| Changeset | # | Tmstmp UTC | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 168115824 by Leon K @ 2025-06-25 23:54 | 1 | 2025-06-29 06:20 | realEatham ♦12 | This outline is terrible, why did you add it? |
| 2 | 2025-06-29 06:21 | realEatham ♦12 | Do not use AI buildings unless they are correct | |
| 3 | 2025-06-29 06:21 | realEatham ♦12 | You also did not merge the address node with the building | |
| 102081485 by Leon K @ 2021-03-31 22:26 | 1 | 2024-12-11 05:26 | realEatham ♦12 | Hello! You have imported a lot of garbage data from Microsoft building footprints in mentone and other suburbs which is completely incorrect and useless as they are nothing like the original data. I would revert this changeset but it is old and I don't know if others have iterated on the buil... |
| 3666005 by Leon K @ 2010-01-20 11:57 | 1 | 2024-06-10 09:03 | Ewen Hill ♦407 | Hi Leon, 14 years ago you worked on the Fyansford railway and added this siding (now modified). I can't see any sign of this siding from aerial photos in 1946 or 1971. Do you have any further details about what it is or what your source was please? I know it's a long time ago but any info ... |
| 2 | 2024-06-10 10:33 | Leon K | That would have been from around the time the line was removed i'm guessing? I can't remember where I saw it but there was some discussion on various railway forums like Railpage about it's removal. | |
| 135602011 by Leon K @ 2023-05-02 06:54 | 1 | 2023-05-05 05:33 | AntBurnett ♦16 | I just got the email from Tesla announcing the Blaxland location, but you beat me to it! |
| 2 | 2023-05-05 09:39 | Leon K | The trick is to follow the Tesla owners club Australia forum. Those guys don’t miss a thing :-) | |
| 129498778 by Leon K @ 2022-11-29 02:35 | 1 | 2022-12-03 23:45 | kurisubrooks ♦54 | Hi there, Maxar and Bing's newer imagery (around Jan 2022) are both slightly older than the newest ESRI Imagery (April 2022), which is what I used to extend that node to where it was due to the construction of the runway apron(? - not sure if this is the right term). You can check this for your... |
| 30155763 by Leon K @ 2015-04-12 05:25 | 1 | 2022-06-11 18:08 | lyctkel ♦332 | Hi Leon K,at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/92607794 you used building=rea. I do suppose you meant building=retail (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building%3Dretail). See as https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dmall well.Regards,lyctkel |
| 118975873 by Leon K @ 2022-03-27 10:38 | 1 | 2022-04-28 09:41 | Pierce ♦41 | Hi Leon,There’s a bit to unpack here, but you’ve created roads that don’t exist that should be marked as such, I’d suggest looking at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Construction and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:proposed to see how to go about this correctly.... |
| 2 | 2022-04-28 10:11 | Leon K | Hi, fair point on the construction tags, that was an oversight. I've also changed the name to Spirit of Tasmania Quay as that is what the geelongport site is referring to it as. | |
| 110850389 by Leon K @ 2021-09-07 10:21 | 1 | 2022-04-28 10:02 | Pierce ♦41 | As per "Future Spirit of Tasmania terminal" name, please refer to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions |
| 116888548 by Leon K @ 2022-02-01 22:48 | 1 | 2022-02-02 07:12 | Diacritic ♦271 | Hey Leon,This appears to be a descriptive name you've added to this drivethrough. It's not a street with that name gazetted. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Naming_conventions#Don.27t_describe_things_using_name_tagI've removed it accordingly. --- ... |
