| Country | Changeset | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|
 | 177343707 (Comments: 9) | Merlingraphy (Discussed changesets: 4) | O sorry. Zie nu dat je zelf die 'andere gebruiker' bent. Mijn opmerking was dus onnodig. Sorry. Toevallig was ik er vandaag ook met de fiets. commented 2026-05-30 22:11:28 UTC by Remlicht89 ♦10 |
 | 166358189 (Comments: 1) | Puerto Vallarta Airport Transportation (Discussed changesets: 12) | Reverted adding SEO spam POI with malformed tag values https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183420131 commented 2026-05-30 22:10:18 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦89 |
| 166588971 (Comments: 1) | Puerto Vallarta Airport Transportation (Discussed changesets: 12) | Reverted adding SEO spam POI with malformed tag values https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183419664 commented 2026-05-30 21:50:12 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦89 |
 | 169130517 (Comments: 1) | HolyArtThou (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hi, Just to say I'm going to change the tags on the building named Al-Shirkatul Islamiyyah to "yes" rather than "mosque". Counter-intuitiviely, building=mosque is reserved for purpose-built mosques. From aerial... commented 2026-05-30 21:49:22 UTC by eteb3 ♦130 |
| 166589130 (Comments: 1) | Puerto Vallarta Airport Transportation (Discussed changesets: 12) | Reverted SEO spam vandalism: adding SEO spam POI with malformed tag values as node on historic path https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183419508 commented 2026-05-30 21:44:20 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦89 |
| 166589236 (Comments: 1) | Puerto Vallarta Airport Transportation (Discussed changesets: 12) | Reverted adding SEO spam POI with malformed tag values as node on highway https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183419406 commented 2026-05-30 21:40:26 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦89 |
| 183419286 (Comments: 1) | eteb3 (Discussed changesets: 39) | missing source: aerial imagery commented 2026-05-30 21:36:45 UTC by eteb3 ♦130 |
| 166589319 (Comments: 1) | Puerto Vallarta Airport Transportation (Discussed changesets: 12) | Reverted adding SEO spam POI with malformed tag values https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183419272 commented 2026-05-30 21:35:26 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦89 |
| 161451437 (Comments: 2) | lottie1040 (Discussed changesets: 10) | sorry, one more thing: there is another POI in that building, a Pakistani community centre. my overwhelming suspicion is that the mosque is the community centre - for some reason they get called "community centre", and maybe they we... commented 2026-05-30 21:34:34 UTC by eteb3 ♦130 |
| 166589400 (Comments: 1) | Puerto Vallarta Airport Transportation (Discussed changesets: 12) | Reverted adding SEO spam POI with malformed tag values https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183419186 commented 2026-05-30 21:30:37 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦89 |
 | 183196121 (Comments: 2) | Geocrest (Discussed changesets: 6) | No answer. I will change it back. commented 2026-05-30 21:25:15 UTC by AndersAndersson ♦646 |
| 178315379 (Comments: 7) | JackArock (Discussed changesets: 9) | Hoi, die access=forestry die je in het buitenland wel hebt (standaard onderbord onder verkeersbord dat sluiting aangeeft) kennen we in Nederland eigenlijk niet, zie onderstaande wiki link. In dit geval is het motor_vehicle=private: het is een eigen ... commented 2026-05-30 21:23:45 UTC by multimodaal ♦279 |
 | 183358774 (Comments: 1) | Szymson (Discussed changesets: 299) | Cześć, super robota z dodaniem nowego OPP. Poprawiłem drobne błędy jak zamiana znaków D-51a z D-51b i odwrotnie czy usunięcie highway=speed_camera z kamer ponieważ nie jest to typowy fotoradar. Usunąłem również `maxspeed` z sa... commented 2026-05-30 21:20:45 UTC by stasiu512 ♦300 |
 | 183407010 (Comments: 1) | MarkM10 (Discussed changesets: 3) | looking at this ALPR on various aerial imagery in iD it seems to be within the road area, being positioned like this is highly unlikely so please double check the position of this ALPR and fix it. Happy mapping, Udar. commented 2026-05-30 21:18:39 UTC by Udarian ♦753 |
| 183407209 (Comments: 1) | MarkM10 (Discussed changesets: 3) | looking at this ALPR on various aerial imagery in iD it seems to be within the road area, being positioned like this is highly unlikely so please double check the position of this ALPR and fix it. Happy mapping, Udar. commented 2026-05-30 21:16:29 UTC by Udarian ♦753 |
| 183418056 (Comments: 1) | CAM-Gerlach_Revert (Discussed changesets: 6) | Revert of changeset 166589761 https://osm.org/changeset/166589761 commented 2026-05-30 21:13:28 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦89 |
| 166589506 (Comments: 1) | Puerto Vallarta Airport Transportation (Discussed changesets: 12) | Reverted adding SEO spam POI with malformed tag values https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183418711 commented 2026-05-30 21:13:21 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦89 |
| 166589562 (Comments: 1) | Puerto Vallarta Airport Transportation (Discussed changesets: 12) | Reverted adding SEO spam POI with malformed tag values https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183418607 commented 2026-05-30 21:10:00 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦89 |
| 181692301 (Comments: 17) | Parkmoto (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Phil, Apologies, I completely forgot it was a private repo, the email has been sent. Cheers, Parkmoto. commented 2026-05-30 21:00:00 UTC by Parkmoto ♦1 |
| 183327487 (Comments: 1) | pj4070 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, you mentioned in your note that you source the name from Google Streetview, but that data is copyrighted and not allowed on OSM. I went ahead and reverted this change commented 2026-05-30 20:59:54 UTC by greatnameguys2472 ♦16 |
| 166589638 (Comments: 1) | Puerto Vallarta Airport Transportation (Discussed changesets: 12) | Reverted adding SEO spam POI with malformed/promotional tag values and vandalism/deletion of existing objects https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183418280 commented 2026-05-30 20:57:41 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦89 |
| 166589761 (Comments: 1) | Puerto Vallarta Airport Transportation (Discussed changesets: 12) | Reverted adding SEO spam POI with malformed tag values in changeset 183418056 https://osm.org/changeset/183418056 commented 2026-05-30 20:56:04 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦89 |
| 166589950 (Comments: 1) | Puerto Vallarta Airport Transportation (Discussed changesets: 12) | Reverted adding SEO spam POI with malformed/promotional tag values and other map vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183417917 commented 2026-05-30 20:44:25 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦89 |
| 175462123 (Comments: 1) | Puerto Vallarta Airport Transportation (Discussed changesets: 12) | Reverted SEO account adding malformed tag values to POI https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183417840 commented 2026-05-30 20:41:46 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦89 |
| 161484047 (Comments: 1) | Soccer Asylum (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted adding SEO spam POI with promotional, misleading and nonsense tagging in changeset 183417711 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183417711 commented 2026-05-30 20:37:28 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦89 |
| 161376117 (Comments: 1) | Soccer Asylum (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted adding SEO spam POI with promotional, misleading and nonsense tagging in changeset 183417711 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183417711 commented 2026-05-30 20:37:17 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦89 |
 | 170834708 (Comments: 1) | DerKaiserschmarren (Discussed changesets: 47) | Das sind die Höhen über Wiener Null, nicht über Adria! Hier fehlen jeweils 156,68m. https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wiener_Null commented 2026-05-30 20:24:29 UTC by kuhni74 ♦451 |
 | 180871491 (Comments: 2) | Fraxi (Discussed changesets: 149) | Пише в уикито: Add the namespace disused:*=* as a prefix to ALL keys which are no longer relevant to the current state of an object. You should treat ALL the tags on an object as a set of facts about the object, and prefix the keys of t... commented 2026-05-30 20:21:45 UTC by Fraxi ♦351 |
 | 98827635 (Comments: 3) | Jany48 (Discussed changesets: 7) | Vďaka :) commented 2026-05-30 20:17:47 UTC by Filip009 ♦1,109 |
 | 183308900 (Comments: 1) | Борозняк Аліна (Discussed changesets: 1) | Вітаю. Те що там можливий проїзд - не означає що це вулиця. commented 2026-05-30 20:16:46 UTC by Валентин Ян ♦16 |
 | 183115748 (Comments: 2) | unbknt (Discussed changesets: 1) | Alles klar, danke. Das sollte so passen! commented 2026-05-30 20:04:09 UTC by unbknt ♦1 |
 | 183379445 (Comments: 3) | timothy_e (Discussed changesets: 1) | OK, perfect thanks! commented 2026-05-30 19:54:33 UTC by ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy ♦484 |
 | 180146883 (Comments: 1) | Schiessen (Discussed changesets: 1) | Не нужно на пересечении дороги и реки ставить точку, даже если на это ругается валидатор. Точка означает что они физически пересекаются, ... commented 2026-05-30 19:43:48 UTC by Takuto ♦50 |
 | 183415139 (Comments: 1) | YBau (Discussed changesets: 2) | J'ai fait ces modifications : Qualification de la zone en amenity=traffic_park : Voir le wiki, cette attraction correspond exactement à la définition. suppression de attraction=car : non documenté et déjà... commented 2026-05-30 19:28:28 UTC by YBau ♦2 |
 | 183410156 (Comments: 2) | Salie_vh (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thank you for the feedback. I'm sorry for doing it wrongly. commented 2026-05-30 19:26:48 UTC by Salie_vh ♦1 |
| 183395128 (Comments: 1) | Jens Kallwaß (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo Jens, vielen Dank, dass du dich um den Eintrag des Unternehmens kümmerst. Das hat auch geklappt, nur leider wurde durch deine Änderung das umliegende Gebäude entfernt. Aber das ist kein Problem. Ich habe das Gebäu... commented 2026-05-30 19:12:40 UTC by Strubbl ♦598 |
| 183414202 (Comments: 1) | mwr0 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Moja pierwsza edycja w JOSM. Chętnie przyjmę wszelkie uwagi i konstruktywną krytykę, bez taryfy ulgowej. Sugestie mile widziane :) commented 2026-05-30 19:05:51 UTC by mwr0 ♦1 |
| 140457264 (Comments: 3) | schoka (Discussed changesets: 18) | Das hab ich wohl nicht ganz durchgängig gemacht :-( . Habs auf "Autoteilen" geändert. commented 2026-05-30 19:03:39 UTC by schoka ♦60 |
| 145584246 (Comments: 2) | E de Wit (Discussed changesets: 94) | Komt niet van deze changeset volgens mij. Op de beelden van 2023 waren funderingswerkzaamheden zichtbaar (bouw gestart) Men heeft binnen het plan blijkbaar na het plaatsen van de begane grondvloer vier woningen nooit verder gebouwd dan dat.... commented 2026-05-30 18:55:27 UTC by E de Wit ♦233 |
 | 183412476 (Comments: 2) | Jelican9 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Teşekkür ederim @scanningunashamedearplugswife. Bu şekilde de olabileceğini bilmiyordum. commented 2026-05-30 18:52:30 UTC by Jelican9 ♦1 |
| 183226970 (Comments: 1) | DwarfNebula_ (Discussed changesets: 31) | Beide lijnen bestaan wel degelijk; ze rijden echter alleen maar tussen de herfstvakantie en pasen wanneer het nog donker is op de weg voor scholieren om te fietsen. Mijn inziens moet deze wijzigingsset ongedaan gemaakt worden. commented 2026-05-30 18:47:40 UTC by Sint E7 ♦32 |
 | 183335057 (Comments: 3) | Joe Cahill (Discussed changesets: 2) | Ti ringrazio dell'attenzione, avrò bisogno di qualche giorno per comunicare con le autorità competenti della situazione in oggetto. La legge italiana è abbastanza chiara, ma purtroppo si scontra con realtà particol... commented 2026-05-30 18:39:44 UTC by Jrachi ♦839 |
| 171770099 (Comments: 3) | theDM (Discussed changesets: 149) | To już bardziej pytanie do kogoś z Łodzi, dodałem najnowsze znalezione źródła, ale czy to nie zostało odłożone w czasie na nieokreślony czas, to nie wiem. commented 2026-05-30 18:33:05 UTC by theDM ♦180 |
| 183330900 (Comments: 6) | cubbe8 (Discussed changesets: 95) | Oh yeah, some ways got deleted during the revert too. I used streetside imagery to confirm the surfaces on some segments of sidewalk, e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1524104611/history And I'd also added some crossings, which got d... commented 2026-05-30 18:32:26 UTC by lunar_jaws812 ♦13 |
| 183412917 (Comments: 1) | EliteMooseTaskForce (Discussed changesets: 2) | Are transit schedules allowed in OpenStreetMap? For instance: arrival and departure times? commented 2026-05-30 18:28:24 UTC by EliteMooseTaskForce ♦2 |
| 183346083 (Comments: 1) | Viktoryia Kaluhina (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi Viktoryia, mappers in Utah as a local community have already worked very hard to correct all TIGER names in Utah, as it did a very poor job of handling our street names (In this case, "University Village" is the name of the complex, not ... commented 2026-05-30 18:27:29 UTC by dknelson9876 ♦104 |
| 183405352 (Comments: 1) | Jakka (Discussed changesets: 243) | Hi, you added a few strange "natur_code" and "objectid" tags - could you check that? commented 2026-05-30 18:13:44 UTC by mueschel ♦7,146 |
| 183412272 (Comments: 1) | EliteMooseTaskForce (Discussed changesets: 2) | Is this good? This is my first time contributing to openstreetmap! commented 2026-05-30 18:10:09 UTC by EliteMooseTaskForce ♦2 |
 | 183267048 (Comments: 2) | SaintCityMapper (Discussed changesets: 2) | Wunderbar, dankeschön :-) commented 2026-05-30 18:09:02 UTC by SaintCityMapper ♦5 |
| 183370951 (Comments: 4) | PizzaTreeIsland (Discussed changesets: 33) | My main argument for having it there is that the main purpose for having that tag in general is not for people to look up what a word means or who a certain person was if they don't know, which I guess is where usually etymology comes from. I th... commented 2026-05-30 18:01:24 UTC by PizzaTreeIsland ♦77 |
| 162680094 (Comments: 2) | Aenet (Discussed changesets: 17) | I named it that because I saw signs that point to it saying “food scrap drop off”. I’d be okay with the “name” tag being removed, I really don’t think what is essentially a compost bin needs a name commented 2026-05-30 17:36:04 UTC by Aenet ♦23 |
| 183410603 (Comments: 1) | osmoj (Discussed changesets: 25) | change summary: - Adds building parts and the corresponding relations - Uses `addr:housename` for building parts instead of `name` - Adds `addr:housename` in addresses and removes `addr:building` if present - Adds building and roof levels... commented 2026-05-30 17:32:43 UTC by osmoj ♦53 |
 | 183284320 (Comments: 1) | Thisik (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hello! Please have a look on http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/2qS3. What is the mean of the tags ID_PRIS = 404 INFO = Safírová OBJEKT = Přístřešek MHD TYP = 0 ? No other OSM keys. commented 2026-05-30 17:29:28 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,573 |
| 183405478 (Comments: 1) | Mariusz 2M (Discussed changesets: 49) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1524614540 Pozdrawiam!... commented 2026-05-30 17:21:49 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦8,669 |
| 183038480 (Comments: 1) | Ileanaa (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ciao! grazie per aver fatto questa modifica esattamente 8 giorni prima di un matrimonio in cui sono in questo momento! Hai salvato il mio navigatore 🤩 grazieeee commented 2026-05-30 17:20:39 UTC by Valerio_Bozzolan ♦43 |
| 183322689 (Comments: 2) | Frozen4 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hoi Leo, Ik probeer je uitleg even te volgen. Ik heb de uitgang niet opgeknipt, dat was al zo. Het zijn ook echt twee uitgangen: eentje voor linksaf en eentje voor rechtsaf met een eigen slagboom. Zonder turn restrictions kan iemand vanaf de r... commented 2026-05-30 17:17:10 UTC by Frozen4 ♦1 |
 | 183351453 (Comments: 1) | kingkingHK (Discussed changesets: 24) | This was motivated by https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2758068 I'm not reviewing the exact arrangement of features, but do you happen to identify any explicit usage of e.g. the location name "乾山大斜坡" in the map? commented 2026-05-30 17:11:40 UTC by vectorial8192 ♦158 |
 | 183405442 (Comments: 1) | Jaume_Gualba (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola, benvingut a OpenStreetMap. No es poden fer proves a la base de dades en línia. Tens un servidor específic a https://master.apis.dev.openstreetmap.org o bé pots preguntar al grup de Telegram https://t.me/osmcat o... commented 2026-05-30 17:11:38 UTC by aTarom ♦951 |
| 183377177 (Comments: 2) | BTMapper (Discussed changesets: 1) | It does not have a name, similar to the campground of 3 tent sites just south. They are both dispersed camping on a first come, first served basis. commented 2026-05-30 17:10:47 UTC by BTMapper ♦1 |
| 180065041 (Comments: 5) | woodpeck_repair (Discussed changesets: 3878) | Nordenburg is actually the listed German name in both Polish and German Wikipedia, same as Nordenbork in Polish. Also, in changeset/182034590 I reverted the polish names in accordance with the KSNG (except for of course Królewiec which has bee... commented 2026-05-30 17:09:00 UTC by OlasMapy ♦60 |
| 183247655 (Comments: 3) | vectorial8192 (Discussed changesets: 164) | For the record, I am currently tracking 10+ topics that can be discussed at Discord, so no worries for that. I'm probably gonna do the topics one at a time, to prevent overload. For this specific junction, the u-turn intended to describe ... commented 2026-05-30 17:08:05 UTC by vectorial8192 ♦158 |
| 183345710 (Comments: 1) | kingkingHK (Discussed changesets: 24) | To "catch" possible future reversion, we could put the unverified name into description or note. commented 2026-05-30 16:55:58 UTC by vectorial8192 ♦158 |
 | 183391519 (Comments: 3) | MistikRuz (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hello, why are you deleting my data? Please stop. commented 2026-05-30 16:49:18 UTC by test0022012 ♦2 |
| 183144932 (Comments: 2) | dgoetz988 (Discussed changesets: 3) | hallo, limes11, danke für den Hinweis; und Danke an kartler175 für die Korrektur. commented 2026-05-30 16:48:29 UTC by dgoetz988 ♦1 |
| 14333060 (Comments: 2) | Rori (Discussed changesets: 1) | weiß nicht worum es geht. wenn ich auf den link klicke bin ich mitten im wald und sehe dort nichts. wenn es müll ist, einfach löschen. commented 2026-05-30 16:46:21 UTC by Rori ♦1 |
| 183408529 (Comments: 1) | aldarosm (Discussed changesets: 7) | https://www.facebook.com/Stadswerk072/posts/de-prinses-julianalaan-is-weer-open-de-straat-heeft-een-frisse-veilige-en-histor/1469771415153859/ commented 2026-05-30 16:36:36 UTC by aldarosm ♦6 |
| 183367525 (Comments: 1) | Nancy Mickleberry (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Nancy: Welcome to OSM. Thank you for your contributions to this neighborhood. Please take a look at the following regarding how not to use the name=* tag. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Don't_map_for_the_render... commented 2026-05-30 16:33:54 UTC by bdentremont ♦63 |
| 182669302 (Comments: 6) | Termininja (Discussed changesets: 46) | Thanks! Since the road is changing constantly during the reconstruction, these detailed tags will become outdated very quickly. I’m not sure it makes sense to update every small section right now. commented 2026-05-30 16:32:02 UTC by Termininja ♦9 |
| 182847456 (Comments: 1) | jkorf (Discussed changesets: 17) | Een aantal van deze, zoals deze: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1516540369 staan alleen op 'bouwvergunning verleend' met nog geen sporen van bouw op de grond. Hoe kwamen die mee met de import? commented 2026-05-30 16:30:14 UTC by JeroenHoek ♦749 |
| 183349584 (Comments: 4) | aldarosm (Discussed changesets: 7) | Thank you will keep it in mind commented 2026-05-30 16:04:23 UTC by aldarosm ♦6 |
| 183362204 (Comments: 2) | BardafFr (Discussed changesets: 24) | Oui, je ne savais pas trop comment marqué la bidir vu que ce n'est que du marquage actuellement. Oui je pense que la bordure de séparation arrivera après les travaux du nouveau quartier pour laisser les camion manœuvre... commented 2026-05-30 16:01:28 UTC by BardafFr ♦24 |
 | 183396665 (Comments: 2) | MenKauRa (Discussed changesets: 51) | * myriad data consumers around the world commented 2026-05-30 15:56:56 UTC by CRCulver ♦223 |
| 183276485 (Comments: 1) | mauro742 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Mauro non sono d'accordo. Le linee guida di OSM non prevedono di cancellare la traccia, perchè si perde lo storico. Solitamente si tagga il percorso come "abandoned" e access = no. commented 2026-05-30 15:52:15 UTC by michi68 ♦3 |
| 183393864 (Comments: 3) | mux4 (Discussed changesets: 17) | OK, thanks for the explanation. I’ll fix the source:maxspeed tag and I’ll also notify the Brussels Region about the fact that this speed limit has been around for some time now and their reference map is outdated. Thanks. commented 2026-05-30 15:45:52 UTC by bxl-forever ♦2,904 |
| 183405217 (Comments: 1) | EnochTheTraveler (Discussed changesets: 1) | Mir ist nicht klar, was hier eben passiert ist, aber der Kommentar zur Änderungssatz wurde mit einem anderen Text überschrieben. Ich hatte geschrieben: Die Bäckerei wurde zum 01.10.2025 – wohl aus Altergründen und ... commented 2026-05-30 15:25:17 UTC by EnochTheTraveler ♦1 |
| 181637715 (Comments: 5) | Carte-on (Discussed changesets: 3) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5314256 Épilogue : il y a bien 2 zones avec arceaux. Tout le monde a raison ! Par contre, pas 10 mais 20 :). Attention car la capacity se compte en nombre de... commented 2026-05-30 15:20:08 UTC by Sébastien Pi ♦120 |
| 183055372 (Comments: 2) | Disp_Kh (Discussed changesets: 1) | Назву видалено commented 2026-05-30 15:13:11 UTC by Disp_Kh ♦1 |
| 182822870 (Comments: 1) | zeytin lady (Discussed changesets: 1) | Merhaba, yol isminin kaynağı nedir? Teşekkürler. commented 2026-05-30 15:11:22 UTC by keyyushi ♦29 |
| 182963664 (Comments: 7) | vectorial8192 (Discussed changesets: 164) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183404546 commented 2026-05-30 15:00:23 UTC by vectorial8192 ♦158 |
 | 183327708 (Comments: 5) | rodrigoe1998 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola. Sí, si no hay problema con sus conocimientos locales y nadie está dudando de sus intenciones. Lo único es que por favor no tome información de Google. Está invitado a unirse al chat de la comunidad c... commented 2026-05-30 14:57:49 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦3,092 |
| 183404241 (Comments: 1) | ABudz (Discussed changesets: 8) | zapomniałem oznaczyć źródła: głównie zdjęcia lotnicze oraz wiedza lokalna commented 2026-05-30 14:55:06 UTC by ABudz ♦6 |
| 87851316 (Comments: 2) | Geofalke (Discussed changesets: 18) | sollte wohl zusammen mit dem Cliff ein inner Multipolygon werden, dass den Wald entfernt commented 2026-05-30 14:54:42 UTC by syncronic ♦45 |
| 183354290 (Comments: 1) | jgphaneuf (Discussed changesets: 1) | The semantics of `no` for access are that walking or biking there is disallowed by signage or law, so it should probably not be applied here. The presence of a sidewalk with `bicycle=yes` should generally be enough for router not to recommend the bri... commented 2026-05-30 14:39:32 UTC by John Kastner ♦63 |
| 183403144 (Comments: 1) | eteb3 (Discussed changesets: 39) | forgot my sources: government open data; mosque website commented 2026-05-30 14:30:38 UTC by eteb3 ♦130 |
 | 183172552 (Comments: 2) | netnomad (Discussed changesets: 1) | Yes, you're right. Fixed. Thanks! commented 2026-05-30 14:27:14 UTC by netnomad ♦2 |
| 183401176 (Comments: 1) | Bartek444 (Discussed changesets: 80) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Duplikat adresu w okolicy. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10032815322 https://www.openstreetmap.or... commented 2026-05-30 14:22:34 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦8,669 |
 | 183292292 (Comments: 3) | nikdonline (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello, OpenStreetMap naming conventions are not always the same as other map services. I think we agreed to leave out the "Εθνική Οδός" prefix from name=* and either ignore it or put it in ... commented 2026-05-30 14:21:53 UTC by ika-chan! ♦401 |
| 163727556 (Comments: 2) | Daniel Langbein (Discussed changesets: 1) | Vielen Dank für dein Feedback! Vor Jahren konnte dort mal ein Fahrzeug fahren. Inzwischen ist nur noch ein verwachsener Fußweg übrig. Ich habe tracktype entfernt und 'surface=ground' hinzugefügt. Da es nur wenige... commented 2026-05-30 14:08:32 UTC by Daniel Langbein ♦1 |
| 179865065 (Comments: 4) | datenkrake156 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo, urlaubsbedingt habe ich die Rückmeldung erst heute gesehen. Ich hatte vorher die Eingaben noch schnell eingetippelt, aber wohl nicht richtig gespeichert oder überschrieben (bin halt Anfänger ohne viel Erfahrung). Offensichtli... commented 2026-05-30 14:01:40 UTC by datenkrake156 ♦1 |
| 183275776 (Comments: 4) | Plmilo08 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thank you Im glad the issue has been solved Plmilo08 commented 2026-05-30 13:46:53 UTC by Plmilo08 ♦1 |
| 183399389 (Comments: 1) | lukabułka (Discussed changesets: 30) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Klucz addr:place oznacza brak nazwy ulicy. Kombinacja z addr:street (który definiuje nazwę ulicy) je... commented 2026-05-30 13:42:14 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦8,669 |
| 183262127 (Comments: 2) | Rumburak57 (Discussed changesets: 7) | Danke für die Info. Ich werde in den nächsten tagen mal etwas sortieren. commented 2026-05-30 13:38:03 UTC by Rumburak57 ♦5 |
| 183362628 (Comments: 1) | IsidoroTerre (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola. Gracias por las ediciones. Muy útiles. eso si voy a hacer un par de correcciones, porque es evidente que usó una foto desactualizada y marcó algunos caminos con categorías que no tienen. Saludos ... commented 2026-05-30 13:32:31 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦3,092 |
| 183384410 (Comments: 1) | Vicente_Estate (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hola. El tag de edificio es para estructuras, no para el predio completo. Y lo moteles parejeros son love_hotel. El concepto de Motel en Chile se usa de manera distinta en todo el mundo. Saludos --- Pu... commented 2026-05-30 13:13:36 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦3,092 |
| 183381604 (Comments: 1) | gordo anorexico (Discussed changesets: 65) | Hola. Le borré el tag building=. Claramente no todo eso es un edificio. Pero tb le saqué el tag de amenity. Si bien es un recinto de carabineros, no es precisamente una comisaría supongo. saludos --- ... commented 2026-05-30 13:12:45 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦3,092 |
 | 173766652 (Comments: 1) | Catweazle2011 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project. Please do not tag paths/highways inside residential areas as a track. Look where a track is to be mapped on the highway wiki. Best regards commented 2026-05-30 13:05:13 UTC by Frans S ♦10,673 |
| 182245409 (Comments: 1) | Leo Olijerhoek VRHM (Discussed changesets: 44) | Deze wijziging is incorrect. Graag geen wegen dichtzetten voor al het verkeer met access=no en dan openzetten voor bijv. voetgangers. Het wegtype highway=pedestrian geeft al aan dat de weg alleen voor voetgangers is bedoeld. Ik zal deze wijzi... commented 2026-05-30 12:57:00 UTC by A67-A67 ♦1,134 |
 | 180230281 (Comments: 2) | Wilmer Osario (Discussed changesets: 54) | Lo consideré, pero los desarrolladores que usan datos de OSM parecen ignorarla, prefiriendo el genérico [aeroway=aerodrome] Esos desarrolladores van desde plataformas como https://openairportmap.org/, hasta videojuegos como Micro... commented 2026-05-30 12:56:48 UTC by Wilmer Osario ♦217 |
 | 182906981 (Comments: 2) | hoiwhite (Discussed changesets: 1) | 좌표가 완전 엉망이고 15년전에 문 닫은 곳을 왜 입력하는거임? 20년 동안 놀이터였던 곳에 왜 피부미용실 찍어둔거지? #5317527 이거 여기 문제네. commented 2026-05-30 12:52:52 UTC by 빵곰손 ♦1 |
| 183398579 (Comments: 2) | vectorial8192 (Discussed changesets: 164) | (Also, to clarify on the confusing wording at the note: we can see from aerial imagery that the east ball has been removed, but there is still a new note complaining about the ball being removed, so assuming "note comes in describing something n... commented 2026-05-30 12:48:25 UTC by kingkingHK ♦346 |
| 176961231 (Comments: 2) | Wilmer Osario (Discussed changesets: 54) | Hola, porque visualizando varias imágenes satelitales, se puede ver que el río se mantiene casi seco en buena parte del año; más o menos desde por frente al Salto Ángel hasta las cabeceras. commented 2026-05-30 12:44:43 UTC by Wilmer Osario ♦217 |
| 183271009 (Comments: 2) | nikdonline (Discussed changesets: 2) | Absolutely not it was a mistake commented 2026-05-30 12:40:17 UTC by nikdonline ♦2 |
| 101969552 (Comments: 1) | Christopher Arndt (Discussed changesets: 2) | Kein Weg oder Pfad zum Punkt, einfach nach GPS durch den Wald laufen? commented 2026-05-30 12:34:57 UTC by -karlos- ♦26 |
 | 183318863 (Comments: 2) | AhtiVasser (Discussed changesets: 1) | Tänan tähelepanu eest. Alguses programm andis punast, et peab suuna märkima ning ei lasknud salvestada kui tee ei jõudnud kuskile välja. Nüüd sain teha paranduse ja on üks tee. commented 2026-05-30 12:25:43 UTC by AhtiVasser ♦1 |
 | 183343964 (Comments: 1) | Kovács Szabolcs (Discussed changesets: 2) | Szia! Az access=no címkét olyan utakon jelöljük ahova senki nem mehet be, szerintem a golfpálya útjaira is az access=private illene, esetleg access=customers További jó térk&eac... commented 2026-05-30 12:18:48 UTC by infeeeee ♦689 |
| 183361631 (Comments: 2) | TyrannisHawk (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hoi Tyrannis, Mij nog een keer, ik zie nu net je net begonnen bent op OSM! Welkom bij ons project. Wat leuk dat je dingen wil bewerken op de kaart. Een naaiatelier is inderdaad iets wat we kunnen gebruiken. Even een paar tips: - Je h... commented 2026-05-30 12:11:39 UTC by Lachgast ♦136 |
| 183053390 (Comments: 10) | kingkingHK (Discussed changesets: 24) | Anyway, if Kovoschiz says that "`=unclassified` is passable" then I really don't have the motivation to continue arguing. commented 2026-05-30 11:49:22 UTC by kingkingHK ♦346 |
| 174808846 (Comments: 1) | combat_wombat (Discussed changesets: 3) | Ich weiß zwar nicht, was du auf den Sat Bildern so siehst, aber hier waren die Nachbearbeitungen der Gebäude schlicht und einfach falsch! Viele der von dir nachgearbeiteten Gebäudegrundrisse sind viel zu groß. Wir erfassen die G... commented 2026-05-30 11:34:28 UTC by BrummsLee ♦55 |
| 162775762 (Comments: 4) | PoliticalCorrectnessGoneMad (Discussed changesets: 2) | There are no "alcohol shops" in New York. You may serve beer, wine, and spirits at a bar. You may not sell beer, wine, and spirits for home consumption all from the same store, so the tag shop=alcohol does not apply. commented 2026-05-30 11:32:34 UTC by PoliticalCorrectnessGoneMad ♦2 |
 | 183395461 (Comments: 1) | TheSwavu (Discussed changesets: 305) | Thanks :) commented 2026-05-30 11:30:34 UTC by TheHolyCessna ♦2 |
| 183390620 (Comments: 1) | BER319 (Discussed changesets: 39) | Der fünf städte-weg hw 27 wurde von mir hier leider aus Versehen gelöscht. Da ich von unterwegs keine wiederherstellung machen kann und ihn sowieso abwanderer trage ich ihn gleich komplett neu ein. commented 2026-05-30 11:28:39 UTC by BER319 ♦115 |
| 183363478 (Comments: 1) | Tymo013 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Leo Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-05-30 11:11:49 UTC by Leo Slager ♦3,465 |
| 183223827 (Comments: 2) | Jamnik z Tarnowa (Discussed changesets: 10) | Ok, jeszcze raz ja: Sam spróbowałem poprawić sprawę placu i katedry (oby skutecznie). Pozmieniałem też kilka innych rzeczy, możesz to przejrzeć i jak chcesz to jakoś się odnieść pod moją nową edycją changeset/183394380 Poz... commented 2026-05-30 11:09:18 UTC by Franciszek Józef ♦10 |
| 183360944 (Comments: 1) | Sweetwood (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Leo Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-05-30 11:09:16 UTC by Leo Slager ♦3,465 |
| 183360825 (Comments: 2) | Marcel Valk (Discussed changesets: 2) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Leo Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-05-30 11:07:32 UTC by Leo Slager ♦3,465 |
| 183360419 (Comments: 2) | McVL02 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Dag McVL02, Je hebt hier wel de landuse=grass verwijderd. Ik vraag me af waarom. De combinatie van tags als het gebruik als campingplaats en de landuse is normaal mogelijk. Dat zijn 2 verschillende zaken die op het zelfd3 vlak getagd kun... commented 2026-05-30 11:06:40 UTC by Leo Slager ♦3,465 |
| 183394380 (Comments: 1) | Franciszek Józef (Discussed changesets: 13) | Sam zacznę dyskusję na wszelki wypadek, bo kilka spraw tu jest: Jeśli chodzi o ul. Batorego, powiększenie obszaru prac budowlanych wymusiło na mnie zmianę organizacji ruchu na ul. Staszica (co i logiczne bo dojazd do lokalnych obiektó... commented 2026-05-30 11:03:45 UTC by Franciszek Józef ♦10 |
| 183345407 (Comments: 2) | confusedbuffalo-bot (Discussed changesets: 14) | I am participating in the discussion commented 2026-05-30 11:01:07 UTC by confusedbuffalo ♦379 |
| 183345453 (Comments: 2) | confusedbuffalo-bot (Discussed changesets: 14) | I am discussing this in the forum: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/proposed-automated-edit-korrektur-von-telefonnummern-in-deutschland-basierend-auf-phonenumbervalidator/142498/7 commented 2026-05-30 11:00:31 UTC by confusedbuffalo ♦379 |
| 174322175 (Comments: 1) | Armire (Discussed changesets: 17) | Hello, Tu as marqué (par erreur) le cours d'eau "L'Amasse" en aqueduc. J'ai corrigé. Bonne journée, Aurélien commented 2026-05-30 10:58:48 UTC by AurélienQ ♦164 |
| 183320836 (Comments: 1) | kaeksy (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Leo Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-05-30 10:56:56 UTC by Leo Slager ♦3,465 |
| 183345422 (Comments: 2) | confusedbuffalo-bot (Discussed changesets: 14) | I am discussing this in the forum: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/proposed-automated-edit-korrektur-von-telefonnummern-in-deutschland-basierend-auf-phonenumbervalidator/142498/7 commented 2026-05-30 10:54:38 UTC by confusedbuffalo ♦379 |
| 183359640 (Comments: 2) | leszek89 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Dzięki, poprawiłem. commented 2026-05-30 10:54:09 UTC by leszek89 ♦3 |
| 183101020 (Comments: 1) | mat (Discussed changesets: 36) | Bonjour, Je ne suis pas d'accord avec vous. La route vient de D765. Certes elle est à sens unique mais à mon sens soit la Route de Blois devrais être en tertiary, soit la rue du stade. Et même si non, la rout... commented 2026-05-30 10:49:29 UTC by AurélienQ ♦164 |
| 183143451 (Comments: 10) | Bat Wings (Discussed changesets: 19) | Thank you for your kindness also,your informative approach :)) commented 2026-05-30 10:49:03 UTC by Bat Wings ♦10 |
| 183358036 (Comments: 1) | firefoxinspace (Discussed changesets: 34) | Moin, highway=primary_links sind Anschluss- oder Verbindungsrampen. Einfädelungs- bzw. Beschleunigungsstreifen würden über das lanes-Tagging erfasst (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:turn:lanes). Meiner Meinung nach war das v... commented 2026-05-30 10:48:55 UTC by Eifelkobold! ♦83 |
 | 183347873 (Comments: 2) | ujang anwar (Discussed changesets: 1) | Telah dipulihkan dalam https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183394174 commented 2026-05-30 10:45:37 UTC by FajrAl ♦367 |
| 183322442 (Comments: 4) | TrueJanus (Discussed changesets: 3) | P.S. Sorry für die Rechtschreibfehler, wie ich gerade sehe. Zu schnell getippt... commented 2026-05-30 10:42:43 UTC by IngoWo ♦24 |
| 183392654 (Comments: 1) | corrector_91 (Discussed changesets: 33) | Hello, Thanks for this. In this edit, you added an old name to this building, which is fine. There is no shame in explaining what you *really* do on the map. We would be grateful if can please use better changeset descriptions for your edits... commented 2026-05-30 10:38:09 UTC by bxl-forever ♦2,904 |
| 183391499 (Comments: 2) | foreigner037 (Discussed changesets: 38) | Не бях тръгнал с тази идея, просто правих нещо друго и видях малък участък, където бяха закачени. commented 2026-05-30 10:32:46 UTC by foreigner037 ♦78 |
| 183266121 (Comments: 2) | michael14528 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Dag michael, Alle begin is moeilijk. Zo een weg in een parkeerplaats krijgt vrijwel altijd de tag Highway=service en service=parking_aisle En wegen zijn standaard voor twee richtings verkeer, dis oneway=no hoeft er dan niet ... commented 2026-05-30 10:32:09 UTC by Leo Slager ♦3,465 |
| 183338671 (Comments: 6) | _vincenttan (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thank you for explainning so patiently! commented 2026-05-30 10:20:26 UTC by _vincenttan ♦3 |
| 183393047 (Comments: 2) | pesticides (Discussed changesets: 43) | Tagging the road with bicycle=yes would be fine, but unnecessary because all roads in the area allow cycling by default. commented 2026-05-30 10:19:50 UTC by pesticides ♦51 |
| 180515784 (Comments: 1) | *Martin* (Discussed changesets: 125) | Naschvál scrub a meadow? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1493477472 commented 2026-05-30 10:13:39 UTC by Filip009 ♦1,109 |
| 183295364 (Comments: 1) | Damian Künz (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ich werde diesen delierische Albtraum reverten. commented 2026-05-30 10:05:53 UTC by hanskuster ♦17 |
| 178049126 (Comments: 3) | fredgolightly (Discussed changesets: 9) | Thanks. commented 2026-05-30 09:58:41 UTC by lyctkel ♦371 |
| 179414869 (Comments: 2) | wuff57 (Discussed changesets: 31) | Hallo ghostrider44, ich war schon mal an der Stelle. vehicle=no ist richtig. Ich glaube, der wesentliche Fehler war die Richtung des Wegs. Busse können nur Rtg. NW durchfahren. Das habe ich jetzt geändert. Und official durch yes ersetzt. Un... commented 2026-05-30 09:57:10 UTC by wuff57 ♦53 |
| 183390410 (Comments: 1) | juicyarp (Discussed changesets: 5) | En español, es menos frecuente el uso de "Carcagente" que "Carcaixent". Así lo recoge el CORPES de la RAE. La RAE afirma que en los "topónimos cuya forma tradicional en español ha caí... commented 2026-05-30 09:51:14 UTC by Jordi MF ♦1,819 |
| 183288234 (Comments: 3) | cantanga2 (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hi cantanga2, fixed. Further I separated the building from vending=bottle_return (is a node now). Kind regards, lyctkel commented 2026-05-30 09:50:02 UTC by lyctkel ♦371 |
| 183388495 (Comments: 1) | Bartek444 (Discussed changesets: 80) | nieźle, dodane zanim do domu wróciłem :) dzięki! (a gdybyś miał ochotę się wspólnie na jakąś wycieczkę rowerowo-mapową wybrać to byłbym chętny) commented 2026-05-30 09:48:33 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,901 |
| 178922218 (Comments: 2) | Jordi MF_import (Discussed changesets: 19) | La RAE afirma que en los "topónimos cuya forma tradicional en español ha caído en desuso en favor de la forma local, se da primacía a la forma local" (https://www.rae.es/dpd/ayuda/tratamiento-de-los-toponimos). |
| 179276346 (Comments: 2) | Jordi MF_import (Discussed changesets: 19) | La RAE afirma que en los "topónimos cuya forma tradicional en español ha caído en desuso en favor de la forma local, se da primacía a la forma local" (https://www.rae.es/dpd/ayuda/tratamiento-de-los-toponimos). |
| 177241341 (Comments: 1) | Yog Sot (Discussed changesets: 82) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13457115791/history te note=istniejący trzeba usunąć, w OSM nie ma miejsca na trzymanie tego że inna baza ma je zaznaczone że istnieją commented 2026-05-30 09:46:28 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,901 |
| 171022154 (Comments: 1) | Eric Ramos Law PLLC (Discussed changesets: 1) | Removed additional SEO spam tags and corrected others for Eric Ramos Law office POI in changeset 183391313 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183391313 commented 2026-05-30 09:39:23 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦89 |
| 178850782 (Comments: 3) | wuff57 (Discussed changesets: 31) | Hallo ghostrider44, Du hast Recht, die Wege der Relation hätten eigentlich erst ab Kleinglattbach Nordbahnhof gehen sollen. Aber es gibt eine solche Verbindung morgens, 7:12 h ab Nordbahnhof, die mit Weizen- und Schillerstraße auch Haltest... commented 2026-05-30 09:33:34 UTC by wuff57 ♦53 |
| 183344592 (Comments: 15) | kingkingHK (Discussed changesets: 24) | Not to mention other people are unhappy with Tunnel Area not being `=motorway` (remedied by `motorway=no` ) commented 2026-05-30 09:26:46 UTC by Kovoschiz ♦2,905 |
| 156170845 (Comments: 2) | habi (Discussed changesets: 450) | Nach https://www.holcim.ch/de/einen-standort-finden/1/891 ist der Standort wochentags von 7-15 offen. Ich hab' das so eingetragen. Die Suche führte zu https://github.com/openstreetmap/tile-attribution/issues/305 commented 2026-05-30 09:26:32 UTC by habi ♦2,133 |
| 161477188 (Comments: 1) | Clean Recovery Centers Sarasota (Discussed changesets: 1) | Removed SEO spam image=* tag, fixed malformed addr:street=* and disambiguated mobile=* in changeset 183390547 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183390547 commented 2026-05-30 09:21:43 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦89 |
| 183140482 (Comments: 1) | Haiko71 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, Bei an mehreren Stellen hast du eine Beschreibung ergänzt, dass es am 15.06.2023 nicht funktionierte. Welchen Mehrwert soll so eine alte Information bringen? Oder ist das Datum evtl. nur falsch? Die Wasserspender am Flughafen brauch... commented 2026-05-30 09:21:17 UTC by onterof ♦33 |
 | 161305988 (Comments: 1) | Outfitters pk (Discussed changesets: 1) | Removed SEO spam and malformed tags from POI in changeset 183390411 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183390411 commented 2026-05-30 09:19:02 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦89 |
 | 161193839 (Comments: 1) | KONZE India Pvt Ltd (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted adding SEO spam POI with blatantly promotional description=*, spammy name=* and malformed address tags https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183390324 commented 2026-05-30 09:16:31 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦89 |
| 161218690 (Comments: 1) | Will Graham (Discussed changesets: 1) | Removed SEO spam description=* from Nashville Appliance Rental POI (and tagged building=* appropriately) in changeset 183390261 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183390261 commented 2026-05-30 09:15:53 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦89 |
| 171055638 (Comments: 1) | Eric Ramos Law (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted adding SEO spam POI with self-promotional description=* https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183390068 commented 2026-05-30 09:10:27 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦89 |
| 183037604 (Comments: 1) | Jordi MF (Discussed changesets: 97) | El CORPES no regula la toponimia en español ni puede usarse como base normativa para intentar imponer la forma en valenciano. Estos topónimos en español sólo han dejado de ser oficiales pero siguen en uso activo hoy en d&i... commented 2026-05-30 09:09:56 UTC by juicyarp ♦6 |
| 183377021 (Comments: 2) | gallseife (Discussed changesets: 40) | Warum nicht, man könnte die Miniflecken auch einfach löschen. Mach es wie du magst, nur Wald ist es nicht :) commented 2026-05-30 09:08:12 UTC by gallseife ♦53 |
 | 161144853 (Comments: 3) | bitwall store (Discussed changesets: 1) | And vestigial addr:country=* removed in changeset 183389922 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183389922 commented 2026-05-30 09:07:01 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦89 |
| 183340121 (Comments: 4) | Šišmiš (Discussed changesets: 1) | I am not so sure how to deal with with issue. So I just opened a note on this issue. openstreetmap.org/note/5317249 commented 2026-05-30 08:53:56 UTC by dienachteule ♦3 |
| 181152541 (Comments: 1) | pierre_geovelo (Discussed changesets: 37) | Salut Pierre, Pourquoi avoir passé cette section en shoulder ? way/307221064 Je ne vois pas de BMF : https://api.panoramax.xyz/fr/index?focus=pic&map=18.91/43.1275961/5.8527977&pic=ff0fe97a-1b2e-44fe-9efa-26d7f148d032&se... commented 2026-05-30 08:43:57 UTC by enzo_immergis ♦35 |
| 182833035 (Comments: 1) | toutouche (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hello, Je crois tu as fait une petite erreur concernant le farmland 1026380498. Tu l'as passé de champs à herbe, et ça m'étonnerait que toute cette surface soit concernée. Je te laisse corriger ?... commented 2026-05-30 08:42:23 UTC by AurélienQ ♦164 |
| 183074226 (Comments: 2) | Cdrik_69 (Discussed changesets: 16) | Si si, je l'ai vu :) Repéré en A ici : https://www.breteuil.fr/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/plan_breteuil_2021.pdf commented 2026-05-30 08:37:08 UTC by Cdrik_69 ♦30 |
| 183317250 (Comments: 2) | PCK46 (Discussed changesets: 11) | W jakim sensie licencja? commented 2026-05-30 08:04:17 UTC by PCK46 ♦4 |
| 183352848 (Comments: 2) | akino_germany (Discussed changesets: 32) | Nachsatz: nicht nur diese Linie. Sondern vermutlich alle, die hier langkommen. Ich blick da nicht durch.. commented 2026-05-30 07:20:22 UTC by Senihtu ♦166 |
| 168561542 (Comments: 2) | paulbrunner (Discussed changesets: 53) | Salut Habi Merci fürs Korrigieren. Bin wohl zu sehr EveryDoor gewöhnt mittlerweile, wo das Länderprefix automatisch gesetzt wird... Lieben Gruss nach Bern! Paul commented 2026-05-30 07:20:14 UTC by paulbrunner ♦67 |
| 183351645 (Comments: 1) | Fijord (Discussed changesets: 52) | Hallo Fijord Ich habe gesehen, dass aufgrund dieser Anpassungen die Anzahl fehlender Adressen in St.Gallen in die Höhe geschossen ist (213 von 344 Adressen betreffen nun die Zürcher Strasse, vgl. https://qa.poole.ch/addresses/ch/). ... commented 2026-05-30 07:19:02 UTC by SaintCityMapper ♦5 |
| 183194296 (Comments: 1) | Rhoon (Discussed changesets: 39) | Hallo Rhoon, ich habe dieses CS reverted, der Weg existiert definitiv – ich bin ihn vor Ort abgefahren. Habe den genauen Verlauf aus einer GPS-Aufzeichnung übernommen und am Ende des Weges noch ein noexit-Tag spendiert. Viele... commented 2026-05-30 07:11:21 UTC by rik_ ♦94 |
| 163238396 (Comments: 1) | Ben506 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Ben, In this changeset, you edited https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/357527028/ to change it from a bank to a cafe. But you left the name as "Santander". I'm wondering if this is correct? I don't suppose you know the are... commented 2026-05-30 07:10:26 UTC by Robert Whittaker ♦312 |
| 183291950 (Comments: 1) | TomJeffs (Discussed changesets: 47) | I don't think highway=living_street is the correct tag for this, that should be used for designated "home zones" in the UK. There is cyclestreet=yes, but again that's based around a legal definition. commented 2026-05-30 06:54:27 UTC by ntzm ♦55 |
| 183327655 (Comments: 2) | Flap Slimy Outward (Discussed changesets: 208) | Oh. "Frewway" is 100% a typo. I meant "Freeway." commented 2026-05-30 06:53:32 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦248 |
 | 183338576 (Comments: 2) | tiger (Discussed changesets: 4) | Something went wrong with that changeset. Should have been two to start with... Fixed now. Thanks for pointing it out. commented 2026-05-30 06:43:46 UTC by tiger ♦2 |
| 183383943 (Comments: 1) | SekeRob (Discussed changesets: 437) | Sorry, anytime someone touches the SS16 route a nation long BoundBox is created. This needs splitting per region or even province and then combined into a super route.. Will limit the version changes now on v2083... and counting commented 2026-05-30 06:41:45 UTC by SekeRob ♦1,501 |
| 183332934 (Comments: 1) | bigmanbusman (Discussed changesets: 11) | Do not start an edit war. Everything has been explained already in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182762861 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183385051 commented 2026-05-30 06:39:33 UTC by kingkingHK ♦346 |
| 183093943 (Comments: 4) | Juvan (Discussed changesets: 1) | la salle de la communauté hellénique existe bien, on y a organisé la bas une marche de la fédération il y a une semaine ou deux je n'ai pas accès à mon pc donc je ne vois pas exactement quelle est... commented 2026-05-30 06:32:16 UTC by Juvan ♦1 |
| 153397854 (Comments: 8) | the_third_man (Discussed changesets: 2) | thanks Mateusz :) I personally didn't change anything because I'm not active or familiar with this area here ;) commented 2026-05-30 06:30:22 UTC by Piagno ♦137 |
| 183208798 (Comments: 2) | Iulian Arcuș (Discussed changesets: 2) | See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183384741 commented 2026-05-30 06:27:08 UTC by kingkingHK ♦346 |
| 183208657 (Comments: 3) | Iulian Arcuș (Discussed changesets: 2) | See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183384706 commented 2026-05-30 06:24:59 UTC by kingkingHK ♦346 |
| 183260942 (Comments: 2) | owennson (Discussed changesets: 102) | See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183384656 commented 2026-05-30 06:23:34 UTC by kingkingHK ♦346 |
| 183089975 (Comments: 2) | bigmanbusman (Discussed changesets: 11) | See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183384534 commented 2026-05-30 06:18:28 UTC by kingkingHK ♦346 |
| 181494109 (Comments: 6) | vectorial8192 (Discussed changesets: 164) | @vectorial8192 > we may modify NSI presets manually. Please re-read what I said. And remember not to deny the antecedent. ------------ Quoting you from a previous changeset: > if the warning system could autom... commented 2026-05-30 06:13:54 UTC by kingkingHK ♦346 |
| 181883534 (Comments: 2) | fs_LT (Discussed changesets: 31) | AT:city_limit wäre auch für den ganzen Ort, für ein paar Straßen dann allenfalls AT:zonexx o.ä. commented 2026-05-30 06:04:44 UTC by wolfbert ♦166 |
| 183272416 (Comments: 1) | j0hn33y (Discussed changesets: 14) | Hello! Please have a look on http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/2qQu. What is the mean of the tag UNITNUM? What is the difference to addr:unit ? commented 2026-05-30 06:04:09 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,573 |
 | 183263866 (Comments: 1) | Heo Tham An (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hello! Please have a look on http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1291205036 ( one of seven ways).What is the man of the tag ré? Did you mean ref? commented 2026-05-30 06:01:01 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,573 |
| 182891163 (Comments: 2) | einufo (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hallo, danke, dass Du meinen Pfusch bemerkt hast - ich habe es korrigiert: Weg ist keine Brücke mehr und die Brücke hat keinen tracktype (den kenne ich nicht). Gruß Tino commented 2026-05-30 05:59:56 UTC by einufo ♦4 |
| 53935850 (Comments: 1) | Farras (Discussed changesets: 61) | what is the source of Kutai National Park boundary? apa sumber batas Taman Nasional Kutai? commented 2026-05-30 05:34:26 UTC by FajrAl ♦367 |
| 183373343 (Comments: 2) | OSMF Operations Working Group (Discussed changesets: 2) | User has been blocked https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20728 commented 2026-05-30 05:07:51 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦6,578 |
| 183307947 (Comments: 2) | SoulCover (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hallo goodidea, danke für den Hinweis. Wenn ich das Wiki richtig interpretiere, sollen in diesem Fall auf den jeweiligen Seiten extra Knoten gesetzt werden. Links/rechts ist ja leider auch nicht eindeutig (von der Straße auszugehen ist ... commented 2026-05-30 05:02:33 UTC by SoulCover ♦3 |
| 183366343 (Comments: 1) | EDVincent (Discussed changesets: 1) | Feature already exists as https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/694337074 . Please be careful. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183382532 commented 2026-05-30 04:54:46 UTC by kingkingHK ♦346 |
| 183360739 (Comments: 1) | jaspercreates (Discussed changesets: 3) | Please don't lie to validators. What even is the purpose of clicking random buttons until the validator shuts up? This is vandalism. People have told you this before: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168117468 This changeset create... commented 2026-05-30 04:40:58 UTC by kingkingHK ♦346 |
| 176912102 (Comments: 1) | Omnific (Discussed changesets: 131) | Thanks for fixing up the flags in front of the air museum! commented 2026-05-30 04:38:05 UTC by watmildon ♦308 |
| 177410089 (Comments: 1) | gostaff (Discussed changesets: 1) | Gunakan tag bangunan, bukan penggunaan lahan, commented 2026-05-30 04:37:06 UTC by FajrAl ♦367 |
| X | 183365372 (Comments: 1) | neitomonoma14 (Discussed changesets: 2) | I am confused by the phrase "OFFICIAL Wikipedia data". Do you mean Wikipedia or Wikidata? How is Wikipedia "official"? Is it sponsored by the officials? Apparently, the "various sources" that you cited are AMTI status... commented 2026-05-30 04:30:43 UTC by 旧加卷 ♦64 |
| 161538057 (Comments: 1) | Tamashaneon (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted added SEO spam POI with many invalid tags https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183380934 commented 2026-05-30 03:20:16 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦89 |
| 183380786 (Comments: 1) | sudface_imports (Discussed changesets: 2) | * Not an import - accidentally logged into the wrong account commented 2026-05-30 03:10:26 UTC by sudface ♦9 |
 | 183367303 (Comments: 1) | Camilarius (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola, bienvenid@ y gracias por editar el mapa en Cochabamba. El área que dibujaste será uno inmobiliario? industrial? 🤔 Ya está en construcción? De todas formas lo recategoricé a terreno porque el que pusi... commented 2026-05-30 03:05:16 UTC by 5m4u9 ♦1,676 |
 | 182872977 (Comments: 1) | qhuai (Discussed changesets: 4) | 为何将正确标注abandoned:railway=station删除，在原地新增railway=service_station？已进行回退处理 commented 2026-05-30 03:03:49 UTC by SY0649 ♦4 |
| 182527044 (Comments: 4) | cubbe8 (Discussed changesets: 95) | It’s all done now, been fixed commented 2026-05-30 02:48:48 UTC by cubbe8 ♦93 |
| 183248503 (Comments: 1) | Dani Safa Adi Nugraha (Discussed changesets: 18) | Bangunan tidak perlu dijadikan multipolygon via relasi. Petakan saja seperti biasanya. Kecuali di bagian dalamnya ada outdoor, itu bisa pakai multipolygon. commented 2026-05-30 02:21:54 UTC by FajrAl ♦367 |
| 182369711 (Comments: 1) | jcrow (Discussed changesets: 11) | Hello! Thanks for your contribution. When working on houses, it's best to use the Q key to square them off so they better reflect the reality on the ground. This helps eliminate the small crookedness that comes with free-drawing building outline... commented 2026-05-30 02:21:26 UTC by maxwellward ♦19 |
| 182731918 (Comments: 1) | Btian Paul Dorsam (Discussed changesets: 4) | this is yard industrial track part of NYA Fresh Pond Yard no longer a branch line. commented 2026-05-30 02:20:23 UTC by RailandSea ♦23 |
| 183379214 (Comments: 1) | lina6174683 (Discussed changesets: 1) | nitikkin apa? commented 2026-05-30 02:19:50 UTC by FajrAl ♦367 |
| 182948572 (Comments: 1) | AeonicB (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, please be careful with reclassifying roads as the different types of roads form a hierarchy of importance. Tertiary, secondary, and primary roads are all different forms of major roadways while residential and minor/unclassified roads are vari... commented 2026-05-30 02:14:23 UTC by Joseph R P ♦432 |
| 183379012 (Comments: 1) | Fizzie-DWG (Discussed changesets: 141) | I guess I must have forgotten to mention in the report that I already manually removed the remaining SEO spam tags for their changesets, so it seems I ended up wasting both of our times here without anything to show for it. Oh well--lesson learned fo... commented 2026-05-30 01:58:52 UTC by CAM-Gerlach ♦227 |
| 168871006 (Comments: 3) | berkahIOO (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thanks; unfortunately, this is not the first time I've seen online gambling promoted on OSM, especially in East and Southeast Asia. The methods may be modern, but the lure of a quick buck (or rupiah, in this case) is timeless. The sketchy... commented 2026-05-30 01:44:37 UTC by CAM-Gerlach ♦227 |
| 156835326 (Comments: 1) | jztrailg (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello. Is "access road" https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/282335763 access=no? do you have a website or map that corroborates this? commented 2026-05-30 01:14:20 UTC by SherbetS ♦158 |
| 180443454 (Comments: 4) | Pinnacle Periodontics and Dental Implants (Discussed changesets: 2) | DWG revert - apparent SEO spam https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183379012 commented 2026-05-30 00:51:16 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,911 |
| 183377395 (Comments: 1) | Firvj (Discussed changesets: 1) | This changeset deletes a number of features that are clearly visible on aerial imagery, and the changeset comment of "-" does not give any reasons why these should be deleted. I have reverted this. commented 2026-05-30 00:50:58 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,651 |
| 183338376 (Comments: 7) | _vincenttan (Discussed changesets: 2) | And also very sorry for miseditting of Eastern Harbour Crosssing and Tai Lam Tunnel (from motorway to trunk) commented 2026-05-30 00:46:24 UTC by _vincenttan ♦3 |
