Your Village Maps have been discussed with 74 replies of this contributorYour Village Maps have been discussed with 74 replies of this contributor| Changeset | # | Tmstmp UTC | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9690339 by Your Village Maps @ 2011-10-30 03:45 | 1 | 2024-11-12 17:16 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,632 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4517280 - what is your source of info about construction ever happening there? |
| 2 | 2024-11-16 02:25 | Your Village Maps | See my comment on your Note. | |
| 119044905 by Your Village Maps @ 2022-03-29 00:38 | 1 | 2024-02-26 10:10 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,632 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9619291124Is bicycle_parking=anchors really correct here? In case that it is a correct tagging - can you make photo and upload it to Wikimedia Commons or make it available on open license in other way?I want to add it to OSM Wiki documentation and so far I ... |
| 2 | 2024-02-26 20:37 | Your Village Maps | Thanks, Mateusz. I don't know why it says anchors. It should be stands. I will correct it. | |
| 50165488 by Your Village Maps @ 2017-07-10 04:48 | 1 | 2024-02-01 05:43 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,632 | Hello!There is a barrier=g on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4961054647/history that (if I checked correctly) was added in this editDo you know what is the meaning of this tag? Is it maybe supposed to be barrier=gate? |
| 2 | 2024-02-01 19:45 | Your Village Maps | Yes, that should be barrier=gate. I will fix it. | |
| 73000042 by Your Village Maps @ 2019-08-04 22:33 | 1 | 2021-08-04 17:38 | Allison P ♦1,136 | Is this service road really called Service Road? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/710760676#map=18/39.81950/-104.74976 |
| 2 | 2021-08-04 19:27 | Your Village Maps | No, I don't think so. I don't even remember seeing this. But I will double-check to be safe. | |
| 3 | 2021-08-04 21:33 | Your Village Maps | As Gaylord Rockies is a very recent development, it definitely could use some improved mapping; and more development around it is occurring now and will continue for some years I am sure.It looks like this is a "service road" or "access road" to the back side of the conventio... | |
| 4 | 2021-08-04 22:07 | Allison P ♦1,136 | The name tag is for names, not descriptions. Seems pretty straightforward to me. | |
| 5 | 2021-08-05 00:22 | Your Village Maps | I'm thinking that maybe there is a sign that actually says "Service Road".I'd have to check street view (I doubt it exists) or visit in person...if I can even get there...look like there are lift gates) | |
| 6 | 2021-08-05 00:30 | Allison P ♦1,136 | Even still, that doesn't indicate that's the name. Could just be a descriptive sign. | |
| 7 | 2023-10-29 03:17 | Allison P ♦1,136 | Coming back to this (as I see the name is still there) I see this name is definitely wrong: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/710765977 | |
| 8 | 2023-10-29 20:55 | Your Village Maps | I will remove the name tags from the tennis courts and basketball court. By the way, why isn't the hotel building rendering anymore?? I will contact the last person who edited it. | |
| 9 | 2023-10-29 21:15 | Allison P ♦1,136 | Members of the multipolygon are touching each other, which is invalid. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/492440869 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/492440734.Doesn't make sense to have a building way as an outer way for a building multipolygon. The issue is that types are being mixed u... | |
| 117927278 by Your Village Maps @ 2022-02-28 03:06 | 1 | 2023-10-14 03:20 | CurlingMan13 ♦2,042 | Any update on this "proposal" or whether construction is ever starting? Or is it still *just* a proposal with no action being done? |
| 2 | 2023-10-14 05:50 | Your Village Maps | Here is the MnDOT page about it:https://www.dot.state.mn.us/d6/projects/i90-hwy52/index.html | |
| 88534523 by Your Village Maps @ 2020-07-26 23:21 | 1 | 2023-09-14 10:08 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,632 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5132030279/history - have you meant shop=variety_store ?If yes, then I fixed it - if no, please let me know what you intended so it can be fixed |
| 2 | 2023-09-15 01:39 | Your Village Maps | I think that shop=variety_store is fine. | |
| 10295852 by Your Village Maps @ 2012-01-04 21:57 | 1 | 2023-08-27 06:30 | CurlingMan13 ♦2,042 | Very old changeset but I see you're still active in the area. The parking lots should not have names. |
| 2 | 2023-08-27 20:22 | Your Village Maps | I don't know what parking lots you're talking about. Did you already remove the names? (I don't see any names) | |
| 3 | 2023-08-27 20:26 | Your Village Maps | I did see two lots at Sargent's Gardens, north of this changeset, that had names and I have removed the names and set access for the employee parking lot to "private". | |
| 4 | 2023-08-27 21:13 | CurlingMan13 ♦2,042 | I went through and tried to get the ones I saw. So some are resolved.For example:https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/144177325My comment was more just a "Hey, heads up, when you're mapping in the area, keep an eye out for this." Area looks good otherwise, just a friendly note... | |
| 118679731 by Your Village Maps @ 2022-03-19 21:29 | 1 | 2023-06-24 13:19 | gpserror ♦221 | https://www.cbsnews.com/colorado/news/park-hill-golf-course-will-remain-golf-course-denver-voters-vote-no-2o/Ugh, will it or will it... |
| 2 | 2023-06-24 13:29 | gpserror ♦221 | https://kdvr.com/video/park-hill-to-stay-a-golf-course/8760072/ | |
