via PM I have undone this change and all the others that wronly changed Saint Lukes to St Lukes. This is as per https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Naming_conventions#Don.27t_use_abbreviations |
| 81103070 by JenTreg @ 2020-02-17 08:52 | 1 | 2020-02-18 03:27 | ralley | Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits. For MTB tracks they should be atgged as highway=path instead of leisure=track, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mountain_biking for MTB guidelines. Thanks, Rob. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbo... |
| 2 | 2020-02-20 09:03 | JenTreg ♦6 | Thanks Rob, I've edited them now, hopefully I've got the right format this time :) | |
| 3 | 2020-02-21 03:48 | ralley | Looks good to me, thanks very much. | |
| 81104204 by JenTreg @ 2020-02-17 09:13 | 1 | 2020-02-17 16:50 | ralley | Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits. Generally most houses in NZ consist of mainly 90 degree corners. In the ID editor if you right click on an area you can choose to square it (shortcut Q) and make all the corners 90 degrees. Thanks, Rob. --- Publishe... |
| 81090019 by David Teirney @ 2020-02-17 04:14 | 1 | 2020-02-17 07:11 | ralley | Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edit. Not sure why you have tagged the track with layer=-1? That is used to indicate that an object is underneath others (i.e. in a tunnel etc) --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/81090019 ... |
| 2 | 2020-02-17 08:04 | David Teirney ♦1 | Whoops, that's an error from one of the options presented by the editor when the path crossed through the building (before I split the building into the 2 real buildings present, which was the correct resolution). I assume there's a way to edit a changeset to remove changes that aren'... | |
| 3 | 2020-02-17 08:26 | ralley | No problems, it's easy enough to delete the layer=-1. Let me know if you need a hand --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/81090019 | |
| 81080470 by Jacque Jonson @ 2020-02-16 19:57 | 1 | 2020-02-17 07:24 | ralley | Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits. One minor point, please don't use abbreviations in names: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Naming_conventions#Don.27t_use_abbreviations Also there is no need to create a note if you actually perform the edit (I've closed the note now). Thanks... |
| 81035136 by Nij4t2 @ 2020-02-15 06:56 | 1 | 2020-02-15 08:25 | ralley | Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits. Most houses in NZ consist of mainly 90 degree corners. In ID if you right click the building outline you can automatically square it so all corners are 90 degrees. Short cut key is Q. --- Published using OSMCha: htt... |
| 80934522 by David Teirney @ 2020-02-13 04:57 | 1 | 2020-02-13 05:25 | ralley | Review as requested: Edit looks good to me, welcome to OSM and thanks for contributing. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/80934522 |
| 76545089 by Romeowns @ 2019-11-03 08:26 | 1 | 2020-02-12 09:04 | ralley | Please dont use the name field to put descriptions: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only |
| 80874073 by mpsupertramp @ 2020-02-12 00:08 | 1 | 2020-02-12 03:38 | ralley | Please don't use the name field for descriptions: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/80874073 |
| 80792075 by sjmackereth @ 2020-02-10 11:12 | 1 | 2020-02-10 16:48 | ralley | Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits. Most buildings in NZ tend to be made up of 90 degree angles. In ID you can use the 'Q' shortcut key to square all the angles to 90 degrees. Cheers, Rob. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.co... |
| 79720532 by ❤️🔥 @ 2020-01-18 01:48 | 1 | 2020-02-03 01:13 | ralley | Can you have a look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2077626 - I think you may have tagged an under construction boardwalk wrongly |
| 80402221 by cameralibre @ 2020-02-01 08:14 | 1 | 2020-02-01 08:15 | cameralibre ♦1 | I didn't know what category to use for 'A Taste of Greece' - it is a Greek food speciality store which also sells pastries and drinks etc to eat in. |
| 2 | 2020-02-02 23:48 | ralley | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=convenience?uselang=en-NZ#With_cafe_.2F_fast_food.3F has some guidance that might help | |
| 80448353 by Seagnoid @ 2020-02-02 22:46 | 1 | 2020-02-02 23:42 | ralley | Wouldn't this be better tagged as "historic=archaeological_site", "site_type=military_trench" and "name=Pratt's Sap"? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/80448353 |
| 80341566 by Martin Lawrence @ 2020-01-31 00:41 | 1 | 2020-02-02 17:48 | ralley | Please don't put descriptions like "Dumpstation" in the name field: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only Instead if there is also a dumpstation here add the tag "amenity=sanitary_dump_station" to a seperate node --- ... |
| 2 | 2020-02-02 18:11 | ralley | I've re-tagged this as suggested in my previous comment - the water point was previously tagged --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/80341566 | |
| 80402193 by Smaugboy14 @ 2020-02-01 08:12 | 1 | 2020-02-01 08:22 | ralley | Please don't put descriptions like "Disused" in the name field, https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only. Instead use a life cycle prefix, i.e. tag as "disused:amenity=fire_station" as per https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:disused:Thanks ... |
| 2 | 2020-02-01 08:24 | Smaugboy14 ♦3 | Cheers. | |
| 80332200 by Smaugboy14 @ 2020-01-30 18:25 | 1 | 2020-01-30 19:40 | ralley | Hi, welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits. As detected by OSMCha the tagging for the road under construction you have used is deprecated. According to current best practice you should tag as "highway=construction" and "construction=residential" you also don't need the &... |
| 2 | 2020-01-30 19:47 | Smaugboy14 ♦3 | Thanks for this ralley, appreciate it! | |
| 79890572 by Adrianna91 @ 2020-01-22 04:54 | 1 | 2020-01-22 05:41 | ralley | Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits - but please don't use the name filed for descriptions: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/79890572 |
| 79745197 by iikke @ 2020-01-19 01:58 | 1 | 2020-01-19 04:30 | ralley | Black Barn Vineyards already exists - there are now three copies all in close porximity --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/79745197 |
| 79364244 by Shengnan Song @ 2020-01-09 04:38 | 1 | 2020-01-09 05:16 | ralley | Please don't use abbreviations like 'St' in names: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Abbreviation_.28don.27t_do_it.29 |
| 2 | 2020-01-10 03:05 | Shengnan Song ♦6 | Thanks for your information. I have modified the name. | |
| 3 | 2020-01-10 05:34 | ralley | Thanks | |
| 79364470 by Shengnan Song @ 2020-01-09 04:52 | 1 | 2020-01-09 05:15 | ralley | Please don't use abbreviations like 'St' in names: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Abbreviation_.28don.27t_do_it.29 |