| 114239450 by Leon K @ 2021-11-25 21:53 | 1 | 2021-12-09 09:04 | TreeTracks ♦32 | Hello Leon, I noticed that this edit changed the town name from “Mortlake” to “Mortlake Post Office”. I haven’t edited POs before but I wonder if the PO and locality tags should be entered separately? Many thanks for all your work on OSM. Cheers TreeTracks. |
| 2 | 2021-12-09 10:33 | Leon K | Good Catch, thanks for pointing that out. I hadn't noticed that the town and post office were merged. I've separated them in the latest change. | |
| 113351171 by Leon K @ 2021-11-03 22:03 | 1 | 2021-11-04 11:21 | Diacritic ♦271 | Hello,What is the benefit in splitting the lanes for a small, innocuous traffic island?Surely a node traffic_calming=Island would be better? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113351171 |
| 109776436 by Leon K @ 2021-08-16 23:12 | 1 | 2021-08-18 23:36 | woowoowoo ♦3 | Not sure I like these RapiD building outlines - I mean, they're mostly in the right place, but the alignments are really flaky. A start, I guess, as long as it's recognised that they're not 'complete'. |
| 95119742 by Leon K @ 2020-12-01 22:43 | 1 | 2020-12-03 02:34 | jonorossi ♦93 | Would the waterway under the shopping centre be better tagged as tunnel=flooded rather than tunnel=culvert? |
| 93094682 by Leon K @ 2020-10-27 05:50 | 1 | 2020-10-27 08:08 | aharvey ♦1,694 | Looks like iD will "upgrade" the building=commercial into building=yes https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/23693353. Probably should be building=retail, but unless you've looked at the building tag you should inspect the tag diff that the "upgrade" would do and i... |
| 80831223 by Leon K @ 2020-02-11 06:34 | 1 | 2020-02-12 11:56 | aharvey ♦1,694 | Did you survey this? Ibis budget was tagged as a motel before, which you changed to a hotel, when I drove past this before it did seem more like a motel, I think it should only be changed if you've surveyed and are sure. |
| 2 | 2020-02-12 22:16 | Leon K | The ID editor preset for Ibis Budget has it as hotel. You're probably right but unless the preset is fixed i'd expect this to keep happening. | |
| 80830981 by Leon K @ 2020-02-11 06:30 | 1 | 2020-02-12 11:57 | aharvey ♦1,694 | https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/node/4313720776 are you sure it's not "Winston Hills Post Office"? We should keep Winston Hills in there if it's still known as that, either in the name or branch tag. |
| 2 | 2020-02-12 22:15 | Leon K | Sorry, I used ID with the Australia Post post office preset. Didn't realise it had changed the name as well. | |
| 80831842 by Leon K @ 2020-02-11 06:44 | 1 | 2020-02-12 11:51 | aharvey ♦1,694 | When adding brand tags, it's still a good idea to leave the branch in place as part of the name, or at the very least include it in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:branch. |
| 71528979 by Leon K @ 2019-06-23 10:53 | 1 | 2019-06-24 05:14 | Warin61 ♦2,663 | Changes to Cherry Flat Rd corrupted admin. boundaries for Bonshaw, Delacombe, Buninyong District and Wendouree District. I have repaired these. |
| 2 | 2019-06-24 06:09 | Leon K | Thanks for that. Once again boundaries connected to roads catch me out. | |
| 34964946 by Leon K @ 2015-10-30 06:17 | 1 | 2019-06-07 05:51 | CloCkWeRX ♦343 | With the woolworths, do you happen to know which one is the right one? See also https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1804159 |
| 42114367 by Leon K @ 2016-09-13 01:30 | 1 | 2019-06-06 00:06 | Warin61 ♦2,663 | Hi,The primary school looks to be in the wrong place? Using the LPI base map and imagery it looks to be nor nor east of the present spot... |
| 63813492 by Leon K @ 2018-10-23 22:56 | 1 | 2018-10-24 01:00 | aharvey ♦1,694 | You can use the branch tag https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:branchbranch=Beecroftbrand=Woolworthsname=Woolworths Beecroft |
