28 changesets created by schadow1 have been discussed with 19 replies of this contributor
Changeset # Tmstmp UTC Contributor Comment
11680533
by schadow1
@ 2012-05-23 12:31
12025-04-02 13:19Mateusz Konieczny
♦7,627
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1763097090/history - Fish Cemetery? What it is?

Is it place where they dump unsold fish?
146140037
by schadow1
@ 2024-01-11 11:57
12024-02-22 02:32Timmy_Tesseract
♦150
Good day Schadow1. Thanks for updating this. Could you confirm if it is already fully paved/operational? Or are more works needed before it can replace the old Maharlika section as the preferred through-road?
22024-02-22 03:36schadow1 hi Timmy
it is fully paved and operational when i was there 2 months ago.
32024-02-22 06:14Timmy_Tesseract
♦150
Thanks! I've updated the road attributes accordingly and changed the old highway to secondary to indicate the decrease in importance.
52416103
by schadow1
@ 2017-09-27 14:53
12017-09-28 11:03Anim Mouse
♦10
Hahahaha
22022-11-18 09:45ivanbranco
♦2,695
I know it's a 5 years old changeset. But this edit created some nodes with only the name, such as: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5014380021/history

they should be fixed or deleted at all
122409886
by schadow1
@ 2022-06-15 10:05
12022-07-02 04:17Timmy_Tesseract
♦150
Good day Schadow,

No sticker no entry policy means that anyone entering this subdivison requires individual permission from the guard. This corresponds to access=private in OSM.

Access=permissive would only be applicable if the gate is open at all times and no verification is needed to enter.
22022-07-02 15:08schadow1 Hi Timmy Thanks for reaching out.

This was based on the Philippine mapping convention where Access tags for roads are sufficient enough on barriers before for (1) redundancy and (2)personally it looks ugly on OSM standard map style with dashes on the roads. Where access should be recognized by ro...
32022-07-15 11:35Timmy_Tesseract
♦150
Hi Schadow, Thanks for sharing your thoughts on this.

(1) It seems that there's a global consensus that access on barriers is the bare minimum, with access on all affected ways being preferable. There are some cases where only the latter will allow for correct routing (for example private s...
101118731
by schadow1
@ 2021-03-16 11:51
12021-03-16 12:23seav
♦163
I think this is incorrect. This relation you created includes the municipalities of San Vicente, Dumaran, and Araceli and not just Roxas.
101118540
by schadow1
@ 2021-03-16 11:48
12021-03-16 12:21seav
♦163
Hmmm. I previously modified the Palawan relation to exclude Puerto Princesa because the city is a HUC and is therefore outside the jurisdiction of the province despite being its capital.
51925592
by schadow1
@ 2017-09-11 03:51
12020-10-10 02:55DP24PH
♦418
Hello, Schadow1 Expeditions! This also solved the note 824278 from our local contributor (see https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/824278).


DP24
68633965
by schadow1
@ 2019-03-28 17:12
12019-06-13 04:03DP24PH
♦418
Hello, Schadow1Expeditions. Is the one-way scheme 24/7 daily?
69417734
by schadow1
@ 2019-04-21 07:11
12019-04-30 12:46DP24PH
♦418
One-way scheme might be implemented on weekends and holidays as per recent text message from Tagaytay City Public Safety Department - Traffic Unit.
22019-04-30 13:42seav
♦163
If this will indeed be implemented, you can use conditional restrictions: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Conditional_restrictions

