Rps333 participated in the following changeset discussionsRps333 participated in the following changeset discussions| Changeset | # | Tmstmp UTC | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 128827437 by Rps333 @ 2022-11-12 21:04 | 1 | 2024-02-29 02:02 | Spaghetti Monster🍝 ♦2,069 | Why are you "verifying" bad data? |
| 2 | 2024-02-29 10:50 | Rps333 | Why is it bad data? I was using "Every Door" Are you a local mapper? | |
| 3 | 2024-02-29 21:54 | Spaghetti Monster🍝 ♦2,069 | You put a checkdate on unsquared buildings tagged as offices. Like what did you check? That they're offices? | |
| 4 | 2024-02-29 22:02 | Rps333 | I was in the area, I used the app to confirm that the golf course was still open. Have a nice day. Bye | |
| 5 | 2024-03-01 00:31 | Spaghetti Monster🍝 ♦2,069 | That would be https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours. You just put a checkdate on 3 mistagged "offices". | |
| 130255343 by Rps333 @ 2022-12-19 16:07 | 1 | 2024-02-02 13:35 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,659 | Hello!You usedsport=ice_hockey;qon https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/934058163/historyHave you maybe meantsport=ice_hockey?I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).Or have you us... |
| 2 | 2024-02-02 17:40 | Rps333 | typo | |
| 132544006 by Cubical @ 2023-02-14 16:01 | 1 | 2023-06-03 21:08 | Rps333 | this is not Kichi Sibi station https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1145188988#map=18/45.39351/-75.75764It is https://devapps.ottawa.ca/en/applications/D01-01-20-0013/details |
| 136418933 by Rps333 @ 2023-05-22 15:00 | 1 | 2023-05-22 15:39 | hrhino ♦61 | seems like there are two "Parker Pie"s here? website makes it seem like it's _primarily_ a pizza place that happens to serve beer. if it's the whole building maybe tag the way instead and do amenity=restaurant, cuisine=pizza, drink:beer=yes? otherwise it shows up twice... ... |
| 2 | 2023-05-22 19:02 | Rps333 | fair comment. I will remove one | |
| 136418621 by Rps333 @ 2023-05-22 14:53 | 1 | 2023-05-22 15:33 | hrhino ♦61 | Hm, now there are 2 fences and 0 pitches. Is this tennis court still there? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136418621 |
| 2 | 2023-05-22 19:02 | Rps333 | The tennis courts are still there. I see them when I edited it. I also added pickleball from the sign I saw. | |
| 136380654 by Rps333 @ 2023-05-21 17:11 | 1 | 2023-05-21 23:32 | hrhino ♦61 | Hi! Why did you tag w1039182229 as "disused:amenity=community_center"? The real Tom Breslin Community Center looks like it's where you added n10916508826; imagery for the former makes it look like tennis courts. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Publishe... |
| 2 | 2023-05-22 14:48 | Rps333 | Hi, I was in the area and using "Everydoor" The tennis courts were tag incorrectly. I am back on my computer and will fix it. Cheers | |
| 121651964 by GuyToronto @ 2022-05-29 11:25 | 1 | 2022-12-30 18:50 | Rps333 | can you comment on this note? https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3497193 |
| 130667387 by Rps333 @ 2022-12-30 00:30 | 1 | 2022-12-30 04:32 | DavidKarlas ♦49 | Hi,looks like https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2388019 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2387995 got disconnected a bit.Could you try to fix it?Thanks,David |
| 2 | 2022-12-30 14:58 | Rps333 | Thanks for the info. I will try to fix it today.CheersJohn | |
| 3 | 2022-12-30 15:11 | Rps333 | someone fixed it last night. https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2387995 | |
| 4 | 2022-12-30 15:15 | DavidKarlas ♦49 | Cool! Sorry I bothered you… | |
| 5 | 2022-12-30 15:26 | Rps333 | No problem. Cheers | |
| 130680478 by kartler175 @ 2022-12-30 10:40 | 1 | 2022-12-30 15:11 | Rps333 | thanks for fixing the boundaries! |
| 130012583 by Rps333 @ 2022-12-12 20:55 | 1 | 2022-12-27 23:57 | hoserab ♦194 | Hey Rps333, just as a heads up and a gentle reminder to be careful about resolving notes (especially ones by anonymous authors) without verifying their veracity, "Sussy Baka Amogus Shrine" is just some internet meme junk. Note 3475588 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3475588) should hav... |
| 2 | 2022-12-28 13:06 | Rps333 | fair enough. Cheers | |
| 105531132 by eireidium @ 2021-05-29 11:46 | 1 | 2022-12-07 20:40 | Rps333 | see note: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3470119 |
| 121955041 by Rps333 @ 2022-06-04 22:01 | 1 | 2022-06-08 23:17 | Danchev ♦11 | Hi Rps333,why have you changed the school name to ALL UPPERCASE? |
| 2 | 2022-06-09 10:37 | Rps333 | I was fixing a note and copied the name from the link provided. https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3210066I have fixed it.Cheers | |
| 3 | 2022-06-10 10:38 | Danchev ♦11 | Thank you very much! | |
| 82730280 by prudent @ 2020-03-27 19:16 | 1 | 2022-05-01 21:20 | Rps333 | what is this for https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/785172508#map=16/47.3703/-70.0421? |
| 40119143 by Rps333 @ 2016-06-18 16:09 | 1 | 2016-06-19 12:52 | mueschel ♦6,570 | Hi,the relations you created in this changeset all have a lot of foreign tags that should not appear in the OSM database. Please consider deleting them or converting to normal OSM tags. It also seems that several of the ways should be tagged waterway=riverbank instead of natural=water.Jan |
| 2 | 2016-06-19 12:54 | Rps333 | Will do. | |
| 3 | 2016-06-19 13:10 | Rps333 | The foreign tags are from someone else edits. However I will try to clean them up. | |
| 4 | 2016-06-19 13:14 | mueschel ♦6,570 | I don't think so, e.g.:http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6327733This relation is version #1, created and edited by you only. | |
| 5 | 2016-07-26 08:25 | mueschel ♦6,570 | Hi,these tags are still in the database. can they be converted to something useful or be deleted? Also, I found several invalid multipolygons that do not have an "outer" way. | |
| 6 | 2022-04-04 15:19 | mueschel ♦6,570 | Hi again. I just found this old import again. There are still about 50 lakes with about 30 foreign tags each in the database. Is there any reason to keep this in OSM?E.g.https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6327716Things like 'datemin' or 'definit_en =Lake' don't s... | |
| 7 | 2022-04-04 15:22 | Rps333 | nope. feel free to remove them | |
| 98185425 by Darrylj @ 2021-01-26 21:51 | 1 | 2022-01-27 13:56 | Rps333 | can you comment on this note? https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3026339 |
| 116360478 by bob2000 @ 2022-01-19 21:57 Active block | 1 | 2022-01-20 10:39 | danieldegroot2 ♦674 | Welcome to OpenStreetMap. I have sent you an extensive welcome message with useful information and links as a private message.Kind regards,DanielOn behalf of the OpenStreetMap community. |