| 183331395 (Comments: 1) | cederbs (Discussed changesets: 1) | #TIP: square bldgs by selecting the outline then just type a "q" --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183331395 commented 2026-05-30 00:26:39 UTC by Glassman ♦5,942 |
| 183327935 (Comments: 1) | aConfusedAmpwave (Discussed changesets: 1) | #TIP: Street names are spelled out in OSM because software has a hard time unabbreviating --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183327935 commented 2026-05-30 00:24:22 UTC by Glassman ♦5,942 |
| 183320934 (Comments: 1) | Hailey Calixtro (Discussed changesets: 2) | This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found. reverted edit ... commented 2026-05-30 00:21:31 UTC by Glassman ♦5,942 |
| 183319624 (Comments: 1) | Hailey Calixtro (Discussed changesets: 2) | This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found. Reverted changeset... commented 2026-05-30 00:20:57 UTC by Glassman ♦5,942 |
| 120118131 (Comments: 1) | Wilmer Osario (Discussed changesets: 54) | Aquí no hay semáforos: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4134409834/history#map=19/10.424674/-66.822886 commented 2026-05-29 23:57:25 UTC by pantufla ♦303 |
| 183376825 (Comments: 3) | brianstrauch (Discussed changesets: 5) | Sounds reasonable. We'll see if the other user has information to the contrary. commented 2026-05-29 23:50:42 UTC by pwbriggs ♦277 |
| 183371620 (Comments: 3) | brianstrauch (Discussed changesets: 5) | Cool, thanks! commented 2026-05-29 23:49:12 UTC by pwbriggs ♦277 |
| 183351413 (Comments: 1) | Z_Pilch (Discussed changesets: 2) | Jeśli ciek ma szerokość 1 m, to na pewno nie jest to rzeka. W OSM cieki o szerokości mniejszej niż 3 m tagujemy waterway=stream https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:waterway%3Dstream https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:waterway%3Driver |
| 183351129 (Comments: 1) | Z_Pilch (Discussed changesets: 2) | Zmieniłeś rów z waterway=ditch na waterway=river i dodałeś szerokość 1 m. Jeśli ciek ma szerokość 1 m, to na pewno nie jest to rzeka. W OSM cieki o szerokości mniejszej niż 3 m tagujemy waterway=stream https://wiki.openstreetmap.org... commented 2026-05-29 23:40:41 UTC by maro21 ♦878 |
 | 183328225 (Comments: 2) | fthmcme (Discussed changesets: 8) | Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20731 commented 2026-05-29 23:40:28 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,911 |
| 182707647 (Comments: 6) | TangledRockets (Discussed changesets: 6) | Verstehe. Frohes Mapping! commented 2026-05-29 22:54:17 UTC by TangledRockets ♦12 |
| 149743030 (Comments: 3) | jengelh (Discussed changesets: 150) | Ok then, so just quote the source in the changeset next time (source=survey). commented 2026-05-29 22:45:38 UTC by aceman444 ♦2,906 |
| 183367422 (Comments: 1) | cipherchief (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thanks! Re: navigation searches (also known as geocoding), depending on what app you're using, you can expect it to be updated in a couple weeks or more with new data—a lot of apps (CoMaps, OSMAnd, etc.) only process and download new data ... commented 2026-05-29 22:43:07 UTC by pwbriggs ♦277 |
| 183368012 (Comments: 2) | cipherchief (Discussed changesets: 2) | It looks like it is based on their website, so I moved WPC to that building instead of at the Our Lady gym. I added more details to the campus as well—your edits were mostly good, my edits just built on top of them. I don't b... commented 2026-05-29 22:40:01 UTC by pwbriggs ♦277 |
| 183279091 (Comments: 1) | UtMtnMan (Discussed changesets: 2) | Gentec LPR cameras on BYU property as you exit to University Ave from the OIT and Philanthropy Buildings. Almost certainly owned by BYU. commented 2026-05-29 22:31:28 UTC by UtMtnMan ♦2 |
| 183376809 (Comments: 1) | Mintgosling (Discussed changesets: 2) | 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap! Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy. Nazwa nadawana jest automatycz... commented 2026-05-29 22:31:05 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦8,669 |
| 183279083 (Comments: 1) | UtMtnMan (Discussed changesets: 2) | Gentec LPR cameras on BYU property as you enter towards the OIT and Philanthropy Buildings. Almost certainly owned by BYU. commented 2026-05-29 22:30:13 UTC by UtMtnMan ♦2 |
| 183130803 (Comments: 1) | brooke10101010 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Another user has set this back to vegan only in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183376825. Please comment there to explain why you think this place is not exclusively vegan. Thanks! commented 2026-05-29 22:28:20 UTC by pwbriggs ♦277 |
| 130643310 (Comments: 3) | Suricata (Discussed changesets: 6) | Sorry, I don't understand the problem here. If there is an error, please correct it. commented 2026-05-29 21:53:28 UTC by Suricata ♦4 |
| 183376170 (Comments: 2) | recollect124 (Discussed changesets: 1) | South row of detached homes have North facing carports, again separation on Tuner Street. commented 2026-05-29 21:52:06 UTC by recollect124 ♦1 |
 | 183312780 (Comments: 1) | J00SECI (Discussed changesets: 35) | STOP MESSING AROUND WITH OUR DATA! I WILL DO MY BEST TO GET YOU BANNED FOR ONCE AND ALL! commented 2026-05-29 21:50:41 UTC by porfiriopaiz ♦134 |
| 183313212 (Comments: 2) | J00SECI (Discussed changesets: 35) | STOP MESSING AROUND WITH OUR DATA! I WILL DO MY BEST TO GET YOU BANNED FOR ONCE AND ALL! commented 2026-05-29 21:49:59 UTC by porfiriopaiz ♦134 |
| 183360549 (Comments: 1) | FlamingoOSM (Discussed changesets: 33) | the url for the image linked to the building way and the node are broken, "osition=0&yposition=380&rw=768&rh=430.jpg" is not a valid url, please update it to point to the correct url. happy mapping, Udar. commented 2026-05-29 21:14:12 UTC by Udarian ♦753 |
| 183364184 (Comments: 3) | venelin98 (Discussed changesets: 7) | Решението е влязло в сила и спирката официално се води преименувана. Вече защо толкова време не могат да обновят 200 табла на спирки и няко... commented 2026-05-29 21:05:11 UTC by Dimitar155 ♦910 |
| 183374753 (Comments: 1) | jmvet24 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi all, I'm a new editor and I have just added several features to this Travelodge hotel, including a grass traffic island in the car park. Could an experienced editor check that it was done correctly? Thanks, Jim. commented 2026-05-29 21:02:43 UTC by jmvet24 ♦1 |
| 183373200 (Comments: 1) | OSMF Operations Working Group (Discussed changesets: 2) | This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/183373243 where the comment is: "Vandalism" commented 2026-05-29 20:10:47 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,815 |
| 183367255 (Comments: 1) | Gravityslc (Discussed changesets: 1) | Based off this being in slc it's probably a motorola rather than a flock. Are you able to check the reference images on this page and confirm? https://deflock.org/identify. Thanks for adding. I think there's still a few unmapped hid... commented 2026-05-29 20:03:49 UTC by HashFerret ♦16 |
| 183372053 (Comments: 1) | cyankahly (Discussed changesets: 11) | Hei, Danke, aber die Lage passt nicht... Parkplatzabstände stimmen nicht zum Luftbild! Dann, wenn diese Detailerfassung: Ganz wichtig (!!!) da fehlen noch: parking_space=disabled... mindestens 8 Stellplätze in Richtung Bahnhof... und, und,... commented 2026-05-29 20:03:45 UTC by streckenkundler ♦1,167 |
| 183361925 (Comments: 4) | Marcel Valk (Discussed changesets: 2) | Ja dat denk ik ook. commented 2026-05-29 19:57:42 UTC by Marcel Valk ♦1 |
| 183349644 (Comments: 1) | Felix14_v2 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Спасибо за замечательные описания своих изменений! commented 2026-05-29 19:45:48 UTC by dypa ♦163 |
| 183279767 (Comments: 2) | greatnameguys2472 (Discussed changesets: 13) | Acknowledged. commented 2026-05-29 19:45:26 UTC by greatnameguys2472 ♦16 |
| 183226256 (Comments: 2) | impact0r (Discussed changesets: 15) | Usunąłem wszystkie maxspeed=60. Ogólnie 50 km/h zostawiam ponieważ w większości to teren zabudowany. W paru miejscach w terenie mogą być niższe wartości np. 40 km/h ale to powiedzmy mała różnica względem 50. Jest też szc... commented 2026-05-29 19:36:07 UTC by grzegorz75jan ♦657 |
| 183335024 (Comments: 1) | brianstrauch (Discussed changesets: 5) | Thanks. In OpenStreetMap at least in the United States, we include the country code (1) and use hyphens for every group, like so: +1-206-708-6637. I've updated this one's format. Thanks for the contribution! commented 2026-05-29 19:29:19 UTC by pwbriggs ♦277 |
| 183353539 (Comments: 2) | MikeBockserman (Discussed changesets: 8) | https://imgur.com/a/ovSMFEf commented 2026-05-29 19:28:43 UTC by gfletcherces ♦1 |
| 183237115 (Comments: 2) | kratzliputzli (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ja das war Absicht, der Weg ist leider nicht mehr vollständig begehbar und wird deshalb von der Stadt auch nicht mehr beworben. Ersetzt wurde er durch mehrere tw. neue Wanderwege, die ich demnächst eintrage. commented 2026-05-29 19:07:47 UTC by kratzliputzli ♦1 |
 | 183356175 (Comments: 1) | JIRIELKOMBI (Discussed changesets: 1) | Please check the ways you added - most of them have several strange tags that look like they shouldn't be in OSM. All regular tags for health boundaries are missing. commented 2026-05-29 18:04:53 UTC by mueschel ♦7,146 |
| 183085301 (Comments: 1) | DouceLuvango (Discussed changesets: 14) | Please check the ways you added - most of them have several strange tags that look like they shouldn't be in OSM. All regular tags for health boundaries are missing. commented 2026-05-29 18:04:17 UTC by mueschel ♦7,146 |
| 183162392 (Comments: 1) | Ngitsisarafina (Discussed changesets: 5) | Please check all the ways you added - most of them have several strange tags that look like they shouldn't be in OSM. All regular tags for health boundaries are missing. commented 2026-05-29 18:03:47 UTC by mueschel ♦7,146 |
| 183233392 (Comments: 1) | eugenenine (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, aren't these nodes milestones? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dmilestone There's also no tag like "distance units" - you have to add the unit directly in the "distance" tag. commented 2026-05-29 18:00:01 UTC by mueschel ♦7,146 |
| 183267394 (Comments: 1) | Xavizard Knight (Discussed changesets: 16) | Has there been some discussion about these tags? "area:amenity" is not used in any other place. Essentially this makes these objects completely invisible to all existing tools and apps unless they explicitly handle this new tagging m... commented 2026-05-29 17:58:05 UTC by mueschel ♦7,146 |
| 183361508 (Comments: 2) | tootsotter (Discussed changesets: 1) | Many thanks for correcting me, I will now look at all the ones I have done. I was astounded to find that all my private tracks had suddenly become accessable to all. All the best George commented 2026-05-29 17:50:55 UTC by tootsotter ♦1 |
| 183350783 (Comments: 1) | henna (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo henna, wurden die schadhaften Stellen verbessert (→ Änderung der smoothness?) oder sind einfach nur die Bauzäune weg? -- Slaven commented 2026-05-29 17:35:29 UTC by eserte ♦170 |
| 183311853 (Comments: 4) | ClairM (Discussed changesets: 1) | Navré que vous ayez perdu votre/notre temps à cause d'autres sites pas à jour : pour ma part j'étais sur place le jour même de la création du POI et il y a bien une boutique ouverte... C'est l&#... commented 2026-05-29 17:25:12 UTC by ClairM ♦1 |
| 183267768 (Comments: 2) | sanzay (Discussed changesets: 6) | effectivement, mais je suis parti de l'application "Streetcomplete" qui indiquait un batiment à mettre à jour . D'où ma modification ensuite avec editeur commented 2026-05-29 16:48:33 UTC by sanzay ♦5 |
 | 111038049 (Comments: 2) | Taameli (Discussed changesets: 1) | I think it has been a mistake. I corrected it to 1-. commented 2026-05-29 16:45:56 UTC by Taameli ♦1 |
| 183364914 (Comments: 1) | Darnight14 (Discussed changesets: 20) | *看见 commented 2026-05-29 16:43:35 UTC by Darnight14 ♦16 |
| 180183133 (Comments: 4) | flowio (Discussed changesets: 2) | May I also add, thanks for making the world a worse place to live in, you freeloading scum. commented 2026-05-29 16:36:41 UTC by SuborbitalPigeon ♦37 |
 | 63632070 (Comments: 3) | AgusQui (Discussed changesets: 227) | Hola, gracias por responder! Interesante propuesta, creo que esta propuesta cae entre esas propuestas que quiere categorizar en lugar de añadirle características a algo. La mayoría creo que quiere lo segundo. En el... commented 2026-05-29 16:33:12 UTC by 5m4u9 ♦1,676 |
| 183308734 (Comments: 1) | Glassfrog (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for adding data around Appleton! In this changeset, you added some sidewalks that double back on themselves, but they shouldn't be drawn that way. It's OK to stop a line, then start a new one! Also, I not... commented 2026-05-29 16:11:05 UTC by neuhausr ♦354 |
| 173502147 (Comments: 1) | ClockRoach (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks for the survey and edits! commented 2026-05-29 16:09:44 UTC by ElliottPlack ♦939 |
| 182450187 (Comments: 1) | 111Raven (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap! You're contributions are much appreciated. Please align your aerial imagery with nearby objects like roads before you start mapping. You can do this in iD by pressing B to open the background settings on the righ... commented 2026-05-29 16:04:57 UTC by ZincoYarvis ♦2 |
| 109636263 (Comments: 1) | mamue (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hat das s'Lädele auch (Öffungs)Zeiten am Freitag? commented 2026-05-29 16:03:30 UTC by Josef73 ♦299 |
| 183292191 (Comments: 4) | mdosch (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hoffe das passt jetzt, habe leider gerade keinen Rechner zur Hand. commented 2026-05-29 16:01:03 UTC by mdosch ♦2 |
| 181020045 (Comments: 3) | Gruemscheler (Discussed changesets: 4) | Since a way is more detailed than a node I'd prefer a way; otherwise there's a loss of information. Generally it's considered bad style to (mis)map for the renderer. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_ren... commented 2026-05-29 15:48:15 UTC by martianfreeloader ♦183 |
| 183334773 (Comments: 2) | yacine01234 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Nous sommes désormais trois à vous avoir posé (publiquement) des questions sans avoir de réponses de votre part. La question de la source utilisée pour vos modification (soulevée par @woodpeck et @Syl ... commented 2026-05-29 15:25:37 UTC by Ltrlg ♦208 |
| 183201971 (Comments: 5) | Johannes Gy (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo Johannes, herzlich Willkommen bei OSM! Was User streckenkundler zum Ausdruck bringen wollte, aber leider nicht in freundliche, erklärende Worte für einen neuen User verpackt hat: In OSM vermeiden wir die Erfassung von Einzelbäume... commented 2026-05-29 15:25:15 UTC by Supaplex030 ♦452 |
| 183320613 (Comments: 1) | Zwyklak (Discussed changesets: 9) | 1368365804 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183361562 commented 2026-05-29 15:24:37 UTC by kamilbogacki ♦42 |
| 183361540 (Comments: 1) | matteobott (Discussed changesets: 7) | note/2456443 commented 2026-05-29 15:24:15 UTC by matteobott ♦11 |
| 183360066 (Comments: 1) | VLD317 (Discussed changesets: 17) | Hi, thank you for your edits in Toronto. Can you point me to where this organized edit has been discussed, and/or the MapRoulette challenge description? commented 2026-05-29 15:23:46 UTC by Jarek 🚲 ♦382 |
| 183311808 (Comments: 3) | LiveWeb (Discussed changesets: 2) | ok, gracias por la aclaración. commented 2026-05-29 15:21:09 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦3,092 |
| 183361048 (Comments: 1) | Azimekh (Discussed changesets: 1) | Typo in the change notes, year should be 2026 commented 2026-05-29 15:14:52 UTC by Azimekh ♦1 |
| 183320538 (Comments: 1) | Zwyklak (Discussed changesets: 9) | Wycofałem zmianę. Na przyszłość, gdy sklep zmienia szyld to oznaczamy to na tym samym punkcie, zmieniając oczywiście dane. Gdy zostanie zamknięty używamy shop=vacant. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183361133 commented 2026-05-29 15:14:23 UTC by kamilbogacki ♦42 |
| 181930686 (Comments: 5) | Matthieu HUGOT (Discussed changesets: 8) | Je n'ai pas attendu ta réponse. J'ai corrigé il y a 2-3 jours. commented 2026-05-29 15:10:19 UTC by Max-Kritic ♦255 |
| 182932413 (Comments: 1) | Artem544894 (Discussed changesets: 21) | Вы выбали слишком высокий статус для дороги. Статус дороги определяется насколько крупные населённые пункта она связывает. Ну и для... commented 2026-05-29 15:02:48 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,503 |
| 149964638 (Comments: 3) | Thierry1030 (Discussed changesets: 102) | Ik heb effectief enkel het zuidelijke deel meegenomen: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1524306192 commented 2026-05-29 14:42:03 UTC by joost schouppe ♦1,483 |
| 102285003 (Comments: 2) | loveshack (Discussed changesets: 16) | I've created a relation to try and group them. https://osm.org/relation/20775577/ I think some work could be done to tidy this up and make it clearer where a feature belongs to more than one protected area e.g. Bulls Cross. commented 2026-05-29 14:36:22 UTC by ohmanger ♦44 |
| 183255003 (Comments: 5) | etgg (Discussed changesets: 26) | Sorry you feel that way, I'm not trying to harass anybody, I often inform contributors who are copying from incompatible sources including Google Streetview and planning documents, so that they don't spend their time on edits that end up ge... commented 2026-05-29 14:26:39 UTC by LordGarySugar ♦268 |
| 181732378 (Comments: 2) | letihu (Discussed changesets: 94) | Das stimmt. Da ist mir wohl ein Fehler unterlaufen. commented 2026-05-29 14:22:45 UTC by letihu ♦806 |
| 180592169 (Comments: 2) | ironspock (Discussed changesets: 34) | Hallo GUFSZ, eigentlich nicht... Über die Jahre komme ich sicherlich an einige Orte, die ich vorher schon einmal besucht habe ;-) Da ich einige Wegweiser ergänzt hatte, ist mir die relativ große Diskrepanz zwischen dem eingetrag... commented 2026-05-29 14:22:42 UTC by ironspock ♦44 |
| 27730995 (Comments: 2) | jbella (Discussed changesets: 3) | Sorry, I have no idea, the change was 11 years ago.. =) commented 2026-05-29 14:13:46 UTC by jbella ♦3 |
| 127073167 (Comments: 2) | Belle Haven Mapper (Discussed changesets: 1) | Nature is working quickly to reclaim it. Unlike the zone and other trails, since it's just a small loop it doesn't get much traffic so the fallen leaves have heavily (fully) obscured it. This park doesn't currently have a MORE liaison ... commented 2026-05-29 13:42:24 UTC by Belle Haven Mapper ♦9 |
| 181891884 (Comments: 2) | Access Claims (komoot) (Discussed changesets: 70) | This change is also bizarre as you have only removed foot and bike access but left horse as designated. Cheers Phil commented 2026-05-29 13:35:31 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,672 |
| 183348720 (Comments: 3) | BER319 (Discussed changesets: 39) | Kein Problem! Ich habe ihn in seinen eigenen wikivoyage=* tag verschoben. Der ist zwar unüblich, aber es gibt ein paar davon, da finde ich ist er gut aufgehoben. Schönes Wandern! commented 2026-05-29 13:31:01 UTC by PizzaTreeIsland ♦77 |
| 183337369 (Comments: 1) | waldviertlerkartograph (Discussed changesets: 13) | An sich ist das Ziel der OpenStreetMap den jetzt Zustand darzustellen und nicht den Zustand von vor 40 Jahren. Für solche Daten, wie in diesem Beispiel die Ölhafenbahn ist die OpenHistoricalMap (https://www.openhistoricalmap.org) zu empfehl... commented 2026-05-29 13:30:08 UTC by Tris_1220 ♦26 |
| 182878354 (Comments: 5) | Pernycek (Discussed changesets: 17) | Hello Pernycek, Ignoring Google Maps (Which we cannot use) and wikidata (usually likewise, for different reasons), what is your source for your edit here? Best Regards, Andy (from OSM's Data Working Group) commented 2026-05-29 13:27:18 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,790 |
| X | 183340138 (Comments: 2) | Spixi (Discussed changesets: 4) | noted, thank you! commented 2026-05-29 13:19:26 UTC by Spixi ♦6 |
 | 183269914 (Comments: 2) | Anders L (Discussed changesets: 6) | Tak, rettet :) commented 2026-05-29 13:12:19 UTC by Anders L ♦5 |
| 183345356 (Comments: 1) | yacine01234 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Bonjour, quelle source avez-vous utilisé ? "research" c'est un peu vague. Vos modifications ressemblent beaucoup à un import, si c'est le cas il y a des directives à suivre : https://wiki.openstreetmap.... commented 2026-05-29 13:02:50 UTC by Syl ♦1,060 |
| 183343812 (Comments: 1) | ApekshaData (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, this parking and some others already exist in a more precise location. Please do a conflation instead of adding it a second time. And also the website link should be in the local language, not in english. commented 2026-05-29 12:59:06 UTC by Syl ♦1,060 |
| 155421599 (Comments: 1) | brianh (Discussed changesets: 119) | Hi brianh, I noticed you deleted all elements except this: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12118608287 should it be deleted as well? thanks and good mapping commented 2026-05-29 12:46:04 UTC by ivanbranco ♦2,891 |
| 149363791 (Comments: 9) | mueschel (Discussed changesets: 973) | The information was still there, and even in a way that is much more visible to the casual mapper: iD will display it directly and doesn't hide it in a closed tab that most mappers will never touch. Can we just agree on a proper tag for ... commented 2026-05-29 12:42:55 UTC by mueschel ♦7,146 |
| 183146299 (Comments: 2) | Валентин Ян (Discussed changesets: 46) | Вітаю! Навпаки видаляю і особливо теги name:ru. В даному наборі змін вносив не нанесені об'єкти та перейменовані назви у Чорнобилі відпо... commented 2026-05-29 12:41:54 UTC by Валентин Ян ♦16 |
 | 183298314 (Comments: 3) | CRCulver (Discussed changesets: 61) | I exported from Overpass API only those churches where the name tag equals "Biserica". I then deleted those name tags, and the corresponding name tags in German, Hungarian, Russian, etc. Ditto for cemeteries. This kind of change is ... commented 2026-05-29 12:29:18 UTC by CRCulver ♦223 |
| 183295978 (Comments: 2) | tmishra (Discussed changesets: 2) | Le vrai P4 est ici: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/253176490/history#map=18/45.613841/6.774442 commented 2026-05-29 12:28:14 UTC by Patrick78 ♦21 |
| 182364279 (Comments: 4) | adigis (Discussed changesets: 4) | done, thank pak. koreksinya commented 2026-05-29 12:24:53 UTC by adigis ♦4 |
| 182920163 (Comments: 2) | Matthieu HUGOT (Discussed changesets: 8) | en principe il n'y a plus de problème au niveau des lignes. Pour les arrêts, je les ai mis au bon endroit, j'en ai parlé avec l'AOM ce matin. commented 2026-05-29 12:24:43 UTC by Matthieu HUGOT ♦6 |
| 183293409 (Comments: 1) | tmishra (Discussed changesets: 2) | Bonjour, ce parking est privé et est réservé aux habitants de la résidence. il n'est pas Q-Park. C'est la même chose pour les autres parkings des résidences Tétras. Merci de corriger commented 2026-05-29 12:23:50 UTC by Patrick78 ♦21 |
| 182381887 (Comments: 1) | sammy21 (Discussed changesets: 4) | "K2-Radweg, ehem. Bahnstrecke Bad Langensalza–Haussömmern" ist kein gültiger Inhalt für das "name"-Tag in OSM. Wenn ein Radweg früher mal eine Bahnstrecke war, kann man das in "note" oder "... commented 2026-05-29 12:23:40 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,651 |
| 182778424 (Comments: 3) | AndyB_66 (Discussed changesets: 52) | Ah - I see a comment on https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/182785531 explaining the signage. commented 2026-05-29 12:14:25 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,790 |
| 183347619 (Comments: 1) | yacine01234 (Discussed changesets: 3) | How is this a "normalisation" when the shop did not even exist before? What is the source "research boucheries halal france" - surely you did not travel the country, so you used some online directory - which? What is... commented 2026-05-29 12:13:33 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,651 |
| 182551539 (Comments: 1) | YellowSoul (Discussed changesets: 20) | Hi YellowSoul, the highway is not yet under construction although contracts in the area are being signed these days. Why the change? commented 2026-05-29 12:06:31 UTC by k9h10a ♦3 |
| 182610353 (Comments: 2) | Vojtěch Fošnár (Discussed changesets: 8) | @Vojtěch Fošnár what is "sync dev"? If you're importing data into OSM you must follow https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines . commented 2026-05-29 12:04:13 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,790 |
| 152583040 (Comments: 8) | pavvv (Discussed changesets: 173) | > albo w ostateczności jako loc_name tak było zanim przyszłeś i wadliwie skasowałeś od biedy też tam pasuje, ale na pewno całkiem wywalenie było błędne commented 2026-05-29 11:58:06 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,901 |
 | 183294100 (Comments: 1) | dinodino1234 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in changeset id:183351522 commented 2026-05-29 11:57:20 UTC by rajdhani ♦129 |
 | 183349088 (Comments: 1) | Lebron Rodriguez (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, welcome to OSM. Is this name real? ebd (223698482), v6 commented 2026-05-29 11:57:14 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦6,578 |
| 183350151 (Comments: 1) | Apex Scale Marketing (Discussed changesets: 1) | #Spam commented 2026-05-29 11:55:25 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦6,578 |
| 182381494 (Comments: 1) | sammy21 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hallo, trägt das Gebäude wirklich den Namen Grillhütte oder ist es vielmehr nur eine https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Namen "Das name-Attribut sollte nur den eigentlichen Namen des fraglichen Objekts enthalten und k... commented 2026-05-29 11:53:05 UTC by CADdog63 ♦27 |
| 182382282 (Comments: 1) | sammy21 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hallo, bist du dir sicher, dass der Radweg auch quer durch private Gärten und mitten durch Gebäude verläuft? Würdest du das bitte prüfen und/oder dich hier melden https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/bitte-um-prufung-der-... commented 2026-05-29 11:48:39 UTC by CADdog63 ♦27 |
| 170667311 (Comments: 10) | vmicho (Discussed changesets: 79) | Hello, Andy from OSM's Data Working Group here (we've been made aware of this discussion). Outside the DWG I've spent quite a lot of time looking at what OSM tags are used with what other OSM tags. "attraction=animal" ... commented 2026-05-29 11:46:14 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,790 |
| 182381766 (Comments: 1) | sammy21 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hallo, du hast den Namen sowohl für das Betriebsgelände als auch für jedes einzelne Gebäude einetragen. An den Gebäuden scheint mir das sehr unpassend, die Gebäude haben keinen solchen Namen. Willst du das selber korr... commented 2026-05-29 11:45:40 UTC by CADdog63 ♦27 |
 | 183185093 (Comments: 1) | Renel augustin (Discussed changesets: 4) | Why you keep adding 000 as a housenumber everywhere? commented 2026-05-29 11:44:30 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,901 |
| 183327152 (Comments: 1) | MapMagics (Discussed changesets: 13) | Hi MapMagics, This turn relation is needed since you aren't allowed to make a u turn if you are coming from the tunnel. The only allowed turns are left and straight on but this is at the intersection which is a few meters to the NW. |
| 175424594 (Comments: 4) | Renel augustin (Discussed changesets: 4) | and I continue reverting commented 2026-05-29 11:43:42 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,901 |
| 183275746 (Comments: 3) | Canti23 (Discussed changesets: 1) | а, понятно тогда надо просто перетащить точку, а номер дома на точке заменить на новый. Попробуете сделать или мне? commented 2026-05-29 11:38:42 UTC by literan ♦7,113 |
| 182945523 (Comments: 2) | zinderMT (Discussed changesets: 4) | This is the park: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4627550 commented 2026-05-29 11:33:36 UTC by qstep ♦101 |
 | 183348562 (Comments: 1) | Ananas2010 (Discussed changesets: 2) | partly reverted - vandalism or test https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183350392 commented 2026-05-29 11:30:12 UTC by yelisey90 ♦471 |
| 183348401 (Comments: 1) | Ananas2010 (Discussed changesets: 2) | partly reverted - vandalism or test https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183350392 commented 2026-05-29 11:30:12 UTC by yelisey90 ♦471 |
| 183348846 (Comments: 1) | Samuelwaked (Discussed changesets: 1) | partly reverted - vandalism or test https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183350392 commented 2026-05-29 11:30:12 UTC by yelisey90 ♦471 |
| 183348567 (Comments: 1) | Asmar12345 (Discussed changesets: 2) | reverted - vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183350155 commented 2026-05-29 11:23:01 UTC by yelisey90 ♦471 |
| 183348422 (Comments: 1) | Asmar12345 (Discussed changesets: 2) | reverted - vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183350155 commented 2026-05-29 11:23:01 UTC by yelisey90 ♦471 |
| 183179228 (Comments: 1) | Adze1 (Discussed changesets: 12) | Hello. it looks like the bollard is seen as an obstacle by some apps when planning a cycle route, even thought the object has the correct tags. Have you seen this before? commented 2026-05-29 11:21:01 UTC by Xcm81 ♦2 |
| 183309611 (Comments: 2) | Katzenauge (Discussed changesets: 1) | Danke für die Korrektur commented 2026-05-29 11:20:45 UTC by Katzenauge ♦1 |
| 183348728 (Comments: 1) | DalakLaRue (Discussed changesets: 2) | reverted - vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183350064 commented 2026-05-29 11:20:23 UTC by yelisey90 ♦471 |
| 183348898 (Comments: 1) | alex1025 (Discussed changesets: 2) | reverted - vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183350064 commented 2026-05-29 11:20:23 UTC by yelisey90 ♦471 |
| 183348877 (Comments: 1) | DalakLaRue (Discussed changesets: 2) | reverted - vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183350064 commented 2026-05-29 11:20:23 UTC by yelisey90 ♦471 |
| 183348852 (Comments: 1) | alex1025 (Discussed changesets: 2) | reverted - vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183350064 commented 2026-05-29 11:20:23 UTC by yelisey90 ♦471 |
 | 182986559 (Comments: 2) | ErieCanal (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hello rild leka. I see that you’ve already restored the turn restrictions. Thank you for your input and happy mapping! commented 2026-05-29 11:16:57 UTC by ErieCanal ♦6 |
| 10136658 (Comments: 7) | Walter Schlögl (Discussed changesets: 71) | die veralteten Import-Daten braucht man wohl generell nicht mehr, siehe auch https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/opengeodb-daten/133840 https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/opengeodb/94687 commented 2026-05-29 11:14:39 UTC by Luzandro ♦997 |
| 183310900 (Comments: 2) | Badojo (Discussed changesets: 121) | The link roads between Via Litoranea and Via de Gasperi were tagged as primary_link instead of secondary_link commented 2026-05-29 11:08:10 UTC by Badojo ♦162 |
| 183313371 (Comments: 3) | Pellegrino 1890 (Discussed changesets: 1) | vedo che hai aggiunto alcune info dell'edificio e l'indirizzo, ma l'indirizzo andrebbe su un punto e non su tutto l'edificio, indicativamente sul punto di accesso, comunque mancano ancora le informazioni essenziali per l'atti... commented 2026-05-29 11:03:39 UTC by George Sears ♦88 |
| 183302164 (Comments: 3) | p*b (Discussed changesets: 18) | Ja da stimme ich dir voll zu, ist teilweise schwer zwischen den sehr ähnlichen Tags zu unterscheiden, und je nach Region wird das dann eh unterschiedlich gemacht x) Ich versuch mich da möglichst an die OSM Wiki zu halten, so ist man meisten... commented 2026-05-29 11:01:44 UTC by Aeiouai ♦4 |
| 180908669 (Comments: 3) | szalona_entropia (Discussed changesets: 330) | z powodu braku odpowiedzi planuję wycofanie tej edycji lub podobne działania commented 2026-05-29 10:56:16 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,901 |
| 178087274 (Comments: 3) | Binanto Aming (Discussed changesets: 1) | it could be something like this: addr:neighbourhood = RT 06/ RW 02 commented 2026-05-29 10:50:08 UTC by Akrimullah ♦46 |
| 183330000 (Comments: 2) | Brían (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi Andy, thanks for noticing this! I haven't really looked into editing relations in detail, so since it showed the relations as having been modified I thought it just did it all correctly automatically!... Editing relations seems complica... commented 2026-05-29 10:45:10 UTC by Brían ♦3 |
| 183159466 (Comments: 1) | JakovRajić (Discussed changesets: 45) | Wrong tag, changed in changeset/183348504 commented 2026-05-29 10:43:38 UTC by JakovRajić ♦37 |
| 182607069 (Comments: 3) | StellarNetWorks (Discussed changesets: 1) | głównie z powodu braku odpowiedzi podejrzewam że cele było dobre ale edytor w Organic Maps jest fatalny commented 2026-05-29 10:43:19 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,901 |
| 183329548 (Comments: 2) | Dhiens22 (Discussed changesets: 1) | nama dummynya di garis sudah di hapus ya... mungkin bisa di cek lg itu nama objek apa commented 2026-05-29 10:37:52 UTC by Akrimullah ♦46 |
| 183312123 (Comments: 1) | Giovanni Cappellari (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hello. Thanks for your contribution. I have changed the access tags to private, since this is a school gate and I assume only students/staff/parents should enter. A "yes" tag means that access is legally open to all in that category. commented 2026-05-29 10:37:30 UTC by gmar5 ♦94 |
| 183152268 (Comments: 1) | MountMapper (Discussed changesets: 5) | It looks like this edit broke a couple of cycle routes - see e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11017#map=20/57.3458154/-4.0042718 . Also, is https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/37121135 really access=no currently? commented 2026-05-29 10:33:26 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,790 |
| 183329136 (Comments: 2) | EmmerLikeThePlant (Discussed changesets: 1) | @EmmerLikeThePlant I just updated the correct name and add some additional info commented 2026-05-29 10:29:00 UTC by Akrimullah ♦46 |
| 170762770 (Comments: 4) | rild leka (Discussed changesets: 2) | maybe add note= on way? commented 2026-05-29 10:27:45 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,901 |
| 183290292 (Comments: 2) | Catalin Strava (Discussed changesets: 2) | Am reparat intre timp multipoligonul Inclusiv rolul rutei de biciclete pe care ai editat este gresit si nefunctional. Rolurile se fac mai usor si se pot remedia mai simplu in JOSM , nu pe ID editor. commented 2026-05-29 10:25:56 UTC by rarad74 ♦508 |
| 183016236 (Comments: 2) | AraucaRiver (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi Buraddo, Thank you for reaching out, checking this over there still seems to be a parking lot here and I will be removing the connection. commented 2026-05-29 10:24:50 UTC by AraucaRiver ♦3 |
| 183338529 (Comments: 1) | 프라하의아침 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Review as requested: Hello, Please be more careful next time. You removed a memorial plaque and address elements, for no apparent reason. Also, I have moved the guesthouse to a separate node, and fixed the tag to touris... commented 2026-05-29 10:14:04 UTC by Piskvor ♦476 |
| 179866657 (Comments: 1) | fonalewis (Discussed changesets: 1) | Podałbyś źródło danych tego "aktualnego planu"? commented 2026-05-29 10:09:39 UTC by feilik ♦2 |
| 180408581 (Comments: 2) | Dundee930 (Discussed changesets: 16) | Would `=buddhist;taoist;confucian` work? commented 2026-05-29 10:03:48 UTC by kingkingHK ♦346 |
| 183313997 (Comments: 1) | halte colorée deu canal (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour, Merci pour l'ajout de la maison d'hôte, j'ai corrigé en créant un noeud dédié et avec le nom spécifique "la hale du canal". Vous pouvez ajouter des infos supplémenta... commented 2026-05-29 09:59:50 UTC by Carto75 ♦23 |
| 183345165 (Comments: 1) | TomekM-GR (Discussed changesets: 3) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna.... commented 2026-05-29 09:51:38 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦8,669 |
| 183345072 (Comments: 1) | jace (Discussed changesets: 1) | Custom tile server for georeferenced survey map: `https://tvc-tileserver.kiran-personal.workers.dev/{z}/{x}/{y}.png ` All assistance with cross-verification will be appreciated. Three tasks: 1. A few jackfruit trees were manually tagge... commented 2026-05-29 09:45:52 UTC by jace ♦1 |
| 183340270 (Comments: 3) | SachaBe (Discussed changesets: 12) | I commented on this changeset because this is the one which introduced the mistake. I gave you the explanation above: oneway:bicycle=no should be added. Don’t bother, I’ll do it myself, then. commented 2026-05-29 09:33:21 UTC by bxl-forever ♦2,904 |
| 183242971 (Comments: 2) | Hervé TUC (Discussed changesets: 39) | Hi! A guinguette is actually a very specific type of venue — often located by the water (but not always), open only during the warm season, with a strong cultural identity in France (outdoor dancing, simple food and drinks, festive atmos... commented 2026-05-29 09:33:04 UTC by Hervé TUC ♦52 |
| 143590789 (Comments: 1) | MenKauRa (Discussed changesets: 51) | Hello! I wonder, what is the second part of "Old Town Plaza \\ Old Taun Plaza"? It seems like a name in another language or alternative. Am I right? commented 2026-05-29 09:24:48 UTC by evgenykatyshev ♦253 |
| 183270814 (Comments: 1) | жопыч (Discussed changesets: 1) | зачем поудаляли здания? от балды набросали дублей контейнерных терминалов. Правка будет откачена, все сделано на тяп-ляп commented 2026-05-29 09:23:58 UTC by literan ♦7,113 |
| 183340191 (Comments: 1) | Viktoryia Kaluhina (Discussed changesets: 2) | *Added road alt name according to Bing Streetside commented 2026-05-29 09:22:45 UTC by Viktoryia Kaluhina ♦1 |
| 183326096 (Comments: 3) | Map-mb2 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Dass ich für die restliche Anlage keine Wege gemapped hatte liegt am Aufwand und daran, dass die Haustüren dort von der Straße aus sichtbar sind bzw. ersichtlich ist, wie man dorthin gelang. Ich halt mich mal zurück. Es... commented 2026-05-29 09:08:33 UTC by ToniE ♦1,268 |
| 183107206 (Comments: 3) | okainov (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hmm, the pump was a bit misplaced (it’s actually a few meters further south than it was originally mapped) – and there are several manhole covers/caps on the sidewalk in that area. Maybe it’s just a mix-up regarding the location. I&... commented 2026-05-29 09:05:21 UTC by Supaplex030 ♦452 |
| 183319080 (Comments: 1) | user567843 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183342983 commented 2026-05-29 09:02:13 UTC by MappingMore ♦453 |
| 183204407 (Comments: 2) | Rommar (Discussed changesets: 5) | Je me suis basé sur l'open data Prix Carburants et j'ai positionné la station grâce à l'image satellite ESRI. Sur celle-ci on voit une station de lavage je pense, mais sans certitude je ne l'ai pas ajout... commented 2026-05-29 09:01:59 UTC by Rommar ♦8 |
| 182621468 (Comments: 4) | mаrаf24 (Discussed changesets: 6) | To efekt podziału drogi. Szlaban i północna część drogi była wcześniej i pozostała, niczego tu nie dodawałem. commented 2026-05-29 08:52:53 UTC by maraf24 ♦5,347 |
| 183244263 (Comments: 1) | infraboi (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hi, "meteorological_station" is not a common tag. Could you check the Wiki how monitoring stations are commonly tagged? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dmonitoring_station commented 2026-05-29 08:50:15 UTC by mueschel ♦7,146 |
| 183338436 (Comments: 1) | TomekM-GR (Discussed changesets: 3) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna.... commented 2026-05-29 08:41:42 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦8,669 |
| 177242731 (Comments: 1) | mobileGEO (Discussed changesets: 30) | was wurde hier genau verbessert? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1984650320 addr:housenumber=* und ein Kommentartext in addr:street ... das macht die Daten zu Schrott commented 2026-05-29 08:40:21 UTC by fs_LT ♦146 |
| 181991303 (Comments: 2) | bxl-forever (Discussed changesets: 178) | Sure. I am happy with whichever option, it is purely conventional. I retagged all the known objects to use the underscore. commented 2026-05-29 08:35:29 UTC by bxl-forever ♦2,904 |
 | 183232745 (Comments: 2) | ABudz (Discussed changesets: 8) | I have deleted them if so: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183341225 (expect the one which was added earlier so I am not sure about it). Sorry for my mistake. commented 2026-05-29 08:21:51 UTC by ABudz ♦6 |
| 183302018 (Comments: 1) | Blythe0625 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits! Yes, every changeset should have a short explanation of what you did. For example "added barangay boundaries". Please also mention what sources you used (aerial imagery, other maps, local kno... commented 2026-05-29 08:17:26 UTC by Timmy_Tesseract ♦185 |
 | 183340908 (Comments: 1) | DaanLT (Discussed changesets: 63) | greitas :-D commented 2026-05-29 08:14:09 UTC by Tomas Straupis ♦2,070 |
| 183340855 (Comments: 1) | Thisik (Discussed changesets: 7) | Chybný název changesetu, pardon, že z Brna dělám Plzeňský kraj 🤣 commented 2026-05-29 08:13:02 UTC by Thisik ♦3 |
| 50008724 (Comments: 2) | jogemu (Discussed changesets: 40) | Heute würde ich andere Tags (Schlüssel) verwenden. In basemap.at Terrain ist ersichtlich, dass dort zumindest regelmäßig Wasser fließt, was aber nicht unbedingt der Definition von Quelle entspricht. Du kannst korrigieren od... commented 2026-05-29 07:47:34 UTC by jogemu ♦47 |
| 183339628 (Comments: 1) | habi (Discussed changesets: 450) | No, fixed note https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5315072 :) commented 2026-05-29 07:44:08 UTC by habi ♦2,133 |
| 183320966 (Comments: 2) | Nazom (Discussed changesets: 7) | Außerdem hat hier nun der Hofname "Mörtlgut" einen anderen Namen als jener des Landuses "Bäckenhof". Wie auch zuvor schon gebeten, bitte vevor du mit Hofnamen weitermachst deine Quellen für diese Hofnamen vorh... commented 2026-05-29 07:35:03 UTC by PPete2 ♦158 |
| 182713550 (Comments: 2) | nucool24 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thanks for updating this in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182835002 commented 2026-05-29 07:31:37 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,840 |
| 182835002 (Comments: 1) | nucool24 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thanks! commented 2026-05-29 07:31:00 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,840 |
| 182635743 (Comments: 2) | Beezleburp (Discussed changesets: 1) | Updated in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183339120 commented 2026-05-29 07:29:33 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,840 |
 | 183303287 (Comments: 1) | Map_Moderator (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially Revert of https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183303095 commented 2026-05-29 07:21:52 UTC by MappingMore ♦453 |
| 182043482 (Comments: 4) | Jarek 🚲 (Discussed changesets: 123) | Thanks for the detailed information! commented 2026-05-29 07:06:51 UTC by Helena Polazava ♦1 |
| 183324288 (Comments: 1) | Roadtonowherelv (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, I deleted all the wrong added crypto tags. Tags like "payment:bitcoin=yes" are deprecated. Use ISO 4217-style codes. Happy mapping, Edwin Comino BTC Map https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Comino commented 2026-05-29 07:04:31 UTC by Comino ♦349 |
| 183240688 (Comments: 2) | Bára Soukupová (Discussed changesets: 3) | Máš pravdu, bude to nejspíš ten druhý případ. Změním to commented 2026-05-29 07:02:16 UTC by Bára Soukupová ♦1 |
| 183306536 (Comments: 1) | david_miha (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183337266 commented 2026-05-29 06:48:13 UTC by MappingMore ♦453 |
| 62787519 (Comments: 1) | 何昕88 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Are the height tags accurate, or just pure guesswork? Looking at the satellite imagery, I highly suspect all your tags are exaggerated. If they can't be trusted, I may end up deleting all the building:levels and height tags you created in Hangzh... commented 2026-05-29 06:42:41 UTC by michaelIsADullGuy ♦12 |
| 62721091 (Comments: 1) | jinsanshun2018 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Are these height tags accurate, or just pure guesswork? Looking at the satellite imagery, I highly suspect all your tags are exaggerated. If they can't be trusted, I may end up deleting all the building:levels and height tags you created in Hang... commented 2026-05-29 06:38:55 UTC by michaelIsADullGuy ♦12 |
| 183266817 (Comments: 2) | michaelIsADullGuy (Discussed changesets: 17) | Sure! I'm about to remove the French, Spanish, and Portuguese address translations in the next changeset. commented 2026-05-29 06:26:56 UTC by michaelIsADullGuy ♦12 |
| 183082695 (Comments: 5) | waterced (Discussed changesets: 12) | Je me dis qu'il faudrait peut-être aussi annuler le changement de nom en attendant d'avoir une réponse à la note qui n'arrivera probablement jamais. Je suis d'accord que les notes peuvent parfois ê... commented 2026-05-29 06:14:50 UTC by Syl ♦1,060 |
| 183213088 (Comments: 7) | evgenykatyshev (Discussed changesets: 80) | I've seen only concerns about the proposed mass update, which could contain mistakes, especially AI-related. I haven't seen arguments against removing settlement names from the POI's names. I've shared all the test changes ... commented 2026-05-29 06:12:32 UTC by evgenykatyshev ♦253 |
 | 183334910 (Comments: 1) | พเนจร (Discussed changesets: 2) | สค.5031 เป็นเลขสายทาง (road reference) ไม่ใช่ส่วนหนึ่งของชื่อถนน จึงไม่ควรรวมไว้ใน name= โดยปัจจุบันมีกา... commented 2026-05-29 06:11:36 UTC by Kri_ttt ♦22 |
| 183335465 (Comments: 1) | พเนจร (Discussed changesets: 2) | สค.5031 เป็นเลขสายทาง (road reference) ไม่ใช่ส่วนหนึ่งของชื่อถนน จึงไม่ควรรวมไว้ใน name= โดยปัจจุบันมีกา... commented 2026-05-29 06:11:20 UTC by Kri_ttt ♦22 |
| 183153781 (Comments: 4) | Helfi 1303 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Alles klar, danke. Habe es entsprechend angepasst. Viele Grüße commented 2026-05-29 06:01:32 UTC by limes11 ♦1,040 |
| 57675052 (Comments: 1) | KapeK (Discussed changesets: 9) | Hello! You used mtb:scale=-1 on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4464972831/history Have you maybe meant mtb:scale=1- ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objec... commented 2026-05-29 05:22:18 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,901 |
| 179952378 (Comments: 2) | Tomek | Yanosik (Discussed changesets: 116) | hej, dzięki za informację, poprawiłem commented 2026-05-29 05:20:42 UTC by Tomek | Yanosik ♦96 |
| 158033160 (Comments: 2) | A94BT (Discussed changesets: 2) | keine Quelle und wohl aus irgendeiner Datenquelle; kein vollständiges Tagging; bin gerade beim Aufräumen commented 2026-05-29 05:17:07 UTC by fs_LT ♦146 |
| 182985958 (Comments: 1) | jellyfish twink (Discussed changesets: 6) | natural=wood should generally not go on parcel boundaries as the "woods" are not bounded by this. Thanks. commented 2026-05-29 04:59:44 UTC by TomPar ♦124 |
| 183333317 (Comments: 1) | Gwen75 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, welcome to OSM. Are the names real? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13892982095 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/152424873 commented 2026-05-29 04:59:39 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦6,578 |
 | 172118444 (Comments: 1) | Zh9567 (Discussed changesets: 75) | Great work! Just a small heads up that the wikidata entries for flag:wikidata should be the "flag of..." ones and not the ones for the region/city/country. For example, here's the correct wikdiata for the Pahang flag (https://www.wikid... commented 2026-05-29 04:50:18 UTC by watmildon ♦308 |
 | 183328938 (Comments: 1) | Paulo Sergio Santos Oliveira (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, welcome to OSM. Is the name real? Casa (482296432), v5 commented 2026-05-29 04:46:19 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦6,578 |
 | 179928253 (Comments: 1) | Nicxon Piaso (Discussed changesets: 22) | Hi, You appear to forgoten to add the outer polygon to the mp. https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/14329829#map=19/-6.135063/143.656094 commented 2026-05-29 04:45:12 UTC by nevw ♦2,226 |
| 168792131 (Comments: 3) | TLS Group (Discussed changesets: 1) | (Which already had the same tags, just actually properly tagged) commented 2026-05-29 04:24:07 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦89 |
| 156086658 (Comments: 1) | ReVIDA Recovery Center - Morristown (Discussed changesets: 1) | Removed/fixed SEO spam tags and corrected/split out name=* in changeset 183332726 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183332726 commented 2026-05-29 04:20:12 UTC by CAM-Gerlach ♦227 |
| 162230770 (Comments: 1) | ReVIDA® Recovery - Tullahoma (Discussed changesets: 1) | Removed SEO spam tags and corrected/split out name=* in changeset 183332639 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183332639 commented 2026-05-29 04:17:16 UTC by CAM-Gerlach ♦227 |
| 183294007 (Comments: 4) | Chekushka (Discussed changesets: 3) | Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183321359 commented 2026-05-29 04:16:43 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦6,578 |
| 160973940 (Comments: 1) | Azalea Tour32 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted SEO spam vandalism and nonsense tagging of a park https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183332529 commented 2026-05-29 04:11:53 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦89 |
| 160974029 (Comments: 1) | Azalea Tour32 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted SEO spam vandalism and nonsense tagging of a park https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183332529 commented 2026-05-29 04:11:53 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦89 |
| 160935709 (Comments: 1) | ReVIDA® Recovery Sparta (Discussed changesets: 1) | Removed SEO spam tags and corrected/split out name=* in changeset 183332470 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183332470 commented 2026-05-29 04:10:13 UTC by CAM-Gerlach ♦227 |
| 160886527 (Comments: 1) | Movers Development (Discussed changesets: 1) | Removed nonsense name=* added to building by SEO account in changeset 183332373 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183332373 commented 2026-05-29 04:06:35 UTC by CAM-Gerlach ♦227 |
| 170098213 (Comments: 3) | driedfish (Discussed changesets: 9) | poprawiłem nieco bardziej w https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183332359 commented 2026-05-29 04:06:17 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,901 |
| 160843468 (Comments: 1) | Premiere Dental (Discussed changesets: 3) | Reverted SEO spam tags and blatantly promotional description=* added to POI https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183332312 commented 2026-05-29 04:04:15 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦89 |
| 160843076 (Comments: 1) | Premiere Dental (Discussed changesets: 3) | Reverted SEO spam tags and blatantly promotional description=* added to POI https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183332299 commented 2026-05-29 04:03:48 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦89 |
| 160843054 (Comments: 1) | Premiere Dental (Discussed changesets: 3) | Reverted SEO spam tags and blatantly promotional description=* added to POI https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183332289 commented 2026-05-29 04:03:32 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦89 |
| 160821669 (Comments: 1) | ParamountBuilt (Discussed changesets: 1) | Added missing top-level tag (office=engineer) to ParamountBuilt POI so it is actually useful, and fixed phone number formatting in changeset 183332206 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183332206 commented 2026-05-29 04:00:23 UTC by CAM-Gerlach ♦227 |
| 183261646 (Comments: 4) | EvanRoss41 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks for the reply, No need for pictures, I believe you. I'm going to restore the part of the road that still exists to the south. When it is actually removed from the ground feel free to remove the rest of it! Thanks commented 2026-05-29 03:57:19 UTC by MassCartog ♦396 |
| 160802029 (Comments: 1) | The Tint Shop (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted inexplicable removal of building=* tag by SEO spam account https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183332128 commented 2026-05-29 03:56:09 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦89 |
| 168622232 (Comments: 1) | Dentista Pachuca (Discussed changesets: 1) | Removed promotional and SEO spam tags and cleaned up others in changeset 183332074 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183332074 commented 2026-05-29 03:54:27 UTC by CAM-Gerlach ♦227 |
| 168747185 (Comments: 1) | LIRO Roma (Discussed changesets: 1) | Removed SEO spam tags and fixed/cleaned up others in changeset 183331723 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183331723 commented 2026-05-29 03:38:28 UTC by CAM-Gerlach ♦227 |
| 168754432 (Comments: 1) | danieleqo (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted SEO spam POI addition with promotional description and entirely nonsense tags https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183331587 commented 2026-05-29 03:31:28 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦89 |
| 168871166 (Comments: 1) | berkahIOO (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted duplicate, SEO spam "hospital" POIs actually advertising an online gambling site https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183331485 commented 2026-05-29 03:25:44 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦89 |
| 168794326 (Comments: 2) | Pedro J López E (Discussed changesets: 4) | Coincido que estos límites son muy imprecisos commented 2026-05-29 03:04:09 UTC by pantufla ♦303 |
| 168946422 (Comments: 1) | best cardiologist in hanamkonda (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted SEO spam POI change with nonsense name=* and tags https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183331005 commented 2026-05-29 03:00:36 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦89 |
| 183327243 (Comments: 2) | steerage250 (Discussed changesets: 14) | you are correct. I should have just deleted the amenity=parking. Please revert the track if have the skills to do so. commented 2026-05-29 02:29:33 UTC by steerage250 ♦15 |
| 169924708 (Comments: 1) | danieldegroot2 (Discussed changesets: 158) | Hi, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1419710430/ fixme=missing object type, knowledge needed. (water infra?) Fixed. commented 2026-05-29 02:26:07 UTC by VictorIE ♦1,134 |
| 183325253 (Comments: 1) | nelsondaga (Discussed changesets: 1) | hola, esa ruta 233 a loreto que añadiste... en las imágenes de 2026 se ve un grupo de minibuses en la esquina martires y nicasio rios... 2 cuadras antes del final que pusiste. commented 2026-05-29 02:15:53 UTC by 5m4u9 ♦1,676 |
| 183328605 (Comments: 1) | raskoln1k0v (Discussed changesets: 6) | Can you confirm that the street name is Jalan Pura Dalem Kemenuh? Not Jalan Ir. Sutami? commented 2026-05-29 02:13:35 UTC by FajrAl ♦367 |
| 183271894 (Comments: 1) | ayanbs (Discussed changesets: 2) | Partially Revert of 183271087 commented 2026-05-29 01:51:39 UTC by MappingMore ♦453 |
| 177457857 (Comments: 2) | Nirmala03 (Discussed changesets: 145) | Hi ZhannaB , Thank you for the update. I initially created the sidewalk based on Bing Maps, Esri Clarity (Beta), and Mapbox Satellite, which did not show imagery dates. However, since the 2025 Esri World Imagery shows the area is covered by gra... commented 2026-05-29 01:30:04 UTC by Nirmala03 ♦5 |
| 183268034 (Comments: 5) | Flap Slimy Outward (Discussed changesets: 208) | A road with full or near full access control is typically an expressway by default. As I said it is a case-by-case basis but a fairly common type of expressway are roads that would otherwise be motorways or be a continuation of a motorway if not some... commented 2026-05-29 01:23:30 UTC by Joseph R P ♦432 |
| 183321766 (Comments: 1) | fil63100 (Discussed changesets: 6) | This merchant appears to be primarily an online business, not a physical retail store at Place de l'Hotel de Ville. There is no evidence of a physical storefront at this address. Webshops are not allowed on OSM, please delete this node. commented 2026-05-29 00:36:29 UTC by Comino ♦349 |
| 183320688 (Comments: 1) | fil63100 (Discussed changesets: 6) | This merchant appears to be primarily an online business, not a physical retail store at Piazza d'Italia. There is no evidence of a physical storefront at this address. Webshops are not allowed on OSM, please delete this node. commented 2026-05-29 00:34:51 UTC by Comino ♦349 |
| 183320943 (Comments: 1) | fil63100 (Discussed changesets: 6) | This merchant appears to be primarily an online business, not a physical retail store at Place Gambetta. There is no evidence of a physical storefront at this address. Webshops are not allowed on OSM, please delete this node. commented 2026-05-29 00:30:20 UTC by Comino ♦349 |
| 183321955 (Comments: 1) | fil63100 (Discussed changesets: 6) | This merchant appears to be primarily an online business, not a physical retail store at Groenplaats. There is no evidence of a physical storefront at this address. Webshops are not allowed on OSM, please delete this node. commented 2026-05-29 00:25:31 UTC by Comino ♦349 |
