| Changeset | # | Tmstmp UTC | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 165474385 by Sal73x @ 2025-04-26 16:49 | 1 | 2025-04-27 10:03 | Aya Samir ♦26 | Hello, Sal73x;Thank you for your contribution to OpenStreetMap. Could you please share your sources regarding the updates in the area "36.7375511, 10.2172134"? My latest image is from 04/23/2025, and I notice that some roads are still under construction in this area.Regards,Aya Samir |
| 2 | 2025-04-27 16:26 | Sal73x | Hi Aya, have a look at this:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C3ExCkoiaAIGreetingsSal73x | |
| 3 | 2025-04-28 07:51 | Aya Samir ♦26 | Hi Sal73x,I just wanted to take a moment to thank you for your prompt response and for sharing your source with me.Best regards,Aya Samir | |
| 159457797 by Sal73x @ 2024-11-22 12:58 | 1 | 2024-11-28 12:45 | Aleksandar Matejevic ♦199 | Hi Sal73x, I see that you have started one admin_level=7 relation, but it is incomplete. Can you finish the work or remove it if this is incorrect edit. |
| 157814080 by Sal73x @ 2024-10-12 21:43 | 1 | 2024-11-04 23:32 | Tommybara ♦85 | Hi there! I noticed that you deleted all tags of the [https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9443832](Gulf of Tonkin) in this changeset. Was this an accident? |
| 158229823 by Sal73x @ 2024-10-22 21:24 | 1 | 2024-10-27 17:49 | UnknownCommand ♦1 | Isn't the cantonment area way better than that? Should I edit it to make it enclose the proper boundary? or Did you get this border from a trusted source? |
| 2 | 2024-10-27 23:33 | Sal73x | Go ahead. I tried but can't find sources and kept it to that. Sal73x | |
| 157813183 by Sal73x @ 2024-10-12 21:12 | 1 | 2024-10-14 04:20 | Supaplex ♦10,425 | HiCan you split your changeset to at least 2? It will make the review process much easier. Thank you |
| 2 | 2024-10-14 06:07 | Sal73x | What do you mean?I'm happy to help.Sal73x | |
| 157448275 by Sal73x @ 2024-10-04 07:48 | 1 | 2024-10-07 13:25 | nona mostafa ♦55 | Hello Sal73x;I noticed you changed the classification for the wayshttps://www.openstreetmap.org/way/106798080https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/694162208from "highway=primary_link" to "highway=secondary_link"but based on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway#L... |
| 2 | 2024-10-07 17:12 | Sal73x | Hi Nona, thank you for your message. This road is part of the urban environment and not every road that leads to a primary road gets marked as prim. link. I believe that marking it as secondary link gives it the necessary importance to mark the route. Thank you again. Regards Sal73x | |
| 3 | 2024-10-09 14:00 | nona mostafa ♦55 | Hello Sal73x;Thank you for your quick response, I agree with your point of view.Regardsnona mostafa | |
| 154160652 by Sal73x @ 2024-07-19 22:09 | 1 | 2024-07-21 12:15 | shahenda_ahmed ♦10 | Hello Sal73x;I noticed you reverted my edit and changed the classification for some streets from "highway=primary_link" to "highway=tertiary_link" and it will be suitable to be "primary_link" as this link is out/in of the primary roadExamples:https://www.openstree... |
| 2 | 2024-07-21 15:25 | Sal73x | Hi Shahenda, the reason of my edit is that the link roads are not part of the main route (Avenue Ali Belhouane) and lead only to minor location with no major importance.Greetings Sal73x | |
| 3 | 2024-07-22 09:58 | shahenda_ahmed ♦10 | Hello Sal73x;Thank you for your quick response, I agree with your point of view.Regardsshahenda_ahmed | |
| 151070479 by Sal73x @ 2024-05-08 18:37 | 1 | 2024-06-20 06:08 | SurlyRider ♦9 | You tagged some roads as motorway, although all traffic-signs indicating, that the part to/from the (smaller) roundabout in the east is NOT motorway. So I guess there are new traffic-signs then? |
