| Changeset | # | Tmstmp UTC | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 67326681 by Nehaj @ 2019-02-18 19:01 | 1 | 2019-02-19 17:10 | Nehaj | I've mistakenly edited a Jim Beam facility near Cincinnati. |
| 67240413 by Nehaj @ 2019-02-15 21:38 | 1 | 2019-02-15 22:39 | A67-A67 ♦932 | Please don't replace widely used tags for undocumented 'made-up' tags like rollercoaster=track.As long as the rollercoaster key isn't commonly used, the railway key is at least needed for compatibility. The results of your changeset are already visible: the rollercoasters are... |
| 2 | 2019-02-15 22:44 | A67-A67 ♦932 | I restored the railway-tags for compatibility and added your tag rollercoaster=track to the rollercoaster parts that you missed. | |
| 3 | 2019-02-16 22:34 | Nehaj | Hi A67-A67,roller coasters are not railways. I understand the problem of a missing official tag. But misusing a tag for a very different feature (railways) is much more 'made-up' than using a correct tag: https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/roller_coaster=trackKind regards | |
| 4 | 2019-02-17 02:41 | A67-A67 ♦932 | Hi Nehaj,A feature can have multiple keys. So we could just keep the railway-key next to the rollercoaster-key until the rollercoaster-key is supported.Besides, it is better when you first discuss these kind of edits with the local OSM-community at https://forum.osm.org/viewforum.php?id=12 | |
| 5 | 2019-07-16 08:12 | marczoutendijk ♦2,755 | In this same changeset the "place=locality" tagging was replaced by "place=leisure" which is completely wrong. The key "place" is used to mark a geographical location with a known name, not the function of something. Please check the wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org... | |
| 63894644 by Nehaj @ 2018-10-26 09:58 | 1 | 2018-10-26 12:03 | ff5722 ♦215 | It was part of a changeset deleting many other object, but after discussion it will be changed back. |
| 2 | 2018-11-02 18:07 | Nehaj | Ok, I understand. | |
| 63902749 by PierZen @ 2018-10-26 14:29 | 1 | 2018-10-30 09:09 | Nehaj | Dear PierZen,it's not acceptable to revert improvements ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/62344402 ) just to ensure that the history of some ways is kept. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Keep_the_history is nice to have, but not more important than any other rules. |
| 2 | 2018-10-30 12:57 | PierZen ♦262 | Je n'ai pas effacé les améliorations, puisque les noeuds ajoutés pour les pilones ont été conservés. Par contre, on perdait l'historique avec les chemins effacés inutilement, les contributeurs qui ont documenté lignes électriqu... | |
| 3 | 2018-10-30 13:16 | PierZen ♦262 | Voir changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/62344402 où contributeur a effacé et recréé chemin avec géométrie à l'identique pour simplement ensuite y ajouter des noeuds pour pilones. Ce contributeur ne répond pas aux commentair... | |
| 4 | 2018-10-31 13:21 | Toliman ♦5 | I would prefer, that the history of an object should be stored at the object's description, e.g. under a property point "history".Often older versions are worse, as they were often mapped according lower resoluted aerial views. Old versions, which have errors should not be kept. | |
| 5 | 2018-10-31 13:38 | PierZen ♦262 | Vous avez effacé des chemins dont la géométrie était très bonne. Cette pratique n'est pas acceptable, pour simplement ajouter des pilones supplémentaires. Ce n'est pas vous qui avez documenté les caractéristiques de cette ligne a haut... | |
| 63765861 by jc86035 @ 2018-10-22 16:42 | 1 | 2018-10-28 18:28 | Nehaj | This seems to be a more invasive change. May you please document at some place (e.g. Wiki) why this was necessary? |
