| Country | Changeset | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|
| 190072616 (Comments: 1) | Jeroen9873457 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Dag Jeroen, Meestal is er een uitzondering voor tweewielers. Is dat hier het geval. Dan voegen we toe oneway:bicycle=no en evt ook voor moped en mofa. Routeren doet het sowieso niet meer op de Kryuising met de Kennedylaan. Dat stukje... commented 2026-10-06 07:47:17 UTC by eggie ♦47,558 | |
| 186999096 (Comments: 1) | Raio Rene (Discussed changesets: 12) | oneway=no is also a default. It may be good to add it to paths, where someone could assume otherwise. commented 2026-10-06 07:46:19 UTC by qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq ♦520 | |
| 187033487 (Comments: 1) | Raio Rene (Discussed changesets: 12) | Hi, you can avoid adding extra tags by using defaults. bicycle=yes is a default for a living street. commented 2026-10-06 07:44:15 UTC by qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq ♦520 | |
| 190013963 (Comments: 3) | WaldundNatur (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo cowboyxup, Danke für die Info, wichtig ist nur dass der Zusatz "Biwak Notlager" nicht mehr angeführt ist. Das verleitet oft viele die Örtlichkeit extra aufzusuchen und eine Nacht dort zu verbringen - das soll hier ve... commented 2026-10-06 07:38:00 UTC by WaldundNatur ♦1 | |
| 190067679 (Comments: 2) | LingM (Discussed changesets: 7) | Zu memorial:addr: Den kann ich wieder dran packen, wenn der gewissermaßen als ref=* genutzt wird. Wobei ich den Vorteil zu object:*=* nicht wirklich sehe. Da kann ja problemlos auch die historische Adresse drinstehen. Zu den Zeilenumb... commented 2026-10-06 07:35:36 UTC by LingM ♦21 | |
| 190047438 (Comments: 2) | ticki_52 (Discussed changesets: 214) | Inhaltliche Frage: warum area=no an dieser Fläche? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/946009360 --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/190047438 commented 2026-10-06 07:30:36 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦4,375 | |
| 173779836 (Comments: 2) | alan1209 (Discussed changesets: 38) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5557621 commented 2026-10-06 07:28:24 UTC by chris66 ♦509 | |
| 189549900 (Comments: 2) | Raio Rene (Discussed changesets: 12) | Oh, sorry. I've got it wrong based on your upload message "road one way bike" I see that the bike path is now separate. IMO it doesn't deserve it. 1) Makes the map messy with details 2) Hides the fact that it's ... commented 2026-10-06 07:26:14 UTC by qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq ♦520 | |
| 190072983 (Comments: 1) | jgran00 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hej, såg att du lägger lite anteckningar för nya POIs. Det går att lägga till de flesta saker direkt i appen genom Lager-menyn -> "Saker". Se https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Tex2002ans/diary/406006 T... commented 2026-10-06 07:24:28 UTC by SereneDeluge ♦46 | |
| 187767372 (Comments: 4) | mapko (Discussed changesets: 75) | Teraz som nemal podklady, tak som musel cakat na prve prejazdy. commented 2026-10-06 07:23:13 UTC by mapko ♦121 | |
| 190069319 (Comments: 1) | etonawa (Discussed changesets: 1) | It was already added: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/14249002306 --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/190069319 commented 2026-10-06 07:21:58 UTC by aq123 ♦29 | |
| 190042995 (Comments: 2) | mapko (Discussed changesets: 75) | Nejako som bol prilis rozbehnuty. Zjednotene. Uz som premenoval aj krizovatku. Popri tom som opravil stlpy VN a VVN. Niekto tam pomotal vedenia 22kV a 110kV, chcelo by opravit. commented 2026-10-06 07:21:41 UTC by mapko ♦121 | |
| 189549950 (Comments: 3) | RobOrRoss (Discussed changesets: 2) | OK bon j'ai du mal à croire qu'OSM met au même pied d'égalité Ségala et le Queens de New York ... Je doute qu'on parle de quartier officiel pour des villages, est-ce qu'il a des documents ... commented 2026-10-06 07:20:17 UTC by Jivesas ♦7 | |
| 190065311 (Comments: 1) | Kalle504 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap :) Danke, dass du hilfst die Datenbank aktuell zu halten. Kleiner Hinweis zu dieser Änderung: Die Linien, die bei uns Wege aller Art darstellen verlaufen idR in der Mitte diese... commented 2026-10-06 07:20:09 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦4,375 | |
| 190042210 (Comments: 1) | sinusnombre (Discussed changesets: 3) | notizen waren bzgl Häuserteile die als seperate Gebäude eingetragen waren commented 2026-10-06 07:14:43 UTC by sinusnombre ♦3 | |
| 190002150 (Comments: 1) | Raio Rene (Discussed changesets: 12) | name and name:et cannot be different in Estonia. If there is an alternative name, you can use alt_name. commented 2026-10-06 07:14:05 UTC by qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq ♦520 | |
| 189757236 (Comments: 3) | gyulasimonyi (Discussed changesets: 108) | In that case, I hope the legal situation allows for the data to be imported from the card. A more understandable notation would be source = ISBN ... (see https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=isbn#values). commented 2026-10-06 07:10:38 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,869 | |
| 189977230 (Comments: 2) | Raio Rene (Discussed changesets: 12) | * Pae and Väike-Paala tram stops commented 2026-10-06 07:09:27 UTC by qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq ♦520 | |
| 188823394 (Comments: 1) | DimitarName (Discussed changesets: 6) | Благодаря за промяната! Автоматите за пратки е добре да се отбелязват като parcel locker. post office са пощенските офиси, а post_box са жълтите кутии за ... commented 2026-10-06 07:04:11 UTC by Dimitar155 ♦1,052 | |
| 190053724 (Comments: 1) | Rmacaraig (Discussed changesets: 14) | You managed to for the second time in a row remove the building that your POI exists in while adding a duplicate of the POI to the entire building, when it is in fact only one unit in said (no longer existing) building--all when it was already tagged... commented 2026-10-06 06:59:39 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,232 | |
| 190043315 (Comments: 1) | Rmacaraig (Discussed changesets: 14) | Why keep wasting your own time, just to degrade quality of your own client's POI in OpenStreetMap and then have it immediately reverted, instead of actually engaging in productive discussion? It's getting you absolutely nowhere. http... commented 2026-10-06 06:54:47 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,232 | |
| 190036009 (Comments: 1) | eduoxman (Discussed changesets: 4) | שלום, הסימון הנכון לסינגל הוא highway=path cycleway מיועד לשביל אופניים עירוני. commented 2026-10-06 06:49:53 UTC by hatul ♦536 | |
| 189867697 (Comments: 7) | Parkwächter (Discussed changesets: 2) | Guten Morgen, Markus, uuups! Die ist ja ganz weg... Bin gespannt, was die antworten. Schöne Woche noch! Andreas commented 2026-10-06 06:43:31 UTC by Herwescheluc ♦208 | |
| 189812650 (Comments: 2) | Alban Plumbing and Heating Ltd- St Albans (Discussed changesets: 1) | No response, looks like an online-only business, no presence here commented 2026-10-06 06:36:38 UTC by BCNorwich ♦5,389 | |
| 189681244 (Comments: 2) | NLCRC (Discussed changesets: 1) | Now moved. commented 2026-10-06 06:34:24 UTC by BCNorwich ♦5,389 | |
| 189931131 (Comments: 3) | JoshuaR (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hi bxl-forever, I've checked the wiki: railway:track_ref is documented for ways only, and the stop_position page lists local_ref for the track/platform number. I'll use local_ref on stop positions from now on. And you're right a... commented 2026-10-06 06:33:38 UTC by JoshuaR ♦6 | |
| 190070018 (Comments: 1) | Antonio Balzani (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ciao e grazie per il tuo contributo al miglioramento di OpenStreetMap! Sembra che tu volessi aggiungere l'indirizzo di un edificio specifico, ma la tua modifica ha aggiunto un indirizzo a un intero tratto della strada. --- ... commented 2026-10-06 06:32:19 UTC by Albe_ ♦20 | |
| 184315988 (Comments: 2) | JGuyAud (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hey there, bit of a pecualir case indeed: - Building there has a big Canal+ ad painted on the wall - It does not belong to Canal+ company not has commercial activity - It is regularly used as a reference point in the city (turn at canal+, lo... commented 2026-10-06 06:06:59 UTC by JGuyAud ♦1 | |
| 190027456 (Comments: 1) | AzKatel (Discussed changesets: 1) | Way: 1565157884 removed as it duplicates existing highways and crosses over others, thus disrupting routing. Many warnings given above. commented 2026-10-06 06:06:50 UTC by BCNorwich ♦5,389 | |
| 187501172 (Comments: 2) | ScarlettB (Discussed changesets: 20) | I hadn't noticed that CS discussion before, but I've read it now. I thought the presence of a barrier was enough to indicate impassability within an area, but it might have been misconception on my part. I can split it no problem. Th... commented 2026-10-06 05:57:12 UTC by ScarlettB ♦19 | |
| 190001807 (Comments: 1) | firstgallery (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190068882 commented 2026-10-06 05:47:16 UTC by rajdhani ♦537 | |
| 189780435 (Comments: 1) | windeditor9 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo! Benutze bitte den Schlüssel generator:output:electricity anstatt Nennleistung. Siehe auch https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:generator:output:* commented 2026-10-06 05:43:51 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,869 | |
| 178011810 (Comments: 1) | Robert SLK2 (Discussed changesets: 13) | Hi, thanks for adding the tracks. But where they go under the motorway on a bridge, they must not be marked as tunnels. It is either a bridge or a tunnel, not both. And going under a bridge is no tunnel (there are no sidewalls). The same with streams... commented 2026-10-06 05:41:21 UTC by aceman444 ♦3,055 | |
| 186794459 (Comments: 4) | jockeswe (Discussed changesets: 1) | Tack för info commented 2026-10-06 05:37:10 UTC by jockeswe ♦1 | |
| 144032079 (Comments: 3) | jonwit (Discussed changesets: 3) | Nice ok thanks! I appreciate those details. I made the discussed changes here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190068616 If you live in the DC area, you should check out Seven Springs. It has some of the best skiing in Virginia, Pe... commented 2026-10-06 05:35:07 UTC by arichnad ♦45 | |
| 189338631 (Comments: 4) | philippfeind (Discussed changesets: 1) | btw, die Europastraße ist auch schon seit Monaten zu, warum hast du die nicht auch gleich mit "angepasst"? commented 2026-10-06 05:33:43 UTC by googie0815 ♦10 | |
| 189963060 (Comments: 1) | uckfield1 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190068715 commented 2026-10-06 05:31:27 UTC by rajdhani ♦537 | |
| 189783556 (Comments: 1) | BartekChom (Discussed changesets: 31) | Hello! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/14235299775. Which genus value is correct genus = Pinus genuus = sosna ? commented 2026-10-06 05:24:07 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,869 | |
| 190058827 (Comments: 1) | 2894 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Du hast jetzt schon WIEDER mehrere boundary zerschossen. Bitte überprüfe deine Arbeitsweise! Repariere die Relationen bevor du weitere Änderungen vornimmst. commented 2026-10-06 05:21:16 UTC by WoSoe ♦129 | |
| 189860628 (Comments: 4) | UWS-Tirol (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hatte telefonisch Kontakt. Wird OrganisedEditing-Seite erstellen und sich im Forum melden. commented 2026-10-06 04:51:25 UTC by fs_LT ♦247 | |
| 190067073 (Comments: 1) | caprieldeluca (Discussed changesets: 5) | El dato fuente es el KMZ subido por Carolina Fassa al mapa publicado en https://www.sanisidro.gob.ar/nuevosrecorridos. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/190067073 commented 2026-10-06 04:43:40 UTC by caprieldeluca ♦167 | |
| 190066359 (Comments: 1) | caprieldeluca (Discussed changesets: 5) | El dato fuente es el KMZ subido por Carolina Fassa al mapa publicado en https://www.sanisidro.gob.ar/nuevosrecorridos. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/190066359 commented 2026-10-06 04:42:36 UTC by caprieldeluca ♦167 | |
| 190064783 (Comments: 1) | profe_sabri (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hola, gracias por la contribución! No puede ser building todo el predio, solo lo que sean edificios (está marcando error de edificios que se cruzan con calles). Puede ser amenity=school, si hay una sola escuela, si no leisure=edu... commented 2026-10-06 04:36:33 UTC by caprieldeluca ♦167 | |
| 190065410 (Comments: 1) | SupraCopilot2026 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola, gracias por contribuir con el mapa! Revisé los cambios. Quitaste mano única a un tramo de Oberá y no veo otra actualización. Si tu conocimiento es que la calle es doble mano, el etiquetado está bien par... commented 2026-10-06 04:22:45 UTC by caprieldeluca ♦167 | |
| 189982088 (Comments: 1) | hschack79 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190067001 commented 2026-10-06 04:13:32 UTC by rajdhani ♦537 | |
| 190028918 (Comments: 2) | TheHolyCessna (Discussed changesets: 6) | Oh cheers, apologies for that. I don't 100% understand the transport network stuff and try to replace it as I found it if there is no way of avoiding it in my changes. This, however helps. Thanks, and apologies again. commented 2026-10-06 04:00:42 UTC by TheHolyCessna ♦3 | |
| 190035761 (Comments: 2) | eri jahai (Discussed changesets: 6) | block given: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21392 Be aware that adding fake data is not tolerated behavior. Dennis Raylin Chen, Data Working Group, OpenStreetMap Foundation data@osmfoundation.org [Ticket#202609211000023... commented 2026-10-06 03:44:29 UTC by Supaplex ♦11,377 | |
| 188280089 (Comments: 1) | SCS721 (Discussed changesets: 3) | The same thing here, this road is closed to vehicles, but it is open to hiking. commented 2026-10-06 03:39:51 UTC by matthewfecica ♦15 | |
| 188280070 (Comments: 1) | SCS721 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi this is a hiking trail, and pedestrians ARE allowed here. commented 2026-10-06 03:39:20 UTC by matthewfecica ♦15 | |
| 188279947 (Comments: 1) | SCS721 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi, this is a hiking trail, and pedestrians ARE allowed here. commented 2026-10-06 03:37:47 UTC by matthewfecica ♦15 | |
| 177694515 (Comments: 2) | Flap Slimy Outward (Discussed changesets: 302) | Okay. I'll modify the way and the relations. commented 2026-10-06 03:29:37 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦378 | |
| 189881355 (Comments: 1) | mwitmer (Discussed changesets: 1) | thank you- I combined the park area and node but I wasn't sure which one was right commented 2026-10-06 02:59:38 UTC by dmjab13 ♦152 | |
| 189356159 (Comments: 5) | ianrbuck (Discussed changesets: 5) | Thanks, I'll check this out commented 2026-10-06 02:36:59 UTC by ion_chi ♦98 | |
| 189918423 (Comments: 3) | confusedbuffalo (Discussed changesets: 133) | The reason I reverted this changeset is because myself and other contributors raised concerns and queries on the forums about the address 'standardisation' you have been undertaking - instead of continuing to engage with this discussion and... commented 2026-10-06 01:46:18 UTC by LordGarySugar ♦399 | |
| 189894658 (Comments: 3) | confusedbuffalo (Discussed changesets: 133) | addr:place is not correct for the Ringway Centre - from the wiki "addr:place is meant to be used when the address does not reference a street at all." - clearly, if Beck Road is in the address, addr:place is not appropriate. Changing addr:s... commented 2026-10-06 01:46:14 UTC by LordGarySugar ♦399 | |
| 189917907 (Comments: 3) | confusedbuffalo (Discussed changesets: 133) | I did not see that you also removed addr:town in this changeset (it was not mentioned in your changeset comment and 7600 objects modified is extremely difficult to review). That gives even more reason why the tags should not have been removed - multi... commented 2026-10-06 01:46:11 UTC by LordGarySugar ♦399 | |
| 189918529 (Comments: 3) | confusedbuffalo (Discussed changesets: 133) | There are 1800 addressed objects in the UK that use addr:village and addr:hamlet in combination - therefore these tags are both necessary to exist. (It is not possible to represent such a situation with addr:suburb only). It therefore logically follo... commented 2026-10-06 01:46:08 UTC by LordGarySugar ♦399 | |
| 190026917 (Comments: 4) | Cbelaust (Discussed changesets: 6) | No sabemos cómo nombra las calles Google, no lo usamos de referencia. En OSM lo que importa es el conocimiento local. Tenemos etiquetas para poner el nombre oficial, el nombre más usado, un nombre anterior, uno alternativo, etc.... commented 2026-10-06 01:39:20 UTC by caprieldeluca ♦167 | |
| 190025572 (Comments: 4) | Cbelaust (Discussed changesets: 6) | Ok, entonces podés ponerle name=Calle 205 a las dos vías, y dejarle como alt_name=Freixas. commented 2026-10-06 01:33:23 UTC by caprieldeluca ♦167 | |
| 190038739 (Comments: 1) | Hensor (Discussed changesets: 2) | el perfil deberia estar ajustado a la imagen mas reciente que es Esri commented 2026-10-06 01:31:57 UTC by HRZA ♦2 | |
| 189997374 (Comments: 5) | VillacortaGerardo (Discussed changesets: 1) | Gracias. En la relación del Patrimonio Mundial (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/10809048) figura la creación de la reserva por decreto provincial 491 de 1999. Para saber si mapeamos diferente esa reserva de la reserva que... commented 2026-10-06 01:30:06 UTC by caprieldeluca ♦167 | |
| 190027089 (Comments: 1) | Cbelaust (Discussed changesets: 6) | Este creo que fue el último, se podría poner el nodo de calle sin salida pero no es grave que termine en la nada. Por favor, la próxima hacé un cambio y esperá a que lo revisen, así no hay que corregir... commented 2026-10-06 01:08:46 UTC by caprieldeluca ♦167 | |
| 190026339 (Comments: 2) | Cbelaust (Discussed changesets: 6) | Buenisimo, lo tengo en cuenta para otra vez. commented 2026-10-06 01:07:26 UTC by Cbelaust ♦4 | |
| 151998794 (Comments: 3) | AntiCompositeNumber (Discussed changesets: 12) | The exact opening dates and hours change every year based on the calendar and staffing. See https://www.cannonmt.com/attractions/echo-lake-beach for the up-to-date information. commented 2026-10-06 01:07:02 UTC by AntiCompositeNumber ♦37 | |
| 190025861 (Comments: 2) | Cbelaust (Discussed changesets: 6) | hola meti la pata por inexperiencia, gracias por arreglarlo. Son todas de Grava ahora las calles tratare de ponerlo commented 2026-10-06 01:06:00 UTC by Cbelaust ♦4 | |
| 190026181 (Comments: 1) | Cbelaust (Discussed changesets: 6) | En este cambio creo que quisiste resolver el error en el cambio anterior, pero solo moviendo los nodos. No lo resuelve, pero además figura el source=* que usaste la imagen de Bing, y tampopco están bien alineados con Bing ni antes ni de... commented 2026-10-06 01:00:30 UTC by caprieldeluca ♦167 | |
| 189988676 (Comments: 1) | Ivan Arinin (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hi, can you try to draw the stream direction in the direction of water flow. The OpenTopoMap can help the water flow downhill. commented 2026-10-06 00:35:47 UTC by nevw ♦2,356 | |
| 190046117 (Comments: 1) | Rusheins (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola, gracias por contribuir con OSM! Creaste un buzón dentro de un edificio, lo cual llama un poco la atención y seguramente estabas queriendo mapear otra cosa. Si querés podés responder a este comentario c... commented 2026-10-06 00:31:54 UTC by caprieldeluca ♦167 | |
| 190048500 (Comments: 1) | Oswards (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola, gracias por las contribuciones! Pero en este conjunto de cambios creo que hubo un error. Lo revertí en https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190063168 porque generaba muchos errores de ruteo, se perdieron todas las esquinas de El Roble... commented 2026-10-06 00:27:10 UTC by caprieldeluca ♦167 | |
| 190062825 (Comments: 1) | Arkadiy Flitman (Discussed changesets: 2) | not 08 but 600, sorry commented 2026-10-06 00:03:18 UTC by Arkadiy Flitman ♦1 | |
| 189907333 (Comments: 2) | AFTERLIGHT (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thanks b-jazz, sorry for my error. I'll go back over these as soon as possible. Thank you for the link, I've bookmarked it and will use the instructions moving forward. commented 2026-10-05 23:54:18 UTC by AFTERLIGHT ♦2 | |
| 190060170 (Comments: 4) | Tokala13 (Discussed changesets: 1) | I mean I can check again on my way to or from work tomorrow, but the only thing I marked looked like asphalt. Not too big to say I'm wrong though, so I can give it a look, I just wanted to be thorough while I was there since it's on my ... commented 2026-10-05 23:53:45 UTC by Tokala13 ♦1 | |
| 189839643 (Comments: 3) | lampronessa (Discussed changesets: 12) | It's not permanent barrier, I'm a local here 🙂 commented 2026-10-05 23:51:24 UTC by FajrAl ♦892 | |
| 189132994 (Comments: 1) | سامي أنيس (Discussed changesets: 12) | Thanks for adding the bus-only right turn onto Moor End Road, I have adjusted the junction further to reflect the fact that it is also left-turn only out of Moor End Road. I noticed you have been doing a few edits around Hemel recently, I have recent... commented 2026-10-05 23:50:08 UTC by LordGarySugar ♦399 | |
| 189893640 (Comments: 3) | oscarm_lyft (Discussed changesets: 9) | Awesome, thank you for checking commented 2026-10-05 23:30:15 UTC by dknelson9876 ♦151 | |
| 151855630 (Comments: 3) | Kerploonk (Discussed changesets: 20) | Alright, thanks for the quick response! I will close the note with no further action commented 2026-10-05 23:10:31 UTC by SereneDeluge ♦46 | |
| 189834529 (Comments: 1) | xanderthemapper31 (Discussed changesets: 9) | It's in the wall? Or which side of the wall is it on? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/189834529 commented 2026-10-05 23:02:53 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,591 | |
| 183771311 (Comments: 1) | Yoda2019 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Каков источник названия озера? commented 2026-10-05 22:38:10 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,774 | |
| 184483815 (Comments: 1) | ianko4olakov (Discussed changesets: 3) | Благодаря за промяната! Това ли е новия адрес на пощата? До общината също има отбелязана поща и не става ясно кой е актуалния. ПоздрÐ... commented 2026-10-05 22:37:06 UTC by Dimitar155 ♦1,052 | |
| 189931728 (Comments: 1) | Kotarba (Discussed changesets: 13) | 1. W komentarzu przy zapisywaniu zmian podajemy co zmieniliśmy/dodaliśmy na mapie. Komentarz "mój projekt" nie mówi co zmieniłeś lub dodałeś. Proszę wpisywać odpowiednie komentarze zmian: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org... commented 2026-10-05 22:33:44 UTC by maro21 ♦954 | |
| 190057304 (Comments: 1) | JoshuaR (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hello, JoshuaR, In this changeset, you added railway=halt to stop position nodes. Vännäs station is now showing as 4 identical stations next to each other. This is not correct. We would really appreciate if you could pl... commented 2026-10-05 22:33:18 UTC by bxl-forever ♦3,091 | |
| 189865748 (Comments: 1) | Kotarba (Discussed changesets: 13) | W komentarzu przy zapisywaniu zmian podajemy co zmieniliśmy/dodaliśmy na mapie. Komentarz "mój projekt" nie mówi co zmieniłeś lub dodałeś. Proszę wpisywać odpowiednie komentarze zmian: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wi... commented 2026-10-05 22:33:12 UTC by maro21 ♦954 | |
| 189865660 (Comments: 1) | Kotarba (Discussed changesets: 13) | 1. W komentarzu przy zapisywaniu zmian podajemy co zmieniliśmy/dodaliśmy na mapie. Komentarz "mój projekt" nie mówi co zmieniłeś lub dodałeś. Proszę wpisywać odpowiednie komentarze zmian: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org... commented 2026-10-05 22:32:08 UTC by maro21 ♦954 | |
| 190049391 (Comments: 2) | archie (Discussed changesets: 312) | access=destination/private, depending on the message commented 2026-10-05 22:30:53 UTC by archie ♦1,376 | |
| 189865566 (Comments: 1) | Kotarba (Discussed changesets: 13) | 1. W komentarzu przy zapisywaniu zmian podajemy co zmieniliśmy/dodaliśmy na mapie. Komentarz "mój projekt" nie mówi co zmieniłeś lub dodałeś. Proszę wpisywać odpowiednie komentarze zmian: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org... commented 2026-10-05 22:28:22 UTC by maro21 ♦954 | |
| 189864346 (Comments: 1) | Kotarba (Discussed changesets: 13) | 1. W komentarzu przy zapisywaniu zmian podajemy co zmieniliśmy/dodaliśmy na mapie. Komentarz "mój projekt" nie mówi co zmieniłeś lub dodałeś. Proszę wpisywać odpowiednie komentarze zmian: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org... commented 2026-10-05 22:26:14 UTC by maro21 ♦954 | |
| 190058878 (Comments: 1) | Paweł Zań (Discussed changesets: 2) | Cześć, to nie jest poprawna zmiana. Nie dodajemy "ul." do nazw ulic. Zmianę wycofałem. commented 2026-10-05 22:10:19 UTC by NieWnen ♦1,498 | |
| 189566184 (Comments: 7) | Valec (Discussed changesets: 21) | Uz ste to opravili. Bol som to pozriet aj osobne a teraz je to dobre. Dakujem. commented 2026-10-05 21:56:40 UTC by aceman444 ♦3,055 | |
| 188634460 (Comments: 1) | ticho2 (Discussed changesets: 24) | Je tam taka nenapadna sipka oznacujuca zaciatok cyklotrasy. Nazov nema, takze opravim. Dakujem commented 2026-10-05 21:56:18 UTC by aceman444 ♦3,055 | |
| X | 189892813 (Comments: 1) | eeeee7yjnnhn (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, thanks for contributing to OSM. I reviewed your changes and would like to give you a few tips: - Since most building are built with right-angled edges, you should square the building outlines if applicable. You can easily do ... commented 2026-10-05 21:43:04 UTC by KartKollektor ♦55 |
| 189875415 (Comments: 1) | Anrijs Terauds (Discussed changesets: 99) | Kāpec saliki layer=-1 ? Pirmā stāva gaiteņi ēkā nav nekādi pazemes tuneļi. Un kāpec novāci level=0? commented 2026-10-05 21:38:01 UTC by kaposts ♦28 | |
| 190051508 (Comments: 1) | mаrаf24 (Discussed changesets: 11) | Naprawdę na parkingu są te sklepy? commented 2026-10-05 21:37:24 UTC by maro21 ♦954 | |
| 190014520 (Comments: 4) | PiezoClear (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thank you for the hints! I do not yet have the simplified Chinese. I'll be on campus on in the next week and should get photos of the signs for the buildings or they will have a map at the entrancs. . I'll keep in mind to leave name=* blan... commented 2026-10-05 21:33:30 UTC by PiezoClear ♦1 | |
| 154238468 (Comments: 2) | Pfad-Finder (Discussed changesets: 33) | It is obviously a typo. Thx commented 2026-10-05 21:31:11 UTC by Pfad-Finder ♦9 | |
| 189949178 (Comments: 1) | KachKeis (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, please consider the geographical size of your changesets: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets You should upload changes in an area before moving on to other locations, otherwise it creates huge ... commented 2026-10-05 21:30:11 UTC by KartKollektor ♦55 | |
| 181821439 (Comments: 5) | Marco Morath (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo, die Hierarchie ist durch die admin_level des Ortsteils r324412 und der Gemeinde r317630 korrekt gegeben. Ich habe beim letzten Update place=suburb für den Ortsteil ergänzt und gleichzeitig das label (place=village) entfernt, das s... commented 2026-10-05 21:27:53 UTC by welzheimerwald ♦114 | |
| 185735731 (Comments: 7) | Pad244Pj (Discussed changesets: 8) | Je to asi vec názoru, podľa mňa rad stromov (ako značka) má opodstatnenie, keď je jeden. Tak, ako je to teraz, je to podľa mňa lepšie. commented 2026-10-05 21:18:15 UTC by Illio ♦96 | |
| 190057181 (Comments: 2) | Bal4zsOSMap (Discussed changesets: 3) | Szia! Korábban már itt láttalak :) Igen. Részben bejárom a helyszínt, de amúgy a Marcali HÉSZ térképéről és a google térképes utcaképekbÅ... commented 2026-10-05 21:13:41 UTC by Bal4zsOSMap ♦1 | |
| 190054738 (Comments: 1) | TVMountingBrisbane (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, you need to place your business over the building you operate from. I have deleted this one placed in the Bunyaville Conservation Park. commented 2026-10-05 21:12:39 UTC by nevw ♦2,356 | |
| 190054516 (Comments: 1) | Mdaves (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, thanks for the updates! Would you mind double-checking Il Forno's hours (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6382318685)? On Fridays and Saturdays it's only open for...30 minutes? commented 2026-10-05 21:04:05 UTC by PuddlesMapping ♦20 | |
| 181993105 (Comments: 2) | Thunichgud (Discussed changesets: 5) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5555917 commented 2026-10-05 20:56:07 UTC by limes11 ♦1,117 | |
| 190058340 (Comments: 1) | اسعد الكامل (Discussed changesets: 1) | قري حصن الذاهبي عزلة المطبابه مخلاف سماه مديرية عتمة محافظة ذمار الجمهورية اليمنية commented 2026-10-05 20:55:36 UTC by اسعد الكامل ♦3 | |
| 173770747 (Comments: 4) | streckenkundler (Discussed changesets: 89) | Hei, ich fange jetzt an, etwas mehr meinen Kopf von schweren persönlichen Belastungen frei zubekommen (Todesfall) OSM ist da eine gute Ablenkung... Schau dir mal https://geobroker.geobasis-bb.de/gbss.php?MODE=GetProductInformation&PRODUC... commented 2026-10-05 20:55:05 UTC by streckenkundler ♦1,196 | |
| 188843079 (Comments: 1) | pittrichimica (Discussed changesets: 78) | Was ist mit den Buslinien 353 und 354 ? Mit einer Haltestelle machen sie meiner Meinung nach keinen Sinn. Wo ist der Weg und die anderen Haltestellen? commented 2026-10-05 20:51:04 UTC by bernward1 ♦52 | |
| 184811351 (Comments: 2) | Tomas_J (Discussed changesets: 74) | Ahoj, cca tu (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13975305467) je znacka Zakaz vjazdu vsetkych vozidiel a pod nou dodatkova tab. Okrem PD, povodia Vahu a nejakej firmy (https://imgur.com/a/b2ZRxBY). Za znacku som nesiel. Zmenil som pristup na vehicle=... commented 2026-10-05 20:47:13 UTC by Tomas_J ♦428 | |
| 189854855 (Comments: 2) | Ashley Connor (Discussed changesets: 1) | Sorry. New to this. commented 2026-10-05 20:44:47 UTC by Ashley Connor ♦1 | |
| 188847401 (Comments: 1) | Nuno Barros (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello Are you sure that N2 is already opened at this point ? See note: The N2 road has subsided / collapsed at this point (since 2025), and is currently closed to vehicle traffic. Cyclists can still pass. Anticipated re-opening date late ~2... commented 2026-10-05 20:44:27 UTC by topolusitania ♦268 | |
| 189105856 (Comments: 2) | Timofeiyst28 (Discussed changesets: 8) | 👋 Не вносите личные заметки в OpenStreetMap. Используйте раздел Метки в приложении commented 2026-10-05 20:40:47 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,774 | |
| 187842692 (Comments: 1) | Timofeiyst28 (Discussed changesets: 8) | Reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190057815 commented 2026-10-05 20:40:18 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,774 | |
| 187172931 (Comments: 1) | Timofeiyst28 (Discussed changesets: 8) | Reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190057815 commented 2026-10-05 20:40:17 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,774 | |
| 187692779 (Comments: 1) | Timofeiyst28 (Discussed changesets: 8) | Reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190057815 commented 2026-10-05 20:40:17 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,774 | |
| 187009624 (Comments: 1) | Timofeiyst28 (Discussed changesets: 8) | Reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190057815 commented 2026-10-05 20:40:16 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,774 | |
| 185098811 (Comments: 1) | Timofeiyst28 (Discussed changesets: 8) | Reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190057815 commented 2026-10-05 20:40:16 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,774 | |
| 185424488 (Comments: 1) | Timofeiyst28 (Discussed changesets: 8) | Reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190057815 commented 2026-10-05 20:40:16 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,774 | |
| 184110419 (Comments: 1) | Timofeiyst28 (Discussed changesets: 8) | Reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190057815 commented 2026-10-05 20:40:15 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,774 | |
| 176727911 (Comments: 6) | Joseph R P (Discussed changesets: 233) | I wouldn't re-map it considering it's an intermittent temporary feature. Since the changes made on OSM take a while to be reflected in the services that use the data, mapping and deleting an object repeatedly will cause many maps and router... commented 2026-10-05 20:31:59 UTC by Joseph R P ♦464 | |
| 187463535 (Comments: 4) | streckenkundler (Discussed changesets: 89) | Hei, ...ja, funktioniert, schöne milchige Soße... Mapillary: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=2806392403076943 --> unverpixelt... Datum: 24.7.2026 (!) Von Außen und in der gesamten Situation ist das f&... commented 2026-10-05 20:26:11 UTC by streckenkundler ♦1,196 | |
| 189327135 (Comments: 1) | Slowmotion0815 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, in OSM werden die Grundstücksgrenzen aus dem ALKIS in der Regel nicht eingetragen, sondern nur die Gebäude. Die Fläche des gesamten Baugebiets sollte "landuse=construction" sein und nach Fertigstellung zu "reside... commented 2026-10-05 20:18:50 UTC by Till_btn ♦56 | |
| 189632363 (Comments: 1) | Wikiiiii (Discussed changesets: 1) | Cześć, dzięki za edycje! Drobna uwaga - nie dodajemy nazw opisowych takich jak 'stojaki', 'huśtawka', 'ławka' itp. To wynika z tagu, a pole 'name' uzupełniamy tylko jeśli istnieje jakaś nazwa własna (c... commented 2026-10-05 20:13:55 UTC by uprkos ♦120 | |
| 189989108 (Comments: 2) | Robert_Fgt (Discussed changesets: 1) | as an sidenote i had to fix your power lines yet can you tell what kind overlay are you using ? and from previous message i asked kindly if could help you with power lines since i am from this village commented 2026-10-05 20:05:16 UTC by Zoki72 ♦2 | |
| 188447938 (Comments: 1) | Kandice Zimbleman (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi Kandice, is the name of this area actually signed or officially recognized as "Sandy Marsh"? Additionally, the name of "marsh" does not seem to line up with it being tagged as a beach. Nor does it appear to be a beach fr... commented 2026-10-05 20:01:09 UTC by maxwellward ♦37 | |
| 157998466 (Comments: 2) | szalona_entropia (Discussed changesets: 337) | Dlatego, że się nigdy nie zmienił i moja poprzednia edycja wymagała wycofania. commented 2026-10-05 19:56:56 UTC by szalona_entropia ♦309 | |
| 189976304 (Comments: 3) | Viima (Discussed changesets: 7) | Voin käydä tarkistamassa ja korjaamassa nuo, kun menen seuraavan kerran Viitaniemen läpi. Kartoitan itse kohteet lähes poikkeuksetta kenttämittauksilla. commented 2026-10-05 19:46:54 UTC by Tuplanolla ♦21 | |
| 190051533 (Comments: 3) | MindaugasS (Discussed changesets: 28) | Atidžiau perskaičiau užrašą ant paties stendo. Nors ten įspūdingai paminėtos Europos direktyvos, įsigilinus pasirodo, kad ta teritorija nėra oficialiai saugoma, o tik stendo autorių norima, kad ji būtų saugoma. Rupūs miltai, neati... commented 2026-10-05 19:41:52 UTC by MindaugasS ♦17 | |
| 175239143 (Comments: 3) | notfalltreffpunkt (Discussed changesets: 11) | Hallo, ich weiß nicht, was ein „Kasernenton“ ist. Was ich weiß: nachdem ich gerade gesehen habe, dass der größte Teil meiner Anmerkungen teilweise auch schon durch andere Mapper geäußert wurden,... commented 2026-10-05 19:40:11 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,663 | |
| 189927659 (Comments: 4) | TG-map4 (Discussed changesets: 19) | Übrigens sind die Alkis-Bilder aktueller als DOP. Das kann man gut verwenden. commented 2026-10-05 19:39:47 UTC by limes11 ♦1,117 | |
| 187239300 (Comments: 4) | Ra_colate (Discussed changesets: 18) | You also removed a bunch of relations even when separate HOV lanes remained... commented 2026-10-05 19:39:41 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦378 | |
| 159206478 (Comments: 8) | Fifco1 (Discussed changesets: 20) | Ďakujem za rady, upravil som to podľa nich. commented 2026-10-05 19:39:12 UTC by Fifco1 ♦17 | |
| 188619100 (Comments: 1) | Scout Jens (Discussed changesets: 131) | Moin, passt die Verwendung von area:highway =footway so? Wenn ich's wiki richtig verstehe, ist area:highway eher dafür da, die Oberfläche einer Straße (für die Darstellung) zu mappen, und nicht eine (routbare) Fläche... commented 2026-10-05 19:24:42 UTC by Jbah ♦57 | |
| 190043161 (Comments: 7) | Pim van der Schalie (Discussed changesets: 1) | Dag Pim, Ik begrijp ergens in 2027. Zolang er niet gebouwd wordt taggen we greenfield.. zodra de eerste paal er in gaat construction. Mapse, eggie commented 2026-10-05 19:22:09 UTC by eggie ♦47,558 | |
| 185891009 (Comments: 1) | Anton_Klebanovich (Discussed changesets: 38) | Please, do not change road geometry just by bing maps if you don't know real state of things. It was correct before you changed it, because there was a reconstruction of roads and paths around. Aerial maps can be quite old very often. I have cor... commented 2026-10-05 19:21:18 UTC by simacekjakub ♦8 | |
| 188451171 (Comments: 4) | ajmat (Discussed changesets: 24) | I find it rather rude against newbie mappers not to help but to revert. commented 2026-10-05 19:20:06 UTC by opendcc ♦1,597 | |
| 190053654 (Comments: 1) | CarlosIllesca (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hola. El tag building es para los edificios, no para el recinto completo. Además por favor no agregar elemento socmo área y luego ocmo nodos. Fue corregido. Saludos y gracias --- Publishe... commented 2026-10-05 19:14:39 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦3,437 | |
| 189973451 (Comments: 3) | Rogoyski (Discussed changesets: 74) | Super, dzięki! Na warstwie uzbrojenia są przerywane krawędzie prostokąta. Stąd to pytanie, bo często są dla "proponowanych" trafo, które niestety nie zawsze powstają. commented 2026-10-05 19:09:23 UTC by NieWnen ♦1,498 | |
| 188035304 (Comments: 4) | zackrossdino2 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Yeah sure commented 2026-10-05 19:07:06 UTC by zackrossdino2 ♦3 | |
| 47612182 (Comments: 1) | sargasso (Discussed changesets: 7) | New roads? And why have you removed a tertiary road to the train station Vyškovce nad Ipľom and created a track https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/485800444 ? How can you see if there is a number (ref) just from Mapbox imagery? commented 2026-10-05 18:56:48 UTC by aceman444 ♦3,055 | |
| 173942385 (Comments: 3) | Enock4seth (Discussed changesets: 29) | Alright, thanks for the quick response! I will try to help out with fixing bad tagging from organized mapping when I come across it. Happy mapping :D commented 2026-10-05 18:38:53 UTC by SereneDeluge ♦46 | |
| 190021690 (Comments: 2) | Kaloan-koko (Discussed changesets: 87) | По-скоро name, иначе разчитаме само на информацията от Уикиданни. Не знам да има приложение което да попълва нашите липси директно от УД. commented 2026-10-05 18:38:34 UTC by Dimitar155 ♦1,052 | |
| 190053126 (Comments: 1) | Davisville (Discussed changesets: 1) | Need assistance in correcting the map for property boundaries as well as removing the black dashed trail line the runs North-south along the western side of the property - refer to AXIS GIS North Kingstown . This is private not part of the Audubon tr... commented 2026-10-05 18:38:29 UTC by Davisville ♦1 | |
| 190053074 (Comments: 1) | evyy (Discussed changesets: 8) | Korrektur zum Changesetkommentar: "Gebäudeumrisse korrigiert und Gebäude und Zufahrten ergänzt" commented 2026-10-05 18:34:25 UTC by evyy ♦9 | |
| 147588031 (Comments: 2) | emvee (Discussed changesets: 203) | No, I did remove it. commented 2026-10-05 18:34:01 UTC by emvee ♦430 | |
| 190051173 (Comments: 1) | Paradine (Discussed changesets: 45) | Moin :) Kleinigkeit: (Fließ)Gewässer, Wege oder auch Hecken haben keine Breite von 0 und die Linie die wir zeichnen um sie darzustellen verläuft idR entlang der Mitte dieser Objekte. Entsprechend ist es idR auch nicht mögl... commented 2026-10-05 18:33:28 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦4,375 | |
| 190035976 (Comments: 1) | alfonx (Discussed changesets: 1) | Moin dein Kommentar liest sich als würdest du im Auftrag arbeiten. Sagen dir die Organized Editing Guidelines etwas? cheers --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changes... commented 2026-10-05 18:28:13 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦4,375 | |
| 189962321 (Comments: 3) | ED0771 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo, kein Problem. Ich habe die Tags wiederhergestellt. Viele Grüße commented 2026-10-05 18:24:11 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,663 | |
| 181869144 (Comments: 3) | MATU1SK (Discussed changesets: 8) | Mozno tam tie building=police pridava automaticky editor iD, aj ked tam nepatria. Ak ide len o preklad (nie oficialny nazov, ktory si uvadza firma) tak sa to do OSM nepridava. Mechanicky preklad si vie urobit aj turista. Dakujem za pridanie... commented 2026-10-05 18:23:13 UTC by aceman444 ♦3,055 | |
| 189665849 (Comments: 3) | Gorger (Discussed changesets: 32) | I see, thanks for the explanation. Is possible for you to upload this GPS traces to https://www.openstreetmap.org/traces ? commented 2026-10-05 18:20:20 UTC by Rodrigo Rega ♦377 | |
| 166901331 (Comments: 1) | Torgau2020 (Discussed changesets: 7) | Would you mind if I split Vejrup Å from Davinde Å at node/6352676967? Both the SDFI Screenmap and "Danske Stednavne" at kortoverblik.dk define a split between them there. commented 2026-10-05 18:19:47 UTC by cyclist789 ♦140 | |
| 190039712 (Comments: 2) | DiederikC (Discussed changesets: 3) | Info samengevoegd met adresnode. commented 2026-10-05 18:19:26 UTC by eggie ♦47,558 | |
| 177357544 (Comments: 3) | evolutions (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks to both of you. @tastrax has fixed the remaining ones for you both. commented 2026-10-05 18:18:58 UTC by Ewen Hill ♦522 | |
| 190050530 (Comments: 1) | Skalimov (Discussed changesets: 3) | Olá, Skalimov! A etiqueta building deve ser usada para áreas que representam edifícios. Para a área de concessionária pode ser usada a etiqueta shop=car. Abraço! --- ... commented 2026-10-05 18:11:20 UTC by adrianojbr ♦597 | |
| 189983294 (Comments: 4) | FFW A (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo, kein Problem! Und sieht jetzt auch okay aus. Viele Grüße commented 2026-10-05 18:10:27 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,663 | |
| 189996202 (Comments: 2) | Grandasse (Discussed changesets: 6) | Salut, Si t'en as marre de me corriger : arrête ? Je suis humain, je fais des erreurs et j'apprends. Tu m'as parlé hier de cette histoire de multipolygones (je t'en remercie à nouveau) et je t'ai... commented 2026-10-05 18:09:52 UTC by Grandasse ♦2 | |
| 185439698 (Comments: 1) | kleiss (Discussed changesets: 2) | Moin. Ich halte deine Änderung für falsch. name=* sollte der Name sein, wie er vor Ort angegeben wird. Auf der Schildern am Bahnsteig steht hier nur "Berlin Hauptbahnhof". Der volle Name der Betriebsstelle war bereits vorher als o... commented 2026-10-05 18:08:57 UTC by Entbert ♦34 | |
| 188212109 (Comments: 1) | marcoSt (Discussed changesets: 110) | Bürgermeister Mücke sagte im Februar 2026: "Es könnte 2030 oder danach passieren." Gemeint war die Inbetriebnahme dieses Haltepunktes. Daher braucht es in nächster Zeit auch noch keine Gl... commented 2026-10-05 18:08:24 UTC by Lovran ♦1 | |
| 185811419 (Comments: 3) | muaum (Discussed changesets: 3) | :) commented 2026-10-05 17:59:10 UTC by VictorIE ♦1,271 | |
| 190048173 (Comments: 3) | DH72 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Dennie... 't klopt. Ik zal je onze welkomstmail sturen per PB met wat handige tips en tricks. Mapse, eggie commented 2026-10-05 17:58:48 UTC by eggie ♦47,558 | |
| 189334261 (Comments: 2) | Snowshoe Outlet (Discussed changesets: 1) | I thought there was a function to do that, but I couldn't find it. Thank you! commented 2026-10-05 17:48:19 UTC by Snowshoe Outlet ♦1 | |
| 189915049 (Comments: 2) | tafla- (Discussed changesets: 11) | Jakie są podstawy tego rewertu? W opisie brak uzasadnienia commented 2026-10-05 17:45:22 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,230 | |
| 190006769 (Comments: 4) | stirps (Discussed changesets: 76) | revert ist reverted commented 2026-10-05 17:44:24 UTC by stirps ♦67 | |
| 189423651 (Comments: 3) | RAW- (Discussed changesets: 7) | Thanks I just upload these from JOSM and somehow that happened, I think because I didn't use the building plugin instead the line tool I don't know? And thanks woodpeck again for fixing my dump mistakes commented 2026-10-05 17:41:55 UTC by RAW- ♦1 | |
| 187884558 (Comments: 1) | tafla- (Discussed changesets: 11) | Gdzie https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1068326973/history jest wymieniona w tej dyskusji? commented 2026-10-05 17:41:01 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,230 | |
| 188186651 (Comments: 1) | tafla- (Discussed changesets: 11) | ta zmiana to była na forum omówiona? commented 2026-10-05 17:39:45 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,230 | |
| 186138432 (Comments: 1) | WaldemarLehner (Discussed changesets: 2) | Du hast hier bei https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1541424864 ein 24m langes Gartentor hinzugefügt. Vermutlich war das ein Versehen, die Luftbilder sind aber alle zu unscharf um zu erkennen was stattdessen dort ist. commented 2026-10-05 17:39:17 UTC by Tatfahren ♦388 | |
| 190000289 (Comments: 1) | אלי123 (Discussed changesets: 1) | שלום אלי הבנייה של דרור כבר מסומנת במפה ובכל מקרה היא לא אטרקציה. בבקשה למפות נכון. commented 2026-10-05 17:36:00 UTC by hatul ♦536 | |
| 190006880 (Comments: 3) | stirps (Discussed changesets: 76) | Und die poller hast du mit dem revert auch erwischt commented 2026-10-05 17:34:27 UTC by stirps ♦67 | |
| 189702137 (Comments: 1) | Garret Langley (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello! Do you know if the toilet is gender_segregated ? Since the unisex tag is skunked we need to specify gender_segregated as well commented 2026-10-05 17:33:27 UTC by SereneDeluge ♦46 | |
| 185143618 (Comments: 2) | wandersmann_OOE (Discussed changesets: 1) | Danke für die Info. Habe leider keine Ahnung warum ich damals den Pfad auf "access=no" gesetzt habe. Habe aber gesehen, dass du alles richtig gestellt hast. Danke dafür & LG commented 2026-10-05 17:29:13 UTC by wandersmann_OOE ♦1 | |
| 189980717 (Comments: 1) | Hadar_iz (Discussed changesets: 1) | שלום הדר וברוכים הבאים אל OSM המפה לא מיועדת לנקודות פרטיות. כל המשתמשים רואים אותן. commented 2026-10-05 17:22:31 UTC by hatul ♦536 | |
| 189982016 (Comments: 3) | Jule_Beuel (Discussed changesets: 28) | so, ich war vorhin auch da, und das VZ 239 steht da noch. Gruß Zrop commented 2026-10-05 17:14:00 UTC by Zrop ♦175 | |
| 189982650 (Comments: 1) | IvanChan2000 (Discussed changesets: 16) | Please add `branch=` , not including it in `name=` commented 2026-10-05 17:07:25 UTC by Kovoschiz ♦3,062 | |
| 190047620 (Comments: 1) | Emerson Straw Injury & Car Accident Lawyers Palm Harbor (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thank you very much for adding your spammy description again ... 🤷♂️ commented 2026-10-05 16:57:24 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦7,039 | |
| 190025261 (Comments: 2) | topolusitania (Discussed changesets: 92) | Hi This is a sport school site. Handball is one of many ball sports played here commented 2026-10-05 16:56:15 UTC by topolusitania ♦268 | |
| 170482981 (Comments: 1) | Emerson Straw Injury & Car Accident Lawyers Palm Harbor (Discussed changesets: 2) | Partly reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170497797 commented 2026-10-05 16:56:05 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦7,039 | |
| 189925690 (Comments: 1) | berco85 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Dag berco, Helaas kun je met de editor iD geen routerelaties bewerken. iD plakt alle nieuwe wegen en haltes achteraan de relatie vast. Dat veroorzaakt dus altijd een gebroken route omdat de wegen en haltes niet in de juiste volgorde staan. | |
| 188451830 (Comments: 3) | MappingMore (Discussed changesets: 18) | Hi opendcc, thank you for your suggestion. I understand that keeping the information added by Miche_92 with a fix would have been appropriate than deletion. I’ll pass your suggestion to my project managers for their consideration on workflow im... commented 2026-10-05 16:44:23 UTC by MappingMore ♦759 | |
| 189993175 (Comments: 1) | Reli1 (Discussed changesets: 1) | (Pediste revisión). Hola, he pasado por la calle y creo que el firme no está mal pero tiene puntos peligrosos para 2 ruedas sobre todo en registros de alcantarilla y limitadores de velocidad; y grietas. Lo vamos a dejar en "bad&quo... commented 2026-10-05 16:29:26 UTC by José Miguel Picazo Núñez ♦6 | |
| 190021828 (Comments: 2) | wombatmaper (Discussed changesets: 44) | Hab ich schon drauf geachtet, aber ich wollte hier niemanden vor dem kopf stoßen, und informationen löschen. Und da ich nicht wusste welcher der beiden öffnungszeiten korrekt ist, hab ich lieber beide gelassen. commented 2026-10-05 16:28:07 UTC by wombatmaper ♦117 | |
| 160980884 (Comments: 2) | bbgg (Discussed changesets: 13) | ciao, procedi pure grazie commented 2026-10-05 16:22:48 UTC by bbgg ♦10 | |
| 190045610 (Comments: 1) | Koreller (Discussed changesets: 23) | #31DayOSMChallenge #Maptober #Maptober2026 #OpenStreetMap commented 2026-10-05 16:13:11 UTC by Koreller ♦67 | |
| 188605357 (Comments: 1) | LokNeko (Discussed changesets: 12) | Hi, thank you for maintaining the level of roads in Zhuhai, but according to related [wiki reference](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway_link) , link roads are supposed to be tagged matching the higher classification. Specifically in the ins... commented 2026-10-05 16:03:03 UTC by XD346 ♦37 | |
| 190044543 (Comments: 1) | krt16s (Discussed changesets: 2) | Quelle: Besuch vor Ort, GPX-Track, Luftbild. commented 2026-10-05 15:56:04 UTC by krt16s ♦2 | |
| 186597677 (Comments: 1) | matpie (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi, schau mal hier rein, da gibt's zu access=no bzw. hw service eine Rückfrage note/5556153 Grüße commented 2026-10-05 15:55:06 UTC by onterof ♦71 | |
| 190024291 (Comments: 1) | TheSYR (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hallo, nochmals die Bitte, deine Änderungssätze etwas kleiner zu halten. Darüber noch folgender Hinweis: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1565145096: Entweder das Gelände bekommt ein Zeltplatz-Tag oder das landuse ke... commented 2026-10-05 15:54:58 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,663 | |
| 190024163 (Comments: 2) | Siem_Hw (Discussed changesets: 17) | Dear Frans S, it has been more than two months, so I no longer recall the exact reason. I do notice, however, that roads are often wide and then transition into a narrower section. I am unsure of the best way to map this. Is it common practice to swi... commented 2026-10-05 15:54:00 UTC by Siem_Hw ♦3 | |
| 189797975 (Comments: 6) | 0x4273 (Discussed changesets: 7) | A community discussion thread on the dilution of the term has been added here: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/have-we-abandoned-recreation-grounds-as-a-concept/148430 commented 2026-10-05 15:38:06 UTC by InsertUser ♦504 | |
| 189556077 (Comments: 6) | Bartek444 (Discussed changesets: 92) | W Krakowie jest to bardziej skomplikowane. Za budowę odpowiada ZDMK (nawierzchnia, płotki), za organizację transportu ZTP (ustalenie co i gdzie), za wywieszenie rozkładów MPK Wiaty stawia prywatna firma, a w zamian może wywieszać r... commented 2026-10-05 15:36:21 UTC by Bartek444 ♦74 | |
| 190039714 (Comments: 2) | meditor2011 (Discussed changesets: 5) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dparking_entrance commented 2026-10-05 15:33:44 UTC by eggie ♦47,558 | |
| 189839015 (Comments: 1) | Fox_45 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Bonjour, Le way 1564202186 est le doublon du way 1564202146 Je le supprime. Cordialement, Yves https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1564202186 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1564202146 commented 2026-10-05 15:25:16 UTC by pyrog ♦469 | |
| 190036049 (Comments: 1) | Saad Fakhri (Discussed changesets: 4) | I think something went wrong here with your renaming ... ? commented 2026-10-05 15:19:22 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦7,039 | |
| 190036515 (Comments: 1) | Saad Fakhri (Discussed changesets: 4) | I think something went wrong here with your renaming ... ? commented 2026-10-05 15:19:12 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦7,039 | |
| 190036035 (Comments: 1) | Saad Fakhri (Discussed changesets: 4) | I think something went wrong here with your renaming ... ? commented 2026-10-05 15:18:54 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦7,039 | |
| 190035905 (Comments: 1) | Saad Fakhri (Discussed changesets: 4) | I think something went wrong here with your renaming ... ? commented 2026-10-05 15:18:44 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦7,039 | |
| 190042253 (Comments: 2) | Alex_457 (Discussed changesets: 67) | source=NaPTAN;survey commented 2026-10-05 15:14:39 UTC by Alex_457 ♦87 | |
| 189891544 (Comments: 3) | Zhen Sun (Discussed changesets: 52) | Apologies on this! I am sorry I missed your message while proceeding with the other changes at hand. The new House Bill 664 in Idaho was in effective on July 1st, 2026 stating that the entire state no longer has separate speed limits for HGV ... commented 2026-10-05 15:13:13 UTC by Zhen Sun ♦1 | |
| 189649072 (Comments: 1) | Sam0Te (Discussed changesets: 7) | Bonjour, Le quartier St-Michel existe déjà dans OSM, il est cartographié en relation : https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13664862#map=16/43.58812/1.44721 Merci de ne pas créer de doublons. Bonne journ&eac... commented 2026-10-05 15:12:12 UTC by Hervé TUC ♦56 | |
| 190030816 (Comments: 5) | Flo-ki (Discussed changesets: 1) | Dag Flo-ki, Ik heb de reclamezuil verwijderd. Dat werkt niet. De praktijk staat nu op de adresnode. MVG eggie commented 2026-10-05 15:02:29 UTC by eggie ♦47,558 | |
| 190033291 (Comments: 2) | Chris Teuben (Discussed changesets: 1) | Het was aangegeven als construction=path Is het wel een fietspad? Over een path routeert een fietser ook. commented 2026-10-05 14:53:37 UTC by eggie ♦47,558 | |
| 186516788 (Comments: 1) | Brummelwuff (Discussed changesets: 28) | Moin aus Wildeshausen! Kannst Du bitte noch mal schauen: Du hast hier an zwei Knoten den Knotenpunkt 56 erfasst: https://www.osm.org/node/440127872 https://www.osm.org/node/352754016 Laut Kataster dürfte nur der nördliche sti... commented 2026-10-05 14:51:11 UTC by GerdP ♦2,877 | |
| 92665839 (Comments: 2) | حبيشان (Discussed changesets: 15) | هنالك أسماء تم إدخالها غير صحيحة في هذه العقده https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/14.5006950/44.0350340 وهي مسميات في عزلة المطبابة مديرية عتمة محافظة ذمار اÙ... commented 2026-10-05 14:50:40 UTC by اسعد الكامل ♦3 | |
| 190016889 (Comments: 7) | U02 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello eggie, Thank you. Kind regards, U02 commented 2026-10-05 14:47:29 UTC by U02 ♦1 | |
| 189982770 (Comments: 2) | AndrewMcCarthy (Discussed changesets: 13) | Sorry to say, I don't remember exactly if there's more seating there. They've divided the two drive-through lanes completely, and there's a hedge between them. At the back, where the link from the parking aisle behind was, is now ... commented 2026-10-05 14:46:30 UTC by AndrewMcCarthy ♦12 | |
| 81453916 (Comments: 3) | Chris Fleming (Discussed changesets: 21) | See this discussion for what we're doing about this: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/should-relation-2621481-be-deleted/148162 commented 2026-10-05 14:45:57 UTC by CanopyFalls ♦140 | |
| 189642014 (Comments: 1) | MistikRuz (Discussed changesets: 7) | مرحبا لما تغير الأسماء الأصلية للمركبة؟ commented 2026-10-05 14:45:53 UTC by yamada-as ♦15 | |
| 189560884 (Comments: 4) | W3NET0wns (Discussed changesets: 32) | Śmiało, tylko Ty masz problem. commented 2026-10-05 14:40:20 UTC by W3NET0wns ♦22 | |
| 189770979 (Comments: 6) | Erik Vroon (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hoi.. Het complex als functie staat al op dat grote vlak. Zo te zien in het Engels. ..name=... is hetgeen rendert op de kaart. ..name:nl=... lijkt me niet nodig. Ik zie ook nog ergens Jaarbeurs staan? Beetje dubbel.. Groet, egg... commented 2026-10-05 14:35:20 UTC by eggie ♦47,558 | |