| 2 | 2024-06-20 06:17 | Sal73x | Yes, there are.Greetings | |
| 147936004 by Sal73x @ 2024-02-26 15:01 | 1 | 2024-03-08 04:38 | Herman Lee ♦312 | 您好，本轮渡台宁渡线路已不存在，请不要添加错误的线路，后续将删除退回。 |
| 141396361 by Sal73x @ 2023-09-17 19:48 | 1 | 2023-09-18 14:12 | luiswoo ♦599 | This airport is closed, its territory is given for development. |
| 2 | 2023-09-18 14:44 | Sal73x | Ok, I wasn't sure. Thank you for the info. | |
| 136467508 by Sal73x @ 2023-05-23 18:00 | 1 | 2023-05-24 11:14 | fayor ♦125 | Ciao, il benzinaio che hai inserito mi risulta essere chiuso per "prezzibenzina", inoltre non è presente fra quelli attivi nel sito nel database del Mise, né risulta nella ricerca sul sito Esso.Hai verificato personalmente che sia aperto? Altrimenti si dovrà eliminar... |
| 2 | 2023-05-24 11:49 | Sal73x | Ciao, in effetti non ci passo dall'anno scorso. In questo caso provvedo ad eliminare. Grazie per la segnalazione. | |
| 114321940 by Sal73x @ 2021-11-28 12:16 | 1 | 2023-03-21 04:14 | Riyadi IRM-ED ♦140 | Hi sal73x.thank you for your outstanding contribution to osm. I do an armchair validation about relation in maproullete and found https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/relation/13487972I saw your history. you are an advanced mapper in osm. i require some advice for you, i would love to hear... |
| 131971432 by Sal73x @ 2023-02-01 17:16 | 1 | 2023-02-06 12:21 | RasandRoad ♦2 | 新門司港の岸壁をオーシャン東九フェリーの岸壁に変更したようですが、その情報源はどこにありますか？I see that the quay at Shin Moji Port has been changed to Ocean Tokyu Ferry's quay, where can I find source for the information? |
| 122121428 by Sal73x @ 2022-06-08 14:28 | 1 | 2022-12-16 03:24 | Tantri IRM-ED ♦102 | hi Sal73xYour edit looks awesome, but I've refined the geometry in natural water according to recent imagery. (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/36907099)If you have any other suggestions, please let me know.(https://maproulette.org/challenge/30161/task/142918612)Thank you |
| 116354607 by Sal73x @ 2022-01-19 18:50 | 1 | 2022-12-14 04:34 | Rizki IRM-ED ♦129 | Hi Sal73x. Your edit looks awesome, but I need you to improve water body (id 1022660299) due crossing with highway (id 696802504). If you have any other suggestion, please let me know (https://maproulette.org/challenge/30208/task/142906710). Thank you. |
| 115950191 by Sal73x @ 2022-01-09 16:40 | 1 | 2022-12-14 04:28 | Rizki IRM-ED ♦129 | Hi . Your edit looks awesome, but I need you to improve water body (id 1019742092) due crossing with several building. If you have any other suggestion, please let me know (https://maproulette.org/challenge/30208/task/142908481). Thank you. |
| 128410655 by Sal73x @ 2022-11-02 21:06 | 1 | 2022-11-03 16:53 | Asly33 ♦1 | Frigintini |
| 127677776 by Sal73x @ 2022-10-17 14:53 | 1 | 2022-10-18 10:01 | Eman Ghareeb ♦22 | Hello Sal73x;I noticed you changed the classification for many streets from "service " to "unclassified" and this area showing its an industrial area,So Preferred the classification in this area is "service" and the main way leading to another major way is "un... |
| 124318933 by Sal73x @ 2022-07-31 21:08 | 1 | 2022-08-02 14:13 | Nithinat S ♦50 | This is not trunk. It doesn't meet the Thailand Wiki Guidelines criteria. If you want it to be trunk, feel free to come and discuss for changing the criteria in Thailand Forum.Regards |
| 119245334 by Sal73x @ 2022-04-02 19:35 | 1 | 2022-04-24 04:47 | startzz ♦1 | Está Correto , Só falta a demarcação do Estado Palestino com um todo. |
