| Country | Changeset | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|
 | 191213773 (Comments: 1) | Sophia Hilbert (Discussed changesets: 1) | Corrected database in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/191270092 commented 2026-10-31 10:18:24 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,271 |
| 191259559 (Comments: 1) | Speedy Pit Stop (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, I flagged this changeset because at least one modified OSM element contains only tags commonly used for names or promotional content, without a tag describing the actual feature. While these tags can be perfectly valid, they should ... commented 2026-10-31 10:16:20 UTC by NeisBot ♦7,518 |
| 191204426 (Comments: 1) | jeff-quade (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, I flagged this changeset because at least one modified OSM element contains only tags commonly used for names or promotional content, without a tag describing the actual feature. While these tags can be perfectly valid, they should ... commented 2026-10-31 10:16:12 UTC by NeisBot ♦7,518 |
| 191219407 (Comments: 1) | emeadows (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1573512956. What is the mean of the tags CTIVITY = Hike CLIMB_M = 12.8 CLOSED = 0 CREATED = 2021-05-18 DESCENT_M = -8.8 DIFFICULTY = White DIRECTION = Both Directions... commented 2026-10-31 10:06:08 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,942 |
| 191245512 (Comments: 1) | magnoliahomestores (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, In your edit you use the tag "payment:cryptocurrencies=yes". The tag "payment:cryptocurrencies=*" was a payment tag proposal which was rejected by the OSM community. Use this tag only when cryptocurrencies are NO... commented 2026-10-31 09:31:18 UTC by Comino ♦426 |
| 191268345 (Comments: 1) | leeagibsteinmd (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! I noticed that text in a description, note or slogan tag in your changeset may be promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping... commented 2026-10-31 09:30:42 UTC by NeisBot ♦7,518 |
| 191268217 (Comments: 1) | ieguy3 (Discussed changesets: 74) | a small portion of romoland still exists after menifee incorporation annexed about 28 sq miles commented 2026-10-31 09:23:30 UTC by ieguy3 ♦75 |
| 190598555 (Comments: 1) | Hazard K9 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190644614 commented 2026-10-31 08:43:29 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦7,210 |
| 191266965 (Comments: 1) | Arora Tech Blackwood (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! I noticed that text in a description, note or slogan tag in your changeset may be promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping... commented 2026-10-31 08:36:42 UTC by NeisBot ♦7,518 |
| 191257296 (Comments: 2) | Alex Wilson07 (Discussed changesets: 3) | User has been blocked https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21502 commented 2026-10-31 07:03:36 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦7,210 |
| 191069415 (Comments: 2) | Royal Caribbean (Discussed changesets: 18) | User has been blocked https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21487 commented 2026-10-31 07:02:47 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦7,210 |
| 191229268 (Comments: 3) | lucidoffices (Discussed changesets: 25) | > And of course, a useless `.` as a changeset comment like in most of their previous changesets Which, to note, was exactly what you yourself banned them for (with the exact same comment), *twice* (because they kept at it after the first ti... commented 2026-10-31 07:00:51 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 191217008 (Comments: 1) | Rmacaraig (Discussed changesets: 16) | As you have been told well over a dozen times by now https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=24569206 and never once acknowledged, your changesets contain numerous malformed tags, such that the information you are trying to add wi... commented 2026-10-31 06:47:54 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 191264101 (Comments: 1) | TheNightRider (Discussed changesets: 53) | Forgot to mention shortening the service road to the entrance until we get aerial imagery of the new road layout. commented 2026-10-31 06:18:03 UTC by TheNightRider ♦90 |
| 190984166 (Comments: 2) | bartpio (Discussed changesets: 3) | yes, good catch. I reverted 190984166. I'll work on another changeset that focuses more on Utley Brook, with standard tags. commented 2026-10-31 03:55:18 UTC by bartpio ♦3 |
| 191245252 (Comments: 1) | Calvin Gluck (Discussed changesets: 1) | This already exists (node 14156601801). I merged your new node with the previously existing node. commented 2026-10-31 03:04:50 UTC by caseywittmier ♦13 |
| 191199417 (Comments: 1) | Val (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Val, in the future please be sure to actually add junction=roundabout to new roundabouts, and match the highway=* tag according to the guidelines on the wiki page for roundabouts commented 2026-10-31 03:02:29 UTC by dknelson9876 ♦166 |
| 191219400 (Comments: 1) | RainBirdLover (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi RainBirdLover, please be sure to use specific changeset comments. Something as simple as "Added street lights" is helpful to fellow mappers reviewing changes and others who look through histories. commented 2026-10-31 02:57:17 UTC by dknelson9876 ♦166 |
| 191259226 (Comments: 1) | BradCW (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Brad, welcome to OSM, and mapping in Utah! We're happy to have you. The specific problem here is that Lazy M Ct is comes closer to the middle of the building than Lazy Water Cv. Adding a fake parking lot at the end of the driveway does not he... commented 2026-10-31 02:56:07 UTC by dknelson9876 ♦166 |
| 191147762 (Comments: 6) | Joseph R P (Discussed changesets: 238) | Hello Joseph P R, I may consider leaving this section of road trunk. However, I want to have the entire highway tagged with appropriate "maxspeed" values. You can use overpass turbo, Google Maps Street View, and Here Map Crea... commented 2026-10-31 02:25:03 UTC by BigSushi ♦6 |
| 188985293 (Comments: 6) | people128256 (Discussed changesets: 6) | I found one residential road named Northeast Campesinos Boulevard. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1391056686. I do believe it would be good to bring this issue up on either the Community Forum or Slack. commented 2026-10-31 02:07:45 UTC by Glassman ♦6,059 |
| 191172656 (Comments: 1) | DonT155 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Corrected database in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/191259163 commented 2026-10-30 23:42:25 UTC by rajdhani ♦642 |
| 190223638 (Comments: 4) | Royal Caribbean (Discussed changesets: 18) | Thanks - reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/191258936 and blocked https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21502 . Please let us know if you see any others! commented 2026-10-30 23:30:29 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,925 |
| 191245358 (Comments: 2) | Bill Folk (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thank you. Noted. Will not happen again. Cheers. commented 2026-10-30 21:17:09 UTC by Bill Folk ♦1 |
| 191122494 (Comments: 1) | northpacific (Discussed changesets: 1) | Yes, I can confirm this (also visible on King County 2025 orthoimagery, available in the backgrounds sidebar on the right of the editor). Good catch, I didn't see that this hadn't been updated in OpenStreetMap yet. I'm going through an... commented 2026-10-30 21:10:20 UTC by pwbriggs ♦520 |
| 191255563 (Comments: 1) | DRinTexas (Discussed changesets: 1) | Set up within last 2 days of 10/30/2026. Picture avail. commented 2026-10-30 21:08:35 UTC by DRinTexas ♦1 |
| 191250240 (Comments: 1) | 68916 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi 68916, Thanks for your contribution. FYI, in RapidEditor you can use the Q hotkey to square a building so every angle is 90 degrees. It makes the resulting buildings look a lot cleaner commented 2026-10-30 19:25:30 UTC by ion_chi ♦111 |
| 189705131 (Comments: 2) | HolyCrapThatsALongUsername (Discussed changesets: 9) | Sounds good! Thanks for letting me know commented 2026-10-30 15:58:20 UTC by HolyCrapThatsALongUsername ♦14 |
| 191148092 (Comments: 27) | scrambling_panda (Discussed changesets: 3) | "I am fine with the conditional access. I am not fine with gates being removed even though they currently exist. Let's do hope that the closure is lifted tomorrow because I am very pessimistic with this whole construction project and whethe... commented 2026-10-30 15:02:30 UTC by Huong Dang ♦13 |
| 48480811 (Comments: 2) | AlaskaDave (Discussed changesets: 67) | I obtained GPS traces from a person who rode a bicycle over the Iditarod Trail. The small details are not verifiable by me and, in fact, the actual position of the trails varies from year to year depending on many factors. Also, in Alaska riv... commented 2026-10-30 14:38:49 UTC by AlaskaDave ♦182 |
| 189743583 (Comments: 1) | FunkyPomeranian39 (Discussed changesets: 1) | I always love seeing somebody put so much care into building outlines. Great job. commented 2026-10-30 13:38:25 UTC by jhaluska80 ♦113 |
| 190903374 (Comments: 3) | Payton C (Discussed changesets: 1) | It would make sense to explain this term under https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access. commented 2026-10-30 13:21:49 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,942 |
| 180024725 (Comments: 2) | Roseland (Discussed changesets: 1) | I dont believe i touched that, just the roads in town. commented 2026-10-30 13:20:50 UTC by Roseland ♦1 |
| 191236069 (Comments: 1) | Maksim Sazanovich (Discussed changesets: 13) | correction: HOV tags were added to the trunk road commented 2026-10-30 12:48:34 UTC by Maksim Sazanovich ♦16 |
| 190858523 (Comments: 1) | Pabtlope (Discussed changesets: 1) | You added this camera as part of a crosswalk. Could you please move this to the correct location and detach it from the crosswalk? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/190858523 ... commented 2026-10-30 12:44:25 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,623 |
| 190863321 (Comments: 1) | NRutt2005 (Discussed changesets: 3) | It's generally a good idea to include the street name on sidewalks as well. Pedestrians like turn by turn instructions, too! Also foot=yes is redundant a bicycle=yes and horse=yes are highly unlikely for sidewalks. --- ... commented 2026-10-30 12:43:32 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,623 |
| 191234464 (Comments: 1) | savannahsterling (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! I noticed that text in a description, note or slogan tag in your changeset may be promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping... commented 2026-10-30 12:06:42 UTC by NeisBot ♦7,518 |
| 191225995 (Comments: 1) | AboveAllGarageDoors (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! I noticed that text in a description, note or slogan tag in your changeset may be promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping... commented 2026-10-30 08:21:42 UTC by NeisBot ♦7,518 |
| 191225939 (Comments: 1) | AboveAllGarageDoors (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! I noticed that text in a description, note or slogan tag in your changeset may be promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping... commented 2026-10-30 08:18:42 UTC by NeisBot ♦7,518 |
| 191219273 (Comments: 1) | restorationuplift (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/191223192 Comment: "Remove spam" commented 2026-10-30 06:49:08 UTC by NeisRevert ♦2,076 |
| 191143193 (Comments: 2) | restorationuplift (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/191195668 commented 2026-10-30 06:48:09 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦7,210 |
| 188541796 (Comments: 3) | Flap Slimy Outward (Discussed changesets: 313) | Yes, this is standard. A nearby example where the road has its own identity is the New York State Thruway which crosses the Hudson River via the Tappan Zee Bridge. But in the case of many of the bridges of NYC, the bridge itself is its own roadway, a... commented 2026-10-30 06:41:59 UTC by ZLima12 ♦293 |
| 191218972 (Comments: 2) | henins1 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks for your revision! https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/191219212 commented 2026-10-30 06:38:51 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦7,210 |
| 191215338 (Comments: 2) | 911SentinelLynnwood (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Glassman, thanks for checking. This is a real, newly registered business (911 SENTINEL, LLC) at 15806 Hwy 99 Ste 1, Lynnwood, WA 98087. The pin was placed slightly off by mistake, which I'll correct. I'll re-add it inside the correct bui... commented 2026-10-30 05:25:03 UTC by 911SentinelLynnwood ♦1 |
| 183232720 (Comments: 4) | alexwohlbruck (Discussed changesets: 13) | Hello, can you please respond to the comments? The Wiki is back up; there is no documentation. commented 2026-10-30 04:38:47 UTC by rivermont ♦246 |
| 191128926 (Comments: 1) | broiledskull (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/191220414 commented 2026-10-30 03:59:24 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,271 |
| 191162120 (Comments: 1) | WJones18 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Corrected database in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/191220079 commented 2026-10-30 03:38:44 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,271 |
| 191169754 (Comments: 1) | MLY1989 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Corrected database in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/191219774 commented 2026-10-30 03:20:42 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,271 |
| 191075130 (Comments: 1) | Espresso95 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, welcome to OpenStreetMap! What's specifically is the source for this information? Do you have local knowledge to indicate that these railroads are all operated by this company? Thanks! commented 2026-10-30 02:56:23 UTC by pwbriggs ♦520 |
| 191153972 (Comments: 1) | rodentshieldbellingham (Discussed changesets: 1) | removed node - seo spam. Not even in a building - plus looks like a residential area. unlikely to be open for people to stop in --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/191153972 ... commented 2026-10-29 23:47:53 UTC by Glassman ♦6,059 |
| 190422852 (Comments: 1) | RTMKE (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi! Thanks for being on top of new bike infrastructure. It looks like you're pretty new to OSM, so I recommend reading into The Great Path Controversy. One of the common agreements in the wake of the Controversy is that protected bike lanes can ... commented 2026-10-29 23:45:23 UTC by BPTT ♦97 |
| 190598445 (Comments: 3) | Hazard K9 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Thanks for the cleanup! commented 2026-10-29 23:01:27 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 188935351 (Comments: 1) | GNR8 (Discussed changesets: 13) | Be sure to put the right street name on the right houses on a specific block. Some are incorrect by several blocks. commented 2026-10-29 21:03:41 UTC by Zol87 ♦51 |
| 191209241 (Comments: 1) | Karen@Digible (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! I noticed that text in a description, note or slogan tag in your changeset may be promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping... commented 2026-10-29 19:39:42 UTC by NeisBot ♦7,518 |
| 190797860 (Comments: 1) | ckronenburg (Discussed changesets: 2) | The airport diagram has been outdated and is not an accurate source. The FAA is behind on the publication, but the new diagram should release today. You can already see it on the FAA Weathercams site for KGPI. Please revert your changes to what we ac... commented 2026-10-29 19:23:36 UTC by GPIA-mgmt ♦2 |
| 190797494 (Comments: 1) | ckronenburg (Discussed changesets: 2) | The airport diagram has been outdated and is not an accurate source. The FAA is behind on the publication, but the new diagram should release today. You can already see it on the FAA Weathercams site for KGPI. Please revert your changes to what we ac... commented 2026-10-29 19:23:11 UTC by GPIA-mgmt ♦2 |
| 191208109 (Comments: 1) | IntegrityCrimeSceneGlendale (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! I noticed that text in a description, note or slogan tag in your changeset may be promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping... commented 2026-10-29 19:06:42 UTC by NeisBot ♦7,518 |
| 191207230 (Comments: 1) | Karen@Digible (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! I noticed that text in a description, note or slogan tag in your changeset may be promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping... commented 2026-10-29 18:45:42 UTC by NeisBot ♦7,518 |
| 191148515 (Comments: 2) | Joseph R P (Discussed changesets: 238) | For the record the buildings I deleted were very large building=construction polygons spanning multiple detached houses and very roughly tracing the row houses, both of which were too poorly-mapped to utilize that plugin without remapping them first. commented 2026-10-29 18:33:58 UTC by Joseph R P ♦476 |
| 191192914 (Comments: 2) | 0x4273 (Discussed changesets: 9) | Apologies for dumping a 130 message thread on you, but its part of a work in progress to formalize this tagging. Turns out recreation_grounds as the original definition intended are basically just a big grass field where you play soccer. https://comm... commented 2026-10-29 18:04:23 UTC by 0x4273 ♦5 |
| 191082045 (Comments: 1) | Gaviero62 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Corrected database in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/191205135 commented 2026-10-29 17:45:48 UTC by ajmat ♦666 |
| 191197737 (Comments: 2) | Café DIOR by Dominique Crenn (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partly reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/191198777 commented 2026-10-29 16:16:35 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦7,210 |
| 190895215 (Comments: 3) | voidmain42 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Oh and CourseBuilder exports to an open source repository here: https://github.com/SpotGolf/CourseData I'd love to rework the OSM tags to match the CourseData model. commented 2026-10-29 15:43:19 UTC by voidmain42 ♦1 |
| 191172739 (Comments: 1) | ICT_maps (Discussed changesets: 20) | A few points here, first it would be wonderful if there are separately mapped sidewalks along a road when you split the bridge out of a road that you do the same with the sidewalks since the sidewalks are also going to be on a bridge, either the same... commented 2026-10-29 15:37:37 UTC by Udarian ♦992 |
| 191197957 (Comments: 1) | Sergei Amuzinski (Discussed changesets: 11) | based on mapbox owned-licensed telemetry data* commented 2026-10-29 14:55:24 UTC by Sergei Amuzinski ♦13 |
| 191170985 (Comments: 1) | mwchipper (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi I see you requested a review on this changeset. You have a typo in the operator tag. Other than that, it looks fine. commented 2026-10-29 14:50:34 UTC by JuanElDemografo ♦59 |
| 191170081 (Comments: 1) | mwchipper (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi and welcome to OSM. I see you requested review on this changeset. Looks fine to me! Happy mapping. commented 2026-10-29 14:46:04 UTC by JuanElDemografo ♦59 |
| 191197216 (Comments: 1) | Maksim Hradaboyeu (Discussed changesets: 33) | #mapbox_hov commented 2026-10-29 14:38:04 UTC by Maksim Hradaboyeu ♦34 |
| 191187703 (Comments: 2) | JJ_P (Discussed changesets: 13) | Hello! Sorry for removing that name; I couldn’t find any confirmation of it. Thank you for your feedback. commented 2026-10-29 14:37:18 UTC by JJ_P ♦11 |
| 190255738 (Comments: 3) | JXKPomelo (Discussed changesets: 12) | 6th Ave between Monaghan Rd & Del Ray St is still undivided, with EB/WB traffic still using the future WB 6th ave lanes. I changed the EB lanes back to construction. commented 2026-10-29 14:31:18 UTC by GarliccBread1 ♦17 |
| 191182009 (Comments: 1) | Maksim Hradaboyeu (Discussed changesets: 33) | #mapbox_hov commented 2026-10-29 14:16:49 UTC by Maksim Hradaboyeu ♦34 |
| 191181007 (Comments: 1) | Maksim Hradaboyeu (Discussed changesets: 33) | #mapbox_hov commented 2026-10-29 14:15:55 UTC by Maksim Hradaboyeu ♦34 |
| 191080467 (Comments: 1) | bbhme (Discussed changesets: 4) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/191190638 commented 2026-10-29 12:08:25 UTC by MappingMore ♦793 |
| 191082209 (Comments: 1) | Sonoran Desert Sanctuary (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/191189414 commented 2026-10-29 11:38:37 UTC by rajdhani ♦642 |
| 191073363 (Comments: 2) | Foster Cardoza (Discussed changesets: 1) | I wasn’t 100% sure so I marked it down just in case,I agree that it also looks temporary, however Kroger has had their ‘temporary’ cameras up for a while. I assumed that placing the nodes would be fine and if not someone else... commented 2026-10-29 11:23:25 UTC by Foster Cardoza ♦1 |
| 191082208 (Comments: 1) | Gaviero62 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Corrected database in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/191187666 commented 2026-10-29 10:57:05 UTC by MappingMore ♦793 |
| 191125638 (Comments: 1) | bbhme (Discussed changesets: 4) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/191187574 commented 2026-10-29 10:55:05 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,271 |
| 191113970 (Comments: 3) | JaeWitThaK (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks @Wildsharky commented 2026-10-29 10:44:09 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦7,210 |
| 191081602 (Comments: 1) | Sonoran Desert Sanctuary (Discussed changesets: 2) | Corrected database in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/191186218 commented 2026-10-29 10:22:40 UTC by rajdhani ♦642 |
| 191112983 (Comments: 1) | BAFAMI (Discussed changesets: 1) | Corrected database in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/191185979 commented 2026-10-29 10:18:31 UTC by MappingMore ♦793 |
| 191125722 (Comments: 1) | bbhme (Discussed changesets: 4) | Corrected database in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/191184383 commented 2026-10-29 09:44:56 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,271 |
| 191036262 (Comments: 1) | jusman79 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Corrected database in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/191183526 commented 2026-10-29 09:21:58 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,271 |
| 191116589 (Comments: 1) | WyattZZZ (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/191178258 commented 2026-10-29 06:52:52 UTC by ajmat ♦666 |
| 191177181 (Comments: 1) | ImranKhanFL (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! I noticed that text in a description, note or slogan tag in your changeset may be promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping... commented 2026-10-29 06:12:42 UTC by NeisBot ♦7,518 |
| 191076002 (Comments: 2) | ClaytonL (Discussed changesets: 1) | Unfortunately I don't remember and I probably won't be able to revisit the site. Doing some research online, it looks like all the connected docks are included in the marina but I've been unable to confirm that 100%. Given that, do you... commented 2026-10-29 06:01:59 UTC by ClaytonL ♦1 |
| 191167080 (Comments: 2) | RiddlersBailBondsCA (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks for your revision @RiddlersBailBondsCA https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/191167389 commented 2026-10-29 05:39:45 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦7,210 |
| 191120699 (Comments: 3) | CadencePHL (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks @pkoby https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/191166940 commented 2026-10-29 05:26:34 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦7,210 |
| 191166689 (Comments: 3) | SwiftPro Heating Cooling and Plumbing (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thanks for the revision @SwiftPro%20Heating%20Cooling%20and%20Plumbing 👍 commented 2026-10-29 05:25:18 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦7,210 |
| 191166179 (Comments: 2) | SwiftPro Heating Cooling and Plumbing (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thanks for the revision @SwiftPro%20Heating%20Cooling%20and%20Plumbing 👍 commented 2026-10-29 05:24:47 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦7,210 |
| 191173651 (Comments: 1) | Asa Foreman (Discussed changesets: 5) | The changeset comment is an error, I was unaware I had previous edits sitting in the editor before I uploaded the changeset. In addition to the node change, I converted Bellview Baptist Church to an area. The node by which it was previously represent... commented 2026-10-29 02:32:39 UTC by Asa Foreman ♦4 |
| 170951377 (Comments: 2) | svansing (Discussed changesets: 10) | It was an error. It was intended to be "Location.transition = yes". It has been corrected. commented 2026-10-29 02:32:21 UTC by svansing ♦7 |
| 187824226 (Comments: 1) | Nasdaq500 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi Nasdaq500, based on feedback provided by another user, these cameras are not made by Axon, instead they are normal CCTV cameras. I have preserved the objects you have added, but changed the tags from ALPR to camera. You may not be able to see t... commented 2026-10-29 01:36:02 UTC by SherbetS ♦175 |
| 187716963 (Comments: 3) | Flap Slimy Outward (Discussed changesets: 313) | That new alignment is a temporary relocation of the road during the construction phase. commented 2026-10-29 00:51:53 UTC by AmpereBEEP ♦3 |
| 191066502 (Comments: 1) | Bodega Marine Reserve (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome to OSM. The feature you removed in this changeset is valid. Please don’t remove valid OSM data. You have a new account and might not be aware, on OSM, we do not remove features if they exist on the ground. If it exists on ... commented 2026-10-28 23:42:13 UTC by MassCartog ♦503 |
| 191053270 (Comments: 2) | BrettJeffries (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome Back* commented 2026-10-28 23:34:24 UTC by MassCartog ♦503 |
| 191170703 (Comments: 1) | Flap Slimy Outward (Discussed changesets: 313) | source=survey, not source=streetlevel_imagery... 🤦♂️ commented 2026-10-28 23:30:57 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦405 |
| 191151296 (Comments: 1) | gwb2 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome to OSM. Wanted to let you know, If the feature exists on the ground, it is valid. You might not be aware, on OSM, we do not remove features if they exist on the ground. If it exists on the ground, it is valid data regardless of ... commented 2026-10-28 23:27:45 UTC by MassCartog ♦503 |
| 191166369 (Comments: 1) | Casa Bella Residences (Discussed changesets: 1) | there where a few issues with these 3 edits so I will put them here. From the get go I went through and fixed what I could but as you know the property better if you see anything I did wrong please feel free to respond here or edit your self. Firs... commented 2026-10-28 23:25:46 UTC by Udarian ♦992 |
| 190908399 (Comments: 1) | h234a2hm (Discussed changesets: 9) | Hi! I see this phone number cannot be valid; 184 is not a valid central office code as NANP central office codes cannot start with "1". I added a fixme=* in changeset 191170435, but would be great if you could help fix it or at least point ... commented 2026-10-28 23:09:11 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 191162147 (Comments: 1) | RickS22-49 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome to OSM. Wanted to let you know, If the feature exists on the ground, it is valid. You might not be aware, on OSM, we do not remove features if they exist on the ground. If it exists on the ground, it is valid data regardless of ... commented 2026-10-28 22:54:49 UTC by MassCartog ♦503 |
| 189655590 (Comments: 2) | Landsat6 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Corrected, thanks. commented 2026-10-28 22:21:27 UTC by Landsat6 ♦1 |
| 191159478 (Comments: 1) | alpacaMaps (Discussed changesets: 11) | This node is legit! Many apologies to Hermit405 who submitted it originally. The node is attached to the light pole on this side street and appears to be operated on city power as it lacks the solar panel component. commented 2026-10-28 21:36:30 UTC by alpacaMaps ♦431 |
| 188068488 (Comments: 5) | Hermit405 (Discussed changesets: 1) | My sincerest apologies, you are entirely correct! I apologize for incurring your extra time to validate a previously correct edit, also. I had already stepped out to run by there and also validated the node is placed on the aforementioned light pole ... commented 2026-10-28 21:33:41 UTC by alpacaMaps ♦431 |
| 191167289 (Comments: 1) | Jack0188 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! I noticed that text in a description, note or slogan tag in your changeset may be promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping... commented 2026-10-28 21:06:42 UTC by NeisBot ♦7,518 |
| 186308516 (Comments: 3) | Loopslol7 (Discussed changesets: 17) | Hi Loopslol7, Thanks for correcting so fast, but only 'yes' or 'no' should be used and 'yes;designated' should not be used (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Drecycling#Recycling ). Kind ... commented 2026-10-28 20:29:55 UTC by lyctkel ♦391 |
| 191028551 (Comments: 16) | ion_chi (Discussed changesets: 14) | Response from Luisa Torres. I'll also ask her to send out a broader email to people subscribed to the construction updates so we're clear. commented 2026-10-28 20:11:30 UTC by Huong Dang ♦13 |
| 191162091 (Comments: 1) | georgemasonjr (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome, and thanks for contributing! While reviewing your changeset, I noticed a potentially unintended geometry change involving a moved node. The automated check looks for situations where moving a node may cause connected ways to cr... commented 2026-10-28 18:27:40 UTC by NeisBot ♦7,518 |
| 191159104 (Comments: 1) | Lonen (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, some of the deleted ways were edited in recent months, and several are still visible in satellite imagery. Could you please clarify whether these paths have actually disappeared on the ground or whether access has simply been restrict... commented 2026-10-28 18:27:02 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦7,210 |
| 191072606 (Comments: 1) | jayboknows (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/191161923 commented 2026-10-28 18:20:59 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,271 |
| 191160440 (Comments: 1) | eskimo_pi (Discussed changesets: 1) | Accidentally flagged this for review! The edits are standard updates and don't actually need a second look commented 2026-10-28 17:47:59 UTC by eskimo_pi ♦1 |
| 190849028 (Comments: 1) | mcoopersmith (Discussed changesets: 1) | Unless we're talking about something like the Brooklyn Bridge, we shouldn't tag small inconsequential bridges like this with a name (unless it really is a named bridge). commented 2026-10-28 17:27:35 UTC by b-jazz ♦976 |
| 190812730 (Comments: 2) | TheBestIdea (Discussed changesets: 74) | I try! commented 2026-10-28 16:22:21 UTC by TheBestIdea ♦120 |
| 191008919 (Comments: 1) | devemporer (Discussed changesets: 5) | why remove construction=motorway, that tag looks correct in this case to me? Happy mapping, Udar commented 2026-10-28 16:18:21 UTC by Udarian ♦992 |
| 190098799 (Comments: 3) | Buttons Cheely (Discussed changesets: 35) | so I am putting the hashtag in the wrong box...i will make the adjustment. I apologize for that commented 2026-10-28 16:17:09 UTC by Buttons Cheely ♦2 |
| 191147595 (Comments: 2) | Buttons Cheely (Discussed changesets: 35) | Hope that helps! Happy mapping! commented 2026-10-28 15:21:45 UTC by JuanElDemografo ♦59 |
| 191148108 (Comments: 1) | rockymountainent (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! I noticed that text in a description, note or slogan tag in your changeset may be promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping... commented 2026-10-28 13:39:41 UTC by NeisBot ♦7,518 |
| 191127878 (Comments: 2) | Huong Dang (Discussed changesets: 11) | Done in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/191148092 commented 2026-10-28 13:37:25 UTC by scrambling_panda ♦26 |
| 190371291 (Comments: 5) | BigSushi (Discussed changesets: 9) | Reverted in changeset/191147762 commented 2026-10-28 13:27:26 UTC by Joseph R P ♦476 |
| 191147547 (Comments: 1) | Gary Baptiste (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! I noticed that text in a description, note or slogan tag in your changeset may be promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping... commented 2026-10-28 13:24:42 UTC by NeisBot ♦7,518 |
| 191106510 (Comments: 2) | RB Neville (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi RB Neville, Thanks for your clarification. I've tried to address your concerns and update the map accordingly. You can review my changes here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/191147409 Could you please take a l... commented 2026-10-28 13:21:07 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦7,210 |
| 191106803 (Comments: 4) | RB Neville (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi RB Neville, Thanks for your clarification. I've tried to address your concerns and update the map accordingly. You can review my changes here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/191147409 Could you please take a l... commented 2026-10-28 13:21:00 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦7,210 |
| 475302 (Comments: 1) | firefighter (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/25519895/history has location = yes that was added in this edit what is the meaning of this tag? commented 2026-10-28 13:15:52 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,339 |
| 191144279 (Comments: 1) | Timely Health (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! I noticed that text in a description, note or slogan tag in your changeset may be promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping... commented 2026-10-28 12:03:42 UTC by NeisBot ♦7,518 |
| 184441153 (Comments: 3) | Marcthenarc (Discussed changesets: 2) | You can upload that photo to https://imgur.com and post link here. commented 2026-10-28 11:26:09 UTC by MxxCon ♦3,582 |
| 191132225 (Comments: 1) | Dean the handyman (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! No business entry without any real address . I will remove this spam. commented 2026-10-28 10:18:59 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,942 |
| 155001654 (Comments: 3) | Derek Morr (Discussed changesets: 6) | sorry for a duplicate :( commented 2026-10-28 08:41:57 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,339 |
| 185052822 (Comments: 1) | RailandSea (Discussed changesets: 21) | hello! Can you take a look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5604116 ? commented 2026-10-28 08:41:35 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,339 |
| 190720568 (Comments: 1) | SherbetS (Discussed changesets: 34) | Over 500 nodes get deleted, by whom and for what reason? commented 2026-10-28 08:00:19 UTC by anticommie ♦1 |
| 135916775 (Comments: 1) | happilymappingrway (Discussed changesets: 33) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10882368693/history has location = yes that was added in this edit what is the meaning of this tag? commented 2026-10-28 08:00:03 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,339 |
| 191040154 (Comments: 1) | spacex02 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/191131179 commented 2026-10-28 06:03:52 UTC by ajmat ♦666 |
| 190941136 (Comments: 2) | Lkumar_lyft (Discussed changesets: 23) | Hi carciofo, My name is Lalit, and I am a mapper on the OpenStreetMap team at Lyft. Thank you for bringing this issue to my attention. I’ve removed the leftover road segment and the associated no_u_turn restriction in this changeset (http... commented 2026-10-28 05:37:11 UTC by Lkumar_lyft ♦9 |
| 191130051 (Comments: 1) | kghomesmn (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! I noticed that text in a description, note or slogan tag in your changeset may be promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping... commented 2026-10-28 05:00:43 UTC by NeisBot ♦7,518 |
| 191051173 (Comments: 2) | sarya_Lyft (Discussed changesets: 28) | Hi Alexey Lukin, My name is Surander, and I am a mapper on the OSM team at Lyft. Thank you for reaching out and sharing the latest information. Regarding my edits, I updated the road direction based on Lyft-owned street-level imagery from Septe... commented 2026-10-28 04:23:21 UTC by sarya_Lyft ♦18 |
| 191038312 (Comments: 2) | santoshipanwar_lyft (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hi Udarian, My name is Santoshi, and I am a mapper on the OSM team at Lyft. Thank you for bringing this issue to my attention. After reviewing the edit again, I realized that I had relied on outdated sources and failed to verify the history of ... commented 2026-10-28 04:19:01 UTC by santoshipanwar_lyft ♦8 |
| 189853931 (Comments: 2) | DividedFrame (Discussed changesets: 9) | I drove by on McEmurray Road--the side I usually don't see--this afternoon. There is a sign for 21 Golf Club construction and contractor's trailer, but not much else visible from the road. I've changed this to landuse=construct... commented 2026-10-28 03:58:26 UTC by bdentremont ♦64 |
| 191127224 (Comments: 1) | dxapanta (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome, and thanks for contributing! While reviewing your changeset, I noticed a potentially unintended geometry change involving a moved node. The automated check looks for situations where moving a node may cause connected ways to cr... commented 2026-10-28 01:51:39 UTC by NeisBot ♦7,518 |
| 180976298 (Comments: 1) | AsterT (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi AsterT. Thanks for adding some buildings. I've fixed these up, but when adding building outlines, please don't put the house number in the 'name' field. That field is reserved for buildings that have an actual name. The house n... commented 2026-10-27 20:38:11 UTC by Adam Franco ♦172 |
| 191114935 (Comments: 1) | florisje (Discussed changesets: 3) | Thank you for adding this commented 2026-10-27 20:05:46 UTC by Adam850 ♦11 |
| 191116290 (Comments: 4) | Captain Kit Carson (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks @Captain%20Kit%20Carson 👍 commented 2026-10-27 19:30:57 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦7,210 |
| 190762514 (Comments: 83) | matthewfecica (Discussed changesets: 16) | Yeah, see also https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/tagging-implied-access-restrictions-for-hiking-route-member-ways/149178/20 for my attempt to break down where the disagreement is happening commented 2026-10-27 18:25:42 UTC by pwbriggs ♦520 |
| 190811580 (Comments: 1) | Brantley Warren (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hello! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1570212689. What is the mean of the tags legal = PT FRL SW millage_rate = 49.9 owner_mailing_address = 6042 Lock & Dam Road, Ozark, AK 72949 plot_type = Ex. Government... commented 2026-10-27 18:13:21 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,942 |
| 191113435 (Comments: 2) | OneSpecificSunday (Discussed changesets: 1) | I may have inadvertently moved more than the camera node that I had intended. This can be reverted to restore the accidental changes and I can add the camera node back. commented 2026-10-27 17:49:04 UTC by OneSpecificSunday ♦1 |
| 190993763 (Comments: 2) | Kellner21 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Info from the city's own files on its drainage infrastructure. Just deleting it all, no interest in finding out the meaning of all that info. More info is not better if it's not understood. commented 2026-10-27 17:23:05 UTC by Kellner21 ♦3 |
| 177834378 (Comments: 1) | ieguy3 (Discussed changesets: 74) | You do nice work. commented 2026-10-27 17:17:24 UTC by Precision Guesswork ♦11 |
| 180877284 (Comments: 1) | mapadu (Discussed changesets: 10) | Is there a reason why Salton Sea State Recreation Area does not use wikidata https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q2933976? commented 2026-10-27 17:11:52 UTC by Precision Guesswork ♦11 |
| 189376988 (Comments: 1) | Baloo Uriza (Discussed changesets: 114) | Thank you, Sir – according to Overpass Turbo (nwr["traffic_sign"~"^US:D2.*a$"]), you have added the first and only Bicycle Distance road signs in the USA so far. I could see and enjoy them on Apple Maps. As a European (where... commented 2026-10-27 15:41:29 UTC by MapsByEX ♦3 |
| 190908043 (Comments: 1) | j0hn33y (Discussed changesets: 22) | Hello! Please have a look on http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1570961046, http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1570961058. What is the mean of the tags ACREAGE = .180 ADDRESS = 1009 JACKSON RD AVIS = 0029 CITY_TEXT = PARK HILLS CLASS_TEXT ... commented 2026-10-27 15:08:43 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,942 |
| 190910589 (Comments: 1) | tastywater (Discussed changesets: 9) | I accidentally set the mapillary= tag to persistent in Vespucci, but that image is not relevant to this changeset. commented 2026-10-27 14:14:52 UTC by tastywater ♦10 |
| 191103819 (Comments: 1) | tsjordan (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! I noticed that text in a description, note or slogan tag in your changeset may be promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping... commented 2026-10-27 14:06:42 UTC by NeisBot ♦7,518 |
| 191100912 (Comments: 1) | NoPeekin1234567890 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hello! I am not familiar with OsmAnd's routing but I can make a guess. I believe that since Student Circle is marked as a driveway, routers might ignore the fact that access=no and motor_vehicle=private. I imagine this is because many drivewa... commented 2026-10-27 13:54:38 UTC by PuddlesMapping ♦25 |
| 191037311 (Comments: 2) | jmapb (Discussed changesets: 53) | Thanks, missed that one -- reverted commented 2026-10-27 12:59:31 UTC by jmapb ♦435 |
| 191034762 (Comments: 1) | dallasoruser1 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/191098345 commented 2026-10-27 12:04:12 UTC by ajmat ♦666 |
| 191098084 (Comments: 1) | kghomesmn (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! I noticed that text in a description, note or slogan tag in your changeset may be promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping... commented 2026-10-27 12:00:42 UTC by NeisBot ♦7,518 |
| 191094951 (Comments: 1) | OTR Truck Trailer Repair (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! I noticed that text in a description, note or slogan tag in your changeset may be promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping... commented 2026-10-27 10:45:42 UTC by NeisBot ♦7,518 |
| 191024987 (Comments: 1) | ResplendentGrace (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/191092186 commented 2026-10-27 09:39:46 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,271 |
| 191091769 (Comments: 1) | GetGuttersJax (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! I noticed that text in a description, note or slogan tag in your changeset may be promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping... commented 2026-10-27 09:27:41 UTC by NeisBot ♦7,518 |
| 191037976 (Comments: 1) | ttyylllrr (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/191091323 commented 2026-10-27 09:16:34 UTC by ajmat ♦666 |
| 191090609 (Comments: 1) | PIOfAtlanta (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! I noticed that text in a description, note or slogan tag in your changeset may be promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping... commented 2026-10-27 09:03:43 UTC by NeisBot ♦7,518 |
| 191090140 (Comments: 1) | One of One (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! I noticed that text in a description, note or slogan tag in your changeset may be promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping... commented 2026-10-27 08:51:41 UTC by NeisBot ♦7,518 |
| 191065361 (Comments: 6) | Get Your Fizzy (Discussed changesets: 1) | I agree with @Omnific. OSM maps verifiable, real-world features, not virtual businesses or service areas. commented 2026-10-27 07:15:53 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦7,210 |
| 182977588 (Comments: 2) | Brennen T Reilly (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/191066619 commented 2026-10-27 07:10:20 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦7,210 |
| 191066556 (Comments: 1) | DrRandazzo (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello, thank you for your contribution. Could you please confirm whether the street signs you observed are current, and whether the official renaming has been implemented? Recent street-level photographs would be helpful. Please note th... commented 2026-10-27 07:09:13 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦7,210 |
| 191066619 (Comments: 1) | DrRandazzo (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello, thank you for your contribution. Could you please confirm whether the street signs you observed are current, and whether the official renaming has been implemented? Recent street-level photographs would be helpful. Please note th... commented 2026-10-27 07:09:03 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦7,210 |
| 190960917 (Comments: 4) | confusedbuffalo-bot (Discussed changesets: 28) | I understand that your point is really that edit stacking makes reverting more difficult. I can't think of an easy way to detect spam like this automatically, so what do you think would work well as a solution? Maybe something like... commented 2026-10-27 07:03:55 UTC by confusedbuffalo ♦505 |
| 191086143 (Comments: 1) | WE Grapple Inc (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! I noticed that text in a description, note or slogan tag in your changeset may be promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping... commented 2026-10-27 07:00:42 UTC by NeisBot ♦7,518 |
| 190532225 (Comments: 4) | TesseractPi (Discussed changesets: 2) | Should be fixed now commented 2026-10-27 05:17:59 UTC by TesseractPi ♦1 |
| 190981893 (Comments: 3) | Justin Wyse (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks @dknelson9876 commented 2026-10-27 05:17:43 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦7,210 |
| 190910609 (Comments: 1) | tastywater (Discussed changesets: 9) | I accidentally set the mapillary= tag to persistent in Vespucci, but that image is not relevant to this changeset. commented 2026-10-27 04:47:08 UTC by tastywater ♦10 |
| 190953559 (Comments: 1) | tastywater (Discussed changesets: 9) | I accidentally set the mapillary= tag to persistent in Vespucci, but that image is not relevant to this changeset. commented 2026-10-27 04:46:47 UTC by tastywater ♦10 |
| 190978355 (Comments: 1) | tastywater (Discussed changesets: 9) | I accidentally set the mapillary= tag to persistent in Vespucci, but that image is not relevant to this changeset. commented 2026-10-27 04:46:29 UTC by tastywater ♦10 |
| 190994126 (Comments: 1) | tastywater (Discussed changesets: 9) | I accidentally set the mapillary= tag to persistent in Vespucci, but that image is not relevant to this changeset. commented 2026-10-27 04:46:17 UTC by tastywater ♦10 |
| 190994670 (Comments: 1) | tastywater (Discussed changesets: 9) | I accidentally set the mapillary= tag to persistent in Vespucci, but that image is not relevant to this changeset. commented 2026-10-27 04:45:46 UTC by tastywater ♦10 |
| 191053021 (Comments: 1) | tastywater (Discussed changesets: 9) | I accidentally set the mapillary= tag to persistent in Vespucci, but that image is not relevant to this changeset. commented 2026-10-27 04:44:42 UTC by tastywater ♦10 |
| 189896962 (Comments: 2) | SteveRal (Discussed changesets: 7) | And the exit from the neighborhood south of Ohio ave on S Lincoln st is now missing an exit from the alleyway, causing routing errors. Please be more careful when editing in the future as this interchange area now needs lots of work with all the now ... commented 2026-10-27 04:40:52 UTC by GarliccBread1 ♦17 |
| 190905941 (Comments: 1) | G's (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi G's, can you provide a source that this parking lot is named "350 KwH"? A measurement is an odd name for a parking lot, especially a power measurement for a parking lot that doesn't have eV charging. And that the correc... commented 2026-10-27 03:19:06 UTC by dknelson9876 ♦166 |
| 191069274 (Comments: 1) | swimdb (Discussed changesets: 56) | Hi swimdb, looks like added a way with just the tag building:part=yes with no other details, and it also doesn't cover the entire building=yes area (which is an expectation of Simple 3D Buildings). Was this intentional? commented 2026-10-27 03:08:18 UTC by dknelson9876 ♦166 |
| 191068280 (Comments: 1) | hassan10 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi hassan10, you appear to have added a duplicate of a POI that was already present on the map. Was this intentional, or is there a website, app, or tool that is failing to show the existing location? commented 2026-10-27 03:05:53 UTC by dknelson9876 ♦166 |
| 191068140 (Comments: 1) | hassan10 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi hassan10, you appear to have added a duplicate of a POI that was already present on the map. Was this intentional, or is there a website, app, or tool that is failing to show the existing location? commented 2026-10-27 03:05:44 UTC by dknelson9876 ♦166 |
| 191036889 (Comments: 1) | LeahLouvie (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi LeahLouvie, welcome to OSM and mapping in Utah! We're happy to have you, and thank you for your contributions. Please note that there is an expected format that mappers have agreed upon for address conventions, which you can read about at htt... commented 2026-10-27 03:03:34 UTC by dknelson9876 ♦166 |
| 190898373 (Comments: 3) | tjasz (Discussed changesets: 3) | Er, I mean I'll be using both of those more in the future. For this crossing, just `hawk`. commented 2026-10-27 02:41:35 UTC by tjasz ♦4 |
| 191033907 (Comments: 1) | Malcolm Maas (Discussed changesets: 14) | Butland Court is listed as a road in the Massachusetts GIS. The wiki does not establish a minimum width for a road, so narrowness alone is not sufficient justification to reclassify it. commented 2026-10-27 00:50:43 UTC by StreetSurveyor ♦213 |
| 146689250 (Comments: 1) | Mr Matt K (Discussed changesets: 15) | Good edit with the note on way 11922660, I immediately figured out what was going on with the PPL line overlap It might be better to just make a separate way for dissimilar circuits commented 2026-10-27 00:36:22 UTC by IsStatenIsland ♦34 |
| 170625878 (Comments: 2) | convissor (Discussed changesets: 14) | Thank you for the heads up. Didn't realize it would be a problem. I created a new relation for all the trails and fixed all the access tags. commented 2026-10-27 00:12:25 UTC by convissor ♦11 |
| 191078602 (Comments: 1) | DFWPestGuard (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! I noticed that text in a description, note or slogan tag in your changeset may be promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping... commented 2026-10-26 23:51:47 UTC by NeisBot ♦7,518 |
| 183609202 (Comments: 1) | mneko (Discussed changesets: 28) | Are you sure about the location of this dock? It appears to be in a detention pond on all available imagery. commented 2026-10-26 23:50:50 UTC by hobbesvsboyle ♦22 |
| 190902596 (Comments: 2) | CAM-Gerlach_Repair (Discussed changesets: 44) | o7, thanks! commented 2026-10-26 23:12:16 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 190980144 (Comments: 1) | Ridder8 (Discussed changesets: 1) | This is not a flock camera. This is a weather camera installed by DOT to help analyze road conditions. This does not capture and does not have the ability to capture license plates, and is not a surveillance camera. If you continue to re-add it marke... commented 2026-10-26 22:58:27 UTC by RedSkies ♦16 |
| 190826792 (Comments: 2) | confusedbuffalo-bot (Discussed changesets: 28) | and https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/14304690924/history commented 2026-10-26 22:13:32 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,925 |
| 191073478 (Comments: 1) | Lakeside Pet Spa (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! I noticed that text in a description, note or slogan tag in your changeset may be promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping... commented 2026-10-26 20:39:42 UTC by NeisBot ♦7,518 |
| 191072533 (Comments: 1) | JRBrown (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome, and thanks for contributing! While reviewing your changeset, I noticed a potentially unintended geometry change involving a moved node. The automated check looks for situations where moving a node may cause connected ways to cr... commented 2026-10-26 20:09:40 UTC by NeisBot ♦7,518 |