| 2 | 2018-10-28 18:31 | jc86035 ♦201 | Multiple name:xx keys are in use to represent the same things (e.g. zh-traditional, zh_hant, zh-hant and zh-Hant for Traditional Chinese), so I have been changing them to the ISO codes, with upper case H to match xx-Latn usage. A while ago I did the same for name:zh-yue to name:yue. | |
| 62643604 by Metrohsrtheedit @ 2018-09-16 18:47 | 1 | 2018-10-26 10:14 | Nehaj | Dear Metroh,how have you identified railway crossings like http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5910245765 which don't lie on any railway line? |
| 60076258 by SWF8 @ 2018-06-22 13:24 | 1 | 2018-10-25 13:29 | Nehaj | Rückgängig gemacht in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/63867551 – Man kann nicht sagen, dass man das Tagging aufräumt und dann bei mehren Anschlussgleisen das service=spur vergessen. Vorher war's weniger falsch! |
| 62187465 by peace2 @ 2018-08-31 23:38 | 1 | 2018-10-06 18:53 | Nehaj | Hi peace2,when there is no inner polygon you don't need a multipolygon relation.Regards |
| 62598739 by M!dgard @ 2018-09-15 00:22 | 1 | 2018-09-15 14:35 | Nehaj | M!dgard stated publicly "i removed an undocumented, fairly low-usage, nonsensical tag to avoid it showing up in iD" -> that's not a valid reason to remove something by a mechanical edit, so I've reverted this in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/62612995BTW there hav... |
| 2 | 2018-09-15 14:40 | M!dgard ♦784 | And what does this tag mean? How can you claim to add meaningful information when you don't define what it should mean? I can understand if you're testing stuff and you're documenting when you played around a bit, I can also understand if tags are so obvious you don't bother with... | |
| 3 | 2018-09-15 14:51 | M!dgard ♦784 | But thanks anyway for having the courtesy of notifying me, and not covertly adding shaming FIXME's in the database, like mrlanduse did. Much appreciated. | |
| 62436455 by Nehaj @ 2018-09-09 22:59 | 1 | 2018-09-13 20:57 | pangoSE ♦409 | What did you remove here? |
| 2 | 2018-09-15 12:31 | Nehaj | Demolished buildings | |
| 62435507 by Nehaj @ 2018-09-09 21:43 | 1 | 2018-09-11 18:36 | pangoSE ♦409 | Hej.Lämna gärna mer utförliga kommentarer när du redigerar.Ser att du tagit bort noder.Har du koll på https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Keep_the_history ? |
| 2 | 2018-09-12 01:07 | Nehaj | Hej. Det visste jag inte. | |
| 3 | 2018-09-13 20:59 | pangoSE ♦409 | Tack för ditt svar. Det är särskild viktigt att du är försiktig och lämnar utförliga kommentarer om du tar bort nått eller är osäker på vad du gör.Ok? | |
| 59440306 by Nehaj @ 2018-05-31 18:42 | 1 | 2018-05-31 20:36 | FredrikLindseth ♦203 | What was questionable here? |
| 2 | 2018-05-31 20:53 | NKA ♦247 | I have reverted this changeset. You deleted a large forest and several islands. Please discuss large deletions first with the mappers involved or with the local community.I know that the quality of the features could be better. You are of course welcome to improve e.g. the coastline of the islan... | |
| 3 | 2018-07-31 12:36 | Nehaj | @NKA: By which changeset? I've wanted to replace this bogus import, which has mainly wrong geometries (see the forests), with new data. You've simply been too fast in reverting. | |
| 4 | 2018-07-31 13:28 | Reitstoen ♦43 | @Nehaj: We are (slowly) doing Topography-import in Norway. And I think it's just better to leave at as it is until someone imports this area. Old (bad) data will be replaced during import.https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Catalogue/Topography_import_for_Norway | |
| 61162206 by Lilla Elna @ 2018-07-29 11:23 | 1 | 2018-07-29 12:18 | pitscheplatsch ♦5,393 | Hi Lilla Elna, welcome to OSM.May I know the reason behind removing almost overall 450 natural areas, coastlines, boundaries and waterways? Thanks.More information about your changeset: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=61162206 |
