Latest OSM Changeset Discussions/Comments (7 days) - Total: 47 - United Kingdom - Feed
Filter for Country selection: (Not displayed: woodpeck_repair,Nakaner-repair,SomeoneElse_Revert,Peda_repair,Stereo_repair)! See all discussions
Country Link Changeset Contributor Comment/Discussion
Epping Forest Taxi
(Discussed changesets: 1)
OK, you had actually deleted the northern section, I now realise this must have been an inadvertent action which I've rectfied. The history of the change is still intact if you wish to view it.


commented 2017-03-27 18:49:40 UTC by BCNorwich
Rahela08
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Hi, welcome to OSM.
It always make me nervous when I see a new mappers first edit is just deleting the work of other mappers.
I have reverted this edit, but please can you explain what you were trying to achieve?
commented 2017-03-27 18:24:03 UTC by trigpoint
MudgePJ
(Discussed changesets: 2)
Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

A board walk needs to be tagged with bridge=boardwalk for it to be correctly represented. Please see :- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:bridge%3Dboardwalk

Regards
commented 2017-03-27 15:11:43 UTC by BCNorwich
MudgePJ
(Discussed changesets: 2)
Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

A board walk needs to be tagged with bridge=boardwalk for it to be correctly represented. Please see :- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:bridge%3Dboardwalk

Regards
commented 2017-03-27 15:10:13 UTC by BCNorwich
cdavila
(Discussed changesets: 11)
The source is data already in OSM coming from nodes tagged maxheight=*. In case of doubt, bing imagery is used to clarify. As a background, I usually keep the original node, so that anyone can check the information and the source if it contains one.\...
commented 2017-03-27 14:31:06 UTC by cdavila
darrensilk3
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I've reversed the change to the hotel as the relation area was already in the database, (with the inner cutout (courtyard) of the building).
commented 2017-03-27 13:59:27 UTC by BCNorwich
whytewm
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Thanks for the update - if "MMT/7/1" is the PROW reference, maybe add it as a "prow_ref" tag?
Best Regards,
Andy
commented 2017-03-26 21:35:23 UTC by SomeoneElse2
hapy12
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

You have inadvertently placed your new space 'park' in the middle of a road which is obviously incorrect. I cannot see any place around here that could accommodate a new park so I've removed the POI.

If I can...
commented 2017-03-26 05:44:10 UTC by BCNorwich
Ards Man
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Is Newtownards Exchange NINT a BT telephone exchange?
commented 2017-03-26 05:08:41 UTC by VictorIE
Ustenyuk Igor
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Hello Ustenyuk,
Please can you confirm the position of this cafe.
commented 2017-03-25 22:23:39 UTC by JamesKingdom
delfimo
(Discussed changesets: 4)
We don't add postcodes to area. We only ever add postcodes to individual addresses. These can be a house or a business. To add a postcode the individual buildings can be drawn and have the postcode attached.

Adding a postcode to an area doesn't wo...
commented 2017-03-25 15:28:04 UTC by chillly
delfimo
(Discussed changesets: 4)
Hi, you have drawn the outline of something you have named 'Woodland'. You have used a name as a description which we don't do. If the area is a woodland it needs to be tagged as natural=wood. If it has a real name then it can be added, but a lot of ...
commented 2017-03-25 15:24:25 UTC by chillly
TTomA
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0
commented 2017-03-25 12:05:37 UTC by TTomA
Stan W
(Discussed changesets: 7)
Hi Stan,

A couple of blog posts about footpath mapping & assessing completeness of PRoW information are: https://sk53-osm.blogspot.co.uk/2014/04/10-years-of-footpath-mapping-for.html and https://sk53-osm.blogspot.co.uk/2014/02/looking-for-footpath...
commented 2017-03-24 16:17:07 UTC by SK53
Peng-Chung
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Wikipedia says Reading is a town. Any reason you changed it to a city?
commented 2017-03-24 09:55:56 UTC by PlaneMad
Polarbear-repair
(Discussed changesets: 9)
Is there any evidence that supports the assumption that the road forming a roundabout does not carry the name of the roundabout? Is there a streetsign posted along the loop carrying the road name and not the roundabout name? I only know cases where t...
commented 2017-03-23 23:32:56 UTC by Polarbear
Tashia-traveline Gloucester
(Discussed changesets: 5)
Hi. Why the change from "service" to "road"? Looked like you got it right first time round. highway=road translates as some sort of road, don't know what, needs fixing. See http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Droad

Would also sugge...
commented 2017-03-23 22:33:18 UTC by southglos
dan_bath
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Thank you
commented 2017-03-23 19:34:22 UTC by dan_bath
michaelinredhill
(Discussed changesets: 13)
The website that you added suggests that http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/715633050/history is shut...
commented 2017-03-23 16:29:40 UTC by SomeoneElse
Simon Hobeck
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Hi,

Yes, the area is called "Zone N" - Its a strange name but is left over from when the area was demolished in the 1970s and then zoned for redevelopment. You'll see another green area SE along the Wells Road, called "Zone A".

The path is acr...
commented 2017-03-23 13:43:15 UTC by Simon Hobeck
khbritish
(Discussed changesets: 5)
Hi khbritish,

I found that you have deleted a POI in this changeset can you please verify that? Because there is a note saying the name of exact POI you deleted.

