Zverik have been discussed with 104 replies of this contributorZverik have been discussed with 104 replies of this contributor| Changeset | # | Tmstmp UTC | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 136620174 by Zverik @ 2023-05-27 11:07 | 1 | 2025-04-28 17:25 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,593 | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10931433254/history has amenity = fixme that was added in this editWhat kind of object is here? Is it a shop? What kind of a shop? (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop ) |
| 139664131 by Zverik @ 2023-08-09 14:45 | 1 | 2025-04-16 07:59 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,593 | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11101873093/history has fixme:type = shop that was added in this editWhat kind of shop is here?See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop for common values - is any of them fitting? |
| 2 | 2025-04-23 11:30 | Zverik | I saw that's a shop, but could not determine a type, so I left it TBC. Thank you for reminding me! I've googled around, and decided to go with office=company, since I still have no idea :) | |
| 147446417 by Zverik @ 2024-02-14 11:24 | 1 | 2024-12-12 13:38 | Pikse ♦199 | This reasoning sounds quite arbitrary to me. Many smaller roads with much less traffic also have bus routes. Also what degree of transit traffic is necessary so that the road has to "stand out"?General convention followed elsewhere outside of cities, and as as currently documented[1], ... |
| 2 | 2024-12-12 13:53 | Zverik | Hmmm. "five digit number => tertiary" is a fun rule that's easy to implement and validate, but what are you expecting to achieve with it, other than theoretical correctness (which in carthography is useless, as you might have experienced).I made it secondary, because of its hei... | |
| 3 | 2024-12-12 17:29 | Pikse ♦199 | The way I see is that the main benefit of mapping highway=* values to certain well-known/official classification is that this way we have a clear criteria on when to use certain highway=* value. Also roads on Maa-amet maps are given prominence/stand out based on the same classification of nation... | |
| 143532120 by Zverik @ 2023-11-02 13:45 | 1 | 2024-05-20 17:27 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,593 | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11307570362/history has shop = oil that was added in this editIs it a shop selling edible oil? Engine oil? Fuel oil? Something else?Is this shop even existing? Their website is down now |
| 2 | 2024-05-20 17:41 | Zverik | Hi Mateusz! The shop is there, it sells edible oils, cold-pressed from seeds. Just not olive oil :)Basically like this https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:craft%3Doil_mill but with an oil-pressing machine instead of a mill. | |
| 3 | 2024-05-20 17:41 | Zverik | (source: my wife sometimes works shifts there) | |
| 4 | 2024-05-20 18:48 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,593 | I retagged it to shop=edible_oil (shop=oil was also used for fuel oil and so on, though how to tag such specialistic food shops is not so well solved) | |
| 141555394 by Zverik @ 2023-09-21 11:49 | 1 | 2024-01-20 16:22 | qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq ♦497 | Hi, do you happen to know anything about https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11207548631 ?As I understand it's an outpost/pickup point for 01.ee, ox.ee and pets.eeI've noticed that they have a large selection of pets.ee stuff on shelves which you can probably buy on the spot, so may... |
| 2 | 2024-01-20 19:21 | Zverik | Yeah I guess that makes sense. I've seen the other links there, but outside of that nothing gave up it's not a single shop. I obviously didn't do an online check. | |
| 3 | 2024-01-21 10:57 | qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq ♦497 | Thanks. I've split the shop. | |
| 130961188 by Zverik @ 2023-01-06 20:12 | 1 | 2023-09-23 09:12 | qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq ♦497 | Hi, is cycling explicitly forbidden here https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1124645979 or is it just very hard? |
| 2 | 2023-09-23 11:31 | Zverik | Come on, it's a bog. Nothing is forbidden. This is a very narrow and wobbly path with wooden planks, you can't physically cycle there. | |
| 3 | 2023-09-23 12:42 | qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq ♦497 | I don't know about this path, that's why I'm asking. I often see people mistaking access for "my own skill doesn't allow this". There are 1 or 2 bicycle tracks on Strava heatmap, but maybe the person dismounted. Or maybe it's passable on a fat bike? | |
| 4 | 2023-09-23 15:03 | dgmapping ♦66 | I agree with qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq, generally it is a bad practice to use bicycle=no tag for paths, that are not suitable for bikes at all.As an alternative you could use:1) highway=footway with appropriate surface tag.2) mtb:scale=6 - this essentially means impassable by MTB. But keep in... | |
| 5 | 2023-09-23 15:42 | qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq ♦497 | This part you surveyed is also pretty "warm" on Strava's heatmap, it's the part to the west of it which is questionable | |
| 6 | 2023-09-23 16:00 | Zverik | Okay maybe the part between those approaches is more ridable. But the part to the west is just a narrow path in the grass, ridable maybe on extremely dry days, and even then you would have to dismount a couple times (and once a tree fell there). Right now it's probably all flooded over and not ... | |
| 7 | 2023-09-23 20:06 | qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq ♦497 | I too think that mtb:scale may not exactly fit here. It seems to be more about stuff like obstacles, rocks, incline, not getting stuck in a bog.It's kind of strange, even for walking it would be beneficial to have a tag which would describe area as boggy for a router, yet I don't think... | |
| 8 | 2023-09-23 21:21 | dgmapping ♦66 | The thing is there is no "you probably don't want to go there with a bike" tag that is widely supported by routers. There is a class:bicycle tag: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:class:bicycle but this is not established one and it has some other issues as well. In case you wan... | |
| 9 | 2023-09-24 09:06 | qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq ♦497 | IMO using mtb:scale is not better than bicycle=no and I'm not sure I like the idea of an umpaved forest path being a footway. | |
| 10 | 2023-09-24 10:31 | Zverik | I share this sentiment, and decided that albeit not enitrely correct, bicycle=no is the best way to reflect you cannot cycle there. | |
| 11 | 2023-09-24 18:14 | dgmapping ♦66 | Here is how I would rank the possible tagging options, if this bog trail is indeed unridable for most of the time by bike.1) leaving it as just "highway=path" is the worst option, since routers have no clue if this section is usable by bike.2) Adding "bicycle=no" is bette... | |
| 12 | 2023-10-27 16:25 | qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq ♦497 | https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/soft-and-boggy-paths/8429/23This reply pointed out that that there is also bicycle:physical=no tag which might be betterhttps://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:bicycle:physical | |
| 13 | 2023-10-27 20:30 | Zverik | Nice idea, but 26 usages, and I believe, all by Matija, who wrote the article. "Status: in use" is a bit of overstatement. | |
| 14 | 2023-10-27 21:21 | qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq ♦497 | Yes, you're right. Though make sure your change of status is correct. I think proposed implies a formal proposal process, in use might be a correct value there https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag_status#Status_values | |