| 2 | 2022-01-20 15:23 | marczoutendijk ♦2,755 | This user is now blocked because this is an account used to circumvent other blocks.https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5605 | |
| 3 | 2022-01-24 10:59 | Rps333 | can you comment on this note? https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3022087 | |
| 4 | 2022-01-24 16:53 | danieldegroot2 ♦674 | @Rps333 I have replied to and closed said note.Afaik the DWG will look at their contributions and consider what to revert / keep. They are always busy ;) | |
| 112161099 by Rps333 @ 2021-10-06 09:45 | 1 | 2021-10-06 19:01 | alester ♦187 | I noticed in this changeset (as well as 112163892), you changed a Thrifty Foods location to Sobeys. While Sobeys bought the chain in 2007, the stores have remained branded as Thrifty Foods. It's a very longstanding local brand, so I'm pretty sure there would be quite a bit of media coverag... |
| 2 | 2021-10-06 20:22 | Rps333 | Thanks. I was fixing notes in the area and ID suggested the name change. Feel free to correct if it was mistake.CheersJohn | |
| 111664558 by Scooter_DE @ 2021-09-24 19:47 | 1 | 2021-10-04 19:02 | Rps333 | can you reply to this note?https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2880557#map=14/43.4110/-80.3748&layers=NCheers |
| 20057601 by Victor Bielawski @ 2014-01-17 20:59 | 1 | 2021-08-16 21:58 | Rps333 | can you comment on this note?https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2805952 |
| 77824774 by Rps333 @ 2019-12-02 13:44 | 1 | 2021-05-25 00:11 | VE7DAC ♦1 | The road is accurate, but it ends in a private driveway so should be shortened by about 80M. The path indicated does not exist, it appears to end in private property with no through access. |
| 2 | 2021-05-25 10:29 | Rps333 | fixed | |
| 104405850 by brianzng @ 2021-05-09 17:57 | 1 | 2021-05-18 16:01 | Rps333 | see note https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2663706Are you going to fix it? |
| 74207479 by alester @ 2019-09-07 15:02 | 1 | 2019-09-24 18:58 | MelioraCogito ♦15 | Another case of vandalism by the arrogant alester. Gotta love it. |
| 2 | 2019-09-24 19:00 | MelioraCogito ♦15 | These ARE administrative boundaries used by the Regional Districts to manage freshwater resources. Stop being a dick. | |
| 3 | 2019-09-24 20:23 | alester ♦187 | I'm sorry that you feel my edits are vandalism. I assure you they aren't, and I make it a point of monitoring the southern part of the island for true vandalism or damaging/misguided edits. To show you that I have the best intentions, I previously agreed to not fix the many duplicated addr... | |
| 4 | 2021-04-22 20:41 | Rps333 | what do you think about this note? https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2634351Thanks | |
| 86067842 by sammuell_imports @ 2020-06-02 01:19 | 1 | 2021-03-20 10:30 | vt100 ♦39 | Could you please take a look at that weirdish landuse pattern in southern The Pas? Are these single lots? |
| 2 | 2021-03-20 11:05 | Rps333 | see note https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2586497 | |
| 45458584 by simon Villeneuve @ 2017-01-25 03:00 | 1 | 2021-03-17 14:37 | Rps333 | can you comment on this note? https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2582587 |
| 97646383 by Fildew @ 2021-01-17 17:26 | 1 | 2021-03-17 11:31 | Rps333 | see note Tagging private cottages as tourism=wilderness_hut is unwanted tagging for the renderer (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Don.27t_map_for_the_renderer). Please revise.https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2582352#map=16/48.2339/-79.3896&layers=N |
| 76835185 by spatially_yours @ 2019-11-09 02:20 | 1 | 2021-03-14 20:57 | Rps333 | can you comment on this note? https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2579255Keremeos Office901 7th AvenueKeremeos, BCV0X 1N3250-687-0146the Red Cross says its at https://www.redcross.ca/in-your-community/british-columbia-and-yukon/british-columbia-and-yukon-find-a-branch/keremeos-off... |
| 61200102 by Olivier Turgeon @ 2018-07-30 15:51 | 1 | 2021-03-10 15:35 | Rps333 | Are these place_of_worship really on the ground? |
| 69395812 by FvGordon @ 2019-04-20 06:44 | 1 | 2019-04-21 22:58 | badenk ♦47 | Hi:I am not sure how to address this, but there are now 2 duplicate AB-BC border segments (Way: AB-BC (48622354). I could remove one, but I thought it would be best to let you deal with it.thanks,Baden |
| 2 | 2019-04-21 23:01 | badenk ♦47 | Sorry, I originally checked last night, however, now it is good. {:-)thanks,Baden | |
| 3 | 2021-03-06 11:15 | Rps333 | The Municipality of Jasper does not include any land within British Columbia.Can you fix it?https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2567500 | |
| 99859345 by PSGOLF @ 2021-02-23 23:43 | 1 | 2021-02-28 11:20 | Rps333 | why did you change 10th Line road to a service road? |
| 98033597 by Rps333 @ 2021-01-23 19:34 | 1 | 2021-01-26 19:31 | user_5359 ♦19,390 | Hello! ou added a bigger number of unknown tags in this change set. acquisitionTechnique=Computed alCode=08007 alType=Indian Reserve creationDate=20030416 datasetName=BC jurisdiction1=BC language1=English language2=French language3=No Language langu... |
| 2 | 2021-01-26 21:42 | Rps333 | thanks. I thought I removed those. I will fix itThanks | |
| 3 | 2021-01-26 21:59 | Rps333 | Ok I just check in JOSM and I cannot see the other tags.just https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12225793#map=18/49.30910/-121.90785&layers=NCan you put to tag or remove the non OSM info? Thanks | |
| 4 | 2021-01-27 05:02 | user_5359 ♦19,390 | Hello! Did you know the overpass-turbo.eu site https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/12PD? If I delete all non OSM keys the ways don't have any tag. | |
| 5 | 2021-01-27 11:58 | Rps333 | thanks. fixed | |
| 96503535 by Cubical @ 2020-12-28 01:41 | 1 | 2021-01-25 22:25 | Rps333 | can you comment on this note? https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2512470#map=17/46.53536/-80.96597&layers=N |
| 17690260 by andrewpmk @ 2013-09-05 16:18 | 1 | 2021-01-07 12:01 | Rps333 | see note https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2488326 |
| 94561443 by InfiNorth @ 2020-11-21 20:57 | 1 | 2021-01-04 21:38 | Rps333 | You added duplicate buildings in this area.see note https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2485488 |
| 96147614 by Rps333 @ 2020-12-20 17:01 | 1 | 2020-12-25 20:21 | blackboxlogic ♦458 | regarding node 7231473006, do you prefer to keep points of interest (in this case, a business) separate from the building elements that they are in? Would you recommend this to others? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/96147614 ... |
| 2 | 2020-12-25 20:37 | Rps333 | Either are correct. I was fixing a note, and was not sure if there were other businesses in the building. So a used a point. | |