| 3 | 2023-06-24 19:05 | Your Village Maps | I guess deleting the golf course features was premature? | |
| 17019290 by Your Village Maps @ 2013-07-20 04:15 | 1 | 2023-03-20 06:01 | Allison P ♦1,136 | I'm not sure that it's correct to tag ref=* on numbered streets in Grand Junction. I've never seen that done in any municipality. Do you have any insight? |
| 2 | 2023-03-20 19:08 | Your Village Maps | Sorry. I don't know. These seem to be or are comparable to County roads. I'm not local to GJ. Maybe if you found someone local; you could also ask the people at Kaart in GJ. | |
| 126673280 by Your Village Maps @ 2022-09-26 21:52 | 1 | 2022-09-27 12:42 | Eric Geiler - A&B Courier ♦33 | Thank you very much! |
| 126673196 by Your Village Maps @ 2022-09-26 21:48 | 1 | 2022-09-27 12:42 | Eric Geiler - A&B Courier ♦33 | Thank you very much! |
| 89218051 by Your Village Maps @ 2020-08-10 21:45 | 1 | 2022-08-28 10:55 | kepivar ♦45 | Restoration by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/125428795 |
| 2 | 2022-08-28 18:27 | Your Village Maps | What did you "restore"? | |
| 118075989 by Your Village Maps @ 2022-03-04 02:19 | 1 | 2022-08-13 21:24 | rjgambrel ♦27 | David, The section of trunk that you added expressway tags to doesn't seem to meet the US def of expressway which is a "slightly degraded" from motorway standards. In this stretch there are two at grade intersections 480th and 490th that I think break "slightly" Let me know ... |
| 2 | 2022-08-13 21:32 | Your Village Maps | This should definitely have the expressway=yes tag. I'm surprised you'd even question it, honestly. I don't know what else to say.... | |
| 3 | 2022-08-13 23:37 | rjgambrel ♦27 | The reason I questioned is the two at grade intersections. I understand that there is a plan to achieve full motorway or expressway by a certain date, but that date isn't here yet. I can only map what I see on the ground, not what the plan is. I will defer to your better judgement on this. I ma... | |
| 4 | 2022-08-14 01:26 | Your Village Maps | Well, it's just one tag and one without much consequence. I'm not sure when this short bit between actual motorway will be upgraded. I heard they want to build a new interchange on the north side of Pine Island or maybe at 500th Street (I think a 1/2 interchange based on the old at-grade c... | |
| 5 | 2022-08-14 20:24 | rjgambrel ♦27 | As I think I mentioned there are a number of mappers (myself included) who have jumped onto this new tag and are using it in various different ways. I tried to stop thinking about this for awhile, but am now ready to jump in. I will be putting something together for the channel in the next few days ... | |
| 6 | 2022-08-14 21:33 | Your Village Maps | I would just simply say that all "motorway islands" should have the tag expressway=yes UNLESS the road also loses its dual carriageway 4-lane divided highway characteristics. | |
| 118079558 by Your Village Maps @ 2022-03-04 06:22 | 1 | 2022-08-13 21:28 | rjgambrel ♦27 | This changeset has a section with even more at grade intersections. I believe it is not expressway. Let me know your thoughts. |
| 2 | 2022-08-13 21:37 | Your Village Maps | I definitely believe that this section also should have expressway=yes. Keep in mind that it is also becoming more and more like a motorway. In fact, the stretch from Maple Way (near County 1 Boulevard) to about 415th Street (near County 50 Boulevard) is having ALL at-grade intersections removed as ... | |
| 3 | 2022-08-13 21:39 | Your Village Maps | ...and the goal (part of MnDOT's "Toward Zero Deaths" program) is for the entirety of US 52 between I-90 and I-94 to be up to Interstate standards by no later than 2035. | |
| 119411406 by Your Village Maps @ 2022-04-07 05:14 | 1 | 2022-04-09 16:49 | user_5359 ♦19,376 | Hello! Please don't use website:<name of operator> and website:<name of the building>. Please user operator:website and website (see the newest version of "The Berkmann" building |
| 118531173 by Your Village Maps @ 2022-03-16 00:27 | 1 | 2022-03-16 12:06 | wireguy ♦548 | hi YVM, this change broke the relation for STEM Academy.Can you look into correcting it? |
| 2 | 2022-03-16 17:20 | Your Village Maps | Yes, I will do that. I think the best way would be to delete the relation and make a new one. I am not sure how that is done in iD? I know how to remove things from a relation, but not how to delete the relation itself. | |
| 3 | 2022-03-16 17:33 | wireguy ♦548 | way 1040681086 isn't closed. you could just remove it from the relation (and delete it), and then extend way 1040681089 to cover the rest of the parking. | |
| 114681846 by Your Village Maps @ 2021-12-08 01:31 | 1 | 2022-01-11 11:05 | kartler175 ♦556 | Why did you remove the from-members fom relations https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7044818 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7044819 |
| 2 | 2022-01-11 20:55 | Your Village Maps | If I understand you correctly,then I have just now corrected it. Please check my work. Thanks | |
| 107529380 by Your Village Maps @ 2021-07-07 04:02 | 1 | 2022-01-01 07:21 | arichnad ♦33 | Hello and thank you for your additions here.Can you tell me about bicycle=dismount? I don't think Reston or Virginia disallow bicycling on the sidewalk. Is that correct?Everything I see over at the wiki seems to discuss using bicycle=dismount for situations where it is illegal. https... |
| 2 | 2022-01-01 19:44 | Your Village Maps | I would go based on signs and in some cases, common sense. Bike symbol in red circle with red diagonal: bicycle=no. Any sign saying dismount: bicycle=dismount. The pedestrian area here to me is a commonsense bicycle=dismount as riding a bike there would not be socially responsible and maybe even dif... | |