| 190038702 (Comments: 1) | Michaall99 (Discussed changesets: 33) | Oczywiście nie "problemów Mapillary", tylko MapRoulette commented 2026-10-05 14:21:06 UTC by Michaall99 ♦54 | |
| 190002136 (Comments: 2) | David__D (Discussed changesets: 7) | Thanks, wist niet dat adressen dubbel mochten. Weer wat geleerd! commented 2026-10-05 14:20:07 UTC by David__D ♦4 | |
| 189955331 (Comments: 5) | Pebbles_1 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Dieses Gebäude existiert nicht mehr commented 2026-10-05 14:16:38 UTC by Pebbles_1 ♦8 | |
| 189771118 (Comments: 2) | Erik Vroon (Discussed changesets: 3) | Goedemiddag Jasper! Bedankt voor de scherpheid en de aanpassing. Zeker, in de volksmond staat de organisatie bekend als Jaarbeurs. Bij een eerste introductie gebruikt Jaarbeurs de meer internationaal geörienteerde naam 'Royal Dutch... commented 2026-10-05 14:11:41 UTC by Erik Vroon ♦2 | |
| 190033781 (Comments: 1) | alx-hld (Discussed changesets: 1) | This change is reverted as changing Northern Territory to place=state is incorrect. It is a place=territory. commented 2026-10-05 14:03:18 UTC by nevw ♦2,356 | |
| 190021941 (Comments: 2) | pnstvmp (Discussed changesets: 1) | Danke fürs Gangway/Zugang eintragen, hatte ich vergessen. commented 2026-10-05 13:53:24 UTC by pnstvmp ♦1 | |
| 190018739 (Comments: 1) | rotsee (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hej! Taggar för buss- och järnvägsstation finns redan på dessa objekt: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13704950843 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/52559841 commented 2026-10-05 13:49:06 UTC by AndersAndersson ♦661 | |
| 189996115 (Comments: 3) | Tatfahren (Discussed changesets: 87) | Ich bin nochmal vorbeigegangen um nachzusehen, weil ich mir grad selber nicht mehr sicher war, ob die wirklich so lang sind. Aber ja, ist präzise so wie es verzeichnet ist (ca. 27m). https://imgur.com/a/DYOiZ9N commented 2026-10-05 13:40:57 UTC by molaren ♦2 | |
| 190007291 (Comments: 1) | stirps (Discussed changesets: 76) | Am Nordende des Sees die details des aktiven Abbaus zu taggen ist eher quatsch. Das sieht jetzt schon nicht mehr so aus wie im Luftbild. Die Haufen werden permanent verschoben. commented 2026-10-05 13:39:14 UTC by flohoff ♦2,604 | |
| 187636436 (Comments: 1) | olaag (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hi, these are public roads, and they were correctly tagged as `highway=unclassified` based on the highway tagging scheme https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India/Tags/Highway could you please explain why these were re-classified as `highway=s... commented 2026-10-05 13:35:55 UTC by uknown-gryphus ♦48 | |
| 190007651 (Comments: 1) | stirps (Discussed changesets: 76) | foot/bicycle is default auf tracks - muss man nicht explizit taggen: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access_restrictions#Germany commented 2026-10-05 13:35:53 UTC by flohoff ♦2,604 | |
| 189859604 (Comments: 2) | UWS-Tirol (Discussed changesets: 7) | vor allem gibt es nun eine ältere Relation https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/15979439 aus der ein Gebiet gelöscht wurde; zusätzlich 2 neue Gebiete https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1564316575 und https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/... commented 2026-10-05 13:34:02 UTC by fs_LT ♦247 | |
| 190035926 (Comments: 1) | imiraldz (Discussed changesets: 5) | *tag commented 2026-10-05 13:24:10 UTC by imiraldz ♦10 | |
| 189723446 (Comments: 2) | Digitaleo (Discussed changesets: 49) | Oui effectivement, c'est corrigé commented 2026-10-05 13:14:35 UTC by Digitaleo ♦52 | |
| 141405005 (Comments: 1) | Andrey_K86 (Discussed changesets: 18) | Добрый день. Раз тропа заросшая https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1097621529 стоит ее удалить, либо указать теги surface=grass; trail_visibility? commented 2026-10-05 13:12:37 UTC by ednzxt ♦20 | |
| 189988716 (Comments: 1) | Venomin (Discussed changesets: 20) | Hi, motorway_link is considered slower than motorway to now routing has changed caused by this changeset: https://osm.zz.de/routeqa/?rid=1341204,1349219#50.90689,7.07108,11z Red is old, green is new. Difference is 21 seconds. ... commented 2026-10-05 13:10:48 UTC by flohoff ♦2,604 | |
| 189336458 (Comments: 1) | Andrey_K86 (Discussed changesets: 18) | Добрый день. Хочу напомнить, что описания объектов не заносятся в name, максимум в description! commented 2026-10-05 13:09:19 UTC by ednzxt ♦20 | |
| 78852687 (Comments: 2) | Geofreund1 (Discussed changesets: 148) | Ich habe seinerzeit in der Gegend viel mit ORKA.MV gearbeitet. Wenn du unsicher bist und keine andere Quelle finden kannst, so lösche doch den Namen einfach. Es passiert sicher nichts Schreckliches. Happy Mapping Geofreund1 commented 2026-10-05 13:00:06 UTC by Geofreund1 ♦294 | |
| 189716636 (Comments: 3) | magnode (Discussed changesets: 5) | I confirmed with Bane NOR that it's open, so i opened the bridge. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190034457 commented 2026-10-05 12:57:20 UTC by ENTUR Johan Wiklund ♦94 | |
| 121555331 (Comments: 1) | 5dMDE7h (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi 5dMDE7h, das office=company empfand ich für ein Unversitäts-Institut etwas unpassend. Habe es angepasst nach office=university. Ich war vor ein paar Wochen dort und das Institut gibt es noch. Da es über mehrere Räume ... commented 2026-10-05 12:53:48 UTC by redd ♦494 | |
| 190021623 (Comments: 3) | Justaspet1 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Niekur neturi būti, nes toks yra susitarimas: fiziškai neatskirtų šaligatvių atskirais vektoriais nežymime. Ir taip, Kaune labai didelis bardakas su duomenimis. commented 2026-10-05 12:48:37 UTC by Tomas Straupis ♦2,133 | |
| 187833428 (Comments: 2) | nicatxo (Discussed changesets: 3) | Bonjour, je me suis basé sur le wiki pour faire ma modification : "Pour faire la distinction entre ces deux types de voies cyclables : les bandes cyclables réservées aux vélos, cycleway:lane=exclusive et les chaucidou... commented 2026-10-05 12:47:12 UTC by SIG_Ville_Anglet ♦2 | |
| 190014027 (Comments: 1) | MappingAnt (Discussed changesets: 4) | revert da die Geometrie einer Straße komplett zerstört wurde (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1561910272, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1561910276) https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190033607 commented 2026-10-05 12:43:28 UTC by fs_LT-repair ♦11 | |
| 140063663 (Comments: 2) | Waaslander (Discussed changesets: 58) | Follow-up with details, in case it helps. (Note at the station: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5556256) 19 steps/escalators have one end within 3 m of a platform at a matching level, but they share no node with it. This list comes from the... commented 2026-10-05 12:31:35 UTC by Fr-e-d ♦1 | |
| 189936528 (Comments: 2) | Kowieszaniex (Discussed changesets: 1) | Jeżeli samochody jadące w przeciwnych kierunkach na drodze mogą się mijać, to albo nie tagujemy w ogóle liczby pasów albo wprowadzamy domyślną wartość `lanes=2`. Na kilku drogach wprowadziłeś liczbę pasów = 1, co nie ... commented 2026-10-05 12:28:29 UTC by Marek-M ♦1,119 | |
| 190025149 (Comments: 3) | DiederikC (Discussed changesets: 3) | Oke.. dan wordt het een herkenbare code. 👍 commented 2026-10-05 12:25:00 UTC by eggie ♦47,558 | |
| 190028504 (Comments: 3) | NickvZelm (Discussed changesets: 9) | Top dankejwel weer Eggie! commented 2026-10-05 12:23:21 UTC by NickvZelm ♦5 | |
| 189935267 (Comments: 6) | kubzon7 (Discussed changesets: 30) | Generalnie warto wejść w społeczność, poznać różne punkty widzenia, potrzeby czy kompromisy aby wiedzieć co tak właściwie jest najważniejsze w naszym mapowaniu. Mapowanie innych miast pozwala nam poznać infrastrukturalne niuans... commented 2026-10-05 12:18:12 UTC by Yog Sot ♦576 | |
| 187035544 (Comments: 3) | Digitaleo (Discussed changesets: 49) | Bonjour @JeanSebastien Merci pour le signalement et pour la correction, vous avez raison. En comparant la version 19 et notre version 20 du nœud 3674920125, notre mise à jour a bien écrasé une correction commu... commented 2026-10-05 12:10:43 UTC by Digitaleo ♦52 | |
| 189988466 (Comments: 6) | Pebbles_1 (Discussed changesets: 6) | ich habe den Hinweis wieder geöffnet und die Änderung gelöscht. commented 2026-10-05 12:07:03 UTC by Pebbles_1 ♦8 | |
| 190008728 (Comments: 1) | Ray Gym (Discussed changesets: 1) | Salut. Exista tag-uri specifice pentru sali de fitness si tag-uri specifice de adresa. Daca le scrieti doar ca text in descriere, nu o sa apara nicaieri pe harta si nici nu va fi vizibil la cautare. Am corectat eu ce era necesar. commented 2026-10-05 12:01:29 UTC by rarad74 ♦580 | |
| 190022857 (Comments: 2) | lvanels (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks! commented 2026-10-05 12:00:04 UTC by lvanels ♦1 | |
| 190030614 (Comments: 1) | Breeze Inn Suites B&B (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OSM, Bedankt voor uw bijdrage. De adresgegevens waren niet compleet. Ik heb wat aan gepast. MVG, eggie commented 2026-10-05 11:59:54 UTC by eggie ♦47,558 | |
| 189904099 (Comments: 3) | IreuN (Discussed changesets: 83) | OK, I am sending you a message with what went wrong. commented 2026-10-05 11:59:24 UTC by adamos ♦78 | |
| 189999806 (Comments: 1) | Subhash0001 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190030636 commented 2026-10-05 11:51:07 UTC by rajdhani ♦537 | |
| 175246671 (Comments: 3) | notfalltreffpunkt (Discussed changesets: 11) | Gab es denn keine Diskussion dazu, ob bzw. wie diese Punkte zu mappen sind? Vor Ort ist ja wahrscheinlich nicht viel davon zu sehen, oder? commented 2026-10-05 11:50:12 UTC by GerdP ♦2,877 | |
| 189848290 (Comments: 2) | Cooperativa Telefonica Coronel Du Graty (Discussed changesets: 1) | Gracias, no tenia esa información. commented 2026-10-05 11:49:32 UTC by Cooperativa Telefonica Coronel Du Graty ♦1 | |
| 190022652 (Comments: 1) | Burock54 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Merhaba. OpenStreetMap'e, Dünya'daki bir yer yalnızca bir öğe şeklinde eklenmeli. Bkz: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element Geçmişte zaten https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8013613561... commented 2026-10-05 11:48:27 UTC by HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi ♦288 | |
| 189936857 (Comments: 2) | mapperue (Discussed changesets: 326) | Hi, see this changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189926362 commented 2026-10-05 11:46:14 UTC by mapperue ♦249 | |
| 190028984 (Comments: 3) | Pim Naaijkens (VRZL) (Discussed changesets: 1) | Quoot ivm een melding van een TS die niet door kan rijden Het zal hier niet meer routeren voor motorvoertuigen muv moped en mofa Hoe de scripts in jullie nav app werken weet ik niet. commented 2026-10-05 11:43:54 UTC by eggie ♦47,558 | |
| 190029600 (Comments: 1) | Jakka (Discussed changesets: 251) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/14251955892 commented 2026-10-05 11:30:50 UTC by Jakka ♦1,881 | |
| 190027977 (Comments: 1) | stalemateofmorality (Discussed changesets: 1) | Sebenarnya tidak perlu dihapus dan buat baru, bisa dipindahkan saja. Jangan lupa selesaikan tutorial interaktifnya terlebih dahulu commented 2026-10-05 11:30:40 UTC by FajrAl ♦892 | |
| 187013742 (Comments: 2) | Palary (Discussed changesets: 27) | Hi Sytys, my edit was focusing on how 1200 East and 1000 North were connected to the roundabout. Thank you for making the corrections on the bus relation I missed. I think all is good there. All the best. commented 2026-10-05 11:28:24 UTC by Palary ♦28 | |
| 189985058 (Comments: 1) | fuego63632 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190029153 commented 2026-10-05 11:22:19 UTC by rajdhani ♦537 | |
| 190024321 (Comments: 1) | frieda99 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Sind die Wege auch entsprechend mit Zusatzeichen "Fahrrad frei" beschildert? In OSM sollten nur tatsächlich beschilderte Verbote (oder in dem Fall Erlaubnisse) eingetragen werden. Sonst kommt bald der nächste vorbei der si... commented 2026-10-05 11:04:36 UTC by Tatfahren ♦388 | |
| 190018381 (Comments: 4) | JJpaete (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thank you for your help. I adjusted the name to ChemSIN since it's the correct one. commented 2026-10-05 10:54:13 UTC by JJpaete ♦1 | |
| 189863729 (Comments: 6) | Alessandro Conticelli (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks for the Swift reply and action taken. Much appreciated. Happy mapping and safe travels commented 2026-10-05 10:44:29 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦4,375 | |
| 190007932 (Comments: 1) | Affiliate link (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap. Almost all stores that you added to the map were already added by mapper "Nike petshop" (https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Nike%20petshop) in the last few weeks. Do you happen to know this pe... commented 2026-10-05 10:23:47 UTC by Timmy_Tesseract ♦206 | |
| 189994973 (Comments: 2) | Pebbles_1 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Ich vergleiche auch mit Luftbild commented 2026-10-05 10:11:14 UTC by Pebbles_1 ♦8 | |
| 187304959 (Comments: 7) | drlellinger (Discussed changesets: 124) | Mehr als den Hinweis geben kann ich leider nicht machen. Soll jemand anderes die Fehler wieder korrigieren... commented 2026-10-05 10:08:51 UTC by XXXVII ♦7 | |
| 189995127 (Comments: 4) | Pebbles_1 (Discussed changesets: 6) | erledigt mit https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190025219 commented 2026-10-05 10:08:38 UTC by Pebbles_1 ♦8 | |
| 189738857 (Comments: 11) | Filip009CZ (Discussed changesets: 20) | Ok, thank you for the details commented 2026-10-05 10:07:09 UTC by brunesto ♦16 | |
| 190017537 (Comments: 2) | erwanlevieux (Discussed changesets: 4) | Effectivement, merci pour votre vigilance. Je viens de corriger commented 2026-10-05 10:07:03 UTC by erwanlevieux ♦3 | |
| 190020312 (Comments: 1) | Djdunord993 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Bonjour. Merci pour votre édition mais attention à nouveau à être plus attentif aux détails. OSM est une base de données de référence, pas un jeu où on peut se permettre des approxi... commented 2026-10-05 10:03:23 UTC by bxl-forever ♦3,091 | |
| 190018862 (Comments: 1) | casssis (Discussed changesets: 7) | review_requested \tyes Lijkt me oke als de situatie is gewijzigd. MVG eggie commented 2026-10-05 10:00:52 UTC by eggie ♦47,558 | |
| 189386552 (Comments: 8) | Tinetto (Discussed changesets: 49) | Agreed, thank you for your understanding. I’ve also paused any further update until receiving word from the requestor and I’ll also reach out to you then. All the best. commented 2026-10-05 09:57:42 UTC by Tinetto ♦26 | |
| 178249846 (Comments: 2) | AlexTies (Discussed changesets: 12) | Hello, Yes this was a input error. I fixed the data in changeset/190024130 commented 2026-10-05 09:47:51 UTC by AlexTies ♦7 | |
| 190022528 (Comments: 1) | DiederikC (Discussed changesets: 3) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-10-05 09:36:07 UTC by eggie ♦47,558 | |
| 182879194 (Comments: 1) | Pernycek (Discussed changesets: 19) | Guten Tag, das ist seit dem 20. Juli 2025 keine Kirche mehr. Deshalb amenity=place_of_worship wieder entfernt. Viele Grüße whb commented 2026-10-05 09:28:50 UTC by whb ♦672 | |
| 182155650 (Comments: 1) | richlv (Discussed changesets: 47) | Go Map laikam kaut ko ne tā rāda, bet te nebija `sett` celiņiem, bet `paving_stones`. commented 2026-10-05 09:28:19 UTC by HellMap ♦997 | |
| 190015376 (Comments: 3) | operator8 (Discussed changesets: 1) | When doing the fenceline, just map the actual fence (tagged as barrier=fence) instead of encompassing the whole property with a fence, unless a fence does completely enclose the property. It looks like this house has no fence across the front in comm... commented 2026-10-05 09:28:02 UTC by nevw ♦2,356 | |
| 183390580 (Comments: 3) | Tuiui (Discussed changesets: 9) | Does it put descriptions in the name fields? Did it create an English `name` and add `name:nl` and `name:de` as with this node (v1)? That would be a nasty bug. commented 2026-10-05 09:27:46 UTC by JeroenHoek ♦802 | |
| 190014581 (Comments: 1) | general345 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ale relacja https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5547622 opisuje nie drogę rowerową tylko *trasę* rowerową… Na pewno jej tam nie ma? Trasa to są takie małe tabliczki z rowerkiem i kolorem szlaku commented 2026-10-05 09:26:59 UTC by dzamper ♦282 | |
| 189956345 (Comments: 1) | Bienson (Discussed changesets: 38) | Ich hatte auch gesehen, dass es so in den Katasterdaten steht, aber vor Ort ist die 30a oben links, die 30b oben rechts und eine 30c konnte ich nicht entdecken commented 2026-10-05 09:26:35 UTC by neri_ ♦7 | |
| 188406995 (Comments: 3) | Aya Samir (Discussed changesets: 25) | مرحبا مرة أخرى، كما ذكرت في الرد السابق ، أنا ما عدّلت اسم المكان ولا أضفت أو حذفت أي تسمية جغرافية. التعديل كان فقط على وسم lanes، يعني تم ت... commented 2026-10-05 09:15:10 UTC by Aya Samir ♦46 | |
| 190022170 (Comments: 1) | c0deaddict (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. Feedback... De placenode heb ik losgemaakt van de weg. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-10-05 09:12:46 UTC by eggie ♦47,558 | |
| 69420 (Comments: 11) | gmatt (Discussed changesets: 1) | nice commented 2026-10-05 09:10:43 UTC by 23634161 ♦5 | |
| 189974104 (Comments: 1) | yassin_metro (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello yassin_metro I noticed several issues in your recent edits, such as: You deleted streets that exist in real life, causing broken connections and wrong directions (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1564873467, https://www.openstreetmap.org... commented 2026-10-05 09:05:49 UTC by salma_z ♦28 | |
| 188410456 (Comments: 1) | Miche_92 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hallo, willkommen auf OpenStreetMap und danke für Deine Beiträge. Ganz stimmt das aber so noch nicht: Objekte in OSM werden mit Eigenschaften belegt (also z.B. eine Sitzbank ist amenity=bench), der Name-Tag wird nur verwendet, wenn es der E... commented 2026-10-05 09:02:07 UTC by opendcc ♦1,597 | |
| 190019243 (Comments: 3) | mappet_the_mapper (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hoi, Die naam klopte inderdaad niet. Ik heb die node verwijderd. Alle info staat al op de bakkerij. Ik weet niet of de naam Bartine Bakery & Market nu correct is. Op de website zie ik geen Market aanvulling staan. Up to you. ... commented 2026-10-05 08:59:01 UTC by eggie ♦47,558 | |
| 190005830 (Comments: 1) | X-rayS5 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Dag X Ray.. Waarom zou hier een relatie nodig zijn. Het geeft ook een foutmelding? Mvg, eggie commented 2026-10-05 08:51:58 UTC by eggie ♦47,558 | |
| 190005416 (Comments: 3) | X-rayS5 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Ahh Dick.. thx. Groet, eggie commented 2026-10-05 08:50:55 UTC by eggie ♦47,558 | |
| 163250890 (Comments: 2) | IBT3032 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Beste Tjuro, nog dank voor het bericht en de correctie. Inderdaad mijn fout, in een onbewaakt moment is die er ingeslopen, dank voor het scherp houden. Mvg, IBT3032 commented 2026-10-05 08:41:47 UTC by IBT3032 ♦8 | |
| 190004855 (Comments: 1) | AzanIQ (Discussed changesets: 1) | this is NOT a website if this mosque, therefore adding link to your website was an incorrect edit please cease commented 2026-10-05 08:41:43 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,230 | |
| 189993064 (Comments: 1) | Tilka (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for updating this. If you want to describe access as being for residents only, you can tag it with access=private + private=residents commented 2026-10-05 08:39:14 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,942 | |
| 189994319 (Comments: 1) | NorthYorkshire (Discussed changesets: 13) | Thanks for updating this! It’s good to see work at the station has finally been completed commented 2026-10-05 08:36:06 UTC by gurglypipe ♦1,127 | |
| 179049135 (Comments: 1) | kzmrzzg (Discussed changesets: 23) | Re: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13598635004 There appears to be an URL inside the statue tag? commented 2026-10-05 08:35:28 UTC by Kees 59 ♦141 | |
| 190000056 (Comments: 1) | meh106 (Discussed changesets: 2) | For a road which is privately owned (unadopted) like this, rather than private access (usually gated), you can also add the tag ownership=private commented 2026-10-05 08:32:41 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,942 | |
| 29071440 (Comments: 1) | Mirecnet (Discussed changesets: 153) | Zdravim, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/330083181 je "chata" stavbou (building=hut), alebo sa pouziva ako chata pre turistov (da sa prenajat?) teda tourism=chalet ? commented 2026-10-05 08:29:25 UTC by aceman444 ♦3,055 | |
| 188094682 (Comments: 1) | Kaloan-koko (Discussed changesets: 87) | Всъщност тротоарът на way/1250823132 е от ~22.09.2026, когато направиха и way/1565122226. commented 2026-10-05 08:20:18 UTC by Kaloan-koko ♦80 | |
| 189998434 (Comments: 1) | 2894 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Bitte keine boundary zerstören. Hab diese gerade zum wiederholten Mal geschlossen. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190019376#map=15/48.93462/13.62283&layers=N commented 2026-10-05 08:17:03 UTC by WoSoe ♦129 | |
| 189946629 (Comments: 1) | Sam0Te (Discussed changesets: 7) | Bonjour, Je ne comprends pas ce que tu as voulu faire ici ? Supprimer une partie du dome ? commented 2026-10-05 08:13:02 UTC by Hervé TUC ♦56 | |
| 189946672 (Comments: 1) | Sam0Te (Discussed changesets: 7) | Bonjour, Pourquoi avoir supprimé la tour de la cathédrale Saint-Étienne ? commented 2026-10-05 08:09:00 UTC by Hervé TUC ♦56 | |
| 189959335 (Comments: 3) | lamms (Discussed changesets: 7) | fixed commented 2026-10-05 08:06:41 UTC by lamms ♦11 | |
| 189173693 (Comments: 1) | Filip009CZ (Discussed changesets: 20) | Super dakujem. Naozaj to dnes vecer otvaraju. commented 2026-10-05 08:06:15 UTC by aceman444 ♦3,055 | |
| 186863846 (Comments: 13) | Milan Batovsky (Discussed changesets: 31) | Občas býva vedľa cesty, hlavne na mostoch, technický chodník pre údržbu zvodidiel a umiestnenie stĺpov a podobne. Je užší než bežný chodník a často blokovany zariadeniami (stĺpy, cestn&... commented 2026-10-05 08:03:09 UTC by Tomas_J ♦428 | |
| 189989721 (Comments: 1) | eazy_learning (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190018839 commented 2026-10-05 08:01:55 UTC by MappingMore ♦759 | |
| 189995525 (Comments: 1) | tafla- (Discussed changesets: 11) | czy usuwanie limitów prędkości w tej edycji było celowe? jak tak to czemu opis edycji o tym nie wspomina? commented 2026-10-05 07:59:56 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,230 | |
| 189511370 (Comments: 1) | Arthur Sene (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, this "object" got a huge number of strange tags. I have no idea what it actually represents. Could you explain? commented 2026-10-05 07:55:56 UTC by mueschel ♦7,392 | |
| 189987618 (Comments: 1) | Marios6069 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190017948 commented 2026-10-05 07:43:07 UTC by MappingMore ♦759 | |
| 190005312 (Comments: 1) | X-rayS5 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-10-05 07:38:21 UTC by eggie ♦47,558 | |
| 188977272 (Comments: 6) | Map_HeRo (Discussed changesets: 15) | Siehe: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dbench#Benches_as_part_of_an_initiative, dort findest Du auch den Link zu der entsprechenden Diskussion im Forum. commented 2026-10-05 07:37:51 UTC by Map_HeRo ♦116 | |
| 187671971 (Comments: 2) | A W C (Discussed changesets: 2) | Sorry new to this. can you please create the safety ramp yourself so it is correct? Thanks commented 2026-10-05 07:32:43 UTC by A W C ♦2 | |
| 190005120 (Comments: 1) | Паша Ивушкин (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190017248 commented 2026-10-05 07:29:48 UTC by rajdhani ♦537 | |
| 189972578 (Comments: 2) | Tozطز (Discussed changesets: 1) | Link to POI: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/14247844702 commented 2026-10-05 07:21:38 UTC by map per ♦1,349 | |
| 189980490 (Comments: 1) | minhchuyen (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190016155 commented 2026-10-05 07:14:42 UTC by ajmat ♦581 | |
| 189699150 (Comments: 3) | puchaczowsky (Discussed changesets: 47) | zabrzmi jak masło maślane, ale ten revert jest do revertu. Nigdzie nie widziałem poparcia dla obniżenia fragmentu do Głogowa. Nie ma tutaj innej secondary. Głogów jest sporym miastem, a na dodatek ta droga została kiedyś wytyczona tak,... commented 2026-10-05 07:03:59 UTC by voltairovicz ♦258 | |
| 190015423 (Comments: 1) | Julian Yandra (Discussed changesets: 3) | Tidak perlu dihapus dan buat baru, kan bisa dipindahkan. Apakah kamu sudah menyelesaikan tutorial interaktifnya? Sepertinya belum.... commented 2026-10-05 06:59:28 UTC by FajrAl ♦892 | |
| 189969199 (Comments: 1) | Nguyễn Thùy Giang (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190015869 commented 2026-10-05 06:58:28 UTC by rajdhani ♦537 | |
| 189817099 (Comments: 2) | liljaadeliina (Discussed changesets: 111) | Moi! Käytän joo Bingiä, se on joillakin aluella tosi hyvälaatuinen. Kiitos tuosta vinkistä. commented 2026-10-05 06:57:17 UTC by liljaadeliina ♦75 | |
| 188720062 (Comments: 1) | liljaadeliina (Discussed changesets: 111) | Palautin osan poistetuista paikkapisteistä. Niihin tuli uudet liikkeet vähän aikaa sitten. Näitä ei yleensä kannata poistaa jos itse liiketila on vielä olemassa. commented 2026-10-05 06:52:27 UTC by rle32795 ♦47 | |
| 189537327 (Comments: 2) | alena karpenka (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, thank you for pointing this out. I missed the demolished:highway=trunk_link tag in this case, and I’ll make sure to pay closer attention to such tags in the future. I appreciate you taking the time to correct it. Best regards, Alena. commented 2026-10-05 06:41:27 UTC by alena karpenka ♦1 | |
| 189859777 (Comments: 1) | UWS-Tirol (Discussed changesets: 7) | wie hier https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189859604 angemerkt ist es nicht ideal vorhandene Daten zu löschen und dann neu anzulegen; zudem ist die Fläche des Gebietes l. TIRIS eine andere? https://maps.tirol.gv.at/synserver?user=g... commented 2026-10-05 06:40:36 UTC by fs_LT ♦247 | |
| 175188258 (Comments: 2) | _klaas_ (Discussed changesets: 19) | Hallo Gerd, da die gesamte Verbindung zwischen Cappeln/West und Merzen noch nicht in Betrieb ist, habe ich die Leitung erstmal als "In Bau" getagged. Kann aber natürlich auch auf power=line geändert werden, wenn der Abschni... commented 2026-10-05 06:39:37 UTC by _klaas_ ♦34 | |
| 188583957 (Comments: 1) | Albert radley (Discussed changesets: 17) | I was going to question why the roundabout is shown with motorway restrictions after this change, but note/5510318 indicates that there's the more serious issue of the new road not even being open yet. It looks like this changeset needs to be re... commented 2026-10-05 06:38:05 UTC by ACarlotti ♦161 | |
| 189715523 (Comments: 1) | UWS-Tirol (Discussed changesets: 7) | wurde von jemand Drittem hier reverted: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189718174 commented 2026-10-05 06:35:57 UTC by fs_LT ♦247 | |
| 189681071 (Comments: 1) | UWS-Tirol (Discussed changesets: 7) | wurde von jemand Drittem hier reverted: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189718174 commented 2026-10-05 06:35:52 UTC by fs_LT ♦247 | |
| 189365636 (Comments: 5) | Martin Borsje (Discussed changesets: 176) | Neither `place=locality` nor `tourism=information` is appropriate here; the signs with the numbers stand alone (no raffic_signs) or are mounted on traffic signs, which are not currently tagged in Austria; I think `curve:ref` is the most appropriate, ... commented 2026-10-05 06:27:13 UTC by fs_LT ♦247 | |
| 183920091 (Comments: 2) | Albert radley (Discussed changesets: 17) | Albert has remade these (or similar) changes in changeset/189860123, which still has no suitable source listed and looks implausible to me. commented 2026-10-05 06:27:09 UTC by ACarlotti ♦161 | |
| 190013479 (Comments: 1) | Ruma Menezes (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hutatma Gurunath Warde Marg, Christian Gaon, Kurla, Mumbai, Maharashtra 400070 its a resedential building however there is a Donios in it commented 2026-10-05 05:54:26 UTC by Ruma Menezes ♦1 | |
| 168010713 (Comments: 3) | dwarfclimbs (Discussed changesets: 9) | Bonjour dwarfclimbs, Il me semblait avoir compris qu'OSM était une cartographie où le terrain primait, et là, il me semble que tu fais une interprétation et ce n'est pas notre rôle. Personnellement, je p... commented 2026-10-05 05:31:43 UTC by Le Petit Léo ♦38 | |
| 190002875 (Comments: 1) | تم تولد هپی لند (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190012429 commented 2026-10-05 05:22:23 UTC by ajmat ♦581 | |
| 113466273 (Comments: 1) | Chronoshift (Discussed changesets: 34) | Hey, Chronoshift! I noticed you added some opening_hours=* values with 2022 dates a while ago... Since the dates have passed, these values are now invalid. Would you like me to remove them? If so, would you like me to remove the associated po... commented 2026-10-05 05:03:56 UTC by PostaMap_Infinite ♦81 | |
| 141304190 (Comments: 2) | ljc_jlyb (Discussed changesets: 28) | 敦化的朝鲜族人口确实不多,但不能因此就去掉地图中的双语标注,应当与延边州其他地方一致 commented 2026-10-05 04:57:56 UTC by Hogan-Fan ♦1 | |
| 189864160 (Comments: 1) | BholeKiBhasam (Discussed changesets: 54) | Source? commented 2026-10-05 04:45:44 UTC by ljc_jlyb ♦63 | |
| 190000000 (Comments: 6) | Shyshka (Discussed changesets: 55) | 190 million! Big milestone! commented 2026-10-05 03:53:19 UTC by uftyv ♦12 | |
| 189591247 (Comments: 2) | Laveure (Discussed changesets: 29) | Sentinel-2 imagery on Oct 1st 2026 shows no reclamation of Tuas View Extension commented 2026-10-05 03:42:18 UTC by FajrAl ♦892 | |
| X | 189952079 (Comments: 2) | M_Lenna (Discussed changesets: 1) | The new industrial=shipyard area doesn't look like a shipyard in the satellite views, what are you trying to represent here? commented 2026-10-05 03:16:40 UTC by InsertUser ♦504 |
| 189857583 (Comments: 2) | Razerboii (Discussed changesets: 1) | Your changeset: https://osmcha.org/changesets/189857583 Corrected: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190009800 commented 2026-10-05 03:15:18 UTC by GrabSG_AndyAng ♦10 | |
| 189990087 (Comments: 1) | tes_maker (Discussed changesets: 4) | Bonjour, Attention !!! En découpant un rond-point ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1564941104 ) vous avez cassé la continuité de plusieurs relations route=bus. La découpe d'un rond-point n'est pas n&e... commented 2026-10-05 03:11:56 UTC by mga_geo ♦347 | |
| 189956229 (Comments: 1) | PBryanP (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, this changeset duplicated a couple of ways and as we are not allowed to use Google as source, I reverted this change. Please don't use Google as source for your editing in the future! commented 2026-10-05 02:59:48 UTC by ratrun ♦307 | |
| 187589822 (Comments: 3) | lazzko (Discussed changesets: 2) | 大山かなめさん、ご指摘ありがとうございます。payment:d_barai やWikiのページがあることを知りませんでした。とても参考になります。d払いの修正もありがとうございました。 commented 2026-10-05 02:54:12 UTC by lazzko ♦2 | |
| 190005052 (Comments: 1) | Andrew Cusack (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi, many of the addresses differ from the DCS NSW Geocoded Addressing especially in 42 Adelaide St and 37 Woodview Rd. How are you obtaining the housenumbers? commented 2026-10-05 02:33:42 UTC by nevw ♦2,356 | |
| 190007293 (Comments: 1) | Hakan Nizam (Discussed changesets: 1) | I was there a few days ago. commented 2026-10-05 02:18:47 UTC by Hakan Nizam ♦1 | |
| 181632223 (Comments: 2) | lazzko (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thanks for pointing out! That was meant to be "apartments". Fixed now. commented 2026-10-05 02:17:53 UTC by lazzko ♦2 | |
| 189988768 (Comments: 1) | Rmacaraig (Discussed changesets: 14) | Please stop spamdelizing your own client's POIs with invalid tags, this time converting the existing valid phone=* to a syntactically invalid format. Reverted in changeset 190008017 commented 2026-10-05 01:29:58 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,232 | |
| 187700067 (Comments: 3) | petrovich_ed (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thanks for the reply and taking care of that! I did spot a couple unintentional removals of valid tags which I fixed and commented about, otherwise looks good. Cheers! commented 2026-10-05 01:22:00 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,232 | |
| 190002397 (Comments: 1) | petrovich_ed (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi @petrovich_ed , thanks for re-adding this using allowed sources. Just one issue, though--it seems the building=church tag was removed so this is no no longer shown as a building at all. I'm guessing that was unintentional and due to something... commented 2026-10-05 01:21:01 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,232 | |
| 189922342 (Comments: 5) | confusedbuffalo (Discussed changesets: 133) | > it is definitely considered valid and appropriate in the UK Based on what?? Where has it been discussed that this tag is actively wanted just because you're already touching these addresses? On the contrary, established in 202... commented 2026-10-05 00:59:19 UTC by Joel Koen ♦98 | |
| 188423681 (Comments: 1) | valuesubtracted (Discussed changesets: 5) | What were you using as a source to update this trail geometry? I'm editing using my own gps track and it lines up with the satellite imagery, but your new trail alignments don't agree with either. commented 2026-10-05 00:14:29 UTC by Roydon Olive ♦75 | |
| 189959023 (Comments: 2) | LachlanTansey2009 (Discussed changesets: 65) | The Sunshine superhub project is expected to be complete in 2030, I think its warranted to map due to how long it is expected to be in place. commented 2026-10-05 00:02:00 UTC by LachlanTansey2009 ♦44 | |
| 190003075 (Comments: 1) | gasernij (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola, gracias por contribuir con OSM! highway=pedestrian debería tomarse como peatonal. highway=footway es sendero. Qué aplicación la estaba tomando como calle siendo highway=pedestrian? Por cualquier consulta o acl... commented 2026-10-04 23:37:57 UTC by caprieldeluca ♦167 | |
| 186335508 (Comments: 1) | oo1337 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hej, kan du kolla om det är något mer som behövs ändras enl. https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4866256 commented 2026-10-04 23:34:26 UTC by SereneDeluge ♦46 | |
| 190005340 (Comments: 1) | stevekeiretsu (Discussed changesets: 6) | Dydh da! I just wanted to say thank you for adding so much landuse in Kernow. It's nice to not be the only one doing it :) commented 2026-10-04 23:26:59 UTC by Flynn_ ♦14 | |
| 189461648 (Comments: 1) | Weronika1101 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Czy dodawanie takiego alt_name=* jest niezbędne w ramach tego projektu? Można to usunąć? Duplikuje inne dane commented 2026-10-04 23:21:09 UTC by kubahahaha ♦533 | |
| 189947371 (Comments: 3) | E-vun (Discussed changesets: 3) | точно, есть тег "alt_name" вместо "name:en" . commented 2026-10-04 23:04:00 UTC by E-vun ♦3 | |
| 189830965 (Comments: 1) | sasshasassha (Discussed changesets: 2) | Навіщо вносити непотрібні уламки маршрутів ГТ по всій Україні? commented 2026-10-04 22:37:46 UTC by ~Jhellico ♦97 | |
| 161651322 (Comments: 3) | voltairovicz (Discussed changesets: 283) | zerkniesz na https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5555483 ? Jak to na etapie wariantów jest to nie ma czego jeszcze dodawać commented 2026-10-04 22:27:08 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,230 | |
| 187611913 (Comments: 2) | Clarke22 (Discussed changesets: 67) | Hi! I'm not seeing any response to this but I see you've made some more changes a couple days ago - if I don't hear back in the next week or so I'll revert the URLA campus pathways to private. I also sent you a PM in case you... commented 2026-10-04 22:17:41 UTC by HeyRayReh ♦20 | |
| 190004129 (Comments: 1) | UnFlockMeNow (Discussed changesets: 11) | its now in the middle of a residential building, please double check on AERIAL IMAGERY (like bing or esri) and fix its position. Happy mapping, Udar commented 2026-10-04 22:12:09 UTC by Udarian ♦960 | |
| 190003889 (Comments: 1) | UnFlockMeNow (Discussed changesets: 11) | On the imagery this is either in the middle of a residential building or inside of someone's backyard, either way its position is highly unlikely and should be updated with aerial imagery to a more correct position. Happy mapping, Uda... commented 2026-10-04 22:10:12 UTC by Udarian ♦960 | |
| 189686101 (Comments: 3) | nortvest (Discussed changesets: 18) | Die Schweiz kennt kein Stadtrecht, wie es z.B. in DE/AT der Fall ist. Des Weiteren ist die Selbstbezeichnung der Gemeinde als "Stadtgemeinde" komplett irrelevant für die Einstufung des place-nodes. Stein am Rhein bezeichnet sich auch a... commented 2026-10-04 22:08:31 UTC by welzheimerwald ♦114 | |
| 190003800 (Comments: 1) | UnFlockMeNow (Discussed changesets: 11) | looking at this ALPR on various aerial imagery in iD it seems to be within the area of a driveway, being positioned like this is highly unlikely so please double check the position of this ALPR and fix it. Happy mapping, Udar. commented 2026-10-04 22:05:45 UTC by Udarian ♦960 | |
| 190003695 (Comments: 1) | UnFlockMeNow (Discussed changesets: 11) | On meany aerial imagery this ALPR is in the middle of the sidewalk, that is a unlikely position for an ALPR, please double check the position and fix it if need be. Either way please respond, I have left comments on multiple changsets of yours alread... commented 2026-10-04 22:02:50 UTC by Udarian ♦960 | |
| 190003651 (Comments: 1) | UnFlockMeNow (Discussed changesets: 11) | looking at this ALPR on various aerial imagery in iD it seems to be within the road area, being positioned like this is highly unlikely so please double check the position of this ALPR and fix it. Happy mapping, Udar. commented 2026-10-04 21:59:44 UTC by Udarian ♦960 | |
| 190003475 (Comments: 1) | UnFlockMeNow (Discussed changesets: 11) | looking at this ALPR on various aerial imagery in iD it seems to be within the road area, being positioned like this is highly unlikely so please double check the position of this ALPR and fix it. Happy mapping, Udar. commented 2026-10-04 21:58:57 UTC by Udarian ♦960 | |
| 161500673 (Comments: 3) | hmpfgnrrr (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hui das sind aber schnelle Wechsel an dem Standort. Danke jedenfalls fürs eintragen/fixen. :) commented 2026-10-04 21:58:03 UTC by dreua ♦148 | |
| 190003721 (Comments: 1) | UnFlockMeNow (Discussed changesets: 11) | looking at this ALPR on various aerial imagery in iD it seems to be within the road area, being positioned like this is highly unlikely so please double check the position of this ALPR and fix it. Happy mapping, Udar. commented 2026-10-04 21:54:40 UTC by Udarian ♦960 | |
| 190001365 (Comments: 1) | Division0250 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Moin :) level=* ist für Objekte die innerhalb eines Gebäudes liegen. Ist hier ja nicht der Fall. Nehme ich wieder raus. cheers --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/change... commented 2026-10-04 21:53:05 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦4,375 | |
| 190003319 (Comments: 1) | UnFlockMeNow (Discussed changesets: 11) | looking at this ALPR on various aerial imagery in iD it seems to be within the road area, being positioned like this is highly unlikely so please double check the position of this ALPR and fix it. Happy mapping, Udar. commented 2026-10-04 21:49:08 UTC by Udarian ♦960 | |
| 190003341 (Comments: 1) | UnFlockMeNow (Discussed changesets: 11) | looking at this ALPR on various aerial imagery in iD it seems to be within the road area, being positioned like this is highly unlikely so please double check the position of this ALPR and fix it. Happy mapping, Udar. commented 2026-10-04 21:46:19 UTC by Udarian ♦960 | |
| 185905609 (Comments: 2) | WinstonSmith (Discussed changesets: 4) | Aww ❤️ commented 2026-10-04 21:44:45 UTC by WinstonSmith ♦5 | |
| 190003385 (Comments: 1) | UnFlockMeNow (Discussed changesets: 11) | looking at this ALPR on various aerial imagery in iD it seems to be within the road area, being positioned like this is highly unlikely so please double check the position of this ALPR and fix it. Happy mapping, Udar. commented 2026-10-04 21:42:38 UTC by Udarian ♦960 | |
| 178038666 (Comments: 3) | alex-esko (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo jkoe, * node/12618340522 Eingang der Kirche. Wenn ich die Verhältnisse vor Ort richtig im Kopf habe, es ist schließlich ein Dreivierteljahr her, dann ist das kein Vordach, sondern ein massives Gebäude, das mit dem Turm un... commented 2026-10-04 21:31:15 UTC by alex-esko ♦2 | |
| 189933054 (Comments: 2) | Nüsschen (Discussed changesets: 37) | Moin Moin, da hatte ich auf dem Handy wohl zu viel erwischt und als Fussballplatz bezeichnet. Hab´s geändert. commented 2026-10-04 21:24:55 UTC by Nüsschen ♦30 | |
| 188881516 (Comments: 3) | A_Rural_Urbanist (Discussed changesets: 5) | Den Schornstein habe ich soeben wiederhergestellt. commented 2026-10-04 21:21:07 UTC by whb ♦672 | |
| 189937223 (Comments: 1) | Woidmadl (Discussed changesets: 10) | surface=gravel beschreibt ganz groben Schotter, bei den meisten grade2-Wegen ist fine_gravel oder compacted richtig. commented 2026-10-04 21:19:21 UTC by martinst ♦419 | |
| 189790624 (Comments: 9) | blosfrth (Discussed changesets: 1) | Avinguda d'Alcoi actualizada en https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190002232, con relaciones trasladadas a la vía restante, y mejoras en cruces de peatones y señalización. Para el carril de bus y taxi, he seguido el eti... commented 2026-10-04 21:05:36 UTC by dmlls ♦32 | |
| 189997621 (Comments: 2) | CacherB (Discussed changesets: 3) | Graag reactie, ik ben van plan om de weg terug te leggen, maar niet omdat ik jouw verwijderen niet ok vond, maar om de aanwezigheid van het recht op doorgang ter plekke te handhaven commented 2026-10-04 21:04:15 UTC by wandelzot ♦9 | |
| 190001396 (Comments: 1) | Cat2006 (Discussed changesets: 17) | Благодаря за промяната! Не е необходимо адреса да се дублира върху магазина. Достатъчно е да се отбележи върху заобикалящата го сграÐ... commented 2026-10-04 21:02:25 UTC by Dimitar155 ♦1,052 | |
| 188070368 (Comments: 2) | eerib (Discussed changesets: 106) | I don't recall seeing any signage and I looked through my photo records and don't see any signage about e-bikes. My guess is that any signage put up was likely targeted at e-moto's like Surrons that frequently get incorrectly lumped in... commented 2026-10-04 20:56:21 UTC by eerib ♦382 | |
| 189249336 (Comments: 1) | Jazko_Heitch (Discussed changesets: 1) | access-tagi on melko lailla virheellinen tässä kohtaa - "permissive" tarkoittaa, että tiellä liikkuminen on luvanvaraista ja se voidaan kieltää, mikä ei kaiketi tässä pidä paikkaansa. | |
| 187296152 (Comments: 2) | OSM-XXXXXX (Discussed changesets: 40) | En ihan tajua tätä järjetöntä tagien määrää. Miksi ihmeessä jossain kävelyalueella on "4wd_only=no" tai "agricultural=no"? Miksi suoralla viivalla on "area=yes"? Mik... commented 2026-10-04 20:33:02 UTC by ssundell ♦84 | |
| 189623567 (Comments: 13) | Morswin_PL (Discussed changesets: 5) | Nom, chodziło mi o użytkownika Rębowo - narobił pełno edycji o opisie "Niemiecka nazwa tej ulicy: Plan von Danzig 1933". Użył niewiadomo jakiej mapy Gdańska z 1933 jako źródło niemieckich nazw. Nie jestem historykiem Gdańs... commented 2026-10-04 20:27:13 UTC by Sylabowy Kot ♦451 | |
| 189883096 (Comments: 3) | Yunan973 (Discussed changesets: 32) | Merci pour les exemples, c'est vrai que j'utilisais la fusion des surfaces pour les déplacer plus simplement. Je viens de lire la doc des multipolygones et je comprends mieux leurs usages. Il y en a encore qui traînent dans ... commented 2026-10-04 20:24:30 UTC by Grandasse ♦2 | |
| 189907811 (Comments: 1) | heashby15 (Discussed changesets: 1) | The tag access=private is for ways that have no trespassing signs posted at the entrance to the road. It's likely a privately maintained road, if so a better tag is ownership=private. --- Published u... commented 2026-10-04 20:24:04 UTC by Glassman ♦6,044 | |
| 190000758 (Comments: 1) | habi (Discussed changesets: 470) | Not "details from the road", but updated details in Finale Ligurie after a visit and stay there. commented 2026-10-04 20:21:11 UTC by habi ♦2,271 | |
| 178238779 (Comments: 3) | NxPFoto (Discussed changesets: 30) | Hab die layer ergänzt, danke für die Erinnerung :) commented 2026-10-04 20:17:40 UTC by NxPFoto ♦29 | |
| 75418280 (Comments: 1) | lmason_aph (Discussed changesets: 7) | Was this temporary back then? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6860579058/history/1 commented 2026-10-04 20:13:50 UTC by 9_tab ♦158 | |
| 189710199 (Comments: 2) | Solarisphere (Discussed changesets: 7) | I removed it along with a few others that slipped through the cracks. It defines the type of waterway in the Freshwater Atlas dataset and shouldn't have been uploaded to OSM. commented 2026-10-04 20:09:48 UTC by Solarisphere ♦8 | |
| 189974146 (Comments: 2) | WUSCH1463 (Discussed changesets: 22) | Korrektur auf Basis der hessischen Katasterkarte. commented 2026-10-04 20:04:12 UTC by WUSCH1463 ♦11 | |
| 189680147 (Comments: 5) | szalona_entropia (Discussed changesets: 337) | edytuje dalej ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189995751 ) bez reakcji w https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187884074 , konto użytkownika znanego z notorycznie wadliwego edytowania highway= wycofam jego wycofanie commented 2026-10-04 20:03:19 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,230 | |
| 188704361 (Comments: 1) | Stranger8 (Discussed changesets: 1) | в ваших правках июля–сентября дороги в нескольких районах сдвинулись на несколько метров, и, судя по GPS-трекам, прежнее положение было... commented 2026-10-04 19:54:37 UTC by StarLine_maps ♦1 | |
| 189762615 (Comments: 1) | float ishigaki (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189999281 commented 2026-10-04 19:46:12 UTC by rajdhani ♦537 | |
| 189674438 (Comments: 5) | Tomek | Yanosik (Discussed changesets: 123) | Ok, byłem na miejscu. Faktycznie dokonali takich zmian i jest odwrócony kontraruch z odwróconą jednokierunkową. Od innego mapującego dostałem linka, że ZDM publikuje kierunki kontraruchów, ale no w tym przypadku akur... commented 2026-10-04 19:43:44 UTC by NieWnen ♦1,498 | |
| 189301084 (Comments: 1) | Chamalito (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello Chamalito, welcome to OpenStreetMap! Thank you for contributing! I noticed that some of your changes seemed to break a big landcover relation in the area by accident. Don't worry, editing relations can be quite tricky and this is an easy m... commented 2026-10-04 19:39:43 UTC by synfarer ♦18 | |
| 188672689 (Comments: 1) | dusoft (Discussed changesets: 33) | cycleway lane is not correct, it should be cycleway:right lane for both directions commented 2026-10-04 19:33:52 UTC by gr4v ♦1 | |
| 186788364 (Comments: 1) | Motor City Elevator Co (Discussed changesets: 4) | Are you sure this camera is gone? After you removed it, someone else added another one at the same location and created a note about it? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/14078155601 https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5439560 commented 2026-10-04 19:30:33 UTC by m8324 ♦19 | |
| 187945043 (Comments: 3) | kaposts (Discussed changesets: 4) | Switched to bicycle parking, and marked as access=customers since that's what it showed in the picture. commented 2026-10-04 19:24:51 UTC by kaposts ♦28 | |
| 189997048 (Comments: 3) | Sportschool Herbert (Discussed changesets: 1) | Schade hersteld ... oude locatie sportschool verwijderd commented 2026-10-04 19:21:26 UTC by eggie ♦47,558 | |
| 189970777 (Comments: 3) | Anas masuris (Discussed changesets: 173) | Szkoda. Dzięki! commented 2026-10-04 19:20:20 UTC by NieWnen ♦1,498 | |
| 189982098 (Comments: 1) | qugeb (Discussed changesets: 36) | Danke für die Entsperrung, qugeb! Der Radweg unter der Autobahnbrücke ist inzwischen als kombinierter Fuß- & Radweg ausgebaut, d. h. die Markierung als reiner Fußweg kann weg, danke. commented 2026-10-04 19:18:55 UTC by Broeselmeier ♦1 | |
| 185958369 (Comments: 5) | mod22 (Discussed changesets: 13) | Ich hab's jetzt mal so geändert und noch Webseite etc. ergänzt ... commented 2026-10-04 19:17:07 UTC by goodidea ♦159 | |
| 173771633 (Comments: 1) | streckenkundler (Discussed changesets: 89) | Hi Sven, ich schon wieder. Muss die Relation nicht weiter bis Manschnow gehen (und von dort sogar in den Letschiner Hauptgraben oder wie immer der dort heißt)? Gruß Tino commented 2026-10-04 19:15:36 UTC by einufo ♦19 | |
| 189996407 (Comments: 1) | 4FunBavel (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. Feedback Ik heb de accesstags G12 toegevoegd.. Fietspaden types: G11: mofa=yes, moped=no, traffic_sign=NL:G11 G12a: ... commented 2026-10-04 19:09:53 UTC by eggie ♦47,558 | |
| 189996186 (Comments: 1) | SomeoneElse (Discussed changesets: 483) | After adding the rest in 189997455, the score is 13, 6 and 3. commented 2026-10-04 19:08:10 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,889 | |
| 189985881 (Comments: 1) | Laura Bąk (Discussed changesets: 1) | Obiekty usługowe dodajemy do mapy jako punkty ze znacznikiem "amenity" (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:amenity), a nie psując/usuwając znaczniki adresowe istniejącego budynku lub dodając punkt z nazwą na chodniku. Zmiany w... commented 2026-10-04 19:06:02 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦1,004 | |
| 189963882 (Comments: 1) | nazgul123 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Willkommen bei OpenStreetMap :) Danke, dass du hilfst die Datenbank aktuell zu halten. Ein kleiner Hinweis: Die meisten Editoren, so auch deine App, haben ein Feld um einen Änderungssatzkommentar zu hinterlassen, wenn du deine &Aum... commented 2026-10-04 19:05:59 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦4,375 | |
| 188418264 (Comments: 1) | Bartek444 (Discussed changesets: 92) | Droga na parking jest oznakowana jako strefa zamieszkania. commented 2026-10-04 19:05:26 UTC by VA00 ♦662 | |
| 189910102 (Comments: 2) | antagonist_tz (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hello. there are no ways, streets or whatever. there is onlay a plane area of gravel. and i reject the indictment of demoltion the osm! and gess what, i read the wiki site to delete "private" ground things. thanke you in advance commented 2026-10-04 19:05:24 UTC by antagonist_tz ♦1 | |
| 189950000 (Comments: 1) | Krzysiek_11 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Postaraj się być bardziej specyficzny w opisie swoich zestawów zmian: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2026-10-04 18:53:40 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦1,004 | |
| 189877281 (Comments: 1) | ADACHessenThueringen (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi warum habt ihr covered=yes und indoor=no entfernt? Und wenn name=* und official_name=* identlsch sind ist zweiteres überflüssig. Grüße --- Published using OSMCha: htt... commented 2026-10-04 18:52:31 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦4,375 | |
| 189883362 (Comments: 2) | Toni Serra (Discussed changesets: 96) | D'acord commented 2026-10-04 18:52:24 UTC by Toni Serra ♦16 | |
| 189877754 (Comments: 1) | ADACHessenThueringen (Discussed changesets: 3) | Moin :) Danke, dass ihr euch auch hier kümmert. Die neue Station habt ihr aber in eine Hecke gesetzt. Ist in der Realität vermutlich nicht der Fall, oder? Grüße silversurfer83 --- ... commented 2026-10-04 18:50:11 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦4,375 | |
| 189877389 (Comments: 1) | maternity671 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi there :) Thank you for helping with the database. There are two things I'd like to point out: - please keep your edits local and don't jump continents. See here https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geograph... commented 2026-10-04 18:48:13 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦4,375 | |
| 184172190 (Comments: 2) | wertol (Discussed changesets: 6) | Ennyi idő után már gondolkodnom kell, hogy ez melyik túrám is volt... Le tudtam rajta jönni, nem járhatatlan. Eléggé köves, de látszik rajta, hogy nincs nagyon használva. Ha j&... commented 2026-10-04 18:47:07 UTC by wertol ♦4 | |
| 189700330 (Comments: 2) | vargailles (Discussed changesets: 1) | Szervusz! Ez a postacíme a Génbanknak. https://mateagrarcsoport.hu/telephelyek/erdi-telephely/ commented 2026-10-04 18:46:19 UTC by vargailles ♦1 | |
| 189129514 (Comments: 3) | olhaleetvin (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi @olhaleetvin , thanks for your detailed and considerate reply--I couldn't ask for a more professional and respectful response; if only the overwhelming majority of other SEO accounts on OSM were even half as responsible as you! Taking ... commented 2026-10-04 18:44:58 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,232 | |
| 189204585 (Comments: 3) | Hypsometric (Discussed changesets: 55) | Hello, it is not a „note“ – it is an exception. You added motor_vehicle=permit, which is not signed, just vehicles and carriages. I changed it. Best regards commented 2026-10-04 18:44:42 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,663 | |
| 189761811 (Comments: 2) | BitcoinMakueni 🇰🇪 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Please update your node! Edwin Comino BTC Map commented 2026-10-04 18:39:52 UTC by Comino ♦416 | |
| 189841340 (Comments: 1) | SLMLS (Discussed changesets: 4) | What do you mean by that fixme=*? Please write what you are updating, not a place because we can see it. commented 2026-10-04 18:35:52 UTC by Sylabowy Kot ♦451 | |
| 184331074 (Comments: 2) | bigbug21 (Discussed changesets: 117) | Yes, apparently at least most of the LZB is back in service. commented 2026-10-04 18:34:24 UTC by bigbug21 ♦170 | |
| 189984913 (Comments: 1) | GBAB (Discussed changesets: 128) | Törlések visszavonva: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189995872 commented 2026-10-04 18:31:11 UTC by infeeeee ♦729 | |
| 189985221 (Comments: 1) | GBAB (Discussed changesets: 128) | Törlések visszavonva: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189995872 commented 2026-10-04 18:31:04 UTC by infeeeee ♦729 | |
| 189985520 (Comments: 6) | GBAB (Discussed changesets: 128) | Törlések visszavonva: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189995872 commented 2026-10-04 18:30:57 UTC by infeeeee ♦729 | |
| 189985644 (Comments: 1) | GBAB (Discussed changesets: 128) | Törlések visszavonva: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189995872 commented 2026-10-04 18:30:50 UTC by infeeeee ♦729 | |
| 189985749 (Comments: 1) | GBAB (Discussed changesets: 128) | Törlések visszavonva: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189995872 commented 2026-10-04 18:30:40 UTC by infeeeee ♦729 | |
| 188309067 (Comments: 2) | PA_Barre (Discussed changesets: 4) | Sistemato. commented 2026-10-04 18:26:19 UTC by PA_Barre ♦3 | |
| 189781629 (Comments: 1) | Raul Carhuatocto (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189995737 commented 2026-10-04 18:24:50 UTC by rajdhani ♦537 | |
| 189795694 (Comments: 3) | S_k_y (Discussed changesets: 5) | Kein Ding. Hatte mich zuerst auch in die irre geführt, daher dann die Anpassung. commented 2026-10-04 18:24:42 UTC by S_k_y ♦4 | |
| 189392213 (Comments: 2) | PA_Barre (Discussed changesets: 4) | Sistemato. commented 2026-10-04 18:24:31 UTC by PA_Barre ♦3 | |
| 189683589 (Comments: 1) | Löschkutschenfahrer (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hallo, eine Anmerkung zu deinen Bearbeitungen: Hydranten sollten nicht mit anderen Linien und Flächen verbunden werden. Das lässt sich leicht beheben: im Editor markieren und „E“ drücken – das löst den Hy... commented 2026-10-04 18:20:16 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,663 | |
| 189807335 (Comments: 2) | S_k_y (Discussed changesets: 5) | Ah okay. Danke für die Erklärung. Ich habe das als eher unpräzise empfungen. Aber mit deiner Erläuterung ist das für mich nachvollziehbarer. thx commented 2026-10-04 18:20:00 UTC by S_k_y ♦4 | |
| 189995203 (Comments: 1) | shawnziv (Discussed changesets: 1) | I'm making this edit to allow my mailing address to be recognized (which is on Trestle View St.). While there is no signage on the street, it is indicated as Trestle View in my mailing address and also on the signage in our mail room. I didn... commented 2026-10-04 18:15:35 UTC by shawnziv ♦1 | |