| 120301243 by Zverik @ 2022-04-28 11:28 | 1 | 2023-09-03 15:05 | qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq ♦497 | Thanks to vandalism, I've noticed that place=cityhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/node/29787492has inconsistent name:ru now |
| 139189535 by Zverik @ 2023-07-29 21:26 | 1 | 2023-07-31 20:00 | dgmapping ♦66 | What happened to this deleted path? Based on Strava heatmap it's still used by foot and by bike: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/117921834#map=18/59.45406/25.17751I've also used this path several times, though couple of years ago. |
| 2 | 2023-07-31 20:30 | Zverik | Idk about strava, but there is a fence along the cycleway, so it isn't possible to turn from it along the channel. Also the path a little to the north (which I kept) is barely visible, so I doubt people use it. | |
| 3 | 2023-07-31 21:01 | dgmapping ♦66 | If I recall correctly there was a gap between fence and the barrier:https://fotoladu.maaamet.ee/?basemap=hybriidk&zlevel=10,25.17544,59.46693&foto=5815919&overlay=avaleht&HDzlevel=14,84.98413,-179.66997&HD=img/a7r3/2022-04/30,2022-04-30-09-09-12_K1.jpg,7952,5304Correct link... | |
| 4 | 2023-07-31 21:20 | Zverik | Nope, no gaps. I planned a bicycle route through that path and examined the barrier very thoroughly. Had to use the cycleway instead. | |
| 5 | 2023-07-31 21:28 | Zverik | Like this but there were no gaps, and no traces of a path along the fence: https://www.google.com/maps/@59.45454,25.1782723,3a,24.3y,234.1h,82.06t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1scAEJ4jf_yEB--9QoVh5yVQ!2e0!6shttps:%2F%2Fstreetviewpixels-pa.googleapis.com%2Fv1%2Fthumbnail%3Fpanoid%3DcAEJ4jf_yEB--9QoVh5yVQ%26cb_c... | |
| 6 | 2023-08-01 07:39 | dgmapping ♦66 | Streetviews from Sep 2022 and Jun 2019 clearly show - there is a gap between two barriers, between bridge and ramp. Although it is quite narrow, it is possible to cycle through the gap, without dismounting. If there's been any recent changes to this area and now you really need to climb over th... | |
| 7 | 2023-08-01 12:04 | Zverik | What I don't like in this discussion is that it's essentially a "but I see it on the imagery" vs a person who's been there two days ago. Now I'm getting a feeling I need to go back and study the area closer, because last year's data (and Strava traces of people who... | |
| 8 | 2023-08-01 12:28 | dgmapping ♦66 | Basically there are 3 distinct things to consider:Is the path clearly visible and usable?Even if it's not, keep in mind that during the summer months grass can grow very quickly making it temporarily unusable. I've personally been there on autumn/winter/spring and it has been ridable... | |
| 9 | 2023-08-27 18:44 | dgmapping ♦66 | Restored the path after a survey.https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140464374 | |
| 10 | 2023-08-28 08:08 | Zverik | Huh. Okay, sorry for having you go there :) | |
| 136937120 by Zverik @ 2023-06-04 15:16 | 1 | 2023-06-05 15:17 | qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq ♦497 | Hi, you've created some duplicates |
| 2 | 2023-06-05 19:25 | Zverik | I don't think these are duplicates. There are indeed 3 parking spaces and 1 bicycle rental. | |
| 3 | 2023-06-05 19:35 | qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq ♦497 | There are currently two bicycle rentals in osm data | |
| 4 | 2023-06-06 06:09 | Zverik | Huh, weird. Thanks. | |
| 135803001 by Zverik @ 2023-05-07 09:25 | 1 | 2023-05-16 15:02 | dgmapping ♦66 | FYI - Loodusravi Bioteek, node 10875199489, is not a pharmacy. |
| 2 | 2023-05-17 06:21 | Zverik | Yeah, I forgot the correct tag for that :( | |
| 3 | 2023-05-17 19:15 | dgmapping ♦66 | Based on the company website shop=nutrition_supplements should be the most appropriate tag. Already fixed it myself. | |
| 4 | 2023-05-17 19:25 | Zverik | Thanks! | |
| 122251746 by Zverik @ 2022-06-11 14:31 | 1 | 2023-04-29 19:16 | qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq ♦497 | Bicycle repair station duplicated and a ping-pong table too. Maybe check if they are displayed in Every Door.removed themhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/135515446 |
| 2 | 2023-05-02 07:23 | Zverik | Huh, weird. Thanks for cleaning up! | |
| 54335476 by Zverik @ 2017-12-04 16:45 | 1 | 2023-04-19 18:32 | pantufla ♦282 | Hello Zverik. I see Barcelona is not represented under the current standard of relations and I see you did changes on all the coverage. I'm going to start making changes which will be basically reverting these changes you did way back. I'll follow the wiki. I only wanted to be sure this is... |
| 2 | 2023-04-20 05:44 | Zverik | Hey pantufla! The subway system was adjusted according to this document: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Metro_MappingYou are referring to the wiki page written 7 years ago, and it's not the definitive source for the tagging.With this change you will definitely break the Barcelona s... | |
| 3 | 2023-04-20 11:44 | pantufla ♦282 | Thank you for your feedback. I'll take the time to review and take a broader and deeper look into it before/if I start doing changes. I'll try to reply again soon. | |
| 53097858 by Zverik @ 2017-10-20 13:05 | 1 | 2023-04-09 11:59 | bjohas ♦12 | Hi Zverik, some of the deleted relationships were part of my effort to regularise the tube stations in London, by grouping various station assets into relationships. I'm going to revert the deletion of those. Assuming that's ok with you! |
| 27018804 by Zverik @ 2014-11-25 11:03 | 1 | 2023-03-21 07:29 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,593 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3204398227/historyHello!What you meant by shop=plastic here?What kind of plastic objects are they selling there? Are they really selling solely plastic objects?Is maybe one of shops listed at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop a better fit... |
| 2 | 2023-03-21 07:44 | Zverik | Wow this is old :) So the shop really sells anything made of plastic: toys, gardening supplies, kitchenware. No idea which would be better — general? idk | |
| 3 | 2023-03-21 07:49 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,593 | shop=toys;gardening_supplies;kitchenware would be still betteryes, not supported by most apps - but with rarity and lack of clarity of shop=plastic it will not beand it expresses at least that they are not selling industrial quantifies of plastic wrap (unless they do?) or large volume of pla... | |
| 133822954 by Zverik @ 2023-03-18 13:28 | 1 | 2023-03-19 17:27 | dgmapping ♦66 | Please use amenity=pharmacy and healthcare=pharmacy tags for only pharmacies. Shops like "Looduse Abi", that sell cosmetics, nutritional supplements and other health products, are not pharmacies and should be tagged with something else like shop=nutrition_supplements or shop=chemist |
| 2 | 2023-03-19 20:06 | Zverik | ok | |
| 131798901 by Zverik @ 2023-01-28 08:26 | 1 | 2023-02-04 15:47 | qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq ♦497 | Hi, I'm trying to tidy up schools in Estonia. I think that such amenities are not really schools, but amenity=training. You can't really skip actual school and go here. Would you agree? |
| 2 | 2023-02-05 08:48 | Zverik | Yeah, I guess so. I also felt that the tag is not exactly right. | |
| 131009176 by Zverik @ 2023-01-08 10:50 | 1 | 2023-01-08 20:22 | qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq ♦497 | Hello, a lot of changes here without a comment ;)1)On Valdeku there is a bicycle path tagged as cycleway=track. Now on bicycle maps it looks as if there are separate bicycle and pedestrian ways which is false.I'd advise to remove cycleway from the street, and for the sidewalk usep... |
| 2 | 2023-01-08 20:59 | Zverik | 1) that's a lot of tags! Also, I am never using highway=path for a sidewalk. That's ridiculous. I've removed cycleway=track, so routing should be better now.2) thanks, fixed.3) well, https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=graphhopper_foot&route=59.38035%2C24.70002... | |
