schadow1 have been discussed with 19 replies of this contributorschadow1 have been discussed with 19 replies of this contributor| Changeset | # | Tmstmp UTC | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11680533 by schadow1 @ 2012-05-23 12:31 | 1 | 2025-04-02 13:19 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,627 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1763097090/history - Fish Cemetery? What it is?Is it place where they dump unsold fish? |
| 146140037 by schadow1 @ 2024-01-11 11:57 | 1 | 2024-02-22 02:32 | Timmy_Tesseract ♦150 | Good day Schadow1. Thanks for updating this. Could you confirm if it is already fully paved/operational? Or are more works needed before it can replace the old Maharlika section as the preferred through-road? |
| 2 | 2024-02-22 03:36 | schadow1 | hi Timmyit is fully paved and operational when i was there 2 months ago. | |
| 3 | 2024-02-22 06:14 | Timmy_Tesseract ♦150 | Thanks! I've updated the road attributes accordingly and changed the old highway to secondary to indicate the decrease in importance. | |
| 52416103 by schadow1 @ 2017-09-27 14:53 | 1 | 2017-09-28 11:03 | Anim Mouse ♦10 | Hahahaha |
| 2 | 2022-11-18 09:45 | ivanbranco ♦2,695 | I know it's a 5 years old changeset. But this edit created some nodes with only the name, such as: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5014380021/historythey should be fixed or deleted at all | |
| 122409886 by schadow1 @ 2022-06-15 10:05 | 1 | 2022-07-02 04:17 | Timmy_Tesseract ♦150 | Good day Schadow,No sticker no entry policy means that anyone entering this subdivison requires individual permission from the guard. This corresponds to access=private in OSM. Access=permissive would only be applicable if the gate is open at all times and no verification is needed to enter. |
| 2 | 2022-07-02 15:08 | schadow1 | Hi Timmy Thanks for reaching out.This was based on the Philippine mapping convention where Access tags for roads are sufficient enough on barriers before for (1) redundancy and (2)personally it looks ugly on OSM standard map style with dashes on the roads. Where access should be recognized by ro... | |
| 3 | 2022-07-15 11:35 | Timmy_Tesseract ♦150 | Hi Schadow, Thanks for sharing your thoughts on this. (1) It seems that there's a global consensus that access on barriers is the bare minimum, with access on all affected ways being preferable. There are some cases where only the latter will allow for correct routing (for example private s... | |
| 101118731 by schadow1 @ 2021-03-16 11:51 | 1 | 2021-03-16 12:23 | seav ♦163 | I think this is incorrect. This relation you created includes the municipalities of San Vicente, Dumaran, and Araceli and not just Roxas. |
| 101118540 by schadow1 @ 2021-03-16 11:48 | 1 | 2021-03-16 12:21 | seav ♦163 | Hmmm. I previously modified the Palawan relation to exclude Puerto Princesa because the city is a HUC and is therefore outside the jurisdiction of the province despite being its capital. |
| 51925592 by schadow1 @ 2017-09-11 03:51 | 1 | 2020-10-10 02:55 | DP24PH ♦418 | Hello, Schadow1 Expeditions! This also solved the note 824278 from our local contributor (see https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/824278).DP24 |
| 68633965 by schadow1 @ 2019-03-28 17:12 | 1 | 2019-06-13 04:03 | DP24PH ♦418 | Hello, Schadow1Expeditions. Is the one-way scheme 24/7 daily? |
| 69417734 by schadow1 @ 2019-04-21 07:11 | 1 | 2019-04-30 12:46 | DP24PH ♦418 | One-way scheme might be implemented on weekends and holidays as per recent text message from Tagaytay City Public Safety Department - Traffic Unit. |
| 2 | 2019-04-30 13:42 | seav ♦163 | If this will indeed be implemented, you can use conditional restrictions: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Conditional_restrictionsSomething like:oneway:conditional=yes @ (Sa,Su,PH) | |
| 3 | 2019-05-01 01:20 | DP24PH ♦418 | For review: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/69754877 | |
| 69162430 by schadow1 @ 2019-04-12 20:08 | 1 | 2019-04-17 11:50 | DP24PH ♦418 | By the way, when is the one-way scheme will last for? Hopefully, most Provincial Buses will pass-thru Taal Vista and Sky Ranch for East Bound to PITX. |
| 2 | 2019-04-21 07:12 | schadow1 | Ends today Apr 21. Reverted 69417734 | |
| 32577325 by schadow1 @ 2015-07-12 09:15 | 1 | 2018-08-27 16:25 | pangoSE ♦409 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3432081064 has an error in the distance. could you delete the km? |
| 2 | 2018-08-27 16:27 | pangoSE ♦409 | there are other milestones entered by you with the same error. could you correct those too? | |
| 41082167 by schadow1 @ 2016-07-28 09:55 | 1 | 2017-10-14 20:42 | GerdP ♦2,751 | Hi!Please review typo addr:place="<different>"on more than 10000 objects near this area, all created by you. |