| 2 | 2020-01-10 03:07 | Shengnan Song ♦6 | Thanks for your information. I have modified the name. | |
| 3 | 2020-01-10 05:20 | ralley | Thank you | |
| 79364514 by Shengnan Song @ 2020-01-09 04:55 | 1 | 2020-01-09 05:15 | ralley | Please don't use abbreviations like 'St' in names: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Abbreviation_.28don.27t_do_it.29 |
| 2 | 2020-01-10 03:09 | Shengnan Song ♦6 | Thanks for your information. I have modified the name. | |
| 3 | 2020-01-10 05:19 | ralley | Thank you | |
| 79268922 by cr01 @ 2020-01-06 23:32 | 1 | 2020-01-07 00:25 | ralley | Is this path actually named "Walking" or is that a desciption being put in the name tag? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/79268922 |
| 2 | 2020-01-08 00:13 | cr01 ♦1 | I just followed the example of most other tracks in the forest where 'name' is used to distinguish between walking, bike (MBT) and horse trails (and even 'paint markers')If there's a better way to do so I'd love to know | |
| 3 | 2020-01-08 00:38 | cr01 ♦1 | (Ideally, according to the map key, tracks should show brown, bridleways (horse?) green, cycleways blue, footways red. This doesn't always seem to happen, I can't find which tags influence this, so in some places 'name' seems to be the only way to ensure a track is correctly id... | |
| 4 | 2020-01-08 00:45 | ralley | Unforunately previous editors look to have set a bad example for naming the trails. As per the referenced wiki page the name field is for the common "on the ground" name only. Access retrictions should use tagging like foot=yes|designated|no, bicycle=yes|designated|no, horse=yes|designa... | |
| 5 | 2020-01-08 10:54 | cr01 ♦1 | Thanks for that, I'll try to apply it. I think 'name' is legitimate for the Green (walking), Blue (walking), Brown (MTB) and Pink (Horse) trails as they are named as such on Council maps & marked by official coloured posts. | |
| 79275469 by Smaugboy14 @ 2020-01-07 04:45 | 1 | 2020-01-07 07:52 | ralley | Why have you removed the emergency traffic signals tagged on the SH20, have they been removed? Also why was this change done under a changeset comment "mount eden construction zones" which has nothing to do withthe change? --- Published using OSMCh... |
| 2 | 2020-01-07 08:04 | Smaugboy14 ♦3 | Hi ralley, It appears these were entered incorrectly on the changeset. Traffic signals are still there, however road layout was incorrect. Will rectify. Thanks --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/79275469 | |
| 63602177 by captain_slow @ 2018-10-17 08:19 | 1 | 2020-01-03 04:28 | ralley | As per https://www.eda.admin.ch/countries/new-zealand/en/home/representations/embassy-wellington/consulate-auckland.html/content/contacts/en/EDAVis/A/271 the Swiss Consulate is in Massey. Do you have a source for this edit? |
| 2 | 2020-01-03 11:03 | captain_slow ♦66 | Hi ralley, I was looking at the admin.ch website. The address seems to have changed since then, so I do not have a source (anymore). Thanks for pointing this out.I have changed the location of the consulate: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/79151855 | |
| 3 | 2020-01-03 17:38 | ralley | Thanks for clearing that up | |
| 79137782 by davidwim @ 2020-01-03 02:47 | 1 | 2020-01-03 03:13 | ralley | Why remove the no-exit? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/79137782 |
| 2 | 2020-01-03 07:58 | davidwim ♦2 | Because it’s a Private Driveway and not a Road?? | |
| 3 | 2020-01-03 08:06 | ralley | That does not change the fact there is no exit | |
| 51956782 by Robert Ancell @ 2017-09-11 22:49 | 1 | 2019-12-27 06:21 | Warin61 ♦2,663 | Hi,There are 2 schools with the name Timaru South School, possibly the one in Pareora is incorrect? Way 132909912 |
| 2 | 2020-01-03 04:46 | ralley | According to http://www.timarusouth.school.nz/Web/50/ the Timaru South School also has a Paeroa East site so I think it's correct | |
| 3 | 2020-01-03 04:52 | Warin61 ♦2,663 | Ok, your more local than me. I just found it strange when I can across it. | |
| 79139769 by cjdv @ 2020-01-03 04:05 | 1 | 2020-01-03 04:19 | ralley | Hi welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits. Rather than drawing footpaths as seperate ways usual practice in NZ is to add sidewalk tags to the existing road. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:sidewalk --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.map... |
| 79131639 by Impress Painting @ 2020-01-02 21:44 | 1 | 2020-01-02 21:51 | ralley | Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edit. There are some problems with your changes: 1) Change set comment does not describe what you did and why; 2) Redundantly added a residential area within existing; 3) Improper tags on office. Please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comme... |
| 78808859 by balcoath @ 2019-12-24 08:40 | 1 | 2019-12-27 07:40 | Warin61 ♦2,663 | Hi,What is 'ECan imagery'? |
| 2 | 2020-01-02 19:28 | ralley | Environment Canterbury - https://ecan.govt.nz/ | |
| 3 | 2020-01-03 05:06 | Warin61 ♦2,663 | Ummm https://ecan.govt.nz/info/copyright/Website visitors may reproduce, store and use the content of this website for personal, informational and non-commercial purposes only. Otherwise, no portion of the content of the website, including text, graphics, photos and the Council logo, may be copi... | |
| 4 | 2020-01-03 05:13 | Warin61 ♦2,663 | Err That looks to be copyright... and there looks to be no waiver.Seehttps://apps.canterburymaps.govt.nz/canterburyMaps/TermsandConditions.pdfhttps://ecan.govt.nz/info/copyright/andhttps://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/New_Zealand_Data_CatalogueAs balcoath has failed to respond and is ... | |
| 5 | 2020-01-06 20:44 | balcoath ♦6 | Warin61: I did not respond because I did not see your messages until today. As you know, it's a busy time of year. ECan's imagery is published as a web service under CC BY 3.0 NZ---I had thought that that was sufficient permission but I've since been made aware that it may not be in i... | |
| 6 | 2020-01-06 22:28 | Warin61 ♦2,663 | All the things copied from that source need to be removed. They cannot be left in OSM. I suggest you cease other activities untill that is completed. | |
| 7 | 2020-01-06 23:19 | balcoath ♦6 | I'm sure you'll kindly tell me how to do that too. | |
| 8 | 2020-01-07 05:38 | Warin61 ♦2,663 | My tool of choice for undoing my own (it happens) ...https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JOSM/Plugins/Reverter | |
| 9 | 2020-01-13 03:59 | aharvey ♦1,709 | I've sent a waiver request to ECAN to ask for imagery tracing permission, but let's not expect that. balcoath it looks like you've reverted your affected changesets, did you manage to do them all without issues? Let me know if you still need a hand.Moving forward, let's hope EC... | |
| 10 | 2020-01-13 20:25 | balcoath ♦6 | That's excellent, thanks. Yes, I've reverted my changesets. I had trouble resolving conflicts with a couple of the earlier ones, mostly because I'm never sure how to do it well. Looking at the map, though, I don't see any glaring problems with the geometries. | |