| 95754262 by Rps333 @ 2020-12-13 13:07 | 1 | 2020-12-15 23:32 | joel56dt ♦169 | I would like to understand why you removed this path. Thanks. |
| 2 | 2020-12-15 23:52 | Rps333 | There was a note saying it wasn't there.. The imagery did really show it either. So I removed it and closed the note. | |
| 91608151 by jcob250 @ 2020-09-28 04:27 | 1 | 2020-12-13 14:11 | Rps333 | is this road really here ?https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/184961614I cannot see it in the imagery. |
| 10042892 by Tygunn @ 2011-12-05 15:34 | 1 | 2020-10-13 22:04 | Rps333 | Hi can you help this new mapper? see note https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1992072 |
| 92008417 by Rps333 @ 2020-10-05 21:40 | 1 | 2020-10-08 15:55 | alester ♦187 | I've removed the opening_hours from this gate. The hours on Mosaic gates vary depending on the time of year, and there are also stretches of the year where it will be closed 24/7. The note that led to this changeset was likely an improper use of notes and was intended for sharing with someone e... |
| 2 | 2020-10-08 21:32 | Rps333 | thanks | |
| 92168816 by Rps333 @ 2020-10-08 10:39 | 1 | 2020-10-08 15:36 | alester ♦187 | This changeset undid recent changes and moved objects to where they were a few years ago, and also added a playground where none has ever existed. I've now reverted it.I now realize that you're remotely "fixing notes" all across Canada with no local on-the-ground knowledge. P... |
| 2 | 2020-10-08 21:31 | Rps333 | Thanks. That was my mistake. Base on the note, I thought the Bing imagery was the most recent imagery not the Maxar. | |
| 91827801 by DasCaver @ 2020-10-01 12:43 | 1 | 2020-10-02 14:34 | Rps333 | Does the campground you added have a name? If no just leave it blank.Cheers |
| 2 | 2020-10-02 14:48 | DasCaver ♦1 | No name. This is dispersed camping on public land. | |
| 3 | 2020-10-02 14:59 | DasCaver ♦1 | Done. Thanks. | |
| 4 | 2020-10-02 15:06 | Rps333 | No problem. Looks like you do a lot of mapping with OSMAnd. Me too, have you tried taking a few photos of the POI with Mapillary?Happy Mapping | |
| 5 | 2020-10-02 18:27 | Viajero Perdido ♦243 | Hi. For dispersed camping (eg no facilities, what we out west call "random camping", may I suggest adding camp_site=basic.https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:camp_siteCheers. | |
| 6 | 2020-10-03 11:49 | DasCaver ♦1 | Where do I add that? (And/or how?) | |
| 7 | 2020-10-03 13:00 | Rps333 | Click on edit. https://learnosm.org/en/. Give it a try. | |
| 32646178 by michael_moovelmaps @ 2015-07-15 09:16 | 1 | 2020-10-01 18:04 | Rps333 | see note: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2370483Addressing on this street is off, all addresses should be shifted one property to the left. First house is 9371 Beckwith Road, the last one is 9571 Beckwith Road. |
| 66674834 by have moicy @ 2019-01-27 11:42 | 1 | 2020-09-28 20:40 | Rps333 | should these disused:highway=track be tags as highway=track or footpath? |
| 2 | 2020-09-29 00:39 | have moicy ♦2 | I am uncertain about the sections that lack GPS traces, which are the only ones I have local knowledge about. The sections with GPS traces are still used regularly, but. the disused trails in the area have become overgrown in recent years. | |
| 3 | 2020-09-29 00:55 | Rps333 | Should we remove them? They don't show up on the map.I don't care either way. Just trying to close notes. | |
| 90797849 by Rps333 @ 2020-09-12 15:55 | 1 | 2020-09-12 19:27 | aweech ♦369 | Hi,I'm extremely confused by these edits. What do you mean by these names? Are they really named that by the residents? They're very technical sounding. And why did you tag every node with `ele=0.0`? This is clearly not sea level. |
| 2 | 2020-09-12 22:28 | Rps333 | Sorry about that, I will check and fix it. | |
| 3 | 2020-09-12 22:58 | Rps333 | Hi, I have removed ele. If I missed any please fell free to remove them or let me know and I will do it.Thanks | |
| 4 | 2020-09-14 00:10 | aweech ♦369 | Thanks for removing the ele tags. But what are the name tags? They seem nonsensical and technical. I get that this is a resort-like area, but "Block Reference [9316]:0" is such a weird name for a building. Checking out the website, most of the buildings have lot names like "Lot #6-TC&... | |
| 5 | 2020-09-14 11:04 | Rps333 | I agree, will clean that up. | |
| 40216005 by Rps333 @ 2016-06-22 22:25 | 1 | 2020-08-13 18:02 | DevonF ♦15 | I noticed some of the islands of lakes, tagged as inner relation of the lake, have also been tagged as natural=water. The islands are not water. An example of this are the islands in Patterson Lake (eg https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/426680908). I've fixed those, but the rest of this import n... |
| 2 | 2020-08-13 18:25 | Rps333 | I was not import CANVEC. I believe i was fixing a note in that area. Thanks for fixing it, if I made the error. | |
| 3 | 2020-08-13 18:29 | Rps333 | My mistake, that was 4 years ago. I add the just the water from CANVEC, someone else must have added the land cover. Thanks for fixing it. | |
| 4 | 2020-08-13 19:01 | DevonF ♦15 | I don't quite follow what you mean. I can see in your changeset that you imported the islands but tagged them as water. It's clearly a tagging mistake. Who else was involved in this? Where's the wiki page for this import?Here's another example https://www.openstreetmap.org/wa... | |
| 5 | 2020-08-14 12:34 | Rps333 | I see the problem. I will work on fixing them. Cheers | |
| 6 | 2020-08-14 17:56 | DevonF ♦15 | Thanks, much appreciated! | |
| 88191265 by Rps333 @ 2020-07-19 05:45 | 1 | 2020-07-20 08:11 | raushiferum ♦8 | Dear Rps333,please don't get mad – and please don't use the name for taking notes / "dealership is closed". |
| 2 | 2020-07-20 19:57 | Rps333 | I was out in the field. Feel free to fix it. | |
| 74750068 by gabd000 @ 2019-09-21 13:51 | 1 | 2020-02-25 01:34 | Rps333 | someone added a note to your edit see here https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2101113you tag Rue Saint-Hubert as underconstuction, but it looks like open. |
| 79125394 by Rps333 @ 2020-01-02 18:09 | 1 | 2020-02-07 18:49 | Eric Geiler - A&B Courier ♦33 | Thanks for touching up my back yard, I live beside this golf club. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/79125394 |
| 2 | 2020-02-07 20:11 | Rps333 | No problem | |
| 78148504 by Rps333 @ 2019-12-09 12:02 | 1 | 2020-01-29 00:37 | SomeoneElse ♦13,389 | Hello,Are you sure that the brand information on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7043819486 is correct? The website for that brand http://ginospizza.com/Locations.aspx suggests that they are WV only.Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2020-01-29 16:27 | Rps333 | I was using info from the note and Id presets. If you have better info feel free to fix it. | |
