Red_Ranger have been discussed with 14 replies of this contributorRed_Ranger have been discussed with 14 replies of this contributor| Changeset | # | Tmstmp UTC | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 61695097 by Red_Ranger @ 2018-08-15 19:16 | 1 | 2022-12-19 22:36 | Russ McD ♦223 | The Kaart team strikes again - this time upgrading a wooden suspension bridge, (just about wide enough for a motorcycle), into a full blown secondary highway.Way 591798130 to be precise.It wasn't funny - I drove nearly 100km to get here, so see it would not go through !Absolute Morons, bu... |
| 119476815 by Red_Ranger @ 2022-04-08 16:04 | 1 | 2022-04-18 16:52 | Dimitar155 ♦657 | Hello Red_Ranger,This road segment is not one way. There are cars which are going in the opposite direction on Maxar Imagery. I've changed the oneway tag.Best regards,Dimitar |
| 111214238 by Red_Ranger @ 2021-09-14 20:44 | 1 | 2021-09-16 15:44 | 4004 ♦1,882 | Hi, please note that the destination sign only applies to motor vehicles |
| 2 | 2021-09-16 15:46 | 4004 ♦1,882 | would been good if you could do an overpass sweep and retag so it only applies to motor vehicles | |
| 3 | 2021-09-16 19:26 | Red_Ranger | Greetings,I will review my edits and please feel free to remove my edits if they’re incorrect.Best,Red Ranger | |
| 4 | 2021-09-17 12:30 | 4004 ♦1,882 | thanks! I've edited tagging on the roads near this changeset (most were incorrectly tagged before you) | |
| 111214158 by Red_Ranger @ 2021-09-14 20:42 | 1 | 2021-09-16 15:41 | 4004 ♦1,882 | hi, any reason why you removed the give_way direction tag? |
| 2 | 2021-09-16 19:26 | Red_Ranger | Greetings,I have restored the direction = backward tag.Best,Red Ranger | |
| 106179587 by Red_Ranger @ 2021-06-10 21:54 | 1 | 2021-06-12 10:16 | Wilmer Osario ♦214 | Este segmento sigue siendo parte de la L-7 |
| 2 | 2021-06-12 10:18 | Wilmer Osario ♦214 | This road segment it is part of the L-7 | |
| 3 | 2021-06-14 18:24 | Red_Ranger | My apologizes for removing the data | |
| 86894456 by Red_Ranger @ 2020-06-19 21:12 | 1 | 2020-06-19 21:13 | agykenzz ♦1 | great <a rel="nofollow" href="https://kenzoqq.com">information</a> |
| 82184029 by Red_Ranger @ 2020-03-14 00:20 | 1 | 2020-03-14 10:59 | InsertUser ♦444 | Note that the previous classification of this road was done by a local mapper who is likely to have visited the road in question. Do you have streetlevel imagery not cited in your changeset? |
| 2 | 2020-03-16 16:25 | Red_Ranger | Greetings, I do not have any street level imagery. I changed the classification from track to service road based on the usage: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dservice | |
| 3 | 2020-03-16 22:38 | InsertUser ♦444 | Where did you learn of this usage? The last local mapper explicitly changed this *from* service to track and the aerial imagery shows something that looks very informal. | |
| 4 | 2020-03-17 15:10 | Red_Ranger | Greetings, I reverted my edits and changed it back to track. Thank you. | |
| 68815325 by Red_Ranger @ 2019-04-02 22:04 | 1 | 2019-04-06 13:55 | JJIglesias ♦1,194 | It's not a one way tag, traffic is allowed in both directions |
| 2 | 2019-04-08 20:32 | Red_Ranger | My apologies. I removed the one way tag. | |
| 68075584 by Red_Ranger @ 2019-03-12 19:41 | 1 | 2019-03-13 04:22 | JJIglesias ♦1,194 | Hi. Please Stop changing the name of the bridges. Those are official names given by the Gobernment of Bolivia, and should NOT be removed. We have been working on that for months. Thanks |
| 2 | 2019-03-21 15:50 | Red_Ranger | Sorry for the changes. I misunderstood the bridge name/road name policy. I will keep that in mind in the future. Thank you for pointing it out and hope you have a good day. | |