| 3 | 2023-01-09 18:14 | qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq ♦497 | 1)>I've removed cycleway=track, so routing should be better now.Maybe you misunderstood me. These "sidewalks" seem to be designated as suitable road for a bicycle. At least the southern "sidewalk", can't say for northern without a survey. The infrastructure is ... | |
| 4 | 2023-01-09 19:43 | Zverik | I'll answer tomorrow I guess, but for now — imagine somebody not 12 years in OSM, but just learning the ropes, mapping some sidewalks and suddenly getting into this kind of discussion. When I started, a similar encounter led me to stop mapping my neighbourhood and choose a different ... | |
| 5 | 2023-01-09 20:28 | qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq ♦497 | I can see that such heavy discussions are exhausting. But I don't really see a way around it. I'd like bicycle routers to work well in Tallinn. It's also nice to read on facebook how someone praises how well komoot works in Tallinn.The only way we can really avoid such discussions... | |
| 6 | 2023-01-10 12:28 | dgmapping ♦66 | I also believe such discussions are necessary. But would it be better to move these to somewhere else? Since talk-ee seems to be dead and previous forum is being retired the only logical place seems to be new community forums: https://community.openstreetmap.org | |
| 7 | 2023-01-10 16:32 | qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq ♦497 | @dgmappingI think this is a discussion about a concrete changeset and it belongs here. Not sure there is something to discuss "globally".----But as whole, about Estonian community - Mailing lists are a "boomer" thing, young people don't even know what they are.... | |
| 8 | 2023-01-15 20:49 | Zverik | So readrding the footway+cycleway sidewalk, I should point out that the "bicycle=designated" page is written by a single person and its path suggestions def won't withstand any public discussion. The "Sidewalks" page has the "questionable or controversial information&qu... | |
| 9 | 2023-01-15 20:50 | Zverik | Also, do you guys think we should kick-start the Estonian community? We're like the three most active people here. | |
| 10 | 2023-01-19 19:39 | qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq ♦497 | Sorry, haven't seen you've answered.>To me, and judging from these pages, highway=cycleway doesn't differ much from highway=path + bicycle=designated. Same for footway and foot.I think it's ok as long as we are not changing our way of mapping back-forth. You don't... | |
| 11 | 2023-01-21 19:25 | qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq ♦497 | And now I'm already regretting not having an Estonian OSM community. There is currently a project being done on adding parking lots in Tallinn by students of Estonian Academy Of Arts. I've contacted the teacher and asked if he could describe it somewhere so that everyone would understand ... | |
| 12 | 2023-01-21 20:08 | Zverik | Absolutely, I'd love to speak on OSM. I even can come in person. Aitäh!Do any of you want to co-moderate the Estonian sub-forum? I can ask the admins to create it. | |
| 13 | 2023-01-21 20:22 | qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq ♦497 | Well, I think I've changed my mind and I can help. I don't think it'll be a lively community with anything to do. If it's half-dead I'll be happy. But there should be an easy default place to go to raise a question regarding Estonia in OSM.There has to be some kind of el... | |
| 14 | 2023-01-21 21:32 | Zverik | Done: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/estonian-category/8093Now is a time to discuss moderatroship and anything else there. Although with the size of the community, I don't think these are important now. | |
| 131324460 by Zverik @ 2023-01-16 07:04 | 1 | 2023-01-16 11:48 | qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq ♦497 | Did you happen to see the name of the sports centre?I want to change it to Valdeku saun-spordihoonehttps://www.tallinn.ee/et/nomme/valdeku-saun-spordihooneBut just in case I wanted to ask. |
| 2 | 2023-01-16 12:51 | Zverik | Yes, it's written with a dash on the side, so I think that's fine. | |
| 130455726 by Zverik @ 2022-12-24 12:58 | 1 | 2022-12-25 21:57 | dgmapping ♦66 | Way 161464733 - this should be path since it is actively used by cyclists. While footway with bicycle=yes tag would work as well, it doesn't make sense in this case. I'm changing it back to path. |
| 2 | 2022-12-26 08:52 | Zverik | Hey dgmapping, thanks for watching the area! I'm not sure bicycle routers would prefer paths to footways, but I'm no expert. I'd set an explicit bicycle=yes or smth like that. To me, footways are managed, while paths are not, so often paths are barely walkable, let alone cyclable. | |
| 3 | 2022-12-26 12:23 | dgmapping ♦66 | Hi Zverik!The issue with bicycle routing is that some tools like Strava won't allow routing on footways unless there is a bicycle yes tag. According to liiklusseadus this kind of approach is actually correct since you shouldn't cycle on "kõnnitee" and "jalgtee&quo... | |
| 4 | 2022-12-26 12:38 | Zverik | Right, thanks. By the way, are you in Tallinn? Wanna meet for a tea or ride a bike next week? :) | |
| 5 | 2022-12-29 16:34 | qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq ♦497 | Just wanted to add that this "managed" argument is IMO should not be taken into account. It's common to tag combined bicycle/pedestrian paths as a highway=path with foot and bicycle=designated and actually more preferred to highway=cycleway by some data consumers. These ways are manag... | |
| 6 | 2022-12-29 16:41 | Zverik | I am so not sure about that! This Summer I planned to cycle along https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/446676433 and found out that that is a overgrown path, suitable just for single walkers, and certainly not bikers. To me, highway=path is less cyclable than highway=footway, when neither has a bicycle... | |
| 7 | 2022-12-29 17:46 | qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq ♦497 | I meant that paths are often managed and choosing between a footway and a path should not be done based on it. Footways should only be chosen if cycling is not allowed there. Paths are versatile and allow to map all kinds of non-car roads by combination with other tags. | |
| 8 | 2022-12-29 20:48 | danieldegroot2 ♦673 | Hey,Fyi I have made the following changesets and note in this area;- https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/130662320- https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/130662427- https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3497100These do not directly change any highway classifications.Regards,... | |
| 9 | 2022-12-29 20:50 | danieldegroot2 ♦673 | PS: If you know whether the water crossing is a ford or bridge, feel free to add it. | |
| 125744434 by Zverik @ 2022-09-03 16:08 | 1 | 2022-11-18 19:51 | qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq ♦497 | Hi, why did you create a separate node for Hawaii express bicycle service? Usually they are mapped as a part of the shop. |
| 2 | 2022-11-19 11:38 | Zverik | Mostly because they have a separate entrance with a different title. | |
| 3 | 2022-11-19 14:21 | qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq ♦497 | You can use the main entrance too. Many bike services have a back door, but are also accessible from the front door. And the title literally says "<bike_shop_name> workshop" which is just an additional word. I think it's better to remove this node. Entrances can be mapped as ent... | |
| 4 | 2022-11-19 14:25 | qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq ♦497 | btw I've visited this workshop once and used the main entrance and payed at the main cash register where all purchases are paid for. | |
