| Country | Link | Changeset Contributor | Comment/Discussion |
|---|---|---|---|
 | 51282722 (Comments: 1) | TobyMG (Discussed changesets: 1) | South Parade is a private gated road, are you sure it has a speed limit? commented 2017-08-21 00:17:59 UTC by Yorvik Prestigitator |
| 51284601 (Comments: 1) | al_johnson (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bicis y Más are closing down and no longer serve food commented 2017-08-21 00:15:13 UTC by Yorvik Prestigitator |
| 51272573 (Comments: 2) | hycart (Discussed changesets: 1) | What effect were you looking to achieve? commented 2017-08-20 22:38:30 UTC by GinaroZ |
| 51274759 (Comments: 1) | dcp (Discussed changesets: 2) | HiWhy have you removed pub details from the polygon that represents the land operated by the pub (same as with the scheme for schools) & placed them on a building within the polygon boundary?Why have you created a MP relation which places t... commented 2017-08-20 21:55:31 UTC by DaveF |
| 51275939 (Comments: 1) | lakedistrict (Discussed changesets: 10) | Thanks, I've added a fixme and will re-survey when I next pass by. commented 2017-08-20 19:12:16 UTC by matt_twam_asi |
| 51081216 (Comments: 2) | DanGregory (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hi Matt and Dan, I've undeleted the node and updated the tags on it so that the address info isn't lost. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/51275939 commented 2017-08-20 12:25:48 UTC by lakedistrict |
| 51265073 (Comments: 1) | horrorhols (Discussed changesets: 1) | This is already mapped. Maps.Me should show it with the latest map update. commented 2017-08-19 21:50:29 UTC by Dr-Mx |
| 51245058 (Comments: 4) | Richard Carden (Discussed changesets: 2) | Brilliant cheers, slowly getting the hang of all this! commented 2017-08-19 20:45:44 UTC by Richard Carden |
| 49587071 (Comments: 2) | Quarticle (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks. Corrected that now. commented 2017-08-19 15:57:00 UTC by Quarticle |
| 51252057 (Comments: 1) | Jazzyfizzy (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, the building is several properties frpm 260 to 270 I think. therefore I've removed number 260 from the whole building, (also corrected the postcode. commented 2017-08-19 14:59:54 UTC by BCNorwich |
| 51239880 (Comments: 2) | jim197 (Discussed changesets: 5) | I agree. I will change it to a memorial.Thanks, Jim commented 2017-08-19 11:51:06 UTC by jim197 |
| 51211668 (Comments: 1) | Dave Nelson (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello Dave, thank you for your contributions and welcome to OpenStreetMap. Regarding the bus stop (node 5041516821) - there is an existing bus stop just to the south on the northbound side of Bury Road. Is there more than one bus stop going north... commented 2017-08-19 11:22:05 UTC by matt_twam_asi |
| 51244209 (Comments: 1) | condorman (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I squared up your new buildings, (this can be achieved in iD editor by selecting the building and from the right click menu click "square". They look better by being squared off.I also terraced the s... commented 2017-08-19 06:25:53 UTC by BCNorwich |
| 51244410 (Comments: 1) | condorman (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I just wanted to point out that you have to be careful you don't inadvertently move other objects while mapping. You actually dragged a highway node (Tivoli Road) quite some distance. Not to worry though I've alre... commented 2017-08-19 06:09:42 UTC by BCNorwich |
| 50428884 (Comments: 1) | AMWS (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi,Please can you check this location, it appears to be inside a roundabout.Thanks commented 2017-08-19 01:54:49 UTC by JamesKingdom |
| 49038461 (Comments: 3) | SomeoneElse (Discussed changesets: 59) | Thanks for your quick answer (and the fix :) commented 2017-08-18 19:45:30 UTC by HolgerJeromin |
| 51210173 (Comments: 1) | Gabriel Reynolds (Discussed changesets: 20) | Also,What evidence do you have for the name of http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/16290716/history ? I live just down the road from there and have driven around it many times. Where is it signed?Best Regards,Andy commented 2017-08-18 15:40:31 UTC by SomeoneElse |
| 51209997 (Comments: 1) | Gabriel Reynolds (Discussed changesets: 20) | Hello,Where did you get the name "Pinxton Interchange" for http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/118554994 here?Best Regards,Andy commented 2017-08-18 15:34:36 UTC by SomeoneElse |
| 50642891 (Comments: 1) | Aoc-One (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo Aoc-One,thanks a lot for your contributions to OSM. However, may I remind you of the rule "The name is the name only" (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only). I have my doubts that the archeologic... commented 2017-08-18 13:21:52 UTC by escada |