| 20043300 by Cecil Coxen @ 2014-01-16 23:54 | 1 | 2020-01-01 17:10 | Rps333 | Great work adding all the sidewalks. But they have to be connected to each other to enable routing. Can you connect them? |
| 57264330 by Rps333 @ 2018-03-17 11:02 | 1 | 2019-11-27 00:15 | Viajero Perdido ♦243 | Hi Rps333.Weird, isn't it? The name of the lake you added here (which is correct according to CanVec, a source I actually trust for names) doesn't match the name of the provincial park surrounding it - which I added straight from the provincial source.You probably wondered the sam... |
| 2 | 2019-11-27 13:14 | Rps333 | All good. I use to camp around here 20 years ago. Feel free to adjust as required.CheersJ | |
| 38365856 by Rps333 @ 2016-04-06 23:08 | 1 | 2019-10-05 09:06 | mueschel ♦6,570 | Hi,could you check this node, it has many foreign tags:https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4103862725 |
| 2 | 2019-10-06 15:07 | Rps333 | fixed | |
| 73279763 by Rps333 @ 2019-08-12 18:48 | 1 | 2019-09-22 06:22 | HubMiner ♦271 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6703822560Hi, the hours look unusual, could you check? |
| 2 | 2019-09-22 22:53 | Rps333 | its 24/7. fixed | |
| 3 | 2019-09-23 12:51 | HubMiner ♦271 | Thanks! | |
| 74594014 by Rps333 @ 2019-09-17 18:04 | 1 | 2019-09-21 07:16 | DENelson83 ♦95 | Why'd you remove the name "Thrifty Foods"? |
| 2 | 2019-09-21 13:59 | Rps333 | I didn't mean too. I was upgrading the tags on POIshttps://maproulette.org/challenge/8301/task/24384144 | |
| 71799012 by MeMaps @ 2019-07-01 20:34 | 1 | 2019-07-12 19:51 | Rps333 | I believe it is now open. I just drove over it. Collected OSC and Mapillary imagery. will upload in the next 45 days or so |
| 67807004 by e pt @ 2019-03-05 14:20 Active block | 1 | 2019-03-05 14:43 | zzptichka ♦97 | Do you mind not deleting an actual existing-on-the-ground disused rail tracks in favor of a proposed railway that is still 5+ years away and that might not even be funded? At least until the tracks are ripped out?Please re-map it. Thanks. |
| 2 | 2019-03-05 15:13 | Rps333 | +1 --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/67807004 | |
| 3 | 2019-03-05 15:23 | LogicalViolinist ♦83 | Please revert your deletions immediately and STOP deleting disused tracks | |
| 65786122 by carpbunker @ 2018-12-26 14:25 | 1 | 2018-12-27 12:55 | kartler175 ♦556 | What is the intended purpose of applying the addr:city tags to the buildings? To my mind it is completly nonsensical. In the import plan it is not adressed either. |
| 2 | 2018-12-28 12:56 | Rps333 | It was added addr:city incase the boundary wasn't there or they wanted to filter out buildings. I will remove it. | |
| 62498045 by Rps333 @ 2018-09-11 18:21 | 1 | 2018-09-17 10:51 | mueschel ♦6,570 | Hi,could you check the 'disused' tag here? Something went wrong there. |
| 2 | 2018-09-17 14:51 | Rps333 | Thanks. fixed. i think | |
| 3 | 2018-09-22 12:37 | mueschel ♦6,570 | Nope, the tag ist still there: "disused_ = amenity=fuel".Am I correct, this gas station doesn't exist any more? | |
| 60495293 by Rps333 @ 2018-07-07 18:57 | 1 | 2018-07-27 15:43 | Matthew Darwin ♦204 | Hi John,name and name:en don't match. Could you review? |
| 2 | 2018-07-27 22:13 | Rps333 | fixed | |
| 59610303 by Rps333 @ 2018-06-06 17:36 | 1 | 2018-07-15 16:53 | Matthew Darwin ♦204 | Hi John,Please check this edit. name and name:en don't match and you moved the address which not aligned to the building next door. |
| 2 | 2018-07-15 18:49 | Rps333 | thanks. It was a Maps.me thing. fixed. | |
| 58472717 by SE16 @ 2018-04-27 11:24 | 1 | 2018-07-11 02:26 | Rps333 | Hi Do you really think Chemin du Moulin is a Secondary Road? Not saying it's wrong but.. Just drove it today, uploading OSC and Mapillary. Lots of logging trucks.Thoughts??? |
| 2 | 2018-07-11 16:45 | SE16 ♦1 | I do not have an opinion - I see it is Route 1055 (one more digit compared with Route 109 - James Bay Road) and near Lebel-sur-Quévillon and Route 113 it is currently marked as a Tertiary Road, and near the Osisko mine as a minor road | |
| 3 | 2018-07-11 16:56 | Rps333 | OK. something to think about. What ref # is it? But I think it should be the same call all the way to Route 113. | |
| 4 | 2018-07-11 16:59 | Rps333 | I will also add the missing water with CANVEC data over the next week or so. | |
| 59431735 by YanikB @ 2018-05-31 14:19 | 1 | 2018-06-04 12:05 | LogicalViolinist ♦83 | Fait attention avec la modification de la rivière, tu as sèché une grosse portion de la rivière entre Britannia Bay et le pont champlain. Je l'ai réparé |
| 2 | 2018-06-04 12:30 | Rps333 | Thanks for fixing it James | |
| 58507889 by Rps333 @ 2018-04-28 16:24 | 1 | 2018-04-29 14:48 | Matthew Darwin ♦204 | Hi John. name and name:en tags don't match here. Could you check? |
| 2 | 2018-04-29 17:09 | Rps333 | fixed | |
| 58195102 by carpbunker @ 2018-04-18 10:03 | 1 | 2018-04-18 12:48 | Nakaner ♦3,149 | Hi carpbunker,your user account does not look to be an account dedicated for imports, does it? Could you please use a dedicated OSM account for uploading data directly derived from Canvec (also known as "Canvec import")? The Import Guidelines require you to use a dedicated account for... |
| 2 | 2018-04-18 12:52 | Nakaner ♦3,149 | Further comments on your imports in that area:- The imported lakes have too many nodes. You don't need a node every five metres if the shore of the lake is nearly straight. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/581002869#map=18/50.17248/-91.41968 There is a JOSM plugin to simplify ways (I forgo... | |
| 3 | 2018-04-18 13:29 | Rps333 | This is a import account. There are no errors from the data I added. The error are from an earlier canvec import to the west. | |
| 4 | 2018-04-18 13:38 | Nakaner ♦3,149 | Hi Rps333,is that your account? If so, could you please add a note to the profile page?I thought it isn't an import account because https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/58091753 does not look like a gas station import. Or is that changeset just an "accident"? (I myself have... | |
| 5 | 2018-04-18 13:39 | Nakaner ♦3,149 | Example for such a note on a profile page: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Nakaner-import | |
| 6 | 2018-04-18 14:34 | Rps333 | Sorry carpbunker is my import account. | |
| 7 | 2018-04-18 14:41 | Rps333 | fixed the railway problem. missed that one. I am check all the canvec data vs bring/ DG imagery. Cheers | |
| 56591697 by Rps333 @ 2018-02-22 20:51 | 1 | 2018-03-31 05:37 | fx99 ♦127 | According to Canvec, MP 8047575 (and others) should be part of Lake St. Joseph.see alsohttp://www4.rncan.gc.ca/search-place-names/unique.php?id=FECHH&output=xml |
| 2 | 2018-03-31 12:29 | Rps333 | OK. Feel free to change the name.Cheers | |
| 50202458 by Nicolas Tardif @ 2017-07-11 13:37 | 1 | 2018-03-27 15:04 | Rps333 | should the chalet be removed? |
| 24167833 by Tom69 @ 2014-07-15 19:33 | 1 | 2018-02-20 21:58 | Rps333 | I will add the lake with canvec |