| 183274269 (Comments: 4) | Treadly (Discussed changesets: 11) | Adding smaller segments of wood like you have here is incorrect. You shouldn't map for a specific editor, just like you shouldn't map for a specific router/renderer. If you need to make a large boundary easier to work with in other editors,... commented 2026-05-29 00:10:10 UTC by fortera_au ♦1,543 |
| 183267392 (Comments: 3) | Xavizard Knight (Discussed changesets: 16) | Bones! Ja he fet el changeset d'esborrar les etiquetes area=yes dels objectes que ja tenen alguna etiqueta area:* https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183328306 Gràcies per l'avís! commented 2026-05-29 00:09:21 UTC by Xavizard Knight ♦21 |
| 183328306 (Comments: 1) | Xavizard Knight (Discussed changesets: 16) | Changeset per treure les etiquetes "area=yes" de diversos objectes que ja tenen alguna etiqueta area:highway=, area:amenity=, area:man_made=, area:power=, area:railway=, area:aeroway= and area:public_transport=. Amb excepcions per a ... commented 2026-05-29 00:06:48 UTC by Xavizard Knight ♦21 |
| 183249972 (Comments: 5) | LoweCloudAgent (Discussed changesets: 1) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course for the best guidelines. generally in ID editor you will be presented with the fields that are best for each feature. commented 2026-05-29 00:01:43 UTC by tastrax ♦1,206 |
| 183321694 (Comments: 1) | NaSH (Discussed changesets: 10) | oups ! il s'agit de fix osmose commented 2026-05-28 23:57:17 UTC by NaSH ♦10 |
| 183327423 (Comments: 1) | NaSH (Discussed changesets: 10) | oups ! il s'agit de fix osmose commented 2026-05-28 23:57:01 UTC by NaSH ♦10 |
| 183223441 (Comments: 4) | Vicente_Estate (Discussed changesets: 6) | ubicame a mi en Telegram @felipeeugenio saludos commented 2026-05-28 23:53:42 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦3,092 |
| 183326627 (Comments: 1) | A67-A67 (Discussed changesets: 377) | Thanks voor het aanvullen, ik had nog niet de tijd gehad om ze allemaal op te pakken :) commented 2026-05-28 23:30:44 UTC by DwarfNebula_ ♦57 |
| 183294530 (Comments: 1) | szydzio (Discussed changesets: 117) | usunąłeś pozbruk i Chodnik ? grube porządki. commented 2026-05-28 23:27:01 UTC by Yog Sot ♦470 |
 | 183168212 (Comments: 1) | kaxtillo (Discussed changesets: 13) | Hello kaxtillo,
I noticed https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1495183569 was recently updated from construction to motorway. Based on current available imagery, it is not fully clear whether the road is complete or operational at this stage. ... commented 2026-05-28 23:26:30 UTC by Haritron ♦12 |
| 183327486 (Comments: 1) | pootriarch (Discussed changesets: 35) | bike route 45 relation looks like a mess. it has bits of northbound and southbound octavia mixed in, and lots of gaps. i made sure to fix my own split, but is the route supposed to be linear? a loop? commented 2026-05-28 23:14:06 UTC by pootriarch ♦28 |
| 183228867 (Comments: 1) | RAytoun (Discussed changesets: 13) | Thank you, @RAytoun commented 2026-05-28 23:07:21 UTC by jayaddison ♦30 |
| 183281688 (Comments: 2) | bogardpd (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thank you for the info! I believe I've now updated them in accordance with the naming conventions, let me know if it still needs correction. commented 2026-05-28 23:03:58 UTC by bogardpd ♦1 |
| 181657838 (Comments: 1) | Lukša (Discussed changesets: 5) | Revert changesetu z důvodu smazání chodníků. commented 2026-05-28 22:37:00 UTC by Dvorný ♦23 |
| 183326407 (Comments: 2) | GeoVern (Discussed changesets: 1) | Correction: Roslyn Place is the correct name, Roslyn Terrace is not a valid street. I've made a separate edit to fix that issue. commented 2026-05-28 22:35:39 UTC by GeoVern ♦1 |
| 179557054 (Comments: 1) | jellyfish twink (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hi there! The element you have edited is not for the municipality of Hawley. That would be (https://www.osm.org/relation/1839615), and it is currently tagged with border_type=town to represent what kind of municipality it is. The element you h... commented 2026-05-28 22:19:50 UTC by diamondarmorsteve ♦67 |
| 181706811 (Comments: 2) | Lukša (Discussed changesets: 5) | Revert changesetu z důvodu smazání chodníků. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183326474 commented 2026-05-28 22:19:14 UTC by Dvorný ♦23 |
 | 183254914 (Comments: 1) | taniguchi asaga (Discussed changesets: 2) | 建物のマッピングお疲れ様です。 ただ、コメントが「あ」だけなのは他の方に親切では無いと思いますので、簡単にコメントを書いて頂けると幸いです（金沢市の建物追加程度で十分... commented 2026-05-28 22:19:08 UTC by K_Sakanoshita ♦15 |
| 183323335 (Comments: 1) | streckenkundler (Discussed changesets: 84) | noch despektierlicher als in diesem Changesetkommentar kann man über anderer Leute Arbeit wohl nicht schreiben. Welche der OpenStreetMap Regeln sagt deiner Ansicht nach, dass man Details löschen kann wenn sie einem übertrieben vorkomme... commented 2026-05-28 22:17:17 UTC by dieterdreist ♦903 |
| 183293523 (Comments: 1) | Lukša (Discussed changesets: 5) | Revert changesetu z důvodu smazání přechodu. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183326403 commented 2026-05-28 22:16:30 UTC by Dvorný ♦23 |
| 86420775 (Comments: 4) | osm-operon (Discussed changesets: 13) | Merci, c'est fait ! https://osmcha.org/changesets/183325970 commented 2026-05-28 21:56:32 UTC by emvee ♦406 |
| 173082123 (Comments: 1) | leednatamap (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, please make sure to add access=private for service roads that you add within airports, thanks. commented 2026-05-28 21:54:06 UTC by LordGarySugar ♦268 |
| 183192135 (Comments: 5) | impact0r (Discussed changesets: 15) | Jeśli zaznaczysz ciek wodny krzyżujący się z drogą, to iD zasugeruje Ci dodatnie przepustu. Przepust to przepust, a most to most. Nie mapujemy fikcji. commented 2026-05-28 21:44:05 UTC by SpinOff ♦389 |
| 180883921 (Comments: 1) | ChickenStrips (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, could you go into more detail about why this building should be tagged with tourism=museum? I could see an argument for tourism=gallery, but even that feels like duplicate tagging (an area encompassing both of AGNSW’s buildings is already t... commented 2026-05-28 21:35:19 UTC by arctic-rocinante ♦37 |
| 91946734 (Comments: 1) | reDoubleYou (Discussed changesets: 8) | Der 7. Baum soll aber jünger sein, da kann das start_date nicht stimmen. Ursprünglich wurden nur 6 Bäume gepflanzt. commented 2026-05-28 21:31:37 UTC by Mammi71 ♦274 |
| 183325481 (Comments: 1) | PostaMap_Infinite (Discussed changesets: 15) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4941503 commented 2026-05-28 21:31:36 UTC by PostaMap_Infinite ♦19 |
| 180883754 (Comments: 1) | ChickenStrips (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, just a heads up that I’m changing this back to tourism=gallery. I’ve visited it recently and it very much feels like an art gallery rather than a museum to me. Online descriptions (including their own website) seem to agree with this.... commented 2026-05-28 21:28:44 UTC by arctic-rocinante ♦37 |
| 183315556 (Comments: 1) | Silnet Media (Discussed changesets: 14) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna.... commented 2026-05-28 21:24:21 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦8,669 |
| 175042838 (Comments: 4) | rohieb (Discussed changesets: 60) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182263613 sieht auf jeden Fall korrekter aus, danke fürs Reparieren! commented 2026-05-28 21:24:20 UTC by rohieb ♦162 |
| 183312759 (Comments: 1) | Halamix2 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap! Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulic... commented 2026-05-28 21:24:17 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦8,669 |
| 183311484 (Comments: 4) | Rbrt7 (Discussed changesets: 8) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna.... commented 2026-05-28 21:24:13 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦8,669 |
| 183321302 (Comments: 8) | Kapshtyk Mariia (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap! Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na ... commented 2026-05-28 21:24:10 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦8,669 |
| 183216804 (Comments: 1) | m_fuhrmann (Discussed changesets: 43) | Hey m_fuhrmann, I did unlink two of your images, as they contained a bit too much kids (of which I want to prevent the privacy). Additionally, the blurring broke down as a part of the face was covered in the image. Sorry about this! Kin... commented 2026-05-28 21:17:29 UTC by Pieter Vander Vennet ♦468 |
| 183223484 (Comments: 3) | hk-wr (Discussed changesets: 1) | Danke für deine Edits :) commented 2026-05-28 21:14:52 UTC by kytta ♦5 |
| 176577353 (Comments: 1) | LudovicG (Discussed changesets: 28) | Hello, on a un petit doublon avec ce nœud ! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13191206438 commented 2026-05-28 21:14:49 UTC by Vétérini ♦21 |
| 178232900 (Comments: 1) | kdpy (Discussed changesets: 10) | skąd te info o projektowanych elektryfikacjach? commented 2026-05-28 21:14:20 UTC by Interswd ♦43 |
| 181852558 (Comments: 5) | Napolegnom (Discussed changesets: 2) | Habe ich in https://osm.org/changeset/183325008 restored commented 2026-05-28 21:13:47 UTC by kytta ♦5 |
| 170813898 (Comments: 2) | Ronyu (Discussed changesets: 2) | its been a while but I'm pretty sure its from the image at the bottom of this website: https://www.orlandgrassland.org/looking-at-the-land#dataItem-ipq3q9ei commented 2026-05-28 21:12:07 UTC by Ronyu ♦1 |
| 183323787 (Comments: 1) | Termininja (Discussed changesets: 46) | Лидъла все още не е отворен, че да го отбелязваме с shop=supermarket :) commented 2026-05-28 21:11:10 UTC by Dimitar155 ♦910 |
| 183226317 (Comments: 1) | IvaKraljić (Discussed changesets: 182) | The unnecessary split and additional tagging has since been done in the changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183324746. #OptimoRoute commented 2026-05-28 21:04:42 UTC by IvaKraljić ♦147 |
| 123836055 (Comments: 3) | klnkengi (Discussed changesets: 38) | O.k. jetzt hab ich es gefunden: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1773924863979321&focus=photo commented 2026-05-28 20:31:31 UTC by Langlaeufer ♦1,559 |
 | 183320653 (Comments: 1) | sarikukiriku234 (Discussed changesets: 1) | There are no trees between the lanes commented 2026-05-28 20:29:21 UTC by anshanin ♦29 |
| 183323018 (Comments: 1) | Rainbow Phoenix (Discussed changesets: 1) | No clue how to delete this. Was placed in wrong spot. commented 2026-05-28 20:27:39 UTC by Rainbow Phoenix ♦1 |
| 183320298 (Comments: 2) | Theo_Dora (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ja, Sie haben recht. Ich habe es gerade gemacht. Entschuldigung, das ist das erste Mal, dass ich mit OpenStreetMap arbeite. commented 2026-05-28 20:26:40 UTC by Theo_Dora ♦1 |
| 183127693 (Comments: 3) | stasiu512 (Discussed changesets: 89) | Zauważyłem, ta luka w ograniczeniu była po staremu, ale po drugiej stronie tunelu. Płażyńskiego dalej w zabudowanym, stabilnie myślą. commented 2026-05-28 20:13:27 UTC by theDM ♦180 |
| 183323177 (Comments: 1) | Bartek444 (Discussed changesets: 80) | W związku z kolejnym etapem prac drogowych w Byszycach, informujemy, że od dnia 21 maja 2026 r., autobusy linii A2 zostaną skierowane na trasę objazdową. Kursy linii A2 będą kursować z pominięciem przystanków: Byszyce Pętla, Byszyce ... commented 2026-05-28 20:12:23 UTC by Bartek444 ♦57 |
| 183323105 (Comments: 1) | Bartek444 (Discussed changesets: 80) | W związku z kolejnym etapem prac drogowych w Byszycach, informujemy, że od dnia 21 maja 2026 r., autobusy linii A2 zostaną skierowane na trasę objazdową. Kursy linii A2 będą kursować z pominięciem przystanków: Byszyce Pętla, Byszyce ... commented 2026-05-28 20:12:14 UTC by Bartek444 ♦57 |
| 183320388 (Comments: 1) | Chekushka (Discussed changesets: 3) | Reverted commented 2026-05-28 19:58:01 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,503 |
| 183240374 (Comments: 2) | Arflha (Discussed changesets: 35) | Hey, Those are raw imports from the Projet Informatique de Cartographie Continue (PICC) https://geoportail.wallonie.be/catalogue/b795de68-726c-4bdf-a62a-a42686aa5b6f.html Trottoir means kerb, I haven't had the time to finish it but now... commented 2026-05-28 19:42:59 UTC by Arflha ♦32 |
| 183306163 (Comments: 1) | BestDoc (Discussed changesets: 2) | This dentists office already existed on the map, by adding another copy of it you duplicated it, that is generally discouraged. It would have been better if you had modified the existing object. Happy mapping, Udar. commented 2026-05-28 19:36:46 UTC by Udarian ♦753 |
| 182641586 (Comments: 5) | iuvi (Discussed changesets: 6) | Вы имеете ввиду например сделал город и окрестности - закрыл правки. И потом переместился в другое место - там открыл и так по кругу, да? commented 2026-05-28 19:34:26 UTC by iuvi ♦2 |
| 183311861 (Comments: 1) | LiveWeb (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hola. por favor escribir con capitalización normal. saludos --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183311861 commented 2026-05-28 19:32:48 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦3,092 |
 | 182420165 (Comments: 2) | Merv_Mangol (Discussed changesets: 1) | Oh sorry about the confusion, the source I got it from was from where the R511 goes to starting from Randburg, going through Fourways, Haartbeespoort and on to Brits to Thabazimba, sorry about that because when I put the destinations from road links ... commented 2026-05-28 19:23:07 UTC by Merv_Mangol ♦1 |
| 182973096 (Comments: 2) | PetersLogistik (Discussed changesets: 1) | Der Teich wurde entsprechend benannt. Das Schild war nicht mehr vorhanden. commented 2026-05-28 19:13:51 UTC by PetersLogistik ♦1 |
| 181974853 (Comments: 2) | anonym663863 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo bieleblog, entschuldige die späte Antwort. Nein, vor Ort findet sich leider kein Hinweis darauf, ich fand es aber trotzdem wichtig, hier etwas zu vermerken. Eventuell passt es besser, das "Denkmal" zu ersetzen, und das Geb&aum... commented 2026-05-28 19:08:48 UTC by anonym663863 ♦1 |
| 183319534 (Comments: 1) | saraihdez (Discussed changesets: 15) | the church isn't the only tenant of this building, so i wouldn't tag the whole thing based on the church. also landuse doesn't go on buildings --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCh... commented 2026-05-28 18:54:51 UTC by jcarlson ♦134 |
| 183319490 (Comments: 1) | saraihdez (Discussed changesets: 15) | sorry, landuse doesn't go on buildings either. the whole property --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183319490 commented 2026-05-28 18:54:04 UTC by jcarlson ♦134 |
| 183319086 (Comments: 2) | Bart1397 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Bureauinfo heb ik verwijderd. MVG eggie commented 2026-05-28 18:52:11 UTC by eggie ♦45,474 |
| 182999832 (Comments: 1) | MVEMJSUNP (Discussed changesets: 17) | Hi, it looks like you've been doing a lot of editing in this area, thanks! Wondering if you could adjust the buildings on Broadway so they don't overlap the sidewalk? It looks like a lot of buildings are traced to the roofline (which is dis... commented 2026-05-28 18:30:57 UTC by neuhausr ♦354 |
| 183212224 (Comments: 1) | xrefz (Discussed changesets: 45) | Hi, "noconstruction" is not a common prefix. You can use "construction" instead - even if these features are not newly constructed but just restored after construction finished. commented 2026-05-28 18:28:59 UTC by mueschel ♦7,146 |
| 183282947 (Comments: 1) | User67676767editor (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OpenStreetMap! Please use the changeset description to describe what you changed and why; for example, "Added the correct name of a café, after visiting." You can find more examples here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wik... commented 2026-05-28 18:26:28 UTC by impiaaa ♦471 |
| 183271345 (Comments: 1) | j0hn33y (Discussed changesets: 14) | Hi, please check this area, it got only strange tags: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1523748915 commented 2026-05-28 18:25:31 UTC by mueschel ♦7,146 |
| 183276017 (Comments: 1) | WrenC (Discussed changesets: 2) | thanks for fixing so many of these building shapes! --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183276017 commented 2026-05-28 18:02:29 UTC by jcarlson ♦134 |
| 183314892 (Comments: 1) | saraihdez (Discussed changesets: 15) | landuse doesn't belong on POI nodes. also, this is a case where the OSM tag and US english don't perfectly align. i would actually tag this as education=kindergarten and drop the amenity tag --- ... commented 2026-05-28 17:54:32 UTC by jcarlson ♦134 |
| 183315944 (Comments: 1) | saraihdez (Discussed changesets: 15) | landuse tag doesn't belong on a POI. you could tag the church property area, though --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183315944 commented 2026-05-28 17:50:35 UTC by jcarlson ♦134 |
| 183316643 (Comments: 1) | saraihdez (Discussed changesets: 15) | the landuse tag doesn't belong on a POI --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183316643 commented 2026-05-28 17:50:01 UTC by jcarlson ♦134 |
| 73895066 (Comments: 2) | Rick Richards (Discussed changesets: 99) | Zdravím, 6 rokov stará úprava, v súčasnosti sa tomu snažím vyvarovať. Vďaka. commented 2026-05-28 17:42:51 UTC by Rick Richards ♦64 |
| 182482355 (Comments: 4) | serhiyklymenko (Discussed changesets: 1) | Велике дякую за таку відверту та швидку відповідь! Але мушу сказати прямо: у нас велика проблема з копірайтом. В OSM діє дуже сувора ліцен... commented 2026-05-28 17:38:56 UTC by Nnifria ♦4 |
| 182831032 (Comments: 3) | Datguymarkus (Discussed changesets: 3) | Így gondoltad? commented 2026-05-28 17:36:05 UTC by Datguymarkus ♦1 |
| 160613438 (Comments: 2) | Hungerburg (Discussed changesets: 42) | Seit die Bim da gradausfährt hat sich das scharfe Eck aufgehört, nicht? Andernorts schon "ehem. …" gelesen, aber hier? commented 2026-05-28 17:29:49 UTC by Hungerburg ♦420 |
| 182799999 (Comments: 1) | unni-geo (Discussed changesets: 23) | Hallo unni-geo! Darf ich fragen was dich veranlaßt hat, diese Bearbeitung von mir zu revertieren? commented 2026-05-28 17:27:45 UTC by BrummsLee ♦55 |
 | 182139152 (Comments: 1) | dkwolf (Discussed changesets: 59) | Why did you change name of the street? commented 2026-05-28 17:27:16 UTC by Ruslan Fatih ♦51 |
| 126855329 (Comments: 1) | aselvadeasfalto (Discussed changesets: 24) | Hi! Do you still think that barrier=kerb should be used for the cathedral outline e.g. here https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1099622911 ? Seems incorrect to me. commented 2026-05-28 17:22:02 UTC by Self-Perfection ♦176 |
| 25714261 (Comments: 1) | nolram (Discussed changesets: 1) | Oi, tenha mais cuidado para não sobrepor edificios já mapeados commented 2026-05-28 17:11:23 UTC by Gustavo22Soares ♦73 |
| 182958293 (Comments: 1) | Vinicius Moraes (Discussed changesets: 7) | Oi, tudo bom? qual foi o criterio para definir essa area como residencial é uma area muito extensa normalmente é evitado definir areas tão grandes como residencial se for para bairro tem outras formas commented 2026-05-28 17:05:58 UTC by Gustavo22Soares ♦73 |
| 161100782 (Comments: 1) | dcruizr (Discussed changesets: 5) | Traducción automática: Hola, tanto aquí como en otros lugares veo que has importado un gran número de escuelas. En primer lugar, no estoy seguro de la calidad de los datos de origen. Por ejemplo, aquí hay ... commented 2026-05-28 17:04:51 UTC by confusedbuffalo ♦379 |
| 183271222 (Comments: 1) | Roobidium (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183271222 commented 2026-05-28 17:02:59 UTC by Glassman ♦5,942 |
| 183314923 (Comments: 1) | Aethonatic (Discussed changesets: 8) | Wrong links provided. Actual changesets are https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171251063 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171251078. commented 2026-05-28 16:55:20 UTC by Aethonatic ♦52 |
| 183314792 (Comments: 1) | Aethonatic (Discussed changesets: 8) | Reverts https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171251139. commented 2026-05-28 16:52:00 UTC by Aethonatic ♦52 |
| 163218176 (Comments: 2) | ma-rt-in (Discussed changesets: 269) | Moin, Vor einem Jahr war da einer und lt. Aktuell Note ist da sogar das Loch noch. commented 2026-05-28 16:51:14 UTC by ma-rt-in ♦1,770 |
| 183257976 (Comments: 3) | rskedgell_import (Discussed changesets: 4) | Thanks for being understanding, it's annoying because my addition of addr:housenumber and addr:street didn't conflict with your additions of uprn and addr:postcode, but josm doesn't have a way to merge two sets of tags together easily.... commented 2026-05-28 16:50:57 UTC by LordGarySugar ♦268 |
| 182839766 (Comments: 1) | Oliver Donoghue (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, I have made a few corrections to what you have mapped here. A lot of the names you added were what we call 'descriptive names' https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions. If you want to provide extra info a... commented 2026-05-28 16:27:49 UTC by LordGarySugar ♦268 |
| 183313058 (Comments: 1) | Lisapple (Discussed changesets: 57) | Pretty extensive changeset for small survey details...did you combine changesets by chance? commented 2026-05-28 16:25:37 UTC by I-76 ♦78 |
| 183313223 (Comments: 1) | Printer（Dayinji） (Discussed changesets: 2) | Please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments commented 2026-05-28 16:21:32 UTC by I-76 ♦78 |
| 183313304 (Comments: 1) | andword (Discussed changesets: 5) | Please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments commented 2026-05-28 16:19:58 UTC by I-76 ♦78 |
| 183222917 (Comments: 7) | Patrick78 (Discussed changesets: 12) | Super, Je pensais avoir vérifier que les arrêts étaient dans le bon ordre pourtant. J'ai mis à jour la ligne 7. Sur le principe, il faudrait faire aussi la 5 et 6 suite à mise à jour horaire ét&eac... commented 2026-05-28 16:18:18 UTC by Patrick78 ♦21 |
| 119969940 (Comments: 1) | _RM-mapper (Discussed changesets: 3) | Apologies for the message, this is an old edit of yours – but I see someone raised a note 576500 where they thought it was accessible. Can I ask where you discovered the closure? commented 2026-05-28 16:17:21 UTC by LateNightTone ♦83 |
| 183271108 (Comments: 3) | czebureks (Discussed changesets: 86) | Z tego co wiem, to słupek ustawia się przy linii highway na wysokości słupka, nawet nie w jego fizycznej lokalizacji ze względu na to, że jest to odpowiednik dla obu słupków naraz. Kilka razy tak zrobiłem ale nie są to rzeczy, kt&oacu... commented 2026-05-28 16:16:36 UTC by Marek-M ♦1,053 |
| 173722905 (Comments: 3) | Canyon Runner (Discussed changesets: 14) | I'll change it to unisex=yes then. Thanks! commented 2026-05-28 16:00:23 UTC by pwbriggs ♦277 |
| 183235763 (Comments: 1) | Daviskj (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi Davis, There are a bunch of problems with your course edits and I wanted to point them out so that you can correct your mapping on future projects. 1. You're deleting other people's work. For instance, there are some green ... commented 2026-05-28 15:59:37 UTC by b-jazz ♦873 |
| 183261081 (Comments: 2) | tyr_asd (Discussed changesets: 55) | Aha, danke. In dem ehemaligen Laden ist jetzt das "Cafe am Brunnen". commented 2026-05-28 15:53:31 UTC by tyr_asd ♦466 |
| 170331529 (Comments: 3) | PianoRailways (Discussed changesets: 3) | Ich meinte übrigens https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1130721773 und hab's jetzt korrigiert. commented 2026-05-28 15:52:30 UTC by habi ♦2,133 |
| 182622455 (Comments: 2) | carlosguerrero_lyft (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hello, cubbe8, My name is Carlos, and I’m part of the OSM team here at Lyft. Thank you for reaching out regarding these edits, and thank you for the feedback. The concrete curbs and impact attenuators (which match our internal telemetry)... commented 2026-05-28 15:51:53 UTC by carlosguerrero_lyft ♦4 |
| 171489987 (Comments: 1) | Access Claims (komoot) (Discussed changesets: 70) | Bore da I am very confused by this one. You have started with a footway with no access tags, on which a router will only route foot traffic. The changeset is "Not a public right of way - Eryri National Park Authority" but rather than res... commented 2026-05-28 15:51:21 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,672 |
| 183307493 (Comments: 1) | Yukiro (Discussed changesets: 33) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2026-05-28 15:45:24 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦912 |
| 183312188 (Comments: 1) | I684 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Verifica di intesezioni stradali e nomi di strade secondo il db del Comune di Sesto Fiorentino commented 2026-05-28 15:44:20 UTC by I684 ♦1 |
| 183312033 (Comments: 1) | networkException (Discussed changesets: 1) | * level commented 2026-05-28 15:40:39 UTC by networkException ♦3 |
| 183252046 (Comments: 2) | Cuberino (Discussed changesets: 1) | Servus und danke. Ja es sind viele Fehler in Hof und Umgebung, Linien die mit Straßen und Bahnschinen verknüpft sind. Ja da hab ich wohl nich alles richtig gemacht. Ist auch das erste mal das ich dieses Durcheinander gehabt habe. Zu... commented 2026-05-28 15:39:31 UTC by Cuberino ♦1 |
| 167720534 (Comments: 1) | travelhike (Discussed changesets: 9) | hello please use man_made=mast + tower:type=communication for describing objects such as https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12920600376 The man_made=communication tag is for very large structures that are only common in europe commented 2026-05-28 15:37:22 UTC by SherbetS ♦158 |
| 183237081 (Comments: 1) | DividedFrame (Discussed changesets: 6) | Thanks Frame, But please make sure you don't intersect golf features. One of your water areas was overlapping a fairway on a golf course. The intersection of the two was declared as both water and grass at the same time. Instead, share th... commented 2026-05-28 15:26:42 UTC by b-jazz ♦873 |
| 182691495 (Comments: 3) | neri_ (Discussed changesets: 4) | Die Gebäudeteile liegen nicht im Grundriss des Gebäudes und sind zum Großteil "überhängend". Den Grundriss des Gebäudes deswegen größer zu machen als er in Wirklichkeit ist ist fand ich keine gute L... commented 2026-05-28 15:18:01 UTC by neri_ ♦6 |
| 174692520 (Comments: 2) | dp7 (Discussed changesets: 25) | Hi SekeRob, Thank you so much for your detailed investigation and for taking the time to restore the data in changeset 183309749. I really appreciate your efforts. To be honest, I had also noticed some strange behaviour from this mapper... commented 2026-05-28 15:17:03 UTC by dp7 ♦88 |
| 183240474 (Comments: 3) | kytta (Discussed changesets: 2) | Ah, danke! commented 2026-05-28 15:07:34 UTC by Ma4G ♦8 |
| 183237031 (Comments: 2) | brianstrauch (Discussed changesets: 5) | Oops, done. commented 2026-05-28 14:58:09 UTC by brianstrauch ♦3 |
| 181889466 (Comments: 1) | Access Claims (komoot) (Discussed changesets: 70) | Hello What legal evidence do you have that the Right of Way has been extinguished? I can find no recent path orders for Maugersbury so please can you find evidence supported by the highway authority. As it stands the access tags you have ad... commented 2026-05-28 14:39:18 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,672 |
| 183309310 (Comments: 1) | PlausibleParaphenalia (Discussed changesets: 3) | Plan to add the multitude of missing buildings and houses in my neighborhood. commented 2026-05-28 14:38:03 UTC by PlausibleParaphenalia ♦3 |
| 183305175 (Comments: 1) | adjust89 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna.... commented 2026-05-28 14:32:59 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦8,669 |
| 183301436 (Comments: 1) | dcapillae (Discussed changesets: 120) | and thanks for a fix and noticing note! commented 2026-05-28 14:32:13 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,901 |
| 126363535 (Comments: 1) | dodelinho (Discussed changesets: 9) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10036107265/history has addr:housename = 23 that was added in this edit What this tag means? Numeric value is unexpected here - was it supposed to be addr:housenumber= ? commented 2026-05-28 14:31:32 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,901 |
| 183217339 (Comments: 2) | Arek4268 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Stoi tam trójzakaz, ale ruch pieszych nie jest zabroniony: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=50.291249899801&lng=18.75011102664&z=17&pKey=848316705767837&focus=photo&x=0.506303880631945&y=0.4963196019454371&zoom=0 commented 2026-05-28 14:20:20 UTC by Dawid2849 ♦892 |
| 183254899 (Comments: 1) | Artur | Yanosik (Discussed changesets: 74) | Ta zmiana została częściowo wycofana w https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183307493 . access=private jest poprawne, ponieważ jest tu brama: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13891546181. To, że Yanosik nie obsługuje poprawnie takich przyp... commented 2026-05-28 14:10:43 UTC by Dawid2849 ♦892 |
| 183081751 (Comments: 3) | AndyB_66 (Discussed changesets: 52) | a, zapomniałem dodać, że dodanie construction: do man_made zostało wykonane zgodnie z https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix commented 2026-05-28 14:06:38 UTC by Dawid2849 ♦892 |
| 182486250 (Comments: 1) | JohnnyCarrey (Discussed changesets: 3) | Вы зачем-то создали дубль станции метро "Фрунзенская", пожалуйста внимательней. commented 2026-05-28 14:04:23 UTC by Константин Гам ♦772 |
| 183295290 (Comments: 2) | mueschel (Discussed changesets: 973) | On a highway=traffic_signals node, it would indeed be just button_operated. According to the Wiki this tag shouldn't be used on ways. Here it's a highway=footway, which is a crossing, which has traffic_signals. So I adde... commented 2026-05-28 14:02:35 UTC by mueschel ♦7,146 |
| 133805421 (Comments: 1) | J_R77 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10742423039/history has addr:housename = 23 that was added in this edit What this tag means? Numeric value is unexpected here - was it supposed to be addr:housenumber= ? commented 2026-05-28 13:54:35 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,901 |
| 132720967 (Comments: 1) | EnglandEditor019 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10676491084/history has addr:housename = 23 that was added in this edit What this tag means? Numeric value is unexpected here - was it supposed to be addr:housenumber= ? commented 2026-05-28 13:54:23 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,901 |
| 183306730 (Comments: 1) | Ms Anna Chrystal (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, welcome to OSM. Are the names real? Pokémon TCG trail 2 (13891511136), v1 Pokémon TCG trail point 1 (13891511137), v1 Pokémon TCG trail point3 (13891511138), v1 Pokémon TCG trail 4 .... commented 2026-05-28 13:52:01 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦6,578 |
| 183307104 (Comments: 1) | Ms Anna Chrystal (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, welcome to OSM. Is the name real? CLOSED (61974907), v8 commented 2026-05-28 13:49:39 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦6,578 |
| 183256312 (Comments: 2) | trichocereus (Discussed changesets: 12) | Ok, voy a delimitar mejor los próximos polígonos. commented 2026-05-28 13:40:44 UTC by trichocereus ♦9 |
| 182966453 (Comments: 2) | World_Winner (Discussed changesets: 30) | Hello jb54osm, Thanks for the clarification—I understand now that the CADO is still in place and can be used in an emergency by removing the guard rail. You’re right about the disused tags; they weren’t appropriate here, so I... commented 2026-05-28 13:40:08 UTC by World_Winner ♦69 |
| 182912979 (Comments: 2) | World_Winner (Discussed changesets: 30) | Hello Halfix, Thank you for the clarification and for sharing your local knowledge of the area. I understand your point that the destination “Enzlar” is only appropriate while turning left. For turning right “Schweinfurt&rdqu... commented 2026-05-28 13:37:15 UTC by World_Winner ♦69 |
| 183303765 (Comments: 2) | gheorgheadriangabriel (Discussed changesets: 1) | Nu a fost un test, sunt modificari reale de la fata locului eu locuind in acel bloc/cartier/zona commented 2026-05-28 13:37:01 UTC by gheorgheadriangabriel ♦1 |
| 183215788 (Comments: 3) | Nico Elbers (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hoi..Het is ook een tunneltag.. ..tunnel=building_passage Groet, eggie commented 2026-05-28 13:30:05 UTC by eggie ♦45,474 |
| 183282042 (Comments: 1) | gabrielvloiola (Discussed changesets: 1) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Good_changeset_comments commented 2026-05-28 13:25:08 UTC by DressyPear4 ♦1,221 |
| 183164142 (Comments: 3) | patman37 (Discussed changesets: 46) | Ok, vous pensez que ce sera un blocage temporaire ou qu’il vaudrait mieux modifier la relation également ? commented 2026-05-28 13:18:03 UTC by Sébastien Pi ♦120 |
| 138811851 (Comments: 5) | ReinerMeyer (Discussed changesets: 93) | Ja, da hast du schon recht, speziell bei großen Waldgebieten mit Löchern gehts oft nicht anders. Ich versuche dann meist aber wie z.b in diesem Fall die riesengroße Wiesenfläche durch geschicktes Unterteilen auf ein paar MP-lose... commented 2026-05-28 13:17:57 UTC by PPete2 ♦158 |
 | 182678316 (Comments: 1) | mikko_tamura (Discussed changesets: 19) | Please, read and follow https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments commented 2026-05-28 13:14:39 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,901 |
| 183300850 (Comments: 3) | Brewbrain (Discussed changesets: 1) | Dank! commented 2026-05-28 13:10:52 UTC by Brewbrain ♦1 |
 | 183245765 (Comments: 1) | woo601 (Discussed changesets: 10) | 因為描繪非開放授權圖資而回退，請參見 https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/topic/124651 累犯將送至 Data Working Group --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha... commented 2026-05-28 13:10:30 UTC by Supaplex ♦11,300 |
| 149980503 (Comments: 2) | Road–Runner (Discussed changesets: 42) | und https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11816147362 hat keinen name commented 2026-05-28 13:09:48 UTC by fs_LT ♦146 |
| 182083921 (Comments: 4) | Dave247 (Discussed changesets: 1) | I think I get it. My misunderstanding steamed from being concerned about the outside walkway not looking like it was inside/part of the building. In that scenario, it should be classified as building=roof like you said. I've corrected it,... commented 2026-05-28 13:08:06 UTC by Dave247 ♦1 |
| 183242109 (Comments: 1) | woo601 (Discussed changesets: 10) | 因為描繪非開放授權圖資而回退，請參見 https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/topic/124651 累犯將送至 Data Working Group --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha... commented 2026-05-28 13:02:43 UTC by Supaplex ♦11,300 |
| 183244047 (Comments: 1) | woo601 (Discussed changesets: 10) | 因為描繪非開放授權圖資而回退，請參見 https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/topic/124651 累犯將送至 Data Working Group --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha... commented 2026-05-28 13:02:31 UTC by Supaplex ♦11,300 |
| 183244106 (Comments: 1) | woo601 (Discussed changesets: 10) | 因為描繪非開放授權圖資而回退，請參見 https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/topic/124651 累犯將送至 Data Working Group --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha... commented 2026-05-28 13:02:08 UTC by Supaplex ♦11,300 |
| 183288656 (Comments: 1) | woo601 (Discussed changesets: 10) | 因為描繪非開放授權圖資而回退，請參見 https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/topic/124651 累犯將送至 Data Working Group --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha... commented 2026-05-28 13:01:52 UTC by Supaplex ♦11,300 |
| 183289573 (Comments: 1) | woo601 (Discussed changesets: 10) | 因為描繪非開放授權圖資而回退，請參見 https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/topic/124651 累犯將送至 Data Working Group --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha... commented 2026-05-28 13:01:44 UTC by Supaplex ♦11,300 |
| 179911939 (Comments: 4) | Клініка Лілу (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi pitscheplatsch, Thank you for your feedback. I will make sure to add direct changeset URLs instead of just number in changeset description. Happy Mapping! commented 2026-05-28 12:59:59 UTC by ajmat ♦213 |
| 179670765 (Comments: 1) | Matty Sims (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, is this a duplicate of the existing AED on the south corner wall of the Phoenix. If so, I'll recheck to see if an AED is again inside. commented 2026-05-28 12:59:37 UTC by Adrian Shobrooke ♦23 |
| 183288147 (Comments: 1) | woo601 (Discussed changesets: 10) | 因為描繪非開放授權圖資而回退，請參見 https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/topic/124651 累犯將送至 Data Working Group --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osm... commented 2026-05-28 12:57:36 UTC by Supaplex ♦11,300 |
| 181550485 (Comments: 1) | prosk8er2 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Здравствуйте! Вы добавили bicycle=yes на дорожку в парке, это избыточно. Велосипеды и так могут ездить. commented 2026-05-28 12:48:02 UTC by Константин Гам ♦772 |
| 183225875 (Comments: 2) | Claudius Henrichs (Discussed changesets: 176) | Thank you for sharing the details to the China rail wiki tagging convention. Helpful differentiation to understand when to use subway versus rail tagging. This is corrected now for Hanghai Line. commented 2026-05-28 12:44:43 UTC by Claudius Henrichs ♦224 |
| 183269864 (Comments: 2) | jayaddison (Discussed changesets: 6) | Thank you for your feedback - I'll watch those videos soon and update my mapping approach! commented 2026-05-28 12:42:49 UTC by jayaddison ♦30 |
| 182218357 (Comments: 1) | Paschberg (Discussed changesets: 20) | was ist das? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1509167178 commented 2026-05-28 12:37:48 UTC by fs_LT ♦146 |
| 183303305 (Comments: 1) | Frozen4 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. Feedback.. Ik heb de landuse grass aangepast. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-05-28 12:37:32 UTC by eggie ♦45,474 |
| 140149063 (Comments: 1) | maptoaster (Discussed changesets: 6) | was soll das sein? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1200670034 commented 2026-05-28 12:33:29 UTC by fs_LT ♦146 |
| 178902901 (Comments: 3) | Серый Еж (Discussed changesets: 3) | У вас кто-то умер? Держите себя пожалуйста в руках. Обычная рабочая ситуация не должна вызывать такой негатив. commented 2026-05-28 12:29:22 UTC by Константин Гам ♦772 |
| 34854601 (Comments: 1) | maction (Discussed changesets: 42) | willst du https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5613327 wirklich als Relation abbilden? "Heiterwandhütte" ist dann jedenfalls auf Relation und outer redundant; und ein umschließender way (wie der outer ja schon ist) mit building... commented 2026-05-28 12:29:16 UTC by fs_LT ♦146 |
| 182412388 (Comments: 1) | Cedric Staces (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, I came across your profile when repairing a few edits that have the same problem. I felt I had to tell you, to give you a chance to improve. Drawing parking areas is a good idea. But please do not glue them on existing roads. ... commented 2026-05-28 12:24:36 UTC by bxl-forever ♦2,904 |
| 166821451 (Comments: 2) | Име (Discussed changesets: 4) | Da der Mapper ein Jahr lang nicht reagiert hat, habe ich das ursprüngliche Tagging jetzt mal wiederhergestellt :) VG David commented 2026-05-28 12:24:12 UTC by dadavid ♦551 |
| 182948646 (Comments: 3) | monotar (Discussed changesets: 16) | Ah danke für die Info, das ist absolut verständlich. Mal sehen wann ich dort mal wieder vorbeikommen, oder jemand anderes es vllt schon anpasst. Wollte nur meine festgestellten Unstimmigkeiten festhalten LG commented 2026-05-28 12:19:34 UTC by sembelst134 ♦43 |
| 183230738 (Comments: 1) | DouceLuvango (Discussed changesets: 14) | Please STOP doing this type of imports. You have created several massive changesets and created multiple duplicated ways, broken boundaries, etc. Please. STOP and review your edits and workflow since it is wrong, it creates mess on the map commented 2026-05-28 12:18:01 UTC by Aleksandar Matejevic ♦235 |
| 160629387 (Comments: 3) | fernerknott (Discussed changesets: 5) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1346343301 hat immer noch keine tags; bitte fertigstellen oder löschen commented 2026-05-28 12:15:25 UTC by fs_LT ♦146 |
| 179998990 (Comments: 1) | Име (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi und willkommen bei OSM :) Du hast Recht, dieses Segment ist Teil der Zeppelinstraße, aber da es quer über die Hölderlinstraße verläuft und diese kreuzt, ist es hier nicht als highway=tertiary sondern als highway=... commented 2026-05-28 12:13:52 UTC by dadavid ♦551 |
| 183220609 (Comments: 2) | iuvi (Discussed changesets: 6) | Постараюсь, но в меру моих путешествий и командировок вношу где выходит. Стараюсь аккуратно commented 2026-05-28 12:10:50 UTC by iuvi ♦2 |
| 154743176 (Comments: 1) | simon04 (Discussed changesets: 19) | empty tag key/value https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/925368298 commented 2026-05-28 12:10:04 UTC by fs_LT ♦146 |
| 123931465 (Comments: 1) | Lokalfuerst (Discussed changesets: 97) | was soll das sein? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/377885249 commented 2026-05-28 12:08:42 UTC by fs_LT ♦146 |
| 180621668 (Comments: 3) | AAA8111 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi AAA8111, Thank you for reaching out. I understand your concern. I will be more careful while editing onwards. commented 2026-05-28 12:07:33 UTC by 007Transformer ♦69 |
| 183270916 (Comments: 1) | Dorfcafé (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in changeset id:183302236 commented 2026-05-28 12:02:57 UTC by rajdhani ♦129 |
| 183298431 (Comments: 1) | Tobias Deppe (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. Feedback Nuttige toevoeging. Er is al een adresnode. Het adres heb ik verijderd MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community |
| 183282692 (Comments: 3) | iriiidio (Discussed changesets: 3) | Gracias por responder. Ya corregí todo. Estamos para ayudar. Por favor integrarse al chat en Telegram de maperos chilenos. Hay varios de Temuco y Rancagua. El link para unirse está en mi perfil. Saludos commented 2026-05-28 11:58:04 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦3,092 |
| 177109764 (Comments: 2) | Име (Discussed changesets: 4) | gleiche Frage zur wikidate ID, war die Löschung Absicht oder ein Versehen? commented 2026-05-28 11:54:26 UTC by dadavid ♦551 |
| 146250813 (Comments: 1) | iriiidio (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hola. Cada una de las casas dibujadas en Francisco Gana son en verdad dos y a veces tres casas completamente separadas. Por favor, dibujarlas separadas. Ya fueron corregidas. Saludos y gracias commented 2026-05-28 11:53:44 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦3,092 |
 | 41763714 (Comments: 2) | shay trails (Discussed changesets: 8) | טוב, בטיול חוזר לפחות ממזרח יש אליו סימון. לא יודע מה מצב השביל. commented 2026-05-28 11:52:21 UTC by hatul ♦463 |
| 183273854 (Comments: 1) | BSauder (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello. Thanks for mapping. FYI High-rise buildings are regulary incorrectly mapped. You can see both one or more side walls and the roof. The Imagery is taken under a certain angle, so you can see more . Often all visible walls and roofs... commented 2026-05-28 11:51:27 UTC by Frans S ♦10,673 |
| 183296406 (Comments: 6) | waldhans (Discussed changesets: 90) | Das Amtsblatt habe ich ja als Quelle angegeben. Dass amtlich nur ein Teil umbenannt wird, erschien mir unlogisch. Daher habe ich den ganzen Weg korrigiert. Du kannst das Problem an die Stadt Willich melden. commented 2026-05-28 11:50:22 UTC by waldhans ♦207 |
| 182179303 (Comments: 2) | Mr Matt K (Discussed changesets: 12) | Hi again! I noticed that this changeset re-adds the crosswalk at Belle Mead-Blawenburg Road and Skillman near the post office. Just a heads-up from a local mapper: this crosswalk no longer exists on the ground. It was removed during a repaving... commented 2026-05-28 11:47:11 UTC by vngx32 ♦5 |
| 183143865 (Comments: 1) | Xxlfussel (Discussed changesets: 31) | Bitte schau mal nach deinen alten Namen. Du benutzt keinen einfachen Bindestrich zwischen den Jahreszahlen, sondern einen längeren, der da falsch ist. commented 2026-05-28 11:41:30 UTC by mueschel ♦7,146 |
| 149155387 (Comments: 3) | okadatsuneo_import (Discussed changesets: 17) | okay, thx! :) commented 2026-05-28 11:38:10 UTC by dpolovinkin ♦391 |
| 183299878 (Comments: 1) | timm1204 (Discussed changesets: 2) | I returned the turning circle to the correct spot using DCS NSW imagery commented 2026-05-28 11:36:10 UTC by nevw ♦2,226 |
| 183299949 (Comments: 1) | timm1204 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, I reverted this changeset as it only dragged nodes https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=183299949 All fixed now. Also... Can you try to be more expressive with your changeset comments and write briefly what you have done in the ... commented 2026-05-28 11:32:51 UTC by nevw ♦2,226 |
| 183290161 (Comments: 1) | Mex (Discussed changesets: 16) | Thanks! commented 2026-05-28 11:32:04 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,840 |
| 183266669 (Comments: 4) | Paul Einstein (Discussed changesets: 2) | Not a problem. You're not the first person to do this and you won't be the last, but you're still making useful contributions to the OSM detail in your area. Happy mapping! commented 2026-05-28 11:31:33 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,840 |
| 183007191 (Comments: 3) | RSota (Discussed changesets: 6) | That's what I would do too. If each part differed from each other and you wanted to add separate heights or levels, etc then you could draw a separate building:part within the main building polygon for each one and add differing tags. commented 2026-05-28 11:24:44 UTC by nevw ♦2,226 |
| 182560821 (Comments: 1) | iuvi (Discussed changesets: 6) | Не существует в реальности, откатил. Не делайте так в будущем! commented 2026-05-28 11:22:17 UTC by Константин Гам ♦772 |
| 182615764 (Comments: 1) | iuvi (Discussed changesets: 6) | Вы добавили не существующую вело-инфраструктуру - не надо так. commented 2026-05-28 11:21:37 UTC by Константин Гам ♦772 |
| 182991706 (Comments: 3) | lambalicious (Discussed changesets: 21) | La misma letra Q para cuadrar. Si seleccionas todo y cuadras, te queda paralelo. saludos commented 2026-05-28 11:17:37 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦3,092 |
| 183294013 (Comments: 1) | Rbrt7 (Discussed changesets: 8) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna.... commented 2026-05-28 11:12:23 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦8,669 |
| 183294748 (Comments: 1) | palycka (Discussed changesets: 5) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkc... commented 2026-05-28 11:12:17 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦8,669 |
| 183170682 (Comments: 5) | Реdактор (Discussed changesets: 21) | Это отдельное село commented 2026-05-28 11:04:18 UTC by Реdактор ♦23 |
| 182497441 (Comments: 2) | Access Claims (komoot) (Discussed changesets: 70) | There are no highway=residential in this CS. For driveways on private property it’s not wrong to add access=private, although it doesn’t really make a difference in this case since they’re dead ends anyway --- ... commented 2026-05-28 11:03:06 UTC by Luzandro ♦997 |
| 182459081 (Comments: 1) | sadiksha (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hello. Thanks for mapping. The high-rise buildings are regulary incorrectly mapped. You can see both one or more side walls and the roof. The Imagery is taken under a certain angle, so you can see more . Often all visible walls and roof... commented 2026-05-28 11:01:15 UTC by Frans S ♦10,673 |
| 182629289 (Comments: 1) | iuvi (Discussed changesets: 6) | Здравствуйте! Уточните пожалуйста, что вы сделали в данном пакете правок на пол-мира и почему в Петербурге появились не существующие в... commented 2026-05-28 11:00:15 UTC by Константин Гам ♦772 |
| 183230562 (Comments: 3) | Demido (Discussed changesets: 6) | wie in dem Wiki-Artikel angegeben, sollte das eine Eigenschaft des Straßenabschnitts sein. Also für https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/4585729 statt parking:both=no über die gesamte Länge, wie es aktuell angegeben ist, den We... commented 2026-05-28 10:58:03 UTC by Luzandro ♦997 |
| 181370953 (Comments: 6) | YduH (Discussed changesets: 3) | z Knurowa kierowało mnie przez centrum Gliwic bo nie umiało przejechać tutaj rowerem, albo się nie znam pewnie to 2. commented 2026-05-28 10:56:02 UTC by YduH ♦1 |
| 183275773 (Comments: 2) | Adam Roth (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ahoj, díky za radu. Doplněno. commented 2026-05-28 10:51:33 UTC by Adam Roth ♦1 |
| 176913763 (Comments: 2) | finn-hound (Discussed changesets: 16) | Looks like user gogorm fixed it when modifying it to create the adjacent construction area, I'll go ahead and delete the fixme commented 2026-05-28 10:47:57 UTC by finn-hound ♦23 |
| 183268749 (Comments: 3) | CRCulver (Discussed changesets: 61) | Next time I should walk around the entire site before deleting! I have restored the parking, but I have changed the outline to reflect that only part of the land is still parking, while the rest is now vacant land for sale. commented 2026-05-28 10:47:03 UTC by CRCulver ♦223 |
| 183297140 (Comments: 1) | dauwerog (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-05-28 10:42:15 UTC by eggie ♦45,474 |
| 183270283 (Comments: 1) | 1luhgodchild (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in changeset id:183298075 commented 2026-05-28 10:40:19 UTC by rajdhani ♦129 |
| 181979771 (Comments: 7) | wgtgov (Discussed changesets: 7) | Nice to agree! Greetings from sunny hot Portugal! commented 2026-05-28 10:36:16 UTC by Jan Olieslagers ♦215 |
| 183265320 (Comments: 2) | Paul Einstein (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thanks for your help. I am an OSM novice. commented 2026-05-28 10:36:13 UTC by Paul Einstein ♦2 |
| 183276961 (Comments: 8) | AJCHurkens (Discussed changesets: 3) | Volgens de straatnaamborden inderdaad Heihoekseweg. https://www.mariakapellen.nl/gassel.htm commented 2026-05-28 10:30:57 UTC by eggie ♦45,474 |
| 183260905 (Comments: 1) | voschix (Discussed changesets: 75) | Please check https://osm.org/note/5313708 commented 2026-05-28 10:22:20 UTC by ChrissW-R1 ♦424 |
| 183296890 (Comments: 1) | jappel (Discussed changesets: 1) | Added weblink to time tables. commented 2026-05-28 10:20:12 UTC by jappel ♦1 |
| 179985469 (Comments: 4) | borovac (Discussed changesets: 69) | Hi borovac, Thank you for your feedback. I will make sure to add direct changeset URLs instead of just number in changeset description. Happy Mapping! commented 2026-05-28 10:18:49 UTC by rajdhani ♦129 |
| 177395115 (Comments: 1) | Amphibulus (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour Vous avez passé ce chemin : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1036488543/history/8 en pipeline. Êtes vous sûr de vous ? commented 2026-05-28 10:16:21 UTC by Rémi_ ♦22 |
| 182534537 (Comments: 1) | siwangi02 (Discussed changesets: 11) | Hello. Thanks for mapping On this task, the high-rise buildings are regulary incorrectly mapped. You can see both one or more side walls and the roof. The Imagery is taken under a certain angle, so you can see more . Often all visible walls... commented 2026-05-28 10:14:18 UTC by Frans S ♦10,673 |
| 183129208 (Comments: 1) | bastien59360 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, what does this area represent? An area next to the highway with stands of some vendors? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1521077130 commented 2026-05-28 10:11:07 UTC by mueschel ♦7,146 |
| 183196761 (Comments: 4) | Antonino_Faro (Discussed changesets: 7) | E di che ; ) Se pensi che sia così noto da essere un punto di riferimento per le persone del luogo allora conviene mettere il nome come loc_name loc_name=Banca Sicula commented 2026-05-28 10:10:42 UTC by Antonino_Faro ♦12 |
| 183129960 (Comments: 16) | Michiel Duyvendak (Discussed changesets: 5) | dank commented 2026-05-28 10:05:00 UTC by Michiel Duyvendak ♦5 |
| 179530243 (Comments: 3) | osmviborg (Discussed changesets: 359) | Hi osmviborg, To provide better clarity and traceability, I include the changeset ID of the corrective edit, especially when something went wrong in the original changes. This helps reference both the issue and the fix. Happy Mapping! commented 2026-05-28 10:03:39 UTC by MappingMore ♦453 |
| 179771128 (Comments: 3) | Zrop (Discussed changesets: 27) | Hi Zrop, Thank you for your feedback. I will make sure to add direct changeset URLs instead of just number in changeset description. Happy Mapping! commented 2026-05-28 09:58:58 UTC by MappingMore ♦453 |
| 183257695 (Comments: 1) | SUBERTy (Discussed changesets: 2) | Please explain why you add a filter road that does not exist (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1523547019)? The road is actually blocked off because of the new motorway. commented 2026-05-28 09:56:21 UTC by ika-chan! ♦401 |
| 179389337 (Comments: 3) | Binzy_Boi (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Binzy_Boi, Thank you for reaching out - I am very happy to help. You added highway that was not splitted at crossing (node/7115276666) as it should have been. Additionally, you removed the building=yes tag (way/777864613) and added area=yes tag... commented 2026-05-28 09:56:18 UTC by MappingMore ♦453 |
| 183241002 (Comments: 1) | woo601 (Discussed changesets: 10) | 因為描繪非開放授權圖資而回退，請參見 https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/topic/124651 累犯將送至 Data Working Group --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osm... commented 2026-05-28 09:55:33 UTC by Supaplex ♦11,300 |
| 183241124 (Comments: 1) | woo601 (Discussed changesets: 10) | 因為描繪非開放授權圖資而回退，請參見 https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/topic/124651 累犯將送至 Data Working Group --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osm... commented 2026-05-28 09:55:29 UTC by Supaplex ♦11,300 |
| 183241311 (Comments: 1) | woo601 (Discussed changesets: 10) | 因為描繪非開放授權圖資而回退，請參見 https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/topic/124651 累犯將送至 Data Working Group --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osm... commented 2026-05-28 09:55:24 UTC by Supaplex ♦11,300 |
 | 179718702 (Comments: 3) | مكتب عبدالمحسن ال مستور القرني للمحاماة (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi مكتب عبدالمحسن ال مستور القرني للمحاماة, Thank you for your feedback. I will make sure to add direct changeset URLs instead of just number in changeset description. Happy Mapping! commented 2026-05-28 09:52:59 UTC by MappingMore ♦453 |
| 179724572 (Comments: 3) | ivanbranco (Discussed changesets: 131) | Hi ivanbranco, Thank you for reaching out, I will not add same info on changeset discussion, if this information is already available in changeset details. Thank you! commented 2026-05-28 09:50:09 UTC by MappingMore ♦453 |
| 171768923 (Comments: 2) | kräckel (Discussed changesets: 32) | Hallo, ich habe die Sammelrelation soeben gelöscht. Solche Listen kann man mit der Overpass- oder Postpass-API erstellen. Details siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183295557 Viele Grüße Michael commented 2026-05-28 09:49:24 UTC by Nakaner ♦3,219 |
| 179634384 (Comments: 6) | Taya_S (Discussed changesets: 97) | Hi Taya_S, Thank you for reaching out, I will not add same info on changeset discussion, if this information is already available in changeset details. Thank you! commented 2026-05-28 09:47:33 UTC by MappingMore ♦453 |
 | 179763561 (Comments: 3) | hebolz (Discussed changesets: 15) | Hi hebolz, Thank you for your feedback. I will make sure to add direct changeset URLs instead of just number in changeset description. Happy Mapping! commented 2026-05-28 09:44:15 UTC by MappingMore ♦453 |
| 132209951 (Comments: 3) | Rick Richards (Discussed changesets: 99) | Vďaka, informoval som používateľa o oprave :) commented 2026-05-28 09:39:48 UTC by Filip009CZ ♦45 |
| 183280054 (Comments: 2) | Snaiperis (Discussed changesets: 18) | Iš pradžių 9 bokštai buvo atrinkti pagal vietovės pavadinimą tekste https://placiajuostis.lrv.lt/lt/naujienos/pirmieji-9-nkp-projekto-rysio-bokstai-yra-paruosti-operatoriu-naudojimui/ vėliau kiti pagal projekto nebeegzistuojančio ... commented 2026-05-28 09:38:53 UTC by Snaiperis ♦8 |
| 183212128 (Comments: 3) | Tom de Lepper (Discussed changesets: 1) | Dag Tom.. Het is in ieder geval vindbaar. Niet te veel naar de 'standaardkaart' kijken. Die rendert heel veel niet. Die kaartlagen zijn van derde partijen. Mvg, eggie commented 2026-05-28 09:34:47 UTC by eggie ♦45,474 |
| 180056307 (Comments: 3) | sleep enjoyer (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi ftrebien, Thank you for pointing out the incorrect edit. I understand that the traffic lights were unlinked from their previous edit histories, and the issue has now been fixed in changeset/180179826. I will make sure to review future edits... commented 2026-05-28 09:26:51 UTC by MappingMore ♦453 |
| 183285543 (Comments: 3) | Darnight14 (Discussed changesets: 20) | josm的文件保存到本地，随时保存 commented 2026-05-28 09:26:12 UTC by 渤海西岸 ♦39 |
| 183285821 (Comments: 1) | EteRiUSao (Discussed changesets: 1) | Dear EteRiUSao, in your earlier changesets you have taken care to write good changeset comments. Thank you - this makes it easier for other mappers to understand and verify your work. In the last few uploads, you used only "." as a changese... commented 2026-05-28 09:25:05 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,651 |
 | 183286759 (Comments: 1) | MayZueZueSwe (Discussed changesets: 1) | Dear MayZueZueSwe, in this changeset you have deleted 136 buildings. Yet your explanation for this is "#hotosm-project-47328 #myOSM #help-mm-mapped buildings building" which is not something that anyone can understand. Have these buildings ... commented 2026-05-28 09:23:04 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,651 |
