| Changeset | # | Tmstmp UTC | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 117688638 by Essex_Boy @ 2022-02-21 16:00 | 1 | 2025-03-22 12:30 | Martin Borsje ♦748 | Hallo, je hebt hier heel veel fences ingetekend. Weet je zeker dat die er allemaal zijn? Een aantal van deze fences zijn met zekerheid heggen. Heb je dit alles in het veld geconstateerd?Dit alles los van het feit dat niet iedereen dit een mooi rustig kaartbeeld vind 😊 |
| 2 | 2025-03-22 12:31 | Martin Borsje ♦748 | vindt natuurlijk. | |
| 3 | 2025-03-22 20:09 | Essex_Boy | Hoi Martijn, ik woon in de Banken en al deze huizen zijn voormalige huurwoningen waarbij elke tuin een hek heeft. In sommige gevallen hebben mensen heggen geplant (zoals wij), maar die zijn alleen over het originele hek gegroeid wat nu niet meer te zien is met satellietbeelden. | |
| 142055470 by Essex_Boy @ 2023-10-02 20:06 | 1 | 2023-10-03 15:59 | kapazao ♦909 | Hi, please use a better zoom with PNOA imagery to edit elements in a good way with realistic geometry and use proper tags or I will need to revert your changes and report your editions.You have more than 13000 edits to know how to map and understand what I am telling you.Regards ---... |
| 142054160 by Essex_Boy @ 2023-10-02 19:31 | 1 | 2023-10-03 15:45 | kapazao ♦909 | Hi, excuse me but addition of elements as forests in that way is not acceptable.The geometry is really poor and should be fixed adjusted to aerial imagery and reality. The forest covers others elements and other editors will need to fix your editions.We have had problems in the past with element... |
| 111835220 by Essex_Boy @ 2021-09-28 19:39 | 1 | 2022-11-07 14:29 | eggie ♦40,705 | Beste Essexboy Bomennamen horen op een andere manier getagd te worden. Niet met name=... behalve als de boom zelf een eigennaam heeft. Bv 'De boom die alles zag'Gebruik species:nl=https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural=treeMVGeggie |
| 119860676 by Essex_Boy @ 2022-04-18 13:54 | 1 | 2022-04-18 14:03 | A67-A67 ♦932 | Please don't change the speed limit without a proper argumentation.You're referring to a section that says that the correct speed limit on on-ramps without explicit speed limit signs is 130 km/h, but you're changing the speed limit to 100 km/h. |
| 2 | 2022-04-18 14:04 | A67-A67 ♦932 | Again:There is no sign with 100 km/h (sign A1-100) at the start of the sliproad, only a sign start motorway (sign G1). This is what you probably verified.Your interpretation of these signs is wrong. After sign G1 the speed limit is 130 km/h, see RVV art 21a: https://wetten.overheid.nl/jci1.3... | |
| 119840984 by Essex_Boy @ 2022-04-18 06:42 | 1 | 2022-04-18 13:18 | A67-A67 ♦932 | Hi,There is no sign with 100 km/h (sign A1-100) at the start of the sliproad, only a sign start motorway (sign G1). This is what you probably verified.Your interpretation of these signs is wrong. After sign G1 the speed limit is 130 km/h, see RVV art 21a: https://wetten.overheid.nl/jci1.3:c:BW... |
| 119797179 by Essex_Boy @ 2022-04-16 20:01 | 1 | 2022-04-16 22:48 | A67-A67 ♦932 | The speed limit was correctly tagged at 130 km/h. There's even a note on the ways to clarify. |
| 2 | 2022-04-16 22:50 | A67-A67 ♦932 | I've reverted the changeset. | |
| 3 | 2022-04-17 21:29 | Essex_Boy | This slip road has never been 130kph ever. Please do not revert the change set otherwise you are inputting incorrect information. I was there today...it is NOT 130kph. | |