| 52529813 by Leon K @ 2017-10-01 08:41 | 1 | 2018-01-22 07:03 | aharvey ♦1,694 | whats https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/529140614 for? The Royal Botanic Garden is mapped out at https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3744999 it seems to overlap it. |
| 2 | 2018-01-22 08:00 | Leon K | To be honest, not sure. I cleaned up the edge of an existing area, no idea how I ended up replacing it, especially since it was 4 months ago. | |
| 3 | 2018-05-17 22:46 | Warin61 ♦2,663 | ??? Deleted ... leisure=park ... inside the botanic gardens... make no sense. | |
| 4 | 2018-05-17 23:19 | Leon K | I wish i'd never touched this one. As far as as I remember there were multiple areas overlapping. I remember smoothing the edge, | |
| 5 | 2018-05-18 00:37 | Warin61 ♦2,663 | Hopefully (wishful thinking?) I have managed to catch most of my mistakes before someone else noticed ... Fingers crossed that this deletion is ok. I think it is .. I did some work on these gardens - separating up the domain etc ... and adding paths, art work .. that was some time ago. Presently... | |
| 55093415 by Leon K @ 2018-01-02 07:51 | 1 | 2018-05-18 00:29 | nevw ♦1,974 | Hi LeonI noticed a couple of lines without tags in this area that may need deleting.http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=tagging&lon=153.04779&lat=-26.41503&zoom=18 |
| 58787185 by Leon K @ 2018-05-08 12:25 | 1 | 2018-05-10 12:40 | Ewen Hill ♦407 | Hi Leon, There is a lot of overlap of residential, commercial and national park around Sassafras. My house is part of it and it certainly isn't classified as natural =wood. Any chance of reverting this or explaining the logic please? |
| 39035152 by Leon K @ 2016-05-02 10:33 | 1 | 2018-04-29 12:02 | aharvey ♦1,694 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/414996696/history isced level 0 is preschool, the NSW Public Schools data says this is K-6 which would be isced level 1, are you sure about this? |
| 30418395 by Leon K @ 2015-04-23 00:09 | 1 | 2017-12-31 03:30 | Warin61 ♦2,663 | Hi,Looks to be little left of this line (former Buninyong line). The associated stations too have disappeared. Should this be removed from OSM and put on OHM? |
| 2 | 2017-12-31 03:35 | Leon K | Yes, there is nothing except a platform at the southern end. I gave up trying to fix abandoned lines in Vic, there are one or two users who insist on putting long gone tracks in as disused.After enough edit wars i've given up :-) | |
| 3 | 2018-01-03 22:54 | Warin61 ♦2,663 | I have now copied this railway line to OHM .. and it is there nicely.Sections of this line I have tagged 'ruined:' other sections 'nonexistent:' and the southern platform/station abandoned: I think that truly represents what is there. And, for those that want the history ... | |
| 51126955 by Leon K @ 2017-08-15 02:50 | 1 | 2017-12-05 19:32 | 红旗渠 ♦1 | Hi Leon,have you really used Bing as source? On Bing these roads are not visible yet.Greetings |
| 2 | 2017-12-06 11:32 | nevw ♦1,974 | DigitalGlobe Standard Imagery is more recent than Bing in this area. | |
| 3 | 2017-12-06 15:50 | 红旗渠 ♦1 | I know this, I've used DigitalGlobe to map the [Tesla Battery](http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/544861272) | |
| 54092668 by Leon K @ 2017-11-26 11:26 | 1 | 2017-11-26 23:42 | CloCkWeRX ♦343 | Ugh, when I added it originally it would have been for the boat shop on the corner of Tapleys/Old Port Road, and I've assumed it the commercial area stopped at Hardy Street |
| 2 | 2017-11-27 00:08 | Leon K | No worries, might be worth adding a node but i've no idea what you'd use, shop=chandler, shop=marine and even shop=boat all exist but no one seems to use them much, | |
| 46829450 by Leon K @ 2017-03-14 04:06 | 1 | 2017-09-19 15:38 | Rudolf Mayer ♦55 | for minigolf, please use leisure=miniature_golf, not leisure=golf_course |