| 3 | 2022-01-03 08:04 | arichnad ♦33 | "not be socially responsible and maybe even difficult"Ah I think I understand what you mean. If it's in the middle of the day on a weekend, or if there's otherwise a bunch of pedestrians, I agree, nobody would ever consider biking here. However, I don't think it's ... | |
| 107730253 by Your Village Maps @ 2021-07-10 00:55 | 1 | 2021-11-23 14:38 | Enock4seth ♦548 | Thanks for mapping and `fixme`. Kindly avoid adding random names from other streets if you don't know. How did you come up with naming some road segments here as "George Walker Bush Highway" see https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/963065590/history ? |
| 2 | 2021-11-23 19:25 | Your Village Maps | I believe I put the source of the information you're looking for in the source= tag. I don't normally map in this country, but I saw a post in a highway-related group on Facebook about the new interchange, and I decided I would help with mapping it. I believe the "George W Bush" ... | |
| 3 | 2021-11-23 20:24 | Enock4seth ♦548 | Thanks for the clarification and taking the time to help map. I haven't seen any information in "source=*". "George W Bush" name mentioned in the articles/news publications I trust didn't refer to the interchange as being named so, but one of the roads nearby (South) th... | |
| 102891276 by Your Village Maps @ 2021-04-13 23:20 | 1 | 2021-05-30 19:53 | fishcharlie ♦12 | The Target (node 2698621578) is not currently open. I don't think this is the correct tagging because of that. It gives the impression that this store is open, which it is not. |
| 2 | 2021-05-30 20:06 | Your Village Maps | I have edited it, adding:opening_date = 2021-07check_date = 2021-05-30 | |
| 102898526 by Your Village Maps @ 2021-04-14 04:40 | 1 | 2021-04-18 10:18 | user_5359 ♦19,376 | Hello! Please use light:count instead of light_count. |
| 2 | 2021-04-18 19:31 | Your Village Maps | Did you correct them or do I need to do that? | |
| 81379386 by Your Village Maps @ 2020-02-24 00:39 | 1 | 2021-03-28 17:44 | SherbetS ♦155 | Hi, please use man_made=mast + tower:type=communication for communication masts. |
| 96163604 by Your Village Maps @ 2020-12-21 04:10 | 1 | 2020-12-22 11:03 | SekeRob ♦1,433 | HiCould you please use rotor:diameter instead of rotor_diameter. Tag info leads the way on what is good and what's not. See https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=rotor:diameterthx |
| 2 | 2020-12-22 20:28 | Your Village Maps | Oops. I was using Potlatch rather than iD, so had to type in that key, and I remembered it wrong. I will certainly remember it now, and I will go back over recent work and correct those too.By the way, are there other rotor:* keys I don't know about? If there are, then that key makes good s... | |
| 3 | 2020-12-23 14:47 | SekeRob ♦1,433 | Hi,TagInfo is easily searchable on what is and what's not favoured. Here all with 'rotor' in it https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=rotor As you see, someone also used diameter:rotorBTW, I did a few mass corrections on the rotor_diameter key, about 3 times, so think you... | |
| 89998359 by Your Village Maps @ 2020-08-27 03:36 | 1 | 2020-09-05 04:13 | Baloo Uriza ♦2,110 | On this motorway portion, you think a proposed=motorway, highway=trunk would be a good compromise? |
| 2 | 2020-09-05 22:02 | Your Village Maps | Not really. This is a long stretch (pretty sure it's more than 10 miles) of continuously completely controlled access highway (motorway). I also checked Rand McNally road atlas; I tend to respect their take, and they have this stretch mapped as freeway. And I'm sure the long-range plan is ... | |
| 3 | 2020-09-05 22:03 | Your Village Maps | It's true that there is only ONE actual interchange on this stretch, but the entire length now mapped as motorway has all the motorway features (overpasses and underpasses of lesser roads, dead-end country roads that used to cross the highway, etc.) | |
| 4 | 2020-09-05 22:05 | Your Village Maps | And I did intentionally leave that bit of it just east of Southeast 100th Avenue as Trunk as it has those characteristics (left and right turn lanes, so part of the intersection). That's why I didn't map it as motorway all the way to Southeast 100th Avenue. | |
| 5 | 2020-09-05 22:07 | Your Village Maps | ditto for the east end of motorway (just west of Southwest 120 Avenue)By the way, I'm also wondering about name = Cannonball Stageline. Street view doesn't show that on any signs that I saw, and business addresses usually have "US-54" or "US Highway 54" or something... | |
| 6 | 2020-09-05 22:08 | Your Village Maps | Maybe it should be noname = yes, and alt_name = Cannonball Stageline? | |
| 7 | 2020-09-05 22:14 | Baloo Uriza ♦2,110 | Checking Rand McNally is just a feedback loop, their source is OpenStreetmap.alt_name isn't compatible with noname=yes.I don't see the characteristics you describe out of line with highway=trunk *especially* given the arbitrary cut to motorway at the locations you gave...there'... | |
| 8 | 2020-09-05 22:16 | Baloo Uriza ♦2,110 | Doublechecked the name, looks like it got renamed in 2017 by the Kansas legislature. I'm disinclined to remove name=* on this for that reason. | |
| 9 | 2020-09-06 01:11 | Your Village Maps | You said: "there's not a reason to step up for one exit with intersections on either end." I would agree if there were intersections just to each side of the interchange. But there's more than 10 miles of controlled access (overpasses, underpasses, dead ends) which has all the ch... | |
| 10 | 2020-09-06 01:11 | Your Village Maps | No problem with the name then. | |