| 128846163 by Zverik @ 2022-11-13 12:57 | 1 | 2022-11-13 19:11 | qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq ♦497 | Did Apollo cinema and Alexela concert hall really close? |
| 2 | 2022-11-13 19:30 | qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq ♦497 | I see that this was an attempt to remove duplicates. 1) For the concert hall we currently have a relation, a room at level -2 with it's own tags and a node which you modified. The relation isn't really pickup up by indoor= or openlevelup, so we'd need to keep something in addition... | |
| 3 | 2022-11-14 09:01 | Zverik | Hey qqqqq, thanks for watching over the city :) I've reverted this changeset and made another one. Deleted the node, and remove the amenity=cinema from the third floor, since the second floor kino would be better for navigation. | |
| 4 | 2022-11-14 09:01 | Zverik | https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/128879073 | |
| 5 | 2022-11-15 10:27 | qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq ♦497 | But don't blindly believe me :)I haven't been in Solaris for a long time. I think I've heard something about cinema moving to one floor and the other being taken over by apollo book store.Btw, does everydoor allow custom comments? It lists what you've done, but sometimes it... | |
| 6 | 2022-11-15 11:57 | Zverik | Every Door allows adding hashtags to comments, but no free-form writing as of yet. Usually the reason and subject for edits should be obvious from the area, contents, and the context — just as this one was suspicious for you. | |
| 7 | 2022-11-15 11:57 | Zverik | Btw are you going to GIS päev in Tartu tomorrow? We could meet then :) | |
| 8 | 2022-11-15 19:11 | qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq ♦497 | >Btw are you going to GIS päev in Tartu tomorrow?nope | |
| 124451074 by Zverik @ 2022-08-03 19:46 | 1 | 2022-09-27 17:33 | qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq ♦497 | Hi, do you think access=private could be added to the gate? I assume it's better supported by routers. |
| 2 | 2022-09-28 08:59 | Zverik | Yeah, sure, added it. Thanks for looking it up :) | |
| 121195210 by Zverik @ 2022-05-19 12:56 | 1 | 2022-05-22 17:53 | qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq ♦497 | Are bar names really translatable? Like if someone has an app with Russian locale, will he even understand that this is the same bar? BTW, the website http://so-va.online says it's Северная Сова. |
| 2 | 2022-05-22 19:06 | Zverik | removed the russian name, I don't really care | |
| 53776431 by Zverik @ 2017-11-14 16:37 | 1 | 2020-01-29 14:10 | iWowik ♦1,071 | https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=774441#p774441 |
| 56519239 by Zverik @ 2018-02-20 12:29 | 1 | 2019-10-03 14:12 | Jojo4u ♦265 | Hi, I reverted this back. Please discuss changes on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Key:capital before editing. I choose village as a middle ground since you and dieterdreist didn't like hamlet . |
| 73011657 by Zverik @ 2019-08-05 08:52 | 1 | 2019-08-29 13:10 | jmapb ♦404 | Hi Zverik -- You've changed a few service roads here to access=destination with the source listed as "Juno provider traces" but I don't see any sign of Juno activity on these roads.Last I surveyed here all of these were signed as authorized vehicles only -- has this changed? ... |
| 2 | 2019-08-30 11:36 | Zverik | Hi,Yeah, I might be wrong to do that. The thing is, half of the roads had been already marked with "access=destination". It should be one way or another: mixing the two produces weird routing results. I am okay if you mark closed roads as private. | |
| 3 | 2019-08-30 15:34 | jmapb ♦404 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/60942164 really is =destination for motor vehicles -- It's not a public road but people can drive to the end of that segment and unload supplies for the picnic areas to the east. (I suppose =yes or =permissive would also work, but =destination feels most correc... | |
| 4 | 2019-08-30 16:38 | jmapb ♦404 | I've reverted in changeset 73931493. If there are still routing issues here, please let me know and we'll figure it out! J | |
| 73487343 by Zverik @ 2019-08-19 09:33 | 1 | 2019-08-20 12:36 | SomeoneElse ♦13,362 | Thanks for fixing. |
| 57245690 by Zverik @ 2018-03-16 15:58 | 1 | 2019-04-09 23:53 | DaveF ♦1,562 | Hihttps://www.openstreetmap.org/way/567081590FYI The platform tag is on the relation so doesn't need to be on the way.This is standard tagging for all relations, |
| 67434765 by Zverik @ 2019-02-21 16:11 | 1 | 2019-02-21 16:16 | jmapb ♦404 | oops, my bad! |
| 64399419 by Zverik @ 2018-11-12 10:07 | 1 | 2019-01-30 03:32 | Yury Yatsynovich ♦114 | Можно поинтересоваться, на основании чего был сделан откат правки с удалением toll booths в МА? Я здесь живу и правил на основании ground truth. Кроме того, правка предваритель... |
| 2 | 2019-01-30 03:39 | Yury Yatsynovich ♦114 | К тому же, этим откатов вы вернули ошибочные начения toll booth точкам, у которых правильным тэгом является barrier=lift_gate (например, вот эта точка https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1873511364 ... | |
| 53247292 by Zverik @ 2017-10-25 20:59 | 1 | 2018-09-21 14:28 | evod ♦95 | Why did you delete relation 7460915? Now the bus + tram stations are not contained in any stop_area relation anymore. |
| 2 | 2018-09-21 15:11 | Zverik | This stop area contained everything around packed into a single relation. I have made several thematic stop areas instead, to correctly mark interchanges and separate modes of transportation.This was made for fixing subway networks to include into maps.me. There is a validator http://osmz.ru/sub... | |
| 3 | 2018-09-24 11:23 | evod ♦95 | I see. Unfortunately you missed out all bus and tram stops when doing your changes. I re-added them, so everything should be fine now. Please be considerate with existing relations. And thanks for working on maps.me, great app :) | |
| 4 | 2018-09-24 12:22 | Zverik | Thank you for finding and fixing the issue! | |
| 59506119 by Zverik @ 2018-06-03 11:38 | 1 | 2018-07-24 08:55 | literan ♦6,685 | а что это за массовые bus_station? это номера домов? заменить их скопом на addr:housenumber + building=house? |
| 2 | 2018-07-24 09:01 | Zverik | Да, это номера участков и прочие заметки. Я отметил их, а потом понял, что не знаю, как правильно их тегировать. | |
| 3 | 2018-07-24 09:37 | literan ♦6,685 | насколько я понял из обсуждения https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=12085&p=2 единого способа не выработано, но один из вариантов - отрисовать участки через boundary=lot, а номера уч... | |
| 4 | 2018-07-24 14:00 | Zverik | Я только за, если тебе не лень. Ну или я когда-нибудь переделаю. | |
| 53770946 by Zverik @ 2017-11-14 12:56 | 1 | 2018-07-10 09:00 | carciofo ♦186 | Hi, what is the reason for having two separate stop area relations for each line? All features belong to the same station, and a stop area relation is meant to group such features, irrespective of which line they serve. I look forward to your response, in the absence of which your changes will be re... |
| 2 | 2018-07-10 09:20 | Zverik | Hi, thanks for reviewing my edits. I modified and created some relations to make subway routes conform to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Metro_Mapping — which allows them to be used in maps.me application. You can see the validation result right here: http://osmz.ru/subways/colombia.html\... | |
| 3 | 2018-07-10 09:50 | carciofo ♦186 | First, applications conform to OSM tagging practices, not the other way around. Secondly, stop area is well defined and understood by the community. See my other comment in changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/53770759 regarding stop areas | |
| 4 | 2018-07-10 10:11 | Zverik | Well, 170 out of 180 metro systems in the world are tagged like this, so you can say wiki is a bit out of date. Wiki should describe tagging practices, and not go against them. | |