| 56427425 by Rps333 @ 2018-02-16 22:19 | 1 | 2018-02-18 12:48 | mueschel ♦6,570 | Hi,I found 23 POIs with rather strange tags, like this node:http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5417428673There are several keys that don't look like they should appear in OSM: City=High Level Province=Alberta Site_Name=High Level site_type=Scheduled OutreachCould ... |
| 2 | 2018-02-18 15:06 | Rps333 | thanks. I will fix them | |
| 54648001 by GerdP @ 2017-12-15 09:55 | 1 | 2017-12-15 10:23 | Rps333 | Ok. Thanks |
| 51267954 by TeVe @ 2017-08-20 01:48 | 1 | 2017-12-13 16:34 | Rps333 | Is this road open now? https://winnipeg.ctvnews.ca/all-weather-road-connecting-2-manitoba-first-nations-to-highways-done-1.3718477 |
| 54188055 by Rps333 @ 2017-11-29 20:19 | 1 | 2017-11-30 13:10 | mueschel ♦6,570 | Hi,you're adding the tag "amenity_02 \t=car_wash" to fuel stations - there is no such key used in any other place. The correct tag would be "car_wash = yes"Cheers, Jan |
| 2 | 2017-11-30 13:45 | Rps333 | ok | |
| 40633656 by Rps333 @ 2016-07-10 16:30 | 1 | 2017-08-24 12:42 | GerdP ♦2,751 | Hi!Please review: Way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/430207075is overlapped by another way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/431899659#map=15/49.1266/-79.2204I assume the 1st should be removed? |
| 2 | 2017-08-24 13:04 | Rps333 | yes. thanks for the QA | |
| 3 | 2017-08-24 13:26 | GerdP ♦2,751 | ok, removed | |
| 46827764 by Rps333 @ 2017-03-14 01:27 | 1 | 2017-08-18 22:15 | Matthew Darwin ♦204 | I reverted your change to 13 Wright Street where you put Chinese characters there. |
| 2 | 2017-08-18 22:37 | Rps333 | Why? Feel free to change the Chinese characters. But this is not Saints Peter. maybe local survey to see what in the building now. Cheers | |
| 48638934 by Rps333 @ 2017-05-13 02:03 | 1 | 2017-05-15 06:37 | Jothirnadh ♦75 | Hi Rps333,In this changeset `amenity=restaurant` is added along with `place=town`. Looks like it's added by mistake. Can you look into it and correct it please. Happy mapping,Jothirnadh |
| 2 | 2017-05-15 11:20 | Rps333 | fixed | |
| 3 | 2017-05-15 13:51 | Jothirnadh ♦75 | Thanks for quick fix Rps33 | |
| 48018357 by Rps333 @ 2017-04-21 22:54 | 1 | 2017-04-22 18:21 | Aleks-Berlin ♦482 | Hi Rps, please follow the OSM wiki guidelines,"wikipedia"="lang:Name" (not http..).https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:wikipedia#ExamplesThanks, Alex |
| 2 | 2017-04-26 21:32 | Rps333 | done | |
| 47841652 by Rps333 @ 2017-04-16 15:55 | 1 | 2017-04-18 10:57 | mueschel ♦6,570 | Hi,these POIs have some foreign tags that could (and should) be converted to usual OSM tags, e.g. ACCESSIBLEADDRESSADDRESS_FRNAME_FRNOTESCould you have a look?Cheers, Jan |
| 2 | 2017-04-18 10:59 | Rps333 | I will have a look. thanks | |
| 42876740 by Rps333 @ 2016-10-13 17:59 | 1 | 2016-10-14 19:50 | SOSM ♦61 | Please explain why you are removing existing valid data, for example http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/68587894/history instead of simply improving geometries (if needed at all). |
| 2 | 2016-10-15 02:12 | Rps333 | I have tired very hard to keep all the existing data when adding the new geometries. If I removed some data by mistake, I will be happy to do a local survey to confirm the data. | |
| 3 | 2016-10-15 13:00 | LogicalViolinist ♦83 | Original data was probably from NRCan v6.0(which is acient and innacurate in building footprints). Data footprints being added are traced on 30cm imagery and correctly positionned. Copying attributes to new geometry and deleting the old is quicker and more effecient than trying to align old geometry... | |
| 4 | 2016-10-15 14:15 | maxerickson ♦234 | In the above example, the "building:levels" tag was not copied over to the new building.Procedurally, it looks like there were 2166 existing buildings deleted in one changeset and new buildings uploaded in another. Where could one look to find documentation of how information from the ... | |
| 5 | 2016-10-15 15:40 | LogicalViolinist ♦83 | This is part of a project involving statistics canada. Documentation can be found here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Canada#Crowdsourcing_buildings_with_Statistics_Canada | |
| 6 | 2016-10-15 17:50 | SimonPoole ♦341 | Nothing against statistics canada, but they have to follow OSM rules just like everybody else. | |
| 7 | 2016-10-17 21:03 | Rps333 | This is part of the Stats Canada Open data project. And has been discussed on Talk:ca It has received OSM Ottawa community approval. OSM Ottawa has been planning on adding the build for 3 months now. We have a dedicated Task sever. FYI, every building I added, I have tried to confirm with Bing imag... | |
| 8 | 2016-10-17 21:26 | PierZen ♦262 | There might be improvements to the process like using JOSM Replace Geometry functionality. Such discussion should benefit to all canadian osm contributors. Please come and discuss this on the Talk-ca discussion list. | |
| 9 | 2016-10-17 21:39 | Nakaner ♦3,149 | Hi Rps333,as you might know, all imports have to comply with the Import Guidelines. Neither "It has received OSM Ottawa community approval." nor a discussion on Talk-ca mailing list is sufficient. You are currently violating almost all sections of the guideline although although you kn... | |
| 10 | 2016-10-17 22:19 | Rps333 | I have never heard of the Replace Geometry. Thanks, I should have used that. | |
| 11 | 2016-10-20 13:59 | mikelmaron ♦34 | @Nakaner, you have some things to learn about the OpenStreetMap community. We do not have police, officially sanctioned or self appointed, who monitor imports for "compliance". If there is an issue, then certainly, there is room to be specific and helpful to address any problems. Sorry, bu... | |
| 12 | 2016-10-20 15:07 | LogicalViolinist ♦83 | @mikelmaron while I do agree with you, it's easy to police people into obeying Guildelines(which by definition should be a suggested coarse of action instead of a hardset rule book that if you don't obey you get reverted) to a T when you work with someone from the DWG:From:https://wiki... | |
| 13 | 2016-10-20 15:26 | Nakaner ♦3,149 | @LogicalViolinist I did not looked at all your edits of the last 18 months. I just asked myself: "Well Gatineau has all addresses on the map. What's the source of them?" And the answer was: "It's changeset 33248922 from LogicalViolinist."I do have a job at Geofabrik... | |
| 14 | 2016-10-20 15:37 | LogicalViolinist ♦83 | I did say roughly. I did not use google translate. Mein Deutsch ist nicht so gut. Side job still qualifies as a job. It means you probably know woodpeck personally in real life (judging that geofabrik is not that big of a company) | |
| 15 | 2016-10-20 15:48 | ottawa_data ♦1 | I do agree that @Nakaner has been actively looking for reasons to revert commits from OSM community members in Canada. Thanks to these reverts, we now have a blank map again. | |