| 189967662 (Comments: 3) | ben45446564 (Discussed changesets: 1) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189994511 --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/189967662 commented 2026-10-04 18:09:15 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦4,375 | |
| 189768913 (Comments: 1) | lal_0018 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189994639 commented 2026-10-04 18:00:45 UTC by rajdhani ♦537 | |
| 153909240 (Comments: 3) | Ernst Poulsen (Discussed changesets: 36) | Det er let at tilføje ford=yes under "Structure" menuen. Jeg kommer nogle gange til at lave akvadukter på samme måde. Jeg fjerner mærkatet. commented 2026-10-04 17:56:27 UTC by cyclist789 ♦140 | |
| 183289504 (Comments: 1) | gerydavid07 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Bonjour, j'ai modifié les attributs des éoliennes en ajout le préfixe "construction:" comme elles ne sont pas encore construites. commented 2026-10-04 17:56:09 UTC by Syl ♦1,121 | |
| 189966000 (Comments: 2) | Reino Baptista (Discussed changesets: 118) | Saludos, La etiqueta es: ref:IPA Proviene de: https://patrimonicultural.diba.cat/element/xalet-del-catllaras En la pestaña: Classificació Está escrito: "... Número inventari Generalitat i altre... commented 2026-10-04 17:53:18 UTC by Reino Baptista ♦116 | |
| 189761215 (Comments: 1) | RKFK (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo, folgende Anmerkungen zu deinen Bearbeitungen bei https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/14233833292 fire_hydrant:type=Unterflurhydrant müsste fire_hydrant:type=underground sein. Viele Grüße commented 2026-10-04 17:48:35 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,663 | |
| 189991534 (Comments: 1) | osm_map_amethyst_lok (Discussed changesets: 30) | Don't add `name:en=` when they are romanization only. `name:yue-Latn=` has already been used. commented 2026-10-04 17:47:50 UTC by Kovoschiz ♦3,062 | |
| 189984588 (Comments: 1) | reiberl (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hallo, woher stammen die ref? Sind diese auch vor Ort ausgewiesen? Viele Grüße commented 2026-10-04 17:44:33 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,663 | |
| 189985320 (Comments: 1) | osm_map_amethyst_lok (Discussed changesets: 30) | Don't add unrelated names to other features commented 2026-10-04 17:43:48 UTC by Kovoschiz ♦3,062 | |
| 189984817 (Comments: 2) | reiberl (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hallo, ich sehe gerade, dass zumindest dieser Teil "nur" Änderungen enthält. Nur zur Klarstellung: auch damals hätte der Import nie stattfinden dürfen. Ich muss mal nachfragen: wieso finden trotz des Imports &Au... commented 2026-10-04 17:43:36 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,663 | |
| 189970797 (Comments: 1) | minamo (Discussed changesets: 22) | Hi, See you're back and alerts going off again. Deleting objects, reducing details, using outdated imagery. DWG been notified. SekeRob commented 2026-10-04 17:42:26 UTC by SekeRob ♦1,529 | |
| 189983161 (Comments: 1) | osm_map_amethyst_lok (Discussed changesets: 30) | Don't remove other names. Other `*_name=` should be used. commented 2026-10-04 17:41:54 UTC by Kovoschiz ♦3,062 | |
| 189993745 (Comments: 1) | trigpoint (Discussed changesets: 81) | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 189301278, 189301520, 189301608, 189301901, 189302061, 189302158, 189302279, 189302397, 189302500, 189302569, 189302647, 189303053, 189303274, 189303359, 189303437, 189303652, 189303848, 189... commented 2026-10-04 17:38:31 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,856 | |
| 189301278 (Comments: 1) | sebastian35346 (Discussed changesets: 28) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189993745 where the changeset comment is: DWG Revert sebastian35346 commented 2026-10-04 17:38:30 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,856 | |
| 189304820 (Comments: 1) | sebastian35346 (Discussed changesets: 28) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189993745 where the changeset comment is: DWG Revert sebastian35346 commented 2026-10-04 17:38:30 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,856 | |
| 189301608 (Comments: 2) | sebastian35346 (Discussed changesets: 28) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189993745 where the changeset comment is: DWG Revert sebastian35346 commented 2026-10-04 17:38:30 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,856 | |
| 189304200 (Comments: 1) | sebastian35346 (Discussed changesets: 28) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189993745 where the changeset comment is: DWG Revert sebastian35346 commented 2026-10-04 17:38:29 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,856 | |
| 189304689 (Comments: 1) | sebastian35346 (Discussed changesets: 28) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189993745 where the changeset comment is: DWG Revert sebastian35346 commented 2026-10-04 17:38:29 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,856 | |
| 189302647 (Comments: 1) | sebastian35346 (Discussed changesets: 28) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189993745 where the changeset comment is: DWG Revert sebastian35346 commented 2026-10-04 17:38:29 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,856 | |
| 189301901 (Comments: 1) | sebastian35346 (Discussed changesets: 28) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189993745 where the changeset comment is: DWG Revert sebastian35346 commented 2026-10-04 17:38:29 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,856 | |
| 189976042 (Comments: 2) | sebastian35346 (Discussed changesets: 28) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189993745 where the changeset comment is: DWG Revert sebastian35346 commented 2026-10-04 17:38:28 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,856 | |
| 189302158 (Comments: 1) | sebastian35346 (Discussed changesets: 28) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189993745 where the changeset comment is: DWG Revert sebastian35346 commented 2026-10-04 17:38:28 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,856 | |
| 189302279 (Comments: 1) | sebastian35346 (Discussed changesets: 28) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189993745 where the changeset comment is: DWG Revert sebastian35346 commented 2026-10-04 17:38:28 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,856 | |
| X | 189303848 (Comments: 1) | sebastian35346 (Discussed changesets: 28) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189993745 where the changeset comment is: DWG Revert sebastian35346 commented 2026-10-04 17:38:28 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,856 |
| 189304375 (Comments: 2) | sebastian35346 (Discussed changesets: 28) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189993745 where the changeset comment is: DWG Revert sebastian35346 commented 2026-10-04 17:38:27 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,856 | |
| 189967803 (Comments: 1) | sebastian35346 (Discussed changesets: 28) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189993745 where the changeset comment is: DWG Revert sebastian35346 commented 2026-10-04 17:38:27 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,856 | |
| 189302500 (Comments: 1) | sebastian35346 (Discussed changesets: 28) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189993745 where the changeset comment is: DWG Revert sebastian35346 commented 2026-10-04 17:38:27 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,856 | |
| 189303437 (Comments: 1) | sebastian35346 (Discussed changesets: 28) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189993745 where the changeset comment is: DWG Revert sebastian35346 commented 2026-10-04 17:38:27 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,856 | |
| 189303359 (Comments: 1) | sebastian35346 (Discussed changesets: 28) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189993745 where the changeset comment is: DWG Revert sebastian35346 commented 2026-10-04 17:38:26 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,856 | |
| 189303652 (Comments: 1) | sebastian35346 (Discussed changesets: 28) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189993745 where the changeset comment is: DWG Revert sebastian35346 commented 2026-10-04 17:38:26 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,856 | |
| 189305521 (Comments: 1) | sebastian35346 (Discussed changesets: 28) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189993745 where the changeset comment is: DWG Revert sebastian35346 commented 2026-10-04 17:38:26 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,856 | |
| 189302569 (Comments: 1) | sebastian35346 (Discussed changesets: 28) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189993745 where the changeset comment is: DWG Revert sebastian35346 commented 2026-10-04 17:38:25 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,856 | |
| 189304517 (Comments: 2) | sebastian35346 (Discussed changesets: 28) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189993745 where the changeset comment is: DWG Revert sebastian35346 commented 2026-10-04 17:38:25 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,856 | |
| 189304294 (Comments: 1) | sebastian35346 (Discussed changesets: 28) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189993745 where the changeset comment is: DWG Revert sebastian35346 commented 2026-10-04 17:38:25 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,856 | |
| 189303053 (Comments: 2) | sebastian35346 (Discussed changesets: 28) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189993745 where the changeset comment is: DWG Revert sebastian35346 commented 2026-10-04 17:38:25 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,856 | |
| 189304771 (Comments: 1) | sebastian35346 (Discussed changesets: 28) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189993745 where the changeset comment is: DWG Revert sebastian35346 commented 2026-10-04 17:38:24 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,856 | |
| 189302061 (Comments: 1) | sebastian35346 (Discussed changesets: 28) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189993745 where the changeset comment is: DWG Revert sebastian35346 commented 2026-10-04 17:38:24 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,856 | |
| 189301520 (Comments: 1) | sebastian35346 (Discussed changesets: 28) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189993745 where the changeset comment is: DWG Revert sebastian35346 commented 2026-10-04 17:38:24 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,856 | |
| 189303274 (Comments: 1) | sebastian35346 (Discussed changesets: 28) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189993745 where the changeset comment is: DWG Revert sebastian35346 commented 2026-10-04 17:38:23 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,856 | |
| 189304970 (Comments: 1) | sebastian35346 (Discussed changesets: 28) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189993745 where the changeset comment is: DWG Revert sebastian35346 commented 2026-10-04 17:38:23 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,856 | |
| 189302397 (Comments: 1) | sebastian35346 (Discussed changesets: 28) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189993745 where the changeset comment is: DWG Revert sebastian35346 commented 2026-10-04 17:38:23 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,856 | |
| 189968811 (Comments: 2) | StarfighterNRW (Discussed changesets: 1) | Moin ! Bei der Wache hatge ich mich vertan ! Es ist und bleibt die Feuer- und Rettungswache 2 ! Ich habe die änderung nur bei der Zahl gemacht ! Eigentlich sind alle Essener Feuer- u. Rettungswachen so beschriftet! 🤷ðŸ... commented 2026-10-04 17:32:58 UTC by StarfighterNRW ♦1 | |
| 189392261 (Comments: 5) | WANTES (Discussed changesets: 12) | Люди уже отрисовали тропу заново. Перед тем как удалять — стоило сначала открыть слой Стравы и увидеть в том месте жирный жирный след, ... commented 2026-10-04 17:32:39 UTC by Andrei Lazarev ♦11 | |
| 189972866 (Comments: 1) | fraglinders (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. Feedback Welk adres hoort hierbij? MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-10-04 17:26:10 UTC by eggie ♦47,558 | |
| 189977982 (Comments: 1) | bbieling (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-10-04 17:24:41 UTC by eggie ♦47,558 | |
| 189777915 (Comments: 1) | Alisbudhouse (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189993034 commented 2026-10-04 17:24:34 UTC by rajdhani ♦537 | |
| 189983826 (Comments: 5) | Ties M (Discussed changesets: 1) | Info samengevoegd commented 2026-10-04 17:23:49 UTC by eggie ♦47,558 | |
| 179829550 (Comments: 11) | Sébastien Pi (Discussed changesets: 30) | https://forum.openstreetmap.fr/t/panneau-c115-voie-verte-sur-piste-agricole-service-et-une-question-subsidaire-sur-les-chemins-de-halage/47190 commented 2026-10-04 17:19:06 UTC by Sébastien Pi ♦167 | |
| 189992683 (Comments: 1) | Piter00 (Discussed changesets: 1) | *please see post of 27th january 2023 commented 2026-10-04 17:16:30 UTC by Piter00 ♦1 | |
| 189986604 (Comments: 1) | Sibaikun (Discussed changesets: 2) | bedakan "river" dengan "stream" https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Id:Pedoman_Penandaan_Indonesia#Perairan commented 2026-10-04 17:10:58 UTC by FajrAl ♦892 | |
| 189986682 (Comments: 1) | ALECHIO (Discussed changesets: 1) | persil lahan? commented 2026-10-04 17:09:42 UTC by FajrAl ♦892 | |
| 189988140 (Comments: 1) | SYRY (Discussed changesets: 1) | Terima kasih untuk kontribusinya, namun alangkah baiknya tiap perubahan sebelum submit, kamu beri deskripsi sedikit apa yang diubah. Contoh: Koreksi geometri jalan, koreksi letak bangunan, menambahkan jalan/bangunan, menghapus jalan/bangunan 🤗 commented 2026-10-04 17:08:08 UTC by FajrAl ♦892 | |
| 189959214 (Comments: 3) | Jonathan7890123456 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Thanks for calling attention to that. I had yet to review their deletions but I do see many that are too spread out for valid 'drive-by-changes' so I believe restoring those nodes will be next. commented 2026-10-04 17:04:13 UTC by alpacaMaps ♦412 | |
| 189959199 (Comments: 1) | Jonathan7890123456 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Are you sure that this camera and the many others you have deleted are actually gone? commented 2026-10-04 16:58:27 UTC by greatnameguys2472 ♦37 | |
| 185599930 (Comments: 5) | wolfbert (Discussed changesets: 24) | Ich habe ausschließlich die PLZ korrigiert, und die stimmt. Jetzt gibt es allerdings ein Duplikat der Adresse in der Friedensstraße 8. commented 2026-10-04 16:53:01 UTC by wolfbert ♦205 | |
| 189988831 (Comments: 1) | Monier07 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Well I looked deeper into the issue and found out that there is no clear rule/consensus about the GmbH extension. While it not wrong to remove it, I was wrong to say that putting it in the name would be a mistake: While you shouldn't incl... commented 2026-10-04 16:52:29 UTC by dreua ♦148 | |
| 189959212 (Comments: 1) | Jonathan7890123456 (Discussed changesets: 3) | This changeset adds one or more ALPR cameras in a spot that looks unlikely — the nodes are in the water.\r \r We'd kindly ask that you avoid adding cameras that aren't actually there, and that you remove any temporary or test no... commented 2026-10-04 16:46:21 UTC by alpacaMaps ♦412 | |
| 189818734 (Comments: 2) | S_k_y (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hallo, gern, hab sogar noch was gelernt, das hier noch ein Museum versteckt ist war mir nicht bekannt. Ich habe die Nummer nach DIN 5008 angepasst. Die Durchwahl behält den Bindestrich. Eine kurze Recherche hat das für mich a... commented 2026-10-04 16:39:08 UTC by S_k_y ♦4 | |
| 54442375 (Comments: 1) | angys (Discussed changesets: 108) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/545333598 this has been 9 years, but the Esri shows the island is still not in construction.... commented 2026-10-04 16:37:30 UTC by FajrAl ♦892 | |
| 189910834 (Comments: 1) | K12230LF (Discussed changesets: 48) | Encore une exemple où la donnée d'origine est meilleure que celle moissonnée par ATP. commented 2026-10-04 16:37:30 UTC by 14im ♦26 | |
| 189859806 (Comments: 2) | Monier07 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Thanks for quickly fixing it :) --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/189859806 commented 2026-10-04 16:31:04 UTC by dreua ♦148 | |
| 189988956 (Comments: 1) | Julysfire (Discussed changesets: 7) | #maproulette commented 2026-10-04 16:30:33 UTC by Julysfire ♦7 | |
| 189989851 (Comments: 1) | Julysfire (Discussed changesets: 7) | #maproulette commented 2026-10-04 16:30:31 UTC by Julysfire ♦7 | |
| 189820572 (Comments: 2) | S_k_y (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hallo, da hast du recht. Das war mein Fehler. Es ist ein Mitarbeiter Parkplatz. commented 2026-10-04 16:29:48 UTC by S_k_y ♦4 | |
| 189911411 (Comments: 1) | Jens Reimer (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hallo, hier passen folgende Angaben nicht: fire_hydrant:diameter=100: Bitte löschen, das gilt nur bei Trinkwasserleitungen fire_hydrant:type=pillar: Bitte gegen pipe ersetzen. pillar:type=dry_barrel: Entsprechend bitte löschen.<... commented 2026-10-04 16:20:51 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,663 | |
| 189911450 (Comments: 1) | Jens Reimer (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hallo, folgende Anmerkungen zu deiner Ergänzung: Eine Saugstelle ohne Gewässer ist nicht datenkonsistent; daher bitte auch den Teich erfassen. Diesen kann man dann auch, sofern es ein offizieller Löschteich ist, direkt als eme... commented 2026-10-04 16:16:16 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,663 | |
| 189822849 (Comments: 1) | S_k_y (Discussed changesets: 5) | Das sieht soweit gut aus. Auch dass du die Flächen nicht miteinander verbunden hast, ist super, das macht es einfacher fürs Editieren in Zukunft. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using... commented 2026-10-04 16:11:30 UTC by KartKollektor ♦55 | |
| 189763492 (Comments: 3) | Monier07 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Thanks! I see now that there is a lot of other POIs with the same issue in this area, so I see how on you assumed that it would be the correct way to do it... Anyway, welcome to the openstreetmap community :) commented 2026-10-04 16:09:23 UTC by dreua ♦148 | |
| 189989252 (Comments: 1) | chumpy100 (Discussed changesets: 2) | sorry, i meant to select aerial imagery. not streetlevel imagery. commented 2026-10-04 16:08:00 UTC by chumpy100 ♦1 | |
| 187100927 (Comments: 4) | OSM-XXXXXX (Discussed changesets: 40) | OSM-XXXXXX, can you please see the above comment commented 2026-10-04 16:04:21 UTC by Sakari_N ♦163 | |
| 181376085 (Comments: 1) | jmittelhammer (Discussed changesets: 1) | Servus, danke für deine Mitarbeit bei OSM. Ich frage mich jedoch, ob die Änderung hier sinnvoll war? Der Radweg war doch bereits gemappt, als Teil des Hauptweges. D.h. er ist durch deine Änderung jetzt doppelt gemappt. Bei Ver... commented 2026-10-04 15:58:43 UTC by Jbah ♦57 | |
| 189967428 (Comments: 2) | javroi199 (Discussed changesets: 2) | También parece que el nombre es simplemente "Jarana". Cuidado que la "I" no es una i sino una barra "|". El nombre no debe incluir el tipo, en este caso "Gastrobar" (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org... commented 2026-10-04 15:58:19 UTC by dmlls ♦32 | |
| 30320281 (Comments: 1) | DAUPHIN84 (Discussed changesets: 12) | Le musée n'est plus là commented 2026-10-04 15:51:25 UTC by Tantine84 ♦1 | |
| 145417159 (Comments: 1) | Boris Angelov (Discussed changesets: 11) | Здравей Боби Благодаря за промяната! Сигурен ли си че way/1078305756 е училището? В сайта им и в регистъра на МОН е записан адрес на ул. Цар Си... commented 2026-10-04 15:49:27 UTC by Dimitar155 ♦1,052 | |
| 189975100 (Comments: 1) | allwe231 (Discussed changesets: 12) | Seharusnya jalannya yang dijadikan jembatan. Tolong bedakan "river" dengan "stream" https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Id:Pedoman_Penandaan_Indonesia#Perairan commented 2026-10-04 15:35:08 UTC by FajrAl ♦892 | |
| 189980219 (Comments: 1) | Mike Glover (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi again, your changeset has been reverted for removing valid features for invalid reasons. You have been asked before not to do this, seems you are now intentionally ignoring feedback and vandalizing OSM data. commented 2026-10-04 15:33:19 UTC by MassCartog ♦486 | |
| 189982983 (Comments: 2) | Jule_Beuel (Discussed changesets: 28) | Stimmt, habs geändert. Danke! Gruß Jule commented 2026-10-04 15:33:07 UTC by Jule_Beuel ♦17 | |
| 189982531 (Comments: 1) | AlexC74 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Same as the other edit you made. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/189982531 commented 2026-10-04 15:30:20 UTC by CanopyFalls ♦140 | |
| 189982470 (Comments: 1) | Jule_Beuel (Discussed changesets: 28) | Hallo Jule_Beuel, wieso bei den Wegen - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/935865147 - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1564908153 und bei den Toren - https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1596505082 - https://www.openstree... commented 2026-10-04 15:29:23 UTC by Zrop ♦175 | |
| 189984571 (Comments: 1) | quadratur (Discussed changesets: 1) | Please avoid changesets spanning locations over such a large distance. Is that something that is encouraged by organic maps? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/189984571 ... commented 2026-10-04 15:29:22 UTC by dreua ♦148 | |
| 189976924 (Comments: 1) | mapping_around (Discussed changesets: 3) | Please avoid changesets spanning locations over such a large distance. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/189976924 commented 2026-10-04 15:28:25 UTC by dreua ♦148 | |
| 188655426 (Comments: 6) | OlasMapy (Discussed changesets: 34) | kingissepp as for the surname, recommended exonym is jaama/jamburg as he was a russian anti-estonian collaborator, same for królewiec/konigsberg where i have corrected name:et because kalinin was a mass murderer commented 2026-10-04 15:14:34 UTC by OlasMapy ♦80 | |
| 189982609 (Comments: 1) | AlexC74 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello and welcome to OSM! Thank you for contributing to the map. Marked this as good as it was mostly okay with only a minor mistake being that the house name was set to the same as the house number. The house name tag is specifically for mapp... commented 2026-10-04 15:11:27 UTC by CanopyFalls ♦140 | |
| 184006153 (Comments: 1) | Saad chaoui (Discussed changesets: 6) | QA change back name to be one of name:ar or name:fr or name:ber https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189984529 commented 2026-10-04 14:45:30 UTC by yamada-as ♦15 | |
| 189948302 (Comments: 4) | erwanlevieux (Discussed changesets: 4) | Erreur de ma part, il existe une signalisation à 30 Je corrige immédiatement commented 2026-10-04 14:42:04 UTC by erwanlevieux ♦3 | |
| 189769537 (Comments: 1) | m7c1m0 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189984116 commented 2026-10-04 14:39:09 UTC by MappingMore ♦759 | |
| 189979708 (Comments: 1) | android_openmap (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ich wurde nur nach der Marke gefragt, nicht nach der Nummer... diese lautet "648". Also gesamt: "DeinFach 648". commented 2026-10-04 14:27:21 UTC by android_openmap ♦1 | |
| 189921800 (Comments: 4) | achadwick (Discussed changesets: 28) | Done. Glad I used Cadastral Parcels too. Looks like 13 is absent, quite rare around here. commented 2026-10-04 14:26:39 UTC by achadwick ♦68 | |
| 189775817 (Comments: 5) | LochnagarMountain (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi LochnagarMountain, I've uploaded 2 pictures from 2 sides near that spot. https://www.mapillary.com/app/user/PatnosD?lat=41.785966666667&lng=44.801030555556&z=17&pKey=2185359182026815 https://www.mapillary.com/app/... commented 2026-10-04 14:24:26 UTC by PatnosD ♦1 | |
| 189754234 (Comments: 1) | Raul Bergia (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189983248 commented 2026-10-04 14:24:20 UTC by MappingMore ♦759 | |
| 189952674 (Comments: 1) | freakyhamster (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi freakyhamster! Welcome to OpenStreetMap and thank you for your first contributions. Is ku: really a place_of_worship? From their website: “Das [ku:] ist ein selbstverwalteter Raum in der Kölner Südstadt. Hier findest ... commented 2026-10-04 14:19:14 UTC by PattaFeuFeu ♦26 | |
| 189847049 (Comments: 2) | JTS51 (Discussed changesets: 39) | Hallo user_5359 Bedankt voor jou melding. Ik heb het inmiddels aangepast. Met vriendelijke groet, JTS51 commented 2026-10-04 14:17:48 UTC by JTS51 ♦7 | |
| 183579301 (Comments: 1) | Saad chaoui (Discussed changesets: 6) | الأمازغية ليست لغة محلية إلا عند حدود بجاية. كل الإشارات على الطرق بالعربية و احيانا مع الفرنسية. آخر معلومة لدي الإتفاق في منتدى الر... commented 2026-10-04 14:17:27 UTC by yamada-as ♦15 | |
| 189953825 (Comments: 1) | JoshuaVA (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello and welcome to OSM, please stop duplicating existing data. I reverted all the changes you did so far. commented 2026-10-04 13:51:21 UTC by ratrun ♦307 | |
| 188626335 (Comments: 3) | jafarbeek (Discussed changesets: 16) | Thanks for the quick response. It would be great if you want to fixup those areas that need it commented 2026-10-04 13:50:27 UTC by SereneDeluge ♦46 | |
| 189751035 (Comments: 4) | Bobby&Anya (Discussed changesets: 4) | dank! commented 2026-10-04 13:49:01 UTC by Bobby&Anya ♦2 | |
| 189965153 (Comments: 2) | Bernd_BDP (Discussed changesets: 9) | Danke für den Hinweis. Hatte ich nicht daran gedacht, dass das auch geht. Hatte nur per Smartphone ein bisschen was korrigiert mit Blick aus dem Hotelfenster. 😅 commented 2026-10-04 13:46:22 UTC by Bernd_BDP ♦8 | |
| 189973245 (Comments: 1) | ezell99 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Please consider https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets commented 2026-10-04 13:45:40 UTC by 9_tab ♦158 | |
| 189980757 (Comments: 1) | sahshoor (Discussed changesets: 26) | From old survey notes from last Summer. commented 2026-10-04 13:42:49 UTC by sahshoor ♦33 | |
| 189980662 (Comments: 1) | Willem Manders (Discussed changesets: 2) | De info heb ik verplaatst naar de adresnode. MVG eggie commented 2026-10-04 13:42:23 UTC by eggie ♦47,558 | |
| 189980891 (Comments: 1) | Jodocus up Straat (Discussed changesets: 8) | Korrektur: der Node war Mast 21. commented 2026-10-04 13:40:54 UTC by Jodocus up Straat ♦9 | |
| 189980500 (Comments: 1) | Willem Manders (Discussed changesets: 2) | Dag Willem.. De info heb ik samengevoegd met de adresnode. MVG eggie commented 2026-10-04 13:40:18 UTC by eggie ♦47,558 | |
| 189975185 (Comments: 1) | Maryancita (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OSM Twee lijkt me één te veel. Ik heb er één verwijderd en één samengevoegd met de adresnode. MVG eggie commented 2026-10-04 13:36:55 UTC by eggie ♦47,558 | |
| 180461849 (Comments: 5) | foreigner037 (Discussed changesets: 44) | В момента е една релация с множество външни пръстени. Само един елемент има тага landuse=residential. Примера ми беше за множество прости пъти... commented 2026-10-04 13:33:06 UTC by Dimitar155 ♦1,052 | |
| 189980420 (Comments: 1) | felipeeugenio (Discussed changesets: 264) | Note\tContributor\t⏱️ Last updated\tAction\tComment 5553513 (iD)\tfelipeeugenio\tjust now\tclosed\tagregado como heritage=yes 5553514 (iD)\tfelipeeugenio\tjust now\tclosed\tagregado como heritage=yes 5553515 (iD)\tfelipeeugenio\tjust now... commented 2026-10-04 13:29:26 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦3,437 | |
| 188610832 (Comments: 2) | nortvest (Discussed changesets: 18) | Danke für den Hinweis - habe die Knoten ohne Eigenschaften entfernt. commented 2026-10-04 13:28:40 UTC by nortvest ♦11 | |
| 183045887 (Comments: 1) | Mapping OBFC (Discussed changesets: 2) | Good evening. You added Abaday Store twice, here (node/13863742301) and here (node/13863782501). Could you please double-check which is the correct one? Thanks! commented 2026-10-04 13:25:23 UTC by Timmy_Tesseract ♦206 | |
| 189980089 (Comments: 1) | imiraldz (Discussed changesets: 5) | *and added population and code of barangay (source: PSA) commented 2026-10-04 13:22:35 UTC by imiraldz ♦10 | |
| 189796501 (Comments: 6) | 9_tab (Discussed changesets: 28) | A mon avis, c'est une interprétation erronée de level=1, des accès et des zones. Mieux vaut suivre les définitions des tags, plutôt qu'inventer des shopping center parce que ça ressemble à une... commented 2026-10-04 13:20:15 UTC by 9_tab ♦158 | |
| 164673571 (Comments: 4) | P_kawa (Discussed changesets: 26) | Część kanalizacji w Krakowie działa osobno, a system ogólnospławny występuje szczególnie w starszych częściach miasta. commented 2026-10-04 13:13:08 UTC by P_kawa ♦28 | |
| 189971187 (Comments: 1) | Cyrlix (Discussed changesets: 5) | Cześć, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/882133855 To raczej nie wygląda na budynek. commented 2026-10-04 12:58:20 UTC by NieWnen ♦1,498 | |
| 188339360 (Comments: 2) | UnFlockMeNow (Discussed changesets: 11) | please respond commented 2026-10-04 12:48:03 UTC by Udarian ♦960 | |
| 1378190 (Comments: 3) | smarties (Discussed changesets: 97) | Was mir gerade auffiel, das sind die Schilder des Naturschutzgebietes. Vielleicht sollte man die nicht löschen, aber Du findest bestimmt einen Weg die Schilder besser zu kartographieren. Bedenke: "verbessern geht immer vor löschen.&quo... commented 2026-10-04 12:39:09 UTC by smarties ♦44 | |
| 189343164 (Comments: 1) | Cello_Bello (Discussed changesets: 4) | See discussion: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/does-this-qualify-as-a-path/147364/13 commented 2026-10-04 12:27:46 UTC by Glyphe ♦19 | |
| 189958787 (Comments: 1) | 0x4273 (Discussed changesets: 7) | These were already mapped as being within a leisure=sports_centre . You even modified the outline of that sports centre when you invented a separate facility whole cloth and nested it within that sports centre. Your complete disregard for fac... commented 2026-10-04 12:10:01 UTC by InsertUser ♦504 | |
| 189972995 (Comments: 2) | BijdeOudeDeel (Discussed changesets: 1) | Aangepast commented 2026-10-04 12:02:48 UTC by eggie ♦47,558 | |
| 189958812 (Comments: 1) | 0x4273 (Discussed changesets: 7) | There was a "Tennis and Sports Club" already mapped for this facility. Of course this isn't a separate recreation ground. Stop inventing new fictitious facilities when local mappers who actually know what these things are have checked ... commented 2026-10-04 12:01:58 UTC by InsertUser ♦504 | |
| 189975604 (Comments: 1) | gormur (Discussed changesets: 82) | First wave of Molobyen buildings soon finished. (Forgot to update the changeset description) commented 2026-10-04 12:01:00 UTC by gormur ♦136 | |
| 189518692 (Comments: 2) | AnnaCatarina (Discussed changesets: 41) | Hello LakeTana, it is common, the lanes are phyiscally separated just inbetween the tollbooths, because the number of lanes per direction is changed in relation to the traffic flow. Therefor it needs free space in front of a toll station to be abl... commented 2026-10-04 11:57:30 UTC by AnnaCatarina ♦63 | |
| 189935965 (Comments: 2) | Ale_Zena_IT (Discussed changesets: 77) | Grazie per la segnalazione, non avevo verificato l'autocompletamento di JOSM commented 2026-10-04 11:55:02 UTC by Ale_Zena_IT ♦184 | |
| 189939457 (Comments: 5) | iSumeri (Discussed changesets: 8) | I very much agree with you but this applies to countries that don't have a good street network, unlike Iraq, which possesses a highly modern road network that meets global standards network Additionally, we have recent imagery dated 2026-09-1... commented 2026-10-04 11:38:50 UTC by little_maper ♦98 | |
| 189621489 (Comments: 2) | trrrem (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted. commented 2026-10-04 11:32:50 UTC by bxl-forever ♦3,091 | |
| 187177064 (Comments: 1) | Simon_Achmueller (Discussed changesets: 1) | Moin Simon, ich sehe grad deine viewpoints und möchte dich auf name=* hinweisen. Bitte nutze das Feld nicht für Beschreibungen. Grüße silversurfer83 commented 2026-10-04 11:30:29 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦4,375 | |
| 188469339 (Comments: 1) | mrkcl (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/14144397666/history has amenity = waste_basket;recycling that was added in this edit it is better to avoid https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Semi-colon_value_separator here see amenity=waste_baske... commented 2026-10-04 11:27:47 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,230 | |
| 168112637 (Comments: 1) | OSMuser111107 (Discussed changesets: 114) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12795795708/history has amenity = waste_basket;recycling that was added in this edit it is better to avoid https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Semi-colon_value_separator here see amenity=waste_baske... commented 2026-10-04 11:27:37 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,230 | |
| 188277798 (Comments: 1) | Jod696969 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/14134530602/history has amenity = waste_basket;recycling that was added in this edit it is better to avoid https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Semi-colon_value_separator here see amenity=waste_baske... commented 2026-10-04 11:27:35 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,230 | |
| 135274676 (Comments: 1) | OhanaUnited (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10834417916/history has amenity = waste_basket;recycling that was added in this edit it is better to avoid https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Semi-colon_value_separator here see amenity=waste_baske... commented 2026-10-04 11:27:30 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,230 | |
| 181498980 (Comments: 1) | cswilson252 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13739991715/history has amenity = waste_basket;recycling that was added in this edit it is better to avoid https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Semi-colon_value_separator here see amenity=waste_baske... commented 2026-10-04 11:27:27 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,230 | |
| 157859224 (Comments: 1) | TheMingus (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12249759234/history has amenity = waste_basket;recycling that was added in this edit it is better to avoid https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Semi-colon_value_separator here see amenity=waste_baske... commented 2026-10-04 11:27:18 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,230 | |
| 189929793 (Comments: 3) | marcellinator (Discussed changesets: 3) | Thanks :) commented 2026-10-04 11:26:08 UTC by marcellinator ♦3 | |
| 169346113 (Comments: 2) | Balázs Hidvégi (Discussed changesets: 14) | Modified. Thank you. commented 2026-10-04 11:24:05 UTC by Balázs Hidvégi ♦5 | |
| 188881488 (Comments: 1) | im_tau (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi, when adding parking lots, please map the whole parking area as amenity=parking instead of mapping each row of parking bays as its own parking lot. You can read more here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dparking I have fixed i... commented 2026-10-04 11:18:13 UTC by Vi2727 ♦21 | |
| 185819927 (Comments: 3) | Sofia_111 (Discussed changesets: 7) | Thanks for your description. What source, though have you used to name these footpaths? I understand that historical streets by these names used to exist along similar routes, but since they were demolished, what source is there for their names being... commented 2026-10-04 11:12:39 UTC by mstrbrid ♦67 | |
| 189932584 (Comments: 3) | muura (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189973092 commented 2026-10-04 11:10:42 UTC by martin-kokos ♦49 | |
| 189821409 (Comments: 3) | iSumeri (Discussed changesets: 8) | also I have removed the blocks and added the jersey berries as I was it on the streets. I am making changes on daily basis based on my survey. thanks commented 2026-10-04 11:05:49 UTC by iSumeri ♦5 | |
| 189969219 (Comments: 1) | BobaFetch (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-10-04 10:56:27 UTC by eggie ♦47,558 | |
| 189968374 (Comments: 1) | Martijn Coppoolse (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-10-04 10:55:01 UTC by eggie ♦47,558 | |
| 189965898 (Comments: 8) | Sijf (Discussed changesets: 1) | Held, danku commented 2026-10-04 10:50:11 UTC by Sijf ♦1 | |
| 189966832 (Comments: 8) | Lowiekse (Discussed changesets: 5) | 👌 commented 2026-10-04 10:48:33 UTC by Lowiekse ♦4 | |
| 189958608 (Comments: 2) | LordGarySugar (Discussed changesets: 58) | See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189888552 This was reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189971704 commented 2026-10-04 10:44:28 UTC by confusedbuffalo ♦486 | |
| 189958557 (Comments: 1) | LordGarySugar (Discussed changesets: 58) | See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189894658 This was regrettably reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189971573 commented 2026-10-04 10:43:57 UTC by confusedbuffalo ♦486 | |
| 189958539 (Comments: 1) | LordGarySugar (Discussed changesets: 58) | See discussion at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189917907 Also note that it was a mixture of addr:town and addr:village commented 2026-10-04 10:43:10 UTC by confusedbuffalo ♦486 | |
| 189958480 (Comments: 1) | LordGarySugar (Discussed changesets: 58) | See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189918423 This was regrettably reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189971166 commented 2026-10-04 10:42:30 UTC by confusedbuffalo ♦486 | |
| 189888552 (Comments: 2) | confusedbuffalo (Discussed changesets: 133) | I have nothing further to add to my comments in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189918423 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189894658 For reference, your revert was: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189958608 I ... commented 2026-10-04 10:41:38 UTC by confusedbuffalo ♦486 | |
| 115015196 (Comments: 1) | Yusuf Kuyucu (Discussed changesets: 1) | do not enter advertising material onto openstreetmap. commented 2026-10-04 10:41:28 UTC by yitimox ♦47 | |
| 189000490 (Comments: 1) | AndreiPopa (Discussed changesets: 3) | Die Straßen sollten wieder befahrbar sein. Zumindest von Rosenkopf war kein Sperrschild mehr zu sehen. Laut Google Maps auch wieder frei. commented 2026-10-04 10:40:50 UTC by Team Tigar ♦2 | |
| 189454274 (Comments: 1) | @Yuvaan (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi, this area is not necessary as everything residential is already mapped. commented 2026-10-04 10:39:48 UTC by foreigner037 ♦93 | |
| 189819218 (Comments: 2) | Heyhohayhohu (Discussed changesets: 5) | Szia. Nem kell takarítani, ami nem úgy van nem írom. De válaszoltam is ha minden igaz ez volt az utolsó. Környékbeli vagyok, hajrá, nyomd a kanapéről akkor! Viszlát. commented 2026-10-04 10:39:40 UTC by Heyhohayhohu ♦3 | |
| 184195465 (Comments: 1) | sgalaxya71silver (Discussed changesets: 56) | In relation to کوی آزادی شماره 1 This is the name of an alley, and it seems like an unsuitable choice for the neighborhood... commented 2026-10-04 10:38:13 UTC by ChehrehBargi ♦574 | |
| 189777091 (Comments: 2) | Heyhohayhohu (Discussed changesets: 5) | Szia. Ez a Meszleny-kastély. Most épp múzeum van benne. Északabbra a Meleny-Wenchheim kastély van, ami egyébként könyvtárnak, kiállításnak is helyet ad. commented 2026-10-04 10:36:08 UTC by Heyhohayhohu ♦3 | |
| 189965361 (Comments: 2) | j3ri (Discussed changesets: 1) | Szia! Köszi szépen és elnézést, ha valami hülyeséget csináltam! :) commented 2026-10-04 10:33:51 UTC by j3ri ♦1 | |
| 189757737 (Comments: 2) | Heyhohayhohu (Discussed changesets: 5) | Igen. commented 2026-10-04 10:32:41 UTC by Heyhohayhohu ♦3 | |
| 185253113 (Comments: 4) | mohamedd_ahmed (Discussed changesets: 5) | changes have been made. thanks commented 2026-10-04 10:28:10 UTC by iSumeri ♦5 | |
| 185182633 (Comments: 3) | mohamedd_ahmed (Discussed changesets: 5) | changes have been made correctly. thank you for your attention. commented 2026-10-04 10:25:35 UTC by iSumeri ♦5 | |
| 189859067 (Comments: 1) | hathavidya (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/14230979361. What is the mean of the key s = 8 Likhnaysir St, Al Danah, Abu Dhabi 22220. Why is there difference to the adrress )see(key addr:....)? commented 2026-10-04 10:25:34 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,869 | |
| 113625341 (Comments: 3) | a9ef57woi45z48rg (Discussed changesets: 3) | Zu dem anschließenden way/172431469 kann ich jedoch nichts sagen. commented 2026-10-04 10:20:45 UTC by a9ef57woi45z48rg ♦3 | |
| 183058973 (Comments: 1) | LachlanTansey2009 (Discussed changesets: 65) | I can confirm through multiple users, as well as my own observations that this is incorrect and the line still has overhead cabling even four months later.. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha... commented 2026-10-04 10:19:50 UTC by melbournefan ♦16 | |
| 189918080 (Comments: 2) | confusedbuffalo (Discussed changesets: 133) | See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189918529, the tagging was valid commented 2026-10-04 10:12:39 UTC by confusedbuffalo ♦486 | |
| 189918484 (Comments: 2) | confusedbuffalo (Discussed changesets: 133) | See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189918529, the tagging was valid commented 2026-10-04 10:12:36 UTC by confusedbuffalo ♦486 | |
| 189918514 (Comments: 2) | confusedbuffalo (Discussed changesets: 133) | See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189918529, the tagging was valid commented 2026-10-04 10:12:34 UTC by confusedbuffalo ♦486 | |
| 189931359 (Comments: 1) | osm_map_amethyst_lok (Discussed changesets: 30) | Please don't change many `old_name*=` to `name*=` without discussion. Use OpenHistoricalMap for original names not currently commonly used. commented 2026-10-04 10:01:32 UTC by Kovoschiz ♦3,062 | |
| 187661915 (Comments: 1) | ViewStreet (Discussed changesets: 15) | Άλλο ΑΒ shop and go άλλο AB! Δεν αλλάζουμε απλά επειδή μας ... commented 2026-10-04 09:57:54 UTC by PeachyOne ♦39 | |
| 189968652 (Comments: 1) | VictorIE (Discussed changesets: 155) | And by "D4", I meant Rathcoole-Greenogue Business Park-Peamount. :) commented 2026-10-04 09:51:05 UTC by VictorIE ♦1,271 | |
| 189743929 (Comments: 5) | Gaung Tebono (Discussed changesets: 54) | Tapi katanya Ai itu Jalan Raya Lebo itu emang sekunder. highway=secondary (Sekunder): Digunakan untuk jalan kolektor sekunder atau jalan provinsi/kabupaten utama yang menghubungkan antar kecamatan atau wilayah penting di dalam kabupaten. Karen... commented 2026-10-04 09:45:59 UTC by Faristoteles ♦21 | |
| 189847435 (Comments: 2) | Visaman (Discussed changesets: 11) | Hi, it looks like something went wrong here. The nodes got tags that are not used in other places, e.g. 'qth', 'source_kind', 'flags', 'review', 'best_source'. commented 2026-10-04 09:45:28 UTC by mueschel ♦7,392 | |
| 185024282 (Comments: 1) | חיליק אגמון (Discussed changesets: 24) | הסימון הנכון הוא Cycle & Foot Path בבקשה לא לשנות ל Cycle path commented 2026-10-04 09:45:02 UTC by Dindia ♦65 | |
| 189922782 (Comments: 1) | IvanChan2000 (Discussed changesets: 16) | Please don't directly delete, as it still represent a store space, and may contain addresses and other info. This makes tracking and updating them more difficult, adding next user's effort, and wasting previous user's work. Change it `... commented 2026-10-04 09:41:21 UTC by Kovoschiz ♦3,062 | |
| 189960133 (Comments: 1) | adigis (Discussed changesets: 11) | *Added buildings commented 2026-10-04 09:40:23 UTC by FajrAl ♦892 | |
| 189968395 (Comments: 1) | MtyH80 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OSM.. Bedankt voor je bijdrage. De info heb ik samengevoegd met de bestaande adresnode. MVG eggie commented 2026-10-04 09:40:17 UTC by eggie ♦47,558 | |
| 167020900 (Comments: 1) | ReinerMeyer (Discussed changesets: 98) | Das MP https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/19197229 finde ich ungünstig. Besser wären einzelne landuse-Streifen, ist wartungsfreundlicher. S.a. https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=16.87980&lat=47.95088&zoo... commented 2026-10-04 09:36:19 UTC by wolfbert ♦205 | |
| 189860153 (Comments: 1) | UWS-Tirol (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hier ist etwas gewaltig schief gegangen. Dutzende kurze Wege, ausschließlich mit Tags die nicht in OSM gehören und Dutzende Relationen mit jeweils einem Mitglied. Ich habe diese Änderungen revertiert. commented 2026-10-04 09:36:06 UTC by mueschel ♦7,392 | |
| 184862684 (Comments: 1) | Sam35 (Discussed changesets: 21) | Die Fläche https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1500639278 ist kein Gras, sondern eine Straße. Das Gras ist das Bankett, muss man nicht unbedingt mappen. Außerdem überlappt die Fläche andere landuses. commented 2026-10-04 09:32:06 UTC by wolfbert ♦205 | |
| 189968154 (Comments: 1) | dmlls (Discussed changesets: 8) | Nota: El comentario del changeset es incorrecto. El cambio primario del changeset es actualizar la Plaza de Gabriel Miró de park a square. commented 2026-10-04 09:26:43 UTC by dmlls+imports ♦4 | |
| 189963417 (Comments: 1) | Victor LP (Discussed changesets: 1) | Look like there is a building there. Is there any name? commented 2026-10-04 09:18:04 UTC by FajrAl ♦892 | |
| 189872077 (Comments: 2) | simonthi (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hallo kadiwa, danke für den Hinweis. Das ist wirklich nicht korrekt so. Habe ich entsprechend angepasst. Leider ist das in StreetComplete etwas missverständlich dargestellt. commented 2026-10-04 09:15:09 UTC by simonthi ♦1 | |
| 189803275 (Comments: 2) | Wikiscout (Discussed changesets: 26) | Ich dachte, dass wären 2 eigenständige Änderungen gewesen. Habe etwas über die Hütte gelesen, die mir auf OSM angesehen und bemerkt, dass Infos fehlen commented 2026-10-04 09:01:48 UTC by Wikiscout ♦9 | |
| 189414525 (Comments: 1) | Meinungsfreiheit (Discussed changesets: 2) | Multipolygon-Problem, siehe https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=14.86720&lat=48.11027&zoom=19&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&opacity=0.63&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_mu... commented 2026-10-04 08:59:18 UTC by wolfbert ♦205 | |
| 188116890 (Comments: 1) | Meinungsfreiheit (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hallo, die Wasserfläche https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1553039713 passt nicht zum Luftbild und ist auch nicht Teil der Ybbs (das Multipolygon hat auch einen Fehler https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=14.86801&lat=48.11443&... commented 2026-10-04 08:58:07 UTC by wolfbert ♦205 | |
| 189819553 (Comments: 4) | Bierphysik (Discussed changesets: 28) | oder halt dein Vorschlags als WMTS: https://mapsneu.wien.gv.at/basemapneu/1.0.0/WMTSCapabilities.xml commented 2026-10-04 08:57:23 UTC by Bierphysik ♦106 | |
| 189966493 (Comments: 2) | Glorp5t (Discussed changesets: 2) | Dag eggie Ok begrepen volgende keer doe ik dat Gr Glorp commented 2026-10-04 08:55:48 UTC by Glorp5t ♦2 | |
| 189959265 (Comments: 2) | Mateusz Konieczny (Discussed changesets: 654) | "Wydaję mi się że gdzieś widziałem" nie wystarcza, jak nie możesz dać linka do dyskusji gdzie była zgoda że edycja jest sensowna i było dość czasu by ludzie skomentowali to edycji nie rób commented 2026-10-04 08:53:06 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,230 | |
| 179645597 (Comments: 2) | Robot8A_import (Discussed changesets: 1) | No, ya que son nombres de películas. El nombre de la película es "La reina de África", también con esa capitalización. Saludos commented 2026-10-04 08:52:59 UTC by Robot8A ♦94 | |
| 187884074 (Comments: 1) | tafla- (Discussed changesets: 11) | A było jakieś poparcie tej zmiany? commented 2026-10-04 08:51:56 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,230 | |
| 189940141 (Comments: 5) | Glorp5t (Discussed changesets: 2) | Als bovenstaand aangevuld. Een voorgaande mapper heeft inmiddels ook zaken aangepast. MVG eggie commented 2026-10-04 08:47:44 UTC by eggie ♦47,558 | |
| 180628231 (Comments: 1) | empers (Discussed changesets: 44) | ar tikrai prie Aibės sandėlio panaikintas bordiūras ir abi aikštelės sujungtos? commented 2026-10-04 08:47:13 UTC by ygcgjp5 ♦120 | |
| 188602001 (Comments: 4) | Faristoteles (Discussed changesets: 17) | Sesuai kondisi lapangan lebih bagus. commented 2026-10-04 08:45:01 UTC by FajrAl ♦892 | |
| 182902689 (Comments: 1) | TheNightRider (Discussed changesets: 49) | the casino is gone. its being torn apart from the inside first. clark county approved it for a logistics center. terribles took over the casino in primm and sold this one commented 2026-10-04 08:44:02 UTC by ieguy3 ♦73 | |
| 189851468 (Comments: 1) | Erelen (Discussed changesets: 24) | Please do not use any changeset comments using another language than English and Serbian (in this case Macedonian) so everybody could understand what it means. commented 2026-10-04 08:40:19 UTC by 5mister7 ♦20 | |
| 188098058 (Comments: 2) | spiregrain (Discussed changesets: 59) | Yes - correct I'll shortly fix these ones. commented 2026-10-04 08:36:45 UTC by spiregrain ♦255 | |
| 180752578 (Comments: 2) | mapper_osm (Discussed changesets: 1) | deleted commented 2026-10-04 08:34:12 UTC by ygcgjp5 ♦120 | |
| 173528749 (Comments: 7) | SekeRob (Discussed changesets: 447) | Where the value came from could be the text below the right margin photo in the location wiki. aboveground is to me unambiguous. I'd is good at picking up values "in-use". Mass edit(s). Think that discussion belongs on discourse. There... commented 2026-10-04 08:16:43 UTC by SekeRob ♦1,529 | |
| 185593717 (Comments: 1) | Ophirh2 (Discussed changesets: 5) | שלום, האם כל האזור הזה עדיין חסום כולל להליכה רגלית? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/801283866 commented 2026-10-04 08:09:09 UTC by hatul ♦536 | |
| 188094591 (Comments: 1) | kevko22 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hallo, du hast hier access=private gesetzt: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/29295612 ich nehme an, das sollte eigentlich vehicle=private sein, nachdem dort ein markierter Wanderweg darüber führt --- ... commented 2026-10-04 07:42:57 UTC by Luzandro ♦1,040 | |
| 169526420 (Comments: 3) | DHuthmann (Discussed changesets: 13) | Thanks. I've removed it. There is more paths that need to be mapped in location anyways. commented 2026-10-04 07:34:39 UTC by martin-kokos ♦49 | |
| 189482583 (Comments: 1) | max93600 (Discussed changesets: 15) | Bonjour, Pour les contributions sur les transformateurs attachés a un poteau électrique, je vous invite à vous référer a cette page wiki qui vous indiquera les attributs a utiliser https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/... commented 2026-10-04 07:32:12 UTC by jbcharron ♦195 | |
| 189861545 (Comments: 1) | kb_lee (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello, kb_lee, I noticed last week that you added the "access=customers" tag to these streets: w1071642057, w1071642059, w1072302886, w1072302887, w1088787033, w1088787035. I removed it because it was incorrect, but you added it again. I... commented 2026-10-04 07:31:01 UTC by mona_magdy ♦24 | |
| 189950754 (Comments: 1) | Janis Stiga RM (Discussed changesets: 5) | ceļu uzzīmēt virsū jau esošam ceļam ir nepareizi highway=unclassified kopā ar service=driveway arī neder kas šeit domāts? varbūt labāk maxweight= vai surface= vai smoothness= vai hgv= iesaku palasīt https://wiki.open... commented 2026-10-04 07:19:13 UTC by Colbertson ♦181 | |
| 189955707 (Comments: 1) | mratabey (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-10-04 07:13:50 UTC by eggie ♦47,558 | |
| 188406509 (Comments: 3) | vb98 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ciao. Stacca i landuse dalle strade o da altri oggetti come fiumi e canali. Questi dovrebbero coprire solo la parte dove sono effettivamente. In questo modo inoltre, il landuse diventa molto più gestibile (ovvero si può modificare pi&ug... commented 2026-10-04 07:11:59 UTC by Andrea Musuruane ♦1,544 | |
| 178988596 (Comments: 1) | Bukas Kalye Mapa (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi! You added a Lawson in ATC, but this already duplicates an existing Lawson. I deleted the one you added. Please do check if there are existing POIs that you can just update instead of adding another one. commented 2026-10-04 07:04:59 UTC by seav ♦170 | |
| 130432613 (Comments: 1) | andrewpmk (Discussed changesets: 89) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10282662501/history has amenity = waste_basket;recycling that was added in this edit it is better to avoid https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Semi-colon_value_separator here see amenity=waste_baske... commented 2026-10-04 07:04:22 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,230 | |
| 189937282 (Comments: 1) | Mini Mapper (Discussed changesets: 5) | Ciao. Anche in questo caso, meglio seguire i cartelli in loco: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=448313880336422 Quindi motorroad=yes sarebbe da inserire mentre bicycle, foot, horse, sono inutili. Ciao, Andrea --- ... commented 2026-10-04 06:54:59 UTC by Andrea Musuruane ♦1,544 | |
| 189938690 (Comments: 1) | Mini Mapper (Discussed changesets: 5) | Ciao. In questo caso userei motorroad=yes + le altre limitazioni agricultural =no + moped=no: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=948518135757845 Eviterei di specificare il bicycle=no perché è già compreso in motorway=no. Ciao, A... commented 2026-10-04 06:54:38 UTC by Andrea Musuruane ♦1,544 | |
| 182068566 (Comments: 2) | muphin (Discussed changesets: 10) | I walked the path myself. Under the trees there is a small but clearly visible path through the forest. Users seem to be Dogs and their owners. commented 2026-10-04 06:40:15 UTC by muphin ♦14 | |
| 173895292 (Comments: 1) | mszrsljszslt (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/92694516/history has width = Ismeretlen that was added in this edit What this tag means? Numeric value is expected here and here is something unusual... commented 2026-10-04 06:25:49 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,230 | |
| 112235664 (Comments: 1) | craftly (Discussed changesets: 1) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. See https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers for mo... commented 2026-10-04 06:21:54 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,232 | |
| 189648171 (Comments: 3) | Dany Côté (Discussed changesets: 1) | It looks like permission wasn't added to the wiki until yesterday. That's ok, I was able to figure out what MRNF meant but couldn't see permission on the wiki before. Please don't add addr:country=CA tags, these are redunda... commented 2026-10-04 06:20:21 UTC by Joel Koen ♦98 | |
| 189686651 (Comments: 2) | Snusmumriken (Discussed changesets: 49) | Under ombyggnationen så har delar av Anna Stecksens gata inga trottoarer så gångtrafikanter är omdirigerade till parken commented 2026-10-04 06:16:20 UTC by Snusmumriken ♦165 | |
| 189718960 (Comments: 1) | getsimpleboxcon (Discussed changesets: 2) | As an account mapping on behalf of a commercial business for financial gain, please be advised that you are expected to understand and carefully follow documented OpenStreetMap standards and conventions, which will both directly benefit the quality o... commented 2026-10-04 06:01:26 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,232 | |
| 189766187 (Comments: 1) | getsimpleboxcon (Discussed changesets: 2) | As an account mapping on behalf of a commercial business for financial gain, please be advised that you are expected to understand and carefully follow documented OpenStreetMap standards and conventions, which will both directly benefit the quality o... commented 2026-10-04 05:59:50 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,232 | |
| 88029005 (Comments: 1) | Riku V (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7716611329/history has label = HKR that was added in this edit is it confusing version of inscription=HKR or does it have some other meaning? If it has different meaning, what it actually means? commented 2026-10-04 05:41:08 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,230 | |