| 11 | 2020-01-22 22:18 | aharvey ♦1,709 | After approaching Environment Canterbury they have agreed to the OSM tracining waiver https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/03/17/use-of-cc-by-data/ to allow OSM to trace from their aerial imagery.Their permission form at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:EnvironmentCanterbury_Aerialimagery... | |
| 12 | 2020-01-22 22:24 | balcoath ♦6 | That's awesome, thanks for doing that. Now, a silly question: can I un-revert some of my reverted changesets? | |
| 13 | 2020-01-22 22:43 | Warin61 ♦2,663 | Not a silly question at all. Think a legal eagle would be required... and I think the answer will be no :( Good luck. | |
| 14 | 2020-01-23 01:55 | aharvey ♦1,709 | @balcoath you can revert the revert changeset. Ideally this would be done in the right order so they can smoothly applied assuming no other changes have been made. Now that we have the imagery tracing waiver from ECan I see no reason why data derived from the imagery can't be used now.See a... | |
| 15 | 2020-01-23 02:16 | balcoath ♦6 | Yes, I'll have to have a think about which reverts I could safely revert. I know other users have made changes in some of the areas I previously mapped.Yep, I'm aware that ECan pass their imagery to LINZ, and there is certainly a lag. There is quite a bit of development going on at the... | |
| 79071758 by davidwim @ 2020-01-01 01:15 | 1 | 2020-01-01 02:07 | ralley | Why is the footway tagged with layer=-1? Is it really underground? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/79071758 |
| 2 | 2020-01-03 08:05 | davidwim ♦2 | No, it’s not underground. It’s outside under the roof of a Building. | |
| 78732253 by Maya_Ne @ 2019-12-22 11:35 | 1 | 2019-12-22 17:51 | ralley | Are you sure these are paths for non-motorised vehicles? (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dpath) From the aerial imagery they appear to be driveways (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:service%3Ddriveway) --- Published using OSMCha: https... |
| 78721870 by Meg1234 @ 2019-12-21 21:31 | 1 | 2019-12-21 22:31 | ralley | Please don't put descriptions in the the name: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/78721870 |
| 78660983 by Ramoutcho @ 2019-12-20 02:39 | 1 | 2019-12-20 02:49 | ralley | Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits. A couple of points: please don't put descriptions like "private' in the name, it is reserved for names only. Also this is still tagged as access=yes which contradicts it being private. Simillary operator=DOC is inconsistent with it being pr... |
| 78491001 by AlwynWellington @ 2019-12-16 20:32 | 1 | 2019-12-16 22:58 | ralley | Review as requested: Rather than "name=not in current use" please tag as dusused or abandoned as appropriate. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:disused: --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/78491001 ... |
| 2 | 2019-12-17 00:52 | AlwynWellington ♦58 | @ralley, kia ora and thank you for that comment.I was hoping for comment on how to tag a 'marae'In that name pretty much unique to Aotearoa - New Zealand.The closest, in some general respects is a 'village green' with buildings. But village the concept of a village g... | |
| 3 | 2019-12-17 18:19 | ralley | Not sure how best to tag a Marae, I've usually just seen the building tagged. Maybe ask on the talk nz mailing list? (https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-nz) | |
| 4 | 2019-12-17 22:30 | AlwynWellington ♦58 | Thanks. Wasn't aware there was a talk-nz forum | |
| 78493074 by Alan Griffith @ 2019-12-16 21:50 | 1 | 2019-12-16 22:55 | ralley | Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edit. One thing - I don't think service=drive-through is correct as per https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:service%3Ddrive-through Maybe just leave it at highway=service? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmch... |
| 78448190 by Ramoutcho @ 2019-12-16 03:53 | 1 | 2019-12-16 07:21 | ralley | Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edit - I've changed the shop type to "deprtment store" as it is a better fit for Kmart. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/78448190 |
| 78439131 by Tom Alexander @ 2019-12-15 20:07 | 1 | 2019-12-15 22:53 | ralley | Hi, welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits. Is this actually 3989 State Highway 47 or is have you put the suburb and postcode in the addr:housenumber field? Is it really named "Cross X Roads" or is that a description? Is this a free site for self contained vehicles or an actual camp s... |
| 78423614 by alspace @ 2019-12-15 07:50 | 1 | 2019-12-15 08:23 | ralley | Phone numbers should be in E.164 format: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:phone#Usage --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/78423614 |
| 2 | 2019-12-15 09:53 | ralley | Thanks for fixing that up --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/78423614 | |
| 78300618 by Johnnynz @ 2019-12-12 07:12 | 1 | 2019-12-12 08:03 | ralley | Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits. Can you please use more descriptive changeset comments - it helps people understand your edits. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments for guidance. Thanks. --- Published using OSMCha: htt... |
| 77958277 by ianel @ 2019-12-04 19:46 | 1 | 2019-12-04 21:10 | ralley | This changeset has changed the highway tag from construction but hasn't removed the construction=unclassified tag --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/77958277 |
| 2 | 2019-12-11 18:28 | ralley | construction= now removed by original editor | |
| 78195850 by ralstogj @ 2019-12-10 09:03 | 1 | 2019-12-10 09:21 | ralley | Pleas dont use the name field for non-names - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/78195850 |
| 2 | 2019-12-11 18:26 | ralley | Removed test | |
| 78043685 by arvic @ 2019-12-06 10:51 | 1 | 2019-12-06 17:11 | ralley | Is this just a driveway for 2024 South Eyre Road? If so it should be tagged as highway=service and service=driverway and it should not have a name tagged. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/78043685 |
| 2 | 2019-12-06 19:20 | arvic ♦3 | Thanks for comment, I just learning how to edit and improve map. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/78043685 | |
| 3 | 2019-12-07 06:10 | ralley | No problem, let me know if you have any questions. The wiki at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Main_Page is a good resource | |
| 78074326 by arvic @ 2019-12-06 22:37 | 1 | 2019-12-07 06:05 | ralley | You've tagged both a building and a cafe as the same place |
| 2 | 2019-12-07 06:07 | arvic ♦3 | But how to deal with it? Should I add only icon and do not add anything to the building? | |
| 3 | 2019-12-07 06:09 | ralley | Normally just leave the building way as is and add the cafe node seperately but inside the extent of the building. | |