| 5 | 2018-07-11 10:03 | carciofo ♦186 | Sure, if you create a validation system with incorrect assumptions and get to the task of fitting tagging of every instance to the validator, then the numbers you cite aren't surprising :) | |
| 6 | 2018-07-11 15:16 | Zverik | There is no "correct" and "incorrect" in OSM. Only tagging that people and software use or don't. | |
| 53770759 by Zverik @ 2017-11-14 12:49 | 1 | 2018-07-10 09:02 | carciofo ♦186 | Station names should reflect the name as it appears in official schedules. Do you have any verifiable source where the station name appears with the line it serves in parenthesis as this changeset indicates? |
| 2 | 2018-07-10 09:04 | carciofo ♦186 | The change to subway station will be reverted, as this is an aerialway station, not a subway station. Such tagging is mapping for the renderer. | |
| 3 | 2018-07-10 09:22 | Zverik | If I have changed a station's name, I am sorry. I indeed have no source for names, except for Wikipedia.Regarding stop area, these are different. On interchanges, there are several stop_area relations to be collected into stop_area_group, and I use line numbers in parentheses for ease of ed... | |
| 4 | 2018-07-10 09:43 | carciofo ♦186 | I think you're missunderstanding what stop_area_groups are for. They aren't meant to be used in simple cases like these. The complexity increase is only justifiable when the names of the station change depending on the line they serve, which is not the case here (from the original proposal... | |
| 5 | 2018-07-10 10:15 | Zverik | I (and other mappers who look after subway systems) use stop area groups for interchanges, that is, for mapping a relation between stops in an interchange. I do not speak German, but the google translation reads very close to that.I'd also like to point out that the proposal you link to is ... | |
| 6 | 2018-07-11 11:00 | carciofo ♦186 | The fact that it's abandoned bears no meaning, as the idea of the tag is first documented there. The explanation is clear that such a relation is only to be used when the name of the different stops in an interchange differs; again that's not the case here. The increase in complexity is un... | |
| 7 | 2018-07-11 15:11 | Zverik | The question is not in compexity, but in usability. The proposal you're pointing to was written in 2010 with no understanging how the data could be used for anything but rendering. Only in 2017 the first public transport router was made. Its approach to stop areas is practical, and does not inc... | |
| 59458873 by Zverik @ 2018-06-01 11:33 | 1 | 2018-06-01 14:22 | literan ♦6,685 | а точно дубликат? в этом полуподвальном помещении размером с комнату открылся АВ дейли, вместо еще недавно существовавших там "Продуктов"? |
| 2 | 2018-06-01 14:26 | literan ♦6,685 | фотка нашлась: http://wikimapia.org/#lang=ru&lat=55.759105&lon=37.613486&z=19&m=b&show=/9896393/ru/%D0%9A%D0%B0%D0%BC%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%B3%D0%B5%D1%80%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%B8%D0%B9-%D0%BF%D0%B5%D1%80-2/photo/2834745 | |
| 3 | 2018-06-01 14:31 | Zverik | Хм, не ожидал, что там два продуктовых магазина один под другим. Восстановил. | |
| 59332875 by Zverik @ 2018-05-28 08:22 | 1 | 2018-05-28 10:24 | Alexander-II ♦577 | Читай, пожалуйста вики, перед тем как делать "исправления" https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dplayground#Playground_equipmentБыло затегировано верно. Исправите обратно как было? |
| 55659340 by Zverik @ 2018-01-22 16:17 | 1 | 2018-01-22 18:15 | bbmiller ♦103 | Thanks for helping out with the Chicago PT situation. FYI in this changeset you added some Red Line subway entrances to the Washington/Wabash Brown/Purple/Orange/Green Line station, which is incorrect. The two aren't linked.https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2588154https://www.openstr... |
| 2 | 2018-01-22 18:17 | bbmiller ♦103 | P.S. Feel free to reach out to me for clarification. I don't live in Chicago any more but I did for some time. Subway entrances in the Loop are tough to untangle. There's the Blue line under Dearborn St, the Red Line under State St, and then the elevated lines above Wabash. Some of the und... | |
| 3 | 2018-01-23 12:44 | bbmiller ♦103 | I fixed the Washington and Washington/Wabash stop_area relations. My offer stands: If you have any questions about the Chicago system, please reach out.Also, thanks for the tools you've built to improve OSM public transport data! | |
| 4 | 2018-01-23 12:47 | Zverik | Hi bbmiller, sorry for connecting the two unrelated Washington stations. I've noticed they are connected with underground footway tunnels on the map, so I thought the interchange still works. Thanks for fixing this!Ilya | |
| 5365889 by Zverik @ 2010-07-31 20:51 | 1 | 2018-01-08 10:09 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,593 | Can you look at http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1261589 ? |
| 50007277 by Zverik @ 2017-07-03 12:08 | 1 | 2017-12-23 08:36 | Alexander-II ♦577 | Кажется, здесь ты поломал https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2565883/history Теперь это поворот с двумя одинаковыми участниками |
| 2 | 2017-12-24 09:46 | Zverik | Спасибо, что заметил! Это отношение и раньше было непонятным — я его удалил. | |
| 3 | 2017-12-24 15:09 | Alexander-II ♦577 | Не обратил внимание, что оно изначально кривое было. Так бы сам снёс :) Спасибо, что удалил. | |
| 54206055 by Zverik @ 2017-11-30 14:18 | 1 | 2017-12-14 18:36 | radek-drlicka ♦17 | Zverik. Why did you do that? Australia is continent in some classifications. Thanks for answer. Radek |
| 2 | 2017-12-15 10:01 | Zverik | Hi Radek,Australia is a part of Oceania in the classification we use for OpenStreetMap. See the note tag on this object: http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/249399679Ilya | |
| 54619454 by Zverik @ 2017-12-14 09:52 | 1 | 2017-12-14 12:40 | BAK365 ♦123 | Die Adresse von node 1783692935 (Oberdorf, Näfels) war vorher korrekt. Wieso hast du das geändert? |
| 2 | 2017-12-14 12:45 | Zverik | Are you sure? I don't see Oberdorf street anywhere near. | |
| 3 | 2017-12-14 12:47 | Zverik | (I've reverted the changes to the node) | |
| 4 | 2017-12-14 18:38 | rarad74 ♦275 | Hello. Maybe you will forward this problem to developers of maps.me which are very uncooperants when it comes about their bad developed app. Alot of damages are done daily with their app because of lack of possibility to add housenumbers to nodes. Users try to put housenumbers on any poi that comes ... | |
| 5 | 2017-12-15 09:59 | Zverik | Hi razor74, I am one of the developers. This changeset fixes mostly a temporary issue that was live a year ago. As for your problem, we know of it. Adding addresses on nodes is a feature I too want, after using Maps.me in a few villages. I sent the request to our product manager, so hopefully we... | |
| 53611083 by Zverik @ 2017-11-08 13:32 | 1 | 2017-12-13 14:54 | dieterdreist ♦836 | This seems to be an automated or semi-automatic remote edit. Can you please disclose your sources? I have found some problems with railway stations flagged as light rail while they seem to be real train stations. |
| 2 | 2017-12-13 15:14 | Zverik | This is a result of a stop_area creating script, that collected stations + platform + entrances in stop_area relations. Every change was manually checked by me in JOSM, and there were some extra edits. There were no external sources. If I broke something, please show me. I assume I marked stations a... | |
| 3 | 2017-12-13 15:22 | dieterdreist ♦836 | Hello Zverik, thank you for replying so fast.Was this an announced / discussed edit? Your approach seems broken, because with station=light_rail you define the railway=station to be a light rail station, but you should take into account that some/many of the stations are light_rail AND normal rail... | |