Something like:
oneway:conditional=yes @ (Sa,Su,PH)
32019-05-01 01:20DP24PH
♦418
For review: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/69754877
69162430
by schadow1
@ 2019-04-12 20:08
12019-04-17 11:50DP24PH
♦418
By the way, when is the one-way scheme will last for? Hopefully, most Provincial Buses will pass-thru Taal Vista and Sky Ranch for East Bound to PITX.
22019-04-21 07:12schadow1 Ends today Apr 21. Reverted 69417734
32577325
by schadow1
@ 2015-07-12 09:15
12018-08-27 16:25pangoSE
♦409
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3432081064 has an error in the distance. could you delete the km?
22018-08-27 16:27pangoSE
♦409
there are other milestones entered by you with the same error. could you correct those too?
41082167
by schadow1
@ 2016-07-28 09:55
12017-10-14 20:42GerdP
♦2,751
Hi!
Please review typo addr:place="<different>"
on more than 10000 objects near this area, all created by you.
22017-10-15 09:06schadow1 OMG! Fixing it now. Probably had an error with JOSM literally tagging them as <different>
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52949461
32017-10-15 09:19GerdP
♦2,751
I think I also did that in the past (but noticed it before uploading), but now I am no longer able to reproduce the problem in JOSM. If you can, please open a ticket for JOSM.
52604708
by schadow1
@ 2017-10-03 18:29
12017-10-04 13:18Harald Hartmann
♦827
Hello schadow1. Where was this import discussed and where is it documented?
22017-10-04 15:34schadow1 Extracted from freepublicwifi.gov.ph under the department of information communications and technology (DICT)
Data from DICT is open data due to Freedom of Information Act enacted under Executive Order 2 of President Duterte of the Philippines.
Tags are fixed to comply with OSM convention.
32017-10-04 15:41Harald Hartmann
♦827
Have you a link to the license of this dataset?
E.g. in Germany we also have OpenData, but most times it doesn't fit or isn't compatible to the ODbL of OSM!
Some items of your import have `internet_access:status=Planning`, so they aren't just really there, right?
And for the future...
42017-10-04 15:44Harald Hartmann
♦827
And have you ever read the Import Guidelines?
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines
52017-10-04 20:27woodpeck_repair
♦33,903
This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52636831 where the changeset comment is: delete undiscussed access point import
62017-10-05 14:37TagaSanPedroAko
♦524
Given your import being reverted as undiscussed, please discuss it with the talk-ph mailing list first, per the Import Guidelines (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines). It is already given that before doing any data import, please discuss it with the local mapping community mailing...
52258657
by schadow1
@ 2017-09-21 21:59
12017-09-22 09:20Harald Hartmann
♦827
Hello schadow1. At you have used a new (and so far unkown) key `width:lane`. Could it also be `lane:width`? https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/lane%3Awidth
22017-09-22 10:04schadow1 Got it here. But I misspelled too. Should be "width:lanes" Which is best to use for this matter?

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lanes
32017-09-22 10:42Harald Hartmann
♦827
If there's a mention in wiki, then i would use the wiki one ;-) And `width:lanes` has got the most usage at https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=width
42017-09-22 11:07schadow1 Gotcha :)
51405414
by schadow1
@ 2017-08-24 12:22
12017-09-21 16:02TagaSanPedroAko
♦524
Thanks for this mapping efforts, but I don't know whether you have surveyed the Ayala Westgrove area. Given the hash tag "#ValleyFaultSystem" on this edit, that looks like it is part of mapping critical areas surrounding the West Valley Fault. Have you been to Ayala Westgrove before y...
22017-09-22 07:56schadow1 Ito po ay para sa research na ito na kakatapos ko lang mailathala
https://www.academia.edu/34595839/Barangays_and_Buildings_Traversed_by_the_Valley_Fault_System
51482687
by schadow1
@ 2017-08-27 13:54
12017-08-30 14:23TagaSanPedroAko
♦524
Mmm, bakit naging magulo yung pagkakamali ng J.M. Loyola sa Carmona? Minapa ko uli ang isang parte non.
22017-08-31 01:44schadow1 Nilagyan ko lang ng ref relation ang N65. Walang ibang binago bukod doon. Anong mali ang iyong napansin?
32017-08-31 06:51TagaSanPedroAko
♦524
Kung naggawa ka ng relation para sa Governor's Drive, ba't biglang magugulo yung parte ng J.M. Loyola? Baka nang inupload mo yung mga edit mo dito, baka magulo yon ng biglaan. Posibleng nakorap yon, kaya nagulo yung unang maayos na pagkakamapa.
48962402
by schadow1
@ 2017-05-25 04:44
12017-07-07 00:33GOwin
♦852
The undocumented tag "townhall:type:ph" is redundant. The local convention is simply to tag these buildings as townhall:type=village
47891655
by schadow1
@ 2017-04-18 04:21
12017-04-18 04:52TagaSanPedroAko
♦524
Found our that "imeeperezveedor" is working at Batangas City's City Planning and Development Office, and make her aware of her mapping activity. Thanks for cleaning up the data, but please view the buildings history touched by her edits, find the previous name before it was changed (d...
22017-04-18 05:30schadow1 I dont have any contacts in Batangas City LGU and was not able to meet them personally, so I guess the only way to contact the editor is through the discussion field.
I'm currently working on a way to automate the fix as we speak. My previous automation only singled out those that have a name ...
32017-04-18 06:25schadow1 should be fixed now. found about 7 buildings with valid names in history and reverted them. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/47893705
40671076
by schadow1
@ 2016-07-12 03:07
12017-02-21 11:03tyr_asd
♦440
Hi. What's the point of those addr:street=<different> tags?