| 189910222 (Comments: 1) | ranjitadhikari (Discussed changesets: 2) | Duplicated highway removed. commented 2026-10-04 05:38:57 UTC by BCNorwich ♦5,389 | |
| 189903045 (Comments: 1) | Chase Travels (Discussed changesets: 1) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. See https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers for mo... commented 2026-10-04 05:26:11 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,232 | |
| 135134983 (Comments: 3) | Amenophis (Discussed changesets: 13) | ( man_made=manhole can be set to indicate manhole without specifying type ) commented 2026-10-04 05:15:30 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,230 | |
| 68150927 (Comments: 3) | HighlandMark (Discussed changesets: 6) | ( man_made=manhole can be set to indicate manhole without specifying type ) commented 2026-10-04 05:15:27 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,230 | |
| 171181223 (Comments: 1) | Dirceu Laurel (Discussed changesets: 3) | what roof:shape=gabled_height_moved_flat means? commented 2026-10-04 05:12:43 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,230 | |
| 189954823 (Comments: 2) | Ewen Hill (Discussed changesets: 103) | Thank you Vincent for the kind words. The initial information from Bass Coast was not that clear and it looked like a longer diversion. Glad it's resolved now. commented 2026-10-04 04:16:45 UTC by Ewen Hill ♦522 | |
| 189956567 (Comments: 1) | Mayor Dmytro Cancún nyc Kishenko (Discussed changesets: 1) | DWG revert - sock-puppet vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189959442 commented 2026-10-04 04:05:04 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,988 | |
| 189915718 (Comments: 1) | tafla- (Discussed changesets: 11) | a było to uzgodnione na forum? Jak tak to edycja musi podlinkować dyskusję jak nie było to nie wolno grzebać przy kategoriach istotnych dróg bez omówienia tego commented 2026-10-04 03:51:27 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,230 | |
| 189915921 (Comments: 1) | tafla- (Discussed changesets: 11) | a było to uzgodnione na forum? Jak tak to edycja musi podlinkować dyskusję jak nie było to nie wolno grzebać przy kategoriach istotnych dróg bez omówienia tego commented 2026-10-04 03:51:25 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,230 | |
| 189925202 (Comments: 1) | tafla- (Discussed changesets: 11) | a było to uzgodnione na forum? Jak tak to edycja musi podlinkować dyskusję jak nie było to nie wolno grzebać przy kategoriach istotnych dróg bez omówienia tego commented 2026-10-04 03:51:23 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,230 | |
| X | 180744064 (Comments: 4) | JriSv250 (Discussed changesets: 56) | ITS THE SIZE OF THE MAP ITSELF commented 2026-10-04 03:51:18 UTC by bobthebuilder423468 ♦18 |
| 189919207 (Comments: 1) | confusedbuffalo-bot (Discussed changesets: 26) | poor Pho Bac Hoa Viet Restaurant bro commented 2026-10-04 03:48:32 UTC by bobthebuilder423468 ♦18 | |
| 179674386 (Comments: 1) | Adam850 (Discussed changesets: 12) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13637495309/history has label = S that was added in this edit is it confusing version of inscription=S or does it have some other meaning? If it has different meaning, what it actually means? commented 2026-10-04 03:33:15 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,230 | |
| 189447029 (Comments: 3) | Oberbergmapper (Discussed changesets: 13) | I guess it is a bit philosophical/definitional discussion... But fix is far more important and thanks for it! And even more importantly thanks for your mapping in general! commented 2026-10-04 03:24:54 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,230 | |
| 181643691 (Comments: 3) | LucianoC63 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Thanks! commented 2026-10-04 03:21:54 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,230 | |
| 187704163 (Comments: 3) | ArneKon (Discussed changesets: 4) | Thanks for a quick answer, fix and for your mapping in general! commented 2026-10-04 03:20:36 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,230 | |
| 147169801 (Comments: 1) | Cap Natation (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11594207606/history has tower:platforms = 3.5 that was added in this edit What this tag means? Integer value is expected here and here is something unusual... commented 2026-10-04 03:09:15 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,230 | |
| 65767998 (Comments: 1) | Kel Black (Discussed changesets: 1) | K blackburn B Hoffman commented 2026-10-04 02:19:04 UTC by Kel Black ♦1 | |
| 189676083 (Comments: 5) | matt_the_bat (Discussed changesets: 7) | Ich habe mir beide Enden der Treppe angesehen. An diesen befindet sich weiterhin ein Schild mit dem Hinweis "Privatweg" "Durchgang verboten!". Unten ist das Schild rechts an der Betonwand angebracht, oben rechts an der Laterne. En... commented 2026-10-04 01:56:49 UTC by whb ♦672 | |
| 189956915 (Comments: 1) | Buenohamster (Discussed changesets: 3) | Sources: - Own knowledge - https://www.nationaalwegenbestand.nl/nwb-downloaden commented 2026-10-04 01:45:37 UTC by Buenohamster ♦1 | |
| 189378228 (Comments: 2) | Joel Koen (Discussed changesets: 5) | Oops, sorry about that. commented 2026-10-04 01:32:34 UTC by Joel Koen ♦98 | |
| 189878711 (Comments: 1) | ChieWoza (Discussed changesets: 1) | Die Antwort sollte hier "Nein, keine Insel" sein, denn die Insel befindet sich nicht in der Mitte von einer der zwei hier separat eingezeichneten Fahrbahnen. Also mit anderen Worten, wenn man "Ja, hier ist eine Insel" antwortet, d... commented 2026-10-04 00:43:27 UTC by kadiwa ♦148 | |
| 189956206 (Comments: 1) | Nile_thebest (Discussed changesets: 1) | oops I forgot to finish the changeset comment i meant to say "added features to Duffield, VA" commented 2026-10-04 00:39:34 UTC by Nile_thebest ♦2 | |
| 189521390 (Comments: 3) | Treadly (Discussed changesets: 13) | I have just put it back to its original location. commented 2026-10-04 00:00:42 UTC by Treadly ♦6 | |
| 189944517 (Comments: 1) | tcarlisle (Discussed changesets: 37) | Hello tcarlisle, Customer only access may have been the more correct tag to add here. We(I'm a part of the Antelope Island Trail crew) have a big electric sign at the entrance to the campsite indicating that the roads on the campsite are only... commented 2026-10-04 00:00:08 UTC by yetanotherhiker ♦3 | |
| 189945044 (Comments: 1) | tcarlisle (Discussed changesets: 37) | Hey Tcarlisle, The edit that was here before was accurate. We(I'm a part of the Antelope Island Trail crew) have a physical barricade where I split the trail the top half is open to the public we don't really recognize it as a trail but ... commented 2026-10-03 23:57:13 UTC by yetanotherhiker ♦3 | |
| 189909937 (Comments: 1) | madzae (Discussed changesets: 1) | Tekan Q untuk membuat persegi sempurna commented 2026-10-03 23:12:52 UTC by FajrAl ♦892 | |
| 189850721 (Comments: 1) | Rafa Ortiz (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola. Gracias por tus ediciones eso si, si está en recuperación, entonces no es un parque aún, Eso entiendo. No hacemos descripciones en los nombres en OSM Lo voy a dejar como una zona en contrucción hasta qu... commented 2026-10-03 23:04:39 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦3,437 | |
| 189081464 (Comments: 2) | Sarieb3ar (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, thank you for the image, I've updated it to the latest condition with PicLayer plugin 👍 changeset/189954087 commented 2026-10-03 22:41:09 UTC by FajrAl ♦892 | |
| 180282658 (Comments: 2) | FajrAl (Discussed changesets: 157) | Hi, thank you for the image, I've updated it to the latest condition with PicLayer plugin 👍 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189954087 commented 2026-10-03 22:40:39 UTC by FajrAl ♦892 | |
| 189898502 (Comments: 1) | Lerzeichenn (Discussed changesets: 1) | DWG revert - personal details included https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189952849 commented 2026-10-03 21:50:28 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,988 | |
| 189802374 (Comments: 2) | richlv (Discussed changesets: 47) | Oops. I probably misclicked something, as they seemed not to have access tag when I was fixing it all up. Thank you for spotting, fixed now. commented 2026-10-03 21:45:45 UTC by richlv ♦436 | |
| 189902854 (Comments: 3) | Daemon Targaryen (Discussed changesets: 27) | Buena. Dale entonces commented 2026-10-03 21:41:12 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦3,437 | |
| 189952205 (Comments: 1) | TheNightRider (Discussed changesets: 49) | Forgot to list this source: https://www.ent.com/our-locations/denver-region/lakewood-service-center/ commented 2026-10-03 21:34:15 UTC by TheNightRider ♦85 | |
| 66375108 (Comments: 2) | Niels Elgaard Larsen (Discussed changesets: 404) | Ja, ret endelig. commented 2026-10-03 21:25:05 UTC by Niels Elgaard Larsen ♦626 | |
| 189211360 (Comments: 1) | rll55 (Discussed changesets: 1) | I think we already have a building polygon at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/431972186 . This new way 1560173288 looks like a duplicate, so I suggest deleting it. commented 2026-10-03 20:42:13 UTC by lasagna ♦47 | |
| 189888122 (Comments: 2) | Timmy_Tesseract (Discussed changesets: 40) | Thanks for spotting it! commented 2026-10-03 20:39:12 UTC by Timmy_Tesseract ♦206 | |
| 189624397 (Comments: 1) | vladislav_les (Discussed changesets: 2) | Спасибо за возвращение тропы на карту! А то удаляют непонятные мапперы commented 2026-10-03 20:37:12 UTC by Andrei Lazarev ♦11 | |
| 189842036 (Comments: 1) | BeaconOSM (Discussed changesets: 84) | This is in Wisconsin, not Illinois. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/189842036 commented 2026-10-03 20:23:06 UTC by Frank Peng ♦239 | |
| 189754469 (Comments: 1) | Dentest2024 (Discussed changesets: 1) | I've reverted this changeset adding a random path. The other changeset with the correct addition will stay https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189949534 commented 2026-10-03 20:19:53 UTC by SereneDeluge ♦46 | |
| 189949394 (Comments: 1) | SomeoneElse (Discussed changesets: 483) | It doesn't really make sense to have a regular "old_name" tag as if it was called that for a long time and then called something else. commented 2026-10-03 20:17:10 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,889 | |
| 189947818 (Comments: 1) | Crtographer (Discussed changesets: 4) | Zie https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189946197 commented 2026-10-03 20:10:58 UTC by Crtographer ♦3 | |
| 189946197 (Comments: 1) | Crtographer (Discussed changesets: 4) | Ter info: apart gemapt omdat de fietspaden gescheiden zijn (op sommige plaatsen met fysieke barriere: haag en draad) en er zowel enkelrichting als dubbelrichting tussen zit. Bij de oude versie werd je bijvoorbeeld vanuit Wareslagedreef (of all... commented 2026-10-03 20:08:57 UTC by Crtographer ♦3 | |
| 189925214 (Comments: 1) | YounesSaadatikian (Discussed changesets: 8) | درود و وقت بخیر متاسفانه حجم ویرایش های اشتباه شما بسیار زیاده و چون جواب کامنت هارو ندادید مجبورم همه را برگشت بزنم. لطفا حتما پاسخ بدید ب... commented 2026-10-03 19:49:21 UTC by elsy1 ♦215 | |
| 189466382 (Comments: 1) | RobertoAntonio052600PA (Discussed changesets: 3) | What is this exactly? You have marked a random polygon and named it "Border area of the Panama Canal Zone. Controlled by the United States", on what basis? Is this a school project or something? commented 2026-10-03 19:41:47 UTC by Rick Morales ♦19 | |
| 189434230 (Comments: 1) | YounesSaadatikian (Discussed changesets: 8) | باسلام و وقت بخیر، این جاده به هیچ وجه صلاحیت دریافت تگ درجه دو ندارد لطفا قبل از اعمال ویرایش حتما ویکی osm رامطالعه بفرمایید که باعث گØ... commented 2026-10-03 19:39:22 UTC by elsy1 ♦215 | |
| 189677485 (Comments: 1) | YounesSaadatikian (Discussed changesets: 8) | باسلام، چون شهیون از نظر جمعیت و اندازه، یک شهرک/شهر کوچک است؛ در OSM مقدار place=town الزاماً با عنوان رسمی «شهر» در تقسیمات کشوری یکی ... commented 2026-10-03 19:37:42 UTC by elsy1 ♦215 | |
| 189890923 (Comments: 1) | raheem_kashif (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello! Great that you're improving the map! On thing though, if you're redrawing shops, please check that they aren't already mapped as nodes. If they are, you'll need to make sure only one of them remain. In this change... commented 2026-10-03 19:28:19 UTC by SereneDeluge ♦46 | |
| 189654340 (Comments: 2) | bb010g (Discussed changesets: 2) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Frame&Focus : Yeah, it's functionally a repair/evolution of the same garage but it also _is_ technically a new building in the same location, aside from probably reusing the foundation. I don't know wh... commented 2026-10-03 19:22:10 UTC by bb010g ♦2 | |
| 184571922 (Comments: 1) | Ichiroichira (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, there is a note related to this changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4959105 Could you please take a look at it? commented 2026-10-03 19:00:19 UTC by map per ♦1,349 | |
| 189873004 (Comments: 3) | Melmack (Discussed changesets: 6) | Zdarzają się miejsca gdzie nadal są adresy z małymi i dużymi literami więc gdzieś numer może być taki sam a różni je tylko litera. Są też miejsca gdzie geoportal swoje a lokalny SIP swoje więc jeżeli nie widziało się cze... commented 2026-10-03 18:55:14 UTC by grzegorz75jan ♦708 | |
| 189757953 (Comments: 1) | 743 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189946213 commented 2026-10-03 18:51:13 UTC by MappingMore ♦759 | |
| 189940457 (Comments: 9) | Sander Roeling (Discussed changesets: 4) | Als er een straatnaambord staat dan lijkt residential mij oke. Bgt Kadaster zal het vast wel verwerken. Antwoord krijg je altijd commented 2026-10-03 18:42:09 UTC by eggie ♦47,558 | |
| 189938565 (Comments: 4) | Sander Roeling (Discussed changesets: 4) | Aha, ik begrijp het. Ik weet dit niet uit m'n hoofd, maar dat kan ik morgen wel laten weten als ik er weer langs rij :) commented 2026-10-03 18:25:50 UTC by Sander Roeling ♦2 | |
| 189941004 (Comments: 3) | Sander Roeling (Discussed changesets: 4) | Bedrijven krijgen meestal een officetag.. Bv office=company of it of consulting.. ..naar gelang de aard van het bedrijf. Kijk even in de wiki bij office= Dan wijst het zichzelf. commented 2026-10-03 18:25:23 UTC by eggie ♦47,558 | |
| 188477825 (Comments: 1) | LandskapsLars (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hello again, it seems the source data for the import might not be of good quality? You may want to check https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/ of the purple areas in oslo for duplicate nodes and other QA issues Happy mapping! commented 2026-10-03 18:22:51 UTC by SereneDeluge ♦46 | |
| 188301789 (Comments: 1) | goeystra (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, bicycle parkings you were editing (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1493404345, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1493404346 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1493404347) were not bicycle parkings after all, but amenity=small_electric_vehicl... commented 2026-10-03 18:20:35 UTC by markalex- ♦49 | |
| 63916602 (Comments: 5) | rivermont (Discussed changesets: 69) | When these changes were made in 2018, `lamp_mount=wall` had around 200 used so I don't think I was aware of it. Feel free to fix to the correct current tagging! commented 2026-10-03 18:19:49 UTC by rivermont ♦243 | |
| 188531493 (Comments: 1) | LandskapsLars (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hello! There are a lot of duplicated nodes added in this changeset. See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=10.58005&lat=59.91699&zoom=16&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=long_ways%2Cways_with_long_segments%2... commented 2026-10-03 18:18:51 UTC by SereneDeluge ♦46 | |
| 189943686 (Comments: 3) | Kavely app (Discussed changesets: 2) | Oke... Ik had alleen die voetpaden die op de Witte uitkwamen doorverbonden. Genoeg nog te doen hier. Wanneer toevallig paden vlak bij elkaar eindigen, maar in het echt niet verbodnen zijn krijg je ook dit soort foutmeldingen. Ik zet dan op de ... commented 2026-10-03 18:15:51 UTC by eggie ♦47,558 | |
| 188544060 (Comments: 3) | ChrissW-R1 (Discussed changesets: 208) | Hi @ChrissW-R1 , thanks for the considerate response! I already finished fixing it, and have no particular reason to suspect it doesn't exist on the ground or is copied from Google, etc, so I certainly wouldn't delete it at this poin... commented 2026-10-03 17:56:39 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,232 | |
| 186260636 (Comments: 1) | Funkytoad (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, I was wondering how recent your knowledge of the gas stations in Rainier is. You changed the one on Centre Street from Shell to Chevron. A few months before I had changed it to Shell though, because a local told me that Shell moved from the old ... commented 2026-10-03 17:53:51 UTC by cuzi ♦194 | |
| 189920591 (Comments: 1) | mueschel (Discussed changesets: 1025) | Thank you. Im sorry, My mistake. commented 2026-10-03 17:39:49 UTC by Vracov ♦4 | |
| 189938709 (Comments: 1) | derkkk (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-10-03 17:35:59 UTC by eggie ♦47,558 | |
| 189900581 (Comments: 1) | fietswim (Discussed changesets: 64) | In deze wijziging worden de feature-tags verwijderd van de scouting. Ook wordt de naam in een omschrijving veranderd. Ik zal dit herstellen. commented 2026-10-03 17:03:45 UTC by A67-A67 ♦1,222 | |
| 189940582 (Comments: 1) | shinterro (Discussed changesets: 15) | For context, "Atlantic Station" can refer to both the major retail destination as well as the larger planned neighborhood. They both exist on the map currently but are a bit messy. This change attempts to reconcile and clean up these bounda... commented 2026-10-03 16:58:46 UTC by shinterro ♦16 | |
| 189895195 (Comments: 1) | nbargolf (Discussed changesets: 4) | This changeset has been reverted as it duplicated existing information. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189941365 for details. commented 2026-10-03 16:46:58 UTC by b-jazz ♦959 | |
| 189941158 (Comments: 1) | Sander Roeling (Discussed changesets: 4) | Beste .. Dit zal geen tertiary zijn. Ik heb het weer aangepast MVG eggie commented 2026-10-03 16:45:35 UTC by eggie ♦47,558 | |
| 189933822 (Comments: 5) | Joseph R P (Discussed changesets: 233) | US 460 is definitely still along the original alignment in Virginia, according to the Virginia Roads LRS Route Master (https://www.virginiaroads.org/datasets/VDOT::lrs-route-master/explore). Users on the AARoads forum found signage for US Route 460 o... commented 2026-10-03 16:43:59 UTC by Joseph R P ♦464 | |
| 189797479 (Comments: 1) | nn5eeyccxxbnn (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189940867 commented 2026-10-03 16:43:19 UTC by MappingMore ♦759 | |
| 189884425 (Comments: 6) | Shinsplints (Discussed changesets: 15) | Hello Shinsplints, The criminal and deceitful actions have been previously explained to you multiple times, in particular the vandalism of the Newt Trail guideposts and the AI generated photo you provided. The OpenStreetMap community ha... commented 2026-10-03 16:42:50 UTC by eerib ♦382 | |
| 189934930 (Comments: 1) | Bram den Dunnen (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-10-03 16:41:40 UTC by eggie ♦47,558 | |
| 189940738 (Comments: 1) | KivaGeo (Discussed changesets: 4) | Only the first line in the change comment is relevant, apologies. The iD editor completes the comment too eagerly on mobile... commented 2026-10-03 16:37:44 UTC by KivaGeo ♦3 | |
| 189933005 (Comments: 1) | AlexQuin (Discussed changesets: 1) | Guten Tag, Änderungssatz rückgängig gemacht, denn die Bussteige waren schon als ref erfasst und sind nicht Teil des Namens. commented 2026-10-03 16:08:26 UTC by whb ♦672 | |
| 187702312 (Comments: 2) | ArneKon (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi! I changed the color to white, thanks for the observation. Happy mapping! commented 2026-10-03 16:06:46 UTC by ArneKon ♦4 | |
| 187706869 (Comments: 2) | ArneKon (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi! I changed the color to white, thanks for the observation. Happy mapping! commented 2026-10-03 16:06:26 UTC by ArneKon ♦4 | |
| 189772579 (Comments: 1) | kirit01 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189938991 commented 2026-10-03 16:03:45 UTC by MappingMore ♦759 | |
| 189935369 (Comments: 1) | infektu (Discussed changesets: 1) | Salut! Se pune un singur tag de scoala pe terenul de dedesubt cu denumirea generala si poti pune nume separate pe cladiri. Care e aia de baieti si cea de fete? commented 2026-10-03 15:58:43 UTC by rarad74 ♦580 | |
| 188865725 (Comments: 2) | UrbanPretzle (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hi UrbanPretzle, In this changeset you added access-yes and disused=true to the amenity=toilets object at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/646762510 . Can I check what you intended to signify here? If it was that the toilets are curre... commented 2026-10-03 15:53:32 UTC by Robert Whittaker ♦347 | |
| 189831810 (Comments: 1) | berrymandj (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hey Berry, When FairwayMapper tells you there is an overlap, please make sure you are cleaning up the original and not leaving duplicate fairways and other objects. Better yet, if you could modify the original objects so that history is mainta... commented 2026-10-03 15:52:35 UTC by b-jazz ♦959 | |
| 189859701 (Comments: 1) | racert (Discussed changesets: 2) | We schrijven afkortingen voluit in de name-tag. De officiële naam met afkortingen staat in de tag official_name. Zie ook: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Abbreviation_(do_not) Ik zal het herstellen. commented 2026-10-03 15:37:56 UTC by A67-A67 ♦1,222 | |
| 176224427 (Comments: 2) | 𝙢𝙖𝙧𝙖𝙯𝙯𝙚𝙧 ദ്ദി ᗜˬᗜ✧ (Discussed changesets: 53) | Naprawione, sama nie ma pojęcia skąd się to wzięło commented 2026-10-03 15:27:15 UTC by 𝙢𝙖𝙧𝙖𝙯𝙯𝙚𝙧 ദ്ദി ᗜˬᗜ✧ ♦79 | |
| 188759834 (Comments: 2) | DevTimmOfTO (Discussed changesets: 2) | Danke. Ich werde es in der fernen Zukunft ändern. commented 2026-10-03 15:10:48 UTC by DevTimmOfTO ♦1 | |
| 189327559 (Comments: 3) | SikeMo (Discussed changesets: 11) | I was under that impression as well, and was a bit surprised to find that signage there. But my understanding with OSM naming convention is that what's physically on the ground has priority as 'name=' commented 2026-10-03 15:10:40 UTC by btwhite92 ♦112 | |
| 189410405 (Comments: 1) | Udo_WDH (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo Udo, Deine Fläche umfasst die Gebäude 19 und 17. Sollte dann nicht die Adresse 17-19 heißen? Oder die Fläche müsste kleiner sein. Schöne Grüße Metzor commented 2026-10-03 15:07:17 UTC by Metzor ♦426 | |
| 188993195 (Comments: 6) | E-vun (Discussed changesets: 3) | хорошо, спасибо. В чужик картах часто бывают ошибки. commented 2026-10-03 15:01:38 UTC by E-vun ♦3 | |
| 189590598 (Comments: 2) | Norbert Dichter (Discussed changesets: 31) | Thanks for the head-up, Mateusz! I fixed it. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/189590598 commented 2026-10-03 14:49:00 UTC by Norbert Dichter ♦210 | |
| 189934318 (Comments: 1) | ZX_OSM_USER (Discussed changesets: 1) | Forgot to add a comment on upload: Created a parking commented 2026-10-03 14:46:13 UTC by ZX_OSM_USER ♦1 | |
| 59989079 (Comments: 3) | xyz32 (Discussed changesets: 4) | if you know the length of it what would be even better. commented 2026-10-03 14:43:21 UTC by xyz32 ♦3 | |
| 189845795 (Comments: 3) | Stetson P (Discussed changesets: 2) | Fain Rd, even through the interchange, should probably remain trunk until its remaining at-grade intersections are built up to interchanges since it technically isn't fully up to freeway standards yet. The highway=trunk tag with expressway=yes h... commented 2026-10-03 14:43:17 UTC by Joseph R P ♦464 | |
| 189764100 (Comments: 1) | mapertzw (Discussed changesets: 28) | Hello, please ensure that bus relations do not break as you are editing streets. It should have alerted you in the iD editor. I'm in the process of fixing it commented 2026-10-03 14:29:51 UTC by marcmarti ♦114 | |
| 189882854 (Comments: 1) | joandg (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola Joan, Cuida de no trencar les relacions de les línies de bus al editar els carrers. Ja t'ho he corregit. Salut commented 2026-10-03 14:26:01 UTC by marcmarti ♦114 | |
| 189793378 (Comments: 4) | Gerrist (Discussed changesets: 13) | No problem... Aldoende leert men. Ooit was ik ook beginner. Mapse, eggie commented 2026-10-03 14:16:30 UTC by eggie ♦47,558 | |
| 189931233 (Comments: 1) | AIGAMER (Discussed changesets: 1) | Event place available in Google maps : https://maps.app.goo.gl/iLBLwnvHVVnXBsRD6 commented 2026-10-03 13:48:42 UTC by AIGAMER ♦1 | |
| 188434657 (Comments: 4) | kevko22 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Ich dachte es mir :) Danke dir fürs ausbessern! commented 2026-10-03 13:46:16 UTC by DerKaiserschmarren ♦79 | |
| 189898076 (Comments: 1) | paravenan (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hola. No son un mall propiamente tal, son un variety_store. Corregido. Saludos y gracias --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/189898076 commented 2026-10-03 13:35:13 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦3,437 | |
| 189499774 (Comments: 4) | Sander H (Discussed changesets: 95) | Kom er de 10e 2x langs, dus als niemand me voor is werk ik het wel bij. commented 2026-10-03 13:26:53 UTC by Sander H ♦92 | |
| 189830030 (Comments: 3) | mma79 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Vielen Dank für die Antwort. Ich habe die Löschung soeben rückgängig gemacht. Der Weg war bereits als access=private erfasst. Siehe auch https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property commented 2026-10-03 13:15:29 UTC by Nakaner ♦3,280 | |
| 189823298 (Comments: 2) | masplashti (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Michael, Das ist tatsächlich kein Weg, sondern der Anfang einer Rückegasse. Viele Grüße Mario commented 2026-10-03 13:01:46 UTC by masplashti ♦1 | |
| 189926876 (Comments: 1) | indr@ (Discussed changesets: 3) | jalan perumahan itu bukan SHM, jadi masih dapat masuk. seharusnya pakai access=permissive commented 2026-10-03 12:59:13 UTC by FajrAl ♦892 | |
| 189927895 (Comments: 1) | indr@ (Discussed changesets: 3) | kenapa access=private? apakah jalan ini dimiliki oleh seseorang (berada di tanah SHM)? commented 2026-10-03 12:58:04 UTC by FajrAl ♦892 | |
| 134302257 (Comments: 1) | MillerPeter (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! Can you take look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5552519 ? commented 2026-10-03 12:55:17 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,230 | |
| 139903836 (Comments: 1) | barfüßiger Algenspäher (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9758296198/history has tower:platforms = 1,3,5 that was added in this edit What this tag means? Integer value is expected here and here is something unusual... commented 2026-10-03 12:54:46 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,230 | |
| 150907928 (Comments: 5) | ❤️🔥 (Discussed changesets: 155) | okay changed to wetland=reedbed for now. it's possible that a lot of auckland is mistagged then, for example way/226024389 and way/226024210 are awash at ±1 hour of high tide (i.e. you could paddle over them for 1/6th of day) commented 2026-10-03 12:54:19 UTC by ❤️🔥 ♦511 | |
| 181601392 (Comments: 1) | LucianoC63 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hello! You used lamp_mount=wall_mounted on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13746593784/history Have you maybe meant lamp_mount=wall ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I ed... commented 2026-10-03 12:51:55 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,230 | |
| 181475083 (Comments: 1) | LucianoC63 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hello! You used lamp_mount=wall_mounted on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13738450833/history Have you maybe meant lamp_mount=wall ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I ed... commented 2026-10-03 12:51:52 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,230 | |
| 179848467 (Comments: 1) | LucianoC63 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hello! You used lamp_mount=wall_mounted on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13647215832/history Have you maybe meant lamp_mount=wall ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I ed... commented 2026-10-03 12:51:41 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,230 | |
| 187509548 (Comments: 1) | Catacrack_bcn (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hola Catacrack_bcn, He revertit aquest conjunt de canvis ja que els senders i camins privats no s'haurien d'eliminar. Aquests dos articles a la wiki ho expliquen bastant bé: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_we_wo... commented 2026-10-03 12:48:09 UTC by marcmarti ♦114 | |
| 188562883 (Comments: 4) | ❤️🔥 (Discussed changesets: 155) | i guess that makes sense. do you want to revert this changeset then, and review the remaining bicycle=yes? commented 2026-10-03 12:42:27 UTC by ❤️🔥 ♦511 | |
| 180454855 (Comments: 2) | OS_chief (Discussed changesets: 1) | Misunderstanding of the tag. I thought it's the height of the platforms. It has a 1 m platform and a 3 m platform commented 2026-10-03 12:42:24 UTC by OS_chief ♦1 | |
| 173241638 (Comments: 5) | mueschel (Discussed changesets: 1025) | i was just following the suggestions from that discussion, i guess it's the same meaning as surveillance_zone but with a different syntax. I'll update that wiki page then commented 2026-10-03 12:39:55 UTC by ❤️🔥 ♦511 | |
| 189830242 (Comments: 1) | Tinetto (Discussed changesets: 49) | Comment from OSM Taiwan: "The issues are corresponding lines for pedestrians and tress are not adjusted that I'm not sure about if those edits are accurate and the adjusted sections of the roads become not straight that don't reall... commented 2026-10-03 12:38:12 UTC by unenTT ♦31 | |
| 189786649 (Comments: 1) | tes_maker (Discussed changesets: 4) | attention, le tracé au Havre est impossible sur le terrain, je corrige commented 2026-10-03 12:34:42 UTC by Lyon-St-Clair ♦137 | |
| 189891805 (Comments: 2) | slipstream-wa (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hey Frame&Focus! This is primarily from research from https://www.evergreenmtb.org/trails commented 2026-10-03 12:34:40 UTC by slipstream-wa ♦2 | |
| 184423090 (Comments: 1) | applejunkie (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13957353956/history has tower:platforms = 3, 5, 10 that was added in this edit What this tag means? Integer value is expected here and here is something unusual... commented 2026-10-03 12:34:18 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,230 | |
| 36991846 (Comments: 1) | cucu (Discussed changesets: 31) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2050172569/history has species = fixme that was added in this edit Skipping adding a tag seems better. Or at least add =unknown in English commented 2026-10-03 12:34:11 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,230 | |
| 27658795 (Comments: 1) | Juan Pedro Ruiz (Discussed changesets: 28) | Hello! You used lamp_mount = wall mounted on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2540239517/history Have you maybe meant lamp_mount=wall ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I e... commented 2026-10-03 12:31:52 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,230 | |
| 70761408 (Comments: 1) | Juan Pedro Ruiz (Discussed changesets: 28) | Hello! You used lamp_mount = wall mounted on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2529816472/history Have you maybe meant lamp_mount=wall ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I e... commented 2026-10-03 12:31:50 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,230 | |
| 165266878 (Comments: 3) | Aalbers69 (Discussed changesets: 15) | Thank you for responding, please be careful with what data you use. We don't actually have permission to use Sunshine Coast's mapping data, but I can see all the names you added in the state government's cadastre data. In futu... commented 2026-10-03 12:30:50 UTC by Joel Koen ♦98 | |
| 189818028 (Comments: 3) | esquire900 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Geen idee of StreetCorner (Volgens de changeset info StreetComplete?) dat kan. Ik gebruik zelf voornamelijk iD en JOSM. Gezien "The app is made specifically for casual contributors and beginners as no prior knowledge about OpenStreetMap&q... commented 2026-10-03 12:16:36 UTC by Kees 59 ♦141 | |
| 189741393 (Comments: 9) | mueschel (Discussed changesets: 1025) | ^ I don't want to cloud this specific changeset too much, so @mueschel I'd appreciate if you find issues with the Australian Tagging Guidelines to post on the talk page (or join the Discord). commented 2026-10-03 12:16:28 UTC by aharvey ♦2,007 | |
| 189353177 (Comments: 2) | jajko30 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Ze strony Wikidata. commented 2026-10-03 12:07:05 UTC by jajko30 ♦1 | |
| 189924514 (Comments: 2) | marcellinator (Discussed changesets: 3) | Dag Marcel, Volgens mij staat alles oo de BAG adresnodes en zijn adressen intact gebleven. Of je een review kunt aanvragen in osmand ..geen idee. Mapse, eggie commented 2026-10-03 12:02:36 UTC by eggie ♦47,558 | |
| 189924403 (Comments: 2) | Dickstorm (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bedrijfsnaam toegevoegd commented 2026-10-03 11:49:49 UTC by eggie ♦47,558 | |
| 189910523 (Comments: 2) | antagonist_tz (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hallo, die Wege waren bereits mit access=private erfasst und damit korrekt. Ihre beschädigenden Änderungen wurden daher von mir soeben rückgängig gemacht. Es ist nicht das erste Mal, dass Sie hier Vandalismus betreib... commented 2026-10-03 11:49:39 UTC by Nakaner ♦3,280 | |
| 183942256 (Comments: 2) | ChrissW-R1 (Discussed changesets: 208) | Please check my new comment: https://osm.org/changeset/188544060#c1671067 commented 2026-10-03 11:48:24 UTC by ChrissW-R1 ♦451 | |
| 187762194 (Comments: 2) | ChrissW-R1 (Discussed changesets: 208) | Don't worry. You're welcome. commented 2026-10-03 11:47:18 UTC by ChrissW-R1 ♦451 | |
| 189732756 (Comments: 1) | C Batenburg (Discussed changesets: 53) | Dag C Batenburg, layer=-1 heb ik verwijderd. dat is niet correct. Wel covered=yes toegevoegd op de onderdoorgang. MVG eggie commented 2026-10-03 11:36:28 UTC by eggie ♦47,558 | |
| 173359469 (Comments: 1) | Andre Duc (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo Andre, durch dein "begradigen" hast du die neue Lage des Weges wieder in einen alten Zustand zurückversetzt. Luftbilder und GPS-Tracks sind grundsätzlich veraltet, und nur zu verwenden, wenn du dir wirklich sicher bist, d... commented 2026-10-03 11:32:43 UTC by fahrimwald ♦10 | |
| 187444276 (Comments: 1) | Fee2024 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hello! You used colour=braun on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/14042193918/history Have you maybe meant colour=brown ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some obje... commented 2026-10-03 11:30:12 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,230 | |
| 188951341 (Comments: 1) | Helper9 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! You used colour=braun on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9673072457/history Have you maybe meant colour=brown ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objec... commented 2026-10-03 11:30:04 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,230 | |
| 189918623 (Comments: 1) | Jurly (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-10-03 11:27:54 UTC by eggie ♦47,558 | |
| 188832197 (Comments: 3) | VELODB (Discussed changesets: 26) | Pour Enedis en majuscule, c'est corrigé :) Pour le tag substation, c'est plus compliqué mais faut avouer qu'on utilise en francais le mot distribution pour les postes de quartier donc c'est vrai que ça peut... commented 2026-10-03 11:27:39 UTC by jbcharron ♦195 | |
| 165783257 (Comments: 1) | JLOSM (Discussed changesets: 40) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/19078817/history type=boundary - right? commented 2026-10-03 11:18:28 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,230 | |
| 189793297 (Comments: 1) | Gerrist (Discussed changesets: 13) | Gerrist.. Altijd goed om zaken actueel te maken. We taggen geen motor_vehicle op motor_ways. MVG eggie commented 2026-10-03 11:15:37 UTC by eggie ♦47,558 | |
| 189849560 (Comments: 3) | benstyle (Discussed changesets: 1) | Danke für die Antwort! Willst Du das berichtigen, oder soll ich im Vorbeigehen mal drübersehen? Grüße 👋 Andreas commented 2026-10-03 11:15:05 UTC by Herwescheluc ♦208 | |
| 59270285 (Comments: 1) | Shamillah (Discussed changesets: 22) | Hello! You used waste=Domestic on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5641723282/history Have you maybe meant waste=household ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some ... commented 2026-10-03 11:06:19 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,230 | |
| 63611342 (Comments: 1) | Shamillah (Discussed changesets: 22) | Hello! You used waste=Domestic on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5993343960/history Have you maybe meant waste=household ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some ... commented 2026-10-03 11:06:17 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,230 | |
| 63641230 (Comments: 1) | Shamillah (Discussed changesets: 22) | Hello! You used waste=Domestic on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5995331798/history Have you maybe meant waste=household ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some ... commented 2026-10-03 11:06:13 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,230 | |
| 73622953 (Comments: 1) | Shamillah (Discussed changesets: 22) | Hello! You used waste=Domestic on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6735356085/history Have you maybe meant waste=household ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some ... commented 2026-10-03 11:04:55 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,230 | |
| 147003639 (Comments: 1) | aliensuperstar (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hello! You used waste=Domestic on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11580451013/history Have you maybe meant waste=household ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some... commented 2026-10-03 11:04:43 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,230 | |
| 189824169 (Comments: 1) | marcie43 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bedankt voor de toevoegingen. De verdieping is in Nederland echter geen onderdeel van het adres, dus de tag addr:floor=0 is incorrect. Ik heb deze verwijderd. commented 2026-10-03 10:53:26 UTC by A67-A67 ♦1,222 | |
| 189912165 (Comments: 1) | DoToDo (Discussed changesets: 10) | а зачем тут дубль адреса? commented 2026-10-03 10:49:13 UTC by literan ♦7,240 | |
| 189841792 (Comments: 3) | Interteutones (Discussed changesets: 89) | So früh am Morgen hätte ich mir einen Telrevert noch nicht zugetraut. Und neu einzeichnen wäre auch nicht einfach gewesen - wegen der ganzen Buslinien. Da bin ich lieber nach einer kurzen Nachricht an dich Frühstücken gegange... commented 2026-10-03 10:44:30 UTC by Senihtu ♦202 | |
| 189859108 (Comments: 1) | user_5359 (Discussed changesets: 430) | Hallo user_5359, du hast hier name:de= entfernt, obwohl ein name:en= gesetzt ist. Warum? Laut https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Multilingual_names#Repeating_name_with_language_specific_tag sollte entweder (falls es keinen "offiziellen&qu... commented 2026-10-03 10:30:49 UTC by JochenOSM ♦148 | |
| 189921232 (Comments: 1) | ChrissW-R1 (Discussed changesets: 208) | https://osm.wiki/31_Day_OSM_Challenge commented 2026-10-03 10:28:40 UTC by ChrissW-R1 ♦451 | |
| 189920586 (Comments: 1) | ChrissW-R1 (Discussed changesets: 208) | https://osm.wiki/wiki/31_Day_OSM_Challenge 2026-10-01 commented 2026-10-03 10:16:44 UTC by ChrissW-R1 ♦451 | |
| 189817241 (Comments: 2) | TheRadScientist (Discussed changesets: 2) | Przepraszam, cofnąłem zmianę i ustawiłem ją na pustą. To była szybka edycja, bo nie widzieliśmy Koliberek wśród innych sklepów. Został zaktualizowany o fixme, bo może być tam inny sklep. commented 2026-10-03 10:12:25 UTC by TheRadScientist ♦2 | |
| 179776498 (Comments: 3) | uprkos (Discussed changesets: 54) | no to jest pełnowymiarowa droga wyznakowana jako DDR commented 2026-10-03 10:11:58 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,230 | |
| 187680975 (Comments: 3) | javbw (Discussed changesets: 18) | oh, so that is what induces these w suffixes... not sure how iD can help to avoid them... and thanks also for all your mapping! commented 2026-10-03 10:10:29 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,230 | |
| 189594929 (Comments: 4) | LordBarracuda (Discussed changesets: 4) | Bedankt, Ik ga het bekijken. Sorry voor het ongemak. commented 2026-10-03 09:57:07 UTC by LordBarracuda ♦3 | |
| 189917531 (Comments: 3) | LordBarracuda (Discussed changesets: 4) | Denk dat het goed gaat omdat busroutes geen role hebben. commented 2026-10-03 09:54:28 UTC by eggie ♦47,558 | |
| 189377903 (Comments: 2) | Hans Jürgen von Lengerke (Discussed changesets: 5) | Also for this two levels have been built but building wasn't finished. I have sent you emails with imagery commented 2026-10-03 09:51:32 UTC by Hans Jürgen von Lengerke ♦4 | |
| 189148133 (Comments: 2) | Hans Jürgen von Lengerke (Discussed changesets: 5) | Two levels have been built commented 2026-10-03 09:38:09 UTC by Hans Jürgen von Lengerke ♦4 | |
| 189890716 (Comments: 1) | De C (Discussed changesets: 27) | `highway=` roads shouldn't have this `name=` commented 2026-10-03 09:25:25 UTC by Kovoschiz ♦3,062 | |
| 189015642 (Comments: 1) | cront (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hallo cront, Du hast sehr schmale 2.2m an einen sehr lanes Stück Weg getaggt. Zu den Luftbildern passt die Breite auch nicht überall. Für welches Stück wolltest du die 2.2 eintragen? Viele Grüße Metzor commented 2026-10-03 09:17:28 UTC by Metzor ♦426 | |
| 187516604 (Comments: 7) | JuanCarlos80 (Discussed changesets: 75) | Mich ärgert das extrem wenn das geändert wird denn die Radverkehrsführung an der Alverdissener Straße ist absolut nicht akzeptabel und ich versuche die zu vermeiden. Fängt außerorts irgendwo an (nicht da wo ausgeschil... commented 2026-10-03 09:08:44 UTC by removed_user ♦10 | |
| 187762885 (Comments: 3) | Sulfo (Discussed changesets: 27) | Jeg har nu tilføjet handicapparkeringsbåsene, som du nok prøvede at markere. :) commented 2026-10-03 09:01:00 UTC by Vi2727 ♦21 | |
| 189860727 (Comments: 6) | Hotel Riverside (Discussed changesets: 13) | Thanks for the quick response. 1. Sorry, I should have been more clear. You deleted this highway=path (trail) https://osm.org/way/458546306 while tagging this service road as access=no , in your most recent changeset I see you deleted it compl... commented 2026-10-03 08:59:26 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,232 | |
| 109976494 (Comments: 1) | \Mike (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hello! Can you take look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5552143 ? commented 2026-10-03 08:55:58 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,230 | |
| 188879878 (Comments: 2) | JTS51 (Discussed changesets: 39) | Dag mueschel, Bedankt voor jou reactie, ik heb de naam aangepast. Met vriendelijke groet, JTS51 commented 2026-10-03 08:33:36 UTC by JTS51 ♦7 | |
| 189861119 (Comments: 1) | Zuborg2012 (Discussed changesets: 2) | `place=` is reserved for organically grown locations not from `landuse=residential` estates. Shek Lei exists originally, and related to the villages. commented 2026-10-03 08:33:11 UTC by Kovoschiz ♦3,062 | |
| 189906461 (Comments: 1) | Mattyp231 (Discussed changesets: 15) | Generally you can add things from your first hand knowledge, or from compatible sources, and usually from primary sources, eg. the shop opening hours from their own website, but from other data or maps they would have some kind of copyright protectio... commented 2026-10-03 08:18:37 UTC by aharvey ♦2,007 | |
| 188550256 (Comments: 1) | popisdead (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello! You used bicycle=Yes on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/129129428/history Have you maybe meant bicycle=yes ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects w... commented 2026-10-03 08:16:41 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,230 | |
| 188550283 (Comments: 2) | popisdead (Discussed changesets: 2) | also, this edit is ot merely fixing names: more accurate edit description and mentioning source of your info would be nice commented 2026-10-03 08:16:37 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,230 | |
| 189910327 (Comments: 3) | Hotel Riverside (Discussed changesets: 13) | I'm not sure how either of these changes is intended to accomplish that? As mentioned, you tagged it as an (implicitly _public_) park, i.e. a feature explicitly intended for human use, rather than a natural area (that absent other tagging typica... commented 2026-10-03 08:13:34 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,232 | |
| 189906818 (Comments: 1) | Mattyp231 (Discussed changesets: 15) | If the changes are unrelated and span a large area then best to do two different changesets. A changeset ideally would be similar kinds of changes clumped together, or all your work in a small area. Further guidance at https://wiki.open... commented 2026-10-03 08:11:44 UTC by aharvey ♦2,007 | |
| 189912511 (Comments: 3) | Evgri (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hoi Emiel . Denk dat het zo ook duidelijker is. Dan zie je welke huisarts er praktijk houdt. Mochten er nog meer praktijken zitten dan kun je die op aparte nodes toevoegen. Als het gezondheidscentrum een aparte naam heeft kan deze natuurli... commented 2026-10-03 08:10:26 UTC by eggie ♦47,558 | |
| 174576682 (Comments: 1) | Railwayfan2005 (Discussed changesets: 47) | The node of the station should be unconnected according to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:railway=station#How_to_map. commented 2026-10-03 07:59:11 UTC by Davileci ♦145 | |
| 185034576 (Comments: 3) | mlody ghoul (Discussed changesets: 2) | To nadal nie uzasadnia kasowania wsześniejszych, powszechnie przyjętych i używanych w lokalnych mediach nazw. Mamy w OSM tagi name, old_name, alt_name, official_name i loc_name. W przypadku gdy obiekty są nowe, powinno wypełnić się możliwie w... commented 2026-10-03 07:58:10 UTC by VA00 ♦662 | |
| 47372193 (Comments: 1) | schoschi (Discussed changesets: 34) | Hello! You used climbing:rock=Gneis on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1462178030/history Have you maybe meant climbing:rock=gneiss ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I ed... commented 2026-10-03 07:56:41 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,230 | |
| 69408969 (Comments: 1) | schoschi (Discussed changesets: 34) | Hello! You used climbing:rock=Gneis on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/306505164/history Have you maybe meant climbing:rock=gneiss ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edi... commented 2026-10-03 07:56:37 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,230 | |
| 24606727 (Comments: 1) | schoschi (Discussed changesets: 34) | Hello! You used climbing:rock=Gneis on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/377003488/history Have you maybe meant climbing:rock=gneiss ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edi... commented 2026-10-03 07:56:31 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,230 | |
| 189798278 (Comments: 3) | fuck4ndyt0wns3nd (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks @fluffycupcakes commented 2026-10-03 07:42:37 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦7,039 | |
| 189872947 (Comments: 5) | Yog Sot (Discussed changesets: 125) | > Jak zmienisz unmarked na uncontrolled, to będzie źle. Nie, źle jest teraz. Przeczytaj co wcześniej zacytowałem z wiki na temat crossing=unmarked. Bardziej jasno tego napisać się już nie da. > Wex raz zbuduj dokumentacje,... commented 2026-10-03 07:40:14 UTC by YomanNH ♦546 | |
| 188600962 (Comments: 1) | wylie39 (Discussed changesets: 1) | have you wanted to mark it as closed? because if not, then this edit should be amended if yes - how you know it is closed? mentioning why you marked it as gone would help commented 2026-10-03 07:14:52 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,230 | |
| 189078580 (Comments: 1) | katzenfrett (Discussed changesets: 2) | is https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1181191597 also affected? commented 2026-10-03 07:13:21 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,230 | |
| 189912063 (Comments: 1) | Luca B (Discussed changesets: 1) | Il commento è rimasto quello dell'invio precedente per errore. Questo changeset contiene: due sentieri interni (vicoli ciechi), un cancello e la correzione di alcuni nodi di un sentiero esistente, da tracce GPS di un sopralluogo (andata e... commented 2026-10-03 07:08:07 UTC by Luca B ♦1 | |
| 189246701 (Comments: 4) | Mateusz Konieczny (Discussed changesets: 654) | pytania nie było wcale, bo edycja szła z CyclewayOverlay a gdyby było to by się o "cycleway" pytało bo mam telefon po angielsku a chodnik z dopuszczonym ruchem rowerowym przy wielkiej drodze jest infrastrukturą rowerową (cy... commented 2026-10-03 06:35:07 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,230 | |
| 176732524 (Comments: 1) | Marek-M (Discussed changesets: 207) | zerkniesz na https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5550333 ? commented 2026-10-03 06:34:41 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,230 | |
| 189749356 (Comments: 2) | KOUAKOU NATHANAEL (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi KOUAKOU NATHANAEL, this error still exits, can I get your feedback here? Gudio commented 2026-10-03 06:19:27 UTC by gscholz ♦3,003 | |
| 189552793 (Comments: 1) | Aravind Kilaru (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM. Please visit Andhra Pradesh page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Andhra_Pradesh) and join OSM Andhra Pradesh Telegram channel (https://t.me/osmandhra). --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA ... commented 2026-10-03 06:16:04 UTC by arjunaraoc ♦844 | |
| 189586612 (Comments: 1) | Vikas C (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM. Please visit Andhra Pradesh page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Andhra_Pradesh) and join OSM Andhra Pradesh Telegram channel (https://t.me/osmandhra). This software requires that I review everything as either good... commented 2026-10-03 06:15:25 UTC by arjunaraoc ♦844 | |
| 189653601 (Comments: 1) | ikerdz28 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM. Please visit Andhra Pradesh page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Andhra_Pradesh) and join OSM Andhra Pradesh Telegram channel (https://t.me/osmandhra). --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA ... commented 2026-10-03 06:12:20 UTC by arjunaraoc ♦844 | |
| 189900356 (Comments: 2) | crisb (Discussed changesets: 6) | Moin! Zu den Bussen kann ich leider nichts sagen. Die offizielle Meldung der Stadt ist nicht mehr verfügbar. Ich habe es aber vor Ort überprüft und die Regelung ist entsprechend des Bildes: https://www.instagram.com/p/DdwanMngYxO/ commented 2026-10-03 06:09:50 UTC by crisb ♦4 | |
| 189725495 (Comments: 1) | SriKodandaramaTempleKurabalakota (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM. Please visit Andhra Pradesh page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Andhra_Pradesh) and join OSM Andhra Pradesh Telegram channel (https://t.me/osmandhra). --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA ... commented 2026-10-03 06:08:27 UTC by arjunaraoc ♦844 | |
| 189654977 (Comments: 1) | yeábsirafl (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM. Please visit Andhra Pradesh page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Andhra_Pradesh) and join OSM Andhra Pradesh Telegram channel (https://t.me/osmandhra). This software requires that I review everything as either good... commented 2026-10-03 06:07:30 UTC by arjunaraoc ♦844 | |
| 189801989 (Comments: 1) | unknownmy2007 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM. Please visit Andhra Pradesh page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Andhra_Pradesh) and join OSM Andhra Pradesh Telegram channel (https://t.me/osmandhra). This software requires that I review everything as either good... commented 2026-10-03 06:05:56 UTC by arjunaraoc ♦844 | |
| 184360466 (Comments: 3) | PeeWee32 (Discussed changesets: 23) | Sorry voor de late reactie maar ... helemaal prima hoor. Ga je gang. commented 2026-10-03 05:57:02 UTC by PeeWee32 ♦45 | |
| 189860750 (Comments: 1) | Hotel Riverside (Discussed changesets: 13) | Again, as I already explained to you in changeset 189808074 and previous changesets, adding the name of a hotel to a natural=scrub area is not correct and is considered SEO spam. Therefore, reverted again in changeset 189909904 Again, if you d... commented 2026-10-03 05:48:36 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,232 | |
| 189850984 (Comments: 1) | Matias Nazareno Candeloro (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola, gracias por contribuir con OSM! Revisé los cambios. Estás etiquetando parcelas como si fueran edificios. Pensá que alguien quiere poder consultar la superficie edificada de Escobar y se va a llevar una sorpresa. Adem... commented 2026-10-03 05:42:20 UTC by caprieldeluca ♦167 | |
| 189859930 (Comments: 1) | Rmacaraig (Discussed changesets: 14) | First off, if you had good faith questions about this or believed your edits were correct, I'm not sure why you wouldn't simply reply saying so to my very first comment on your changesets a week ago, instead of only doing indirectly in a ch... commented 2026-10-03 05:36:26 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,232 | |
| 187841092 (Comments: 4) | lunar_jaws812 (Discussed changesets: 11) | Yes, I remember that sign, but my understanding is it bans pedestrians behind the sign (i.e., north of the sign), as pedestrians & cyclists are banned from the Sepulveda Boulevard tunnels. There are similar signs on northbound Sepulveda Boulevard... commented 2026-10-03 05:31:22 UTC by crushtheserpent ♦28 | |
| 189908775 (Comments: 1) | MarbleMax (Discussed changesets: 4) | Google map duomenų negalima niekaip naudoti, tai prilyginama vagystei su atitinkamomis pasekmėmis. Jei kažkas neaišku, visada geriau paklausti, o ne tiesiog belekaip beleką į duomenų bazę mėtyti ir taip daryti tik žalą. Atšauk... commented 2026-10-03 05:20:09 UTC by Tomas Straupis ♦2,133 | |
| 189900128 (Comments: 1) | MarbleMax (Discussed changesets: 4) | Šitą irgi atšaukiu, nes administraciniai ryšiai visiškai ne taip braižomi. Nubraižysiu Laumalenkos ribas. commented 2026-10-03 05:10:58 UTC by Tomas Straupis ♦2,133 | |
| 189897118 (Comments: 1) | MarbleMax (Discussed changesets: 4) | Laba diena. Administracinės ribos visiškai kitaip braižomos ir su iD redaktoriumi jų nubraižyti iš principo neįmanoma, tai visi šitie pakeitimai realiai gadina esamus duomenis. Reikia naudoti arba pilnavertį redaktorių JOS... commented 2026-10-03 05:06:28 UTC by Tomas Straupis ♦2,133 | |
| 189858673 (Comments: 1) | obst96 (Discussed changesets: 5) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/14241427541 https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/142414275 are these producing electricity directly? I am asking as generator:output:electricity=yes may have been added here by an iD bug, see https://git... commented 2026-10-03 05:03:47 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,230 | |
| 189906687 (Comments: 1) | Flap Slimy Outward (Discussed changesets: 302) | Dear Mapbox... Why on EARTH would you put HIGHWAY shields on BIKE trails? If ANY symbol should be rendered on top of bike trails, it should be the official shields (for example, those found on the ground) and NOT an arbitrary shield constructed in... commented 2026-10-03 04:58:39 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦378 | |
| 189612681 (Comments: 1) | Mattyp231 (Discussed changesets: 15) | regarding https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/54777951/history per https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle%20prefix the abandoned lifecycle prefix would be tagged as abandoned:highway=track ie. the key is abandoned:highway and the value is track.... commented 2026-10-03 04:39:06 UTC by aharvey ♦2,007 | |