| 2 | 2017-10-15 09:06 | schadow1 | OMG! Fixing it now. Probably had an error with JOSM literally tagging them as <different>http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52949461 | |
| 3 | 2017-10-15 09:19 | GerdP ♦2,751 | I think I also did that in the past (but noticed it before uploading), but now I am no longer able to reproduce the problem in JOSM. If you can, please open a ticket for JOSM. | |
| 52604708 by schadow1 @ 2017-10-03 18:29 | 1 | 2017-10-04 13:18 | Harald Hartmann ♦827 | Hello schadow1. Where was this import discussed and where is it documented? |
| 2 | 2017-10-04 15:34 | schadow1 | Extracted from freepublicwifi.gov.ph under the department of information communications and technology (DICT) Data from DICT is open data due to Freedom of Information Act enacted under Executive Order 2 of President Duterte of the Philippines.Tags are fixed to comply with OSM convention. | |
| 3 | 2017-10-04 15:41 | Harald Hartmann ♦827 | Have you a link to the license of this dataset?E.g. in Germany we also have OpenData, but most times it doesn't fit or isn't compatible to the ODbL of OSM!Some items of your import have `internet_access:status=Planning`, so they aren't just really there, right?And for the future... | |
| 4 | 2017-10-04 15:44 | Harald Hartmann ♦827 | And have you ever read the Import Guidelines? http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines | |
| 5 | 2017-10-04 20:27 | woodpeck_repair ♦33,903 | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52636831 where the changeset comment is: delete undiscussed access point import | |
| 6 | 2017-10-05 14:37 | TagaSanPedroAko ♦524 | Given your import being reverted as undiscussed, please discuss it with the talk-ph mailing list first, per the Import Guidelines (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines). It is already given that before doing any data import, please discuss it with the local mapping community mailing... | |
| 52258657 by schadow1 @ 2017-09-21 21:59 | 1 | 2017-09-22 09:20 | Harald Hartmann ♦827 | Hello schadow1. At you have used a new (and so far unkown) key `width:lane`. Could it also be `lane:width`? https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/lane%3Awidth |
| 2 | 2017-09-22 10:04 | schadow1 | Got it here. But I misspelled too. Should be "width:lanes" Which is best to use for this matter? http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lanes | |
| 3 | 2017-09-22 10:42 | Harald Hartmann ♦827 | If there's a mention in wiki, then i would use the wiki one ;-) And `width:lanes` has got the most usage at https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=width | |
| 4 | 2017-09-22 11:07 | schadow1 | Gotcha :) | |
| 51405414 by schadow1 @ 2017-08-24 12:22 | 1 | 2017-09-21 16:02 | TagaSanPedroAko ♦524 | Thanks for this mapping efforts, but I don't know whether you have surveyed the Ayala Westgrove area. Given the hash tag "#ValleyFaultSystem" on this edit, that looks like it is part of mapping critical areas surrounding the West Valley Fault. Have you been to Ayala Westgrove before y... |
| 2 | 2017-09-22 07:56 | schadow1 | Ito po ay para sa research na ito na kakatapos ko lang mailathalahttps://www.academia.edu/34595839/Barangays_and_Buildings_Traversed_by_the_Valley_Fault_System | |
| 51482687 by schadow1 @ 2017-08-27 13:54 | 1 | 2017-08-30 14:23 | TagaSanPedroAko ♦524 | Mmm, bakit naging magulo yung pagkakamali ng J.M. Loyola sa Carmona? Minapa ko uli ang isang parte non. |
| 2 | 2017-08-31 01:44 | schadow1 | Nilagyan ko lang ng ref relation ang N65. Walang ibang binago bukod doon. Anong mali ang iyong napansin? | |
| 3 | 2017-08-31 06:51 | TagaSanPedroAko ♦524 | Kung naggawa ka ng relation para sa Governor's Drive, ba't biglang magugulo yung parte ng J.M. Loyola? Baka nang inupload mo yung mga edit mo dito, baka magulo yon ng biglaan. Posibleng nakorap yon, kaya nagulo yung unang maayos na pagkakamapa. | |
| 48962402 by schadow1 @ 2017-05-25 04:44 | 1 | 2017-07-07 00:33 | GOwin ♦852 | The undocumented tag "townhall:type:ph" is redundant. The local convention is simply to tag these buildings as townhall:type=village |
| 47891655 by schadow1 @ 2017-04-18 04:21 | 1 | 2017-04-18 04:52 | TagaSanPedroAko ♦524 | Found our that "imeeperezveedor" is working at Batangas City's City Planning and Development Office, and make her aware of her mapping activity. Thanks for cleaning up the data, but please view the buildings history touched by her edits, find the previous name before it was changed (d... |