| 43812883 (Comments: 2) | Ballard OpenStreetMap (Discussed changesets: 5) | I removed those 3 tags in lieu of a response. Happy mapping! commented 2026-10-26 19:21:47 UTC by pwbriggs ♦520 |
| 190965349 (Comments: 1) | Jwheels98765 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hello there :) "cleanup" does not describe what you did. Please read and apply https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments to future changes at OSM. Thank you commented 2026-10-26 19:21:09 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦4,434 |
| 191069751 (Comments: 1) | Melbious99 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap :) thanks for taking care of Warwick. You asked for a review of your edit and I can say that all four of them to date look fine. Regarding this school you might wish to take a look at our wiki ... commented 2026-10-26 19:17:50 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦4,434 |
| 190890862 (Comments: 1) | NoPeekin1234567890 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hello, I see that you've added footway=sidewalk to a lot of the footpaths around here. Apologies if this is a bit nit-picky, but I believe that per https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:footway=sidewalk#What_is_considered_a_sidewalk, a ... commented 2026-10-26 19:16:07 UTC by PuddlesMapping ♦25 |
| 191032309 (Comments: 1) | MidwestMapGeek (Discussed changesets: 37) | Have you considered adding a wikidata tag for the operator? (Q5382468) commented 2026-10-26 18:17:03 UTC by KFCmenomonie ♦12 |
| 191020875 (Comments: 1) | p**um***u****m*******p********v************** (Discussed changesets: 10) | Hello, How come you removed the name from the Savanna Avenue alleway? Local GIS and the plat of South Orchard Phase 2 show this alleway being named Savanna Avenue. Do you have any evidence otherwise? commented 2026-10-26 17:54:32 UTC by ScrawnyMeowth1 ♦59 |
| 191063516 (Comments: 1) | Flap Slimy Outward (Discussed changesets: 313) | Source: Bing commented 2026-10-26 16:23:34 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦405 |
| 191034627 (Comments: 1) | JaacobRaamos (Discussed changesets: 7) | Did you mean to add ford=yes to 6th St? The ford tag is for roads and paths that cross rivers without a bridge commented 2026-10-26 16:14:05 UTC by ion_chi ♦111 |
| 191048712 (Comments: 1) | Digitaleo (Discussed changesets: 57) | Are you sure this is the right place? Seems a bit odd to have a random node in small town midwest US with contact information for some place in France. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/chang... commented 2026-10-26 14:54:45 UTC by mrpenner ♦5 |
| 191026520 (Comments: 1) | Medieval (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/191048572 commented 2026-10-26 10:59:31 UTC by ajmat ♦666 |
| 191045903 (Comments: 1) | novacafeastoria (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! I noticed that text in a description, note or slogan tag in your changeset may be promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping... commented 2026-10-26 09:54:43 UTC by NeisBot ♦7,518 |
| 190953384 (Comments: 5) | Unknown Sample (Discussed changesets: 2) | https://trails.lacounty.gov/Files/QuickGuide/HastingDebris.pdf commented 2026-10-26 09:41:21 UTC by Unknown Sample ♦1 |
| 190991303 (Comments: 1) | Firearch (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/191044609 commented 2026-10-26 09:21:42 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,271 |
| 191035636 (Comments: 1) | ConnerRudi (Discussed changesets: 4) | Your changeset was tagged as using Bing imagery, but it's from September 2023. Did you use some other source, such as Esri? Esri is from May 2026, for reference. commented 2026-10-26 07:31:04 UTC by Allison P ♦1,154 |
| 191033889 (Comments: 2) | Mercy Patrick (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/191039471 commented 2026-10-26 06:33:55 UTC by rajdhani ♦642 |
| 190420481 (Comments: 1) | Rhino Roofers: San Antonio Roofing Company (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! I noticed that text in a description, note or slogan tag in your changeset may be promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping... commented 2026-10-26 06:30:49 UTC by NeisBot ♦7,518 |
| 119513931 (Comments: 1) | UrbanUnPlanner (Discussed changesets: 22) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1050592207 railway=loading_rack ? what is that? commented 2026-10-26 06:14:48 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,339 |
| 190993202 (Comments: 1) | ajpennyroblox2ii (Discussed changesets: 1) | Please do not make up names on OpenStreetMap commented 2026-10-26 03:39:55 UTC by willkmis ♦234 |
| 191035888 (Comments: 1) | tjboegle (Discussed changesets: 5) | you dont need a "permit" to ride these - only a membership or day pass. setting them as permit only prevents them from being used on routing software like ride with gps. commented 2026-10-26 03:17:44 UTC by tjboegle ♦6 |
| 191035900 (Comments: 1) | tjboegle (Discussed changesets: 5) | you dont need a "permit" to ride these - only a membership or day pass. setting them as permit only prevents them from being used on routing software like ride with gps. commented 2026-10-26 03:17:32 UTC by tjboegle ♦6 |
| 191035929 (Comments: 1) | tjboegle (Discussed changesets: 5) | you dont need a "permit" to ride these - only a membership or day pass. setting them as permit only prevents them from being used on routing software like ride with gps. commented 2026-10-26 03:17:24 UTC by tjboegle ♦6 |
| 191035967 (Comments: 1) | tjboegle (Discussed changesets: 5) | you dont need a "permit" to ride these - only a membership or day pass. setting them as permit only prevents them from being used on routing software like ride with gps. commented 2026-10-26 03:17:08 UTC by tjboegle ♦6 |
| 191035992 (Comments: 1) | tjboegle (Discussed changesets: 5) | you dont need a "permit" to ride these - only a membership or day pass. setting them as permit only prevents them from being used on routing software like ride with gps. commented 2026-10-26 03:16:48 UTC by tjboegle ♦6 |
| 189845522 (Comments: 3) | Hesh123 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Sorry I am so late with a response, but as can be seen in the example screenshot I have attached below the ALPR (the one selected) is within the road area, please use aerial imagery to make sure that the position is correct, ALPR's are very rare... commented 2026-10-26 03:09:53 UTC by Udarian ♦992 |
| 191031366 (Comments: 1) | SwellTime (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi welcome to OSM. Could you describe why you removed the trails in this changeset? Try to let people know what sort of thing in your changeset comments "Route classification" was not very helpful. Thanks commented 2026-10-26 00:58:39 UTC by MassCartog ♦503 |
| 191033140 (Comments: 1) | MassCartog (Discussed changesets: 40) | spoke too soon missed this "HASTINGS DEBRIS BASIN TRAIL IS CLOSED TO PROTECT PUBLIC SAFETY AND SUPPORT THE ECOSYSTEM’S RECOVERY FROM THE 2025 EATON FIRE. " commented 2026-10-25 23:56:24 UTC by MassCartog ♦503 |
| 190837278 (Comments: 3) | Transit Captain (Discussed changesets: 2) | I reverted it. I want you to know it's possible your edit may technically be correct due to one or two conditions: Amtrak might not have bothered to reprogram the transponders and might not have bothered to add the ATC cab signal codes for speed... commented 2026-10-25 23:44:07 UTC by IsStatenIsland ♦34 |
| 188109079 (Comments: 1) | Unknown Sample (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello, welcome to OSM. Wanted to let you know, If the feature exists on the ground, it is valid. You might not be aware, on OSM, we do not remove features if they exist on the ground. If it exists on the ground, it is valid data regardless of ... commented 2026-10-25 23:38:40 UTC by MassCartog ♦503 |
| 191032600 (Comments: 1) | Potatoleum (Discussed changesets: 6) | also divided meadows blvd and golden meadows way into two one-ways where there is a median commented 2026-10-25 23:25:52 UTC by Potatoleum ♦6 |
| 191026416 (Comments: 1) | OneTusi (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome to OSM. Wanted to let you know, If the feature exists on the ground, it is valid. You might not be aware, on OSM, we do not remove features if they exist on the ground. If it exists on the ground, it is valid data regardless of ... commented 2026-10-25 22:22:21 UTC by MassCartog ♦503 |
| 141664342 (Comments: 2) | AntiCompositeNumber (Discussed changesets: 13) | Operator just comes from knowing the territory, ref will usually come from a marker on the pole or line. You usually have to see the same number more than once to confirm that it's a line number and not a pole number. There's a good view of... commented 2026-10-25 20:15:35 UTC by AntiCompositeNumber ♦38 |
| 176244754 (Comments: 1) | tguen (Discussed changesets: 39) | maybe building=houseboat would be better for https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1460408755 and similar ones? commented 2026-10-25 18:52:43 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,339 |
| 157720583 (Comments: 1) | briansquared (Discussed changesets: 1) | maybe building=houseboat would be better for https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/204859081 ? commented 2026-10-25 18:51:10 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,339 |
| 191012768 (Comments: 1) | J k for e (Discussed changesets: 1) | looking at this ALPR on various aerial imagery in iD it seems to be within the road area, being positioned like this is highly unlikely so please double check the position of this ALPR and fix it. Happy mapping, Udar. commented 2026-10-25 18:26:31 UTC by Udarian ♦992 |
| 191017794 (Comments: 1) | Steven Vance (Discussed changesets: 7) | I traced Bing aerial maps commented 2026-10-25 16:04:38 UTC by Steven Vance ♦13 |
| 83618721 (Comments: 1) | dmccoy129 (Discussed changesets: 1) | hello! Can you take look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5599795 ? commented 2026-10-25 15:44:48 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,339 |
| 164413107 (Comments: 2) | tguen (Discussed changesets: 39) | And for https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/368220605 - maybe building=static_caravan would be better? commented 2026-10-25 15:11:31 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,339 |
| 190886570 (Comments: 3) | SpeedPro North Houston (Discussed changesets: 1) | Yes, thanks a lot for cleaning this up, CAM. I really appreciate it! :) NeisRevert hasn't been re-enabled for this process yet, though. At the moment, NeisBot is only checking the US, since you're one of the few people who have activ... commented 2026-10-25 14:33:37 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦7,210 |
| 190992671 (Comments: 1) | Evan Nichols (Virtual Tours) (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hey Evan, thanks for adding some missing buildings to the map. You might want to hit `Q` after drawing rectangular buildings to make them actually rectangular. Alternatively you will find the function in the context menu on the building outline. H... commented 2026-10-25 12:11:33 UTC by aighes ♦63 |
| 190985426 (Comments: 1) | elpigz (Discussed changesets: 1) | Correction: Added informal trail connecting FS370 to Spring Gulch Road. commented 2026-10-25 02:51:20 UTC by elpigz ♦1 |
| 190535231 (Comments: 2) | towerrail (Discussed changesets: 1) | Very sorry! I must've pulled it on accident while moving around. Thanks for fixing it! commented 2026-10-24 23:04:17 UTC by towerrail ♦1 |
| 190684856 (Comments: 3) | Kellner21 (Discussed changesets: 3) | No worries, thanks for the quick response. I'll add the tag again. commented 2026-10-24 21:10:59 UTC by carciofo ♦197 |
| 181434989 (Comments: 4) | NE2 (Discussed changesets: 17) | > As for the changeset by Kellner21, they seem to be local, so it's possible it is signed now. I commented on that changeset to ask for details. Yup, that was going to be my next step. Thanks for the fast response! commented 2026-10-24 21:08:34 UTC by carciofo ♦197 |
| 190683802 (Comments: 4) | Kellner21 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Thanks. I'll change the tags. commented 2026-10-24 20:28:05 UTC by NE2 ♦15 |
| 190460171 (Comments: 7) | Dek77 (Discussed changesets: 1) | How can I attach a picture of the boundaries so you can see them? commented 2026-10-24 20:24:57 UTC by Dek77 ♦1 |
| 190962754 (Comments: 1) | kenmorelocksmith (Discussed changesets: 1) | Deleted. node was added to a parking lot --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/190962754 commented 2026-10-24 19:36:37 UTC by Glassman ♦6,059 |
| 190898381 (Comments: 1) | washington_irving (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi, I just wanted to let you know that the phone numbers added here were not in a valid format--they contained an incorrect +01 country code instead of the correct +1, and were in the E.123 format (space seperators) instead of the NANP-standar... commented 2026-10-24 19:28:57 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 189080789 (Comments: 1) | TheAmazingSparky (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks for editing. This building (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1243552787) is not ALL Sherwin Williams. The business is already mapped as a node. There are additional businesses in the building. commented 2026-10-24 18:22:39 UTC by x000111 ♦2 |
| 190977223 (Comments: 1) | rubyros_map (Discussed changesets: 1) | I am not sure how to add it but the building number is 5955 commented 2026-10-24 18:18:52 UTC by rubyros_map ♦1 |
| 190981369 (Comments: 1) | Seasidegde (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! I noticed that text in a description, note or slogan tag in your changeset may be promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping... commented 2026-10-24 17:39:42 UTC by NeisBot ♦7,518 |
| 185595937 (Comments: 2) | GNR8 (Discussed changesets: 13) | Resolved in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190975579 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190975481 commented 2026-10-24 15:01:02 UTC by Casey_boy ♦89 |
| 190630711 (Comments: 1) | ugarten (Discussed changesets: 5) | Signed on site as Parkman Road commented 2026-10-24 12:48:24 UTC by StreetSurveyor ♦213 |
| 190808746 (Comments: 1) | ugarten (Discussed changesets: 5) | Signed on site as Meadow Brook Way commented 2026-10-24 12:45:47 UTC by StreetSurveyor ♦213 |
| 190585491 (Comments: 1) | ugarten (Discussed changesets: 5) | Signed on site as Checkerberry Trail commented 2026-10-24 12:41:21 UTC by StreetSurveyor ♦213 |
| 190618176 (Comments: 1) | ugarten (Discussed changesets: 5) | Signed on site as Cavalier Rd commented 2026-10-24 12:39:29 UTC by StreetSurveyor ♦213 |
| 190900153 (Comments: 1) | ugarten (Discussed changesets: 5) | This road is signed on site as Windermere Road commented 2026-10-24 12:36:53 UTC by StreetSurveyor ♦213 |
| 190953016 (Comments: 1) | Jwheels98765 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hi, When I asked you before to not do certain types of edits. What I ment was to not do those edits even temporarily. OSM is not a sandbox for playing around. If you need certain changes of data for yourself, please save those locally to your comp... commented 2026-10-24 11:57:36 UTC by Mashin ♦610 |
| 190964524 (Comments: 2) | Titanbowtransport (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks for your revision https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190965413 commented 2026-10-24 11:14:32 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦7,210 |
| 190960219 (Comments: 2) | Pixemsoft (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thanks for your revision https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190960646 commented 2026-10-24 09:31:43 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦7,210 |
| 190959236 (Comments: 1) | Pixemsoft (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! I noticed that text in a description, note or slogan tag in your changeset may be promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping... commented 2026-10-24 08:21:42 UTC by NeisBot ♦7,518 |
| 190952793 (Comments: 1) | Ren__1218 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome, and thanks for contributing! While reviewing your changeset, I noticed a potentially unintended geometry change involving a moved node. The automated check looks for situations where moving a node may cause connected ways to cr... commented 2026-10-24 05:57:31 UTC by NeisBot ♦7,518 |
| 190722025 (Comments: 3) | Malcolm Maas (Discussed changesets: 14) | And I think my understanding of the parking aisle tag was incorrect, also. commented 2026-10-24 03:41:35 UTC by Malcolm Maas ♦11 |
| 185374954 (Comments: 2) | CAM-Gerlach_Repair (Discussed changesets: 44) | For some context, this is part of a highly organized mass SEO spam ring (one of the biggest on OSM), operating thousands of accounts--what we've been calling the "numbers" gang (as most of their usernames are just strings of numbers). ... commented 2026-10-24 01:54:07 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 190936342 (Comments: 2) | JVTesla (Discussed changesets: 1) | Also want to note the road already is marked 55mph so OSM data seems to match what you see, so you have old or some other data source. commented 2026-10-24 01:49:10 UTC by gpserror ♦254 |
| 190279698 (Comments: 1) | Mossimer (Discussed changesets: 1) | This is an not a real location https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190951713 commented 2026-10-24 01:16:02 UTC by that_maifa ♦2 |
| 190633113 (Comments: 1) | BigSushi (Discussed changesets: 9) | Hello, a political boundary should not affect the classification of a road—only changes in physical construction like an intersection, end of the separated carriageways, signage stating the end of the freeway, etc. Things should be mapped from ... commented 2026-10-24 01:11:45 UTC by Joseph R P ♦476 |
| 190949481 (Comments: 1) | OutpostGrandCanyon (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! I noticed that text in a description, note or slogan tag in your changeset may be promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping... commented 2026-10-23 23:18:41 UTC by NeisBot ♦7,518 |
| 190809916 (Comments: 5) | lrocksl (Discussed changesets: 1) | Mostly I couldn't see where it should have been on any available imagery but I could see where it was, was in the middle of the street with nothing over it. commented 2026-10-23 22:51:23 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,623 |
| 190881820 (Comments: 2) | Baloo Uriza (Discussed changesets: 114) | Both Bing and Mapbox and Esri all show the end of the gore is positioned immediately adjacent to where I put it back to. placement=transition indicates that where that line is positioned relative to the roadway it represents is transitioning. Compa... commented 2026-10-23 22:45:06 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,623 |
| 190611234 (Comments: 4) | SD Mapman (Discussed changesets: 40) | Sent you a message on proposals, let me know what you think commented 2026-10-23 20:43:32 UTC by SD Mapman ♦101 |
| 190932715 (Comments: 6) | Oregonian3 (Discussed changesets: 53) | I can agree with CR 5 that tertiary might be best, most drivers are using US 40 here commented 2026-10-23 20:43:01 UTC by GarliccBread1 ♦17 |
| 190768064 (Comments: 2) | carlosguerrero_lyft (Discussed changesets: 9) | Hello, ratrun, My name is Carlos, and I'm part of the OSM team at Lyft. Thank you for bringing this to our attention, and apologies for the oversight! After re-checking the area, I completely agree with your feedback. I missed integra... commented 2026-10-23 20:17:02 UTC by carlosguerrero_lyft ♦9 |
| 190944525 (Comments: 1) | Grand Central Phoenix Locksmith (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! I noticed that text in a description, note or slogan tag in your changeset may be promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping... commented 2026-10-23 20:03:41 UTC by NeisBot ♦7,518 |
| 190943515 (Comments: 1) | Alcatraz Locksmith (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! I noticed that text in a description, note or slogan tag in your changeset may be promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping... commented 2026-10-23 19:30:41 UTC by NeisBot ♦7,518 |
| 190943369 (Comments: 1) | Stetson P (Discussed changesets: 3) | Love it! commented 2026-10-23 19:25:47 UTC by Loopslol7 ♦45 |
| 181109091 (Comments: 1) | erikdesilva-nps (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, while reviewing roads in this area I reversed several of your prior changes. Roads that are legally closed but still exist on the ground should be marked with motor_vehicle=no access tags but left mapped as highway=track and not marked as aban... commented 2026-10-23 19:21:17 UTC by pmckay419 ♦21 |
| 190923790 (Comments: 1) | TransAct-AS (Discussed changesets: 93) | Hello! It looks like in this changeset you changed a road in Texas as well as the one in Washington. Please remember to save your changes in one area before moving on to another, to keep the bounding box small. Thank you! commented 2026-10-23 18:48:22 UTC by impiaaa ♦502 |
| 190915023 (Comments: 2) | PizzaTreeIsland (Discussed changesets: 41) | No worries! My telegram bot has a very eager eye on trees commented 2026-10-23 17:50:59 UTC by PizzaTreeIsland ♦104 |
| 190936972 (Comments: 1) | smvaughn (Discussed changesets: 2) | Yes, this is what I meant earlier. Shorter names are easier to render than longer ones, and users who search for either name should get the same results. Thanks for incorporating feedback! commented 2026-10-23 17:34:53 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦405 |
| 155786045 (Comments: 1) | Mateusz Konieczny - bot account (Discussed changesets: 125) | It looks like Heber Fire Station has moved to https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/60223986. Agree? Disagree? commented 2026-10-23 17:27:27 UTC by Precision Guesswork ♦11 |
| 188979919 (Comments: 1) | Stroller2835 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi there, thanks for your edit. This path is still under construction and inaccessible to the public. commented 2026-10-23 16:58:12 UTC by democat ♦36 |
| 190934056 (Comments: 2) | smvaughn (Discussed changesets: 2) | Good feedback, I'll make that change. Open to any other guidance as I learn the ropes. Thanks! commented 2026-10-23 15:37:43 UTC by smvaughn ♦1 |
| 190934880 (Comments: 1) | Angelika kastner (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! I noticed that text in a description, note or slogan tag in your changeset may be promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping... commented 2026-10-23 15:24:41 UTC by NeisBot ♦7,518 |
| 190898640 (Comments: 1) | JaacobRaamos (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hi, I noticed we keep reverting each other. I’m changing interior paths to highway=corridor + indoor=yes and removing name=Saint Paul Skyway from ones that are ground-level or just internal building circulation. The name tag is meant for... commented 2026-10-23 15:20:59 UTC by ion_chi ♦111 |
| 190906717 (Comments: 1) | JaacobRaamos (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hi, Thanks for adding the level here. A quick note: layer=* is for the physical stacking order of features that cross or overlap each other, like bridges and tunnels. It isn’t for floors, and it expects a single integer, so values like 0;1;2 ar... commented 2026-10-23 15:02:18 UTC by ion_chi ♦111 |
| 190931881 (Comments: 1) | Bradley Cobb (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12464193134. You move this more than 100 meters in the lake. commented 2026-10-23 14:55:28 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,942 |
| 190860788 (Comments: 1) | Jared @ ShotSink (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, here you created duplicate golf course outline and duplicated some of the holes as well. commented 2026-10-23 14:31:47 UTC by Mashin ♦610 |
| 190902653 (Comments: 1) | I-76 (Discussed changesets: 38) | Hate to keep saying this - nearmap imagery was not used. I don't have the apikey, obviously, and I was testing custom bg URLs. commented 2026-10-23 14:30:41 UTC by I-76 ♦91 |
| 190931071 (Comments: 1) | Elan Westpointe (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! I noticed that text in a description, note or slogan tag in your changeset may be promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping... commented 2026-10-23 14:00:41 UTC by NeisBot ♦7,518 |
| 190930787 (Comments: 1) | Elan Westpointe (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! I noticed that text in a description, note or slogan tag in your changeset may be promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping... commented 2026-10-23 13:54:42 UTC by NeisBot ♦7,518 |
| 190925673 (Comments: 1) | HEC Wellness Center (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! I noticed that text in a description, note or slogan tag in your changeset may be promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping... commented 2026-10-23 11:54:41 UTC by NeisBot ♦7,518 |
| 190863002 (Comments: 2) | LostReality (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, In your edit you use the deprecated tag "payment:bitcoin=yes" and the none existing tag "currency:crypto=yes". Please DELETE the payment:bitcoin=yes and the currency:crypto=yes tag! Use the "currency:XBT=... commented 2026-10-23 11:43:11 UTC by Comino ♦426 |
| 190923968 (Comments: 1) | Sergei Amuzinski (Discussed changesets: 11) | Based on Mapbox-owned licensed telemetry data* commented 2026-10-23 11:09:56 UTC by Sergei Amuzinski ♦13 |
| 190923807 (Comments: 1) | phoenixcm (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! I noticed that text in a description, note or slogan tag in your changeset may be promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping... commented 2026-10-23 11:06:41 UTC by NeisBot ♦7,518 |
| 190861037 (Comments: 1) | All Weather Heating & Air Conditioning (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190923770 commented 2026-10-23 11:04:01 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,271 |
| 190896966 (Comments: 3) | Blackwell Innovations (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks @tastywater commented 2026-10-23 06:07:29 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦7,210 |
| 190910585 (Comments: 1) | cannavitanyc (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! I noticed that text in a description, note or slogan tag in your changeset may be promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping... commented 2026-10-23 04:09:46 UTC by NeisBot ♦7,518 |
| 188936207 (Comments: 2) | Malcolm Maas (Discussed changesets: 14) | You're right, I'm not sure why I used that tag. I think service=alley is more appropriate. Sorry about that, thanks for checking. commented 2026-10-23 03:52:28 UTC by Malcolm Maas ♦11 |
| 190796137 (Comments: 2) | Malcolm Maas (Discussed changesets: 14) | Hm, I see. I just think the situation for bike data consumers is not ideal here because they assume bike access on primary roads and not motorways (here I mean practical access, not legal access). But bike cannot go down these segments without goi... commented 2026-10-23 03:35:25 UTC by Malcolm Maas ♦11 |
| 190735455 (Comments: 1) | bgcni (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190909921 commented 2026-10-23 03:30:13 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,271 |
| 190322564 (Comments: 3) | jmapb (Discussed changesets: 53) | Okay, well one small but correct thing at a time is exactly what I'm doing with the Long Path. A 300+ mile trail takes time to fix. 99% of the time sidewalks are concrete, but I'm in this area all the time so its easy to check. commented 2026-10-23 01:56:28 UTC by matthewfecica ♦17 |
| 190761443 (Comments: 2) | Flap Slimy Outward (Discussed changesets: 313) | Sorry about that. There's a reason I request these changesets for review. Unfortunately, from what I've learned, that button doesn't do anything other than add review_requested=yes to the changeset's tags. I'll keep th... commented 2026-10-23 01:53:13 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦405 |
| 190836420 (Comments: 5) | Transit Captain (Discussed changesets: 2) | https://www.mta.info/document/13046 Apparently NYCT speed limits are all implicit (and also dependent the acceleration/braking standards, which is also an important part of signal block sizes and system safety) outside of curves and some of th... commented 2026-10-23 00:28:20 UTC by IsStatenIsland ♦34 |
| 180691752 (Comments: 2) | Flap Slimy Outward (Discussed changesets: 313) | Wow sorry for my poor grammar. I'm too tired right now. My first sentence should be more like "When you merged POI nodes with buildings, the change led to conflation of two distinct features with conflicting tags." commented 2026-10-23 00:26:09 UTC by lunar_jaws812 ♦21 |
| 186549477 (Comments: 1) | 💠💠💠💠💠💠💠💠💠💠 (Discussed changesets: 6) | I've seen tons of these edits in the last year, where are you guys getting speed limit information? commented 2026-10-22 23:34:31 UTC by IsStatenIsland ♦34 |
| 190897359 (Comments: 5) | KGo (Discussed changesets: 3) | No worries. And thanks for the quick turnaround in fixing up those phone formats with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190903571 commented 2026-10-22 23:01:30 UTC by goliath_jr ♦3 |
| 190765905 (Comments: 1) | BWReece70 (Discussed changesets: 1) | The greens already existed. There is no reason for you to create additional putting areas here. Can you please explain what you are attempting to do? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changes... commented 2026-10-22 21:15:00 UTC by b-jazz ♦976 |
| 190818655 (Comments: 1) | BWReece70 (Discussed changesets: 1) | You've erased a wooded area, not a field. You shouldn't have done this unless there is something you aren't explaining to us. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/19081... commented 2026-10-22 21:14:09 UTC by b-jazz ♦976 |
| 175451635 (Comments: 2) | Anticom76 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Mounted on a traffic light. commented 2026-10-22 20:32:57 UTC by Anticom76 ♦1 |
| 190642603 (Comments: 1) | Jwheels98765 (Discussed changesets: 6) | When drawing golf course areas (i.e. greens, fairways, bunkers, tees, etc.), please be aware that the ways (lines) used to outline those areas must not cross over each other. Fairway outlines shouldn't cross over greens or bunkers or other fairw... commented 2026-10-22 19:29:33 UTC by b-jazz ♦976 |
| 190137037 (Comments: 3) | sbedwal_Lyft (Discussed changesets: 27) | Hi Shubham, thanks for correcting the roads and sharing the tracks! 👍 commented 2026-10-22 18:58:34 UTC by carciofo ♦197 |
| 184375295 (Comments: 1) | TetrisEffect (Discussed changesets: 9) | Your edit may have removed ways that were part of the relation, it is no longer a closed polygon. commented 2026-10-22 17:54:40 UTC by PCarew_EG ♦11 |
| 189281041 (Comments: 1) | user2466784 (Discussed changesets: 2) | the camera is still on the road. it must be some mistake to remove it from the database. commented 2026-10-22 17:54:17 UTC by colt04 ♦8 |
| 189281043 (Comments: 1) | user2466784 (Discussed changesets: 2) | the camera is still on the road. it must be some mistake to remove it from the database. commented 2026-10-22 17:46:29 UTC by colt04 ♦8 |
| 187043376 (Comments: 1) | JonathanDavidArndt (Discussed changesets: 4) | Just a heads up, you shouldn't glue landuse / woods to roads. The roads should be treated as the middle of the road and the landuse/woods should end at the edge of the road. Occasionally you'll see boundaries glued to roads, but tha... commented 2026-10-22 16:12:43 UTC by jhaluska80 ♦113 |
| 190818355 (Comments: 1) | Joe Bowen (Discussed changesets: 2) | Partly reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190881280 commented 2026-10-22 15:55:38 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦7,210 |
| 190814563 (Comments: 2) | Joe Bowen (Discussed changesets: 2) | Partly reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190881280 commented 2026-10-22 15:55:33 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦7,210 |
| 190856504 (Comments: 1) | JCarothers (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi and welcome to OSM! You asked for a review, so I'll give you a few pointers. First, you applied the tag natural=tree_row to way/1570506054. This looks like it should be a natural=wood, or perhaps the neighboring swamp should be expande... commented 2026-10-22 15:46:59 UTC by JuanElDemografo ♦59 |
| 190889569 (Comments: 2) | SwingTimeStudio (Discussed changesets: 1) | Sorry, this appears to be a false positive from NeisBot's automated check. Just a small tagging suggestion: If "Pines #1" is the actual name of the golf hole, name=* might be more appropriate than description=* Best rega... commented 2026-10-22 15:44:52 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦7,210 |
| 190854087 (Comments: 3) | Flap Slimy Outward (Discussed changesets: 313) | Done, I have removed them at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190889789. commented 2026-10-22 15:18:33 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦405 |
| 190876367 (Comments: 1) | Cartographearth (Discussed changesets: 6) | I have previously pointed out to you that names should not be a description like "camera" on an ALPR (or other surveillance device) please remove all instances where you have done this in the passed and stop adding them in the future. for m... commented 2026-10-22 14:59:21 UTC by Udarian ♦992 |
| 190860376 (Comments: 2) | Jared @ ShotSink (Discussed changesets: 2) | reverted back to original, more accurate, boundary relation --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/190860376 commented 2026-10-22 14:01:41 UTC by Glassman ♦6,059 |
| 190818112 (Comments: 1) | wambag (Discussed changesets: 37) | So this median was removed? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/190818112 commented 2026-10-22 12:38:56 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,623 |
| 190789787 (Comments: 1) | LuckyDutch (Discussed changesets: 2) | The original matched the ramp perfectly, you have extended the ramp beyond the end of the ramp. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/190789787 commented 2026-10-22 12:32:06 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,623 |
| 190577430 (Comments: 1) | OngsHat (Discussed changesets: 1) | This appears to be associated with the Condor model PTZ camera on the street light post on the corner, but it has several directions instead of being tagged as a Condor with no direction. It also is located on the map inside the church building inste... commented 2026-10-22 12:27:19 UTC by Exporter7281 ♦1 |
| 190876387 (Comments: 1) | Pencilrick (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! I noticed that text in a description, note or slogan tag in your changeset may be promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping... commented 2026-10-22 10:42:41 UTC by NeisBot ♦7,518 |
| 190854979 (Comments: 3) | NerjiAMflora90 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi NerjiAMflora90, Thanks for clarifying. Generally, name=* should reflect the commonly used name, while official_name=* can be used for the full official name. This would be preferable to using description=*. Best regards, Pascal commented 2026-10-22 10:36:13 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦7,210 |
| 190808856 (Comments: 6) | Kevin Daste (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks for your feedback, Juan! I think that's a good idea. I have now disabled the alternative description suggestions in @NeisBot. Let's see how things develop from here. Best regards, Pascal commented 2026-10-22 10:25:13 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦7,210 |
| 172976659 (Comments: 2) | zluuzki (Discussed changesets: 122) | thanks, no idea what happened there commented 2026-10-22 09:53:04 UTC by zluuzki_2 ♦1 |
| 190795242 (Comments: 1) | Philip McCutchan (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190865229 commented 2026-10-22 06:07:37 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,271 |
| 190274020 (Comments: 5) | Swingman7000 (Discussed changesets: 7) | I ended up leaving the tag updates and other changes you made while just restoring the deleted areas. See changeset 190769559. The river areas have mostly been marked as "intermittent" to reflect the rainy season when there's more wate... commented 2026-10-22 05:15:21 UTC by Brendan_07 ♦9 |
| 190837680 (Comments: 1) | davisluxenberg (Discussed changesets: 4) | Reverted in changeset/190863468 . Link to photos of this stop: https://drive.proton.me/urls/X436G84W40#8fDBBrmqgxWu commented 2026-10-22 05:05:38 UTC by 68916 ♦4 |
| 190837674 (Comments: 1) | davisluxenberg (Discussed changesets: 4) | Reverted in changeset/190863468 . Link to photos of this stop: https://drive.proton.me/urls/X436G84W40#8fDBBrmqgxWu commented 2026-10-22 05:05:33 UTC by 68916 ♦4 |
| 190837673 (Comments: 1) | davisluxenberg (Discussed changesets: 4) | Reverted in changeset/190863468 . Link to photos of this stop: https://drive.proton.me/urls/X436G84W40#8fDBBrmqgxWu commented 2026-10-22 05:05:28 UTC by 68916 ♦4 |
| 190837668 (Comments: 1) | davisluxenberg (Discussed changesets: 4) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190863468 . Link to photos of this stop: https://drive.proton.me/urls/X436G84W40#8fDBBrmqgxWu commented 2026-10-22 05:05:18 UTC by 68916 ♦4 |
| 190799129 (Comments: 1) | M Lench (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190863542 commented 2026-10-22 05:02:23 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,271 |
| 189476809 (Comments: 2) | sarya_Lyft (Discussed changesets: 28) | Hi andriu44, My name is Surander, and I am a mapper on the OSM team at Lyft. Thank you for bringing this to my attention. Regarding the edits, I added the ways using outdated sources, which was my mistake. I sincerely apologize for the error a... commented 2026-10-22 05:02:09 UTC by sarya_Lyft ♦18 |
| 190811527 (Comments: 1) | NRutt2005 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Usually turning circle knuckles get treated as a two-way intersection with the intersecting node tagged highway=turning_circle and turning_circle=knuckle --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/cha... commented 2026-10-22 03:40:44 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,623 |
| 190796684 (Comments: 1) | xander78 (Discussed changesets: 14) | Something like "added buildings" would be a better changeset description. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/190796684 commented 2026-10-22 03:13:22 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,623 |
| 190763105 (Comments: 1) | leftybender (Discussed changesets: 14) | I've updated the former military area with a lifecycle prefix to accurately represent what it is, since this is not a new school, and just land that used to be military. commented 2026-10-22 02:52:05 UTC by dknelson9876 ♦166 |
| 190846244 (Comments: 1) | slakis981 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi slakis981, I'm not sure you understand the meaning of access=no. From the wiki: "Public access is prohibited on foot and for any vehicle, for every type of person." In other words, literally no one is allowed to use th... commented 2026-10-22 02:41:52 UTC by dknelson9876 ♦166 |
| 190859178 (Comments: 2) | OmegaSleepy (Discussed changesets: 1) | This is an interesting case. The original design was a church, but then an architect and construction company turned it into a condo, aka building=apartments --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org... commented 2026-10-22 02:14:08 UTC by Glassman ♦6,059 |
| 190860298 (Comments: 1) | Cleveland Roofing (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! I noticed that text in a description, note or slogan tag in your changeset may be promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping... commented 2026-10-22 01:36:47 UTC by NeisBot ♦7,518 |
| 158229796 (Comments: 1) | Diamondsun9275 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Nice work! commented 2026-10-22 00:43:58 UTC by Precision Guesswork ♦11 |
| 185245098 (Comments: 7) | NastassiaK (Discussed changesets: 1) | I brought up this changeset in the community forums at https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/propertyview-mappers-adding-advertising-slogans-to-names/149108. If you could send it over to your manager or someone empowered to discuss your organized edi... commented 2026-10-21 22:21:04 UTC by JuanElDemografo ♦59 |
| 190856712 (Comments: 1) | Flap Slimy Outward (Discussed changesets: 313) | #31DayOSMChallenge #Maptober commented 2026-10-21 21:54:56 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦405 |
| 190855662 (Comments: 1) | Roadside Assistance Palm Coast (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! I noticed that text in a description, note or slogan tag in your changeset may be promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping... commented 2026-10-21 21:18:43 UTC by NeisBot ♦7,518 |
| 190850361 (Comments: 2) | RechatAlex (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi Udar, Thank you for your feedback. I'm reviewing it now and requested to join the slack channel to familiarize myself with the existing best practices for neighborhoods like Brickell and Wynwood. commented 2026-10-21 21:11:30 UTC by RechatAlex ♦1 |
| 190855488 (Comments: 1) | Roadside Assistance Palm Coast (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! I noticed that text in a description, note or slogan tag in your changeset may be promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping... commented 2026-10-21 21:09:43 UTC by NeisBot ♦7,518 |
| 190848355 (Comments: 1) | RechatAlex (Discussed changesets: 2) | see comment on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190850361 Happy mapping, Udar commented 2026-10-21 20:52:41 UTC by Udarian ♦992 |
| 190849371 (Comments: 1) | constructioncorpsfl (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! I noticed that text in a description, note or slogan tag in your changeset may be promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping... commented 2026-10-21 18:21:42 UTC by NeisBot ♦7,518 |
| 190849191 (Comments: 1) | constructioncorpsfl (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! I noticed that text in a description, note or slogan tag in your changeset may be promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping... commented 2026-10-21 18:15:47 UTC by NeisBot ♦7,518 |
| 190842704 (Comments: 1) | Justin Abrams (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to Open Street Map, When multiple businesses occupy a single building, non of the businesses should be tagged on the building it's self, they should be added as a separate point within the building at a location corresponding to where th... commented 2026-10-21 18:03:42 UTC by Udarian ♦992 |
| 190815833 (Comments: 1) | Lilybeth Ledea (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to Open Street Map, I have a few pointers for future edits and a question about this edit. First it is generally best practice to leave a good changeset comment, these are useful so that other mappers can know what you intended to do, this wo... commented 2026-10-21 17:47:34 UTC by Udarian ♦992 |
| 190566224 (Comments: 1) | Ponce de le Rollin' (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190677473 commented 2026-10-21 17:09:37 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,271 |
| 190832979 (Comments: 2) | redgatorttal (Discussed changesets: 1) | Also, this node is placed in the middle of a detention basin... commented 2026-10-21 16:31:08 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦405 |
| 190838623 (Comments: 1) | Sunnyspark69 (Discussed changesets: 2) | There are two cameras on this pole. See original edit for directions commented 2026-10-21 14:01:47 UTC by Sunnyspark69 ♦2 |
| 190764970 (Comments: 5) | Nix_Nada (Discussed changesets: 3) | If the road is private and dangerous, it can be tagged as such. No navigator program will route people through such a road. But it's still a road, and it still exists. commented 2026-10-21 13:49:49 UTC by miksuko ♦14 |
| 190743598 (Comments: 1) | shuah (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Shuah, welcome to OSM and thanks for adding to the map around Missoula! In an OSM QA tool, I have noticed some issues with your changesets (https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/hdyc-osmi-issues?uid=23188560). I know these get flagged in iD Editor, but ... commented 2026-10-21 13:49:09 UTC by neuhausr ♦368 |
| 190742814 (Comments: 2) | TransAct-JT (Discussed changesets: 18) | Fixed. This was inadvertent --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/190742814 commented 2026-10-21 11:40:16 UTC by TransAct-JT ♦4 |
| 190811603 (Comments: 1) | Jwheels98765 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hi, there are several problems with your edits: 1. You deleted objects e.g. fairways that you then redraw. The correct way is to adjust nodes of the existing polygon. 2. You made Fairways to include Green inside them. The corr... commented 2026-10-21 11:13:58 UTC by Mashin ♦610 |
| 190829539 (Comments: 1) | sarasotapremier (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! I noticed that text in a description, note or slogan tag in your changeset may be promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping... commented 2026-10-21 10:27:41 UTC by NeisBot ♦7,518 |
| 190743591 (Comments: 1) | EkroopM (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190829488 commented 2026-10-21 10:25:39 UTC by rajdhani ♦642 |
| 190758836 (Comments: 1) | bbhme (Discussed changesets: 4) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190827724 commented 2026-10-21 09:39:50 UTC by ajmat ♦666 |
| 190826556 (Comments: 1) | sarasotapremier (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! I noticed that text in a description, note or slogan tag in your changeset may be promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping... commented 2026-10-21 09:18:41 UTC by NeisBot ♦7,518 |
| 190761265 (Comments: 1) | eefisher13 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190825269 commented 2026-10-21 08:54:01 UTC by ajmat ♦666 |
| 189425571 (Comments: 3) | Swingman7000 (Discussed changesets: 7) | Partially reverted by changeset/190817611 commented 2026-10-21 05:12:23 UTC by Mxdanger ♦121 |
| 190817143 (Comments: 1) | soulandbeautymedx (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-10-21 04:45:41 UTC by NeisBot ♦7,518 |
| 190812410 (Comments: 1) | GraceZ17 (Discussed changesets: 3) | I added these bike lanes to represent how you're supposed to traverse this intersection. When biking westbound on Miller you are supposed to cross Maple and wait in a turn box until you get the northbound crossing signal on Maple. Then you bike ... commented 2026-10-21 01:26:59 UTC by bjanevic ♦4 |
| 190812362 (Comments: 1) | h234a2hm (Discussed changesets: 9) | source = Mapbox Satellite; survey commented 2026-10-20 23:34:43 UTC by h234a2hm ♦8 |
| 185909522 (Comments: 5) | secutanudu (Discussed changesets: 5) | > guard rail on 118 modified for Greenway a couple weeks ago Nice! I've never been there, but I can see it on streetside in iD. I've haven't done the 55 or the 40 so my only time doing the middle-bits was on my own. I'... commented 2026-10-20 22:56:52 UTC by arichnad ♦46 |
| 187144244 (Comments: 3) | jimson8 (Discussed changesets: 1) | I just checked out the location again and confirmed what you said -- that there are not currently any ALPRs at this corner. Apologies for misidentifying this, and thanks for calling this to my attention! I just removed it from the map commented 2026-10-20 21:03:13 UTC by jimson8 ♦1 |
| 190808963 (Comments: 1) | Activedoc (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-10-20 21:00:42 UTC by NeisBot ♦7,518 |
| 190802388 (Comments: 1) | blumdrew (Discussed changesets: 2) | By the way, this note is not needed! This relation is of the Metro regional government, not the UGB. While Metro is indeed mandated by the state to manage the UGB, their areas do not fully overlap. Some parts of the UGB fall outside the Metro boundar... commented 2026-10-20 19:52:22 UTC by snopas24 ♦34 |
| 190674308 (Comments: 3) | cpearson01 (Discussed changesets: 1) | No worries, I fixed it. commented 2026-10-20 16:30:56 UTC by maptheworld2050 ♦12 |
| 184411982 (Comments: 1) | ianrbuck (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hey ianrbuck, Wouldn't access=private have been more appropriate here? The trail still exists but is no longer open to the public commented 2026-10-20 16:01:49 UTC by ion_chi ♦111 |
| 190125309 (Comments: 4) | NRutt2005 (Discussed changesets: 3) | I made that revision to aerodrome:ctaf and also aerodrome:unicom for consistency. While the ctaf and unicom frequency are the same at this particular airport, they are two different communication frequencies at other airports. commented 2026-10-20 15:18:47 UTC by NRutt2005 ♦1 |
| 190201946 (Comments: 6) | xander78 (Discussed changesets: 14) | I usually don't really check note comments until i go through my changesets every couple of weeks, so that's honestly my fault, i need to start checking my changesets more. commented 2026-10-20 15:13:39 UTC by xander78 ♦12 |
| 190792920 (Comments: 1) | jcarlson (Discussed changesets: 22) | oops, sorry! source is aerial imagery commented 2026-10-20 14:24:58 UTC by jcarlson ♦143 |
| 190759206 (Comments: 6) | rsavoye (Discussed changesets: 64) | I'll push back a little on your "tagging OSM highways is by function, not the surface". Function is obviously the primary driver of what a classification should be. However, we can't ignore the surface or road quality entirely. |
| 190766054 (Comments: 1) | Farmer01921 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190779119 commented 2026-10-20 09:30:43 UTC by ajmat ♦666 |
| 187004916 (Comments: 1) | long walk (Discussed changesets: 1) | Please mark this as resolved. I have no idea why I requested a review. commented 2026-10-20 07:04:22 UTC by long walk ♦1 |
| 181489498 (Comments: 2) | Denise412 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Partly reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181605547 commented 2026-10-20 05:31:26 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦7,210 |
| 181490578 (Comments: 2) | Denise412 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Partly reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181605547 commented 2026-10-20 05:29:31 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦7,210 |
| 190761264 (Comments: 9) | malifica (Discussed changesets: 13) | https://www.fairwaymapper.com/map/the-country-club-at-golden-nugget-us I do care. commented 2026-10-20 02:46:57 UTC by malifica ♦6 |
| 190696184 (Comments: 1) | Ěmil rokov (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi Ěmil, welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for trying to contribute! Unfortunately, it doesn't look like your changes make much sense to me. It seems you're trying to add a POI with a Slovak phone number, website=* of a Slovak gas... commented 2026-10-20 02:16:00 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 183554580 (Comments: 5) | aduxas (Discussed changesets: 13) | Thanks for the feedback. I’ve updated the vehicle access tagging based on your input. Regarding the location, I believe the current mapping is accurate based on the on-the-ground signage. commented 2026-10-20 02:06:51 UTC by StreetSurveyor ♦213 |
| 190764064 (Comments: 1) | 3DEZR (Discussed changesets: 10) | Bridge construction completed; US 22 bridge over Clear Creek reopened to traffic. commented 2026-10-19 21:59:02 UTC by 3DEZR ♦1 |
| 190278094 (Comments: 7) | StreetSurveyor (Discussed changesets: 102) | @StreetSurveyor if you don't combine ways you won't have the problem. commented 2026-10-19 21:50:57 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,925 |
| 190629732 (Comments: 2) | amakarevich_lyft (Discussed changesets: 19) | Hi Baloo Uriza, I'm Artem, the OSM Quality Control Lead at Lyft. I appreciate you contacting us to point out this issue. During my review, I concentrated solely on the turn restriction applied to the reverse direction of the oneway road a... commented 2026-10-19 21:13:44 UTC by amakarevich_lyft ♦41 |
| 190762299 (Comments: 1) | Potatoleum (Discussed changesets: 6) | Forgot to add source=gps commented 2026-10-19 20:53:18 UTC by Potatoleum ♦6 |
| 174578715 (Comments: 8) | Flap Slimy Outward (Discussed changesets: 313) | If I had a nickel for every time I revived an old discussion because of new information coming out... I'd probably have at least three. Anyway, looking at OpenWeb and Clark County's assessor and parcel maps reveals that the "origina... commented 2026-10-19 20:02:47 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦405 |
| 190673022 (Comments: 1) | Mateusz Konieczny - bot account (Discussed changesets: 125) | Thank you! commented 2026-10-19 17:07:44 UTC by Mxdanger ♦121 |
| 179793871 (Comments: 1) | bdiscoe (Discussed changesets: 57) | I live in the unincorporated town of Spring, TX. The OpenStreetMap boundary currently only includes zipcode 77373, but locals here call a much larger area as "Spring, TX" that spans multiple zipcodes. Is it possible to extend the bou... commented 2026-10-19 16:32:27 UTC by Alex Marvin ♦1 |