| 180956097 (Comments: 3) | SB ARC GIS (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi SB ARC GIS, Thank you for your feedback. I will make sure to add direct changeset URLs instead of just number in changeset description. Happy Mapping! commented 2026-05-28 09:20:29 UTC by MappingMore ♦453 |
 | 183086579 (Comments: 1) | quecrees_ (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, what does this node represent? It didn't get any proper tag. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13869489301 commented 2026-05-28 09:20:19 UTC by mueschel ♦7,146 |
| 183180523 (Comments: 3) | Hogmite (Discussed changesets: 3) | "golf_slope" and "golf_rating" and in general "golf_*" are also not used. You can check current statistics on https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/ You'll see that these are already used, although only 6 tim... commented 2026-05-28 09:11:32 UTC by mueschel ♦7,146 |
| 172379996 (Comments: 1) | Bradilos3 (Discussed changesets: 14) | Hi Hab eben nach dem Freizeitpark nebenan geschaut und dabei deine "Aussichtspunkte" gesehen. Vielleicht schaust du mal unter name=* . Dort wird erklärt, dass wir das Feld nicht als Beschreibung nutzen sollen. Gepl... commented 2026-05-28 09:06:44 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦4,057 |
| 183182043 (Comments: 1) | roamingsonaa (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, please don't try to add the full menu of some restaurant - OSM is not the right place for that. The food:* tags are meant to point out some categories of food specialities, but not for detailed lists of everything on the menu. commented 2026-05-28 09:03:22 UTC by mueschel ♦7,146 |
| 182564256 (Comments: 1) | TheDivingShellyfish (Discussed changesets: 1) | hi there, is the editing fine? :) commented 2026-05-28 08:47:54 UTC by TheDivingShellyfish ♦1 |
| 180143851 (Comments: 1) | Numbergod (Discussed changesets: 24) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13433682624/history has image = https://streetcomplete.app/p/329749.jpg that was added in this edit https://streetcomplete.app/p/329749.jpg is a link to a temporary files hosted at streetcomplete.app. Note... commented 2026-05-28 08:46:42 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,901 |
| 183190197 (Comments: 6) | Kookykooky (Discussed changesets: 75) | While reverting the changes, I verified the tagging and fixed some of it at the end. So this edit helped improve the map. Thanks! Have a nice day too! commented 2026-05-28 08:39:12 UTC by Marek-M ♦1,053 |
| 183286618 (Comments: 1) | Blythe0625 (Discussed changesets: 2) | The boundaries of the Ecclesiastical Province of Lipa should be at the maritime boundaries instead. (if available) commented 2026-05-28 08:38:49 UTC by ClaveScottPH ♦7 |
| 182885914 (Comments: 3) | mapper999 (Discussed changesets: 115) | BTW, danke für https://osm.mueschelsoft.de/destinationsign/example/index.htm Sehr hilfreich beim Kontrollieren der destination tags! commented 2026-05-28 08:38:23 UTC by mapper999 ♦383 |
| 183274575 (Comments: 1) | JakobDLM (Discussed changesets: 1) | Prima na werken niet vergeten terug aan te passen Thx commented 2026-05-28 08:32:25 UTC by Jakka ♦1,860 |
| 183287446 (Comments: 7) | thechillbunks (Discussed changesets: 2) | 👍 commented 2026-05-28 08:28:39 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦6,578 |
| 183290352 (Comments: 1) | Rbrt7 (Discussed changesets: 8) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna.... commented 2026-05-28 08:21:47 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦8,669 |
| 150272967 (Comments: 1) | Sim88 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, Please decrease your edit area. This may harm the map. Don't shift the map! Greetz, eggie commented 2026-05-28 08:18:06 UTC by eggie ♦45,474 |
| 183252321 (Comments: 1) | Ilanride22 (Discussed changesets: 37) | You create a duplicate bridge 2 hours after me and then erase my changes with "Deleted a duplicate bridge" Seriously? commented 2026-05-28 08:16:18 UTC by Dindia ♦59 |
| 183287750 (Comments: 1) | Lycée Élie Faure SNT (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour Quel commentaire intéressant, en anglais s'il vous plaît, pour une contribution qui n'a pas de sens et qui a donc été annulée. reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183289611 |
| 179799804 (Comments: 4) | Friendly_Ghost (Discussed changesets: 180) | Helemaal goed. Fijn dat dat opgehelderd is. commented 2026-05-28 08:13:42 UTC by Friendly_Ghost ♦657 |
| 183285884 (Comments: 1) | mat (Discussed changesets: 36) | Bien vu! Merci. commented 2026-05-28 08:11:34 UTC by blef ♦79 |
| 183279232 (Comments: 1) | Sim88 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi Please decrease your editarea. Don't shift the map.This may harm the map. Greetz, eggie commented 2026-05-28 08:06:58 UTC by eggie ♦45,474 |
| 183261716 (Comments: 1) | noabalde (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in changeset id: 183290276; 183290513 commented 2026-05-28 08:05:37 UTC by rajdhani ♦129 |
| 173225519 (Comments: 7) | kuhni74 (Discussed changesets: 51) | Wir können's gern in der community besprechen. Aber der Benutzer ÖTK ist leider nicht immer sehr kommunikativ gewesen bisher. commented 2026-05-28 08:04:52 UTC by kuhni74 ♦451 |
| 183274216 (Comments: 4) | idkwhatname2use (Discussed changesets: 84) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20716 commented 2026-05-28 07:59:01 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,651 |
| 183247818 (Comments: 1) | Harsha514000 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello Harsha514000, Your update on this way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1523448002#map=19/16.403228/79.411148 does not align with the BIng image. Please fix the same immediately. Please add specific comments for each of your changeset in futur... commented 2026-05-28 07:49:10 UTC by arjunaraoc ♦763 |
| 170154178 (Comments: 2) | MC79 (Discussed changesets: 10) | "Hi, thank you for pointing this out. You are correct, tagging them as apartments was a mistake. Thank you for taking the time to update the tags to building=hotel. I appreciate the help!" commented 2026-05-28 07:43:08 UTC by MC79 ♦6 |
| 183236258 (Comments: 1) | accuratejanitorial (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in changeset id: 183289098 commented 2026-05-28 07:29:07 UTC by rajdhani ♦129 |
| 183222819 (Comments: 3) | sanjanasharma_lyft (Discussed changesets: 11) | No worries, thank you! commented 2026-05-28 07:26:45 UTC by marcmarti ♦33 |
| 183222439 (Comments: 5) | qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (Discussed changesets: 22) | Also see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:footway%3Dsidewalk commented 2026-05-28 07:23:26 UTC by qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq ♦514 |
| 183280914 (Comments: 1) | Lance Joaquin (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hi, welcome to OSM. Are the names real? commented 2026-05-28 07:20:44 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦6,578 |
| 183287381 (Comments: 1) | thechillbunks (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, welcome to OSM. is the name real? kodai clouds (11181480721), v2 commented 2026-05-28 07:19:59 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦6,578 |
| 180928063 (Comments: 2) | Teo Cata (Discussed changesets: 10) | Am înțeles. Mersi pentru explicații. commented 2026-05-28 07:19:27 UTC by Teo Cata ♦4 |
| 183254579 (Comments: 1) | Gotta Dance (Discussed changesets: 1) | Is this a dancing school? commented 2026-05-28 07:16:31 UTC by pwbriggs ♦277 |
| 183258000 (Comments: 2) | LiudmilaBareika (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hello, flohoff! Thank you so much for your kind feedback and engagement, it's much appreciated! Best regards, Liudmila commented 2026-05-28 07:12:32 UTC by LiudmilaBareika ♦6 |
| 182508967 (Comments: 1) | TUGa_boot (Discussed changesets: 2) | страсвите 👋. Пожалуйста, писать значение тега на английском языке. commented 2026-05-28 07:03:45 UTC by RobotFK ♦28 |
 | 183171992 (Comments: 1) | SStumpf (Discussed changesets: 2) | Bitte die Rechtwinkligkeit korrigieren commented 2026-05-28 06:53:03 UTC by Aeiouai ♦4 |
| 183168226 (Comments: 1) | SStumpf (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hallo, deine gezeichneten Gebäude sind nicht rechtwinklig. Nach dem Zeichnen und klassifizieren eines Gebäudes, drücke bitte "Q" um die Fläche rechtwinklig zu machen! Ich bitte um Korrektur. Hello, your constructe... commented 2026-05-28 06:50:41 UTC by Aeiouai ♦4 |
| 183285370 (Comments: 1) | SaPatz (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi SaPatz, in OSM werden die Straßen zu Str. nicht abgekürzt. Dafür gibt es hier einen Eintrag official_name:de Sieh OSM-Wiki! Gruß, Znaika commented 2026-05-28 06:45:43 UTC by Znaika ♦189 |
| 183180448 (Comments: 1) | Robin van der Linde (Discussed changesets: 34) | Topper! Mooi dat je de haltes ingetekend hebt! commented 2026-05-28 06:44:06 UTC by martiensch ♦81 |
| 183287203 (Comments: 1) | pawka007 (Discussed changesets: 38) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Duplikat adresu w okolicy. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11059899561 https://www.openstreetmap.or... commented 2026-05-28 06:41:31 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦8,669 |
| 183245464 (Comments: 1) | neviksasha (Discussed changesets: 13) | Please use appropriate and meaningful comments for your changesets: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Uk:%D0%A1%D1%82%D0%B2%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BD%D1%8F_%D0%B3%D0%B0%D1%80%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%85_%D0%BE%D0%BF%D0%B8%D1%81%D1%96%D0%B2_%D0%BD%D0%B0%D... commented 2026-05-28 06:30:32 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦912 |
| 183247665 (Comments: 1) | neviksasha (Discussed changesets: 13) | Please use appropriate and meaningful comments for your changesets: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Uk:%D0%A1%D1%82%D0%B2%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BD%D1%8F_%D0%B3%D0%B0%D1%80%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%85_%D0%BE%D0%BF%D0%B8%D1%81%D1%96%D0%B2_%D0%BD%D0%B0%D... commented 2026-05-28 06:29:38 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦912 |
| 183272843 (Comments: 2) | grzegorczykk (Discussed changesets: 2) | Poza tym żadną miarą nie jest to budynek przemysłowy ("industrial"). commented 2026-05-28 06:27:07 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦912 |
| 183239459 (Comments: 3) | Michiel Duyvendak (Discussed changesets: 5) | Alleen met een omweg.. Een hyperlink plaatsen naar de plek waar je je foto naar hebt 'geupload'. Bv met.. Imgur: Een van de populairste apps voor forumgebruik. Upload de foto, kopieer de 'BBCode' (link) en plak deze in je fo... commented 2026-05-28 06:23:53 UTC by eggie ♦45,474 |
| 183129571 (Comments: 1) | brooke10101010 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thanks. FWIW, that description doesn't add more information to the map—the affiliation with safeway is already captured in the tag brand=Safeway, and the machine-readable equivalent brand:wikidata=Q1508234. Thanks again for your con... commented 2026-05-28 06:23:20 UTC by pwbriggs ♦277 |
| 183000711 (Comments: 1) | Dpark12300 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks. If possible, do try to write more meaningful changeset comments. Other editors do see your changeset comments and it helps a lot to be able to know what you were trying to edit. Thanks again for your contributions and welcome to OpenSt... commented 2026-05-28 06:16:50 UTC by pwbriggs ♦277 |
| 182527963 (Comments: 12) | Skywaltuh (Discussed changesets: 36) | No to muszę Cię zaprosić na forum. Może tam się ktoś z tobą zgodzi. Ja niestety tego nie widzę. commented 2026-05-28 06:11:03 UTC by Yunkers ♦437 |
| 183281877 (Comments: 1) | Terotechnica Asset Management College (Discussed changesets: 1) | #Spam commented 2026-05-28 05:59:37 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦6,578 |
| 183285724 (Comments: 1) | jorchr (Discussed changesets: 22) | Error fix of inners, not wetlands. Sorry. commented 2026-05-28 05:39:56 UTC by jorchr ♦12 |
| 180349227 (Comments: 1) | mzioma (Discussed changesets: 14) | dodawanie tego do granic administracyjnych wydaje mi się błędne, zbędne i wadliwe - nie powinno tam się jako elementów losowych statystyk wrzucać mogę ten pomysł na szerszym forum przedyskutować commented 2026-05-28 05:34:58 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,901 |
| 183238426 (Comments: 3) | tomzyl (Discussed changesets: 49) | budowy może nie było, ale skoro działka obok wyznaczono drogę do tego miejsca, to ciężko utrzymać obie. Jak niepoprawnie jest naniesione (a posiłkowałem się dość dokładnym BDOT500) to popraw. commented 2026-05-28 05:30:02 UTC by tomzyl ♦41 |
| 183245869 (Comments: 1) | Luz Choque (Discussed changesets: 10) | Hola, me olvidé mencionar, el ref de los light_rail es solo la primera letra, en todo lado usan números pero aquí se les ocurrió letras :/... está en los carros tranvías en una esquina por fuera donde conduce... commented 2026-05-28 05:22:39 UTC by 5m4u9 ♦1,676 |
| 181961720 (Comments: 1) | seafoxx (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo seafoxx, einige Änderungen in diesem Änderungssatz zeigen ein Problem. Und zwar überschneiden sich die folgenden zwei Straßen im westlichen Abschnitt.: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/391058074/history https://www.... commented 2026-05-28 05:21:06 UTC by söm4324 ♦58 |
| 43812883 (Comments: 1) | Ballard OpenStreetMap (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hey, do you happen to know what you meant by female=no male=no unisex=no on this hairdresser shop? What audience does this shop serve? Is one of those tags incorrect? Thanks! commented 2026-05-28 05:15:57 UTC by pwbriggs ♦277 |
| 182843827 (Comments: 2) | vrabcak (Discussed changesets: 3) | Díky za upozornění, chyba při kopírování tagů. Opravil jsem https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183284993 commented 2026-05-28 05:09:18 UTC by vrabcak ♦8 |
| 180133192 (Comments: 6) | gnlpfth (Discussed changesets: 53) | Mit dem Komma steht es aber sogar auf Basemap.at ;) Das habe ich von dort übernommen gehabt, da es damals auch zur Beschilderung passte. commented 2026-05-28 05:03:33 UTC by DerKaiserschmarren ♦61 |
| 183253087 (Comments: 1) | Sa_BDP_26 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in changeset id: 183284456 commented 2026-05-28 04:48:59 UTC by rajdhani ♦129 |
| 182211205 (Comments: 3) | Access Claims (komoot) (Discussed changesets: 70) | Thanks commented 2026-05-28 04:44:35 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦4,057 |
| 183273636 (Comments: 1) | Trojahøj (Discussed changesets: 1) | @Trojahøj Jeg har været nødt til at tilbageføre dit changeset for der var lavet en del rod med flere veje, der var rykket. commented 2026-05-28 04:42:59 UTC by b-holdet ♦370 |
| 182041840 (Comments: 1) | Access Claims (komoot) (Discussed changesets: 70) | If there is a sign, tag it correctly; otherwise, please revert it and join the discussions in the community about it. commented 2026-05-28 04:35:04 UTC by fs_LT ♦146 |
| 182035071 (Comments: 6) | Access Claims (komoot) (Discussed changesets: 70) | Sehr gut! Ich prüfe auch gerade andere CS von denen commented 2026-05-28 04:23:32 UTC by fs_LT ♦146 |
| 183245970 (Comments: 1) | Luz Choque (Discussed changesets: 10) | Hola, hay varios cambios que retornaron al anterior que estaban mal... :(. nombres de operadores que estan escritos mal, PH en horarios del teleférico, los teleféricos no son buses :(, los colores inventados en los light_rail (no hay in... commented 2026-05-28 04:19:17 UTC by 5m4u9 ♦1,676 |
| 182068560 (Comments: 1) | stosh77 (Discussed changesets: 59) | I have corrected the details. commented 2026-05-28 03:55:45 UTC by stosh77 ♦63 |
| 182276747 (Comments: 1) | stosh77 (Discussed changesets: 59) | I have corrected the details. commented 2026-05-28 03:54:38 UTC by stosh77 ♦63 |
| 183282075 (Comments: 1) | okadatsuneo_import (Discussed changesets: 17) | 51347007 が正 commented 2026-05-28 02:41:38 UTC by okadatsuneo_import ♦20 |
| 183281883 (Comments: 1) | Mxdanger (Discussed changesets: 27) | Master edit can be found here https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183280765 commented 2026-05-28 02:30:35 UTC by Mxdanger ♦99 |
 | 170722666 (Comments: 1) | lx uae (Discussed changesets: 1) | Removed SEO spam brand=* tag and used more correct shop=* tag for Luxury Materials POI in changeset 183281918 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183281918 commented 2026-05-28 02:29:23 UTC by CAM-Gerlach ♦227 |
| 183280100 (Comments: 1) | idkwhatname2use (Discussed changesets: 84) | Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183281883 commented 2026-05-28 02:27:52 UTC by Mxdanger ♦99 |
| 168960293 (Comments: 1) | Skillfloor (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted SEO spammer adding many duplicate SEO POIs with many SEO spam/nonsense tags https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183281893 commented 2026-05-28 02:27:49 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦89 |
| 183280285 (Comments: 1) | idkwhatname2use (Discussed changesets: 84) | Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183281883 commented 2026-05-28 02:27:45 UTC by Mxdanger ♦99 |
| 169047704 (Comments: 1) | Murphi AI (Discussed changesets: 1) | Changeset 169067912 fixed the rest of the SEO spam; I fixed the invalid building=* tag in changeset 183281677 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169067912 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183281677 commented 2026-05-28 02:14:03 UTC by CAM-Gerlach ♦227 |
| 169059095 (Comments: 1) | Indian Coat (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted added SEO spam relation and POI with no useful tags, just name=* https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183281619 commented 2026-05-28 02:08:46 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦89 |
| 163410068 (Comments: 4) | brendan714 (Discussed changesets: 11) | I'm mapping around tomorrow so i'll make the correction. commented 2026-05-28 02:04:58 UTC by jfd553 ♦63 |
| 169057005 (Comments: 1) | Prettify Creative Innovation Pvt Ltd (Discussed changesets: 1) | Removed SEO spam description=* and used correct top-level tags for Prettify Creative in changeset 183281551 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183281551 commented 2026-05-28 02:04:46 UTC by CAM-Gerlach ♦227 |
| 183190093 (Comments: 1) | confusedbuffalo-bot (Discussed changesets: 14) | Partially Revert of 183176584 commented 2026-05-28 01:58:11 UTC by MappingMore ♦453 |
| 183237554 (Comments: 1) | Anton Owner (Discussed changesets: 1) | This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found. removed bad seo ed... commented 2026-05-28 01:54:00 UTC by Glassman ♦5,942 |
| 183236087 (Comments: 1) | Bropple (Discussed changesets: 1) | #TIP: house outlines should follow the roof line. Plus, if you select the outline then just type a "q" the building will be square. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/1832... commented 2026-05-28 01:48:42 UTC by Glassman ♦5,942 |
| 183233192 (Comments: 1) | Paprika_Campus (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183233192 commented 2026-05-28 01:46:11 UTC by Glassman ♦5,942 |
| 183233117 (Comments: 1) | Paprika_Campus (Discussed changesets: 2) | This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found. You removed the ro... commented 2026-05-28 01:45:14 UTC by Glassman ♦5,942 |
| 183232696 (Comments: 1) | Evan Slosser (Discussed changesets: 1) | #TIP: it is smart not lo leave any personal information. Unfortunately without deleting the edit, it is going to be there forever. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183232696 ... commented 2026-05-28 01:35:52 UTC by Glassman ♦5,942 |
| 183271818 (Comments: 1) | brianstrauch (Discussed changesets: 5) | #TIP: you removed a stand alone address node. It's good to leave address nodes so when a new business moves in it save the time to add the address. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/chan... commented 2026-05-28 01:34:02 UTC by Glassman ♦5,942 |
| 169101557 (Comments: 1) | user_5359 (Discussed changesets: 414) | Yup, as you surmised the location of the node was already incorrect and then they inexplicably changed the details for this Fort Collins, CO location to those of the Amarillo, TX location. I reverted this, moved the point to the correct location per ... commented 2026-05-28 00:47:30 UTC by CAM-Gerlach ♦227 |
| 169093153 (Comments: 1) | Two Men and a Truck Moving in Amarillo TX (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted POI address and details being changed to those of a different brand location in a complete other state, moved point to correct location per address and fixed other tags in changeset 183280371, and merged the relevant tags with the actual int... commented 2026-05-28 00:44:00 UTC by CAM-Gerlach ♦227 |
| 183086507 (Comments: 5) | Saamat (Discussed changesets: 5) | Ещё одна проблема в том, что названия изменены только на точках. В таком виде точно оставлять нельзя. Откачу на время обсуждения. commented 2026-05-28 00:24:31 UTC by mini-me ♦276 |
| 183077600 (Comments: 2) | Fidelis Assis (Discussed changesets: 44) | Está em discussão na comunidade brasileira uma nova regra para, primeiramente, valores de place de sedes municipais e distritais que vai levar em conta não apenas a população mas a hierarquia administrativa. Par... commented 2026-05-28 00:15:59 UTC by Fidelis Assis ♦43 |
| 183279106 (Comments: 3) | LordGarySugar (Discussed changesets: 33) | "A borderline case may be where a railway was dismantled and replaced with a road of the same geometry." This isnt even close to the current status of the ROW. Get a job man stop wasting your life editing all day for ur own sake. commented 2026-05-28 00:08:47 UTC by idkwhatname2use ♦15 |
| 183274605 (Comments: 2) | idkwhatname2use (Discussed changesets: 84) | Sure! commented 2026-05-27 23:59:08 UTC by idkwhatname2use ♦15 |
| 183263752 (Comments: 1) | mitchspicer (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hello, in this changeset you have created overlapping ways that cause routing issues. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183279436 commented 2026-05-27 23:48:17 UTC by cubbe8 ♦93 |
| 183273936 (Comments: 1) | mitchspicer (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hello, I see you are a new editor to OpenStreetMap. Unfortunately, I've had to revert this changeset as it is inconsistent with OSM guidelines. As seen on OSM wiki, roads that lead to a bus depot should be tagged highway=service + access=no + bu... commented 2026-05-27 23:45:36 UTC by cubbe8 ♦93 |
| 182940136 (Comments: 1) | mitchspicer (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hello, I see you are a new editor to OpenStreetMap. Unfortunately, I've had to revert this changeset as it is inconsistent with OSM guidelines. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183279202 commented 2026-05-27 23:40:56 UTC by cubbe8 ♦93 |
| 183273492 (Comments: 1) | mitchspicer (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hello, I see you are a new editor to OpenStreetMap. Unfortunately, I've had to revert this changeset as it is inconsistent with OSM guidelines. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183279202 commented 2026-05-27 23:40:56 UTC by cubbe8 ♦93 |
| 182365012 (Comments: 1) | idkwhatname2use (Discussed changesets: 84) | As this railway no longer exists, it should not be mapped in OSM. OHM is the best place for historic railways. commented 2026-05-27 23:22:35 UTC by LordGarySugar ♦268 |
| 183219415 (Comments: 2) | LAX_maps (Discussed changesets: 1) | you should probably watch every YouTube video about the keywords ""CAHSR is bad" (plus there is even the possibility that the whole rail line won't even exist because the train is going too fast at 220 mph) commented 2026-05-27 23:20:49 UTC by LAX_maps ♦1 |
| 183274204 (Comments: 1) | HaPe-CZ (Discussed changesets: 108) | Hi, this (and many of your recent) changesets use the signal prefix Cz-D1. Instead of Cs-D1, which was proposed by you, documented on wiki by you, and already widely established in Czechia by you. Why are you changing the tagging schema... commented 2026-05-27 23:14:20 UTC by detective-fiasco ♦43 |
| 169104056 (Comments: 1) | Futurism Technologies (Discussed changesets: 1) | Fixed dragged node and abbreviated addr:street=* and added more specific top-level tags in changeset 183278700 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183278700 commented 2026-05-27 23:11:16 UTC by CAM-Gerlach ♦227 |
 | 169109444 (Comments: 1) | Green Godawari Resort (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted apparent serious damage from SEO spammer vandalizing a variety of roads and relations https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183278566 commented 2026-05-27 23:05:01 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦89 |
| 169110256 (Comments: 1) | Green Godawari Resort (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted apparent serious damage from SEO spammer vandalizing a variety of roads and relations https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183278566 commented 2026-05-27 23:05:01 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦89 |
| 183278281 (Comments: 1) | T19B1K10T19B1 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ups, habe mich vertan. Meinte changeset/182176521 commented 2026-05-27 23:04:21 UTC by T19B1K10T19B1 ♦1 |
| 172566633 (Comments: 2) | THardi (Discussed changesets: 1) | Eigentlich muß es ja an der Navi Software liegen. Ich kenne in D keinen Kreisverkehr, wo eine Ausfahrt in Fahrtrichtung linksseitig von einem Kreisverkehr abbiegt! commented 2026-05-27 22:58:59 UTC by BrummsLee ♦55 |
| 169207547 (Comments: 5) | Anytime Anywhere Therapy (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks for actually responding to the bot and trying to fix this yourself. I removed the SEO spam image=* and description=* tags as well as redundant healthcare:speciality=* tagging (`psychotherapist` and `counselling` are primary `healthcare=*` tags... commented 2026-05-27 22:58:52 UTC by CAM-Gerlach ♦227 |
| 181965727 (Comments: 2) | bxl-forever (Discussed changesets: 178) | You are right. I saw an article in a newspaper today announcing that more than 80% of the retail space of all the 7 former malls has been reallocated, and promising that more shops are coming over the next months along with a renovation of those spa... commented 2026-05-27 22:51:39 UTC by bxl-forever ♦2,904 |
 | 169292185 (Comments: 1) | Bitkwa (Discussed changesets: 1) | Removed SEO spam image=* and fixed addr:housenumber=* and name=* in changeset 183278228 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183278228 commented 2026-05-27 22:49:37 UTC by CAM-Gerlach ♦227 |
| 182977108 (Comments: 1) | Ewen Hill (Discussed changesets: 90) | Hi, this mp is in error in a few respects. https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/20697791#map=15/-34.11386/141.02526 https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=141.03974&lat=-34.11004&zoom=14 commented 2026-05-27 22:46:35 UTC by nevw ♦2,226 |
| 183277947 (Comments: 1) | pesticides (Discussed changesets: 43) | The entire road has a shoulder, but it varies from 7' to less than 1'. In the absence of any guidance on the OSM wiki, I chose 4' as threshold for cycleway=shoulder. Per WSDOT, this is the minimum width of a shoulder that "facilit... commented 2026-05-27 22:42:23 UTC by pesticides ♦51 |
| 169574650 (Comments: 1) | Glassman (Discussed changesets: 80) | Thanks! I in changeset 183278028 removed the SEO spam description=* that was evidently accidentally left after this cleanup. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183278028 commented 2026-05-27 22:41:38 UTC by CAM-Gerlach ♦227 |
| 181046871 (Comments: 2) | Srdjan023 (Discussed changesets: 55) | Hi. Before commenting, you could have googled the source stated in the changeset. If you had, you would have seen that highways 260 and 261 were introduced in February 2026 (https://www.putevi-srbije.rs/images/pdf/referentni-sistem/Referentni_sistem_... commented 2026-05-27 22:40:01 UTC by Srdjan023 ♦44 |
| 169472515 (Comments: 4) | Landmark Roofing and Siding (Discussed changesets: 1) | Removed SEO spam description=* (that was evidently accidentally left after the previous cleanup) in changeset 183278028 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183278028 commented 2026-05-27 22:39:47 UTC by CAM-Gerlach ♦227 |
| 183133984 (Comments: 1) | EVolta (Discussed changesets: 4) | Is this only a shoes store? Please check the tag "ahop". commented 2026-05-27 22:36:07 UTC by ChrissW-R1 ♦424 |
 | 169698171 (Comments: 1) | Distillerie Mana'o (Discussed changesets: 1) | Fixed invalid opening hours and at least attempted to improve address tagging (still needs major fixes by someone who understands the local addressing scheme and conventions; there weren't enough local examples or street names to be able to dete... commented 2026-05-27 22:34:19 UTC by CAM-Gerlach ♦227 |
| 183274079 (Comments: 1) | idkwhatname2use (Discussed changesets: 84) | Zero remanence of the track left. This will be reverted. I recommend you use https://www.openhistoricalmap.org/ commented 2026-05-27 22:23:57 UTC by Mxdanger ♦99 |
| 183240020 (Comments: 6) | Michiel Duyvendak (Discussed changesets: 5) | Bedankt voor de aanpassingen. Doet recht aan de feitelijke situatie commented 2026-05-27 22:22:29 UTC by Michiel Duyvendak ♦5 |
| 183225107 (Comments: 3) | Locke1NZ (Discussed changesets: 2) | Das gibt dein immer genutztes "geändert" nicht her. -> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments#Beispiele commented 2026-05-27 22:20:36 UTC by Map-Peter ♦349 |
| 182230607 (Comments: 1) | Robuster (Discussed changesets: 14) | Hi, multipolygons cannot share outer sides. https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=149.11485&lat=-35.28397&zoom=19 commented 2026-05-27 22:12:47 UTC by nevw ♦2,226 |
| 183268649 (Comments: 2) | llazzar (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola Marc, he canviat de nou a `amenity=theatre`. Gràcies per la precisió, estava utilitzant malament l’etiqueta. Salut! commented 2026-05-27 22:08:39 UTC by llazzar ♦1 |
| X | 183275879 (Comments: 1) | Z3llmer (Discussed changesets: 10) | Maybe make smaller edits instead of a huge changeset. commented 2026-05-27 22:05:13 UTC by MapmakerrrJohn ♦5 |
| 182626834 (Comments: 2) | benglo67 (Discussed changesets: 1) | This is fixed now commented 2026-05-27 22:03:44 UTC by nevw ♦2,226 |
| 182009711 (Comments: 3) | Davie Dean (Discussed changesets: 26) | I have removed the invalid mp and changed to one simple polygon. commented 2026-05-27 22:01:09 UTC by nevw ♦2,226 |
| 107998761 (Comments: 1) | juhygf (Discussed changesets: 1) | it is 370m, where did you see 120? commented 2026-05-27 22:00:18 UTC by pasciakd ♦1 |
| 183199055 (Comments: 1) | capt_planet (Discussed changesets: 9) | https://osm.org/way/234317886 Which is the right surface? You added two tags with different values. commented 2026-05-27 21:57:52 UTC by ChrissW-R1 ♦424 |
 | 170234145 (Comments: 3) | Al_Sol (Discussed changesets: 1) | > Sve je točno. Ako mogu da posalim foto ili video - recite gdje. I didn't remove your POI or revert your changeset, I just did you a favor and fixed the name=* for you to remove SEO spam elements and be correct and acceptable on Open... commented 2026-05-27 21:57:01 UTC by CAM-Gerlach ♦227 |
| 183274017 (Comments: 1) | Callen Lynch (Discussed changesets: 1) | Please remember to add detailed changeset comments that help other mappers know what you added! commented 2026-05-27 21:56:45 UTC by ScrawnyMeowth1 ♦28 |
| 183257221 (Comments: 1) | Wanderstock24 (Discussed changesets: 3) | die Nummer war nicht überflüssig sondern ziemlich wahrscheinlich an dem Gebäudeeingang mit dieser Nummer. Überflüssig wäre entweder der komplette Node (sofern er keinen Eingang repräsentiert, anderenfalls sollte man... commented 2026-05-27 21:56:26 UTC by dieterdreist ♦903 |
| 183192676 (Comments: 1) | eduprojects (Discussed changesets: 1) | Please check https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Key:payment:* to enter the payment information. commented 2026-05-27 21:53:37 UTC by ChrissW-R1 ♦424 |
| 183230355 (Comments: 1) | Lorae (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Lorae, Thanks for helping add farmland and other landuse! A few tips for moving forward: Try not to attach landuse areas to non-landuse features like roads or boundaries. This makes it harder to edit the landuse in the future, becaus... commented 2026-05-27 21:51:01 UTC by ScrawnyMeowth1 ♦28 |
| 183246965 (Comments: 1) | Alexandre148025 (Discussed changesets: 66) | Bonjour, ce changeset a brisé la continuité d'un itinéraire pédestre qui passe par là. Je m'occupe de la réparation. commented 2026-05-27 21:17:18 UTC by StC ♦464 |
| 183256283 (Comments: 1) | Alexandre148025 (Discussed changesets: 66) | Bonjour, ce changeset a brisé la continuité d'un itinéraire pédestre qui passe par là. Je m'occupe de la réparation. commented 2026-05-27 21:15:30 UTC by StC ♦464 |
| 181144853 (Comments: 1) | pierre_geovelo (Discussed changesets: 37) | Bonjour Pierre, Même retour que sur le changeset suivant : changeset/181102794#map=15/43.12478/6.01819&layers=C Est-il possible de faire machine arrière et de repasser les chemins en 'highway=path' ? Merci <... commented 2026-05-27 21:11:19 UTC by enzo_immergis ♦35 |
| 183275552 (Comments: 1) | jvanheerikhuize (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-05-27 21:07:56 UTC by eggie ♦45,474 |
| 182545332 (Comments: 1) | pierre_geovelo (Discussed changesets: 37) | Salut Pierre, Merci pour la modif ! Quand tu fais des changements de géométrie sur les landuses avec "source=Union européenne - SOeS, CORINE Land Cover, 2006.", hésite pas supprimer la source et les tags a... commented 2026-05-27 21:05:46 UTC by enzo_immergis ♦35 |
| 183026369 (Comments: 1) | pierre_geovelo (Discussed changesets: 37) | Salut Pierre, Je crois que tu as créé un doublon, peux-tu corriger stp ? Merci d'avance Enzo node/9397553545 commented 2026-05-27 21:02:38 UTC by enzo_immergis ♦35 |
| 180986542 (Comments: 1) | pierre_geovelo (Discussed changesets: 37) | Bonjour Pierre, Même retour que sur le changeset suivant : https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181102794#map=15/43.12478/6.01819&layers=C Est-il possible de faire machine arrière et de repasser les chemins en 'high... commented 2026-05-27 20:57:20 UTC by enzo_immergis ♦35 |
| 181102794 (Comments: 7) | pierre_geovelo (Discussed changesets: 37) | Salut Simon ou Pierre, Est-il possible de faire machine arrière et de repasser les chemins en 'highway=path' ? Merci commented 2026-05-27 20:54:49 UTC by enzo_immergis ♦35 |
| 183249646 (Comments: 2) | wvdp (Discussed changesets: 156) | Teruggedraaid commented 2026-05-27 20:54:07 UTC by A67-A67 ♦1,134 |
| 183248934 (Comments: 2) | wvdp (Discussed changesets: 156) | Ik heb het ook gevraagd aan de oorspronkelijke mapper: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182513718 Ik hoop niet dat dit weer klakkeloos overnemen van iD-suggesties was... commented 2026-05-27 20:50:25 UTC by A67-A67 ♦1,134 |
| 182513718 (Comments: 1) | Tebon (Discussed changesets: 5) | Bedankt voor het toevoegen. Je geeft aan dat de vervoerder van Bravoflex Qarin is. Iemand anders heeft dat later veranderd naar Hermes, de concessiehouder. Ik twijfel of die wijziging wel betrouwbaar is. Is Qarin of Hermes de vervoerder van B... commented 2026-05-27 20:49:33 UTC by A67-A67 ♦1,134 |
| 9734218 (Comments: 1) | Richard (Discussed changesets: 54) | Hi Richard, this is about Way 135801510 where komoot just removed your note "open access land" Maybe you want to have a look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183205021 cheers commented 2026-05-27 20:43:23 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦4,057 |
| 183273589 (Comments: 1) | WieKo68 (Discussed changesets: 505) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Klucz addr:place oznacza brak nazwy ulicy. Kombinacja z addr:street (który definiuje nazwę ulicy) je... commented 2026-05-27 20:42:42 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦8,669 |
| 183212605 (Comments: 1) | Access Claims (komoot) (Discussed changesets: 70) | if we don't know what's allowed we don't set any access=* tags. A general "yes" allows everything. Don't do that if you don't know what's really allowed --- Publish... commented 2026-05-27 20:38:37 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦4,057 |
| 183227820 (Comments: 4) | shimmy-lilac (Discussed changesets: 1) | Danke, ja, das wird's wahrscheinlich gewesen sein. Ist tatsächlich potentiell verwirrend, dass das Suchfeld den selben Platz einnimmt wie die Preset-Auswahl. In dem Fall kann man übrigends einfach wieder zurück zum Objekt kommen i... commented 2026-05-27 20:29:26 UTC by tyr_asd ♦466 |
| 183140980 (Comments: 1) | -Romain- (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour, Le guidepost est plus sud (et n’est pas cartographié). L’information n’est pas sur le bon élément. Je vais corriger. commented 2026-05-27 20:27:09 UTC by Sébastien Pi ♦120 |
| 182817704 (Comments: 1) | Access Claims (komoot) (Discussed changesets: 70) | Why would you add horse=private when you ALREADY added access=private? Stop this! --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/182817704 commented 2026-05-27 20:21:27 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦4,057 |
| 183273120 (Comments: 1) | alxmg (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi :) I guess you simply wished to edit the opening hours of the hair dresser, right? It looks like you moved several nodes while moving the map around in edit mode. Some in London, some by Parma. I fixed those. You can av... commented 2026-05-27 20:10:59 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦4,057 |
| 182964617 (Comments: 1) | marceli123 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Każdy numer telefonu powinien zaczynać się od prefiksu +48. commented 2026-05-27 20:10:32 UTC by maro21 ♦878 |
| 183241252 (Comments: 1) | Fiszi37 (Discussed changesets: 11) | A jaką to robi różnicę? Nie na to samo wychodzi? commented 2026-05-27 20:09:59 UTC by maro21 ♦878 |
| 183201792 (Comments: 1) | AbuMavi (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thank you for adding the hotel to OpenStreetMap! Doing this will allow the hotel to appear in various apps and amenity searches. However: please choose to display the hotel as _either_ node 13882574456 OR way 604661067 - but not both. ... commented 2026-05-27 20:06:08 UTC by jayaddison ♦30 |
| 183270522 (Comments: 6) | vulcan_vulcan (Discussed changesets: 2) | Dat is dus de open vraag. Er zijn 3 visuele aanwijzingen (een bord met lane layout, stoplicht; pijlen voor rechtsaf en rondjes voor rechtdoor en links, pijlen op het wegdek) welke lane er moet worden gekozen om rechtdoor te gaan en toch kiest FSD con... commented 2026-05-27 20:00:26 UTC by vulcan_vulcan ♦1 |
| 182996359 (Comments: 2) | birdlawyer (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hello BerryTrails, thank you for reaching out! I downgraded this section of motorway to secondary because it has multiple at-grade intersections, which doesn’t match the global definition for a feature tagged as highway=motorway. Accordi... commented 2026-05-27 19:57:47 UTC by birdlawyer ♦20 |
| 182921477 (Comments: 3) | grzegorz75jan (Discussed changesets: 22) | Jest ok :) commented 2026-05-27 19:51:16 UTC by Tomasz Mleczek ♦4 |
| X | 183258530 (Comments: 2) | Lostmonkey (Discussed changesets: 38) | As I mention on the changeset deleting the stray node from this changeset that ended up in the US, I have no idea why it happened. I was editing a small area in Denmark and never left it (at least not in the visible editor window). commented 2026-05-27 19:48:10 UTC by Lostmonkey ♦143 |
| 183266154 (Comments: 3) | ayanbs (Discussed changesets: 2) | Very good, 'tracktype' is the most common but also quite coarse tag. If you want to add further details you might want to look into 'surface' and 'smoothness'. commented 2026-05-27 19:46:11 UTC by mueschel ♦7,146 |
| 182180865 (Comments: 1) | Popiel77726 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Cześć. Drogi które wrysowałeś w rejonie budowy OTO Park Lubin są do usunięcia. Trwa budowa i teren jest kompletnie przeobrażony. Zdjęcia według któryś rysowałeś są nieaktualne. commented 2026-05-27 19:42:20 UTC by marco406 ♦52 |
| 181329406 (Comments: 2) | b-jazz (Discussed changesets: 90) | Looks like it was part of https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180969802 and the other components of that "ecoregion" were deleted. This lingering way should have also be deleted, but was probably missed because they were only looking fo... commented 2026-05-27 19:28:29 UTC by b-jazz ♦873 |
| 183268340 (Comments: 2) | mathpaul (Discussed changesets: 3) | reverted by changeset #183271995 commented 2026-05-27 19:26:22 UTC by eggie ♦45,474 |
| 183270477 (Comments: 2) | vulcan_vulcan (Discussed changesets: 2) | reverted by changeset #183271874 commented 2026-05-27 19:23:30 UTC by eggie ♦45,474 |
| 183224446 (Comments: 4) | QuigleyJones (Discussed changesets: 18) | fix what? commented 2026-05-27 19:13:26 UTC by QuigleyJones ♦8 |
| 183212498 (Comments: 3) | ckruse (Discussed changesets: 2) | Danke für die flotte Rückmeldung. Weißt du, wie man eine Löschung rückgängig macht oder soll ich das für dich machen? commented 2026-05-27 19:12:20 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦4,057 |
| 159513788 (Comments: 3) | YacoobPL (Discussed changesets: 52) | no to przeznaczenie raczej dla unclassified, tertiary pełnią funkcję zbiorczą/rozprowadzającą commented 2026-05-27 19:00:25 UTC by puchaczowsky ♦159 |
| 183232720 (Comments: 2) | alexwohlbruck (Discussed changesets: 13) | These came from the county dataset, I'll filter these out commented 2026-05-27 18:56:11 UTC by alexwohlbruck ♦21 |
| 183253073 (Comments: 2) | Brennholzfahrer-de (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ja Kunden könnten bei mir auch Brennholz holen, jedoch ist das Lager nicht an dieser Adresse. Die NEU-Kunden kommen immer erstmal zu mir "Zum Toracker 15" und dann fahren wir zusammen zum Lager. Ich möchte nicht, dass das Lager &... commented 2026-05-27 18:45:45 UTC by Brennholzscout ♦1 |
| 183247884 (Comments: 2) | Chekushka (Discussed changesets: 3) | Reverted https://osm.org/changeset/183270462 commented 2026-05-27 18:44:05 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,503 |
| 183218449 (Comments: 2) | PlayzinhoAgro-imports (Discussed changesets: 47) | Fixed thanks commented 2026-05-27 18:36:30 UTC by Gustavo22Soares ♦73 |
| 182925033 (Comments: 1) | Taxi Końskie i okolice Hordieiev (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, what does "real_time_availability" mean? This tag is not used in any other place. Please use only tags that are described in the OSM Wiki or are available in the presets of your editor. This is necessary to make sure that e... commented 2026-05-27 18:35:16 UTC by mueschel ♦7,146 |
| 183090296 (Comments: 1) | Hogmite (Discussed changesets: 3) | Please check the spelling of keys: they should be in lower case without capital letters. E.g. 'position' instead of "Position" commented 2026-05-27 18:26:34 UTC by mueschel ♦7,146 |
| 183269105 (Comments: 1) | disneyritozx_ (Discussed changesets: 5) | HTML/iframe injection attempting JavaScript execution via OSM tag. Should be reverted. commented 2026-05-27 18:22:47 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦6,578 |
| 183269585 (Comments: 1) | disneyritozx_ (Discussed changesets: 5) | HTML/iframe injection attempting JavaScript execution via OSM tag. Should be reverted. commented 2026-05-27 18:22:29 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦6,578 |
| 183269460 (Comments: 1) | disneyritozx_ (Discussed changesets: 5) | pitscheplatsch\tHTML/iframe injection attempting JavaScript execution via OSM tag. Should be reverted. commented 2026-05-27 18:22:17 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦6,578 |
| 183201561 (Comments: 1) | DoloresReis (Discussed changesets: 24) | Reminder: Please check the tags before uploading. It's "water", not "walter". commented 2026-05-27 18:20:31 UTC by mueschel ♦7,146 |
| 183251746 (Comments: 2) | Drthunder (Discussed changesets: 1) | Afternoon - There is no road name...it's not even a road anymore.. I only put decommissioned to ensure someone had context that this was once a driveway for a building, but that building no longer exists. commented 2026-05-27 18:20:24 UTC by Drthunder ♦1 |
| 183200903 (Comments: 1) | tnnk-gis (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, something went wrong here. You added strange tags to hundreds of roads, e.g. alleyResourceId batch contributor process_id commented 2026-05-27 18:19:06 UTC by mueschel ♦7,146 |
| 183220114 (Comments: 3) | bhietsch (Discussed changesets: 24) | Yeah, I tried to capture as many of the alternates as possible but feel free to add more to alt_name as you see fit! commented 2026-05-27 18:17:25 UTC by bhietsch ♦69 |
| 183260181 (Comments: 1) | Equipo SEO Málaga (Discussed changesets: 1) | #Spam commented 2026-05-27 18:11:43 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦6,578 |
| 183085687 (Comments: 2) | Hetisbakkerijdepinknietdegier (Discussed changesets: 8) | I'm not sure what the tag means, as I am not the one who came up with it. I simply fixed the formatting of the tagging. First the tag was: "real_time_availability=yes" = "real_time_availability=yes" And I changed it to: &q... commented 2026-05-27 18:11:08 UTC by Hetisbakkerijdepinknietdegier ♦5 |
| 183269076 (Comments: 1) | disneyritozx_ (Discussed changesets: 5) | HTML/iframe injection attempting JavaScript execution via OSM tag. Should be reverted. commented 2026-05-27 18:08:58 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦6,578 |
| 183268411 (Comments: 1) | disneyritozx_ (Discussed changesets: 5) | HTML/iframe injection attempting JavaScript execution via OSM tag. Should be reverted. commented 2026-05-27 18:08:43 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦6,578 |
| 183248945 (Comments: 1) | minamo (Discussed changesets: 21) | Hi, Went to read your past history communications to you. The German speaking sector was unhappy with you and a series of reverts took place of items you deleted particularly which exist both in Bing of whatever image tile date is on OSM and 2... commented 2026-05-27 18:04:23 UTC by SekeRob ♦1,501 |
| 183151171 (Comments: 4) | even666 (Discussed changesets: 18) | Einen Teil deiner Änderungen habe ich mit https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183268433 retten können commented 2026-05-27 17:55:56 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,495 |
| 183132655 (Comments: 4) | User54234 (Discussed changesets: 1) | ill look closer next time thanks. commented 2026-05-27 17:55:01 UTC by User54234 ♦1 |
| 183264969 (Comments: 3) | nighter_watch (Discussed changesets: 3) | Here ai already delete some of them. because of tha you dont see them. commented 2026-05-27 17:47:43 UTC by rarad74 ♦508 |
| 183141603 (Comments: 2) | raccoss (Discussed changesets: 10) | Ciao Ivo, mi spiace che tu abbia preso questo changeset come un attacco personale al notevole lavoro di manutenzione sentieri che credo che tu faccia in Val d'Ala con la tua sezione e che in sporadiche occasioni ho provato a fare anche io. |
| 182354817 (Comments: 3) | VLD317 (Discussed changesets: 17) | Hi HLD317. This discussion was scattered across a number of interactions between individual mappers, however I was recommended to forward you to this thread on the OSMUS Slack team (https://osmus.slack.com/archives/C6E4S4CQG/p1777661542940159?... commented 2026-05-27 17:42:13 UTC by NE_SwampYankee ♦3 |
| 183264743 (Comments: 4) | nighter_watch (Discussed changesets: 3) | There are trwo options. I will try a revert for the entire changeset, or if you have time, based on esri standard imagery delete all tracks that not exist anymore. Track in most of times are not permanent roads. Many of them are temporar agricultural... commented 2026-05-27 17:39:05 UTC by rarad74 ♦508 |
| 183263225 (Comments: 4) | Pete Owens (Discussed changesets: 123) | I guess we’ll have to see what happens when all work is complete. Perhaps it would be worth adding bicycle=yes to the road, and adding a barrier= node in the appropriate place describing how the road is blocked, to make it clearer the re... commented 2026-05-27 17:35:46 UTC by gurglypipe ♦1,053 |
| 183092361 (Comments: 1) | AnthonyG3124 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hey, why did you add a "Future I-11" designation to this portion of US 95? There aren't any signs alongside this portion of US 95 that indicate that this portion of US 95 is part of Future I-11. commented 2026-05-27 17:33:36 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦248 |
| 183219554 (Comments: 6) | RowanP (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks for updating the tagging again and for your explanation. The tagging of the track/path looks correct to me now. Perhaps one approach would be to add some more detail to the map to make it clear why people shouldn’t go up Garth Row... commented 2026-05-27 17:32:53 UTC by gurglypipe ♦1,053 |
| 167420543 (Comments: 1) | taxi301 (Discussed changesets: 126) | At https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/206978360 landuse=recreation_ground was still better than your changed 'residential'. Anyway, I would suggest leisure=resort instead. You added tourism=hotel, which is good too. commented 2026-05-27 17:17:11 UTC by aceman444 ♦2,906 |
 | 183103653 (Comments: 1) | hyasat (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in changeset id:183266444 commented 2026-05-27 17:05:20 UTC by MappingMore ♦453 |
| 183212874 (Comments: 1) | ckruse (Discussed changesets: 2) | Und nochmal ich, dieser Weg wurde erst vor Kurzem von einem zuverlässigen Mapper in die Datenbank eingetragen. Auch auf dem Digitalen Höhenmodell von NRW (DTM Hillshade) ist ein gut ausgebauter Feld/Waldweg zu erkennen. Warum ... commented 2026-05-27 16:57:26 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦4,057 |
| 183266057 (Comments: 1) | baprischka (Discussed changesets: 17) | *quasi finita commented 2026-05-27 16:55:09 UTC by baprischka ♦40 |
| 183152089 (Comments: 2) | Geocrest (Discussed changesets: 6) | Resolved by a local editor in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183263225 commented 2026-05-27 16:53:21 UTC by gurglypipe ♦1,053 |
| 183153871 (Comments: 2) | Cliffmap (Discussed changesets: 2) | Resolved by a local editor in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183263225 commented 2026-05-27 16:53:09 UTC by gurglypipe ♦1,053 |
| 183216892 (Comments: 1) | JakobD029 (Discussed changesets: 9) | Moin das, was du hier erfasst hast, sieht aktuell wie ein Bahnhof mit Betrieb aus. Wenn ich mir die vorhandenen Bilder (Luft, WikiCommons) ansehe, dann sehe ich hier keinen Bahnbetrieb. Alles, was hier ungenutzt ist (station, pla... commented 2026-05-27 16:48:25 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦4,057 |
| 67515314 (Comments: 2) | Martin2035 (Discussed changesets: 24) | ahoj, to je spíš omyl. commented 2026-05-27 16:47:50 UTC by Martin2035 ♦24 |
| 183265679 (Comments: 1) | hoserab (Discussed changesets: 47) | Whoops, sorry; not that changeset, this changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183190762 commented 2026-05-27 16:46:02 UTC by hoserab ♦234 |
| 182987151 (Comments: 2) | MountMapper (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hi, as you didnt respond to this report MapBox hat to fix this in this changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183258000 Please be more careful. Flo commented 2026-05-27 16:40:02 UTC by flohoff ♦2,478 |
| 183139641 (Comments: 1) | confusedbuffalo-bot (Discussed changesets: 14) | Partially Revert of 183094923 commented 2026-05-27 16:30:18 UTC by MappingMore ♦453 |
| X | 183230854 (Comments: 2) | Izzybolu (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thank you Jack for the spot-on. I will ensure that going forward. commented 2026-05-27 16:26:52 UTC by Izzybolu ♦1 |
| 171626900 (Comments: 2) | ramthelinefeed (Discussed changesets: 58) | I must can't remember exactly - I vaguely recall the path would need a site visit to figure out exactly where it all goes... commented 2026-05-27 16:24:58 UTC by ramthelinefeed ♦82 |
| 183258852 (Comments: 1) | Agnieszka Grabowicz (Discussed changesets: 2) | 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap! Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulic... commented 2026-05-27 16:22:54 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦8,669 |
| 183260974 (Comments: 1) | WieKo68 (Discussed changesets: 505) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Klucz addr:place oznacza brak nazwy ulicy. Kombinacja z addr:street (który definiuje nazwę ulicy) je... commented 2026-05-27 16:22:51 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦8,669 |
| 183165546 (Comments: 2) | Catonif (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi! Thanks for the heads up, and sorry for the mess. I indeed noted the discrepancy and was wondering on which imagery to rely on, assumed Bing was superior since it was the first of the list. Thanks for the links to the wiki, that is a good read.... commented 2026-05-27 16:22:43 UTC by Catonif ♦1 |
 | 139403803 (Comments: 3) | Friniate (Discussed changesets: 1) | Never mind. "Sacrie" could also be a German toponym (it's difficult to tell sometimes because Austrian authorities used both Italian and German in this area, but the "Z" becoming "S" is an indicator), I've put ... commented 2026-05-27 16:00:30 UTC by Friniate ♦2 |
| 183025050 (Comments: 1) | Реdактор (Discussed changesets: 21) | Вы отмечаете придомовую территорию отдельного дома через landuse=allotments, но объекты землепользования не определяются на таком микроуровне. ... commented 2026-05-27 15:50:21 UTC by alexey_zakharenkov ♦248 |
 | 5059789 (Comments: 7) | webrian (Discussed changesets: 4) | Yes, these seem to be the correct names. Thanks for the explanation. commented 2026-05-27 15:45:35 UTC by solenoid jam ♦196 |
| 179967366 (Comments: 2) | Windsor Essex Strong Towns (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thank you for the comment! Thats a great idea thank you! I haven't done much detailed editing in sandwhich yet but eventually I will go over the town in detail to clean it up and get everything to current OSM standards. I think what you did is p... commented 2026-05-27 15:45:26 UTC by Windsor Essex Strong Towns ♦2 |
| 183122922 (Comments: 1) | Реdактор (Discussed changesets: 21) | Вы удалили множество полигонов landuse=residential и нарисовали landuse=orchard на месте придомовых участков. Но это тег не для таких садов, а местность ... commented 2026-05-27 15:31:53 UTC by alexey_zakharenkov ♦248 |
| 182359592 (Comments: 2) | mittens_unofficial (Discussed changesets: 1) | Of course pedestrians... commented 2026-05-27 15:03:30 UTC by kukuk ♦5 |
| 183221114 (Comments: 6) | camperplaats Uden Maashorst (Discussed changesets: 1) | Prive visvijvers krijgen ook gewoon de tag leisure=fishing (geeft een pictogram) en dan access=private. Dan zie je het pictogram iets vager. commented 2026-05-27 14:43:26 UTC by eggie ♦45,474 |
| 162355968 (Comments: 2) | Đuro Jiří (Discussed changesets: 95) | shop Mobilepoint still exists. commented 2026-05-27 14:40:47 UTC by Jpraga ♦1 |
| 182688076 (Comments: 1) | bahnpirat (Discussed changesets: 72) | Hallo, du hast das voltage tag der Nord-Süd-Leitung von 0;0 auf 380000 geändert. Sowohl das nördliche, als auch das südliche Ende sind, wenn man Straßenfotos aus dem Jahre 2025 heranzieht, nicht mit dem übrigen Leitungs... commented 2026-05-27 14:22:02 UTC by _klaas_ ♦32 |
| 174607125 (Comments: 2) | Ziemowit Zabawa (Discussed changesets: 19) | Nigdy nie byłem w Kielcach, tutejsze kategorie dróg koło S74 i Galerii Echo poprawiałem bo (nawet nie pamiętam jak) "zabłądziłem", ale dzięki za podesłanie uwag, były dość proste do rozwiązania: https://osm.wiki/Pl:Hi... commented 2026-05-27 14:00:29 UTC by Ziemowit Zabawa ♦40 |
| 181726183 (Comments: 4) | Illio (Discussed changesets: 52) | Zmenené na barrier=handrail. commented 2026-05-27 13:58:20 UTC by Illio ♦94 |
| 181815927 (Comments: 9) | Nazom (Discussed changesets: 7) | Ich habe von Statistik Austria zurückgehört und habe einen Forum-Eintrag dazu gemacht. Ich habe spezifisch Daten von (https://www.statistik.at/statistiken/bevoelkerung-und-soziales/bevoelkerung/bevoelkerungsstand/bevoelkerung-zu-jahres-/-qu... commented 2026-05-27 13:44:33 UTC by Nazom ♦2 |
| X | 183215281 (Comments: 3) | ❤️🔥 (Discussed changesets: 142) | No worries, I just keep an eye on osmcha for changesets with my editor in case of any issues commented 2026-05-27 13:36:36 UTC by confusedbuffalo ♦379 |
| 183058296 (Comments: 1) | avi32 (Discussed changesets: 29) | Добрый день https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/20752576 В таких случаях надо делать мультиполигон, потому как просто две линии с тегом place - это два насе... commented 2026-05-27 13:25:33 UTC by mini-me ♦276 |
| 159569598 (Comments: 2) | astradotblue (Discussed changesets: 3) | I have updated the name, it is Mountain Warehouse and I'm actually unsure how I managed to type hardware, thanks for noticing :) commented 2026-05-27 13:25:12 UTC by astradotblue ♦4 |
| 182946765 (Comments: 2) | WieKo68 (Discussed changesets: 505) | poprawione commented 2026-05-27 13:24:18 UTC by WieKo68 ♦202 |
| 183017048 (Comments: 2) | WieKo68 (Discussed changesets: 505) | poprawiono commented 2026-05-27 13:23:24 UTC by WieKo68 ♦202 |
| 183016597 (Comments: 2) | WieKo68 (Discussed changesets: 505) | poprawione commented 2026-05-27 13:21:56 UTC by WieKo68 ♦202 |
| 183042911 (Comments: 2) | WieKo68 (Discussed changesets: 505) | poprawiono commented 2026-05-27 13:20:07 UTC by WieKo68 ♦202 |