| 2 | 2017-04-18 05:30 | schadow1 | I dont have any contacts in Batangas City LGU and was not able to meet them personally, so I guess the only way to contact the editor is through the discussion field.I'm currently working on a way to automate the fix as we speak. My previous automation only singled out those that have a name ... | |
| 3 | 2017-04-18 06:25 | schadow1 | should be fixed now. found about 7 buildings with valid names in history and reverted them. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/47893705 | |
| 40671076 by schadow1 @ 2016-07-12 03:07 | 1 | 2017-02-21 11:03 | tyr_asd ♦440 | Hi. What's the point of those addr:street=<different> tags?Also: why bother putting on address information without an identifier such as a house number? Wouldn't it make more sense to map the postcode areas and cities as administrative boundaries? |
| 2 | 2017-02-22 02:55 | schadow1 | Thanks for reminding. Tagged the addr:street in error.As for the admin boundaries and address tags, yes, both make sense. The problem is the Philippine government is not yet releasing admin boundaries data with compatible license to OSM. Those available are still based on survey and estimations. | |
| 3 | 2017-02-22 03:01 | schadow1 | http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/46293240 | |
| 44531196 by schadow1 @ 2016-12-20 03:47 | 1 | 2016-12-20 08:45 | maning ♦41 | Hi Ervin, yun ba talga ang mga pangalan ng mga sandbar? |
| 2 | 2016-12-20 10:48 | schadow1 | Kapitan Andong of Poblacion 4 in Balabac offered to name some unnamed sandbars to the owners of the first tour operator that helped develop the tourism industry in their locality and has been used since last year. Recently he also offered one to us for mapping their islets and replacing some of the ... | |
| 42399053 by schadow1 @ 2016-09-24 05:29 | 1 | 2016-09-25 16:32 | mueschel ♦6,565 | Hi,I found the tag "addir:province" on many of your buildings. There is a spelling mistake ("addr:...") which should be corrected. Cheers, Jan |
| 2 | 2016-09-26 03:05 | schadow1 | thanks for notifying. typo. fixed nowhttp://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/42435447 | |
| 39831229 by schadow1 @ 2016-06-06 06:45 | 1 | 2016-07-16 05:42 | seav ♦163 | Are you sure there's a turn restriction here? I've been able to do this turn a few times already. |
| 2 | 2016-07-17 08:46 | seav ♦163 | OK. I saw the no-left-turn sign.I do think this is a silly move by the LP traffic people. :/ | |
| 3 | 2016-07-18 04:50 | schadow1 | About to reply last weekend regarding this but was not able to get to a computer. Yes the no left turn is silly. My neighbors there are against it. Although it seems the policy is implemented passively and is for PUJs only who wanted to do a short trip. But this only according to hearsay. | |
| 39368248 by schadow1 @ 2016-05-17 06:09 | 1 | 2016-06-26 22:46 | d1754 ♦4 | Somebody had deleted the Ayala Mall Serin Diversion Road and placed houses there that were already demolished. Please advice those people partIicipating on your #ProjectNOAH-ISAIAH not to delete anything because the BING MAP being used is to old. Please compare it to the GOOGLE EARTH before digiti... |
| 2 | 2016-06-27 01:11 | schadow1 | 1) Please specify the specific changeset that deleted the "Ayala Mall Serin Diversion Road" so we can address the specific issue2) Digitizing from Google Earth is not allowed in OSM due to incompatible licensehttps://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/28089/can-i-overlay-google-earth-ima... | |
| 19084608 by schadow1 @ 2013-11-24 02:07 | 1 | 2016-05-29 12:28 | CloCkWeRX ♦343 | I'm guessing from strava user reports this (w247960495) is now built? |
| 33576822 by schadow1 @ 2015-08-25 17:00 | 1 | 2015-08-27 15:48 | seav ♦163 | Gen. Trias is not yet a city. The cityhood still needs to be ratified by the residents through a plebiscite. See Section 51 of RA 10675. |
| 2 | 2015-08-27 16:37 | schadow1 | Plebiscite is just formality. They would more likely vote for it even if I myself would vote against it. But you are correct, it is not yet a city as of this point. | |
| 27365364 by schadow1 @ 2014-12-09 20:54 | 1 | 2014-12-10 16:12 | woodpeck ♦2,425 | You have accidentally classed the Philippine Continental Shelf EEZ as an "administrative boundary" leading to it showing on the map. This is undesirable and creates tension with other mappers in the region. I have changed it to a maritime boundary. |
| 2 | 2014-12-11 03:53 | schadow1 | this is noted. thanks | |
| 27348074 by schadow1 @ 2014-12-09 03:33 | 1 | 2014-12-11 02:41 | AlexLazaro ♦1 | Coloured Dreams Realty (CDR) is fruition of hardwork and perseverance of a couple who want to make a contribution and uphold integrity and professionalism in real estate industry. |
| 26656936 by schadow1 @ 2014-11-09 07:13 | 1 | 2014-11-09 11:50 | ianlopez1115 ♦365 | Good job on updating the area |