| 4 | 2022-04-18 00:24 | A67-A67 ♦932 | There is only a sign 'start of motorway' (g1) here. After that sign the legal motorway speed limit of 130 km/h is the speed limit until the first sign indicating an explicit speed limit. That sign after the ramp, so on the ramp the speed limit is 130km/h. | |
| 5 | 2022-04-18 00:31 | A67-A67 ♦932 | I've restored the speed limit. These situations have been discussed extensively. I know it's counterintuitive, but it's the correct interpretation of the traffic signs, verified by Rijkswaterstaat. | |
| 6 | 2022-04-18 00:35 | A67-A67 ♦932 | Article 21a of the traffic law tells the legal speed limit after sign G1 (start motorway).https://wetten.overheid.nl/jci1.3:c:BWBR0004825&hoofdstuk=II¶graaf=8&artikel=21&z=2021-07-01&g=2021-07-01 | |
| 118047353 by Essex_Boy @ 2022-03-03 08:59 | 1 | 2022-03-04 06:58 | eggie ♦40,705 | Dag Essex Boy..Tip. Kijk nooit naar de vorm van de daken. Dat is niet de plek waar de gebouwen staan.Wanneer je gebouwen opsplitst heb je kans dat bij periodieke import gebouwen op elkaar liggen. Beter niet op deze manier veranderen.Je kunt wel een vlak building:part= op de delen leggen en ... |
| 2 | 2022-03-04 07:33 | eggie ♦40,705 | BAG data hersteld... Jouw gegevens staan nu op de building:partsGr eggie | |
| 110076954 by Essex_Boy @ 2021-08-22 19:45 | 1 | 2021-08-24 09:27 | Leo Slager ♦3,212 | The editor iD is not suitable for handling of routerelations.So I had to spend half an hour to make the routerelations correct.Please do not change routerelations using editor iD !! |
| 2 | 2021-10-07 13:56 | salvoconducto Active block | Comment not displayed. To view it, please select the "Include blocked users" option. | |
| 68427633 by Essex_Boy @ 2019-03-22 20:56 | 1 | 2021-08-28 18:38 | jambamkin ♦81 | Hello Essex_Boy, Did you intentionally tag this large area as landuse=grass? Since this it has been change to just a line with a fixme tag on it. I suggest it has not use and should be removed. What do you think? |
| 110077826 by Essex_Boy @ 2021-08-22 20:12 | 1 | 2021-08-24 09:48 | eggie ♦40,705 | Beste Essex BoyFietsroutes Ook ov en wandelroutes) kun je niet bewerken met editor iD.Gebruik dan svp editor JOSM.Je krijgt zo alleen maar een berg schade.editor josm stap voor stap https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=53710 MVGeggie |
| 110077714 by Essex_Boy @ 2021-08-22 20:08 | 1 | 2021-08-24 09:30 | Leo Slager ♦3,212 | Never, never use oneway on a roundabout.Please read your wiki !! |
| 2 | 2021-08-24 09:33 | Leo Slager ♦3,212 | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:junction%3Droundabout | |
| 93063963 by Essex_Boy @ 2020-10-26 13:31 | 1 | 2021-04-28 18:43 | SK53 ♦864 | I dont know about some of these grass areas. Substantial parts of the area around Marefield are ploughed crops. (Surveyed in June 2015 & again 2018) |
| 92582733 by Essex_Boy @ 2020-10-16 11:50 | 1 | 2021-03-28 12:27 | model rocketry ♦3 | Why have you deleted all the hedges originally mapped by PeterIto e.g. in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/10305488, (see https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=92582733 for comparison) which indeed exist?This is not the first changeset by you which couldn't be trusted ... |
| 98806026 by Essex_Boy @ 2021-02-06 10:00 | 1 | 2021-02-06 10:30 | Forest of Dean ♦3 | Why haven't you created a multipolygon for https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/904385364 ?There is a whole Maproulette challenge by George Honeywood to clean up such messes again .. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/98669555 |