| 67944861 by Red_Ranger @ 2019-03-08 23:51 | 1 | 2019-03-12 16:59 | 5m4u9 ♦1,573 | bad mapping, geometry of trunks should be in a straight line |
| 60627995 by Red_Ranger @ 2018-07-11 20:51 | 1 | 2018-11-14 18:17 | Mirasolera ♦37 | Hi Red_Ranger. Just to let you know, i realised that you splited the way RN) near Cerrito and you put both ways in one direction. Now it is already in maps.me and you cannot navigate throug this area. I will fix it. Please be careful when you work on such big roads. I am the only one who maintains t... |
| 2 | 2018-11-14 19:14 | Red_Ranger | Thank you for catching my mistake. I will be more careful next time. | |
| 63396090 by Red_Ranger @ 2018-10-10 21:55 | 1 | 2018-10-11 12:02 | glglgl ♦274 | Hi!Here, you disconnected the road and the anabndoned railway which used to be connected at node 327300468. The roads are now connected at node 5973363505. The problem is, there are boundaries which use pairs of road and railway, respectively. If you are sure these should be separated, we should... |
| 2 | 2018-10-11 18:01 | Red_Ranger | Hi! My apologies, I disconnected the railway with Autopista Ñu Guasú since it has a layer tag, but I didn't realize I created a gap in the boundary. I fixed the boundary and connected the boundaries here node 327300468. Thank you for pointing it out! | |
| 61199570 by Red_Ranger @ 2018-07-30 15:30 | 1 | 2018-08-08 05:09 | PelleV ♦17 | Hi, it is not possible to reach the petrol station from D69 going North-West anymore. I will change separately :) |
| 2 | 2018-08-08 15:16 | Red_Ranger | Perfect! Thank you for doing that! | |
| 61312108 by Red_Ranger @ 2018-08-02 23:05 | 1 | 2018-08-04 09:45 | PelleV ♦17 | Also all wrong. Please revert. |
| 2 | 2018-08-06 18:15 | Red_Ranger | I reverted my edits. I will make sure to do better research before I make changes to data other people added. Sorry for my mistake. | |
| 61335475 by Red_Ranger @ 2018-08-03 16:19 | 1 | 2018-08-06 16:02 | SomeoneElse ♦13,362 | Hello Red_Ranger,All of your changeset comments seem to be just "Updated the alignment" which isn't very helpful. Can you try and explain a bit more on what sources were used (just imagery, or was there a survey as well, and if so when?) and what sorts of changes you were making?... |
| 2 | 2018-08-06 16:54 | Red_Ranger | Yes, I can explain my edits more in my changeset comments going forward. In UAE, the Kaart team did a ground survey, and I used up-to-date Digital Globe Premium that matched our GPS traces and ground survey imagery. | |
| 3 | 2018-08-06 17:12 | SomeoneElse ♦13,362 | Thanks. When was the survey? | |
| 4 | 2018-08-06 17:20 | Red_Ranger | It was in February and June of 2017. | |
| 61201158 by Red_Ranger @ 2018-07-30 16:29 | 1 | 2018-08-04 09:44 | PelleV ♦17 | This is ALL WRONG, please revert. |
| 61070924 by Red_Ranger @ 2018-07-25 23:57 | 1 | 2018-07-26 11:17 | andi9876 ♦295 | Hm, I guess inside Phnom Penh better no trunk. |
| 2 | 2018-07-27 09:37 | andi9876 ♦295 | Note: Navigation systems will show a wrong time calculation. | |
| 3 | 2018-07-27 13:27 | andi9876 ♦295 | maxspeed=40 added | |
| 61064450 by Red_Ranger @ 2018-07-25 18:12 | 1 | 2018-07-25 18:31 | andi9876 ♦295 | Dear, this Blvd. is 60 meter wide, no trunk? |
| 2 | 2018-07-26 17:39 | Red_Ranger | The road is important because it connects NH1 and NH2 but it isn't more significant as NH2 in terms of routing so I made it primary. | |
| 3 | 2018-07-27 09:31 | andi9876 ♦295 | Note: Hun Sen Blvd. and NH2 are very different for the time calculation of navigation systems. This Blvd. is almost like a motorway. |