| 4 | 2017-12-13 15:23 | dieterdreist ♦836 | forget the part about the "discussed announced", as you checked them individually it is not a requirement of course. | |
| 5 | 2017-12-13 15:26 | dieterdreist ♦836 | Basically, most railway routes are missing in OSM (although most light rail routes are mapped), so you cannot rely on OSM data to check whether it is a railway station or a light rail station. | |
| 6 | 2017-12-13 15:34 | Zverik | I agree, and I usually check whether there are railway=light_rail tracks through the station. For this city I probably looked at the route relations and thought that there are no regular trains through these stations. | |
| 7 | 2017-12-13 15:35 | Zverik | Of course I'll be more careful next time when retagging station types. Sorry for this. | |
| 8 | 2017-12-13 21:34 | dieterdreist ♦836 | you’re welcome.I have not performed any fixes in Spain as I don’t know the situation, I only searched for some example connections on the national railway website. It would be good to inform the local community that they should check their stations.In Rome in the meantime I’ve ... | |
| 52685420 by Zverik @ 2017-10-06 14:46 | 1 | 2017-10-06 15:55 | fantomas ♦9 | Hello. Please, use special OSM account for the imports. See http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines |
| 2 | 2017-10-06 17:15 | Zverik | Hi fantomas, sorry for this. I have an imports account (Zverik_imports), but forgot to change settings in JOSM. I'll be more careful next time. | |
| 3 | 2017-11-24 21:25 | Anton Khorev ♦254 | Берёт из Бургер Кинг из "Галереи" и перебрасывает его в "Стокманн". В "Галерею" добавляет новый, но с псевдо-координатами.https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4762656467/ | |
| 4 | 2017-11-24 21:37 | Anton Khorev ♦254 | Conflator его на 600 метров перетащил | |
| 5 | 2017-12-12 09:39 | Anton Khorev ♦254 | Время работы на сайте тоже не обязательно правильное. Например https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3461870802 на сайте написано, что в 10 открывается, а на дверях, что в 7. Я туда зашёл в пол... | |
| 54241729 by Zverik @ 2017-12-01 16:36 | 1 | 2017-12-07 11:00 | Omegatherion ♦132 | Das light_rail=yes tag gehört an die stop_position und nicht an die station |
| 2 | 2017-12-07 16:14 | Zverik | It doesn't matter much. The goal is to show that light_rail routes stop at a station. Some of these are used for trains or subways. And what if many modes of transportation stop at a station? You cannot add both station=subway and station=light_rail. That's why data consumers should suppor... | |
| 53395581 by Zverik @ 2017-10-31 13:21 | 1 | 2017-11-23 14:51 | bxl-forever ♦2,476 | Hello,Why did you remove turnaround relations?We need those because we import OSM data into systems aimed at monitoring subway traffic, and those relations are necessary because trains do not fly from one relation to the other. We normally tag those relations with access=no, so that data consum... |
| 2 | 2017-11-23 15:10 | Zverik | These route relations did not have any access tags on them. I have been writing a general subway processing script, and these routes stood out as having a single station. I guess I can add support for access=no tag, but these would need to be set (and they weren't). | |
| 53267689 by Zverik @ 2017-10-26 16:30 | 1 | 2017-11-03 08:44 | transilien_cartocite ♦14 | Hi Zverik.We are looking after railway stations data on behalf of SNCF, the french railway company.You removed most of the members of the stop_area "Gare de Lyon". These relations are being used to extract the data so for now we need to keep the station infrastructure, equipments and... |
| 2 | 2017-11-03 09:31 | Zverik | Hi Antoine,You have been using a stop_area type wrong. That type of relation was made to group elements relevant to transit data: stops, platforms, entrances, stations. Not to group everything in sight, from footways to shops and information signs.For your use case, the type of relation is &... | |
| 3 | 2017-11-03 15:37 | transilien_cartocite ♦14 | The wiki also says that amenities such as "shelter, bench, bicycle_parking, taxi", are valid in the stop_area relations (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:public_transport%3Dstop_area#Members). This suggests other facilities such as toilets, tickets offices and so on also make sense ... | |
| 4 | 2017-11-03 16:16 | Zverik | Okay, I am reverting the four railway stations I've modified, but also changing the relations' type to "site". I believe you are relying on relation identifiers, so this should not break anything. | |
| 5 | 2017-11-03 17:24 | transilien_cartocite ♦14 | Thanks for that. This should be okay however I'll double check. Does that mean you'll produce new stop_area relations forthose stations ? | |
| 6 | 2017-11-03 17:52 | Zverik | Yes, I have already done that. | |
| 7 | 2017-11-08 16:52 | transilien_cartocite ♦14 | Hi Zverik.I'm coming back to you as it turns out that your change broke several applications in SNCF. We are handling 385 railway stations and migrating them all to Site relations needs to be carefully thought and planned. How urgent is it for you to 'lighten' those stop_area relati... | |
| 8 | 2017-11-08 19:53 | Zverik | Sorry, I don't understand your process. Nominatim does not use any relations: it returns only nodes and ways for railway stations. Regardless of relation types, you won't get neither "stop_area", nor "site" from it.Depending on OpenStreetMap in this way, but storing... | |
| 9 | 2017-11-09 10:08 | transilien_cartocite ♦14 | Hi again.(The point with Nominatim was not about our process but a general concern with the possible impact.)The stop_area wiki is rather blur on what fits into a stop_area : the table listing the possible members includes amenity=* and gives as examples bench, taxi, parking... I saw your Me... | |
| 10 | 2017-11-10 20:28 | Zverik | Hi,I've reverted my changes and then removed railway tracks from the five stop_area relations.There is another issue with these stop_areas: such relation should have only one station node, while four relations have two or more. In that case the common way is to remove these station node... | |
| 53262566 by Zverik @ 2017-10-26 12:45 | 1 | 2017-11-04 14:31 | Nakaner ♦3,143 | Hi Zverik,your use of network=* is wrong. network=* is used to tag which Verkehrsverbund a route relation belongs to. There is no "Nuremberg S-Bahn" Verkehrsverbund, it is called "Verkehrsverbund Großraum Nürnberg". Could you please fix this?Btw, light_rail is ... |
| 2 | 2017-11-05 13:13 | Zverik | Okay, I see U-Bahn and S-Bahn in relation names. Why are they not networks? Naming a "transport and tariff network" with a "network" in the title does not automatically make it a network in OSM terms, just like naming a cafe "restaurant" does not make it a restaurant, a... | |
| 3 | 2017-11-05 13:16 | Zverik | Also, why light_rail is wrong for S-Bahn? It is definitely not a subway, and since it has short intervals, not a common train. | |
| 4 | 2017-11-05 14:47 | Nakaner ♦3,143 | Hi Ilya,it is common mapping practice in Germany to use network=* for the Verkehrsverbund or Verkehrsverbünde (plural if necessary) instead of using relations of type=network to tie all stops, platforms and routes together. And yes, it is (unfortunately) common mapping practice to abuse the... | |
| 5 | 2017-11-06 12:08 | Zverik | Michael, thank you for this extended explanation. I have learnt a lot from it. I agree that light_rail might be unacceptable for Nuremberg. I change these routes type to train, if the local community agrees with it.As you might know, I've made a metro validator, which runs for the whole pla... | |
| 6 | 2017-11-06 13:35 | Nakaner ♦3,143 | route=* alone does not help (and network is useless). If you also check the first characters of the value of ref=*, you can guess pretty well the type of train. U-Bahn line numbers always starts with a "U", S-Bahn line numbers always start with an "S".Many private railway com... | |