| 183176673 (Comments: 2) | WieKo68 (Discussed changesets: 505) | poprawiono commented 2026-05-27 13:17:53 UTC by WieKo68 ♦202 |
| 183215633 (Comments: 2) | WieKo68 (Discussed changesets: 505) | poprawiono commented 2026-05-27 13:17:09 UTC by WieKo68 ♦202 |
| 183215027 (Comments: 2) | WieKo68 (Discussed changesets: 505) | poprawiono commented 2026-05-27 13:16:32 UTC by WieKo68 ♦202 |
| 183230256 (Comments: 2) | WieKo68 (Discussed changesets: 505) | poprawiono commented 2026-05-27 13:15:52 UTC by WieKo68 ♦202 |
| 182561440 (Comments: 1) | 111Alpha (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo 111Alpha, Ich hab diese Änderung am Sendlinger Tor Platz größtenteils wieder zurückgesetzt. In OpenStreetMap werden Radstreifen und Busspuren nicht als eigene Linie, sondern als Attribut an der Straße eingezeic... commented 2026-05-27 13:12:35 UTC by map per ♦1,323 |
 | 183192849 (Comments: 2) | JFL-75 (Discussed changesets: 13) | Hi Fran S, Good point, thanks for your remark. Best regards. jfl commented 2026-05-27 13:08:21 UTC by JFL-75 ♦8 |
 | 183221294 (Comments: 1) | Williamsbond (Discussed changesets: 2) | Siguiendo las buenas practicas, los nombres no se abrevian. "Cont." no va, va "Continuación". Ver https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Nombres#Abreviaturas_(no_hacer_esto) commented 2026-05-27 13:08:14 UTC by muralito ♦2,151 |
| 183221652 (Comments: 1) | Williamsbond (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hola Williamsbond. Gracias por los aportes. En referencia a lo que nombraste como "Pasillo complejo de viviendas", en el nombre (etiqueta "name") va solo el nombre del elemento si es que lo tiene, no van textos descriptivos. Los t... commented 2026-05-27 13:04:40 UTC by muralito ♦2,151 |
| 183253438 (Comments: 1) | justupdate4p (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hiya, welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for trying to improve the map in your area :) I’ve tweaked your changes because I think what was here was tagged correctly already. access=no on the bridge should mark it as out of use (to vehicl... commented 2026-05-27 12:58:54 UTC by gurglypipe ♦1,053 |
| 183154574 (Comments: 1) | Maksim Hradaboyeu (Discussed changesets: 30) | Connected ways according to Mapbox Satellite;Bing Maps Aerial and OSMWiki #mapbox_linters commented 2026-05-27 12:52:46 UTC by Maksim Hradaboyeu ♦31 |
| 182954769 (Comments: 4) | MrLocalFixer (Discussed changesets: 3) | (And btw the 'square' option does not make perfect squares, it makes all angles 90° that are close to it - try it!) commented 2026-05-27 12:44:01 UTC by Seyruun ♦21 |
| 183106935 (Comments: 5) | Mikolaj1332 (Discussed changesets: 9) | Wygląda w porządku. Dzięki za poprawki! commented 2026-05-27 12:38:37 UTC by NieWnen ♦1,281 |
| 183246445 (Comments: 10) | Steef Zuid (Discussed changesets: 2) | Het nieuwe traject staat nog wel op foot=no Geen idee of dat nog klopt? commented 2026-05-27 12:31:15 UTC by eggie ♦45,474 |
| 183248363 (Comments: 7) | neosalicious (Discussed changesets: 3) | Goeie toevoeging als in scherp opgemerkt commented 2026-05-27 12:28:24 UTC by neosalicious ♦2 |
| 179686397 (Comments: 1) | Sahar Mustafa 2025 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hello. Thanks for mapping. Please do not cluster buildings. See this building. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1487590168/history#map=19/15.310371/32.539528 This are 7 buildings. Best regards commented 2026-05-27 12:24:05 UTC by Frans S ♦10,673 |
| 183252641 (Comments: 3) | Steef Zuid (Discussed changesets: 2) | Oh super, weer wat geleerd! commented 2026-05-27 12:21:49 UTC by Steef Zuid ♦2 |
| 183204334 (Comments: 2) | biologeek (Discussed changesets: 11) | 🙏 je ne l'avais pas vu sur Vespucci commented 2026-05-27 12:16:42 UTC by biologeek ♦2 |
| 179074752 (Comments: 2) | ⇄ john paul jones & gringo (Discussed changesets: 23) | 'elaborate' Well, I'll try. Shoe Zone is the name of this shop, it still says Shoe Zone above the shop but the shop is empty. It is tagged as branch=closed but I added closed to the name tag 'Shoe Zone (Closed)' so as to be c... commented 2026-05-27 11:59:36 UTC by ⇄ john paul jones & gringo ♦28 |
| 183192072 (Comments: 1) | Hanzy902 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap. Checking with a local is fine, however using OS Maps is not unless they are out of copyright or licensed under the Open Government Licence. There's an OSM-compatible site which lets you check public rig... commented 2026-05-27 11:56:52 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,840 |
| 181628654 (Comments: 4) | osmviborg (Discussed changesets: 359) | Hvilken "kamp"? commented 2026-05-27 11:55:08 UTC by cyclist789 ♦65 |
| 183034093 (Comments: 1) | Geocrest (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hi, I don't agree with this changeset. These highways are "residential". Thanks for the correction. commented 2026-05-27 11:54:57 UTC by Rom1 ♦408 |
| 179742321 (Comments: 2) | liljaadeliina (Discussed changesets: 88) | Taisin poistaa ne epähuomiossa, anteeksi. commented 2026-05-27 11:40:22 UTC by liljaadeliina ♦71 |
| 172641042 (Comments: 3) | liljaadeliina (Discussed changesets: 88) | Tarkoitin talviuinti paikkaa, korjaan sen kartalle, jos joku muu ei ehdi ensin / ole jo lisännyt sitä, siinä tapauksessa poistan tuon toisen. commented 2026-05-27 11:39:04 UTC by liljaadeliina ♦71 |
| 183197797 (Comments: 3) | Car Tographer (Discussed changesets: 4) | I believe I have fixed this now. Will check back when geofabrik's inspector updates itself. commented 2026-05-27 11:38:36 UTC by Car Tographer ♦3 |
| 181397263 (Comments: 2) | liljaadeliina (Discussed changesets: 88) | Hei Unohdin tuon, kun kartoitin karttaa, kiitos kun muistutit. Olen tarkempi tulevaisuudessa. commented 2026-05-27 11:37:11 UTC by liljaadeliina ♦71 |
| 156995693 (Comments: 4) | catgirlseraid (Discussed changesets: 39) | open to interpretation! I'm thinking about possibly changing it, but am unsure as it's kind of recognisable now commented 2026-05-27 11:36:28 UTC by catgirlseraid ♦55 |
| 182695637 (Comments: 2) | liljaadeliina (Discussed changesets: 88) | Hei Kiitos paljon tiedosta. Tulkitsin wikia itse eri tavalla. commented 2026-05-27 11:35:35 UTC by liljaadeliina ♦71 |
| 180336186 (Comments: 2) | liljaadeliina (Discussed changesets: 88) | Hello Thank you for the feedback and I'm sorry / you're correct I shouldn't have added the access tags without being extra sure. commented 2026-05-27 11:34:29 UTC by liljaadeliina ♦71 |
| 182460256 (Comments: 1) | Ufones de Aliste (Discussed changesets: 18) | Hola Ufones de Aliste, la travesía de Garray se cedió al ayuntamiento en el año 2019 como se refleja en este conjunto de cambios https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/110276508 Puedes consultarlo en el Catálogo Ofi... commented 2026-05-27 11:32:09 UTC by MarinoBM ♦153 |
| 183155719 (Comments: 5) | luky89 (Discussed changesets: 7) | vďaka commented 2026-05-27 11:29:14 UTC by luky89 ♦6 |
 | 154295095 (Comments: 1) | IvarioLV (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hi, Just to let you know `access=permit` on OSM means that anyone from public can acquire such a permit. In other words, military areas and most private locations are never `permit` but `private` or `no`. commented 2026-05-27 11:11:53 UTC by HellMap ♦901 |
| 183210854 (Comments: 3) | BholeKiBhasam (Discussed changesets: 42) | Thanks for the explanation. If you do think you can determine it from aerial imagery then that's fine, I mostly just wanted to see if there was a way it was determined or if it was just picked from a preset. commented 2026-05-27 11:08:40 UTC by fortera_au ♦1,543 |
| 183245608 (Comments: 2) | Kookykooky (Discussed changesets: 75) | I rolled back this edit - the roads were tagged correctly. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183249879 commented 2026-05-27 11:01:45 UTC by Marek-M ♦1,053 |
| 112679777 (Comments: 1) | geri4you (Discussed changesets: 9) | Servus, darf ich Dich fragen, ob Du bei https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5254513 etwas beitragen kannst? commented 2026-05-27 11:00:49 UTC by kuhni74 ♦451 |
 | 183053235 (Comments: 2) | APneunzehn74 (Discussed changesets: 37) | Hey, thanks for pointing that out. I’ve corrected it—`mtb:scale=1` is correct, at least in my assessment. There is quite a bit of loose, somewhat coarser material lying around in several spots there. commented 2026-05-27 10:57:49 UTC by APneunzehn74 ♦163 |
| 183166757 (Comments: 2) | userrg (Discussed changesets: 3) | I had initially marked the bridge as open because I thought it was already accessible - I passed nearby by bicycle and mistakenly assumed it was open. I just checked again and saw that you've already corrected it back to closed. Thanks for takin... commented 2026-05-27 10:56:10 UTC by userrg ♦2 |
| 183204453 (Comments: 1) | World_Winner (Discussed changesets: 30) | Hi! The mapbox satellite imagery is outdated/inprecise in this area. The geometry was carefully aligned using official geodesic data. I will revert. In Quebec, please ask before realigning roads. Thanks and have a nice day! commented 2026-05-27 10:45:55 UTC by ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy ♦484 |
| 182635922 (Comments: 1) | natejw (Discussed changesets: 3) | in this one, you're mapping for the renderer: a name "oval" is not useful to maps, we know it's an oval as it's tagged as one. Since SICG has not officially released a name for it, we leave it blank. For example, the Year 7/8... commented 2026-05-27 10:42:22 UTC by LittleJimmyR ♦3 |
| 183217381 (Comments: 2) | AMureika (Discussed changesets: 2) | There is asphalt all the way now too. I updated the surface. The closed road/local traffic only sign is still there between Coteau-du-Trèfle Sud and Salaberry. I added a note. commented 2026-05-27 10:36:39 UTC by ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy ♦484 |
| 173487303 (Comments: 2) | xcazin (Discussed changesets: 4) | Salut @MatthieuMartin, Le principe est de dissocier les POI des chemins qu'ils occupent, en anticipation d'un éventuel déménagement ou simplement d'une fermeture de la boutique en question. Je me concentre sur l... commented 2026-05-27 10:33:25 UTC by xcazin ♦4 |
| 182807703 (Comments: 1) | natejw (Discussed changesets: 3) | rather than ref=, this should be tagged as local_ref= :) also, just the number is sufficient --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/182807703 commented 2026-05-27 10:27:38 UTC by LittleJimmyR ♦3 |
| 183001774 (Comments: 3) | Spanwar_lyft (Discussed changesets: 1) | OK, perfect, thanks! commented 2026-05-27 10:25:29 UTC by ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy ♦484 |
| 153873849 (Comments: 1) | whammo (Discussed changesets: 78) | what does the tag "fixme:atp" signify? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153873849 commented 2026-05-27 10:23:40 UTC by Kovirii ♦51 |
| 182226388 (Comments: 1) | natejw (Discussed changesets: 3) | hey mate - good start :) just want to note that you should use official names of buildings. eg, rather than "Food Tech", you might want to label as "MacKillop Centre" (Both the new, and the old building are the MacKillop C... commented 2026-05-27 10:22:49 UTC by LittleJimmyR ♦3 |
| 183244509 (Comments: 1) | marceli123 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna.... commented 2026-05-27 10:22:17 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦8,669 |
| 183112688 (Comments: 1) | WWSS (Discussed changesets: 27) | 請在你的變更集加上來源，JOSM可以記錄相關的套疊底圖，請記得用符合開放授權的底圖來描繪 --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183112688 ... commented 2026-05-27 10:15:00 UTC by Supaplex ♦11,300 |
| 183115935 (Comments: 1) | WWSS (Discussed changesets: 27) | 請在你的變更集加上來源，JOSM可以記錄相關的套疊底圖，請記得用符合開放授權的底圖來描繪 --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183115935 ... commented 2026-05-27 10:13:32 UTC by Supaplex ♦11,300 |
| 183245915 (Comments: 1) | De Streekzaak (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OSM.. Ale format is in het UK English. Wanneer je deze tool gebruikt en de openingstijden invult krijg je wel de goede format. openingsuren-tool http://projets.pavie.info/yohours/ MVG eggie commented 2026-05-27 10:11:16 UTC by eggie ♦45,474 |
| 183129812 (Comments: 1) | calyptcs (Discussed changesets: 2) | Partially reverted in changeset id:183247323 commented 2026-05-27 10:02:29 UTC by MappingMore ♦453 |
| 180131409 (Comments: 3) | Rainero (Discussed changesets: 110) | Hello, Rainer! Thank you so much for your clarification, it's much appreciated. Best regards, Liudmila. commented 2026-05-27 10:00:37 UTC by LiudmilaBareika ♦6 |
| 181336537 (Comments: 4) | sifila29 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Yes, the one located right next to Aldi is the one run by Aldi. commented 2026-05-27 09:42:44 UTC by sifila29 ♦2 |
| 183158663 (Comments: 1) | D8729 (Discussed changesets: 1) | בבקשה לא לשנות סתם שמות של מקומות commented 2026-05-27 09:37:04 UTC by hatul ♦463 |
| 183221079 (Comments: 1) | bxl-forever_repair (Discussed changesets: 26) | Partially Revert of 183091709 commented 2026-05-27 09:32:46 UTC by MappingMore ♦453 |
| 183209362 (Comments: 1) | Rodrigo Riveros (Discussed changesets: 1) | Estimado buenos días, el cambio ha sido revertido ya que no sigue las buenas prácticas de mapeo al ser algo temporal. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Don't_map_temporary_events_and_temporary_features Cualquier ... commented 2026-05-27 09:28:56 UTC by guillemmal ♦54 |
| 182918530 (Comments: 3) | SurlyRider (Discussed changesets: 9) | Hallo Sven, bei der Elbstraße (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/29735636) handelt es sich um eine vollständige Einbahnstraße. Keine Freigabe für Radverkehr. Richtig ist: Am Beginn der Elbstraße an der Einmündu... commented 2026-05-27 09:26:29 UTC by SurlyRider ♦14 |
| 183139124 (Comments: 1) | luky89 (Discussed changesets: 7) | Znovu nesprávna a duplicitná adresa. commented 2026-05-27 09:22:34 UTC by Dodko ♦1,347 |
| 182044089 (Comments: 3) | Evoluxe (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, perhaps, you could upload your photo on https://panoramax.openstreetmap.fr/ ? Thanks commented 2026-05-27 09:18:06 UTC by Rom1 ♦408 |
| 182943586 (Comments: 2) | Nazom (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hallo, das Thema am besten zentral in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181815927 weiter besprechen, danke commented 2026-05-27 09:16:26 UTC by PPete2 ♦158 |
| 173685744 (Comments: 3) | Fred_OSM (Discussed changesets: 7) | it seems few more are affected: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/2qGn commented 2026-05-27 08:57:56 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,901 |
| 168716877 (Comments: 1) | E2va (Discussed changesets: 1) | не балуйтесь commented 2026-05-27 08:50:40 UTC by literan ♦7,113 |
| 183214335 (Comments: 1) | Carlo55 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Ciao Carlo Il tag NAME va utilizzato solo per indicare il nome proprio di un oggetto, non la descrizione. Va quindi bene il nome dell'agriturismo o quello di una via, ma non è corretto usarlo per indicazioni generiche come "cister... commented 2026-05-27 08:33:36 UTC by dp7 ♦88 |
| 183065707 (Comments: 3) | Vasilix (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ok, stavio sam da je loc_name=Pružatovačka, a name=Pružatovac, pa smo pokrili obe varijante. commented 2026-05-27 08:24:18 UTC by MaliMrav ♦82 |
| 183199591 (Comments: 2) | René888 (Discussed changesets: 2) | OK, ďakujem za opravu. commented 2026-05-27 08:21:07 UTC by René888 ♦1 |
| 182935406 (Comments: 1) | Matthew Hostak (Discussed changesets: 40) | Čo sa týka toho okolia stanice Vrakuňa, naozaj ste to robili podľa survey? Lebo ja som to pred vami aktualizoval podľa fotiek čo som urobil 30. 3.: https://imgur.com/a/UrWB3d0 No vyzerá že ste moje zmeny viac menej v... commented 2026-05-27 08:10:12 UTC by EfreetSK ♦23 |
| 183196251 (Comments: 4) | kartoittaa (Discussed changesets: 3) | Ei hätää, ymmärrettävä juttu! Kiitos vastauksesta sekä tekemästäsi palautuksesta. commented 2026-05-27 08:01:32 UTC by lankapuhelin ♦96 |
| 181855239 (Comments: 1) | Kelvin Ryanta (Discussed changesets: 1) | nama jalan hanya berikan nama saja, tidak boleh alamat lengkap commented 2026-05-27 07:53:03 UTC by FajrAl ♦367 |
| 183058883 (Comments: 8) | neo-plan (Discussed changesets: 188) | так все же, что за знаки стоят на этих водоемах? Может быть, такие? https://ptk53.ru/znak-f07-pozharnyj-vodoistochnik commented 2026-05-27 07:42:20 UTC by literan ♦7,113 |
| 182533135 (Comments: 1) | Tech Dec (Discussed changesets: 48) | Hi, outer ways cannot share segments in multipolygons. This would need to be drawn as simple polygons. https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=153.29334&lat=-27.58593&zoom=19 commented 2026-05-27 07:35:13 UTC by nevw ♦2,226 |
| 181702304 (Comments: 4) | C Batenburg (Discussed changesets: 48) | Hoi, Denk dat het zo wel weer klopt. Ik heb dat ooit zelf gemapt, maar soms verandert er natuurlijk wel eens wat. Het westelijk deel is een G11 fietspad en het oostelijkdeel is een bromfietspad G12a met een onderbord uitgezonderd bestemming... commented 2026-05-27 07:23:39 UTC by eggie ♦45,474 |
 | 141737659 (Comments: 4) | WalkerB (Discussed changesets: 8) | Good morning Enock4Seth, I was wondering if you had a chance to review my inputs and tell me where I was going wrong? I want to make sure my edits are in line with the Ghanian OSM community standards commented 2026-05-27 07:21:10 UTC by WalkerB ♦83 |
| 181567990 (Comments: 4) | C Batenburg (Discussed changesets: 48) | Oke, maar emergency_access is nu verwarrend, want als je de paal niet kunt passeren is dat onmogelijk.. Ik maak er weer even fixed van en zet er een note bij dat de paal vastgeroest zit. commented 2026-05-27 07:13:03 UTC by eggie ♦45,474 |
| 183240354 (Comments: 1) | andrzej-pl (Discussed changesets: 25) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13887110989 Pozdrawia... commented 2026-05-27 07:11:23 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦8,669 |
| 177410762 (Comments: 3) | C Batenburg (Discussed changesets: 48) | Hoi.. yep.. motor_vehicle is een soort van default muv mope en mofa. Tag je het wel dan routeer het niet voor moped en mofa. Groet, eggie commented 2026-05-27 07:03:10 UTC by eggie ♦45,474 |
| 183238219 (Comments: 1) | Patrick HVE (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. Feedback Iets is een fietspad als er een bord fietspad staat. Is dit het geval? Waarom eindigt dit fietspad op een voetpad? |
| 183231028 (Comments: 1) | Niels Krijnen (Discussed changesets: 4) | Tip.. Geef concreet commentaar bij je uploads. Dat stellen medemappers op prijs. MVG eggie commented 2026-05-27 06:47:47 UTC by eggie ♦45,474 |
| 183230967 (Comments: 1) | Niels Krijnen (Discussed changesets: 4) | Dag Niels.. Probeer bij te taggen op de bestaande adresnode. Dus geen nieuw adres aanmaken. MVG eggie commented 2026-05-27 06:46:48 UTC by eggie ♦45,474 |
| 183230741 (Comments: 1) | Niels Krijnen (Discussed changesets: 4) | Dag Niels Je info heb ik samengevoegd met de adresnode. Heeft deze 'winkel' wel een bezoekadres? Op de website staat nl een ander adres? MVG eggie commented 2026-05-27 06:45:37 UTC by eggie ♦45,474 |
| 183229835 (Comments: 1) | Niels Krijnen (Discussed changesets: 4) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-05-27 06:41:49 UTC by eggie ♦45,474 |
| 183146660 (Comments: 4) | Comino (Discussed changesets: 49) | No problem, these things happen. :-) Edwin Comino BTC Map commented 2026-05-27 06:41:18 UTC by Comino ♦349 |
| 182743603 (Comments: 6) | Yalio (Discussed changesets: 2) | C'est https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/588944222 qui ne semble pas connecté à la D7, et dont je mets l'existence en doute. commented 2026-05-27 06:40:12 UTC by StC ♦464 |
| 183228530 (Comments: 1) | JopieN (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-05-27 06:38:25 UTC by eggie ♦45,474 |
| 182739604 (Comments: 3) | fghj753 (Discussed changesets: 43) | Those tiny signs are not in the law either. Cycling prohibited sign cannot be inside other sign and there is no human depicted on the real sign. To be accurate, only custom signs which explain, but not change the meaning of normal signs, are ... commented 2026-05-27 06:37:22 UTC by qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq ♦514 |
| 183209410 (Comments: 2) | mueschel (Discussed changesets: 973) | For "normal" changesets I write proper comments, but not when I insert a single character in a single object with just two tags. Everybody can easily see what happens even without comment. I could also write "fix spelling mistake in k... commented 2026-05-27 06:28:56 UTC by mueschel ♦7,146 |
| 183193013 (Comments: 3) | gt3400 (Discussed changesets: 25) | Gern geschehen :) commented 2026-05-27 06:28:29 UTC by DerKaiserschmarren ♦61 |
| 183239069 (Comments: 1) | Valerio_Bozzolan (Discussed changesets: 17) | Apologies! The edit summary should be: "Add memorial plaque". I misclicked Vespucci... uhmf... commented 2026-05-27 06:25:31 UTC by Valerio_Bozzolan ♦43 |
| 183212445 (Comments: 3) | AleAleVa (Discussed changesets: 1) | 1) Примеры - хотя бы здания 4 и 6 по Кубинке, которые вы сдвинули на местоположение их крыш (а должны быть контуры дома по метоположению на с... commented 2026-05-27 06:23:16 UTC by literan ♦7,113 |
| 183238792 (Comments: 1) | Gaung Tebono (Discussed changesets: 17) | Tolong baca pedoman klasifikasi jalan di Wiki OSM "Id:Tag:Highway=Primary" supaya tidak terjadi kesalahpahaman dan perang suntingan Please read the road classification guidelines on the OSM Wiki "Id:Tag:Highway=Primary" to ... commented 2026-05-27 06:18:14 UTC by Gaung Tebono ♦13 |
| 183238666 (Comments: 1) | Weronika Yanosik (Discussed changesets: 13) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna.... commented 2026-05-27 06:11:30 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦8,669 |
| 183153850 (Comments: 9) | Michiel Duyvendak (Discussed changesets: 5) | 👍 Wat die erven betreft. Dan is de tag vaak access=private als het Verboden Toegang is.. soms permissive. Je hoeft dan geen aparte categorieën toe te voegen. commented 2026-05-27 05:56:37 UTC by eggie ♦45,474 |
| 156081074 (Comments: 4) | griba (Discussed changesets: 19) | Hi griba, thank s for the explanation. “recycling:glass” might be a better fit. It covers all types of glass and is used more frequently. Best regards, lyctkel commented 2026-05-27 05:48:24 UTC by lyctkel ♦371 |
| 183200034 (Comments: 2) | Emetas Semaška (Discussed changesets: 1) | There are no formal names for these driveways, and formal names are not usually numbers anyway. There is private access to the driveways so the access=no tags should be removed. It would be better to add addresses to the individual hou... commented 2026-05-27 05:46:58 UTC by BCNorwich ♦5,185 |
| 181458347 (Comments: 3) | MassCartog (Discussed changesets: 30) | Thank You commented 2026-05-27 05:32:57 UTC by Natfoot ♦119 |
| 183154165 (Comments: 2) | Michiel Duyvendak (Discussed changesets: 5) | Ja commented 2026-05-27 05:16:49 UTC by Michiel Duyvendak ♦5 |
| 170924604 (Comments: 1) | Wiiktor19 (Discussed changesets: 15) | co do źródeł: w https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5305055 są commented 2026-05-27 05:00:08 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,901 |
| 183155550 (Comments: 4) | Mateusz Konieczny (Discussed changesets: 622) | (at least in my opinion, if someone adds claimed_by= without fake borders I will not revert them) commented 2026-05-27 04:57:24 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,901 |
| 183227131 (Comments: 1) | lilykiwi (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. The houses would look much better if they were squared up, shortcut "Q" in the iD editor. All iD shortcuts here:- https://mamapa.org/images/mamapa/pdfs/en/ID_Editor_QuickRef-EN.pdf Regards ... commented 2026-05-27 04:38:45 UTC by BCNorwich ♦5,185 |
| 183151222 (Comments: 3) | farukyildizbas (Discussed changesets: 2) | The first question is whether the GeoJSON data is licensed under an OSM-compatible licence. The second question is whether the values also have English terms, as this helps to ensure that the keys remain understandable to others. Please also bear in ... commented 2026-05-27 04:21:12 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,573 |
| 181871100 (Comments: 2) | DannyMcD (Discussed changesets: 92) | Haven't heard back from you, so I'm going to remove the bicycle = yes tag. LMK if you know a reason why it should remain. commented 2026-05-27 04:05:26 UTC by Dave Laird ♦3 |
| 181513720 (Comments: 1) | opoak (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, I noticed you have retagged the Delhi-Dehradun Expressway as a motorway. Since this is an access controlled National Highway (NH344-G), it should be tagged with highway=trunk + expressway=yes. Please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India/... commented 2026-05-27 04:03:56 UTC by uknown-gryphus ♦44 |
| 183127817 (Comments: 1) | lorenzo23622 (Discussed changesets: 105) | Do not tag the frontage roads as highway=*_link commented 2026-05-27 03:45:22 UTC by 蕉饼电脑 ♦57 |
| 183208096 (Comments: 1) | mueschel (Discussed changesets: 973) | valid edit in this case, "source:bicykle -> source:bicycle" fix see http://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=183208096 commented 2026-05-27 03:41:19 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,901 |
| 183209403 (Comments: 1) | mueschel (Discussed changesets: 973) | removal was valid, but tag was not misspelled at all commented 2026-05-27 03:38:54 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,901 |
| 183209956 (Comments: 1) | mueschel (Discussed changesets: 973) | in this case removal was justified, but NOT because it was misspelled misspelled ones should be fixed, not removed commented 2026-05-27 03:37:44 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,901 |
| 170761137 (Comments: 2) | rhhs (Discussed changesets: 86) | Thanks, please edit it. The tag is not available as a preset in SC commented 2026-05-27 03:33:17 UTC by rhhs ♦215 |
| 183235794 (Comments: 1) | samho1234567 (Discussed changesets: 32) | It's typo. Should be T2. commented 2026-05-27 03:30:56 UTC by samho1234567 ♦32 |
| 169997224 (Comments: 1) | LESEHAN MERANTI ONE (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted SEO spam changeset deleting existing monument and replacing with SEO POI with SEO spam tags https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183235599 commented 2026-05-27 03:17:25 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦89 |
| 169506385 (Comments: 1) | Numa Concept (Discussed changesets: 1) | Removed additional SEO spam tags in changeset 183235558 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183235558 commented 2026-05-27 03:15:21 UTC by CAM-Gerlach ♦227 |
| 182807124 (Comments: 1) | emiigon (Discussed changesets: 23) | Aca el 388 da la vuelta en Mario Bravo supongo? https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/8302500#map=17/-35.068814/-58.284402 Por otro lado me llama la atención que vaya por Castelli que figura sin pavimentar en vez de Cabral. commented 2026-05-27 03:13:20 UTC by AgusQui ♦643 |
| 169654451 (Comments: 1) | A Ma Maniére (Discussed changesets: 1) | Removed SEO spam tags, fixed address and opening hours and added/corrected other tags for POI in changeset 183235506 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183235506 commented 2026-05-27 03:12:40 UTC by CAM-Gerlach ♦227 |
| 183235316 (Comments: 1) | LilianBencz (Discussed changesets: 1) | CEP' commented 2026-05-27 03:05:53 UTC by LilianBencz ♦1 |
| 172436502 (Comments: 1) | Sapa Rosemary Restaurant & Café - Nhà hàng Cây Hương Thảo (Discussed changesets: 1) | Restored amenity=restaurant tag inexplicably removed from Sapa Rosemary Restaurant and fixed diet tags in changeset 183235357 https://osm.org/changeset/183235357 commented 2026-05-27 03:03:32 UTC by CAM-Gerlach ♦227 |
| 169781498 (Comments: 1) | Yıldırım Topçu (Discussed changesets: 1) | Removed SEO spam tags and fixed incorrect top-level and other tags in changeset 183235246 and restored inexplicably removed building=* tag in changeset 183235301 https://osm.org/changeset/183235246 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/18... commented 2026-05-27 02:58:23 UTC by CAM-Gerlach ♦227 |
 | 169819960 (Comments: 1) | Capri Chalet (Discussed changesets: 1) | Consolidated the duplicate SEO-added POI and building for Capri Chalet, removed SEO spam tags and fixed others in changeset 183235155 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183235155 commented 2026-05-27 02:50:26 UTC by CAM-Gerlach ♦227 |
| 173329343 (Comments: 1) | Nevada Registered Agent LLC (Discussed changesets: 2) | (2/2) Revert added SEO spam POI missing top-level tags, an incorrect name and other other SEO spam and invalid tag values https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183234982 commented 2026-05-27 02:37:54 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦89 |
| 173329570 (Comments: 1) | Nevada Registered Agent LLC (Discussed changesets: 2) | Revert added SEO spam POI with incorrect top-level tags, a blatantly promotional description and many other SEO spam and invalid tag values https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183234958 commented 2026-05-27 02:35:48 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦89 |
| 169854515 (Comments: 1) | mitra scatter indonesia (Discussed changesets: 1) | Fixed name capitalization in changeset 183234916 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183234916 commented 2026-05-27 02:33:28 UTC by CAM-Gerlach ♦227 |
| 169891533 (Comments: 1) | VRATA HOTEL YOGYAKARTA (Discussed changesets: 1) | Cleaned up many SEO spam and incorrect tags from hotel in changeset 183234854 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183234854 commented 2026-05-27 02:30:03 UTC by CAM-Gerlach ♦227 |
| 183176912 (Comments: 1) | jstnbl (Discussed changesets: 1) | Couple of questions, is the road posted no trespassing? If it isn't it would be more appropriate to tag it as ownership=private. Otherwise someone will likely remove the access tag. Also, the county shows it as Northeast Flicker Hill Lan... commented 2026-05-27 02:10:26 UTC by Glassman ♦5,942 |
| 183231802 (Comments: 1) | CharlieTVb (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, welcome to OSM. Is the name real? commented 2026-05-27 02:04:56 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦6,578 |
| 181173508 (Comments: 1) | JIMShiin (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! What research was this fence feature used for? It does not appear to correspond to any physical feature. commented 2026-05-27 01:32:22 UTC by c4rlo ♦1 |
| 182318243 (Comments: 1) | seichan1028 (Discussed changesets: 4) | you leave "微修正" comment of every change you do, please don't to that and leave meaningful comments wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments commented 2026-05-27 01:16:43 UTC by dpolovinkin ♦391 |
| 181949694 (Comments: 2) | GPMapper (Discussed changesets: 68) | и вы как ни в чем не бывало продолжаете писать такие же комменты... хотя вы я смотрю на комменты вообще не отвечаете. не профессионально в ... commented 2026-05-27 01:14:16 UTC by dpolovinkin ♦391 |
| 168670165 (Comments: 1) | Dvarkian (Discussed changesets: 2) | lane_markings=no means there is no centre marking ... Sutherland Rd has markings.. corrected. commented 2026-05-27 01:12:13 UTC by Warin61 ♦2,795 |
| 183209103 (Comments: 1) | SUBERTy (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello, the service road at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1522688629 has been removed because there is no physical separation (not even hatched lines), according to Mapillary imagery: please only map roads that physically exist. commented 2026-05-27 00:31:11 UTC by ika-chan! ♦401 |
| 183196681 (Comments: 1) | Fiszi37 (Discussed changesets: 11) | restrykcja destination dotyczy wyłącznie pojazdów, co naprawiłem commented 2026-05-27 00:29:27 UTC by Yog Sot ♦470 |
| 183198985 (Comments: 1) | Jacob Turnbull (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, what is the source for this? I can't find anything about Schoenthal in SA other than a winery? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183198985 commented 2026-05-27 00:28:59 UTC by fortera_au ♦1,543 |
| 183199815 (Comments: 1) | Jacob Turnbull (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, what's the source for this new suburb? I can't find anything indicating it exists --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183199815 commented 2026-05-27 00:26:55 UTC by fortera_au ♦1,543 |
| 183202918 (Comments: 1) | Sigma92749 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, is there a reason why Beadell Street has been split into a bunch of short segments? You don't need to split a way for a road where another comes off of it, routers can handle that fine. --- Publi... commented 2026-05-27 00:26:21 UTC by fortera_au ♦1,543 |
| 183120393 (Comments: 6) | 6b17d8c50e264a46 (Discussed changesets: 10) | no i na screenie widać, że nie kieruje cię po ścieżce, którą usunąłeś commented 2026-05-27 00:22:57 UTC by Yog Sot ♦470 |
| 182851003 (Comments: 2) | mamanakis (Discussed changesets: 20) | It's one of my goto elements for connecting sidewalks that don't have any natural crossings to make them more rout-able for foot traffic. commented 2026-05-27 00:14:24 UTC by mamanakis ♦9 |
| 183232290 (Comments: 2) | Edward35 (Discussed changesets: 9) | https://gis.data.mass.gov/datasets/massgis::massgis-massdot-roads/explore?location=42.376171%2C-71.029431%2C17 commented 2026-05-26 23:31:04 UTC by cubbe8 ♦93 |
| 183210069 (Comments: 1) | Edward35 (Discussed changesets: 9) | This is not a secondary road per https://gis.data.mass.gov/datasets/massgis::massgis-massdot-roads/explore?filters=eyJDTEFTUyI6WzEsNl0sIkZfQ0xBU1MiOlszLDNdfQ%3D%3D&location=42.377309%2C-71.028930%2C17 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changese... commented 2026-05-26 23:25:27 UTC by cubbe8 ♦93 |
| 183163900 (Comments: 1) | DarkNark (Discussed changesets: 16) | Bonjour, "Nouveau tronçon marqué" ? S'agit-il de la véloroute V45 ? Est-ce qu'il y a maintenant un balisage continu V45 entre Rosnoen, le pont de Terenez, Kerfang et La Fontaine Blanche ? Il y a un an... commented 2026-05-26 23:24:46 UTC by josmougn ♦260 |
| 182672497 (Comments: 1) | Ctown1875 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi, and welcome to OpenStreetMap! Looking at your changes here, it looks partially good but there are also a few issues. The name tag is reserved for the actual name of the feature. Mapping notes and so on should go in note= or description=. Also, it... commented 2026-05-26 23:10:36 UTC by Xvtn ♦492 |
| 183181076 (Comments: 2) | wcedmisten (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hello! As far as I can tell, this is not actually a hospital, so I replaced this with a more accurate POI. commented 2026-05-26 22:56:54 UTC by wcedmisten ♦10 |
| 183181131 (Comments: 2) | wcedmisten (Discussed changesets: 7) | Nice find! Mapped as a doctor's office in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183231587 commented 2026-05-26 22:51:18 UTC by wcedmisten ♦10 |
| 96882657 (Comments: 6) | gigi2037 (Discussed changesets: 57) | Questo non ricordo sono andato a controllare La Luna non esiste più il civico comunque e rimasto. commented 2026-05-26 22:37:35 UTC by gigi2037 ♦26 |
| 181947488 (Comments: 1) | ohmanger (Discussed changesets: 27) | Hi, personally I think it would be easier if large residential polygons were split up into smaller sections rather than turning them into multipolygons; I split up the residential areas in Porthcawl in this changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/cha... commented 2026-05-26 22:32:17 UTC by LordGarySugar ♦268 |
| 165296013 (Comments: 1) | gomedia91 (Discussed changesets: 43) | Hi, just to let you know I've reorganised tagging of Universities in Wales; each university is now a single multipolygon with amenity=university. Each campus is now tagged education=campus. Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/1832... commented 2026-05-26 22:30:03 UTC by LordGarySugar ♦268 |
| 182077501 (Comments: 1) | compassnne (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thank you for making this change, it's correct that there should only be one university here, as College Lane and de Havilland campuses are not individual universities. commented 2026-05-26 22:24:20 UTC by LordGarySugar ♦268 |
| 174612157 (Comments: 1) | Fgjgdrou (Discussed changesets: 13) | Hi, just to let you know I've reorganised tagging of Universities in Wales; each university is now a single multipolygon with amenity=university. Each campus is now tagged education=campus. Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/1830... commented 2026-05-26 22:21:55 UTC by LordGarySugar ♦268 |
| 181814642 (Comments: 1) | rycee (Discussed changesets: 1) | It's not accessible by everybody. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5311493 commented 2026-05-26 22:16:40 UTC by Fraxi ♦351 |
| 183175346 (Comments: 1) | J00SECI (Discussed changesets: 35) | Stop messing around with Nicaraguan data! commented 2026-05-26 22:08:29 UTC by porfiriopaiz ♦134 |
| 183174549 (Comments: 1) | J00SECI (Discussed changesets: 35) | STOP MESSING AROUND WITH NICARAGUAN DATA! commented 2026-05-26 22:07:48 UTC by porfiriopaiz ♦134 |
| 178256253 (Comments: 2) | theDM (Discussed changesets: 149) | Cześć jestem pewien. Ta droga została wyłączona ze strefy zamieszkania, ale została oznaczona strefą ruchu. commented 2026-05-26 22:03:45 UTC by theDM ♦180 |
| 182310778 (Comments: 4) | matthewfecica (Discussed changesets: 13) | Okay I see what you are talking about. In those cases, the existing data on OSM was significantly off from what was visible in the Strava Heatmap. I started fixing those trails from one end, but only got so far in one sitting and didn't finish, ... commented 2026-05-26 22:02:58 UTC by matthewfecica ♦10 |
| 170945535 (Comments: 3) | dbrgn (Discussed changesets: 4) | ...und gerne! commented 2026-05-26 22:02:39 UTC by dbrgn ♦3 |
| 183229614 (Comments: 1) | SomeoneElse (Discussed changesets: 470) | Also ts2761a (Walsden 509 bus) and ts2762b (Todmorden) commented 2026-05-26 21:58:36 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,790 |
| 183099470 (Comments: 1) | Christoph Lotz (Discussed changesets: 50) | Hallo Christoph! Danke für die Korrektur des countrycodes an der Schillerstraße 27. Warum aber gibst du den Straßen Postleitzahlen? Straßen haben keine Postleitzahlen!!! Zitat Wiki: "Die Verwendung des Tags ... commented 2026-05-26 21:56:40 UTC by BrummsLee ♦55 |
| 183039883 (Comments: 3) | SherbetS (Discussed changesets: 31) | Thanks for fixing James! I have written an email to find out which Bitcoin payment types are accepted. To be continued. Edwin BTC Map commented 2026-05-26 21:50:14 UTC by Comino ♦349 |
| 182702596 (Comments: 2) | geognosist (Discussed changesets: 5) | Danke, Beau, für die Quelle und den Hinweis. Den See habe ich verkleinert. Ich hoffe, die nächste offizielle Befliegung lässt nicht mehr lange auf sich warten. commented 2026-05-26 21:49:54 UTC by geognosist ♦4 |
| 170768623 (Comments: 1) | billbonelawgroup (Discussed changesets: 1) | Three duplicate SEO-added POIs with SEO spam tags cleaned up and consolidated in changeset 183181851 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183181851 commented 2026-05-26 21:38:31 UTC by CAM-Gerlach ♦227 |
| 183109589 (Comments: 2) | ViPE3R (Discussed changesets: 3) | Poprawiłem edycje @ViPE3R związane z nazwami opisowymi tutaj: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183229569 Przy kolejnych edycjach proszę o poprawne nadawanie nazw przez autora tych edycji. Dzięki. commented 2026-05-26 21:28:44 UTC by Marek-M ♦1,053 |
 | 183226526 (Comments: 1) | Haritron (Discussed changesets: 11) | I meant to say Updated geometries and tags near Laguna del Pedregal #adt commented 2026-05-26 21:27:01 UTC by Haritron ♦12 |
| 177953950 (Comments: 1) | NV333 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Thanks! I must have accidentally edited this parking lot while extending SR 157 east by a few hundred feet/meters. commented 2026-05-26 21:26:56 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦248 |
| 181780224 (Comments: 3) | Mapwin (Discussed changesets: 1) | *aware about commented 2026-05-26 21:09:41 UTC by Mapwin ♦1 |
| 183117551 (Comments: 1) | IvaKraljić (Discussed changesets: 182) | The wrong tag has since been fixed in the changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183228831#map=19/38.939755/-76.924723. #OptimoRoute commented 2026-05-26 21:00:08 UTC by IvaKraljić ♦147 |
| 183042774 (Comments: 1) | IvaKraljić (Discussed changesets: 182) | The tagged area has since been shortened in the changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183228715#map=18/40.712070/-74.362021. #OptimoRoute commented 2026-05-26 20:57:13 UTC by IvaKraljić ♦147 |
| 183227814 (Comments: 1) | CrispyCookie (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-05-26 20:42:54 UTC by eggie ♦45,474 |
| 183084690 (Comments: 1) | Estuks (Discussed changesets: 6) | A CE-266 é a rota IDEAL entre Tamboril e Boa Viagem? Se não for, não deve ser secundária. Algo me diz que a maioria das pessoas prefere dar a volta pela CE-265. Somente pode ser secundária se for a rota seguida pela... commented 2026-05-26 20:30:16 UTC by ftrebien ♦187 |
| 183209941 (Comments: 1) | Gaung Tebono (Discussed changesets: 17) | Maaf typo "edot" seharusnya "edit" malah jadi "edot" 🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🤣🤣🤣 Sorry for the typo, "edot" should be "edit" but instead it became "edot" 🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏... commented 2026-05-26 19:56:40 UTC by Gaung Tebono ♦13 |
| 182452180 (Comments: 2) | blue389 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Fixed in changeset 183226750. commented 2026-05-26 19:50:38 UTC by Minh Nguyen ♦622 |
| 170278836 (Comments: 1) | Trade Lines Shop Equipment Ltd (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted adding this SEO spam POI with just a spam description=*, name=* and website=* (no top-level tags) which also broke a nearby multipolygon by adding the POI to it as outer https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183226448 commented 2026-05-26 19:42:51 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦89 |
| 170371719 (Comments: 1) | Chefline Ltd (Discussed changesets: 1) | Removed SEO spam tags and fixed tagging errors for Chefline POI in changeset 183226291 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183226291 commented 2026-05-26 19:39:02 UTC by CAM-Gerlach ♦227 |
| 181949498 (Comments: 3) | Georg Hennecke (Discussed changesets: 11) | Am einfachsten kann man die Panoramax-Bilder mit Mapcomplete mit dem Trinkwasser-Thema hinzufügen: https://mapcomplete.org/drinking_water.html commented 2026-05-26 19:31:26 UTC by Strubbl ♦598 |
| 183210972 (Comments: 1) | StRoschmann (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap. Du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten. Ich habe nur eine Anmerkung zu https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10021573675: Es ist eine gute Idee, den Node nicht einfach zu lös... commented 2026-05-26 19:26:06 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,495 |
| 183169995 (Comments: 3) | Raio Rene (Discussed changesets: 4) | This one https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1221389917/history I've already changed it back. Also removed oneway from here as you don't have to ride on the narrow bicycle path there, the area is wider and allows to support routing ... commented 2026-05-26 19:18:23 UTC by qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq ♦514 |
| 182995670 (Comments: 1) | Oscarín Orbitus (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hello Oscarín Orbitus, I noticed that you added destination=Usaquén;Chapinero;Bogotá centro;La Calera (El Codito);San Cristobal to (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/25123220). Mapillary from October 6th, 2025 (https://www... commented 2026-05-26 19:15:17 UTC by HurricaneGator ♦36 |
| 183224516 (Comments: 1) | Cyberbeast26 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Edit done in error. Street in question was unnamed on map and has been corrected (Will Cherry Road) commented 2026-05-26 19:15:00 UTC by Cyberbeast26 ♦1 |
| 183005883 (Comments: 7) | confusedbuffalo (Discussed changesets: 99) | Tu auras compris, je suis pour des bases de données propres, sans réplications inutiles. Si certaines applis ne savent pas faire avec, il leur suffit de préprocesser les données afin d'obtenir les données qui l... commented 2026-05-26 19:10:56 UTC by trial ♦1,159 |
| 170947102 (Comments: 1) | dbrgn (Discussed changesets: 4) | 🤩 commented 2026-05-26 19:03:48 UTC by stillhart ♦246 |
| 181604021 (Comments: 1) | raivov (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, maxima, selver, prisma, etc. are supermarkets. This is a specialized shop. Maybe shop=houseware or shop=trade + trade=baking_equipment commented 2026-05-26 18:59:07 UTC by qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq ♦514 |
| 181627778 (Comments: 1) | KRISTO IVANOV (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, this building is not a dentist's. To add a dentist clinic, you need to add separate node inside the building, like the restaurant in the same building. commented 2026-05-26 18:50:42 UTC by qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq ♦514 |
| 183198926 (Comments: 1) | Vaprikon (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, Please do not add names as descriptions to elements. Names should be official or at least well-known current names that can be verified somewhere in other sources. Former and non-existent feature explanations should be placed in descrip... commented 2026-05-26 18:45:15 UTC by HellMap ♦901 |
| 183148498 (Comments: 3) | Pa413 (Discussed changesets: 21) | Sur Plouay, une partie de la rue des Alliés et la rue de Kerveline sont en sens unique. Si vous êtes du secteur connaissez-vous le nouveau tracé ? commented 2026-05-26 18:40:25 UTC by mga_geo ♦302 |
| 181194865 (Comments: 1) | mmett (Discussed changesets: 1) | Please don't change path into cycleway for bicycle pedestrians paths. Path is proffered and accepted way to map them for many mappers. commented 2026-05-26 18:40:11 UTC by qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq ♦514 |
| 183147247 (Comments: 5) | Johlo6 (Discussed changesets: 11) | Osobne by som to dal do tagu "operator", nakolko sa jedna o nazov prevadzkovatela. Kludne mozes pouzit "full_name" alebo "official_name", vzdy sa to da v buducnosti pretagovat na nieco ine. commented 2026-05-26 18:29:48 UTC by t_ja ♦265 |
| 183093430 (Comments: 1) | Chris Kerr (Discussed changesets: 6) | Strange. I've seen water tap here last year. commented 2026-05-26 18:21:22 UTC by qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq ♦514 |
| 181786891 (Comments: 1) | Raio Rene (Discussed changesets: 4) | Name is to be used for street names. Do not use it just to display some label on the map. You can add it to description tag. commented 2026-05-26 18:16:16 UTC by qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq ♦514 |
| 41454126 (Comments: 3) | mucx (Discussed changesets: 18) | Da lief was falsch! Von der Münchner Strasse kommend, nahe Schützenried führt die KASTANIEN-BAUMREIHE vorbei am Abzweig zur Lindenallee und weiter, westlich um Holzen herum bis zur Verbindungsstrasse nach Norden. Dort beginnt die Kast... commented 2026-05-26 18:15:32 UTC by Planer47 ♦1 |
| 183122554 (Comments: 1) | Raio Rene (Discussed changesets: 4) | Something is wrong here. oneway:bicycle=yes and cycleway:left=opposite seem to be in conflict. cycleway=opposite is also deprecated. Please check out "Contraflow lanes" https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:cycleway%3Dopp... commented 2026-05-26 18:14:36 UTC by qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq ♦514 |
| 183206781 (Comments: 2) | melcomsx (Discussed changesets: 16) | I try to improve commented 2026-05-26 18:12:38 UTC by melcomsx ♦15 |
| 183207588 (Comments: 2) | Johlo6 (Discussed changesets: 11) | Áno, tiež som si to všimol. Už som to opravil. Dík za upozornenie. commented 2026-05-26 18:04:04 UTC by Johlo6 ♦11 |
| 182606016 (Comments: 2) | ירח אפל (Discussed changesets: 11) | אין לי מושג commented 2026-05-26 18:04:03 UTC by ירח אפל ♦6 |
| 170098306 (Comments: 1) | optykbadura (Discussed changesets: 5) | Nazwa opisowa do poprawy https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Nazwy commented 2026-05-26 18:00:30 UTC by olo81 ♦738 |
| 170101532 (Comments: 1) | optykbadura (Discussed changesets: 5) | Nazwa opisowa do poprawy https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Nazwy commented 2026-05-26 18:00:10 UTC by olo81 ♦738 |
| 170101817 (Comments: 1) | optykbadura (Discussed changesets: 5) | Nazwa opisowa do poprawy https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Nazwy commented 2026-05-26 17:59:30 UTC by olo81 ♦738 |
| 170101962 (Comments: 1) | optykbadura (Discussed changesets: 5) | Nazwa opisowa do poprawy https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Nazwy commented 2026-05-26 17:59:22 UTC by olo81 ♦738 |
| 183038150 (Comments: 4) | Robert46798 (Discussed changesets: 19) | Okay. Danke für den Link. Ich kam über diese Seite zu den Grenzen: https://grenzabgleich.osm-verkehrswende.org/ Ich habe mein Vorgehen jetzt angepasst, und hoffe, dass ich nicht noch einmal etwas kaputt mache! commented 2026-05-26 17:58:31 UTC by Robert46798 ♦195 |
| 170101679 (Comments: 1) | optykbadura (Discussed changesets: 5) | Nazwa opisowa do poprawy https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Nazwy commented 2026-05-26 17:58:27 UTC by olo81 ♦738 |
| 183218832 (Comments: 1) | Dikkie Dik (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. Feedback Ik heb het aangepast naar drinking_water. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Ddrinking_water MVG... commented 2026-05-26 17:52:46 UTC by eggie ♦45,474 |
| 183215891 (Comments: 1) | fulcod (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-05-26 17:49:23 UTC by eggie ♦45,474 |
| 183136770 (Comments: 1) | adrian87bp (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hola Adrián. Estás modificando el tipo de edificio de forma incorrecta. Estos edificios son casas y deben de manternerse como "house". Si los cambias a building=yes, ya no se sabe de qué tipo de edificio se trata... commented 2026-05-26 17:45:52 UTC by Jordi MF ♦1,819 |
| 181181263 (Comments: 1) | kornus18 (Discussed changesets: 3) | "Budynek laboratoryjno-biurowy" nie jest nazwą, tylko opisem budynku. Do usunięcia. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Nazwy commented 2026-05-26 17:44:31 UTC by olo81 ♦738 |
| 183210873 (Comments: 1) | PawelZia (Discussed changesets: 2) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna.... commented 2026-05-26 17:43:50 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦8,669 |
| 183205158 (Comments: 1) | Mathpro (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap! Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulic... commented 2026-05-26 17:43:43 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦8,669 |
| 177740650 (Comments: 1) | Ilanride22 (Discussed changesets: 37) | Hi! Where did you get information about construction on way 1471475302 next to Beit Arye. I deleted the road last year, and visited the area today again. There's a massive mound of dirt and definitely no plans on making a road there.... commented 2026-05-26 17:35:29 UTC by Dindia ♦59 |
| 25463201 (Comments: 1) | Tormi (Discussed changesets: 12) | Hi, is this some kind of official route or a route your personally invented? Can't find any information about it. commented 2026-05-26 17:31:54 UTC by qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq ♦514 |
| 183013319 (Comments: 1) | kotla85 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Szia! Üres üzletként volt jelölve, jó így, hagyd fent. Ha majd más üzlet nyílik a helyén akkor egyszerűbb lesz azt majd felvenni: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Keep_the_histo... commented 2026-05-26 17:26:40 UTC by infeeeee ♦689 |
| 183215940 (Comments: 1) | Tischlehr (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ciao Hier hast du dem Weg https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1522834094 `roof:orientation=along` und `roof:shape=round` vergeben, was für einen Weg sicher falsch ist, und auch für ein Gebäude keinen Sinn macht :) Dazu has... commented 2026-05-26 17:21:58 UTC by habi ♦2,133 |
| 67988180 (Comments: 4) | ervinjoshuadelrosario (Discussed changesets: 46) | better late than never .. commented 2026-05-26 17:19:41 UTC by Aleks-Berlin ♦488 |
| 127378033 (Comments: 2) | ervinjoshuadelrosario (Discussed changesets: 46) | Sorry for not responding. Yes. Borders must to be ways that form closed areas. Relations cannot be outer borders and only subareas. Nodes cannot have the role outer and only label or admin_centre. Relation already fixed. Thank you. commented 2026-05-26 17:18:44 UTC by ervinjoshuadelrosario ♦34 |
| 181434106 (Comments: 1) | Rimrocker (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reviewing your edits and it looks good. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181434106 commented 2026-05-26 17:18:34 UTC by Natfoot ♦119 |
| 126745623 (Comments: 3) | ervinjoshuadelrosario (Discussed changesets: 46) | Sorry for not responding. Yes. When an infrastructure is not yet built, I will map it first as proposed. Thank you and you're welcome. commented 2026-05-26 17:15:44 UTC by ervinjoshuadelrosario ♦34 |
| 67437463 (Comments: 3) | ervinjoshuadelrosario (Discussed changesets: 46) | Sorry for not responding. Yes. One must use Ctrl+Shift+{ and Ctrl+Shift+} shortcuts in iD jumping directly to the first or last node along the way. List of members of the main boundary relation can also be used to jump to pieces of the border. The co... commented 2026-05-26 17:09:57 UTC by ervinjoshuadelrosario ♦34 |
| 67306727 (Comments: 3) | ervinjoshuadelrosario (Discussed changesets: 46) | Sorry for not responding. Relation name already changed from United States Mainland to Contiguous United States, with United States Mainland placed as an alternative name. Thank you. commented 2026-05-26 17:04:35 UTC by ervinjoshuadelrosario ♦34 |
| 125098591 (Comments: 1) | milos21 (Discussed changesets: 11) | Zdravím, jedná sa o značenú cyklotrasu? https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/14475525 Aký je jej zdroj? commented 2026-05-26 17:00:58 UTC by Filip009 ♦1,109 |
| 183022250 (Comments: 2) | bxl-forever (Discussed changesets: 178) | Oh, you are are totally right, what a silly mistake. Fixed now, thanks. commented 2026-05-26 17:00:23 UTC by bxl-forever ♦2,904 |
| 182139255 (Comments: 3) | bobthebuilder423468 (Discussed changesets: 27) | barrier=yes or barrier=bollard or barrier=wall specify material and height if desired. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/182139255 commented 2026-05-26 16:50:18 UTC by Natfoot ♦119 |
| 176366992 (Comments: 3) | mapperue (Discussed changesets: 308) | Ďakujem za príklady relácií! Ani som nevedela, že je zvyk ich robiť... Koľaje čo boli cez domy už nepridám, minulý rok som mala viac maximalistický názor na to, čo značiť - teraz už s... commented 2026-05-26 16:39:24 UTC by 1Mmarek ♦17 |
| 183213318 (Comments: 1) | Sniper1917 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, In your edit you use the deprecated tag "payment:bitcoin=yes". Please DELETE the payment:bitcoin=yes tag ! Use the "currency:XBT=yes" instead. For more information please read: https://gitea.btcmap.org/... commented 2026-05-26 16:20:07 UTC by Comino ♦349 |
| 181745814 (Comments: 2) | cgreggescalante (Discussed changesets: 2) | That's definitely correct, thanks for the note. I'm starting work on correcting my previous edits --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181745814 commented 2026-05-26 16:17:37 UTC by cgreggescalante ♦2 |
| 183043587 (Comments: 2) | mushymapper (Discussed changesets: 5) | There is an over lapping line in this change set. https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?note=5305252 both Ian Ave and East Stanford Avenue are overlapping. we also don't abbreviate Ave. we write it out as Avenue as a standard. commented 2026-05-26 16:16:13 UTC by Natfoot ♦119 |
| 180512056 (Comments: 2) | BrummsLee (Discussed changesets: 26) | Danke dir für die Info! In Deutschland geht es nicht so schnell, wenn überhaupt... 🤭 Ich würde es drin lassen. Meldet sich bestimmt jemand, wenn das Teil im Herbst immer noch nicht da ist. commented 2026-05-26 16:15:58 UTC by BrummsLee ♦55 |
| 183182364 (Comments: 2) | Joseph R P (Discussed changesets: 214) | In the event this change were to be reverted, I think Georgetown stands even more as a city now with its population surpassing 100k and its insanely rapid growth since the 2020 census. commented 2026-05-26 16:12:37 UTC by Joseph R P ♦432 |
| 183159177 (Comments: 1) | Wally_PL (Discussed changesets: 9) | Miałem ją dodać, ale gdy przejeżdzałem tam to jeszcze nie było jej w EGiB ani BDOT500 i później o niej zapomniałem. Dzięki :) commented 2026-05-26 15:54:33 UTC by Dawid2849 ♦892 |
| 183209793 (Comments: 2) | Seliminhooo (Discussed changesets: 1) | The changeset has been reverted. Buildings on OpenStreetMap must be the exact outline of the built surface. Buildings should never be traced from aerial images, instead users should manually select the UrbIS numerical background. This is why... commented 2026-05-26 15:52:24 UTC by bxl-forever ♦2,904 |
| 113685662 (Comments: 1) | FD Gca (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour, concernant le chemin https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1001674733, pourquoi est-il dénommé mourjou2 ? commented 2026-05-26 15:37:47 UTC by 7tonin ♦25 |
| 138115974 (Comments: 1) | Thomas666 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Bonjour, concernant le sentier https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1187362453, un agriculteur m'a indiqué qu'il préférait que ce passage reste privé. Il n'est cependant pas opposé à un usage e... commented 2026-05-26 15:33:48 UTC by 7tonin ♦25 |