| 78071227 by arvic @ 2019-12-06 20:28 | 1 | 2019-12-07 06:06 | ralley | Farm roads are typically tagged as highway=track or highway=service, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway Also what is the source for the maxspeed you have tagged? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/78071227 ... |
| 2 | 2019-12-07 06:19 | arvic ♦3 | For the MAX speed - Local signs provided by property owner. | |
| 78030169 by NelsonArea @ 2019-12-06 06:59 | 1 | 2019-12-06 08:10 | ralley | This should be layer=-1 if it is a tunnel under the surface, layer=1 is above. Also please dont put descriptions in the name: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/7803... |
| 2 | 2019-12-06 17:30 | ralley | I've cleaned this up as best I can | |
| 78030522 by NelsonArea @ 2019-12-06 07:07 | 1 | 2019-12-06 08:11 | ralley | Why layer=-2 and not -1 ? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/78030522 |
| 2 | 2019-12-06 17:21 | ralley | Fixed by NelsonArea | |
| 78038727 by NelsonArea @ 2019-12-06 09:35 | 1 | 2019-12-06 09:41 | ralley | Why is layer=-1 needed? It is not tagged as a tunnel and appears in aerial imagery as on the surface, it even has a bridge crossing it --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/78038727 |
| 2 | 2019-12-06 17:19 | ralley | Fixed by NelsonArea | |
| 78044404 by arvic @ 2019-12-06 11:02 | 1 | 2019-12-06 17:18 | ralley | Is this added from local knowledge? I ask because LINZ shows Maindonalds road starting further West just before the intersection with School Road --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/78044404 |
| 77757176 by steveb-online @ 2019-11-30 12:45 | 1 | 2019-11-30 17:41 | ralley | Review: Looks correct to me, thanks --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/77757176 |
| 77702705 by Joshy_B @ 2019-11-29 02:06 | 1 | 2019-11-29 16:46 | ralley | Hi, welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits. Are you familiar enough with the area to resolve nearby note https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1164314 ? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/77702705 |
| 77714962 by thisisDerpy @ 2019-11-29 08:38 | 1 | 2019-11-29 09:05 | ralley | Hi, you've put covered=yes on a lot of the driveways you have added. Are they really covered by a building or structure? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:covered --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/77714962 ... |
| 2 | 2019-11-30 04:09 | thisisDerpy ♦1 | Woops, I kind of just assumed that it meant the road was covered by asphalt or something, but, uh yeah, I'll go about fixing that! | |
| 77651368 by Kiwi Nomad @ 2019-11-27 19:55 | 1 | 2019-11-27 20:52 | ralley | Please don't put descriptions like "Morningside Reserve Path" in the name field unless it is in common use/sign posted. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/ch... |
| 77308215 by Wyatt Burrows @ 2019-11-20 08:07 | 1 | 2019-11-24 06:11 | ralley | Please do not rename objects with personal names and add fake parks. |
| 2 | 2019-11-26 00:10 | ralley | All vandalism reverted | |
| 77476487 by Rudy355 @ 2019-11-24 08:32 | 1 | 2019-11-24 16:38 | ralley | Typo? Isn't way 749133111 a playground rather than a quarry? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/77476487 |
| 2 | 2019-11-26 00:07 | ralley | Changed to playground | |
| 77497799 by 8tomo8 @ 2019-11-25 02:59 | 1 | 2019-11-25 06:32 | ralley | Welcome to OSM and thanks for you edits. One thing to note, please don't use the name field for descriptions like "Public Walkthrough", see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmc... |
| 77490541 by exciterobbie @ 2019-11-24 19:20 | 1 | 2019-11-24 19:33 | ralley | This changeset has introduced a duplicate bus stop. Also the exisiting bus stop does have the number - it is in the ref field which I believe is the correct way to tag this. I will remove your new poi. Please feel free to modify the existing bus stop if you think it still needs changing. Thanks,... |
| 77473071 by Kiwi Nomad @ 2019-11-24 02:28 | 1 | 2019-11-24 06:16 | ralley | Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits. I see you tried to correct the vandalism of the school name. Rather than creating a new node the brst solution was to edit the exisiting node. I've mreged your fix with the exisiting node so it should all be good now. Thanks, Rob. ---... |
| 2 | 2019-11-24 19:09 | Kiwi Nomad ♦1 | Thanks for fixing that @ralley I couldn't work out why it kept disappearing when I put the mouse curser over it. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/77473071 | |
| 77445267 by Joachim Somers @ 2019-11-22 20:51 | 1 | 2019-11-23 09:53 | ralley | Please don't put descriptions such as "Self Contained" in the name field (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only). Also your new node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7003130893 is very close to https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6204386885. Are they d... |
| 77352979 by Paul Wieser @ 2019-11-21 04:06 | 1 | 2019-11-21 04:46 | ralley | Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edit, just one thing, please don't put descriptions like "Freedom Camping" in the name field. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only. Thanks. --- Published using OSMCha: https://o... |
| 2 | 2019-11-21 04:49 | ralley | The toilet and campsite added both turned out to be duplicates (maps.me is frequently outdated) - I've merged them with the existing objects --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/77352979 | |
| 77253048 by BzHandLyon @ 2019-11-19 02:22 | 1 | 2019-11-21 04:36 | ralley | Review as requested: Youve tagged two buildings as being number 9 neither of which appear to be the main building. Normally just one building gets tagged with the street number etc or just a node is place for the property as a whole (as was already the case here) |
| 77265691 by CoyKoi @ 2019-11-19 09:53 | 1 | 2019-11-19 17:03 | ralley | Can note 1948111 be actioned now? |
| 2 | 2019-11-20 02:34 | CoyKoi ♦228 | I'm not going to remove the old station POI myself - I haven't confirmed with survey or seen reports that they're fully moved out yet - might still have operations out of there? | |
| 77044811 by Sam Charles Peters @ 2019-11-14 01:29 | 1 | 2019-11-14 08:33 | ralley | Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edit. One thing, please don't use the name key for generic descriptions like "Native Forest". See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.map... |
| 2 | 2019-11-14 08:33 | ralley | Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edit. One thing, please don't use the name key for generic descriptions like "Native Forest". See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.map... | |
| 3 | 2019-11-18 23:28 | ralley | Removed description from name field | |
| 77044739 by Sam Charles Peters @ 2019-11-14 01:26 | 1 | 2019-11-14 08:33 | ralley | Please don't use the name field for generic names like "Milking Shed". https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/77044739 |
