| Changeset | No. | Date | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 50729981 by Essin | 1 | 2018-03-06 16:53:24 UTC | andrewsh | Hi,This changeset of yours seems to add a lot of nonsense data, such as ways with invalid tags or without tags at all.Could you please verify and fix it?Thanks! |
| 2 | 2018-03-11 18:07:02 UTC | Essin | Hi,I would of course clean up after myself if I accidentally have added nonsense data, but after going through the ways in this changeset, I could only find https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/395003928/history with obviously wrong tagging, which I have now corrected (snowmobile=* without highway=* ... | |
| 3 | 2018-03-11 18:49:25 UTC | andrewsh | As far as I can see there are multiple ways which aren't part of any relations and don't have any tags. | |
| 4 | 2018-03-11 18:51:36 UTC | andrewsh | Strange, I cannot see them anymore. | |
| 5 | 2018-03-11 18:52:26 UTC | andrewsh | I could have made a mistake or looked at a different changeset, but I cannot find the ways I've seen. | |
| 53768009 by Arne Paulsen | 1 | 2018-03-06 16:33:54 UTC | andrewsh | Hi,You seem to have added a lot of meaningless tags to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/507084935/history…Please check the data you upload to make sure this doesn't happen in future :)Thanks! |
| 54307989 by Borbus | 1 | 2018-03-06 16:31:34 UTC | andrewsh | Could you please make sure you don't add meaningless tags such as yes=yes next time? :)Thanks! |
| 2 | 2018-03-06 20:45:29 UTC | Borbus | I did? Where? If it was me then I'm surprised that JOSM didn't through up a warning before I made the change. | |
| 53633061 by Hagar66 | 1 | 2018-03-06 16:29:54 UTC | andrewsh | Please make sure you don't add meaningless tags like yes=no next time.Thanks! |
| 55278337 by Jose Riha | 1 | 2018-01-21 12:40:37 UTC | andrewsh | We don't map official names though, do we? The street sign on this street says Ulica. |
| 46701719 by MatoKesan | 1 | 2017-03-09 10:36:39 UTC | laznik | dobry den, to jazierko sa naozaj vola "Súkromné jazierko"? Na oznacenie faktu ze objekt je sukromny mame v OSM tagy. Do nazvu tato informacia nepatri. |
| 2 | 2017-12-29 18:14:06 UTC | andrewsh | Nepatrí. Mažem. | |
| 46707058 by MatoKesan | 1 | 2017-12-29 18:11:13 UTC | andrewsh | Erm, why? |
| 46701141 by MatoKesan | 1 | 2017-12-28 14:49:24 UTC | andrewsh | Hi Maťo,What is the source for the park name? I was unable to find any evidence it is in fact named like that during the survey on the location.Thanks! |
| 2 | 2017-12-29 13:29:49 UTC | *Martin* | It is a Pokemon Go virtual park ;-).Please revert. | |
| 3 | 2017-12-29 13:48:00 UTC | MatoKesan | It is not a virtual park, all the changes I described where made, I live here. My motivation to map these changes where Pokémon Go but that doesn't mean I put in something that doesn't exist. Only the name of the park area has no source it isn't named yet it was my own naming because the bu... | |
| 4 | 2017-12-29 17:17:15 UTC | *Martin* | OK, thanks for the explanation :-). | |
| 5 | 2017-12-29 18:07:17 UTC | andrewsh | If there's no source for the park name, I will have to remove it, at least until it is officially confirmed (or not). | |
| 54327122 by andrewsh | 1 | 2017-12-05 16:07:09 UTC | Harald Hartmann | Ok, you just fixed the wrong "bunglow", but why not fixed "builing:level", too?http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/544522258Please have a look athttp://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/54274260I think the DWG should block him and revert all his changesets. |
| 2 | 2017-12-05 16:08:41 UTC | andrewsh | I haven't noticed that. I only noticed bunglow because I was watching http://osmlab.github.io/show-me-the-way/. | |