| 119795883 by Sal73x @ 2022-04-16 19:13 | 1 | 2022-04-18 13:35 | Jyunhou ♦130 | Nice job, but why delete this bridge? WAY: 930640757 --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119795883 |
| 2 | 2022-04-18 15:10 | Sal73x | Not sure which bridge you mean but if I haven't, usually is because I determine if it's a bridge or tunnel on depending what type of water way flaws under. Feel free to add if you think it's necessary. | |
| 58803917 by Sal73x @ 2018-05-09 00:30 | 1 | 2022-03-24 17:44 | Koreller ♦46 | Thanks for this changeset ! |
| 118177432 by Sal73x @ 2022-03-06 23:20 | 1 | 2022-03-07 05:51 | user_5359 ♦19,351 | Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/1037841197/history. I correct your key Name to name? But is this really the name or can only buses park here? Have a look on the key access: motor_vehicle=no, bus=yes. |
| 115687855 by Sal73x @ 2022-01-02 22:31 | 1 | 2022-01-03 09:14 | Eman_Mehrez ♦52 | Hello Sal73x,I noticed you have changed the classification for "Coastal Road " but didn't change the links between for this way.examples:-https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/577258657https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/661685799Could you change all links located in" Coastal... |
| 114832771 by Sal73x @ 2021-12-11 22:51 | 1 | 2021-12-11 23:04 | 黄庭坚 ♦3 | Dear Sal73x,even if landuses are traced not perfectly it's a loss of information to delete them: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=114832771 |
| 2 | 2021-12-11 23:11 | Sal73x | I have replaced them after deleting. | |
| 108367449 by Sal73x @ 2021-07-21 13:05 | 1 | 2021-07-22 03:08 | vulasala ♦209 | Hi Sal73x,Trust you are doing well. I have modified the classification of way 463253380, way 463253381and way 463255224 from tertiary to unclassified, as there is a classification gap.Thanks. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmch... |
| 108370328 by Sal73x @ 2021-07-21 14:09 | 1 | 2021-07-22 02:54 | vulasala ♦209 | Hi Sal73x,Trust you are doing well. I have modified the classification of way 283793477, way 283793465, way 283793459, way 966206924, way 549579454 and way 549579453 from unclassified to service and secondary link, as there are some classification gaps.Thanks. --- #REVI... |
| 105248115 by Sal73x @ 2021-05-24 19:52 | 1 | 2021-06-19 20:18 | datendelphin ♦330 | Please use more descriptive changeset comments. For example adding piers in Bootshafen Zug. |
| 103663691 by Sal73x @ 2021-04-26 22:52 | 1 | 2021-04-27 05:04 | KuoLLK ♦21 | Hello, this path(茂南大道西,茂南大道中,茂南大道东) is not primary |
| 85397210 by Sal73x @ 2020-05-18 17:58 | 1 | 2021-03-17 01:47 | Akrimullah IRM-RV ♦114 | Hi Bud, Looks like this road pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/805518169 already well constructed. I changed it to tertiary to match with your edit class https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/631990017. Have a look at this. thank you.. |
| 2 | 2021-03-17 11:22 | Sal73x | Ok, no problem. Thank you. | |
| 63283318 by Sal73x @ 2018-10-07 16:12 | 1 | 2021-03-10 01:58 | Ficky IRM-ED ♦131 | Hi Sal73x,I've modified this road (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/631618187) based on maxar premium.Thank you, happy mapping! |
| 62691334 by Sal73x @ 2018-09-18 09:58 | 1 | 2021-02-25 08:27 | Ficky IRM-ED ♦131 | Hi Sal73x,I've modified this road (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/626378315) based on maxar premium. I also made some changes around this changeset.Thank you, happy mapping! |
| 76005563 by Sal73x @ 2019-10-21 15:12 | 1 | 2021-02-22 04:13 | Ficky IRM-ED ♦131 | Hi, Sal73xI've modified this road (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/737330118) based on maxar premium.Thank you, happy mapping! |