| 11 | 2020-09-06 01:12 | Your Village Maps | I was not aware that Rand McNally was using OpenStreetMap data. And they've been around a LONG time, way before OSM came along. | |
| 12 | 2020-09-08 15:42 | Baloo Uriza ♦2,110 | I honestly don't think length comes into play here since it terminates with intersections on either end. If there was one more grade separated change, I think we'd be on the same page for this one.Yeah, Rand McNally switched to using OSM 5-10 years ago instead of doing their own carto... | |
| 65057897 by Your Village Maps @ 2018-11-30 21:00 | 1 | 2020-06-16 03:57 | compdude ♦169 | Is this road still closed? |
| 2 | 2020-06-16 20:00 | Your Village Maps | No, it isn't. Sorry I forgot to change it back. | |
| 3 | 2020-06-16 20:00 | Your Village Maps | I will take care of it right now.Thanks | |
| 81138386 by Your Village Maps @ 2020-02-17 22:07 | 1 | 2020-05-04 21:09 | chachafish ♦462 | Howdy :) I noticed here you changed the name of a road to "CLOSED". I looked through the OSM wiki and didn't see any reference to changing a name of a street like this based on its construction status. Is there somewhere on the wiki that supports changing the name of the street like t... |
| 2 | 2020-05-04 21:26 | Your Village Maps | I didn't check the Wiki before temporarily changing the street names. I just thought it was the best way to inform people. Trying to keep up with all the changes in this project has been almost impossible and I'm usually running behind. Would you like to take over for me? Let me know!\... | |
| 3 | 2020-05-04 22:24 | chachafish ♦462 | Hi :) Well, I don't know that I want to "take over", but I'll be happy to take a look at the area and update things as I go along. I was pretty much leaving it to you since you seemed to have a pretty good handle on it all. Cheers :) | |
| 4 | 2020-05-04 22:52 | Your Village Maps | I don't know how good of a handle I have on it. It's the most complex road construction project I've ever dealt with in OSM. When closures are only for a few days or even a few weeks, I don't change access to "no" or highway to "construction", but if it's... | |
| 5 | 2020-05-04 23:20 | phidauex ♦194 | Given the complexity of the changes I think a little extra verbosity is warranted here, just my two cents. | |
| 6 | 2020-05-05 03:16 | Your Village Maps | phidauex, sounds like you have some questions? Please do ask. Thanks | |
| 7 | 2020-05-05 03:56 | phidauex ♦194 | Sorry, no questions, but I can see how you read it! I was just adding that, given the situation, I think the extra "closed" text indicators in the name field, while a bit unconventional, are an OK way of communicating what is going on with the construction, given the complexity of the proj... | |
| 21946672 by Your Village Maps @ 2014-04-26 04:38 | 1 | 2020-04-28 00:52 | Allison P ♦1,136 | Why did you abbreviate the direction of East Cedar Place? Directions and road name types are supposed to be fully expanded. |
| 2 | 2020-04-28 02:58 | Your Village Maps | I must have done that back in the "old days" before I knew about that. I had a bad habit back then of abbreviating names for short streets, so that the street name would render better for very short streets. | |
| 84175796 by Your Village Maps @ 2020-04-27 06:44 | 1 | 2020-04-27 16:08 | chachafish ♦462 | Howdy :) Per your fixme request (Has name been changed to Martin Luther King Jr Blvd?), a recent photo indicates this street name has not changed. Why do you think the name has changed? https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=DMBszRVQ-Omiv5PS4vQY5A&focus=photo&lat=39.75883805555556&lng=-104.... |
| 2 | 2020-04-27 20:47 | Your Village Maps | I thought it might have in order for the name to remain the same as people drove eastward. I didn't actually check it. Next time I'm up that way I will.I'm also thinking that MLK Jr Blvd (previously Havana Way) might be entirely dual carriageway now between Ironton and Moline. | |
| 3 | 2020-04-27 20:50 | chachafish ♦462 | 👍🏽 | |
| 81841333 by Your Village Maps @ 2020-03-05 22:32 | 1 | 2020-04-16 19:14 | Theodin ♦21 | Hi fellow mapper!Today i stumbled over your tagess way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/778704015Maybe you can add the missing tags, as it is unusable otherwise.Regards, Theodin |
| 82275770 by Your Village Maps @ 2020-03-16 22:19 | 1 | 2020-04-16 19:11 | Theodin ♦21 | Hi fellow mapper!Today i stumbled over your tagess way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/781938297#map=17/38.05395/-106.01697Maybe you can add the missing tags, as it is unusable otherwise.Regards, Theodin |
| 72575551 by Your Village Maps @ 2019-07-23 20:40 | 1 | 2019-07-28 17:10 | Stretch Longfellow ♦92 | Highway 10 should not be a trunk road. Half of it is only a two-lane highway, and it does not serve the function of a trunk road by OSM's definition. NDOT currently has it marked as the equivalent of a secondary road. Please revert this road. As far as I can tell, the rest looks good. Thank yo... |
| 2 | 2019-07-31 23:15 | Your Village Maps | Done some thinking about this. We might differ in our opinions. For one thing, I think that NE 10 and US 183 should both be primary between I-80 and NE 2 and NE 44 should also be primary between I-80 and US 6/US 34. I do agree with US 30 being secondary due to its lowered importance being close to a... | |
| 3 | 2019-08-03 15:00 | Stretch Longfellow ♦92 | I'm not following the state highways being primary, based on OSM's standards and the amount of traffic they carry, especially because they don't connect major towns. I can see an argument for US 183, as even though it is a very low traffic road (fun fact: it was the last US Route to g... | |