| 2 | 2018-07-29 20:37 | Nehaj | I've checked this in detail: The account has only removed very small PGS fragments, which are irretrievably broken. They are no benefit for remapping. | |
| 59753906 by Seandebasti @ 2018-06-11 20:31 | 1 | 2018-06-11 20:37 | Seandebasti ♦124 | goo just for minor check |
| 2 | 2018-07-25 14:26 | Nehaj | Do you know this tag https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:irrigation%3Dpivot ? | |
| 53074097 by nikasth @ 2017-10-19 16:49 | 1 | 2017-10-23 10:59 | mueschel ♦6,572 | Hi,could you explain this tag?Γηπεδο = Γηπεδο πλαταιωνhttp://osm.org/way/171463369Tags should always be in English and documented in the wiki - automatic translation is not really he... |
| 2 | 2017-10-24 16:16 | freebeer ♦1,598 | Hi Jan,Based on a similar entry on page 2 below starting with Γηπεδο and as a sports pitch, I think it was intended to be name=and is simply a mistake.(My greek is poor enough to imPEDE my understanding ;-) | |
| 3 | 2017-10-24 17:13 | nikasth ♦1 | hi from Nikas ThΓήπεδο = football fieldgipedo = football fieldγιπεδο Μπασκετ = basketball court | |
| 4 | 2018-06-01 21:14 | Nehaj | @nikasth: You've mapped several wind turbines as duplicates directly beneath pre-existing wind mills. Example:http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1824857437 - http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5176647130 (your dupe) | |
| 58942150 by spietsnaz @ 2018-05-14 07:28 | 1 | 2018-05-17 20:54 | Nehaj | What are you changing when you just write a "."? |
| 35909815 by trolleway @ 2015-12-12 14:26 | 1 | 2017-01-05 15:26 | az09 ♦101 | на точки ж/д путей понаставил service=spur, в чатик телеги не появляешься... безобразие )) |
| 2 | 2018-05-17 07:46 | Nehaj | Please read this and act! | |
| 58613984 by Nehaj @ 2018-05-02 12:38 | 1 | 2018-05-02 18:39 | muralito ♦2,022 | Hi Nehaj. Thanks for your collaboratios. Please check because most of the pieces you tagged as natural=wood are in fact landuse=forest. In our country most of the natural=wood pieces (Here calles "monte nativo") are only in the edges of waterways. |
| 2 | 2018-05-02 18:45 | Nehaj | Ok, I'm sorry. Actually I've changed my mapping habits because of complaints by some German users.Before I've mapped the same way like you. These forest pieces are clearly planted and not native forests.Thanks for your advice! | |
| 58621172 by Nehaj @ 2018-05-02 17:12 | 1 | 2018-05-02 17:32 | Nehaj | I'm now using the "Download along" tool from JOSM to delete this ways again, but this is huge data and JOSM is just eating up all my memory. Please give me a little bit more time. |
| 52718816 by nickvet419 @ 2017-10-07 22:13 | 1 | 2018-05-01 17:55 | Nehaj | Hi Nick,I doubt, that there are any 500 kV lines in Puerto Rico. I've just falsely accusated someone else (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52834243), which told me you as source of this.Greetings |
| 52834243 by Verdy_p @ 2017-10-11 17:36 | 1 | 2018-04-30 19:57 | Nehaj | Hi Verdy_p,do you really think, that there is a 500 kV power line in Puerto Rico?Greetings |
| 2 | 2018-04-30 21:07 | Verdy_p ♦105 | I've not indicated any voltage, I just traced the visible lines or prolongated those that were only started. | |
| 3 | 2018-04-30 21:08 | Verdy_p ♦105 | look at the history to find who indicated the voltage initially. I can't tell that! | |
| 4 | 2018-04-30 21:10 | Verdy_p ♦105 | Notably look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52718816 | |
| 5 | 2018-04-30 21:10 | Verdy_p ♦105 | This was done before me! | |
| 6 | 2018-05-01 20:12 | nickvet419 ♦92 | I did the same, but anyone can go back and adjust the default values. | |