| 89893521 by Essex_Boy @ 2020-08-25 06:29 | 1 | 2020-12-26 23:14 | Borbus ♦31 | Salt marsh seems an odd choice here. From what I remember of Mersea, when the tide's out it's all mud. Salt marshes lie above the mean high water level, they can't be below the beach.Did you perhaps mean to change a smaller area to saltmarsh? |
| 96135524 by Essex_Boy @ 2020-12-20 11:12 | 1 | 2020-12-21 12:02 | BCNorwich ♦4,856 | Hi, You are repeatedly making self-intersecting ways on your mapping. |
| 91845113 by Essex_Boy @ 2020-10-01 20:17 | 1 | 2020-10-02 17:29 | Leo Slager ♦3,212 | Your changeset will be reverted due to severe damage to the map. http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=4.50888&lat=52.17759&zoom=18&opacity=0.89 |
| 2 | 2020-10-02 17:46 | Leo Slager ♦3,212 | Adjusted Merenwijk Kinderboerderij border to include the new pony riding area. But now without damaging the multipolygon forest.Please be more carefull with what you are doing. To many times you are damaging the map. | |
| 91662477 by Essex_Boy @ 2020-09-28 18:57 | 1 | 2020-09-29 07:50 | BCNorwich ♦4,856 | Hi, I've removed the self intersection of Way: 852160460Regards Bernard |
| 2 | 2020-09-29 07:59 | BCNorwich ♦4,856 | I also removed woods from extending across the trunk road A47, a very dangerous hazard for vehicles. | |
| 91561546 by Essex_Boy @ 2020-09-26 19:08 | 1 | 2020-09-29 07:46 | BCNorwich ♦4,856 | Hi, In drawing the massive farmland area Way: 851901419 (which actually is not all farmland so is incorrect), you inadvertently self intersected and dragged a section of Way: Swaffham Road (539686138) out of alignment. Thus disrupting correct routing of the highway A1122. No problem now though, ... |
| 89021979 by Essex_Boy @ 2020-08-06 07:40 | 1 | 2020-08-07 06:18 | BCNorwich ♦4,856 | Hi, I've removed several self crossing way instances on bare rock areas around the islands.Regards Bernard. |
| 88531225 by Essex_Boy @ 2020-07-26 20:00 | 1 | 2020-07-31 23:49 | Leo Slager ♦3,212 | bad mapping.changed in tourism=artwork |
| 87902723 by Essex_Boy @ 2020-07-13 06:34 | 1 | 2020-07-14 06:35 | BCNorwich ♦4,856 | Hi, I've removed the self intersection from your water area polygon Way: 825715094. Tagged the islet and created a multipolygon of the water and islet.I noticed you've made similar self intersections in the past, perhaps you could in the future use this method to show similar features... |
| 87187425 by Essex_Boy @ 2020-06-26 10:02 | 1 | 2020-06-26 15:15 | multimodaal ♦269 | Hi, please do not delete the previous bridge but change it to reflect the new situation, you have also deleted the name : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Keep_the_history, Furthermore you made "highway=footway" with "construction=footway" Have you seen in... |
| 83979532 by Essex_Boy @ 2020-04-23 06:38 | 1 | 2020-05-11 10:56 | Samuel Vasko ♦1 | Seems like there is gap between Mangrove Lane (355279756, v6) and 11855220, v4. |
| 2 | 2020-05-11 14:32 | Essex_Boy | Hi Samuel, can you tell me which feature you see a gap on? | |
| 3 | 2020-05-11 14:50 | Samuel Vasko ♦1 | Sorry, create a note https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2189081 | |
| 83857365 by Essex_Boy @ 2020-04-21 06:16 | 1 | 2020-04-21 08:54 | eggie ♦40,705 | Hi essex boy Please comment your edits properly. I see a lot of damage in this area. Potlatch is not suited for this kind of edits.What is your intention? The whole area is rendering badly. Greetz,Eggie |
| 2 | 2020-04-21 08:54 | Leo Slager ♦3,212 | Hi Essex_Boy,De vernielingen die je aanricht zijn zo omvangrijk dat ik overweeg om alle wijzigingen te reverten.landuse en water willekeurig over elkaar.Onnauwkeurig werken waardoor de hele kuststrook nu blanco op de kaart staat, etc etc.Waarom maak je er zo een knoeiboel van ? | |