| 49997328 by Leon K @ 2017-07-03 02:36 | 1 | 2017-07-11 03:22 | Warin61 ♦2,663 | Hi,I've been working on this treed area. The Barrington Top NP is not all trees .. nor do the trees stop at its boundaries. I have added a new relationship 7387469 for this treed area. I will work on it - expand and add holes. |
| 37623631 by Leon K @ 2016-03-05 09:17 | 1 | 2017-05-24 05:04 | CloCkWeRX ♦343 | Thoughts on classification of Ringwood Bypass (http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/979260) ? |
| 21565224 by Leon K @ 2014-04-08 06:29 | 1 | 2017-03-23 22:49 | Warin61 ♦2,663 | Why layer=1 for these buildings? At the moment relationship 6592787 has 3 of these buildings .. all layer=1 ... and they over lap one another ... so in order to 'fix' the problem I'd like to understand the use of the layer tag here. |
| 2 | 2017-03-23 23:01 | Leon K | Hi, not sure about the layer tag to be honest, I can't remember a specific reason for it. The reason for the three spearate parts is they are different heights and colours. It's part of the 3d tagging. The layer isn't associated with that but might be because of the underground ... | |
| 3 | 2017-03-25 10:40 | CloCkWeRX ♦343 | Better to model the different chunks as building:part I reckon; and the building 'footprint' as a building.A bit hard to get them all in a relation properly with ID; dunno about other editors | |
| 4 | 2017-03-25 11:01 | Warin61 ♦2,663 | Interesting and dynamic architecture is hard to map... particularly from satellite imagery! :) Don't think any of the 2D editors handle it well. Now if we modeled the world in solid modeler? :)))My thinking at the moment is to map it by the roof over laps .. at least that is visible from the ... | |
| 5 | 2017-03-25 11:14 | Leon K | I've been there plenty of times, only issue I can see was one overlap, which i've just removed. Hopefully that solves whatever error you're seeing. | |
| 6 | 2017-03-25 11:16 | Leon K | A single building and building parts might work better, might look into that. 3D tagging isn't so bad, eventually you learn how to see the result from the tags. | |
| 7 | 2017-03-26 00:41 | Warin61 ♦2,663 | Thanks Leon. I'll have a look at it later .. There should be a method of tagging the roof too so that they don't clash. | |
| 45700284 by Leon K @ 2017-01-31 22:51 | 1 | 2017-02-01 08:02 | adamh ♦25 | Hi, you've swapped all scrub for wood. I wondered how you managed to arrive at a distinction between the two for this location. When i've visited it's very difficult to distinguish (especially as a non-naturalist like me) which parts of the gardens are scrub, scrubby woodland and wood... |
| 2 | 2017-02-01 08:13 | Leon K | Hi, the original intent was to remove the scrub tag from the overall park, since the individual areas were properly marked as well and it put scrub over the carparks and lakes. I'm certainly no expert but my interpretation of the OSM wiki on the subject is that scrub is generally more grass... | |
| 3 | 2017-02-01 11:48 | adamh ♦25 | Ah, I'd only seen the individual areas changing scrub to woods. I'd not noticed that the whole thing had been tagged scrub. I remember putting all those areas in just to fix this but clearly had forgotten to remove the overall thing! | |
| 40817999 by Leon K @ 2016-07-18 12:37 | 1 | 2016-09-11 21:28 | Warin61 ♦2,663 | Hummm ... the relation should have tags on it. The ways should be 'free' of the relationship tags. I think there are at least 2 tracks here ... the relation is for the outer one. I have added that relationship. There is more detail taht can be added - a barrier with gaps.. I have a... |
| 2 | 2016-09-12 04:01 | Leon K | My understanding is that both methods are permissible. Admittedly when you start adding more detail as you have then tagging the relation does makes more sense. | |