| 189374980 (Comments: 1) | Mattyp231 (Discussed changesets: 15) | ps it looks like you're using the en-GB translations in iD, which is fine if that's your preference, but just wanted to make you aware there are also en-AU translations if you change your locale. So when you say update it to "pa... commented 2026-10-03 04:35:25 UTC by aharvey ♦2,007 | |
| 189472444 (Comments: 1) | Mattyp231 (Discussed changesets: 15) | See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Utilities_and_infrastructure#Ventilation_shafts Most are currently mapped as man_made=sewer_vent see https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/2xtA and for consistency I think that's... commented 2026-10-03 04:32:49 UTC by aharvey ♦2,007 | |
| 189472202 (Comments: 1) | Mattyp231 (Discussed changesets: 15) | Please see access=permit. In particular > As originally proposed, this tag should be used in cases where a permit is required, but is routinely granted to everyone requesting it. In cases where access to permit is obstructed it would be mor... commented 2026-10-03 04:25:43 UTC by aharvey ♦2,007 | |
| 189612765 (Comments: 2) | Mattyp231 (Discussed changesets: 15) | Reverted in changeset/189908570 commented 2026-10-03 04:15:49 UTC by aharvey ♦2,007 | |
| 188594369 (Comments: 1) | Mattyp231 (Discussed changesets: 15) | I've restored https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8242141793/history which was deleted. The node and tags represent the vacant shop, which I've confirmed still exists on the ground as a vacant shop. commented 2026-10-03 04:09:21 UTC by aharvey ♦2,007 | |
| 188553530 (Comments: 1) | Mattyp231 (Discussed changesets: 15) | Regarding https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1089800442/history given it doesn't occupy the whole building, it shouldn't be on the building way. The facility was already mapped at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13610563879/history. If yo... commented 2026-10-03 04:00:09 UTC by aharvey ♦2,007 | |
| 189631742 (Comments: 1) | PacifyUwU (Discussed changesets: 12) | Hi, I'm just letting you know that waterways and roads shouldn't share nodes. Thank you commented 2026-10-03 03:40:28 UTC by Solaris07 ♦39 | |
| 189865724 (Comments: 1) | Tungsten Electric (Discussed changesets: 2) | Spam commented 2026-10-03 03:33:09 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦7,039 | |
| 189865556 (Comments: 1) | Tungsten Electric (Discussed changesets: 2) | Spam commented 2026-10-03 03:32:59 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦7,039 | |
| 189907517 (Comments: 3) | yetanotherhiker (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks for the reply, its no problem! Thanks for the other updates you have been making! good stuff. Happy mapping! commented 2026-10-03 03:16:30 UTC by MassCartog ♦486 | |
| 189856663 (Comments: 2) | GorillaMunch (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello GorillaMunch, I have reverted your import as it was undiscussed and contained a number of issues. Imports require community discussion and approval, as they can be difficult to cleanup when done incorrectly. Your changes had a few issues, such ... commented 2026-10-03 02:52:48 UTC by Joel Koen ♦98 | |
| 189906098 (Comments: 1) | Flap Slimy Outward (Discussed changesets: 302) | So, Clark County GIS officially recognizes the segment between Stewart Avenue and Mesquite Avenue as "North Rue 13," even though street signs still refer to the thoroughfare as "North 13th Street." Which name should I use? I swear... commented 2026-10-03 01:30:52 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦378 | |
| 189894858 (Comments: 1) | Olaf56807R2 (Discussed changesets: 13) | Też nie wiem, co to w ogóle jest.... commented 2026-10-03 00:36:20 UTC by Adam Haba ♦43 | |
| 173467221 (Comments: 3) | mbeyerle (Discussed changesets: 49) | Thanks! commented 2026-10-02 23:58:56 UTC by Entbert ♦34 | |
| 122362505 (Comments: 4) | steerage250 (Discussed changesets: 15) | they were breathing when we were there (which was quite calm), but not blowing (need the right tides and swell) commented 2026-10-02 23:54:15 UTC by steerage250 ♦16 | |
| 189889016 (Comments: 1) | eerib (Discussed changesets: 106) | Well it comes up as imba2 on strava, which is easy/green. Hopefully strava realizes this inaccuracy and stops using osm data. commented 2026-10-02 23:39:09 UTC by Shinsplints ♦11 | |
| 189897661 (Comments: 1) | Samuel Cedeño (Discussed changesets: 1) | Revertido en https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189903985 commented 2026-10-02 23:23:38 UTC by caprieldeluca ♦167 | |
| 189903585 (Comments: 1) | anothergene (Discussed changesets: 3) | Other two changes have been requested to be backed out so I might as well get rid of this one too if I'm starting again. commented 2026-10-02 23:20:51 UTC by anothergene ♦3 | |
| 189902851 (Comments: 1) | anothergene (Discussed changesets: 3) | can this one be backed out too? I'd like to start from scratch before I mess too much up. commented 2026-10-02 23:19:59 UTC by anothergene ♦3 | |
| 188055774 (Comments: 2) | craghead (Discussed changesets: 19) | Hi. Unfortunately I am not in the area, and won't be for some time. Will check it out if I am back there. Thanks commented 2026-10-02 22:58:04 UTC by craghead ♦13 | |
| 189903028 (Comments: 1) | anothergene (Discussed changesets: 3) | I moved my street before I realized it was an image alignment issue. Can someone please refer this change. please and thanks. commented 2026-10-02 22:49:20 UTC by anothergene ♦3 | |
| 184653204 (Comments: 2) | JULESD15 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Pour Chronopost, il s'agit bien d'une plateforme postale et non d'un bureau de poste. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:amenity%3Dpost_depot commented 2026-10-02 22:42:12 UTC by gendy54 ♦614 | |
| 189851283 (Comments: 2) | Akiba220 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Ok will do in future. commented 2026-10-02 22:36:23 UTC by Akiba220 ♦5 | |
| 189901487 (Comments: 1) | Bienenhof Keil (Discussed changesets: 1) | . commented 2026-10-02 21:44:27 UTC by Bienenhof Keil ♦1 | |
| 189883203 (Comments: 1) | rromitr (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hola. Esa no es la ruta S-285. Es conocida por ese nombre? salu2 --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/189883203 commented 2026-10-02 21:38:14 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦3,437 | |
| 66075213 (Comments: 1) | Maya Georgieva (Discussed changesets: 1) | Здравейте Мая, Благодаря за вашите промени в селото! Там където сте отбелязали читалището, само читалището ли се помещава? Питам, ... commented 2026-10-02 21:34:54 UTC by Dimitar155 ♦1,052 | |
| 187400049 (Comments: 1) | jakecopp (Discussed changesets: 49) | Hi, did you forget to add tags to way/1549423380? It has no tags at all. commented 2026-10-02 21:24:58 UTC by Vi2727 ♦21 | |
| 189893996 (Comments: 3) | Gregory Bednov (Discussed changesets: 7) | Поправил, спасибо за замечания! С английскмм немного сбил с толку плейсхолдер в iD-е, где на русском написано. Обычно заполняю с SCEE, поэтомÑ... commented 2026-10-02 21:18:01 UTC by Gregory Bednov ♦3 | |
| 189713531 (Comments: 1) | Kyle Joseph Eriksen Buchanan (Discussed changesets: 2) | The location is in the middle of the building? Can you please review this. It looks a bit suspicious. commented 2026-10-02 21:17:27 UTC by FreshlyTweezed ♦11 | |
| 189899575 (Comments: 2) | limes11 (Discussed changesets: 60) | Kein Problem! commented 2026-10-02 21:17:01 UTC by limes11 ♦1,117 | |
| 189900523 (Comments: 1) | CatFitness (Discussed changesets: 6) | Added wetland areas as well. commented 2026-10-02 21:13:32 UTC by CatFitness ♦4 | |
| 185453064 (Comments: 1) | PedestrianMapping_StealthMapper (Discussed changesets: 7) | No crossing exists like the one added in this changeset: way 1537092741 commented 2026-10-02 21:13:04 UTC by FreshlyTweezed ♦11 | |
| 189665545 (Comments: 1) | Kyle Joseph Eriksen Buchanan (Discussed changesets: 2) | The operator is Home Depot? Can you please review this. It looks a bit suspicious. commented 2026-10-02 20:58:33 UTC by FreshlyTweezed ♦11 | |
| 189823061 (Comments: 1) | PetrazzoPaola (Discussed changesets: 6) | attenzione che nel tag name sarebbe meglio mettere il nome della via esattamente come quanto già presente nella viabilità mappata, ovvero Via Valcanale (V maiuscola) --- Published using OSMC... commented 2026-10-02 20:41:09 UTC by fabiotofy ♦338 | |
| 189090237 (Comments: 2) | Bienson (Discussed changesets: 38) | Hallo Bienson, es wäre für andere Mapper sehr hilfreich, wenn du aussagekräftigere Changeset-Kommentare verwenden würdest als nur „Korrekturen“ – ich nehme an, die hiesigen Änderungen beziehen sich auf di... commented 2026-10-02 20:40:36 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,889 | |
| 185623681 (Comments: 1) | fintler (Discussed changesets: 14) | If you're not sure of the shape of a building, it's better to use a building node than to guess the shape or make one up. If you are tracing from imagery, please use the "square" function (shortcut Q) to make sure that the corners... commented 2026-10-02 20:33:54 UTC by impiaaa ♦499 | |
| 189888931 (Comments: 1) | Sahand913 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Review needed. commented 2026-10-02 20:33:41 UTC by Xoheil ♦3 | |
| 189882505 (Comments: 1) | fintler (Discussed changesets: 14) | Please only mark roads as open if you're sure they're open right now. We don't want any apps telling users to drive down roads with still wet asphalt! commented 2026-10-02 20:32:28 UTC by impiaaa ♦499 | |
| 189848309 (Comments: 4) | Karsten Natebus (Discussed changesets: 20) | Dann wäre eher access=private passender. Der Bauer darf ja auf sein Feld. commented 2026-10-02 20:27:07 UTC by martinst ♦419 | |
| 181251238 (Comments: 2) | BDGAS (Discussed changesets: 2) | je peux comprendre votre argumentation, mais la suppression d'une voie dans chaque sens et la réduction de vitesse imposée par l'état de la route nécessitent temporairement le changement de classement, En raison ... commented 2026-10-02 20:25:06 UTC by BDGAS ♦1 | |
| 189898453 (Comments: 1) | JackIV_ (Discussed changesets: 1) | I am fairly new to this, but do intend to do a semi-thorough updating of local businesses around town in the coming months, so any tips and advice is greatly appreciated. commented 2026-10-02 20:20:16 UTC by JackIV_ ♦1 | |
| 189877038 (Comments: 9) | YomanNH (Discussed changesets: 69) | Nie no, te wszystkie trzy konta są moje i sam najpierw robię wandalizm, a potem z dwóch swoich kont sobie do siebie piszę xddddd commented 2026-10-02 20:14:05 UTC by db-ak ♦87 | |
| 189664482 (Comments: 2) | Binky Bunny (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hello Dave Thanks for the info. I'll get those updated. I think I was misled by the editor UI commented 2026-10-02 20:13:09 UTC by Binky Bunny ♦4 | |
| 189895021 (Comments: 1) | WebStudio Neururer (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo WebStudio Neururer, willkommen in OSM. Bitte beachte, dass OSM kein Ort für SEO wie in der hinzugefügten description ist. ist: Siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Spam#SEO_Spam. Deshalb geändert in https://www.openst... commented 2026-10-02 20:07:43 UTC by cowboyxup ♦41 | |
| 189763762 (Comments: 1) | edorigon (Discussed changesets: 2) | In Italia si preferisce mettere l'indirizzo su un nodo separato (e anzi qui vedo che c'è già, quindi non andava messo). Più dettagli sulla pagina della wiki in particolare a https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Addres... commented 2026-10-02 19:57:49 UTC by Gicorada ♦12 | |
| 189897584 (Comments: 1) | woodpeck (Discussed changesets: 132) | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 189888456, 189891106, 189891109, 189891110, 189891112, 189891116, 189891118, 189891119, 189891126, 189891128, 189891515, 189891517, 189891519, 189891521, 189891524, 189891526, 189891527, 189... commented 2026-10-02 19:55:29 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,455 | |
| 189896687 (Comments: 1) | Zhen Sun (Discussed changesets: 52) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189897584 where the changeset comment is: revert automated edits made without prior discussion, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21377 commented 2026-10-02 19:55:28 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,455 | |
| 189891526 (Comments: 1) | Zhen Sun (Discussed changesets: 52) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189897584 where the changeset comment is: revert automated edits made without prior discussion, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21377 commented 2026-10-02 19:55:28 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,455 | |
| 189891126 (Comments: 1) | Zhen Sun (Discussed changesets: 52) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189897584 where the changeset comment is: revert automated edits made without prior discussion, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21377 commented 2026-10-02 19:55:28 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,455 | |
| 189891537 (Comments: 1) | Zhen Sun (Discussed changesets: 52) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189897584 where the changeset comment is: revert automated edits made without prior discussion, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21377 commented 2026-10-02 19:55:28 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,455 | |
| 189891542 (Comments: 1) | Zhen Sun (Discussed changesets: 52) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189897584 where the changeset comment is: revert automated edits made without prior discussion, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21377 commented 2026-10-02 19:55:28 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,455 | |
| 189896670 (Comments: 1) | Zhen Sun (Discussed changesets: 52) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189897584 where the changeset comment is: revert automated edits made without prior discussion, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21377 commented 2026-10-02 19:55:28 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,455 | |
| 189896662 (Comments: 1) | Zhen Sun (Discussed changesets: 52) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189897584 where the changeset comment is: revert automated edits made without prior discussion, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21377 commented 2026-10-02 19:55:27 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,455 | |
| 189891118 (Comments: 1) | Zhen Sun (Discussed changesets: 52) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189897584 where the changeset comment is: revert automated edits made without prior discussion, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21377 commented 2026-10-02 19:55:27 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,455 | |
| 189896684 (Comments: 1) | Zhen Sun (Discussed changesets: 52) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189897584 where the changeset comment is: revert automated edits made without prior discussion, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21377 commented 2026-10-02 19:55:27 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,455 | |
| 189891517 (Comments: 1) | Zhen Sun (Discussed changesets: 52) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189897584 where the changeset comment is: revert automated edits made without prior discussion, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21377 commented 2026-10-02 19:55:27 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,455 | |
| 189896685 (Comments: 1) | Zhen Sun (Discussed changesets: 52) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189897584 where the changeset comment is: revert automated edits made without prior discussion, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21377 commented 2026-10-02 19:55:27 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,455 | |
| 189891515 (Comments: 1) | Zhen Sun (Discussed changesets: 52) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189897584 where the changeset comment is: revert automated edits made without prior discussion, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21377 commented 2026-10-02 19:55:26 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,455 | |
| 189896656 (Comments: 1) | Zhen Sun (Discussed changesets: 52) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189897584 where the changeset comment is: revert automated edits made without prior discussion, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21377 commented 2026-10-02 19:55:26 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,455 | |
| 189891519 (Comments: 1) | Zhen Sun (Discussed changesets: 52) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189897584 where the changeset comment is: revert automated edits made without prior discussion, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21377 commented 2026-10-02 19:55:26 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,455 | |
| 189896676 (Comments: 1) | Zhen Sun (Discussed changesets: 52) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189897584 where the changeset comment is: revert automated edits made without prior discussion, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21377 commented 2026-10-02 19:55:26 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,455 | |
| 189891543 (Comments: 1) | Zhen Sun (Discussed changesets: 52) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189897584 where the changeset comment is: revert automated edits made without prior discussion, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21377 commented 2026-10-02 19:55:26 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,455 | |
| 189891109 (Comments: 1) | Zhen Sun (Discussed changesets: 52) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189897584 where the changeset comment is: revert automated edits made without prior discussion, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21377 commented 2026-10-02 19:55:25 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,455 | |
| 189896663 (Comments: 1) | Zhen Sun (Discussed changesets: 52) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189897584 where the changeset comment is: revert automated edits made without prior discussion, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21377 commented 2026-10-02 19:55:25 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,455 | |
| 189891119 (Comments: 1) | Zhen Sun (Discussed changesets: 52) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189897584 where the changeset comment is: revert automated edits made without prior discussion, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21377 commented 2026-10-02 19:55:25 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,455 | |
| 189891539 (Comments: 1) | Zhen Sun (Discussed changesets: 52) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189897584 where the changeset comment is: revert automated edits made without prior discussion, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21377 commented 2026-10-02 19:55:25 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,455 | |
| 189891534 (Comments: 1) | Zhen Sun (Discussed changesets: 52) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189897584 where the changeset comment is: revert automated edits made without prior discussion, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21377 commented 2026-10-02 19:55:25 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,455 | |
| 189896677 (Comments: 1) | Zhen Sun (Discussed changesets: 52) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189897584 where the changeset comment is: revert automated edits made without prior discussion, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21377 commented 2026-10-02 19:55:24 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,455 | |
| 189896673 (Comments: 1) | Zhen Sun (Discussed changesets: 52) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189897584 where the changeset comment is: revert automated edits made without prior discussion, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21377 commented 2026-10-02 19:55:24 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,455 | |
| 189896667 (Comments: 1) | Zhen Sun (Discussed changesets: 52) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189897584 where the changeset comment is: revert automated edits made without prior discussion, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21377 commented 2026-10-02 19:55:24 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,455 | |
| 189896680 (Comments: 1) | Zhen Sun (Discussed changesets: 52) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189897584 where the changeset comment is: revert automated edits made without prior discussion, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21377 commented 2026-10-02 19:55:24 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,455 | |
| 189896682 (Comments: 1) | Zhen Sun (Discussed changesets: 52) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189897584 where the changeset comment is: revert automated edits made without prior discussion, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21377 commented 2026-10-02 19:55:24 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,455 | |
| 189891524 (Comments: 1) | Zhen Sun (Discussed changesets: 52) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189897584 where the changeset comment is: revert automated edits made without prior discussion, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21377 commented 2026-10-02 19:55:24 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,455 | |
| 189891110 (Comments: 1) | Zhen Sun (Discussed changesets: 52) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189897584 where the changeset comment is: revert automated edits made without prior discussion, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21377 commented 2026-10-02 19:55:23 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,455 | |
| 189891530 (Comments: 1) | Zhen Sun (Discussed changesets: 52) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189897584 where the changeset comment is: revert automated edits made without prior discussion, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21377 commented 2026-10-02 19:55:23 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,455 | |
| 189891529 (Comments: 1) | Zhen Sun (Discussed changesets: 52) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189897584 where the changeset comment is: revert automated edits made without prior discussion, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21377 commented 2026-10-02 19:55:23 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,455 | |
| 189891112 (Comments: 1) | Zhen Sun (Discussed changesets: 52) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189897584 where the changeset comment is: revert automated edits made without prior discussion, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21377 commented 2026-10-02 19:55:23 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,455 | |
| 189891541 (Comments: 1) | Zhen Sun (Discussed changesets: 52) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189897584 where the changeset comment is: revert automated edits made without prior discussion, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21377 commented 2026-10-02 19:55:23 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,455 | |
| 189896678 (Comments: 1) | Zhen Sun (Discussed changesets: 52) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189897584 where the changeset comment is: revert automated edits made without prior discussion, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21377 commented 2026-10-02 19:55:22 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,455 | |
| 189891532 (Comments: 1) | Zhen Sun (Discussed changesets: 52) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189897584 where the changeset comment is: revert automated edits made without prior discussion, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21377 commented 2026-10-02 19:55:22 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,455 | |
| 189891128 (Comments: 1) | Zhen Sun (Discussed changesets: 52) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189897584 where the changeset comment is: revert automated edits made without prior discussion, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21377 commented 2026-10-02 19:55:22 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,455 | |
| 189896658 (Comments: 1) | Zhen Sun (Discussed changesets: 52) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189897584 where the changeset comment is: revert automated edits made without prior discussion, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21377 commented 2026-10-02 19:55:22 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,455 | |
| 189891106 (Comments: 1) | Zhen Sun (Discussed changesets: 52) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189897584 where the changeset comment is: revert automated edits made without prior discussion, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21377 commented 2026-10-02 19:55:21 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,455 | |
| 189891527 (Comments: 1) | Zhen Sun (Discussed changesets: 52) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189897584 where the changeset comment is: revert automated edits made without prior discussion, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21377 commented 2026-10-02 19:55:21 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,455 | |
| 189888456 (Comments: 1) | Zhen Sun (Discussed changesets: 52) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189897584 where the changeset comment is: revert automated edits made without prior discussion, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21377 commented 2026-10-02 19:55:21 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,455 | |
| 189891536 (Comments: 1) | Zhen Sun (Discussed changesets: 52) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189897584 where the changeset comment is: revert automated edits made without prior discussion, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21377 commented 2026-10-02 19:55:20 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,455 | |
| 189891116 (Comments: 1) | Zhen Sun (Discussed changesets: 52) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189897584 where the changeset comment is: revert automated edits made without prior discussion, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21377 commented 2026-10-02 19:55:20 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,455 | |
| 189896665 (Comments: 1) | Zhen Sun (Discussed changesets: 52) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189897584 where the changeset comment is: revert automated edits made without prior discussion, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21377 commented 2026-10-02 19:55:20 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,455 | |
| 189891521 (Comments: 1) | Zhen Sun (Discussed changesets: 52) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189897584 where the changeset comment is: revert automated edits made without prior discussion, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21377 commented 2026-10-02 19:55:20 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,455 | |
| 189896674 (Comments: 1) | Zhen Sun (Discussed changesets: 52) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189897584 where the changeset comment is: revert automated edits made without prior discussion, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21377 commented 2026-10-02 19:55:19 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,455 | |
| 189896655 (Comments: 1) | Zhen Sun (Discussed changesets: 52) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189897584 where the changeset comment is: revert automated edits made without prior discussion, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21377 commented 2026-10-02 19:55:19 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,455 | |
| 189896675 (Comments: 1) | Zhen Sun (Discussed changesets: 52) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189897584 where the changeset comment is: revert automated edits made without prior discussion, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21377 commented 2026-10-02 19:55:19 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,455 | |
| 189896669 (Comments: 1) | Zhen Sun (Discussed changesets: 52) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189897584 where the changeset comment is: revert automated edits made without prior discussion, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21377 commented 2026-10-02 19:55:19 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,455 | |
| 189896664 (Comments: 1) | Zhen Sun (Discussed changesets: 52) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189897584 where the changeset comment is: revert automated edits made without prior discussion, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21377 commented 2026-10-02 19:55:18 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,455 | |
| 189891528 (Comments: 1) | Zhen Sun (Discussed changesets: 52) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189897584 where the changeset comment is: revert automated edits made without prior discussion, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21377 commented 2026-10-02 19:55:18 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,455 | |
| 189896659 (Comments: 1) | Zhen Sun (Discussed changesets: 52) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189897584 where the changeset comment is: revert automated edits made without prior discussion, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21377 commented 2026-10-02 19:55:18 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,455 | |
| 189891533 (Comments: 1) | Zhen Sun (Discussed changesets: 52) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189897584 where the changeset comment is: revert automated edits made without prior discussion, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21377 commented 2026-10-02 19:55:17 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,455 | |
| 189888200 (Comments: 1) | edorigon (Discussed changesets: 2) | La modifica in sé non è sbagliata, ma in casi come questo generalmente si cerca di mantenere lo stesso nodo spostandolo, in modo da preservare la cronologia dell'elemento (non che qui ci fosse molto, visto che l'hai creato tu ... commented 2026-10-02 19:54:37 UTC by Gicorada ♦12 | |
| 189897156 (Comments: 1) | Pedro Souza Costa Maps (Discussed changesets: 91) | Esse trecho da RJ-104 onde foi alterado a velocidade máxima, tem mais placas indicando 50 km/h e algumas de 40 km/h do que 60 km/h commented 2026-10-02 19:45:46 UTC by Pedro Souza Costa Maps ♦97 | |
| 189890596 (Comments: 1) | Editex (Discussed changesets: 2) | This is not the correct way to map a turning circle https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dturning_circle commented 2026-10-02 19:36:38 UTC by MikeN ♦373 | |
| 189879653 (Comments: 3) | Yog Sot (Discussed changesets: 125) | Zachęcam w takim razie do opisania swojego pomysłu na mapowanie niezgodnie z dokumentacją na forum. commented 2026-10-02 19:31:10 UTC by YomanNH ♦546 | |
| 189718546 (Comments: 1) | alter_stromer (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hey, danke für deinen Beitrag. Bist du sicher, dass die Referenz zum Neuen Schloss komplett irrelevant ist? Laut diesem Wikipedia Eintrag (https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liste_der_Baudenkm%C3%A4ler_in_Niederwerrn#Baudenkm%C3%A4le... commented 2026-10-02 19:29:20 UTC by sy_ossfin ♦7 | |
| 189774886 (Comments: 1) | Местный механик (Discussed changesets: 1) | Привет. Вижу, вы создали несколько почтовых ящиков. Пожалуйста, уточните - это почтовые ящики частных лиц, для получения почты? Если да, то... commented 2026-10-02 19:24:36 UTC by Takuto ♦57 | |
| 189891205 (Comments: 1) | eric57890 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi there again. Please note it's best practice to modify existing geometry, like buildings or parking lots, if you're just tweaking them, not deleting them entirely. That's because it preserves the history of object modifications and t... commented 2026-10-02 19:22:11 UTC by willkmis ♦233 | |
| 189888362 (Comments: 1) | ATROXUS (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hallo, das sidewalk:left=no sidewalk:right=lane war richtig. StreetComplete stellt hier leider die Frage falsch, siehe https://github.com/streetcomplete/StreetComplete/issues/7206 Viele Grüße commented 2026-10-02 19:17:14 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,663 | |
| 189869356 (Comments: 12) | maarten sijmkens (Discussed changesets: 1) | Maarten...De melding is in goede orde ontvangen en het streven is binnen 10 werkdagen met een oplossing te komen. Ik durf er wel een cent om te verwedden dat het antwoord zal zijn. 'Er is daar geen eenrichtingsverkeer.. pas na 50 m.... en ... commented 2026-10-02 19:11:05 UTC by eggie ♦47,558 | |
| 165815946 (Comments: 4) | Le_Cartographe (Discussed changesets: 2) | Oh intéressant, je note ! Merci :) commented 2026-10-02 18:42:02 UTC by Le_Cartographe ♦3 | |
| 189891776 (Comments: 1) | Asa Foreman (Discussed changesets: 4) | Generally we don't classify streets within a residential=trailer_park as highway=residential. Those are typically highway=service unless they are named and part of mailing addresses. commented 2026-10-02 18:39:30 UTC by JuanElDemografo ♦45 | |
| 180590727 (Comments: 1) | rems25 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour, Les voies de service privées ne sont pas a supprimer mais doivent être qualifiées avec le tag access=private Jean-Baptiste commented 2026-10-02 18:34:26 UTC by jbcharron ♦195 | |
| 189776564 (Comments: 2) | Oxeelix (Discussed changesets: 20) | Thanks for touching up the area, I didn't even realise there was another alley there, was speeding through that note. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1681744377 this node looks like a gate alright judging by https://www.mapillary.com/... commented 2026-10-02 18:32:26 UTC by Oxeelix ♦13 | |
| 189893594 (Comments: 1) | cswilson252 (Discussed changesets: 5) | *Willowbrook commented 2026-10-02 18:19:41 UTC by cswilson252 ♦29 | |
| 189872470 (Comments: 1) | fb552 (Discussed changesets: 15) | Ho notato un problemino nel changeset, gli attraversamenti sono stati aggiunti come nodi non attaccati alla strada, inoltre esistevano già; volevo solo avvisarti, arrivederci. Buona serata commented 2026-10-02 18:16:34 UTC by davide020382 ♦9 | |
| 189893220 (Comments: 1) | Koreller (Discussed changesets: 23) | #31DayOSMChallenge #Maptober #Maptober2026 #OpenStreetMap commented 2026-10-02 18:15:24 UTC by Koreller ♦67 | |
| 177714016 (Comments: 6) | gt2 (Discussed changesets: 8) | Danke. MfG commented 2026-10-02 18:11:57 UTC by gt2 ♦6 | |
| 188880062 (Comments: 3) | Meeliz (Discussed changesets: 6) | Ok, I'll do that. I didn't notice the 'description', but the typical tag would be 'direction'. commented 2026-10-02 18:11:27 UTC by mueschel ♦7,392 | |
| 189815304 (Comments: 3) | efolgado (Discussed changesets: 3) | Buenas, la área residencial la dejaría como está, ya que los entornos son residenciales y la etiqueta landuse no tiene alternativas claras para hoteles. Aquí tienes un ejemplo en el recinto hotelero de Santa Susanna (todo ... commented 2026-10-02 18:08:59 UTC by marcmarti ♦114 | |
| 189867019 (Comments: 4) | Elenainciviel (Discussed changesets: 2) | Voorgaande steiger heb ik verwijderd. Gr eggie commented 2026-10-02 17:58:54 UTC by eggie ♦47,558 | |
| 189887006 (Comments: 1) | Viorel-Cătălin Răpițeanu (Discussed changesets: 2) | Salut . Nu mai repozitiona cladiri dupa Bing. La pozitionezi eronat. Imaginile Bing sunt foarte vechi si nu sunt pozitiuonate corect. Foloseste te rog ESRI Standard. commented 2026-10-02 17:58:47 UTC by rarad74 ♦580 | |
| 189888045 (Comments: 1) | ab058 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-10-02 17:55:55 UTC by eggie ♦47,558 | |
| 189877605 (Comments: 1) | LindyLearn (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-10-02 17:55:03 UTC by eggie ♦47,558 | |
| 158023426 (Comments: 2) | gpetz (Discussed changesets: 3) | I reverted as the speed limit increase done in this changeset does not exist on the ground.. :( https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189892338 commented 2026-10-02 17:53:50 UTC by cswilson252 ♦29 | |
| 189800692 (Comments: 2) | LordGarySugar (Discussed changesets: 58) | No problem 🙏 commented 2026-10-02 17:44:56 UTC by LordGarySugar ♦399 | |
| 189837846 (Comments: 4) | mapperue (Discussed changesets: 326) | V nejbližší době se k tomu nedostanu. Pokud máš zájem, můžeš pokračovat. commented 2026-10-02 17:44:10 UTC by mapperue ♦249 | |
| 189442344 (Comments: 1) | HAM-OST1 (Discussed changesets: 1) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5550973 commented 2026-10-02 17:35:21 UTC by Bienson ♦660 | |
| 189881589 (Comments: 1) | cyberatlas (Discussed changesets: 116) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189891048#map=14/50.17473/22.09176 troszkę błędów (tzn: np: highway=motorway zamiast linka znalazłem) rzecz jasna już poprawionych, pozdrawiam commented 2026-10-02 17:26:01 UTC by gavekk ♦9 | |
| 189838260 (Comments: 2) | eric57890 (Discussed changesets: 2) | That was my mistake. I will readd it now, because it is indeed a residential area. commented 2026-10-02 17:09:57 UTC by eric57890 ♦1 | |
| 179172400 (Comments: 2) | Heidutzek Tim (Discussed changesets: 3) | Keine Antwort ist auch eine Antwort. Habe die "alpine_hut" gelöscht, da die Hütte nicht die Kriterien erfüllt commented 2026-10-02 17:08:21 UTC by Andreas Binder ♦266 | |
| 166209919 (Comments: 2) | Valario127 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hello, Mateusz Konieczny. Please check this comment: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171241323#c1635083 commented 2026-10-02 16:47:07 UTC by Valario127 ♦7 | |
| 189067799 (Comments: 1) | dblanzac (Discussed changesets: 6) | Bonjour dblanzac, Merci pour ta contribution ! Je me permets de te contacter au sujet de ce projet : aurais-tu des informations sur un éventuel démarrage des travaux prochainement ? Le projet date maintenant de presque 10 ... commented 2026-10-02 16:45:44 UTC by PikaMap ♦9 | |
| 189888927 (Comments: 1) | Norbert Dichter (Discussed changesets: 31) | corrected after reviewing the photo taken in front of the Volksbank entrance p.s. closed a quest: The ATM in entrance room is available from 5:00 - 24:00 --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.... commented 2026-10-02 16:39:32 UTC by Norbert Dichter ♦210 | |
| 57053913 (Comments: 2) | Borisy (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello! Thanks for the comments; yes, you guessed right—I meant "logistics." I was just starting out on OSM back then, so I might have left a few things out. commented 2026-10-02 16:33:52 UTC by Borisy ♦4 | |
| 189600096 (Comments: 5) | Gigiliusz (Discussed changesets: 4) | Dzięki! commented 2026-10-02 16:31:30 UTC by NieWnen ♦1,498 | |
| 189624323 (Comments: 1) | Bartek444 (Discussed changesets: 92) | Będzie dobudowana pętla autobusowa https://dziennikpolski24.pl/w-nowej-hucie-w-krakowie-zbuduja-petle-autobusowa-przy-stacji-koscielniki/ar/c1p2-29403773 commented 2026-10-02 16:19:23 UTC by Bartek444 ♦74 | |
| 189755661 (Comments: 5) | World_Winner (Discussed changesets: 42) | Hi MrAnderson. Yeah, having both is unnecessary. Thanks for catching this, also for cleaning up the restriction. I kept the lane level tag and removed the other. Happy mapping! commented 2026-10-02 16:10:57 UTC by World_Winner ♦100 | |
| 189857607 (Comments: 1) | Cartographearth (Discussed changesets: 4) | names should not be descriptions, aka adding name=camera to an ALPR is incorrect, for more info see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions for more info. Happy mapping, Udar commented 2026-10-02 16:04:55 UTC by Udarian ♦960 | |
| 189703218 (Comments: 1) | SuperNova66 (Discussed changesets: 1) | FYI, you did two almost identical fairways on top of each other here. Can you clean up the duplication? commented 2026-10-02 15:58:18 UTC by b-jazz ♦959 | |
| 189598815 (Comments: 1) | DerKaiserschmarren (Discussed changesets: 57) | Der Vollständigkeit halber sei erwähnt: Die Survey wurde nur im Rahmen der Veranstaltung von OpenHouse gemacht jedoch bin ich unabhängig von dieser. Ich mappe im Innenraum bewusst nur die Teile die zu Zeitpunkt der Survey... commented 2026-10-02 15:51:53 UTC by DerKaiserschmarren ♦79 | |
| 189701099 (Comments: 1) | iszulik101 (Discussed changesets: 3) | RE: http://osm.org/way/1563328633 Please don't use the "lollipop" style of mapping golf course elements as you've done in the URL above. You need to create proper multipolygon relations in order to map features like roughs/... commented 2026-10-02 15:44:06 UTC by b-jazz ♦959 | |
| 133329075 (Comments: 3) | rubasov (Discussed changesets: 7) | szia! köszi a gyors választ! egyrészt igazad van és a térkép akkor hasznos, ha leírja a környezetet. viszont úgy tapasztaltam, hogy sok más túrázós app is innen ve... commented 2026-10-02 15:43:16 UTC by norbijuzer ♦1 | |
| 189097611 (Comments: 1) | Dumbaz (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo Dumbaz! Schöner Username ... :-) An dieser crossing https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9227631433 hast du kürzlich tactile_paving=no gesetzt. Stimmt aber nicht. Da hatte ich bereits 2023 (weiterhin korrekt) tactil... commented 2026-10-02 15:36:49 UTC by goodidea ♦159 | |
| 189706543 (Comments: 1) | iszulik101 (Discussed changesets: 3) | When drawing golf course areas (i.e. greens, fairways, bunkers, tees, etc.), please be aware that the ways (lines) used to outline those areas must not cross over each other. Fairway outlines shouldn't cross over greens or bunkers or other fairw... commented 2026-10-02 15:29:41 UTC by b-jazz ♦959 | |
| 189842971 (Comments: 1) | nichtmatze (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo und Willkommen bei osm, Danke für Deine Anpassung. An der Ludwig-Gall-Str. hängt ein access=private, das erscheint mir recht unwahrscheinlich. Welche Beschilderung gibt es hier ? Grüße, L... commented 2026-10-02 15:26:22 UTC by limes11 ♦1,117 | |
| 187776033 (Comments: 1) | Brian Bergstrom (Discussed changesets: 1) | These small buildings you mapped are actually verandah roofs, so they should be combined with the main building rather than mapped as separate buildings. commented 2026-10-02 15:22:14 UTC by FajrAl ♦892 | |
| 184753998 (Comments: 3) | mini-me (Discussed changesets: 52) | Спасибо commented 2026-10-02 15:17:10 UTC by Dacha2 ♦8 | |
| 189880673 (Comments: 1) | danielatak (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hej, Adresseoplysninger på POI'er bruges ikke, de findes kun på importerede punkter. Description feltet må ikke bruges til reklame. Dine POI'er er rettet. commented 2026-10-02 15:13:50 UTC by osmviborg ♦1,932 | |
| 187783902 (Comments: 1) | perfect liapa (Discussed changesets: 2) | There are still unmapped buildings. And please use the custom imagery, not the Bing one. commented 2026-10-02 15:11:40 UTC by FajrAl ♦892 | |
| 189845425 (Comments: 4) | Meesch (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hoi.. Wanneer je schuift en je hebt onbedoeld een node geselecteerd.. bv een hoekje van de landuse en je schuit dan.. dan verplaats je niet de kaart maar dat hoekje. In iD gebruik je de linker muisknop voor selectie.. maar dus ook voor schuiven... commented 2026-10-02 14:48:58 UTC by eggie ♦47,558 | |
| 177290917 (Comments: 1) | Herr Bause (Discussed changesets: 10) | Hi, in einem offenen Hinweis geht es gerade um ein kleines Wegstück, das in dieser Änderung kartiert wurde. Ich lade gerne ein, dein Wissen dort einzubringen: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5307019 commented 2026-10-02 14:43:45 UTC by KartKollektor ♦55 | |
| 189810407 (Comments: 1) | Grandasse (Discussed changesets: 6) | Bonjour, merci de lire cette page wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Adresses#A_quoi_sert_une_adresse et d'arrêter de mettre des adresses sur des bâtiments qui ont déjà une adresse car cela fait redo... commented 2026-10-02 14:42:15 UTC by Yunan973 ♦174 | |
| 189372275 (Comments: 1) | rumbrummer (Discussed changesets: 18) | Hi, why did you shift the saddle into the road? The saddle point is next to the road. It also is not a mountain pass. Col de Fontbelle is the pass. This is just a tiny saddle next to a 5 m high rock. I was on side and observed this. Therefore, I w... commented 2026-10-02 14:37:55 UTC by Harald Hetzner ♦35 | |
| 189872793 (Comments: 1) | Mateusz Konieczny - bot account (Discussed changesets: 123) | wiki page is at osm.wiki/Mechanical_Edits/Mateusz_Konieczny_-_bot_account/migrate_multiple_climbing_tags commented 2026-10-02 14:37:02 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,230 | |
| X | 189882075 (Comments: 1) | f_gonella (Discussed changesets: 67) | Way w15730135 was mistaken with r15730135. Partial revert already executed with Changeset: #189882377. Many apologies for the inconvenience! :( commented 2026-10-02 14:32:27 UTC by f_gonella ♦71 |
| 189408684 (Comments: 2) | Ivo Levenovičs (Discussed changesets: 2) | No reply, so reverted. commented 2026-10-02 14:28:52 UTC by HellMap ♦997 | |
| 161601318 (Comments: 1) | fdn23 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Bonjour, J'ai remarqué que vous aviez ajouté un certain nombre de voies allant vers des maisons avec l'attribut highway=track. Il est préférable d'utiliser pour ces voies highway=service + service=driv... commented 2026-10-02 14:28:18 UTC by zorglubu ♦365 | |
| 189844342 (Comments: 2) | Meesch (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hoi Eggie, mijn fout, hij staat vlak voor de kruising. Ik heb hem iets verplaatst naar waar hij echt staat commented 2026-10-02 14:10:10 UTC by Meesch ♦2 | |
| 181543614 (Comments: 5) | osmviborg (Discussed changesets: 377) | Problemet er, at der hverken er hæk eller hegn i den vestlige ende. Jeg bor i byen. De tilgængelige kort - deriblandt Surface Shadow Map - er nøjagtige. @osmviborg har slettet detaljerne og bare lavet hæk hele vejen omkring g... commented 2026-10-02 13:53:53 UTC by cyclist789 ♦140 | |
| 189871393 (Comments: 2) | Comrade Bulkin (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ah, okay, got it. I will not do it any more. commented 2026-10-02 13:45:35 UTC by Comrade Bulkin ♦2 | |
| 189554178 (Comments: 1) | Prefeitura de Sumaré (Discussed changesets: 2) | Melhor lava jato da cidade commented 2026-10-02 13:43:31 UTC by Prefeitura de Sumaré ♦1 | |
| 189134004 (Comments: 3) | Peter W34 (Discussed changesets: 15) | Ok, thanks Peter. > Is there a legal database/website to use Yes, there is a land parcels and address layer we can use. I believe we have only gotten permission in the last year. It's visible in JOSM under "Imagery" -&... commented 2026-10-02 13:39:50 UTC by Joel Koen ♦98 | |
| 181196877 (Comments: 5) | gungnir (Discussed changesets: 7) | Yeah, the part near that node I've not personally checked, it's all on private land unfortunately. commented 2026-10-02 13:39:09 UTC by gungnir ♦5 | |
| 188063679 (Comments: 16) | cyclist789 (Discussed changesets: 24) | Nåh nej, det var changeset/186710084, hvor der stod om rutens opbrydning. Beklager forvirringen. Jeg skal spørge @Tntdruid om hegnet. Jeg satte en MTB-rute, fordi jeg troede, at der var en MTB-rute. Den kan have været blevet... commented 2026-10-02 13:38:11 UTC by cyclist789 ♦140 | |
| 189878671 (Comments: 1) | who_i_am (Discussed changesets: 19) | 濮阳公交69路路线 commented 2026-10-02 13:34:32 UTC by who_i_am ♦20 | |
| 189876167 (Comments: 3) | Borjen (Discussed changesets: 1) | Eens commented 2026-10-02 13:29:14 UTC by Borjen ♦1 | |
| 189871369 (Comments: 1) | KylesWeb-ID (Discussed changesets: 7) | Terima kasih untuk kontribusinya, namun alangkah baiknya tiap perubahan sebelum submit, kamu beri deskripsi sedikit apa yang diubah. Contoh: Koreksi geometri jalan, koreksi letak bangunan, menambahkan jalan/bangunan, menghapus jalan/bangunan 🤗 commented 2026-10-02 13:25:41 UTC by FajrAl ♦892 | |
| 189875218 (Comments: 2) | Pebbles_1 (Discussed changesets: 6) | erledigt mit https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189878782 commented 2026-10-02 13:24:12 UTC by Pebbles_1 ♦8 | |
| 189878699 (Comments: 3) | OSM-Contributer (Discussed changesets: 11) | node/12902226105 commented 2026-10-02 13:23:49 UTC by OSM-Contributer ♦25 | |
| 189667087 (Comments: 1) | ⇄ john paul jones & gringo (Discussed changesets: 32) | Hello, you're adding a significant amount of addr:country=GB tags. Are you aware these tags are completely redundant when inside relation/62149? Your changes probably have something to do with almost doubling the amount of uses in just a year...... commented 2026-10-02 13:13:45 UTC by Joel Koen ♦98 | |
| 89534073 (Comments: 1) | Leif Lodahl (Discussed changesets: 73) | The water body way/837956222 and nearby waterways don't match the SDFI maps. Can I change them? commented 2026-10-02 13:12:16 UTC by cyclist789 ♦140 | |
| 189870524 (Comments: 2) | Pebbles_1 (Discussed changesets: 6) | erledigt mit https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189878153 commented 2026-10-02 13:10:34 UTC by Pebbles_1 ♦8 | |
| 189821207 (Comments: 1) | 3D打印 (Discussed changesets: 12) | Please explain your source for the place name changes that you have made within this changeset. An example is https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/17900208 , changes can be seen easily at https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/osm-deep-history/#/relati... commented 2026-10-02 13:09:02 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,889 | |
| 189530815 (Comments: 1) | 3D打印 (Discussed changesets: 12) | Please explain your source for the place name changes that you have made within this changeset. An example is https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13313234498/history , changes can be seen easily at https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/osm-deep-history/#... commented 2026-10-02 13:08:12 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,889 | |
| 189866100 (Comments: 1) | Sir Bryce (Discussed changesets: 2) | wat? you had no reason for deleting these? commented 2026-10-02 12:51:57 UTC by FajrAl ♦892 | |
| 189817785 (Comments: 1) | Map_Team (Discussed changesets: 13) | Bonjour, J'ai revert vos changements, vous avez cartographié les anciens aménagements du Quai Ouest et de la Route d'Audruicq à partir d'imageries anciennes. Les nouveaux aménagements sont visibles ic... commented 2026-10-02 12:43:26 UTC by Alexb60 ♦22 | |
| 189842742 (Comments: 1) | Tom Becker1 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Tom, wie kommst du darauf, dass da ein Campingplatz ist? commented 2026-10-02 12:43:07 UTC by Strubbl ♦616 | |
| 189871867 (Comments: 2) | BardafFr (Discussed changesets: 26) | Surement, j'ai cherché un peu ce qui était mieux, mais j'avais pas trouvé destroyed commented 2026-10-02 12:29:26 UTC by BardafFr ♦26 | |
| 189445073 (Comments: 1) | Noah Reijnen (Discussed changesets: 21) | Ha, de huidige situatie is wel iets anders dan hoe die nu is ingetekend, zie https://viewer.satellietdataportaal.nl/@51.82518,5.825726,17/?datastrip=20260925_SVNEO-01&bbox=51.82331%2C5.82685%2C51.82490%2C5.82845 (opname van vorige week) commented 2026-10-02 12:21:49 UTC by rutgerbrf ♦4 | |
| 189869367 (Comments: 1) | PhamTienSon (Discussed changesets: 1) | Chào bạn. Tại sao bạn lại ghi số tầng của tòa nhà vào thẻ name=* ? Nếu bạn muốn thêm thông tin số tầng của tòa nhà thì bạn có thể ghi vào thẻ... commented 2026-10-02 12:17:32 UTC by vietnam321 ♦19 | |
| 188884580 (Comments: 1) | Meeliz (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hello! Please have a look on http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/14173995899. What is the mean of the tags lest_x = 6442846.963 lest_y = 695865.512 What is the mean of the tags stop_area = Räpina vald stop_code = 6500563-1 stop_i... commented 2026-10-02 12:10:25 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,869 | |
| 189410360 (Comments: 1) | Faberitex (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ich lass das von unserem Experten nochmal checken. Vielen Dank! commented 2026-10-02 12:10:03 UTC by ADACHessenThueringen ♦2 | |
| 188823925 (Comments: 2) | RobbyS63 (Discussed changesets: 11) | Op de gevel staat toch echt The Readshop XL. Maar vind het prima. commented 2026-10-02 12:04:34 UTC by RobbyS63 ♦5 | |
| X | 169884727 (Comments: 6) | ceirios (Discussed changesets: 23) | That's now changed at https://github.com/SomeoneElseOSM/SomeoneElse-style/blob/master/changelog.md and will be visible at the next release. commented 2026-10-02 12:01:14 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,889 |
| 189825090 (Comments: 1) | Tyoma14 (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hi! When you added a hotel as a node within a building polygon (I consider it as best practice), you shouldn't add hotel name to the polygon represents the building. Please check hotel სასტუმრო უნიკალი commented 2026-10-02 11:54:12 UTC by evgenykatyshev ♦326 | |
| 189829674 (Comments: 1) | СергейБА (Discussed changesets: 1) | Привет! Вижу, что вы лично были на местности. Но есть много замечаний по тому, как именно вы внесли данные на карту. 1. Мы не в носим Ð... commented 2026-10-02 11:50:10 UTC by evgenykatyshev ♦326 | |
| 189872738 (Comments: 2) | fb552 (Discussed changesets: 15) | Non riesco a scaricare il layer Bing al momento. Ho solo esri, mapbox e pcn. Mi fermo un attimo di mappare finché non riesco a scaricare commented 2026-10-02 11:39:26 UTC by fb552 ♦25 | |
| 189846852 (Comments: 1) | Blip-blip (Discussed changesets: 2) | We don't add name for ATM, only brand and operator https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189873569 commented 2026-10-02 11:38:05 UTC by evgenykatyshev ♦326 | |
| 119530551 (Comments: 1) | Saeed Sarshar (Discussed changesets: 1) | gps live commented 2026-10-02 11:30:30 UTC by Kiwikami ♦1 | |
| 189872575 (Comments: 1) | Mateusz Konieczny - bot account (Discussed changesets: 123) | wiki page is at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mechanical_Edits/Mateusz_Konieczny_-_bot_account/migrate_multiple_climbing_tags commented 2026-10-02 11:24:27 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,230 | |
| 189810093 (Comments: 1) | griba (Discussed changesets: 23) | Strona nie wygląda na prawidłową commented 2026-10-02 11:19:05 UTC by NieWnen ♦1,498 | |
| 189767517 (Comments: 2) | ⇄ john paul jones & gringo (Discussed changesets: 32) | Hi, its simply because in this case Desborough is a separate entity to the postal town/city (Kettering). If there was an urban sprawl as it were, then Desborough could indeed be described as a suburb of Kettering but seeing as there is clear country... commented 2026-10-02 10:55:51 UTC by ⇄ john paul jones & gringo ♦38 | |
| 179876649 (Comments: 2) | zsolt d (Discussed changesets: 225) | Köszi, takarítottam kicsit: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189871079 commented 2026-10-02 10:41:37 UTC by qstep ♦266 | |
| 178180752 (Comments: 1) | Seth Connold (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hot Task for Mozambique? but editing in Indonesia commented 2026-10-02 10:33:50 UTC by FajrAl ♦892 | |
| 182331712 (Comments: 3) | Poesil (Discussed changesets: 3) | Habs geänder, danke dir! commented 2026-10-02 10:32:14 UTC by Poesil ♦3 | |
| 189609670 (Comments: 1) | alexxromero (Discussed changesets: 1) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/21445938 this has strange geometry, you know.... commented 2026-10-02 10:31:41 UTC by FajrAl ♦892 | |
| 188422677 (Comments: 1) | zlyntud (Discussed changesets: 19) | masih ada yang belum tertutup, silakan cek https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=112.03906&lat=-6.88850&zoom=15&baselayer=OSM%20Carto%20(OSMF)&overlays=intersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Crole_should... commented 2026-10-02 10:30:05 UTC by FajrAl ♦892 | |
| 189807639 (Comments: 1) | Gaung Tebono (Discussed changesets: 54) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/14729835 Bukan begitu caranya membuat tugu perbatasan. Yang ada malah error commented 2026-10-02 10:28:53 UTC by FajrAl ♦892 | |
| 189867501 (Comments: 1) | Keipi (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-10-02 10:28:40 UTC by eggie ♦47,558 | |
| 181403685 (Comments: 1) | Wikiscout (Discussed changesets: 26) | gibts Pizza, Pasta, Sphaghetti & Co überhaupt noch? commented 2026-10-02 10:24:57 UTC by Pebbles_1 ♦8 | |
| 189820890 (Comments: 3) | eri jahai (Discussed changesets: 6) | im stuck with this map HELP! commented 2026-10-02 10:24:45 UTC by eri jahai ♦1 | |