| 54326713 by Arshan Arshan | 1 | 2017-12-04 11:57:54 UTC | andrewsh | Hi,Thanks for your edits.According to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building%3Dbungalow, it should be building=bungalow, not building=bunglow (sic: missing "a").It would be great if you used the correct spelling for your future edits. |
| 2 | 2017-12-05 11:21:10 UTC | mueschel | The same holds for 2700 buildings with the tag "builing:levels" which should be "building:levels".And there are buildings mapped twice, e,g, around 7th Commercial Street. | |
| 3 | 2017-12-05 11:26:36 UTC | andrewsh | Indeed, I haven't noticed that. | |
| 48397418 by emergency99 | 1 | 2017-11-04 12:46:03 UTC | andrewsh | @emergency99, when you do this next time please go and actually check it on ground. The name wasn't wrong, it was (unfortunately) put into a wrong tag.Thanks very much. |
| 2 | 2017-11-04 14:20:50 UTC | emergency99 | But also the tag “shop=vacant” was wrong in that case. | |
| 3 | 2017-11-04 14:28:54 UTC | andrewsh | Well, it was, but unfortunately I couldn't see it in the app, it looked just like a shop. | |
| 4 | 2017-11-04 14:50:03 UTC | emergency99 | Well, Maps.me is not necessarily a good OSM-editor. | |
| 5 | 2017-11-06 08:28:41 UTC | andrewsh | Obviously it isn't. Yet it's necessary to pay more attention when reverting changes contributed using it. | |
| 36878147 by Panorama-mingas | 1 | 2017-05-25 11:19:27 UTC | andrewsh | Добрый день,Можно поинтересоваться, зачем Вы удалили бо́льшую часть Прилукской Слободы? |
| 47594514 by andrewsh | 1 | 2017-05-10 22:38:21 UTC | aceman444 | Zdravim, vsetky objekty odoslane cez maps.me sa nahrali s name:en, takze tie nazvy nie je normalne vidiet. Presiel som ich a niektore zmenil na 'name', kedze su po slovensky. Da sa s tym nieco robit, aby to nerobilo? |
| 2 | 2017-05-10 22:49:14 UTC | andrewsh | Sorry, ze som neskontroloval po sebe. Treba asi nahlasit bug, inu moznost nevidim. Ked som to daval tam, vyzeralo to kvazifajn. | |
| 3 | 2017-05-10 22:51:08 UTC | andrewsh | A dakujem za opravu.Je to take dost blbe, ze neponuka nazov "by default", ponuka samostatne slovencinu, anglictinu, madarcinu. Mozno som to a ja niekde nespravne dal, predpokladajuc, ze to pochopi spravne, uz teraz neviem. | |
| 48285566 by andrewsh | 1 | 2017-05-03 06:10:17 UTC | MiroJanosik | Ahoj, toto bude duplikat (mozno starsie mapy v maps.me?) pretoze pred dvoma tyzdnami som tu pridal Centrum Caffe aj s detailami. Dovolim si zmazat ho, noda pre cafe je https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4333007691 |
| 2 | 2017-05-03 09:33:23 UTC | andrewsh | O, jasne :) | |
| 47475017 by andrewsh | 1 | 2017-04-05 12:48:46 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, is this a real business that customers can visit?I was about to ask, the website looks like it is contact by web or phone only so should not be in OSM.Cheers Phil |
| 2 | 2017-04-05 12:53:11 UTC | andrewsh | No idea, I just added the correct tag. | |
| 3 | 2017-04-05 12:53:50 UTC | andrewsh | Hmm, the website says they're in Aylesbury, Buckinghamshire:4 – 12 Kempson CloseGatehouse Way Industrial Estate | |
| 4 | 2017-04-05 12:54:56 UTC | andrewsh | I will probably remove them. Thanks for paying attention. It looked like a legitimate business to me… which it probably isn't. Well, not in Oxford, at least. | |
| 5 | 2017-04-05 12:59:01 UTC | trigpoint | Thank you.It looked like spam, both the username and long description. | |
| 6 | 2017-04-05 13:00:46 UTC | andrewsh | Well, these two looked like spam, but the website looked okay-ish to me. I should have checked the address :) | |
| 43660721 by Ivor Švihran | 1 | 2016-12-10 13:48:12 UTC | andrewsh | "Vnútorné Mesto"? To vážne? |