| 190723407 (Comments: 1) | emslotnick (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks for the info and welcome to OpenStreetMap! commented 2026-10-19 16:00:49 UTC by pwbriggs ♦520 |
| 190584680 (Comments: 1) | phandangle (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi phandangle, I reverted your change because there's a separate building part for the section of the building with 7 levels https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1393158928 commented 2026-10-19 15:46:18 UTC by ion_chi ♦111 |
| 190670908 (Comments: 3) | unknown246 (Discussed changesets: 8) | Thank you! Happy mapping. commented 2026-10-19 15:39:08 UTC by PuddlesMapping ♦25 |
| 190655836 (Comments: 1) | Ball5 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, What is the meaning of these two castles you added? They are both on the same building and from aerial imagery it looks like a normal house. commented 2026-10-19 15:11:29 UTC by PuddlesMapping ♦25 |
| 190632997 (Comments: 3) | Allison P (Discussed changesets: 135) | If you spend many months on preparing a data set and then incorporate that into OSM, then you are importing a data set. This comes with all the potential pitfalls that an import has - there must be some sort of conflation process (what if the fire hy... commented 2026-10-19 13:38:21 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 190553319 (Comments: 2) | Yuliya_Petrash (Discussed changesets: 13) | Hi, pitscheplatsch! I’m glad to be of help and make the map better. Best regards, Yulia! commented 2026-10-19 13:02:53 UTC by Yuliya_Petrash ♦15 |
| 190552867 (Comments: 2) | Yuliya_Petrash (Discussed changesets: 13) | Hi, pitscheplatsch! Thank you for noting my corrections! Best regards, Yulia! commented 2026-10-19 13:02:15 UTC by Yuliya_Petrash ♦15 |
| 190727768 (Comments: 1) | Cartographearth (Discussed changesets: 6) | the address of the Barnes & Noble at Sunset Place seems to have been correct just missing some tags based on their website, in future cases like this please either add the missing info or just leave the tags as is. Secondly, I know I have poi... commented 2026-10-19 12:09:25 UTC by Udarian ♦992 |
| 190672330 (Comments: 1) | theUser1733 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21448 commented 2026-10-19 11:10:18 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,101 |
| 190710662 (Comments: 1) | Ornits (Discussed changesets: 11) | Dear user Ornits, please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relations_are_not_categories and stop creating relations like "The 20th-Century Architecture of Frank Lloyd Wright". These will be deleted again. commented 2026-10-19 08:01:21 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 189510831 (Comments: 3) | Malcolm Maas (Discussed changesets: 14) | Thanks for clarifying. I’ve changed Harvard Place back to residential. Appreciate the discussion! commented 2026-10-19 03:27:58 UTC by StreetSurveyor ♦213 |
| 186479317 (Comments: 1) | Nalsonwashere (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hey Nalson! Appreciate the edits in the Columbia County area recently. If you wouldn't mind, could you make sure you're squaring your building footprints where possible? It's mapped as the hotkey [Q] in iD. This helps us produce better... commented 2026-10-19 03:11:25 UTC by ResistivKai ♦2 |
| 190425902 (Comments: 3) | Timothy Galusha (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:height and also number of levels is the same as the number of floors in a building. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/19042590... commented 2026-10-19 02:45:51 UTC by Glassman ♦6,059 |
| 190630153 (Comments: 1) | Contributor274591 (Discussed changesets: 2) | If you're going to remove existing POIs, it's really helpful to include a source=* and/or an explanation for doing so, to the best of your ability. Could you provide one here? Thanks! commented 2026-10-19 02:03:18 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 190630199 (Comments: 1) | Contributor274591 (Discussed changesets: 2) | It looks like you didn't standardize any phone formats here, but rather deleted a fax=* number and two POIs without a source=* or explanation. Could you please explain this? Thanks. commented 2026-10-19 02:00:33 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 190531656 (Comments: 1) | Branson_14 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Branson_14, It looks like you're trying to use the DeFlock app to add features other than ALPRs. The app is not tooled to map these features. Please consider using a general purpose phone editor like Vespucci https://vespucci.io/... commented 2026-10-19 00:54:43 UTC by SherbetS ♦175 |
| 189572231 (Comments: 3) | DanK435 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks for the thoughtful explanation and kind words! That’s a good suggestion, and I’ve modified the layout based on your feedback. I’ve retained the distinction between the public and private sections, while having the public sect... commented 2026-10-18 23:24:17 UTC by StreetSurveyor ♦213 |
| 90606708 (Comments: 1) | bdiscoe (Discussed changesets: 57) | Nice work! commented 2026-10-18 22:22:26 UTC by Precision Guesswork ♦11 |
| 190232199 (Comments: 2) | A-classes (Discussed changesets: 3) | Due to receiving no response, I'm removing this camera for now. Let me know if you have more details to add. Thanks! commented 2026-10-18 21:12:23 UTC by pwbriggs ♦520 |
| 190232212 (Comments: 2) | A-classes (Discussed changesets: 3) | Due to receiving no response, I'm removing this camera for now. Let me know if you have more details to add. Thanks! commented 2026-10-18 21:11:50 UTC by pwbriggs ♦520 |
| 190232103 (Comments: 2) | A-classes (Discussed changesets: 3) | Due to receiving no response, I'm removing this camera for now. Let me know if you have more details to add. Thanks! commented 2026-10-18 21:11:20 UTC by pwbriggs ♦520 |
| 190709975 (Comments: 1) | woodpeck_repair (Discussed changesets: 4154) | Thank you for this, however this has now caused some issues since i started to remap since the revert. Many of the changes now overlap & a river feature multipolygon has now been broken. commented 2026-10-18 20:09:37 UTC by ChrisTheMapDude ♦3 |
| 190701963 (Comments: 1) | woodpeck_repair (Discussed changesets: 4154) | Thank you for this, however this has now caused some issues since i started to remap since the revert. Many of the changes now overlap & a river feature multipolygon has now been broken. commented 2026-10-18 19:58:17 UTC by ChrisTheMapDude ♦3 |
| 159887024 (Comments: 3) | Balooog (Discussed changesets: 4) | Corrected commented 2026-10-18 18:52:09 UTC by Balooog ♦4 |
| 190536873 (Comments: 2) | KGo (Discussed changesets: 3) | Fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190582439. I was going off of the name in the website for the business as well as store signage ("Papa Johns Pizza"). Thanks again! commented 2026-10-18 18:32:05 UTC by KGo ♦3 |
| 190371515 (Comments: 1) | Winkerbeen (Discussed changesets: 3) | The purpose of the highway tag is to classify roads based on their importance in the road network. This means, for example, that dead-end roads should be classified lower than main roads through an area, **regardless of their official designation.**<... commented 2026-10-18 16:12:57 UTC by diamondarmorsteve ♦78 |
| 190629927 (Comments: 1) | MagnAxiom (Discussed changesets: 1) | Usually adding shop=vacant or shop=yes (if the shop still exists but what it is now is unknown) is welcome in this kind of situation. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/c... commented 2026-10-18 15:43:25 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,623 |
| 190700046 (Comments: 2) | moustache708 (Discussed changesets: 1) | I will pause this update based on TIGER and if I am denied permission to use the newer source I will finish making changes based on this older one. commented 2026-10-18 15:14:47 UTC by moustache708 ♦1 |
| 190690004 (Comments: 4) | ALEWIS299 (Discussed changesets: 1) | These changes are now complete, and the map reflects what the state GIS says the boundaries are. I also dropped a courtesy note to the Audobon Society to let them know that their trail maps disagree with RIGIS. commented 2026-10-18 13:39:42 UTC by ZeLonewolf ♦584 |
| 187544153 (Comments: 1) | lumost (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, and welcome to OSM! Please avoid adding road names that aren’t supported by on-the-ground evidence or official sources. I’ve personally surveyed these ways and found no signage or official names. If something has changed, I’m... commented 2026-10-18 13:13:59 UTC by StreetSurveyor ♦213 |
| 190665810 (Comments: 3) | rzrz242 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hey thanks for the reply, sorry you been dealing with that. If it's blocked with a gate feel free to add a gate where it exists on the ground and set its tags to locked and private. Using access tags will prevent services that do use openstreetm... commented 2026-10-18 12:59:14 UTC by MassCartog ♦503 |
| 190619128 (Comments: 2) | Ashe011 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi!! Dr. Ruffin's clinic is located inside Hearing Speech & Deaf Center. commented 2026-10-18 07:34:57 UTC by Ashe011 ♦1 |
| 190325542 (Comments: 1) | Seattle_Guy53 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks! Sometimes people add them in the wrong spots, or cameras get removed, so thanks for cleaning this up! commented 2026-10-18 07:21:36 UTC by pwbriggs ♦520 |
| 190480492 (Comments: 1) | lucasishere (Discussed changesets: 1) | Good catch. I think that what this restriction was supposed to represent was that you cannot make a hairpin turn from that non-stopped right lane back onto the eastbound travel lane. I changed the type to restriction=only_straight_on because this isn... commented 2026-10-18 07:05:05 UTC by pwbriggs ♦520 |
| 190569091 (Comments: 1) | MBJ Nursing Home Abuse & Medical Malpractice Lawyers (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190680546 commented 2026-10-18 06:58:04 UTC by rajdhani ♦642 |
| 190490300 (Comments: 1) | Mohammed Barish (Discussed changesets: 1) | This seems to be a mistake. Let me know what you were trying to do and I can help you make this edit. Thanks! commented 2026-10-18 06:50:53 UTC by pwbriggs ♦520 |
| 190327333 (Comments: 1) | An0nym0usWa (Discussed changesets: 1) | per your note https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5565875, it sounds like this isn't actually a Flock-manufactured camera? I'll remove the Flock-specific tags unless you are sure of the brand of these devices. Thanks! commented 2026-10-18 06:24:52 UTC by pwbriggs ♦520 |
| 190429849 (Comments: 1) | Trod Skunk (Discussed changesets: 9) | Thanks, I've re-worked this intersection to incorporate the improvements. Copied from my other changeset comment on a changeset you posted at a similar time, for reference: "As for the mechanics of deleting objects, you can ju... commented 2026-10-18 06:14:47 UTC by pwbriggs ♦520 |
| 190678559 (Comments: 1) | NoFlockJordan (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, thanks for the contribution! I notice that you've only specified an undefined point with a name. In OpenStreetMap, every map feature has information associated with it, encoded in the form of "tags" that include name=* and m... commented 2026-10-18 05:45:16 UTC by pwbriggs ♦520 |
| 190676654 (Comments: 1) | LordGarySugar (Discussed changesets: 60) | clickable link -> https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/115280643 commented 2026-10-18 03:30:38 UTC by LordGarySugar ♦422 |
| 21166706 (Comments: 2) | miha12 (Discussed changesets: 12) | yes, it is 1m fence on top of the roof of a building part with height=5. commented 2026-10-18 02:50:00 UTC by miha12 ♦13 |
| 190675221 (Comments: 1) | Flap Slimy Outward (Discussed changesets: 313) | This is now the third time I've seen the North 5th Street Transit Corridor get referenced in a document, so I believe that there's a high chance of it existing soon. commented 2026-10-18 01:08:22 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦405 |
| 190629786 (Comments: 1) | iismitch55 (Discussed changesets: 70) | Please make sure to modify the geometry of existing map objects instead of deleting them and remapping them anew. This helps preserve the editing history of the map objects. I mentioned this to you in many of your past changesets. I can see in... commented 2026-10-18 00:35:37 UTC by Frank Peng ♦256 |
| 188381120 (Comments: 5) | Flap Slimy Outward (Discussed changesets: 313) | Ah, I can revert the bike trail part to a relation then. But as for Old Pomerado Road in Poway that you made residential, it's signed US 395 Hist by the City of Poway and was also the original alignment. So I will be keeping those there.<... commented 2026-10-17 23:32:32 UTC by Yushclay ♦25 |
| 190626537 (Comments: 1) | Dale Pancoast (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Dale, I'm not sure how your mapping tool allowed you to do this, but you ended up with three areas all overlapping each other defining the same feature (the isle in the pond). I'm removed all of your additions as they weren't... commented 2026-10-17 23:26:27 UTC by b-jazz ♦976 |
| 190671000 (Comments: 1) | jan Sopija (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi and welcome to OSM, You requested a review, so I'll note that this could be a tourism=guest_house rather than tourism=hotel. Also, it looks like there's a second address on the building, but 2631 is what's listed on the websi... commented 2026-10-17 22:37:06 UTC by JuanElDemografo ♦59 |
| 190472614 (Comments: 1) | Antigen_ (Discussed changesets: 1) | This is not a Flock device. It is just a camera that takes an image every 5 minutes. See https://wsdot.com/Travel/Real-time/Map/?featuretype=camera&featureid=9731 commented 2026-10-17 22:35:24 UTC by Glassman ♦6,059 |
| 179426813 (Comments: 3) | Flap Slimy Outward (Discussed changesets: 313) | Just keep predirectionals. It's fine to remove useless names like "State Highway XX". "Highway XX" is used by the post office in Idaho when a county lacks explicit directionals, but that can easily be obtained from the ref ta... commented 2026-10-17 20:55:42 UTC by Allison P ♦1,154 |
| 183943298 (Comments: 4) | Joseph R P (Discussed changesets: 238) | Hm. The Wiki page only mentions this at the very end. "For settlements with exactly two levels of divisions, if they are smaller than a place=borough, use place=quarter and place=neighbourhood and skip place=suburb." Does Aries have exactly... commented 2026-10-17 20:48:20 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦405 |
| 185342992 (Comments: 1) | dns10 (Discussed changesets: 12) | thanks for mapping these; I saw them on east 6th and figured they were so new and weren't mapped yet :D commented 2026-10-17 20:47:16 UTC by skorasaurus ♦226 |
| 190561079 (Comments: 6) | Oregonian3 (Discussed changesets: 53) | Absolutely. And GB1 you are most definitely not the mapper we are referring to here :) commented 2026-10-17 16:34:05 UTC by Oregonian3 ♦70 |
| 190652663 (Comments: 2) | Joseph R P (Discussed changesets: 238) | Probably parts of relation https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1319486 commented 2026-10-17 16:12:28 UTC by NV333 ♦2 |
| 190628356 (Comments: 2) | mycota (Discussed changesets: 16) | That was a copy/paste error. Thanks for catching it. I removed those tags. commented 2026-10-17 15:45:23 UTC by mycota ♦16 |
| 190616275 (Comments: 1) | j0hn33y (Discussed changesets: 22) | Hello! Please have a look on http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1568891879. What is the mean of the tags CLASS_TEXT = Commercial LANDUSE_TE = SMALL SHOP ? commented 2026-10-17 14:57:48 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,942 |
| 158766000 (Comments: 1) | KindredCoda (Discussed changesets: 21) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5585019 - can you take a look? commented 2026-10-17 14:14:56 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,339 |
| 127939471 (Comments: 1) | JustSayRow (Discussed changesets: 2) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1106185318 min_height=3.5 ? Are you sure there is 3.5 gap below fence allowing everyone to just pass? commented 2026-10-17 14:13:21 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,339 |
| 181789470 (Comments: 1) | amacmcgrann (Discussed changesets: 49) | what min_height means on fences? also, height=3.9624 looks a bit suspiciously accurate commented 2026-10-17 14:11:18 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,339 |
| 190365149 (Comments: 1) | Winkerbeen (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello, please stop reclassifying every state route to highway=secondary. These roads were correctly classified based on their importance and role in the highway network. commented 2026-10-17 13:52:01 UTC by Joseph R P ♦476 |
| 190627504 (Comments: 2) | Oregonian3 (Discussed changesets: 53) | My opinion here isn't super strong, but I do think these roads should be tertiary. Anyone traveling through the area would be using the freeway as the through route, only using the frontage road to access destinations on the frontage road itself... commented 2026-10-17 13:41:37 UTC by Oregonian3 ♦70 |
| 190630698 (Comments: 2) | StreetSurveyor (Discussed changesets: 102) | I understand your safety concerns, but the absence of a shoulder or sidewalk does not establish a legal prohibition on pedestrian access. OSM access tags should reflect actual legal restrictions, not whether a road is safe or advisable to walk. We sh... commented 2026-10-17 12:45:30 UTC by StreetSurveyor ♦213 |
| 190621308 (Comments: 3) | D Ave (Discussed changesets: 3) | I appreciate that you physically surveyed the location, but I have also surveyed this section myself and completed it on foot. The fact that this road is named a highway does not automatically prohibit pedestrian access. This section is not cl... commented 2026-10-17 12:41:38 UTC by StreetSurveyor ♦213 |
| 187988901 (Comments: 1) | The Retreat Chiropractic (Discussed changesets: 2) | Welcome to OSM! Your business isn't part of a street crossing. We miss also the address. I revert you changeset with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190645176 commented 2026-10-17 11:22:37 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,942 |
| 190594141 (Comments: 1) | The Retreat Chiropractic (Discussed changesets: 2) | Welcome to OSM! Your business isn't part of a street crossing. We miss also the address. I revert you changeset with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190644949 commented 2026-10-17 11:18:20 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,942 |
| 190644527 (Comments: 1) | user_5359 (Discussed changesets: 432) | Again? Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190644614 commented 2026-10-17 11:10:53 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,942 |
| 190630897 (Comments: 1) | JustAnotherCartographer13 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/306668976. What is the meaning of the tags access = yes capacity = 0 ? These two values are contradictory. commented 2026-10-17 10:52:16 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,942 |
| 190641974 (Comments: 1) | barefootstache (Discussed changesets: 19) | obvious that the ways 959833198 and 959833192 got included into this changeset commented 2026-10-17 10:06:43 UTC by barefootstache ♦16 |
| 190631886 (Comments: 1) | Potatoleum (Discussed changesets: 6) | Here’s a changeset comment so you don’t have to feel lonely ;) Have a good day and keep up the good work! commented 2026-10-17 06:24:05 UTC by habi ♦2,298 |
| 190632201 (Comments: 2) | IMASOMEOTHERGUY (Discussed changesets: 2) | This changeset has been reverted at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190633964 --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/190632201 commented 2026-10-17 05:48:51 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦405 |
| 190632310 (Comments: 1) | IMASOMEOTHERGUY (Discussed changesets: 2) | This changeset has been reverted at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190633964 --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/190632310 commented 2026-10-17 05:48:22 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦405 |
| 187450140 (Comments: 2) | Osmgimmy (Discussed changesets: 2) | Ah sorry! I must have made a mistake. commented 2026-10-17 05:20:08 UTC by Osmgimmy ♦1 |
| 190631429 (Comments: 1) | whammo (Discussed changesets: 81) | Incorrectly removed `admin_level` tags reverted in changeset/190631697 commented 2026-10-17 02:24:08 UTC by whammo ♦102 |
| 190627229 (Comments: 1) | seoteamforce0128@ (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in changeset 190631410 due to incompatible source. Please do not use Google as a source. I would caution against using business websites unless you can verify its connection to the business in person. Also please explain what editor you are ... commented 2026-10-17 02:01:43 UTC by schobbish ♦87 |
| 190615140 (Comments: 1) | Brynnan (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, These were originally tagged closer to how the wiki suggests, with the entire enclosing area tagged as the storage complex, not each individual building https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dstorage_rental commented 2026-10-16 23:35:27 UTC by noahheffron ♦31 |
| 190623405 (Comments: 2) | oscarm_lyft (Discussed changesets: 10) | Hi Udar My name is Oscar, and I'm a mapper in the OSM team at Lyft. Thanks for pointing that out! You're completely right that removing the 'unsigned_ref' tag was my oversight. I apologize for any inconvenience my edits ... commented 2026-10-16 22:59:34 UTC by oscarm_lyft ♦8 |
| 190628425 (Comments: 1) | Udarian (Discussed changesets: 118) | typo, roads not rods commented 2026-10-16 22:54:54 UTC by Udarian ♦992 |
| 190203720 (Comments: 1) | DarkHeartOfTheWood (Discussed changesets: 34) | These features were recreated half a day later by changeset 190230813; I removed them again with changeset 190626601. commented 2026-10-16 21:29:55 UTC by heftych1 ♦2 |
| 182524962 (Comments: 1) | StreetSurveyor (Discussed changesets: 102) | Hi StreetSurveyor, I noticed that the foot access on New Rutherford Avenue has been changed back and forth over the past 2 years quite a few times, and that you've changed it to "Yes" 4 times. There is a lot going on in this area, and... commented 2026-10-16 21:21:19 UTC by D Ave ♦5 |
| 190626601 (Comments: 1) | heftych1 (Discussed changesets: 7) | These features were re-created less than half a day after being deleted (changeset 190203720 by $DarkHeartOfTheWood ). They were originally tagged as "proposed", but I could find no evidence of any such proposal. Then, the tags were changed... commented 2026-10-16 21:19:51 UTC by heftych1 ♦2 |
| 190612503 (Comments: 1) | GA_Kevin (Discussed changesets: 25) | Please at least try to place these precisely before adding a fixme=. I can see a few parking spots reserved for charging in the Holiday Inn lot in Esri imagery, is that where this is supposed to be? commented 2026-10-16 20:53:11 UTC by impiaaa ♦502 |
| 190463399 (Comments: 1) | FlashStopFall (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome toOSM! commented 2026-10-16 19:28:57 UTC by xander78 ♦12 |
| 184772208 (Comments: 1) | Baloo Uriza (Discussed changesets: 114) | Was this a 100% confirmed change? If so resolve the anonymous note at the location challenging it commented 2026-10-16 18:08:58 UTC by I-76 ♦91 |
| 190609314 (Comments: 1) | Sara Rebecca (Discussed changesets: 1) | Edit, Cumberland Md. homes added commented 2026-10-16 17:41:23 UTC by Sara Rebecca ♦1 |
| 190611479 (Comments: 1) | Precision Guesswork (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190611689 commented 2026-10-16 16:58:02 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦7,210 |
| 190483720 (Comments: 2) | MappingJunkie (Discussed changesets: 16) | I didn't realize it was a county road! I will change back. I rode it a couple of weeks ago and it was in bad shape, with lots of ruts that have been there for over 12 months. I will add a smoothness value to flag for passenger cars. commented 2026-10-16 16:14:31 UTC by MappingJunkie ♦11 |
| 190105137 (Comments: 1) | YouthNys (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Youth, Can you tell me where there is a flat edge that crosses over the 14th green? Was there some mistake where a bunch of nodes got deleted, leaving a long straight line? Here's a link: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/156559... commented 2026-10-16 16:08:26 UTC by b-jazz ♦976 |
| 190474987 (Comments: 1) | jcrada (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks jcrada for adding to the map. Just wanted to reach out real quick and let you know that you shouldn't "name" these tree areas when there is no official name (like a plaque or nametag of some sort). Thanks. commented 2026-10-16 15:24:50 UTC by b-jazz ♦976 |
| 190460617 (Comments: 1) | berrymandj (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hey Berry, just wanted to reach out and let you know that you are duplicating existing features. Instead of modifying them, you are creating a second feature that lies on top of an existing feature. It is best to modify existing work if at all possib... commented 2026-10-16 15:21:29 UTC by b-jazz ♦976 |
| 190573211 (Comments: 2) | PatDHE (Discussed changesets: 1) | Opps, thanks for catching that! commented 2026-10-16 13:25:43 UTC by PatDHE ♦1 |
| 190535548 (Comments: 4) | danuntu (Discussed changesets: 2) | They're already gone. The default/standard map is made of pre-rendered tiles. It can take a little bit before they update, especially since your computer has some of them cached. You can speed it up by clearing your browser's cache and forc... commented 2026-10-16 13:05:33 UTC by JuanElDemografo ♦59 |
| 190576009 (Comments: 1) | onethreethreeone (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190600352 commented 2026-10-16 11:07:12 UTC by rajdhani ♦642 |
| 190571785 (Comments: 3) | lxndrl (Discussed changesets: 7) | I've had some websites reject requests that lack tracking, so even if there is no reason some still do... I do agree that the tracking params should be removed but if it results in an error then might well remove the whole url. I'd prob... commented 2026-10-16 08:53:03 UTC by gpserror ♦254 |
| 190585872 (Comments: 1) | maxcoservices (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welocme to OSM! I reverted your entry, becaus he has no address (and additional unkown keys). If you need help you are welcome. commented 2026-10-16 07:16:16 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,942 |
| 190589085 (Comments: 1) | 🅱 𝗺𝗮𝗷𝗼𝗿 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Theres a new flock camera on northbound decatur blvd right after the hacienda intersection. Dont know who owns it but most likely lv metro pd commented 2026-10-16 07:01:38 UTC by 🅱 𝗺𝗮𝗷𝗼𝗿 ♦1 |
| 190407322 (Comments: 1) | gagnstua (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190586918 commented 2026-10-16 05:43:22 UTC by MappingMore ♦793 |
| 190329067 (Comments: 8) | danuntu (Discussed changesets: 2) | no sorry. no offense taken. and i apologized as well. i am quite new to this platform. and i understand and agree with everything you suggested. i do have questions and ideas, but i'll get the answers in due time. thank you for your patience. i&... commented 2026-10-16 04:23:45 UTC by danuntu ♦2 |
| 167157565 (Comments: 4) | ZeLonewolf (Discussed changesets: 154) | Coming back to this. The sign says private property. Not private road. Also check https://www.bristolri.gov/DocumentCenter/View/1249/MOUNT-HOPE-COMMUNITY-FOREST-Plan, pages 5-7. The public road should at least include everything in plat 135-3. commented 2026-10-15 21:41:20 UTC by aduxas ♦48 |
| 190430253 (Comments: 1) | LouisianaMisty (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, I was looking through changesets from new mappers in Louisiana and noticed your fixme on Jesma International Foodmart. My first instinct from the name would be shop=supermarket with cuisine=* from your note. Happy mapping! commented 2026-10-15 20:30:05 UTC by JuanElDemografo ♦59 |
| 190458366 (Comments: 1) | mascarotheodore (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi and welcome to OSM, Your changeset says you requested a review, so here are a few things I noticed: The way you added, Mamre Oaks Drive, looks more like a driveway (highway=service, service=driveway) rather than a residential road (h... commented 2026-10-15 20:19:48 UTC by JuanElDemografo ♦59 |
| 163816663 (Comments: 2) | mapping vale (Discussed changesets: 1) | is this still under construction?? commented 2026-10-15 20:16:48 UTC by Udarian ♦992 |
| 190575490 (Comments: 1) | dmjab13 (Discussed changesets: 5) | also moved a brewery to it's new location in tatamy. so that's why this changeset is so wide. committed my own cardinal sin commented 2026-10-15 20:00:50 UTC by dmjab13 ♦153 |
| 156777722 (Comments: 3) | beddy (Discussed changesets: 7) | Sorry. Thank you for the courtesy of a reply. Hope you are doing well. commented 2026-10-15 19:41:36 UTC by Precision Guesswork ♦11 |
| 190536376 (Comments: 3) | bhartinegi_lyft (Discussed changesets: 3) | Some links were broken in the previous response. I just want to share updated one https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1564367115 https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Wbp3VwwzbU3-U6RUtvrDI8MfvdQvMVoA/view?usp=sharing https://drive.google.com/file/d... commented 2026-10-15 19:07:04 UTC by amakarevich_lyft ♦41 |
| 188447198 (Comments: 1) | Kandice Zimbleman (Discussed changesets: 22) | This changeset has been reverted due to suspected Pokemon GO mapping, that is, mapping things that do not exist in real-life for the purpose of modifying spawns in the game. Please ensure that your edits reflect what is on the ground, and use ... commented 2026-10-15 18:42:52 UTC by maxwellward ♦56 |
| 188447181 (Comments: 1) | Kandice Zimbleman (Discussed changesets: 22) | This changeset has been reverted due to suspected Pokemon GO mapping, that is, mapping things that do not exist in real-life for the purpose of modifying spawns in the game. Please ensure that your edits reflect what is on the ground, and use ... commented 2026-10-15 18:42:51 UTC by maxwellward ♦56 |
| 188447421 (Comments: 1) | Kandice Zimbleman (Discussed changesets: 22) | This changeset has been reverted due to suspected Pokemon GO mapping, that is, mapping things that do not exist in real-life for the purpose of modifying spawns in the game. Please ensure that your edits reflect what is on the ground, and use ... commented 2026-10-15 18:38:28 UTC by maxwellward ♦56 |
| 188447360 (Comments: 1) | Kandice Zimbleman (Discussed changesets: 22) | This changeset has been reverted due to suspected Pokemon GO mapping, that is, mapping things that do not exist in real-life for the purpose of modifying spawns in the game. Please ensure that your edits reflect what is on the ground, and use ... commented 2026-10-15 18:38:28 UTC by maxwellward ♦56 |
| 188447300 (Comments: 1) | Kandice Zimbleman (Discussed changesets: 22) | This changeset has been reverted due to suspected Pokemon GO mapping, that is, mapping things that do not exist in real-life for the purpose of modifying spawns in the game. Please ensure that your edits reflect what is on the ground, and use ... commented 2026-10-15 18:38:27 UTC by maxwellward ♦56 |
| 188447494 (Comments: 1) | Kandice Zimbleman (Discussed changesets: 22) | This changeset has been reverted due to suspected Pokemon GO mapping, that is, mapping things that do not exist in real-life for the purpose of modifying spawns in the game. Please ensure that your edits reflect what is on the ground, and use ... commented 2026-10-15 18:36:42 UTC by maxwellward ♦56 |
| 188447454 (Comments: 1) | Kandice Zimbleman (Discussed changesets: 22) | This changeset has been reverted due to suspected Pokemon GO mapping, that is, mapping things that do not exist in real-life for the purpose of modifying spawns in the game. Please ensure that your edits reflect what is on the ground, and use ... commented 2026-10-15 18:36:42 UTC by maxwellward ♦56 |
| 188447471 (Comments: 1) | Kandice Zimbleman (Discussed changesets: 22) | This changeset has been reverted due to suspected Pokemon GO mapping, that is, mapping things that do not exist in real-life for the purpose of modifying spawns in the game. Please ensure that your edits reflect what is on the ground, and use ... commented 2026-10-15 18:36:42 UTC by maxwellward ♦56 |
| 188447577 (Comments: 1) | Kandice Zimbleman (Discussed changesets: 22) | This changeset has been reverted due to suspected Pokemon GO mapping, that is, mapping things that do not exist in real-life for the purpose of modifying spawns in the game. Please ensure that your edits reflect what is on the ground, and use ... commented 2026-10-15 18:35:46 UTC by maxwellward ♦56 |
| 188447545 (Comments: 1) | Kandice Zimbleman (Discussed changesets: 22) | This changeset has been reverted due to suspected Pokemon GO mapping, that is, mapping things that do not exist in real-life for the purpose of modifying spawns in the game. Please ensure that your edits reflect what is on the ground, and use ... commented 2026-10-15 18:35:46 UTC by maxwellward ♦56 |
| 188447531 (Comments: 1) | Kandice Zimbleman (Discussed changesets: 22) | This changeset has been reverted due to suspected Pokemon GO mapping, that is, mapping things that do not exist in real-life for the purpose of modifying spawns in the game. Please ensure that your edits reflect what is on the ground, and use ... commented 2026-10-15 18:35:45 UTC by maxwellward ♦56 |
| 188447760 (Comments: 1) | Kandice Zimbleman (Discussed changesets: 22) | This changeset has been reverted due to suspected Pokemon GO mapping, that is, mapping things that do not exist in real-life for the purpose of modifying spawns in the game. Please ensure that your edits reflect what is on the ground, and use ... commented 2026-10-15 18:31:13 UTC by maxwellward ♦56 |
| 188447817 (Comments: 1) | Kandice Zimbleman (Discussed changesets: 22) | This changeset has been reverted due to suspected Pokemon GO mapping, that is, mapping things that do not exist in real-life for the purpose of modifying spawns in the game. Please ensure that your edits reflect what is on the ground, and use ... commented 2026-10-15 18:31:13 UTC by maxwellward ♦56 |
| 188447614 (Comments: 1) | Kandice Zimbleman (Discussed changesets: 22) | This changeset has been reverted due to suspected Pokemon GO mapping, that is, mapping things that do not exist in real-life for the purpose of modifying spawns in the game. Please ensure that your edits reflect what is on the ground, and use ... commented 2026-10-15 18:31:12 UTC by maxwellward ♦56 |
| 188447718 (Comments: 1) | Kandice Zimbleman (Discussed changesets: 22) | This changeset has been reverted due to suspected Pokemon GO mapping, that is, mapping things that do not exist in real-life for the purpose of modifying spawns in the game. Please ensure that your edits reflect what is on the ground, and use ... commented 2026-10-15 18:31:12 UTC by maxwellward ♦56 |
| 188447669 (Comments: 1) | Kandice Zimbleman (Discussed changesets: 22) | This changeset has been reverted due to suspected Pokemon GO mapping, that is, mapping things that do not exist in real-life for the purpose of modifying spawns in the game. Please ensure that your edits reflect what is on the ground, and use ... commented 2026-10-15 18:31:12 UTC by maxwellward ♦56 |
| 190536653 (Comments: 2) | KGo (Discussed changesets: 3) | Ah good point. I missed that - I was adding what the business actually advertises for their address commented 2026-10-15 18:27:34 UTC by KGo ♦3 |
| 188448005 (Comments: 1) | Kandice Zimbleman (Discussed changesets: 22) | This changeset has been reverted due to suspected Pokemon GO mapping, that is, mapping things that do not exist in real-life for the purpose of modifying spawns in the game. Please ensure that your edits reflect what is on the ground, and use ... commented 2026-10-15 18:24:25 UTC by maxwellward ♦56 |
| 188447938 (Comments: 2) | Kandice Zimbleman (Discussed changesets: 22) | This changeset has been reverted due to suspected Pokemon GO mapping, that is, mapping things that do not exist in real-life for the purpose of modifying spawns in the game. Please ensure that your edits reflect what is on the ground, and use ... commented 2026-10-15 18:24:25 UTC by maxwellward ♦56 |
| 188447912 (Comments: 1) | Kandice Zimbleman (Discussed changesets: 22) | This changeset has been reverted due to suspected Pokemon GO mapping, that is, mapping things that do not exist in real-life for the purpose of modifying spawns in the game. Please ensure that your edits reflect what is on the ground, and use ... commented 2026-10-15 18:24:25 UTC by maxwellward ♦56 |
| 188447887 (Comments: 1) | Kandice Zimbleman (Discussed changesets: 22) | This changeset has been reverted due to suspected Pokemon GO mapping, that is, mapping things that do not exist in real-life for the purpose of modifying spawns in the game. Please ensure that your edits reflect what is on the ground, and use ... commented 2026-10-15 18:24:24 UTC by maxwellward ♦56 |
| 190570487 (Comments: 1) | ianburgwin (Discussed changesets: 2) | I walked every trail I found and recorded GPS tracks. But it was raining today so I didn’t want to try and add everything on the spot. I added the main POIs and will add the trails later on a PC. commented 2026-10-15 17:50:12 UTC by ianburgwin ♦2 |
| 190562114 (Comments: 1) | J Adams (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please check the position of the nodes https://www.osm.org/node/11110521426 (tree), https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11363231497 (traffic sign). You move the nodes more than 100 meters. commented 2026-10-15 16:00:40 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,942 |
| 189516966 (Comments: 1) | Ctown1875 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hi Ctown1875, I'm thinking that a mountain peak named "Mike butt rock area" is not a real feature that belongs in OSM. Please have a look at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Verifiability if you need more information o... commented 2026-10-15 15:56:06 UTC by Xvtn ♦511 |
| 190284031 (Comments: 1) | Mom Tomahawk (Discussed changesets: 17) | Hello! I see you're back! Many of these waterways you've added look wide enough to be tagged as rivers rather than streams - a "discussion" we've had many times already. ("Discussion" in quotes as you've... commented 2026-10-15 15:24:29 UTC by kaleidoscopica ♦48 |
| 190487568 (Comments: 2) | wb_import (Discussed changesets: 1) | This is an error, thanks for noticing! I'll fix it soon. commented 2026-10-15 14:46:46 UTC by wb_import ♦2 |
| 190532332 (Comments: 1) | JXKPomelo (Discussed changesets: 12) | Why did you revert my edits and upgrade some of these minor dirt roads to secondary? commented 2026-10-15 14:17:09 UTC by Oregonian3 ♦70 |
| 190525078 (Comments: 2) | Dannymacj (Discussed changesets: 5) | Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190535160 commented 2026-10-15 12:43:23 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦7,210 |
| 190525027 (Comments: 2) | Dannymacj (Discussed changesets: 5) | Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190535160 commented 2026-10-15 12:43:15 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦7,210 |
| 190524961 (Comments: 2) | Dannymacj (Discussed changesets: 5) | Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190535160 commented 2026-10-15 12:43:06 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦7,210 |
| 190524892 (Comments: 2) | Dannymacj (Discussed changesets: 5) | Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190535160 commented 2026-10-15 12:42:59 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦7,210 |
| 190524758 (Comments: 2) | Dannymacj (Discussed changesets: 5) | Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190535160 commented 2026-10-15 12:42:51 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦7,210 |
| 189426100 (Comments: 1) | unforgiven512 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, you added a larger number of communication tags here which are not used in other places. Could you check how airport infrastructure is commonly tagged and change your tags? commented 2026-10-15 11:53:33 UTC by mueschel ♦7,415 |
| 190426443 (Comments: 1) | MatF88 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190551930 commented 2026-10-15 11:20:51 UTC by ajmat ♦666 |
| 190378209 (Comments: 1) | chalfeezy (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190539178 commented 2026-10-15 08:13:01 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,271 |
| 190419338 (Comments: 1) | Cobrin (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190512110 commented 2026-10-15 08:05:07 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,271 |
| 190414623 (Comments: 1) | Mom Tomahawk (Discussed changesets: 17) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190501260 commented 2026-10-15 08:03:44 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,271 |
| 190380060 (Comments: 1) | Luke Vincere (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190486258 commented 2026-10-15 07:26:45 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,271 |
| 190522446 (Comments: 1) | Big_Jon!!! (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hey! I saw that you have a lot of changes with reviews requested. I'll take a look at them in more detail over the next few days if someone else doesn't before I do, but as for your addition in this changeset, the Pack River waterway is onl... commented 2026-10-15 07:22:33 UTC by Ponderosopine ♦15 |
| 190507591 (Comments: 1) | Bryce Wood (Discussed changesets: 30) | Hi could you please double check this changeset? it broke the Huston relation (returns 404 in nominatim) https://nominatim.openstreetmap.org/ui/details.html?osmtype=R&osmid=2688911 commented 2026-10-15 07:02:02 UTC by vricciardulli ♦43 |
| 190476789 (Comments: 1) | Omnific (Discussed changesets: 147) | Hey Omnific! I noticed you've been making a lot of opening_hours=* fixes using the opening-hours.pages.dev tool. On the OSMus Slack, I've been communicating with some other users on making fixes, and I would greatly appreciate to be able to... commented 2026-10-15 06:21:33 UTC by PostaMap_Infinite ♦83 |
| 190537058 (Comments: 1) | Mxdanger (Discussed changesets: 30) | Fixed note/1156058 commented 2026-10-15 05:31:26 UTC by Mxdanger ♦121 |
| 190534155 (Comments: 1) | iismitch55 (Discussed changesets: 70) | You spelled "cemetery" incorrectly in this changeset's comment. Cemetery is spelled c-e-m-e-t-e-r-y. It does not end with -ary, which is a common misspelling. --- Published using OSMCha: ht... commented 2026-10-15 04:48:59 UTC by Frank Peng ♦256 |
| 190528362 (Comments: 1) | Brian H Wilson (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi! Thanks for getting these building types in. As for the addresses, I have a data file with addresses for all of Corvallis sitting around in my downloads that I have permission to upload, I just haven't gotten around to it yet. It doesn't... commented 2026-10-15 04:31:31 UTC by jmarchon ♦537 |
| 190528157 (Comments: 1) | Brian H Wilson (Discussed changesets: 3) | There should be an undo button at the bottom left, as long as you have "upload answers automatically" turned off in the settings, which I usually recommend anyway :-) commented 2026-10-15 04:28:08 UTC by jmarchon ♦537 |
| 190378416 (Comments: 1) | Mr_Jay (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi there! It looks like this building was previously mapped as having Maximum Sight & Sound in it. Do two businesses share the space now, or has the old business moved/closed? That information would help to update the existing business nod... commented 2026-10-15 02:58:50 UTC by FeetAndInches ♦14 |
| 190415246 (Comments: 7) | nickvet419 (Discussed changesets: 98) | Yeah actually I'm kinda down with unclassified or tertiary, and arguably make 66th and 68th and 85th agree as such since they're all functionally the same system doing the same work in the same mostly retail subdivision. I think the poor d... commented 2026-10-15 01:58:07 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,623 |
| 190533392 (Comments: 1) | revent (Discussed changesets: 18) | Calling this an "airport" since there are multiple hangars... it's an "airpark". Might be better tagging. commented 2026-10-15 01:51:51 UTC by revent ♦9 |
| 190530493 (Comments: 2) | Hufkratzer (Discussed changesets: 8) | The above comment does not belong to this changeset, but to https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190433432 commented 2026-10-14 23:13:16 UTC by Hufkratzer ♦920 |
| 190433432 (Comments: 1) | nuttyhawkfan (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, I retagged some round pens and riding arenas which you incorrectly mapped as riding centers and horse walkers, e.g. Riding arenas, not riding centers: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1567852891 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1567... commented 2026-10-14 23:09:19 UTC by Hufkratzer ♦920 |
| 187841092 (Comments: 7) | lunar_jaws812 (Discussed changesets: 11) | Thanks for making those changes! commented 2026-10-14 23:03:16 UTC by crushtheserpent ♦28 |
| 167031404 (Comments: 1) | Omnific (Discussed changesets: 147) | FYI, Way #1391258959 that you created with this changeset had some funky geometry and wasn't connected properly to other roads at either end. In the future I recommend doing some more quality control on imported roads. Thanks! commented 2026-10-14 22:57:33 UTC by ScrawnyMeowth1 ♦59 |
| 190530589 (Comments: 1) | Necessarycoot72 (Discussed changesets: 85) | wrong changeset description: I fixed iD error commented 2026-10-14 22:53:26 UTC by Necessarycoot72 ♦74 |
| 189363961 (Comments: 1) | JovialBird (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hey there! Welcome to OSM. This footway is representing the ground-level path between SLC and Berkner underneath the skybridge, not the skybridge itself. There's no way object for the skybridge connection yet (I don't think there are any wa... commented 2026-10-14 22:45:08 UTC by democat ♦36 |
| 190530121 (Comments: 1) | ChrisTheMapDude (Discussed changesets: 3) | The NeuroPoint Editor is currently in development to be a next generation OSM and GIS mapping program, highly advanced & easy to use. Full showcase will be shown on my page on Friday, October 16th. commented 2026-10-14 22:41:48 UTC by ChrisTheMapDude ♦3 |
| 190408813 (Comments: 3) | IronCar (Discussed changesets: 1) | Weird, Google Maps doesn't usually accept changes, and when they do, it's usually wrong-answers-only. Hence why Google still thinks half the streets in Tulsa are named after white supremacists and refuses to acknowledge I 244 was renamed f... commented 2026-10-14 22:38:08 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,623 |
| 190368600 (Comments: 5) | BigSushi (Discussed changesets: 9) | Google Maps also thinks half the streets in Tulsa are named after white supremacists and refuses to acknowledge that I 244 was renamed for MLK 30 years ago. They're not a credible source. commented 2026-10-14 22:36:08 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,623 |
| 190520848 (Comments: 1) | Mike Williams 3 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi welcome to OSM. Try to make sure not to remove features that exist on the ground. This feature was already map correctly as a private driveway, removing it was incorrect. Thanks Read more here if your interested: https://wiki.openstreetmap.... commented 2026-10-14 22:17:58 UTC by MassCartog ♦503 |
| 190509119 (Comments: 2) | CPack (Discussed changesets: 1) | Sorry, isced:level=1. It's an elementary school. The building is three stories high.Thank you!Corey commented 2026-10-14 20:46:06 UTC by CPack ♦1 |
| 190511388 (Comments: 1) | rp92 (Discussed changesets: 1) | This County Road has no posted speed limits from Manito Black top to Goofy Ridge. All traffic travels at 55 mph or greater. commented 2026-10-14 19:58:15 UTC by RMun ♦1 |
| 190484621 (Comments: 1) | Wroth91 (Discussed changesets: 1) | In future can you please save changes in places this far apart in separate changesets? commented 2026-10-14 19:33:22 UTC by hoserab ♦259 |
| 190519418 (Comments: 1) | Derick Marin (Discussed changesets: 1) | on the 2026 imagery from Miami Dade County this is within the road area (also others like esri), please double check with aerial imagery and fix it's position. Happy mapping, Udar commented 2026-10-14 19:10:47 UTC by Udarian ♦992 |
| 180832237 (Comments: 3) | noahheffron (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks for fixup! And even more for surveying, even if some fixable problems like this appear commented 2026-10-14 17:42:36 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,339 |
| 188697615 (Comments: 2) | Malcolm Maas (Discussed changesets: 14) | Sorry, the changeset description is misleading, that's my fault. I didn't remove bicycle access, I just removed the bicycle=yes tags, which are redundant for the reason you've stated - bike access should be assumed on alleys unless the... commented 2026-10-14 17:07:36 UTC by Malcolm Maas ♦11 |
| 190489814 (Comments: 1) | Outn'about (Discussed changesets: 1) | Somehow you added the way to the San Juan relation. I've removed it. Also removed the name and width. We only add names to actual named features. The width was removed since it was tagged a 0. Also, changed it to a footway. Let me know if you ha... commented 2026-10-14 16:56:13 UTC by Glassman ♦6,059 |
| 190515808 (Comments: 1) | muhlemann (Discussed changesets: 1) | Added addresses commented 2026-10-14 16:08:32 UTC by muhlemann ♦3 |
| 190508880 (Comments: 1) | Bryce Wood (Discussed changesets: 30) | Hi Bryce Wood, I saw that you have changed Webster city limits. Can you specify the source for this, since in Tiger data it looks as it was before your change? Currently relations for Webster city and Houston are broken so this needs to be fixed.... commented 2026-10-14 15:24:02 UTC by Aleksandar Matejevic ♦242 |
| 187757532 (Comments: 1) | geonarb (Discussed changesets: 2) | Just a light reminder to pay attention to things added in iD. I imported addresses across Merion Park, and you added a few buildings with addresses on top. I merged my import unto your couple houses. commented 2026-10-14 15:22:03 UTC by I-76 ♦91 |
| 190501354 (Comments: 1) | Kalhounster (Discussed changesets: 1) | Wrong location. No camera here commented 2026-10-14 15:04:31 UTC by Kalhounster ♦1 |
| 190503683 (Comments: 1) | Farmers Direct Hay and Feed LLC (Discussed changesets: 1) | Removing this SEO spam. It is clearly not occupying an entire apartment block. commented 2026-10-14 14:57:17 UTC by Omnific ♦244 |
| 188783595 (Comments: 1) | HopsAndSpokes (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thanks for adding this! Just a quick note - for roundabouts/mini roundabouts, make sure to mark them as one way and remove the name= tag from the circle itself commented 2026-10-14 10:50:37 UTC by GarliccBread1 ♦17 |
| 187107897 (Comments: 3) | SherbetS (Discussed changesets: 34) | These are not official ISO codes on that web page. E.g. Bitcoin is XBT, not BTC. Lightning is not a separate currency, it is still currency:XBT. It is just a special way to pay with Bitcoin. Similar to other payment methods it is tagged as: |
| 189545087 (Comments: 2) | sbedwal_Lyft (Discussed changesets: 27) | Hi Joseph R P, My name is Santosh, and I’m a mapper on the OpenStreetMap team at Lyft. Thank you for identifying this issue and correcting the changeset. I apologize for the oversight. I’ll take greater care when splitting roads int... commented 2026-10-14 06:03:42 UTC by sbedwal_Lyft ♦24 |
| 141329339 (Comments: 1) | Ryan Watern (Discussed changesets: 16) | Hi, government=weather was more accurate than government=public_service. The latter is for a public-facing customer service center for government social services. Currently, the standard name-suggestion-index preset for NWS stations uses office=gover... commented 2026-10-14 05:45:12 UTC by Minh Nguyen ♦659 |
| 190472217 (Comments: 1) | degoogled-not-a-car (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello. In this changeset you tagged Ave O as not having lane marking, when it clearly does a center line drawn. Please correct this tag. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/190472217... commented 2026-10-14 05:01:25 UTC by MxxCon ♦3,582 |
| 189549898 (Comments: 1) | T Johnson 789 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Are you sure this is a surveillance camera and not something else? I would highly doubt that there is a camera on a state owned highway. commented 2026-10-14 04:41:14 UTC by RedSkies ♦16 |
| 190481075 (Comments: 1) | Trod Skunk (Discussed changesets: 9) | If this is a historic ship that stays here indefinitely, I think it's appropriate to map it under https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building=ship. I left a comment at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/107461767 asking for more... commented 2026-10-14 04:04:28 UTC by pwbriggs ♦520 |