| 182115157 (Comments: 1) | SabineSW (Discussed changesets: 3) | Inzwischen habe ich eine Anzeige im blick gesehen, dass am 22./23.Mai 2026 in Halfing (Bahnhofstr. 20) Neueröffnung ist. Auf der Webseite nach wie vor kein Hinweis. commented 2026-05-26 15:33:39 UTC by SabineSW ♦3 |
| 182913258 (Comments: 3) | Pernycek (Discussed changesets: 17) | Thanks. commented 2026-05-26 15:32:11 UTC by FroschForscher ♦143 |
| 162786862 (Comments: 2) | olo_12 (Discussed changesets: 16) | Poprawiłem w https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183214343 , można sobie podejrzeć commented 2026-05-26 15:18:20 UTC by dzamper ♦229 |
 | 176232815 (Comments: 3) | xpisar (Discussed changesets: 7) | My point is that I can see two issues here: 1. Access restriction mapped as a "way". Shape of this way is not verifiable and thus should not be mapped. 2. The second is that the way is mapped as "protected area". Whi... commented 2026-05-26 15:06:41 UTC by Layft Greater ♦208 |
| 183209675 (Comments: 3) | weapona (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hier wat info https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course commented 2026-05-26 14:59:20 UTC by eggie ♦45,474 |
| 183110851 (Comments: 1) | Thomas der Erste (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo, was ist der Hintergrund, dass hier Fußgänger verboten sind? Beschilderung? Gruß commented 2026-05-26 14:56:39 UTC by aixbrick ♦912 |
| 183212631 (Comments: 1) | Biesbosch MuseumEiland (Discussed changesets: 2) | Dag MuseumEiland. Dit is niet correct. Het is geen straatnaam. Ik zal name= veranderen in description. U kunt beter een bordje neerzetten met dergelijke tekst. MVG eggie validator OSM commented 2026-05-26 14:49:38 UTC by eggie ♦45,474 |
| 183212204 (Comments: 1) | Biesbosch MuseumEiland (Discussed changesets: 2) | Welkom bij OSM, Op een wandelpad routeert het alleen voor wandelaars. Al die accesstags zijn dus niet nodig. Het routeert hier echt niet voor iets met wielen. MVG eggie commented 2026-05-26 14:47:55 UTC by eggie ♦45,474 |
| 183203227 (Comments: 2) | Alice0356 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Als bovenstaand aangepast commented 2026-05-26 14:39:59 UTC by eggie ♦45,474 |
| 183211690 (Comments: 1) | schobbish (Discussed changesets: 8) | Reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183212510 commented 2026-05-26 14:39:57 UTC by schobbish ♦56 |
| 168392310 (Comments: 1) | FidzisLV (Discussed changesets: 2) | Šajā izmaiņā nodzēsts mikroliegums https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1372418590 bez paskaidrojuma. Tas ir atjaunots. commented 2026-05-26 14:09:40 UTC by HellMap ♦901 |
| 182042022 (Comments: 1) | ישי סלומון "במרחק נגיעה מירושלים" (Discussed changesets: 1) | שלום ישי מה הסיבה שמחקת את התמונות של המעיין שהיו בנקודה. אם אתה רוצה להוסיף תמונות אתה מוזמן, אבל בדרך כלל סיבה למחוק תמונות של אחרים. commented 2026-05-26 14:09:31 UTC by hatul ♦463 |
| 183011184 (Comments: 3) | Alexa3r (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ok, tako mi izgleda i da je na RGZ sloju, a i kućni brojevi se slažu. Ispravio sam i ostale nazive (name:sr, name:sr-Latn i int_name) da budu Ustanička. commented 2026-05-26 14:03:39 UTC by MaliMrav ♦82 |
| 183084683 (Comments: 1) | Aiden Kelly (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hey Aiden, It's usually better update a node with shop=vacant or disused:amenity=restaurant than to delete the nodes. This helps preserve the history: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Keep_the_history commented 2026-05-26 13:58:46 UTC by ion_chi ♦73 |
| 183177923 (Comments: 2) | fahrradfan9711 (Discussed changesets: 1) | @fahrradfan9711 Deine Änderung wurde inzwischen rückgängig gemacht https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183208099 Beschreibe bitte trotzdem dein Problem mit einigen Routern an dieser Stelle commented 2026-05-26 13:57:12 UTC by Fischkopp0815 ♦277 |
| 183045080 (Comments: 1) | Lopata007 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, what does 'bicycles_by_foot' mean? Maybe "bicycle=dismount"? commented 2026-05-26 13:53:13 UTC by mueschel ♦7,146 |
| 183206592 (Comments: 3) | Anonomous46786532566 (Discussed changesets: 1) | I have done a partial revert of this changeset so the footpath should now exist on the map. See changeset 183209363. commented 2026-05-26 13:38:07 UTC by Car Tographer ♦3 |
| 183209192 (Comments: 1) | osmviborg (Discussed changesets: 359) | Minus Skarø commented 2026-05-26 13:33:52 UTC by osmviborg ♦1,840 |
| 16011194 (Comments: 1) | AnyFile (Discussed changesets: 6) | Ciao AnyFile, grazie per questo contributo! Ti segnalo che forse la società dei trasporti ha rimosso questi percorsi. Segnalo discussione: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4304203 Grazie ciau :) commented 2026-05-26 13:17:59 UTC by Valerio_Bozzolan ♦43 |
| 183174433 (Comments: 3) | Sakujakira (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hallo Pitfire, ich habe die ITU-T E.164 nochmal angeschaut und kann nicht erkennen wo der Datensatz der Telefonnummer der Norm widerspricht. https://www.itu.int/rec/T-REC-E.164-202602-I/en Oft gesehene Leerstellen zwischen Country C... commented 2026-05-26 13:17:54 UTC by Sakujakira ♦4 |
| 183186042 (Comments: 1) | rodrigojesus333 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Olá, google não deve ser usado como fonte de dados, cuide para não deixar pontas soltas ao editar vias. commented 2026-05-26 13:10:13 UTC by DressyPear4 ♦1,221 |
| 183207659 (Comments: 1) | Master Maintenance (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, which unit in this complex do you occupy? commented 2026-05-26 13:07:38 UTC by nevw ♦2,226 |
| 177150608 (Comments: 5) | DerKaiserschmarren (Discussed changesets: 47) | Kein Ding :) commented 2026-05-26 12:42:21 UTC by DerKaiserschmarren ♦61 |
| 170789632 (Comments: 1) | BertRadke (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo Bert! Ich kann mir nicht vorstellen, daß es dieses Telefon noch geben und auch noch funktionieren soll! Und warum steht es auf der Grünfläche eines Privatgrundstückes? Auf Satbildern erkenne ich hier auch nichts, was ... commented 2026-05-26 12:24:16 UTC by BrummsLee ♦55 |
| 160985957 (Comments: 3) | ernestoandolfi (Discussed changesets: 23) | Grazie per la risposta :) Ad essere sincero, ho trovato quel nodo perché ha il tag memorial=historic che non è documentato; la cosa più semplice da fare secondo me sarebbe cambiare quel tag in historic=memorial (+memorial=... commented 2026-05-26 12:18:33 UTC by MarcoR ♦580 |
| 183121910 (Comments: 10) | Neil Boyd (Discussed changesets: 2) | It depends... Autowegen: Als de N-weg is aangeduid als autoweg (bord A15), is deze strikt verboden voor voetgangers. Hier mogen alleen gemotoriseerde voertuigen komen die een bepaalde minimumsnelheid halen.Overige N-wegen: Heeft de weg geen au... commented 2026-05-26 12:09:21 UTC by eggie ♦45,474 |
| 183191262 (Comments: 4) | Tomas_J (Discussed changesets: 69) | Tak teraz z toho nie som múdry. Skús napísať pls. pre túto výzvu doporučenie jednou vetou, čo v praxi presne dávať do názvu obecného úradu na dedinách (samotný ná... commented 2026-05-26 12:08:20 UTC by Tomas_J ♦367 |
| 182902716 (Comments: 1) | Nada Ahmed ali (Discussed changesets: 1) | Restored valid address node without private information. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183204928 commented 2026-05-26 12:08:17 UTC by Taya_S ♦2,660 |
| 183200634 (Comments: 1) | SVARIO73 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hi, welcome to OSM. Is the name real? commented 2026-05-26 12:01:20 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦6,578 |
| 183200751 (Comments: 1) | SVARIO73 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hi, welcome to OSM. Is the name real? commented 2026-05-26 12:01:16 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦6,578 |
| 183200923 (Comments: 1) | SVARIO73 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hi, welcome to OSM. Are the names real? commented 2026-05-26 12:00:59 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦6,578 |
| 183201087 (Comments: 1) | SVARIO73 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hi, welcome to OSM. Are the names real? commented 2026-05-26 12:00:56 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦6,578 |
| 183201685 (Comments: 1) | SVARIO73 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hi, welcome to OSM. Are the names real? commented 2026-05-26 12:00:51 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦6,578 |
| 182155675 (Comments: 1) | Mcomm (Discussed changesets: 1) | I removed this one - it was already mapped a twenty meters more to the north. You also pointed out "the top" of the turbine, but on aerial imagery, the "bottom" of things is in the correct location, the top is not. Same with buil... commented 2026-05-26 11:53:05 UTC by joost schouppe ♦1,483 |
| 183200932 (Comments: 1) | Jens van Bommel (Discussed changesets: 2) | Dag jens.. Er zijn al adresnodes. Dus je hoeft niet nogmaals een adres toe te voegen. Doe het svp dan wel volledig, want in welke gemeente staan deze kerken? MVG eggie commented 2026-05-26 11:49:18 UTC by eggie ♦45,474 |
| 183161686 (Comments: 3) | Yinnon Gershi (Discussed changesets: 1) | תודה, כדאי גם להוסיף למפה את השער commented 2026-05-26 11:48:55 UTC by hatul ♦463 |
 | 183167566 (Comments: 1) | KeithCaruana (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in changeset id:183203468 commented 2026-05-26 11:46:18 UTC by MappingMore ♦453 |
| 182128456 (Comments: 1) | Jakka (Discussed changesets: 243) | Hoi Jakka, Ik denk dat je dit niet hebt toegepast: The tag leisure=swimming_pool should only be used for the water area of the swimming pool. A facility containing one or more swimming pools (mainly focused on swimming as a sport) should be tag... commented 2026-05-26 11:41:04 UTC by joost schouppe ♦1,483 |
| 183200653 (Comments: 1) | Jens van Bommel (Discussed changesets: 2) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. Feedback Mainstreet stond al op de kaart. Ik heb je info samengevoegd en fixed de postcode. Geen spatie svp. MVG, Eggie<... commented 2026-05-26 11:38:35 UTC by eggie ♦45,474 |
| 183191529 (Comments: 4) | Jean-Louis Stanus (Discussed changesets: 19) | Your Welcome. Thank you for your vigilance :) commented 2026-05-26 11:33:24 UTC by Jean-Louis Stanus ♦27 |
| 182285685 (Comments: 1) | steak country (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi, On small places of worship like this https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/232245316 , it's very useful to clarify the building type or add a historic=wayside_cross|shrine|chapel or add place_of_worship=* to make it clear to data users that i... commented 2026-05-26 11:24:11 UTC by joost schouppe ♦1,483 |
| 171418852 (Comments: 1) | psykon (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello You changed building type, but most of the allotment-houses seem to have changed completely. I'd rather leave a comment for more survey needed than keeping wrong outlines. commented 2026-05-26 11:20:38 UTC by chzolli ♦1 |
| 170543633 (Comments: 1) | Karthoo (Discussed changesets: 84) | Guten Tag, befinden sich in dem Gebäude 2 Trafos? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13075137775 https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13075137774 Viele Grüße whb commented 2026-05-26 11:19:35 UTC by whb ♦655 |
| 183184462 (Comments: 2) | jpgalvez (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ahora que vemos, la cartelería de la calle indica L-325. Lo que es incorrecto, pero nos causa un problema. vamos a ver --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183184462 ... commented 2026-05-26 11:14:06 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦3,092 |
 | 183165795 (Comments: 1) | kktami909 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in changeset id:183200877 commented 2026-05-26 11:02:54 UTC by MappingMore ♦453 |
| 182874402 (Comments: 4) | Richard2244 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Oke, Er wordt je niets kwalijk genomen. OSM heeft wel een heel steile leercurve. En vakantie achter de rug. Dat pakt ook niemand je meer af. Mapse, eggie commented 2026-05-26 10:59:52 UTC by eggie ♦45,474 |
| 165219644 (Comments: 1) | TagaSanPedroAko (Discussed changesets: 331) | Hi @TagaSanPedroAko, We will be starting an organised editing activity about truck/HGV access in Canada, as announced here: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/optimoroute-organised-editing-activity-in-canada-truck-hgv-access/143453 W... commented 2026-05-26 10:55:19 UTC by MarkoŠatrak ♦72 |
| 182714313 (Comments: 2) | JonnyW03 (Discussed changesets: 63) | Hello again. No, there has not been a discussion because there is not one to be had. Gibraltar's current Territorial Sea borders (3nm) were were hand drawn and incorrect, partially due to the number of disputes between editors over the years.... commented 2026-05-26 10:49:27 UTC by JonnyW03 ♦9 |
| 106457687 (Comments: 9) | empers (Discussed changesets: 40) | Aš noriu pasakyti, kad aš niekur nerašiau, kad aš naikinsiu tavo duomenis. Taipogi nepamenu, kad kažkur specialiai būčiau naikinęs. Ir mano pirma pastaba buvo, kad nors duomenys abejotinos naudos, bet tebūnie, tiesiog... commented 2026-05-26 10:43:21 UTC by Tomas Straupis ♦2,070 |
| 183199906 (Comments: 1) | gurglypipe (Discussed changesets: 159) | In case the URI for the London Gazette breaks in future, the exact TRO is: Lancaster City Council (Ridge Estate Zone) and (Marsh Estate Zone) (Prohibition of Heavy Commercial Vehicles) Order 1990 and Width Restriction Order 1990 It was ... commented 2026-05-26 10:39:33 UTC by gurglypipe ♦1,053 |
| 181710489 (Comments: 1) | mriley78 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thank you for adding this path. Unfortunately you have added it in the wrong place. There is a path between Haw Clough Lane and Bunkers, but it runs next to Morley cottage. Having things missing from the map seems better than having confusin... commented 2026-05-26 10:33:10 UTC by tomhukins ♦289 |
| 182585562 (Comments: 1) | dayooyinloye (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello. Thanks for mapping. About multi story buildings: Check this video. For buildings with a few floors, start watching from position 1 minute. https://youtu.be/Tpi-BTMVo1M https://youtu.be/dsfUcslLtVc?si=bEHwRl1sxDI_GA0H commented 2026-05-26 10:31:39 UTC by Frans S ♦10,673 |
| 172801418 (Comments: 1) | Mister_R2 (Discussed changesets: 30) | Čau, No kādiem avotiem to secināji, ka https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1435133277 un https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1435133287 ir pirmsskola un skola? Tu norādīji tikai ortofoto kā avotu izmaiņai. Es nevaru neko atrast internetā, ... commented 2026-05-26 10:29:08 UTC by HellMap ♦901 |
| 183199367 (Comments: 1) | gurglypipe (Discussed changesets: 159) | In case the URI for the London Gazette breaks in future, the exact TRO is: Lancaster City Council (Ridge Estate Zone) and (Marsh Estate Zone) (Prohibition of Heavy Commercial Vehicles) Order 1990 and Width Restriction Order 1990 It was ... commented 2026-05-26 10:27:44 UTC by gurglypipe ♦1,053 |
| 183194399 (Comments: 1) | Rene Pedersen (Discussed changesets: 1) | Den er så "highway=trunk", rettet. commented 2026-05-26 10:22:21 UTC by osmviborg ♦1,840 |
| 181155325 (Comments: 1) | Jacek79 (Discussed changesets: 10) | Hallo Jacek79, du hast den Ringlokschuppen gelöscht. Bestimmt gibt es einen Grund, warum du den gelöscht hast und nicht mit dem Lifecycle-Prefix razed: versehen hast. Mit razed: wäre er in den Umrissen noch sichtbar und suchbar gewesen... commented 2026-05-26 10:16:36 UTC by Schramme ♦36 |
| 182310423 (Comments: 1) | SirKillian (Discussed changesets: 3) | There's a specific tag for Lourdes grottos, I'll add it commented 2026-05-26 10:12:08 UTC by joost schouppe ♦1,483 |
| 183197302 (Comments: 1) | eniu93 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap! Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulic... commented 2026-05-26 10:12:03 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦8,669 |
| 183198104 (Comments: 1) | gurglypipe (Discussed changesets: 159) | In case the URI for the London Gazette breaks in future, the exact TRO is: Lancaster City Council (Ridge Estate Zone) and (Marsh Estate Zone) (Prohibition of Heavy Commercial Vehicles) Order 1990 and Width Restriction Order 1990 It was ... commented 2026-05-26 10:03:44 UTC by gurglypipe ♦1,053 |
| 183137324 (Comments: 1) | NK10101 (Discussed changesets: 14) | Je hebt hier de eigenschappen van het gebouw gewist. Meer info via https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/260474587 commented 2026-05-26 09:52:45 UTC by joost schouppe ♦1,483 |
| 183091617 (Comments: 1) | NK10101 (Discussed changesets: 14) | Mooie detaillering van de site hier. Het blijkt om assistentiewoningen te gaan, dus ik heb die als dusdanig gemapped, zie https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183197491 De naam van de instelling hoort op de hele site, niet op alle individuele a... commented 2026-05-26 09:51:27 UTC by joost schouppe ♦1,483 |
| 183009511 (Comments: 10) | simonschaufi (Discussed changesets: 10) | @McKulkin I wasn't sure if people would even read the notes. It looks like people are getting notifications when changes happen (I don't know how to get notifications myself). I had a look into the "bus terminal" and couldn... commented 2026-05-26 09:49:51 UTC by simonschaufi ♦14 |
| 178314752 (Comments: 10) | simon_geovelo (Discussed changesets: 111) | Pour la traversée, dans la mesure où les automobiles ont le droit de rejoindre leur garage en faisant le même type de manœuvre je ne m’inquiéterais pas trop (ou demandez à un·e juriste). On ... commented 2026-05-26 09:49:03 UTC by Ltrlg ♦208 |
| 183091544 (Comments: 1) | NK10101 (Discussed changesets: 14) | Wat bedoel je hier precies mee? Is dit een onderdeel van de school aan de overkant van de straat? Hoe je het nu hebt getekend, zou dit betekenen dat dit grasveld zélf een school is. Ik verwijder voorlopig, laat maar weten wat je bedoelde en da... commented 2026-05-26 09:46:17 UTC by joost schouppe ♦1,483 |
| 168441428 (Comments: 2) | serge Raidon (Discussed changesets: 3) | Bonjour Enzo, Pour préciser le contexte, ce sont des sentiers qui ont été créés et qui sont entretenus directement par le club de VTT et gite local pour la pratique technique. Mais je comprends votre remar... commented 2026-05-26 09:42:27 UTC by serge Raidon ♦3 |
| 162299252 (Comments: 1) | Rhodez (Discussed changesets: 17) | Hi @Rhodez, We will be starting an organised editing activity about truck/HGV access in Canada, as announced here: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/optimoroute-organised-editing-activity-in-canada-truck-hgv-access/143453 We noticed... commented 2026-05-26 09:41:16 UTC by MarkoŠatrak ♦72 |
| 182514711 (Comments: 2) | Carto75 (Discussed changesets: 10) | Bonjour,merci pour votre message, je n'ai pas eu d'alerte de JOSM et je pense que les points devaient apparaitre en orange, ce qui m'a incité à les ajouter. Désolé pour l'erreur, vous pouvez effacer cet... commented 2026-05-26 09:40:14 UTC by Carto75 ♦23 |
| 183175418 (Comments: 2) | Sakujakira (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hallo pitfire, mir ist in mehreren Anwendungen/Apps aufgefallen das nicht alle Parkplätze hier als Privat gekennzeichnet werden. Zum Beispiel die Parkreihe nördlich direkt an den Gebäuden. Daher die zusätzliche Kennzei... commented 2026-05-26 09:38:24 UTC by Sakujakira ♦4 |
| 183070778 (Comments: 1) | NK10101 (Discussed changesets: 14) | Je hebt hier een woonstraat in de speeltuin getekend; dat is voor gewone wegen naar huizen. Ik heb er een dienstweg van gemaakt. Als je wegen laat kruisen, dan moeten ze een gemeenschappelijk punt hebben en niet gewoon "over elkaar" lopen. ... commented 2026-05-26 09:38:03 UTC by joost schouppe ♦1,483 |
| 183196743 (Comments: 1) | Stefan_89 (Discussed changesets: 14) | Hinweis vergessen: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5296801 commented 2026-05-26 09:34:38 UTC by Stefan_89 ♦14 |
| 183187582 (Comments: 1) | Anvesh Marni (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM. Please visit India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OS... commented 2026-05-26 09:33:58 UTC by arjunaraoc ♦763 |
| 183144861 (Comments: 3) | dott-Frasca-Trapani (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ok, grazie mille per la conferma, sto facendo delle piccole correzioni per identificare meglio la banca. commented 2026-05-26 09:33:57 UTC by Antonino_Faro ♦12 |
| 73166018 (Comments: 1) | libertus (Discussed changesets: 2) | W prawdzie już nie edytujesz ale skąd wziąłeś nazwy ulic w Nowodworzu ? commented 2026-05-26 09:32:22 UTC by grzegorz75jan ♦657 |
| 183187025 (Comments: 1) | Subhani9441 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM. Please visit India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OS... commented 2026-05-26 09:32:20 UTC by arjunaraoc ♦763 |
| 183070469 (Comments: 1) | NK10101 (Discussed changesets: 14) | Dag NK, Voor de duidelijkheid: het is niet enkel ik die de kaart in de gaten houdt. Veel van je wijzigingen op deze site zijn teruggedraaid door bxl-forever, zie https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183141851 Hij kan je misschien een en ande... commented 2026-05-26 09:32:16 UTC by joost schouppe ♦1,483 |
| 182901907 (Comments: 1) | BobJim84 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project. You regularly cluster buildings! Please map each building as an individual building. Best regards commented 2026-05-26 09:31:27 UTC by Frans S ♦10,673 |
| 183084323 (Comments: 2) | Matúš Tkáč (Discussed changesets: 3) | Príjemný deň, ďakujem za Vaše pripomienky k mojim zmenám v mape. Som v mapovaní začiatočník, preto som pri realizácii zmien postupoval podľa vlastného uváženia a myslenia, bez pozre... commented 2026-05-26 09:31:19 UTC by Matúš Tkáč ♦1 |
| 183171633 (Comments: 1) | yuric70 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in changeset id:183195814 commented 2026-05-26 09:16:03 UTC by MappingMore ♦453 |
| 170151305 (Comments: 2) | user_5359 (Discussed changesets: 414) | I’m changing all images under the “image” tag to “logo” if they don’t show the actual object. Admittedly, I’m not taking the legal situation into account here, since even a link to the WordPress media library... commented 2026-05-26 09:03:36 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,573 |
| 183188757 (Comments: 1) | Calumr2026 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. OSM is a live worldwide database from which countless maps are compiled. Thus, OSM shouldn't be edited merely for fun. Your edits here deleted a cycle way crossing, which would cause disruption to routing. Th... commented 2026-05-26 09:03:14 UTC by BCNorwich ♦5,185 |
| 182221326 (Comments: 1) | Sander H (Discussed changesets: 89) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/274448008/ is inderdaad building=prison, maar niet amenity=prison. Die info staat al op de hele site en moet niet nog eens herhaald worden. Ik fix het even. commented 2026-05-26 08:55:37 UTC by joost schouppe ♦1,483 |
| 182252738 (Comments: 1) | ThomasDu (Discussed changesets: 42) | Hopital de jour is an amenity=clinic in OSM tagging, not an amenity=hospital. I'll fix it. commented 2026-05-26 08:45:53 UTC by joost schouppe ♦1,483 |
| 182237910 (Comments: 1) | ThomasDu (Discussed changesets: 42) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13798055263 is not a hospital - amenity/healthcare=hospital is only for places where patients spend the night. I retagged to amenity=clinic (as there seem to be several therapists working here) and added the special... commented 2026-05-26 08:44:34 UTC by joost schouppe ♦1,483 |
| 183193888 (Comments: 1) | StefBurg77 (Discussed changesets: 1) | There was already a beach here, no need to duplicate it! commented 2026-05-26 08:38:33 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,651 |
| 183191891 (Comments: 1) | René888 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Ak je to budova, treba zakresliť budovu. commented 2026-05-26 08:31:46 UTC by Dodko ♦1,347 |
| 170283553 (Comments: 1) | A2Z INTERIORS (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted due to SEO spam: spammy name formatting, likely invalid addr:*=* tagging, nonsense office=* tag and SEO spam description. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183193824 commented 2026-05-26 08:31:24 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦89 |
| 183193464 (Comments: 1) | BRCKD (Discussed changesets: 3) | Lasallestraße anstatt Zuckerbusch - Zusätzlich noch Gehweg vor Haus 1-11 Herweghstraße commented 2026-05-26 08:31:12 UTC by BRCKD ♦2 |
| 183193492 (Comments: 1) | 特爾_Tyer (Discussed changesets: 1) | 缺少鴻邑時代園邸的公寓用地繪製 commented 2026-05-26 08:24:48 UTC by 特爾_Tyer ♦1 |
| 183115448 (Comments: 2) | jayaddison (Discussed changesets: 6) | The imagery on Bing show what appear to be a cross-hatched roof/covering across both that building and the one adjacent to it. In Mapbox, the building does not appear, but some smaller buildings are evident. I felt that the large roof s... commented 2026-05-26 08:23:46 UTC by jayaddison ♦30 |
| 180447396 (Comments: 1) | VáclavS (Discussed changesets: 22) | Zdravím, jedná sa o značenú cyklotrasu schválenú návštevným poriadkom Národného parku Nízke Tatry? https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/20377727 commented 2026-05-26 08:23:34 UTC by Filip009 ♦1,109 |
| 170153344 (Comments: 1) | Mint Hill Orthodontics (Discussed changesets: 2) | Removed blatently SEO spam description and other SEO spam tags in changeset/183193308 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183193308 commented 2026-05-26 08:22:04 UTC by CAM-Gerlach ♦227 |
| 146539079 (Comments: 1) | Pinnacle Periodontics and Dental Implants (Discussed changesets: 2) | Removed blatently SEO spam description and other SEO spam tags in changeset 183193308 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183193308 commented 2026-05-26 08:19:41 UTC by CAM-Gerlach ♦227 |
| 183101563 (Comments: 1) | Matúš Tkáč (Discussed changesets: 3) | Zastávka sa nemaže a nevytvára vedľa nová ale presúva sa aby ostala zachovaná história, takisto sa nespája s chodníkom commented 2026-05-26 08:16:25 UTC by Dodko ♦1,347 |
| 183178436 (Comments: 1) | rochirochi (Discussed changesets: 13) | Hola. Podríamos usar «EMTSAM» en lugar de «EMT» en claves como «old_ref:EMT». Así, las claves de referencias coincidirían con el valor de la etiqueta «operator=EMTSAM» que us... commented 2026-05-26 08:15:06 UTC by dcapillae ♦415 |
| 183084873 (Comments: 1) | Matúš Tkáč (Discussed changesets: 3) | Kruhový objazd sa robí inak https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Tag:junction%3Droundabout pozri si existujúce kruháče a podľa nich sa naučíš ako ich značiť commented 2026-05-26 08:11:53 UTC by Dodko ♦1,347 |
| 183181077 (Comments: 1) | Saykay 04 (Discussed changesets: 2) | My comment on your earlier changeset also applies here. Changes reverted via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183192620 commented 2026-05-26 08:03:49 UTC by Sammyhawkrad ♦158 |
| 183181004 (Comments: 1) | Saykay 04 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi Saykay 04, buildings are mapped as polygons with the tag building=*. Adding historic=building nodes on already mapped buildings is not right. These changes have been reverted via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183192409. commented 2026-05-26 07:59:41 UTC by Sammyhawkrad ♦158 |
| 170148617 (Comments: 1) | Mint Hill Orthodontics (Discussed changesets: 2) | Removed SEO spam description as well as image=*/logo=* in changeset 183192452 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183192452 commented 2026-05-26 07:58:27 UTC by CAM-Gerlach ♦227 |
| 183192418 (Comments: 1) | AndyB_66 (Discussed changesets: 52) | revert of https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183176629 commented 2026-05-26 07:57:22 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦912 |
| 183176629 (Comments: 1) | OSMaper_xD (Discussed changesets: 32) | Bzdura, między jezdniami nie ma żadnej skarpy - tu masz definicję: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:embankment i na pewno nie jest to "An artificial steep slope"! commented 2026-05-26 07:55:35 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦912 |
| 174482402 (Comments: 1) | WALDDESIGNERIN® (Discussed changesets: 1) | Fixed additional SEO spam tags (ALL CAPS and trademarked operator=*, invalid opening_hours=*) in changeset 183192288 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183192288 commented 2026-05-26 07:54:33 UTC by CAM-Gerlach ♦227 |
| 183124463 (Comments: 1) | KennyCompassKids (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in changeset id:183192293 commented 2026-05-26 07:54:31 UTC by MappingMore ♦453 |
| 182911453 (Comments: 1) | Peter Holúbek (Discussed changesets: 1) | Adresa je už v budove, vtedy sa nedáva duplicitne do POI commented 2026-05-26 07:53:20 UTC by Dodko ♦1,347 |
| 95089945 (Comments: 3) | LucieALO (Discussed changesets: 8) | Bonjour Patchanka, Effectivement! L'exploitant a déménagé à Pey il y a déjà 3ans. Merci. J'ai fait les modifs. Ils font toujours de la vente à la ferme mais le lieu de vente n'est pas co... commented 2026-05-26 07:53:00 UTC by LMJpro-PALO ♦1 |
| 183176687 (Comments: 1) | Tema check check (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Tema check check, welcome to OSM. If you only wanted to change a name, you didn't have to edit the geometries. Your changes have to be reverted due to errors created via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183192058. If you want t... commented 2026-05-26 07:52:55 UTC by Sammyhawkrad ♦158 |
| 170176866 (Comments: 1) | BH PROPERTY SERVICES (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted added SEO spam POI due to blatantly promotional description, spammy image=* tag, ALL CAPS name and missing any meaningful top-level tags https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183192098 commented 2026-05-26 07:48:36 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦89 |
| 170177670 (Comments: 1) | BH PROPERTY SERVICES (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted added SEO spam POI due to blatantly promotional description, spammy image=* tag, ALL CAPS name and missing any meaningful top-level tags https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183192098 commented 2026-05-26 07:48:36 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦89 |
| 183006520 (Comments: 1) | CoolFrog (Discussed changesets: 1) | Adresa môže byť len na jednom vchode. commented 2026-05-26 07:44:58 UTC by Dodko ♦1,347 |
| 170256969 (Comments: 1) | Oyuneks (Discussed changesets: 1) | Many bad/SEO spam tag values fixed in changeset 170264383. I stripped a couple remaining SEO-related tags in changeset 183191854 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170264383 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183191854 commented 2026-05-26 07:42:16 UTC by CAM-Gerlach ♦227 |
| 167100289 (Comments: 2) | Rabo2024 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Für die Zufahrt ri. Innenstadt (ober bei Nordorientierung) auf jeden Fall nicht. Das ist noch von der Zeit des Umbaus übrig. Ich hab es jetzt auf =yes zurück gestellt. Für die untere weiß ich's gerade nicht. Muss ich be... commented 2026-05-26 07:41:25 UTC by Rabo2024 ♦1 |
| 182972098 (Comments: 1) | ticho2 (Discussed changesets: 18) | opravené https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1518179148/history commented 2026-05-26 07:41:23 UTC by Dodko ♦1,347 |
| 183190496 (Comments: 1) | RobotFK (Discussed changesets: 26) | Danke für's erledigen meiner Hinweise! commented 2026-05-26 07:36:16 UTC by 0xb7767000 ♦24 |
| 177714646 (Comments: 2) | multimob (Discussed changesets: 58) | Bedankt voor de info, we passen dit aan. Tip: om een probleem met OSM-data te melden, is het beter om een direct bericht te sturen of een note op de kaart aan te maken. Changeset-opmerkingen zijn bedoeld om fouten in die specifieke wijziging t... commented 2026-05-26 07:36:02 UTC by multimob ♦86 |
| 182070136 (Comments: 3) | martino260 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Top, bedankt! GPS'en en bossen zullen nooit vriendjes worden... commented 2026-05-26 07:34:33 UTC by Geim ♦208 |
| 183104121 (Comments: 1) | Helena Eshun (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello Helena Eshun, you have created all these nodes at the same position. Most of which already exist. Please pay attention to existing data when mapping. commented 2026-05-26 07:33:17 UTC by Sammyhawkrad ♦158 |
| 183182589 (Comments: 3) | Lonen (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello there, I think there's no need for intervention here by the DWG because it seems that user Lonen is already clear about this, just stating it for the sake of completeness: There is almost nothing that is "not permitted to be mapped&qu... commented 2026-05-26 07:29:58 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,651 |
 | 183094381 (Comments: 2) | Layanan 24jam (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted SEO nonsense https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183191322 commented 2026-05-26 07:23:29 UTC by Taya_S ♦2,660 |
| 182103290 (Comments: 1) | francois poncage parquet vitrification (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted due to SEO spam node with just SEO spam tags (name, image, blatant self-promotional description, website and deleted wikidata) and no top-level tags inexplicably added to a random footway node https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/1... commented 2026-05-26 07:20:13 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦89 |
| 183156455 (Comments: 1) | EdoBoo (Discussed changesets: 13) | FYI https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183190751. Subfields all outer, cant be inner to itself. direction 180, no heliostatic to follow the sun. happy mapping. commented 2026-05-26 07:10:23 UTC by SekeRob ♦1,501 |
| 183189616 (Comments: 1) | masaya2 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Dear masaya2, thank you for your contributions to OSM. In this changeset you have deleted and then re-created a number of buildings because they were in the wrong location. It is recommended to instead move the existing building to the right place in... commented 2026-05-26 07:09:46 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,651 |
| 182197475 (Comments: 1) | CrystalTravel (Discussed changesets: 2) | Fixed spurious brand=* tag pointing to a URL for a single-location business to be website=* instead in changeset 183190821 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183190821 commented 2026-05-26 07:09:11 UTC by CAM-Gerlach ♦227 |
| 183167842 (Comments: 1) | Amulya2007 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM. Please visit India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). Please add proper comments about what you have contributed, sources etc ---... commented 2026-05-26 07:09:01 UTC by arjunaraoc ♦763 |
| 183154114 (Comments: 1) | GraceBabu (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM. Please visit India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OS... commented 2026-05-26 07:07:08 UTC by arjunaraoc ♦763 |
| 178197775 (Comments: 3) | Pernycek (Discussed changesets: 17) | Sorry, my bad. I fixed it. commented 2026-05-26 07:05:35 UTC by Pernycek ♦7 |
| 183151273 (Comments: 2) | farukyildizbas (Discussed changesets: 2) | Merhaba, yorumunuz için teşekkür ederim. Evet doğru, henüz inşaat başlamadı. Bu yüzden proposed olarak işaretlemek uygundur. Bu alanı OSM’ye kaydetmemin sebebi, Karaman Havalimanı projesinin 2014 yılından beri T&... commented 2026-05-26 07:03:46 UTC by farukyildizbas ♦2 |
| 182999876 (Comments: 3) | Map-Peter (Discussed changesets: 32) | Hallo Peter - (Hinweis für alle Wartenden: Auf Gleis 42 hat Einfahrt der ICE "Godot".) Sorry für die Verwirrung: bei der Karriere hat scheints die Rechtschreibprüfung auf dem so smarten Phone ihre "Intelligenz" spie... commented 2026-05-26 06:55:27 UTC by look4book ♦52 |
| 154601996 (Comments: 4) | lefou (Discussed changesets: 2) | Also an der östlichen Zufahrt war ich gestern mal schauen, und habe dem entsprechend gemappt. Nur am Spohlaer Weg müsste die Beschilderung nochmal überprüft werden, insbesondere ab der Brücke, denn ich bezweifle dass dort ... commented 2026-05-26 06:48:55 UTC by sembelst134 ♦43 |
| 179853491 (Comments: 1) | mircozorzo (Discussed changesets: 63) | Ho appena visto che la rotonda disegnata in questo momento è molto più grande di quella che si vede nelle foto satellitari . Va ridotta oppure si tratta della TERZA versione della viabilità ? Cioè dapprima incrocio a ra... commented 2026-05-26 06:47:40 UTC by Pucciotrex30 ♦14 |
| 183074831 (Comments: 4) | simonschaufi (Discussed changesets: 10) | Well, yes, the official city stop can also be used for intercity marshrutkas, why not. Although if it's not used more or less systematically for boarding or alighting, but only sporadically, then there is no point including it into the route. Ot... commented 2026-05-26 06:46:01 UTC by yelisey90 ♦471 |
| 183189608 (Comments: 1) | LachlanTansey2009 (Discussed changesets: 60) | West Footscray to Sunshine. Not West Footscray to Sunbury, my apologies. commented 2026-05-26 06:38:50 UTC by LachlanTansey2009 ♦40 |
| 176908058 (Comments: 1) | zeigmalan (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo zeigmalan, die von Dir verwendete App trägt Deine Eingaben direkt in die Rohdaten von OpenStreetMap ein. Das ist weltweit für alle sichtbar und wirkt in diesem Fall sehr störend. Deshalb habe ich diesen Eintrag und viele w... commented 2026-05-26 06:19:41 UTC by DD1GJ ♦2,431 |
| 182898106 (Comments: 1) | syntex (Discussed changesets: 295) | Gierdziejewskiego 5 nie będzie na razie ruszana. Są takie plany, ale chyba nawet nie złożyli wniosku do UM. https://www.facebook.com/kdauksz/posts/pfbid0WV2CFYTCdJn1Qqd9tDiKAgQ5JCWTsqCMXCvDZGKav4Nf1289JWSMqY4i4tXrzYssl commented 2026-05-26 06:04:21 UTC by SzymonH ♦225 |
| 183170745 (Comments: 2) | AutoMod (Discussed changesets: 1) | User has been blocked https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20710 commented 2026-05-26 05:19:34 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦6,578 |
| 183168455 (Comments: 2) | Mönchgut-Granitz (Discussed changesets: 1) | User has been blocked https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20709 commented 2026-05-26 05:18:40 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦6,578 |
| 183178975 (Comments: 1) | Atlas of Westeros (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, welcome to OSM. is the name real? commented 2026-05-26 05:17:36 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦6,578 |
| 183179998 (Comments: 1) | Atlas of Westeros (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, welcome to OSM. is the name real? commented 2026-05-26 05:17:31 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦6,578 |
 | 183182005 (Comments: 1) | ペイペイ (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, welcome to OSM. are the names real? commented 2026-05-26 05:17:08 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦6,578 |
| 183183495 (Comments: 1) | John Paul Manarin (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, welcome to OSM. are the names real? commented 2026-05-26 05:16:05 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦6,578 |
| 183183893 (Comments: 1) | Lance Joaquin (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hi, welcome to OSM. is the name real? commented 2026-05-26 05:15:50 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦6,578 |
| 183183912 (Comments: 1) | Lance Joaquin (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hi, welcome to OSM. is the name real? commented 2026-05-26 05:15:32 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦6,578 |
| 183184912 (Comments: 1) | Lance Joaquin (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hi, welcome to OSM. is the name real? commented 2026-05-26 05:15:28 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦6,578 |
| 183184904 (Comments: 1) | Lance Joaquin (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hi, welcome to OSM. is the name real? commented 2026-05-26 05:15:23 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦6,578 |
| 183179777 (Comments: 1) | Hotshotitaliano (Discussed changesets: 1) | When adding it directly to the map, please also don't submit a note.... commented 2026-05-26 05:12:40 UTC by CurlingMan13 ♦2,096 |
| 183186283 (Comments: 1) | Lizardtrails35 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Revert CS 183186283, 183186245, 183185993, 183185865, 183185692 - Vandalism Sockpuppet account of previously banned vandal. https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20705 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183186603 commented 2026-05-26 04:54:13 UTC by eerib ♦300 |
| 183186245 (Comments: 1) | Lizardtrails35 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Revert CS 183186283, 183186245, 183185993, 183185865, 183185692 - Vandalism Sockpuppet account of previously banned vandal. https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20705 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183186603 commented 2026-05-26 04:54:13 UTC by eerib ♦300 |
| 183185993 (Comments: 1) | Lizardtrails35 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Revert CS 183186283, 183186245, 183185993, 183185865, 183185692 - Vandalism Sockpuppet account of previously banned vandal. https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20705 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183186603 commented 2026-05-26 04:54:12 UTC by eerib ♦300 |
| 183185865 (Comments: 1) | Lizardtrails35 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Revert CS 183186283, 183186245, 183185993, 183185865, 183185692 - Vandalism Sockpuppet account of previously banned vandal. https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20705 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183186603 commented 2026-05-26 04:54:12 UTC by eerib ♦300 |
| 183185692 (Comments: 1) | Lizardtrails35 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Revert CS 183186283, 183186245, 183185993, 183185865, 183185692 - Vandalism Sockpuppet account of previously banned vandal. https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20705 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183186603 commented 2026-05-26 04:54:12 UTC by eerib ♦300 |
| 183122045 (Comments: 1) | Icak Albani (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in changeset id:183186179 commented 2026-05-26 04:39:39 UTC by MappingMore ♦453 |
| 164022367 (Comments: 1) | GridHopper (Discussed changesets: 12) | Hey, I noticed this changeset doesn't add a sign as your comment says, but it joins a hedge with a power line that is quite far away. I would like to get your approval before reverting the changeset. commented 2026-05-26 04:37:10 UTC by ZincoYarvis ♦2 |
| 183185521 (Comments: 1) | maxis27 (Discussed changesets: 2) | 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap! Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulic... commented 2026-05-26 04:21:10 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦8,669 |
| 183185472 (Comments: 1) | maxis27 (Discussed changesets: 2) | 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap! Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulic... commented 2026-05-26 04:11:31 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦8,669 |
| 182998018 (Comments: 2) | LachlanTansey2009 (Discussed changesets: 60) | I used the planning documents initially and yes, they are public initially but wanted to go out in person to confirm. From what I saw, It looked as if the junction from the Main Suburban lines into the Metro Tunnel had been lifted but riding past on ... commented 2026-05-26 04:05:00 UTC by LachlanTansey2009 ♦40 |
| 183175923 (Comments: 2) | stavrosspyropoulos (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thank you so much and I’m very sorry for the inconvenience. I’ll be aware of the naming conventions from this point on. commented 2026-05-26 04:02:45 UTC by stavrosspyropoulos ♦1 |
| 183068782 (Comments: 1) | StreetSurveyor (Discussed changesets: 92) | btw, it looks like cubbe8 reverted this changeset in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183071407#map=13/42.35448/-71.07948 commented 2026-05-26 03:57:43 UTC by synthfi ♦20 |
| 181883943 (Comments: 1) | MiraGlow (Discussed changesets: 1) | Removed SEO spam name=* on terrace with no other meaningful tags in changeset 183183635 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183183635 commented 2026-05-26 02:41:53 UTC by CAM-Gerlach ♦227 |
| 182131542 (Comments: 1) | Udarian (Discussed changesets: 107) | Thanks for fixing the other issues. Seems the SEO spam description was missed here; removed in changeset 183183544 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183183544 commented 2026-05-26 02:40:00 UTC by CAM-Gerlach ♦227 |
| 182102939 (Comments: 1) | Parrish Bail Bonds (Discussed changesets: 1) | Many problems fixed in changeset 182131542 ; I then removed the SEO spam description=* in changeset 183183544 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182131542 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183183544 commented 2026-05-26 02:38:12 UTC by CAM-Gerlach ♦227 |
| 181397423 (Comments: 1) | halil ılgın (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted removal of valid building=yes tag and addition of nonsensical/malformed/SEO spam tags to POI "Dr. Halil ILGIN" https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183183485 commented 2026-05-26 02:31:36 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦89 |
| 181117928 (Comments: 3) | Thrissur_Villas (Discussed changesets: 2) | Removed additional SEO spam and promotional tagging from POI in changeset 183183436 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183183436 commented 2026-05-26 02:28:49 UTC by CAM-Gerlach ♦227 |
| 181116509 (Comments: 3) | Thrissur_Villas (Discussed changesets: 2) | Removed additional SEO spam tagging and nonsensical name=* addition to the end of a way in changeset 183183370 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183183370 commented 2026-05-26 02:26:34 UTC by CAM-Gerlach ♦227 |
 | 182312040 (Comments: 1) | AB Rafi Farhad (Discussed changesets: 3) | Reverted addition of SEO spam POI with spurious and promotional tags/values and related spam/nonsensical changes (e.g. route relation of the POI) https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183183323 commented 2026-05-26 02:22:39 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦89 |
| 181343019 (Comments: 2) | AB Rafi Farhad (Discussed changesets: 3) | Reverted addition of SEO spam POI with spurious and promotional tags/values and related spam/nonsensical changes (e.g. route relation of the POI) https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183183323 commented 2026-05-26 02:22:38 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦89 |
| 181976122 (Comments: 1) | AB Rafi Farhad (Discussed changesets: 3) | Reverted addition of SEO spam POI with spurious and promotional tags/values and related spam/nonsensical changes (e.g. route relation of the POI) https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183183323 commented 2026-05-26 02:22:38 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦89 |
| 181135227 (Comments: 1) | Spendable (Discussed changesets: 1) | Removed SEO spam POI with no meaningful tags, reverted name change of entire building to one POI within, and fixed bad address tagging in changset 183183242 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183183242 commented 2026-05-26 02:17:01 UTC by CAM-Gerlach ♦227 |
| 183126869 (Comments: 2) | JesseFTW (Discussed changesets: 17) | Yes, good idea. Please do so! commented 2026-05-26 02:14:03 UTC by JesseFTW ♦155 |
| 181176995 (Comments: 2) | TRUCK SATHI (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted addition of likely Google Maps-sourced SEO POI with a spam description and no top-level tags https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183183173 commented 2026-05-26 02:11:25 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦89 |
| 181258184 (Comments: 1) | Levels AI (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted SEO addition of name=* to building with no other meaningful tags https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183183145 commented 2026-05-26 02:09:12 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦89 |
| 181426191 (Comments: 5) | Swedish Flow (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted addition of SEO POI that the statement of the mapper doesn't exist as a physical business at this location https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183182938 commented 2026-05-26 01:56:51 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦89 |
| 181333815 (Comments: 2) | Mei Zoo (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted adding SEO spam POI with many nonsensical tags and possibly Google Maps-derived data https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183182561 commented 2026-05-26 01:33:17 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦89 |
| 183173997 (Comments: 1) | AN11 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Kampung itu gunakan tag place=hamlet; untuk tag place=villlage itu digunakan untuk administrasi Desa. commented 2026-05-26 01:26:21 UTC by FajrAl ♦367 |
| 181407589 (Comments: 2) | Tharpure Organic Farms Pvt Ltd (Discussed changesets: 1) | Removed promotional SEO spam description and fixed other malformed tags in changeset 183182268 www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183182268 commented 2026-05-26 01:16:18 UTC by CAM-Gerlach ♦227 |
| 181430661 (Comments: 1) | BRIGHT STREET FACILITIES MANAGEMENT (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted adding SEO spam POI with ALL CAPS name and malformed tags https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183181950 commented 2026-05-26 00:56:17 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦89 |
| 181442468 (Comments: 1) | Bill Bone Bike Law (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted the SEO spam road name change, removed POI name from entire building and merged three SEO-added POIs for Bill Bone law into one in changeset 183181851 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183181851 commented 2026-05-26 00:52:37 UTC by CAM-Gerlach ♦227 |
| 183123639 (Comments: 2) | syntex (Discussed changesets: 295) | już naprawione commented 2026-05-26 00:50:10 UTC by syntex ♦897 |
| 181454859 (Comments: 1) | Sundays Sun Spa Wellness (Discussed changesets: 4) | Reverted addition of non-existent/promotional beauty=* subtags, and also fixed website=* to point to this specific location in changeset 183181642 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183181642 commented 2026-05-26 00:40:46 UTC by CAM-Gerlach ♦227 |
| 181454600 (Comments: 1) | Sundays Sun Spa Wellness (Discussed changesets: 4) | In changeset 183181571 I reverted this incorrect change of a location-specific website=* URL to the general homepage, and fix the malformed opening_hours=* added here https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183181571 commented 2026-05-26 00:37:10 UTC by CAM-Gerlach ♦227 |
| 164746109 (Comments: 2) | ContraBand (Discussed changesets: 13) | There's no shortage of places to enjoy coffee area here, thats for sure. One of my favorite places to map/record 360 trails with my dog. commented 2026-05-26 00:31:17 UTC by ContraBand ♦4 |
| 181453383 (Comments: 1) | Sundays Sun Spa Wellness (Discussed changesets: 4) | Reverted the inexplicable SEO spam change of a strip mall suite from building=retail to building=service in changset 183181482 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183181482 commented 2026-05-26 00:30:50 UTC by CAM-Gerlach ♦227 |
| 181453006 (Comments: 1) | Sundays Sun Spa Wellness (Discussed changesets: 4) | Reverted SEO spam: Tags for one POI were incorrectly added to an entire strip mall building, and most tags added/changed on the POI had incorrect/malformed values https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183181429 commented 2026-05-26 00:25:31 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦89 |
| 180677346 (Comments: 1) | BlueBlurr1565 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hey, just a heads up that setting access=no and bicycle=designated (I think with the "bicycle path" setting in iD?) like you did on the Gordie Howe Bridge MUP access path (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1480556248) results in it being ta... commented 2026-05-26 00:13:23 UTC by Jarek 🚲 ♦382 |
| 183098091 (Comments: 1) | MrLocalFixer (Discussed changesets: 3) | Great to see all the updates you're making! Can you tell me what the house thing with trees is that you called 'Dera' (and didn't add any tags to >.<)? I keep seeing these and have no idea what that is. It's a bi... commented 2026-05-25 23:48:28 UTC by Seyruun ♦21 |
| 183089094 (Comments: 2) | maddog107 (Discussed changesets: 15) | Ok yes, I fixed all the stuff. Thanks for telling me! commented 2026-05-25 23:18:34 UTC by maddog107 ♦14 |
| 82410152 (Comments: 2) | Laci (Discussed changesets: 33) | Nein, keine Ahnung, sorry. commented 2026-05-25 22:40:26 UTC by Laci ♦42 |
| 181959183 (Comments: 2) | Ave Arboris (Discussed changesets: 1) | I believe Tulsa's currently not installing anything less than 6 feet wide, and most everything south of the tracks is likely at least 7... I'd recommend actually measuring. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA ... commented 2026-05-25 22:33:29 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,421 |
| 118254700 (Comments: 1) | StriDez (Discussed changesets: 1) | This is Village Sardar Aurangzaib khan Rajar commented 2026-05-25 22:06:39 UTC by Umer Randhawa ♦1 |
| 183159641 (Comments: 1) | Негуляев (Discussed changesets: 10) | Здравствуйте, не возражаете если я заменю "7 Отделение улица" на "улица 7 Отделение" (и другие цифры в этих _отделениях_? commented 2026-05-25 22:06:10 UTC by Grass-snake ♦279 |
| 172204444 (Comments: 1) | Bootprint (Discussed changesets: 26) | hiii! please make sure to type in full street name, I noticed it's just a short version in couple of change sets! Thank you for mapping! commented 2026-05-25 22:06:09 UTC by skfd ♦288 |
| 177667774 (Comments: 1) | BallbusterFtheGOV (Discussed changesets: 1) | thanks for the add. commented 2026-05-25 22:04:44 UTC by skorasaurus ♦221 |
| 183128763 (Comments: 1) | DSanchez777 (Discussed changesets: 6) | RE: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1521074656, et al When drawing golf course areas (i.e. greens, fairways, bunkers, tees, etc.), please be aware that the ways (lines) used to outline those areas must not cross over each other. Fairway outl... commented 2026-05-25 21:58:13 UTC by b-jazz ♦873 |
| 182881767 (Comments: 1) | городская управа Суровикино (Discussed changesets: 3) | Здравствуйте, хочу обратить внимание, что в OSM принято писать полные названия дорог, включая слова "улица", "проезд", "переуло... commented 2026-05-25 21:52:20 UTC by Grass-snake ♦279 |
| 182906857 (Comments: 2) | Maradona11 (Discussed changesets: 60) | Thank you for pointing that out to us. I will pass it on to the data owner at TfNSW - sourced from local councils. commented 2026-05-25 21:48:36 UTC by Maradona11 ♦47 |
| 179136684 (Comments: 1) | maps4junkies (Discussed changesets: 11) | Hi du hast hier https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/437668009 die Beschreibung entfernt. Ist das weiterhin access=customers, wenn "Käptn Store Kundenparkplatz" nicht mehr zutrifft ? Viele Grüße commented 2026-05-25 21:41:06 UTC by limes11 ♦1,040 |
| 177976055 (Comments: 1) | mm_m_mm (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hallo, mit welcher Begründung hast du hier das angebliche "Duplikat" entfernt? Es gibt hier einmal die Betriebsstelle "RGZ", "Karlsruhe-Grötzingen" das ist ein Bahnhof der DB InfraGO nach EBO, für de... commented 2026-05-25 21:30:59 UTC by bjoern262 ♦9 |
| 177925855 (Comments: 2) | ABF_Amsterdam (Discussed changesets: 1) | I changed the direction to solve the problem. Greetz, eggie commented 2026-05-25 21:28:50 UTC by eggie ♦45,474 |
| 183176004 (Comments: 1) | nestorlora (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hola, Néstor. Usamos «footway=sidewalk» para las aceras: una senda que discurre en paralelo a la calzada o está asociada a una carretera. Si se trata de una senda que discurre por un parque o no se trata propia... commented 2026-05-25 21:25:22 UTC by dcapillae ♦415 |
| 183177267 (Comments: 1) | TheFreeName (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. Feedback Netherlands heb ik weer verwijderd. Dat hoort niet in de format van een adres. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Comm... commented 2026-05-25 21:23:18 UTC by eggie ♦45,474 |
| 183177053 (Comments: 1) | Daniel_171 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-05-25 21:19:51 UTC by eggie ♦45,474 |
| 183175234 (Comments: 2) | LoneWolf3040 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Voorlopig aangepast naar hondenveldje. CTRL F5 voor het effect commented 2026-05-25 21:19:23 UTC by eggie ♦45,474 |
| 183173425 (Comments: 1) | dav23r (Discussed changesets: 17) | partly reverted, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183177984 commented 2026-05-25 21:18:31 UTC by yelisey90 ♦471 |
| 183038899 (Comments: 8) | box_911 (Discussed changesets: 7) | 1. ... 2. В результате ваших правок исчез мультиполигон подземного здания. Не будем вдаваться в детали, куда и что вы перенесли, но здание и... commented 2026-05-25 20:55:21 UTC by literan ♦7,113 |
| 183174895 (Comments: 1) | Alikam (Discussed changesets: 19) | Selam, Akaryakıt istasyonu arazisini amenity=fuel olarak eklemişsiniz ancak istasyon için amenity=fuel olarak node mevcut. Bu şekilde kullanımda orada 2 adet akaryakıt istasyonu var gibi görünmekte. Eklediğiniz ht... commented 2026-05-25 20:43:28 UTC by burakonder ♦6 |