| 2 | 2016-12-10 15:10:36 UTC | Ivor Švihran | Vychádzal som z tohto: https://sk.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vn%C3%BAtorn%C3%A9_mesto_(Bratislava) | |
| 36502116 by andrewsh | 1 | 2016-01-11 13:32:59 UTC | TomH | I assume you followed http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct for this mechanical edit? |
| 2 | 2016-01-11 13:54:58 UTC | andrewsh | Well, not quite… | |
| 3 | 2016-01-11 17:50:38 UTC | trigpoint | Please revert it then | |
| 4 | 2016-01-14 14:27:17 UTC | chillly | Undiscussed mechanical edits must be reverted. | |
| 5 | 2016-01-15 17:41:29 UTC | andrewsh | Sorry, I haven't yet had time to revert it. I will try during the weekend. | |
| 6 | 2016-01-15 17:43:43 UTC | trigpoint | I have already reverted it, the UK community will work out how they should be tagged.Thanks | |
| 7 | 2016-01-15 17:46:13 UTC | andrewsh | Right, having googled that I see this is a topic already discussed and quite a controversial one. | |
| 8 | 2016-01-15 17:57:50 UTC | andrewsh | Actually, one of your comments isn't quite right:> ALDI, LIDL, ASDA and SPAR are all abbreviations of their full names, inthe same way as NATO, AIDS, BBC, OSM or GNU are.Except Lidl isn't :) | |
| 36501921 by andrewsh | 1 | 2016-01-11 12:12:49 UTC | andrewsh | Okay, not German, probably, but Dutch. |
| 2 | 2016-01-11 12:13:17 UTC | andrewsh | Okay, and originally an abbreviation:The name was originally DE SPAR, an acronym of the Dutch phrase Door Eendrachtig Samenwerken Profiteren Allen Regelmati | |
| 3 | 2016-01-11 13:32:57 UTC | TomH | I assume you followed http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct for this mechanical edit? | |
| 4 | 2016-01-11 16:59:37 UTC | trigpoint | SPAR is an abbreviation as you have mentioned, the shops are signed SPAR, not Spar. This change should be reverted. | |
| 5 | 2016-01-11 17:00:16 UTC | andrewsh | The company is now called Spar, not SPAR. | |
| 6 | 2016-01-11 17:02:29 UTC | TomH | So that would be name=SPAR; operator=Spar then.This is why we ask you to discuss mechanical edits before doing them. | |
| 7 | 2016-01-11 17:04:16 UTC | andrewsh | Well, if a police department says POLICE on the label, we don't tag it as name=POLICE, do we? | |
| 8 | 2016-01-11 17:29:46 UTC | chillly | Undiscussed mechanical edits should be reverted. | |
| 9 | 2016-01-11 17:39:11 UTC | trigpoint | Police is a word, rather than an abbreviation. The day the signs on SPAR shops in the UK changes, then local mappers will change the tags.In the meantime this change needs to be reverted. | |
| 10 | 2016-01-15 17:45:45 UTC | trigpoint | I have reverted this, the UK community will decide how to correctly tag these shops | |
| 12749534 by Alexey_ND | 1 | 2015-11-27 18:43:56 UTC | andrewsh | Уже не 8? Сколько сейчас-то? |
| 21014566 by evgenykatyshev | 1 | 2015-11-16 08:35:24 UTC | andrewsh | Вообще говоря, делить границу на 107 маленьких частей — не очень хорошая идея. Не стоит так делать впредь. |
| 2 | 2015-11-16 09:33:05 UTC | evgenykatyshev | А в чём проблема? Все части объединены отношением, поэтому вообще не важно на сколько частей она поделена. | |
| 3 | 2015-11-16 09:33:54 UTC | andrewsh | Ну теперь уже, когда katpatuka пофиксил. А не были. Katpatuka был жутко недоволен. | |
| 4 | 2015-11-16 09:48:55 UTC | evgenykatyshev | Ну да, если не были, то плохо.Я обычно аккуратно отношусь к отношениям границ, но если в этот раз что-то случайно сломал или не доделал, то приношу свои извинения. | |
| 5 | 2015-11-16 09:50:40 UTC | andrewsh | Окей, передал :) Он по-русски с гугль-транслейтом только, потому попросил кого-то по-русски на всяки | |
| 6 | 2015-11-16 09:51:00 UTC | andrewsh | …на всякий случай написать. | |
| 7 | 2015-11-16 10:53:59 UTC | katpatuka | thanks - well nothing was "broken" though but the boundary was just difficult to maintain ;) | |