| 63198337 by Sal73x @ 2018-10-04 14:34 | 1 | 2021-02-18 05:30 | Ficky IRM-ED ♦131 | Hi Sal73x,I've modified this road (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/630662815) based on maxar premium.Thank you, happy mapping! |
| 62702649 by Sal73x @ 2018-09-18 16:15 | 1 | 2021-02-05 13:36 | ruthikdhoni ♦11 | Hi Sal73xHope doing good,As per the osm policy links should be the highest priority road link I have corrected the data plz do refer way 626439623 |
| 71686604 by Sal73x @ 2019-06-27 20:56 | 1 | 2020-10-29 07:58 | Arma IRM-ED ♦196 | Hi, Sal73x. I have modified this road (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/700215811) based on Maxar Premium Imagery |
| 65217525 by Sal73x @ 2018-12-05 20:45 | 1 | 2020-10-27 04:10 | Anisa IRM-ED ♦83 | Hi, Sal73x. I have adjusted the residential road (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/652944241) based on Maxar Premium Imagery and I also made some changes around this changeset. Thank you |
| 83776163 by Sal73x @ 2020-04-19 15:11 | 1 | 2020-10-06 06:38 | Arma IRM-ED ♦196 | Hi, Sal73x. I have modified these roads (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/793497298, https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/793497304, andhttps://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/521931657) based on Maxar Premium Imagery. |
| 83776790 by Sal73x @ 2020-04-19 15:33 | 1 | 2020-10-04 23:52 | Arma IRM-ED ♦196 | Hi, Sal73x. I have modified this road (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/793503757) based on Maxar Premium Imagery. |
| 83780366 by Sal73x @ 2020-04-19 17:38 | 1 | 2020-10-04 23:51 | Arma IRM-ED ♦196 | Hi Sal73x. I have changed the classification of the roads to be service highways. https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/793537334https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/793537335https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/793537346 |
| 83778608 by Sal73x @ 2020-04-19 16:28 | 1 | 2020-10-04 23:50 | Arma IRM-ED ♦196 | Hi, Sal73x. I have modified the highways based on Maxar Premium Imagery.https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/793519666https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/793519667 |
| 64897356 by Sal73x @ 2018-11-26 13:04 | 1 | 2020-10-02 10:52 | Arma IRM-ED ♦196 | Hi, I modified many roads in this changeset based on Maxar Premium Imagery (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/649145644, https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/649145558, https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/649145637https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/649145640https://pewu... |
| 83774891 by Sal73x @ 2020-04-19 14:30 | 1 | 2020-10-01 02:21 | Arma IRM-ED ♦196 | Hi, Sal73x. I have changed the classification of the road (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/793484564) to be service highway because it leads to the mining. |
| 69414059 by Sal73x @ 2019-04-21 00:26 | 1 | 2020-09-30 06:23 | Arma IRM-ED ♦196 | Hi, Sal73x. I have added bridge on the primary highway (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/685021317) because it crossed with waterway |
| 2 | 2020-09-30 06:24 | Arma IRM-ED ♦196 | Sorry, I mean the secondary highways (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/685021317). Thank you | |
| 63211569 by Sal73x @ 2018-10-04 22:27 | 1 | 2020-09-30 00:24 | Aglis IRM-ED ♦109 | Hi Sal73x, I changed geometry of this way (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/630782210) based on Maxar Premium Imagery. I also made some change around this changeset. Thankyou. |