| 189840393 (Comments: 1) | Brendaalcudrado2009 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, please have a look at the opening hours you added. This tag needs a specific tagging scheme, e.g. no "AM/PM" as described here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours commented 2026-10-02 10:04:50 UTC by mueschel ♦7,392 | |
| 189687985 (Comments: 1) | Edagar (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, you added many shops with idential names. Please make sure that the 'name' is the actual name of the shop, and not just a description like 'muebleria'. commented 2026-10-02 10:03:11 UTC by mueschel ♦7,392 | |
| 179821039 (Comments: 1) | StreetK34T (Discussed changesets: 2) | This changeset moved this boundary https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/388078427 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189869442 commented 2026-10-02 10:03:08 UTC by FajrAl ♦892 | |
| 189843262 (Comments: 1) | MayteBadillo12 (Discussed changesets: 10) | Hi, I noticed you and others adding many strange tags like these listed below: What do they mean? Please make sure to agree on one common spelling in all edits! clave clave de verificaion clave_de_verificaacion clve de verificac... commented 2026-10-02 10:01:55 UTC by mueschel ♦7,392 | |
| 189573340 (Comments: 1) | Nanepiwo (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, you used the key "keyfob" here - what does it mean? commented 2026-10-02 09:50:50 UTC by mueschel ♦7,392 | |
| 189861580 (Comments: 1) | tyksom (Discussed changesets: 1) | Dobrá práce, díky! commented 2026-10-02 09:42:42 UTC by VladaC ♦40 | |
| 160693209 (Comments: 1) | Neil James Tarrant (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, I know it was a while ago, but foot=no is not correct for roads like this. foot=no is strictly about legal access/rights to use the way. In the UK, almost all roads are legally accessible on foot. The main exceptions are motorways. Otherwise acce... commented 2026-10-02 09:34:52 UTC by Borbus ♦32 | |
| 189862316 (Comments: 1) | Colbertson (Discussed changesets: 36) | fixing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189837394 commented 2026-10-02 09:32:57 UTC by Colbertson ♦181 | |
| 189864352 (Comments: 1) | Aeiouau (Discussed changesets: 3) | forgot to add the hashtags, darnit! #31DayOSMChallenge #Maptober commented 2026-10-02 09:28:28 UTC by Aeiouau ♦9 | |
| 189866098 (Comments: 1) | Aeiouau (Discussed changesets: 3) | forgot to add the hashtags, darnit! #31DayOSMChallenge #Maptober commented 2026-10-02 09:28:21 UTC by Aeiouau ♦9 | |
| 189864148 (Comments: 2) | Lizzy- Flitsmeister (Discussed changesets: 2) | De landuse construction heb ik hier aangepast. CTRL- F5 voor versneld effect. commented 2026-10-02 09:28:21 UTC by eggie ♦47,558 | |
| 189865511 (Comments: 1) | jvanhienen (Discussed changesets: 2) | Dit is toch de achterkant van die huizenrij? Service klopt hier volgens mij wel. commented 2026-10-02 09:26:26 UTC by JeroenHoek ♦802 | |
| 189857275 (Comments: 1) | Aditya1382 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Terima kasih untuk kontribusinya, namun alangkah baiknya tiap perubahan sebelum submit, kamu beri deskripsi sedikit apa yang diubah. Contoh: Koreksi geometri jalan, koreksi letak bangunan, menambahkan jalan/bangunan, menghapus jalan/bangunan 🤗 unt... commented 2026-10-02 09:25:35 UTC by FajrAl ♦892 | |
| 189864901 (Comments: 1) | Faristoteles (Discussed changesets: 17) | seasonal=yes saja sudah cukup commented 2026-10-02 09:20:04 UTC by FajrAl ♦892 | |
| 189295111 (Comments: 2) | spughetti (Discussed changesets: 70) | Thanks🙏🙏 commented 2026-10-02 09:14:22 UTC by spughetti ♦124 | |
| 175380769 (Comments: 1) | kevinmcg (Discussed changesets: 21) | Hi, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1376768194/ Why have you changed the man_made=reservoir_covered - an underground water tank to a water=reservoir - a reservoir that you might find on a river? The only work that happened ... commented 2026-10-02 09:11:23 UTC by VictorIE ♦1,271 | |
| 182013430 (Comments: 2) | GrabID_FaizahM (Discussed changesets: 4) | seharusnya gak perlu tag akses motorcar, tapi ditambahkan lanes=1 commented 2026-10-02 09:11:12 UTC by FajrAl ♦892 | |
| 188485591 (Comments: 1) | kevinmcg (Discussed changesets: 21) | Hi, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1037929972/ How come you changed the underground power cable to an overhead power line? commented 2026-10-02 09:02:18 UTC by VictorIE ♦1,271 | |
| 189861136 (Comments: 1) | Dylanvd041200 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-10-02 08:55:58 UTC by eggie ♦47,558 | |
| 189861089 (Comments: 1) | vrstrkp (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-10-02 08:55:18 UTC by eggie ♦47,558 | |
| 189860037 (Comments: 1) | stasel (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-10-02 08:54:32 UTC by eggie ♦47,558 | |
| 189859761 (Comments: 1) | amirmasoudabdol (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-10-02 08:53:43 UTC by eggie ♦47,558 | |
| 189865647 (Comments: 1) | gmar5 (Discussed changesets: 28) | This reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189793098 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189848112 These are the current explicit default values (plus time-based conditions): motorcar=permit motorhome=permit bicycle... commented 2026-10-02 08:53:11 UTC by gmar5 ♦106 | |
| 189859446 (Comments: 1) | 92640203946610002980831 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-10-02 08:53:08 UTC by eggie ♦47,558 | |
| 189793098 (Comments: 5) | DrivingOxford (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189865647 commented 2026-10-02 08:49:49 UTC by gmar5 ♦106 | |
| 189848112 (Comments: 2) | DrivingOxford (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189865647 commented 2026-10-02 08:49:20 UTC by gmar5 ♦106 | |
| 186995861 (Comments: 2) | TranslatorPS (Discussed changesets: 37) | W tym wszystkim najlepsze jest to, że ten komentarz zobaczyłem dopiero wczoraj. W każdym razie uzupełnione → https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189865398 commented 2026-10-02 08:44:03 UTC by TranslatorPS ♦51 | |
| 184016226 (Comments: 1) | osmviborg (Discussed changesets: 377) | The southern parts of way/1495044511 and the barrier west of it are not "wire fences". commented 2026-10-02 08:41:14 UTC by cyclist789 ♦140 | |
| 189629038 (Comments: 2) | AstroAure (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, Indeed, they all are rescue_box. Sorry, I hadn't see this tag when I created these points. commented 2026-10-02 08:38:00 UTC by AstroAure ♦1 | |
| 189822845 (Comments: 2) | Kovoschiz (Discussed changesets: 155) | It's tentative. I would have used `landmark:*=yes` , not them. commented 2026-10-02 08:24:49 UTC by Kovoschiz ♦3,062 | |
| 189827677 (Comments: 4) | StC (Discussed changesets: 30) | Pas de pb. Je comprends l’objectif. On avance 😊 Concernant vos questions : - signalements à l’IGN. À rediscuter : est-ce que ça vaut le coup de faire 1 signalement alors qu’il pourrait y en avoir d&rsq... commented 2026-10-02 08:09:48 UTC by cr85 ♦3 | |
| 174321953 (Comments: 1) | Sigurdblueface (Discussed changesets: 15) | already mapped https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8628394193 commented 2026-10-02 08:09:14 UTC by Layft Greater ♦225 | |
| 189612023 (Comments: 2) | Kesh-LOW (Discussed changesets: 1) | Yeah. Your right the store has a second part where the old marker is. My bad. commented 2026-10-02 07:42:46 UTC by Kesh-LOW ♦1 | |
| 189837394 (Comments: 2) | vaivis (Discussed changesets: 1) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189862316 commented 2026-10-02 07:29:31 UTC by Colbertson ♦181 | |
| 189031625 (Comments: 1) | Irina1981 (Discussed changesets: 1) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1442182712/history#map=16/52.04051/39.73656&layers=N Добрый день. Просьба внимательно смотреть, что меняйте, это выглядит как вандализм.<... commented 2026-10-02 07:26:58 UTC by DRiveR39 ♦37 | |
| 189861472 (Comments: 1) | lpf452 (Discussed changesets: 6) | *Auto-generated following a large commit* NOTE: ALL edits included in this changeset were performed manually based on community-approved data sources. They are not automated imports, nor were they traced from unauthorized third-party sources (... commented 2026-10-02 07:10:23 UTC by lpf452 ♦7 | |
| 165368730 (Comments: 6) | archINFORM (Discussed changesets: 15) | I've restored Q170119 as Wikidata ID. Humboldt Forum (museum) by the way is already mapped separately as node/8413352835, which seems reasonable. Possible further steps to improve things on Wikidata's side: 1) consider creating separ... commented 2026-10-02 07:09:55 UTC by Pikse ♦250 | |
| 189848079 (Comments: 4) | Chris Alberda (Discussed changesets: 2) | De school heb ik als bovenstaand aangepast. MVG eggie commented 2026-10-02 07:08:11 UTC by eggie ♦47,558 | |
| 189486227 (Comments: 1) | nnf635 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Kannst Du Dir diese Änderung noch einmal genauer ansehen? Fährt der BW1 immer von/ab Kindergarten? Sollte man dann nicht den Namen entsprechend abändern? oder fährt nur der "Rufauto BW1: Bad Wildbad Bahnhof => Neuwei... commented 2026-10-02 07:03:46 UTC by Senihtu ♦202 | |
| 189857629 (Comments: 1) | GrabID_FaizahM (Discussed changesets: 4) | Perumahan itu masih bisa masuk dan bukan tanah sendiri, jadi pakainya permissive. Private itu udah tergolong tanah sendiri commented 2026-10-02 07:00:57 UTC by FajrAl ♦892 | |
| 189106192 (Comments: 17) | Kovoschiz (Discussed changesets: 155) | Why don't you ask the original authors? If an attribute has been set on a shorter section, it should be kept. commented 2026-10-02 06:58:45 UTC by Kovoschiz ♦3,062 | |
| 189809554 (Comments: 3) | Kovoschiz (Discussed changesets: 155) | 1. Again as aforementioned, if you have disagreements on its status, you should add `sac_scale=` etc for the passability. `highway=scramble` etc has been discussed, but `=path` is still the mainstay. commented 2026-10-02 06:56:56 UTC by Kovoschiz ♦3,062 | |
| 189792787 (Comments: 3) | phodgkin (Discussed changesets: 40) | Cheers! commented 2026-10-02 06:54:29 UTC by gurglypipe ♦1,127 | |
| 189860087 (Comments: 1) | LaraMJ (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-10-02 06:52:07 UTC by eggie ♦47,558 | |
| 189859406 (Comments: 1) | JkWa (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-10-02 06:50:24 UTC by eggie ♦47,558 | |
| 186063560 (Comments: 2) | likesrhubarb (Discussed changesets: 1) | Tack! commented 2026-10-02 06:47:08 UTC by likesrhubarb ♦1 | |
| 141902146 (Comments: 3) | hlfan (Discussed changesets: 68) | Ok, danke dir! commented 2026-10-02 06:34:53 UTC by ayxis ♦70 | |
| 184956548 (Comments: 1) | pavel bankevich (Discussed changesets: 15) | #mapbox_roads_attributes commented 2026-10-02 06:31:49 UTC by pavel bankevich ♦15 | |
| 185635634 (Comments: 1) | pavel bankevich (Discussed changesets: 15) | #mapbox_roads_attributes commented 2026-10-02 06:31:28 UTC by pavel bankevich ♦15 | |
| 185655071 (Comments: 1) | pavel bankevich (Discussed changesets: 15) | #mapbox_roads_attributes commented 2026-10-02 06:29:46 UTC by pavel bankevich ♦15 | |
| 187611235 (Comments: 1) | WrógRowerówElektrycznych (Discussed changesets: 2) | Są te numery oznakowane w terenie? commented 2026-10-02 06:22:48 UTC by krzysiuup ♦8 | |
| 181938441 (Comments: 1) | cRaIgalLAn (Discussed changesets: 20) | Hi cRaIgalLAn, this changeset has destroyed a bare_rock relation and left behind the "inner" members: https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=36.70824&lat=-0.47178&zoom=13&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&... commented 2026-10-02 06:16:15 UTC by gscholz ♦3,003 | |
| 188522538 (Comments: 2) | NickBprime (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour, sur le nom, le changement correspond à la dénomination utilisée depuis le passage aux adresses normalisées (et l'usage était antérieur); la mairie doit avoir négligé de mettre &agr... commented 2026-10-02 06:05:41 UTC by NickBprime ♦1 | |
| 185993742 (Comments: 2) | SPLATPLAYS (Discussed changesets: 12) | Thanks for catching that Joel, I have fixed it in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189859388 . commented 2026-10-02 05:55:55 UTC by SPLATPLAYS ♦10 | |
| 189859280 (Comments: 1) | seav (Discussed changesets: 39) | Oops. Forgot the #31DayOSMChallenge and #Maptober hashtags commented 2026-10-02 05:51:56 UTC by seav ♦170 | |
| 189859255 (Comments: 1) | ChehrehBargi (Discussed changesets: 64) | The local name was correct and is being restored. To confirm whether the local name is correct or not, local users are invited to confirm the correctness of the name. commented 2026-10-02 05:50:09 UTC by ChehrehBargi ♦574 | |
| 124992035 (Comments: 1) | NGL-engel (Discussed changesets: 104) | Moin aus Wildeshausen! Kannst Du diesen Knoten bitte noch mal prüfen: https://www.osm.org/node/9957960595 Das Haus daneben hat die Adressse Dorfstraße 10, nicht 14. commented 2026-10-02 05:49:12 UTC by GerdP ♦2,877 | |
| 189807373 (Comments: 2) | myxor (Discussed changesets: 9) | Hey silversurfer83, alles klar, ich habe es angepasst. Danke commented 2026-10-02 05:41:37 UTC by myxor ♦6 | |
| 189610577 (Comments: 1) | Channel91 (Discussed changesets: 5) | be careful you left the highway=crossing even though you deleted the line through the road. commented 2026-10-02 05:31:50 UTC by Natfoot ♦133 | |
| 189858049 (Comments: 1) | MarbleMax (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi, please do not change buildings to random shapes next time. Change reverted commented 2026-10-02 05:28:39 UTC by DaanLT ♦119 | |
| 189835741 (Comments: 1) | Hotel Riverside (Discussed changesets: 13) | SEO spam addition of hotel name to scrub area reverted in changeset 189858535 commented 2026-10-02 05:18:33 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,232 | |
| 189808074 (Comments: 1) | Hotel Riverside (Discussed changesets: 13) | Then it should be tagged as such, not repeatedly deleted with no explanation, and you should actually respond when repeatedly asked for one. See https://osm.wiki/Why_can't_I_delete_this_trail%3F and https://osm.wiki/Why_we_won't_delete_road... commented 2026-10-02 05:17:38 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,232 | |
| 189839502 (Comments: 1) | Rmacaraig (Discussed changesets: 14) | All you are doing is making the POIs you are being paid to promote strictly _less_ up to date and visible to users by taking the existing correct address, phone and name and making them malformed and invalid, and moving it from an actual building to ... commented 2026-10-02 05:08:59 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,232 | |
| 137598091 (Comments: 1) | Lababulscio (Discussed changesets: 3) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10167411008/history what you meant by waterway=water_point ? commented 2026-10-02 04:53:30 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,230 | |
| 189857623 (Comments: 1) | OrdinaryScarlett (Discussed changesets: 56) | Why did you remove the valid old_ref=* tag from the highway=motorway_junction node? The old_ref=* tag provides useful information to other mappers about the history of the feature. --- Published using OSM... commented 2026-10-02 04:44:51 UTC by Frank Peng ♦239 | |
| 189856611 (Comments: 1) | RedbandanaAndrew (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi Redbandana Thank you for taking the time for mapping this area. It helps a lot a s humanitarian response. One note, you do not need to add area=yes to each building. commented 2026-10-02 04:16:39 UTC by AngocA ♦245 | |
| 189648960 (Comments: 1) | nyanpsyche (Discussed changesets: 22) | Hmm, I see where you're coming from but I'm afraid I can't see classifications like this working out. I definitely am not quite content with Oak St being classified the same as Wolfe and 15th, nor with the primary classification ending... commented 2026-10-02 04:08:43 UTC by in2itivity ♦11 | |
| 170940429 (Comments: 1) | jplahti (Discussed changesets: 6) | Tämä laiturien kohdistaminen auttaa erittäin paljon etenkin silloin kun pitää vaihtaa junaa ja vaihtoaika on hyvin rajallinen. Lisää sujuvuutta kun tietää että vaihto on samalla laiturilla mutta va... commented 2026-10-02 03:10:08 UTC by kimble72 ♦1 | |
| 183943298 (Comments: 1) | Joseph R P (Discussed changesets: 233) | Random question: Is there a reason Aries is tagged as place=quarter instead of a different tag, like t̶y̶p̶e̶=c̶o̶n̶s̶t̶e̶l̶l̶a̶t̶i̶o̶n̶ a̶s̶t̶r̶o̶l̶o̶g̶y̶=z̶o̶d̶i̶a̶c̶ place=suburb or place=neighbourhood? Since Foothi... commented 2026-10-02 02:57:02 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦378 | |
| 189837116 (Comments: 2) | Artha_ (Discussed changesets: 3) | done thank you commented 2026-10-02 02:51:08 UTC by Artha_ ♦3 | |
| 189587236 (Comments: 1) | AN11 (Discussed changesets: 4) | memang bangunannya sudah tidak ada? commented 2026-10-02 01:35:11 UTC by FajrAl ♦892 | |
| 189836008 (Comments: 1) | wafriadi (Discussed changesets: 2) | tandonnya hilang dari peta commented 2026-10-02 01:25:35 UTC by FajrAl ♦892 | |
| 189836193 (Comments: 1) | wafriadi (Discussed changesets: 2) | perubahan ini membuat tandonnya jadi hilang commented 2026-10-02 01:21:47 UTC by FajrAl ♦892 | |
| 189794850 (Comments: 1) | Keith Helbley (Discussed changesets: 15) | Sorry for being annoying - but have you used Google Street View by any chance? https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5548313 commented 2026-10-02 01:00:32 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,230 | |
| 189801040 (Comments: 1) | TheCFG (Discussed changesets: 2) | Configured Gumi Namtong-dong, Sandong-eup regions commented 2026-10-02 00:55:27 UTC by TheCFG ♦2 | |
| 189800305 (Comments: 1) | TheCFG (Discussed changesets: 2) | Configured Namtong-dong region commented 2026-10-02 00:55:00 UTC by TheCFG ♦2 | |
| 183517293 (Comments: 1) | JohnnyCarrey (Discussed changesets: 4) | Человек неразумный, на кой ляд вы выпиливали остановки??? commented 2026-10-02 00:10:29 UTC by Bobropiton ♦149 | |
| 189832310 (Comments: 1) | TG-map4 (Discussed changesets: 19) | Danke! commented 2026-10-02 00:06:06 UTC by LucGommans ♦79 | |
| 189853440 (Comments: 1) | Pedro Souza Costa Maps (Discussed changesets: 91) | Essa rua tem uma placa de 40 km/h: https://www.google.com/maps/@-18.8765968,-41.9795799,3a,15.8y,85.79h,73.04t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1s5Qp-DkeURWS5mYu1Cg3j6A!2e0!6shttps:%2F%2Fstreetviewpixels-pa.clients6.google.com%2Fv1%2Fthumbnail%3Fcb_client%3Dmaps_sv... commented 2026-10-02 00:02:40 UTC by Pedro Souza Costa Maps ♦97 | |
| 189730048 (Comments: 1) | grAnd1 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello. You have change landuse=construction to building=apartments tag, which created a weird situation on the map, where two buildings overlap each other, with the building you created having a non-sensical shape. If you wanted to specify that const... commented 2026-10-01 23:49:53 UTC by fluffycupcakes ♦31 | |
| 189845697 (Comments: 1) | cwhitby (Discussed changesets: 1) | (Review requested) "The tag access=permit indicates an area or feature which is open only to people who have obtained a permit granting them access." Who issues these permits and when was this introduced? Tagging on the... commented 2026-10-01 23:14:45 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,942 | |
| 189498161 (Comments: 1) | TransAct-AS (Discussed changesets: 92) | It appears in this changeset here that you incorrectly adjusted a road from its actual alignment seen in aerial imagery to try to resolve a crossing_ways issue in the iD editor. Please don't adjust or align roads away from buildings or other fea... commented 2026-10-01 23:14:06 UTC by Frank Peng ♦239 | |
| 189852119 (Comments: 1) | JriSv250 (Discussed changesets: 56) | #31DayOSMChallenge commented 2026-10-01 23:02:08 UTC by JriSv250 ♦32 | |
| 181286964 (Comments: 3) | bbmiller (Discussed changesets: 6) | Thanks! commented 2026-10-01 23:01:26 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,230 | |
| 189841265 (Comments: 1) | BeaconOSM (Discussed changesets: 84) | Illinois? I believe this is Wisconsin. And thanks for adding in the buildings! commented 2026-10-01 22:55:34 UTC by O1S ♦37 | |
| 181988102 (Comments: 1) | TransAct-AS (Discussed changesets: 92) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182148478 --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181988102 commented 2026-10-01 22:51:08 UTC by Frank Peng ♦239 | |
| 189483956 (Comments: 2) | cuzi (Discussed changesets: 33) | Mir war nicht bekannt wie lange die Straße gesperrt ist. commented 2026-10-01 21:47:41 UTC by cuzi ♦194 | |
| 189408247 (Comments: 1) | craigsteapartyy (Discussed changesets: 2) | This camera and the others you have posted are not flock surveillance cameras. these are all city of charlottetown owned e watch program cameras that are owned and operated by the city. to call them flock cameras is disingenuous without proof they ar... commented 2026-10-01 21:46:15 UTC by AriXVX ♦2 | |
| 189411860 (Comments: 1) | craigsteapartyy (Discussed changesets: 2) | This camera and the others you have posted are not flock surveillance cameras. these are all city of charlottetown owned e watch program cameras that are owned and operated by the city. to call them flock cameras is disingenuous without proof they ar... commented 2026-10-01 21:46:04 UTC by AriXVX ♦2 | |
| 189845522 (Comments: 1) | Hesh123 (Discussed changesets: 2) | looking at this ALPR on various aerial imagery in iD it seems to be within the road area, being positioned like this is highly unlikely so please double check the position of this ALPR and fix it. Happy mapping, Udar. commented 2026-10-01 21:41:47 UTC by Udarian ♦960 | |
| 189839825 (Comments: 1) | Tjr33150 (Discussed changesets: 4) | looking at this ALPR on various aerial imagery in iD it seems to be within the road area, being positioned like this is highly unlikely so please double check the position of this ALPR and fix it. Happy mapping, Udar. commented 2026-10-01 21:40:03 UTC by Udarian ♦960 | |
| 189849481 (Comments: 1) | Alex_457 (Discussed changesets: 67) | source=survey commented 2026-10-01 21:39:23 UTC by Alex_457 ♦87 | |
| 189839750 (Comments: 1) | Tjr33150 (Discussed changesets: 4) | looking at this ALPR on various aerial imagery in iD it seems to be within the road area, being positioned like this is highly unlikely so please double check the position of this ALPR and fix it. Happy mapping, Udar. commented 2026-10-01 21:38:15 UTC by Udarian ♦960 | |
| 189599877 (Comments: 4) | Lumikeiju (Discussed changesets: 60) | No - I'm not involved in or aware of that project. commented 2026-10-01 21:14:17 UTC by Lumikeiju ♦132 | |
| 134191886 (Comments: 2) | Niels Elgaard Larsen (Discussed changesets: 404) | Tak. Har rettet det. commented 2026-10-01 21:10:00 UTC by Niels Elgaard Larsen ♦626 | |
| 189826275 (Comments: 1) | Voidnox90 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Moin :) zwei Kleinigkeiten: - wenn du, wie du im Änderungssatz sagst, geguckt hast, wäre es ggf. am Besten die Antennen als Punkte an der Stelle des Silos zu setzen, wo sie wirklich sind. Kann dann location=* und support=* mit... commented 2026-10-01 21:07:00 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦4,375 | |
| 189838818 (Comments: 1) | WompatuckSupervisor (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello again, incase you didnt see my last message on your last changeset here it is again. Features you removed in this changeset are valid. Please don’t remove valid OSM data. You have a new account and might not be aware, on OSM... commented 2026-10-01 20:33:20 UTC by MassCartog ♦486 | |
| 189839283 (Comments: 1) | zb-gladwyne-mapper (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please note: DVRPC imagery is rarely the best imagery for a given location, given its 1ft tiles. Esri and Mapbox imagery both show the house much clearer - I aligned the building to the Mapbox imagery here. Also note: Most building... commented 2026-10-01 20:10:29 UTC by I-76 ♦87 | |
| 189844900 (Comments: 1) | Tootsie_Roller (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. Feedback.. Op een voetpad hoef je geen foot=yes te taggen. Dat is default. Een officieel voetpad heeft meestal een G7 bord... commented 2026-10-01 20:10:17 UTC by eggie ♦47,558 | |
| 189843819 (Comments: 1) | Meesch (Discussed changesets: 3) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-10-01 20:02:22 UTC by eggie ♦47,558 | |
| 186919616 (Comments: 1) | OSM-XXXXXX (Discussed changesets: 40) | Ratikan operaattori ei ole VR vaan Tampereen Raitiotie. Track_ref tarkoittaa raidenumeroa, jos sellainen on virallisesti määritelty. Tampereen Ratikalla näin ei ole. Päivitin tiedot vastaamaan todellisuutta. commented 2026-10-01 20:02:08 UTC by jplahti ♦22 | |
| 189842997 (Comments: 1) | Steff D (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-10-01 20:01:11 UTC by eggie ♦47,558 | |
| 189841475 (Comments: 1) | MegamindHQ (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-10-01 20:00:21 UTC by eggie ♦47,558 | |
| 189839975 (Comments: 1) | Jonago (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-10-01 19:59:36 UTC by eggie ♦47,558 | |
| 189839941 (Comments: 1) | six apples (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-10-01 19:58:46 UTC by eggie ♦47,558 | |
| 189809861 (Comments: 2) | BenoitL (Discussed changesets: 7) | Sorry for the bus relations I thought I fixed them all. I'm not sure where the actual N6 is going to be. Part of it looks like it will be one way on the final plans (coming from the Cureghem bridge), and a bidirectional road in front of the L... commented 2026-10-01 19:55:21 UTC by BenoitL ♦5 | |
| 189533208 (Comments: 1) | SzilágyiGyula (Discussed changesets: 12) | Üdv. Mi van pontosan kitáblázva ezen az átkelőn? A KRESZ szerint kijelölt kerékpárúton gyalogos csak akkor közlekedhet, ha nincs járda. A foot megadása szükségtelen: ... commented 2026-10-01 19:48:02 UTC by qstep ♦266 | |
| 189755130 (Comments: 1) | Samuel Desmarchais (Discussed changesets: 4) | Bonjour, par rapport à mon autre message, si tu veux améliorer les bâtiments existants, il ne faut pas faire des multipolygones mais des bâtiments avec des parties de bâtiments, cf. par exemple https://www.opens... commented 2026-10-01 19:42:36 UTC by Yunan973 ♦174 | |
| 189666169 (Comments: 1) | SzilágyiGyula (Discussed changesets: 12) | Üdv. Ezek szerintem nem lakóterületi utak, hiszen ipartelepen vannak. commented 2026-10-01 19:41:32 UTC by qstep ♦266 | |
| 99053149 (Comments: 1) | Milhouse (Discussed changesets: 13) | Thank you for your helpful work improving the map. The houses you added were modified in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/108436662 and their numbers now look wrong so I have created https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5549950. commented 2026-10-01 19:40:59 UTC by tomhukins ♦303 | |
| 108436662 (Comments: 2) | Maptapper (Discussed changesets: 28) | As you haven't replied yet I have create https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5549950 to track this problem. commented 2026-10-01 19:39:23 UTC by tomhukins ♦303 | |
| 748530 (Comments: 3) | iandees (Discussed changesets: 87) | Wild! Looks like USGS got rid of it, so it's worth deleting here too. commented 2026-10-01 19:31:32 UTC by iandees ♦1,405 | |
| 169116924 (Comments: 5) | TommyRobloxOfficial (Discussed changesets: 22) | Dom Paliona! commented 2026-10-01 19:29:50 UTC by -Hubert- ♦4 | |
| 189746656 (Comments: 1) | rhle (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, Did you read the wiki for this tag? It's not appropriate here; it has already been added where it needs to be commented 2026-10-01 19:26:23 UTC by Cele078 ♦14 | |
| 189843037 (Comments: 1) | Doritos2020 (Discussed changesets: 3) | #31DayOSMChallenge #Maptober #Maptober2026 (optional) #OpenStreetMap (optional) commented 2026-10-01 19:02:43 UTC by Doritos2020 ♦1 | |
| 180479317 (Comments: 1) | DeFra85 (Discussed changesets: 171) | highway=path ist hier eindeutig die falsche Lösung, da die Zufahrt durch die Krahnstraße (aus Richtung Bierstraße) für Anwohner, Taxen, Hotelgäste, Lieferanten und zu den Behindertenparkplätzen freigegeben ist. highway... commented 2026-10-01 18:55:30 UTC by N9713 ♦18 | |
| 189509599 (Comments: 4) | TransAct-JT (Discussed changesets: 17) | Thank you! I appreciate the assistance on this and the feedback. It is greatly appreciated. commented 2026-10-01 18:52:10 UTC by TransAct-JT ♦3 | |
| 189824838 (Comments: 4) | ckmcc (Discussed changesets: 1) | Fixed and updated the streets around commented 2026-10-01 18:35:31 UTC by ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy ♦550 | |
| 185849373 (Comments: 2) | pavel bankevich (Discussed changesets: 15) | #mapbox_roads_attributes commented 2026-10-01 18:24:26 UTC by pavel bankevich ♦15 | |
| 185850135 (Comments: 1) | pavel bankevich (Discussed changesets: 15) | #mapbox_roads_attributes commented 2026-10-01 18:24:14 UTC by pavel bankevich ♦15 | |
| 189841090 (Comments: 1) | Suhbeena (Discussed changesets: 4) | #Maptober commented 2026-10-01 18:15:21 UTC by Suhbeena ♦6 | |
| 189840917 (Comments: 1) | ToniE (Discussed changesets: 239) | ... ist kein shed, ... commented 2026-10-01 18:14:48 UTC by ToniE ♦1,288 | |
| 186217099 (Comments: 1) | pavel bankevich (Discussed changesets: 15) | #mapbox_roads_attributes commented 2026-10-01 18:14:22 UTC by pavel bankevich ♦15 | |
| 189803596 (Comments: 1) | qgmzmy (Discussed changesets: 6) | #31DayOSMChallenge #Maptober #Maptober2026 commented 2026-10-01 17:55:00 UTC by qgmzmy ♦10 | |
| 189838766 (Comments: 2) | Molis83 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Voorlopig het ik het adres teruggezet. De BAG viewer ligt er momenteel uit. Kan het dus nu niet checken of het adres nog bestaat. MVG, eggie commented 2026-10-01 17:38:08 UTC by eggie ♦47,558 | |
| 189817675 (Comments: 1) | hiasl89 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted. Es handelt sich um die Grenze des Postleitzahlgebiets, wie aus der Relation ersichtlich. commented 2026-10-01 17:35:38 UTC by wolfbert ♦205 | |
| 189804598 (Comments: 3) | itineris (Discussed changesets: 80) | Köszönöm a választ! (Látom, közben az old_name is megváltozott.) commented 2026-10-01 17:34:42 UTC by Marton Ádám ♦4 | |
| 189833994 (Comments: 1) | Kaan Isik (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. Feedback .. Probeer svp het gebied van je edits klein te houden. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-10-01 17:32:47 UTC by eggie ♦47,558 | |
| 189828940 (Comments: 1) | 3sjah (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-10-01 17:31:06 UTC by eggie ♦47,558 | |
| 189827370 (Comments: 1) | ikbenfrank4 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-10-01 17:29:03 UTC by eggie ♦47,558 | |
| 165125067 (Comments: 5) | Wolfgang Holtz (Discussed changesets: 39) | Ein Issue ist wie ein Hinweis bei OSM. Und ja, der Rest ist ein wenig kompliziert. Ich mach einfach mal. https://github.com/osmlab/name-suggestion-index/pull/12901 commented 2026-10-01 17:25:18 UTC by kadiwa ♦148 | |
| 189319313 (Comments: 4) | YourLocalEnbyMapper (Discussed changesets: 2) | I see, thank you! commented 2026-10-01 17:14:59 UTC by YourLocalEnbyMapper ♦2 | |
| 182093105 (Comments: 1) | aajahah (Discussed changesets: 1) | It was not quite rebuild the exact some way. The space where the restaurant and the hairdresser was removed. The current ESRI World Imagery is from during reconstruction, so I have made averaged GPS waypoints (< 1 meter between 2nd and 3rd revi... commented 2026-10-01 17:14:41 UTC by JohnnyGPS ♦7 | |
| 148297795 (Comments: 1) | Qualhano (Discussed changesets: 49) | Olá, Qualhano, Eu estava revisando a rede de referência em Campos dos Goytacazes e notei que a BR-356 segue trajetos diferentes na *way* (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/103563566) e na relação (https://www.openstr... commented 2026-10-01 17:01:45 UTC by dcskobuffs ♦85 | |
| 189823429 (Comments: 1) | Fame Dawud (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Fame Dawud and welcome to OpenStreetMap, I am guessing this was a test. Do not save tests to OSM. You can use CoMaps to add missing places to map but not tests. I am reverting this changeset as there is no fuel/filling station here. commented 2026-10-01 16:54:31 UTC by Enock4seth ♦686 | |
| 134107619 (Comments: 1) | Khidistavi (Discussed changesets: 17) | Hi, the source link on way 1157199629 (Batumi–Khelvachauri boundary) is now dead. Near Gantiadi the line departs from NAPR's settlement borders by up to ~210 m. Do you remember what this section was based on? commented 2026-10-01 16:45:04 UTC by Comrade Bulkin ♦2 | |
| 189792918 (Comments: 1) | witti-42 (Discussed changesets: 5) | gelöscht mit gleicher Begründung wie bei https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189719239 commented 2026-10-01 16:40:37 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,663 | |
| 188848156 (Comments: 3) | Flap Slimy Outward (Discussed changesets: 302) | I reverted the changeset. hope that helps save you the effort @btwhite92. @flappy next time consider being a bit more respectful and clean it up instead of asking someone else to do it for you. commented 2026-10-01 16:36:21 UTC by OddlyAngled ♦138 | |
| 189830958 (Comments: 3) | Lightswitchr (Discussed changesets: 14) | @Lightswitchr: That was not the intention and I apologise if it came across as that way. The building is still standing and I don't believe it should be tagged as completely demolished yet. commented 2026-10-01 16:23:15 UTC by Aethonatic ♦93 | |
| 185989984 (Comments: 2) | Reusedheadgasket (Discussed changesets: 3) | looking at the 2026 aerial imagery from the county these ALPR's that you added in the middle of road are still not there on the aerial imagery, please double check their location with aerial imagery and fix the location. A ALPR being in the midd... commented 2026-10-01 16:20:41 UTC by Udarian ♦960 | |
| 189834017 (Comments: 2) | Aethonatic (Discussed changesets: 20) | The deletion of the node, I mean. commented 2026-10-01 16:16:26 UTC by Aethonatic ♦93 | |
| 189817713 (Comments: 1) | michealcurran (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ceci n'est pas un hôtel. Reverted in changeset 189834260 commented 2026-10-01 16:06:55 UTC by schobbish ♦84 | |
| 189698257 (Comments: 1) | Breaaad (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, die Anlagen sind noch nicht im Luftbild zu sehen, nur die alten abgeabuten (leider sind die Luftbilder in Bayern sehr alt). Die abgebauten Anlagen sollte man erst nach einiger Zeit löschen, bestenfalls wenn die gängingen Luftbilder aktu... commented 2026-10-01 16:01:09 UTC by onterof ♦71 | |
| 189536339 (Comments: 6) | flohoff (Discussed changesets: 87) | Klar ich hatte nur mir das ALKIS angeschaut und dann vor Ort es für plausibel gehalten da das quasi für jedermann zugängliche Bänke und Flächen sind. Und müssen Parks auf öffentlichem Grund sein? Ich finde nicht unb... commented 2026-10-01 15:49:30 UTC by stirps ♦67 | |
| 189733273 (Comments: 2) | Daham (Discussed changesets: 19) | Die Ost- Kardinalleuchttonne auf Position 53°23,3940'N 006°57,4260'E wurde ersatzlos eingezogen. commented 2026-10-01 15:49:28 UTC by Daham ♦14 | |
| 174810560 (Comments: 2) | KarooDesert (Discussed changesets: 12) | Hi foreigner037, Thanks for catching this! I’ll keep that policy in mind for future edits. commented 2026-10-01 15:39:28 UTC by KarooDesert ♦12 | |
| 189830166 (Comments: 2) | janmb (Discussed changesets: 7) | Okay - du hast das von 50 auf 30 runtergestuft - und zwar dauerthaft - Bisher halt galt da eine reduktion nur 7-21 uhr und so war das eingetragen: Hier ein Bild aus Juni diesen Jahres: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=123149860561991... commented 2026-10-01 15:39:27 UTC by flohoff ♦2,604 | |
| 189827974 (Comments: 1) | joost schouppe (Discussed changesets: 96) | Nog vergeten vermelden: de buitenste energiecentrale was gemapped als https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/18024360 met slechts één way als lid. Dus die relatie verwijderd en de info op die ene way gezet commented 2026-10-01 15:39:01 UTC by joost schouppe ♦1,559 | |
| 154195010 (Comments: 3) | Lodda (Discussed changesets: 59) | Hi Lodda, I've already checked it out. There's no mini-golf course here, just a school grounds. Done. commented 2026-10-01 15:38:48 UTC by TG-map4 ♦33 | |
| 170580003 (Comments: 4) | GanKonMalade (Discussed changesets: 6) | en effet.. dur a dire si ce point est vraiment pertinent, il est tel quel dans la BAN, je vais le signaler car effectivement il n'y a pas l'air d'avoir grand chose commented 2026-10-01 15:37:44 UTC by GanKonMalade ♦10 | |
| 189750391 (Comments: 5) | Cowboy79 (Discussed changesets: 41) | Danke fürs Anpassen commented 2026-10-01 15:37:12 UTC by aixbrick ♦942 | |
| 184630652 (Comments: 3) | GanKonMalade (Discussed changesets: 6) | Je pense que c'est juste la BD topo qui n'a pas ete mise a jour, j'ai utilise l outil de signalement de la BAN sur cette rue , on verra bien la reponse... si il y en a une. commented 2026-10-01 15:35:15 UTC by GanKonMalade ♦10 | |
| 189831032 (Comments: 1) | Fabricio Lima (Discussed changesets: 7) | O que seria "maps"? commented 2026-10-01 15:24:58 UTC by Lucas_semK ♦4 | |
| 189197830 (Comments: 1) | brodzio (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hey ! Merci de la contribution. Comme le site internet de refuges.info n'est pas le site internet officiel du refuge, je pense que la clé "website" n'est pas appropriée. Il semble y avoir une clé "ref:... commented 2026-10-01 15:17:03 UTC by EpicKiwi ♦1 | |
| 189799922 (Comments: 2) | jptolosa (Discussed changesets: 75) | Buen día, en Openstreetmap los glaciares de roca se mapean como natural=scree + geological=rock_glacier. La etiqueta natural=glacier se utiliza para los glaciares típicos de montaña o de valle. Ver acá: https://wiki.openst... commented 2026-10-01 15:16:36 UTC by jptolosa ♦249 | |
| 66300578 (Comments: 1) | MosKartograf (Discussed changesets: 36) | zerkniesz na https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5549533 ? commented 2026-10-01 15:13:50 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,230 | |
| 189819810 (Comments: 1) | Jan Derk (Discussed changesets: 4) | Dag Jan, Beter geen adressen op de gebouwomtrek zetten. er is een adresnode. Ik heb het adres verwijderd.(incompleet) MVG eggie commented 2026-10-01 15:11:12 UTC by eggie ♦47,558 | |
| 189755446 (Comments: 1) | Samuel Desmarchais (Discussed changesets: 4) | Bonjour, peux tu éviter de détruite des bâtiments corrects en les remplaçant par des multipolygones erronés ? Ta relation https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/21461173/history#map=19/44.253873/1.76410... commented 2026-10-01 15:05:03 UTC by Yunan973 ♦174 | |
| 189829722 (Comments: 1) | rubenk42 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Dag Ruben, Nooit naar de daken kijken. Daar staat het gebouw niet. Een luchtfoto is vaak schuin genomen. Ik heb het gebouw uitgelijnd mbv de BGT. Het lijkt verkeerd, maar het klopt precies. MVG eggie commented 2026-10-01 15:02:51 UTC by eggie ♦47,558 | |
| 189826271 (Comments: 2) | SophiaAstraea (Discussed changesets: 1) | Dank voor de tips Groetjes, Sophie commented 2026-10-01 15:01:53 UTC by SophiaAstraea ♦1 | |
| 189822509 (Comments: 1) | CantFindASeat (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks for your survey of house numbers, really useful stuff. When you encounter a mapped "house" which should actually be more than one house... rather than adding multiple numbers e.g. 2-4, could you either split the house into two... commented 2026-10-01 14:59:04 UTC by LateNightTone ♦94 | |
| 189827878 (Comments: 1) | rubenk42 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. Feedback Volgens de website hoort niet de plaatsnaam achter de naam. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-10-01 14:56:23 UTC by eggie ♦47,558 | |
| 189825044 (Comments: 1) | woohuanghp (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-10-01 14:52:37 UTC by eggie ♦47,558 | |
| 189822048 (Comments: 1) | punkinthehall (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-10-01 14:51:38 UTC by eggie ♦47,558 | |
| 189821280 (Comments: 1) | Jobjuhh (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-10-01 14:50:32 UTC by eggie ♦47,558 | |
| 189820730 (Comments: 1) | Max Maton (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-10-01 14:49:46 UTC by eggie ♦47,558 | |
| 189819920 (Comments: 1) | Fiat van der Laan (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-10-01 14:48:35 UTC by eggie ♦47,558 | |
| 189818653 (Comments: 1) | HSchutrups (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. Feedback Format phone aangepast naar +31... MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-10-01 14:46:44 UTC by eggie ♦47,558 | |
| 189818026 (Comments: 1) | esquire900 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-10-01 14:44:14 UTC by eggie ♦47,558 | |
| 189821589 (Comments: 1) | Aditya1382 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Kalau nama jembatan, pakai label bridge:name=Jembatan Drojo. Label name=* itu untuk nama jalannya. commented 2026-10-01 14:37:34 UTC by FajrAl ♦892 | |
| 189777455 (Comments: 5) | Stephen Lorié (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hoi... Er gaat bij OSM niemand over de goedkeuring. 😀 Het lijkt me oke. Formeel zou het ook building=roof layer=1 kunnen zijn. Overkappingen komen niet met de Kadaster import mee. Groet, eggie commented 2026-10-01 14:36:13 UTC by eggie ♦47,558 | |
| 189815087 (Comments: 1) | KylesWeb-ID (Discussed changesets: 7) | Terimakasih untuk kontribusinya, namun alangkah baiknya tiap perubahan sebelum submit, kamu beri deskripsi sedikit apa yang diubah. Contoh: Koreksi geometri jalan koreksi letak bangunan menambahkan jalan/bangunan menghapus jalan/bangunan<... commented 2026-10-01 14:34:07 UTC by FajrAl ♦892 | |
| 189813707 (Comments: 1) | confusedbuffalo (Discussed changesets: 133) | End of a true era of OSM 🫡 commented 2026-10-01 14:11:33 UTC by 0235 ♦53 | |
| 189821552 (Comments: 3) | Heidler (Discussed changesets: 1) | korrekter Link: https//wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Why_can't_I_delete_this_trail%3F commented 2026-10-01 14:03:28 UTC by Nakaner ♦3,280 | |
| 189826568 (Comments: 1) | yitimox (Discussed changesets: 7) | Havaist hat verileri çok eskide kalmış. Çoğu hattın güncel durak ve güzergah detaylarına göre yeniden çizilmesi gereklidir commented 2026-10-01 14:03:27 UTC by yitimox ♦47 | |
| 187360165 (Comments: 1) | LeX Rooster (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi LeX Rooster :). Hier scheint ein Bahngleis dupliziert: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1549184578/history. Es ist mit höherem Layer über dem regulären Gleis. commented 2026-10-01 14:01:12 UTC by kartograph ♦39 | |
| 189826398 (Comments: 1) | Nakaner-repair (Discussed changesets: 463) | Accidentially uploaded without proper changeset comment. It should have the comment: "Revert changeset 189821552 due to vandalism. Access tags were present. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Why_can%27t_I_delete_this_trail%3F" commented 2026-10-01 14:01:11 UTC by Nakaner ♦3,280 | |
| 189803629 (Comments: 1) | spacetime_786 (Discussed changesets: 1) | This changeset left broken borders, e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/16117507#map=13/31.54899/74.32826 because you deleted one way. Will you fix this? commented 2026-10-01 13:52:49 UTC by Flynn Marquardt ♦87 | |
| 189773883 (Comments: 2) | s8321414 (Discussed changesets: 21) | @Supaplex 看了一下,中文維基百科的地址是寫東吉村,我先寫東吉村好了 commented 2026-10-01 13:39:20 UTC by s8321414 ♦7 | |
| 189817989 (Comments: 1) | LochnagarMountain (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hey LochnagarMountain, Please do not continue mapping until you have replied to comments on your changeset at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189775817 Regards, Daniel commented 2026-10-01 13:16:15 UTC by danieldegroot2 ♦749 | |
| 189823782 (Comments: 1) | SomeoneElse (Discussed changesets: 483) | (forgot to mention it but source=local_knowledge) commented 2026-10-01 13:14:10 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,889 | |
| 189809564 (Comments: 1) | u915 (Discussed changesets: 1) | level=2 likely a mistake. For the purpose of consistency and automated processing levels are preferably numbered starting from 0 regardless of how they are commonly numbered and named in local language. So in a 2 storey building level=0 and level=1. ... commented 2026-10-01 13:00:10 UTC by kaposts ♦28 | |
| 186275678 (Comments: 1) | pavel bankevich (Discussed changesets: 15) | #mapbox_roads_attributes commented 2026-10-01 12:59:58 UTC by pavel bankevich ♦15 | |
| 186458827 (Comments: 1) | pavel bankevich (Discussed changesets: 15) | #mapbox_roads_attributes commented 2026-10-01 12:59:49 UTC by pavel bankevich ♦15 | |
| 186854709 (Comments: 1) | pavel bankevich (Discussed changesets: 15) | #mapbox_roads_attributes commented 2026-10-01 12:59:15 UTC by pavel bankevich ♦15 | |
| 186511222 (Comments: 1) | pavel bankevich (Discussed changesets: 15) | #mapbox_roads_attributes commented 2026-10-01 12:59:08 UTC by pavel bankevich ♦15 | |
| 186511084 (Comments: 1) | pavel bankevich (Discussed changesets: 15) | #mapbox_roads_attributes commented 2026-10-01 12:59:02 UTC by pavel bankevich ♦15 | |
| 187791702 (Comments: 1) | pavel bankevich (Discussed changesets: 15) | #mapbox_roads_attributes commented 2026-10-01 12:57:35 UTC by pavel bankevich ♦15 | |
| 189822643 (Comments: 1) | kamstut (Discussed changesets: 1) | I also remove a "service road", which doesn't actually exist. Its the perimeter of my neighbors property and covered in regular old grass. Not a drive, not a road, just yard. commented 2026-10-01 12:56:44 UTC by kamstut ♦1 | |
| 189516169 (Comments: 1) | evyy (Discussed changesets: 8) | Grammatic correction: "Added paths and all remaining sand traps" commented 2026-10-01 12:50:11 UTC by evyy ♦9 | |
| 189807285 (Comments: 1) | Janis Stiga RM (Discussed changesets: 5) | Vai varētu paskaidrot, kāpēc no https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1563685243 tika izņemts surface=unpaved? commented 2026-10-01 12:45:00 UTC by markalex- ♦49 | |
| 189821394 (Comments: 2) | TheCatInABox (Discussed changesets: 1) | Gotcha, thanks! commented 2026-10-01 12:43:21 UTC by TheCatInABox ♦1 | |
| 189802959 (Comments: 1) | Elias Rogge (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hallo Elias Rogge, bevor Du weitere Änderungen machst: Kannst Du bitte erstmal antworten, woher die Informationen stammen? Gruß Roger Wilco commented 2026-10-01 12:40:28 UTC by OSM_RogerWilco ♦839 | |
| 189821725 (Comments: 1) | Francesco Zanaboni (Discussed changesets: 23) | Modifiche limitate alla zona del porto di Cremona, area del changeset ampia per una modifica ad alcuni punti della riserva naturale commented 2026-10-01 12:39:10 UTC by Francesco Zanaboni ♦37 | |
| 189778772 (Comments: 1) | opensourcefriend (Discussed changesets: 4) | Guten Tag, wenn dort wirklich inzwischen durchgehend (Tag und Nacht) Tempo 30 gilt, dann kann das "maxspeed:conditional=30 @ (22:00-06:00)" entfernt werden. Viele Grüße whb commented 2026-10-01 12:33:59 UTC by whb ♦672 | |
| 189796765 (Comments: 1) | CarlosIllesca (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hola. Buen trabajo. Eso sí lo adapté para seguir las convenciones y agregué un par de datos más según el SII. Saludos commented 2026-10-01 12:33:45 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦3,437 | |
| 186870679 (Comments: 3) | Flamen_Sru (Discussed changesets: 34) | Hi Alew W2, thank you for making the corrections and reaching out to me regarding the issue. While combining the designated HOV lane with the motorway, I carried over the existing tags to the merged section. I see and understand the effect of the tol... commented 2026-10-01 12:31:24 UTC by Flamen_Sru ♦44 | |
| 189768887 (Comments: 2) | Gorger (Discussed changesets: 32) | Hi Pete Owens, my mapping activity at the location solely involved modifications on way 1563658339, which was flagged for review due to being a very short road segment. No other changes that would affect the connectivity were made as part of my edit ... commented 2026-10-01 12:29:38 UTC by Gorger ♦61 | |
| 188856918 (Comments: 1) | Nordpfeil (Discussed changesets: 78) | Hallo Nordpfeil, irgendwo in unseren Webseiten zum Thema automatisiertes Editieren steht sinngemäß: "Wenn jemand ein Pferd mit animal=kow taggt und jemand anders repariert das dann auf animal=cow, wird es dadurch nicht besser." | |
| 189821217 (Comments: 1) | Le99 (Discussed changesets: 5) | source was ESRI; tagged source has clouds commented 2026-10-01 12:26:22 UTC by Le99 ♦6 | |
| 180231230 (Comments: 34) | Pete Owens (Discussed changesets: 130) | ... and for the avoidance of doubt, the question here is not "are people allowed to cycle along pavements (in OSM terms highway=footway; footway=sidewalk)". Everyone, bar the "rogue cyclist" at the top of https://community.openst... commented 2026-10-01 12:24:56 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,889 | |
| X | 189587945 (Comments: 2) | StamppotAndijvie (Discussed changesets: 5) | NAMOBJ is an artefact from the borders of the desa that slipped through, used by geoservices.big.go.id. commented 2026-10-01 12:21:03 UTC by StamppotAndijvie ♦1 |
| 189449606 (Comments: 1) | Ste_Nova (Discussed changesets: 17) | Hi Ste_Nova, Can I ask why you have added the amenity=school tag back onto Ruthin School when it closed in July 2026 [1] and the site is now up for sale [2]. Your changeset comment of "details" is insufficient to explain why you have ... commented 2026-10-01 12:19:50 UTC by JezCrow ♦180 | |
| 189241505 (Comments: 3) | Tunibal (Discussed changesets: 18) | I know, I think OSM bugged at this point. commented 2026-10-01 12:03:51 UTC by Tunibal ♦10 | |
| 189797088 (Comments: 1) | jarinsy (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189819598 commented 2026-10-01 11:55:39 UTC by rajdhani ♦537 | |
| 189591509 (Comments: 1) | StamppotAndijvie (Discussed changesets: 5) | what's you judgement for converting all place from hamlet → neighbourhood? commented 2026-10-01 11:50:07 UTC by FajrAl ♦892 | |
| 189551777 (Comments: 1) | RV Fisherman (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi, what does opening-hours:signed-in mean? You can enter with a membership card? commented 2026-10-01 11:49:13 UTC by mueschel ♦7,392 | |
| 189659125 (Comments: 1) | M3lvin (Discussed changesets: 2) | ini bukan kampung, kan commented 2026-10-01 11:42:45 UTC by FajrAl ♦892 | |
| 189659362 (Comments: 1) | M3lvin (Discussed changesets: 2) | ini bukan kampung, kan commented 2026-10-01 11:42:19 UTC by FajrAl ♦892 | |
| 189812760 (Comments: 1) | Dexterdy (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OSM, Je info heb ik samengevoegd met het bestaande adres. Mvg, eggie commented 2026-10-01 11:22:18 UTC by eggie ♦47,558 | |
| 189699861 (Comments: 6) | Matti109 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Sæll, LMÍ hættu að taka loftmyndir af Íslandi upp úr síðustu aldamótum. Þá taka Loftmyndir ehf. við keflinu. LMÍ er þó núna farið að taka lo... commented 2026-10-01 11:18:17 UTC by Kerploonk ♦24 | |
| 189775073 (Comments: 1) | kevinmcg (Discussed changesets: 21) | Hi, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1356901405/ https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1549592109/ The geometry of the school and youth centre are distorted. commented 2026-10-01 11:12:09 UTC by VictorIE ♦1,271 | |
| 189815183 (Comments: 1) | scacciase (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, why did you delete these ways in Civitano del Sannio? https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?changeset=189815183#map=18/41.668947/14.404418 They clearly exist in both the authoritative Abruzzo Orto '18 and in Mapbox'26. Let me know, poste h... commented 2026-10-01 11:10:14 UTC by SekeRob ♦1,529 | |
| 171244107 (Comments: 3) | Marion_Moseby (Discussed changesets: 6) | Thank you for your answer. The tagging was wrong as it is not a memorial. I have fixed it. Regards commented 2026-10-01 10:52:38 UTC by kapazao ♦1,045 | |
| 189530152 (Comments: 1) | asokuria (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello Precisely what strettview photos did you use here? As far as I am aware there is no allowed streetlevel imagery available from which to make this edit. Cheers Phil commented 2026-10-01 10:43:11 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,856 | |
| 182927258 (Comments: 1) | mapl (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hallo mapl, ich habe die Relation gefunden und schreibe dich an, weil du offensichtlich in jüngerer Zeit am meisten daran gearbeitet hast. Wie es aussieht versuchst du, die recht große Relation in kleinere zu zerlegen. Im Landkreis Weil... commented 2026-10-01 10:37:53 UTC by santon ♦50 | |
| 189785135 (Comments: 1) | Tyoma14 (Discussed changesets: 8) | Исправил с правильного на неправильное. Вот тут описано соглашение: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Georgia_Abkhazia_South-Ossetia#Numbered_Lanes Откатываю commented 2026-10-01 10:36:53 UTC by evgenykatyshev ♦326 | |
| 189795464 (Comments: 1) | PatnosD (Discussed changesets: 3) | Fixed the name and phone format commented 2026-10-01 10:33:04 UTC by evgenykatyshev ♦326 | |
| 189795671 (Comments: 1) | PatnosD (Discussed changesets: 3) | I fixed the name and phone format. Please have a look commented 2026-10-01 10:32:04 UTC by evgenykatyshev ♦326 | |
| 189795784 (Comments: 1) | PatnosD (Discussed changesets: 3) | The name in Georgia should be in Georgian. For English or latin name use the name:en tag. I've fixed in this case commented 2026-10-01 10:29:54 UTC by evgenykatyshev ♦326 | |
| 154175989 (Comments: 2) | Heiner Einer (Discussed changesets: 6) | Der Kommentar ist zwar nun schon fast 2 Jahre alt, aber die Begründung für deine Ergänzung @Heiner Einer würde mich auch interessieren! Nicht auf einen Kommentar zu reagieren ist hier in OSM nicht die feine englische Art. commented 2026-10-01 10:24:11 UTC by BrummsLee ♦68 | |
| 189807331 (Comments: 1) | Synnovebr (Discussed changesets: 1) | It IS forbidden* commented 2026-10-01 10:09:18 UTC by Synnovebr ♦1 | |
| 188643425 (Comments: 2) | AhmedMohamedAli (Discussed changesets: 3) | Sorry for the late reply, Mueschel. I'm new here and I've never checked my "Notifications" page or the comments before. I only knew when someone sent me a private message, because a green "1" number shows up so I know so... commented 2026-10-01 10:03:50 UTC by AhmedMohamedAli ♦3 | |
| 171656942 (Comments: 1) | Bem Mapas (Discussed changesets: 4) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13128788113 is it OK to delete it now? commented 2026-10-01 10:01:25 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,230 | |
| 188030920 (Comments: 2) | AhmedMohamedAli (Discussed changesets: 3) | Thank you Salma. commented 2026-10-01 09:58:24 UTC by AhmedMohamedAli ♦3 | |
| 189807333 (Comments: 1) | Heyhohayhohu (Discussed changesets: 5) | Mint korábban is írtam, jelezve volt már a gyógyszertár. commented 2026-10-01 09:55:30 UTC by qstep ♦266 | |
| 188980222 (Comments: 1) | AndyB_66 (Discussed changesets: 69) | No to już budowa ruszyła. https://s74-lagow-opatow.gddkia.gov.pl/aktualnosci/ commented 2026-10-01 09:52:46 UTC by forgelang ♦1 | |
| 187773898 (Comments: 2) | AhmedMohamedAli (Discussed changesets: 3) | Sorry for the late reply, VLD0251. I'm new here and I've never checked my "Notifications" page or the comments before. I only knew when someone sent me a private message, because a green "1" number shows up so I know som... commented 2026-10-01 09:51:19 UTC by AhmedMohamedAli ♦3 | |
| 189811790 (Comments: 1) | JL5858 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Wow! Sehr geil! Danke für diesen Beitrag! commented 2026-10-01 09:36:48 UTC by m_fuhrmann ♦72 | |
| 189810429 (Comments: 1) | mjr13 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Terimakasih untuk kontribusinya, namun alangkah baiknya tiap perubahan sebelum submit, kamu beri deskripsi sedikit apa yang diubah. Contoh: Koreksi geometri jalan koreksi letak bangunan menambahkan jalan/bangunan menghapus jalan/banguna... commented 2026-10-01 09:27:41 UTC by FajrAl ♦892 | |
| 189144507 (Comments: 2) | luk323 (Discussed changesets: 35) | Dankeschön für den Tipp! Ich denke auch, das der Turm leider vermutlich abgerissen wird, da wichtige Streben angefault sind und der Turm ohnehin nicht groß genug ist, um einen guten Blick über die Bäume zu bekommen. commented 2026-10-01 09:27:39 UTC by luk323 ♦23 | |
| 182047464 (Comments: 1) | Afribit Africa BCE (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, Please stick to the Bitcoin tags as outlined in our wiki's like: https://gitea.btcmap.org/teambtcmap/btcmap-general/wiki/Verifying-Existing-Merchants Happy mapping, Edwin Comino BTC Map commented 2026-10-01 09:19:16 UTC by Comino ♦416 | |