| 3 | 2020-04-21 09:12 | Leo Slager ♦3,212 | Ik stel voor om alle changesets te reverten. | |
| 4 | 2020-04-21 09:17 | eggie ♦40,705 | Mee eens.. Hopelijk reageert Essex Boy nog.Up to you Leo! Gr Eggie | |
| 5 | 2020-04-21 10:11 | Leo Slager ♦3,212 | All 21 changesets are reverted, due to severe damage to the map.Please do not make this kind of changes, unless you know what you are doing. | |
| 6 | 2020-04-21 20:36 | eggie ♦40,705 | Send PM with some questions why mapper is still continuing not to comment his edits properly and not to use multipolygons.Eggie | |
| 7 | 2020-04-26 13:43 | SomeoneElse ♦13,389 | Hi all,Andy from the DWG here. I've asked that future changesets have meaningful comments (see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3653 ) - that would hopefully help avoid some of the misunderstandings here.However, I'd be surprised if the old 3dshapes import of stuff like htt... | |
| 8 | 2020-05-04 12:15 | Leo Slager ♦3,212 | It took me more as a week to solve all the problems in this area.See my changeset 84622121. | |
| 83883664 by Essex_Boy @ 2020-04-21 13:21 | 1 | 2020-04-21 20:23 | eggie ♦40,705 | Please comment your edits properly. Why not using multipolygons? Eggie |
| 83878853 by Essex_Boy @ 2020-04-21 11:50 | 1 | 2020-04-21 20:19 | eggie ♦40,705 | Please comment your edits properly. Gr eggie |
| 83800690 by Essex_Boy @ 2020-04-20 06:39 | 1 | 2020-04-21 09:02 | eggie ♦40,705 | What do you think is the effect of your edits?These are all multipolygons!http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=83800690No comment? Gr eggie |
| 83825902 by Essex_Boy @ 2020-04-20 13:47 | 1 | 2020-04-21 08:58 | eggie ♦40,705 | What is your edit? Gr Eggie |
| 83857214 by Essex_Boy @ 2020-04-21 06:13 | 1 | 2020-04-21 08:56 | eggie ♦40,705 | Are you aware these polygons must be edit with multipolygons?Gr eggie |
| 83806971 by Essex_Boy @ 2020-04-20 08:19 | 1 | 2020-04-21 08:38 | Leo Slager ♦3,212 | Dag Essex_Boy,Door onzorgvuldig werken staat nu het hele duingebied van Den Haag tot Wassenaarse Slag blanco op de kaart.Een aantal fouten kon ik makkelijk herstellen:http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=4.33103&lat=52.13471&zoom=12&opacity=0.89Zo een ingewikkeld... |
| 81123078 by Essex_Boy @ 2020-02-17 15:25 | 1 | 2020-02-18 07:43 | BCNorwich ♦4,856 | Hi, your grass area Way: 773556763 encompasses large areas that can be seen are not grass. |
| 75219577 by Essex_Boy @ 2019-10-03 09:06 | 1 | 2019-10-03 22:54 | Leo Slager ♦3,212 | Changing the roundabout was not correct and damaged the routerelations of busses 3 and 4.Your changeset is reverted.Never change a routerelation using the editor iD. The editor iD will always damage the routerelations by placing the ways not in a correct order ! |
| 73885273 by Essex_Boy @ 2019-08-29 13:57 | 1 | 2019-08-30 06:34 | BCNorwich ♦4,856 | Hi, I removed the self intersection from the water outline Way: 719922245 and tagged the inner part as islet then created a multipolygon. This is the way to draw such features without having a self intersection, plus the islet is properly tagged.Regards Bernard. |
| 71540851 by Essex_Boy @ 2019-06-23 20:24 | 1 | 2019-06-24 08:02 | borishag ♦150 | If you make any modifications, please leave a comment with what you did. |
| 69320017 by Essex_Boy @ 2019-04-17 18:23 | 1 | 2019-04-24 07:35 | BCNorwich ♦4,856 | Hi, I removed your grass area (Way: 684444058) from across a road and bridge. The field does not extend across the highway, please be more careful regarding this sort of situation.Regards Bernard. |