| 107461767 (Comments: 1) | JRH50 (Discussed changesets: 55) | Hi! I'm curious why a ship belongs in OpenStreetMap - doesn't the ship move around? Please leave a comment at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190481075. Thanks! commented 2026-10-14 03:59:54 UTC by pwbriggs ♦520 |
| 190420752 (Comments: 1) | Katiecs (Discussed changesets: 1) | the tag, access=private implies that the road has no trespassing signs posted at the entrance. If it is privately owned and maintained, then add the tag ownership=private. --- Published using OSMCha: http... commented 2026-10-14 03:04:41 UTC by Glassman ♦6,059 |
| 190481484 (Comments: 1) | Matt McCutchen (Discussed changesets: 62) | I made a mistake in my editor and submitted this changeset with tags incorrectly copied from a previous changeset. The intended tags: summary=Add Megamart on Nicholson Lane. source=survey;mapillary survey:date=2026-09-27 commented 2026-10-14 02:14:39 UTC by Matt McCutchen ♦82 |
| 190427713 (Comments: 3) | BigSushi (Discussed changesets: 9) | OK, be sure to add expressway=yes to the expressway portions. commented 2026-10-14 01:01:25 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,623 |
| 190375918 (Comments: 1) | BigSushi (Discussed changesets: 9) | Again, very strange to downgrade expressways like this. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/190375918 commented 2026-10-13 22:42:47 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,623 |
| 190375727 (Comments: 1) | BigSushi (Discussed changesets: 9) | Looks like highway=trunk, expressway=yes would be appropriate for at least the double-carriageway portions. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/190375727 ... commented 2026-10-13 22:42:20 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,623 |
| 187715365 (Comments: 15) | GA_Kevin (Discussed changesets: 25) | Aha! The 2-stall Flo charger got removed to make way for the Resound Energy Supercharger. Check Mapillary, which shows them installing the SfB. commented 2026-10-13 21:28:10 UTC by TheNightRider ♦90 |
| 190473761 (Comments: 1) | synthfi (Discussed changesets: 15) | also moved two bus stops to be on the sidewalk as they are commented 2026-10-13 20:12:07 UTC by synthfi ♦29 |
| 149891666 (Comments: 3) | TheConductor (Discussed changesets: 35) | Thank you. commented 2026-10-13 18:46:19 UTC by Precision Guesswork ♦11 |
| 68629849 (Comments: 4) | TheConductor (Discussed changesets: 35) | Thank you. commented 2026-10-13 18:44:48 UTC by Precision Guesswork ♦11 |
| 190432397 (Comments: 1) | KylePolansky (Discussed changesets: 1) | Good catch! I was wondering why the directional prefix was sometimes listed (early voting), sometimes not (day-of voting) in the county data. Turns out it should not be there and the county's data for early voting mistakenly lists it: htt... commented 2026-10-13 18:01:11 UTC by Preston Maness ☭ (aspensmonster) ♦2 |
| 189573935 (Comments: 2) | IL91 (Discussed changesets: 1) | This changeset has been reverted at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190468096. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/189573935 commented 2026-10-13 17:52:07 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦405 |
| 190463772 (Comments: 1) | alfonsojon (Discussed changesets: 1) | cdn5.com HQ is here commented 2026-10-13 16:18:27 UTC by CDN5COM ♦1 |
| 190427803 (Comments: 1) | moosewx (Discussed changesets: 1) | "Pride Park" is already set in official_name=*, so to me adding it also to name=* seems like duplication, so the question becomes is "Miami Beach Convention Center Park" used anywhere (including on government websites, signs on s... commented 2026-10-13 15:57:19 UTC by Udarian ♦992 |
| 169347256 (Comments: 1) | Hypsometric (Discussed changesets: 56) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5571197 commented 2026-10-13 14:45:16 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,339 |
| 122095018 (Comments: 5) | Falsernet (Discussed changesets: 114) | now discussed at https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/what-qualifies-as-junction-circular/148748 commented 2026-10-13 14:24:23 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,339 |
| 190404005 (Comments: 1) | Harry Wood (Discussed changesets: 35) | Getting my hashtags wrong. That should've been #31DayMapChallenge ! commented 2026-10-13 09:50:12 UTC by Harry Wood ♦113 |
| 190418324 (Comments: 1) | mezzaroni (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190438995 commented 2026-10-13 08:23:14 UTC by rajdhani ♦642 |
| 190387397 (Comments: 2) | cuzi (Discussed changesets: 35) | It is ok like this for openstreetmap. People who need legal details can look at government maps. commented 2026-10-13 08:08:41 UTC by cuzi ♦197 |
| 190366644 (Comments: 1) | Josh Blaine (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190389026 commented 2026-10-13 06:56:14 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,271 |
| 190373984 (Comments: 1) | Jhayvee Eder (Discussed changesets: 3) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190381854 commented 2026-10-13 06:54:43 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,271 |
| 190367177 (Comments: 1) | Jhayvee Eder (Discussed changesets: 3) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190380745 commented 2026-10-13 06:53:50 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,271 |
| 190434879 (Comments: 1) | TheNightRider (Discussed changesets: 53) | Sorry, it was the phone, not the hours, that was updated. commented 2026-10-13 06:38:43 UTC by TheNightRider ♦90 |
| 190370875 (Comments: 1) | Bertving (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190433076 commented 2026-10-13 05:41:28 UTC by rajdhani ♦642 |
| 187015362 (Comments: 1) | conquest59 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Landcover tagging (natural=wood) shouldn't be placed on parcel boundaries. The "woods" don't end there. commented 2026-10-13 05:26:27 UTC by TomPar ♦125 |
| 190377980 (Comments: 1) | Preston Maness ☭ (aspensmonster) (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, this change appears to add a new node for Westlake Fire Department (with address 2000 West Dove Road). However, this location is a Southlake fire department location at 100 East Dove Road. I removed this erroneous location, and added addit... commented 2026-10-13 05:10:20 UTC by KylePolansky ♦1 |
| 185985161 (Comments: 3) | gvwaal (Discussed changesets: 5) | Converted some more in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190432014 commented 2026-10-13 04:47:31 UTC by scrambling_panda ♦26 |
| 190359754 (Comments: 3) | Caleb VPI (Discussed changesets: 1) | Yeah, I use OsmAnd but not for mapping--I mostly stick to SCEE on mobile and do anything more non-trivially complex in JOSM at my workstation. Awesome, glad its just like old times! I bought probably my favorite lens, "Fitty" my Yash... commented 2026-10-13 04:25:47 UTC by CAM-Gerlach ♦308 |
| 190281133 (Comments: 2) | CAM-Gerlach_Repair (Discussed changesets: 44) | Thanks, glad it was helpful. Happy mapping. commented 2026-10-13 04:15:23 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 190400425 (Comments: 1) | Trinity Subsurface (Discussed changesets: 4) | Sorry, but once again this is not really correct. I'd moved the POI tags to a separate node, so this created a duplicate POI missing a primary tag. It also added back the incorrect name=* . See https://osm.wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element <... commented 2026-10-13 04:09:24 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 190400133 (Comments: 1) | Trinity Subsurface (Discussed changesets: 4) | Sorry, but the previous phone=* format was correct per accepted OSM conventions, while this one is not. As is documented community consensus, the standard format for NANP numbers is +1-NNN-NNN-NNNN , while the E.123 format you converted it to is the... commented 2026-10-13 04:03:45 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 178208668 (Comments: 1) | kfinity (Discussed changesets: 3) | Nice work. commented 2026-10-13 03:38:51 UTC by Precision Guesswork ♦11 |
| 190420153 (Comments: 1) | 500370622 (Discussed changesets: 3) | As an account mapping on behalf of a commercial business for financial gain, please be advised that you are expected to understand and carefully follow documented OpenStreetMap standards and conventions, which will both directly benefit the quality o... commented 2026-10-13 03:36:03 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 187239300 (Comments: 7) | Ra_colate (Discussed changesets: 20) | Hi Flap Slimy Outward, thanks a lot for the clarification. I understand the concern much better now. Also thank you for manually restoring some affected relations already. I’ll review all the affected relations carefully from edit histories and... commented 2026-10-13 03:14:31 UTC by Ra_colate ♦28 |
| 190429642 (Comments: 1) | TheNightRider (Discussed changesets: 53) | Accidentally used comments from https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190429647 . For this location changed the bank name, added old_name and address, and set to office because it's not a retail bank location. commented 2026-10-13 02:43:05 UTC by TheNightRider ♦90 |
| 190429000 (Comments: 1) | schubertm (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to the OSM community. Your changset looks good, If you have any questions feel free to ask people or use the forum, Thank you for your first commit. : ) commented 2026-10-13 02:27:29 UTC by SPLATPLAYS ♦12 |
| 190421383 (Comments: 2) | NV333 (Discussed changesets: 5) | There are 2 separate trail heads mapped. Before, the relation contained one whole trail section from south trailhead to end of trail marker, plus the other short section from northern trailhead. I made a separate relation from each trailhead, as they... commented 2026-10-12 22:02:42 UTC by NV333 ♦2 |
| 190317742 (Comments: 2) | niboe (Discussed changesets: 1) | Yes, the address clarification is especially needed in High Point, where every street is named "East High Point" with a suffix except Southgate, so houses often have duplicate numbers and the name suffix matters. commented 2026-10-12 19:18:23 UTC by Closeapple ♦3 |
| 190404189 (Comments: 3) | skohel (Discussed changesets: 2) | OK, thanks for letting me know. commented 2026-10-12 18:37:11 UTC by b-jazz ♦976 |
| 190326488 (Comments: 1) | JXKPomelo (Discussed changesets: 12) | Can you explain why you upgraded this to secondary? This is quite literally a dirt road through the mountains, and it hasn't been a state highway in quite some time. I'm of the opinion that no dirt roads should be any higher than tertiary, ... commented 2026-10-12 18:28:44 UTC by Oregonian3 ♦70 |
| 190265973 (Comments: 2) | xander78 (Discussed changesets: 14) | All good- Apologies for mistake! commented 2026-10-12 18:11:13 UTC by xander78 ♦12 |
| 190361415 (Comments: 1) | Irish1987 (Discussed changesets: 5) | When joining fairways and greens, make sure you share every node at the border. You are doing pretty good, but have missed about 10-20 here on this course and that trips out Q/A checks because of the overlap (even by a tiny amount). Your help to make... commented 2026-10-12 17:55:01 UTC by b-jazz ♦976 |
| 174743060 (Comments: 1) | Baloo Uriza (Discussed changesets: 114) | for features like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1451157802 you want to tag the whole area as amenity=parking the individual spaces can be be tagged additionally as amenity=parking_space. Street_side is not used in a parking lot but instead along ... commented 2026-10-12 17:47:39 UTC by nickvet419 ♦115 |
| 190371750 (Comments: 1) | Nic Jensen (Discussed changesets: 1) | RE: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1567465148 and others When drawing golf course areas (such as greens, fairways, bunkers, tees, etc.), please be aware that the ways used to outline those areas can't cross over each other. Fairway out... commented 2026-10-12 17:47:23 UTC by b-jazz ♦976 |
| 190414739 (Comments: 1) | BMIA88 (Discussed changesets: 4) | thank you :) 👍 Happy mapping, Udar commented 2026-10-12 17:40:44 UTC by Udarian ♦992 |
| 190411382 (Comments: 4) | BMIA88 (Discussed changesets: 4) | that doesn't matter to the fact that the ALPR was attached to it and shouldn't have been. In iD if you click on the "Map Data" tab on the right side (shortcut "u") and scroll down to the "Map Features" list... commented 2026-10-12 17:37:57 UTC by Udarian ♦992 |
| 187811302 (Comments: 2) | paxxom (Discussed changesets: 5) | And I should have noted - if you want to improve the shapes of things that are already there, feel free to do so. Just please edit the existing thing, or at least make sure you carry over whatever existing information has already been tagged, unless... commented 2026-10-12 17:28:57 UTC by noliver ♦9 |
| 190411627 (Comments: 1) | BMIA88 (Discussed changesets: 4) | This ALPR is attached to a landuse area and ALPR's should not be attached to landuse areas commented 2026-10-12 17:23:28 UTC by Udarian ♦992 |
| 190411301 (Comments: 1) | BMIA88 (Discussed changesets: 4) | looking at this ALPR on various aerial imagery in iD it seems to be within the road area, being positioned like this is highly unlikely so please double check the position of this ALPR and fix it. Happy mapping, Udar. commented 2026-10-12 17:16:57 UTC by Udarian ♦992 |
| 190381031 (Comments: 1) | BeanBrainzz (Discussed changesets: 1) | I have removed personal information. OSM does not allow the addition of personal information to protect the privacy of individuals. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/190381031 ... commented 2026-10-12 16:04:10 UTC by Glassman ♦6,059 |
| 190407015 (Comments: 1) | dwiniarsk92 (Discussed changesets: 1) | oops meant to say St Rita commented 2026-10-12 14:56:37 UTC by dwiniarsk92 ♦1 |
| 188159446 (Comments: 1) | SteveRal (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hi Steve, these ramps are not open yet and MDTA has reached out to OpenStreetMap to figure out why routing companies that use OSM are sending their customers here. Did you happen to survey this in person to know if it was open? Thanks, ... commented 2026-10-12 14:42:13 UTC by ElliottPlack ♦953 |
| 190404088 (Comments: 1) | Oregonian3 (Discussed changesets: 53) | This should say "from secondary to tertiary", whoops! commented 2026-10-12 14:00:21 UTC by Oregonian3 ♦70 |
| 173889370 (Comments: 1) | F-T-P (Discussed changesets: 1) | removed (pole included) as of 10/12/2026 commented 2026-10-12 13:25:14 UTC by SigmaBing ♦1 |
| 190367462 (Comments: 1) | Waypoint47 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190396716 commented 2026-10-12 11:45:07 UTC by ajmat ♦666 |
| 190390693 (Comments: 1) | Coast to Coast Remodel (Discussed changesets: 1) | Spam commented 2026-10-12 10:18:58 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦7,210 |
| 190366370 (Comments: 3) | ereere (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks @ajmat commented 2026-10-12 10:18:06 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦7,210 |
| 190367315 (Comments: 1) | Jhayvee Eder (Discussed changesets: 3) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190390011 commented 2026-10-12 09:32:27 UTC by rajdhani ♦642 |
| 190378104 (Comments: 1) | PNkVuu (Discussed changesets: 1) | when an object already exists please do not add duplicates and instead edit the existing feature. Also Please use the correct phone number format in the future, in the US it is +1-NNN-NNN-NNNN where N is a number between 0 and 9. Happy mapping... commented 2026-10-12 04:34:12 UTC by Udarian ♦992 |
| 190377584 (Comments: 1) | FlamingoOSM (Discussed changesets: 46) | if (in the main editor (the one that pops up when you click "Edit" on this website)) you go to "Background Settings" (shortcut "B") go down the list of "Backgrounds" at the bottom there is a "Custom",... commented 2026-10-12 03:45:20 UTC by Udarian ♦992 |
| 190374575 (Comments: 1) | goliath_jr (Discussed changesets: 1) | EDIT: This changeset was for website, not opening_hours commented 2026-10-12 01:37:10 UTC by goliath_jr ♦3 |
| 189891544 (Comments: 4) | Zhen Sun (Discussed changesets: 52) | A mode-specific key like :hgv would only be applied if we do know for certain there is a separate value for it. It is otherwise presumed to be the same as the base key. A value such as this can only truly be confirmed by on-the-ground in-person surve... commented 2026-10-12 00:59:22 UTC by Moonfire ♦9 |
| 189610743 (Comments: 2) | diamondarmorsteve (Discussed changesets: 52) | Hi, what exactly is not correct? I tried my best ;-; commented 2026-10-12 00:46:35 UTC by diamondarmorsteve ♦78 |
| 190180376 (Comments: 3) | PostaMap_Infinite (Discussed changesets: 28) | Glad I could help! Feel free to let me know if you have any questions! commented 2026-10-11 23:44:02 UTC by PostaMap_Infinite ♦83 |
| 181909201 (Comments: 4) | StreetSurveyor (Discussed changesets: 102) | Where street signs say one thing and "official" records say another, street signs win. Official records can be wrong. commented 2026-10-11 23:35:19 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,925 |
| 189417548 (Comments: 2) | ersaz (Discussed changesets: 3) | I retagged them in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190373620 commented 2026-10-11 23:30:58 UTC by Hufkratzer ♦920 |
| 190372827 (Comments: 1) | nomadTB (Discussed changesets: 1) | I drove out to this location and looked at the street sign. It says "Brickhouse Dr". I saw no indication the entryway to Brickhouse Commons has a separate name. I asked the staff at the cafe about their use of "Brickhouse Road... commented 2026-10-11 22:53:18 UTC by nomadTB ♦1 |
| 190271311 (Comments: 3) | g234arcia (Discussed changesets: 3) | Thank you for your comment! Brownfield is more accurate, it is just a vague open space with no specific use yet. commented 2026-10-11 22:04:57 UTC by g234arcia ♦1 |
| 190258188 (Comments: 2) | coleman (Discussed changesets: 2) | I didn’t add those tags, already there. I was only editing geometry and might’ve left some there without removing them. No idea how someone created those. commented 2026-10-11 21:23:08 UTC by coleman ♦1 |
| 179219624 (Comments: 2) | rebeccanara (Discussed changesets: 2) | still not there on the latest imagery so deleted. commented 2026-10-11 21:22:55 UTC by Udarian ♦992 |
| 190326604 (Comments: 1) | SuperLottoFlock (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! You've not actually removed the camera node in this changeset, only one of the tags. Looking at the edit history it seems it existed before, according to a user adding them from a California public information request. You may w... commented 2026-10-11 21:21:47 UTC by SereneDeluge ♦74 |
| 190364542 (Comments: 1) | woodpeck (Discussed changesets: 148) | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changeset 190356322. commented 2026-10-11 18:28:02 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 190356322 (Comments: 1) | Dima Rocks (Discussed changesets: 1) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 190364542 where the changeset comment is: revert vandalism commented 2026-10-11 18:28:01 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 190311867 (Comments: 2) | kiritimati7 (Discussed changesets: 14) | @Mapiate no commented 2026-10-11 17:54:57 UTC by kiritimati7 ♦17 |
| 190362109 (Comments: 1) | skohel (Discussed changesets: 2) | Please take a look at way 1567137515. You've mapped over yourself without cleaning up previous works. Plus, you've left several nodes orphaned (e.g. node 14270096468). Please clean this up because it triggers a bunch of Q/A alarms fo... commented 2026-10-11 17:45:15 UTC by b-jazz ♦976 |
| 190172867 (Comments: 2) | ChloeEdmondson (Discussed changesets: 7) | sorry about that commented 2026-10-11 16:43:50 UTC by ChloeEdmondson ♦7 |
| 190241935 (Comments: 1) | Joedg (Discussed changesets: 1) | RE: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1566740393 When drawing golf course areas (i.e. greens, fairways, bunkers, tees, etc.), please be aware that the ways (lines) used to outline those areas must not cross over each other. Fairway outlines sh... commented 2026-10-11 16:30:08 UTC by b-jazz ♦976 |
| 190357141 (Comments: 1) | Udarian (Discussed changesets: 118) | also the intersections of Mary Brickell Road and Southwest 25th Road/ the I 95 exit ramp, Southwest 25th Road and the I 95 entrance ramp, all based on the latest imagery due to somewhat recent construction in the area. commented 2026-10-11 15:53:02 UTC by Udarian ♦992 |
| 190288933 (Comments: 1) | cpeuvrel (Discussed changesets: 3) | @cpeuvrel See changeset/190304380 about local tagging convention commented 2026-10-11 15:42:17 UTC by SereneDeluge ♦74 |
| 179059351 (Comments: 3) | cwodwrth (Discussed changesets: 2) | woops, wrong person, but still relevant commented 2026-10-11 15:41:24 UTC by SereneDeluge ♦74 |
| 190304380 (Comments: 3) | Baloo Uriza (Discussed changesets: 114) | Looking at https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/roads-with-two-names-on-different-sides/131230/21 it seems the US is using a different standard to everyone else. But if there's local consensus on it, then it should be that way. There... commented 2026-10-11 15:36:52 UTC by SereneDeluge ♦74 |
| 190217069 (Comments: 1) | berrymandj (Discussed changesets: 3) | When drawing golf course areas (such as greens, fairways, bunkers, tees, etc.), please be aware that the ways used to outline those areas can't cross over each other. Fairway outlines shouldn't cross over greens or bunkers or other fairways... commented 2026-10-11 15:21:30 UTC by b-jazz ♦976 |
| 150778463 (Comments: 2) | Jorisbo (Discussed changesets: 212) | Hi Biff, thanks for the remark. I don't know. Someone else added the conditional=no value. Kind regards, Joris commented 2026-10-11 11:48:38 UTC by Jorisbo ♦166 |
| 189935159 (Comments: 1) | mj dziendziel (Discussed changesets: 9) | What's all this about? These streets don't exist. commented 2026-10-11 08:41:11 UTC by liebezeit ♦9 |
| 190241239 (Comments: 5) | ieguy3 (Discussed changesets: 74) | not sure why i wait. to be honest. i normally wait like a week. ill update it right now commented 2026-10-11 07:34:07 UTC by ieguy3 ♦75 |
| 190327615 (Comments: 1) | Flap Slimy Outward (Discussed changesets: 313) | I forgot to change the source. The actual URL is https://youtube.com/watch?v=EUKmKZSKfXI&t=55. commented 2026-10-11 01:36:05 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦405 |
| 190317197 (Comments: 1) | kc350twin (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi welcome to OSM, if it exists on the ground please dont remove it from OSM. Instead update the feature type tag from road to a driveway and set the access tags to private. You may Improve OSM data, but can not destroy it. Once you set the access ta... commented 2026-10-11 01:03:02 UTC by MassCartog ♦503 |
| 190325910 (Comments: 1) | Eiim (Discussed changesets: 3) | *in Sunbury. Why did I say Sawmill? commented 2026-10-10 23:46:32 UTC by Eiim ♦34 |
| 190324893 (Comments: 1) | Precision Guesswork (Discussed changesets: 2) | Your edits and contributions are welcomed. commented 2026-10-10 22:37:34 UTC by Precision Guesswork ♦11 |
| 188737966 (Comments: 3) | Cuddlycactus2142 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Got it. I did see a Facebook post (dated Aug. 29) stating that they did add a camera to it so it may be the case. Thanks. (and F Flock) commented 2026-10-10 21:50:21 UTC by Mr Matt K ♦9 |
| 190317639 (Comments: 1) | bmwhidden (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks for the edit and welcome to OpenStreetMap! commented 2026-10-10 20:41:38 UTC by pwbriggs ♦520 |
| 190316847 (Comments: 1) | HardPanGolf (Discussed changesets: 1) | I will this go without reverting immediately but "delete first, retrace later" is not how we work in OSM. Instead, you would ideally improve the existing geometries (some editors have explicit tooling support for that kind of edit), or if a... commented 2026-10-10 19:22:46 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187940208 (Comments: 2) | StoneSphere (Discussed changesets: 1) | I didn't know what those numbers were, just that they were incorrectly set as name_1, which is the outdated version of "Altname" I was just updating outdated tags commented 2026-10-10 19:15:59 UTC by StoneSphere ♦3 |
| 189455605 (Comments: 1) | neelyjoe12 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, please do not map features that do not exist yet. Please only map what exists currently on the ground. Thanks! commented 2026-10-10 17:40:29 UTC by Joseph R P ♦476 |
| 190289816 (Comments: 1) | cpeuvrel (Discussed changesets: 3) | The FAA uses / as separators, OpenStreetMap uses ; instead. Please be consistent with OSM usage. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/190289816 commented 2026-10-10 13:51:52 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,623 |
| 189705453 (Comments: 1) | Keelen Brown (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, what does it mean: "oneway==*" on the highway construction North Main Street https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1563350446, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1563350448, and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1563350447 commented 2026-10-10 13:39:39 UTC by chris2map ♦61 |
| 190261717 (Comments: 2) | TheLoller (Discussed changesets: 2) | made a mistake, this was supposed to be the link to nominatim https://nominatim.openstreetmap.org/ui/details.html?osmtype=R&osmid=174885 commented 2026-10-10 12:20:10 UTC by vricciardulli ♦43 |
| 190112421 (Comments: 2) | Swingman7000 (Discussed changesets: 7) | Yeah, natural=bay isn't a definition that shows water... commented 2026-10-10 11:47:24 UTC by ICT_maps ♦23 |
| 190289522 (Comments: 1) | woodpeck (Discussed changesets: 148) | Forest track https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1567029062 and surrounding built-up stuff is only present on lower ESRI imagery zoom levels, goes away when you zoom in. Unclear. commented 2026-10-10 09:09:48 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 190071881 (Comments: 6) | aldotheapache (Discussed changesets: 5) | Dear aldotheapache, have you even read the wiki article pointed out by user MassCartog? Have you understood that you are potentially sabotaging the activities of rescue teams or fire brigades by deleting these paths and - at least in parts - asphalte... commented 2026-10-10 08:37:15 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 190286143 (Comments: 1) | aldotheapache (Discussed changesets: 5) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 190287835 where the changeset comment is: revert deletion of private roads which was repeated after user had been told not to delete commented 2026-10-10 08:31:42 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 190177886 (Comments: 1) | aldotheapache (Discussed changesets: 5) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 190287835 where the changeset comment is: revert deletion of private roads which was repeated after user had been told not to delete commented 2026-10-10 08:31:42 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 190287835 (Comments: 1) | woodpeck (Discussed changesets: 148) | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 190071881, 190177886, 190286040, 190286092, 190286143. commented 2026-10-10 08:31:42 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 190286040 (Comments: 1) | aldotheapache (Discussed changesets: 5) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 190287835 where the changeset comment is: revert deletion of private roads which was repeated after user had been told not to delete commented 2026-10-10 08:31:41 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 190286092 (Comments: 1) | aldotheapache (Discussed changesets: 5) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 190287835 where the changeset comment is: revert deletion of private roads which was repeated after user had been told not to delete commented 2026-10-10 08:31:41 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 189957285 (Comments: 2) | User-2945 (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hello, Compound Street, Sonoita Avenue, Crawford Street, Arroyo Boulevard, and Grand Avenue should remain trunk roads. Not only are they the fastest connection between the freeway and Mexican Federal Highway 15, but you technically left a gap in t... commented 2026-10-10 06:11:49 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦405 |
| 190219702 (Comments: 1) | Trinity Subsurface (Discussed changesets: 4) | As an account mapping on behalf of a commercial business for financial gain, please be advised that you are expected to understand and carefully follow documented OpenStreetMap standards and conventions, which will both directly benefit the quality o... commented 2026-10-10 03:49:50 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 190219425 (Comments: 1) | Trinity Subsurface (Discussed changesets: 4) | As an account mapping on behalf of a commercial business for financial gain, please be advised that you are expected to understand and carefully follow documented OpenStreetMap standards and conventions, which will both directly benefit the quality o... commented 2026-10-10 03:30:32 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 188812606 (Comments: 1) | Pilcrowconsulting (Discussed changesets: 1) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. See https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers for mo... commented 2026-10-10 03:25:01 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 190280030 (Comments: 1) | StreetSurveyor (Discussed changesets: 102) | Looks like you removed the turn lanes and the 1 lane segment. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190280608 commented 2026-10-10 03:14:22 UTC by cubbe8 ♦113 |
| 190257744 (Comments: 1) | ryhuff83 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Actually useful changeset descriptions are appreciated. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/190257744 commented 2026-10-10 03:13:40 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,623 |
| 190260553 (Comments: 1) | Llamaben54 (Discussed changesets: 4) | It's generally best to include names on sidewalks and protected cycleways in addition to the carriageways. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/190260553 |
| 188600962 (Comments: 2) | wylie39 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Closed, see https://www.penbaypilot.com/article/smokestack-grill-closes-forever-class-1981-helping/77463 commented 2026-10-10 03:02:28 UTC by wylie39 ♦2 |
| 190037989 (Comments: 1) | aweech (Discussed changesets: 55) | Correct, this used to be a Burger King, but they tore it down and built a new building commented 2026-10-10 02:38:59 UTC by dknelson9876 ♦166 |
| 190278565 (Comments: 1) | libraryclg (Discussed changesets: 1) | Clarification of changeset: Updated the addresses of Health 1 and Health 2, added an address to Fertitta College of Medicine, and adjusted the sidewalk geometry in front of Health 1 building. The address updates reflect the renaming of Calhoun Road t... commented 2026-10-10 01:17:28 UTC by libraryclg ♦1 |
| 190226235 (Comments: 1) | Paul Fisher (Discussed changesets: 5) | Please don’t add access=foot=no unless there is a legal restriction in place, such as signage explicitly prohibiting pedestrian access. commented 2026-10-10 00:24:40 UTC by StreetSurveyor ♦213 |
| 190057728 (Comments: 2) | Chase Ebeling (Discussed changesets: 1) | Please also note that in OSM, we avoid abbreviations (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Abbreviations) and that the name of this street was already correct, and the "North" part of this address was already present in the name:prefix=* tag... commented 2026-10-10 00:08:39 UTC by dknelson9876 ♦166 |
| 190224385 (Comments: 4) | gbear605 (Discussed changesets: 2) | The revert looks good - thank you for doing that so quickly and with exact coords. The story, more 90%-likely-true lore than hard fact, is that it used to be the normal stone (required to be 4' at installation) but was hit by a snowmobiler lon... commented 2026-10-09 23:50:49 UTC by gdt ♦60 |
| 190267698 (Comments: 2) | YourLocalBasement10 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Also, it is not only a bridge for pedestrians. Bikers will be able to use it. The new bridge will include access ramps on both the north and south sides of Highway 62 to improve access for people with mobility challenges or those who want to ... commented 2026-10-09 23:30:29 UTC by Huong Dang ♦13 |
| 190260373 (Comments: 4) | pallindo (Discussed changesets: 5) | Like I said earlier it should be fine, no need to change it unless someone else complains commented 2026-10-09 22:09:02 UTC by SD Mapman ♦101 |
| 190274014 (Comments: 1) | Klihgtybht7 (Discussed changesets: 2) | looking at this ALPR on various aerial imagery in iD it seems to be within the road area, being positioned like this is highly unlikely so please double check the position of this ALPR and fix it. Happy mapping, Udar. commented 2026-10-09 21:53:09 UTC by Udarian ♦992 |
| 190273989 (Comments: 1) | Klihgtybht7 (Discussed changesets: 2) | looking at this ALPR on various aerial imagery in iD it seems to be within the road area, being positioned like this is highly unlikely so please double check the position of this ALPR and fix it. Happy mapping, Udar. commented 2026-10-09 21:52:03 UTC by Udarian ♦992 |
| 190265835 (Comments: 1) | BTownMapper (Discussed changesets: 1) | Looks good! Thanks for your contributions and welcome to OpenStreetMap! Please feel free to reach out if you have any questions about OSM. ~Peter commented 2026-10-09 21:23:36 UTC by pwbriggs ♦520 |
| 172316673 (Comments: 3) | Joseph R P (Discussed changesets: 238) | Hm. I guess that checks out. Just like how Stockton Hill Rd is the major north–south road in western Kingman and Andy Devine Ave is the major north–south road in eastern Kingman, Northern Avenue is the last west–east through street ... commented 2026-10-09 20:32:27 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦405 |
| 164008308 (Comments: 3) | Joseph R P (Discussed changesets: 238) | I did find some AADT for Meadows Lane and Michael Way between Harmony Avenue and Decatur Boulevard. Unfortunately, TRINA doesn't provide any traffic data for any other intersecting streets, including Harmony Avenue, Temple Drive, Churchill Avenu... commented 2026-10-09 20:21:59 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦405 |
| 190210235 (Comments: 1) | xander78 (Discussed changesets: 14) | Hey there, this area is no longer under construction, the newest Mapbox imagery is from 2024, and all the houses were thrown together super quickly and completed in 2025 commented 2026-10-09 18:17:20 UTC by greatnameguys2472 ♦39 |
| 190266278 (Comments: 1) | xander78 (Discussed changesets: 14) | once again it decided to autofill commented 2026-10-09 17:53:04 UTC by xander78 ♦12 |
| 186410405 (Comments: 1) | smeagle_0 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi there, why did you add cycleways as separate ways when there does not appear to be any physical separation of the bike lane from the road? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/1864... commented 2026-10-09 16:41:45 UTC by democat ♦36 |
| 189546323 (Comments: 2) | Malcolm Maas (Discussed changesets: 14) | yup there was a no trespassing sign commented 2026-10-09 16:20:21 UTC by Malcolm Maas ♦11 |
| 184567625 (Comments: 1) | Murali3 (Discussed changesets: 31) | Hi, your change here was incorrect. This road is North Sias Road and can be verified in Nantucket's online GIS map. commented 2026-10-09 15:52:03 UTC by StreetSurveyor ♦213 |
| 190237109 (Comments: 1) | nevergocloudy (Discussed changesets: 1) | Just to let you know in the future: Houses are tagged as building=house, not landuse=residential (which was already present surrounding the house). Additionally, you mapped the property instead of the building itself. I've fixed these tags so th... commented 2026-10-09 15:43:59 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦405 |
| 190171975 (Comments: 2) | onionsoupandtea (Discussed changesets: 1) | @citrula thank you for the feedback, I have fixed the hours. commented 2026-10-09 14:50:41 UTC by onionsoupandtea ♦1 |
| 190055765 (Comments: 4) | Blahblah_blah (Discussed changesets: 7) | The traffic signals as they appear in OpenStreetMap are based on where you stop for the traffic light (since most of the world has near-side traffic signals and America's the weirdo on this). commented 2026-10-09 12:23:45 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,623 |
| 190219255 (Comments: 1) | flaneurer (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190245781 commented 2026-10-09 10:51:49 UTC by ajmat ♦666 |
| 190216950 (Comments: 1) | Alieko (Discussed changesets: 3) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190243961 commented 2026-10-09 10:08:52 UTC by MappingMore ♦793 |
| 190123632 (Comments: 3) | elafirc (Discussed changesets: 1) | The boundary reflects the City Clerk's Geographic Indexing Atlas (https://data.seattle.gov/dataset/Neighborhood-Map-Atlas-Neighborhoods/w3qt-9btr/about_data) which is explicitly not an accurate representation of neighborhood boundaries. The name... commented 2026-10-09 09:42:07 UTC by elafirc ♦1 |
| 190121465 (Comments: 1) | ArapahoeRoads (Discussed changesets: 2) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190235343 commented 2026-10-09 09:19:06 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,271 |
| 188636658 (Comments: 1) | IWillKillYou (Discussed changesets: 1) | Flock Condor node that is pointed towards children playing in water commented 2026-10-09 07:29:31 UTC by IWillKillYou ♦1 |
| 190115417 (Comments: 1) | kangkankd (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please have a look https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/14256323800. What is the men of the tags License number = #1127564 Service:adu = Yes Service:bathroom_remodel = Yes Service:home_renovation = Yes Service:kitchen_rem... commented 2026-10-09 06:58:29 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,942 |
| 190172882 (Comments: 1) | super awesome man (Discussed changesets: 2) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190235008 commented 2026-10-09 06:41:28 UTC by rajdhani ♦642 |
| 190055863 (Comments: 2) | Blahblah_blah (Discussed changesets: 7) | It's a PTZ camera strapped at the top of the vertical mast that goes all the way to the ground. Usually where the night light attaches to. It's only on one of the traffic lights. There are four lights at this intersection. OSM shows non... commented 2026-10-09 05:47:30 UTC by Blahblah_blah ♦6 |
| 190055748 (Comments: 2) | Blahblah_blah (Discussed changesets: 7) | OSM is not showing the traffic light in it's correct position. It should be on the other side of the intersection. commented 2026-10-09 05:44:55 UTC by Blahblah_blah ♦6 |
| 190055928 (Comments: 2) | Blahblah_blah (Discussed changesets: 7) | It's not hanging in the center of the intersection. It's a PTZ camera strapped to the top of the vertical mast that goes into the ground on only one of the traffic lights in the intersection. Typically trying to place them on the traffic l... commented 2026-10-09 05:43:16 UTC by Blahblah_blah ♦6 |
| 190056025 (Comments: 2) | Blahblah_blah (Discussed changesets: 7) | There are many cameras on the building, but this was not a dome camera, it looked just like the rekor cameras that hang on the traffic lights. And Walmart has stated that they are using ALPRs. https://corporate.walmart.com/privacy-security/wa... commented 2026-10-09 05:39:50 UTC by Blahblah_blah ♦6 |
| 190220680 (Comments: 2) | DiluteTussle (Discussed changesets: 3) | Oh my gosh I didn't see, I assumed it was mapped based on unfinished plans or something. Now it's a giant pile of dirt, what a waste. commented 2026-10-09 05:01:26 UTC by DiluteTussle ♦2 |
| 190228981 (Comments: 1) | monty87 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi there, welcome to OSM! Your changeset looks good, though I would mark it as access=private instead of access=no - =no is when it's completely inaccessible to ANYONE (e.g. permanently closed), while =private is for private ways like this one.<... commented 2026-10-09 03:41:38 UTC by democat ♦36 |
| 190063171 (Comments: 1) | swaxwing (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi swaxwing, in OpenStreetMap we map what's on the ground. This means that if a trail exists but is private or access to the trail is blocked, we still map the trail, but we mark it with an access=* tag to denote that the trail is not access... commented 2026-10-09 03:40:43 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,271 |
| 190118298 (Comments: 2) | MystyYourLocalEnby (Discussed changesets: 2) | You mistakenly tagged the entire school as a building. Also, you put the website as a religion=* instead of website=* I moved it to the correct tag. commented 2026-10-09 02:11:58 UTC by Mxdanger ♦121 |
| 190173836 (Comments: 2) | Metalnob (Discussed changesets: 1) | Good catch! That's a left over from the shape file I started from. Fixed in Changeset: 190228601 commented 2026-10-09 02:01:33 UTC by Metalnob ♦1 |
| 190174415 (Comments: 5) | Jordan Leick (Discussed changesets: 9) | I didn't realize Transit app used OSM for walking directions. I've never used the audio queues. And that's totally fair. The duplication is annoying. commented 2026-10-09 01:38:40 UTC by ion_chi ♦111 |
| 190207153 (Comments: 1) | lolllllllllll (Discussed changesets: 1) | This appears to be centrally located in the middle of a driveway. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/190207153 commented 2026-10-09 01:15:33 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,623 |
| 181337330 (Comments: 5) | zsuraski (Discussed changesets: 1) | Fair enough, I think that's reasonable. I agree with what you have to say here. I'll follow similar practice moving forward. commented 2026-10-09 00:56:14 UTC by zsuraski ♦1 |
| 181498980 (Comments: 2) | cswilson252 (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hi, good to know, thank you! I've updated this to a more comprehensible value as per the OSM wiki page! :) commented 2026-10-09 00:24:56 UTC by cswilson252 ♦36 |
| 190089670 (Comments: 1) | optimistic9 (Discussed changesets: 10) | Is there a particular reason why you deleted the construction roads and left the former freeway in place, rather than doing it the right way, the other way around? The entire plan for this interchange was carefully imported and I personally don'... commented 2026-10-08 23:37:42 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,623 |
| 190225499 (Comments: 1) | Llamaben54 (Discussed changesets: 4) | It's generally a good idea to include street names on carriageways and their sidewalks. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/190225499 commented 2026-10-08 23:31:30 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,623 |
| 190225540 (Comments: 1) | Ale 77 (Discussed changesets: 2) | looking at this ALPR on various aerial imagery in iD it seems to be within the road area, being positioned like this is highly unlikely so please double check the position of this ALPR and fix it. Happy mapping, Udar. commented 2026-10-08 23:09:10 UTC by Udarian ♦992 |
| 190122164 (Comments: 1) | OrdinaryScarlett (Discussed changesets: 70) | Would you mind to explain why you merged those ways? Those ways were intentionally split to accommodate different placement=* tagging. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/190122164 |
| 190122235 (Comments: 1) | OrdinaryScarlett (Discussed changesets: 70) | Why did you merge those ways? Those ways were intentionally split to accommodate different placement=* tagging. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/190122235 commented 2026-10-08 21:29:15 UTC by Frank Peng ♦256 |
| 190122245 (Comments: 2) | OrdinaryScarlett (Discussed changesets: 70) | Also, why did you merge those ways? It looks like those ways were intentionally split to accommodate different placement=* tagging. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/190122245 ... commented 2026-10-08 21:24:26 UTC by Frank Peng ♦256 |
| 190122265 (Comments: 1) | OrdinaryScarlett (Discussed changesets: 70) | Why did you merge those ways? It looks like those ways were intentionally split to accommodate different placement=* tagging. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/190122265 ... commented 2026-10-08 21:19:43 UTC by Frank Peng ♦256 |
| 190122251 (Comments: 1) | OrdinaryScarlett (Discussed changesets: 70) | Why did you merge those ways? It looks like those ways were intentionally split to accommodate different placement=* tagging. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/190122251 ... commented 2026-10-08 21:18:09 UTC by Frank Peng ♦256 |
| 190122717 (Comments: 1) | OrdinaryScarlett (Discussed changesets: 70) | "ce" doesn't tell the average mapper what you changed in this changeset and why. Please take the time to use better changeset comments that describe what you changed and why. Also, why did you merge those ways? It looks like tho... commented 2026-10-08 21:06:14 UTC by Frank Peng ♦256 |
| 190122581 (Comments: 1) | OrdinaryScarlett (Discussed changesets: 70) | Please use better changeset comments that describe what you changed and why, instead of putting "ce" in your changeset comments. Also, why did you merge those ways? It looks like those ways were intentionally split to accommodate dif... commented 2026-10-08 20:57:36 UTC by Frank Peng ♦256 |
| 190122615 (Comments: 1) | OrdinaryScarlett (Discussed changesets: 70) | I would advise against merging those ways as it looks like those ways were intentionally split to accommodate different lanes and turn lanes tagging according to aerial imagery. --- Published using OSMCha... commented 2026-10-08 20:52:27 UTC by Frank Peng ♦256 |
| 190122726 (Comments: 2) | OrdinaryScarlett (Discussed changesets: 70) | Also, I would advise not merging those ways, as it looks like those ways were intentionally segmented to accommodate different lane counts and turn lanes tagging. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmch... commented 2026-10-08 20:48:30 UTC by Frank Peng ♦256 |
| 190221530 (Comments: 1) | VeeBack02 (Discussed changesets: 7) | The correct way exists already at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/37503182 commented 2026-10-08 20:35:58 UTC by VeeBack02 ♦8 |
| 190206276 (Comments: 1) | best_mapper101 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Don't mark the a group of properties as one building! commented 2026-10-08 19:10:17 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,942 |
| 190216272 (Comments: 1) | emma_cons (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please notice: a name isn't a description. Also all way, roar, street (name it) have the key highway (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway) commented 2026-10-08 18:26:58 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,942 |
| 190067361 (Comments: 1) | BMyer1 (Discussed changesets: 1) | When drawing golf course areas (i.e. greens, fairways, bunkers, tees, etc.), please be aware that the ways (lines) used to outline those areas must not cross over each other. Fairway outlines shouldn't cross over greens or bunkers or other fairw... commented 2026-10-08 17:59:47 UTC by b-jazz ♦976 |