| 4 | 2019-08-03 15:03 | Stretch Longfellow ♦92 | I should also point out that I am the one who originally drew N-10 onto this map a few years back, and had it as trunk to US 30, and I totally get what you're saying. But I'm more inclined to go with what the actual engineers and OSM say than personal preference. | |
| 65057115 by Your Village Maps @ 2018-11-30 20:35 | 1 | 2019-07-27 04:21 | eteela ♦1 | All Glen Highway closures have been repaired months ago. If you are going to add temporary note of a closure, please make sure to remove it in a timely fashion. |
| 31705537 by Your Village Maps @ 2015-06-03 23:46 | 1 | 2019-06-20 04:00 | HubMiner ♦271 | Hello,I am going through correcting opening_hours in Denver area, using Osmose, and it is showing warnings on places that you edited. A quick hint - if you are not sure whether opening_hours format is correct, you can check with https://openingh.openstreetmap.de/evaluation_tool/Happy mapp... |
| 2 | 2019-06-20 05:07 | Your Village Maps | Yes, I recently learned about my errors re: opening_hours, mainly the punctuation.How do you use the evaluation tool? | |
| 3 | 2019-06-21 04:38 | HubMiner ♦271 | Usage:1) enter value in "value for opening_hours"2) observe proposed correction in "prettified opening_hours value" field; if you double click it, it will replace original value.3) visually check the graph (very helpful for complex expressions)4) possibly click +-1 day bu... | |
| 68903659 by Your Village Maps @ 2019-04-05 01:17 | 1 | 2019-04-15 11:29 | mueschel ♦6,568 | Hi,what is the meaning of the "alt_" keys on this node? If there are two amenities, they have to be mapped using separated notes. The 'alt_' tags are not recognized by any software.https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6384581039Jan |
| 2 | 2019-04-15 21:50 | Your Village Maps | I combined them this way because they use the same space/unit. I have just now edited and have split them up. Many years ago I came across a combination shoe store & ice cream shop. I'm serious. They also sold cookies. | |
| 51125374 by Your Village Maps @ 2017-08-15 00:24 | 1 | 2019-02-11 02:23 | omgitsgela ♦26 | When you're adding opening_hours values, please make sure you're using the standard format as described in the wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hoursSpecifically, you're leaving out the colons, and you're using commas for separators when semicolons are sta... |
| 2 | 2019-02-11 22:46 | Your Village Maps | Thanks for the "heads up". I must have picked up this bad habit from others' work rather than studying the information in the Wiki. I will use ; instead of , now between days/sets of days. | |
| 65059249 by Your Village Maps @ 2018-11-30 21:55 | 1 | 2019-01-31 00:02 | Polarbear ♦940 | Is this section still closed?https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/651233065 |
| 61997984 by Your Village Maps @ 2018-08-26 03:07 | 1 | 2018-09-14 07:43 | lorandr_telenav ♦26 | Hi. I saw you edited our signpost edits.We've benn working following this rules. What it's you opinion about it? Is there anyting we did not take into consideration? Thank youhttps://www.mapbox.com/mapping/mapping-for-navigation/adding-exit-and-destination-signs/http://wiki.op... |
| 2 | 2018-09-14 22:12 | Your Village Maps | I've been doing a lot of editing on and near CO 470 (C-470) lately and noticed most Exit Numbers were missing. Confusing story: a company contracting with CDOT added a bunch of blue services signs a few years ago (the ones with the paid advertiser logos on them) and they all had Exit Number t... | |
| 3 | 2018-09-17 08:32 | lorandr_telenav ♦26 | Hi.Thanks for your response,the problem was with the tag: destination:ref=* , you moved it to name=* which is not correct.Can you please take a look on your edits (for example here: 39.726204, -105.2021818)and change them on the correct tag?Thank you! | |
| 61212939 by Your Village Maps @ 2018-07-31 02:06 | 1 | 2018-08-02 16:32 | user_5359 ♦19,376 | Hello! Short comment to the introducing of important_note. Please read the definition of note. Your tag "note" = "updated 2018/07/30 by Your Village Maps" doesn't match this definition (and can be found also in the history of the objects). Please use note instead the new key... |
| 2 | 2018-08-03 22:17 | Your Village Maps | I have taken care of it. | |
| 61218062 by Your Village Maps @ 2018-07-31 07:08 | 1 | 2018-08-02 07:28 | mueschel ♦6,568 | Hi,you added several long notes to all these objects - this information doesn't belong there, but to the changeset. Could you have a look and remove those tags? E.g.important_note=DigitalGlobe-Standard lines up best and image quality is good; Bing is the most current but does not line up ... |
| 2 | 2018-08-03 22:16 | Your Village Maps | I have taken care of it. | |
| 57678241 by Your Village Maps @ 2018-03-31 02:51 | 1 | 2018-06-08 12:39 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,632 | Can you look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1419840 ? |
| 2 | 2018-06-08 20:44 | Your Village Maps | Building is still there but appears abandoned. I probably shouldn't have tagged it as such, but didn't know of a better alternative other than building=yes. Can you suggest something else? I also assume it will be demolished eventually. | |
| 3 | 2018-06-08 21:04 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,632 | how severely it is damaged?Is it so destroyed that it is not a building anymore but rather a ruin?If it still building then building=yes is perfectly fine. | |
| 4 | 2018-06-08 21:20 | Your Village Maps | Yes, it is still a building but has boarded up windows and uncut grass and weeds all around it. I assume it's just a matter of time until it's gone. Maybe they'll even re-align South Wabash Street, although they probably like the sharp curves because they make people slow down by th... | |