| 33440551 by wonchs91 | 1 | 2015-11-11 13:28:46 UTC | andrewsh | Hello wonchs91,I'm not able to find anything in this area on any satellite images or on any other maps. Could you please explain where do the data come from?Cheers,Andrew |
| 35151699 by ante44ante | 1 | 2015-11-11 13:03:35 UTC | andrewsh | This doesn't look real; where do the data come from? |
| 2 | 2015-11-14 10:32:11 UTC | Jose Riha | Razumiješ li engleski? | |
| 34924078 by andrewsh | 1 | 2015-10-28 18:23:46 UTC | Jose Riha | preco obchodom a podnikom vymazavas adresu? |
| 2 | 2015-10-28 18:28:06 UTC | andrewsh | Pretože adresu už majú. | |
| 3 | 2015-10-28 18:31:16 UTC | Jose Riha | kombinacia shop/pub + adresa nie je nic neobvykleho. pred mazanim akehokolvek tagu prosim konzultuj wiki alebo taginfo https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/amenity#combinations | |
| 4 | 2015-10-28 18:33:45 UTC | andrewsh | Nie je nič neobvyklého, ale neznamená to, že to je potrebné a to má byť. Ako mať nekonzistentné adresy na POI a budovách, tak lepšie ich mať len na budovách, za podmienkou že sa jednoznačne to otagovať. | |
| 5 | 2015-10-28 18:34:13 UTC | andrewsh | …že sa jednoznačne to dá otagovať. | |
| 34841569 by RobJN | 1 | 2015-10-28 11:10:42 UTC | andrewsh | Hello,Thanks for your contribution, but there's no need to add extra duplicate data: the addresses of these places are already on the buildings there in, so adding them to the places themselves increases duplication and adds some confusion if the address information is not exactly the same (as i... |
| 2 | 2015-10-28 18:05:04 UTC | RobJN | Actually as a tourist it is more important to have the address data in the POI so that when you search for the POI you get all the detail you need. My preference would be to move all the POI data on to the building in cases where the POI occupies the building. Something for you to think about: D... | |
| 3 | 2015-10-28 18:07:40 UTC | andrewsh | No, it usualy does not apply to the building, as normally there are multiple POIs in the building except when it's a building specifically built for some purpose (in that case it's okay to have POI tags on the whole building). | |
| 4 | 2015-10-28 18:11:42 UTC | RobJN | It's cute that things are so clear cut in Bratislava. Shame you're not thinking about the benefit to the end data user but that's one for you to figure out with the local community. | |
| 5 | 2015-10-28 18:12:51 UTC | andrewsh | How does the end user benefit from excessive or wrong data? | |
| 6 | 2015-10-28 18:17:59 UTC | RobJN | Because when they search for Moods bakery they get results that include an address - something that most people would expect. Ultimately it comes down to what you think an "address" is. One could argue that the address is a delivery point and therefore the address should be tagged to the d... | |
| 7 | 2015-10-28 18:19:19 UTC | andrewsh | If some software can't figure the address from the building the POI is in, it's defective software and it needs to be fixed. | |
| 8 | 2015-10-28 18:22:54 UTC | RobJN | So please offer to fix all the software that doesn't currently work in your desired way. Also what to do with a large building that includes multiple addresses (say 1 to 20) and one of these is a cafe at address 18 in that building? | |
| 9 | 2015-10-28 18:27:11 UTC | andrewsh | Multiple addresses is one of the use cases for having addresses on POIs, I never argued that. | |
| 10 | 2015-10-28 18:30:10 UTC | RobJN | Well no worries. I'll leave it to your community to work out. I just wanted to highlight that it is not as clear cut as you think it is and the "so fix your software" argument is not particularly helpful when the matter isn't so clear cut and the software developers are usually working unp... | |