| 190214394 (Comments: 1) | woodpeck (Discussed changesets: 148) | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 189665982, 189667228, 189693721, 189697845, 189715515, 189748340, 189860566, 189864860, 189865016, 189908104, 189910689, 189937003, 189960270, 189961641, 189996665, 190002335, 190011322, 190... commented 2026-10-08 17:40:28 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 190214396 (Comments: 1) | woodpeck (Discussed changesets: 148) | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 189665982, 189667228, 189693721, 189697845, 189715515, 189748340, 189860566, 189864860, 189865016, 189908104, 189910689, 189937003, 189960270, 189961641, 189996665, 190002335, 190011322, 190... commented 2026-10-08 17:40:28 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 189937003 (Comments: 1) | ChrisTheMapDude (Discussed changesets: 3) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 190214405, 190214400, 190214389, 190214398, 190214396, 190214394 where the changeset comment is: revert automated edits performed without discussion, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/us... commented 2026-10-08 17:40:27 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 190214405 (Comments: 1) | woodpeck (Discussed changesets: 148) | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 189665982, 189667228, 189693721, 189697845, 189715515, 189748340, 189860566, 189864860, 189865016, 189908104, 189910689, 189937003, 189960270, 189961641, 189996665, 190002335, 190011322, 190... commented 2026-10-08 17:40:27 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 190214400 (Comments: 1) | woodpeck (Discussed changesets: 148) | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 189665982, 189667228, 189693721, 189697845, 189715515, 189748340, 189860566, 189864860, 189865016, 189908104, 189910689, 189937003, 189960270, 189961641, 189996665, 190002335, 190011322, 190... commented 2026-10-08 17:40:27 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 190214398 (Comments: 1) | woodpeck (Discussed changesets: 148) | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 189665982, 189667228, 189693721, 189697845, 189715515, 189748340, 189860566, 189864860, 189865016, 189908104, 189910689, 189937003, 189960270, 189961641, 189996665, 190002335, 190011322, 190... commented 2026-10-08 17:40:27 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 190214389 (Comments: 1) | woodpeck (Discussed changesets: 148) | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 189665982, 189667228, 189693721, 189697845, 189715515, 189748340, 189860566, 189864860, 189865016, 189908104, 189910689, 189937003, 189960270, 189961641, 189996665, 190002335, 190011322, 190... commented 2026-10-08 17:40:27 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 189865016 (Comments: 1) | ChrisTheMapDude (Discussed changesets: 3) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 190214405, 190214400, 190214389, 190214398, 190214396, 190214394 where the changeset comment is: revert automated edits performed without discussion, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/us... commented 2026-10-08 17:40:26 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 189693721 (Comments: 1) | ChrisTheMapDude (Discussed changesets: 3) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 190214405, 190214400, 190214389, 190214398, 190214396, 190214394 where the changeset comment is: revert automated edits performed without discussion, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/us... commented 2026-10-08 17:40:26 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 189667228 (Comments: 1) | ChrisTheMapDude (Discussed changesets: 3) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 190214405, 190214400, 190214389, 190214398, 190214396, 190214394 where the changeset comment is: revert automated edits performed without discussion, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/us... commented 2026-10-08 17:40:26 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 189665982 (Comments: 1) | ChrisTheMapDude (Discussed changesets: 3) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 190214405, 190214400, 190214389, 190214398, 190214396, 190214394 where the changeset comment is: revert automated edits performed without discussion, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/us... commented 2026-10-08 17:40:26 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 190111831 (Comments: 2) | ChrisTheMapDude (Discussed changesets: 3) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 190214405, 190214400, 190214389, 190214398, 190214396, 190214394 where the changeset comment is: revert automated edits performed without discussion, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/us... commented 2026-10-08 17:40:26 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 190205574 (Comments: 1) | ChrisTheMapDude (Discussed changesets: 3) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 190214405, 190214400, 190214389, 190214398, 190214396, 190214394 where the changeset comment is: revert automated edits performed without discussion, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/us... commented 2026-10-08 17:40:25 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 190082283 (Comments: 1) | ChrisTheMapDude (Discussed changesets: 3) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 190214405, 190214400, 190214389, 190214398, 190214396, 190214394 where the changeset comment is: revert automated edits performed without discussion, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/us... commented 2026-10-08 17:40:25 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 190071927 (Comments: 1) | ChrisTheMapDude (Discussed changesets: 3) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 190214405, 190214400, 190214389, 190214398, 190214396, 190214394 where the changeset comment is: revert automated edits performed without discussion, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/us... commented 2026-10-08 17:40:25 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 189908104 (Comments: 1) | ChrisTheMapDude (Discussed changesets: 3) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 190214405, 190214400, 190214389, 190214398, 190214396, 190214394 where the changeset comment is: revert automated edits performed without discussion, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/us... commented 2026-10-08 17:40:25 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 189748340 (Comments: 1) | ChrisTheMapDude (Discussed changesets: 3) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 190214405, 190214400, 190214389, 190214398, 190214396, 190214394 where the changeset comment is: revert automated edits performed without discussion, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/us... commented 2026-10-08 17:40:25 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 189715515 (Comments: 1) | ChrisTheMapDude (Discussed changesets: 3) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 190214405, 190214400, 190214389, 190214398, 190214396, 190214394 where the changeset comment is: revert automated edits performed without discussion, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/us... commented 2026-10-08 17:40:25 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 190108906 (Comments: 2) | ChrisTheMapDude (Discussed changesets: 3) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 190214405, 190214400, 190214389, 190214398, 190214396, 190214394 where the changeset comment is: revert automated edits performed without discussion, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/us... commented 2026-10-08 17:40:24 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 189910689 (Comments: 1) | ChrisTheMapDude (Discussed changesets: 3) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 190214405, 190214400, 190214389, 190214398, 190214396, 190214394 where the changeset comment is: revert automated edits performed without discussion, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/us... commented 2026-10-08 17:40:24 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 189960270 (Comments: 1) | ChrisTheMapDude (Discussed changesets: 3) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 190214405, 190214400, 190214389, 190214398, 190214396, 190214394 where the changeset comment is: revert automated edits performed without discussion, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/us... commented 2026-10-08 17:40:24 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 190046049 (Comments: 1) | ChrisTheMapDude (Discussed changesets: 3) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 190214405, 190214400, 190214389, 190214398, 190214396, 190214394 where the changeset comment is: revert automated edits performed without discussion, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/us... commented 2026-10-08 17:40:24 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 189697845 (Comments: 1) | ChrisTheMapDude (Discussed changesets: 3) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 190214405, 190214400, 190214389, 190214398, 190214396, 190214394 where the changeset comment is: revert automated edits performed without discussion, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/us... commented 2026-10-08 17:40:24 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 189961641 (Comments: 1) | ChrisTheMapDude (Discussed changesets: 3) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 190214405, 190214400, 190214389, 190214398, 190214396, 190214394 where the changeset comment is: revert automated edits performed without discussion, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/us... commented 2026-10-08 17:40:23 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 190011322 (Comments: 1) | ChrisTheMapDude (Discussed changesets: 3) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 190214405, 190214400, 190214389, 190214398, 190214396, 190214394 where the changeset comment is: revert automated edits performed without discussion, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/us... commented 2026-10-08 17:40:23 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 190002335 (Comments: 1) | ChrisTheMapDude (Discussed changesets: 3) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 190214405, 190214400, 190214389, 190214398, 190214396, 190214394 where the changeset comment is: revert automated edits performed without discussion, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/us... commented 2026-10-08 17:40:23 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 190111830 (Comments: 1) | ChrisTheMapDude (Discussed changesets: 3) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 190214405, 190214400, 190214389, 190214398, 190214396, 190214394 where the changeset comment is: revert automated edits performed without discussion, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/us... commented 2026-10-08 17:40:23 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 189860566 (Comments: 1) | ChrisTheMapDude (Discussed changesets: 3) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 190214405, 190214400, 190214389, 190214398, 190214396, 190214394 where the changeset comment is: revert automated edits performed without discussion, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/us... commented 2026-10-08 17:40:22 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 189864860 (Comments: 1) | ChrisTheMapDude (Discussed changesets: 3) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 190214405, 190214400, 190214389, 190214398, 190214396, 190214394 where the changeset comment is: revert automated edits performed without discussion, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/us... commented 2026-10-08 17:40:22 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 189996665 (Comments: 1) | ChrisTheMapDude (Discussed changesets: 3) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 190214405, 190214400, 190214389, 190214398, 190214396, 190214394 where the changeset comment is: revert automated edits performed without discussion, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/us... commented 2026-10-08 17:40:22 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 190205570 (Comments: 1) | ChrisTheMapDude (Discussed changesets: 3) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 190214405, 190214400, 190214389, 190214398, 190214396, 190214394 where the changeset comment is: revert automated edits performed without discussion, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/us... commented 2026-10-08 17:40:21 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 190165053 (Comments: 2) | cryptickryptos (Discussed changesets: 36) | Hi, thanks for pointing that out - I'll delete that. I was using TxGIO's Stratmap parcels dataset to help me map landuse and I accidentally copied one of the areas from it without erasing the tags. commented 2026-10-08 16:06:54 UTC by cryptickryptos ♦37 |
| 188322099 (Comments: 1) | Regain3851 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hey, since we're mapping in the same area I wanted to give you a heads up. I've been using "compacted" as the surface for all these gravel roads since it's more specific. Keep up the good work 😊 commented 2026-10-08 15:37:53 UTC by I W ♦8 |
| 190202976 (Comments: 1) | TheReal_Notebook (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on https://wiki.osm.org for a detail description of the key and values. commented 2026-10-08 14:37:08 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,942 |
| 190196569 (Comments: 1) | Clairness (Discussed changesets: 9) | sources meant to include Esri World Imagery as well commented 2026-10-08 12:10:57 UTC by Clairness ♦10 |
| 190115975 (Comments: 1) | MystyYourLocalEnby (Discussed changesets: 2) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190181420 commented 2026-10-08 06:44:12 UTC by ajmat ♦666 |
| 190106417 (Comments: 1) | skywire (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190180995 commented 2026-10-08 06:33:01 UTC by rajdhani ♦642 |
| 190099016 (Comments: 1) | glasspilot (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190180760 commented 2026-10-08 06:26:33 UTC by rajdhani ♦642 |
| 190062948 (Comments: 1) | Stoose (Discussed changesets: 8) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190180506 commented 2026-10-08 06:19:43 UTC by MappingMore ♦793 |
| 189916826 (Comments: 1) | Living Faith Fitness LLC (Discussed changesets: 1) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-10-08 06:04:39 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 190105977 (Comments: 1) | Stannorth (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190179886 commented 2026-10-08 06:01:32 UTC by rajdhani ♦642 |
| 190165419 (Comments: 1) | Rmacaraig (Discussed changesets: 16) | Yes, if you actually paid attention to any of my guidance or changes on your numerous previous changesets, you'd know that your name=*, addr:street=* is malformed, even more than the previous, and so is your phone=* like before albeit to a lesse... commented 2026-10-08 05:51:24 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 190093567 (Comments: 1) | maskill6 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190179313 commented 2026-10-08 05:43:32 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,271 |
| 190093497 (Comments: 1) | on_thebus68 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190177720 commented 2026-10-08 05:42:56 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,271 |
| 190113524 (Comments: 1) | Alieko (Discussed changesets: 3) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190178434 commented 2026-10-08 05:05:24 UTC by MappingMore ♦793 |
| 190107111 (Comments: 1) | roadsurg (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190178082 commented 2026-10-08 04:52:18 UTC by rajdhani ♦642 |
| 189896389 (Comments: 2) | Sytys (Discussed changesets: 19) | thanks! commented 2026-10-08 02:25:07 UTC by Sytys ♦11 |
| 186032778 (Comments: 1) | occlusion (Discussed changesets: 1) | In future edits, please spell out the street names (e.g., “Drive” rather than “Dr.”). Thanks! commented 2026-10-08 01:05:59 UTC by StreetSurveyor ♦213 |
| 190112487 (Comments: 1) | Peter Hopper (Discussed changesets: 1) | I capitalized the street name and added addresses for the other houses. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/190112487 commented 2026-10-08 00:19:22 UTC by Glassman ♦6,059 |
| 190121803 (Comments: 1) | tunamanz (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome back to OSM. Many many feature you removed in this changeset are valid. Please don’t remove valid OSM data. You might not be aware, on OSM, we do not remove features if they exist on the ground. If it exists on the ground,... commented 2026-10-07 23:36:57 UTC by MassCartog ♦503 |
| 190147478 (Comments: 1) | Larry Fleetwood (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi welcome to OSM! So service roads are a correct way to map a way through a parking lot. Look around the map for other examples. commented 2026-10-07 23:28:55 UTC by MassCartog ♦503 |
| 190172222 (Comments: 1) | EvanSiroky (Discussed changesets: 16) | Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IQp4yhdicoY commented 2026-10-07 23:10:56 UTC by EvanSiroky ♦68 |
| 190122308 (Comments: 1) | OrdinaryScarlett (Discussed changesets: 70) | It looks like those ways were intentionally segmented to accommodate change:lanes=* tagging. Please note that it's good practice on OSM not to remove map objects you don't need or don't like. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good... commented 2026-10-07 22:29:41 UTC by Frank Peng ♦256 |
| 190122334 (Comments: 1) | OrdinaryScarlett (Discussed changesets: 70) | Why did you merge those ways? It looks like those ways were intentionally segmented to accommodate different lanes and turn lanes tagging. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/1901223... commented 2026-10-07 22:26:56 UTC by Frank Peng ♦256 |
| 190122364 (Comments: 1) | OrdinaryScarlett (Discussed changesets: 70) | Just to make you aware that those ways were intentionally segmented to accommodate different lanes and turn lanes tagging. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/190122364 ... commented 2026-10-07 22:25:33 UTC by Frank Peng ♦256 |
| 190122386 (Comments: 1) | OrdinaryScarlett (Discussed changesets: 70) | Why did you merge those ways? Those ways were intentionally segmented for different lane counts and turn lanes tagging. Ways may also be split/segmented to accommodate different route relations. --- Publi... commented 2026-10-07 22:22:55 UTC by Frank Peng ♦256 |
| 190122427 (Comments: 1) | OrdinaryScarlett (Discussed changesets: 70) | Those ways were intentionally segmented for different lane counts and turn lanes tagging. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/190122427 commented 2026-10-07 22:19:56 UTC by Frank Peng ♦256 |
| 110785281 (Comments: 5) | Natfoot (Discussed changesets: 77) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Searching_the_wiki commented 2026-10-07 22:17:52 UTC by Joel Amos ♦30 |
| 176483506 (Comments: 1) | RadLP (Discussed changesets: 1) | A member of the DeFlock Data Quality group drove by this node recently and informed us that no ALPR was present at this location. Due to this node being a vertex on a way, we've opted to only strip the tags to leave the way untouched. commented 2026-10-07 21:40:26 UTC by alpacaMaps ♦431 |
| 190053126 (Comments: 2) | Davisville (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi there, just for your information: This edit seems to have damaged several Protected Area relations and deleted a highway=path. I tried to repair that by reverting your edit. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190167567 pl... commented 2026-10-07 20:18:08 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦4,434 |
| 174739097 (Comments: 2) | luke_unknown (Discussed changesets: 5) | Yes, sorry I must have forgotten to change that when I changed the other POIs after learning the proper way to tag them. commented 2026-10-07 19:02:50 UTC by luke_unknown ♦2 |
| 190058806 (Comments: 1) | ncapple (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190162078 commented 2026-10-07 18:43:49 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,271 |
| 190010237 (Comments: 1) | ktappe (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190150718 commented 2026-10-07 18:41:39 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,271 |
| 190044788 (Comments: 1) | cdcorea (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190149513 commented 2026-10-07 18:41:13 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,271 |
| 190114417 (Comments: 3) | b3rnardino (Discussed changesets: 3) | Yeah fair, I thought after I commented that it was probably an iD thing. No worries. commented 2026-10-07 17:53:57 UTC by pkoby ♦134 |
| 190160259 (Comments: 1) | thePurpleMonkey (Discussed changesets: 1) | This change is End0fLine approved commented 2026-10-07 17:11:44 UTC by End0fLine ♦26 |
| 190157487 (Comments: 1) | Fucktheflockers (Discussed changesets: 1) | looking at this ALPR on various aerial imagery in iD it seems to be within the road area, being positioned like this is highly unlikely so please double check the position of this ALPR and fix it. Happy mapping, Udar. commented 2026-10-07 16:42:12 UTC by Udarian ♦992 |
| 190150746 (Comments: 1) | postylem (Discussed changesets: 1) | This is my first edit (or first in a very long time), so I would welcome any feedback. commented 2026-10-07 16:29:56 UTC by postylem ♦1 |
| 190064575 (Comments: 2) | Flockerdoodle (Discussed changesets: 1) | I am new to this and could not figure out how to post all 4 cameras (posting is kind of confusing for a non-tech person). I assume they are LPRs as there are four cameras pointing down all 4 ways of the 4 way intersection. I have pictures of the came... commented 2026-10-07 16:10:55 UTC by Flockerdoodle ♦1 |
| 190105542 (Comments: 1) | Asistencia Leistung (Discussed changesets: 3) | why did you remove the node for 6802 Northwest 77th Court, I ask because it is exists on the address data set on the Miami Dade open data hub https://opendata.miamidade.gov/datasets/eef6b33da60d47c0964387960c840eea_0/explore?location=25.835057%2C-80.... commented 2026-10-07 15:46:52 UTC by Udarian ♦992 |
| 189233008 (Comments: 1) | Closeapple (Discussed changesets: 7) | In this changeset you created/modified a bench designating it as a bench at a bus stop instead of a bus stop with a bench, that may sound confusing. When designating a bus stop with a bench you first designate the bus stop as a feature, then tag it a... commented 2026-10-07 15:33:39 UTC by cordev1 ♦4 |
| 187611913 (Comments: 4) | Clarke22 (Discussed changesets: 67) | No worries! Signage is really bad, I wouldn't have realized it was private if I hadn't wandered on campus. Thanks for putting the work in! commented 2026-10-07 15:30:49 UTC by HeyRayReh ♦20 |
| 190138848 (Comments: 2) | m8324 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Thank you for letting me know! I’ll keep that in mind next time. commented 2026-10-07 15:10:28 UTC by m8324 ♦20 |
| 189610577 (Comments: 3) | Channel91 (Discussed changesets: 5) | I found two. the rest is a trail now. thanks and happy mapping. commented 2026-10-07 15:03:19 UTC by Natfoot ♦163 |
| 189526565 (Comments: 1) | Shy gear (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! The parking areas are not connected to any parking aisles so they throw an error. If you go into map data and select "Osmose Issues" it will show you exactly what the problem is. The first parking lot I edited I also neatly marked ou... commented 2026-10-07 15:00:22 UTC by cordev1 ♦4 |
| 183574815 (Comments: 7) | Natfoot (Discussed changesets: 77) | well that is the beauty of OSM change it. commented 2026-10-07 14:56:44 UTC by Natfoot ♦163 |
| 103122716 (Comments: 4) | Natfoot (Discussed changesets: 77) | yep, and already talked about and resolved in another mode commented 2026-10-07 14:54:29 UTC by Natfoot ♦163 |
| 189790101 (Comments: 2) | Joel D Reid (Discussed changesets: 3) | Thanks for the note. I've amended the its tagging so it shouldn't appear as a school anymore. commented 2026-10-07 13:34:30 UTC by Joel D Reid ♦4 |
| 190122369 (Comments: 1) | ArapahoeRoads (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello, It looks like you had a few dragged nodes in this edit. I have fixed them, but please be aware in the future thank you commented 2026-10-07 12:44:57 UTC by jjyach ♦46 |
| 190143340 (Comments: 1) | eastern-bank-customer (Discussed changesets: 3) | This was actually at the intersection of Oliver St. and High St. commented 2026-10-07 12:29:40 UTC by eastern-bank-customer ♦3 |
| 190054140 (Comments: 1) | NikoDoo (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190138765 commented 2026-10-07 10:49:44 UTC by rajdhani ♦642 |
| 190008471 (Comments: 1) | fuego63632 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190128211 commented 2026-10-07 07:18:16 UTC by ajmat ♦666 |
| 190019985 (Comments: 1) | Swell-Concepts (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190126585 commented 2026-10-07 06:39:33 UTC by rajdhani ♦642 |
| 190054686 (Comments: 1) | maskill6 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190125818 commented 2026-10-07 06:16:23 UTC by rajdhani ♦642 |
| 190056669 (Comments: 1) | Tokala13 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190123694 commented 2026-10-07 05:30:23 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,271 |
| 190053609 (Comments: 1) | maskill6 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190122903 commented 2026-10-07 05:29:12 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,271 |
| 190029993 (Comments: 1) | John Joseph A Gatchalian (Discussed changesets: 62) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190122102 commented 2026-10-07 05:28:34 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,271 |
| 190014076 (Comments: 1) | John k0ip (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190082079 commented 2026-10-07 05:24:17 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,271 |
| 190057593 (Comments: 1) | NikoDoo (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190076906 commented 2026-10-07 05:20:54 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,271 |
| 190055425 (Comments: 1) | Editex (Discussed changesets: 4) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190071475 commented 2026-10-07 05:16:49 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,271 |
| 190123857 (Comments: 1) | Minh Nguyen (Discussed changesets: 188) | The National Map was another source for this edit (with the caveat that it has a typo). commented 2026-10-07 05:02:40 UTC by Minh Nguyen ♦659 |
| 70497625 (Comments: 2) | Natfoot (Discussed changesets: 77) | okay commented 2026-10-07 04:34:12 UTC by Natfoot ♦163 |
| 63363399 (Comments: 2) | Natfoot (Discussed changesets: 77) | this is all good commented 2026-10-07 04:33:44 UTC by Natfoot ♦163 |
| 63491706 (Comments: 2) | Natfoot (Discussed changesets: 77) | might have thought I was on OHM. commented 2026-10-07 04:32:44 UTC by Natfoot ♦163 |
| 59514082 (Comments: 2) | Natfoot (Discussed changesets: 77) | thanks for the pointers commented 2026-10-07 04:32:14 UTC by Natfoot ♦163 |
| 49973625 (Comments: 2) | Natfoot (Discussed changesets: 77) | Sorry I don't have this information. check: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OpenHistoricalMap/Projects/Railway/BNSF and UP: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OpenHistoricalMap/Projects/Railway/UP commented 2026-10-07 04:31:51 UTC by Natfoot ♦163 |
| 50210558 (Comments: 2) | Natfoot (Discussed changesets: 77) | likely has been changed by now commented 2026-10-07 04:28:45 UTC by Natfoot ♦163 |
| 51954547 (Comments: 2) | Natfoot (Discussed changesets: 77) | cleaning up un-responded to comments commented 2026-10-07 04:28:20 UTC by Natfoot ♦163 |
| 41461656 (Comments: 2) | Natfoot (Discussed changesets: 77) | cleaning up un-responded to comments commented 2026-10-07 04:27:59 UTC by Natfoot ♦163 |
| 78998794 (Comments: 2) | Natfoot (Discussed changesets: 77) | still sidewalks commented 2026-10-07 04:27:21 UTC by Natfoot ♦163 |
| 113251896 (Comments: 2) | Natfoot (Discussed changesets: 77) | not to my understanding. commented 2026-10-07 04:26:53 UTC by Natfoot ♦163 |
| 103861442 (Comments: 2) | Natfoot (Discussed changesets: 77) | no we map what is on the ground. commented 2026-10-07 04:26:22 UTC by Natfoot ♦163 |
| 94529339 (Comments: 2) | Natfoot (Discussed changesets: 77) | I don't use RapiD commented 2026-10-07 04:25:31 UTC by Natfoot ♦163 |
| 94533554 (Comments: 2) | Natfoot (Discussed changesets: 77) | I don't use RapiD commented 2026-10-07 04:25:23 UTC by Natfoot ♦163 |
| 94558076 (Comments: 2) | Natfoot (Discussed changesets: 77) | I don't use RapiD commented 2026-10-07 04:25:10 UTC by Natfoot ♦163 |
| 90471856 (Comments: 2) | Natfoot (Discussed changesets: 77) | thanks for pointing that out commented 2026-10-07 04:24:16 UTC by Natfoot ♦163 |
| 88184704 (Comments: 2) | Natfoot (Discussed changesets: 77) | thanks for mapping. commented 2026-10-07 04:23:51 UTC by Natfoot ♦163 |
| 73198958 (Comments: 2) | Natfoot (Discussed changesets: 77) | thanks for pointing this out. commented 2026-10-07 04:22:36 UTC by Natfoot ♦163 |
| 79269540 (Comments: 2) | Natfoot (Discussed changesets: 77) | thanks commented 2026-10-07 04:20:15 UTC by Natfoot ♦163 |
| 105702820 (Comments: 2) | Natfoot (Discussed changesets: 77) | unclear on what reviewer is saying commented 2026-10-07 04:19:56 UTC by Natfoot ♦163 |
| 105748118 (Comments: 2) | Natfoot (Discussed changesets: 77) | reviewer never deleted my rocks nor changed them correctly. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190122871 commented 2026-10-07 04:15:00 UTC by Natfoot ♦163 |
| 143393520 (Comments: 2) | Natfoot (Discussed changesets: 77) | likely was commented 2026-10-07 04:08:52 UTC by Natfoot ♦163 |
| 179225335 (Comments: 2) | Natfoot (Discussed changesets: 77) | thanks commented 2026-10-07 04:08:04 UTC by Natfoot ♦163 |
| 181597584 (Comments: 2) | Natfoot (Discussed changesets: 77) | it was changed. it still shows up on old imagery. commented 2026-10-07 04:07:36 UTC by Natfoot ♦163 |
| 190116625 (Comments: 1) | Tokala13 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Looks good! Sorry if I came off as a bit snappy yesterday. If you keep up mapping as a hobby you should get involved with OSM Deep South. We're pretty active nowadays in the Louisiana channel https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OpenStreetMap_Dee... commented 2026-10-07 03:18:58 UTC by JuanElDemografo ♦59 |
| 190118451 (Comments: 1) | TheNightRider (Discussed changesets: 53) | Forgot to put comments for Tesla Supercharger: update branding per NSI changes. commented 2026-10-07 03:06:55 UTC by TheNightRider ♦90 |
| 189856728 (Comments: 5) | dolph13 (Discussed changesets: 2) | thanks and happy mapping. commented 2026-10-07 01:53:05 UTC by Natfoot ♦163 |
| 190063047 (Comments: 1) | Lucas Burckhard (Discussed changesets: 2) | Device has not been removed commented 2026-10-07 01:42:26 UTC by DeFlock_Admin ♦2 |
| 190065836 (Comments: 1) | Lucas Burckhard (Discussed changesets: 2) | Device has not been removed commented 2026-10-07 01:42:09 UTC by DeFlock_Admin ♦2 |
| 182902689 (Comments: 2) | TheNightRider (Discussed changesets: 53) | Depending on what type of logistics center, this landuse area might need to be split into separate industrial and commercial areas. commented 2026-10-07 00:05:00 UTC by TheNightRider ♦90 |
| 184250463 (Comments: 7) | Flap Slimy Outward (Discussed changesets: 313) | None of the site addresses include a directional either, according to that GIS application. (The USPS doesn’t deliver to any addresses along the street.) This weakens the case for including a directional. Still, North Horizon Boulevard should a... commented 2026-10-06 23:52:04 UTC by Minh Nguyen ♦659 |
| 189844727 (Comments: 1) | BirdBikeBonanza (Discussed changesets: 2) | Another "please report bike lane violators to 311" block. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/189844727 commented 2026-10-06 23:38:54 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,623 |
| 189840646 (Comments: 1) | BirdBikeBonanza (Discussed changesets: 2) | Please do report parking violations in the bike lane and daylighting zones to 311 if you spot 'em. It's a real problem on this block and endangers cyclists and pedestrians when drivers do that. --- #REVIEWED_G... commented 2026-10-06 23:37:04 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,623 |
| 190116866 (Comments: 1) | oh_finks (Discussed changesets: 3) | Meant to say that I added the website link, Sorry. commented 2026-10-06 22:40:21 UTC by oh_finks ♦3 |
| 188497509 (Comments: 3) | wolfgang8741 (Discussed changesets: 23) | Thanks for a fix! And even more, thanks for your mapping in general! Have a nice day! commented 2026-10-06 22:34:58 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,339 |
| 190105311 (Comments: 1) | ncowen (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi welcome to OSM. instead of removing features that exist on the ground because there feature type is wrong, please just update that feature type. So for example change them to driveway feature type. commented 2026-10-06 22:32:48 UTC by MassCartog ♦503 |
| 168463562 (Comments: 3) | mycota (Discussed changesets: 16) | Thanks for a fix! And even more, thanks for your mapping in general! Have a nice day! commented 2026-10-06 22:32:35 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,339 |
| 190060170 (Comments: 5) | Tokala13 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Double checked, and you are correct. Not sure how I mistook where the seam was and what the material was. First day of working with the map though so maybe I zoomed out too far and mistook where the pin was. Same for the sidewalk out front that one I... commented 2026-10-06 22:31:02 UTC by Tokala13 ♦1 |
| 190110297 (Comments: 1) | dfw_mapfixer (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted in changeset 190115950. See my comment in changeset 190066231. commented 2026-10-06 22:30:39 UTC by schobbish ♦87 |
| 189211360 (Comments: 2) | rll55 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks for the feedback, I will delete this duplicate feature. commented 2026-10-06 21:58:17 UTC by rll55 ♦1 |
| 190066231 (Comments: 1) | dfw_mapfixer (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted in changeset 190114928. Due to licensing issues, do not copy any info from Google. I would even stay away from business websites without another way to verify. I noticed this was mapped in a hotel—generally businesses without a ... commented 2026-10-06 21:48:58 UTC by schobbish ♦87 |
| 185385850 (Comments: 1) | sadadada (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello, this rail line makes no logical sense. could you provide any website or details about this? I have edited railroads in the past including a very fictional railroad in the south this follows these same keys to look for. Are these edits made... commented 2026-10-06 20:32:38 UTC by Natfoot ♦163 |
| 189383867 (Comments: 1) | heftych1 (Discussed changesets: 7) | best to ask in the change set that made it. commented 2026-10-06 20:24:01 UTC by Natfoot ♦163 |
| 190103602 (Comments: 1) | mil-brat-71 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello. This edit adds name=surveillance to an existing untagged geometry node that is part of the road. surveillance is a description rather than a real-world name, so it should not be entered in name=*. If there is a verified surveill... commented 2026-10-06 18:54:16 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦7,210 |
| 190103680 (Comments: 1) | mil-brat-71 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello and welcome to OSM. I noticed that this changeset changed an existing highway=traffic_signals junction node into name=surveillance. If there is an ALPR camera here, please map the camera as a separate node at its actual location ... commented 2026-10-06 18:52:04 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦7,210 |
| 190093467 (Comments: 3) | lowz (Discussed changesets: 1) | Got it. I've reverted that part of your change commented 2026-10-06 18:30:12 UTC by ion_chi ♦111 |
| 190101785 (Comments: 1) | Asistencia Leistung (Discussed changesets: 3) | First a question, I am assuming that https://confidomedical.com/ is the businesses website. Second buildings should not be within each other, so I deleted the way and transferred all the information I could to a node. If that is the actual shape of t... commented 2026-10-06 16:59:01 UTC by Udarian ♦992 |
| 190101164 (Comments: 2) | mbeyerle (Discussed changesets: 50) | For the locations that have retail operations, one should consider adding the appropriate second_hand=[yes]/[only] tags, ideally after a survey or via local knowledge commented 2026-10-06 16:50:17 UTC by mbeyerle ♦55 |
| 189906598 (Comments: 3) | Malcolm Maas (Discussed changesets: 14) | sounds good thanks commented 2026-10-06 16:33:15 UTC by Malcolm Maas ♦11 |
| 190055036 (Comments: 1) | jumbanho (Discussed changesets: 23) | Thanks for making this change. I've been trying to remove these suffixes/prefixes where they don't belong too commented 2026-10-06 15:01:19 UTC by ion_chi ♦111 |
| 190084191 (Comments: 1) | benn3tt (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi benn3tt, Please don't change phone numbers to non-standard formats, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:phone#Usage commented 2026-10-06 14:45:34 UTC by ion_chi ♦111 |
| 182182542 (Comments: 2) | ion_chi (Discussed changesets: 14) | Thanks for deleting the duplicate. The source for these was from walking around Saugatuck. I don't remember the Southerner specifically; I might have misplaced the node in the app or my phone's GPS was acting up commented 2026-10-06 13:53:51 UTC by ion_chi ♦111 |
| 188596633 (Comments: 1) | w0x0f (Discussed changesets: 7) | Thanks for updating the parkway closures! Be careful when updating construction areas - this left all of the overlooks 'hanging' as still under construction, and some other changesets removed the construction tags but left 'access=no&#... commented 2026-10-06 13:09:32 UTC by rivermont ♦246 |
| 190059113 (Comments: 1) | Connoljj (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190077488 commented 2026-10-06 08:52:36 UTC by rajdhani ♦642 |
| 190053724 (Comments: 1) | Rmacaraig (Discussed changesets: 16) | You managed to for the second time in a row remove the building that your POI exists in while adding a duplicate of the POI to the entire building, when it is in fact only one unit in said (no longer existing) building--all when it was already tagged... commented 2026-10-06 06:59:39 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 190043315 (Comments: 1) | Rmacaraig (Discussed changesets: 16) | Why keep wasting your own time, just to degrade quality of your own client's POI in OpenStreetMap and then have it immediately reverted, instead of actually engaging in productive discussion? It's getting you absolutely nowhere. http... commented 2026-10-06 06:54:47 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 144032079 (Comments: 3) | jonwit (Discussed changesets: 3) | Nice ok thanks! I appreciate those details. I made the discussed changes here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190068616 If you live in the DC area, you should check out Seven Springs. It has some of the best skiing in Virginia, Pe... commented 2026-10-06 05:35:07 UTC by arichnad ♦46 |
| 188280089 (Comments: 1) | SCS721 (Discussed changesets: 3) | The same thing here, this road is closed to vehicles, but it is open to hiking. commented 2026-10-06 03:39:51 UTC by matthewfecica ♦17 |
| 188280070 (Comments: 1) | SCS721 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi this is a hiking trail, and pedestrians ARE allowed here. commented 2026-10-06 03:39:20 UTC by matthewfecica ♦17 |
| 188279947 (Comments: 1) | SCS721 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi, this is a hiking trail, and pedestrians ARE allowed here. commented 2026-10-06 03:37:47 UTC by matthewfecica ♦17 |
| 177694515 (Comments: 2) | Flap Slimy Outward (Discussed changesets: 313) | Okay. I'll modify the way and the relations. commented 2026-10-06 03:29:37 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦405 |
| 189881355 (Comments: 1) | mwitmer (Discussed changesets: 1) | thank you- I combined the park area and node but I wasn't sure which one was right commented 2026-10-06 02:59:38 UTC by dmjab13 ♦153 |
| 189356159 (Comments: 5) | ianrbuck (Discussed changesets: 6) | Thanks, I'll check this out commented 2026-10-06 02:36:59 UTC by ion_chi ♦111 |
| 151998794 (Comments: 3) | AntiCompositeNumber (Discussed changesets: 13) | The exact opening dates and hours change every year based on the calendar and staffing. See https://www.cannonmt.com/attractions/echo-lake-beach for the up-to-date information. commented 2026-10-06 01:07:02 UTC by AntiCompositeNumber ♦38 |
| 189907333 (Comments: 2) | AFTERLIGHT (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thanks b-jazz, sorry for my error. I'll go back over these as soon as possible. Thank you for the link, I've bookmarked it and will use the instructions moving forward. commented 2026-10-05 23:54:18 UTC by AFTERLIGHT ♦2 |
| 189893640 (Comments: 3) | oscarm_lyft (Discussed changesets: 10) | Awesome, thank you for checking commented 2026-10-05 23:30:15 UTC by dknelson9876 ♦166 |
| 189834529 (Comments: 1) | xander78 (Discussed changesets: 14) | It's in the wall? Or which side of the wall is it on? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/189834529 commented 2026-10-05 23:02:53 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,623 |
| 190054516 (Comments: 1) | Mdaves (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, thanks for the updates! Would you mind double-checking Il Forno's hours (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6382318685)? On Fridays and Saturdays it's only open for...30 minutes? commented 2026-10-05 21:04:05 UTC by PuddlesMapping ♦25 |
| 189854855 (Comments: 2) | Ashley Connor (Discussed changesets: 1) | Sorry. New to this. commented 2026-10-05 20:44:47 UTC by Ashley Connor ♦1 |
| 176727911 (Comments: 6) | Joseph R P (Discussed changesets: 238) | I wouldn't re-map it considering it's an intermittent temporary feature. Since the changes made on OSM take a while to be reflected in the services that use the data, mapping and deleting an object repeatedly will cause many maps and router... commented 2026-10-05 20:31:59 UTC by Joseph R P ♦476 |
| 189334261 (Comments: 2) | Snowshoe Outlet (Discussed changesets: 1) | I thought there was a function to do that, but I couldn't find it. Thank you! commented 2026-10-05 17:48:19 UTC by Snowshoe Outlet ♦1 |
| 190047620 (Comments: 1) | Emerson Straw Injury & Car Accident Lawyers Palm Harbor (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thank you very much for adding your spammy description again ... 🤷♂️ commented 2026-10-05 16:57:24 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦7,210 |
| 170482981 (Comments: 1) | Emerson Straw Injury & Car Accident Lawyers Palm Harbor (Discussed changesets: 2) | Partly reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170497797 commented 2026-10-05 16:56:05 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦7,210 |
| 187013742 (Comments: 2) | Palary (Discussed changesets: 27) | Hi Sytys, my edit was focusing on how 1200 East and 1000 North were connected to the roundabout. Thank you for making the corrections on the bus relation I missed. I think all is good there. All the best. commented 2026-10-05 11:28:24 UTC by Palary ♦28 |
| 189985058 (Comments: 1) | fuego63632 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190029153 commented 2026-10-05 11:22:19 UTC by rajdhani ♦642 |
| 189537327 (Comments: 2) | alena karpenka (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, thank you for pointing this out. I missed the demolished:highway=trunk_link tag in this case, and I’ll make sure to pay closer attention to such tags in the future. I appreciate you taking the time to correct it. Best regards, Alena. commented 2026-10-05 06:41:27 UTC by alena karpenka ♦1 |
| 113466273 (Comments: 1) | Chronoshift (Discussed changesets: 34) | Hey, Chronoshift! I noticed you added some opening_hours=* values with 2022 dates a while ago... Since the dates have passed, these values are now invalid. Would you like me to remove them? If so, would you like me to remove the associated po... commented 2026-10-05 05:03:56 UTC by PostaMap_Infinite ♦83 |
| 190007293 (Comments: 1) | Hakan Nizam (Discussed changesets: 1) | I was there a few days ago. commented 2026-10-05 02:18:47 UTC by Hakan Nizam ♦1 |
| 189988768 (Comments: 1) | Rmacaraig (Discussed changesets: 16) | Please stop spamdelizing your own client's POIs with invalid tags, this time converting the existing valid phone=* to a syntactically invalid format. Reverted in changeset 190008017 commented 2026-10-05 01:29:58 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 190004129 (Comments: 1) | UnFlockMeNow (Discussed changesets: 11) | its now in the middle of a residential building, please double check on AERIAL IMAGERY (like bing or esri) and fix its position. Happy mapping, Udar commented 2026-10-04 22:12:09 UTC by Udarian ♦992 |
| 190003889 (Comments: 1) | UnFlockMeNow (Discussed changesets: 11) | On the imagery this is either in the middle of a residential building or inside of someone's backyard, either way its position is highly unlikely and should be updated with aerial imagery to a more correct position. Happy mapping, Uda... commented 2026-10-04 22:10:12 UTC by Udarian ♦992 |
| 190003800 (Comments: 1) | UnFlockMeNow (Discussed changesets: 11) | looking at this ALPR on various aerial imagery in iD it seems to be within the area of a driveway, being positioned like this is highly unlikely so please double check the position of this ALPR and fix it. Happy mapping, Udar. commented 2026-10-04 22:05:45 UTC by Udarian ♦992 |
| 190003695 (Comments: 1) | UnFlockMeNow (Discussed changesets: 11) | On meany aerial imagery this ALPR is in the middle of the sidewalk, that is a unlikely position for an ALPR, please double check the position and fix it if need be. Either way please respond, I have left comments on multiple changsets of yours alread... commented 2026-10-04 22:02:50 UTC by Udarian ♦992 |
| 190003651 (Comments: 1) | UnFlockMeNow (Discussed changesets: 11) | looking at this ALPR on various aerial imagery in iD it seems to be within the road area, being positioned like this is highly unlikely so please double check the position of this ALPR and fix it. Happy mapping, Udar. commented 2026-10-04 21:59:44 UTC by Udarian ♦992 |
| 190003475 (Comments: 1) | UnFlockMeNow (Discussed changesets: 11) | looking at this ALPR on various aerial imagery in iD it seems to be within the road area, being positioned like this is highly unlikely so please double check the position of this ALPR and fix it. Happy mapping, Udar. commented 2026-10-04 21:58:57 UTC by Udarian ♦992 |
| 190003721 (Comments: 1) | UnFlockMeNow (Discussed changesets: 11) | looking at this ALPR on various aerial imagery in iD it seems to be within the road area, being positioned like this is highly unlikely so please double check the position of this ALPR and fix it. Happy mapping, Udar. commented 2026-10-04 21:54:40 UTC by Udarian ♦992 |
| 190003319 (Comments: 1) | UnFlockMeNow (Discussed changesets: 11) | looking at this ALPR on various aerial imagery in iD it seems to be within the road area, being positioned like this is highly unlikely so please double check the position of this ALPR and fix it. Happy mapping, Udar. commented 2026-10-04 21:49:08 UTC by Udarian ♦992 |
| 190003341 (Comments: 1) | UnFlockMeNow (Discussed changesets: 11) | looking at this ALPR on various aerial imagery in iD it seems to be within the road area, being positioned like this is highly unlikely so please double check the position of this ALPR and fix it. Happy mapping, Udar. commented 2026-10-04 21:46:19 UTC by Udarian ♦992 |
| 190003385 (Comments: 1) | UnFlockMeNow (Discussed changesets: 11) | looking at this ALPR on various aerial imagery in iD it seems to be within the road area, being positioned like this is highly unlikely so please double check the position of this ALPR and fix it. Happy mapping, Udar. commented 2026-10-04 21:42:38 UTC by Udarian ♦992 |
| 189907811 (Comments: 1) | heashby15 (Discussed changesets: 1) | The tag access=private is for ways that have no trespassing signs posted at the entrance to the road. It's likely a privately maintained road, if so a better tag is ownership=private. --- Published u... commented 2026-10-04 20:24:04 UTC by Glassman ♦6,059 |
| 75418280 (Comments: 1) | lmason_aph (Discussed changesets: 7) | Was this temporary back then? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6860579058/history/1 commented 2026-10-04 20:13:50 UTC by 9_tab ♦168 |
| 186788364 (Comments: 1) | Motor City Elevator Co (Discussed changesets: 4) | Are you sure this camera is gone? After you removed it, someone else added another one at the same location and created a note about it? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/14078155601 https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5439560 commented 2026-10-04 19:30:33 UTC by m8324 ♦20 |
| 189995203 (Comments: 1) | shawnziv (Discussed changesets: 1) | I'm making this edit to allow my mailing address to be recognized (which is on Trestle View St.). While there is no signage on the street, it is indicated as Trestle View in my mailing address and also on the signage in our mail room. I didn... commented 2026-10-04 18:15:35 UTC by shawnziv ♦1 |
| 189959214 (Comments: 3) | Jonathan7890123456 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Thanks for calling attention to that. I had yet to review their deletions but I do see many that are too spread out for valid 'drive-by-changes' so I believe restoring those nodes will be next. commented 2026-10-04 17:04:13 UTC by alpacaMaps ♦431 |
| 189959199 (Comments: 1) | Jonathan7890123456 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Are you sure that this camera and the many others you have deleted are actually gone? commented 2026-10-04 16:58:27 UTC by greatnameguys2472 ♦39 |
| 189959212 (Comments: 1) | Jonathan7890123456 (Discussed changesets: 3) | This changeset adds one or more ALPR cameras in a spot that looks unlikely — the nodes are in the water.\r \r We'd kindly ask that you avoid adding cameras that aren't actually there, and that you remove any temporary or test no... commented 2026-10-04 16:46:21 UTC by alpacaMaps ♦431 |
| 189988956 (Comments: 1) | Julysfire (Discussed changesets: 7) | #maproulette commented 2026-10-04 16:30:33 UTC by Julysfire ♦7 |
| 189989851 (Comments: 1) | Julysfire (Discussed changesets: 7) | #maproulette commented 2026-10-04 16:30:31 UTC by Julysfire ♦7 |
| 189989252 (Comments: 1) | chumpy100 (Discussed changesets: 2) | sorry, i meant to select aerial imagery. not streetlevel imagery. commented 2026-10-04 16:08:00 UTC by chumpy100 ♦1 |
| 189980219 (Comments: 1) | Mike Glover (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi again, your changeset has been reverted for removing valid features for invalid reasons. You have been asked before not to do this, seems you are now intentionally ignoring feedback and vandalizing OSM data. commented 2026-10-04 15:33:19 UTC by MassCartog ♦503 |
| 189769537 (Comments: 1) | m7c1m0 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189984116 commented 2026-10-04 14:39:09 UTC by MappingMore ♦793 |
| 188339360 (Comments: 2) | UnFlockMeNow (Discussed changesets: 11) | please respond commented 2026-10-04 12:48:03 UTC by Udarian ♦992 |
| 157859224 (Comments: 1) | TheMingus (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12249759234/history has amenity = waste_basket;recycling that was added in this edit it is better to avoid https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Semi-colon_value_separator here see amenity=waste_baske... commented 2026-10-04 11:27:18 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,339 |
| 188881488 (Comments: 1) | im_tau (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi, when adding parking lots, please map the whole parking area as amenity=parking instead of mapping each row of parking bays as its own parking lot. You can read more here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dparking I have fixed i... commented 2026-10-04 11:18:13 UTC by Vi2727 ♦41 |
| 130432613 (Comments: 1) | andrewpmk (Discussed changesets: 89) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10282662501/history has amenity = waste_basket;recycling that was added in this edit it is better to avoid https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Semi-colon_value_separator here see amenity=waste_baske... commented 2026-10-04 07:04:22 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,339 |
| 112235664 (Comments: 1) | craftly (Discussed changesets: 1) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. See https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers for mo... commented 2026-10-04 06:21:54 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 189718960 (Comments: 1) | getsimpleboxcon (Discussed changesets: 2) | As an account mapping on behalf of a commercial business for financial gain, please be advised that you are expected to understand and carefully follow documented OpenStreetMap standards and conventions, which will both directly benefit the quality o... commented 2026-10-04 06:01:26 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 189766187 (Comments: 1) | getsimpleboxcon (Discussed changesets: 2) | As an account mapping on behalf of a commercial business for financial gain, please be advised that you are expected to understand and carefully follow documented OpenStreetMap standards and conventions, which will both directly benefit the quality o... commented 2026-10-04 05:59:50 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 189903045 (Comments: 1) | Chase Travels (Discussed changesets: 1) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. See https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers for mo... commented 2026-10-04 05:26:11 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 189956567 (Comments: 1) | Mayor Dmytro Cancún nyc Kishenko (Discussed changesets: 1) | DWG revert - sock-puppet vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189959442 commented 2026-10-04 04:05:04 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,101 |
| 189919207 (Comments: 1) | confusedbuffalo-bot (Discussed changesets: 28) | poor Pho Bac Hoa Viet Restaurant bro commented 2026-10-04 03:48:32 UTC by bobthebuilder423468 ♦18 |
| 179674386 (Comments: 1) | Adam850 (Discussed changesets: 12) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13637495309/history has label = S that was added in this edit is it confusing version of inscription=S or does it have some other meaning? If it has different meaning, what it actually means? commented 2026-10-04 03:33:15 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,339 |
| 65767998 (Comments: 1) | Kel Black (Discussed changesets: 1) | K blackburn B Hoffman commented 2026-10-04 02:19:04 UTC by Kel Black ♦1 |
| 189956206 (Comments: 1) | Nile_thebest (Discussed changesets: 1) | oops I forgot to finish the changeset comment i meant to say "added features to Duffield, VA" commented 2026-10-04 00:39:34 UTC by Nile_thebest ♦2 |
| 189944517 (Comments: 1) | tcarlisle (Discussed changesets: 37) | Hello tcarlisle, Customer only access may have been the more correct tag to add here. We(I'm a part of the Antelope Island Trail crew) have a big electric sign at the entrance to the campsite indicating that the roads on the campsite are only... commented 2026-10-04 00:00:08 UTC by yetanotherhiker ♦3 |
| 189945044 (Comments: 1) | tcarlisle (Discussed changesets: 37) | Hey Tcarlisle, The edit that was here before was accurate. We(I'm a part of the Antelope Island Trail crew) have a physical barricade where I split the trail the top half is open to the public we don't really recognize it as a trail but ... commented 2026-10-03 23:57:13 UTC by yetanotherhiker ♦3 |
| 189952205 (Comments: 1) | TheNightRider (Discussed changesets: 53) | Forgot to list this source: https://www.ent.com/our-locations/denver-region/lakewood-service-center/ commented 2026-10-03 21:34:15 UTC by TheNightRider ♦90 |
| 189842036 (Comments: 1) | BeaconOSM (Discussed changesets: 84) | This is in Wisconsin, not Illinois. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/189842036 commented 2026-10-03 20:23:06 UTC by Frank Peng ♦256 |
| 189654340 (Comments: 2) | bb010g (Discussed changesets: 2) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Frame&Focus : Yeah, it's functionally a repair/evolution of the same garage but it also _is_ technically a new building in the same location, aside from probably reusing the foundation. I don't know wh... commented 2026-10-03 19:22:10 UTC by bb010g ♦2 |
| 63916602 (Comments: 5) | rivermont (Discussed changesets: 69) | When these changes were made in 2018, `lamp_mount=wall` had around 200 used so I don't think I was aware of it. Feel free to fix to the correct current tagging! commented 2026-10-03 18:19:49 UTC by rivermont ♦246 |
| 188544060 (Comments: 3) | ChrissW-R1 (Discussed changesets: 211) | Hi @ChrissW-R1 , thanks for the considerate response! I already finished fixing it, and have no particular reason to suspect it doesn't exist on the ground or is copied from Google, etc, so I certainly wouldn't delete it at this poin... commented 2026-10-03 17:56:39 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 186260636 (Comments: 1) | Funkytoad (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, I was wondering how recent your knowledge of the gas stations in Rainier is. You changed the one on Centre Street from Shell to Chevron. A few months before I had changed it to Shell though, because a local told me that Shell moved from the old ... commented 2026-10-03 17:53:51 UTC by cuzi ♦197 |
| 189940582 (Comments: 1) | shinterro (Discussed changesets: 15) | For context, "Atlantic Station" can refer to both the major retail destination as well as the larger planned neighborhood. They both exist on the map currently but are a bit messy. This change attempts to reconcile and clean up these bounda... commented 2026-10-03 16:58:46 UTC by shinterro ♦16 |
| 189895195 (Comments: 1) | nbargolf (Discussed changesets: 4) | This changeset has been reverted as it duplicated existing information. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189941365 for details. commented 2026-10-03 16:46:58 UTC by b-jazz ♦976 |
| 189933822 (Comments: 5) | Joseph R P (Discussed changesets: 238) | US 460 is definitely still along the original alignment in Virginia, according to the Virginia Roads LRS Route Master (https://www.virginiaroads.org/datasets/VDOT::lrs-route-master/explore). Users on the AARoads forum found signage for US Route 460 o... commented 2026-10-03 16:43:59 UTC by Joseph R P ♦476 |
| 189831810 (Comments: 1) | berrymandj (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hey Berry, When FairwayMapper tells you there is an overlap, please make sure you are cleaning up the original and not leaving duplicate fairways and other objects. Better yet, if you could modify the original objects so that history is mainta... commented 2026-10-03 15:52:35 UTC by b-jazz ♦976 |