| 2 | 2019-11-18 23:27 | ralley | Moved description | |
| 77197667 by Matthew_Reyes @ 2019-11-17 19:21 | 1 | 2019-11-17 23:51 | ralley | Review as requested: Building looks good to me. Only thing I can suggest is maybe bundle a bunch of buildings (say a blocks worth) into a single changeset. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/77197667 |
| 2 | 2019-11-17 23:51 | ralley | Review as requested: Building looks good to me. Only thing I can suggest is maybe bundle a bunch of buildings (say a blocks worth) into a single changeset. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/77197667 | |
| 76941716 by ❤️🔥 @ 2019-11-12 06:37 | 1 | 2019-11-12 23:50 | ralley | Please don't put descriptions like "Forklift Only" in the name tag - it is for the name only. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/76941716 ... |
| 2 | 2019-11-13 03:53 | ❤️🔥 ♦364 | Apologies; fixed in #76989857 | |
| 76841996 by Randi Basse @ 2019-11-09 11:23 | 1 | 2019-11-09 18:31 | ralley | Hi, welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits. A few points: You added a POI for the sand dune which is already in OSM; you added it twice; you set the name as generic "Sand Dune" - the name should just be the common name of the instance, in this case "Te Paki Dunes" (as already ... |
| 76793315 by xoxRARITYxox @ 2019-11-08 08:12 | 1 | 2019-11-08 09:06 | ralley | Hi, most of these buildings should probably have 90 degree corners, You can do that in Id by selecting the building and pressing 'Q' |
| 76669429 by Petr Faitl @ 2019-11-05 22:02 | 1 | 2019-11-05 23:13 | ralley | Review as requested: I think you should map this as two seperate POI's at the same address - "Beyond Fitness" as leisure=fitness_centre and "Beyond Physiotherapy" as healthcare=physiotherapist. Also phone numbers should be in international format (+64 7 571 6745) as per htt... |
| 76632909 by Morswinowa @ 2019-11-05 08:51 | 1 | 2019-11-05 09:14 | ralley | Please don't use the name key for putting descriptions/notes on objects it is for holding the common name only. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/76632909 |
| 2 | 2019-11-05 09:20 | ralley | According to https://www.newzealand.com/int/feature/omarama-clay-cliffs/ the cliffs are on private property at this location but there is a $5 per vehicle fee to enter | |
| 76517810 by Philipp Blanz @ 2019-11-02 00:26 | 1 | 2019-11-02 03:10 | ralley | Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edit, one thing please don't put descriptions like "cool pool along the waterfall track" in the name key, it is reserved for the common name of the feature. Thanks. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.m... |
| 2 | 2019-11-04 23:57 | ralley | Removed name | |
| 76595314 by xoxRARITYxox @ 2019-11-04 13:51 | 1 | 2019-11-04 23:50 | ralley | Spelling mistake on "Gtimsby Grove Recreation Reserve"? |
| 76568177 by IsaiahHolman @ 2019-11-04 03:58 | 1 | 2019-11-04 08:02 | ralley | Please don't use yello pages as a source for OSM edits - it is copyright with an incompatible licence --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/76568177 |
| 76569390 by Geoelder @ 2019-11-04 05:15 | 1 | 2019-11-04 08:01 | ralley | Review as requested: Looks good to me, thanks for your additions. One minor point: most buildings in NZ tend to consist of mainly 90 degrees corners. In the Id editor if you press 'Q' it will square the object so all corners are 90 degrees. --- Pub... |
| 76470729 by ghesling @ 2019-10-31 23:32 | 1 | 2019-10-31 23:57 | ralley | Hi, welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits. Rather than highway=streetlamp I believe the lighting towers are more properly tagged as man_made=tower (or man_made=mast) and tower:type=lighting. Also please don't tag descriptions like "light tower" as the name. |
| 2 | 2019-11-02 10:04 | ralley | Fixed | |
| 56504093 by Andreas Hippe @ 2018-02-19 21:29 | 1 | 2019-10-30 18:42 | Martin Skvor ♦1 | This overnight stay is no longer valid. |
| 2 | 2019-11-01 00:18 | ralley | Martin, do you have a source for that? | |
| 3 | 2019-11-01 00:46 | Martin Skvor ♦1 | Lived in Richmond 4 months🙂 you can also check vikicamps app or campermate. It is day use area only now, no overnight stay. The only overnight stay fo SC vehicles is at the end of Fital street close to nr. 14 | |
| 4 | 2019-11-02 10:01 | ralley | Thanks, I've removed it | |
| 76480347 by DanGamingTV @ 2019-11-01 07:55 | 1 | 2019-11-01 09:26 | ralley | Why have you tagged a path visible on aerial imagery as a tunnel and dragged a turning circle from it's proper position? |
| 2 | 2019-11-02 10:00 | ralley | Reverted | |
| 76430377 by MikeJMills @ 2019-10-31 06:53 | 1 | 2019-10-31 07:34 | ralley | H, welcome to OSM and thanks for your edit. The cafe you have added is already in OSM - I suspect maps.me is using outdated data. |
| 2 | 2019-11-01 00:19 | ralley | Removed duplicate | |
| 76315593 by Heaven's Rest B&B @ 2019-10-28 20:57 | 1 | 2019-10-28 23:01 | ralley | Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edit. One small mistake - you appear to have tagged the entire property with building=yes whereas this should be put on just the outline of the building itself. |
| 2 | 2019-10-29 06:09 | ralley | Thanks for fixing that up | |
| 76276970 by ObamaObamaObama @ 2019-10-27 21:34 | 1 | 2019-10-28 00:14 | ralley | Please don't add fictional elements to the map |
| 2 | 2019-10-28 00:59 | ralley | Reverted | |
| 75963371 by G vidal @ 2019-10-20 19:45 | 1 | 2019-10-20 21:59 | ralley | Hi welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits. Unfortunately you have created 3 POI's for the same place and haven't used the correct ISO format (including international dial code) for the phone number. Can you fix these things up? Just ask if you need help. Thanks |
| 2 | 2019-10-26 11:00 | ralley | Cleaned up | |
| 76137926 by Sofian Fakhira @ 2019-10-24 07:40 | 1 | 2019-10-24 15:02 | ClarkstonCorrect ♦62 | Why is the whole world in the box |
| 2 | 2019-10-24 16:44 | ralley | Hi, welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits. Unfortunately this changeset added a node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6911507022 which is making it look like you've edited the whole world. Can you please clean it up? | |
| 3 | 2019-10-26 01:57 | ralley | Orphan node removed | |
| 75395897 by Darroch @ 2019-10-07 23:05 | 1 | 2019-10-07 23:13 | ralley | Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits. Please don't use the name field to add descriptions like "Garden with tree". See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only Thanks, Rob. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha... |
| 2 | 2019-10-17 07:55 | ralley | Cleaned up | |
| 75395885 by Darroch @ 2019-10-07 23:05 | 1 | 2019-10-07 23:15 | ralley | Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits. Please don't use the name field to add descriptions like "Garden with tree". See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only Thanks, Rob. |