| 30451655 by Komяpa | 1 | 2015-04-24 13:40:01 UTC | andrewsh | Teh Wow. |
| 2 | 2015-04-24 13:55:41 UTC | trolleway | Солсбері | |
| 3 | 2015-04-24 14:35:00 UTC | woodpeck | What is the source of these names? For example, Russian names of "Swadlincote" or "Great Dunmow"? Is there any evidence of these places actually having a name in Russian, or are these just transliterations? | |
| 4 | 2015-04-24 14:38:08 UTC | dudka | This should be interesting discussion :DSee the previous one.https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/2014-August/thread.html#16294 | |
| 5 | 2015-04-24 14:46:35 UTC | Komяpa | Hello,to find russian names for places, I googled for English place names plus "достопримечательности", "погода" or some other russian word. It shows a lot of pages where the name is used, and some of them have russian version.see for example ... | |
| 6 | 2015-04-24 14:59:16 UTC | woodpeck | Frankly, no - is *any* of these web sites more than a database of transliterated place names? I saw hotel listings, tour operators, and weather pages, all obviously using a generic catalogue of transliterated place names. These sites would generate a place page for any remote village that has a hote... | |
| 28724296 by Veronika VeLe | 1 | 2015-02-10 17:55:29 UTC | andrewsh | Takto sa to prosím nerobí. Ak chcete doplniť dáta — v pohode, ale nerozhádzať popri tom existujúce. Kolega-Žilinčan tuším teraz to opraví, ak nie — skúsim ja, ale Vaše dáta žiaľ budú zmazané.... |
| 2 | 2015-02-11 10:45:12 UTC | andrewsh | Revertol som to. | |
| 28471641 by Mergen | 1 | 2015-01-29 12:47:48 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap. What exactly is http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/325048641 ? Is it something that you can actually see on the ground? |
| 2 | 2015-01-29 12:49:04 UTC | andrewsh | Seems like a new branch of Eurotunnel… | |
| 3 | 2015-01-29 12:54:41 UTC | andrewsh | Mergen, I think it's not a good idea to add low-cost flights to OSM, at least not in the specific way you did.Добавлять лоукостеры в ОСМ — не самая лучшая идея вообще, ну и точно уж не таким способом, как это сд... | |
| 4 | 2015-02-05 20:11:08 UTC | zool | OpenStreetMap is an attempt to make an accurate map of the observable world. | |
| 5 | 2015-02-11 16:30:44 UTC | aceman444 | On the other hand, there already are ferry (ship) routes (on water) in OSM. | |
| 6 | 2015-02-11 16:44:50 UTC | Mergen | Блин, я вообще не хотел выгружать это в OSM. В общем, я нуб и накосячил по полной. Пытался освоиться в JOSM, но видимо что-то пошло не так, только сейчас заметил. Как вообще... | |
| 7 | 2015-02-11 16:47:02 UTC | SomeoneElse | @Mergen - don't worry, it's not there any more :)We've all made mistakes like this - the only people who haven't have never tried to do anything in the first place! | |
| 28236423 by Komяpa | 1 | 2015-01-26 13:22:40 UTC | andrewsh | Далеко уплыл, однако! |
| 28304543 by Clira14 | 1 | 2015-01-21 19:30:20 UTC | aceman444 | Dobry den. Tu bola povodne budova a teraz je z nej bazen? Ak je to kryta plavaren, potom budovu nechajte a dajte samostatny bod do budovy, ktory bude mat leisure=swimming_pool a indoor=yes a covered=yes. |
| 2 | 2015-01-22 11:17:45 UTC | Clira14 | Upravene. Takze na tej budove ten tag swimmingpool nema byt? Teda, ze v OSM je budova proste budova a swimming poolom sa mysli to, co je v budove, preto tam mam dat pin? | |
| 3 | 2015-01-22 12:40:32 UTC | andrewsh | @Clira14, nie úplne. Ak je to budova, je postup ako napísal @aceman444: vytvori bod, dať tag. Mazať building vo väčšine prípadov nie je dobrý nápad ;) | |
| 4 | 2015-01-22 12:41:54 UTC | Clira14 | budovu mazat nechcem... len ja by som ten swimmingpool a indoor a covered dala aj na nu, tym padom by tam nemusel byt aj ten pin naviac. pride mi to zbytocne duplikovanie akoby... ci? @andrewsh | |