| 69148613 by Essex_Boy @ 2019-04-12 13:12 | 1 | 2019-04-13 11:30 | BCNorwich ♦4,856 | Hi, you've drawn a scrub area, (Way: 683353505) to cover several highways, grass verges, half a round about, a highway drainage filter area, meadows, and tracks. The way is also self intersecting at the west. |
| 2 | 2019-04-21 17:05 | BCNorwich ♦4,856 | No response so I've removed the area. | |
| 68642611 by Essex_Boy @ 2019-03-28 20:24 | 1 | 2019-04-01 06:58 | BCNorwich ♦4,856 | Hi,I've made amendments to four of your water areas in this changeset, those with islets in them. I've removed self intersections, tagged inner areas as islets, created multipolygons. Errors are now rectified and the features are now rendered correctly.Regards Bernard. |
| 67858530 by Essex_Boy @ 2019-03-06 20:36 | 1 | 2019-03-09 11:27 | nplath ♦23 | Hi Essex_Boy,do you know multipolygons? May you please create one for the grass area in the Avon river meadow as it is overlaying other landuses? http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/675036186Best wishes |
| 19093262 by Essex_Boy @ 2013-11-24 15:58 | 1 | 2018-10-11 01:12 | Warin61 ♦2,665 | Hi,On Way: 248048284 you have tagged landuse=scrub.I have not changed it, but I think it should be tagged natural=scrub.See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dscrub |
| 2 | 2018-10-11 18:07 | Essex_Boy | Cheers for that. My mistake. I've now changed it to natural=scrub. | |
| 44417023 by Essex_Boy @ 2016-12-15 08:33 | 1 | 2018-10-11 01:11 | Warin61 ♦2,665 | Hi,On Way: 459779977 you have tagged landuse=scrub.I have not changed it, but I think it should be tagged natural=scrub.See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dscrub |
| 62015144 by Essex_Boy @ 2018-08-26 20:10 | 1 | 2018-10-03 18:43 | multimodaal ♦269 | Reverted; outer for proper multipolygon was removed and replaced by overlapping huge patch of grass, (just like in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52354931 ); leaving mulipolygon without its outerMapper has not responded to any of the 16 earlier changeset comments (including one earlie... |
| 52354931 by Essex_Boy @ 2017-09-25 12:44 | 1 | 2017-09-26 06:36 | BCNorwich ♦4,856 | Hello reference Way: 527505258 landuse=grassThis is a huge area and although it does contain some grass it is mainly farmland. There are also residential and commercial areas within it as well which you've not indicated.IIMHO it's better not to just map huge swathes of land in this way... |
| 2 | 2017-10-06 11:50 | BCNorwich ♦4,856 | It also included a very long section of highway, (obviously not grass). No response from mapper so I've removed it. | |
| 52648557 by Essex_Boy @ 2017-10-05 09:22 | 1 | 2017-10-06 07:21 | BCNorwich ♦4,856 | Way: 530247646Hi, I removed the self intersection from the outline of this feature. |
| 52653542 by Essex_Boy @ 2017-10-05 12:39 | 1 | 2017-10-06 07:19 | BCNorwich ♦4,856 | Way: 530294700Hi, I removed the self intersection from the outline of this feature. |
| 52651379 by Essex_Boy @ 2017-10-05 11:16 | 1 | 2017-10-06 07:17 | BCNorwich ♦4,856 | Way: 530278912Hi, I removed the self intersection from the outline of this feature. |
| 52003387 by Essex_Boy @ 2017-09-13 11:33 | 1 | 2017-09-19 20:41 | GinaroZ ♦1,280 | Hi, you were correct the first time with landuse=allotments on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/524382717/ - I've fixed it for you :) |