| 51214880 (Comments: 1) | RichRico (Discussed changesets: 41) | Hi I added this Sustainable Drainage Retention Pond as it's just been built in my village. You've removed it. Why? commented 2017-08-18 06:32:21 UTC by joyma |
| 51214917 (Comments: 1) | papamat15 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Perhaps it should also be tagged as tourism=guest_house if it is indeed a guest house/b&b? commented 2017-08-17 21:17:43 UTC by GinaroZ |
| 51189748 (Comments: 1) | Gabriel Reynolds (Discussed changesets: 20) | Hihttp://www.openstreetmap.org/node/29426931/historyAre you sure it's a church? Looks domesticto me.How about a place suburb? commented 2017-08-17 19:05:24 UTC by DaveF |
| 51190534 (Comments: 3) | Fluclo (Discussed changesets: 3) | You're duplicting data which is to be discouraged. You should contact ORM to ask why it renders differently. Please don't tag incorrectly to suit the renderer. commented 2017-08-17 18:52:45 UTC by DaveF |
| 51209759 (Comments: 1) | AceOfMarc (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi and welcome to OSM,Are you sure that this bridlepath is real?The footpath appears to be there on the right, but there is no evidence of the left side of the trail.Thanks commented 2017-08-17 16:12:50 UTC by JamesKingdom |
| 51149076 (Comments: 8) | Mike Baggaley (Discussed changesets: 40) | Wow, just how far are you going with this?Read the link again. DOWNLOADED files are OGL, the web page you directed me to is copyright. I doubt anyone in the NHS would care, but you were prepared to use a copyright source before you then checked t... commented 2017-08-17 11:33:14 UTC by chillly |
| 51180381 (Comments: 1) | Gabriel Reynolds (Discussed changesets: 20) | Thanks for the changes. A changeset comment would be helpful to see what you've done. commented 2017-08-17 11:01:33 UTC by Chris Fleming |
| 51093590 (Comments: 1) | Mike Baggaley (Discussed changesets: 40) | Thanks for fixing this, this area has been bugging me for a while and after quite a bit of research I finally found out it is a spur of the A272, I come back to do it and someone already had! commented 2017-08-17 10:34:51 UTC by Thomas Jarvis |
| 50259396 (Comments: 1) | Rowland (Discussed changesets: 37) | Way: 507330969 self intersection fixed. commented 2017-08-17 10:22:18 UTC by BCNorwich |
| 50260083 (Comments: 7) | Rowland (Discussed changesets: 37) | Way: 507336801 fixed self intersection problem of the area outline commented 2017-08-17 10:19:34 UTC by BCNorwich |
| 51175514 (Comments: 3) | Aubry1 (Discussed changesets: 1) | If this is not the water you refer to, please give me a link to the object.And I'm not new, I like anonymity and privacy, had my main account for 5 or 6 years. commented 2017-08-17 07:52:17 UTC by Aubry1 |
| 51177988 (Comments: 1) | Niall347 (Discussed changesets: 1) | hey Niall347, welcome to OSM. i appreciate your interest in mapping. I have noticed that you have added a water body . but it does not appear on any of the images, could you please specify the source.. keep adding to the map. Happy mapping !! commented 2017-08-17 06:27:17 UTC by oormilavinod |
| 50807783 (Comments: 24) | Rowland (Discussed changesets: 37) | Way: 512580572 remove recreation ground which is part of mapped school ground commented 2017-08-17 06:18:26 UTC by BCNorwich |
| 51177381 (Comments: 2) | yurasi (Discussed changesets: 46) | Oh I'm sorry. I didn't notice of construction land use. Thanks for let know me.Greetings. commented 2017-08-16 23:10:10 UTC by yurasi |
| 39330672 (Comments: 1) | Rikki Glitzkicker (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi Rikki, do the footpaths follow the path of the service roads mapped in this changeset or are they actually separate? commented 2017-08-16 22:37:56 UTC by matt_twam_asi |
| 51184055 (Comments: 6) | Dr Mark (Discussed changesets: 1) | The map is created by volunteers. It looks as though no one has put the hours in to draw the houses in your village. A quick look at the aerial imagery tells me they could be traced from there, but it's a long job and not your real intention.Elec... commented 2017-08-16 20:43:02 UTC by chillly |
| 51177385 (Comments: 1) | Harinder Burkhart (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi!What is your source for this?cheers,Derick commented 2017-08-16 18:03:17 UTC by Derick Rethans |
| 51179954 (Comments: 1) | Gabriel Reynolds (Discussed changesets: 20) | How does https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/206875957 cross the railway line? Via a level crossing or a bridge/tunnel? commented 2017-08-16 16:52:14 UTC by GinaroZ |
| 51177405 (Comments: 1) | Harinder Burkhart (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello Harinder Burkhart,What is the source for the population figure here?Best Regards,Andy commented 2017-08-16 15:50:15 UTC by SomeoneElse |
| 51144606 (Comments: 1) | Roger Wilcox (Discussed changesets: 1) | I'm not sure that deleting the track is correct solution to a routing problem. It would be better to mark the track private or somesuch. commented 2017-08-16 15:15:32 UTC by lostmike |