| 187629043 (Comments: 2) | KseniyaChykun (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, and sorry I couldn’t answer earlier. Yes, the removal of the highway=track tag was intentional. When reviewing the latest available satellite imagery, I couldn’t see this road in that area. I also noticed that the mapped way cro... commented 2026-10-01 09:15:59 UTC by KseniyaChykun ♦1 | |
| 104261545 (Comments: 2) | TUBSmail (Discussed changesets: 17) | Yes. That's s stop for school busses only. There's no sign, no hit, no nothing. The "Gesamtschule Rödinghausen" falls this stop officially like that though. To disembark, theyll bus stops before the gate when the gate is clo... commented 2026-10-01 09:04:00 UTC by TUBSmail ♦3 | |
| 189730479 (Comments: 1) | MALVIN ALRAFIF (Discussed changesets: 1) | Suntingan ini telah dipulihkan. Harap ikuti tutorial interaktifnya commented 2026-10-01 08:25:31 UTC by FajrAl ♦892 | |
| 189753562 (Comments: 1) | Tobi Ferdianto (Discussed changesets: 1) | titik apa? commented 2026-10-01 08:20:53 UTC by FajrAl ♦892 | |
| 189713839 (Comments: 2) | BDP-CHUMTP (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour, C'est exactement ça que je souhaiter faire, merci de votre intervention. Bonne journée. Cordialement, commented 2026-10-01 07:29:03 UTC by BDP-CHUMTP ♦1 | |
| 189769167 (Comments: 8) | Bosburger (Discussed changesets: 2) | 👍 commented 2026-10-01 07:15:54 UTC by eggie ♦47,558 | |
| 189743328 (Comments: 1) | 2Thomas97 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189806131 commented 2026-10-01 06:56:39 UTC by kmpoppe ♦102 | |
| 189688272 (Comments: 5) | gelkins4 (Discussed changesets: 1) | > "I honestly don't want any of this on the map" In that case it's best to contact the map provider directly with your request. commented 2026-10-01 06:48:55 UTC by Mashin ♦607 | |
| 189727257 (Comments: 1) | Rmacaraig (Discussed changesets: 14) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers for mor... commented 2026-10-01 06:42:03 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,232 | |
| 189726798 (Comments: 1) | Rmacaraig (Discussed changesets: 14) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-10-01 06:39:05 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,232 | |
| 189739260 (Comments: 2) | MXC48 (Discussed changesets: 5) | You're welcome, I try to keep the Corsican data as up to date as possible (the only regular contributor here). So when I saw your note and the number of buildings to add, I rolled up my sleeves :) commented 2026-10-01 06:32:27 UTC by MXC48 ♦5 | |
| 189803268 (Comments: 1) | Hotel Riverside (Discussed changesets: 13) | You've been asked many times over the past >week to please properly (or at all) explain your edits and deletions of existing objects instead of no source=* and nonsense changeset comments, and particularly as a SEO account with a financial in... commented 2026-10-01 06:28:26 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,232 | |
| 189573166 (Comments: 2) | Hotel Riverside (Discussed changesets: 13) | Reverted due to continued mapping with zero response to any changeset comments in changeset 189805033 commented 2026-10-01 06:23:08 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,232 | |
| 189774343 (Comments: 2) | TransAct-AS (Discussed changesets: 92) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189803500 --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/189774343 commented 2026-10-01 06:20:42 UTC by Frank Peng ♦239 | |
| 189800291 (Comments: 1) | Wimmm777 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OSM, Hier staat nog helemaal niets. Ik zal het bedrijf samenvoegen met de adresnode op de juiste locatie. MVG eggie commented 2026-10-01 06:20:30 UTC by eggie ♦47,558 | |
| 189794553 (Comments: 3) | Rtromeds (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, Thanks for the quick response. I've amended the tagging as per OSM practice and your changes. Regards Bernard. commented 2026-10-01 06:06:52 UTC by BCNorwich ♦5,389 | |
| 187275366 (Comments: 2) | Janis Stiga RM (Discussed changesets: 5) | I reverted this change and added weight limit instead as it's shown on sign https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189804402 commented 2026-10-01 06:03:35 UTC by markalex- ♦49 | |
| 189754607 (Comments: 1) | Janis Stiga RM (Discussed changesets: 5) | What you did here is wrong: adding new road segment on top of existing one doesn't limit routers, as they still can use old road segments "underneath". But also, please, stop adding service=driveway to roads that are clearly not a d... commented 2026-10-01 05:51:44 UTC by markalex- ♦49 | |
| 189794812 (Comments: 2) | Rtromeds (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thank you commented 2026-10-01 05:48:17 UTC by Rtromeds ♦2 | |
| 189803781 (Comments: 1) | ljc_jlyb (Discussed changesets: 28) | 因未能及时保存更改,实际包括沈阳苏家屯区中央大街相关改动 commented 2026-10-01 05:37:49 UTC by ljc_jlyb ♦63 | |
| 189803500 (Comments: 1) | Frank Peng (Discussed changesets: 34) | Another mapper had already removed the highway=primary tag on Way 33300230 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/33300230) before this revert edit was made. commented 2026-10-01 05:32:22 UTC by Frank Peng ♦239 | |
| 163703958 (Comments: 1) | YoungCR (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! Can you take look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5548601 ? is node/3708215513/history really also a bus stop? commented 2026-10-01 04:42:03 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,230 | |
| 189800465 (Comments: 1) | iismitch55 (Discussed changesets: 68) | The layer=-1 tag should not be on ways 20357252 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/20357252) and 1563950444 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1563950444) as those roads are on ground level and not crossing over other features or below ground level. ... commented 2026-10-01 04:38:38 UTC by Frank Peng ♦239 | |
| 189713869 (Comments: 1) | erul2 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189800870 commented 2026-10-01 04:16:14 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,069 | |
| 189714322 (Comments: 1) | MapperTim (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189800721 commented 2026-10-01 04:15:47 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,069 | |
| 189709422 (Comments: 1) | Hotel Riverside (Discussed changesets: 13) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189800540 commented 2026-10-01 04:15:17 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,069 | |
| 189799566 (Comments: 1) | iismitch55 (Discussed changesets: 68) | No landuse was adjusted in this changeset. You just mapped those residential areas. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/189799566 commented 2026-10-01 04:14:47 UTC by Frank Peng ♦239 | |
| 189704901 (Comments: 1) | lucrobman101 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189787428 commented 2026-10-01 04:14:43 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,069 | |
| 189708120 (Comments: 1) | 徳太郎 佐野 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189787218 commented 2026-10-01 04:14:09 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,069 | |
| 189714236 (Comments: 1) | RikuNoUki (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189786839 commented 2026-10-01 04:13:38 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,069 | |
| 189715521 (Comments: 1) | firdavs11 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189786371 commented 2026-10-01 04:13:06 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,069 | |
| 189730296 (Comments: 1) | Tri Vuong (Discussed changesets: 2) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189770734 commented 2026-10-01 04:12:26 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,069 | |
| 189728297 (Comments: 1) | Nexus Labs AI (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189770220 commented 2026-10-01 04:11:57 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,069 | |
| 189703837 (Comments: 1) | Hawbs729 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189770011 commented 2026-10-01 04:11:26 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,069 | |
| 189726305 (Comments: 1) | ALESSANDRAHERMINIO (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189769921 commented 2026-10-01 04:10:52 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,069 | |
| 189708407 (Comments: 1) | Mani Kumar Reddy Kancharla (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189764667 commented 2026-10-01 04:10:00 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,069 | |
| 189720015 (Comments: 1) | potaemnyi (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189761414 commented 2026-10-01 04:09:29 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,069 | |
| 189732334 (Comments: 1) | AnnisaSalma17 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189760675 commented 2026-10-01 04:09:04 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,069 | |
| 189700606 (Comments: 1) | Daniel_Macia (Discussed changesets: 3) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189754983 commented 2026-10-01 04:07:37 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,069 | |
| 189656721 (Comments: 1) | Anizio (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189754384 commented 2026-10-01 04:06:59 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,069 | |
| 189673733 (Comments: 1) | Svilen Stanchev (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189741386 commented 2026-10-01 04:06:27 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,069 | |
| 189691289 (Comments: 1) | SUJIROKIMIMAME (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189724256 commented 2026-10-01 04:05:58 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,069 | |
| 189689154 (Comments: 1) | dcWallin (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189723236 commented 2026-10-01 04:05:26 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,069 | |
| 189689850 (Comments: 1) | AshAIXD (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189722345 commented 2026-10-01 04:04:55 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,069 | |
| 189672119 (Comments: 1) | closerthanmost (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189719159 commented 2026-10-01 04:04:24 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,069 | |
| 189683293 (Comments: 1) | WTon (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189756348 commented 2026-10-01 04:03:04 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,069 | |
| 189700032 (Comments: 1) | Daniel_Macia (Discussed changesets: 3) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189756512 commented 2026-10-01 04:02:26 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,069 | |
| 189691982 (Comments: 1) | Daniel_Macia (Discussed changesets: 3) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189757529 commented 2026-10-01 04:01:23 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,069 | |
| 189657304 (Comments: 1) | Davis Gallegos (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189757825 commented 2026-10-01 04:00:50 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,069 | |
| 189662286 (Comments: 2) | ShonkyCH (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189759278 commented 2026-10-01 04:00:26 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,069 | |
| 189776349 (Comments: 1) | Heo Tham An (Discussed changesets: 8) | Các cầu trên tuyến cao tốc phải được đặt layer=2 thay vì layer=1, bạn để ý kỹ nhé, và các tuyến cao tốc khác commented 2026-10-01 03:34:16 UTC by ZioDragon ♦30 | |
| 189775808 (Comments: 1) | พเนจร (Discussed changesets: 6) | (การแปลด้วยคอมพิวเตอร์) สวัสดี ดูเหมือนว่าคุณได้เพิ่มประเทศที่ไม่จำเป็นและแท็ก addr:country จำà... commented 2026-10-01 03:07:41 UTC by Joel Koen ♦98 | |
| 189797478 (Comments: 1) | yoisho2734_import (Discussed changesets: 1) | こんにちは、積極的な活動ありがとうございます。 Plateauデータのインポートにあたって、2点ほどお願い事項をメッセージで送らせていただきました。 お手数をおかけしますã... commented 2026-10-01 02:49:08 UTC by nyampire ♦203 | |
| 143415735 (Comments: 1) | muchichka_s (Discussed changesets: 53) | бред . я народжений в радянському союзі і не зусстрічав ніколи у виданної в Україні пресі російською таких перекладів Друге - порушення... commented 2026-10-01 02:42:49 UTC by pztu ♦3 | |
| 189615383 (Comments: 2) | Asa Foreman (Discussed changesets: 4) | I understand; however, my thought process was: the link roads coming from/going to 378 Spur will only ever see as much traffic as the spur itself, and therefore should not be classified any higher. Also, the intersection is less cluttered the way I d... commented 2026-10-01 02:33:08 UTC by Asa Foreman ♦3 | |
| 187306219 (Comments: 1) | CoolMan00541 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi CoolMan, Have you seen https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Utah/Naming_Conventions ? Because of the unusual way that street addresses work here in Utah, we have a dedicated wiki page to explain that, even though a local may read this addres... commented 2026-10-01 02:27:47 UTC by dknelson9876 ♦151 | |
| 189745945 (Comments: 1) | leftybender (Discussed changesets: 13) | I see the note you left on the trailhead, and you're absolutely right! That is bad form! Even if you can't find it spelled all the way out as "500 South" in any official materials, that doesn't mean it's not an abbreviat... commented 2026-10-01 02:22:16 UTC by dknelson9876 ♦151 | |
| 189743080 (Comments: 1) | TransAct-AS (Discussed changesets: 92) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189799546 commented 2026-10-01 01:34:32 UTC by rajdhani ♦537 | |
| 189735851 (Comments: 1) | malums_ (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189798838 commented 2026-10-01 00:45:48 UTC by rajdhani ♦537 | |
| 189796681 (Comments: 4) | Huong Dang (Discussed changesets: 10) | Seems like an oversight on the bike streets implementation side, shouldn’t have to alter the main database for it. Just don’t want to overly fragment things on OSM and slow down editing commented 2026-10-01 00:43:50 UTC by cstromw ♦7 | |
| 189732609 (Comments: 1) | Tri Vuong (Discussed changesets: 2) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189798717 commented 2026-10-01 00:35:00 UTC by rajdhani ♦537 | |
| 189742187 (Comments: 1) | Gage Maxwell (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189798549 commented 2026-10-01 00:22:17 UTC by rajdhani ♦537 | |
| 189795971 (Comments: 1) | chafe619 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola, eliminaste la esquina. Para quitar el semáforo se elimina solo la etiqueta, no el nodo. Revertí el cambio y quité el semáforo. Por cualquier consulta o aclaración, podés contactarte con l... commented 2026-10-01 00:20:40 UTC by caprieldeluca ♦167 | |
| 85435980 (Comments: 2) | TsukuMap (Discussed changesets: 1) | since the change is 6 years old i don't remember why i did it that way, so it was probably a typo. i've fixed it. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189798454 commented 2026-10-01 00:17:09 UTC by TsukuMap ♦1 | |
| 189787641 (Comments: 1) | marcomir (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola, gracias por la información. Revisé los cambios, entiendo que solo agregaste un nodo para poder poner el comentario en el conjunto de cambios? Por cualquier consulta o aclaración, podés contactarte con la comun... commented 2026-10-01 00:16:08 UTC by caprieldeluca ♦167 | |
| 189793187 (Comments: 1) | germanchelo1 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hola, ¿Por qué eliminaste este landuse? Los otros que creaste no son residential=urban, porque significa que hay torres de departamentos. Deshice los cambios. Por cualquier consulta o aclaración, podés contac... commented 2026-10-01 00:12:40 UTC by caprieldeluca ♦167 | |
| 189175227 (Comments: 2) | blacx (Discussed changesets: 22) | si, selecciona la capa ICGC provisional commented 2026-10-01 00:09:51 UTC by blacx ♦88 | |
| 189796387 (Comments: 1) | GullibleMappazo (Discussed changesets: 25) | i meant pois it autocorrected to lois for some reason commented 2026-09-30 23:47:32 UTC by GullibleMappazo ♦16 | |
| 189499706 (Comments: 2) | enterprise1995 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Für jedenfalls die umfassende Platzgeometrie scheidet highway=pedestrian definitionsgemäß aus. Genau genommen bleibt da auch nicht viel als zu Fuß begebarer Platzbereich. commented 2026-09-30 23:22:39 UTC by enterprise1995 ♦11 | |
| 189385321 (Comments: 2) | JoWa93 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Sorry, ich wollte auf https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1563922468 verlinken, nicht auf den Changeset. commented 2026-09-30 22:50:39 UTC by rohieb ♦175 | |
| 180106451 (Comments: 4) | Filip009CZ (Discussed changesets: 20) | Na dátach nebolo uvedené, kto trasu prevádzkuje. Väčšina trás je v správe miestneho SCK. Občas majú cyklotrasy v správe aj miestne skupiny. Preto som na nové trasy pridával ... commented 2026-09-30 22:41:47 UTC by Filip009CZ ♦55 | |
| 189716388 (Comments: 1) | Elias Rogge (Discussed changesets: 5) | Wo soll der sein? Ich war da und konnte ihn nicht finden. commented 2026-09-30 22:35:19 UTC by OSM_RogerWilco ♦839 | |
| 126436408 (Comments: 1) | joe2812 (Discussed changesets: 59) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10040209160/history/1 does this actually exist as place name? commented 2026-09-30 22:21:29 UTC by 9_tab ♦158 | |
| 189795896 (Comments: 1) | draaglom (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for noting this. For private roads, it's better to use access=private rather than access=no means no access to any mode of transport. That's not your fault, the wording in the iD editor is a little... commented 2026-09-30 22:18:42 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,942 | |
| 188909733 (Comments: 8) | Scout Jens (Discussed changesets: 131) | Aus meiner Sicht passt es jetzt. Schließen kann ich hier nichts, Changeset-Kommentare kann man nur einschlafen lassen. Aber hier in diesem Wald mit den vielen MTB-Trails werden wir wahrscheinlich auch in Zukunft noch Diskussion führen. Die... commented 2026-09-30 22:07:40 UTC by george1201 ♦343 | |
| 189763975 (Comments: 1) | Ankarfeer (Discussed changesets: 1) | You're doing great work, thank you! commented 2026-09-30 21:54:03 UTC by Seyruun ♦32 | |
| 186947963 (Comments: 1) | Probertp (Discussed changesets: 21) | Ahoj, tu (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/299622075) si imho nespravne zmenil sidewalk=right na sidewalk:both=no. Ja tam chodnik po lavej strane cesty vidim... commented 2026-09-30 21:47:40 UTC by Tomas_J ♦428 | |
| 113098909 (Comments: 1) | KosutM (Discussed changesets: 4) | Zdar, existencia tohoto chodniku (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/803314091) uz bola raz v minulosti vyznaceny na prilahlej ceste tagom sidewalk=left. Ty si ho vyznacil ako samostatnu liniu dupliticne k vyssie uvedenemu. Opravil som. Daj v buducnos... commented 2026-09-30 21:41:47 UTC by Tomas_J ♦428 | |
| 184865899 (Comments: 1) | b-unicycling (Discussed changesets: 358) | building=service is for utlities like power. Maybe building=office for an office building would be more fitting? Feel free to change it yourself. commented 2026-09-30 21:29:53 UTC by danieldegroot2 ♦749 | |
| 189389504 (Comments: 2) | Robert Ancell (Discussed changesets: 9) | I couldn't decide if using the slash (as it is written on a scorecard) or an underscore (which might not make it clear this is a scorecard for a mixed colour scorecard). I see taginfo (https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/reports/characters_in_keys... commented 2026-09-30 21:17:16 UTC by Robert Ancell ♦10 | |
| 189239791 (Comments: 4) | datainazwa (Discussed changesets: 5) | Maybe so, but OSM is NOT the place to lodge your protest! commented 2026-09-30 21:17:16 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,988 | |
| 189726715 (Comments: 1) | Banano boarding (Discussed changesets: 2) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189794608 where the changeset comment is: revert questionable edits commented 2026-09-30 21:15:57 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,455 | |
| 189794608 (Comments: 1) | woodpeck (Discussed changesets: 132) | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 189726715, 189792005. commented 2026-09-30 21:15:57 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,455 | |
| 189792005 (Comments: 2) | Banano boarding (Discussed changesets: 2) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189794608 where the changeset comment is: revert questionable edits commented 2026-09-30 21:15:56 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,455 | |
| 189793535 (Comments: 4) | danieldebari (Discussed changesets: 7) | Precies.. selecteer de BAG adresnode en dan regels aanvullen. Mapse commented 2026-09-30 21:11:30 UTC by eggie ♦47,558 | |
| 189790101 (Comments: 1) | Joel D Reid (Discussed changesets: 3) | Thanks for the help adding buildings in our area! This one is no longer an active school. We have a lot of abandoned schools in this area. Do you know of any good ways to tag it as no longer in use, or if we should? commented 2026-09-30 21:01:56 UTC by Boberino ♦1 | |
| 189744946 (Comments: 1) | Pedro Frason Jorge (Discussed changesets: 1) | Essa extensão que você alterou a velocidade, tem mais placas indicando 40 km/h do que 60 km/h, veja as imagens no Street View: https://www.google.com/maps/@-21.7619728,-41.3476043,3a,75y,166.79h,85.2t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1s-CCGHVuVbflhBren... commented 2026-09-30 20:53:10 UTC by Pedro Souza Costa Maps ♦97 | |
| 189638466 (Comments: 2) | B Armstrong (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks Phil - will update. commented 2026-09-30 20:46:18 UTC by B Armstrong ♦1 | |
| 189719947 (Comments: 3) | danieldebari (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hoi.. Nee. CoMaps maakt zelf een adres en is niet toegesneden op de Nederlandse situatie waarin we adresnodes importeren. Met de webdditor oo de PC gaat het wel correct. Mvg, eggie commented 2026-09-30 20:45:50 UTC by eggie ♦47,558 | |
| 189793389 (Comments: 1) | jxpsert (Discussed changesets: 88) | Source is survey + https://www.shishkebab.nl/contact/ commented 2026-09-30 20:36:52 UTC by jxpsert ♦93 | |
| 141066270 (Comments: 1) | Keith Helbley (Discussed changesets: 15) | Hello! Can you take look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5548269 ? commented 2026-09-30 20:33:30 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,230 | |
| 186822088 (Comments: 3) | Nicolas Vial (Discussed changesets: 12) | Thanks for the info, I've opened note/5548267 so it can be surveyed. commented 2026-09-30 20:31:21 UTC by Dimitar155 ♦1,052 | |
| 188198436 (Comments: 1) | JTnl (Discussed changesets: 27) | It looks like you deleted some of my work in the USC. The PDOK imagery is not fresh enough: I visited there in person and surveyed it. Please try not to overwrite manual survey with PDOK aerial edits which might not be up-to-date for an active constr... commented 2026-09-30 20:25:06 UTC by mcld ♦73 | |
| 169034108 (Comments: 2) | rezemika (Discussed changesets: 3) | Bonjour, Merci pour le retour, et désolé pour ces oublis ! Effectivement je ne sais pas si elles sont très utiles, je n'avais pas osé les supprimer vu qu'elles étaient déjà là, mais... commented 2026-09-30 20:22:41 UTC by rezemika ♦29 | |
| 189539626 (Comments: 1) | kawaai (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello, Despite we should be grateful that you are adding more data to the map, could you please spend a little more time to learn correct mapping practice? There are several tutorials and an entire wiki full of examples. In this edit, y... commented 2026-09-30 20:17:49 UTC by bxl-forever ♦3,091 | |
| 189792432 (Comments: 1) | trigpoint (Discussed changesets: 81) | Add access:fuel:lpg commented 2026-09-30 20:07:02 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,856 | |
| 189761284 (Comments: 2) | LySioS (Discussed changesets: 29) | Thx for your watch. It's clean now commented 2026-09-30 20:04:43 UTC by LySioS ♦160 | |
| 188559305 (Comments: 2) | cuzi (Discussed changesets: 33) | Thanks I have changed it to man_made=waterwheel according to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:historic%3Dwatermill If this was a watermill, historic=watermill tag could be added, as a single point, or as an area if the area is known. commented 2026-09-30 20:02:50 UTC by cuzi ♦194 | |
| 189728397 (Comments: 2) | duffyduckas (Discussed changesets: 1) | the slope is steeper at saddle, so it is easier to cross little bit southern commented 2026-09-30 19:58:42 UTC by duffyduckas ♦1 | |
| 189745853 (Comments: 2) | CrstblS (Discussed changesets: 22) | Sí Felipe, de hecho están documentados por una organización que trabaja seriamente en el catastro de glaciares rocosos en el valle del aconcagua, que justamente suelen ser omitidos porque están cubiertos de roca. Utilic&ea... commented 2026-09-30 19:55:59 UTC by CrstblS ♦8 | |
| 189790151 (Comments: 3) | Heydoc (Discussed changesets: 1) | No problem.. paar keer ctrl-F5 dan ziet u het gebouw weer. commented 2026-09-30 19:45:16 UTC by eggie ♦47,558 | |
| 189791584 (Comments: 1) | Duja (Discussed changesets: 28) | I acknowledge that this changeset broke a few boundary and forest relations, and I plan to fix them ASAP. commented 2026-09-30 19:42:15 UTC by Duja ♦104 | |
| 189777300 (Comments: 1) | Heyhohayhohu (Discussed changesets: 5) | Szia. Ezt visszavontam, jelölve volt már a gyógyszertár külön pontként. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element commented 2026-09-30 19:40:06 UTC by qstep ♦266 | |
| 189788204 (Comments: 1) | Patrik470 (Discussed changesets: 1) | You've dragged nodes 12308983606 and 12454324097 out of position, causing road and sidewalk ways to cross buildings. I have manually reverted these changes. I have also moved the camera you added and amended the tagging to reflect it... commented 2026-09-30 19:32:39 UTC by hoserab ♦256 | |
| 189649277 (Comments: 1) | Pete Owens (Discussed changesets: 130) | Are these sidewalks explicitly signed as no bicycles allowed at all, or are you continuing to mistakenly add "bicycle=no" when either omitting the "bicycle=*" tag or using"bicycle=dismount" describes the situation correc... commented 2026-09-30 19:31:11 UTC by tomhukins ♦303 | |
| 189781571 (Comments: 1) | AlejandroGHL (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hola. Por favor no agregar el tag building. eso es para las estructuras. Es claro que no hay un edificio que ocupe toda la propiedad. Salu2 --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/189781... commented 2026-09-30 19:29:53 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦3,437 | |
| 189783128 (Comments: 1) | CarlosIllesca (Discussed changesets: 3) | ok, gracias, pero el camino sigue existiendo? solo que no pueden pasar vehículos. Pueden pasar peatones? saludos --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/189783128 ... commented 2026-09-30 19:29:05 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦3,437 | |
| 189768614 (Comments: 5) | Tim van der Kloet (Discussed changesets: 1) | Wanneer het clubhuis van de Scouting hier ook zit kun je op de adresnode ook de tagging voor scout toevoegen. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:club%3Dscout Meestal voeg ik nog amenity=community_centre toe met community_centre=clu... commented 2026-09-30 19:26:44 UTC by eggie ♦47,558 | |
| 189648980 (Comments: 3) | jesh (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hyvä juttu. Polku lienee siis väärällä paikalla. Siirrän polkua sitten, kun menen siitä seuraavan kerran ohi. commented 2026-09-30 19:06:27 UTC by Tuplanolla ♦21 | |
| 189763623 (Comments: 2) | foehn (Discussed changesets: 13) | Bonjour David, J’ai cherché les bâtiments manquants sur les photos aériennes Bing disponibles sur Josm, j’ai du passer à côté du bâti dont tu parles. En général, je vér... commented 2026-09-30 18:52:26 UTC by foehn ♦15 | |
| 189469561 (Comments: 4) | Stanislav_1988 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thanks Stanislav! Cheers, and happy mapping! commented 2026-09-30 18:48:58 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,232 | |
| 189761955 (Comments: 2) | foehn (Discussed changesets: 13) | Bonjour David, Merci pour ce suivi. Effectivement j’applique la méthode convenue avec l’auteur de Pifometre lors d’une discussion au SOTM2025 à Tours. Cet outil développé bénévolement per... commented 2026-09-30 18:46:54 UTC by foehn ♦15 | |
| 33056659 (Comments: 4) | Melaskia (Discussed changesets: 1) | Le Procès-verbal de séance de la mairie d'Orléans, en date du 7 février 1908 (seance du 19 octobre), parle d'une contribution financière pour faire élever à Paris un monument à Marceli... commented 2026-09-30 18:41:23 UTC by Dani CS ♦79 | |
| 180733193 (Comments: 1) | Sam Jayah (Discussed changesets: 6) | the road between sooriyakanda and rakwana is not a trunk, primary would be okay commented 2026-09-30 18:37:54 UTC by VisibleSouth ♦20 | |
| 187717409 (Comments: 5) | I W (Discussed changesets: 5) | I think that looks really good! Thank you. Yeah, things do get a bit shifty around the dams - it becomes a judgment call where to stop following the old river path. I think your approach here is fine. If you want to do more waterway map... commented 2026-09-30 18:37:27 UTC by kaleidoscopica ♦47 | |
| 189071500 (Comments: 1) | abaddon89 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ciao! Il tag name serve solo per i nomi propri. Inserire "Fontanella" come nome è un errore di ridondanza: la natura dell'oggetto è già definita dal tag della categoria (amenity=drinking_water). Buona giornata commented 2026-09-30 18:35:21 UTC by davide020382 ♦9 | |
| 189274526 (Comments: 1) | Mapikids (Discussed changesets: 13) | DreamLand wordt met een camel case geschreven, dus niet als Dreamland. Ik zal het herstellen. Zie ook https://www.dreamland.nl/ commented 2026-09-30 18:27:08 UTC by A67-A67 ♦1,222 | |
| 189722711 (Comments: 1) | xuyaca (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, unfortunately you removed the most important tag highway=crossing. crossing=traffic_signal was also right there, as this is an important regulated pedestrian crossing. I fixed that Greetings commented 2026-09-30 18:20:59 UTC by onterof ♦71 | |
| 189748010 (Comments: 1) | User202608 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189788304 commented 2026-09-30 18:11:27 UTC by rajdhani ♦537 | |
| 189712688 (Comments: 1) | UWS-Tirol (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hallo, diese Objekte haben sehr viele Tags, die nicht in OSM gehören. Für größere Importe bitte auch immer die Import Richtlinien beachten: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines commented 2026-09-30 18:06:46 UTC by mueschel ♦7,392 | |
| 189745539 (Comments: 1) | Mariafernandacanoclemente (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, I noticed you and others adding many strange tags like these listed below: What do they mean? Please make sure to agree on one common spelling in all edits! clave clave de verificaion clave_de_verificaacion clve de verif... commented 2026-09-30 18:01:28 UTC by mueschel ♦7,392 | |
| 189558270 (Comments: 1) | TrejoSsalcedo (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, I noticed you and others adding many strange tags like these listed below: What do they mean? Please make sure to agree on one common spelling in all edits! clave clave de verificaion clave_de_verificaacion clve de verif... commented 2026-09-30 18:01:11 UTC by mueschel ♦7,392 | |
| 189521192 (Comments: 1) | MOISES ALEJANDRO GARCIA (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, I noticed you and others adding many strange tags like these listed below: What do they mean? Please make sure to agree on one common spelling in all edits! clave clave de verificaion clave_de_verificaacion clve de verif... commented 2026-09-30 18:01:07 UTC by mueschel ♦7,392 | |
| 189420381 (Comments: 2) | rogerscgreg (Discussed changesets: 1) | It's unfortunately vacant. In fact, the entire building is. commented 2026-09-30 17:59:22 UTC by rogerscgreg ♦1 | |
| 189698623 (Comments: 1) | GrowinBabies (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189787405 commented 2026-09-30 17:49:57 UTC by ajmat ♦581 | |
| 189409587 (Comments: 4) | JSAN_2018 (Discussed changesets: 5) | What is the source of all this data? If you import data from another source into OSM, it's mandatory to follow our Import Guidelines: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines As these nodes can't be used in OSM, and a... commented 2026-09-30 17:44:02 UTC by mueschel ♦7,392 | |
| 189740142 (Comments: 1) | abakuk (Discussed changesets: 1) | i contenuti delle carte Tabacco sono soggetti ai diritti di proprietà intellettuale della casa editrice Tabacco. Non credo consentano l'uso per redigere altra cartografia (come OSM) / The content of Tabacco maps is subject to the intellec... commented 2026-09-30 17:43:35 UTC by fabiotofy ♦338 | |
| 189716725 (Comments: 1) | firdavs11 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189787143 commented 2026-09-30 17:42:56 UTC by rajdhani ♦537 | |
| 189785797 (Comments: 1) | mavOsaure (Discussed changesets: 5) | source= Orthos Express - IGN 2026; knowledge commented 2026-09-30 17:13:50 UTC by mavOsaure ♦41 | |
| 189754217 (Comments: 1) | Белый Андрей (Discussed changesets: 5) | Разве здесь полный запрет проезда для авто? - http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11174764547 На всех спутниках автомобили припаркованы у дома. Прошу вернуть кÐ... commented 2026-09-30 17:09:31 UTC by Dimacn ♦1,294 | |
| 176252747 (Comments: 1) | ArMapper (Discussed changesets: 2) | Bonjour, Si c'est fermé définitivement, pourquoi ne pas l'avoir basculé en was:shop ou shop=vacant ? En laissant shop=bakery, ça peut ressortir quand on demande (comaps ou autre) une boulangerie (sous-enten... commented 2026-09-30 16:58:29 UTC by LudovicG ♦165 | |
| 189695052 (Comments: 4) | Pete Owens (Discussed changesets: 130) | That is simply out of date. There USED to be a play area there - it has now gone. It has never been a recreation ground. commented 2026-09-30 16:58:27 UTC by Pete Owens ♦88 | |
| 189722448 (Comments: 1) | matder (Discussed changesets: 3) | Bonjour, cette relation est cassée https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/10743540/history#map=16/51.00729/2.08267 Je te laisse poursuivre tes modifs dans le coin, notamment en la corrigeant. Cordialement commented 2026-09-30 16:41:07 UTC by Yunan973 ♦174 | |
| 189774181 (Comments: 3) | daniellenz (Discussed changesets: 4) | Genau, dann muss aber der amenity-Tag an die Fläche, sonst ist sie doppelt erfasst. Am Gebäude darf dann nur der building-tag bleiben. Hab es schon behoben commented 2026-09-30 16:39:16 UTC by limes11 ♦1,117 | |
| 189773104 (Comments: 1) | Uwenr5 (Discussed changesets: 47) | Hier ist beim Teilen der Straße zwar das neu Straßenstück zur Linie VRT 408 hinzugefügt worden. Jedoch nicht an der richtigen Stelle, sonder am Ende. Ich habe das angepasst. Bitte demnächst beachten, dass der ID-Editor ... commented 2026-09-30 16:31:27 UTC by bernward1 ♦52 | |
| 189507462 (Comments: 2) | l3BAM (Discussed changesets: 23) | Yes, thank you. It is a typo that i am fixing. I cannot qualified this broken barrier. commented 2026-09-30 16:28:06 UTC by l3BAM ♦74 | |
| 184016299 (Comments: 20) | matthewfecica (Discussed changesets: 15) | I agree with Kevin. And you said the AT is broken down to match trail guides, and like Kevin said, the End to End Tally Sheet uses these same sections, the official Long Path guide uses these sections, when people are hiking the Long Path thry will s... commented 2026-09-30 16:27:54 UTC by matthewfecica ♦15 | |
| 189698447 (Comments: 3) | Octer (Discussed changesets: 2) | En supprimant l'attribut wall, tu as mis des murs partout alors qu'avant il y avait des bâtiments sans murs. J'ai tout annulé et remis comme c'était. Retient qu'il ne faut JAMAIS fusionner de... commented 2026-09-30 16:27:41 UTC by Yunan973 ♦174 | |
| 189774620 (Comments: 1) | daniellenz (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hallo, der Spielplatz ist bereits hier erfasst: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/679052450 Ist das komplette Gelände, das bisher als Park erfasst war, ein Spielplatz ? commented 2026-09-30 16:16:51 UTC by limes11 ♦1,117 | |
| 189775168 (Comments: 1) | daniellenz (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hallo, das Gymasium ist bereits hier erfasst: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/983740785 Was ist denn in dem nördlichen Gebäudetrakt ? Wird der auch vom Gymasium genutzt ? Viele Grüße commented 2026-09-30 16:10:35 UTC by limes11 ♦1,117 | |
| 189668307 (Comments: 2) | Ky_AT (Discussed changesets: 27) | Hi Udarian, thank you for making the corrections and the nudge. That obviously has slipped my attention, but I’ll make sure to be more careful about affected alignments. Much appreciated, happy mapping to you too. commented 2026-09-30 16:07:48 UTC by Ky_AT ♦26 | |
| 189510257 (Comments: 5) | Fannar82 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo, nein, dafür ist die Sachlage zu kurzfristig. Wie ich oben schrieb, der Zustand sollte für mehrere Monate vorhanden sein. Dass diese Fähre ihren Dienst komplett einstellt ist selten und so aussichtslos ist die Situation n... commented 2026-09-30 16:04:34 UTC by limes11 ♦1,117 | |
| 189405571 (Comments: 3) | AlejandroGHL (Discussed changesets: 3) | Gracias Alejandro. El nombre que eliminaste es es el nombre oficial del camino. Eso no está en cuestión. El tema es si acaso el nombre que agregaste es el usado. Sobre Google, no es una fuente que podamos usar. Por lo dem&aac... commented 2026-09-30 16:02:55 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦3,437 | |
| 148758459 (Comments: 2) | gc27 (Discussed changesets: 10) | Hi, this changeset created at 2y ago and 10000 change set ago, so I'm not sure what I did at that time. But I will look into your note. * I think this way means that "station building that build over the platform", but not sure h... commented 2026-09-30 15:53:58 UTC by gc27 ♦28 | |
| 189776415 (Comments: 1) | Nikola Djunev (Discussed changesets: 1) | Здравейте, Благодаря за промяната! Струва ми се че е доста рано за повишаване на ранга на тези улици. По-скоро бих изчакал да завършат ... commented 2026-09-30 15:52:17 UTC by Dimitar155 ♦1,052 | |
| 189680456 (Comments: 3) | xanderthemapper31 (Discussed changesets: 9) | In the case, you would put landuse=construction on the individual lots that are being constructed, not the whole neighborhood. Also, are you sure you're using the most up-to-date imagery when determining that an area is under construction? I... commented 2026-09-30 15:40:37 UTC by ScrawnyMeowth1 ♦55 | |
| 189754835 (Comments: 1) | Xaver R (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Xaver, willkommen bei OpenStreetMap! Ich sehe, dass du in deiner ersten Änderung das Stadion Vaterstetten als Punkt (https://osm.org/node/14233123840) hinzugefügt hast. Jetzt ist es aber doppelt eingetragen, denn es war bisher sch... commented 2026-09-30 15:40:14 UTC by flo2154 ♦72 | |
| 189775288 (Comments: 1) | kawaai (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello, and welcome to OSM. I am currently trying to repair all the edits you made today and spotted this. While you are adding some useful information to the map, I am afraid there are a few issues. One of the key principles of O... commented 2026-09-30 15:36:53 UTC by bxl-forever ♦3,091 | |
| 158679085 (Comments: 5) | A67-A67 (Discussed changesets: 404) | Top dankjewel @A67-A67 commented 2026-09-30 15:33:16 UTC by defluyter ♦28 | |
| 189778882 (Comments: 2) | defluyter (Discussed changesets: 23) | Ik heb deze en de vorige foutieve wijziging teruggedraaid. commented 2026-09-30 15:33:03 UTC by A67-A67 ♦1,222 | |
| 181823301 (Comments: 6) | Ορφέας Μαρκετάκης (Discussed changesets: 4) | i see that currently drivers are using this part of the road commented 2026-09-30 15:31:52 UTC by rodolfosp ♦1 | |
| 189780717 (Comments: 1) | ReedShomaker (Discussed changesets: 1) | Sorry please don't accept this, I got confused on where this is, the current state is accurate commented 2026-09-30 15:31:40 UTC by ReedShomaker ♦1 | |
| 166305840 (Comments: 1) | Jvitegem (Discussed changesets: 38) | In deze wijziging wordt naast de BAG-update ook een relatie omgezet van een toekomstige turn-restrictie naar een bestaande turn-restrictie. Dit is onjuist en heeft inmiddels meer dan een jaar voor verkeerde navigatie gezorgd. Ik ga het terugze... commented 2026-09-30 15:31:09 UTC by A67-A67 ♦1,222 | |
| 182480778 (Comments: 1) | Ilanride22 (Discussed changesets: 42) | 95150699 is not a pedestrian street. it was tagged correcly as link. FYI commented 2026-09-30 15:26:22 UTC by Dindia ♦65 | |
| 189558854 (Comments: 2) | Madi-Red (Discussed changesets: 44) | Hi Frans S, Thank you for your message. I wanted to validate the grids thoroughly, with a primary focus on adding buildings that had been missed during the initial editing. However, I apparently overlooked some existing issues. I acknowledge the f... commented 2026-09-30 15:17:51 UTC by Madi-Red ♦23 | |
| 189771966 (Comments: 2) | corridorhybrids (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo kadiwa, covered=arcade kannte ich noch nicht, ist hier aber eindeutig korrekter als tunnel=building_passage. Vielen Dank für das sorfältige Anschauen, den ausführlichen Hinweis und die schnelle Korrektur. Viele Grü... commented 2026-09-30 15:12:22 UTC by corridorhybrids ♦1 | |
| 189363213 (Comments: 3) | skradacz (Discussed changesets: 4) | Poprawiłem na tyle, na ile udało mi się ustalić z Trójmiasta xD na pewno Babimojska jest odcięta od parkingu, jak wynika że zdjęć które udało mi się znaleźć. Układ drogowy, jezeli chodzi o połączenie tego parkingu z drogÄ... commented 2026-09-30 15:11:48 UTC by skradacz ♦1 | |
| 188380169 (Comments: 1) | lubosb (Discussed changesets: 11) | Ahoj, tento chodnik (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/803314091) si vyznacil duplicitne. Uz raz bola jeho pritomnosti vyznacena na prilahlej ceste tagom sidewalk=left. Opravil som. Daj na to pozor v buducnosti, prosim. Viac viz. osm wiki. commented 2026-09-30 15:05:03 UTC by Tomas_J ♦428 | |
| 189779588 (Comments: 1) | cyclist789 (Discussed changesets: 24) | I apparently added a Node to underground cable way/1378675226 by accident. commented 2026-09-30 15:00:52 UTC by cyclist789 ♦140 | |
| 189747101 (Comments: 1) | Sam0Te (Discussed changesets: 7) | Bonjour, peux tu éviter de détruire des bâtiments corrects en les remplaçant pas des éléments erronés ? En fusionnant les 4 bâtiments de la mairie, deux qui sont des toits et deux avec d... commented 2026-09-30 14:59:06 UTC by Yunan973 ♦174 | |
| 189767764 (Comments: 4) | sembelst134 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Oke, habs zurückgesetzt: changeset/189778437 Bei Gelegenheit werd ich da vllt mal die issues von den osm-carto auf git durchsuchen, ob es da bereits ein thread bezüglich der Darstellung gibt. Und wenn Reiter auf DE:240 Wegen v... commented 2026-09-30 14:57:48 UTC by sembelst134 ♦66 | |
| 186004150 (Comments: 8) | Wikilux (Discussed changesets: 56) | Niemand sagt im natürlichen Sprachgebrauch: "Bin in Birmensdorf Zett Ha" sondern "Bin in Birmensdorf in Zürich". Dass dieses Birmensdorf hier in ZH ist lässt sich von den übrigen Daten ableiten. Und wenn ... commented 2026-09-30 14:47:59 UTC by GartenStuhl ♦108 | |
| 189659231 (Comments: 1) | aul12 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189778380 commented 2026-09-30 14:36:22 UTC by rajdhani ♦537 | |
| 188810751 (Comments: 2) | Cortix (Discussed changesets: 27) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:community Fixed commented 2026-09-30 14:32:59 UTC by Cortix ♦23 | |
| 189277571 (Comments: 3) | hobby_mapper98 (Discussed changesets: 2) | No worries. Like a lot of OSM stuff it's a European style to differentiate between ground floor and 1st floor (North American 2nd floor). One way to think about it is building:levels - building:min_level gives the actual number of floors/levels. commented 2026-09-30 14:14:44 UTC by ion_chi ♦98 | |
| 189770121 (Comments: 1) | Dwella (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi Dwella, welcome to OSM! Just a quick note: most urban roads in Ghana have already been mapped, so before tracing new roads, please check whether they already exist on the map. Also, Go Map!! isn’t the best app for adding roads... commented 2026-09-30 13:51:26 UTC by Sammyhawkrad ♦190 | |
| 189658893 (Comments: 1) | Kevin Obregon (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189776206 commented 2026-09-30 13:48:49 UTC by rajdhani ♦537 | |
| 189720826 (Comments: 2) | f_gonella (Discussed changesets: 67) | Ciao @totera, è vero il tuo argomento sull'ambiguità, e lo stesso si può dire anche per segnali di stop, semafori, etc... quando hanno una direzione e sono su un nodo condiviso tra due vie. Però un cartello mappato su... commented 2026-09-30 13:47:40 UTC by f_gonella ♦71 | |
| 189441960 (Comments: 3) | ngocthienvtii (Discussed changesets: 2) | Tôi mong bạn cẩn thận hơn khi chỉnh sửa, và đừng tạo ra những lỗi sai như thế này, vì nó ảnh hưởng đến vấn đề điều hướng. commented 2026-09-30 13:39:02 UTC by Hung Tran 9x0 ♦59 | |
| 189052119 (Comments: 1) | artenovis_9020 (Discussed changesets: 7) | Благодаря за промяната! След като сте решили проблем от дадена бележка е хубаво да я затваряте. Поздрави, Митко commented 2026-09-30 13:38:30 UTC by Dimitar155 ♦1,052 | |
| 189733662 (Comments: 1) | Bosbeheerder RV (Discussed changesets: 13) | Dag Bosbeheerder Er is nu weer een nieuwe mapper actief die de voetpaden openzet voor fietsers met bicycle=yes. Geen idee of het klopt en of het wel voetpaden zijn? https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189769167#map=18/52.381553/5... commented 2026-09-30 13:34:17 UTC by eggie ♦47,558 | |
| 189775232 (Comments: 1) | Erik Vroon (Discussed changesets: 3) | .. en dan ga je door als je al die foutmeldingen krijgt? Ik heb nu de buildingtag verwijderd. MVG eggie commented 2026-09-30 13:29:37 UTC by eggie ♦47,558 | |
| 189765006 (Comments: 2) | Kris Van Kerckhoven (Discussed changesets: 1) | This is how it looks like on my wandrer app; the red line I cannot walk. All the blue lines I did walk and so they are no red anymore... Hmm I cannot add a screenshot? OK so pls go to wandrer.earth and try to fill all the paths on this intersection.... commented 2026-09-30 13:28:59 UTC by Kris Van Kerckhoven ♦1 | |
| 189745065 (Comments: 2) | Poblete22 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Eliminado por vandalismo commented 2026-09-30 13:26:09 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦3,437 | |
| 189770115 (Comments: 1) | BLwYWIC1Ak6bAIZ (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-09-30 13:13:35 UTC by eggie ♦47,558 | |
| 188800056 (Comments: 1) | MarylinRamos (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, what does 'diet:salinera' mean? Some low-salt diet? commented 2026-09-30 13:10:33 UTC by mueschel ♦7,392 | |
| 189768702 (Comments: 1) | Bosburger (Discussed changesets: 2) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. Feedback Zeker weten dat je hier mag fietsen... daar Bosbeheerder BV de fietspaden juist op bicycle=no heeft gezet? MVG, | |
| 189773885 (Comments: 1) | nulltivitamine (Discussed changesets: 1) | stark! commented 2026-09-30 13:06:07 UTC by nulltivitamine ♦1 | |
| 155158430 (Comments: 5) | michel60 (Discussed changesets: 57) | Hi, But what is the solution for indicating that the basement is partially below grade? commented 2026-09-30 13:03:23 UTC by michel60 ♦104 | |
| 189654700 (Comments: 1) | nifqi (Discussed changesets: 2) | ya apa bedanya? commented 2026-09-30 13:01:08 UTC by FajrAl ♦892 | |
| 189761141 (Comments: 1) | Rtaa (Discussed changesets: 1) | Tekan Q untuk membuat sempurna persegi commented 2026-09-30 12:58:09 UTC by FajrAl ♦892 | |
| 189749001 (Comments: 5) | Fonv (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hier GraphHopper https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=graphhopper_bicycle&route=52.07382%2C4.424583%3B52.072877%2C4.424004 Maar als je Valhalla of osrm instelt in het al weer anders. commented 2026-09-30 12:50:51 UTC by eggie ♦47,558 | |
| 134715463 (Comments: 1) | Eric Bie (Discussed changesets: 58) | Bonjour ! Est-ce que le changement d'orthographe "Marcelin" ⇒ "Marcellin" est confirmé? Cf. changeset 33056659 qui prenait soin à corriger l'orthographe dans le sens opposé. commented 2026-09-30 12:37:43 UTC by Dani CS ♦79 | |
| 189766920 (Comments: 1) | fluzzz (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi Fluzzz, thank you for your contribution! It's very useful to have amenities like restaurants up to date. You changed the name of the restaurants, however, it's clear that other tags have also changed (website, phone, opening hours, cuisi... commented 2026-09-30 12:28:08 UTC by BBJIB ♦18 | |
| 186986034 (Comments: 2) | multimob (Discussed changesets: 62) | Inderdaad. Toen deze wijziging in augustus werd doorgevoerd, beschouwde De Lijn die haltes als niet meer bestaand. En nu zijn ze weer terug in de officiële gegevens. Dit is ondertussen aangepast. Bedankt. commented 2026-09-30 12:27:08 UTC by multimob ♦91 | |
| 189769776 (Comments: 2) | witti-42 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Ganz ehrlich? Welche bessere Darstellung nach der Verschiebung? Lass es! Es ist unnötig, die Objekte zu verschieben, wenn die richtige Lage haben commented 2026-09-30 12:24:58 UTC by Znaika ♦227 | |
| 187104933 (Comments: 3) | stavrosP (Discussed changesets: 5) | Όταν έφυγε ο Κρητικός ξήλωσε και το Joltie commented 2026-09-30 12:15:31 UTC by stavrosP ♦5 | |
| 188787240 (Comments: 2) | Langlaeufer (Discussed changesets: 140) | Ja, der letzte doppelpunkt ist zu viel. commented 2026-09-30 12:14:02 UTC by Langlaeufer ♦1,586 | |
| 189622299 (Comments: 2) | Jagged DeepPink Echidna (Discussed changesets: 2) | Good catch! at the time I forgot to add an note regarding that. I plan to check myself next weekend to see the situation commented 2026-09-30 12:01:00 UTC by Jagged DeepPink Echidna ♦2 | |
| 49731438 (Comments: 1) | Bahntech (Discussed changesets: 38) | moin Bahntech, kannst du bitte schauen, warum du in diesem Changeset dem Way (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/467133055) die Tags genommen hast? commented 2026-09-30 11:59:01 UTC by AlexSpritze ♦47 | |
| 189731386 (Comments: 3) | janhals (Discussed changesets: 33) | Map what's on the ground is het motto. 👍 commented 2026-09-30 11:53:00 UTC by eggie ♦47,558 | |
| 189724686 (Comments: 2) | Elias Rogge (Discussed changesets: 5) | Ok, ich habe mich verguckt. Dachte der Punkt liegt außerhalb vom Gebäude. Aber das ist der Restaurantbereich, nicht die Rezeption. Bist Du vor Ort gewesen? commented 2026-09-30 11:48:09 UTC by OSM_RogerWilco ♦839 | |
| 189756124 (Comments: 1) | Elias Rogge (Discussed changesets: 5) | Und jetzt hast Du ihn doppelt eingetragen. commented 2026-09-30 11:40:18 UTC by OSM_RogerWilco ♦839 | |
| 189756123 (Comments: 1) | Elias Rogge (Discussed changesets: 5) | Wir hier vermutet? Auf dem Platz? Woher hast Du die Info? commented 2026-09-30 11:38:32 UTC by OSM_RogerWilco ♦839 | |
| 189552843 (Comments: 3) | Doc Géofan (Discussed changesets: 3) | @kunalchharpe For the time being, I had chosen to add them, but I gather it is better to wait for more recent images or another source; please feel free to let me know. I can then remove the relevant items. Oh, and speaking of land use, I admit it... commented 2026-09-30 11:30:46 UTC by Doc Géofan ♦2 | |
| 174674309 (Comments: 1) | lukeender (Discussed changesets: 2) | Re: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/17018903 This is a bit of strange tagging. parking:both=left shouldn't that not be parking:left=yes? And when parking only on one side, should parking:both:orientation=parallel not be change... commented 2026-09-30 11:26:33 UTC by Kees 59 ♦141 | |
| 188237112 (Comments: 1) | jo xeis (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi! Ich werde dein changeset reverten, ich denke es ist klar, dass aus eine Fährenroute nicht einfach so ein Wanderweg werden kann. mfg commented 2026-09-30 11:16:18 UTC by parsewski ♦27 | |
| 188295947 (Comments: 1) | Rove (Discussed changesets: 13) | Hi, I noted you have reconnected the cima to the admin boundary, but it has been recently removed by Simon Poole as a result of checking with official swiss data. Which are your sources? commented 2026-09-30 11:15:29 UTC by dieterdreist ♦920 | |
| 189718461 (Comments: 1) | Tyoma14 (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hi! Wrong format for street name translations. See my comment on this changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188789608 commented 2026-09-30 11:11:16 UTC by evgenykatyshev ♦326 | |
| 137472682 (Comments: 4) | dx125 (Discussed changesets: 28) | Okay, ich prüfe das und dann wird das in den meisten Fällen gelöscht werden. Es wird etwas dauern, bitte um Geduld. commented 2026-09-30 11:05:16 UTC by dx125 ♦130 | |
| 181875506 (Comments: 1) | artfulblahblah (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, you've changed access=destination to bicycle=destination for this bicycle road. I assume you meant bicycle=designated instead. access=destination most likely should have been vehicle=destination, since through traffic is prohib... commented 2026-09-30 11:02:23 UTC by Luzandro ♦1,040 | |
| 177613129 (Comments: 2) | Boswachter Piet (Discussed changesets: 1) | I have fixed one part were the modification from highway=path to highway=cyclepath was incorrect. I get what was intended (there is a path for hikers and a path for offroad cycling), but it several mistakes were made while mapping this situation. I r... commented 2026-09-30 10:51:32 UTC by L'imaginaire ♦435 | |
| 189765330 (Comments: 2) | engel321 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hey, in meiner Gegend bin ich sie schon abgefahren aber die sind auch unter https://radroutenplaner.hessen.de/map/ kartiert :) commented 2026-09-30 10:28:16 UTC by engel321 ♦1 | |
| 189639134 (Comments: 4) | britischer_elch (Discussed changesets: 6) | Alles klar, danke dir für deine Erklärung! commented 2026-09-30 10:24:15 UTC by PPete2 ♦189 | |
| 189766565 (Comments: 1) | Dave Attacks (Discussed changesets: 1) | NB: The title need careful reading (more careful than when I first added this). In the Title Plan, the woodland is *not* the brown/orange shaded area, rather it is the area within the red border but excluding the areas with green borders. commented 2026-09-30 10:22:58 UTC by Dave Attacks ♦1 | |
| 185251438 (Comments: 1) | Knubbelbubble (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo, danke füs mappen. Die Hausnummer liegt bereits im Adresstag (Punkt) auf dem Hauptgebäude,diese werden für die Navigation heraugezogen. Gebäude selber tagen keine Adressbezeichnung. Werde die Haunummern aus den Nebenge... commented 2026-09-30 10:21:40 UTC by SaPatz ♦6 | |
| 189750774 (Comments: 4) | Bobby&Anya (Discussed changesets: 4) | Oke.. laat maar even zo dan hoef je allen maar de details aan te passen en disused te verwijderen. Gr eggie commented 2026-09-30 10:21:16 UTC by eggie ♦47,558 | |
| 188285839 (Comments: 2) | superrache (Discussed changesets: 27) | Bonjour, vérifié sur le terrain, c'est une descente très directe avec un panneau "descente abrupte". Je l'ai repéré d'en haut mais pas emprunté. J'irai vérifier sa positio... commented 2026-09-30 10:10:30 UTC by superrache ♦25 | |
| 181211101 (Comments: 2) | Pieter Vander Vennet (Discussed changesets: 175) | Het was me verteld op de natuurpunt-werkdag. Echte inside knowledge dus :p commented 2026-09-30 10:00:31 UTC by Pieter Vander Vennet ♦473 | |
| 189756086 (Comments: 1) | Kaloan-koko (Discussed changesets: 87) | За n11026067469 - какво трябва да означава "PPSA Association only"? Това предполага ли някакви ограничения? Какво е PPSA? Ако контекстът е шеговит(примÐ... commented 2026-09-30 09:56:25 UTC by Fraxi ♦519 | |
| 189765064 (Comments: 1) | NeatNit (Discussed changesets: 5) | Accidentally pressed the "Restore" button, was really unclear what it was gonna do... Whoops. I think better-osm needs a confirmation dialog. commented 2026-09-30 09:55:03 UTC by NeatNit ♦87 | |
| 160535412 (Comments: 5) | pangoSE (Discussed changesets: 47) | ;-) jag skall på möte imorgon https://www.lansstyrelsen.se/stockholm/om-oss/kalender/kalenderhandelser---stockholm/2026-06-05-regionalt-vandringsledsforum.html Tror det saknas ledägare som det heter etc.... Tackar den ka... commented 2026-09-30 09:51:29 UTC by salgo60 ♦22 | |
| 189762892 (Comments: 1) | PGTypes (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. Feedback In OSM taggen we bedrijven e.d. bij op de adresnodes. Ook voegen we de aard van het bedrijf toe. Ik heb het a... commented 2026-09-30 09:49:33 UTC by eggie ♦47,558 | |
