Changeset | # | Tmstmp UTC | Contributor | Comment |
---|---|---|---|---|
39651764 by RicoZ @ 2016-05-29 21:41 | 1 | 2016-05-30 14:46 | gormo ♦159 | Hi, is there a discussion of your large-scale edits? Although your edits are probably not harmful, prior discussion is necessary (see http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct ). Using JOSM and doing find/replace large scale is considered mechanical editing! |
2 | 2016-05-30 14:55 | RicoZ | I am always trying to contact the individual authors whose data I am changing by private message and work in small chunks - however in this one case I have accidentaly uploaded too much at once. I am pretty sure that I have contacted most of the affected contributors though. | |
3 | 2016-05-30 14:58 | gormo ♦159 | thanks for the clarification. | |
4 | 2016-05-30 15:01 | RicoZ | Thanks for having an eye on it, I am also making mistakes often enough. | |
5 | 2017-05-09 20:58 | letihu ♦800 | Diesen Wasserweg https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/330130228/historykann ich auf dem Luftbild nicht sehen. Er kreuzt auch Wege und Gebäude. Vielleicht fehlt "Tunnel" und "Layer -1" | |
6 | 2017-05-10 11:17 | RicoZ | Habe es geändert und vorsichtshalber den OC angeschrieben.https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/48558910 | |
39644090 by RicoZ @ 2016-05-29 14:57 | 1 | 2017-04-18 12:44 | letihu ♦800 | Dieser Wasserweghttps://www.openstreetmap.org/way/44131874/historygeht vielleicht nicht direkt durch dieseshttps://www.openstreetmap.org/way/44131874/historyHaus ;-) Vielleicht kennst Du den richtigen Verlauf.Wenn Du schon dabei bist, die Straßenquerung mit dem Wasserhttps://www.op... |
2 | 2017-04-19 15:31 | RicoZ | Bin leider auch nicht von dort, habe es jetzt so verschoben wie es mit Bing aussieht aber im Zweifelsfall lasse ich lieber einen offensichtlichen Fehler drinstehen als einen gut versteckten.Irgednwie passt auch die "Flussrichtung" vom Flutgraben und dem verbundenen ditch nicht gut zus... | |
39651087 by RicoZ @ 2016-05-29 20:55 | 1 | 2016-09-26 22:45 | geodreieck4711 ♦94 | seems to be a senseless mass- or mechanical edit..... |
2 | 2016-09-27 07:57 | MKnight ♦909 | should be revertet too... | |
39650507 by RicoZ @ 2016-05-29 20:24 | 1 | 2016-09-26 22:49 | geodreieck4711 ♦94 | mechanical edit???(layer= -1 removed) |
2 | 2016-09-27 07:43 | MKnight ♦909 | should be reverted... | |
39668724 by RicoZ @ 2016-05-30 15:54 | 1 | 2016-06-05 07:29 | PT-53 ♦3,642 | Nach Deiner Bearbeitung meldet keep right jetzt diesen Fehler:http://keepright.at/report_map.php?schema=94&error=78555854Würdest Du bitte das erledigen ! |
2 | 2016-06-05 09:33 | RicoZ | Aber gerne, weißt Du zufällig ob an der Stelle ein Culvert, eine Brücke oder ein Ford ist?Übrigens bin ich nicht der "Verursacher" wie in Deinem dem Keepright Kommentar vermerkt und es ist auch nicht ein "Fehler" sondern eine Warnung. | |
3 | 2016-06-05 10:12 | RicoZ | war ausnahmsweise auf Bing unübersehbar eindeutig, keine Mühe machen. | |
39749704 by RicoZ @ 2016-06-02 16:31 | 1 | 2016-06-03 22:24 | RicoZ | sorry.. wrong changeset comment leftover from an earlier changeset. I was doing some local fixes here. |
39697460 by RicoZ @ 2016-05-31 20:23 | 1 | 2016-06-03 22:24 | RicoZ | sorry.. wrong changeset comment leftover from an earlier changeset. I was doing some local fixes here. |
39686857 by RicoZ @ 2016-05-31 11:41 | 1 | 2016-05-31 12:46 | woodpeck ♦2,422 | I would appreciate it if you could use more precise changeset comments. I can see from the changeset that you edited a waterway but what exactly are you "fixing" (and, preferably, why - as you probably know, we do not usually start retagging everything just because the consensus on taggin... |
2 | 2016-05-31 13:12 | RicoZ | In this changeset I tried to fix JOSM warnings where the river crosses the lake shore and dam. Btw I do try to contact the main contributors when I am doing larger scale retagging. | |
33832681 by RicoZ @ 2015-09-06 13:20 | 1 | 2015-09-06 13:24 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,593 | Invalid data should not be kept as "example for wiki"Just copy tags, list them and make screenshot. |
2 | 2015-09-06 13:41 | RicoZ | there must be a way how to link a specific version of an object but I can't see it - can you help?Btw besides fixing this one bridge I have intended to contact the author of the unlucky mechanical edit causing this because there are a few thousands of bridges with layer=-1 in Italy. It is s... | |
3 | 2015-09-06 14:54 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,593 | "there must be a way how to link a specific version of an object but I can't see it - can you help?"http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Overpass_API/Overpass_QL#Attic_data_.28.22date.22.29In that case it would be http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/bjc (note that map rendering is for cu... | |
4 | 2015-09-06 14:56 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,593 | or simply http://www.openstreetmap.org/api/0.6/way/37264089/history | |
5 | 2015-09-06 16:02 | RicoZ | thanks. I was also looking at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/37264089/history but does not seem to have the possibility to link a specific version directly. So the overpass query seems like the only way to get a stable pointer. | |
6 | 2015-09-06 16:36 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,593 | Such feature may be (or already is) requested at https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/issues | |
7 | 2015-09-06 16:48 | RicoZ | Indeed, it has been requested already - https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/issues/662 |