| 91665986 by Sal73x @ 2020-09-28 20:49 | 1 | 2020-09-29 15:44 | naveenpf ♦714 | Welcome to OSM Kerala.https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Kerala/MembersTo join OSM Kerala Telegram click on. https://t.me/osmkerala --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/91665986 |
| 63802128 by Sal73x @ 2018-10-23 16:17 | 1 | 2020-09-25 01:49 | Aglis IRM-ED ♦109 | Hi Sal73x. I changed classification and geometry of this road based on Maxar Premium Imagery (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/637231332). I also made some change in this changeset. Thankyou. |
| 63260812 by Sal73x @ 2018-10-06 16:18 | 1 | 2020-09-20 23:53 | Fadlilaa IRM-ED ♦26 | I made some improvement in your work based on Maxar Premium Imagery. |
| 83773807 by Sal73x @ 2020-04-19 13:54 | 1 | 2020-09-17 09:56 | Arma IRM-ED ♦196 | Hi, Sal73x. I changed the classification of these roads (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/793464558, https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/793464558 and https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/793464557) to service highway |
| 63264436 by Sal73x @ 2018-10-06 19:23 | 1 | 2020-09-10 02:05 | Elisabeth IRM-ED ♦45 | Hello Sal73x,I've changed the geometry of this way-731370042 based on Maxar Premium Imagery, thank you |
| 77494813 by Sal73x @ 2019-11-24 23:00 | 1 | 2020-09-04 05:44 | Aglis IRM-ED ♦109 | Hi Sal73x. I changed geometry of this way based on Maxar Premium Imagery (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/749297240). I also made some change around this changeset. Thankyou |
| 77541936 by Sal73x @ 2019-11-25 20:11 | 1 | 2020-09-02 23:37 | Aglis IRM-ED ♦109 | Hi Sal73x. I changed geometry of this way based on Maxar Premium Imagery (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/749602396). I also made some change around this changeset. Thankyou. |
| 71016116 by Sal73x @ 2019-06-07 09:09 | 1 | 2020-08-28 01:09 | Arma IRM-ED ♦196 | Hi, Sal73x. I adjusted the tertiary road (way 695579205) based on Maxar Premium Imagery. |
| 63178065 by Sal73x @ 2018-10-04 01:03 | 1 | 2020-08-03 06:49 | Arma IRM-ED ♦196 | Hi Sal73x, I added bridge on highways (way160605620) because it crossed with waterways. Thank you |
| 73474678 by Sal73x @ 2019-08-18 22:04 | 1 | 2020-07-29 01:25 | sykul ♦58 | Hi. It looks like 314 Provincial Road kind of does a weird thing here where there are two parallel sections and the road doesn't really connect to itself. https://imgur.com/kd3X1OuIs this really how it is? |
| 82822898 by Sal73x @ 2020-03-30 12:14 | 1 | 2020-05-18 02:16 | apm-wa ♦256 | Thank you for contributing to the map of Turkmenistan. The name Azatlyk is unattested in this part of Lebap etraby. What is the source of your information that this village is named Azatlyk? Please check against https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Districts_in_Turkmenistan. |
| 2 | 2020-05-18 14:54 | Sal73x | Hi apm-wa, I might have altered the size of the residential area but I didn't add the name on it and it must have been there already. Greetings | |
| 3 | 2020-05-18 21:38 | apm-wa ♦256 | I'm going to change it to a neighborhood since it was annexed by the city of Turkmenabat in July 2016 and is now inside the city limits (which I have finally finished drawing). It may have been a village before being annexed. | |
| 83322296 by Sal73x @ 2020-04-09 17:51 | 1 | 2020-05-12 06:36 | apm-wa ♦256 | Thank you for your edits, but there is no need to add residential areas to entire towns and villages that have been demarcated with administrative boundaries. I will delete these duplicates when I encounter them. |