| 2 | 2019-10-17 07:55 | ralley | Cleaned up | |
| 75395875 by Darroch @ 2019-10-07 23:04 | 1 | 2019-10-07 23:16 | ralley | Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits. Please don't use the name field to add descriptions like "Path at ...". See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only Thanks, Rob. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.... |
| 2 | 2019-10-17 07:54 | ralley | Cleaned up | |
| 75396036 by NF8 @ 2019-10-07 23:16 | 1 | 2019-10-07 23:20 | ralley | Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits. Please don't use the name field to add descriptions like "Walkway". See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only Thanks, Rob. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/... |
| 2 | 2019-10-17 07:54 | ralley | Cleaned up | |
| 75396001 by NF8 @ 2019-10-07 23:14 | 1 | 2019-10-07 23:25 | ralley | Welsome to OSM and thanks for your edits, please don't use the operator tag for descriptions like "Disabled parking spot" it is intended to hold the name of the enitity that operates the amenity, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:operator. You can also make an area enclos... |
| 2 | 2019-10-17 07:54 | ralley | Cleaned up | |
| 75396061 by Team AJJ @ 2019-10-07 23:18 | 1 | 2019-10-07 23:30 | ralley | Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits. Please don't use the name key for descriptions like "Disabled Car Park", see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changes... |
| 2 | 2019-10-17 07:54 | ralley | Cleaned up | |
| 75635033 by tristanjlandry @ 2019-10-13 21:15 | 1 | 2019-10-13 23:29 | ralley | Can you please use descriptive comments on your changesets as per https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/75635033 |
| 75400578 by ruseurope @ 2019-10-08 06:17 | 1 | 2019-10-08 07:06 | ralley | Can you please use meaningful changset comments as per https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/75400578 |
| 75399328 by ruseurope @ 2019-10-08 04:41 | 1 | 2019-10-08 06:05 | ralley | You appear to have accidentally added a description to the name key --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/75399328 |
| 75396071 by chickenwing @ 2019-10-07 23:19 | 1 | 2019-10-07 23:28 | ralley | Welsome to OSM and thanks for tyour edits, please use meaningful changeset comments as per https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/75396071 |
| 75396094 by chickenwing @ 2019-10-07 23:20 | 1 | 2019-10-07 23:28 | ralley | Welsome to OSM and thanks for tyour edits, please use meaningful changeset comments as per https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/75396094 |
| 75274226 by CoyKoi @ 2019-10-04 10:27 | 1 | 2019-10-04 10:33 | CoyKoi ♦228 | Not sure why OSMCha reports "possible import" - there was no import in this changeset. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/75274226 |
| 2 | 2019-10-07 18:32 | ralley | Don't worry about the OSMCHA warning - it produces quite a lot of false positives. From memory the metric used for "possible import" is just based on the ratio of new nodes to modified/deleted nodes. | |
| 75173133 by Phyllishomes @ 2019-10-01 22:36 | 1 | 2019-10-02 23:30 | ralley | You have added a residential area instead of changing the name of Rimu Street |
| 2 | 2019-10-07 06:32 | ralley | Cleaned up --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/75173133 | |
| 75331522 by tristanjlandry @ 2019-10-06 03:36 | 1 | 2019-10-06 04:44 | ralley | Hi and welcome to OSM, thanks for your edits. Can you please use descriptive messages for your changeset comments? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments. Also I believe the roads you added as "unclassified" would be better tagged as "service". Thanks... |
| 75053726 by Samuel Babin @ 2019-09-29 06:13 | 1 | 2019-09-29 09:37 | ralley | Thanks for the edit but I think you've made a few mistakes. Youve created two places named "Sweet As" one of which is still tagged as bar "The Bach". Also I believe the correct name is just "Sweet As", not "French Bakery Sweet As" |
| 2 | 2019-09-29 09:45 | Samuel Babin ♦1 | I'm working in bakery the bach and the stable now is sweet as bakery.This is same owner that before but is sweet as bakery now. | |
| 74986872 by LeoSOnnekus @ 2019-09-27 03:05 | 1 | 2019-09-27 07:34 | ralley | Hi welcome to OSM and thanks for your edit. Just one thing to be careful of - you dragged a node of the kerb (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/448059596) across the motorways. I have moved it back. |
| 2 | 2019-09-28 02:37 | CoyKoi ♦228 | Welcome! And thanks for the addition. I've made some slight changes to the tags for the shop, in line with the wiki page. These aren't hard-and-fast rules, but are useful guidelines for consistency.https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:clothes --- ... | |
| 3 | 2019-09-30 21:25 | CoyKoi ♦228 | Another node which was misplaced (as yet unfixed):https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3884313280 | |
| 74983447 by NickCrisp @ 2019-09-26 22:57 | 1 | 2019-09-27 00:27 | ralley | Welsome to OSM and thanks for your edit. One point to note - please don't put descriptions in the name field. Rather use the seperate decription field and also use tags like fee=no to mark that it is free. |
| 74697473 by Symtech Developers @ 2019-09-19 22:38 | 1 | 2019-09-20 04:43 | ralley | Can I ask what your source for this change is? From local knowledge and the mapillary imagery the 100kmh zone for the North bound lanes starts North of where it is now placed, outside the police station. The South bound 100 zone ends North of its current position, where the bus way merges. |
| 2 | 2019-09-24 00:44 | Symtech Developers ♦1 | Hi Rob, This was a misinterpretation by one of our team members looking at google street view. We've changed the zone segment back to 100 km/h. | |
| 3 | 2019-09-24 04:58 | ralley | Thanks for the quick response and fix. Please don't use google street view as a source for edits though - it does not have a compatible licence. Mapillary imagery is available and has a compatible licence. | |
| 4 | 2019-09-24 23:32 | Symtech Developers ♦1 | Thanks for the mapillary suggestion, we'll look into it. | |
| 58099826 by cole m @ 2018-04-14 23:29 Active block | 1 | 2019-09-22 06:50 | ralley | Edit identified as vandalism and reverted by changeset 58530422 |
| 59616934 by cole m @ 2018-06-06 23:35 Active block | 1 | 2019-09-21 21:22 | ralley | What is the source for Park Road? It does not appear in the LINZ road data set and is not visible on the aerial imagery. According to LINZ Park Road is to the East of Te Awamutu central (as it appears in OSM) |
| 59616996 by cole m @ 2018-06-06 23:42 Active block | 1 | 2019-09-21 21:13 | ralley | Identified as vandalism and reverted by changeset 65488448 |
| 58099848 by cole m @ 2018-04-14 23:32 Active block | 1 | 2018-04-15 02:27 | ralley | Why have you changed the morotcross raceways to be tagged as motorways?Also as previously requested can you please use meaningful changeset comments as per https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments |
| 2 | 2019-09-21 21:12 | ralley | Identified as vandalism and reverted by changeset 58530422 | |
| 57308235 by cole m @ 2018-03-19 06:55 Active block | 1 | 2019-09-21 21:11 | ralley | Identified as vandalism and reverted by changeset 57339094 |
| 74739557 by cole m @ 2019-09-21 04:40 Active block | 1 | 2019-09-21 21:04 | ralley | Review: What is the source you used for this? I ask because I can't find reference to the new roads you have added in LINZ road data set nor are they visible on the LINZ aerial imagery listed as used. Also there are warnings about crossing ways that should be resolved. Can you also please us... |
| 2 | 2019-09-23 11:58 | Polarbear-repair ♦690 | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/74801221 being fiction. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/cole%20m/blocks | |
| 74643577 by Chipperdoo @ 2019-09-18 19:46 | 1 | 2019-09-18 20:37 | ralley | Hi, welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits. Just one thing, please don't tag generic descriptions like "speed camera" as the object name. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions for guidance. Thanks. |
| 74643563 by Chipperdoo @ 2019-09-18 19:45 | 1 | 2019-09-18 20:34 | ralley | Hi, welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits. With the address tags please don't put all the details (road name, suburb, postcode) etc. in the addr:street tag, there are seperate addr:suburb and addr:postcode to hold the other details. Also abbreviations such as "Rd" should be expan... |
| 74287105 by TmmDaniel @ 2019-09-10 03:34 | 1 | 2019-09-11 08:34 | ralley | Hi there, when adding nodes instead of putting the information in the name like "Freedom Camping Self-Contained 3 nights" can you please just put the actual name in that tag and put the other info in seperate tags, e.g. "fee=no" and use the description for anything else. Thanks. |
| 2 | 2019-09-16 18:54 | ralley | Updated tags | |
| 73454467 by greta_hm @ 2019-08-18 02:03 | 1 | 2019-09-14 01:18 | ralley | Are you sure Morningside Church Of Christ is at the correct location? All the other address nodes (mostly imported from LINZ) suggest that 42 is the other side of the road (where there is a # 42 already) |
| 2 | 2019-09-22 07:57 | greta_hm ♦1 | Hi, thanks for spotting that, I’ll note that and pass it on to the people in my team responsible for the nodes. | |
| 74120530 by Muren16 @ 2019-09-05 09:01 | 1 | 2019-09-08 20:04 | ralley | Hi wlecome to OSM and thanks for your edit. Do you have a verifiable source for your changes? I ask because you have added a park that does not appear in the Auckland Council park extents data set and appears from aerial imagery to in fact be private land. Thanks, Rob. |
| 2 | 2019-09-08 20:32 | Muren16 ♦1 | Hi rob, you are correct, it is not council owned land, I did not see an option for private park , the area is currently being developed and the neighbouring properties are also having foundation works started soon also for more residential specific applications, I had to add it as a park for a repor... | |
| 3 | 2019-09-10 04:54 | ralley | Thanks for responding. Maybe change leisure=park to landuse=grass? | |
| 4 | 2019-09-10 05:02 | Muren16 ♦1 | i didnt even know that was an option as it wasnt listed when i clicked the landuse button, i had to search for it before it showed up, thanks i have changed it now, hope that clears up any confusion | |
| 5 | 2019-09-10 05:03 | ralley | Awesome, thanks for that. | |
| 73959905 by markbegbie @ 2019-08-31 23:12 | 1 | 2019-09-04 21:17 | GinaroZ ♦1,280 | Using highway=raceway here is tagging for the renderer... |
| 2 | 2019-09-04 22:29 | markbegbie ♦28 | Cheers. I was struggling a bit with what the tagging should be for this, and found the wiki unclear. Do you have any suggestions or examples I could learn from?Thanks. | |
| 3 | 2019-09-10 04:52 | ralley | Maybe use leisure=track and attaction=summer_toboggan (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dtrack and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:attraction%3Dsummer_toboggan) | |
| 4 | 2019-09-15 00:19 | markbegbie ♦28 | Thanks for the tip. All changed now. | |
| 74063649 by Vanman989 @ 2019-09-04 03:55 | 1 | 2019-09-04 05:47 | ralley | Welcome to OSM and thanks for the edit. A pointer: in the ID editor you can right click and select "SQUARE" (Shortcut 'Q') to set all the building angles to 90 degrees which is generally correct for many NZ buildings. |
| 2 | 2019-09-10 04:44 | ralley | Cleaned up | |
| 3 | 2019-09-10 20:49 | Vanman989 ♦1 | thanks man | |
| 74061280 by Brebdo99 @ 2019-09-04 00:36 | 1 | 2019-09-04 00:58 | ralley | Hi, welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits. Just a couple of points: please don't put descriptions like "playground" in the name field (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name). In this case you could create a seperate area tagged with lesiure=playground. Also can you p... |
| 2 | 2019-09-10 04:42 | ralley | Cleaned up | |
| 66579193 by finchensheep @ 2019-01-23 18:58 | 1 | 2019-09-03 00:28 | ralley | This path (and various others) is tagged as access=no and foot=yes which is contradictory, is it open to the public to walk? |
| 2 | 2019-09-03 01:10 | finchensheep ♦1 | yes open to public | |
| 3 | 2019-09-03 04:21 | ralley | Thanks for the quick response, I'll edit the tags. | |
| 71657265 by callum_AT @ 2019-06-27 03:52 | 1 | 2019-08-28 03:55 | ralley | What app/router are you using that is attempting to route over the train tracks? I ask because the edits you have made are being flagged as wrong by QA checkers such as OSMOSE and from my understanding shouldn't be required. Thanks. |
| 2 | 2019-08-29 02:23 | callum_AT ♦6 | Its using the open trip planner router at the back end, but the app is AT Mobile. For some reason, the router is providing a walking route from the bus stop, across the parking area and across the train tracks to the platform, rather than the footpath further down New North Road that provides access... | |
| 3 | 2019-08-31 18:48 | ralley | Both graphhopper and OSRM are routing correctly so the underlying data looks fine now: https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=graphhopper_foot&route=-36.87474%2C174.73495%3B-36.87500%2C174.73520 | |
| 71944595 by deizenov @ 2019-07-05 20:24 | 1 | 2019-07-07 08:06 | ralley | Something has gone wrong with way 317607799 (Kingdom Hall of Jehovah's Witnesses) - it looks nothing like the aerial imagery and has errors identified by OSMI. |
| 2 | 2019-08-28 17:38 | ralley | Updated buildinbg outline | |
| 73339175 by Wyatt Burrows @ 2019-08-14 09:20 | 1 | 2019-08-14 11:00 | ralley | Do you have a source for this? |
| 2 | 2019-08-28 17:33 | ralley | No response so I've undone this at it appears to be vandalism | |