| 16 | 2016-10-20 17:34 | SOSM ♦61 | @mikelmaron the complaints about the import originate with local mappers that found that their data was needlessly being deleted/replaced without any substantial previous discussion. As nakaner has pointed out, the people involved were very well aware of what the guidelines say from previous discuss... | |
| 17 | 2016-10-20 17:37 | SimonPoole ♦341 | Upps, the previous comment was from me, and is obviously not an opinion of SOSM. | |
| 18 | 2016-10-22 15:03 | woodpeck_repair ♦33,903 | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43067946 where the changeset comment is: revert un-discussed building import in Ottawa | |
| 42776641 by Rps333 @ 2016-10-10 12:57 | 1 | 2016-10-17 20:12 | scruss ♦74 | Is this a dedicated import account? This looks like a data import. The Stats Canada data import has not yet received community approval |
| 2 | 2016-10-17 20:55 | Rps333 | This is part of the Stats Canada import. It has received OSM Ottawa community approval. We has been planning on adding the build for 3 months now. We have a dedicated Task sever. FYI everbuild I added, I have tried to confirm with Bing imagery if it makes sense. If there was a build there pick the... | |
| 3 | 2016-10-17 21:02 | scruss ♦74 | but it hasn't received the national talk-ca approval or had approval from the main Imports list, as required here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines#Step_5_-_Import_Review . Also, it's an import from a non-dedicated account, which is not allowed. | |
| 4 | 2016-10-17 21:38 | Nakaner ♦3,149 | https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ca/2016-October/007416.html | |
| 5 | 2016-10-22 15:03 | woodpeck_repair ♦33,903 | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43067946 where the changeset comment is: revert un-discussed building import in Ottawa | |
| 5466477 by Johnwhelan @ 2010-08-11 19:49 | 1 | 2016-10-09 13:54 | Rps333 | are you sure about the location of Osgoode Gardens |
| 41676348 by Geography Canada @ 2016-08-24 23:48 | 1 | 2016-08-25 13:56 | SomeoneElse ♦13,389 | Did you discuss the naming change for http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/96223684/history on the talk-ca list like you were asked to last time you made these sorts of changes? |
| 2 | 2016-08-25 15:28 | Geography Canada ♦104 | No, but seeing that you were okay with adding Tigrinya to Asmara, maybe I thought you would be okay with me adding Inuktitut to Iqaluit (over 69% of people in Nunavut speak Inuktitut). | |
| 3 | 2016-08-25 15:38 | SomeoneElse ♦13,389 | Which part of pnorman's comments on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/40333070 did you not understand?It's is difficult to see how he could have expressed himself more clearly. | |
| 4 | 2016-08-25 15:53 | Geography Canada ♦104 | That was a country name, not a city! | |
| 5 | 2016-08-25 15:54 | SomeoneElse ♦13,389 | It's the same issue though - you're choosing to shove together two different languages into one name field. The earlier changeset discussion comment says " The name=* tag should only have one name in it.". | |
| 6 | 2016-08-25 15:56 | Geography Canada ♦104 | You were okay with this: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/41545650. You say: "it's changing the name of http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/321732075/history from English to Amharic (which may make sense of course). What I did here is essentially the same thing - the main local langua... | |
| 7 | 2016-08-25 15:56 | Geography Canada ♦104 | Oh okay. I will delete the English. | |
| 8 | 2016-08-25 15:59 | Geography Canada ♦104 | Fixed: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/41692017. However, note the same thing is happening in Sudan (Arabic and English in one name= tag). | |
| 9 | 2016-08-25 16:15 | SomeoneElse ♦13,389 | Re using Inuktitut rather than English - I'd definitely discuss it on talk-ca. A number of countries have decided to use a "non-local" name in the name tag to avoid confusion or conflict (India's an example, as PlaneMad has said to you on another changeset discussion). | |
| 10 | 2016-08-26 18:53 | Geography Canada ♦104 | I don't think there would be a conflict here. There are very few people that pay attention to Iqaluit on OSM.Over 69 percent of people in Nunavut speak Inuktitut. Inuktitut is official in Nunavut.I could raise the problem on the forum.Besides, just the city name's (not the road... | |
| 11 | 2016-08-26 19:37 | SomeoneElse ♦13,389 | Given what happened last time when people complained, I'd definitely raise it on the talk-ca list. I wouldn't bother with the Canadian forum because that seems to be ignored by most Canadian mappers. | |
| 12 | 2016-08-27 01:32 | Geography Canada ♦104 | That was about the country name, which actually gets attention. I think people would agree with replacing English with Inuktitut. Or else it would've been reverted by now. | |
| 13 | 2016-08-27 01:34 | Geography Canada ♦104 | I will look into the talk-ca list. | |
| 14 | 2016-09-06 16:40 | Geography Canada ♦104 | Thanks for the help! It is greatly appreciated. | |
| 15 | 2016-09-17 14:12 | Rps333 | There needs to be more discussion on talk-ca! | |
| 16 | 2016-09-18 16:39 | scruss ♦74 | Thing is, few (if any) people call it “ᐃᖅᐊᓗᑦ Iqaluit”. It's either ᐃᖅᐊᓗᑦ *or* Iqaluit. As the node has both name:en and name:iu tags, we should pick _one_. Having both is wrong. | |
| 17 | 2016-10-19 15:54 | Geography Canada ♦104 | Someone added "Iqaluit" in, after I removed it. It was simply "ᐃᖅᐊᓗᑦ". | |
| 41966172 by Rps333 @ 2016-09-06 20:28 | 1 | 2016-09-07 02:55 | DenisCarriere ♦31 | Cool stuff! I wanted to add this tag via Maps.me but it wouldn't let me add `wheelchair` tag. That's why i created a note :) |
| 2 | 2016-09-07 11:28 | Rps333 | Had to beat you to it. Try wheelmap.org I used it a few years back to add this info.Just installed the App again | |
| 3 | 2016-09-07 11:41 | DenisCarriere ♦31 | Cool! I'll check that out | |
| 39517002 by Rps333 @ 2016-05-23 19:09 | 1 | 2016-08-26 12:07 | Nakaner ♦3,149 | Hi Rps333,I am going to revert this changeset in the next hours due to following reasons:1. Import using no dedicated account (i.e. violation of Import Guidelines)2. bad import because of uploading data which is clearly broken (ways with natural=water which are not closed). Your editor (... |
| 2 | 2016-08-26 16:40 | Rps333 | HiI will check the errors you are talking about tonight. Please wait. | |
| 3 | 2016-08-26 16:48 | Nakaner ♦3,149 | Hi Rps333,I won't wait.If an import is bad and/or violates the guideline, everyone can revert it. I will have a look at your other changesets which I consider as imports and will revert them, too, if they seem to have the same systematic errors than this changeset.JOSM has an built-... | |