| 7 | 2017-11-09 13:47 | Zverik | Just reverted the network tag in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/53639647 | |
| 47953270 by Zverik @ 2017-04-19 21:49 | 1 | 2017-10-30 09:08 | bopoh13 ♦25 | Похоже, что в Департаменте природопользования р.Чурилиха отмечена как речной коллектор http://greenpatrolmoscow.ru/upload/iblock/faa/Sostoyanie%20vodnyh%20obiektov%20VAO.jpg |
| 2 | 2017-10-30 14:45 | Zverik | Ух ты, точные схемы коллекторов! Понятно, что речной: в нём же река течёт. А ты можешь достать такие же для других районов? Я бы уточнил трассы в OSM. | |
| 3 | 2017-10-30 15:25 | bopoh13 ♦25 | Пожалуйста :) http://greenpatrolmoscow.ru/eco_maps_archive/?SECTION_ID=131&map_type=1288 | |
| 47961003 by Zverik @ 2017-04-20 06:50 | 1 | 2017-10-30 09:06 | bopoh13 ♦25 | Похоже, что в Департаменте природопользования р.Чурилиха отмечена как речной коллектор http://greenpatrolmoscow.ru/upload/iblock/faa/Sostoyanie%20vodnyh%20obiektov%20VAO.jpg |
| 52186934 by Zverik @ 2017-09-19 16:39 | 1 | 2017-10-28 18:26 | freeExec ♦628 | Почему в stop_area в роли stop выступают точки не являющиеся stop_position?http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7588455 |
| 2 | 2017-10-28 18:33 | Zverik | Если станции добавляют в отношения маршрутов с ролью stop, не вижу проблем в этой роли в отношениях stop_area. По-моему, в этих отношениях роли вообще можно наобум выставл... | |
| 3 | 2017-10-28 18:55 | freeExec ♦628 | С ролью stop добавляются только точки с public_transport=stop_position, что в маршрут, что в stop_area. Всё остальное неверно или как максимум должно быть без роли. | |
| 4 | 2017-10-28 19:48 | Zverik | Я за последние две недели смотрел и правил сети метро в нескольких десятках городов. Все сплошь и рядом присваивают роль stop станциям во всех отношениях. Если что-то ... | |
| 5 | 2017-10-28 20:08 | freeExec ♦628 | Но это не повод добавлять хаоса ещё. Надо стараться, чтобы было соответствие вики.А раз на роли тебе всё равно, то я их поснимаю где неверно использованы. | |
| 6 | 2017-10-28 20:17 | Zverik | Не очень понимаю, зачем тебе это и что ты будешь делать с аналогичными «ошибками» в десятках других стран, но поступай как хочешь, я роли в отношениях stop_area в св... | |
| 53172442 by Zverik @ 2017-10-23 09:13 | 1 | 2017-10-26 08:44 | Redoute ♦5 | You (accidently) moved the entrances of Bank station, please repair!https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1184057 |
| 2 | 2017-10-26 09:08 | Zverik | Sorry for that, repaired just now. | |
| 3 | 2017-10-26 09:57 | Redoute ♦5 | Great, thank you! | |
| 38523058 by Zverik @ 2016-04-13 11:57 | 1 | 2017-07-18 15:44 | naoliv ♦1,783 | In version 4 http://osm.mapki.com/history/relation.php?id=3434801 you did remove a lot of information and left addr:housenumber (which it was supposed to be removed in this changeset) |
| 2 | 2017-07-18 16:36 | Zverik | Thanks for noticing and sorry for that. The edit was made by hand, so I must have mistyped in that relation tags. | |
| 47859382 by Zverik @ 2017-04-17 07:23 | 1 | 2017-06-25 06:22 | Dzertanoj ♦9 | Вы что, из Википедии по словесному описанию http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/487344474#map=18/55.81798/37.68955 рисовали? Приблизительно всё, что нарисовано по Богатырскому ручью начиная от Лоси... |
| 2 | 2017-06-26 12:54 | Zverik | По словесному описанию, конечно: никаких авторитарных геоданных по рекам нет. Описания брал из разных источников: из википедии, из сайта «малых рек москвы», из... | |
| 3 | 2017-07-09 20:06 | Dzertanoj ♦9 | Знаю - большая часть того, что в этих словесных описаниях сказано, не актуально уже лет 60. Большей половины этого ручья просто не существует. Так что большую часть пр... | |
| 50007223 by Zverik @ 2017-07-03 12:05 | 1 | 2017-07-03 13:13 | literan ♦6,685 | а что, тут больше не пускают?? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2953060476 Критичный момент, часть большого веломаршрута |
| 2 | 2017-07-03 13:26 | Zverik | Там же bicycle=yes. Я только добавил access=private, чтобы было ясно, что на машине не проедешь. | |
| 3 | 2017-07-03 13:47 | literan ♦6,685 | ааа. Тогда я лучше исправлю на motorcar=yes, так будет точнее | |
| 4 | 2017-07-03 13:50 | Zverik | motorcar не включает hgv, goods, psv и остальные. Лучше motor_vehicle. Заменил сам. | |
| 5 | 2017-07-03 13:52 | Zverik | Хотя по дереву в https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access#Land-based_transportation стало хуже: например, гужевая повозка едва ли там пройдёт. Ну, решай сам теперь :) | |
| 6 | 2017-07-03 15:45 | literan ♦6,685 | а это вы пытались на машине к реке проехать? Вплоть до Звенигорода все выезды на авто к Москве-реке перекрыты - санитарная зона водозабора, блюдут строго | |
| 7 | 2017-07-03 17:19 | Zverik | Про санитарную зону не видел ни одной таблички — везде шлагбаумы в своём стиле, частная территория или просто без объяснения. | |
| 8 | 2017-07-03 17:28 | literan ♦6,685 | ну, они местами стоят)) https://yandex.ru/maps/?ll=37.208128%2C55.753083&z=16&l=map%2Ccmr%2Cstv%2Csta&panorama%5Bpoint%5D=37.216290%2C55.752799&panorama%5Bdirection%5D=169.654951%2C-3.216540&panorama%5Bspan%5D=43.506238%2C31.204379 | |
| 9 | 2017-07-03 17:36 | Zverik | Я не думаю, что знаки про водоохранную зону и шлагбаумы связаны. Знаков полно во всех областях: полагаю, это намёк на то, что машину нельзя мыть и постройки возводить... | |
| 48458910 by Zverik @ 2017-05-06 18:35 | 1 | 2017-05-08 10:36 | ad47 ♦32 | Откуда дровишки? Просто в большинстве оврагов Битцы ручьи можно обнаружить только ранней весной, а объект https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/491805677 я вообще не смог вспомнить на мес... |
| 2 | 2017-05-08 11:36 | Zverik | Привет, про этот ручей написано в справочнике Насимовича: «в 260 м выше МКАД» (http://temnyjles.narod.ru/Reki3-21.htm — см. Комаровская речка). Сейчас я вижу, что выше обозначен ... | |
| 47808519 by Zverik @ 2017-04-15 09:18 | 1 | 2017-04-17 10:17 | literan ♦6,685 | приветствую! А что, действительно ручей прям из центра Патриаршего пруда начинается https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/55.76412/37.59173 ? Может, все же к краю его подсоединить - обычно та... |
| 2 | 2017-04-17 11:06 | Zverik | Я не уверен, что пруд и коллектор сообщаются. Википедия пишет: « Исток находился <...> на месте болота Патриаршие пруды». Болото было чуть больше, из него выте... | |
| 3 | 2017-04-17 11:17 | literan ♦6,685 | Так если 'находился' - то почему не historic=stream, а waterway=stream? Может, и нет там трубы никакой под землей... на месте моего дома вот деревня находилась когда-то :) | |
| 4 | 2017-04-17 11:19 | Zverik | Труба есть, только я их рисую с очень малой точностью. Метров в пятьсот :) Дальше их, по уму, нужно скормить диггерам, чтобы они по люкам поправили. Пара ручьёв у меня и... | |
| 5 | 2017-04-17 11:25 | literan ♦6,685 | ... и их вполне можно понять :) | |
| 45226716 by Zverik @ 2017-01-16 20:56 | 1 | 2017-01-17 14:04 | SomeoneElse ♦13,362 | Another mole to whack:https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/281922156 |
| 2 | 2017-01-29 20:47 | SomeoneElse ♦13,362 | Ah well, looks like BushmanK beat you to that! | |
| 43866745 by Zverik @ 2016-11-22 10:08 | 1 | 2016-12-04 20:46 | Jojo4u ♦265 | Hello Zverik, what is your motivation of using capital=2 instead of capital=yes? All capitals of independent countries worldwide - with the exception of Minsk and Astana - use capital=yes for some time now. The Osmcarto style also supports only capital=yes for capital rendering (recent discussions e... |
| 2 | 2016-12-04 22:00 | Zverik | Okay, I've reverted my change. I guess either way is good. | |
| 41441386 by Zverik @ 2016-08-14 07:13 | 1 | 2016-08-14 07:29 | Magnitogorsk Trams ♦3 | Не было ни одной остановки?! |