| 51166065 (Comments: 2) | schwall (Discussed changesets: 1) | For info, the most used values are at http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org.uk/keys/maxspeed%3Atype#values . commented 2017-08-16 12:50:05 UTC by SomeoneElse |
| 50994661 (Comments: 1) | Ollie3345 (Discussed changesets: 1) | hey Ollie3345, welcome to OSM. i appreciate your interest in mapping. I have noticed that you have added a node to represent a park. but according to conventions, we trace a way along the park. keep adding to the map. Happy mapping !! commented 2017-08-16 07:09:20 UTC by oormilavinod |
| 51145148 (Comments: 1) | Gabriel Reynolds (Discussed changesets: 20) | Pretty sure it's not a secondary road into the school -- they'd soon run out of pupils commented 2017-08-15 23:08:28 UTC by ndm |
| 50632028 (Comments: 2) | flierfy (Discussed changesets: 35) | Hello Jan,I thank you for the hint. I've added the missing letter.With thankful regards, Stephan commented 2017-08-15 21:58:10 UTC by flierfy |
| 51118678 (Comments: 2) | Russ McD (Discussed changesets: 8) | Thanks Mike,Yes, my mistake - the Potlatch hint was a bit confusing and after reading the Wiki, have changed it to Private as you suggest.Rgds. commented 2017-08-15 21:29:39 UTC by Russ McD |
| 51116574 (Comments: 4) | jim197 (Discussed changesets: 5) | It turns out iD isn't even consistent with itself. I now notice that its pull-down menu of access tag values in the 'All tags' section includes 'residents', but its pull-down menu of access tag values in the 'All fields' section doesn't! Sadly I was ... commented 2017-08-15 15:12:01 UTC by jim197 |
| 51093359 (Comments: 3) | yurasi (Discussed changesets: 46) | Thanks for the reply. The problem now is that the name is not rendered on the standard map! :)All of the suburbs in Edinburgh are mapped with a node and area. I agree that a solution needs to be found with place areas and a label node.I will reve... commented 2017-08-15 13:03:22 UTC by GinaroZ |
| 51109061 (Comments: 2) | mrpixelr (Discussed changesets: 2) | Please provide more information, as I've been onsite and have surveyed the site. It does exist. commented 2017-08-15 10:16:21 UTC by mrpixelr |
| 50881838 (Comments: 2) | VlIvYur (Discussed changesets: 14) | I'd confuse land and yard commented 2017-08-14 23:36:51 UTC by VlIvYur |
| 51113852 (Comments: 3) | Steve Mapping (Discussed changesets: 3) | Cheers. Just paranoid about details being copied from OS maps. commented 2017-08-14 22:50:09 UTC by southglos |
| 48088139 (Comments: 4) | VlIvYur (Discussed changesets: 14) | 489053247 looks like a tree row, because fence/wall in the meter to the N489053234, 489053236 maybe there are walls. Shadow is strange, looks like this barrier consists of 4 pieces with height of 0.5-1m, and another one from the house to the next r... commented 2017-08-14 21:09:14 UTC by VlIvYur |
| 51030461 (Comments: 1) | Dyserth (Discussed changesets: 15) | Great edition! Thanks to improve my earlier draft. Do you use Mapillary photos I upload?Cheers commented 2017-08-14 20:39:13 UTC by msevilla00 |
| 50943658 (Comments: 11) | msevilla00 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hello again,If you came now to this discussion you may notice something happens in the wiki. A British user changed it after the discussion in the talk-gb mailing list:https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/2017-August/020493.html\... commented 2017-08-14 20:36:09 UTC by msevilla00 |
| 47952488 (Comments: 1) | VlIvYur (Discussed changesets: 14) | Do you have any evidence is a fence now? The imagery would suggest that it isn't one. commented 2017-08-14 18:36:27 UTC by SomeoneElse |
| 51112498 (Comments: 1) | u003f (Discussed changesets: 1) | Should this be tagged as tourism=guesthouse? commented 2017-08-14 18:05:01 UTC by trigpoint |
| 51075572 (Comments: 2) | Setithing (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello,Sorry for that. I have amended the tags and added the fix me as you suggested. There is more mapping of foot paths to be done which is why it stops. I will avoid not joining footpaths in the future.Thank you for letting me know.Tom commented 2017-08-14 18:03:41 UTC by Setithing |
| 48363783 (Comments: 1) | PeterP (Discussed changesets: 3) | This footpath seems to be mistaken for a power line? commented 2017-08-14 17:12:40 UTC by brianboru |
| 51027821 (Comments: 3) | PeterPan99 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hi Peter, I believe you are correct that bridge:ref is not rendered on the standard OSM map (the bridges in question had bridge_ref which was an older convention). However, incorrect data should not be set simply to get the standard map to display so... commented 2017-08-14 10:38:51 UTC by Mike Baggaley |
| 51059042 (Comments: 2) | Pink Duck (Discussed changesets: 13) | Good spot, seems I tagged that erroneously thinking it was only bus/taxis/cycle but the restrictive sign is indeed just for motor vehicles. commented 2017-08-14 06:43:35 UTC by Pink Duck |