| 16219190 by Your Village Maps @ 2013-05-21 05:17 | 1 | 2018-05-04 09:58 | marinad_telenav ♦10 | Hi. I saw that you added the road name for some of the roads ( Melting Snow Way).Do you have any information about the roads in this area? Because I saw on satellite imagery that are now finished but I don't have the information about the road name |
| 2 | 2018-05-04 21:45 | Your Village Maps | Wow. That was almost 5 years ago. Time flies. I live in far SE Denver and sometimes make trips to Castle Rock for mapping and recreation. I don't specifically recall this street, but I probably saw it when I was there. | |
| 3 | 2018-05-07 06:26 | marinad_telenav ♦10 | Hi. I know it was 5 year ago, but I was thinking if you are a local maybe you know some available open source data. | |
| 4 | 2018-05-07 20:45 | Your Village Maps | I don't really remember that particular street. I might have seen a street sign; sometimes they get put up even before the street opens. Or maybe Douglas County GIS. | |
| 57072832 by Your Village Maps @ 2018-03-11 04:29 | 1 | 2018-03-12 14:43 | chachafish ♦462 | Greetings, again :) I was chasing down some OSM Inspector-tagged errors and came across the stand-alone address nodes you created (Addison at Cherry Creek Apartment Homes). I didn't quite understand why they were tagged as errors, so I contacted the website's team. Sorry to modify your wor... |
| 2 | 2018-03-12 19:18 | Your Village Maps | Did you also notice when they were created and that only a few of the apartment buildings in that complex had them? That's because it's a work in progress. Please check with me before deleting or editing things I am in the middle of working on. | |
| 3 | 2018-03-13 02:01 | chachafish ♦462 | Hello, again. I'll be happy to check with you before making any corrections. No problem. Are you still working on Hampden Village? It looks like the last edit there was 25 days ago. Cheers :) | |
| 4 | 2018-03-13 03:34 | Your Village Maps | I had finished Hampden Village; however, I think I will re-do a bit: delete addr:unit key and add addr:housename to replace it. From what I've seen that's preferred. Right? And it certainly looks better when rendered. | |
| 5 | 2018-03-13 15:35 | chachafish ♦462 | I wish I could say I was an expert and I knew what is preferred, but I'm just learning with some aspects of addresses. However, yes, a stand-alone address that isn't a building or isn't physically attached to a building always pops up as an error. If you're ever curious to see, j... | |
| 6 | 2018-03-14 18:06 | Your Village Maps | Could you please tell me exactly what is wrong with this node, which I recently added? Note that it is connected to another similar node (addresses of end-unit townhomes). I also had started adding a few of the buildings in this development.Node: 5474276570no_feature_tag_nodes?????I g... | |
| 7 | 2018-03-15 01:57 | chachafish ♦462 | Hi again :), No problem. If you go here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_Inspector/Views/Tagging#Name.2Fdescription_without_feature_tagsThis link lays out the problem. The node is flagged as an error because the "key" has no "feature" associated with it. A feature could... | |
| 8 | 2018-03-15 02:02 | chachafish ♦462 | Again, sorry to bother you with all this, but I see you are an avid mapper. I could just go around fixing errors, but I assume you'd like to be able to recognize errors before they're made. The knowledge certainly helps my own mapping skills a great deal ;) | |
| 9 | 2018-03-15 03:40 | Your Village Maps | Well, if you ask me the Address IS the feature. A row of townhomes is considered one building but has a range of addresses from one end of the building to the other. Based on what I read about addr:interpolation, this should not be a problem. And the rendering is what I would expect and prefer. Do ... | |
| 10 | 2018-03-15 14:34 | chachafish ♦462 | I see what you're saying, but I can also see the Wiki's point of view. Your solution for the address interpolation is spot-on. The address part is excellent. Now the nodes need to be attached to a structure. That would mean either, a) creating a building and attaching the nodes to it or, b... | |
| 56251456 by Your Village Maps @ 2018-02-10 22:22 | 1 | 2018-02-19 01:53 | chachafish ♦462 | Hey, nice work on these addresses. Tagging the addresses with an interpolation seems to have done the trick. The lines don't pop up as an error any longer. Cheers :) |
| 12991447 by Your Village Maps @ 2012-09-05 06:44 | 1 | 2018-02-14 17:35 | neuhausr ♦331 | Since it's been a few years since you added it to the name, wanted to check if County Road 13 is still a US 14 detour? |
| 2 | 2018-02-14 21:09 | Your Village Maps | No, it isn't a detour and hasn't been for a good while. I must have overlooked those short segments around the interchange when I reverted the detour back to normal. I will take care of this right now. Thanks | |
| 55370806 by Your Village Maps @ 2018-01-12 06:09 | 1 | 2018-02-08 02:03 | chachafish ♦462 | Thanks for fixing the previous changeset. While I have you, just so you know, there are a lot of errors popping up on OSM Inspector around the corner of South Yosemite Street and East Mansfield Avenue. There are a lot of buildings here that have a total of about 100 untagged lines on them. Cheers :) |
| 2 | 2018-02-08 03:20 | Your Village Maps | Yes, that's my recent work. Did you take a closer look? If I did not do this correctly, please instruct me on the proper method. At each end of each untagged line is a node with address information (lowest and highest street address (addr:housenumber) for each building of town homes). I had... | |