| 189327559 (Comments: 3) | SikeMo (Discussed changesets: 11) | I was under that impression as well, and was a bit surprised to find that signage there. But my understanding with OSM naming convention is that what's physically on the ground has priority as 'name=' commented 2026-10-03 15:10:40 UTC by btwhite92 ♦112 |
| 189845795 (Comments: 3) | Stetson P (Discussed changesets: 3) | Fain Rd, even through the interchange, should probably remain trunk until its remaining at-grade intersections are built up to interchanges since it technically isn't fully up to freeway standards yet. The highway=trunk tag with expressway=yes h... commented 2026-10-03 14:43:17 UTC by Joseph R P ♦476 |
| 189891805 (Comments: 2) | slipstream-wa (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hey Frame&Focus! This is primarily from research from https://www.evergreenmtb.org/trails commented 2026-10-03 12:34:40 UTC by slipstream-wa ♦2 |
| 183942256 (Comments: 2) | ChrissW-R1 (Discussed changesets: 211) | Please check my new comment: https://osm.org/changeset/188544060#c1671067 commented 2026-10-03 11:48:24 UTC by ChrissW-R1 ♦454 |
| 189798278 (Comments: 3) | fuck4ndyt0wns3nd (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks @fluffycupcakes commented 2026-10-03 07:42:37 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦7,210 |
| 189859930 (Comments: 1) | Rmacaraig (Discussed changesets: 16) | First off, if you had good faith questions about this or believed your edits were correct, I'm not sure why you wouldn't simply reply saying so to my very first comment on your changesets a week ago, instead of only doing indirectly in a ch... commented 2026-10-03 05:36:26 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 189906687 (Comments: 1) | Flap Slimy Outward (Discussed changesets: 313) | Dear Mapbox... Why on EARTH would you put HIGHWAY shields on BIKE trails? If ANY symbol should be rendered on top of bike trails, it should be the official shields (for example, those found on the ground) and NOT an arbitrary shield constructed in... commented 2026-10-03 04:58:39 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦405 |
| 189907517 (Comments: 3) | yetanotherhiker (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks for the reply, its no problem! Thanks for the other updates you have been making! good stuff. Happy mapping! commented 2026-10-03 03:16:30 UTC by MassCartog ♦503 |
| 189906098 (Comments: 1) | Flap Slimy Outward (Discussed changesets: 313) | So, Clark County GIS officially recognizes the segment between Stewart Avenue and Mesquite Avenue as "North Rue 13," even though street signs still refer to the thoroughfare as "North 13th Street." Which name should I use? I swear... commented 2026-10-03 01:30:52 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦405 |
| 173467221 (Comments: 3) | mbeyerle (Discussed changesets: 50) | Thanks! commented 2026-10-02 23:58:56 UTC by Entbert ♦41 |
| 189851283 (Comments: 2) | Akiba220 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Ok will do in future. commented 2026-10-02 22:36:23 UTC by Akiba220 ♦5 |
| 189900523 (Comments: 1) | CatFitness (Discussed changesets: 7) | Added wetland areas as well. commented 2026-10-02 21:13:32 UTC by CatFitness ♦5 |
| 185623681 (Comments: 1) | fintler (Discussed changesets: 14) | If you're not sure of the shape of a building, it's better to use a building node than to guess the shape or make one up. If you are tracing from imagery, please use the "square" function (shortcut Q) to make sure that the corners... commented 2026-10-02 20:33:54 UTC by impiaaa ♦502 |
| 189882505 (Comments: 1) | fintler (Discussed changesets: 14) | Please only mark roads as open if you're sure they're open right now. We don't want any apps telling users to drive down roads with still wet asphalt! commented 2026-10-02 20:32:28 UTC by impiaaa ♦502 |
| 189898453 (Comments: 1) | JackIV_ (Discussed changesets: 1) | I am fairly new to this, but do intend to do a semi-thorough updating of local businesses around town in the coming months, so any tips and advice is greatly appreciated. commented 2026-10-02 20:20:16 UTC by JackIV_ ♦1 |
| 189897584 (Comments: 1) | woodpeck (Discussed changesets: 148) | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 189888456, 189891106, 189891109, 189891110, 189891112, 189891116, 189891118, 189891119, 189891126, 189891128, 189891515, 189891517, 189891519, 189891521, 189891524, 189891526, 189891527, 189... commented 2026-10-02 19:55:29 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 189896687 (Comments: 1) | Zhen Sun (Discussed changesets: 52) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189897584 where the changeset comment is: revert automated edits made without prior discussion, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21377 commented 2026-10-02 19:55:28 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 189891526 (Comments: 1) | Zhen Sun (Discussed changesets: 52) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189897584 where the changeset comment is: revert automated edits made without prior discussion, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21377 commented 2026-10-02 19:55:28 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 189891126 (Comments: 1) | Zhen Sun (Discussed changesets: 52) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189897584 where the changeset comment is: revert automated edits made without prior discussion, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21377 commented 2026-10-02 19:55:28 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 189896670 (Comments: 1) | Zhen Sun (Discussed changesets: 52) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189897584 where the changeset comment is: revert automated edits made without prior discussion, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21377 commented 2026-10-02 19:55:28 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 189891542 (Comments: 1) | Zhen Sun (Discussed changesets: 52) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189897584 where the changeset comment is: revert automated edits made without prior discussion, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21377 commented 2026-10-02 19:55:28 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 189891537 (Comments: 1) | Zhen Sun (Discussed changesets: 52) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189897584 where the changeset comment is: revert automated edits made without prior discussion, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21377 commented 2026-10-02 19:55:28 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 189891517 (Comments: 1) | Zhen Sun (Discussed changesets: 52) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189897584 where the changeset comment is: revert automated edits made without prior discussion, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21377 commented 2026-10-02 19:55:27 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 189896662 (Comments: 1) | Zhen Sun (Discussed changesets: 52) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189897584 where the changeset comment is: revert automated edits made without prior discussion, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21377 commented 2026-10-02 19:55:27 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 189896684 (Comments: 1) | Zhen Sun (Discussed changesets: 52) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189897584 where the changeset comment is: revert automated edits made without prior discussion, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21377 commented 2026-10-02 19:55:27 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 189891118 (Comments: 1) | Zhen Sun (Discussed changesets: 52) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189897584 where the changeset comment is: revert automated edits made without prior discussion, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21377 commented 2026-10-02 19:55:27 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 189896685 (Comments: 1) | Zhen Sun (Discussed changesets: 52) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189897584 where the changeset comment is: revert automated edits made without prior discussion, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21377 commented 2026-10-02 19:55:27 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 189891515 (Comments: 1) | Zhen Sun (Discussed changesets: 52) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189897584 where the changeset comment is: revert automated edits made without prior discussion, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21377 commented 2026-10-02 19:55:26 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 189896656 (Comments: 1) | Zhen Sun (Discussed changesets: 52) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189897584 where the changeset comment is: revert automated edits made without prior discussion, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21377 commented 2026-10-02 19:55:26 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 189896676 (Comments: 1) | Zhen Sun (Discussed changesets: 52) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189897584 where the changeset comment is: revert automated edits made without prior discussion, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21377 commented 2026-10-02 19:55:26 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 189891543 (Comments: 1) | Zhen Sun (Discussed changesets: 52) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189897584 where the changeset comment is: revert automated edits made without prior discussion, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21377 commented 2026-10-02 19:55:26 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 189891519 (Comments: 1) | Zhen Sun (Discussed changesets: 52) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189897584 where the changeset comment is: revert automated edits made without prior discussion, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21377 commented 2026-10-02 19:55:26 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 189891539 (Comments: 1) | Zhen Sun (Discussed changesets: 52) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189897584 where the changeset comment is: revert automated edits made without prior discussion, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21377 commented 2026-10-02 19:55:25 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 189891119 (Comments: 1) | Zhen Sun (Discussed changesets: 52) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189897584 where the changeset comment is: revert automated edits made without prior discussion, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21377 commented 2026-10-02 19:55:25 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 189891109 (Comments: 1) | Zhen Sun (Discussed changesets: 52) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189897584 where the changeset comment is: revert automated edits made without prior discussion, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21377 commented 2026-10-02 19:55:25 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 189891534 (Comments: 1) | Zhen Sun (Discussed changesets: 52) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189897584 where the changeset comment is: revert automated edits made without prior discussion, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21377 commented 2026-10-02 19:55:25 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 189896663 (Comments: 1) | Zhen Sun (Discussed changesets: 52) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189897584 where the changeset comment is: revert automated edits made without prior discussion, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21377 commented 2026-10-02 19:55:25 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 189891524 (Comments: 1) | Zhen Sun (Discussed changesets: 52) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189897584 where the changeset comment is: revert automated edits made without prior discussion, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21377 commented 2026-10-02 19:55:24 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 189896682 (Comments: 1) | Zhen Sun (Discussed changesets: 52) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189897584 where the changeset comment is: revert automated edits made without prior discussion, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21377 commented 2026-10-02 19:55:24 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 189896673 (Comments: 1) | Zhen Sun (Discussed changesets: 52) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189897584 where the changeset comment is: revert automated edits made without prior discussion, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21377 commented 2026-10-02 19:55:24 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 189896680 (Comments: 1) | Zhen Sun (Discussed changesets: 52) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189897584 where the changeset comment is: revert automated edits made without prior discussion, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21377 commented 2026-10-02 19:55:24 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 189896677 (Comments: 1) | Zhen Sun (Discussed changesets: 52) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189897584 where the changeset comment is: revert automated edits made without prior discussion, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21377 commented 2026-10-02 19:55:24 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 189896667 (Comments: 1) | Zhen Sun (Discussed changesets: 52) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189897584 where the changeset comment is: revert automated edits made without prior discussion, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21377 commented 2026-10-02 19:55:24 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 189891541 (Comments: 1) | Zhen Sun (Discussed changesets: 52) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189897584 where the changeset comment is: revert automated edits made without prior discussion, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21377 commented 2026-10-02 19:55:23 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 189891112 (Comments: 1) | Zhen Sun (Discussed changesets: 52) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189897584 where the changeset comment is: revert automated edits made without prior discussion, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21377 commented 2026-10-02 19:55:23 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 189891110 (Comments: 1) | Zhen Sun (Discussed changesets: 52) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189897584 where the changeset comment is: revert automated edits made without prior discussion, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21377 commented 2026-10-02 19:55:23 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 189891530 (Comments: 1) | Zhen Sun (Discussed changesets: 52) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189897584 where the changeset comment is: revert automated edits made without prior discussion, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21377 commented 2026-10-02 19:55:23 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 189891529 (Comments: 1) | Zhen Sun (Discussed changesets: 52) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189897584 where the changeset comment is: revert automated edits made without prior discussion, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21377 commented 2026-10-02 19:55:23 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 189896658 (Comments: 1) | Zhen Sun (Discussed changesets: 52) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189897584 where the changeset comment is: revert automated edits made without prior discussion, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21377 commented 2026-10-02 19:55:22 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 189896678 (Comments: 1) | Zhen Sun (Discussed changesets: 52) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189897584 where the changeset comment is: revert automated edits made without prior discussion, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21377 commented 2026-10-02 19:55:22 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 189891128 (Comments: 1) | Zhen Sun (Discussed changesets: 52) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189897584 where the changeset comment is: revert automated edits made without prior discussion, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21377 commented 2026-10-02 19:55:22 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 189891532 (Comments: 1) | Zhen Sun (Discussed changesets: 52) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189897584 where the changeset comment is: revert automated edits made without prior discussion, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21377 commented 2026-10-02 19:55:22 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 189891527 (Comments: 1) | Zhen Sun (Discussed changesets: 52) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189897584 where the changeset comment is: revert automated edits made without prior discussion, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21377 commented 2026-10-02 19:55:21 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 189891106 (Comments: 1) | Zhen Sun (Discussed changesets: 52) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189897584 where the changeset comment is: revert automated edits made without prior discussion, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21377 commented 2026-10-02 19:55:21 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 189888456 (Comments: 1) | Zhen Sun (Discussed changesets: 52) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189897584 where the changeset comment is: revert automated edits made without prior discussion, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21377 commented 2026-10-02 19:55:21 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 189891536 (Comments: 1) | Zhen Sun (Discussed changesets: 52) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189897584 where the changeset comment is: revert automated edits made without prior discussion, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21377 commented 2026-10-02 19:55:20 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 189896665 (Comments: 1) | Zhen Sun (Discussed changesets: 52) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189897584 where the changeset comment is: revert automated edits made without prior discussion, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21377 commented 2026-10-02 19:55:20 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 189891116 (Comments: 1) | Zhen Sun (Discussed changesets: 52) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189897584 where the changeset comment is: revert automated edits made without prior discussion, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21377 commented 2026-10-02 19:55:20 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 189891521 (Comments: 1) | Zhen Sun (Discussed changesets: 52) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189897584 where the changeset comment is: revert automated edits made without prior discussion, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21377 commented 2026-10-02 19:55:20 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 189896655 (Comments: 1) | Zhen Sun (Discussed changesets: 52) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189897584 where the changeset comment is: revert automated edits made without prior discussion, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21377 commented 2026-10-02 19:55:19 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 189896675 (Comments: 1) | Zhen Sun (Discussed changesets: 52) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189897584 where the changeset comment is: revert automated edits made without prior discussion, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21377 commented 2026-10-02 19:55:19 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 189896669 (Comments: 1) | Zhen Sun (Discussed changesets: 52) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189897584 where the changeset comment is: revert automated edits made without prior discussion, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21377 commented 2026-10-02 19:55:19 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 189896674 (Comments: 1) | Zhen Sun (Discussed changesets: 52) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189897584 where the changeset comment is: revert automated edits made without prior discussion, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21377 commented 2026-10-02 19:55:19 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 189896664 (Comments: 1) | Zhen Sun (Discussed changesets: 52) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189897584 where the changeset comment is: revert automated edits made without prior discussion, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21377 commented 2026-10-02 19:55:18 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 189896659 (Comments: 1) | Zhen Sun (Discussed changesets: 52) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189897584 where the changeset comment is: revert automated edits made without prior discussion, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21377 commented 2026-10-02 19:55:18 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 189891528 (Comments: 1) | Zhen Sun (Discussed changesets: 52) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189897584 where the changeset comment is: revert automated edits made without prior discussion, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21377 commented 2026-10-02 19:55:18 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 189891533 (Comments: 1) | Zhen Sun (Discussed changesets: 52) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189897584 where the changeset comment is: revert automated edits made without prior discussion, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21377 commented 2026-10-02 19:55:17 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 189890596 (Comments: 1) | Editex (Discussed changesets: 4) | This is not the correct way to map a turning circle https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dturning_circle commented 2026-10-02 19:36:38 UTC by MikeN ♦373 |
| 189891205 (Comments: 1) | eric57890 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi there again. Please note it's best practice to modify existing geometry, like buildings or parking lots, if you're just tweaking them, not deleting them entirely. That's because it preserves the history of object modifications and t... commented 2026-10-02 19:22:11 UTC by willkmis ♦234 |
| 189891776 (Comments: 1) | Asa Foreman (Discussed changesets: 5) | Generally we don't classify streets within a residential=trailer_park as highway=residential. Those are typically highway=service unless they are named and part of mailing addresses. commented 2026-10-02 18:39:30 UTC by JuanElDemografo ♦59 |
| 189838260 (Comments: 2) | eric57890 (Discussed changesets: 2) | That was my mistake. I will readd it now, because it is indeed a residential area. commented 2026-10-02 17:09:57 UTC by eric57890 ♦1 |
| 189857607 (Comments: 1) | Cartographearth (Discussed changesets: 6) | names should not be descriptions, aka adding name=camera to an ALPR is incorrect, for more info see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions for more info. Happy mapping, Udar commented 2026-10-02 16:04:55 UTC by Udarian ♦992 |
| 189703218 (Comments: 1) | SuperNova66 (Discussed changesets: 1) | FYI, you did two almost identical fairways on top of each other here. Can you clean up the duplication? commented 2026-10-02 15:58:18 UTC by b-jazz ♦976 |
| 189701099 (Comments: 1) | iszulik101 (Discussed changesets: 3) | RE: http://osm.org/way/1563328633 Please don't use the "lollipop" style of mapping golf course elements as you've done in the URL above. You need to create proper multipolygon relations in order to map features like roughs/... commented 2026-10-02 15:44:06 UTC by b-jazz ♦976 |
| 189706543 (Comments: 1) | iszulik101 (Discussed changesets: 3) | When drawing golf course areas (i.e. greens, fairways, bunkers, tees, etc.), please be aware that the ways (lines) used to outline those areas must not cross over each other. Fairway outlines shouldn't cross over greens or bunkers or other fairw... commented 2026-10-02 15:29:41 UTC by b-jazz ♦976 |
| 189573340 (Comments: 1) | Nanepiwo (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, you used the key "keyfob" here - what does it mean? commented 2026-10-02 09:50:50 UTC by mueschel ♦7,415 |
| 185655071 (Comments: 1) | pavel bankevich (Discussed changesets: 15) | #mapbox_roads_attributes commented 2026-10-02 06:29:46 UTC by pavel bankevich ♦15 |
| 189839502 (Comments: 1) | Rmacaraig (Discussed changesets: 16) | All you are doing is making the POIs you are being paid to promote strictly _less_ up to date and visible to users by taking the existing correct address, phone and name and making them malformed and invalid, and moving it from an actual building to ... commented 2026-10-02 05:08:59 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 189857623 (Comments: 1) | OrdinaryScarlett (Discussed changesets: 70) | Why did you remove the valid old_ref=* tag from the highway=motorway_junction node? The old_ref=* tag provides useful information to other mappers about the history of the feature. --- Published using OSM... commented 2026-10-02 04:44:51 UTC by Frank Peng ♦256 |
| 189794850 (Comments: 1) | Keith Helbley (Discussed changesets: 15) | Sorry for being annoying - but have you used Google Street View by any chance? https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5548313 commented 2026-10-02 01:00:32 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,339 |
| 189498161 (Comments: 1) | TransAct-AS (Discussed changesets: 93) | It appears in this changeset here that you incorrectly adjusted a road from its actual alignment seen in aerial imagery to try to resolve a crossing_ways issue in the iD editor. Please don't adjust or align roads away from buildings or other fea... commented 2026-10-01 23:14:06 UTC by Frank Peng ♦256 |
| 189852119 (Comments: 1) | JriSv250 (Discussed changesets: 56) | #31DayOSMChallenge commented 2026-10-01 23:02:08 UTC by JriSv250 ♦32 |
| 181286964 (Comments: 3) | bbmiller (Discussed changesets: 6) | Thanks! commented 2026-10-01 23:01:26 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,339 |
| 189841265 (Comments: 1) | BeaconOSM (Discussed changesets: 84) | Illinois? I believe this is Wisconsin. And thanks for adding in the buildings! commented 2026-10-01 22:55:34 UTC by O1S ♦37 |
| 181988102 (Comments: 1) | TransAct-AS (Discussed changesets: 93) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182148478 --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181988102 commented 2026-10-01 22:51:08 UTC by Frank Peng ♦256 |
| 189839825 (Comments: 1) | Tjr33150 (Discussed changesets: 4) | looking at this ALPR on various aerial imagery in iD it seems to be within the road area, being positioned like this is highly unlikely so please double check the position of this ALPR and fix it. Happy mapping, Udar. commented 2026-10-01 21:40:03 UTC by Udarian ♦992 |
| 189839750 (Comments: 1) | Tjr33150 (Discussed changesets: 4) | looking at this ALPR on various aerial imagery in iD it seems to be within the road area, being positioned like this is highly unlikely so please double check the position of this ALPR and fix it. Happy mapping, Udar. commented 2026-10-01 21:38:15 UTC by Udarian ♦992 |
| 189838818 (Comments: 1) | WompatuckSupervisor (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello again, incase you didnt see my last message on your last changeset here it is again. Features you removed in this changeset are valid. Please don’t remove valid OSM data. You have a new account and might not be aware, on OSM... commented 2026-10-01 20:33:20 UTC by MassCartog ♦503 |
| 189839283 (Comments: 1) | zb-gladwyne-mapper (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please note: DVRPC imagery is rarely the best imagery for a given location, given its 1ft tiles. Esri and Mapbox imagery both show the house much clearer - I aligned the building to the Mapbox imagery here. Also note: Most building... commented 2026-10-01 20:10:29 UTC by I-76 ♦91 |
| 748530 (Comments: 3) | iandees (Discussed changesets: 87) | Wild! Looks like USGS got rid of it, so it's worth deleting here too. commented 2026-10-01 19:31:32 UTC by iandees ♦1,405 |
| 189843037 (Comments: 1) | Doritos2020 (Discussed changesets: 3) | #31DayOSMChallenge #Maptober #Maptober2026 (optional) #OpenStreetMap (optional) commented 2026-10-01 19:02:43 UTC by Doritos2020 ♦1 |
| 189509599 (Comments: 4) | TransAct-JT (Discussed changesets: 18) | Thank you! I appreciate the assistance on this and the feedback. It is greatly appreciated. commented 2026-10-01 18:52:10 UTC by TransAct-JT ♦4 |
| 189841090 (Comments: 1) | Suhbeena (Discussed changesets: 4) | #Maptober commented 2026-10-01 18:15:21 UTC by Suhbeena ♦6 |
| 186217099 (Comments: 1) | pavel bankevich (Discussed changesets: 15) | #mapbox_roads_attributes commented 2026-10-01 18:14:22 UTC by pavel bankevich ♦15 |
| 188848156 (Comments: 3) | Flap Slimy Outward (Discussed changesets: 313) | I reverted the changeset. hope that helps save you the effort @btwhite92. @flappy next time consider being a bit more respectful and clean it up instead of asking someone else to do it for you. commented 2026-10-01 16:36:21 UTC by OddlyAngled ♦138 |
| 185989984 (Comments: 2) | Reusedheadgasket (Discussed changesets: 3) | looking at the 2026 aerial imagery from the county these ALPR's that you added in the middle of road are still not there on the aerial imagery, please double check their location with aerial imagery and fix the location. A ALPR being in the midd... commented 2026-10-01 16:20:41 UTC by Udarian ♦992 |
| 189817713 (Comments: 1) | uj0y (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ceci n'est pas un hôtel. Reverted in changeset 189834260 commented 2026-10-01 16:06:55 UTC by schobbish ♦87 |
| 186458827 (Comments: 1) | pavel bankevich (Discussed changesets: 15) | #mapbox_roads_attributes commented 2026-10-01 12:59:49 UTC by pavel bankevich ♦15 |
| 186854709 (Comments: 1) | pavel bankevich (Discussed changesets: 15) | #mapbox_roads_attributes commented 2026-10-01 12:59:15 UTC by pavel bankevich ♦15 |
| 186511222 (Comments: 1) | pavel bankevich (Discussed changesets: 15) | #mapbox_roads_attributes commented 2026-10-01 12:59:08 UTC by pavel bankevich ♦15 |
| 186511084 (Comments: 1) | pavel bankevich (Discussed changesets: 15) | #mapbox_roads_attributes commented 2026-10-01 12:59:02 UTC by pavel bankevich ♦15 |
| 189822643 (Comments: 1) | kamstut (Discussed changesets: 1) | I also remove a "service road", which doesn't actually exist. Its the perimeter of my neighbors property and covered in regular old grass. Not a drive, not a road, just yard. commented 2026-10-01 12:56:44 UTC by kamstut ♦1 |
| 186870679 (Comments: 3) | Flamen_Sru (Discussed changesets: 36) | Hi Alew W2, thank you for making the corrections and reaching out to me regarding the issue. While combining the designated HOV lane with the motorway, I carried over the existing tags to the merged section. I see and understand the effect of the tol... commented 2026-10-01 12:31:24 UTC by Flamen_Sru ♦46 |
| 188856918 (Comments: 1) | Nordpfeil (Discussed changesets: 79) | Hallo Nordpfeil, irgendwo in unseren Webseiten zum Thema automatisiertes Editieren steht sinngemäß: "Wenn jemand ein Pferd mit animal=kow taggt und jemand anders repariert das dann auf animal=cow, wird es dadurch nicht besser." |
| 189688272 (Comments: 5) | gelkins4 (Discussed changesets: 1) | > "I honestly don't want any of this on the map" In that case it's best to contact the map provider directly with your request. commented 2026-10-01 06:48:55 UTC by Mashin ♦610 |
| 189727257 (Comments: 1) | Rmacaraig (Discussed changesets: 16) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers for mor... commented 2026-10-01 06:42:03 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 189726798 (Comments: 1) | Rmacaraig (Discussed changesets: 16) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-10-01 06:39:05 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 189774343 (Comments: 2) | TransAct-AS (Discussed changesets: 93) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189803500 --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/189774343 commented 2026-10-01 06:20:42 UTC by Frank Peng ♦256 |
| 189803500 (Comments: 1) | Frank Peng (Discussed changesets: 34) | Another mapper had already removed the highway=primary tag on Way 33300230 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/33300230) before this revert edit was made. commented 2026-10-01 05:32:22 UTC by Frank Peng ♦256 |
| 163703958 (Comments: 1) | YoungCR (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! Can you take look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5548601 ? is node/3708215513/history really also a bus stop? commented 2026-10-01 04:42:03 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,339 |
| 189800465 (Comments: 1) | iismitch55 (Discussed changesets: 70) | The layer=-1 tag should not be on ways 20357252 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/20357252) and 1563950444 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1563950444) as those roads are on ground level and not crossing over other features or below ground level. ... commented 2026-10-01 04:38:38 UTC by Frank Peng ♦256 |
| 189799566 (Comments: 1) | iismitch55 (Discussed changesets: 70) | No landuse was adjusted in this changeset. You just mapped those residential areas. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/189799566 commented 2026-10-01 04:14:47 UTC by Frank Peng ♦256 |
| 189704901 (Comments: 1) | lucrobman101 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189787428 commented 2026-10-01 04:14:43 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,271 |
| 189703837 (Comments: 1) | Hawbs729 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189770011 commented 2026-10-01 04:11:26 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,271 |
| 189689154 (Comments: 1) | dcWallin (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189723236 commented 2026-10-01 04:05:26 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,271 |
| 189615383 (Comments: 2) | Asa Foreman (Discussed changesets: 5) | I understand; however, my thought process was: the link roads coming from/going to 378 Spur will only ever see as much traffic as the spur itself, and therefore should not be classified any higher. Also, the intersection is less cluttered the way I d... commented 2026-10-01 02:33:08 UTC by Asa Foreman ♦4 |
| 187306219 (Comments: 1) | CoolMan00541 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi CoolMan, Have you seen https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Utah/Naming_Conventions ? Because of the unusual way that street addresses work here in Utah, we have a dedicated wiki page to explain that, even though a local may read this addres... commented 2026-10-01 02:27:47 UTC by dknelson9876 ♦166 |
| 189745945 (Comments: 1) | leftybender (Discussed changesets: 14) | I see the note you left on the trailhead, and you're absolutely right! That is bad form! Even if you can't find it spelled all the way out as "500 South" in any official materials, that doesn't mean it's not an abbreviat... commented 2026-10-01 02:22:16 UTC by dknelson9876 ♦166 |
| 189743080 (Comments: 1) | TransAct-AS (Discussed changesets: 93) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189799546 commented 2026-10-01 01:34:32 UTC by rajdhani ♦642 |
| 189796681 (Comments: 4) | Huong Dang (Discussed changesets: 11) | Seems like an oversight on the bike streets implementation side, shouldn’t have to alter the main database for it. Just don’t want to overly fragment things on OSM and slow down editing commented 2026-10-01 00:43:50 UTC by cstromw ♦7 |
| 189239791 (Comments: 4) | datainazwa (Discussed changesets: 5) | Maybe so, but OSM is NOT the place to lodge your protest! commented 2026-09-30 21:17:16 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,101 |
| 141066270 (Comments: 1) | Keith Helbley (Discussed changesets: 15) | Hello! Can you take look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5548269 ? commented 2026-09-30 20:33:30 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,339 |
| 187717409 (Comments: 5) | I W (Discussed changesets: 5) | I think that looks really good! Thank you. Yeah, things do get a bit shifty around the dams - it becomes a judgment call where to stop following the old river path. I think your approach here is fine. If you want to do more waterway map... commented 2026-09-30 18:37:27 UTC by kaleidoscopica ♦48 |
| 189420381 (Comments: 2) | rogerscgreg (Discussed changesets: 1) | It's unfortunately vacant. In fact, the entire building is. commented 2026-09-30 17:59:22 UTC by rogerscgreg ♦1 |
| 184016299 (Comments: 20) | matthewfecica (Discussed changesets: 16) | I agree with Kevin. And you said the AT is broken down to match trail guides, and like Kevin said, the End to End Tally Sheet uses these same sections, the official Long Path guide uses these sections, when people are hiking the Long Path thry will s... commented 2026-09-30 16:27:54 UTC by matthewfecica ♦17 |
| 189668307 (Comments: 2) | Ky_AT (Discussed changesets: 28) | Hi Udarian, thank you for making the corrections and the nudge. That obviously has slipped my attention, but I’ll make sure to be more careful about affected alignments. Much appreciated, happy mapping to you too. commented 2026-09-30 16:07:48 UTC by Ky_AT ♦27 |
| 189680456 (Comments: 3) | xander78 (Discussed changesets: 14) | In the case, you would put landuse=construction on the individual lots that are being constructed, not the whole neighborhood. Also, are you sure you're using the most up-to-date imagery when determining that an area is under construction? I... commented 2026-09-30 15:40:37 UTC by ScrawnyMeowth1 ♦59 |
| 189780717 (Comments: 1) | ReedShomaker (Discussed changesets: 1) | Sorry please don't accept this, I got confused on where this is, the current state is accurate commented 2026-09-30 15:31:40 UTC by ReedShomaker ♦1 |
| 189277571 (Comments: 3) | hobby_mapper98 (Discussed changesets: 2) | No worries. Like a lot of OSM stuff it's a European style to differentiate between ground floor and 1st floor (North American 2nd floor). One way to think about it is building:levels - building:min_level gives the actual number of floors/levels. commented 2026-09-30 14:14:44 UTC by ion_chi ♦111 |
| 189658893 (Comments: 1) | Kevin Obregon (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189776206 commented 2026-09-30 13:48:49 UTC by rajdhani ♦642 |
| 174674309 (Comments: 1) | lukeender (Discussed changesets: 2) | Re: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/17018903 This is a bit of strange tagging. parking:both=left shouldn't that not be parking:left=yes? And when parking only on one side, should parking:both:orientation=parallel not be change... commented 2026-09-30 11:26:33 UTC by Kees 59 ♦150 |
| 189750653 (Comments: 1) | LenapeTrail (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, In your edit you use the deprecated tag "payment:bitcoin=yes". I have DELETE the payment:bitcoin=yes tag ! Use the "currency:XBT=yes" instead. For more information please read: https://gitea.btcmap.org/... commented 2026-09-30 08:31:53 UTC by Comino ♦426 |
| 183355690 (Comments: 6) | visitingangels (Discussed changesets: 5) | Took more time than I thought as I also fixed a load of one-off issues with one of the many tags used to fix and make consistent, but its all done in changeset 189758052 for the CONUS and Canada, changeset 189758068 for the UK and changeset 189758080... commented 2026-09-30 06:39:37 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 189496289 (Comments: 2) | rsitoni_Lyft (Discussed changesets: 23) | Hi Udarian, Thank you so much for reaching out. On September 25, the connection ramp from I-95 to US 441 was added (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1562302209/history), and based on our telemetry, it accurately represents how you can merge onto... commented 2026-09-30 05:32:47 UTC by rsitoni_Lyft ♦19 |
| 189729209 (Comments: 2) | Omnific (Discussed changesets: 147) | Yeah, honestly I'm not sure there's a typically accepted methodology for this specific case. I would probably put it in quotes like "every second week" but that's just my guess. commented 2026-09-30 04:55:32 UTC by Omnific ♦244 |
| 189755361 (Comments: 1) | people128256 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Source for this changeset: https://mtbachelor.co.washington.or.us/images/survey/Plats/MOUNTAIN_ROSE.pdf commented 2026-09-30 04:35:31 UTC by people128256 ♦7 |
| 189705126 (Comments: 1) | plato59 (Discussed changesets: 10) | Mistake: Vuldestein is a fictional nation and does not exist in Oregon. commented 2026-09-30 03:11:57 UTC by plato59 ♦8 |
| 189744499 (Comments: 1) | Editex (Discussed changesets: 4) | Why was this changed to secondary? commented 2026-09-30 02:23:38 UTC by MikeN ♦373 |
| 189704110 (Comments: 4) | FloxStopr (Discussed changesets: 1) | With them being corporate “owned” and installed on private property not much the state can do. These would be the first in the state for sure. But more will be coming at least these “private” ones. commented 2026-09-30 02:22:46 UTC by FloxStopr ♦1 |
| 187768976 (Comments: 1) | Cecelia Chen (Discussed changesets: 1) | Are you sure the WHOLE building is Natural Healing Path? commented 2026-09-30 01:42:23 UTC by 15419 NE 140th St ♦10 |
| 189750143 (Comments: 1) | maxwellward (Discussed changesets: 17) | From note: Added by way of Strava heatmap Thanks for adding the paths! commented 2026-09-30 01:30:36 UTC by O1S ♦37 |
| 10871174 (Comments: 2) | Cartographer1973 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Ooh... that was 14 years ago. I can't be sure, but if I added a road name, it most likely came from the Denton County Central Appraisal District (they maintain all the tax records, plats, and so on.) However, they have since removed road layers... commented 2026-09-30 01:17:29 UTC by Cartographer1973 ♦2 |
| 189751250 (Comments: 1) | 66townsend (Discussed changesets: 2) | Please use more descriptive changeset comments. "Fixed" says nothing. commented 2026-09-30 00:30:27 UTC by pkoby ♦134 |
| 189684426 (Comments: 1) | 66townsend (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, in what way did you "fix" the parkway? You deleted a multitude of pieces in favor of one big chunk, but the city database shows the individual pieces. It looks like you, gebowd, and philpennmap (or just you?) have been chipping away at... commented 2026-09-30 00:29:27 UTC by pkoby ♦134 |
| 189709880 (Comments: 1) | JayKay242 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi welcome to OSM. Next time you can just removed the tags you added by mistake rather then the whole building. Thanks commented 2026-09-29 23:33:31 UTC by MassCartog ♦503 |
| 189749980 (Comments: 1) | diamondarmorsteve (Discussed changesets: 52) | Source: surveyed maxspeeds, lane counts from aerials. Turn lanes at the intersection of Nash and Iron Bridge need to be added once aerials update commented 2026-09-29 22:53:51 UTC by diamondarmorsteve ♦78 |
| 189730354 (Comments: 9) | Oregonian3 (Discussed changesets: 53) | I agree it probably should be in that segment especially as every router takes folks that way. I'll let it be. commented 2026-09-29 22:16:49 UTC by jjyach ♦46 |
| 189745508 (Comments: 1) | xander78 (Discussed changesets: 14) | Hi Xander, What's your reasoning for this and the other road classification upgrades you've been making in Blue Springs? There haven't been any major design changes to these roads recently and the MoDOT data doesn't ... commented 2026-09-29 21:20:59 UTC by sannkc ♦177 |
| 189600559 (Comments: 1) | Grimreaprincess (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello! I noticed that you moved a bench, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13152134280. Was that intentional or a mistake? Thanks, Peter commented 2026-09-29 21:07:26 UTC by pwbriggs ♦520 |
| 189746566 (Comments: 1) | JamesChevalier (Discussed changesets: 7) | 🤔 After checking the Wikipedia page, I'm less sure of this change. Its page notes: > Lordstown is a village and paper township in southern Trumbull County, Ohio, United States. commented 2026-09-29 20:30:50 UTC by JamesChevalier ♦9 |
| 186186144 (Comments: 1) | Ajtorres317 (Discussed changesets: 1) | This camera is actually on the east side of South Estrella Parkway, just across the street from the entrance on West Tanglewood Drive. It is pointing South. commented 2026-09-29 20:17:49 UTC by kamodt ♦1 |
| 189511513 (Comments: 7) | Suhbeena (Discussed changesets: 4) | That is a tricky spot and the change from a one-way PBL to a two-way painted bike lane is about as well-handled as anything I can think of. commented 2026-09-29 19:20:30 UTC by atticquilt ♦15 |
| 189365959 (Comments: 1) | cubbe8 (Discussed changesets: 114) | Hi cubbe8, I'm Artem, the OSM Quality Control lead at Lyft. I have a question about reverting the changes made in changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189357892. We realign road geometry and exit location based on recent t... commented 2026-09-29 19:14:35 UTC by amakarevich_lyft ♦41 |
| 132972771 (Comments: 1) | terminalpreppie (Discussed changesets: 4) | Using modern high-res imagery I was able to find an old diversion dam just upstream. This is the likeliest candidate for this GNIS entry and I merged the tags, but without more historical information I can't be 100% sure. I'd value a second... commented 2026-09-29 18:46:00 UTC by quincylvania ♦92 |
| 189708462 (Comments: 1) | primesepticservice (Discussed changesets: 1) | This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found. Reverting SEO spam... commented 2026-09-29 15:53:51 UTC by Glassman ♦6,059 |
| 189707122 (Comments: 1) | BenW2026 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, thanks for the contribution. Are you sure that the height is right? Note that the measurement unit for height=* is meters, not feet. commented 2026-09-29 15:32:55 UTC by PuddlesMapping ♦25 |
| 189702728 (Comments: 2) | cubbe8 (Discussed changesets: 114) | Nope, it’s been blocked off and pedestrian signals removed, i’ve mapped the new crosswalk locations as under construction. commented 2026-09-29 15:04:27 UTC by cubbe8 ♦113 |
| 189724307 (Comments: 1) | Zach Brown (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, thanks for the edits! In this case I believe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:access%3Dprivate is a more accurate value. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:access%3Dno implies it is illegal for _anybody_ to use these servic... commented 2026-09-29 14:13:02 UTC by PuddlesMapping ♦25 |
| 189704707 (Comments: 1) | 68916 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi, I removed the more specific opening_date from Beltline Station. The name is misleading; it's a residential project separate from the transit line commented 2026-09-29 14:07:15 UTC by ion_chi ♦111 |
| 189705279 (Comments: 1) | 68916 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi 68916, house looks to be misspelled for many of these. You might also want to use the more specific building=detached commented 2026-09-29 13:52:00 UTC by ion_chi ♦111 |
| 189696411 (Comments: 1) | kellandagoat (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189721304 commented 2026-09-29 11:02:09 UTC by MappingMore ♦793 |
| 188192688 (Comments: 1) | dindidindi (Discussed changesets: 2) | This address doesn't appear to exist walking down Market Street; could you add more detail or refine its location? commented 2026-09-29 08:06:24 UTC by twassman ♦2 |
| 189668549 (Comments: 1) | Mahir Floral & Event Designs (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189711423 commented 2026-09-29 06:49:50 UTC by ajmat ♦666 |
| 189652977 (Comments: 1) | eegeebs (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189707566 commented 2026-09-29 04:37:51 UTC by MappingMore ♦793 |
| 189678632 (Comments: 1) | Portage Liquors (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189707055 commented 2026-09-29 04:16:57 UTC by ajmat ♦666 |
| 175856750 (Comments: 1) | fsck (Discussed changesets: 1) | This camera was cut down and destroyed. commented 2026-09-29 01:08:50 UTC by wilkems ♦2 |
| 175174329 (Comments: 1) | Apoapsis (Discussed changesets: 1) | This camera is no longer present. commented 2026-09-29 01:08:24 UTC by wilkems ♦2 |
| 189594692 (Comments: 9) | malifica (Discussed changesets: 13) | Apology accepted. Thanks malifica. I thought we were in agreement on most things as well so I was a little surprised by this thread. Glad to hear we're back on the same page. And I'm thrilled to hear that those tools can handle multipolygon... commented 2026-09-28 23:37:41 UTC by b-jazz ♦976 |
| 188429617 (Comments: 6) | crfdude (Discussed changesets: 1) | I made a change, you might look and see if I did it correctly. commented 2026-09-28 22:27:14 UTC by ADVPS ♦1 |
| 189688157 (Comments: 4) | jjyach (Discussed changesets: 22) | That section is just an odd doughnut hole of unincorporated Arapahoe County squished between Centennial and Aurora. It has high traffic counts but is neglected by the county and it has far more cars traversing it than the section south of Quincy. S... commented 2026-09-28 19:04:28 UTC by jjyach ♦46 |
| 188962563 (Comments: 3) | cstromw (Discussed changesets: 5) | Makes sense. Thank you! commented 2026-09-28 16:30:49 UTC by ion_chi ♦111 |
| 163032532 (Comments: 1) | Not Just 4 Bikes (Discussed changesets: 8) | I still would tag that as a prison because it is for young offenders. In hungary we have them too for example this building for youth female offenders: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/836137327 So I'll tag it as a prison. And actually t... commented 2026-09-28 16:10:04 UTC by ottwiz ♦400 |
| 188086993 (Comments: 1) | Facts Matter (Discussed changesets: 1) | User "Facts Matter" is deleting verified surveillance nodes without evidence. commented 2026-09-28 14:08:28 UTC by Bote Man ♦1 |
| 189645662 (Comments: 1) | b_chancel (Discussed changesets: 1) | Should spell out street names. Computers are great at creating abbreviations when desirable but bad about being able to come up with intelligent expansions. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org... commented 2026-09-28 14:06:11 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,623 |
| 189663024 (Comments: 1) | The Winslow - Oklahoma City (Discussed changesets: 2) | Branch information goes in the branch tag only, not the name tag. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/189663024 commented 2026-09-28 14:02:54 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,623 |
| 189663143 (Comments: 1) | The Winslow - Oklahoma City (Discussed changesets: 2) | Please use descriptive changeset comments. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/189663143 commented 2026-09-28 14:02:29 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,623 |
| 189408439 (Comments: 2) | xander78 (Discussed changesets: 14) | I honestly may continue mapping here commented 2026-09-28 13:32:55 UTC by xander78 ♦12 |
| 187264616 (Comments: 6) | Blahblah_blah (Discussed changesets: 7) | The video traffic detection are usually between protected left and middle. These things are usually behind the right traffic light. commented 2026-09-28 12:29:14 UTC by Blahblah_blah ♦6 |
| 189084965 (Comments: 7) | P Diddy (Discussed changesets: 2) | I've strongly suspected as well, but the evidence was just circumstantial enough that I haven't been able to prove a formal DWG case. However, at the very least there is strong evidence they are a sock of the perma-blocked @TheAutoAidEditor... commented 2026-09-28 11:08:53 UTC by CAM-Gerlach ♦308 |
| 189643240 (Comments: 1) | JOHNNY951951951 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189667818 commented 2026-09-28 09:20:47 UTC by ajmat ♦666 |