| 2 | 2020-05-13 09:56 | Sal73x | Administrative boundaries are very different to what is simply a residential area. I disagree and I will keep marking residential areas as and when needed. | |
| 3 | 2020-05-13 12:14 | apm-wa ♦256 | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dresidential"The extent of the area should mark the boundary of known residential use, not the extent of the whole town or village." | |
| 4 | 2020-05-13 12:14 | apm-wa ♦256 | Please read the guidance in the wiki. | |
| 5 | 2020-05-13 12:28 | Sal73x | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dresidential"If there is a small (one company/property) area of commercial (or similar) landuse within an otherwise residential area, you can still decide to use landuse=residential for the outline of the whole larger area as a preliminary solu... | |
| 6 | 2020-05-13 12:37 | apm-wa ♦256 | Preliminary does not mean permanent. | |
| 7 | 2020-05-13 15:58 | Sal73x | Didi I say they are permanent? | |
| 82687085 by Sal73x @ 2020-03-27 01:15 | 1 | 2020-04-27 01:50 | apm-wa ♦256 | Awaza is certainly not a residential area. It is a resort complex and this portion of the city of Turkmenbashy has no permanent residents. I am deleting this. |
| 82680374 by Sal73x @ 2020-03-26 20:05 | 1 | 2020-04-21 00:49 | apm-wa ♦256 | A clinic is not a hospital. Besides, this has already been mapped. Deleting. Клиника--не больница. Кроме того, это учреждение уже на карте. Удаляю. |
| 58686406 by Sal73x @ 2018-05-04 17:35 | 1 | 2020-03-12 06:36 | Akrimullah IRM-RV ♦114 | Hi Sal73x, I wanna ask. I found this way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/585736446 and other same way along the primary road. it tagged as residential when it shouldn't. This way has a role as main road that connecting several activities such as residential, commercial area, public facilities... |
| 70250495 by Sal73x @ 2019-05-14 19:35 | 1 | 2019-06-22 07:49 | kucai ♦107 | How can you put a whole town into a residential landuse classification?You need to undo this and restricts residential areas to their appropriate boundaries. If you don't know which is which, then please refrain from drawing arbitrary areas. |
| 71124041 by Sal73x @ 2019-06-11 03:21 | 1 | 2019-06-12 19:33 | richardninde ♦2 | Hi Sal,I'd love to discuss the decision to use tertiary_link for the roads bypassing the roundabout here. My first reaction was to treat them as a frontage roads and call them tertiary, since a lot of residential roads connect with them. Please feel free to send me a message on OSM ... |
| 63623099 by Sal73x @ 2018-10-17 19:42 | 1 | 2019-05-25 12:54 | angys ♦377 | Can you retrace the raod by using Esri Imagery? |
| 58570010 by Sal73x @ 2018-04-30 22:13 | 1 | 2018-12-20 17:53 | alee_m ♦11 | Hi Sal73x,It's clear from satellite imagery that there is no need of slip road (way 584778897) at this intersection since there is not physical medium in between.Can you please review the edits made at Phạm Hùng - Quốc lộ 1 interchange.Thank you,alee_m |
| 62831110 by Sal73x @ 2018-09-22 16:50 | 1 | 2018-09-23 16:50 | mbethke ♦410 | Thanks for taking care of all these landuse classifications :) |
| 62469308 by Sal73x @ 2018-09-10 22:35 | 1 | 2018-09-19 13:28 | ff5722 ♦214 | You opened up the expressway for routing, but some exits still have construction tags, do you have information whether they are opened for traffic or not? |
| 2 | 2018-09-19 16:49 | Sal73x | The article below is saying that the Da Nang-Quang Ngai expressway was opened the 02/09/18. Unfortunately it does not clarify if all exits are complete:https://english.vov.vn/economy/da-nangquang-ngai-expressway-to-be-inaugurated-on-national-day-382346.vov | |