| 3 | 2018-02-08 04:45 | chachafish ♦462 | Well, I'm certainly no expert when it comes to this. I was just looking over flagged errors that brought up some untagged lines. The way I handle multiple addresses for one building is like this example: 2138 Eliot Street, Denver. But, there are certainly many different ways to handle this; I t... | |
| 31652014 by Your Village Maps @ 2015-06-02 01:06 | 1 | 2018-02-06 02:10 | chachafish ♦462 | Greetings, I was reviewing some OSM Inspector-tagged errors and I came across a line you created encircling a large residential area. Is this something you meant to finish, but didn't get back to? It's the area centered roughly at South Lewiston Street and East Iliff Avenue. Thanks, just c... |
| 2 | 2018-02-06 20:17 | Your Village Maps | Did you delete this line? Because I didn't see it. It was most likely going to be landuse = residential, including name of development. | |
| 3 | 2018-02-07 01:00 | chachafish ♦462 | It's still there. Look at East Iliff Avenue, east of South Chambers Road. Just west of South Buckley Road. Or, look to the right of Yale Elementary School :) | |
| 4 | 2018-02-07 05:07 | Your Village Maps | I see it now. I didn't check it in an editor before so it wasn't visible.It was originally created on 18th October 2011 by mapper 42429 and edited by me in 2015. I had intended to split it into two areas, each side of Iliff Avenue, but didn't finish. I have now finished it.... | |
| 24195592 by Your Village Maps @ 2014-07-17 07:25 | 1 | 2018-01-13 13:46 | chachafish ♦462 | Greetings, I was reviewing some OSM Inspector-tagged errors and came across this area. It seems a building was created between these medical buildings. I think you meant to create an area of grass? I thought I'd give you the opportunity to correct this yourself, since I'm not sure what the... |
| 2 | 2018-01-13 21:45 | Your Village Maps | It would help if I knew what way(s) you are talking about. So much in this little area. | |
| 3 | 2018-01-13 21:52 | Your Village Maps | Wait - I think I see what you're talking about - way 293145527 - edited 3 days ago by SaturatedPhat, changeset 55338668 "Added park land". Obviously this is wrong. It should not be a building; it also should not be leisure=park. Also 3 days ago SaturatedPhat added a large polygon leis... | |
| 4 | 2018-01-14 01:37 | chachafish ♦462 | Hello, yes, that's it. I mistakenly thought SaturatedPhat had created the building. I agree the area is neither a building nor a park. However, grass would seem appropriate. :) | |
| 5 | 2018-01-14 02:23 | Your Village Maps | I have edited the area and left a comment on SaturatedPhat's changeset. Also found more new construction to add. | |
| 6 | 2018-01-14 02:46 | chachafish ♦462 | Thanks | |
| 48960656 by Your Village Maps @ 2017-05-25 00:49 | 1 | 2018-01-02 22:09 | compdude ♦169 | Has this road reopened yet? |
| 2 | 2018-01-02 23:18 | Your Village Maps | Yes it has re-opened, apparently around 10/31/2017. I thought I was subscribed to this area's MnDOT construction emails. I guess maybe not. I will fix it now. | |
| 51867680 by Your Village Maps @ 2017-09-09 01:14 | 1 | 2017-09-13 07:13 | rickmastfan67 ♦234 | Heads up, but I-87 will only go as far as the US-64 Business / NC-97 interchange (New Bern Aveune).http://surewhynotnow.blogspot.com/2017/09/goodbye-interstate-495-hello-interstate.htmlhttp://www.newsobserver.com/news/traffic/article171521622.html |
| 2 | 2017-09-13 07:14 | rickmastfan67 ♦234 | The FHWA hasn't approved it any farther than that yet. | |
| 3 | 2017-09-15 02:39 | Your Village Maps | I had just heard about the change from I-495 to I-87 and wanted to make sure OSM showed the change. Mapper sprjus4 beat me to it by one day. However, there were a few segments that they missed, so I updated those to I-87 also and added oldref = I 495 to all segments, which they did not do. I did rea... | |
| 4 | 2017-09-15 02:49 | Your Village Maps | Follow-up to my comment just posted a few minutes ago above:I have also now discovered that another mapper, Silvertronica, has edited this motorway 4 days ago, extending the stretch labeled with ref = I 87 from Buffalo Creek (where sprjus4 had it end) to Little River, a few miles further NE of t... | |
| 48960968 by Your Village Maps @ 2017-05-25 01:30 | 1 | 2017-06-10 20:36 | FTA ♦201 | Hey!I noticed you were adding some construction detour information. We recently ran into this problem in Madison, WI, with a bridge that was dismantled and rebuilt. A tidy solution we had was to tag the roads as highway=construction to indicate that fact (and also show up nicely on rendering). Jus... |
| 48901339 by Your Village Maps @ 2017-05-22 23:29 | 1 | 2017-05-23 17:37 | neuhausr ♦331 | I see that you've added local_ref to some of the bus stops, but it seems like you're using it incorrectly. According to the wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:local_ref) local_ref should be used to tag one platform within a station. You are using it for the bus route numbers, wh... |
| 2 | 2017-05-24 00:19 | Your Village Maps | Looks like you're right. And so I have learned yet another detail about something I assumed was correct for so long. Openstreetmap really needs to develop one or more online courses for new (and old!) mappers to help get more people "on the same page" regarding things like this. Also,... | |
| 3 | 2017-05-25 15:15 | neuhausr ♦331 | I am constantly learning new details too! :) There is an effort to move to a different tagging scheme for transit, so that doesn't make it any easier. The new scheme distinguishes between the bus stop location where one waits (public_transport=platform) and the place where the bus stops on the ... | |