| 189653095 (Comments: 2) | Mitya1234 (Discussed changesets: 18) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189666043 where the changeset comment is: revert vandalism commented 2026-09-28 08:41:08 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 189654280 (Comments: 2) | Mitya1234 (Discussed changesets: 18) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189666043 where the changeset comment is: revert vandalism commented 2026-09-28 08:41:08 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 189655372 (Comments: 3) | Mitya1234 (Discussed changesets: 18) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189666043 where the changeset comment is: revert vandalism commented 2026-09-28 08:41:08 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 189655344 (Comments: 2) | Mitya1234 (Discussed changesets: 18) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189666043 where the changeset comment is: revert vandalism commented 2026-09-28 08:41:08 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 189653231 (Comments: 3) | Mitya1234 (Discussed changesets: 18) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189666043 where the changeset comment is: revert vandalism commented 2026-09-28 08:41:08 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 189653182 (Comments: 3) | Mitya1234 (Discussed changesets: 18) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189666043 where the changeset comment is: revert vandalism commented 2026-09-28 08:41:08 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 189654080 (Comments: 2) | Mitya1234 (Discussed changesets: 18) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189666043 where the changeset comment is: revert vandalism commented 2026-09-28 08:41:07 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 189653068 (Comments: 3) | Mitya1234 (Discussed changesets: 18) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189666043 where the changeset comment is: revert vandalism commented 2026-09-28 08:41:07 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 189652919 (Comments: 2) | Mitya1234 (Discussed changesets: 18) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189666043 where the changeset comment is: revert vandalism commented 2026-09-28 08:41:07 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 189654744 (Comments: 2) | Mitya1234 (Discussed changesets: 18) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189666043 where the changeset comment is: revert vandalism commented 2026-09-28 08:41:07 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 189652870 (Comments: 2) | Mitya1234 (Discussed changesets: 18) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189666043 where the changeset comment is: revert vandalism commented 2026-09-28 08:41:07 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 189654297 (Comments: 2) | Mitya1234 (Discussed changesets: 18) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189666043 where the changeset comment is: revert vandalism commented 2026-09-28 08:41:06 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 189655530 (Comments: 3) | Mitya1234 (Discussed changesets: 18) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189666043 where the changeset comment is: revert vandalism commented 2026-09-28 08:41:06 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 189652890 (Comments: 2) | Mitya1234 (Discussed changesets: 18) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189666043 where the changeset comment is: revert vandalism commented 2026-09-28 08:41:06 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 189653240 (Comments: 3) | Mitya1234 (Discussed changesets: 18) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189666043 where the changeset comment is: revert vandalism commented 2026-09-28 08:41:06 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 189654827 (Comments: 2) | Mitya1234 (Discussed changesets: 18) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189666043 where the changeset comment is: revert vandalism commented 2026-09-28 08:41:05 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 189654368 (Comments: 2) | Mitya1234 (Discussed changesets: 18) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189666043 where the changeset comment is: revert vandalism commented 2026-09-28 08:41:05 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 189654752 (Comments: 2) | Mitya1234 (Discussed changesets: 18) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189666043 where the changeset comment is: revert vandalism commented 2026-09-28 08:41:05 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 189666038 (Comments: 1) | woodpeck (Discussed changesets: 148) | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 189652870, 189652890, 189652919, 189653068, 189653095, 189653182, 189653231, 189653240, 189654080, 189654280, 189654297, 189654368, 189654744, 189654752, 189654827, 189655344, 189655372, 189... commented 2026-09-28 08:41:01 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 189466651 (Comments: 1) | Glendora (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189620688 commented 2026-09-28 05:05:38 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,271 |
| 189425184 (Comments: 1) | Helio_works (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189620298 commented 2026-09-28 05:03:51 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,271 |
| 189505520 (Comments: 1) | osmforlife (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189614530 commented 2026-09-28 04:51:59 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,271 |
| 189609886 (Comments: 1) | Dima Kishenko13 (Discussed changesets: 44) | DWG revert - sock-puppet vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189652258 commented 2026-09-27 22:26:07 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,101 |
| 189609844 (Comments: 1) | Dima Kishenko13 (Discussed changesets: 44) | DWG revert - sock-puppet vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189652258 commented 2026-09-27 22:26:07 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,101 |
| 189609821 (Comments: 1) | Dima Kishenko13 (Discussed changesets: 44) | DWG revert - sock-puppet vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189652258 commented 2026-09-27 22:26:07 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,101 |
| 189609811 (Comments: 1) | Dima Kishenko13 (Discussed changesets: 44) | DWG revert - sock-puppet vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189652258 commented 2026-09-27 22:26:07 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,101 |
| 189369301 (Comments: 3) | dolph13 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thank you for the link to the HOA site, I appreciate it. Your change looks good then. Do note that we can't use Google's maps or imagery to update OpenStreetMap (due to copyright restrictions). Happy mapping! commented 2026-09-27 20:01:51 UTC by pwbriggs ♦520 |
| 189567767 (Comments: 2) | DividedFrame (Discussed changesets: 9) | Thanks for the heads up, I wouldn't have noticed otherwise! I think I've fixed it. commented 2026-09-27 19:05:21 UTC by DividedFrame ♦6 |
| 189643730 (Comments: 1) | WompatuckSupervisor (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello, welcome to OSM. Features you removed in this changeset are valid. Please don’t remove valid OSM data. You have a new account and might not be aware, on OSM, we do not remove features if they exist on the ground. If it exists on th... commented 2026-09-27 19:01:44 UTC by MassCartog ♦503 |
| 189268476 (Comments: 3) | griffin_greene (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hey, thanks for the clarification! You're all good, just needed to confirm that you could verify all the details you mapped between at least one of those other sources. Cheers! commented 2026-09-27 18:43:03 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 189612936 (Comments: 1) | Lucky_Cat (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM, and thanks for your contribution! commented 2026-09-27 17:39:46 UTC by citrula ♦1,020 |
| 152184358 (Comments: 1) | austinthecat_ (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/605409005/history has building:flats = 16A;16B;16C;16D that was added in this edit What this tag means? Integer value is expected here with info how many flats are here If that was intended to expres... commented 2026-09-27 17:31:48 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,339 |
| 189606636 (Comments: 1) | iszulik101 (Discussed changesets: 3) | FYI, greens and fairways shouldn't overlap (lines shouldn't cross each other). Also, golf=hole lines shouldn't connect to other lines between the tee and the green. commented 2026-09-27 15:56:06 UTC by b-jazz ♦976 |
| 189626667 (Comments: 1) | Kram_xfly (Discussed changesets: 1) | This changeset added a duplicate of an already mapped feature, in OSM we try and avoid duplicates. Next time if you want to edit a feature that already exists please check that the feature isn't already mapped. If it is already mapped please edi... commented 2026-09-27 15:41:19 UTC by Udarian ♦992 |
| 188008597 (Comments: 1) | Jdhdbsbs (Discussed changesets: 1) | Shift the location (of both) one or two light poles northwest. commented 2026-09-27 15:19:43 UTC by David_CottonFarmer ♦1 |
| 189627813 (Comments: 1) | Jordan Leick (Discussed changesets: 9) | I rode the entire stretch of the new Bassett creek trail on Friday and there were still parts where construction crew were working on. I dodged a big mound of dirt and a claw machine when I biked west to connect to Douglas. The project manager also c... commented 2026-09-27 15:13:10 UTC by Huong Dang ♦13 |
| 189634665 (Comments: 1) | woodpeck (Discussed changesets: 148) | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 189631875, 189632035, 189632734. commented 2026-09-27 14:54:32 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 189632734 (Comments: 2) | BoxerDima (Discussed changesets: 3) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189634665 where the changeset comment is: revert vandalism commented 2026-09-27 14:54:32 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 189632035 (Comments: 2) | BoxerDima (Discussed changesets: 3) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189634665 where the changeset comment is: revert vandalism commented 2026-09-27 14:54:32 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 189631875 (Comments: 2) | BoxerDima (Discussed changesets: 3) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189634665 where the changeset comment is: revert vandalism commented 2026-09-27 14:54:32 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 189634559 (Comments: 1) | woodpeck (Discussed changesets: 148) | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 189631875, 189632035, 189632734. commented 2026-09-27 14:52:16 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 189614867 (Comments: 1) | Asa Foreman (Discussed changesets: 5) | Why did you delete the slip roads here? Also when you deleted them you forgot to update/delete several of the restrictions which included them. commented 2026-09-27 14:09:16 UTC by JuanElDemografo ♦59 |
| 121391181 (Comments: 1) | IanH (Discussed changesets: 26) | Hello! Can you take look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5541802 ? commented 2026-09-27 08:34:01 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,339 |
| 56152656 (Comments: 1) | u1138 (Discussed changesets: 23) | Hello! Can you take look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5541803 ? commented 2026-09-27 08:33:24 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,339 |
| 189278444 (Comments: 1) | livelaughtoasterbarth (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189615751 commented 2026-09-27 07:14:11 UTC by ajmat ♦666 |
| 184076163 (Comments: 4) | Natfoot (Discussed changesets: 77) | Thanks. I don't know what route=n/a is supposed to mean and/or why route=bicycle is better, which is why I brought this up with you who knows much, much more about all these routes than I do. Happy mapping! commented 2026-09-27 07:02:30 UTC by pwbriggs ♦520 |
| 189614397 (Comments: 1) | Crownie_O (Discussed changesets: 1) | Flock camera placed in this spot on 26 September 2026. It has flashing lights and is shining directly into the backyards on the other side of the fence line; approximately 20 feet from the fence. commented 2026-09-27 06:21:00 UTC by Crownie_O ♦1 |
| 189597005 (Comments: 1) | jrreally (Discussed changesets: 2) | Welcome back to OSM! commented 2026-09-27 04:50:33 UTC by jmarchon ♦537 |
| 189517036 (Comments: 1) | erica_busright (Discussed changesets: 11) | Hi, please try to use a smaller bounding box for your changes, and not have one changeset that spans most of the continent in the future :( (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets for the "why".) T... commented 2026-09-27 04:01:00 UTC by cswilson252 ♦36 |
| 189452242 (Comments: 1) | Rmacaraig (Discussed changesets: 16) | As an account mapping on behalf of a commercial business for financial gain, please be advised that you are expected to understand and carefully follow documented OpenStreetMap standards and conventions, which will both directly benefit the quality o... commented 2026-09-27 03:54:04 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 178131267 (Comments: 1) | flanaganlaw (Discussed changesets: 1) | As an account mapping on behalf of a commercial business for financial gain, please be advised that you are expected to understand and carefully follow documented OpenStreetMap standards and conventions, which will both directly benefit the quality o... commented 2026-09-27 03:53:54 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 189485176 (Comments: 1) | Rmacaraig (Discussed changesets: 16) | As an account mapping on behalf of a commercial business for financial gain, please be advised that you are expected to understand and carefully follow documented OpenStreetMap standards and conventions, which will both directly benefit the quality o... commented 2026-09-27 03:47:47 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 189403389 (Comments: 1) | Rmacaraig (Discussed changesets: 16) | As an account mapping on behalf of a commercial business for financial gain, please be advised that you are expected to understand and carefully follow documented OpenStreetMap standards and conventions, which will both directly benefit the quality o... commented 2026-09-27 03:46:18 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 189399457 (Comments: 1) | Rmacaraig (Discussed changesets: 16) | As an account mapping on behalf of a commercial business for financial gain, please be advised that you are expected to understand and carefully follow documented OpenStreetMap standards and conventions, which will both directly benefit the quality o... commented 2026-09-27 03:44:49 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 189364552 (Comments: 1) | Rmacaraig (Discussed changesets: 16) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-09-27 03:42:10 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 189262111 (Comments: 1) | Rmacaraig (Discussed changesets: 16) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is not allowed on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account; see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers for more infor... commented 2026-09-27 03:38:50 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 138261863 (Comments: 1) | Anthony Karls (Discussed changesets: 1) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-09-27 03:38:04 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 189227822 (Comments: 1) | Rmacaraig (Discussed changesets: 16) | As an account mapping on behalf of a commercial business for financial gain, please be advised that you are expected to understand and carefully follow documented OpenStreetMap standards and conventions, which will both directly benefit the quality o... commented 2026-09-27 03:26:08 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 189611404 (Comments: 1) | Dima Kishenko13 (Discussed changesets: 44) | DWG revert - sock-puppet vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189611794 commented 2026-09-27 03:25:24 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,101 |
| 189611287 (Comments: 1) | Dima Kishenko13 (Discussed changesets: 44) | DWG revert - sock-puppet vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189611794 commented 2026-09-27 03:25:24 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,101 |
| 189611262 (Comments: 1) | Dima Kishenko13 (Discussed changesets: 44) | DWG revert - sock-puppet vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189611794 commented 2026-09-27 03:25:24 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,101 |
| 189611351 (Comments: 1) | Dima Kishenko13 (Discussed changesets: 44) | DWG revert - sock-puppet vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189611794 commented 2026-09-27 03:25:24 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,101 |
| 189611361 (Comments: 1) | Dima Kishenko13 (Discussed changesets: 44) | DWG revert - sock-puppet vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189611794 commented 2026-09-27 03:25:24 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,101 |
| 189611319 (Comments: 1) | Dima Kishenko13 (Discussed changesets: 44) | DWG revert - sock-puppet vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189611794 commented 2026-09-27 03:25:24 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,101 |
| 189611550 (Comments: 2) | Dima Kishenko13 (Discussed changesets: 44) | DWG revert - sock-puppet vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189611794 commented 2026-09-27 03:25:24 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,101 |
| 189611256 (Comments: 1) | Dima Kishenko13 (Discussed changesets: 44) | DWG revert - sock-puppet vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189611794 commented 2026-09-27 03:25:23 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,101 |
| 189611225 (Comments: 1) | Dima Kishenko13 (Discussed changesets: 44) | DWG revert - sock-puppet vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189611794 commented 2026-09-27 03:25:23 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,101 |
| 189611147 (Comments: 1) | Dima Kishenko13 (Discussed changesets: 44) | DWG revert - sock-puppet vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189611794 commented 2026-09-27 03:25:23 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,101 |
| 189611116 (Comments: 1) | Dima Kishenko13 (Discussed changesets: 44) | DWG revert - sock-puppet vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189611794 commented 2026-09-27 03:25:23 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,101 |
| 189611095 (Comments: 1) | Dima Kishenko13 (Discussed changesets: 44) | DWG revert - sock-puppet vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189611794 commented 2026-09-27 03:25:23 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,101 |
| 189611086 (Comments: 1) | Dima Kishenko13 (Discussed changesets: 44) | DWG revert - sock-puppet vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189611794 commented 2026-09-27 03:25:23 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,101 |
| 189611046 (Comments: 1) | Dima Kishenko13 (Discussed changesets: 44) | DWG revert - sock-puppet vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189611794 commented 2026-09-27 03:25:23 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,101 |
| 189611017 (Comments: 1) | Dima Kishenko13 (Discussed changesets: 44) | DWG revert - sock-puppet vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189611794 commented 2026-09-27 03:25:23 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,101 |
| 189610620 (Comments: 1) | Dima Kishenko13 (Discussed changesets: 44) | DWG revert - sock-puppet vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189611794 commented 2026-09-27 03:25:22 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,101 |
| 189610789 (Comments: 1) | Dima Kishenko13 (Discussed changesets: 44) | DWG revert - sock-puppet vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189611794 commented 2026-09-27 03:25:22 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,101 |
| 189610745 (Comments: 1) | Dima Kishenko13 (Discussed changesets: 44) | DWG revert - sock-puppet vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189611794 commented 2026-09-27 03:25:22 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,101 |
| 189610599 (Comments: 1) | Dima Kishenko13 (Discussed changesets: 44) | DWG revert - sock-puppet vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189611794 commented 2026-09-27 03:25:22 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,101 |
| 189610898 (Comments: 1) | Dima Kishenko13 (Discussed changesets: 44) | DWG revert - sock-puppet vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189611794 commented 2026-09-27 03:25:22 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,101 |
| 189610869 (Comments: 1) | Dima Kishenko13 (Discussed changesets: 44) | DWG revert - sock-puppet vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189611794 commented 2026-09-27 03:25:22 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,101 |
| 189610836 (Comments: 1) | Dima Kishenko13 (Discussed changesets: 44) | DWG revert - sock-puppet vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189611794 commented 2026-09-27 03:25:22 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,101 |
| 189610563 (Comments: 1) | Dima Kishenko13 (Discussed changesets: 44) | DWG revert - sock-puppet vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189611794 commented 2026-09-27 03:25:21 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,101 |
| 189610583 (Comments: 1) | Dima Kishenko13 (Discussed changesets: 44) | DWG revert - sock-puppet vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189611794 commented 2026-09-27 03:25:21 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,101 |
| 189610402 (Comments: 1) | Dima Kishenko13 (Discussed changesets: 44) | DWG revert - sock-puppet vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189611794 commented 2026-09-27 03:25:20 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,101 |
| 189610545 (Comments: 1) | Dima Kishenko13 (Discussed changesets: 44) | DWG revert - sock-puppet vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189611794 commented 2026-09-27 03:25:20 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,101 |
| 189610503 (Comments: 1) | Dima Kishenko13 (Discussed changesets: 44) | DWG revert - sock-puppet vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189611794 commented 2026-09-27 03:25:20 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,101 |
| 189610488 (Comments: 1) | Dima Kishenko13 (Discussed changesets: 44) | DWG revert - sock-puppet vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189611794 commented 2026-09-27 03:25:20 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,101 |
| 189610426 (Comments: 1) | Dima Kishenko13 (Discussed changesets: 44) | DWG revert - sock-puppet vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189611794 commented 2026-09-27 03:25:20 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,101 |
| 189610383 (Comments: 1) | Dima Kishenko13 (Discussed changesets: 44) | DWG revert - sock-puppet vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189611794 commented 2026-09-27 03:25:19 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,101 |
| 189610234 (Comments: 1) | Dima Kishenko13 (Discussed changesets: 44) | DWG revert - sock-puppet vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189611794 commented 2026-09-27 03:25:19 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,101 |
| 189610266 (Comments: 1) | Dima Kishenko13 (Discussed changesets: 44) | DWG revert - sock-puppet vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189611794 commented 2026-09-27 03:25:19 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,101 |
| 189610387 (Comments: 1) | Dima Kishenko13 (Discussed changesets: 44) | DWG revert - sock-puppet vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189611794 commented 2026-09-27 03:25:19 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,101 |
| 189610143 (Comments: 1) | Dima Kishenko13 (Discussed changesets: 44) | DWG revert - sock-puppet vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189611794 commented 2026-09-27 03:25:18 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,101 |
| 189610210 (Comments: 1) | Dima Kishenko13 (Discussed changesets: 44) | DWG revert - sock-puppet vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189611794 commented 2026-09-27 03:25:18 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,101 |
| 189610204 (Comments: 1) | Dima Kishenko13 (Discussed changesets: 44) | DWG revert - sock-puppet vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189611794 commented 2026-09-27 03:25:18 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,101 |
| 189610156 (Comments: 1) | Dima Kishenko13 (Discussed changesets: 44) | DWG revert - sock-puppet vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189611794 commented 2026-09-27 03:25:18 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,101 |
| 189610014 (Comments: 1) | Dima Kishenko13 (Discussed changesets: 44) | DWG revert - sock-puppet vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189611794 commented 2026-09-27 03:25:17 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,101 |
| 189609967 (Comments: 1) | Dima Kishenko13 (Discussed changesets: 44) | DWG revert - sock-puppet vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189611794 commented 2026-09-27 03:25:17 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,101 |
| 189610096 (Comments: 1) | Dima Kishenko13 (Discussed changesets: 44) | DWG revert - sock-puppet vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189611794 commented 2026-09-27 03:25:17 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,101 |
| 189605077 (Comments: 2) | Paul Fisher (Discussed changesets: 5) | whoops! I did not intend to have these be lumped into one edit. I will try to be more careful in the future commented 2026-09-27 02:41:18 UTC by Paul Fisher ♦4 |
| 189182471 (Comments: 1) | IsaacHBurner (Discussed changesets: 3) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is not allowed on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account; see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers for more infor... commented 2026-09-27 02:37:57 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 189182378 (Comments: 1) | IsaacHBurner (Discussed changesets: 3) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is not allowed on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account; see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers for more infor... commented 2026-09-27 02:37:17 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 189181991 (Comments: 1) | IsaacHBurner (Discussed changesets: 3) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is not allowed on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account; see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers for more infor... commented 2026-09-27 02:36:24 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 189383383 (Comments: 1) | Aaaguards security (Discussed changesets: 4) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is not allowed on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account; see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers for more infor... commented 2026-09-27 02:25:07 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 189383310 (Comments: 1) | Aaaguards security (Discussed changesets: 4) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is not allowed on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account; see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers for more infor... commented 2026-09-27 02:24:58 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 189331128 (Comments: 2) | Aaaguards security (Discussed changesets: 4) | Also an explicit source=* of Google Maps--they re-added it with such and I had to revert it again. commented 2026-09-27 02:24:13 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 189382986 (Comments: 1) | Aaaguards security (Discussed changesets: 4) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is not allowed on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account; see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers for more infor... commented 2026-09-27 02:23:30 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 187316360 (Comments: 1) | Mroysterhead (Discussed changesets: 1) | This camera was removed Sept 23, 2026 commented 2026-09-27 01:51:18 UTC by Vowels ♦1 |
| 189609226 (Comments: 1) | 'Lex (Discussed changesets: 6) | Thank you for this! I intend to do a real survey of the area around Muskegon Catholic at some point, but my JOSM skills are quite limited lol commented 2026-09-27 00:29:49 UTC by mitteneer ♦1 |
| 189602806 (Comments: 1) | UncleBoy12 (Discussed changesets: 13) | DWG revert - sock-puppet vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189607347 commented 2026-09-26 22:04:23 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,101 |
| 189602902 (Comments: 1) | UncleBoy12 (Discussed changesets: 13) | DWG revert - sock-puppet vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189607347 commented 2026-09-26 22:04:23 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,101 |
| 189603107 (Comments: 2) | UncleBoy12 (Discussed changesets: 13) | DWG revert - sock-puppet vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189607347 commented 2026-09-26 22:04:23 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,101 |
| 189602525 (Comments: 1) | UncleBoy12 (Discussed changesets: 13) | DWG revert - sock-puppet vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189607347 commented 2026-09-26 22:04:22 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,101 |
| 189602747 (Comments: 1) | UncleBoy12 (Discussed changesets: 13) | DWG revert - sock-puppet vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189607347 commented 2026-09-26 22:04:22 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,101 |
| 189588434 (Comments: 1) | UncleBoy12 (Discussed changesets: 13) | DWG revert - sock-puppet vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189607347 commented 2026-09-26 22:04:22 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,101 |
| 189588764 (Comments: 1) | UncleBoy12 (Discussed changesets: 13) | DWG revert - sock-puppet vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189607347 commented 2026-09-26 22:04:22 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,101 |
| 189597478 (Comments: 1) | UncleBoy12 (Discussed changesets: 13) | DWG revert - sock-puppet vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189607347 commented 2026-09-26 22:04:22 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,101 |
| 189587862 (Comments: 1) | UncleBoy12 (Discussed changesets: 13) | DWG revert - sock-puppet vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189607347 commented 2026-09-26 22:04:21 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,101 |
| 189587732 (Comments: 1) | UncleBoy12 (Discussed changesets: 13) | DWG revert - sock-puppet vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189607347 commented 2026-09-26 22:04:21 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,101 |
| 189587954 (Comments: 1) | UncleBoy12 (Discussed changesets: 13) | DWG revert - sock-puppet vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189607347 commented 2026-09-26 22:04:21 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,101 |
| 189588101 (Comments: 1) | UncleBoy12 (Discussed changesets: 13) | DWG revert - sock-puppet vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189607347 commented 2026-09-26 22:04:21 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,101 |
| 189587640 (Comments: 1) | UncleBoy12 (Discussed changesets: 13) | DWG revert - sock-puppet vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189607347 commented 2026-09-26 22:04:20 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,101 |
| 144058342 (Comments: 2) | jleedev (Discussed changesets: 25) | Almost certain that ` is an accident trying to press Tab to move fields. commented 2026-09-26 21:58:26 UTC by jleedev ♦306 |
| 189601954 (Comments: 1) | kevinparsonsjr (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Kev. Address info should not be on roads, but on buildings. Abbreviations should be expanded, South for S, Road for Road, etc. I've adjusted. commented 2026-09-26 19:58:56 UTC by wireguy ♦587 |
| 189401143 (Comments: 1) | SpeedBlade (Discussed changesets: 1) | Even BMX bikes not allowed? commented 2026-09-26 19:41:00 UTC by mbeyerle ♦55 |
| 188259675 (Comments: 1) | Yipper (Discussed changesets: 1) | Yipper, welcome to OSM. I see you deleted the business, building and address node at 6 Coryell Street. Was the building demolished, or just the business gone. The address should still be there. Probably want to use the disued tag, see this item a... commented 2026-09-26 19:32:21 UTC by wireguy ♦587 |
| 189429353 (Comments: 4) | lbilldt (Discussed changesets: 5) | Yeah, eliminating the "rough-in" would be preferred. It's sets off all sort of Q/A alarms and causes me and others extra work. It's better to just leave your work unsubmitted until you have things polished. Thanks. I don�... commented 2026-09-26 17:22:26 UTC by b-jazz ♦976 |
| 187622133 (Comments: 1) | Causeistheffect (Discussed changesets: 1) | For tracking purposes only but not really for solving other types of crimes commented 2026-09-26 16:12:44 UTC by Causeistheffect ♦1 |
| 189567632 (Comments: 3) | opensourceisbetter (Discussed changesets: 1) | Got it, Thanks for getting back to me. You have a new account and might not be aware, on OSM, we do not remove features if they exist on the ground. If it exists on the ground, it is valid data regardless of a feature being public or private, ... commented 2026-09-26 15:13:15 UTC by MassCartog ♦503 |
| 66131356 (Comments: 2) | maxolasersquad (Discussed changesets: 30) | Yes. I have fixed it. commented 2026-09-26 15:11:47 UTC by maxolasersquad ♦97 |
| 189569084 (Comments: 1) | Brynnan (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi -- is there a reason the house number was removed with this update? commented 2026-09-26 11:23:55 UTC by noahheffron ♦31 |
| 109155864 (Comments: 1) | Andrew_pnnl (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/970407449/history has building:levels = 0.5 that was added in this edit building:levels= is for how many above-ground non-roof levels the building has, so this always should be an integer. Here it has some ... commented 2026-09-26 08:05:32 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,339 |
| 188642651 (Comments: 1) | GeoDave5280 (Discussed changesets: 14) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1556666985/history - that barrier is a typo, right? (or was, at least for that specific object - other may remain) commented 2026-09-26 07:25:39 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,339 |
| 83758209 (Comments: 1) | Krennel (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! You used surface=san on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/51964993/history Have you maybe meant surface=sand ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects w... commented 2026-09-26 07:04:43 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,339 |
| 153752807 (Comments: 1) | AnnDee4444 (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hello! You used surface=pave on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1257945432/history Have you maybe meant surface=paved ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objec... commented 2026-09-26 06:53:21 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,339 |
| 154719402 (Comments: 1) | 23rfsd25v1c81 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1284735554/history has building:levels = 3.3 that was added in this edit building:levels= is for how many above-ground non-roof levels the building has, so this always should be an integer. Here it has some... commented 2026-09-26 06:48:29 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,339 |
| 189560777 (Comments: 1) | KayViv (Discussed changesets: 1) | FYI: holes (the centerline) shouldn't be drawn with so many nodes. See the wiki at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:golf%3Dhole for more info. commented 2026-09-26 06:48:01 UTC by b-jazz ♦976 |
| 189568564 (Comments: 1) | BMJ007 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Dairy farm commented 2026-09-26 06:12:51 UTC by BMJ007 ♦1 |
| 189571392 (Comments: 1) | Flap Slimy Outward (Discussed changesets: 313) | *Put the Water Street District node AT the main crossroads commented 2026-09-26 05:44:50 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦405 |
| 189488487 (Comments: 1) | Mint Hill Orthodontics (Discussed changesets: 4) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-09-26 04:19:40 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 189487219 (Comments: 1) | Mint Hill Orthodontics (Discussed changesets: 4) | As an account mapping on behalf of a commercial business for financial gain, please be advised that you are expected to understand and carefully follow documented OpenStreetMap standards and conventions, which will both directly benefit the quality o... commented 2026-09-26 04:17:04 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 189195191 (Comments: 1) | AndreaSchmidtCo (Discussed changesets: 2) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is not allowed on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account; see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers for more infor... commented 2026-09-26 04:15:00 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 189569709 (Comments: 1) | Flap Slimy Outward (Discussed changesets: 313) | Source: https://gis.dot.nv.gov/trina/ (OSM-Revert does not allow you to specify a source when reverting, so I have to provide it in a comment instead.) commented 2026-09-26 03:54:05 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦405 |
| 189427387 (Comments: 2) | OrdinaryScarlett (Discussed changesets: 70) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:start_date commented 2026-09-26 03:12:46 UTC by Frank Peng ♦256 |
| 189568531 (Comments: 1) | Collinrenk23! (Discussed changesets: 1) | The crossing of first christian church and the parking lot aisle is a covered entrance to the building commented 2026-09-26 02:26:28 UTC by Collinrenk23! ♦1 |
| 61729605 (Comments: 1) | rjc3000 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! You used surface=dir on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/617506117/history Have you maybe meant surface=dirt ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects ... commented 2026-09-26 01:41:53 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,339 |
| 135078468 (Comments: 1) | graham980 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/817861194/history has building:flats = 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8 that was added in this edit What this tag means? Integer value is expected here with info how many flats are here If that was intended to expres... commented 2026-09-26 01:36:15 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,339 |
| 189565629 (Comments: 1) | Menchithecat (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM. I notice that Island County GIS doesn't show these streets. They have Twin Oaks Lane ending at the 1881 Twin Oaks Lane house. Could these be highway=service with a possible tag of ownership=private and no name tag? |
| 98454261 (Comments: 1) | DUGA (Discussed changesets: 42) | Hello! You used surface=dir on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/11979000/history Have you maybe meant surface=dirt ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects w... commented 2026-09-26 00:18:37 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,339 |
| 98519259 (Comments: 1) | DUGA (Discussed changesets: 42) | Hello! You used surface=dir on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/17604289/history Have you maybe meant surface=dirt ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects w... commented 2026-09-26 00:18:32 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,339 |
| 183753521 (Comments: 2) | Omnific (Discussed changesets: 147) | Don't know how that happened. Fixed commented 2026-09-26 00:15:20 UTC by Omnific ♦244 |
| 185212538 (Comments: 1) | ayanbs (Discussed changesets: 8) | can you explain this edit? commented 2026-09-25 23:37:16 UTC by Natfoot ♦163 |
| 189566107 (Comments: 1) | Flap Slimy Outward (Discussed changesets: 313) | The street addresses and ZIP codes came from OpenWeb. commented 2026-09-25 23:33:33 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦405 |
| 147163728 (Comments: 1) | Oversold (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! You used advertising=sign3 on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11593868185/history Have you maybe meant advertising=sign ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited ... commented 2026-09-25 23:11:59 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,339 |
| 189564226 (Comments: 2) | FDOT_Ryan (Discussed changesets: 7) | Happy to help. This area is very confusing to say the least. -Ryan commented 2026-09-25 23:06:39 UTC by FDOT_Ryan ♦7 |
| 189368154 (Comments: 7) | kmenard (Discussed changesets: 4) | seems to have been fixed by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189564226 commented 2026-09-25 22:44:40 UTC by Udarian ♦992 |
| 142247894 (Comments: 1) | zfish118 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1213692963/history has building:flats = 1A,1B,1C,1D,1E,1F,1G,H that was added in this edit What this tag means? Integer value is expected here with info how many flats are here If that was intended t... commented 2026-09-25 22:33:44 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,339 |
| 173245368 (Comments: 1) | Mike Moresi (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/882625262/history has building:flats = 37-42 that was added in this edit What this tag means? Integer value is expected here with info how many flats are here If that was intended to express addresse... commented 2026-09-25 22:25:25 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,339 |
| 178253345 (Comments: 1) | Relics (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hello! You used leaf_cycle=mixed;deciduous on https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/20188870/history Have you maybe meant leaf_cycle=mixed ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it ... commented 2026-09-25 22:23:58 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,339 |
| 138204690 (Comments: 2) | rivermont (Discussed changesets: 69) | A typo indeed! It has been fixed. Thanks commented 2026-09-25 22:22:18 UTC by rivermont ♦246 |
| 189430445 (Comments: 1) | noone2301 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks for the contribution! In OpenStreetMap, we expand abbreviations, so we write "Street" instead of "St", "Northeast" instead of "NE", etc. This is because it's easier to automatically abbreviate names... commented 2026-09-25 22:07:56 UTC by pwbriggs ♦520 |
| 188695342 (Comments: 2) | Mr Matt K (Discussed changesets: 15) | That node fixed. I occasionally see "pole" used on busbar structures (placed by others) though they're really not on poles per se. commented 2026-09-25 21:30:00 UTC by Mr Matt K ♦9 |
| 189124341 (Comments: 4) | atticquilt (Discussed changesets: 9) | You too, wow! commented 2026-09-25 20:39:14 UTC by atticquilt ♦15 |
| 155243592 (Comments: 3) | dknelson9876 (Discussed changesets: 14) | And thanks for your mapping in general! Not only this specific fix. commented 2026-09-25 20:38:13 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,339 |
| 178208514 (Comments: 3) | shinterro (Discussed changesets: 15) | And thanks for your mapping in general! Not only this specific fix. commented 2026-09-25 20:38:07 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,339 |
| 178647548 (Comments: 3) | VLD319 (Discussed changesets: 15) | And thanks for your mapping in general! Not only this specific fix. commented 2026-09-25 20:37:46 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,339 |
| 189554668 (Comments: 1) | Mityaboxer (Discussed changesets: 1) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189562037 where the changeset comment is: revert vandalism commented 2026-09-25 20:31:57 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 189562037 (Comments: 1) | woodpeck (Discussed changesets: 148) | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 189554668, 189555052, 189555071, 189557391, 189557466. commented 2026-09-25 20:31:57 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 189557391 (Comments: 1) | MityastrongBoxer (Discussed changesets: 2) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189562037 where the changeset comment is: revert vandalism commented 2026-09-25 20:31:56 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 189555052 (Comments: 1) | Dimakishenko12 (Discussed changesets: 2) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189562037 where the changeset comment is: revert vandalism commented 2026-09-25 20:31:56 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 189555071 (Comments: 1) | Dimakishenko12 (Discussed changesets: 2) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189562037 where the changeset comment is: revert vandalism commented 2026-09-25 20:31:56 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 189557466 (Comments: 1) | MityastrongBoxer (Discussed changesets: 2) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189562037 where the changeset comment is: revert vandalism commented 2026-09-25 20:31:55 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 189512121 (Comments: 1) | Skyeward (Discussed changesets: 1) | On the building you tagged as name=Saint Francis Hospital, I don't think this is correct. That's the name of the campus the building is on, but the building itself has multiple names for each tower. --- #REVIE... commented 2026-09-25 19:30:56 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,623 |
| 188274385 (Comments: 3) | I W (Discussed changesets: 5) | Thanks for being so receptive! It's refreshing. I should say, I do like the work you're doing to add landuse and natural area on the map. Keep it up. commented 2026-09-25 19:30:00 UTC by kaleidoscopica ♦48 |
| 189510778 (Comments: 1) | grphx (Discussed changesets: 2) | camera:type=destroyed would be invalid anyway (just remove the camera). Fixed would mean it doesn't turn. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/189510778 |
| 164451499 (Comments: 1) | TJ Clark (Discussed changesets: 2) | ALPR no longer present commented 2026-09-25 19:08:23 UTC by TJ Clark ♦2 |
| 189027393 (Comments: 1) | Levanter66 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello Levanter66! Thanks for your edits to OSM! Can you describe why you deleted way/1553318210? It's often best to leave ways with `abandoned:highway` tags, so others don't re-add them. Learn more: https://wiki.openst... commented 2026-09-25 18:07:00 UTC by uppermethow ♦4 |
| 189553829 (Comments: 1) | paxxom (Discussed changesets: 5) | millbrook* commented 2026-09-25 17:44:28 UTC by paxxom ♦3 |
| 189551244 (Comments: 1) | paxxom (Discussed changesets: 5) | millbrook* commented 2026-09-25 17:44:21 UTC by paxxom ♦3 |
| 189556320 (Comments: 1) | paxxom (Discussed changesets: 5) | millbrook* commented 2026-09-25 17:44:05 UTC by paxxom ♦3 |
| 188482074 (Comments: 3) | Jack_expl0res (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, thanks for the explanation! The best is to split the road into two parallel ones - one marked as ford, the other as bridge. Both can get their appropriate access tags, and the bridge can have a 'width' tag describing how wide it is. ... commented 2026-09-25 17:25:27 UTC by mueschel ♦7,415 |
| 189136183 (Comments: 2) | stutterdirectly (Discussed changesets: 1) | Must've been by mistake, sorry commented 2026-09-25 17:09:00 UTC by stutterdirectly ♦1 |
| 189171338 (Comments: 1) | GeoSafe-Moshe_Import (Discussed changesets: 1) | These should be refs, not names, and probably also mapped as route relations as network=US:OK:Garvin --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/189171338 commented 2026-09-25 17:01:47 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,623 |
| 189132823 (Comments: 1) | erica_busright (Discussed changesets: 11) | Looks like it is one-way but the opposite direction it was originally mapped. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/189132823 commented 2026-09-25 16:57:54 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,623 |
| 188319949 (Comments: 3) | Killian Bath (Discussed changesets: 3) | Yes I see that, good point, go ahead and change it. commented 2026-09-25 16:52:38 UTC by Killian Bath ♦1 |
| 189088005 (Comments: 1) | ArgyleZombie (Discussed changesets: 16) | Pretty sure these are county road numbers, not names. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/189088005 commented 2026-09-25 16:48:57 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,623 |
| 188676981 (Comments: 1) | skorasaurus (Discussed changesets: 20) | just to note, yes, it's odd that the lots size are inconsistent sizes, but that's what exists. commented 2026-09-25 16:47:30 UTC by skorasaurus ♦226 |
| 153668171 (Comments: 1) | PurpleLuckyCat (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hello! You used surface=grave on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/608499561/history Have you maybe meant surface=gravel ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some obje... commented 2026-09-25 16:43:33 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,339 |
| 189065213 (Comments: 1) | visitingangels (Discussed changesets: 5) | Opening hours applies to when the location is physically open, not when the website is. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/189065213 commented 2026-09-25 16:37:26 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,623 |
| 188988521 (Comments: 1) | HeadHunter7 (Discussed changesets: 1) | This optometrist got added in a drainage ditch equally distant from multiple buildings. Could you position this at the correct spot, please? --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmch... commented 2026-09-25 16:32:29 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,623 |
| 47553785 (Comments: 2) | Stretch Longfellow (Discussed changesets: 44) | Well, that’s sat there for almost a decade with no one catching it… Yes, it is gravel. Not driving over graves! commented 2026-09-25 16:31:15 UTC by Stretch Longfellow ♦106 |
| 188698443 (Comments: 1) | FlockOffTulsa (Discussed changesets: 2) | Unlikely location (blocking sidewalk, please improve). --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/188698443 commented 2026-09-25 15:20:51 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,623 |
| 188599430 (Comments: 1) | ktr-osm (Discussed changesets: 3) | This building levitates? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/188599430 commented 2026-09-25 15:00:34 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,623 |
| 30829045 (Comments: 1) | ihamr (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/343124425/history has building:levels = 1.25 that was added in this edit building:levels= is for how many above-ground non-roof levels the building has, so this always should be an integer. Here it has some... commented 2026-09-25 14:26:55 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,339 |
| 157417105 (Comments: 1) | KINGDM76 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1319885443/history has building:levels = 1.25 that was added in this edit building:levels= is for how many above-ground non-roof levels the building has, so this always should be an integer. Here it has som... commented 2026-09-25 14:26:51 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,339 |
| 176072931 (Comments: 1) | NK-Mapper (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1459431188/history has building:levels = 1.25 that was added in this edit building:levels= is for how many above-ground non-roof levels the building has, so this always should be an integer. Here it has som... commented 2026-09-25 14:26:44 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,339 |
| 150086034 (Comments: 1) | cmitchell (Discussed changesets: 30) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1273087930/history has building:levels = 1.25 that was added in this edit building:levels= is for how many above-ground non-roof levels the building has, so this always should be an integer. Here it has som... commented 2026-09-25 14:26:41 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,339 |
| 188540596 (Comments: 1) | AtlasVoyager (Discussed changesets: 1) | Are these really "anybody can park here" or are these "customer parking only"? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/188540596 commented 2026-09-25 14:26:37 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,623 |
| 188473534 (Comments: 1) | jeffmartin1 (Discussed changesets: 1) | So if I came to this location at 3 on a holiday Sunday morning, you'd be open for business? If not, then opening_hours=24/7 is not correct. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/... commented 2026-09-25 14:06:26 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,623 |
| 188470872 (Comments: 2) | AaronFTD (Discussed changesets: 1) | Looks like the florist tags were also missed. I updated this location. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/188470872 commented 2026-09-25 14:05:20 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,623 |
| 188320590 (Comments: 2) | Killian Bath (Discussed changesets: 3) | Curious if you got a chance to see this or not? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/188320590 commented 2026-09-25 13:59:55 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,623 |
| 148035279 (Comments: 1) | Guthrie (Discussed changesets: 11) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1254958389/history has building:flats = 1911, 1912, 1913, 1921, 1922, 1923, 1924, 1925, 1926, 1931, 1932, 1933, 1934, 1935, 1936 that was added in this edit What this tag means? Integer value is expected he... commented 2026-09-25 13:48:52 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,339 |