| 73775496 by Kowhai Forge @ 2019-08-27 03:11 | 1 | 2019-08-27 03:52 | ralley | REVIEW: Hi welcome to OSM, thanks for your edit, it looks good to me. A couple of improvements you could make: instead of the description field you could put "Kowhai Forge Ltd." in the name tag and add a "craft=blacksmith" tag |
| 2 | 2019-08-28 09:23 | ralley | I've changed tagging as per my suggestions | |
| 73710583 by james2185 @ 2019-08-25 06:45 | 1 | 2019-08-25 07:38 | ralley | Why have you changed this from a swimming pool to a pond? From the aerial imagery it definitely appears to be a pool. Also please use desciptive changeset comments as per https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments |
| 2 | 2019-08-28 09:06 | ralley | Changed back to swimming pool by james2185 | |
| 73710948 by james2185 @ 2019-08-25 07:09 | 1 | 2019-08-25 07:42 | ralley | Do you have a source for this? From the aerial it does not appear to be a park and the name seems suspicious as well. |
| 2 | 2019-08-25 17:38 | ralley | Deleted by james2185 | |
| 73711110 by Rusty3456 @ 2019-08-25 07:20 | 1 | 2019-08-25 07:40 | ralley | Can I ask what the source for this name is? It looks like naming an individuals house based on their name which is not good practice. Thanks. |
| 73711062 by Rusty3456 @ 2019-08-25 07:17 | 1 | 2019-08-25 07:35 | ralley | Please don't use OSM to map fantasy or joke elements |
| 73708073 by Free Iphone X @ 2019-08-25 02:03 | 1 | 2019-08-25 03:22 | ralley | What is your source for these changes? They do not appear to be supported by aerial imagery and your changeset description gives no information on the change or it's source. |
| 2 | 2019-08-25 09:22 | SomeoneElse_Revert ♦70,576 | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73712820 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some fake data in New Zealand. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3034 , 3037 and 3122. | |
| 73530961 by svenpascal @ 2019-08-20 10:08 | 1 | 2019-08-22 00:37 | ralley | please don't change the names to reflect fantasy elements and please use descriptive comments on your changesets. |
| 73434326 by robinvant @ 2019-08-17 03:17 | 1 | 2019-08-17 06:20 | ralley | Thanks for the edit. The city tag is not required (and not used in the LINZ imports) as it can be derived from the fact that the node lised within the boundary of the city. The LINZ ref should not be added if the node is not imported from LINZ as it is used to tie imported data back to the source ... |
| 2 | 2019-08-17 06:21 | ralley | That should have been "lies" not "lised" | |
| 68133301 by CairParavelian @ 2019-03-14 11:27 | 1 | 2019-08-14 09:06 | ralley | I have removed this, please don't use OSM to map fantasy elements |
| 73284729 by Quadramedia @ 2019-08-12 21:53 | 1 | 2019-08-14 00:13 | ralley | Review: Edit looks good to me, thanks |
| 73148679 by ❤️🔥 @ 2019-08-08 10:57 | 1 | 2019-08-08 17:56 | ralley | As per Auckland Council, Lumsden Green is actually a park, can you please put the tag back? See https://www.arcgis.com/home/webmap/viewer.html?panel=gallery&suggestField=true&url=https%3A%2F%2Fmapspublic.aklc.govt.nz%2Farcgis%2Frest%2Fservices%2FLiveMaps%2FParkAssetPublic%2FMapServer%2F42 |
| 2 | 2019-08-13 21:48 | ❤️🔥 ♦364 | appologies; fixed now | |
| 3 | 2019-08-13 21:49 | ralley | No problems, thanks for fixing | |
| 73249631 by screwluse @ 2019-08-11 19:58 | 1 | 2019-08-12 07:43 | ralley | Hi, you've managed to create this building as two seperate areas with a split down the middle which doesn't seem to match the aerial imagery. Also most buildings in NZ consist of 90 degree corners. In ID the command "Square" (shortcut key: Q) will make the angles 90 degrees. |
| 2 | 2019-08-12 07:58 | screwluse ♦2 | Thanks! This is consistent with my capacity to map that feature. If you have improved features, please add them. | |
| 3 | 2019-08-12 08:01 | screwluse ♦2 | Both areas match the descriptive feature, "Building" thanks for commenting however. In my view, it is you who is desiring of there to be a common feature with square corners to be labeled as "building" however, in this case, that was not what happened. But the feature is still de... | |
| 4 | 2019-08-12 08:02 | screwluse ♦2 | If you are more skilled at mapping buildings, please do so. | |
| 5 | 2019-08-12 08:03 | screwluse ♦2 | Thanks!!! | |
| 73255018 by CWAHARRISON @ 2019-08-12 04:49 | 1 | 2019-08-12 07:34 | ralley | Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edit. Just one thing to note, there was already an existing node with the address information for 12 Easton Way. You could have merged that with the building outline instead of creating duplicate information for number 12. |
| 73256235 by boboBEBE @ 2019-08-12 06:39 | 1 | 2019-08-12 06:57 | ralley | Please do not create fake buildings and please use meaningful comments for you changes |
| 2 | 2019-08-12 07:29 | ralley | This changeset also placed kerbs accross street ways etc. Reverted by changeset 73257261. | |
| 73177749 by fthomas2019 @ 2019-08-09 04:54 | 1 | 2019-08-09 06:31 | ralley | Review: Is this really a footway that is visible on the ground or just a shortcut accross the grass? It appears to be the latter in the aerial imagery. If it is just a short cut please dont map it as a footway - maybe (if at all) use highway=path and trail_visibilty=no |
| 73177693 by fthomas2019 @ 2019-08-09 04:50 | 1 | 2019-08-09 06:27 | ralley | Review: Looks good to me |
| 73042585 by Phyllishomes @ 2019-08-05 23:01 | 1 | 2019-08-06 03:57 | ralley | Please don't delete ways that are private, instead tag them as "access=private" this stops them getting added again and routers will not route people through them. Also you edit deleted the park/reserve - this is sourced from the Auckland Council data (https://data-aucklandcouncil.op... |
| 72548538 by Rudy355 @ 2019-07-23 09:58 | 1 | 2019-07-23 17:49 | ralley | This changeset has resulted in strange text being added to the lanes:forward tag of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/621305758 |
| 2 | 2019-07-25 09:51 | ralley | Fixed by Rudy355 | |
| 72493408 by Nellafantasia @ 2019-07-21 22:13 | 1 | 2019-07-22 00:29 | ralley | Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits. A couple of review points: the building outlines you have drawn are quite approximate, if you use the ESRI aerial imagery instead of bing it may be clearer and you can make the buildings more accurate. The buildings to should also be "squared" to... |
| 2 | 2019-07-25 09:49 | ralley | Buildings tidied | |
| 72451388 by Daniel Mau @ 2019-07-20 04:49 | 1 | 2019-07-20 08:12 | ralley | Please undo your changes to the Te Whau pathway - the way it was tagged is correct for a planned/proposed cycleway. What you have done effectively replaces it with an open footway - very misleading. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dproposed |
| 2 | 2019-07-25 09:42 | ralley | I have corrected the tagging | |
| 72579201 by Waitangi @ 2019-07-24 00:06 | 1 | 2019-07-24 00:44 | ralley | Can you please use more descriptive changeset comments instead of just a generic "relaigned'? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments for guidelines. Thanks |