| 41054995 by Leon K @ 2016-07-27 07:10 | 1 | 2016-07-28 10:05 | mueschel ♦6,564 | Hi Leon,please check for spelling mistakes in keys. E.g. I found "building:levela", "building;levels" and "bulding:levels"in this changeset.Cheers, Jan |
| 40008270 by Leon K @ 2016-06-14 04:18 | 1 | 2016-06-14 06:54 | TheSwavu ♦544 | Thanks for fixing that.I've been noticing quite a few of these being added by this user:https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Lake%20Leung/historybut I hadn't got round to fixing them yet. |
| 25850434 by Leon K @ 2014-10-04 12:23 | 1 | 2016-01-27 21:12 | Warin61 ♦2,663 | Presently way 169174227 is tagged;name=Blue Mountains National Parkboundary=national_parkThis covers a very large area ... that is;part of the Blue Mountains National Park (not the northern section)all of;Yerrandrie State Conservation AreaYerrandrie Regional ParkNattai Nati... |
| 2 | 2016-01-27 23:31 | Leon K | I didn't even realise i'd touched this :-)I've been following your posts on the list and happy for you to improve these. | |
| 36734722 by Leon K @ 2016-01-22 09:24 | 1 | 2016-01-22 22:02 | Ewen Hill ♦407 | Leon, A lot of these roads were closed for well over a year after floods of 2012. The original person who closed this may have moved on from OSM or just forgotten or perhaps was not aware that it had reopened. |
| 36311838 by Leon K @ 2016-01-02 06:01 | 1 | 2016-01-13 02:48 | CloCkWeRX ♦343 | Do the various offramps intersect with the Cross city tunnel? It's also at layer -2 and showing up in missing-junctions checks on keepright |
| 2 | 2016-01-13 07:53 | Leon K | The tunnel doesn't intersect with the surface roads except where the ramps surface and are already marked.It does pass directly below the surface roads though. I'd class the junction errors as false positives. As for the layer, yes the tunnel is below the surface so -2 seems appropria... | |
| 36169020 by Leon K @ 2015-12-26 02:15 | 1 | 2015-12-29 09:10 | GerdP ♦2,751 | Hi there!Please check highway=ra, not sure what was meant (guess traffic_signals ?):https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3910032278 |
| 35861021 by Leon K @ 2015-12-10 08:37 | 1 | 2015-12-11 08:55 | GerdP ♦2,751 | Hi there!Please check : I've changed the typo highway=trea to traffic_signals:https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/452354569 |
| 35656217 by Leon K @ 2015-11-29 22:18 | 1 | 2015-12-03 02:17 | adamh ♦25 | Hi Leon K,You certainly get a lot of mapping done! :)You and I map similar areas, so I'd like to ask if you could possibly add Changeset Comments to your work?I like to see what's been updated near me and it's difficult to have to drill into each changeset to get a flavour of th... |
| 35098872 by Leon K @ 2015-11-05 10:42 | 1 | 2015-11-16 08:43 | GerdP ♦2,751 | please review:what was meant withhighway=ra ?https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3818493424 |
| 2 | 2015-11-16 10:06 | Leon K | was meant to be highway=traffic_signals and messed up so didn't autocomplete.fixed now. | |
| 3 | 2015-11-16 10:20 | GerdP ♦2,751 | okay, thanks, I was about to change it rest_area ;-) | |
| 21641314 by Leon K @ 2014-04-12 07:34 | 1 | 2015-08-14 12:42 | Alan Bragg ♦152 | Just thought you'd like to know that natural=tree_row is the correct tag for a line of trees, not natural=tree_line. A complete description is in the wiki at http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dtree_row |
| 2 | 2015-08-15 00:33 | Leon K | Thanks, can't have been concentrating as i've used tree_row hundreds of times :-) | |
| 25910092 by Leon K @ 2014-10-07 03:53 | 1 | 2014-12-27 16:50 | CloCkWeRX ♦343 | http://keepright.ipax.at/report_map.php?schema=50&error=69263475 |