Also: why bother putting on address information without an identifier such as a house number? Wouldn't it make more sense to map the postcode areas and cities as administrative boundaries?
22017-02-22 02:55schadow1 Thanks for reminding. Tagged the addr:street in error.
As for the admin boundaries and address tags, yes, both make sense. The problem is the Philippine government is not yet releasing admin boundaries data with compatible license to OSM. Those available are still based on survey and estimations.
32017-02-22 03:01schadow1 http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/46293240
44531196
by schadow1
@ 2016-12-20 03:47
12016-12-20 08:45maning
♦41
Hi Ervin, yun ba talga ang mga pangalan ng mga sandbar?
22016-12-20 10:48schadow1 Kapitan Andong of Poblacion 4 in Balabac offered to name some unnamed sandbars to the owners of the first tour operator that helped develop the tourism industry in their locality and has been used since last year. Recently he also offered one to us for mapping their islets and replacing some of the ...
42399053
by schadow1
@ 2016-09-24 05:29
12016-09-25 16:32mueschel
♦6,565
Hi,
I found the tag "addir:province" on many of your buildings. There is a spelling mistake ("addr:...") which should be corrected.

Cheers, Jan
22016-09-26 03:05schadow1 thanks for notifying. typo. fixed now
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/42435447
39831229
by schadow1
@ 2016-06-06 06:45
12016-07-16 05:42seav
♦163
Are you sure there's a turn restriction here? I've been able to do this turn a few times already.
22016-07-17 08:46seav
♦163
OK. I saw the no-left-turn sign.

I do think this is a silly move by the LP traffic people. :/
32016-07-18 04:50schadow1 About to reply last weekend regarding this but was not able to get to a computer. Yes the no left turn is silly. My neighbors there are against it. Although it seems the policy is implemented passively and is for PUJs only who wanted to do a short trip. But this only according to hearsay.
39368248
by schadow1
@ 2016-05-17 06:09
12016-06-26 22:46d1754
♦4
Somebody had deleted the Ayala Mall Serin Diversion Road and placed houses there that were already demolished. Please advice those people partIicipating on your #ProjectNOAH-ISAIAH not to delete anything because the BING MAP being used is to old. Please compare it to the GOOGLE EARTH before digiti...
22016-06-27 01:11schadow1 1) Please specify the specific changeset that deleted the "Ayala Mall Serin Diversion Road" so we can address the specific issue
2) Digitizing from Google Earth is not allowed in OSM due to incompatible license
https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/28089/can-i-overlay-google-earth-ima...
19084608
by schadow1
@ 2013-11-24 02:07
12016-05-29 12:28CloCkWeRX
♦343
I'm guessing from strava user reports this (w247960495) is now built?
33576822
by schadow1
@ 2015-08-25 17:00
12015-08-27 15:48seav
♦163
Gen. Trias is not yet a city. The cityhood still needs to be ratified by the residents through a plebiscite. See Section 51 of RA 10675.
22015-08-27 16:37schadow1 Plebiscite is just formality. They would more likely vote for it even if I myself would vote against it. But you are correct, it is not yet a city as of this point.
27365364
by schadow1
@ 2014-12-09 20:54
12014-12-10 16:12woodpeck
♦2,425
You have accidentally classed the Philippine Continental Shelf EEZ as an "administrative boundary" leading to it showing on the map. This is undesirable and creates tension with other mappers in the region. I have changed it to a maritime boundary.
22014-12-11 03:53schadow1 this is noted. thanks
27348074
by schadow1
@ 2014-12-09 03:33
12014-12-11 02:41AlexLazaro
♦1
Coloured Dreams Realty (CDR) is fruition of hardwork and perseverance of a couple who want to make a contribution and uphold integrity and professionalism in real estate industry.
26656936
by schadow1
@ 2014-11-09 07:13
12014-11-09 11:50ianlopez1115
♦365
Good job on updating the area