| 3 | 2018-09-19 17:28 | Sal73x | Just fond some info. Exits for Chu Lai and Dung Quat are still under construction and currently closed (they should be ready by end of Oct 18). | |
| 4 | 2018-09-19 18:29 | ff5722 ♦214 | Ok thanks, i thought maybe you forgot to open them. | |
| 55537093 by Sal73x @ 2018-01-18 01:32 | 1 | 2018-01-19 07:10 | stephankn ♦321 | You created a lot of unconnected roads to highway 24, eg node 5345963620.I hope it is due to you being in the process of making it separated by direction. Please check all the road connections to have a routable network. Thanks |
| 2 | 2018-01-21 12:29 | stephankn ♦321 | These are the unconnected ones. Are you in the process of adding a separate highway lane for 24 or shall I connect the to the existing road? I didn't want to interfere with ongoing mapping...node 5345965541node 5345963620node 5345965527node 5345965565node 5345965705node 5345965544... | |
| 55572129 by Sal73x @ 2018-01-19 08:54 | 1 | 2018-01-19 11:01 | sundew ♦73 | Hi Sal73x,can you confirm the way 554210863 is currently accessable to cross the Cambodian-Thai-border? The two public gps-tracks are of 01/2016 and the political situation around the Prasat Ta Muean Thom is changing from time to time. At my survey (2018-01-02) here all visible people came from ... |
| 55571592 by Sal73x @ 2018-01-19 08:28 | 1 | 2018-01-19 10:58 | sundew ♦73 | Hi Sal73x,are you sure, the way 554207412 is existing and accessable to cross the Thai-Cambodian border? I can not find GPS-Tracks here. This is very important to avoid false routing results using OSM ..Otherwise, please use access=no.Bye,sundew |
| 53096530 by Sal73x @ 2017-10-20 12:04 | 1 | 2017-10-20 22:56 | AkuAnakTimur ♦453 | Hello. Please use the latest DigitalGlobe layers and/or Esri World Imagery to improve this area. Bing imagery dates between 2005 and 2011 around here. |
| 48431870 by Sal73x @ 2017-05-05 16:35 | 1 | 2017-05-06 00:43 | AkuAnakTimur ♦453 | Google Earth imagery? If I recall correctly, using any kind of data from Google is refrained I'm afraid: https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/41362/and-again-using-google-satellite-images-to-align-my-paths |
| 2 | 2017-05-08 07:33 | Ahmad_Amsyar ♦6 | I fix it in changeset 48493228.I get to know what things that have change in this changeset from this website :http://osmhv.openstreetmap.de/changeset.jsp?id=48431870 | |
| 3 | 2017-05-08 07:39 | Ahmad_Amsyar ♦6 | For more simply view of changeset change :https://osmlab.github.io/changeset-map/#48431870 | |
| 47809250 by Sal73x @ 2017-04-15 09:50 | 1 | 2017-04-16 10:40 | sorcrosc ♦412 | please do not change tagging at your choice. leisure=racetrack is a proposed tag:https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/leisure%3Dracetrack |
| 2 | 2017-04-16 20:27 | sorcrosc ♦412 | Reverted.Please also start commenting your changesets. It's a pity a user with so many chengesets around the world doesn't give any information and reply to comments from other users | |
| 43572544 by Sal73x @ 2016-11-11 23:28 | 1 | 2016-11-12 15:22 | sorcrosc ♦412 | Running tracks are leisure=track.https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3DtrackPlease comment your changesetshttps://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments |
| 33404956 by Sal73x @ 2015-08-17 23:42 | 1 | 2015-08-18 09:49 | rooselol ♦2 | ولاية بركاء هي محافظة جنوب الباطنة في منطقة الباطنة في الجزء الشمالي من سلطنة عمان تبعد عن مسقط العاصمة حوالي 85كم. تقع على الشريط الساحلي لبحر عمان. يقّدر عدد سكانها ... |