| 20277472 by Your Village Maps @ 2014-01-30 05:24 | 1 | 2017-04-18 16:13 | neuhausr ♦331 | I noticed your very detailed work on the golf course--nice! However, it's tagging for the renderer to use highway=path for the golf=hole way. |
| 45382068 by Your Village Maps @ 2017-01-23 01:02 | 1 | 2017-02-02 13:53 | maxerickson ♦234 | Hi-The tag "access=yes" on this footway:https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/45098306Doesn't really mean anything. The default access= state for any highway is yes.horse=no and motor_vehicle=no are also quite redundant on a way tagged highway=cycleway/footway/path (as the... |
| 40050901 by Your Village Maps @ 2016-06-16 01:40 | 1 | 2016-06-18 11:07 | mueschel ♦6,568 | Hi,the tag "lanes:turn" is not used anywhere else. I guess you want to tag a center turn lane? This can be done using common tagging:lanes:both_ways = 1turn:lanes:both_ways = leftCheers, Jan |
| 2 | 2016-06-18 20:48 | Your Village Maps | Thanks for the info. I shouldn't have assumed a tag w/o checking the wiki. I did check it and I'm a bit confused about what is the correct method for a 2-lane street with a center left-turn "chicken" lane. You gave me two possibilities; is there a difference? I've also seen ... | |
| 3 | 2016-06-18 21:20 | mueschel ♦6,568 | It's the combination of both tags - the first says "there is a lane used for both directions" and the second one clarifies "this lane is used to turn left".The xzy:lanes = a | b | c is used to describe if lanes used in the same direction have different properties. This doe... | |
| 4 | 2016-06-18 21:27 | Your Village Maps | OK. Thanks for clarifying. I've seen some places (not many) where a busy street (say 2 lanes in each direction with a median) has multiple turn lanes at an intersection with another busy street and lanes=2 changes to lanes=5 with 2 left turn lanes and 1 right turn lane; I haven't chosen to... | |
| 5 | 2016-06-18 21:47 | mueschel ♦6,568 | That would beturn:lanes = left|left|through|through|rightJust list the different turns for each lane separated by | | |
| 6 | 2016-06-18 21:52 | Your Village Maps | Thanks! You've been a great help. Do you live in Lincoln? I live in Denver, but I was born in Lincoln. | |
| 7 | 2016-06-18 22:08 | mueschel ♦6,568 | No, I live a bit to the east... 7500km to the east to be precise. If you have further questions, feel free to send me a message.Jan | |
| 8 | 2016-06-19 23:23 | Your Village Maps | One thing I'm still not quite clear on: take a typical 3-lane 2-way street like we've been discussing, tag it like you said....but in the areas where it crosses another street (usually tertiary or higher and usually with traffic signals), that center lane becomes a left-turn lane in the d... | |
| 9 | 2016-06-20 20:35 | mueschel ♦6,568 | You got a private message - I think that is too much to discuss in changeset comments. | |
| 34562987 by Your Village Maps @ 2015-10-11 06:28 | 1 | 2015-10-28 16:00 | GerdP ♦2,751 | please review: some roads were taggedhighway=l I've corrected that to residential, seehttps://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/34929740 |
| 11197004 by Your Village Maps @ 2012-04-06 05:55 | 1 | 2015-08-04 13:04 | SomeoneElse ♦13,368 | Re http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/158177904/history , what is a "building=hut; designation=shed"? "designation" is supposed to be for legal classifications (see http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:designation?uselang=en-GB ). |
| 2 | 2015-08-04 20:15 | Your Village Maps | True, SomeoneElse. These are from my earliest days as an OSM mapper. I haven't done edits like this in a long time now. Today I just leave them as "generic" buildings. | |
| 28814077 by Your Village Maps @ 2015-02-13 06:39 | 1 | 2015-05-12 15:35 | 715371 ♦34 | Hi, I disagree to tag roundabouts as highway=trunk. It is like a crossing: You gonna have to stop, if there is a car on the road - which is the usual case. I am undecided about the road in between the two roundabouts, because its still built without any crossings. We may see. |
| 29150977 by Your Village Maps @ 2015-02-28 08:46 | 1 | 2015-04-17 06:33 | rickmastfan67 ♦234 | I'm curious, but why did you in this changeset (and others) change how the ref tag for PA 5 Alternate was tagged? In 99.9% of PA, we do it as 'PA # Alternate', not 'ALT PA #'. |
| 2 | 2015-04-17 21:02 | Your Village Maps | Because it wasn't rendered using the standard OSM rendering; it only showed up with the MapQuest Open renderer. | |
| 3 | 2015-04-17 21:06 | Your Village Maps | By the way, I just tried to switch to view using MQO and it was blank (light grey). Cycle, Transport, and Humanitarian show up, but not MQO. Weird. I did check a number of times after I made the edits to make sure the PA highway shields for the Alternate PA 5 stayed the same, and they did. | |
| 4 | 2015-04-17 21:55 | rickmastfan67 ♦234 | Still, wouldn't changing the tagging for the OSM rendering (Mapnik) be considered 'tagging for the renderer'? There are other apps like routers that rely on the data in the 'ref' tag. Some of them might not understand the abbreviation and when speaking it, confuse the driv... | |
| 5 | 2015-04-17 21:58 | rickmastfan67 ♦234 | Even for 'business' highways in PA, we don't abbreviate the text as 'bus' (just so Mapnik renders it), but spell it out fully. | |
| 6 | 2015-04-17 22:01 | rickmastfan67 ♦234 | Maybe submit a ticket over @ https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto for them to bump up the number of rendered characters by 3 or 4. I know 'ref=US 19 Truck" renders just fine, and that's 3 less characters then "ref=PA 5 Alternate". |