| 183175508 (Comments: 1) | Silnet Media (Discussed changesets: 14) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna.... commented 2026-05-25 20:42:55 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦8,669 |
| 157415634 (Comments: 2) | mcliquid (Discussed changesets: 223) | nevermind, gerade street view gesehen commented 2026-05-25 20:39:08 UTC by stillhart ♦246 |
| 72591384 (Comments: 1) | stefan3000 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Kurze Frage, weisst du ob das tatsächlich ein tesla supercharger ist? Ich glaube das ist wenn überhaupt ein Tesla Destination Charger https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6642996759/history commented 2026-05-25 20:32:24 UTC by stillhart ♦246 |
| 183057957 (Comments: 1) | ogJXAksHkFT0wmrr (Discussed changesets: 9) | cliff or earth_bank? commented 2026-05-25 20:24:18 UTC by yelisey90 ♦471 |
| 176543333 (Comments: 2) | d3mol3k (Discussed changesets: 115) | Cześć grelus - jeśli usunąłem to sorry ale nie było takiego zamysłu najprawdopodobniej coś nie tak się klikło :( - sorry też że dopiero teraz odpisuję ale teraz dokopałem się do tej wiadomości podczas sprzątania poczty bo przez pewie... commented 2026-05-25 20:23:46 UTC by d3mol3k ♦189 |
| 183029015 (Comments: 1) | Luka Latsabidze (Discussed changesets: 1) | Is this really what you wanted to create? A shop selling swimming pools, named Netari, without any cafe? commented 2026-05-25 20:20:37 UTC by yelisey90 ♦471 |
| 183150747 (Comments: 1) | Memolog23 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Мороженое (как и "Чулки-носки" или "Пиво дешево" и т.п.) это не название, а текст с вывески https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Названия#Не_по... commented 2026-05-25 20:19:21 UTC by literan ♦7,113 |
| 183039436 (Comments: 1) | iuvi (Discussed changesets: 6) | partly rv — not the whole area is a building; and don't use a generic name, only a specific name for this particular fuel station or brand https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183176188 commented 2026-05-25 20:18:57 UTC by yelisey90 ♦471 |
| 178679984 (Comments: 9) | OEBF_ej (Discussed changesets: 1) | Vielen Dank für die Informationen und die Quellen. Mir war nicht bewusst, dass so viel Privatbesitz ist. Wenn Radfahren im Wald als „Erholungszweck“ angesehen wird, erscheint es mir praktisch kaum umsetzbar, bei jedem Weg, der... commented 2026-05-25 20:13:49 UTC by Beau Jonckers ♦21 |
| 183166845 (Comments: 1) | Raa39 (Discussed changesets: 42) | тег name для названий, имен собственных не надо туда писать все подряд commented 2026-05-25 20:12:33 UTC by literan ♦7,113 |
| 183135000 (Comments: 1) | Noelia<3 (Discussed changesets: 1) | I visited this park in March 2026 and realized that the OSM routes were so different than the actual park map that I had to come back and fix it. My GPS track appears to match the official park map, which I consulted along the way: https://parks.alam... commented 2026-05-25 20:08:01 UTC by Noelia<3 ♦1 |
| 153276047 (Comments: 1) | Spitzalit87 (Discussed changesets: 3) | zu https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11202616436/history#map=19/47.104597/9.739817&layers=N Hoi. Das ist doch ziemlich sicher ein Tesla destination charger und kein Tesla Supercharger? Supercharger sind schnellladestationen. Auf de... commented 2026-05-25 20:01:23 UTC by stillhart ♦246 |
| 153275440 (Comments: 1) | Spitzalit87 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hoi. Das ist doch ziemlich sicher ein Tesla destination charger und kein Tesla Supercharger? Supercharger sind schnellladestationen. Auf der Tesla website lässt sich nichts dazu finden, und die ist in der Regel top aktuell. https://www... commented 2026-05-25 20:00:34 UTC by stillhart ♦246 |
| 176813917 (Comments: 2) | Meeliz (Discussed changesets: 3) | reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183174685 commented 2026-05-25 19:44:30 UTC by qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq ♦514 |
| 182017351 (Comments: 1) | Grüner Baum (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo Grüner Baum, node/1802189162 darf von Kunden mit Autos und Pferden genutzt werden, nicht jedoch mit dem Fahrrad oder zu Fuß. Ist das so korrekt? FroschForscher commented 2026-05-25 19:41:46 UTC by FroschForscher ♦143 |
| 183174737 (Comments: 1) | Franciszek Józef (Discussed changesets: 13) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy. Nazwa nadawana jest automatycznie, na podstawie wartości brand. Opcj... commented 2026-05-25 19:41:39 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦8,669 |
| 183141069 (Comments: 1) | noblewarrior (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello noblewarrior, Thank you for your interest in OpenStreetMap and your first edit! I have improved this edit by reverting the deletions and instead marking the trails as access=private or access=no depending on if they're on privately ... commented 2026-05-25 19:36:22 UTC by eerib ♦300 |
| 183150301 (Comments: 1) | Reinis Bērziņš (Discussed changesets: 27) | Sveiki, Lūdzu neveido šādus https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1521282410 taku gabalus nesavienotus un ar nestandarta tegiem. Tos grūti vēlāk izlabot un nevar saprast, kas te domāts. `crossing` ir pāreja - to var lietot tik... commented 2026-05-25 19:28:19 UTC by HellMap ♦901 |
| 182976306 (Comments: 1) | no_sch (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hallo no_sch, cycleway:right=track ist hier (way/65336954) von der Bauform korrekt, da der Radweg jedoch separat eingezeichnet ist wäre cycleway:right=seperate (der orange Pfeil in SC) richtig. FroschForscher commented 2026-05-25 19:25:55 UTC by FroschForscher ♦143 |
| 183007361 (Comments: 2) | eerib (Discussed changesets: 73) | Hello LoamSaviour, I did not add the trail name for this trail. The name for this trail was added by user "cole12345" in changeset #182392901 on May 8, 2026. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182392901 If you are ... commented 2026-05-25 19:18:32 UTC by eerib ♦300 |
 | 182099450 (Comments: 2) | Ybizu (Discussed changesets: 8) | PS: Correct wikilink for dams: waterway=dam commented 2026-05-25 19:17:43 UTC by dafadllyn ♦75 |
| 183169664 (Comments: 2) | Ole Kieschnick (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hallo, Danke für den Hinweis, werde ich bei Gelegenheit anpassen. Mit besten Grüßen commented 2026-05-25 19:13:25 UTC by Ole Kieschnick ♦1 |
| 163690279 (Comments: 1) | Samus343 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour, Il y a clairement une anomalie sur les horaires de Rude. Erreur de manipulation apperemment avec StreetComplete. commented 2026-05-25 19:11:52 UTC by Sébastien Pi ♦120 |
| 183096129 (Comments: 1) | LucasToMap (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo, Hydranten haben keine Namen, zumal die Information schon in ref steht. Daher: Bitte einmal die Namen entfernen. Viele Grüße commented 2026-05-25 19:11:28 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,495 |
| 183173241 (Comments: 1) | degemian (Discussed changesets: 5) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Klucz addr:place oznacza brak nazwy ulicy. Kombinacja z addr:street (który definiuje nazwę ulicy) je... commented 2026-05-25 19:11:19 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦8,669 |
| 183096871 (Comments: 1) | AUG_FW (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap. Zu https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13871451640 https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13871451641 https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13871451642 ref ist die Hydrantennummer, du meinte... commented 2026-05-25 19:06:00 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,495 |
| 183097911 (Comments: 1) | PeterJobst (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hallo, auch hier: bitte dringend korrigieren, darüber kommen auch etliche Nonsens-Daten rein; Beispiel: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13871511342 als Unterflurhydrant in einem Bachlauf? Viele Grüße commented 2026-05-25 18:59:11 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,495 |
| 183099137 (Comments: 1) | PeterJobst (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hallo wie bereits schon einmal geschrieben: Hydranten sollten nicht mit Straßen, Gebäuden u. ä. verbunden werden. Das lässt sich leicht beheben: im Editor markieren und „E“ drücken – das löst den Hy... commented 2026-05-25 18:56:08 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,495 |
| 183145520 (Comments: 1) | Ole Kieschnick (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hallo, auch wenn du es nur angepasst hast: Hydranten haben keine Namen. Daher bei https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7817388376 https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11585037977 bitte löschen. Viele Grüße commented 2026-05-25 18:53:25 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,495 |
| 183129347 (Comments: 1) | Pinecorn (Discussed changesets: 1) | #TIP: please leave a changeset comment, it will help you and others. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments for more info. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changeset... commented 2026-05-25 18:50:13 UTC by Glassman ♦5,942 |
| 183129683 (Comments: 1) | calyptcs (Discussed changesets: 2) | #TIP: please leave good changeset comments. I will help you and others. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments for more informations --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org... commented 2026-05-25 18:48:49 UTC by Glassman ♦5,942 |
| 183068636 (Comments: 1) | 253-himmelblau (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap. Du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten. Ich habe keine Anmerkungen. Vielen Dank für deinen Beitrag und weiterhin viel Spaß beim Mappen. Viele Grüße commented 2026-05-25 18:48:12 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,495 |
| 183151278 (Comments: 1) | MichaelWetzel87 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hallo, bitte nimm die Farben wieder raus. Nur zur Klarstellung: Das ist die Farbe, die der Hydrant vor Ort hat. Das hat nichts mit der Darstellung in Karten oder Apps zu tun. Viele Grüße commented 2026-05-25 18:47:14 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,495 |
| 183015627 (Comments: 3) | Ozon OSM13 (Discussed changesets: 10) | Здравствуйте. Прошу прощения, действительно моя ошибка что указал номер участка. Буду внимательней commented 2026-05-25 18:46:35 UTC by Ozon OSM13 ♦5 |
| 183117608 (Comments: 1) | dhcmrlchtdj (Discussed changesets: 1) | #TIP: we spell out street names in OSM because softare has a hard time unabbreviating --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183117608 commented 2026-05-25 18:44:32 UTC by Glassman ♦5,942 |
| 183103787 (Comments: 1) | TTMine20 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo, du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten. Ich habe nur Anmerkungen zu https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1520593195: - Unvollständige Adressbestandteile werden nicht erfasst. D. h. die addr:*-Angaben sollten w... commented 2026-05-25 18:43:07 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,495 |
| 177393707 (Comments: 1) | delonix (Discussed changesets: 11) | Hola. Subir de categoría las calles de la CI Huachipa Este no tiene mucho sentido. Es básicamente un sector sin salida. Su importancia en la red no es mucha. Hay un tertiary además para un relleno sanitario. No parecen ser... commented 2026-05-25 18:41:14 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦3,092 |
| 183126908 (Comments: 1) | Inmobiliaria Mendieta Müller (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola. Te hago la revision que pediste: Si es una inmobiliaria tenes que mapearlo con office=estate_agent. Asi como lo agregaste queda como lugar de culto. Ver: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:office%3Destate_agent commented 2026-05-25 18:32:55 UTC by muralito ♦2,151 |
| 183171344 (Comments: 1) | angelooneda (Discussed changesets: 1) | . commented 2026-05-25 18:15:01 UTC by angelooneda ♦1 |
| 182085265 (Comments: 2) | test0022012 (Discussed changesets: 74) | What's even funnier is that some names are inherently in French and they know it's the case, but they don't have a choice but to keep it in the name tag, and just replace name:fr by name:en, like no one will notice. Examples: "Cit... commented 2026-05-25 18:13:11 UTC by ilias_ ♦441 |
| 174839202 (Comments: 1) | nickhex (Discussed changesets: 1) | próvelmente, uma edição errado: um usuário com uma só edição; objetos com nomes estranhos e "teste" como comentário de changeset. commented 2026-05-25 17:54:27 UTC by Geogast ♦97 |
| 172767314 (Comments: 2) | Anas masuris (Discussed changesets: 150) | Taka moja mania bezpieczeństwa, miałem już przywrócić ścieżkę, ale mnie uprzedziłeś xd commented 2026-05-25 17:40:23 UTC by Anas masuris ♦180 |
| 179808578 (Comments: 1) | Dawiddd (Discussed changesets: 9) | To że coś dodajesz to dobrze i edytujesz od nie dawna ale umówmy się że zaczniesz trochę więcej czytać pomoc edytora do obiektów czyli Wikipedię. Zbiorczo do paru edycji. W okolicy ulicy Romanowicza dodałeś ciągi pi... commented 2026-05-25 17:39:49 UTC by grzegorz75jan ♦657 |
| 181471642 (Comments: 6) | Zverik (Discussed changesets: 75) | I was more concerned about it being a highway=footway. But now that you mention it, it is segregated, no doubt about it. Truly physical segregation would allow to map it as two paths. Of course, dark red asphalt for bicycles or cobble... commented 2026-05-25 17:29:41 UTC by qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq ♦514 |
| 183152476 (Comments: 4) | E Tsipa (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thank you for the welcome and the useful tips! commented 2026-05-25 17:20:50 UTC by E Tsipa ♦1 |
| 183080695 (Comments: 1) | Advanced Pest Management Services Inc - Residential & Commercial Exterminators (Discussed changesets: 2) | SEO spam fully reverted. commented 2026-05-25 17:16:03 UTC by MxxCon ♦3,537 |
| 183006260 (Comments: 6) | Raymond (Discussed changesets: 27) | Ich habe eine Note gesetzt: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5309709 commented 2026-05-25 17:15:45 UTC by Raymond ♦34 |
| 183079340 (Comments: 1) | Advanced Pest Management Services Inc - Residential & Commercial Exterminators (Discussed changesets: 2) | SEO spam fully reverted. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183079340 commented 2026-05-25 17:15:29 UTC by MxxCon ♦3,537 |
| 113271177 (Comments: 1) | mego_map (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hi, what is the reason for changing the road classification? It seems there is a schema for this road 11 in changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/113255131 where all these interconnecting roads are trunk_link and you randomly change on... commented 2026-05-25 17:10:18 UTC by aceman444 ♦2,906 |
| 177266999 (Comments: 2) | Lisapple (Discussed changesets: 57) | Oui, je ne vois pas bien pourquoi j'avais ajouté ce fixme puisque le nom a toujours été correct. Je le supprime donc. Merci. commented 2026-05-25 17:03:23 UTC by Lisapple ♦66 |
| 164950283 (Comments: 4) | José Guerrero López (Discussed changesets: 1) | En el caso concreto del Cerrillo de Juan Rodríguez (y la fuente a sus pies) son elementos del paisaje de muy poca importancia, es decir, la fuente sólo echa agua en años lluviosos, y el cerrillo, como su propio nombre indica, es ... commented 2026-05-25 17:02:21 UTC by José Guerrero López ♦1 |
| 183105945 (Comments: 4) | bmskater (Discussed changesets: 1) | ja. aber halt auch mit überall laola dran geschrieben... mir scheint das der Name aller Angebote auf dem Gelände zu sein, macht daher vielleicht Sinn noch mal ein polygon ganz rumzzuziehen. pass gern an, wie es dir sinnvoll erscheint. commented 2026-05-25 16:50:47 UTC by bmskater ♦1 |
| 183164168 (Comments: 1) | Robert Lazu (Discussed changesets: 10) | None of those appear to be a tertiary road, most of them appear to be driveways and then residential roads. I'd like to recommend you learn more about road classifications before you continue editing. I've been following your edits and almo... commented 2026-05-25 16:36:12 UTC by CoryS89 ♦12 |
| 183166477 (Comments: 1) | reestgen (Discussed changesets: 1) | помилка: не Сохнацьке, а Сохацьке commented 2026-05-25 16:20:54 UTC by reestgen ♦1 |
| 183166530 (Comments: 1) | EP_Repair (Discussed changesets: 24) | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 178008082, 178008636, 178048810, 178102167, 179275692, 179304824, 179305488, 179317327, 179317427, 179400451, 179404764, 180306953, 180645564, 180646868, 180676408, 180732227, 180733807, 180... commented 2026-05-25 16:20:44 UTC by EP_Repair ♦586 |
| 179317327 (Comments: 1) | kris507 (Discussed changesets: 4) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183166530 where the changeset comment is: Revert changesets adding vegetation traced from water and boundary ways, causing disruption to both features. User block issued. commented 2026-05-25 16:20:43 UTC by EP_Repair ♦586 |
| 179275692 (Comments: 1) | kris507 (Discussed changesets: 4) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183166530 where the changeset comment is: Revert changesets adding vegetation traced from water and boundary ways, causing disruption to both features. User block issued. commented 2026-05-25 16:20:43 UTC by EP_Repair ♦586 |
| 182206099 (Comments: 1) | kris507 (Discussed changesets: 4) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183166530 where the changeset comment is: Revert changesets adding vegetation traced from water and boundary ways, causing disruption to both features. User block issued. commented 2026-05-25 16:20:43 UTC by EP_Repair ♦586 |
| 179305488 (Comments: 1) | kris507 (Discussed changesets: 4) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183166530 where the changeset comment is: Revert changesets adding vegetation traced from water and boundary ways, causing disruption to both features. User block issued. commented 2026-05-25 16:20:42 UTC by EP_Repair ♦586 |
| 179400451 (Comments: 1) | kris507 (Discussed changesets: 4) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183166530 where the changeset comment is: Revert changesets adding vegetation traced from water and boundary ways, causing disruption to both features. User block issued. commented 2026-05-25 16:20:42 UTC by EP_Repair ♦586 |
| 180646868 (Comments: 1) | kris507 (Discussed changesets: 4) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183166530 where the changeset comment is: Revert changesets adding vegetation traced from water and boundary ways, causing disruption to both features. User block issued. commented 2026-05-25 16:20:41 UTC by EP_Repair ♦586 |
| 178048810 (Comments: 1) | kris507 (Discussed changesets: 4) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183166530 where the changeset comment is: Revert changesets adding vegetation traced from water and boundary ways, causing disruption to both features. User block issued. commented 2026-05-25 16:20:41 UTC by EP_Repair ♦586 |
| 180733807 (Comments: 1) | kris507 (Discussed changesets: 4) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183166530 where the changeset comment is: Revert changesets adding vegetation traced from water and boundary ways, causing disruption to both features. User block issued. commented 2026-05-25 16:20:40 UTC by EP_Repair ♦586 |
| 178102167 (Comments: 1) | kris507 (Discussed changesets: 4) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183166530 where the changeset comment is: Revert changesets adding vegetation traced from water and boundary ways, causing disruption to both features. User block issued. commented 2026-05-25 16:20:40 UTC by EP_Repair ♦586 |
| 179304824 (Comments: 1) | kris507 (Discussed changesets: 4) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183166530 where the changeset comment is: Revert changesets adding vegetation traced from water and boundary ways, causing disruption to both features. User block issued. commented 2026-05-25 16:20:39 UTC by EP_Repair ♦586 |
| 182206429 (Comments: 1) | kris507 (Discussed changesets: 4) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183166530 where the changeset comment is: Revert changesets adding vegetation traced from water and boundary ways, causing disruption to both features. User block issued. commented 2026-05-25 16:20:39 UTC by EP_Repair ♦586 |
| 178008082 (Comments: 1) | kris507 (Discussed changesets: 4) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183166530 where the changeset comment is: Revert changesets adding vegetation traced from water and boundary ways, causing disruption to both features. User block issued. commented 2026-05-25 16:20:38 UTC by EP_Repair ♦586 |
| 178008636 (Comments: 1) | kris507 (Discussed changesets: 4) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183166530 where the changeset comment is: Revert changesets adding vegetation traced from water and boundary ways, causing disruption to both features. User block issued. commented 2026-05-25 16:20:38 UTC by EP_Repair ♦586 |
| 179404764 (Comments: 1) | kris507 (Discussed changesets: 4) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183166530 where the changeset comment is: Revert changesets adding vegetation traced from water and boundary ways, causing disruption to both features. User block issued. commented 2026-05-25 16:20:37 UTC by EP_Repair ♦586 |
| 180645564 (Comments: 1) | kris507 (Discussed changesets: 4) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183166530 where the changeset comment is: Revert changesets adding vegetation traced from water and boundary ways, causing disruption to both features. User block issued. commented 2026-05-25 16:20:37 UTC by EP_Repair ♦586 |
| 180733887 (Comments: 1) | kris507 (Discussed changesets: 4) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183166530 where the changeset comment is: Revert changesets adding vegetation traced from water and boundary ways, causing disruption to both features. User block issued. commented 2026-05-25 16:20:36 UTC by EP_Repair ♦586 |
| 182220084 (Comments: 2) | kris507 (Discussed changesets: 4) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183166530 where the changeset comment is: Revert changesets adding vegetation traced from water and boundary ways, causing disruption to both features. User block issued. commented 2026-05-25 16:20:36 UTC by EP_Repair ♦586 |
| 179317427 (Comments: 1) | kris507 (Discussed changesets: 4) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183166530 where the changeset comment is: Revert changesets adding vegetation traced from water and boundary ways, causing disruption to both features. User block issued. commented 2026-05-25 16:20:35 UTC by EP_Repair ♦586 |
| 180306953 (Comments: 1) | kris507 (Discussed changesets: 4) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183166530 where the changeset comment is: Revert changesets adding vegetation traced from water and boundary ways, causing disruption to both features. User block issued. commented 2026-05-25 16:20:35 UTC by EP_Repair ♦586 |
| 180732227 (Comments: 1) | kris507 (Discussed changesets: 4) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183166530 where the changeset comment is: Revert changesets adding vegetation traced from water and boundary ways, causing disruption to both features. User block issued. commented 2026-05-25 16:20:34 UTC by EP_Repair ♦586 |
| 180676408 (Comments: 1) | kris507 (Discussed changesets: 4) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183166530 where the changeset comment is: Revert changesets adding vegetation traced from water and boundary ways, causing disruption to both features. User block issued. commented 2026-05-25 16:20:34 UTC by EP_Repair ♦586 |
| 181992571 (Comments: 1) | kris507 (Discussed changesets: 4) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183166530 where the changeset comment is: Revert changesets adding vegetation traced from water and boundary ways, causing disruption to both features. User block issued. commented 2026-05-25 16:20:33 UTC by EP_Repair ♦586 |
| 183109244 (Comments: 2) | Vicker (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks. Well noted. commented 2026-05-25 16:00:47 UTC by Vicker ♦1 |
| 176718924 (Comments: 6) | Jordi MF (Discussed changesets: 97) | Hola Antonio, La verdad es que usar el nombre antiguo de una Planimetría sin estar seguro si ese nombre era puntual de aquel momento o si se 'arrastraba' de años anteriores es suponer demasiado... He preguntado a... commented 2026-05-25 15:56:38 UTC by Jordi MF ♦1,819 |
| 182940331 (Comments: 5) | NumisK (Discussed changesets: 14) | Hi JeroenHoek, Thank You for implementing the fix. commented 2026-05-25 15:45:23 UTC by NumisK ♦17 |
| 174642716 (Comments: 5) | NumisK (Discussed changesets: 14) | Hi Sébastien Pi, Thank You for implementing the fix. commented 2026-05-25 15:44:42 UTC by NumisK ♦17 |
| 178787853 (Comments: 4) | Byenin (Discussed changesets: 47) | Hi Frans S, thanks for fixing it — I usually follow building footprints, but here I accidentally aligned the building to the rooftop instead. I also haven’t been mapping rooftop details like those rusted corrugated sheet structures be... commented 2026-05-25 15:42:53 UTC by Byenin ♦43 |
| 152624086 (Comments: 2) | ramthelinefeed (Discussed changesets: 58) | I mapped that bit working from an FOI to the Council re public rights of way. I haven't visited it to see it with my own eyes. It's not without precedent in NI that local landowners unlawfully block PRoW's and even try to edit online m... commented 2026-05-25 15:39:25 UTC by ramthelinefeed ♦82 |
| 183155974 (Comments: 1) | Pudelek (Discussed changesets: 3) | Nazwa opisowa - poprawiam za Ciebie ale nie rób takich błędów w przyszłości. Dzięki commented 2026-05-25 15:39:09 UTC by Marek-M ♦1,053 |
| 183156133 (Comments: 1) | Pudelek (Discussed changesets: 3) | Cześć, nie dajemy nazw opisowych a taką jest 'Wiata przy parkingu'. Wystarczy tag `amenity=shelter` a przy czym ona stoi wynika z mapy. Poprawiłem Twoją edycję: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183164702 commented 2026-05-25 15:37:49 UTC by Marek-M ♦1,053 |
| 183156786 (Comments: 3) | Skabrera (Discussed changesets: 2) | Perfecto, gracias por la rápida respuesta y ayuda para mantener el ruido de tags bajo :D Eliminadas las restantes en https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183164058 Saludos commented 2026-05-25 15:25:40 UTC by aTarom ♦951 |
| 163210843 (Comments: 2) | rsavoye (Discussed changesets: 63) | That's a very unusual way to find an area to do some mapping in! My last changeset just reverted my drag mistake, but otherwise the geometries were the same as what was already there. All I was doing was adding name and/or ref where they were la... commented 2026-05-25 15:22:59 UTC by rsavoye ♦48 |
| 183072030 (Comments: 4) | db-ak (Discussed changesets: 48) | Tak, to chyba z przyzwyczajenia do chodników masowo zrobiłem commented 2026-05-25 15:12:43 UTC by db-ak ♦61 |
| 183148048 (Comments: 1) | Muskovian (Discussed changesets: 4) | Here you say that https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/osm-deep-history/#/way/8692572 is no longer disputed by Morocco. What evidence do you have for that? commented 2026-05-25 15:02:37 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,790 |
| 183148239 (Comments: 1) | Muskovian (Discussed changesets: 4) | Here you have changed the name of https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/osm-deep-history/#/way/8692572 from a mulitlingual version to just Spanish. Did you discuss that with both the Spanish and Moroccan OSM communities? commented 2026-05-25 15:01:34 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,790 |
| 183148302 (Comments: 1) | Muskovian (Discussed changesets: 4) | Here you have removed a couple of alt_names from Parsley Island https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/osm-deep-history/#/way/8692572 . Can you explain why? commented 2026-05-25 15:00:05 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,790 |
| 183148350 (Comments: 2) | Muskovian (Discussed changesets: 4) | Also, what does the changeset comment "lines" mean? commented 2026-05-25 14:58:24 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,790 |
| 183160769 (Comments: 1) | Pajelo (Discussed changesets: 4) | Das is noch immer personlicher Einkunft. Was ist Pajelo . Ihre Namen oder der Namen des Chalets? commented 2026-05-25 14:22:06 UTC by eggie ♦45,474 |
| 183160657 (Comments: 1) | Pajelo (Discussed changesets: 4) | Pajelo Das hier hat doch kein Deutscher Name? Es is ein Beschreibung und gehört nicht auf der Karte. commented 2026-05-25 14:19:37 UTC by eggie ♦45,474 |
| 182397592 (Comments: 8) | CartographerC (Discussed changesets: 7) | Ne, moguće je naravno, ja sam više komentarisao kako je nemoguće to uradili lagano, jednim Ctrl+W shortcutom. > Што се тиче зграда, мислио сам да треба избегавати вишеструке лин... commented 2026-05-25 14:18:59 UTC by Branko Kokanovic ♦356 |
| 183157943 (Comments: 3) | Knilessew (Discussed changesets: 6) | Je kunt het toevoegen en evt de bebording ook aan het wegelement. Dat zal zijn traffic_sign=NL:C15 Gr eggie commented 2026-05-25 14:17:33 UTC by eggie ♦45,474 |
| 183160239 (Comments: 1) | Pajelo (Discussed changesets: 4) | Tag Pajelo, Wo dein Ferienhaus liegt ist nicht so wichtig für OSM. Die Chalets haben auch ein eigener Adresse Es geht darum das Europarcs findbar ist auf der Karte. Grüss, eggie commented 2026-05-25 14:16:27 UTC by eggie ♦45,474 |
| 183159188 (Comments: 2) | NiobiumGrey (Discussed changesets: 1) | building=yes heb ik teruggezet. Dat is niet verder gespecificeerd. De rendering van het ondergrondse gedeelte aangepast commented 2026-05-25 14:11:18 UTC by eggie ♦45,474 |
| 183158135 (Comments: 1) | Pajelo (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi, Welcome to OSM You used the name=\tEuroParcs Bad Hoophuizen and changed this to PaJeLo Ferienhaus im EuroParcs Bad Hoophuizen (looks like a description) Europarc is now disapeared from the map. I don't think that'... commented 2026-05-25 13:58:10 UTC by eggie ♦45,474 |
| 175292780 (Comments: 4) | Patryk2710 (Discussed changesets: 105) | Super, dzięki wielkie commented 2026-05-25 13:54:54 UTC by Patryk2710 ♦25 |
| 182993650 (Comments: 1) | vjyblauw (Discussed changesets: 33) | Hi, "cyclezone" is not a common tag. Did you mean "cyclestreet"? commented 2026-05-25 13:54:31 UTC by mueschel ♦7,146 |
| 182599463 (Comments: 1) | Cilibrionfray (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour, J'ai supprimé le point SAE, car le sport "escalade" était déjà renseigné sur le gymnase. J'ai rajouté les infos que tu as mises dans la description du gymnase. Tu peux voir le ... commented 2026-05-25 13:53:53 UTC by LySioS ♦148 |
| 183131775 (Comments: 1) | infaog (Discussed changesets: 1) | We don't delete roads just because they're private, we put access=private on them instead. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183131775 ... commented 2026-05-25 13:52:06 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,421 |
| 182236452 (Comments: 1) | Mathias_ADAV (Discussed changesets: 29) | salut Mathias, J’allais mettre à jour justement cette zone. Je n’ai pas trop compris pourquoi ils n’ont pas mis de l’exclusif. C’est assez large. Je n’ai pas vu de panneau chaucidou ... commented 2026-05-25 13:48:04 UTC by Sébastien Pi ♦120 |
| 183079998 (Comments: 1) | Yaa bby (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, what is the name of these hostels? The name=* field is reserved for the name of the features not description. Please update the names, not just "Hostel", it's like saying the name of a school is "School", etc. |
| 183155297 (Comments: 1) | Morlark (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thank you! commented 2026-05-25 13:31:10 UTC by Ltrlg ♦208 |
| 182038079 (Comments: 1) | Sheraf59 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour Sheraf, Si c’est privé, il faut mieux mettre private que no. La signification n’est pas la même (dans le 2e, c’est soit illégal, soit impossible techniquement). Je ... commented 2026-05-25 13:13:18 UTC by Sébastien Pi ♦120 |
| 182887313 (Comments: 1) | Rowland (Discussed changesets: 49) | Is Hornsby Fields https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/940863122 really access=private (usually gated), or just signed as a "private road" (i.e. unadopted and ownership=private ). What makes it a highway=living_street ? commented 2026-05-25 13:03:55 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,840 |
| 183132232 (Comments: 2) | DunDan8 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Kk, I'll try to cross reference more with NAD and Bing Streetside commented 2026-05-25 13:00:49 UTC by DunDan8 ♦1 |
| 183148363 (Comments: 3) | OpDieFiets (Discussed changesets: 8) | name heb ik vervangen door crop. Gr eggie commented 2026-05-25 12:57:46 UTC by eggie ♦45,474 |
| 172583098 (Comments: 4) | pyram (Discussed changesets: 57) | Laut Langläufer doch kein Fehler, ich hab den alten Zustand deshalb wiederhergestellt. Aber beruhigt mich, dass du es auch für einen Fehler gehalten hast. :-) commented 2026-05-25 12:47:15 UTC by HaraldBk ♦2 |
| 183154789 (Comments: 1) | jottebaard (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-05-25 12:33:54 UTC by eggie ♦45,474 |
| 183150534 (Comments: 1) | sudiup (Discussed changesets: 2) | 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap! Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulic... commented 2026-05-25 12:23:44 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦8,669 |
| 183099471 (Comments: 2) | u9f4y1f941f9h9 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Also highway maxspeeds were updated. commented 2026-05-25 12:21:47 UTC by u9f4y1f941f9h9 ♦4 |
| 183142280 (Comments: 6) | Champi67 (Discussed changesets: 2) | that's how the schema works, one polygon for the outline, then fill it with building parts. "The building outline represents the area of land covered by the union of all parts of the building." "A building should have a ... commented 2026-05-25 12:18:45 UTC by ivanbranco ♦2,891 |
| 183154514 (Comments: 1) | felipeeugenio (Discussed changesets: 244) | Note\tContributor\t⏱️ Last updated\tAction\tComment 5308298 (iD)\tfelipeeugenio\t~ 6 minutes ago\tclosed\tok 5308278 (iD)\tfelipeeugenio\t~ 6 minutes ago\tclosed\tok 5308293 (iD)\tfelipeeugenio\t~ 6 minutes ago\tclosed\tok, movido al... commented 2026-05-25 12:16:16 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦3,092 |
| 155503940 (Comments: 2) | cyganka (Discussed changesets: 85) | Siłownia była, ale została zniszczona, podobnie jak większość pozostałego wyposażenia (ławki, śmietniki itp.). Obecnie teren oczekuje na inwestycję przygotowaną przez ZUK Szczecin w ramach programu "Parki dla szczecinian" (włą... commented 2026-05-25 12:13:52 UTC by cyganka ♦22 |
| 183124090 (Comments: 1) | VLADYSLAV STERLING (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in changeset id:183154218 commented 2026-05-25 12:12:25 UTC by MappingMore ♦453 |
| 183115826 (Comments: 1) | Emiliz (Discussed changesets: 7) | Thanks for your contribution to this project. This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (Se... commented 2026-05-25 12:10:13 UTC by Frans S ♦10,673 |
| 183127293 (Comments: 2) | Engideer (Discussed changesets: 1) | Danke für die Info, den Artikel kannte ich noch nicht. In diesem Fall waren die Edits alle immernoch manuell angewandt sodass ich jedes Objekt zumindest kurz sah, und ein Großteil in Bezug auf Strecken und Haltestellen die ich persönl... commented 2026-05-25 11:53:47 UTC by Engideer ♦1 |
| 179976217 (Comments: 2) | ITALIANO_ADAMO (Discussed changesets: 3) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/684989037/history - jesteś pewien że tu jest zakaz jazdy konno? commented 2026-05-25 11:48:53 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,901 |
| 182365147 (Comments: 1) | CC_Simon (Discussed changesets: 214) | can i have the source for the information about the tseng tau - sham chung ferry commented 2026-05-25 11:47:57 UTC by bigmanbusman ♦2 |
| 182710112 (Comments: 1) | JakovRajić (Discussed changesets: 45) | Removed the tag east of South Webster Ave in changeset/183152683 commented 2026-05-25 11:39:58 UTC by JakovRajić ♦37 |
| 177367606 (Comments: 1) | Stalker61 (Discussed changesets: 101) | Здравствуйте. Пожалуйста, не рисуйте полосы разгона/торможения отдельными линиями на протяжении десятков и сотен метров, если они н... commented 2026-05-25 11:36:10 UTC by alexey_zakharenkov ♦248 |
| 183109341 (Comments: 2) | kingkingHK (Discussed changesets: 24) | Ultimately that distance data was added by a new user https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142935672 so I would take it as a grain of salt. Agree distance and duration data shouldn't be included. P.S. Maybe get better-osm-org to measur... commented 2026-05-25 11:34:37 UTC by kingkingHK ♦346 |
| 181888544 (Comments: 1) | Zwiadowca21 (Discussed changesets: 33) | Zmiana do wycofania. źródło: https://zzdwkoszalin.lp-portal.pl/# commented 2026-05-25 11:34:22 UTC by szalona_entropia ♦306 |
| 169796296 (Comments: 3) | Maradona11 (Discussed changesets: 60) | Based on my own observations and https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4886298 it seems like there is nothing on the ground here indicating it's a shared path. Nearby https://yoursay.northernbeaches.nsw.gov.au/frenchs-forest-active-transport... commented 2026-05-25 11:24:01 UTC by aharvey ♦1,942 |
| 182013808 (Comments: 6) | AntBurnett (Discussed changesets: 19) | The TfNSW cycleway data should only be used to generate hints of where there could be things wrong in OSM, but we shouldn't be using it as a source of truth, because it's not always correct. Changes to OSM should only happen by cross... commented 2026-05-25 11:19:53 UTC by aharvey ♦1,942 |
| 183150555 (Comments: 1) | Kalo963 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ciao! Grazie per aver aggiunto la pizzeria. Purtroppo devo rimuovere l'elemento perché la fonte non è compatibile con le regole di OpenStreetMap (che richiede dati da rilievo diretto o fonti con licenza libera). Se conosci bene il ... commented 2026-05-25 11:19:43 UTC by Antonino_Faro ♦12 |
| 183150453 (Comments: 2) | sudiup (Discussed changesets: 2) | Cześć, dzięki za uwagę. Poprawiłem :) commented 2026-05-25 11:16:37 UTC by sudiup ♦1 |
| 182811596 (Comments: 3) | Lurikbolding (Discussed changesets: 5) | Bonjour. J'ai corrigé fait trop de correction en un seul bloc (j'essaie de ne pas le faire, mais il m'arrive de trop trainer a envoyer les modifs. Pour les chemins superposé, c'est certainement moi qui ... commented 2026-05-25 11:06:38 UTC by Lurikbolding ♦3 |
| 164556068 (Comments: 1) | Noconnection (Discussed changesets: 1) | non sono un esperto, ma direi che la strada forestale dopo viale dei boschi andrebbe etichettata come surface=compacted o gravel commented 2026-05-25 11:02:12 UTC by luca zacca ♦2 |
| 181678492 (Comments: 2) | Lurikbolding (Discussed changesets: 5) | Bonjour. J'ai ces corrections en me baladant dans la rue (entre le peletier et chaussée d'antin). Mais parfois j'ai eu des hésitations sur "faut il garder un bout de piste cyclable dessiné" ... commented 2026-05-25 11:01:12 UTC by Lurikbolding ♦3 |
| 183126086 (Comments: 1) | Neel Jain (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in changeset id:183150443 commented 2026-05-25 10:55:41 UTC by rajdhani ♦129 |
| 183149073 (Comments: 1) | hahae (Discussed changesets: 11) | 如果您有异议请随时撤销这个更改 commented 2026-05-25 10:38:29 UTC by hahae ♦25 |
| 150832488 (Comments: 1) | wo扬 (Discussed changesets: 2) | 您好，我注意到您添加的公交线路将无标签的线作为路径添加到了关系中，这是不正确的，您应当把单独的highway作为成员添加到关系中，烦请修正，具体的例子，请看周边的公交关系，如her... commented 2026-05-25 10:35:34 UTC by hahae ♦25 |
| 182425819 (Comments: 2) | OsmDandl (Discussed changesets: 1) | (Correction : en fait @GilB a fait la modif entre temps.) commented 2026-05-25 10:34:56 UTC by rezemika ♦25 |
| 183148824 (Comments: 1) | Ltrlg (Discussed changesets: 61) | source += Panoramax commented 2026-05-25 10:22:26 UTC by Ltrlg ♦208 |
| 182986534 (Comments: 2) | Pa413 (Discussed changesets: 21) | Bonjour, Je ne travailler pas sur cette relation (je suis pas l'auteur du désordre je n'ai touché à aucune relation volotairement) Mais je viens de la remettre en ordre dans le bon sens. Par contre je suspecte qu... commented 2026-05-25 10:18:05 UTC by Pa413 ♦21 |
| 183139359 (Comments: 4) | The Invisible Freak (Discussed changesets: 16) | P.S.: Danke fürs löschen commented 2026-05-25 10:13:53 UTC by tux67 ♦2,043 |
| 183119337 (Comments: 3) | dmo84 (Discussed changesets: 9) | Thanks, seems "waiting" ist the only option here. GTFS data provided by MVV is available but does not include "shape" data. So we know where the stops are but not where the bus goes. https://ptna.openstreetmap.de/... commented 2026-05-25 10:07:33 UTC by ToniE ♦1,268 |
| 182990464 (Comments: 1) | м1т (Discussed changesets: 34) | Пожалуйста не вносите аварии в карту. Это как раскопали, так и закопали. Очень быстро, а в навигаторах это может остаться на месяц+.... commented 2026-05-25 10:02:07 UTC by Константин Гам ♦772 |
| 183077256 (Comments: 1) | fghifnh (Discussed changesets: 2) | Po co tak gęsto dajesz te węzły? Dodatkowo połączyłeś gazociąg z rzeczką https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13867526641 - poprawię za chwilę. commented 2026-05-25 09:57:19 UTC by Marek-M ♦1,053 |
| 182757852 (Comments: 1) | Самат_kakavaka (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👋 Вы уверены что здесь Мирная улица? commented 2026-05-25 09:48:56 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,503 |
| 183146757 (Comments: 1) | OpDieFiets (Discussed changesets: 8) | Dag op die Fiets... Het is beter en gebruikeijk om bedrijven op de (een) adresnode bij te taggen. Dus niet op de gebouwomtrek. MVG eggie commented 2026-05-25 09:46:35 UTC by eggie ♦45,474 |
| 181259286 (Comments: 2) | lev1chzr (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183146994 commented 2026-05-25 09:45:54 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,503 |
| 183144278 (Comments: 1) | stefanWLN (Discussed changesets: 16) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Duplikat adresu w okolicy. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9418529702 https://www.openstreetmap.org... commented 2026-05-25 09:41:54 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦8,669 |
| 181163720 (Comments: 1) | Глист Фёдор (Discussed changesets: 1) | Нет, слово «улица» не нужно убирать commented 2026-05-25 09:40:44 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,503 |
| 183098831 (Comments: 6) | uprkos (Discussed changesets: 50) | Jakiś czas temu wykonywałem w okolicy małe, pobieżne edycje Strona (pinezka) https://www.delikatesy.pl/sklepy/704944/rzepiennik-strzyzewski-nr.403-ndelikatesy-centrum pokazuje poprzednią lokalizację sklepu ale adres jest już podany ... commented 2026-05-25 09:40:20 UTC by grzegorz75jan ♦657 |
| 182999186 (Comments: 8) | josmougn (Discussed changesets: 81) | Pour éviter la rue de la Gravell, l'itinéraire tourne à gauche à ce panneau https://hiking.waymarkedtrails.org/#guidepost?id=13872343710&map=18.0/48.7452/2.2777 J'ai retrouvé un jalon sur tes ph... commented 2026-05-25 09:26:19 UTC by pyrog ♦430 |
| 183144262 (Comments: 1) | Alberto70new (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ciao, i civici non vanno sulla strada ma sugli edifici. Poi cosa vuol dire bonifica? commented 2026-05-25 09:12:03 UTC by GiovanniPen ♦28 |
| 167948418 (Comments: 1) | Yod4z (Discussed changesets: 33) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1408539842 should rawbridge be drawbridge? commented 2026-05-25 09:09:31 UTC by Kees 59 ♦86 |
| 141942125 (Comments: 8) | Taya_S (Discussed changesets: 97) | If the name -be it english, gaelic, etc.- is no lnoger in common use, it is not used by OSM, except some old_name (or name:[year]) though this is better suited for OpeHistoricalMap. It'd be better to consult the forums in any case. commented 2026-05-25 08:42:02 UTC by danieldegroot2 ♦716 |
| 183143244 (Comments: 3) | PlausibleParaphenalia (Discussed changesets: 3) | The trees issue is also a problem with the detached garage of the home that was missing, as you can only see part of it on Bing Maps Aerial. commented 2026-05-25 08:40:24 UTC by PlausibleParaphenalia ♦3 |
| 164537987 (Comments: 3) | charl3s (Discussed changesets: 204) | poczyściłem tam tagi commented 2026-05-25 08:39:34 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,901 |
| 180715131 (Comments: 6) | vectorial8192 (Discussed changesets: 164) | In retrospect, for many years I am not very sure how the layering validation works. It seems buildings are validated differently than e.g. roads. It's basically "give both layer and level and then one of them will work". commented 2026-05-25 08:31:26 UTC by vectorial8192 ♦158 |
| 183130531 (Comments: 1) | SpatialDada (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello. Thanks for mapping. Difficult to map here due to the poor imagery quality. Use Maxbox satellite imagery for a better contrast (after aligning with the Bing imagery.) This building you mapped https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/152008373... commented 2026-05-25 08:28:44 UTC by Frans S ♦10,673 |
| X | 181135159 (Comments: 2) | SOUGrOjj2Ppa4zMrmfv (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bei meiner Änderung habe ich nur die Reihenfolge von zwei Wegen getauscht um den PTNA Fehler "PTv2 Route: besteht aus x Segmenten, [...]" zu beheben. Der Weg wurde in der vorhergehenden Änderung (https://www.openstreetmap.org/r... commented 2026-05-25 08:28:16 UTC by SOUGrOjj2Ppa4zMrmfv ♦1 |
| 145327292 (Comments: 4) | OttoR (Discussed changesets: 72) | Thanks! commented 2026-05-25 08:25:27 UTC by OttoR ♦67 |
| 122359761 (Comments: 1) | C2oc4 (Discussed changesets: 481) | zerkniesz na https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5308904 ? Czy ta budowa jest fikcyjna? commented 2026-05-25 08:24:54 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,901 |
| 179356645 (Comments: 4) | C2oc4 (Discussed changesets: 481) | skasowałem jako fikcyjne jakie są jeszcze fikcyjne budowy w okolicy? commented 2026-05-25 08:23:11 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,901 |
| 183100419 (Comments: 3) | justsomerat (Discussed changesets: 1) | Danke für das tolle Feedback habs (theoretisch) gefixt commented 2026-05-25 08:23:06 UTC by justsomerat ♦1 |
| 86759374 (Comments: 3) | C2oc4 (Discussed changesets: 481) | Tak, posprzątane commented 2026-05-25 08:18:31 UTC by olo81 ♦738 |
| 169769354 (Comments: 1) | Julien Mairie de Lacaune (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour Julien Mairie de Lacaune, Dans OSM, les abréviations doivent être évitées. Voir : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Names#Abr%C3%A9viation_(%C3%A0_ne_pas_faire) Bonne carto! Suite modif... commented 2026-05-25 08:14:08 UTC by MatthieuMartin ♦100 |
| 183098426 (Comments: 3) | Fjana (Discussed changesets: 40) | Edit: omylem jsem prohodil ty dva linky na diskuze commented 2026-05-25 08:03:10 UTC by Fjana ♦38 |
| 111057442 (Comments: 2) | C2oc4 (Discussed changesets: 481) | Zamierzasz to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/981956507 poprawić? commented 2026-05-25 07:59:30 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,901 |
| 177883467 (Comments: 1) | C2oc4 (Discussed changesets: 481) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1472654682/history ta budowa też jest fikcyjna? czy ta akurat jest? commented 2026-05-25 07:58:43 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,901 |
| 183141222 (Comments: 1) | AHGr (Discussed changesets: 11) | Dag AH, Je hebt de website (nog) niet aangepast. Die is van de vorige eigenaar. Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=183141222 MVG eggie commented 2026-05-25 07:58:17 UTC by eggie ♦45,474 |
| 180999866 (Comments: 5) | C2oc4 (Discussed changesets: 481) | @c4 czy wiesz czym jest śluza rowerowa? commented 2026-05-25 07:57:00 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,901 |
| 180679610 (Comments: 3) | C2oc4 (Discussed changesets: 481) | po co to name_1 ? commented 2026-05-25 07:56:50 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,901 |
| 177908129 (Comments: 6) | C2oc4 (Discussed changesets: 481) | to poprawisz to? czy tam szyld został czy co? commented 2026-05-25 07:55:29 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,901 |
| 182916627 (Comments: 4) | OT Cerfontaine (Discussed changesets: 1) | merci pour vos retour. La suggestion vient de la dernière rencontre "Bienvenue vélo" avec Tourisme Wallonie. commented 2026-05-25 07:54:25 UTC by OT Cerfontaine ♦1 |
| 183121739 (Comments: 1) | UCRbrooks (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi I merged your info with the present addressnode Gr eggie commented 2026-05-25 07:52:29 UTC by eggie ♦45,474 |
| 183122011 (Comments: 2) | UCRbrooks (Discussed changesets: 4) | I deleted landuse=residential... and restored the building with building=apartments. Greetz, eggie commented 2026-05-25 07:50:42 UTC by eggie ♦45,474 |
| 183123330 (Comments: 1) | wojtowicz_mikolaj (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in changeset id: 183140644 commented 2026-05-25 07:31:54 UTC by World_Winner ♦69 |
| 183031463 (Comments: 3) | Geim (Discussed changesets: 80) | Slim idee om de project documenten aan of fietspad of weg toe te voegen ? Reden om hem toe te willen voegen: 1. verdere toekomstige detaillering mocht iemand dat willen. 2. Vandalisme tegenmaatregel (tekeningen als backup) wanneer een OSM rollback... commented 2026-05-25 07:31:49 UTC by Dillen GJ ♦52 |
| 183140180 (Comments: 1) | PlausibleParaphenalia (Discussed changesets: 3) | I'm not entirely sure whether the road that goes underneath the building should be considered a "tunnel" or not, since it's just going underneath the roof of the gas station. I don't really know, since I am new to this... commented 2026-05-25 07:28:39 UTC by PlausibleParaphenalia ♦3 |
| 182835015 (Comments: 2) | TrTtpTm (Discussed changesets: 12) | Добрый день. Тем, что фактически там полянок нет. commented 2026-05-25 07:08:30 UTC by TrTtpTm ♦1 |
| 182977999 (Comments: 1) | MountMapper (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hi MOuntMapper, this crossing is now broken by at least 2 wrong turn restrictions after your edit. Could you re-check ? Thanx Arndt commented 2026-05-25 06:41:04 UTC by abrensch ♦676 |
| 183070519 (Comments: 1) | Azeem Rai (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. I've removed some duplicated sections of highways, changed highway status to from pedestrian to residential and joined numerous crossing highways. Regards Bernard. commented 2026-05-25 06:11:25 UTC by BCNorwich ♦5,185 |
| 179520958 (Comments: 5) | olecky (Discussed changesets: 16) | hey, thanks for looking into that. If you decide that it's not a cycle track after all, maybe it would be good to add a note tag? commented 2026-05-25 05:49:58 UTC by olecky ♦19 |
| 183093733 (Comments: 1) | Mrjethliya (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Please take notice of the warnings given above. I've just now corrected many self-intersecting highways and removed several duplicated highway sections. These problems could cause disruption to routing. |
| 614688 (Comments: 1) | lluc (Discussed changesets: 5) | Bonjour, J'y suis passé hier. Apparemment, il s'agit d'un relais postal. Peut-être qu'à une époque, il y avait une post_box à côté du relais postal ? commented 2026-05-25 05:46:13 UTC by LudovicG ♦145 |
| 183137414 (Comments: 1) | Владимир Новые Ключи (Discussed changesets: 3) | Отмена! Не менять. commented 2026-05-25 05:43:21 UTC by Владимир Новые Ключи ♦2 |
| 182985521 (Comments: 2) | NK10101 (Discussed changesets: 14) | No commented 2026-05-25 05:41:55 UTC by NK10101 ♦3 |
| 183130718 (Comments: 1) | twink80 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-05-25 05:39:07 UTC by eggie ♦45,474 |
| 183004258 (Comments: 6) | NK10101 (Discussed changesets: 14) | STOP! commented 2026-05-25 05:35:17 UTC by NK10101 ♦3 |
| 165326079 (Comments: 2) | AreckPL (Discussed changesets: 1) | Nie jest to komisariat. Jedno pomieszczenie jakieś 20-24 m2 commented 2026-05-25 04:51:38 UTC by AreckPL ♦1 |
| 182373505 (Comments: 1) | Tible Geeraerts (Discussed changesets: 1) | Beste Tible, ben je zeker van de locatie van deze AED? de beschrijving "betekom" lijkt niet met die locatie overeen te komen? commented 2026-05-25 04:45:34 UTC by pieterpaul ♦5 |
| 183135670 (Comments: 1) | okadatsuneo_import (Discussed changesets: 17) | 51336780が正 commented 2026-05-25 04:31:07 UTC by okadatsuneo_import ♦20 |
| 48840080 (Comments: 2) | arobl (Discussed changesets: 11) | Bonjour, Ci-dessous le lien vers le wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:amenity%3Dlavoir Cordialement. commented 2026-05-25 04:30:39 UTC by arobl ♦5 |
| 67 (Comments: 2) | zool (Discussed changesets: 6) | ts is tuff commented 2026-05-25 04:15:30 UTC by GullibleMappazo ♦15 |
| 183048840 (Comments: 1) | Asa Azkia (Discussed changesets: 1) | Coba dicek lagi, Toserba Griya apakah memang ada di tempat yang kurang strategis? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13864527004 commented 2026-05-25 04:08:19 UTC by FajrAl ♦367 |
| 183130252 (Comments: 1) | Rio Achmad (Discussed changesets: 5) | Butuh sumber datanya commented 2026-05-25 04:01:01 UTC by FajrAl ♦367 |
| 168621076 (Comments: 1) | kasztelan111 (Discussed changesets: 115) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1413109296/history są jakieś konkretne plany budowy tej drogi? commented 2026-05-25 03:24:32 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,901 |
| 183043591 (Comments: 2) | mb64 (Discussed changesets: 3) | I will quote the official OSM wiki here. Please, read very carefully both sentences (!). > Note that trunk is classified by its importance in road network, not by its quality (though in a given area these two tend to correlate strongly). |
| 183007071 (Comments: 2) | dinarsharg (Discussed changesets: 1) | Спасибо! Исправил! commented 2026-05-25 02:39:57 UTC by dinarsharg ♦1 |
| 178075433 (Comments: 3) | GrabID_FaizahM (Discussed changesets: 1) | halo, tagnya sudah dikembalikan menjadi access=no. terima kasih atas feedbacknya commented 2026-05-25 02:25:55 UTC by GrabID_FaizahM ♦1 |
| 183132807 (Comments: 1) | Johannes Titor (Discussed changesets: 2) | *Added more buildings commented 2026-05-25 02:16:50 UTC by Johannes Titor ♦1 |
| 183124467 (Comments: 1) | jm428 (Discussed changesets: 13) | Source is survey not imagery commented 2026-05-25 02:13:12 UTC by jm428 ♦50 |
| 183133302 (Comments: 1) | jm428 (Discussed changesets: 13) | Source is survey not imagery commented 2026-05-25 02:13:00 UTC by jm428 ♦50 |
| 183133318 (Comments: 1) | jm428 (Discussed changesets: 13) | Source is survey not imagery commented 2026-05-25 02:12:48 UTC by jm428 ♦50 |
| 183133333 (Comments: 1) | jm428 (Discussed changesets: 13) | Source is survey not imagery commented 2026-05-25 02:12:28 UTC by jm428 ♦50 |
| 182937352 (Comments: 1) | Nate U (Discussed changesets: 1) | While this is a sweet gesture, it actually goes against OSM's 'On the Ground Rule' and the 'Don't invent names' good practice guidelines on the OSM Wiki. Features can only be given names that actually exist in real life,... commented 2026-05-25 01:57:58 UTC by Cheeser ♦1 |
| 183001676 (Comments: 2) | markkoch (Discussed changesets: 1) | Fair enough - are you able to do that please? commented 2026-05-25 00:38:48 UTC by markkoch ♦1 |
| 183099678 (Comments: 1) | Zkir (Discussed changesets: 13) | The following was done in this changeset: species tag values Cupressocyparis leylandii, Cupressocyparis x leylandii X Cupresocyparis leylandii, were changed to × Cupressocyparis leylandii commented 2026-05-25 00:00:27 UTC by Zkir ♦19 |
| 182963743 (Comments: 1) | городская управа Суровикино (Discussed changesets: 3) | Partially reverted in changeset id: 183130900 commented 2026-05-24 23:56:58 UTC by rajdhani ♦129 |
| 142639956 (Comments: 1) | SirCowMan (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi, I noticed you've added a lot of detail in St. John's area - thanks! I have a question about the continuous_sidewalk=yes tags you've added on points like https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11265688456. Is it to you the same ... commented 2026-05-24 23:56:55 UTC by Jarek 🚲 ♦382 |
| 182963551 (Comments: 1) | городская управа Суровикино (Discussed changesets: 3) | Partially reverted in changeset id: 183131048 commented 2026-05-24 23:56:18 UTC by rajdhani ♦129 |
| 32070450 (Comments: 1) | RomEvg (Discussed changesets: 6) | Sumbernya dari mana? commented 2026-05-24 23:45:34 UTC by FajrAl ♦367 |
 | 182526072 (Comments: 1) | Tropic parapente (Discussed changesets: 1) | Removed promotional SEO spam description and fixed other malformed tags in changeset 183130466 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183130466 commented 2026-05-24 23:24:23 UTC by CAM-Gerlach ♦227 |
| 171384719 (Comments: 1) | Outdoor Warehouse Supply Plano (Discussed changesets: 1) | Removed blatantly promotional SEO spam description and logo tags in changeset 183130361 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183130361 commented 2026-05-24 23:17:29 UTC by CAM-Gerlach ♦227 |
| 171611008 (Comments: 2) | Coastal Marine Charters (Discussed changesets: 1) | Removed remaining SEO spam tags in changeset 183130280 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183130280 commented 2026-05-24 23:13:20 UTC by CAM-Gerlach ♦227 |
| 171811379 (Comments: 4) | Saint Raphael Roofing (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted due to being a SEO spam POI apparently added at the wrong location https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183130207 commented 2026-05-24 23:09:44 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦89 |