| 7 | 2018-05-01 21:14 | Verdy_p ♦105 | So you say you indicated "default values". In OSM there's NO default value at all to insert in the database, if you don't know, don't specify anything. Anytway I have not removed anything in existing tags, even if it's possible that I interconnected two segments of a li... | |
| 58522113 by mrlanduse @ 2018-04-29 09:14 | 1 | 2018-04-29 19:34 | Nehaj | You've changed relations which had type=site to type=windfarm. I don't think, that this is according to the Wiki. |
| 2 | 2018-04-29 23:35 | muralito ♦2,022 | And it's isnt acording to facts. You tagged hydroelectic plants as windfarms.Was this massive changeset discussed, planned and tested? If yes, please put a lik to the documentation. If not, please revert it and follow the proper steps to make a change like this. | |
| 3 | 2018-04-30 19:33 | maxerickson ♦234 | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/58565004It probably doesn't make sense to change these away from site relations (using 2 tags, type=site and power=plant, is not ambiguous), but in any case it should not be done unilaterally. | |
| 4 | 2018-05-01 18:05 | mrlanduse ♦19 | I'm deeply sorry for this. But what about using a unique relation type for collections like this? | |
| 5 | 2018-05-02 12:40 | muralito ♦2,022 | No problem. Just keep in mind the code of conduct. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conductYou should post your proposal in the tagging-list. | |
| 57942085 by Nehaj @ 2018-04-09 14:03 | 1 | 2018-04-09 17:13 | aixbrick ♦840 | Hallo,die Stromleitung befindet sich auf deutscher Seite noch im Planfeststellungsverfahren (https://www.bezreg-koeln.nrw.de/brk_internet/verfahren/25_energieleitungen_planfeststellungsverfahren/energie_oberzier_lichtenbusch/index.html), ist also noch nicht mal im Bau. Ferner wird der geplante Tra... |
| 2 | 2018-04-12 12:51 | aixbrick ♦840 | zur Info: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=61990 | |
| 3 | 2018-04-13 06:21 | Nehaj | Hallo aixbrick,es tut mir Leid, dass ich nicht früher geantwortet habe. Jetzt weiß ich, dass man nicht vorbeugend mappen soll.In Belgien wurde allerdings schon am 15. Januar 2018 mit den Baubarbeiten begonnen (http://www.elia.be/fr/projets/projets-reseau/alegro/alegro-de). Daher h... | |
| 4 | 2018-04-13 14:05 | aixbrick ♦840 | Hallo,ok, dann kann man die belgische Seite natürlich belassen. Für die deutsche Seite halte ich die Eintragung aber weiterhin für verfrüht. Aufgrund des noch laufenden Planfeststellungsverfahrens würde ich den deutschen Teil der Trasse löschen (der ja, wie ich oben s... | |
| 5 | 2018-04-13 21:57 | Nehaj | Sicher wäre Löschen sauberer,ich benutze die Relation allerdings schon für eine Visualisierung der Netzausbaumaßnahmen in Deutschland. Vorgeschlagene Umgehungsstraßen, die dann nie kommen, dürfen doch auch in OSM bleiben? | |
| 6 | 2018-04-14 08:51 | aixbrick ♦840 | Ich würde dich bitten, die weitere Diskussion ins Forum (s.o.) zu verlagern, da die Changeset-Kommentarfunktion für solche Fragen nicht geeignet ist. Du kannst dich im Forum mit deinen OSM-Zugangsdaten anmelden. | |
| 48432151 by Nehaj @ 2017-05-05 16:47 | 1 | 2017-06-07 17:23 | bkowshik ♦7 | Hey Nehaj,I see that you have removed `place=town` and `name=Mandeville` tags and added `landuse=residential` tag.I think the tags in the old version of the feature were appropriate. Can you help me understand.Thank you,Bhargav |
| 2 | 2017-06-08 20:04 | Nehaj | Hi Bhargav,there is already a node for Mandeville: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/290803556To have an area and a node with the same name and features is wrong.Best regards,nehaj | |
| 49285555 by RichRico @ 2017-06-05 19:35 | 1 | 2017-06-08 20:02 | Nehaj | Hi RichRico,I've just wanted to get height profiles along these lines. I'm fine with the deletion. |