| 4 | 2016-08-26 17:30 | Nakaner ♦3,149 | Changesets 39517571 and 39517686 have the same problems as this changeset: unclosed ways. Changeset 39517944 and 39518147 have a different problem: You added lakes inside lakes.Within 34 minutes (19:30–20:04), you created 35,972 objects (1058 objects/min). A manual tracer who checks his tr... | |
| 5 | 2016-08-28 07:08 | Nakaner ♦3,149 | The revert has been started. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/41749133 and following changesets. | |
| 6 | 2016-08-28 16:14 | Nakaner-repair ♦8,261 | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 41756737 where the changeset comment is: Revert low-quality CANVEC import due to violation of Import Guideline and technical errors. See discussion of changeset 39517002. | |
| 7 | 2016-08-29 12:43 | Rps333 | Why? I had fixed most if not all the errors you noticed. What are your guideline for determining poor quality? | |
| 8 | 2016-08-29 13:00 | Nakaner ♦3,149 | Yes, you fixed some errors but there have been left still enough errors which justify a revert.Unclosed polygons, liquid islets (natural=water inside natural=water), wetlands overlapping with water are the main problems of your import.In addition, you violated the policy by not using a dedic... | |
| 9 | 2016-08-29 14:05 | LogicalViolinist ♦83 | Nakaner, I think you should have discussed your rollback on the talk-ca mailing list to decide what to do. Rps333 does fix his errors and is a very active mapper. Adding lakes and rivers around native reservations is quite useful to Canadians. | |
| 10 | 2016-08-30 12:45 | Rps333 | So, if I used an import account it would be OK? Could I have just remove all the wetlands? | |
| 11 | 2016-08-30 13:07 | Nakaner ♦3,149 | Hi Rps333,if you used a dedicated account and check all your uploads before you upload them, you would take the wind out of the sails of people like me.Please note that not every error can be detected using JOSM's validation engine. If you upload data which is simple wrong (compare the ... | |
| 12 | 2016-08-30 13:33 | Kevo ♦28 | "been on-the-ground quality of Canvec's hydrological data"If you're talking about on-the-ground checks in areas like this changeset, you've proven that you're unqualified to make decisions on data in a country that is 30 times bigger than your own. This land is sti... | |
| 13 | 2016-08-30 13:33 | Rps333 | Michael, I always check the data against Bing/ Mapbox imagery/ NRCan Map in JOSM. In this area the imagery is very poor.I also alway check if the CANVEC data is better than what is already there. Not alway the case.I added one layer at a time; roads (if required), water, streams and sometime... | |
| 14 | 2016-08-30 13:59 | Nakaner ♦3,149 | I do not claim that every lake has to be checked on the ground but some secpscepticism about third-party datasets is always a good idea.Has ever been an OSM mapper in Northern Communities around James Bay and Nunavut and can say if the lakes at CANVEC match the reality? If you do remote sensing ... | |
| 15 | 2016-08-30 14:18 | jfd553 ♦55 | All available Canvec data in northern areas were checked less than 10 years ago using much higher resolution imagery than what is available in OSM. Everything is not perfect but way much accurate than nothing. I used to work on the checking process mentioned above! | |
| 16 | 2016-08-30 16:55 | the506 ♦1 | In addition, most of these communities are tiny (<1000 people) and often do not have quality Internet access. The chances of there being active local OSM mappers in these areas are essentially zero. For all its faults, CANVEC is literally all we have in these areas, and given the sheer size o... | |
| 17 | 2016-08-30 17:03 | LogicalViolinist ♦83 | Not to mention that Bing Imagery can be older than CanVec itself (10-15 years or more) | |
| 18 | 2016-08-31 15:02 | mikelmaron ♦34 | > I won't wait.This is not OK.OSM only works with cooperation and respect. We find ways to help support each others work and make the map better. The work of this changeset is led by active mappers in an active community, who are ready to discuss and work on their data. Certainly the... | |
| 19 | 2016-08-31 18:34 | Nakaner ♦3,149 | I have sent an email to the Talk-ca mailing list via Gmane. I hope it arrives. Otherwise I'll resent it the normal way. (I have subscribed the list) | |
| 20 | 2016-09-06 12:11 | Rps333 | Ref JOSM validator: I have deleted my JOSM profile. It now picks up the broken lakes. Thanks for the info.I will be happy to fix the broken lakes and any other problems that are in this change set. | |
| 41438261 by Rps333 @ 2016-08-13 23:54 | 1 | 2016-09-05 05:40 | oini ♦24 | Hi Rps333!I was wondering if it's okay to update Repulse Bay -> http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6488928 with `name=Naujaat` and `alt_name=Repulse Bay` tags as it seems that Repulse Bay has been renamed to Naujaat since July 2 2015 (according to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naujaat )... |
| 2 | 2016-09-06 00:24 | Rps333 | Sure. Thanks | |
| 40743204 by Rps333 @ 2016-07-14 16:24 | 1 | 2016-08-20 08:03 | kartler175 ♦556 | Please connect highways at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4303030804#map=15/48.5121/-79.2803 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4303030805 to enable correct routing: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4303030805#map=14/48.5116/-79.2517http://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=osrm_car... |
| 2 | 2016-08-20 14:15 | Rps333 | fixed | |
| 22841381 by Rps333 @ 2014-06-10 02:20 | 1 | 2016-07-26 08:51 | oini ♦24 | Hi Rps333! I was adding Turn Restrictions in Ottawa using Mapillary images and came across this 'No-straight-on' restriction added by you: http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3809341It would be great if you could please confirm that this actually exists since none of the Mapillary imag... |
| 2 | 2016-07-26 11:30 | Rps333 | I might have miss tag it. I will check it out, and add mapillary. | |
| 3 | 2016-07-26 12:51 | oini ♦24 | Thank you! | |
| 4 | 2016-08-10 12:11 | Rps333 | Thanks for fixing it. Will add some OSV today. If you are heading south on Woodroffe you cannot turn left into the Starbucks parking lot. Also from the Starbucks parking lot you must turn right (north) on Woodroffe. | |
| 34349217 by Komяpa @ 2015-09-30 15:07 | 1 | 2016-08-08 18:40 | Rps333 | Why did you tag the town as construction? |
| 2 | 2016-08-08 21:32 | Komяpa ♦22 | It was already there before me: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/9793656 | |
| 3 | 2016-08-09 01:26 | Rps333 | Thanks. Then I will remove it. Cheers | |
| 41249566 by Rps333 @ 2016-08-04 23:36 | 1 | 2016-08-06 10:13 | mueschel ♦6,570 | Hi,does this bridge have one lane or two? http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/70196340Cheers, Jan |
| 2 | 2016-08-06 12:17 | Rps333 | one. | |
| 3 | 2016-08-06 12:33 | Rps333 | http://openstreetview.com/details/11394/4 | |