Thank you.
Fa7C0N
commented 2017-03-23 07:26:36 UTC by Fa7C0N
lk07
(Discussed changesets: 3)
Hi lk07,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. I found that you are adding natural = marsh tags to a lot of water bodies in this region. can you please check this [link]("https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dmarsh") and tag. because the schema yo...
commented 2017-03-23 07:12:53 UTC by Fa7C0N
lk07
(Discussed changesets: 3)
Hi, there are now several area named "Kidbrooke Village". I doubt if this large area is one apartment build, rather it could be several buildings. From the quoted website "Kidbrooke Village" is a name given to the whole area.
Regards Bernard
commented 2017-03-23 07:03:59 UTC by BCNorwich
lk07
(Discussed changesets: 3)
Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I just wanted to point out a couple of things.
I wonder if "Sutcliffe Park Walkway" is a proper name given to all of the footpaths and if this is verifiable on the ground? (Please see :- https://wiki.openstreetma...
commented 2017-03-23 06:53:52 UTC by BCNorwich
jesus_army
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Information came from a GPX trace rather than the map tile but I will remove that way and re-edit for clarity
commented 2017-03-22 21:04:51 UTC by jesus_army
Dr John O'Connor
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Welcome to OSM

Thanks for the detail. It needs a little change to be more useful.
You have added a point with only a name. OSM needs a tag to know what the object is and so how to display it. I would suggest you need to add amenity=clinic as well...
commented 2017-03-22 15:32:53 UTC by chillly
NickT452
(Discussed changesets: 1)
This change moves an administrative boundary (parish) imported from OS_OpenData_Boundary-Line in 2011
Has the boundary changed or is this a mistake?
commented 2017-03-22 14:36:33 UTC by srbrook
Alex Huntley
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Welcome to OSM

Is Ben's house really an embassy? Can we stick to facts please? :-)
commented 2017-03-22 14:05:22 UTC by chillly
Sangeetha Mahesh
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Welcome to OSM

Disused premises can be marked as such. A consistent way is to change from amenity=bar to disused:amenity=bar. You may remove the name too. This will prevent it showing up on the map.
commented 2017-03-22 14:03:18 UTC by chillly
mooselon
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I've amended the opening hours tagging to suit that required by OSM, removed your description tag as that's really blatant advertising and is on your tagged website anyway.
That leaves the following two problems ...
commented 2017-03-22 13:40:49 UTC by BCNorwich
Stan W
(Discussed changesets: 7)
Noticed you've added some underpasses under the A6 in this changeset and in changeset 46813168. At the moment the tagging (railway=subway) implies the track of a underground train running on the surface! Suggest you use the tags of the adjacent path...
commented 2017-03-22 11:57:44 UTC by Cebderby
Fradeve11
(Discussed changesets: 4)
Thanks, I'll change it back then. It appears that 1QE (the post code on the bill) is the other side of the road.
commented 2017-03-22 11:56:06 UTC by pneff
mountainmonkey
(Discussed changesets: 2)
Thanks for comment - I've checked http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Tag:highway%3Dtrack and I think you're right. Have fixed this one and some others nearby.
commented 2017-03-22 10:21:04 UTC by mountainmonkey
rayand
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap.
So is that now a single building all with the address that was/is on the original part of the building? If so then the two building areas should be merged into one single area with the address. I could do this if ...
commented 2017-03-22 07:22:28 UTC by BCNorwich
homemademan
(Discussed changesets: 2)
Reverted
commented 2017-03-21 22:44:39 UTC by trigpoint
homemademan
(Discussed changesets: 2)
The hosital is already mapped, for some reason you have created a duplicate node.
commented 2017-03-21 22:03:44 UTC by trigpoint
kyle_pearson97
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Hi, welcome to OSM. You seem to have changed a place node to a park, the park is already mapped and the name you added looks very unlikely. I have put this back to the place node
commented 2017-03-21 18:33:37 UTC by trigpoint
Shaunllew
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Welcome to OSM

Your parks seem a little odd. Parc Y Peggrem is clearly over the top of a house and garden.

Parc y Llew is over the top of a recreation ground, which looks a better choice of tag to me. It also has the English name in the Welsh n...
commented 2017-03-21 18:22:50 UTC by chillly
Mavis55
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Looks like you're right - I'll put it back!
commented 2017-03-21 17:56:58 UTC by Mavis55
srfl92
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Welcome to OSM

You seem to have drawn a park over the top of a road. Are you sure there is a park there?
commented 2017-03-21 17:19:23 UTC by chillly
Skidle
(Discussed changesets: 2)
Changed, happy enough with your choice
commented 2017-03-21 16:29:01 UTC by Spearmint
dialogueuk
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Thanks, much appreciated.

Regards, Dave/.
commented 2017-03-21 15:22:06 UTC by dialogueuk
Bluegates
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Hi, if the road is closed that would not make its name Road Closed, so I've removed the name tag.
commented 2017-03-21 14:43:17 UTC by BCNorwich
Steven Paul Candlin
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap.
The info in the fire station POI you added is already contained on the amenity=fire_station area outline. I've removed the extraneous POI which no extra data.
Regards
commented 2017-03-21 07:33:33 UTC by BCNorwich
tms13
(Discussed changesets: 16)
Yes - good catch. Now fixed.
commented 2017-03-21 07:31:18 UTC by tms13
Jonathan Martin Forte
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap.
You've placed this POI on the roadside by a little park, likely inadvertently incorrect. Features uploaded to OSM must be verifiable on the ground. It would be good if you could look at this positioning again. Or...
commented 2017-03-21 07:16:34 UTC by BCNorwich
Cebderby
(Discussed changesets: 4)
I agree the cross ways should be secondary, and I would consider Putney Road/Commercial Square to be tertiary. But a router should cope with the mapping as is, classifications are an indication of importance rather than speed, especially when they ar...
commented 2017-03-20 22:36:51 UTC by trigpoint