| 5 | 2015-01-22 12:45:44 UTC | Clira14 | este jedna vec mi nejde do hlavy... ze preco tato mapa nesedi so satelitnymi snimkami - myslim napriklad tvar budovy? http://puu.sh/eRO5V/a1552c9d7a.png odkial sa vzalo, ze ma ta budova takyto tvar? ... a prave som zistila, ze som to tu asi uplne zle oznacila... jedine, ze by nie, este musim popatra... | |
| 6 | 2015-01-22 12:58:06 UTC | andrewsh | source=kapor2 → asi je to z katastru importované.Ďalšia vec je že sa obkresľuje podľa ako keby podľa ‘tieňa’ budovy: predstav si že na budovu svieti zhora (90°) paralelný prúd svetla. Ten obraz, ktorý zostáva na zemi, sa obkre... | |
| 7 | 2015-01-22 12:59:17 UTC | andrewsh | Inak ale asi tu je táto budova označená nesprávne, asi ju prestavali od toho času kedy to bolo importované. | |
| 8 | 2015-01-22 13:01:44 UTC | Clira14 | ahaa... uz chapem. vdaka. inak vobec to nie je ta budovova, ktoru som myslela. uz je to dobre, zmenila som to cele... lebo tu ta budova s plavarnou uplne chyba. Mozno este updatnem ten obrys, ktory neviem ci je uplne spravny, ale v zasade je to uz lepsie. Navyse tam uz nie je ten tenisovy kurt ktory... | |
| 9 | 2015-01-22 13:07:13 UTC | andrewsh | Hej, už vidím, asi bazén je tuná, [kde budova chýba](http://i.imgur.com/VUozVoQ.png), ale ten kurt je asi vpravo vedľa. | |
| 10 | 2015-01-22 13:07:28 UTC | andrewsh | Aha, Markdown tu nefunguje. | |
| 11 | 2015-01-22 20:41:15 UTC | aceman444 | Ono islo o to, ze ste building=yes vymazali a namiesto toho dali len leisure=swimming_pool. Takze uz to nie je budova (nech je vnutri cokolvek) ale otvoreny bazen pod holym nebom (ako napr. na kupalisku Tehelne pole). Aj keby ste building nechali, je to hybrid, lebo budova nemoze byt zaroven bazenom... | |
| 12 | 2015-01-22 20:56:21 UTC | aceman444 | A k tej nepresnosti fotiek: satelitne fotky byvaju aj niekolko rokov stare, takze budovy mozu byt davno zmenene. A aj na najnovsej mape potom plati to co pisal andrew: budova moze byt tazko obkreslitelna kvoli tienom, stromom a streche zakryvajucej skutocny podorys. | |
| 28305148 by Clira14 | 1 | 2015-01-21 12:28:56 UTC | andrewsh | Len toto, ak dávaš to na way, tak nezabudni tak dať aj building=yes |
| 2 | 2015-01-21 12:29:50 UTC | Clira14 | ahaa... ok, idem to upravit. | |
| 28192949 by Walter Schlögl | 1 | 2015-01-19 10:20:58 UTC | andrewsh | This change has to be reverted as conscription number unfortunately overrides housenumber, which is why streetnumber is important. |
| 20486433 by michaelis1888 | 1 | 2015-01-14 17:22:21 UTC | andrewsh | Ahoj, prečo si vymazal name?Hi, why have you removed the name tag? |
| 2 | 2015-01-14 17:25:09 UTC | andrewsh | Inak by bolo dobre ak by ste sa zapojili do diskusie: osm_sk@googlegroups.comBy the way, it'd be great if you joined the discussion here: osm_sk@googlegroups.com | |
| 27364856 by AvnerR | 1 | 2014-12-10 09:00:52 UTC | andrewsh | *Part* Tomášov? What's that? |
| 27080145 by AvnerR | 1 | 2014-12-02 09:43:39 UTC | andrewsh | You shouldn't add the name in Hungarian to name, there's name:hu for that. |
| 26070192 by TomasRegina | 1 | 2014-11-13 13:29:24 UTC | andrewsh | Dávajte si prosím pozor na to kam posúvate body a aký to má vplyv na všetko.Ďakujem. |
| 26511878 by *Martin* | 1 | 2014-11-04 10:37:07 UTC | *Martin* | test |
| 2 | 2014-11-04 12:22:02 UTC | Durko_freemap | vyzera to dobre | |
| 3 | 2014-11-04 12:40:36 UTC | andrewsh | ahoj | |
| 4 | 2014-11-04 12:54:09 UTC | *Martin* | vsetko funguje | |
| 26493883 by Kilkenni | 1 | 2014-11-02 12:37:56 UTC | lks1[konto usunięte] | Test |
| 2 | 2014-11-02 12:53:44 UTC | andrewsh | Failed. | |
| 25578550 by Komяpa | 1 | 2014-11-02 11:40:10 UTC | andrewsh | кот тут? |