| 52068215 by Essex_Boy @ 2017-09-15 12:47 | 1 | 2017-09-16 14:34 | Harald Hartmann ♦827 | Hello Essex_Boy. At http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/524918433 and http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/524918430 you have add the misspelled `nan_made` ... and please have a look at http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Djetty which mark `man_made=jetty` as deprecated. #typo |
| 51510461 by Essex_Boy @ 2017-08-28 13:59 | 1 | 2017-08-29 10:28 | BCNorwich ♦4,856 | Way: 519344354Hi the tagging value green is not usually used with the key landuse. Can you explain what you mean and possibly amend the tag?Regards Bernard |
| 51232331 by Essex_Boy @ 2017-08-18 12:28 | 1 | 2017-08-23 16:53 | BCNorwich ♦4,856 | Way: 516616957 fixed several self intersections |
| 47996927 by Essex_Boy @ 2017-04-21 09:25 | 1 | 2017-04-21 12:07 | Allroads ♦420 | Hallo, op basis van welke data gebruik maak je de aanpassingen, BING is oud, we hebben nu Luchtfoto actueel van de overheid en ook is RWS Rijkswaterstaat, DTB (digitaal topografisch bestand), te gebruiken, als wms laag eronder te liggen, deze twee lagen dan zie je op de luchtfoto de afdak RWS kloppe... |
| 2 | 2017-04-21 12:10 | Allroads ♦420 | Daarbij moet de weg eroverheen ook nog goed gelegd worden, de RWS DTB wms vlakken layer is hier bijzonder geschikt voor. | |
| 44417703 by Essex_Boy @ 2016-12-15 09:02 | 1 | 2016-12-15 13:23 | EdLoach ♦171 | Can you not make changes based on aerial imagery, please? This former farmland has been earmarked for housing, hence the greenfield tags. I'll put them back |
| 38405274 by Essex_Boy @ 2016-04-08 12:55 | 1 | 2016-04-11 14:38 | Hervé Saint-Amand ♦5 | Castle Rock is of volcanic origin, but there's not a volcano in the heart of Edinburgh. Is this really the right tag? |
| 2 | 2016-04-11 22:03 | Rostranimin ♦16 | Hi Essex_Boy - I've reverted the edit to Castle Rock - back to 'peak'. Would be happy to see more detailed discussion of the options, but I don't think you're going to get agreement on natural=volcano. See the discussion also on this note: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/... | |
| 3 | 2016-04-12 14:59 | SK53 ♦864 | Yes indeed please no mapping of volcanic origin rocks as volcanoes. There may be some mapped this way in Germany but I've complained about these particular ones in the past. | |
| 36548581 by Essex_Boy @ 2016-01-13 12:26 | 1 | 2016-01-18 19:14 | trigpoint ♦2,373 | HiYou seem to have added a 6th mini-roundabout to the magic roundabout.It looks like one, but also seems odd.Have you been there, have there been recent changes?Thanks Phil |
| 34819499 by Essex_Boy @ 2015-10-23 12:05 | 1 | 2015-11-10 10:25 | multimodaal ♦269 | Dear Essex_Boy, I noticed that you have changes this waterway back into the shape it was until two years ago. I had adapted it to the actual current shape in the field based on survey by canoe. Could you please change it back into the way it was before your changeset, because until you changed it, t... |
| 31686255 by Essex_Boy @ 2015-06-03 08:53 | 1 | 2015-08-14 12:46 | Alan Bragg ♦152 | Just thought you'd like to know that natural=tree_row is the correct tag for a line of trees, not natural=tree_line. A complete description is in the wiki at http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dtree_row |
| 32907967 by Essex_Boy @ 2015-07-27 11:39 | 1 | 2015-08-13 09:22 | Rudolf Mayer ♦55 | I saw that you changed this area to a golf course - do you also have a name and website for it? |
| 26651752 by Essex_Boy @ 2014-11-08 21:15 | 1 | 2014-11-12 07:36 | BCNorwich ♦4,856 | I removed the self intersection from the residential, from the Bing image it looks like a great amount of this area in not residential, IMHO. |