| 40325979 by Rps333 @ 2016-06-27 17:08 | 1 | 2016-06-27 18:46 | mueschel ♦6,570 | Hi,there are 109 ways with the tag "numlanes" added recently. Common tagging uses the key "lanes". Could you change that?Jan |
| 2 | 2016-06-27 20:59 | Rps333 | Yes. May take a day or so. | |
| 39268894 by Rps333 @ 2016-05-12 14:33 | 1 | 2016-05-20 16:11 | highflyer74 ♦2,447 | Hello there!Is the ctry=140 required? It does not seem to be an established OSM key=value combination... |
| 2 | 2016-05-20 22:11 | Rps333 | No. My mistake I meant to remove it. | |
| 3 | 2016-05-21 09:00 | highflyer74 ♦2,447 | Thank you :-) | |
| 34906338 by DenisCarriere @ 2015-10-27 15:49 | 1 | 2016-05-12 12:08 | Rps333 | Should also be tagged "military"? |
| 38886799 by Rps333 @ 2016-04-26 13:37 | 1 | 2016-04-26 18:15 | bdiscoe ♦45 | Rps, there are some serious issues with this import. For example, consider way http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/413668789 It is "water", but unclosed. It is also duplicated, as is all the other sections of water which should have been joined here. PLEASE stop importing millions of featu... |
| 2 | 2016-04-26 20:28 | Rps333 | Hi, thanks for pointing it out. The JOSM validation did not pick that out. I will clean them up. cheers | |
| 3 | 2016-04-26 21:52 | bdiscoe ♦45 | When I load a small area around this feature, the JOSM validator reports "Errors: Duplicated ways (98), Duplicated nodes (s), Warning: natural type water - Unclosed way (46)" | |
| 4 | 2016-04-26 22:01 | bdiscoe ♦45 | Rather than import huge amounts (>500K changed features on the day of this changeset!), I'd strongly recommend doing smaller sections (like ~10K features/day) so you can check it for errors _before_ uploading, thanks. | |
| 5 | 2016-04-28 19:08 | bdiscoe ♦45 | It's two days later, and JOSM in this area still reports errors unclosed ways. Please fix your import before importing any more, thanks. | |
| 6 | 2016-04-28 19:13 | Rps333 | Hi I have been checking the JOSM again and for what ever reason JOSM is not finding the errors. I am pretty sure most of the errors are on the edge of the AOI that I downloaded from NRCan. I will try checking with another version of JOSM and a different PC. | |
| 38588841 by Rps333 @ 2016-04-15 14:11 | 1 | 2016-04-18 20:11 | jptolosa ♦205 | Here there is an unconnected coastline segment: http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=coastline&lon=-81.50004&lat=52.32722&zoom=16&opacity=1.00&overlays=coastline,coastline_error_lines,line_not_a_ring,line_overlap,line_invalid,line_direction,questionable,coastline_error_points,unc... |
| 2 | 2016-04-18 21:09 | Rps333 | thanks | |
| 38454344 by MagSungam @ 2016-04-10 15:52 | 1 | 2016-04-16 16:59 | Rps333 | Did you mean to add this road in northern Canada? |
| 2 | 2016-04-18 08:01 | MagSungam ♦3 | Oh, no, this was an miss calibrated JOSM Tool. I will erase it. Original the Street is there :https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/38454344#map=17/53.31058/12.74784 | |
| 3 | 2016-04-18 11:29 | Rps333 | Thanks. Thought it was a error with JOSM. wanted you to know about it.Cheers | |
| 37833535 by ParanormalTech @ 2016-03-15 01:22 | 1 | 2016-03-26 16:59 | Rps333 | Thanks for adding the roads. But I think you have miss tags these roads. Check out the wiki. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Canadian_tagging_guidelinesCheers |
| 37930017 by Rps333 @ 2016-03-18 23:23 | 1 | 2016-03-21 20:55 | mueschel ♦6,570 | Hi Rps333,could you explain all the tags on this way?http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/404482224There is a lot of information, but no key is a standard OSM key that can be understood by other mappers and software.Jan |
| 2 | 2016-03-22 00:12 | Rps333 | Thought I removed those tags. Removed. Thanks | |
| 37786098 by Rps333 @ 2016-03-12 16:35 | 1 | 2016-03-13 06:56 | jptolosa ♦205 | In this import you have replaced some data with resolution worse than they had before (Bing Imagery).For example here: http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/56.81269/-79.59474Press edit button and compare it! |
| 2 | 2016-03-13 13:07 | Rps333 | That's fair comment. I've been adding adding CANVEC because in most cases it is better than what was on OSM. If I see source= bing. I will leave it. On another note why are you mapping up here? Long way from home. Not that I'm complaining, the Arctic is huge and needs all the help... | |
| 3 | 2016-03-13 17:44 | jptolosa ♦205 | English is no my mother language. I was just doing an observation. You not consider the comment as an "attack". Must be careful with automated data import. You should think that not all users fill source tag with Bing when it's necessary.I'm not mapping here, but in your import... | |
| 4 | 2016-03-16 00:18 | Rps333 | Thanks for the link. I have fix all the error. Happy mapping. John | |
| 5 | 2016-03-16 00:34 | jptolosa ♦205 | You're welcome. Also if you use JOSM editor you can run the validator, then you can detect any error (like coastline intersections or gaps) before uploading data. Regards. | |
| 37450749 by Rps333 @ 2016-02-26 02:08 | 1 | 2016-02-27 14:09 | mueschel ♦6,570 | Hi Rps333,did you really want to upload this way with a lot of foreign tags or was it a mistake?Cheers, Jan |
| 2 | 2016-02-27 14:50 | Rps333 | The extra tags were a mistake. | |
| 3 | 2016-03-04 20:51 | mueschel ♦6,570 | Ok, I just removed them. | |
| 4 | 2016-03-04 20:52 | Rps333 | Thanks | |
| 32862005 by JamesBadger_CanVecImport @ 2015-07-24 22:32 | 1 | 2016-03-04 20:30 | Rps333 | Hi James. I think you put Igloolik Island in the wrong place. I think it's here. https://www.openstreetmap.org/search?query=Igloolik%20Island#map=12/69.3844/-81.6655&layers=N |
| 36496793 by nababi tracy @ 2016-01-11 07:13 | 1 | 2016-02-04 02:40 | Rps333 | Looking at the Bing imagery. should this be tag building = no? |
| 24725359 by konu @ 2014-08-13 14:53 | 1 | 2015-10-26 13:14 | Rps333 | Why did you relabel the the range? |
| 2 | 2015-10-26 22:31 | konu ♦3 | The distance markers used the highway key, making them show up as streets in OsmAnd street searches. Using boundary:marker solved this problem. | |
| 3 | 2015-10-27 11:54 | Rps333 | But I wanted to see the the paths on OsmAnd and OSM.org. The markers are real paths on the ground. | |
| 4 | 2015-10-27 21:42 | konu ♦3 | Can you find a way to tag the paths that will not make them show up in OsmAnd's address search? That was the objective with my changeset. | |
| 5 | 2015-10-28 18:25 | Rps333 | What about we tag it as a path, but remove the name. ie 500m | |
| 6 | 2015-10-29 01:07 | konu ♦3 | Yes, that is a good idea. Please make this change at your convenience. | |
| 25777421 by Manasie Kendall @ 2014-09-30 20:29 | 1 | 2015-10-12 06:59 | Rps333 | Nice mapping in Iqaluit. |
| 31565543 by TheDalek223 @ 2015-05-29 15:15 | 1 | 2015-07-03 02:01 | Rps333 | Is this a real path? |