| 189676532 (Comments: 1) | tyroleanDave (Discussed changesets: 4) | bitte versuche bei Baustellen, abgebrochenen Häusern die neu gebaut werden etc. statt zu löschen und etwas mit gleichen Infos (z.B. Adresse) wieder als construction anzulegen die vorhandenen Elemente und zu bearbeiten; das erhält die H... commented 2026-09-30 09:48:01 UTC by fs_LT ♦247 | |
| 189702932 (Comments: 1) | joof_gambron (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189765241 commented 2026-09-30 09:47:21 UTC by MappingMore ♦759 | |
| 189762857 (Comments: 4) | youphavermans (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted by changeset #189765198 commented 2026-09-30 09:46:26 UTC by eggie ♦47,558 | |
| 189677069 (Comments: 1) | tyroleanDave (Discussed changesets: 4) | ich nehme an das Haus Maderspergerstr 22 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/318044740) wurde abgebrochen, es wird aber ein Neues gebaut und das bekommt vermutlich auch wieder die selbe Adresse? dann wäre es optimal statt zu löschen den http... commented 2026-09-30 09:38:14 UTC by fs_LT ♦247 | |
| 189640109 (Comments: 3) | lyctkel (Discussed changesets: 63) | Hi lyctkel, Handig zo'n foto. Ik heb de name aangepast. commented 2026-09-30 09:37:03 UTC by Kees 59 ♦141 | |
| 104374027 (Comments: 1) | blauloke (Discussed changesets: 26) | Hallo, ich habe Dir bzgl. des nodes 8712708066 (fountain) eine PM geschickt. commented 2026-09-30 09:36:05 UTC by tracker51 ♦17 | |
| 184207182 (Comments: 1) | Картограф-любитель (Discussed changesets: 13) | Прикольно, когда на узкой пешеходной дорожке появляется "разворотная петля с островом". commented 2026-09-30 09:35:33 UTC by save2desk ♦90 | |
| 189760342 (Comments: 1) | rorcho (Discussed changesets: 1) | Благодаря за промяната! Когато има група от контейнери, достатъчно е да се сложи само една точка с допълнителен таг за броя им. В случая - c... commented 2026-09-30 09:29:12 UTC by Dimitar155 ♦1,052 | |
| 188273039 (Comments: 1) | Ernie C (Discussed changesets: 19) | Zijn de veld/boswegen hier daadwerkelijk wegen of slechts bandensporen van de grasmaaier/machines die hier onderhoud plegen. Vraag me af of het de bedoeling is dat ik hier met mijn auto gebruik van maak. commented 2026-09-30 09:25:50 UTC by Remlicht89 ♦15 | |
| 189669226 (Comments: 2) | Валентин Ян (Discussed changesets: 48) | Вітаю! Перепрошую, гадав що для старих назв це не суттєво. В подальшому залишатиму усі мови старої назви за виключенням зазначених вами! commented 2026-09-30 09:23:52 UTC by Валентин Ян ♦18 | |
| 170905114 (Comments: 1) | Dasharath Shetty (Discussed changesets: 1) | Moved commented 2026-09-30 09:15:34 UTC by Dashu42332 ♦1 | |
| 189722893 (Comments: 1) | xoravo (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189763722 commented 2026-09-30 09:13:07 UTC by MappingMore ♦759 | |
| 169237735 (Comments: 1) | Linus W Frische (Discussed changesets: 28) | Jeg har tilføjet area=yes på way/1080449845 og andre overflader. Jeg kan dog ikke gennemskue way/1080195426. commented 2026-09-30 08:59:54 UTC by cyclist789 ♦140 | |
| 184340122 (Comments: 1) | nshz (Discussed changesets: 52) | What is the purpose of adding an Arabic name to a cul-de-sac in Vietnam? commented 2026-09-30 08:46:12 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦1,004 | |
| 188554234 (Comments: 1) | nshz (Discussed changesets: 52) | What is the purpose of adding an Arabic name to a small residential road in Bangladesh? commented 2026-09-30 08:45:14 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦1,004 | |
| 134586892 (Comments: 2) | piterwrc (Discussed changesets: 14) | Nie wiem jak z https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/366133897 , ale z https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/360545368 zachowały się ruiny przyczółków commented 2026-09-30 08:43:46 UTC by dzamper ♦282 | |
| 184340119 (Comments: 1) | nshz (Discussed changesets: 52) | What is the purpose of adding an Arabic name to a footway crossing in Italy? commented 2026-09-30 08:41:28 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦1,004 | |
| 187516998 (Comments: 1) | nshz (Discussed changesets: 52) | What is the purpose of adding an Arabic name to an alley in Bulgaria? commented 2026-09-30 08:40:23 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦1,004 | |
| 188901515 (Comments: 1) | nshz (Discussed changesets: 52) | What is the purpose of adding an Arabic name to a building in India? commented 2026-09-30 08:38:17 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦1,004 | |
| 188901567 (Comments: 1) | nshz (Discussed changesets: 52) | What is the purpose of adding an Arabic name to a building in Great Britain? commented 2026-09-30 08:37:23 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦1,004 | |
| 189754535 (Comments: 1) | nshz (Discussed changesets: 52) | What is the purpose of adding an Arabic name to a solar power generator in Poland? commented 2026-09-30 08:36:32 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦1,004 | |
| 189422066 (Comments: 3) | voschix (Discussed changesets: 79) | :-) commented 2026-09-30 08:35:41 UTC by Đuro Jiří ♦373 | |
| 189750653 (Comments: 1) | LenapeTrail (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, In your edit you use the deprecated tag "payment:bitcoin=yes". I have DELETE the payment:bitcoin=yes tag ! Use the "currency:XBT=yes" instead. For more information please read: https://gitea.btcmap.org/... commented 2026-09-30 08:31:53 UTC by Comino ♦416 | |
| 189551066 (Comments: 9) | SuperMarkus (Discussed changesets: 17) | Hier das betreffende Schild: https://web.archive.org/web/20260930074444if_/https://d2exd72xrrp1s7.cloudfront.net/www/000/1k4/qt/qtzvlb0e7kz2hzxwi0p7gmnm38zv8fnk-uhi10190928/ Es kommt dabei auch darauf an, dass kein Weg entlang des Rheinufers v... commented 2026-09-30 08:21:27 UTC by Mammi71 ♦284 | |
| 185898819 (Comments: 5) | squeaker_andrus (Discussed changesets: 17) | That’s a very fair point, and it touches on the classic OSM dilemma of 'tagging for the renderer'. It’s definitely frustrating when the technically correct tag isn't visible to the end-users who need it most. I completely u... commented 2026-09-30 08:18:58 UTC by squeaker_andrus ♦18 | |
| 189721790 (Comments: 1) | imiraldz (Discussed changesets: 5) | Sorry, I meant the elevation. :P commented 2026-09-30 08:18:29 UTC by imiraldz ♦10 | |
| 189759957 (Comments: 1) | VivekTWD (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. Feedback: Wellicht office=it ? MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-09-30 07:54:14 UTC by eggie ♦47,558 | |
| 187671600 (Comments: 2) | Bosbeheerder RV (Discussed changesets: 13) | Het pad liep dan door over een al bestaand pad bij het informatiebord. commented 2026-09-30 07:49:48 UTC by eggie ♦47,558 | |
| 123560810 (Comments: 1) | nilogian (Discussed changesets: 15) | Scusa il disturbo, ma https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9884991527 è davvero un data center dell'ACI? Buon mapping, Marco commented 2026-09-30 07:43:15 UTC by MarcoR ♦639 | |
| 189758364 (Comments: 1) | neefBas (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. Feedback.. OSM zit vol met regeltjes. De straatnaam Parkeerplaats.... heb ik verwijderd. Het is geen officiële straa... commented 2026-09-30 07:40:26 UTC by eggie ♦47,558 | |
| 189613341 (Comments: 1) | liopolis (Discussed changesets: 1) | J'ai modifié le nom du cinéma il y a quelques jours, vous avez remis l'ancien. Merci de vérifier vos sources et l'historique des changements avant. Ce n'est plus le cinéma Vautier mais la bobine illib&e... commented 2026-09-30 07:40:16 UTC by LySioS ♦160 | |
| 174379002 (Comments: 1) | BeMa84 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Ist das kleine Stück Radweg an der Kreuzung Labertalstraße wirklich nur entgegen der entsprechenden Fahrtrichtung auf der Fahrbahn befahrbar? Gehört die Richtung evtl. umgekehrt? commented 2026-09-30 07:38:35 UTC by doppel-b ♦11 | |
| 173044303 (Comments: 2) | maxxdan (Discussed changesets: 11) | Hello! Yes, it's a mistake, I meant sport=motor Actually I think I shouldn't have used club=sport sport=motor but club=motorcycle I've fixed it, thank you. commented 2026-09-30 07:35:01 UTC by maxxdan ♦8 | |
| 189618941 (Comments: 3) | Dave Venables (Discussed changesets: 126) | Addresses Vs postal addresses are all a bit complicated. I'm happy for them to be left as Clifton, I'll add exceptions so it doesn't get changed back to Clifton Estate commented 2026-09-30 07:33:16 UTC by confusedbuffalo ♦486 | |
| 188664033 (Comments: 1) | Sharon A Cruz (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Sharon A Cruz, this changeset has destroyed the boundary relations of "Dele" and "Lengabo". https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13530573/history https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13530572/history | |
| 85202605 (Comments: 2) | M100g200 (Discussed changesets: 2) | moto means motorcycle. This naming is standard practice and doesn't require correction. But you can fix it if you think it's necessary commented 2026-09-30 07:02:40 UTC by M100g200 ♦1 | |
| 187862178 (Comments: 10) | harisont (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🤦♂️ my bad! commented 2026-09-30 06:52:47 UTC by maasa123 ♦20 | |
| 183355690 (Comments: 6) | visitingangels (Discussed changesets: 5) | Took more time than I thought as I also fixed a load of one-off issues with one of the many tags used to fix and make consistent, but its all done in changeset 189758052 for the CONUS and Canada, changeset 189758068 for the UK and changeset 189758080... commented 2026-09-30 06:39:37 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,232 | |
| 189746047 (Comments: 4) | osmguy101 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Nou... Ik ben geen 'fan' van OrganicMaps als editor. Misschien leuk voor onderweg. Die genereert veel fouten. Vooral met adressen. Je kunt het beste de webeditor iD gebruiken of nog beter editor JOSM. editor josm stap voor stap... commented 2026-09-30 06:39:00 UTC by eggie ♦47,558 | |
| 189734094 (Comments: 3) | Bosbeheerder RV (Discussed changesets: 13) | Ahh... oke. In het 'osm verleden' werd tracktype alleen voor tracks gebruikt als specificatie. Tegenwoordig mag je tracktype ook gebruiken voor paden. Vandaar mijn opmerking. Erg logisch is het niet gezien de naam. Tr... commented 2026-09-30 06:35:23 UTC by eggie ♦47,558 | |
| 189686391 (Comments: 2) | osmdanil (Discussed changesets: 1) | Achso alles klar! Danke für die Erklärung:) Hatte mich irgendwie auch gewundert warum diese Angabe bei einer doch recht bekannten Straße fehlt und hätte das evtl mehr hinterfragen sollen. commented 2026-09-30 06:34:01 UTC by osmdanil ♦1 | |
| 189700305 (Comments: 1) | Julien39 (Discussed changesets: 113) | un shop=vacant au lieu d'une suppression // cela nous permettrait de suivre le taux de vacance commented 2026-09-30 06:30:15 UTC by Matmat-25 ♦16 | |
| 189600594 (Comments: 1) | witti-42 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OSM. Lies bitte OSM-Wiki! Sollte so sein Tu-Sa "Termine nach Vereinbarung" Phone format phone=+<Landesvorwahl> <Bereichsvorwahl> <Rufnummer>, entsprechend ITU-T E.123 und DIN 5... commented 2026-09-30 06:25:40 UTC by Znaika ♦227 | |
| 189708227 (Comments: 1) | witti-42 (Discussed changesets: 5) | sollte so sein https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:opening%20hours?uselang=de commented 2026-09-30 06:22:36 UTC by Znaika ♦227 | |
| 189244736 (Comments: 2) | Termininja (Discussed changesets: 52) | Благодаря за промяната! Само ако може да проверяваш и крайния резултат на рендъра. В случая символите за шубраци се показват върху нивитÐ... commented 2026-09-30 06:21:25 UTC by Dimitar155 ♦1,052 | |
| 188688421 (Comments: 1) | Narusax (Discussed changesets: 1) | Coś Ty za gwiazdki tu porysował?! commented 2026-09-30 06:17:02 UTC by Pooh01 ♦29 | |
| 189709117 (Comments: 1) | krissed (Discussed changesets: 1) | Благодаря за редакцията! Отбелязах асансьорите като възли и ги свързах с наземното и подземното ниво, за да може да се използват при нави... commented 2026-09-30 06:15:20 UTC by Dimitar155 ♦1,052 | |
| 189658437 (Comments: 1) | Fobos-Bloxy (Discussed changesets: 20) | Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21367 commented 2026-09-30 06:05:05 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,988 | |
| 189558726 (Comments: 1) | Doc Géofan (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi, could you please clarify the approach and sources you are using for these changes? I have reviewed several of these edits against the available imagery and the current real-world situation, and many of them do not appear to match what is a... commented 2026-09-30 06:03:40 UTC by kunalchhapre ♦2 | |
| 189075471 (Comments: 1) | Fobos-Bloxy (Discussed changesets: 20) | DWG revert - apparent fictitious mapping https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189757356 commented 2026-09-30 06:03:36 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,988 | |
| 189075664 (Comments: 2) | Fobos-Bloxy (Discussed changesets: 20) | DWG revert - apparent fictitious mapping https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189757356 commented 2026-09-30 06:03:36 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,988 | |
| 189036123 (Comments: 1) | Fobos-Bloxy (Discussed changesets: 20) | DWG revert - apparent fictitious mapping https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189757356 commented 2026-09-30 06:03:35 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,988 | |
| 189028999 (Comments: 2) | Fobos-Bloxy (Discussed changesets: 20) | DWG revert - apparent fictitious mapping https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189757356 commented 2026-09-30 06:03:35 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,988 | |
| 189036231 (Comments: 1) | Fobos-Bloxy (Discussed changesets: 20) | DWG revert - apparent fictitious mapping https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189757356 commented 2026-09-30 06:03:35 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,988 | |
| 189028686 (Comments: 1) | Fobos-Bloxy (Discussed changesets: 20) | DWG revert - apparent fictitious mapping https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189757356 commented 2026-09-30 06:03:34 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,988 | |
| 189028613 (Comments: 1) | Fobos-Bloxy (Discussed changesets: 20) | DWG revert - apparent fictitious mapping https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189757356 commented 2026-09-30 06:03:34 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,988 | |
| 189028730 (Comments: 1) | Fobos-Bloxy (Discussed changesets: 20) | DWG revert - apparent fictitious mapping https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189757356 commented 2026-09-30 06:03:34 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,988 | |
| 189028783 (Comments: 1) | Fobos-Bloxy (Discussed changesets: 20) | DWG revert - apparent fictitious mapping https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189757356 commented 2026-09-30 06:03:34 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,988 | |
| 189028079 (Comments: 1) | Fobos-Bloxy (Discussed changesets: 20) | DWG revert - apparent fictitious mapping https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189757356 commented 2026-09-30 06:03:33 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,988 | |
| 189028198 (Comments: 1) | Fobos-Bloxy (Discussed changesets: 20) | DWG revert - apparent fictitious mapping https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189757356 commented 2026-09-30 06:03:33 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,988 | |
| 189731705 (Comments: 8) | Kavely app (Discussed changesets: 2) | https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/de-beste-imagery-layers-om-nl-osm-te-mappen-met-josm/85393 commented 2026-09-30 06:01:41 UTC by eggie ♦47,558 | |
| 189496289 (Comments: 2) | rsitoni_Lyft (Discussed changesets: 23) | Hi Udarian, Thank you so much for reaching out. On September 25, the connection ramp from I-95 to US 441 was added (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1562302209/history), and based on our telemetry, it accurately represents how you can merge onto... commented 2026-09-30 05:32:47 UTC by rsitoni_Lyft ♦19 | |
| 189490764 (Comments: 2) | Tomasz Kozlowski (Discussed changesets: 1) | Jasne. Dziękuję za informację, będę o tym pamiętać przy przyszłych edycjach. commented 2026-09-30 05:15:42 UTC by Tomasz Kozlowski ♦1 | |
| 189729209 (Comments: 2) | Omnific (Discussed changesets: 144) | Yeah, honestly I'm not sure there's a typically accepted methodology for this specific case. I would probably put it in quotes like "every second week" but that's just my guess. commented 2026-09-30 04:55:32 UTC by Omnific ♦242 | |
| 189755361 (Comments: 1) | people128256 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Source for this changeset: https://mtbachelor.co.washington.or.us/images/survey/Plats/MOUNTAIN_ROSE.pdf commented 2026-09-30 04:35:31 UTC by people128256 ♦6 | |
| 189340739 (Comments: 2) | jewadin (Discussed changesets: 1) | Danke für den Hinweis. Meine Hoffnung ist, dass dadurch die Zustellung von Paketen auch am Wochenende erfolgt. Denn das Büro ist täglich besetzt... commented 2026-09-30 03:28:21 UTC by jewadin ♦1 | |
| 186110292 (Comments: 2) | John Sinclair (Discussed changesets: 18) | I got the tags mixed up, actually. The correct combination is highway=construction + construction=residential commented 2026-09-30 03:27:20 UTC by Solaris07 ♦39 | |
| 189705126 (Comments: 1) | Alban McGregor (plato59) (Discussed changesets: 7) | Mistake: Vuldestein is a fictional nation and does not exist in Oregon. commented 2026-09-30 03:11:57 UTC by Alban McGregor (plato59) ♦5 | |
| 175584891 (Comments: 1) | cha73 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo, mir sind da in Buch einige Mappingfehler aufgefallen. Bitte achte auf solche warnings (und behebe das vor dem Hochladen) und erfinde auch keine Straßennamen oder Verkehrsvorgaben, wo nichts beschildert ist. Servus Wolfgang commented 2026-09-30 02:37:33 UTC by opendcc ♦1,597 | |
| 189744499 (Comments: 1) | Editex (Discussed changesets: 2) | Why was this changed to secondary? commented 2026-09-30 02:23:38 UTC by MikeN ♦373 | |
| 189704110 (Comments: 4) | FloxStopr (Discussed changesets: 1) | With them being corporate “owned” and installed on private property not much the state can do. These would be the first in the state for sure. But more will be coming at least these “private” ones. commented 2026-09-30 02:22:46 UTC by FloxStopr ♦1 | |
| 187768976 (Comments: 1) | Cecelia Chen (Discussed changesets: 1) | Are you sure the WHOLE building is Natural Healing Path? commented 2026-09-30 01:42:23 UTC by 15419 NE 140th St ♦10 | |
| 189750143 (Comments: 1) | maxwellward (Discussed changesets: 17) | From note: Added by way of Strava heatmap Thanks for adding the paths! commented 2026-09-30 01:30:36 UTC by O1S ♦37 | |
| 10871174 (Comments: 2) | Cartographer1973 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Ooh... that was 14 years ago. I can't be sure, but if I added a road name, it most likely came from the Denton County Central Appraisal District (they maintain all the tax records, plats, and so on.) However, they have since removed road layers... commented 2026-09-30 01:17:29 UTC by Cartographer1973 ♦2 | |
| 189751250 (Comments: 1) | 66townsend (Discussed changesets: 2) | Please use more descriptive changeset comments. "Fixed" says nothing. commented 2026-09-30 00:30:27 UTC by pkoby ♦132 | |
| 189684426 (Comments: 1) | 66townsend (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, in what way did you "fix" the parkway? You deleted a multitude of pieces in favor of one big chunk, but the city database shows the individual pieces. It looks like you, gebowd, and philpennmap (or just you?) have been chipping away at... commented 2026-09-30 00:29:27 UTC by pkoby ♦132 | |
| 189544817 (Comments: 1) | Freedomoftheseas (Discussed changesets: 1) | А почему редактирвоано? Дача это не этот дом? commented 2026-09-30 00:14:58 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,774 | |
| 189743781 (Comments: 1) | ColectivosdeParaná (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola, gracias por unirte a OSM! Mil disculpas, pero tuve que revertir los cambios, ya que generaba errores graves de ruteo en muchas aplicaciones. El mapeo de transporte público en OSM no es algo sencillo con lo que empezar. Es m... commented 2026-09-30 00:05:51 UTC by caprieldeluca ♦167 | |
| 189749665 (Comments: 1) | germanchelo1 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hola, gracias por contribuir con el mapa! Revisé el conjunto de cambios. La etiqueta reservoir_type=* no me parece correcta. Sin conocer el lugar, por lo que se ve en la imagen satelital, creo que corresponde water=pond. Por cual... commented 2026-09-29 23:41:25 UTC by caprieldeluca ♦167 | |
| 181070821 (Comments: 1) | Thomas_112 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! Can you take look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5544063 ? commented 2026-09-29 23:39:46 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,230 | |
| 189709880 (Comments: 1) | JayKay242 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi welcome to OSM. Next time you can just removed the tags you added by mistake rather then the whole building. Thanks commented 2026-09-29 23:33:31 UTC by MassCartog ♦486 | |
| 118475468 (Comments: 1) | Jozabal (Discussed changesets: 5) | Se tendrá que borrar esto. Es vandalismo puro commented 2026-09-29 23:25:51 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦3,437 | |
| 189565098 (Comments: 1) | Ian Jackson (Discussed changesets: 4) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189630480 commented 2026-09-29 23:09:36 UTC by Davileci ♦145 | |
| 189564941 (Comments: 1) | Ian Jackson (Discussed changesets: 4) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189630995 commented 2026-09-29 23:08:09 UTC by Davileci ♦145 | |
| 189565022 (Comments: 1) | Ian Jackson (Discussed changesets: 4) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189630995 commented 2026-09-29 23:06:33 UTC by Davileci ♦145 | |
| 187882989 (Comments: 2) | Yasenia (Discussed changesets: 2) | Автобусы останавливаются в нескольких местах вдоль дороги с обеих сторон, а не только там где указан автовокзал commented 2026-09-29 23:01:27 UTC by Yasenia ♦1 | |
| 182518967 (Comments: 1) | SCMapper9947 (Discussed changesets: 29) | Please note these are already tagged under highway_authority_ref so have been removed from the ref field commented 2026-09-29 22:59:07 UTC by GinaroZ ♦1,317 | |
| 189749980 (Comments: 1) | diamondarmorsteve (Discussed changesets: 52) | Source: surveyed maxspeeds, lane counts from aerials. Turn lanes at the intersection of Nash and Iron Bridge need to be added once aerials update commented 2026-09-29 22:53:51 UTC by diamondarmorsteve ♦76 | |
| 132232227 (Comments: 3) | luisforte (Discussed changesets: 18) | Toda a propriedade tem a designação Monte dos Aromas, desde há alguns anos. Obrigado pela correção 🙏 commented 2026-09-29 22:39:34 UTC by Bargao_Henriques ♦1 | |
| 189730354 (Comments: 9) | Oregonian3 (Discussed changesets: 49) | I agree it probably should be in that segment especially as every router takes folks that way. I'll let it be. commented 2026-09-29 22:16:49 UTC by jjyach ♦43 | |
| 189690414 (Comments: 1) | Македонија (Discussed changesets: 2) | Уставното име на државата е Република Северна Македонија. Големиот патриотизам чувај си го за друго место commented 2026-09-29 21:59:26 UTC by Tiramiso ♦3 | |
| 189649677 (Comments: 1) | SP6ZOLW-7 (Discussed changesets: 17) | Każdy zestaw zmian to zmiany. Proszę opisywać co zmieniłeś. commented 2026-09-29 21:54:50 UTC by maro21 ♦954 | |
| X | 189729690 (Comments: 1) | Nordpfeil (Discussed changesets: 78) | shifted nodes reverted in 189748851 --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/189729690 commented 2026-09-29 21:53:22 UTC by aighes ♦62 |
| 181647701 (Comments: 4) | aceman444 (Discussed changesets: 136) | Dakujem za upozornenie, ospravedlnujem sa. Nevedel som, ze je nelegalny, ked to niekto oznacil za biketrail. Prosim opravte ako pisete. commented 2026-09-29 21:36:05 UTC by aceman444 ♦3,055 | |
| 189650127 (Comments: 2) | Timo_G (Discussed changesets: 6) | Vielen Dank :) commented 2026-09-29 21:27:56 UTC by Timo_G ♦4 | |
| 189158484 (Comments: 1) | Ellen Bogen (Discussed changesets: 16) | Warum mussten Sie den Weg 1328113570 löschen? commented 2026-09-29 21:27:33 UTC by DerSchmopf ♦9 | |
| 189650412 (Comments: 2) | Timo_G (Discussed changesets: 6) | Jo, vielen Dank. commented 2026-09-29 21:27:06 UTC by Timo_G ♦4 | |
| 189517612 (Comments: 1) | mactim1 (Discussed changesets: 1) | A zmiana nazwy na jakiej podstawie? Oraz co to jest OTAR? commented 2026-09-29 21:21:51 UTC by maro21 ♦954 | |
| 189745508 (Comments: 1) | xanderthemapper31 (Discussed changesets: 9) | Hi Xander, What's your reasoning for this and the other road classification upgrades you've been making in Blue Springs? There haven't been any major design changes to these roads recently and the MoDOT data doesn't ... commented 2026-09-29 21:20:59 UTC by sannkc ♦177 | |
| 134120729 (Comments: 2) | aceman444 (Discussed changesets: 136) | Zda sa mi to OK, dakujem. commented 2026-09-29 21:20:08 UTC by aceman444 ♦3,055 | |
| 189170819 (Comments: 1) | Ellen Bogen (Discussed changesets: 16) | Auch hier, warum entfernen Sie grundlos building:part von Gebäuden? commented 2026-09-29 21:16:38 UTC by DerSchmopf ♦9 | |
| 189104611 (Comments: 2) | Kotarba (Discussed changesets: 13) | 1. W komentarzu przy zapisywaniu zmian podajemy co zmieniliśmy/dodaliśmy na mapie. Komentarz "mój projekt" nie mówi co zmieniłeś lub dodałeś. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian 2... commented 2026-09-29 21:12:54 UTC by maro21 ♦954 | |
| 189219846 (Comments: 1) | Ellen Bogen (Discussed changesets: 16) | Was war der Sinn, hier building:part zu entfernen? commented 2026-09-29 21:09:49 UTC by DerSchmopf ♦9 | |
| 189600559 (Comments: 1) | Grimreaprincess (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello! I noticed that you moved a bench, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13152134280. Was that intentional or a mistake? Thanks, Peter commented 2026-09-29 21:07:26 UTC by pwbriggs ♦499 | |
| 189463633 (Comments: 2) | violette34 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour Thibault, j'ai justement pris des captures pour que le nom de l'auteur de la photo soit présent mais je ne lui ai pas demandé si je pouvais les utiliser. Si tu préfères supprimer ces photos je compr... commented 2026-09-29 21:06:37 UTC by violette34 ♦1 | |
| 189747472 (Comments: 2) | Luke5080 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Adressen heb ik teruggezet. commented 2026-09-29 21:05:18 UTC by eggie ♦47,558 | |
| 189511232 (Comments: 1) | jeka p (Discussed changesets: 124) | Kann es sein, dass bei den Telefonnummern die Landesvorwahl fehlt? commented 2026-09-29 21:01:33 UTC by hlfan ♦121 | |
| 189219428 (Comments: 1) | Ellen Bogen (Discussed changesets: 16) | Warum haben Sie hier die Gebäude wieder hinzugefügt? Die wurden abgerissen. Und die Kita war hier auch nicht, sondern die Kirche? commented 2026-09-29 21:00:58 UTC by DerSchmopf ♦9 | |
| 189723910 (Comments: 5) | Svenboyy (Discussed changesets: 6) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:motor_vehicle%3Ddelivery commented 2026-09-29 20:55:45 UTC by eggie ♦47,558 | |
| 189307009 (Comments: 2) | kubap2167 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Też jestem szczęśliwy jak prosię https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/dodawanie-danych-otwartego-repozytorium-atrakcji-turystycznych/146679/6 https://discord.com/channels/783754873861963786/791017914525679616/1553079224774959219 commented 2026-09-29 20:54:05 UTC by grzegorz75jan ♦708 | |
| 159652208 (Comments: 1) | ticki_52 (Discussed changesets: 214) | och mensch ticki... Wieso hast du denn die Blickrichtung des Aussichtspunktes am Wbh Sonnenberghof auf direction=180-360 geändert? Man hat dort nämlich keine Aussicht nach Nordosten und Norden. Die Aussicht ist dort Richtung Süd... commented 2026-09-29 20:49:57 UTC by welzheimerwald ♦114 | |
| 189746566 (Comments: 1) | JamesChevalier (Discussed changesets: 7) | 🤔 After checking the Wikipedia page, I'm less sure of this change. Its page notes: > Lordstown is a village and paper township in southern Trumbull County, Ohio, United States. commented 2026-09-29 20:30:50 UTC by JamesChevalier ♦9 | |
| 169726031 (Comments: 2) | James McGurk - Glen Coe NNR Ranger (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi James, Since I didn't hear back, I've gone ahead and restored way 1192139769 and put it back into the Ben Nevis Mountain Path and Ben Nevis Trail route relations in changeset 189746427: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/1897... commented 2026-09-29 20:25:33 UTC by Kimsey0 ♦1 | |
| 188892406 (Comments: 4) | philipcullen (Discussed changesets: 51) | They are - at least to a subset of people including me. You can directly derive the postcode and linked USRN from them (and then usually other address details from that, which I find handy. They're also good for finding unmapped things (new hous... commented 2026-09-29 20:21:20 UTC by philipcullen ♦43 | |
| 154897771 (Comments: 1) | Ricky's Sport Treff (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ich habe gesehen, dass hier ein Gebäude https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/254694581 mit landuse=retail gemappt wurde. DieserTag soll nur für Gebiete, nicht für einzelne Gebäude verwendet werden. Hier sind sowieso mehrere Gebä... commented 2026-09-29 20:19:01 UTC by pxlframes ♦1 | |
| 186186144 (Comments: 1) | Ajtorres317 (Discussed changesets: 1) | This camera is actually on the east side of South Estrella Parkway, just across the street from the entrance on West Tanglewood Drive. It is pointing South. commented 2026-09-29 20:17:49 UTC by kamodt ♦1 | |
| 189098006 (Comments: 1) | SIG Terres des Confluences (Discussed changesets: 2) | Bonjour, j'ai rajouté le tag addr:street au numéros adresses. Pour le schéma en noeud, il faut sur chaque adresse (point ou bâtiment) le numéro et la voie orrespondante. Pour le schéma en rel... commented 2026-09-29 20:17:36 UTC by gendy54 ♦614 | |
| 185665257 (Comments: 1) | SPG2LD (Discussed changesets: 11) | Hi SPG2LD, mir sind https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/14010947019 und https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/14010947020 aufgefallen. Hier steht: recycling:glass=track Ich nehme an recycling:glass=yes war gemeint. Möglicherweise ja a... commented 2026-09-29 20:10:11 UTC by lyctkel ♦383 | |
| 189711796 (Comments: 1) | fangheshuju (Discussed changesets: 1) | It’s a Vandalism commented 2026-09-29 20:09:38 UTC by Line225 ♦3 | |
| 188035150 (Comments: 1) | liljaadeliina (Discussed changesets: 111) | Nämä eivät ole oikeita portteja vaan hidastepuomeja, jotka oli jo kesällä merkitty tasoristeykseen crossing:chicane=yes -tagilla aivan oikein ja se riittää. commented 2026-09-29 20:07:11 UTC by jplahti ♦22 | |
| 187770592 (Comments: 1) | vakulya (Discussed changesets: 44) | Úgy látom, hogy félreérted a landuse=residential jelentését. Ezt a címkét nem az egyes háztömbökre, hanem a lakott területre kell használni, vagyis beletartoznak az ... commented 2026-09-29 19:57:01 UTC by BáthoryPéter ♦98 | |
| 189736297 (Comments: 1) | DeKoerier (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hoi .. In dat geval tag je highway=construction construction=footway Dan hoeft die note er niet bij. MVG eggie commented 2026-09-29 19:55:58 UTC by eggie ♦47,558 | |
| 189412792 (Comments: 7) | rumbrummer (Discussed changesets: 18) | It is two completely different things. Renderers can merge nearby data for display purposes if appropriate for the respective zoom level. They cannot separate it if it is merged into one node. Two Wikidata IDs on the same node also does not work. commented 2026-09-29 19:54:42 UTC by Harald Hetzner ♦35 | |
| 189736507 (Comments: 1) | openoptimix (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, These tags are default. No need to tag bicycle no and foot=yes on a footway. Greetz, eggie commented 2026-09-29 19:54:36 UTC by eggie ♦47,558 | |
| 189736851 (Comments: 1) | DeKoerier (Discussed changesets: 6) | Dag Koerier, Alle info heb ik verplaatst naar de adresnode. MVG, eggie commented 2026-09-29 19:52:37 UTC by eggie ♦47,558 | |
| 189715874 (Comments: 1) | CGT (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hi, I've notice a lot of your change-set's comments are not very helpful or descriptive. What does "." mean? what was changed or what was attended to be change. A useful guide can be found on the wiki: https://wiki.ope... commented 2026-09-29 19:50:28 UTC by OneLoneRanger ♦17 | |
| 189743062 (Comments: 1) | Ximble (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-09-29 19:46:35 UTC by eggie ♦47,558 | |
| 188177050 (Comments: 2) | Hiki is railing (Discussed changesets: 2) | hi Michael, we understand that bahnhof.de is not to be used any further as a source for track number information, though would like to state that I do not believe our specific use is in violation of the terms specified in their Nutzungs... commented 2026-09-29 19:44:48 UTC by Hiki is railing ♦2 | |
| 189728859 (Comments: 1) | Hofmanautomotive (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OSM, Bedankt voor uw bijdrage.. MVG, eggie validator commented 2026-09-29 19:39:20 UTC by eggie ♦47,558 | |
| 189717466 (Comments: 1) | Bobby&Anya (Discussed changesets: 4) | We kennen ook naast species ook species:nl . Dan kun je de Nederlandse naam kwijt. Mapse, commented 2026-09-29 19:36:17 UTC by eggie ♦47,558 | |
| 189716845 (Comments: 2) | Bobby&Anya (Discussed changesets: 4) | Ahh .. de boom is al volgens de wiki aangepast commented 2026-09-29 19:34:50 UTC by eggie ♦47,558 | |
| 188011260 (Comments: 1) | XD346 (Discussed changesets: 11) | G228怎么消失了啊? commented 2026-09-29 19:29:15 UTC by GSF1200S ♦36 | |
| 189743124 (Comments: 1) | Mugur Marin (Discussed changesets: 1) | Salut. te rog nu mai desenasau repozitiona cladiri dupa imaginile BING deoarece sunt foarte vechi ( mai vechi de 8 ani) si in unele situatii nu sunt suficient de bine centrate. Foloseste MApbox pentru o acuratete buna sau ESRI Standard care sunt din ... commented 2026-09-29 19:28:39 UTC by rarad74 ♦580 | |
| 189511513 (Comments: 7) | Suhbeena (Discussed changesets: 4) | That is a tricky spot and the change from a one-way PBL to a two-way painted bike lane is about as well-handled as anything I can think of. commented 2026-09-29 19:20:30 UTC by atticquilt ♦15 | |
| 189365959 (Comments: 1) | cubbe8 (Discussed changesets: 114) | Hi cubbe8, I'm Artem, the OSM Quality Control lead at Lyft. I have a question about reverting the changes made in changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189357892. We realign road geometry and exit location based on recent t... commented 2026-09-29 19:14:35 UTC by amakarevich_lyft ♦39 | |
| 110305943 (Comments: 5) | SomeoneElse (Discussed changesets: 483) | > so image from node/12599457953 is representative ? Like that, but with less rain outside of Ireland :) I'm not convinced that it's worth documenting as a "different" value, since it dates from before stile vales... commented 2026-09-29 19:01:16 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,889 | |
| 132972771 (Comments: 1) | terminalpreppie (Discussed changesets: 4) | Using modern high-res imagery I was able to find an old diversion dam just upstream. This is the likeliest candidate for this GNIS entry and I merged the tags, but without more historical information I can't be 100% sure. I'd value a second... commented 2026-09-29 18:46:00 UTC by quincylvania ♦92 | |
| 189087472 (Comments: 2) | B_KSL (Discussed changesets: 133) | jeszcze trochę nam na później zostało, być może bez dziur tym razem commented 2026-09-29 18:36:48 UTC by B_KSL ♦98 | |
| 186584044 (Comments: 1) | FKaindl (Discussed changesets: 11) | Moin, bitte achte vielleicht darauf, (Geh-)Wege, die nicht tatsächlich separat von der eigentlichen Straße sind, nicht als separate Entität zu mappen. z.B. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1545693683 Es ist nicht komplett falsc... commented 2026-09-29 18:36:42 UTC by Jbah ♦57 | |
| 135222155 (Comments: 1) | Анонимус-2023 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Не нужно менять современное название реки на вычитанное со старинных карт. ОСМ содержит данные на сегодняшний день, сейчас это река Стра... commented 2026-09-29 18:27:57 UTC by Takuto ♦57 | |
| 189700692 (Comments: 1) | firefighter—>112 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Danke ;-) Stellst du das water_source noch auf "main" um? Viele Grüße commented 2026-09-29 18:21:41 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,663 | |
| 189720101 (Comments: 1) | Yannis23412 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hallo, hier müsste die Farbe "red" sein. Viele Grüße commented 2026-09-29 18:19:05 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,663 | |
| 189372467 (Comments: 2) | rumbrummer (Discussed changesets: 18) | "local observation" was wrong: Vespucci app fills in source with last used, non empty source, I forgot to clear :-( But saddle located in river (impossible: river can not flow over a saddle, on topo maps you can see that river flows ... commented 2026-09-29 18:18:24 UTC by rumbrummer ♦23 | |
| 189717221 (Comments: 1) | Yannis23412 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hallo, eine einfache Saugstelle - Aufstellort für (P)FPN - ohne feste Verrohrung ist einfach emergency=suction_point, ohne weitere Tags. Viele Grüße commented 2026-09-29 18:15:45 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,663 | |
| 189664780 (Comments: 4) | Thomaso58 (Discussed changesets: 45) | Hi Hecktor I already found it and have it added, but not used. Now I have used it yes it is very fast especially at rectangular shaped buildings. It is easy to use. BR Thomas commented 2026-09-29 18:13:18 UTC by Thomaso58 ♦53 | |
| 189714117 (Comments: 1) | Yannis23412 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap. Du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten. Ich habe hier nur eine Anmerkung: Das Feld "couplings" bleibt bei Unterflurhydranten normalerweise leer, da es sich um die &bd... commented 2026-09-29 18:13:12 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,663 | |
| 188780439 (Comments: 2) | Toto2642 (Discussed changesets: 17) | Merci pour la correction :) commented 2026-09-29 18:12:47 UTC by Syl ♦1,121 | |
| 189728651 (Comments: 1) | TheSYR (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hallo, dein Changeset ist zu groß. Bitte fasse künftig kleinere Gebiete zusammen. Den Namen an https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/48232248 habe ich wieder entfernt, dieser ist bereits an https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11347700... commented 2026-09-29 18:00:54 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,663 | |
| 189719239 (Comments: 1) | witti-42 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hallo, das Unternehmen ist bereits erfasst. Das Erfassen weiterer office bzw. shop und Anflanschen beschreibender Namen ist "Taggen für den Renderer", https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Taggen_f%C3%BCr_den_Renderer. Es gib... commented 2026-09-29 17:52:36 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,663 | |
| 189725181 (Comments: 2) | Octer (Discussed changesets: 2) | Je l'ignorais, merci pour l'info commented 2026-09-29 17:46:28 UTC by Octer ♦2 | |
| 189685771 (Comments: 1) | martynie (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hey, welcome to OSM! Thanks for your first edit. I noticed you tagged "The quiet tower" as a peak, which is normally used for mountains and hills. Is this actually a water tower, watch tower, or a building? If you're not sure how to re... commented 2026-09-29 17:44:54 UTC by L4PSA ♦11 | |
| 189623944 (Comments: 3) | rumbrummer (Discussed changesets: 18) | I agree and removed saddle tag in mountain pass duplicate for 2nd lane of road commented 2026-09-29 17:37:50 UTC by rumbrummer ♦23 | |
| 189720787 (Comments: 1) | jplahti (Discussed changesets: 6) | hei kiitos tästä! Kävin tässä myymälässä viime viikolla ja sen lisääminen openstreetmapiin oli mun joskus-jonossa :) --- Published using OSMCha: https://o... commented 2026-09-29 17:29:09 UTC by Albe_ ♦20 | |
| 189492016 (Comments: 3) | Ben Schwarzmeier (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thx, i fixed it. You can choose "note" in the search field of Organic Maps when you can't find the proper genres commented 2026-09-29 17:05:46 UTC by LySioS ♦160 | |
| 189738609 (Comments: 1) | Locomeister (Discussed changesets: 1) | Updated the webadres of this hut at ut.no, the Norwegian Tourist Association commented 2026-09-29 17:04:52 UTC by Locomeister ♦1 | |
| 189732274 (Comments: 1) | scaalmap (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hi Scaalmap Thank you for collaborating in the mapping as part of the responde of the Palmar quake. However, I see you didn't put the tags used to identify the affected constructions: damage:date=2026-08-10 damage:event:wiki... commented 2026-09-29 16:50:16 UTC by AngocA ♦245 | |
| 189704768 (Comments: 3) | santon (Discussed changesets: 50) | Siehe PM. Die Details will ich hier nicht breit treten. commented 2026-09-29 16:39:19 UTC by ToniE ♦1,288 | |
| 189737187 (Comments: 1) | habi (Discussed changesets: 470) | And some more. I have to get the hang of the new function to geographically split changesets sets in Go Map!! commented 2026-09-29 16:36:29 UTC by habi ♦2,271 | |
| 189698613 (Comments: 4) | TheEnbyperor (Discussed changesets: 154) | Reife Leistung :) commented 2026-09-29 16:24:28 UTC by chris66 ♦509 | |
| 189698554 (Comments: 1) | Kaloan-koko (Discussed changesets: 87) | Работното време съм го добавил в changeset/157976335 преди 2 години. Тогава го пишеше на входа. commented 2026-09-29 16:10:03 UTC by Dimitar155 ♦1,052 | |
| 189618948 (Comments: 1) | Yurch12386 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Зачем этот пешеходный переход если уже есть node/14066174008 ? commented 2026-09-29 16:05:24 UTC by morkovkin ♦15 | |
| 189341980 (Comments: 1) | Yurch12386 (Discussed changesets: 3) | hazard=pedestrians используется только если это отдельно обозначено, а так это highway=crossing https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:hazard=pedestrians commented 2026-09-29 16:03:02 UTC by morkovkin ♦15 | |
| 168463562 (Comments: 2) | mycota (Discussed changesets: 15) | You're right - it should be "no". I've fixed it. Thanks for letting me know. commented 2026-09-29 16:02:25 UTC by mycota ♦15 | |
| 189708462 (Comments: 1) | primesepticservice (Discussed changesets: 1) | This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found. Reverting SEO spam... commented 2026-09-29 15:53:51 UTC by Glassman ♦6,044 | |
| 189592395 (Comments: 3) | kaartenliefhebber (Discussed changesets: 12) | 👍 commented 2026-09-29 15:51:42 UTC by eggie ♦47,558 | |
| 163920200 (Comments: 2) | A67-A67 (Discussed changesets: 404) | Hi, I've fixed the typo. It's sometimes hard to know whether a tag should be in singular or plural. commented 2026-09-29 15:45:28 UTC by A67-A67 ♦1,222 | |
| 189663290 (Comments: 1) | Yurch12386 (Discussed changesets: 3) | 1. Камера - это не название https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Названия#Имя_–_это_название_и_только 2. office=chamber это вообще "Офис Профессиональной пÐ... commented 2026-09-29 15:33:31 UTC by morkovkin ♦15 | |
| 189707122 (Comments: 1) | BenW2026 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, thanks for the contribution. Are you sure that the height is right? Note that the measurement unit for height=* is meters, not feet. commented 2026-09-29 15:32:55 UTC by PuddlesMapping ♦20 | |
| 189729007 (Comments: 4) | Carloh (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hier wird übrigens darüber gerade diskutiert: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/ich-bitte-mal-um-meinungen-bei-diesem-hinweis und du bist gerne eingeladen commented 2026-09-29 15:32:03 UTC by uvi ♦152 | |
| 189249923 (Comments: 1) | GhostHorsti (Discussed changesets: 1) | CS reverted commented 2026-09-29 15:30:56 UTC by hsc666 ♦497 | |
| 189734475 (Comments: 1) | geo-d (Discussed changesets: 36) | Die Route wurde hier wohl irrtümlich über den Bürgersteig geführt, korrigiert mit Changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189734475. commented 2026-09-29 15:29:53 UTC by geo-d ♦31 | |
| 33720756 (Comments: 1) | MicDK (Discussed changesets: 75) | Jeg mistænker at tunnelen way/368585554 ikke eksisterer, og at vejen fungerer som vandskel mellem Hovedrenden og Lundby Bæk. Det antyder højdekortet i hvert fald. Desuden: Ifølge kortoverblik.dk ender Lundby Bæk... commented 2026-09-29 15:09:42 UTC by cyclist789 ♦140 | |
| 189574560 (Comments: 2) | Slartibartfast141 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Thank you. It's a typo I sometimes make from auto-complete in JOSM... At least I'm blaming JOSM. Either way I should pay a little more attention. commented 2026-09-29 15:08:23 UTC by Slartibartfast141 ♦5 | |
| 189702728 (Comments: 2) | cubbe8 (Discussed changesets: 114) | Nope, it’s been blocked off and pedestrian signals removed, i’ve mapped the new crosswalk locations as under construction. commented 2026-09-29 15:04:27 UTC by cubbe8 ♦111 | |
| 189732730 (Comments: 1) | Biff (Discussed changesets: 39) | correction: "direction" moved to "destination:forward". commented 2026-09-29 14:55:53 UTC by Biff ♦29 | |
| 189723895 (Comments: 4) | fx99 (Discussed changesets: 84) | siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5545788#map=18/48.600480/8.870159&layers=N commented 2026-09-29 14:54:54 UTC by fx99 ♦137 | |
| 189729554 (Comments: 1) | kr3vitz (Discussed changesets: 1) | Zestaw zmian jest błędny i został wycofany. Pozdrawiam commented 2026-09-29 14:38:21 UTC by bartgron ♦673 | |
| 189319977 (Comments: 3) | lanroamer (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ah, makes sense, wouldn't bother using GPX tracks in the UK. We have the cadastral parcels that have near perfect alignment that can be used to align imagery. Always check mapbox and esri imagery for any newer developments in case they've b... commented 2026-09-29 14:33:32 UTC by CanopyFalls ♦140 | |
| 189481784 (Comments: 1) | Vuiser (Discussed changesets: 3) | Bonjour, ce changeset a brisé la continuité d'un itinéraire pédestre qui passe par là. Je m'occupe de la réparation. commented 2026-09-29 14:29:31 UTC by StC ♦535 | |
| 189716843 (Comments: 2) | Arranus (Discussed changesets: 2) | Ah, I see. Thank you for letting me know commented 2026-09-29 14:29:08 UTC by Arranus ♦2 | |
| 189719304 (Comments: 2) | Arranus (Discussed changesets: 2) | Oh sorry! I didn't see the other comments you had left! I will keep this in mind commented 2026-09-29 14:25:43 UTC by Arranus ♦2 | |
| 189724307 (Comments: 1) | Zach Brown (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, thanks for the edits! In this case I believe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:access%3Dprivate is a more accurate value. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:access%3Dno implies it is illegal for _anybody_ to use these servic... commented 2026-09-29 14:13:02 UTC by PuddlesMapping ♦20 | |
| 189704707 (Comments: 1) | 68916 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, I removed the more specific opening_date from Beltline Station. The name is misleading; it's a residential project separate from the transit line commented 2026-09-29 14:07:15 UTC by ion_chi ♦98 | |
| 189705279 (Comments: 1) | 68916 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi 68916, house looks to be misspelled for many of these. You might also want to use the more specific building=detached commented 2026-09-29 13:52:00 UTC by ion_chi ♦98 | |
| 188642372 (Comments: 1) | wildmaps (Discussed changesets: 50) | Hi, could you check this node, the house number is missing: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/14158562687 commented 2026-09-29 13:47:52 UTC by mueschel ♦7,392 | |
| 183597505 (Comments: 1) | napo (Discussed changesets: 10) | Re: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/23808336 parking:left=right? That can't be correct. Should that maybe be parking:right=yes or one of the other values named in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Street_parking#Parking_positio... commented 2026-09-29 13:47:48 UTC by Kees 59 ♦141 | |
| 189502388 (Comments: 1) | Elodie La Vallée du Kiwi (Discussed changesets: 2) | Coucou, ça va ? est-ce que courriel, facebook, téléphoen et siret sont les mêmes ? à plus commented 2026-09-29 13:38:20 UTC by Vinber-Pro ♦1,344 | |
| 189646867 (Comments: 2) | SereneDeluge (Discussed changesets: 3) | :D commented 2026-09-29 13:37:22 UTC by SereneDeluge ♦46 | |
| 189683464 (Comments: 7) | Hervé Bourne (Discussed changesets: 2) | Merci @aurelien pour cette correction qui pour l'instant n'est pas encore visible, mais attendons un peu. commented 2026-09-29 13:34:18 UTC by Hervé Bourne ♦2 | |
| 189157826 (Comments: 1) | kb_lee (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello, I am not on-site, but access=customer on a road from the national road network seems bizarre to me. I understand access=customer as basically for private roads giving access to an amenity (e.g. restaurant) . I was about to remove the access ... commented 2026-09-29 13:28:04 UTC by brunesto ♦16 | |
| 189727984 (Comments: 1) | siwangi02 (Discussed changesets: 12) | Shouldn't the trees be an forest or orchard cover (area) instead? commented 2026-09-29 13:27:49 UTC by imiraldz ♦10 | |
| 186885832 (Comments: 1) | tesp (Discussed changesets: 35) | Tuo ref=1 oli VR:n reittinumero aikataulukirjasesta. Ei kovin yleisesti enää tiedossa oleva asia, mutta yhä käytössä. commented 2026-09-29 13:26:54 UTC by jplahti ♦22 | |
| 189723696 (Comments: 1) | imiraldz (Discussed changesets: 5) | Looks good! Ty for adding this information! --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/189723696 commented 2026-09-29 13:19:41 UTC by CanopyFalls ♦140 | |
| 189608674 (Comments: 5) | jabu29 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Zarówno odcinek przy Przemysłowej ma takie błędne tagowanie jak i odcinek ulicy bez nazwy prostopadłej do Przemysłowej. commented 2026-09-29 12:50:27 UTC by NieWnen ♦1,498 | |
| 189697726 (Comments: 1) | bentzy (Discussed changesets: 37) | יש כבר נקודה של מצפור השייטת. בבקשה לא ליצור נקודות כפולות. commented 2026-09-29 12:38:19 UTC by hatul ♦536 | |
| 189498229 (Comments: 4) | palycka (Discussed changesets: 44) | Dokładna wysokość nad poziomem morza według portalu wynosi 356,8 m n.p.m. commented 2026-09-29 12:37:35 UTC by palycka ♦4 | |
| 189722269 (Comments: 1) | gurglypipe (Discussed changesets: 169) | Ooops! Thanks commented 2026-09-29 12:26:49 UTC by Dezza ♦36 | |
| 189697019 (Comments: 1) | johnysfajczony (Discussed changesets: 1) | Dodany tag jest zbędny i został usunięty. Pozdrawiam commented 2026-09-29 12:26:13 UTC by bartgron ♦673 | |
| 189719927 (Comments: 1) | PPowroznik (Discussed changesets: 1) | Zestaw zmian został wycofany. Nie używamy Google jako źródła do mapowania. Pozdrawiam commented 2026-09-29 12:19:49 UTC by bartgron ♦673 | |
| 189663855 (Comments: 1) | blmarek (Discussed changesets: 1) | Zestaw zmian jest błędny i został wycofany. Pozdrawiam commented 2026-09-29 12:14:55 UTC by bartgron ♦673 | |
| 186762814 (Comments: 2) | Morswin_PL (Discussed changesets: 5) | Zestaw zmian został wycofany. Pozdrawiam commented 2026-09-29 12:08:31 UTC by bartgron ♦673 | |
| 186368034 (Comments: 1) | Morswin_PL (Discussed changesets: 5) | Zestaw zmian został wycofany. Pozdrawiam commented 2026-09-29 12:06:20 UTC by bartgron ♦673 | |
| 189345703 (Comments: 1) | Cello_Bello (Discussed changesets: 4) | have you seen https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/does-this-qualify-as-a-path/147364/10 ? can you respond to it? commented 2026-09-29 12:05:36 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,230 | |
| 189723071 (Comments: 1) | nemca (Discussed changesets: 23) | Salut. Nu mai folosi imaginile Bing deoarece sunt foarte vechi. Foloseste ESRI Standard sau Mapbox. commented 2026-09-29 12:04:28 UTC by rarad74 ♦580 | |
| 189622409 (Comments: 1) | Morswin_PL (Discussed changesets: 5) | Zestaw zmian został wycofany. Pozdrawiam commented 2026-09-29 12:02:28 UTC by bartgron ♦673 | |
| 189718040 (Comments: 2) | Morswin_PL (Discussed changesets: 5) | Zestaw zmian został wycofany. Pozdrawiam commented 2026-09-29 12:00:17 UTC by bartgron ♦673 | |
| 189589004 (Comments: 1) | OneLoneRanger (Discussed changesets: 17) | Thank you. Not sure how I managed to duplicate the stop. Carelessness, probably. commented 2026-09-29 11:57:08 UTC by EdLoach ♦182 | |
| 120828543 (Comments: 1) | Hike39 (Discussed changesets: 14) | Ein "kleiner" Fehler in diesem Änderrungssatz hat es ins Fernsehen geschafft. https://youtu.be/fuNHmkqNfBQ?t=146 ;-) commented 2026-09-29 11:53:46 UTC by tyr_asd ♦473 | |
| 182333466 (Comments: 5) | Tntdruid (Discussed changesets: 76) | @cyclist789 der er ingen mountainbikerute i Naturnationalpark Gribskov. commented 2026-09-29 11:40:03 UTC by kortgodt ♦123 | |
| 189443505 (Comments: 1) | LARYSA4587 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Вы разорвали границу полигонов, будьте внимательны. На данный момент исправил commented 2026-09-29 11:29:17 UTC by abnafch ♦1 | |
| 189721517 (Comments: 1) | Dezza (Discussed changesets: 23) | Nice work! commented 2026-09-29 11:23:27 UTC by gurglypipe ♦1,127 | |
| 189498704 (Comments: 1) | peter_dedo (Discussed changesets: 2) | Pozerám že ste odstránili tagy highway a surface z námestia. No ja by som to vrátil, námestie naozaj má povrch sett https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:surface=sett?uselang=sk a highway=ped... commented 2026-09-29 11:07:31 UTC by EfreetSK ♦33 | |
| 189696411 (Comments: 1) | kellandagoat (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189721304 commented 2026-09-29 11:02:09 UTC by MappingMore ♦759 | |
| 189719407 (Comments: 1) | Cambellbarton (Discussed changesets: 1) | Please do not add personal markers like this to the map. It has been deleted. commented 2026-09-29 10:49:14 UTC by nevw ♦2,356 | |
| 189681111 (Comments: 1) | Ignasi Cervera (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189720726 commented 2026-09-29 10:48:31 UTC by rajdhani ♦537 | |
| 189543322 (Comments: 5) | Pedritope (Discussed changesets: 8) | Ok, muchas gracias por la información. commented 2026-09-29 10:48:25 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦3,437 | |
| 189691259 (Comments: 1) | Pedritope (Discussed changesets: 8) | Además, por favor cuadrar lo que dibujas con lo que se observa en el satélite, cada casa por separado, sin agrupar. Aquí como que pusiste poligonos arriba de donde hay casas, pero no hacemos dibujos esquemáticos. Salu2 ... commented 2026-09-29 10:48:02 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦3,437 | |
| 189691308 (Comments: 1) | Pedritope (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hola. Las casas las puedes cuadrar con la letra Q. las que agregas están obviamente hechas a pulso. Saludos --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/189691308 commented 2026-09-29 10:47:02 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦3,437 | |
| 189718160 (Comments: 1) | chefche (Discussed changesets: 6) | Servus, in JOSM gibt es für diesen Bereich die "Aktuelle Luftbilder der Landeshauptstadt München 20cm". Die sind genauer und korrekt = exakt ausgerichtet. Gruß Toni commented 2026-09-29 10:14:29 UTC by ToniE ♦1,288 | |
| 189679149 (Comments: 1) | Matheus_Santos (Discussed changesets: 1) | CEP 32677-024 Rua N - Imbiruçu - Betim/MG a Rua N ainda não mudou de nome commented 2026-09-29 10:13:58 UTC by Lucas Santana ♦14 | |
| 189480701 (Comments: 1) | rumbrummer (Discussed changesets: 18) | I believe with "Col de la Tourne" you once again made an error. Using the open Swiss Lidar data available, one can once again determine that the road is higher. The actual mountain pass is tagged here: https://www.openstreetmap.or... commented 2026-09-29 10:05:48 UTC by KartKollektor ♦55 | |
| 164061672 (Comments: 3) | DerKaiserschmarren (Discussed changesets: 57) | :) commented 2026-09-29 10:05:48 UTC by DerKaiserschmarren ♦79 | |
| 189716365 (Comments: 1) | tyroleanDave (Discussed changesets: 4) | Da wäre https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity%3Drecycling passender? commented 2026-09-29 10:01:46 UTC by fs_LT ♦247 | |
| 173556281 (Comments: 1) | user_msh (Discussed changesets: 7) | Bonjour, Pour quoi avoir mis SNCF Réseau comme operator sur des luminaires urbains (hors emprise ferroviaire) ? commented 2026-09-29 09:57:02 UTC by Denis_Helfer ♦106 | |
| 189670522 (Comments: 4) | Stephanievanr (Discussed changesets: 11) | instead *of using .. commented 2026-09-29 09:53:34 UTC by Enock4seth ♦686 |