| 2 | 2016-08-23 03:58 | Jothirnadh ♦75 | Hello Zverik,Thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap, but the data you added doesn't make sense. How can every house have a bus station or correct me if I am wrong. If this is added by mistake can you please look into this issue and fix this? Thanking you,Cheers,Jothirnadh | |
| 3 | 2016-08-23 05:28 | Jothirnadh ♦75 | Seems like the data is already deleted in this changeset http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/41449227 . Thanks for fixing it.Cheers,Jothirndh | |
| 4 | 2016-08-23 05:49 | Zverik | Hi Jothirnadh,I've used bus stations for recording addresses, because maps.me does not have a dedicated building/address types. I fixed it when I returned home.Thanks for monitoring suspicious edits! | |
| 5 | 2016-08-23 06:25 | Jothirnadh ♦75 | Ohh, that's a smart way to do it. It would be great if maps.me have the feature to add building/address types. Hope to see it in future.Happy mapping | |
| 41382309 by Zverik @ 2016-08-11 07:18 | 1 | 2016-08-11 12:25 | literan ♦6,685 | Ты уверен, что этот съезд перекрыт? На всех схемах было только, что нельзя будет после съезда повернуть налево на 1 ул. Ямского поля; разворот под мостом остается. См. ... |
| 2 | 2016-08-11 12:29 | Zverik | Не знал точной схемы движения, решил, что уберут поворот целиком. Поправил по фотографии, спасибо за ссылку. | |
| 40002699 by Zverik @ 2016-06-13 21:03 | 1 | 2016-06-13 21:10 | Ars-UA ♦260 | Пользователям MAPS.ME вообще частенько хочется поджопников надавать. |
| 38469326 by Zverik @ 2016-04-11 08:34 | 1 | 2016-04-15 14:57 | literan ♦6,685 | shop=tobaccotobacco=hookah/sheesha?Вопрос еще, как многочисленные кальянные отмечать. Как обычные кафе (но там обычно кроме чаю/кофе ничего нет), или какой-то тег выдумывать |
| 2 | 2016-04-15 15:09 | Zverik | Наверное, amenity=cafe + cuisine=tea + smoking=dedicated. Всё равно, конечно, главным тегом остаётся name, ну или description. | |
| 3 | 2016-04-16 10:37 | literan ♦6,685 | я все же склоняюсь к отдельному тегу, т.к. туда ходят не попить чаю, а именно курить кальян (а его уж запивают чаем) | |
| 4 | 2016-04-16 10:45 | Zverik | Мне лениво писать пропозал :)Кстати, судя по времени работы, в «кальянбесте» не только продают, но и дают попробовать. Мне страшновато туда заходить, чтобы про... | |
| 38402999 by Zverik @ 2016-04-08 11:06 | 1 | 2016-04-08 20:04 | Marych_ ♦189 | Удивлен, видеть это пакет.что было? |
| 2 | 2016-04-08 20:09 | Zverik | В предыдущей версии точки какой-то местный пользователь MAPS.ME заменил название на «????». Скорее всего, кафе закрылось, но поскольку точно непонятно, я решил верн... | |
| 3 | 2016-04-09 06:19 | Marych_ ♦189 | Надо будет передвинуть, там развязку планируют строить, кафе скорее всего снесли, но давно там там не был.Будет эстакада от Мукими до Нукуской на Шота Руставели | |
| 4 | 2016-04-09 06:21 | Marych_ ♦189 | PS Я не успеваю просматривать, что в городе творится от пользователей Maps.meТо что попадалось на глаза, реально приносит пользу, но надо все равно просматривать и по... | |
| 38392702 by Zverik @ 2016-04-07 21:21 | 1 | 2016-04-08 12:11 | literan ♦6,685 | задвоил: сам же 3 недели назад его внес уже https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4062327189/history |
| 2 | 2016-04-08 12:19 | Zverik | Вот блин. Откатил :) | |
| 37856349 by Zverik @ 2016-03-15 21:07 | 1 | 2016-03-16 12:19 | literan ♦6,685 | И зачем для amenity=pharmacy слово "Аптека" в name? Неужели надо давать ссылку на вики, где написано, что так делать не нужно? Поправлю. |
| 2 | 2016-03-16 13:33 | Zverik | Потому что это часть названия. Не аптека «ИФК», а «Аптека ИФК». http://www.apteka-ifk.ru/ | |
| 3 | 2016-03-16 15:09 | literan ♦6,685 | Это может быть только в одном случае - если можно сказать "Я купил аспирин в аптеке "Аптека ИФК"". Собственно, они и сами так не говорят: см. на стр. http://www.apteka-... | |
| 5937421 by Zverik @ 2010-10-02 16:10 | 1 | 2015-12-17 09:47 | geevee ♦13 | А "Панорама города с подсветкой" точно нужна на OSM? Честно говоря, к ней нет свободного доступа. |
| 2 | 2015-12-17 10:15 | Zverik | Я её рисовал пять лет назад — даже не знаю, есть ли она. Если есть — это вполне себе хорошая достопримечательность. Закрытый вход (который легко проходится п... | |
| 3 | 2015-12-17 10:20 | geevee ♦13 | Попробую поискать еще раз, пробившись через охрану. А где ее искать – на улице? | |
| 4 | 2015-12-17 10:27 | Zverik | Нет, там внутренний дворик, отделённый от улицы забором. И прямо на стене соседнего дома (15Б), видно из дворика, и под определённым углом — кусочек с тротуара сн... | |
| 5 | 2015-12-26 19:29 | geevee ♦13 | Нашел панораму – крутая! Немного уточнил теги: что это панорама Венеции, и что это artwork. | |
| 36036398 by Zverik @ 2015-12-18 21:38 | 1 | 2015-12-21 02:07 | jptolosa ♦205 | Hello,Lakes Ladoga and Onega are freshwater lakes, they aren't a "sea". tagging natural=coastline is incorrect and it conflicts with tagging natural=water & water=lake.You can read about this in the wiki: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dcoastline#What_about_... |
| 2 | 2015-12-21 05:40 | Zverik | Hi, I know what these lakes are, and the policy regarding natural=coastline. I see coastlines come and go from the lakes, and I'm fine with it. What I didn't like in your changes, is that they broke coastlines for all these lakes, and it was easier to revert them, than to fix all the error... | |
| 3 | 2015-12-21 17:41 | jptolosa ♦205 | Ok, I'm sorry. I will be careful next time. | |
| 33737016 by Zverik @ 2015-09-01 19:35 | 1 | 2015-09-01 20:22 | edward17 ♦35 | Лайк |
| 2 | 2015-09-01 20:23 | Zverik | :) | |
| 32162498 by Zverik @ 2015-06-23 14:11 | 1 | 2015-06-23 20:25 | EdLoach ♦171 | What was fixed exactly? Looks like you lost loads of detail, and the offshore (below MHW) tidal multipolygon. |
| 2 | 2015-06-24 06:34 | Zverik | Hi, I've redrawn the coastline here, because it was very innacurate, had geometrical errors and denoted things that should not be in a coastline, e.g. ditches. I've added a stream that was mapped only for some meters. As for the tidal multipolygon, it was tagged wetland=marsh and was too c... | |
| 3 | 2015-06-24 07:36 | EdLoach ♦171 | If it helps, the tidal area is from the mean high water (coastline) to the mean low water (admin boundary). The seawall is where the footpath runs. The land areas outside the wall - some are above water at high tide, and what you're calling ditches fill with water at high tide. Hopefully that h... | |
| 4 | 2015-06-24 18:13 | Zverik | Added the wetland, but may have chosen wrong tags. Wiki tells coastline should be drawn at high tide, and I'm not sure how to properly tag tidal area. It is sure not a wetland. | |
| 5 | 2015-06-25 07:40 | EdLoach ♦171 | The wiki thinks otherwise - natural=wetland, wetland=tidalflat with perhaps surface=mud - this for the tidal areas between the land. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:wetland - this was done previously as multipolygon between the coastline (mean high water) and the admin boundary (mean low wate... | |
| 6 | 2015-06-25 13:40 | EdLoach ♦171 | To be honest, I think I'm going to have to try and fix what you've done when I get chance. The coastline is complex here - just switch to OS Opendata Streetview in P2 to see how much closer the coastline was to the high tide line than before you amended it to something closer to Bing which... | |
| 7 | 2015-06-25 14:20 | EdLoach ♦171 | Hmmm. I see. The Highwater mark in OS Opendata Streetview is out of date, as clearly on Bing some of that area is under water. I'll consider things carefully before changing anything. | |
| 8 | 2015-06-25 14:35 | Zverik | Thanks, please do. I was just fixing a geometry error and got caught up in the process. | |
| 31110072 by Zverik @ 2015-05-13 17:46 | 1 | 2015-05-14 08:50 | ullus ♦9 | Впечатляет! На Клёпики и Туму появился Бинг? |
| 2 | 2015-05-14 09:11 | Zverik | На Клёпики — только mapbox (поэтому я быстро сдался), а на Туму — да, Бинг. Залип случайно :) | |
| 25329813 by Zverik @ 2014-09-09 14:46 | 1 | 2014-11-03 17:30 | crazylost ♦4 | тест |