| 172014272 (Comments: 1) | DigitalVia Technologies (OPC) Private Limited | An ISO Certified Best Digital Marketing Company In Indore (Discussed changesets: 1) | Removed blatantly SEO spam promotional name added to building and use correct building=* tag for commercial use in changeset 183130119 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183130119 commented 2026-05-24 23:04:24 UTC by CAM-Gerlach ♦227 |
| 172421172 (Comments: 1) | Go Smart Travels - Rent a Car in Lahore (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted due to SEO spam: Just a SEO spam name, description and nonsense tag https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183130085 commented 2026-05-24 23:01:10 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦89 |
| 172655332 (Comments: 1) | Progress Holding (Discussed changesets: 1) | Removed promotional SEO spam description and added correct top-level tag in changeset 183130040 https://osm.org/changeset/183130040 commented 2026-05-24 22:59:06 UTC by CAM-Gerlach ♦227 |
| 172989135 (Comments: 3) | TN Computer Medics (Discussed changesets: 1) | Removed remaining SEO spam tags in changeset 183129988 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183129988 commented 2026-05-24 22:55:39 UTC by CAM-Gerlach ♦227 |
| 172589184 (Comments: 4) | Apple Roofing Urbandale (Discussed changesets: 1) | NB Pascal, in case you see this, you might want to strip logo=* and image=* in these cases as well as they are commonly added by these SEO spam accounts, and typically link to non-free, copyrighted and trademarked images hosted on external sites (and... commented 2026-05-24 22:48:31 UTC by CAM-Gerlach ♦227 |
| 172730343 (Comments: 3) | Apple Roofing Lakewood (Discussed changesets: 1) | Stripped additional SEO spam tags in changeset 183129751 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183129751 commented 2026-05-24 22:43:49 UTC by CAM-Gerlach ♦227 |
| 175778369 (Comments: 1) | Apple Roofing - Plymouth (Discussed changesets: 2) | Stripped SEO spam tags, and fixed incorrect opening hours and address tags in changeset 183129696 https://osm.org/changeset/183129696 commented 2026-05-24 22:41:48 UTC by CAM-Gerlach ♦227 |
| 170331275 (Comments: 1) | Apple Roofing Blue Springs (Discussed changesets: 3) | Stripped SEO spam description and tags, and fixed incorrect address tags in changeset 183129644 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183129644 commented 2026-05-24 22:37:52 UTC by CAM-Gerlach ♦227 |
| 170333125 (Comments: 1) | Apple Roofing Blue Springs (Discussed changesets: 3) | Stripped SEO spam description and tags, and fixed incorrect address tags in changeset 183129644 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183129644 commented 2026-05-24 22:37:44 UTC by CAM-Gerlach ♦227 |
| 172526042 (Comments: 1) | Apple Roofing in St Peters (Discussed changesets: 1) | Incorrectly abbreviated street name and city fixed in changeset 183129515 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183129515 commented 2026-05-24 22:32:37 UTC by CAM-Gerlach ♦227 |
| 170414009 (Comments: 1) | Apple Roofing Plano (Discussed changesets: 1) | SEO spam removed in changeset 170421265 and changeset 183129395 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170421265 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183129395 commented 2026-05-24 22:29:15 UTC by CAM-Gerlach ♦227 |
| 174554916 (Comments: 1) | Apple Roofing in Springfield (Discussed changesets: 1) | Fixed wrongly-abbreviated street name (that was already fixed for you before) in changeset 183129352 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183129352 commented 2026-05-24 22:25:06 UTC by CAM-Gerlach ♦227 |
| 172252626 (Comments: 1) | Apple Roofing Lincoln (Discussed changesets: 1) | You attempted to change the address of an existing building, which in fact did not move to a totally different location but rather it was merely the business inside that did (the actual location of which was not actually moved at all to match). There... commented 2026-05-24 22:22:13 UTC by CAM-Gerlach ♦227 |
| 176462784 (Comments: 2) | macdale (Discussed changesets: 62) | Zdravim a dakujem za koment. V tomto pripade bol zdrojom k zakresleniu danej lokality osobny terenny vyskum v kombinacii s lidarovym skenom povrchu. commented 2026-05-24 22:20:00 UTC by macdale ♦56 |
| 183128599 (Comments: 1) | Adam_Piszczek (Discussed changesets: 208) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Duplikat adresu w okolicy. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10311339954 https://www.openstreetmap.or... commented 2026-05-24 22:01:28 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦8,669 |
| 183123490 (Comments: 3) | lunar_jaws812 (Discussed changesets: 7) | Cheers! commented 2026-05-24 21:26:57 UTC by Mxdanger ♦99 |
| 173529720 (Comments: 2) | Ockmonek (Discussed changesets: 2) | I saw your later edits about "Enisa Boutique", which is the nearby street "Θεσσαλονίκης". I assume you accidentally assumed that was the place you selected. commented 2026-05-24 21:26:31 UTC by jimkats ♦78 |
| 183123323 (Comments: 1) | Casteo (Discussed changesets: 5) | Casteo, please create smaller changesets and give a proper description of what you changed for which reason. Road is under construction, when you change a road to highway- construction. Do not span your edits that large and just call the chang... commented 2026-05-24 21:02:15 UTC by aighes ♦44 |
| 181218978 (Comments: 2) | RRJest (Discussed changesets: 2) | reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183127046 commented 2026-05-24 20:57:25 UTC by qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq ♦514 |
| 183116598 (Comments: 1) | engri (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hola. Eso no es un footway. En caso que puedan entrar autos sería un track, de lo contrario un path, pero un footway es otro concepto. Los nombres que agrega para la subida al cerro son oficiales? o es una descripción solamente? <... commented 2026-05-24 20:52:32 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦3,092 |
| 183077328 (Comments: 3) | CapitanFindus@ (Discussed changesets: 1) | Buonasera, ho commentato solamente perché di solito gli edifici hanno gli angoli dei muri a 90 gradi ed è un errore comune, almeno all'inizio, non squadrare un edificio dopo averlo disegnato. Se è davvero cos&igrav... commented 2026-05-24 20:34:21 UTC by MarcoR ♦580 |
| 182961912 (Comments: 1) | vrkrebs (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thank you! commented 2026-05-24 20:32:28 UTC by stevea ♦318 |
| 183121259 (Comments: 3) | szalona_entropia (Discussed changesets: 330) | Rzeczywiście, mój błąd, sorry commented 2026-05-24 20:21:38 UTC by OSMaper_xD ♦33 |
| 183044721 (Comments: 1) | mushymapper (Discussed changesets: 5) | #TIP: just add the address to the building outline unless the building has multiple addresses. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183044721 commented 2026-05-24 20:21:10 UTC by Glassman ♦5,942 |
| 183042188 (Comments: 3) | mushymapper (Discussed changesets: 5) | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183042188 commented 2026-05-24 20:19:44 UTC by Glassman ♦5,942 |
| 183041887 (Comments: 1) | mushymapper (Discussed changesets: 5) | when adding a driveway, it needs to be tagged as highway=service + service=driveway. Can you fix this? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183041887 commented 2026-05-24 20:18:49 UTC by Glassman ♦5,942 |
| 183041279 (Comments: 1) | mushymapper (Discussed changesets: 5) | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183041279 commented 2026-05-24 20:17:12 UTC by Glassman ♦5,942 |
| 183037215 (Comments: 1) | idalis_laboy (Discussed changesets: 2) | When adding a gate to a private road, it makes sense to tag the section of the road as private to inform routers --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183037215 commented 2026-05-24 20:15:11 UTC by Glassman ♦5,942 |
| 183036900 (Comments: 1) | idalis_laboy (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183036900 commented 2026-05-24 20:13:47 UTC by Glassman ♦5,942 |
| 183035593 (Comments: 1) | AwestG (Discussed changesets: 1) | It looks like you acidentially dragged a node when updating the polygon. It has been fixed. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183035593 commented 2026-05-24 20:11:23 UTC by Glassman ♦5,942 |
| 183124990 (Comments: 1) | Sylabowy Kot (Discussed changesets: 148) | Źródło: https://www.smbjary.waw.pl/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/mapa_jary.png commented 2026-05-24 19:52:43 UTC by Sylabowy Kot ♦403 |
 | 183080841 (Comments: 2) | Zkir (Discussed changesets: 13) | @maro21 https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/massive-edit-fixing-typos-and-other-errors-in-species-for-trees/143760/64 commented 2026-05-24 19:47:32 UTC by DwarfNebula_ ♦57 |
| 182622528 (Comments: 3) | zunaKejas (Discussed changesets: 2) | Okay, thanks for the information! I also did not know about the FastDraw plugin. Perhaps I'll give it a try. As for the portions around the Vegas metro area that need the most attention (IMO), I think the westernmost section needs the mos... commented 2026-05-24 19:38:21 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦248 |
| 183112749 (Comments: 3) | captain_slow (Discussed changesets: 52) | thanks ! commented 2026-05-24 19:38:14 UTC by Mevess ♦101 |
| 143927949 (Comments: 2) | JamJar II (Discussed changesets: 23) | Well spotted. And apologies. Surface s a mixture of gravel and grass so I will delete this value. Thanks for flagging commented 2026-05-24 19:34:19 UTC by JamJar II ♦19 |
| 183105537 (Comments: 1) | Alvig17 (Discussed changesets: 18) | Bonjour, ce changeset a brisé la continuité d'itinéraires pédestres qui passent par là. Je vais essayer de m'occuper de la réparation. commented 2026-05-24 19:11:45 UTC by StC ♦464 |
| 182707735 (Comments: 1) | Yoyo bibi (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour, cet itinéraire était en cours de suppression parce qu'il n'apparait plus dans les sources disponibles récentes. Avez-vous des informations confirmant son maintien ? commented 2026-05-24 19:03:09 UTC by StC ♦464 |
| 183106292 (Comments: 2) | Tabbytoffee (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Bernard, Thank you for the advice, I think that I have corrected everything. Regards, Adam commented 2026-05-24 18:36:47 UTC by Tabbytoffee ♦1 |
| 183116521 (Comments: 1) | MapmakerrrJohn (Discussed changesets: 7) | Please dont revert this changeset commented 2026-05-24 18:26:36 UTC by MapmakerrrJohn ♦5 |
| 175095764 (Comments: 2) | TheNet1996 (Discussed changesets: 20) | Hallo erstmal, ich habe am Tagging von opening hours nichts geändert bzw. die Falscheintragung hat jemand anderes gemacht. VG Mike commented 2026-05-24 18:21:42 UTC by TheNet1996 ♦178 |
| 174453698 (Comments: 5) | MS50 (Discussed changesets: 19) | Thanks MS50! commented 2026-05-24 18:13:48 UTC by PPete2 ♦158 |
| 183119467 (Comments: 1) | _Kostka_ (Discussed changesets: 17) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna.... commented 2026-05-24 18:12:44 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦8,669 |
| 182878803 (Comments: 1) | Weathering (Discussed changesets: 16) | 안녕하세요, 편집해주신 부분과 관련하여 참고를 부탁드리는 내용이 있어 댓글을 남깁니다. 국토교통부 고시 상 노선명칭과 도로의 명칭은 서로 다른 개념이기 때문에, 노선에 변경이... commented 2026-05-24 18:04:53 UTC by aaei924 ♦36 |
| 180728946 (Comments: 2) | s3488 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bedankt Eggie! Ik ken de straat en zal daarom alsnog access=private taggen; de route via Tolhuisweg is beter voor bezorgdiensten e.d. commented 2026-05-24 18:04:25 UTC by s3488 ♦1 |
| 183075783 (Comments: 5) | Brad McConnell (Discussed changesets: 4) | (Oops, made a mistake of my own and accidentally submitted before I was quite finished editing my comment--meant to say at the beginning "might want to consider doing some research or consulting the community before conducting a far-reaching pro... commented 2026-05-24 17:42:44 UTC by CAM-Gerlach ♦227 |
 | 179100841 (Comments: 1) | K1RB1L1TY (Discussed changesets: 3) | According to this iNaturalist Observation (https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/147269577) this tree is Ceiba pentandra, without any doubt. Who says it is Adansonia digitata ? commented 2026-05-24 17:41:44 UTC by Sylvain M ♦72 |
| 182046246 (Comments: 2) | Dimitar155_bot (Discussed changesets: 4) | Решението е влязло в сила. Това че се мотат една година с този списък, а сега един месец не могат да принтират и залепят 300 стикера си е тех... commented 2026-05-24 17:36:52 UTC by Dimitar155 ♦910 |
| 180417383 (Comments: 4) | C2oc4 (Discussed changesets: 481) | Tak jak wyżej napisałem, jest dobrze. commented 2026-05-24 17:33:01 UTC by olo81 ♦738 |
| 166058608 (Comments: 1) | gunnar1m (Discussed changesets: 80) | Hallo gunnar1m, du hast hier vor einem Jahr diverse Gleisstücke und einen yard eingetragen. Nichts davon ist mehr vor Ort sichtbar/verifizierbar. Vielleicht magst du diese Objekte in die OHM übertragen? Ich werde alle "razed" T... commented 2026-05-24 17:30:34 UTC by Map_HeRo ♦103 |
| 183118264 (Comments: 1) | twestdyk (Discussed changesets: 2) | Het 'gangetje' loopt eerst over een soort parkeerterrein. Dan zou over dat gedeelte beter highway=service kunnen worden getagd. MVG eggie commented 2026-05-24 17:28:29 UTC by eggie ♦45,474 |
| 183077156 (Comments: 2) | Szymson (Discussed changesets: 299) | Masz słuszność, dziękuję za czujność :D commented 2026-05-24 17:27:17 UTC by Szymson ♦508 |
| 182440437 (Comments: 1) | MaxStirn (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks for adding data to OpenStreetMap! However: O'Neill's is already on the map as node 839139665. Please prefer to update details on existing objects when possible, unless it is missing from the map. Thanks again. commented 2026-05-24 17:26:08 UTC by jayaddison ♦30 |
| 183117933 (Comments: 1) | twestdyk (Discussed changesets: 2) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. Feedback Eigenlijk hoef je geen adressen op gebouwomtrekken te zetten . Er is al een adresnode. Daar staat school Het Nieuwe... commented 2026-05-24 17:26:03 UTC by eggie ♦45,474 |
| 183113735 (Comments: 1) | _xXxcoolguyxXx_ (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-05-24 17:22:42 UTC by eggie ♦45,474 |
| 183114564 (Comments: 1) | user_5589 (Discussed changesets: 62) | Salut. te rog nu mai floosa harta si asa de incarcata cu copaci. Imaginile Bing sunt mai vechi de 12 ani in Bucuresti si sunt prost pozitionate. O parte din ei nici nu mai exista, au fost taiati, uscati, etc. commented 2026-05-24 17:22:24 UTC by rarad74 ♦508 |
| 169502341 (Comments: 2) | C2oc4 (Discussed changesets: 481) | z sierpnia * commented 2026-05-24 17:20:32 UTC by olo81 ♦738 |
| 79016796 (Comments: 1) | PabloJosh (Discussed changesets: 2) | W tej zmianie zostały pododawane cycleway=asl, ale to nie są śluzy rowerowe. Zachęcam do zajrzenia na wiki, żeby sprawdzić czym to jest. commented 2026-05-24 16:57:56 UTC by NieWnen ♦1,281 |
| 182600417 (Comments: 1) | pagie (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks for adding this description - does it refer to a water tap in Bridge End harbour (node 13824244501)? For some reason this point is in the middle of the Sound! commented 2026-05-24 16:55:29 UTC by jayaddison ♦30 |
| 171552988 (Comments: 1) | Jan Mathys (Discussed changesets: 26) | Please note that place name Vana-Antsla stands for the entire settlement (relation/352485), not only the more compact centre mapped as residential area that misleadingly got this name here. commented 2026-05-24 16:50:26 UTC by Pikse ♦236 |
| 183117346 (Comments: 1) | NieWnen (Discussed changesets: 169) | *bez tej drugiej części z urzędem – to było do poprzedniej zmiany commented 2026-05-24 16:47:08 UTC by NieWnen ♦1,281 |
| 183095514 (Comments: 2) | The_77 (Discussed changesets: 1) | So I see on the ERH website, all good 👍 commented 2026-05-24 16:37:04 UTC by The_77 ♦1 |
| 182773087 (Comments: 1) | Ufones de Aliste (Discussed changesets: 18) | Hola Ufones de Aliste: has cambiado de forma errónea la clasificación de estas carreteras. Los criterios para su clasificación están recogidos en las Directrices de etiquetado para Castilla y León Red Complementa... commented 2026-05-24 16:27:20 UTC by MarinoBM ♦153 |
| 182772851 (Comments: 1) | Ufones de Aliste (Discussed changesets: 18) | Hola Ufones de Aliste: has cambiado de forma errónea la clasificación de estas carreteras. Los criterios para su clasificación están recogidos en las Directrices de etiquetado para Castilla y León Red Complementa... commented 2026-05-24 16:27:20 UTC by MarinoBM ♦153 |
| 182740902 (Comments: 1) | Ufones de Aliste (Discussed changesets: 18) | Hola Ufones de Aliste: has cambiado de forma errónea la clasificación de estas carreteras. Los criterios para su clasificación están recogidos en las Directrices de etiquetado para Castilla y León Red Complementa... commented 2026-05-24 16:27:19 UTC by MarinoBM ♦153 |
| 182439933 (Comments: 1) | Ufones de Aliste (Discussed changesets: 18) | Hola Ufones de Aliste: has cambiado de forma errónea la clasificación de estas carreteras. Los criterios para su clasificación están recogidos en las Directrices de etiquetado para Castilla y León Red Complementa... commented 2026-05-24 16:27:19 UTC by MarinoBM ♦153 |
| 182740529 (Comments: 1) | Ufones de Aliste (Discussed changesets: 18) | Hola Ufones de Aliste: has cambiado de forma errónea la clasificación de estas carreteras. Los criterios para su clasificación están recogidos en las Directrices de etiquetado para Castilla y León Red Complementa... commented 2026-05-24 16:27:19 UTC by MarinoBM ♦153 |
| 182740156 (Comments: 1) | Ufones de Aliste (Discussed changesets: 18) | Hola Ufones de Aliste: has cambiado de forma errónea la clasificación de estas carreteras. Los criterios para su clasificación están recogidos en las Directrices de etiquetado para Castilla y León Red Complementa... commented 2026-05-24 16:27:19 UTC by MarinoBM ♦153 |
| 181839443 (Comments: 1) | Ufones de Aliste (Discussed changesets: 18) | Hola Ufones de Aliste: has cambiado de forma errónea la clasificación de estas carreteras. Los criterios para su clasificación están recogidos en las Directrices de etiquetado para Castilla y León Red Complementa... commented 2026-05-24 16:27:18 UTC by MarinoBM ♦153 |
| 182428366 (Comments: 1) | Ufones de Aliste (Discussed changesets: 18) | Hola Ufones de Aliste: has cambiado de forma errónea la clasificación de estas carreteras. Los criterios para su clasificación están recogidos en las Directrices de etiquetado para Castilla y León Red Complementa... commented 2026-05-24 16:27:18 UTC by MarinoBM ♦153 |
| 181838363 (Comments: 1) | Ufones de Aliste (Discussed changesets: 18) | Hola Ufones de Aliste: has cambiado de forma errónea la clasificación de estas carreteras. Los criterios para su clasificación están recogidos en las Directrices de etiquetado para Castilla y León Red Complementa... commented 2026-05-24 16:27:18 UTC by MarinoBM ♦153 |
| 181838942 (Comments: 1) | Ufones de Aliste (Discussed changesets: 18) | Hola Ufones de Aliste: has cambiado de forma errónea la clasificación de estas carreteras. Los criterios para su clasificación están recogidos en las Directrices de etiquetado para Castilla y León Red Complementa... commented 2026-05-24 16:27:18 UTC by MarinoBM ♦153 |
| 181839245 (Comments: 1) | Ufones de Aliste (Discussed changesets: 18) | Hola Ufones de Aliste: has cambiado de forma errónea la clasificación de estas carreteras. Los criterios para su clasificación están recogidos en las Directrices de etiquetado para Castilla y León Red Complementa... commented 2026-05-24 16:27:18 UTC by MarinoBM ♦153 |
| 181826626 (Comments: 1) | Ufones de Aliste (Discussed changesets: 18) | Hola Ufones de Aliste: has cambiado de forma errónea la clasificación de estas carreteras. Los criterios para su clasificación están recogidos en las Directrices de etiquetado para Castilla y León Red Complementa... commented 2026-05-24 16:27:17 UTC by MarinoBM ♦153 |
| 181836670 (Comments: 1) | Ufones de Aliste (Discussed changesets: 18) | Hola Ufones de Aliste: has cambiado de forma errónea la clasificación de estas carreteras. Los criterios para su clasificación están recogidos en las Directrices de etiquetado para Castilla y León Red Complementa... commented 2026-05-24 16:27:17 UTC by MarinoBM ♦153 |
| 181826557 (Comments: 1) | Ufones de Aliste (Discussed changesets: 18) | Hola Ufones de Aliste: has cambiado de forma errónea la clasificación de estas carreteras. Los criterios para su clasificación están recogidos en las Directrices de etiquetado para Castilla y León Red Complementa... commented 2026-05-24 16:27:17 UTC by MarinoBM ♦153 |
| 181826798 (Comments: 1) | Ufones de Aliste (Discussed changesets: 18) | Hola Ufones de Aliste: has cambiado de forma errónea la clasificación de estas carreteras. Los criterios para su clasificación están recogidos en las Directrices de etiquetado para Castilla y León Red Complementa... commented 2026-05-24 16:27:17 UTC by MarinoBM ♦153 |
| 181826514 (Comments: 1) | Ufones de Aliste (Discussed changesets: 18) | Hola Ufones de Aliste: has cambiado de forma errónea la clasificación de estas carreteras. Los criterios para su clasificación están recogidos en las Directrices de etiquetado para Castilla y León Red Complementa... commented 2026-05-24 16:27:16 UTC by MarinoBM ♦153 |
| 182866803 (Comments: 2) | sokolgeo (Discussed changesets: 13) | This was clear mistake, thank you, fixed. commented 2026-05-24 16:18:31 UTC by sokolgeo ♦5 |
| 182377788 (Comments: 1) | Btian Paul Dorsam (Discussed changesets: 4) | bu yol otoyol değildir. bölünmüş yoldur bkz: https://www-kgm-gov-tr.translate.goog/SiteCollectionImages/KGMimages/Otoyollar/istanbul.jpg?_x_tr_sl=en&_x_tr_tl=tr&_x_tr_hl=tr&_x_tr_pto=tc commented 2026-05-24 16:16:06 UTC by yitimox ♦22 |
| 182523188 (Comments: 1) | Btian Paul Dorsam (Discussed changesets: 4) | Fiziksel olarak bölgede bir kalıntısı bulunmayan eski otoyol veya demiryolları OSM'ye işlenmez. commented 2026-05-24 16:12:13 UTC by yitimox ♦22 |
| 183113760 (Comments: 1) | rohieb (Discussed changesets: 60) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:military%3Ddanger_area#How_to_map notes that boundary=hazard should be used if the danger area is non-military related. The official sources only speak of an "entry ban", but don't mention anythi... commented 2026-05-24 15:53:16 UTC by rohieb ♦162 |
| 165496517 (Comments: 3) | fedoroff net (Discussed changesets: 22) | There actually already were two objects with village name, the other one being node/1973428366 at the village centre. This can be searched for, too. Landuse carrying this name on the other hand is misleading, as this is simply the wrong area.<... commented 2026-05-24 15:38:13 UTC by Pikse ♦236 |
| 183026190 (Comments: 2) | Taya_S (Discussed changesets: 97) | Hello sus242424, Please look at the shape of the residential landuse I removed. It was basically just a city sized blob that had no regards for what is actually on the ground or what has already been mapped. Right on top of motorways; on top o... commented 2026-05-24 15:35:56 UTC by Taya_S ♦2,660 |
| 183112909 (Comments: 1) | Rbrt7 (Discussed changesets: 8) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna.... commented 2026-05-24 15:31:47 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦8,669 |
| 183108348 (Comments: 4) | Cat2006 (Discussed changesets: 16) | Ясно, мерси! commented 2026-05-24 15:14:50 UTC by Dimitar155 ♦910 |
| 183058528 (Comments: 1) | Mirko Drensek (Discussed changesets: 29) | Habría que chequear que el recorrido esté bien trazado commented 2026-05-24 15:14:21 UTC by Nicolás Antonio Celano ♦35 |
| 135656603 (Comments: 1) | Jesse Tujula (Discussed changesets: 11) | Do you know of sources where name of this particular suburb is actually translated in all these languages? Usually names of smaller places like this are not translated. commented 2026-05-24 15:10:00 UTC by Pikse ♦236 |
| 34294943 (Comments: 2) | OceanVortex (Discussed changesets: 10) | I made that edit almost 11 years ago. I believe the building is now occupied by an auto body shop, so the power_ question is now moot. commented 2026-05-24 15:02:25 UTC by OceanVortex ♦19 |
| 183112185 (Comments: 1) | ViPE3R (Discussed changesets: 3) | 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap! Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy. Nazwa nadawana jest automatycz... commented 2026-05-24 15:01:22 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦8,669 |
| 181680182 (Comments: 3) | Ricco Borsdorf (Discussed changesets: 1) | Danke. Ja, deswegen hatte ich erst deine Einträge gefunden, weil ich wissen wollte, was es sonst so an Einträgen für amenity gibt mit 'hike'. Die Kennzeichnung der anderen Stempelstellen kommt auch sehr unerwartet. De... commented 2026-05-24 14:45:57 UTC by Manuel H ♦77 |
| 183084803 (Comments: 1) | Enocturno (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola. Gracias por sus ediciones. por favor no agrupar edificios. En el mas grande es claro que en polígono dibujado hay varias estructuras, algunas de las cuales no son edificios tampoco. saludos --- ... commented 2026-05-24 14:44:25 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦3,092 |
| 183111520 (Comments: 1) | GUFSZ (Discussed changesets: 43) | basic_network eingetragen quelle eigene Befahrung commented 2026-05-24 14:41:26 UTC by GUFSZ ♦171 |
| 183110077 (Comments: 1) | ViPE3R (Discussed changesets: 3) | 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap! Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy. Nazwa nadawana jest automatycz... commented 2026-05-24 14:31:39 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦8,669 |
| 183069405 (Comments: 1) | Asdf130 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello, amenity=post_office is only used for "real" post offices not for shops acting on behalf of a postal service provider. I merged the data with the kiosk: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183110812. Regards commented 2026-05-24 14:29:52 UTC by aixbrick ♦912 |
| 183080488 (Comments: 2) | nestorlora (Discussed changesets: 5) | Gracias Acabo de corregirlo commented 2026-05-24 14:11:58 UTC by nestorlora ♦3 |
| 183090695 (Comments: 1) | JCJerezT (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hola. Para realinear uso fotos Bing. Pero en ese sector está mejor alineado Esri. Como sabemos? por las trazas strava. Como principio no recomendamos alinear por este y otros motivos, pero además, en sectores con mucha pendiente, las... commented 2026-05-24 13:59:44 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦3,092 |
| 183100646 (Comments: 4) | JeroenvanDoorn (Discussed changesets: 4) | Overzicht is best lastig. Ik map net als de meeste ervaren mappers met JOSM. Die heeft een goede foutenanalyse en geeft meer overzicht. Een aanrader dus voordat je te veel went aan editor iD. Dan kun je ook wegen met routerelaties bewerken. Met... commented 2026-05-24 13:45:54 UTC by eggie ♦45,474 |
| 183075260 (Comments: 2) | najodleglejszy (Discussed changesets: 2) | sorki. korzystałem ze StreetComplete, i przy pytaniu o godziny otwarcia mieli opcję "Inne", która mnie przeniosła do "Jest w trochę innym miejscu", więc z tego skorzystałem. commented 2026-05-24 13:45:30 UTC by najodleglejszy ♦2 |
| 183108060 (Comments: 2) | JeroenvanDoorn (Discussed changesets: 4) | Kijk, weer wat geleerd. Dank! commented 2026-05-24 13:43:57 UTC by JeroenvanDoorn ♦4 |
| 183102147 (Comments: 1) | Abevdv (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-05-24 13:42:55 UTC by eggie ♦45,474 |
| 183107962 (Comments: 2) | JeroenvanDoorn (Discussed changesets: 4) | Daar is niks aan veranderd inderdaad, gezien die school er nog steeds zit. commented 2026-05-24 13:40:58 UTC by JeroenvanDoorn ♦4 |
| 151095816 (Comments: 3) | UtterClutter (Discussed changesets: 35) | I see you have fixed this in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183038389 - thank you! commented 2026-05-24 13:06:20 UTC by tomhukins ♦289 |
| 170995276 (Comments: 1) | AlexTriloba (Discussed changesets: 5) | grade1 for unpaved? commented 2026-05-24 13:05:35 UTC by andrewsuzuki ♦101 |
| 183060764 (Comments: 2) | gvSmartEnergy (Discussed changesets: 6) | Danke. Werde Name fortan leer lassen. commented 2026-05-24 12:55:22 UTC by gvSmartEnergy ♦4 |
| 183072227 (Comments: 8) | Iosg7 (Discussed changesets: 1) | > Да, сам парк включает много участков , и этот в том числе ну вот возьмите координаты из паостановлений, отрисуйте парк целиком, и на... commented 2026-05-24 12:53:49 UTC by literan ♦7,113 |
| 182349395 (Comments: 1) | IvaKraljić (Discussed changesets: 182) | The wrongly tagged segment has since been fixed in the changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183106502. #OptimoRoute commented 2026-05-24 12:51:56 UTC by IvaKraljić ♦147 |
| 182344745 (Comments: 1) | IvaKraljić (Discussed changesets: 182) | The wrongly tagged segment has since been fixed in the changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183106308#map=16/32.48720/-93.75054. #OptimoRoute commented 2026-05-24 12:48:11 UTC by IvaKraljić ♦147 |
| 182914696 (Comments: 1) | Ulii (Discussed changesets: 8) | На лініях вулиць (highway=*) не потрібні теґи addr:* commented 2026-05-24 12:23:58 UTC by ~Jhellico ♦96 |
| 154854983 (Comments: 3) | evgenykatyshev (Discussed changesets: 80) | Thanks for connecting the path. It makes more sense now. commented 2026-05-24 12:22:15 UTC by McKulkin ♦40 |
 | 182971673 (Comments: 1) | Stive André Baco (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in changeset id: 183104636 commented 2026-05-24 12:14:00 UTC by ajmat ♦213 |
| 166827517 (Comments: 3) | Tomkow1933 (Discussed changesets: 28) | By some reason, your change was from "good" to "bad: https://osm.org/way/414453283/history/4 → https://osm.org/way/414453283/history/5 commented 2026-05-24 12:12:22 UTC by Alexey Vazhnov ♦174 |
| 182985866 (Comments: 1) | GAIIXC (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, for Greenfield Academy, can I check why you said that operator:wikidata=Q122616508 was incorrect? Because that is the wikidata item for Advance Learning Partnership, which is the multi academy trust that the school is officially part of (h... commented 2026-05-24 12:05:54 UTC by confusedbuffalo ♦379 |
| 179515403 (Comments: 1) | wlisss (Discussed changesets: 1) | Rio não é aqueduto commented 2026-05-24 12:05:13 UTC by DressyPear4 ♦1,221 |
| 183104157 (Comments: 1) | Bat Wings (Discussed changesets: 19) | correction: Mönchengladbach Airport commented 2026-05-24 12:00:49 UTC by Bat Wings ♦10 |
| 182279372 (Comments: 1) | vtanger (Discussed changesets: 1) | opening hours should always be written with the minutes included (08:00-21:00 instead of 08-21) so they can be parsed automatically. I just fixed this for you :) commented 2026-05-24 11:59:52 UTC by ForestWhisperer ♦2 |
| 179988315 (Comments: 1) | daro_1967 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Kategoria drogi wygląda na błędną. Jaka jest nawierzchnia i jej stan? Należy rozważyć użycie tagu "tracktype". Największym problemem jest jednak częściowo wspólny przebieg z istniejącą drogą leśną oraz brak węz... commented 2026-05-24 11:59:20 UTC by WiFox ♦2 |
| 182896496 (Comments: 1) | simonschaufi (Discussed changesets: 10) | I don't think so. It had the correct lifecycle tag, exactly as stated in OSM wiki. Though you could've mapped it via `aerialway=construction construction=gondola` tag combo, but the prefix version is preferred. commented 2026-05-24 11:44:15 UTC by McKulkin ♦40 |
| 131122347 (Comments: 3) | b-unicycling (Discussed changesets: 334) | They look like small round bollards with a flat top with the number carved into the top, made from limestone. commented 2026-05-24 11:39:54 UTC by b-unicycling ♦286 |
| 182305240 (Comments: 2) | b-unicycling (Discussed changesets: 334) | It's not a building though, it's just an abandoned boat. I think the wreck tag is usually used for ones in or along rivers or water bodies, and maybe I shouldn't have mapped it at all. I don't care enough, tbh. commented 2026-05-24 11:36:50 UTC by b-unicycling ♦286 |
| 183067628 (Comments: 5) | Kestix (Discussed changesets: 1) | Danke für die Infos und den Link! Ich sollte jetzt wieder den Ausgangszustand bezüglich der railway=construction Tags wieder hergestellt haben. Nur die eingefügten Weichen sind geblieben. commented 2026-05-24 11:31:22 UTC by Kestix ♦1 |
| 183100760 (Comments: 2) | rdk040 (Discussed changesets: 1) | De info heb ik samengevoegd met adresnode 25. social_facility toegevoegd.. anders geen symbool. CTRL-F5 voor het effect straks. MVG eggie commented 2026-05-24 11:19:37 UTC by eggie ♦45,474 |
| 183070658 (Comments: 18) | JeroenvanDoorn (Discussed changesets: 4) | Westelijk deel Céramiquelaan weer op oneway yes gezet muv tweewielers. Het routeert in ieder geval weer.. Probleem met die voetpaden opgelost. Er zal nog wel eens wat veranderen daar denk ik. Mapse, eggie commented 2026-05-24 11:13:02 UTC by eggie ♦45,474 |
| 183011442 (Comments: 5) | Nordpfeil (Discussed changesets: 74) | Gracias para la información actualizada commented 2026-05-24 11:11:32 UTC by Nordpfeil ♦86 |
| 183101772 (Comments: 1) | James Hunger (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap! Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli ad... commented 2026-05-24 11:11:22 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦8,669 |
| 183093526 (Comments: 1) | mirnayani (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello. Thanks for mapping. Well mapped and squared. However, you regularly cluster buildings, Check these mappings, please. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1520416471/history https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1520416468/history |
| 168559358 (Comments: 2) | Rimplot (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi, you're right that the combination of tags is incorrect, but the bike lane actually splits off into separate infrastructure, so I've removed the cycleway=lane and kept the highway=cycleway tag. commented 2026-05-24 10:52:24 UTC by Rimplot ♦3 |
| 175464977 (Comments: 1) | Ayışığı Saat (Discussed changesets: 1) | it is correct. commented 2026-05-24 10:51:03 UTC by Ayışığı Saat ♦1 |
| 183100654 (Comments: 1) | jfckm (Discussed changesets: 5) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Klucz addr:place oznacza brak nazwy ulicy. Kombinacja z addr:street (który definiuje nazwę ulicy) je... commented 2026-05-24 10:31:20 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦8,669 |
| 182983371 (Comments: 1) | DouceLuvango (Discussed changesets: 14) | Hi, please check these edits. I found more than 200 ways with strange tags like "ref_dhis2" and "source_dat" which shouldn't appear in OSM. Many of the ways are tagged as boundary, but are not closed areas and are n... commented 2026-05-24 10:07:42 UTC by mueschel ♦7,146 |
| 183099281 (Comments: 1) | FajrAl (Discussed changesets: 31) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183099864 commented 2026-05-24 10:05:03 UTC by FajrAl ♦367 |
| 183099112 (Comments: 1) | Piagno (Discussed changesets: 140) | and bus 130 prepared upgrade to ptv2 commented 2026-05-24 09:43:13 UTC by Piagno ♦137 |
| 182972036 (Comments: 1) | eyw27 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Partially reverted in changeset id:183098595 commented 2026-05-24 09:31:46 UTC by MappingMore ♦453 |
| 183064555 (Comments: 1) | Gufinson (Discussed changesets: 1) | добавил теги портного, ведь вы не сделали главное - не поставили основной значащий тег (тип заведения) commented 2026-05-24 09:27:38 UTC by literan ♦7,113 |
| 175396188 (Comments: 5) | MS50 (Discussed changesets: 19) | *(and even around the other ford) commented 2026-05-24 09:21:09 UTC by Fraxi ♦351 |
| 182930263 (Comments: 2) | wuff57 (Discussed changesets: 31) | Bonjour, merci beaucoup pour l'information. Je ne connaissais pas cette couche et je vais l'essayer. Bien à vous, commented 2026-05-24 09:09:57 UTC by wuff57 ♦53 |
| 183088206 (Comments: 1) | 0x98 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, The bus stop was already mapped here as https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13790024496. Please update Organic Maps map data to the latest version. Thanks commented 2026-05-24 09:08:38 UTC by HellMap ♦901 |
| 182645602 (Comments: 3) | Thisik (Discussed changesets: 7) | Ale jo, vypadá to, že tag bus_bay=both by se asi hodil. Franta commented 2026-05-24 08:58:20 UTC by Fjana ♦38 |
| 153079899 (Comments: 2) | Joško Horvat (Discussed changesets: 59) | Thanks for the quick action there. Happy mapping! commented 2026-05-24 08:56:24 UTC by martianfreeloader ♦183 |
| X | 183077448 (Comments: 3) | dima monsky (Discussed changesets: 15) | As to the why see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets commented 2026-05-24 08:45:12 UTC by Kees 59 ♦86 |
| 175714847 (Comments: 1) | Vojtěch Mikeš (Discussed changesets: 2) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1457141720/history - are there some kind of remains of that tracks on the ground? anything visible at all? commented 2026-05-24 08:44:26 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,901 |
| 182835555 (Comments: 2) | lefou (Discussed changesets: 2) | Danke für die Hinweise. Habe ich teilweise nachgepflegt. Den Rest muss ich nochmal überprüfen. commented 2026-05-24 08:39:58 UTC by lefou ♦2 |
| 118880856 (Comments: 2) | voltairovicz (Discussed changesets: 274) | Aaa faktycznie. F na klawiaturze jest skrótem w id do tworzenia Obszaru tak by się wszytskie punkty ze sobą złączyły, a jak punktów jest kilkadziesiąt to przytrzymuję f by się linia zrobiła z sąsiednią I pewnie nie zauważył... commented 2026-05-24 08:37:38 UTC by voltairovicz ♦245 |
| 183053299 (Comments: 5) | kingkingHK (Discussed changesets: 24) | 1. So I didn't want to make it `=primary_link` commented 2026-05-24 08:33:21 UTC by Kovoschiz ♦2,905 |
| 183045568 (Comments: 1) | AghilesAthMekla (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello AghilesAthMekla, Thank you for your contributions to OpenStreetMap in Algeria! I noticed that you've changed several highways from under construction to operational. For example: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/168523993, ... commented 2026-05-24 08:32:59 UTC by Mohamed_Taha ♦19 |
| 182368996 (Comments: 2) | phobie (Discussed changesets: 8) | Keine Antwort... Ich habe es wieder rückgängig gemacht. commented 2026-05-24 08:28:35 UTC by IngoWo ♦24 |
| 183087884 (Comments: 1) | Skywave (Discussed changesets: 31) | Hello, as I told you in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165309768, bus=yes is perfectly fine. Stop adding tags just for routing, instead adjust your router. Reverted with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183096266. Regards commented 2026-05-24 08:27:45 UTC by aixbrick ♦912 |
| 175152410 (Comments: 1) | 2434 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1453889023/history has surface = 3 that was added in this edit What this tag means? Numeric value is unexpected here and it is unclear what it means commented 2026-05-24 08:24:28 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,901 |
| 169388186 (Comments: 1) | PengualaHeadphones (Discussed changesets: 22) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13020646171/history has addr:housename = 199 that was added in this edit What this tag means? Numeric value is unexpected here - was it supposed to be addr:housenumber= ? commented 2026-05-24 08:18:13 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,901 |
| 132592178 (Comments: 1) | willisturm (Discussed changesets: 122) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/39775470/history has addr:housename = 04 that was added in this edit What this tag means? Numeric value is unexpected here - was it supposed to be addr:housenumber= ? commented 2026-05-24 08:16:53 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,901 |
| 182877052 (Comments: 1) | Max-Kritic (Discussed changesets: 972) | Hello! You used crossing:markings=yesz on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12811137416/history Have you maybe meant crossing:markings=yes ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it ... commented 2026-05-24 08:15:10 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,901 |
| 76475823 (Comments: 1) | AdamTheWebMan (Discussed changesets: 11) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/245883124/history has shop = power_equipment that was added in this edit shop=power_equipment ? What kind of shop, if any is here? Is shop=power_equipment used intentionally instead of https://wiki.openstre... commented 2026-05-24 08:14:43 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,901 |
| X | 179496343 (Comments: 11) | ylivny (Discussed changesets: 5) | מצוין, תודה commented 2026-05-24 08:09:35 UTC by hatul ♦463 |
| 181838936 (Comments: 2) | OsM-podkarpackii (Discussed changesets: 4) | Czemu nie odpowiadasz na komentarze? commented 2026-05-24 08:08:12 UTC by MapperrZPolski ♦19 |
| 182591575 (Comments: 2) | OsM-podkarpackii (Discussed changesets: 4) | Czemu nie reagujesz na komentarze? commented 2026-05-24 08:07:46 UTC by MapperrZPolski ♦19 |
| 182644573 (Comments: 4) | JuRK1410001 (Discussed changesets: 1) | For now I am only working on areas I personally know and often visit, but it looks like a great tool for the future, thanks! commented 2026-05-24 08:01:13 UTC by JuRK1410001 ♦1 |
| 169662324 (Comments: 1) | Soczek2752 (Discussed changesets: 12) | What's the source for ele=2? commented 2026-05-24 07:45:48 UTC by Mammi71 ♦274 |
| 183061160 (Comments: 2) | codehelp_home (Discussed changesets: 1) | I shouldn't have mentioned that map in the changeset. I noticed some house numbers whilst browsing that map for an entirely different (and private) enquiry about some of the trees in my village, near my property. Editing OSM happened later. commented 2026-05-24 07:44:35 UTC by codehelp_home ♦1 |
| 183079706 (Comments: 1) | Murdoc84 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Cześć, usunąłeś wszystko z tego terenu i nie dodałeś bieżącej funkcji. Proponuję https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:landuse%3Dconstruction. commented 2026-05-24 07:23:13 UTC by stasiu512 ♦300 |
| 164663556 (Comments: 3) | C2oc4 (Discussed changesets: 481) | oki, nie ma nazwy ulica robimy add place jest to tak jak zawsze oki commented 2026-05-24 07:22:40 UTC by C2oc4 ♦219 |
| 180423670 (Comments: 3) | C2oc4 (Discussed changesets: 481) | poprawiono commented 2026-05-24 07:20:03 UTC by C2oc4 ♦219 |
| 183085363 (Comments: 1) | snoogie2k (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo snoogie2k, willkommen bei OSM. Vielen Dank für diesen lokalen Namen :) commented 2026-05-24 07:15:59 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦6,578 |
| 182977870 (Comments: 1) | Torre Almoguera (Discussed changesets: 7) | Partially reverted in changeset id:183093911 commented 2026-05-24 07:14:06 UTC by MappingMore ♦453 |
| 182988589 (Comments: 2) | Dennis Ino (Discussed changesets: 3) | reverted by changeset #182992071 commented 2026-05-24 07:13:20 UTC by eggie ♦45,474 |
| 182731525 (Comments: 2) | Ozecho (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182999907 commented 2026-05-24 07:13:19 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦6,578 |
| 182731815 (Comments: 4) | Ozecho (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182999907 Thanks @aharvey commented 2026-05-24 07:13:03 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦6,578 |
| 182748246 (Comments: 3) | psmd3v (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182776035 Thanks @literan commented 2026-05-24 07:12:26 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦6,578 |
| 183087697 (Comments: 1) | LingVCon (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, welcome to OSM. is the following name real? commented 2026-05-24 07:09:49 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦6,578 |
| 182982667 (Comments: 1) | eggie (Discussed changesets: 396) | Revert of 182981161 commented 2026-05-24 07:08:14 UTC by MappingMore ♦453 |
| 38265231 (Comments: 1) | travelling_salesman (Discussed changesets: 13) | Zumindest ein Teil der vor zehn Jahren angelegten Stromleitung scheint inzwischen nicht mehr zu exisierten, zumindest nicht als oberirdische Leitung. Siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5307147 commented 2026-05-24 07:06:15 UTC by bigbug21 ♦156 |
| 160032700 (Comments: 2) | stasiu512 (Discussed changesets: 89) | Cześć, to raczej stała organizacja ruchu, znalazłem u siebie zdjęcie z 7 grudnia 2024 - https://imgur.com/a/R67TARK. Nie słyszałem aby organizacja ruchu w tym miejscu została zmieniona. Dodatkowo zaktualizowałem tagowanie na bardziej prawid... commented 2026-05-24 07:01:01 UTC by stasiu512 ♦300 |
| 182980799 (Comments: 1) | kuhfrcagykva (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted in changeset id:183093490 commented 2026-05-24 06:54:48 UTC by MappingMore ♦453 |
| 183093207 (Comments: 1) | Andrew Kvalheim (Discussed changesets: 8) | JOSM bugged out; actual description and tags are in changeset 183093226. commented 2026-05-24 06:54:45 UTC by Andrew Kvalheim ♦25 |
| 183060182 (Comments: 6) | HubertusH8 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183084580 Thanks @bartgron commented 2026-05-24 06:46:19 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦6,578 |
| 183092483 (Comments: 1) | LoamSaviour (Discussed changesets: 25) | Revert CS 183092483, 183092429, 183092391, 183092380, 183092324, 183092313, 183092301, 183092286, 183092208, 183092183, 183092128, 183092105, 183092054, 183091955, 183091918, 183091885, 183091874 - Vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/chang... commented 2026-05-24 06:20:20 UTC by eerib ♦300 |
| 183092429 (Comments: 1) | LoamSaviour (Discussed changesets: 25) | Revert CS 183092483, 183092429, 183092391, 183092380, 183092324, 183092313, 183092301, 183092286, 183092208, 183092183, 183092128, 183092105, 183092054, 183091955, 183091918, 183091885, 183091874 - Vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/chang... commented 2026-05-24 06:20:20 UTC by eerib ♦300 |
| 183092324 (Comments: 1) | LoamSaviour (Discussed changesets: 25) | Revert CS 183092483, 183092429, 183092391, 183092380, 183092324, 183092313, 183092301, 183092286, 183092208, 183092183, 183092128, 183092105, 183092054, 183091955, 183091918, 183091885, 183091874 - Vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/chang... commented 2026-05-24 06:20:19 UTC by eerib ♦300 |
| 183092380 (Comments: 1) | LoamSaviour (Discussed changesets: 25) | Revert CS 183092483, 183092429, 183092391, 183092380, 183092324, 183092313, 183092301, 183092286, 183092208, 183092183, 183092128, 183092105, 183092054, 183091955, 183091918, 183091885, 183091874 - Vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/chang... commented 2026-05-24 06:20:19 UTC by eerib ♦300 |
| 183092313 (Comments: 1) | LoamSaviour (Discussed changesets: 25) | Revert CS 183092483, 183092429, 183092391, 183092380, 183092324, 183092313, 183092301, 183092286, 183092208, 183092183, 183092128, 183092105, 183092054, 183091955, 183091918, 183091885, 183091874 - Vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/chang... commented 2026-05-24 06:20:19 UTC by eerib ♦300 |
| 183092301 (Comments: 1) | LoamSaviour (Discussed changesets: 25) | Revert CS 183092483, 183092429, 183092391, 183092380, 183092324, 183092313, 183092301, 183092286, 183092208, 183092183, 183092128, 183092105, 183092054, 183091955, 183091918, 183091885, 183091874 - Vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/chang... commented 2026-05-24 06:20:19 UTC by eerib ♦300 |
| 183092286 (Comments: 1) | LoamSaviour (Discussed changesets: 25) | Revert CS 183092483, 183092429, 183092391, 183092380, 183092324, 183092313, 183092301, 183092286, 183092208, 183092183, 183092128, 183092105, 183092054, 183091955, 183091918, 183091885, 183091874 - Vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/chang... commented 2026-05-24 06:20:19 UTC by eerib ♦300 |
| 183092391 (Comments: 1) | LoamSaviour (Discussed changesets: 25) | Revert CS 183092483, 183092429, 183092391, 183092380, 183092324, 183092313, 183092301, 183092286, 183092208, 183092183, 183092128, 183092105, 183092054, 183091955, 183091918, 183091885, 183091874 - Vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/chang... commented 2026-05-24 06:20:19 UTC by eerib ♦300 |
| 183091955 (Comments: 1) | LoamSaviour (Discussed changesets: 25) | Revert CS 183092483, 183092429, 183092391, 183092380, 183092324, 183092313, 183092301, 183092286, 183092208, 183092183, 183092128, 183092105, 183092054, 183091955, 183091918, 183091885, 183091874 - Vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/chang... commented 2026-05-24 06:20:18 UTC by eerib ♦300 |
| 183092054 (Comments: 1) | LoamSaviour (Discussed changesets: 25) | Revert CS 183092483, 183092429, 183092391, 183092380, 183092324, 183092313, 183092301, 183092286, 183092208, 183092183, 183092128, 183092105, 183092054, 183091955, 183091918, 183091885, 183091874 - Vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/chang... commented 2026-05-24 06:20:18 UTC by eerib ♦300 |
| 183092105 (Comments: 1) | LoamSaviour (Discussed changesets: 25) | Revert CS 183092483, 183092429, 183092391, 183092380, 183092324, 183092313, 183092301, 183092286, 183092208, 183092183, 183092128, 183092105, 183092054, 183091955, 183091918, 183091885, 183091874 - Vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/chang... commented 2026-05-24 06:20:18 UTC by eerib ♦300 |
| 183092128 (Comments: 1) | LoamSaviour (Discussed changesets: 25) | Revert CS 183092483, 183092429, 183092391, 183092380, 183092324, 183092313, 183092301, 183092286, 183092208, 183092183, 183092128, 183092105, 183092054, 183091955, 183091918, 183091885, 183091874 - Vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/chang... commented 2026-05-24 06:20:18 UTC by eerib ♦300 |
| 183092183 (Comments: 1) | LoamSaviour (Discussed changesets: 25) | Revert CS 183092483, 183092429, 183092391, 183092380, 183092324, 183092313, 183092301, 183092286, 183092208, 183092183, 183092128, 183092105, 183092054, 183091955, 183091918, 183091885, 183091874 - Vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/chang... commented 2026-05-24 06:20:18 UTC by eerib ♦300 |
| 183092208 (Comments: 1) | LoamSaviour (Discussed changesets: 25) | Revert CS 183092483, 183092429, 183092391, 183092380, 183092324, 183092313, 183092301, 183092286, 183092208, 183092183, 183092128, 183092105, 183092054, 183091955, 183091918, 183091885, 183091874 - Vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/chang... commented 2026-05-24 06:20:18 UTC by eerib ♦300 |
| 183091918 (Comments: 1) | LoamSaviour (Discussed changesets: 25) | Revert CS 183092483, 183092429, 183092391, 183092380, 183092324, 183092313, 183092301, 183092286, 183092208, 183092183, 183092128, 183092105, 183092054, 183091955, 183091918, 183091885, 183091874 - Vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/chang... commented 2026-05-24 06:20:17 UTC by eerib ♦300 |
| 183091885 (Comments: 1) | LoamSaviour (Discussed changesets: 25) | Revert CS 183092483, 183092429, 183092391, 183092380, 183092324, 183092313, 183092301, 183092286, 183092208, 183092183, 183092128, 183092105, 183092054, 183091955, 183091918, 183091885, 183091874 - Vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/chang... commented 2026-05-24 06:20:17 UTC by eerib ♦300 |
| 183091874 (Comments: 1) | LoamSaviour (Discussed changesets: 25) | Revert CS 183092483, 183092429, 183092391, 183092380, 183092324, 183092313, 183092301, 183092286, 183092208, 183092183, 183092128, 183092105, 183092054, 183091955, 183091918, 183091885, 183091874 - Vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/chang... commented 2026-05-24 06:20:17 UTC by eerib ♦300 |
| 183073674 (Comments: 1) | ticki_52 (Discussed changesets: 116) | Moin! Du hast die Gebäude auf dem ehemaligen Sanatorium Gelände bei Löhma auf »disused:building=*« gesetzt. Die Verwendung wird schon seit längerem nicht mehr empfohlen. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/... commented 2026-05-24 05:25:56 UTC by WoSoe ♦122 |
| 183039389 (Comments: 5) | szalona_entropia (Discussed changesets: 330) | > Czemu temu użytkownikowi tak nie napisałeś? bo doba ma 24h a OSM jest jednym z moich hobby a nie jedynym sensem mojego życia? Akurat twoją zmianę zauważyłem, tamtej nie teraz napisałem > ogarnij się poczy... commented 2026-05-24 05:19:37 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,901 |
| 177211145 (Comments: 1) | :-} (Discussed changesets: 192) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/173034943/history/19 - takie zmiany trzeba omówić na forum przed ich zrobieniem była jakaś rozmowa? jak nie to nie zmieniaj klasy istotnych dróg commented 2026-05-24 05:19:13 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,901 |
| 183081519 (Comments: 4) | AndyB_66 (Discussed changesets: 52) | Może ta droga jest możliwa do zmapowania, nie zmienia to że w tej sytuacji to wycofanie było 100% poprawne commented 2026-05-24 05:16:27 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,901 |
| 183087854 (Comments: 1) | Im Fokus (Discussed changesets: 23) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183091198 - Vorher war alles korrekt getaggt. commented 2026-05-24 04:44:43 UTC by Bienson ♦574 |
| 183088355 (Comments: 1) | Im Fokus (Discussed changesets: 23) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183091198 - Vorher war alles korrekt getaggt. commented 2026-05-24 04:44:39 UTC by Bienson ♦574 |
| 182958286 (Comments: 1) | Saiddd11 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in changeset id:183090934 commented 2026-05-24 04:20:01 UTC by MappingMore ♦453 |
| 183078212 (Comments: 1) | Verónica Márquez (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola Verónica, ¡bienvenida y muchas gracias por tu gran trabajo mapeando la vegetación de la zona! He revisado tus ediciones, te paso unas sugerencias técnicas muy importantes para que tus aportes sigan los est&aacu... commented 2026-05-24 04:17:27 UTC by Eddie845 ♦14 |
| 183086211 (Comments: 1) | LoamSaviour (Discussed changesets: 25) | Revert CS183086333, 183086211, 183086175, 183086106, 183085980, 183085927, 183085880, 183085529 - Vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183090582 commented 2026-05-24 03:41:38 UTC by eerib ♦300 |
| 183086175 (Comments: 1) | LoamSaviour (Discussed changesets: 25) | Revert CS183086333, 183086211, 183086175, 183086106, 183085980, 183085927, 183085880, 183085529 - Vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183090582 commented 2026-05-24 03:41:38 UTC by eerib ♦300 |
| 183086333 (Comments: 1) | LoamSaviour (Discussed changesets: 25) | Revert CS183086333, 183086211, 183086175, 183086106, 183085980, 183085927, 183085880, 183085529 - Vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183090582 commented 2026-05-24 03:41:38 UTC by eerib ♦300 |
| 183085880 (Comments: 1) | LoamSaviour (Discussed changesets: 25) | Revert CS183086333, 183086211, 183086175, 183086106, 183085980, 183085927, 183085880, 183085529 - Vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183090582 commented 2026-05-24 03:41:37 UTC by eerib ♦300 |
| 183086106 (Comments: 1) | LoamSaviour (Discussed changesets: 25) | Revert CS183086333, 183086211, 183086175, 183086106, 183085980, 183085927, 183085880, 183085529 - Vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183090582 commented 2026-05-24 03:41:37 UTC by eerib ♦300 |
| 183085980 (Comments: 1) | LoamSaviour (Discussed changesets: 25) | Revert CS183086333, 183086211, 183086175, 183086106, 183085980, 183085927, 183085880, 183085529 - Vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183090582 commented 2026-05-24 03:41:37 UTC by eerib ♦300 |
| 183085927 (Comments: 1) | LoamSaviour (Discussed changesets: 25) | Revert CS183086333, 183086211, 183086175, 183086106, 183085980, 183085927, 183085880, 183085529 - Vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183090582 commented 2026-05-24 03:41:37 UTC by eerib ♦300 |
| 183085529 (Comments: 1) | LoamSaviour (Discussed changesets: 25) | Revert CS183086333, 183086211, 183086175, 183086106, 183085980, 183085927, 183085880, 183085529 - Vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183090582 commented 2026-05-24 03:41:37 UTC by eerib ♦300 |
| 183090149 (Comments: 1) | alexwohlbruck (Discussed changesets: 13) | I got rate limited mid upload and now can't revert these changes. I will try tomorrow, but if anyone would like to revert sooner feel free commented 2026-05-24 03:35:36 UTC by alexwohlbruck ♦21 |
| 183089749 (Comments: 2) | schobbish (Discussed changesets: 8) | Thank you QuiLe………. commented 2026-05-24 03:29:23 UTC by schobbish ♦56 |
| 183088858 (Comments: 1) | Brad McConnell (Discussed changesets: 4) | it is good that the brand and brand:wikidata have been added but the addresses are still incorrectly formatted, for more info see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Addresses#United_States Happy mapping, Udar. commented 2026-05-24 02:37:21 UTC by Udarian ♦753 |
| 183088043 (Comments: 2) | nobodi3390 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Portable speed detector with a pair of cameras pointed towards both sides of the road. Placed in the diagonal yellow stripes zone (no crossing). commented 2026-05-24 02:00:13 UTC by nobodi3390 ♦2 |
| 182098869 (Comments: 1) | Ktr101 (Discussed changesets: 27) | Maple St / Old Maple St is a bit confusing on the ground. I’ve updated the previous edit to reflect MassGIS road data alongside on-the-ground signage. MassGIS shows the corridor primarily as Maple St, but it also supports a short segment near t... commented 2026-05-24 01:47:53 UTC by StreetSurveyor ♦161 |
| 180906808 (Comments: 2) | McKulkin (Discussed changesets: 15) | *change it back to "shelter" from "building" commented 2026-05-24 01:00:40 UTC by McKulkin ♦40 |
| 183088053 (Comments: 1) | nobodi3390 (Discussed changesets: 4) | looking at this ALPR on various aerial imagery in iD it seems to be within the road area, being positioned like this is highly unlikely so please double check the position of this ALPR and fix it. Happy mapping, Udar. commented 2026-05-24 00:54:24 UTC by Udarian ♦753 |
| 183087148 (Comments: 1) | Jesús Rodríguez P (Discussed changesets: 1) | Pensaba que estaba mal pero estaba bien. Fallo mío. Si puede ser, alguien que ponga los datos de vuelta a como antes. commented 2026-05-24 00:20:31 UTC by Jesús Rodríguez P ♦1 |