| 189426421 (Comments: 2) | barefootstache (Discussed changesets: 19) | Thanks for fixing that with clarifications. I was hoping Vespucci had a validator, but it seems like it's not the case. commented 2026-09-25 12:46:20 UTC by barefootstache ♦16 |
| 143810341 (Comments: 1) | Ke945 (Discussed changesets: 9) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/220816784/history has building:flats = 01,02,03,04,05,06,07,08 that was added in this edit What this tag means? Integer value is expected here with info how many flats are here If that was intended t... commented 2026-09-25 12:36:51 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,339 |
| 136634970 (Comments: 1) | blak-likorish (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/312525567/history has building:flats = 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12 that was added in this edit What this tag means? Integer value is expected here with info how many flats are here If that was intende... commented 2026-09-25 12:30:13 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,339 |
| 189474575 (Comments: 1) | Rooster_21 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189541613 commented 2026-09-25 12:17:55 UTC by ajmat ♦666 |
| 189501544 (Comments: 1) | Stannorth (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189540212 commented 2026-09-25 11:42:31 UTC by ajmat ♦666 |
| 189462496 (Comments: 1) | JDubMTB (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189530595 commented 2026-09-25 07:44:03 UTC by ajmat ♦666 |
| 189419634 (Comments: 1) | Jaclyn5 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hey, I just wanted to let you know that I noticed you accidentally made an invalid opening_hours=* tag. For way 1561443387 "Sunday: Closed, Monday:7am-6pm Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday: 9am-7pm, Friday:7am-6pm, Saturday: 8am-4pm" shou... commented 2026-09-25 05:00:44 UTC by PostaMap_Infinite ♦83 |
| 186214886 (Comments: 2) | kiritimati7 (Discussed changesets: 14) | @Mateusz%20Konieczny the value is correct, the crossing is a crossing:markings=lines but with only one line instead of two commented 2026-09-25 03:10:14 UTC by kiritimati7 ♦17 |
| 189520045 (Comments: 1) | MassCartog (Discussed changesets: 40) | I removed them because i felt like it was sort of unsafe to have that detail, but im not sure, im sort of new to this. commented 2026-09-25 03:09:34 UTC by Winterfureternal ♦1 |
| 189508823 (Comments: 1) | Warren Wilcock (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Warren, did you realize that you changed the outline of the river to have highway=secondary? Since this is obviously a mistake, I've already taken care of reverting this change. What part of the bridge were you trying to fix? It appears to al... commented 2026-09-25 02:35:49 UTC by dknelson9876 ♦166 |
| 189369523 (Comments: 1) | jackson_gay (Discussed changesets: 2) | what is the source of these edits? these roads look fake commented 2026-09-25 02:35:03 UTC by kiritimati7 ♦17 |
| 172453306 (Comments: 1) | B-Mac A-Tac (Discussed changesets: 7) | Pine Plantation Trail should be removed- it is an unofficial trail, and the USFS would like to limit off-trail navigation due to ordinance, user safety, and ecological impact. commented 2026-09-25 02:32:16 UTC by srkniery ♦3 |
| 189522976 (Comments: 1) | srkniery (Discussed changesets: 2) | Trails plan documentation: https://woodlandswv.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/EAST_Trail-Master-Plan.pdf commented 2026-09-25 02:27:05 UTC by srkniery ♦3 |
| 186328363 (Comments: 1) | alpacaMaps (Discussed changesets: 11) | The mapper attested to this node being properly placed. Restoring node to the map! commented 2026-09-24 23:55:16 UTC by alpacaMaps ♦431 |
| 189520537 (Comments: 1) | srkniery (Discussed changesets: 2) | Official USFS Mower Basin Trail Map can be found here: https://www.fs.usda.gov/sites/nfs/files/publication/MowerBasinTrailMap_0.pdf Additional information about trails can be found on Mon Forest Towns Partnership Website: https://monforesttown... commented 2026-09-24 23:30:29 UTC by srkniery ♦3 |
| 189517471 (Comments: 1) | TrevMW (Discussed changesets: 1) | This is my first edit on OSM so happy to hear what I should work on! commented 2026-09-24 21:03:18 UTC by TrevMW ♦1 |
| 133274223 (Comments: 1) | dannmer (Discussed changesets: 42) | Shouldn't the area around all the tennis courts be a recreation ground rather than a sport pitch or am I hallucinating commented 2026-09-24 20:21:34 UTC by I-76 ♦91 |
| 187245424 (Comments: 1) | FlockFree (Discussed changesets: 1) | This appears to be a CDOT traffic camera, not an ALPR. commented 2026-09-24 20:20:59 UTC by WhatHappened ♦1 |
| 189468188 (Comments: 6) | slyons17 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ahh that makes sense. Thanks so much! commented 2026-09-24 20:07:46 UTC by slyons17 ♦1 |
| 184777967 (Comments: 3) | Zynko (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks so much for reaching out to let me know. I'll review what I can see about restoring the node tonight. Thanks again! commented 2026-09-24 19:38:22 UTC by alpacaMaps ♦431 |
| 189143143 (Comments: 2) | VikasChandra_Lyft (Discussed changesets: 3) | it is still there on the 2026 aerial imagery from Miami Dade county, why did you disconnect it? Happy mapping, Udar commented 2026-09-24 19:33:31 UTC by Udarian ♦992 |
| 189510821 (Comments: 1) | Cavmir (Discussed changesets: 1) | this changeset was almost purely SEO, I have added the correct office=* tag to make it at least useful and removed the SEO language from the description as that is not allowed in OSM, for more info see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/About_OpenSt... commented 2026-09-24 19:24:59 UTC by Udarian ♦992 |
| 189511092 (Comments: 1) | slipstream-wa (Discussed changesets: 2) | * Capitol Forest not Taylor Mountain commented 2026-09-24 18:15:14 UTC by slipstream-wa ♦2 |
| 189503691 (Comments: 1) | Pulchritude (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Pulchritude, can you double-check the placement of this ALPR feature? This seems like a strange location for something like that. Perhaps this is more of a temporary construction-related camera? commented 2026-09-24 17:56:56 UTC by Xvtn ♦511 |
| 189504102 (Comments: 1) | PhilLowry (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi PhilLowry, can you double check your reclassification of FR 168 from unclassified to path? My general rule of thumb is that singletrack is generally highway=path, while doubletrack or ways wide enough for a 4-wheeled vehicle typically should at le... commented 2026-09-24 17:54:09 UTC by Xvtn ♦511 |
| 733654 (Comments: 2) | alexrudd (Discussed changesets: 1) | It has since been changed to ref=* . A lot of streams in this area seem to have been imported with such tags in the name and there's been people moving some of them (not all) to ref. commented 2026-09-24 16:35:19 UTC by I-76 ♦91 |
| 189458537 (Comments: 1) | Waxahachie GIS (Discussed changesets: 3) | Thanks for the fix! Happy mapping commented 2026-09-24 14:18:42 UTC by citrula ♦1,020 |
| 189496384 (Comments: 2) | TFrank52 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Also I was discussing this with another mapper, and it sounds like what you spotted here might be and LVT tower rather than an ALPR (https://www.lvt.com) commented 2026-09-24 13:37:16 UTC by JuanElDemografo ♦59 |
| 189473543 (Comments: 1) | mikotiwa (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi there, what is your reasoning for this change? None of these streets have residences along them, and they seem to mostly fit the definition at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dunclassified (notably, the tag does *not* mean the roa... commented 2026-09-24 11:43:38 UTC by willkmis ♦234 |
| 183193137 (Comments: 1) | AeonicB (Discussed changesets: 3) | Please check/correct: highway=0 !? (node 13881308468) Thx in advance. commented 2026-09-24 11:23:31 UTC by Ropino ♦431 |
| 123443212 (Comments: 2) | scarapella (Discussed changesets: 25) | Hello. Happily this is a gravel quarry not a grave quarry. And for that matter I hope the practice of mining graves (e.g. for Mummy Brown https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mummy_brown) is solidly in our collective past. fixed via: https://www.op... commented 2026-09-24 11:11:57 UTC by scarapella ♦65 |
| 189363048 (Comments: 1) | Jason19991112 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189488556 commented 2026-09-24 10:08:36 UTC by rajdhani ♦642 |
| 189359106 (Comments: 1) | Big Bubbles (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189486863 ; https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189486689 commented 2026-09-24 09:32:20 UTC by rajdhani ♦642 |
| 189376010 (Comments: 1) | Melissa Engelsen (Discussed changesets: 10) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189485523 commented 2026-09-24 09:05:57 UTC by ajmat ♦666 |
| 189380764 (Comments: 1) | John Joseph A Gatchalian (Discussed changesets: 62) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189483464 commented 2026-09-24 08:13:39 UTC by ajmat ♦666 |
| 189473236 (Comments: 1) | ArancioneMilano (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi, Thank you for your contribution to BTCmap. By sharing information about Bitcoin friendly businesses, you’re helping to support the Bitcoin community. Your listing's tags were incomplete, so I have filled them in for you. Please ... commented 2026-09-24 08:12:33 UTC by Comino ♦426 |
| 189473148 (Comments: 1) | ArancioneMilano (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi, Thank you for your contribution to BTCmap. By sharing information about Bitcoin friendly businesses, you’re helping to support the Bitcoin community. Your listing's tags were incomplete, so I have filled them in for you. Please ... commented 2026-09-24 08:07:35 UTC by Comino ♦426 |
| 189473078 (Comments: 1) | ArancioneMilano (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi, Thank you for your contribution to BTCmap. By sharing information about Bitcoin friendly businesses, you’re helping to support the Bitcoin community. Your listing's tags were incomplete, so I have filled them in for you. Please ... commented 2026-09-24 08:02:52 UTC by Comino ♦426 |
| 189472994 (Comments: 1) | ArancioneMilano (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi, Thank you for your contribution to BTCmap. By sharing information about Bitcoin friendly businesses, you’re helping to support the Bitcoin community. Your listing's tags were incomplete, so I have filled them in for you. Please ... commented 2026-09-24 07:48:53 UTC by Comino ♦426 |
| 189371123 (Comments: 1) | SLin07 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189478272 commented 2026-09-24 07:15:26 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,271 |
| 189372316 (Comments: 1) | Rog232 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189464002 commented 2026-09-24 07:12:58 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,271 |
| 189350449 (Comments: 1) | Raul Candias (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189480832 commented 2026-09-24 07:01:58 UTC by ajmat ♦666 |
| 189479854 (Comments: 1) | ieguy3 (Discussed changesets: 74) | there was 2 ocean hills for the same neighborhood commented 2026-09-24 06:28:27 UTC by ieguy3 ♦75 |
| 187167929 (Comments: 1) | Danylo Mostovyi (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, original creator of the node here. Could I get some clarification regarding the purpose of its deletion? The device was present at the time that I added it to OSM. commented 2026-09-24 05:29:37 UTC by mappislandzuli ♦1 |
| 189458752 (Comments: 1) | MrPuffelFisch (Discussed changesets: 1) | what's the purpose of adding line=no to the boundary ways? commented 2026-09-24 04:26:54 UTC by citrula ♦1,020 |
| 189428778 (Comments: 5) | TheNightRider (Discussed changesets: 53) | Just sent you a JOSM screenshot on Slack commented 2026-09-24 03:04:16 UTC by TheNightRider ♦90 |
| 189461745 (Comments: 1) | Tom Noogen (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! For future reference, typically chain stores (Walmart, Safeway, Taco John's, etc.) don't include the city name in the name= field. Thanks! commented 2026-09-24 02:45:52 UTC by SD Mapman ♦101 |
| 189369963 (Comments: 1) | AJ_Domelle (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi AJ, welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for your contribution! I just had a couple suggestions for you to improve your mapping in the future: * opening_hours=* for Bridges Nepal Cuisine and Midwest Family Outlet did not follow the va... commented 2026-09-24 01:45:51 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 189376276 (Comments: 1) | AJ_Domelle (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi AJ, welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for your contributions here! I just had a few suggestions for you to improve your mapping in the future: * description=* and note=*, if used, should be strictly an objective description of the ... commented 2026-09-24 01:44:10 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 189376370 (Comments: 1) | AJ_Domelle (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi AJ, welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for your contribution! I just had one suggestion for you to improve your mapping in the future: make sure to strip out any extra tracking junk out of URLs--the website=* for Jimbo Auto Service had a w... commented 2026-09-24 01:41:40 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 186376040 (Comments: 1) | Mr Matt K (Discussed changesets: 15) | Don't use a descriptive name like "Former Rite-Aid" just leave it blank if it is currently vacant. commented 2026-09-24 00:51:11 UTC by CurlingMan13 ♦2,101 |
| 189195360 (Comments: 1) | AndreaSchmidtCo (Discussed changesets: 2) | As an account mapping on behalf of a commercial business for financial gain, please be advised that you are expected to understand and carefully follow documented OpenStreetMap standards and conventions, which will both directly benefit the quality o... commented 2026-09-24 00:31:59 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 189348397 (Comments: 1) | Dslrocks10 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for your contribution! I just had a suggestion for you to improve your mapping in the future: Specifically. opening_hours=* did not follow the valid syntax, Ww-Ww HH:MM-HH:MM (e.g. Mo-Fr 09:00-17:... commented 2026-09-24 00:30:49 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 189036451 (Comments: 6) | vngx32 (Discussed changesets: 2) | w128011127 Hard to tell on aerial imagery, but with the latest mapillary images in the area you can zoom in at the southern part of this way and see that it says "Bike Lane" even though on aerial it looks like a regular sidewalk. If you ... commented 2026-09-23 23:56:57 UTC by HolyCrapThatsALongUsername ♦14 |
| 189464252 (Comments: 1) | Matt Gatti (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome to OSM. The feature you removed in this changeset is valid. Please don’t remove valid OSM data. You have a new account and might not be aware, on OSM, we do not remove features if they exist on the ground. If it exists on ... commented 2026-09-23 23:32:57 UTC by MassCartog ♦503 |
| 189459112 (Comments: 1) | NoPeekin1234567890 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Looks really good! I noticed that on https://indoorequal.org/#map=18.6/39.6302304/-77.6693418&level=0 the women's bathroom isn't showing up. I believe this is because it is missing a level=0 tag. commented 2026-09-23 22:05:44 UTC by PuddlesMapping ♦25 |
| 176444179 (Comments: 2) | mueschel (Discussed changesets: 1027) | fixed. commented 2026-09-23 18:39:31 UTC by mueschel ♦7,415 |
| 189409441 (Comments: 3) | unknown246 (Discussed changesets: 8) | Sounds good, thanks! commented 2026-09-23 18:12:13 UTC by PuddlesMapping ♦25 |
| 189438486 (Comments: 1) | tarheelcons (Discussed changesets: 1) | moved, sanity check if you like https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189459772 commented 2026-09-23 16:54:32 UTC by m86 ♦23 |
| 189452801 (Comments: 2) | Waxahachie GIS (Discussed changesets: 3) | Yes, Waterfront Drive is still named as such. commented 2026-09-23 16:22:06 UTC by Waxahachie GIS ♦1 |
| 180675101 (Comments: 1) | shinylman (Discussed changesets: 5) | I'm not convinced that we should be tagging routes from "suggested bike routes" layer on the city bike map. These are simple roads that are bike-friendly, which we can indicate using bicycle_road=yes. The fact that these routes have no... commented 2026-09-23 16:14:50 UTC by alexwohlbruck ♦25 |
| 189455132 (Comments: 1) | timurmr (Discussed changesets: 2) | Follows the guideline: "if entering or exiting the HOV lane(s) is only permitted at certain locations, modeling the HOV lane(s) as separate ways is preferable." (hov=*) commented 2026-09-23 15:54:26 UTC by timurmr ♦2 |
| 189456706 (Comments: 1) | timurmr (Discussed changesets: 2) | Follows the guideline: "if entering or exiting the HOV lane(s) is only permitted at certain locations, modeling the HOV lane(s) as separate ways is preferable." (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:hov) Existing example of su... commented 2026-09-23 15:53:27 UTC by timurmr ♦2 |
| 189376682 (Comments: 4) | Teddy5245 (Discussed changesets: 2) | So if Frederick PD has nothing to with Flock cameras within their City limits, who installing them? Is PD allowing “someone” to “spy” on their citizens? The PD should take down the remaining Flocks and other ALPR. They hav... commented 2026-09-23 15:14:17 UTC by Teddy5245 ♦1 |
| 175971535 (Comments: 2) | j0hn33y (Discussed changesets: 22) | Added heights to all ways in the relation. Was likely a quick tweak for 3d render. 1 level is normally ~3m https://beakerboy.github.io/OSMBuilding/?type=relation&id=20068469 commented 2026-09-23 14:40:12 UTC by j0hn33y ♦21 |
| 189422918 (Comments: 1) | Blahblah_blah (Discussed changesets: 7) | Getting these on Panoramax, too, would be very helpful for mapping these accurately. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/189422918 commented 2026-09-23 13:47:46 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,623 |
| 187447214 (Comments: 2) | btwhite92 (Discussed changesets: 28) | Hi there, This was deliberate; the trail is posted with both a 'blue' and 'black' designation, as opposed to other nearby trails in the same network with just a 'blue' or a 'black'. (https://imglink.cc/cdn/U... commented 2026-09-23 13:40:23 UTC by btwhite92 ♦112 |
| 182478728 (Comments: 3) | maxolasersquad (Discussed changesets: 30) | Alright, don't know how to tag that either. Just stumbled over this while researching how to tag a bath house. I'll leave it to you. commented 2026-09-23 12:53:39 UTC by LingM ♦21 |
| 147950133 (Comments: 2) | 1998alexkane (Discussed changesets: 62) | Never mind. commented 2026-09-23 09:43:53 UTC by MapsByEX ♦3 |
| 161764497 (Comments: 1) | Arefsn89 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1353386570/history has building:levels = 4.9 that was added in this edit building:levels= is for how many above-ground non-roof levels the building has, so this always should be an integer. Here it has some... commented 2026-09-23 08:57:05 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,339 |
| 189358693 (Comments: 1) | Camron Day (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189432206 commented 2026-09-23 07:29:18 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,271 |
| 189370878 (Comments: 1) | AJ_Domelle (Discussed changesets: 4) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189429268 commented 2026-09-23 07:27:21 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,271 |
| 189406894 (Comments: 9) | TheNightRider (Discussed changesets: 53) | So all the SfB brands will need to be set up in the NSI. They are coming out of the woodwork, too. I've got a running list. commented 2026-09-23 07:27:09 UTC by TheNightRider ♦90 |
| 189322083 (Comments: 1) | Skyshark95 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189393782 commented 2026-09-23 07:26:31 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,271 |
| 189367917 (Comments: 1) | ersaz (Discussed changesets: 3) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189433664 commented 2026-09-23 07:18:08 UTC by MappingMore ♦793 |
| 189368243 (Comments: 1) | ersaz (Discussed changesets: 3) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189433536 commented 2026-09-23 07:14:51 UTC by rajdhani ♦642 |
| 189351326 (Comments: 1) | MikeShep (Discussed changesets: 2) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189433246 commented 2026-09-23 07:04:33 UTC by ajmat ♦666 |
| 189351246 (Comments: 1) | MikeShep (Discussed changesets: 2) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189431611 commented 2026-09-23 06:15:24 UTC by MappingMore ♦793 |
| 189328712 (Comments: 2) | ajmat (Discussed changesets: 25) | Hello andrewrunner, On iD Editor, you’d need to scroll down on the left panel and below the “Feature Type” presets and the “Fields” section that has data forms, you’ll see the “Tags” section. The... commented 2026-09-23 05:44:33 UTC by ajmat ♦666 |
| 189425337 (Comments: 1) | Spyder_Monkey (Discussed changesets: 5) | noooo why would you make it all multipolygons whyyyy Please use regular areas for landuse, unless there is a cutout of a different landuse within one landuse, e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1318010105 Using exclusively multipoly... commented 2026-09-23 05:26:40 UTC by diamondarmorsteve ♦78 |
| 189364622 (Comments: 1) | calvelage (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189429974 commented 2026-09-23 05:16:54 UTC by ajmat ♦666 |
| 189189131 (Comments: 3) | carlosguerrero_lyft (Discussed changesets: 9) | I've created a forum post at https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/what-service-value-for-fuel-pump-aisles-at-amenity-fuel/148007/2 commented 2026-09-23 02:49:48 UTC by dknelson9876 ♦166 |
| 188215667 (Comments: 3) | Robtieman (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks Rob. I've updated it! commented 2026-09-23 02:01:51 UTC by will l ♦6 |
| 184774819 (Comments: 2) | Moonfire (Discussed changesets: 8) | My pleasure! I enjoyed cleaning up parts of 101 almost as much as I enjoyed driving it! The Avenue of the Giants was especially magical. commented 2026-09-23 00:57:51 UTC by Moonfire ♦9 |
| 68421475 (Comments: 1) | LukeyBear (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hello, Do you have a source for https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/64039488? It runs entirely on service roads that parallel the Sloan Channel. Thanks! commented 2026-09-23 00:01:42 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦405 |
| 189401769 (Comments: 1) | xander78 (Discussed changesets: 14) | Hi, Why was this area set to landuse - grass? It is already marked as residential and has a mix of houses, grass and trees. commented 2026-09-22 23:02:19 UTC by MikeN ♦373 |
| 189275464 (Comments: 1) | Travln1620 (Discussed changesets: 12) | I added back the roads you deleted. Please stop vandalizing the map. OSM maps features that exist on the ground not how you wish things were. Your repeated vandalism of motorized routes in Utah has been noted. Please stop. commented 2026-09-22 21:31:15 UTC by pmckay419 ♦21 |
| 189128640 (Comments: 3) | alojmm (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks! commented 2026-09-22 21:23:14 UTC by will l ♦6 |
| 189371618 (Comments: 1) | ClaireBotanist (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello, welcome back to OSM. The feature you removed in this changeset is valid. Please don’t remove valid OSM data. You might not be aware, on OSM, we do not remove features if they exist on the ground. If it exists on the ground, it is ... commented 2026-09-22 21:18:58 UTC by MassCartog ♦503 |
| 189406032 (Comments: 3) | Omnific (Discussed changesets: 147) | Oh, well that's an easy fix. I must have mislabeled that too, it should be using the post office tag. commented 2026-09-22 20:24:17 UTC by jorbit ♦2 |
| 189412492 (Comments: 1) | eric_1345 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi there, thanks for adding details here! For the future, it's generally considered preferable to modify existing elements rather than deleting and redrawing them, like you did for the parking aisles and woods here. See https://wiki.openstreetma... commented 2026-09-22 19:19:18 UTC by willkmis ♦234 |
| 189372867 (Comments: 2) | greatnameguys2472 (Discussed changesets: 17) | My bad, reverted commented 2026-09-22 18:51:47 UTC by greatnameguys2472 ♦39 |
| 187355428 (Comments: 2) | billatq (Discussed changesets: 1) | Yup, fixed it. commented 2026-09-22 17:21:49 UTC by billatq ♦1 |
| 189362997 (Comments: 3) | Christopher Stouter (Discussed changesets: 1) | Okay, awesome! Thank you for your work. commented 2026-09-22 16:01:43 UTC by PuddlesMapping ♦25 |
| 186733602 (Comments: 2) | maxolasersquad (Discussed changesets: 30) | Yes, it is a typo. commented 2026-09-22 15:08:03 UTC by maxolasersquad ♦97 |
| 58095779 (Comments: 2) | OceanVortex (Discussed changesets: 11) | Just a typo, I guess. I've fixed it. commented 2026-09-22 15:06:03 UTC by OceanVortex ♦20 |
| 189360909 (Comments: 1) | Cares8 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Please make the shapes match the building footprints. That's the whole reason why OSM hasn't blind-imported Bing's building detections, the shape is important. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Pub... commented 2026-09-22 15:02:40 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,623 |
| 97331693 (Comments: 1) | JriSv250 (Discussed changesets: 56) | Hello! You used shop=candle;cosmetics on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8313186666/history Have you maybe meant shop=candles;cosmetics ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (... commented 2026-09-22 15:02:40 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,339 |
| 144436347 (Comments: 1) | countrymouse (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hello! You used shop=tile on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7332028633/history Have you maybe meant shop=tiles ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects wh... commented 2026-09-22 14:59:05 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,339 |
| 51693573 (Comments: 1) | MikeN (Discussed changesets: 21) | Hello! You used shop=tile on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5077122147/history Have you maybe meant shop=tiles ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects wh... commented 2026-09-22 14:59:03 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,339 |
| 3181241 (Comments: 1) | MikeN (Discussed changesets: 21) | Hello! You used shop=tile on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/568121368/history Have you maybe meant shop=tiles ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects whe... commented 2026-09-22 14:59:00 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,339 |
| 6316381 (Comments: 1) | BN1228 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! You used shop=tile on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/981662437/history Have you maybe meant shop=tiles ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects whe... commented 2026-09-22 14:58:45 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,339 |
| 15369289 (Comments: 1) | 123maps (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hello! You used shop=tile on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2202651327/history Have you maybe meant shop=tiles ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects wh... commented 2026-09-22 14:58:43 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,339 |
| 146682553 (Comments: 1) | Jon Hanson (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hello! You used parking:right=streetside on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/391846966/history Have you maybe meant parking:right=street_side ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace ... commented 2026-09-22 14:49:32 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,339 |
| 189253249 (Comments: 3) | Howpper (Discussed changesets: 207) | You can change it for now if you want. commented 2026-09-22 13:41:49 UTC by Howpper ♦122 |
| 189388826 (Comments: 1) | revent (Discussed changesets: 18) | This version actually comes closest to matching the ground truth (just use the correct separator on ref). The newer version as an area is an unusual way to map runways and goes off into the trees. --- Pu... commented 2026-09-22 13:35:10 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,623 |
| 189392192 (Comments: 1) | revent (Discussed changesets: 18) | It should be noted that references are separated by ; in OSM, even if the FAA doesn't do it that way. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/189392192 commented 2026-09-22 13:32:06 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,623 |
| 172213883 (Comments: 1) | elwwan (Discussed changesets: 2) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13158337867/history so is tree or shrub? or have you meant that it is shrub that can/will/could grow into a tree? commented 2026-09-22 13:00:04 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,339 |
| 189342414 (Comments: 1) | TransAct-AS (Discussed changesets: 93) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189395230 commented 2026-09-22 11:51:40 UTC by rajdhani ♦642 |
| 189322354 (Comments: 1) | Feisty_Wench (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189393284 commented 2026-09-22 11:10:13 UTC by rajdhani ♦642 |
| 189385601 (Comments: 1) | h234a2hm (Discussed changesets: 9) | source=local knowledge;aerial imagery commented 2026-09-22 08:28:33 UTC by h234a2hm ♦8 |
| 189203054 (Comments: 2) | Sergei Amuzinski (Discussed changesets: 11) | Hello, Baloo Uriza! Thanks for the feedback. I see your point, but I am not sure it would be appropriate to map this as a culvert. The existing way is an administrative boundary, not a waterway. The OSM Wiki describes tunnel=culvert as being used ... commented 2026-09-22 08:18:24 UTC by Sergei Amuzinski ♦13 |
| 189371508 (Comments: 1) | Melissa Engelsen (Discussed changesets: 10) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189381443 commented 2026-09-22 06:48:59 UTC by MappingMore ♦793 |
| 189372020 (Comments: 1) | Woazboat (Discussed changesets: 11) | Mmm. Oh. Good pie. Yeah. commented 2026-09-22 06:36:54 UTC by marcmarti ♦120 |
| 189131560 (Comments: 1) | Mules_510 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! Thanks for your contributions. I noticed a small thing that I wanted to let you know about. You've added the "lazy river" tag to a few swimming pools that aren't lazy rivers. They're a pretty particular thing. For ... commented 2026-09-22 06:04:45 UTC by watmildon ♦320 |
| 187852520 (Comments: 1) | Christie91277 (Discussed changesets: 2) | I hate to break it to you, but splitting ways like this (ie the single lane mapping) isn't the approved OSM way of mapping and will confuse a lot of GPSes. The rule of thumb is not to split unless there is a physical separation, like a median.<... commented 2026-09-22 04:35:15 UTC by jhaluska80 ♦113 |
| 189294274 (Comments: 1) | FrenchToastFox (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189353098 commented 2026-09-22 04:20:03 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,271 |
| 189281541 (Comments: 1) | John Joseph A Gatchalian (Discussed changesets: 62) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189342691 commented 2026-09-22 04:17:45 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,271 |
| 189311378 (Comments: 1) | Tommy Pellettiere (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189328391 commented 2026-09-22 04:15:16 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,271 |
| 184554528 (Comments: 1) | Bub$ (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Bub$,\r \r This edit appears to be incorrect according to a Lubbock resident and GSV. Please only update nodes that have been physically verified in the world. The node appears to point down Dowden Road by the aforementioned accounts.\r \... commented 2026-09-22 02:47:00 UTC by alpacaMaps ♦431 |
| 189142845 (Comments: 1) | Dookie Doctors Pet Waste Removal (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, this business has been removed in changeset/189374904 as it appears to have come from an SEO company that is adding many businesses incorrectly, always using incorrect tags that then demand cleanup from volunteer mappers. We have tried ... commented 2026-09-22 02:03:11 UTC by Joel Koen ♦115 |
| 189360508 (Comments: 2) | AmoebaWasTaken (Discussed changesets: 2) | Not a hard and fast rule, just wanted to explain my rationale since we're working on similar areas! :) commented 2026-09-22 00:14:26 UTC by cederbs ♦1 |
| 189372702 (Comments: 1) | goyslop (Discussed changesets: 1) | on various aerial imagery (including the 2026 imagery from Miami Dade County) this is positioned in a likely incorrect way, it is in the middle of the kerb which seems incredibly unlikely to me. Please double check its position and fix it using aeria... commented 2026-09-21 23:53:10 UTC by Udarian ♦992 |
| 189366471 (Comments: 1) | kiritimati7 (Discussed changesets: 14) | ** source=survey commented 2026-09-21 23:50:22 UTC by kiritimati7 ♦17 |
| 189352644 (Comments: 2) | zsmith3 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted with changeset/189372691 commented 2026-09-21 23:21:18 UTC by Mxdanger ♦121 |
| 189352656 (Comments: 2) | zsmith3 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted with changeset/189372662 commented 2026-09-21 23:19:56 UTC by Mxdanger ♦121 |
| 189215414 (Comments: 1) | tmgessner (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi welcome to OSM. Please dont removed features that exist on the ground, instead just update the feature type to driveway. Thanks! commented 2026-09-21 23:00:25 UTC by MassCartog ♦503 |
| 187652799 (Comments: 5) | Sparks (Discussed changesets: 42) | - [/] **MD 4 SB → Suitland Pkwy → Dower House Rd/Marlboro Pike ramp**: check for a stray connection/tag letting routers go straight through the MD4/Suitland Pkwy signal instead of right-turn-then-ramp. Confirm turn:lanes / restriction refle... commented 2026-09-21 22:51:30 UTC by Sparks ♦39 |
| 188599607 (Comments: 7) | w0x0f (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hello. I recently went to the area, and both directions of traffic are now open, as proved by my GPX files of the region. commented 2026-09-21 22:24:10 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦405 |
| 188498086 (Comments: 1) | washington_irving (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hey there, I agree with the revert. Bollards and paint are not enough to denote a separate bikeway. The road should be tagged with cycleway=lane or cycleway:left=lane + cycleway:right=lane and the separate cycle path removed. See: https://wiki.openst... commented 2026-09-21 22:10:17 UTC by clambake92115 ♦14 |
| 189362777 (Comments: 2) | pkaiser0828 (Discussed changesets: 1) | @pitscheplatsch Yes, I'm new and just might use it to make some personal bike routes. So yeah, testing out the editing features. I don't know- what should I do to test, or watch? commented 2026-09-21 21:52:39 UTC by pkaiser0828 ♦1 |
| 180566042 (Comments: 2) | Flap Slimy Outward (Discussed changesets: 313) | Yes, actually. I had a brief discussion with Joseph R P here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180033654 commented 2026-09-21 21:35:45 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦405 |
| 188889301 (Comments: 2) | 5Nap (Discussed changesets: 3) | fair point... I checked the guidelines for US roads, it should be primary_link, you're right. Don't like this approach, but I'll revert my changes for the sake of consistency commented 2026-09-21 21:24:34 UTC by 5Nap ♦1 |
| 187100153 (Comments: 4) | oscarm_lyft (Discussed changesets: 10) | Hi Udar, Thanks a lot for confirming this and for sharing the link to the 2026 Miami-Dade imagery! That custom layer is super helpful to have right in iD. Best regards and happy mapping, Oscar commented 2026-09-21 20:38:33 UTC by oscarm_lyft ♦8 |
| 189201635 (Comments: 1) | HansHansen123 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Red Hawk Road continues as Red Hawk Road until it dead ends near the Blanco River. It does not change back to Lone Man Creek Drive. commented 2026-09-21 20:14:17 UTC by Lloyd Provost ♦1 |
| 188319736 (Comments: 1) | Citizen208 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Heads up on this one. There's a principle in OSM called "Names are not functions". You don't want to put a name on a road that doesn't have one, like a parking isle. The other tags make that clear. I've gone ahead and re... commented 2026-09-21 19:18:42 UTC by ColbyTheWorldTraveler ♦34 |
| 188317527 (Comments: 1) | Citizen208 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Looks good! Welcome to the mapping community! --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/188317527 commented 2026-09-21 19:15:15 UTC by ColbyTheWorldTraveler ♦34 |
| 189264432 (Comments: 4) | AmoebaWasTaken (Discussed changesets: 2) | Okay, I just uploaded a revert. Thanks! commented 2026-09-21 19:01:11 UTC by pwbriggs ♦520 |
| 189315980 (Comments: 6) | Daniel Claassen (Discussed changesets: 1) | Even though you requested a review on your changeset, things you edit still go live immediately, so there's nothing for me to decline or restart. The request for review is why I looked at the changeset. You can make corrections yourself: go in t... commented 2026-09-21 18:53:20 UTC by Allison P ♦1,154 |
| 189217188 (Comments: 1) | Rainstone Water Heaters (Discussed changesets: 1) | Removed in changeset 189361046 due to promotional description and invalid tags. Please follow our tagging conventions and do not include promotional material in your edits. See osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers. commented 2026-09-21 18:05:15 UTC by schobbish ♦87 |
| 188896212 (Comments: 2) | SkySide (Discussed changesets: 2) | The path through the Hilton is for guests, I did add the correct path through the building around the perimeter commented 2026-09-21 17:33:20 UTC by SkySide ♦1 |
| 189358778 (Comments: 1) | chath_tsu (Discussed changesets: 17) | right turns from I-5 offramp to 64th are allowed; the arrows on the pavement are one-way reminder arrows and not turn restrictions commented 2026-09-21 16:50:41 UTC by chath_tsu ♦34 |
| 135985165 (Comments: 6) | Stretch Longfellow (Discussed changesets: 44) | Agreed. When I started this project (2017ish), such rules weren't in place, and I admittedly haven't kept up as well as I should have on changes to such rules. I'll work on getting those fixed! commented 2026-09-21 15:11:52 UTC by Stretch Longfellow ♦106 |
| 189353073 (Comments: 1) | GA_Kevin (Discussed changesets: 25) | source is AFDC commented 2026-09-21 14:53:35 UTC by GA_Kevin ♦58 |
| 189318388 (Comments: 1) | mikedotd (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to oSM! Please be careful! You move the node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7915560416 more over 100 meters over other buildings. I correct this to the old position commented 2026-09-21 12:19:48 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,942 |
| 189324808 (Comments: 1) | dsabey3 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please be carefull you move the nodes https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/521988427, https://www.osm.org/node/213541432 more than 100 meters over buildings and other streets. I move the node back to the original position. commented 2026-09-21 11:39:34 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,942 |
| 189311918 (Comments: 1) | capitalriftplayer1 (Discussed changesets: 1) | This map data is actually used by people. Please don't add junk. commented 2026-09-21 11:10:17 UTC by InsertUser ♦511 |
| 189309317 (Comments: 1) | Blazearator (Discussed changesets: 4) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189339365 commented 2026-09-21 10:13:41 UTC by MappingMore ♦793 |
| 189178910 (Comments: 1) | leftybender (Discussed changesets: 14) | Hi, there is no need for new electric bicycle tags for the US: electric_bicycle:class_1 is equivalent to electric_bicycle. electric_bicycle:class_2 is equivalent to electric_moped (proposed only) electric_bicycle:class_3 is eq... commented 2026-09-21 10:00:15 UTC by mueschel ♦7,415 |
| 187469768 (Comments: 1) | Christie91277 (Discussed changesets: 2) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1174489610/history - you meant house=terraced, not house=terrace, right? commented 2026-09-21 09:36:53 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,339 |
| 189310863 (Comments: 1) | Loljhh (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189332077 commented 2026-09-21 07:30:38 UTC by ajmat ♦666 |
| 189302273 (Comments: 1) | andrewrunner (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189328712 commented 2026-09-21 06:02:52 UTC by ajmat ♦666 |
| 189280081 (Comments: 2) | Flap Slimy Outward (Discussed changesets: 313) | There were numerous errors with the original set that I wanted to fix. First and foremost, ramps should not have names. The fact that many primary links have names like "Arrivals," "Departures," and "Return to Terminal... commented 2026-09-21 05:40:13 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦405 |
| 189326459 (Comments: 1) | awdaviswa (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks for the contribution and welcome to OpenStreetMap! Feel free to reach out if you have any questions. commented 2026-09-21 05:14:15 UTC by pwbriggs ♦520 |
| 189327329 (Comments: 1) | pwbriggs (Discussed changesets: 31) | See https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5528511 commented 2026-09-21 05:01:39 UTC by pwbriggs ♦520 |
| 188074676 (Comments: 5) | Fountain0206 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Behind the OSM map data is a community of people that agree to some general guidelines about how to do things, and in many cases there are multiple approaches. Why I made a comment, though, is because what you seem to be creating as a standard practi... commented 2026-09-21 05:00:43 UTC by neuhausr ♦368 |
| 189274897 (Comments: 1) | waynejesse12 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thank you for the contribution. The opening_hours=* tag has a particular format that helps data consumers be able to more easily process opening hours in a computerized way. If you're interested, https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_h... commented 2026-09-21 04:37:29 UTC by pwbriggs ♦520 |
| 189266414 (Comments: 1) | maxwellward (Discussed changesets: 17) | Thanks. FYI, it looks like you added an extra semicolon at the end. I removed the semicolon. Happy mapping! commented 2026-09-21 04:30:15 UTC by pwbriggs ♦520 |
| 182854927 (Comments: 7) | RoseBTCmap (Discussed changesets: 6) | Check out https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Good_practice#temporary_events_and_temporary_features_clarification. There is a strong pushback to discuss mapping tempy features elsewhere. Let me suggest joining the OSM US Slack and discuss the is... commented 2026-09-21 02:39:00 UTC by Glassman ♦6,059 |
| 189180210 (Comments: 2) | Winkerbeen (Discussed changesets: 3) | Lord have mercy why did you change every state-maintained road to primary and secondary?? Please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway#Values and also see how roads are generally tagged in the rest of the state. You will notice that mo... commented 2026-09-21 01:00:33 UTC by diamondarmorsteve ♦78 |
| 189304700 (Comments: 3) | Stetson P (Discussed changesets: 3) | Thanks for the reply, explanation, and understanding despite my typo! commented 2026-09-20 22:05:47 UTC by MassCartog ♦503 |
| 189270213 (Comments: 1) | Rush Bowls Rino (Discussed changesets: 1) | As an account mapping on behalf of a commercial business for financial gain, please be advised that you are expected to understand and carefully follow documented OpenStreetMap standards and conventions, which will both directly benefit the quality o... commented 2026-09-20 22:01:24 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 189212152 (Comments: 4) | happy5214 (Discussed changesets: 10) | Unprefixed tags removed (and other minor issues fixed) in changeset 189318702, thanks! commented 2026-09-20 21:46:40 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 162189120 (Comments: 1) | deweyjungles (Discussed changesets: 6) | The correct name is B Bar S, not B Bar South. Fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189318663 commented 2026-09-20 21:44:20 UTC by Allison P ♦1,154 |
| 189261140 (Comments: 1) | Wtberry (Discussed changesets: 1) | #TIP: If the name of the street isn't correct, you can revise it yourself. I've sent you a DM with a bunch of info on OSM. Let me know if you need more help. --- Published using OSMCha: https://... commented 2026-09-20 21:31:51 UTC by Glassman ♦6,059 |
| 187002098 (Comments: 37) | carciofo (Discussed changesets: 21) | We're all here to learn and if you see mistakes in edits I've made, please, point them out. I'd rather learn from a mistake rather than keep making the same mistake over and over and over and over. My definition of "local e... commented 2026-09-20 21:10:29 UTC by txemt ♦86 |
| 189179219 (Comments: 3) | leftybender (Discussed changesets: 14) | Let me go fix that now. I didn't realize that the person who claimed it was fixed was a troll who commented false or vulgar information on a lot of random notes on Jul 30 and has done nothing else with the account. commented 2026-09-20 19:31:10 UTC by tjasz ♦4 |
| 189281269 (Comments: 2) | Potatoleum (Discussed changesets: 6) | I accidentally edited an underground pipeline. I fixed it now. commented 2026-09-20 19:25:26 UTC by Potatoleum ♦6 |
| 189275944 (Comments: 6) | Cobrapond (Discussed changesets: 1) | Yah thanks for improving your area, happy mapping! commented 2026-09-20 19:08:06 UTC by MassCartog ♦503 |
| 188792013 (Comments: 2) | Omnific (Discussed changesets: 147) | It means not yet used. Unfortunately no option for that in Every Door. commented 2026-09-20 18:40:23 UTC by Omnific ♦244 |
| 189307238 (Comments: 1) | Mr Kishenko (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted commented 2026-09-20 18:25:42 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦7,210 |
| 189310315 (Comments: 1) | synthfi (Discussed changesets: 15) | this is adding levels to the buildings I was walking by commented 2026-09-20 18:04:04 UTC by synthfi ♦29 |
| 183935023 (Comments: 1) | BryanOSullivan (Discussed changesets: 11) | If you're connecting a dirt track directly to an interstate highway, you might take a moment to double check conditions around the highway. This changeset connected way/1528232844 to I 15, but as with most interstate highways, there's a fen... commented 2026-09-20 17:02:19 UTC by Kai Johnson ♦182 |
| 189307254 (Comments: 1) | bobthebuilder423468 (Discussed changesets: 35) | sorry I forgot I did a couple other things too! commented 2026-09-20 16:51:52 UTC by bobthebuilder423468 ♦18 |
| 188868038 (Comments: 3) | Wildsharky (Discussed changesets: 39) | Hi cr0wb0y, No worries, and thanks for getting back to me. I just made sure the relevant information is kept on OpenStreetMap while outdated information is removed. Thank you for your contributions, and please let us know if we can be of any h... commented 2026-09-20 12:45:46 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,271 |
| 189128971 (Comments: 2) | WebfootJack (Discussed changesets: 3) | Also, since you are interested in road classification, I'd like to invite you to discuss on the OSM US Slack Server https://slack.openstreetmap.us/ (there is a #highway-classification channel to discuss precisely these sorts of changes) commented 2026-09-20 12:26:48 UTC by 1998alexkane ♦93 |
| 189288865 (Comments: 1) | ieguy3 (Discussed changesets: 74) | hey, can you guys make sure your edits align with the buildings. some of the roads had overlap and most are now zig zag. alleys are not residential streets commented 2026-09-20 10:03:42 UTC by ieguy3 ♦75 |
| 187610549 (Comments: 2) | kguenther24 (Discussed changesets: 28) | The Esri and Mapbox imagery show the pavilion and some paths under construction, as well as referencing the public diagrams of the park. There are definitely still some missing paths and details though that are harder to map without newer imagery. commented 2026-09-20 05:01:08 UTC by kguenther24 ♦26 |
| 189248075 (Comments: 1) | P Diddy (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi P Diddy, Thanks for your contributions to OpenStreetMap. However, before you continue to map, please respond to the questions and and follow the feedback given to you on changeset 189084965 , namely to clearly explain your source(s) for the... commented 2026-09-20 02:49:58 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 189276425 (Comments: 1) | ieguy3 (Discussed changesets: 74) | the portion of markham from roosevelt to wood is going to be redone and paved according the county transit website commented 2026-09-20 00:22:38 UTC by ieguy3 ♦75 |
| 189268970 (Comments: 2) | Clairness (Discussed changesets: 9) | On the highway=stop page, under the 'Multiple nodes' subsection of the All-way stop section, it says for a higher level of detail (or for split carriageways, which is not applicable here) you can add stop=all to all of the highway=stop node... commented 2026-09-19 22:30:05 UTC by Clairness ♦10 |
| 189211232 (Comments: 2) | HashFerret (Discussed changesets: 12) | Reverted for you in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189271627 commented 2026-09-19 20:42:32 UTC by dknelson9876 ♦166 |
| 189233009 (Comments: 1) | JustClay (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi JustClay, welcome to OpenStreetMap and mapping in Utah! I see that you requested a review of your changes on this and a couple other changes on this apartment building. While every tag on OSM technically is free form entry, there are agreed upon p... commented 2026-09-19 20:34:41 UTC by dknelson9876 ♦166 |
| 153997046 (Comments: 1) | Nostradumbass (Discussed changesets: 4) | I'm curious why the path to the Whatcom view the falls is tagged as a cycleway, when the path is tagged with dismount and a maxspeed of 15 mph? commented 2026-09-19 19:39:35 UTC by Glassman ♦6,059 |
| 189265593 (Comments: 3) | CAM-Gerlach_Repair (Discussed changesets: 44) | Hi, Just to be clear, I'm not the one blocking you for vandalism; that's the OSM Data Working Group due to numerous reports from other mappers as well as myself. And a number of other mappers have reverted your previous changesets as... commented 2026-09-19 19:36:23 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 187300427 (Comments: 1) | GraceZ17 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Please do not tag roads as access=no motor_vehicle=yes. This is not accurate. Also, if sidewalks are mapped separately, use foot=use_sidepath, not foot=no. I've also noticed in some of your other changes you've tagged roads as bicycl... commented 2026-09-19 19:33:37 UTC by EllieNyaa ♦25 |
| 189267427 (Comments: 1) | tzenfore (Discussed changesets: 1) | I may have got the category wrong. This is a shop that sells live fish as pets. commented 2026-09-19 19:00:17 UTC by tzenfore ♦1 |
| 189137292 (Comments: 1) | cartodal (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189268009 commented 2026-09-19 19:00:07 UTC by rajdhani ♦642 |
| 189251442 (Comments: 1) | Tjr33150 (Discussed changesets: 4) | looking at this ALPR on various aerial imagery in iD it seems to be within the road area, being positioned like this is highly unlikely so please double check the position of this ALPR and fix it. Happy mapping, Udar. commented 2026-09-19 18:40:51 UTC by Udarian ♦992 |
| 188246309 (Comments: 1) | thedavidtyler (Discussed changesets: 1) | Access restrictions like foot=no should only be added when there is clear on-the-ground signage or another verifiable legal basis. commented 2026-09-19 18:31:15 UTC by StreetSurveyor ♦213 |
| 189236312 (Comments: 1) | Belén Chicaiza de (Discussed changesets: 12) | Reverted more sockpuppet vandalism in changeset 189265593 commented 2026-09-19 17:55:00 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 189251280 (Comments: 1) | Belén Chicaiza gamer (Discussed changesets: 1) | Evicted continued sockpuppet vandalism from OpenStreetMap in changeset 189265593 commented 2026-09-19 17:54:12 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 189240732 (Comments: 1) | eretyhh (Discussed changesets: 19) | I have reverted this edit which goes against community recommendations. See https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mount-mckinley-or-denali/127411/12 --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changese... commented 2026-09-19 17:45:43 UTC by Glassman ♦6,059 |
| 189141257 (Comments: 1) | RomanRose (Discussed changesets: 1) | When drawing golf course areas (i.e. greens, fairways, bunkers, tees, etc.), please be aware that the ways (lines) used to outline those areas must not cross over each other. Fairway outlines shouldn't cross over greens or bunkers or other fairw... commented 2026-09-19 17:37:05 UTC by b-jazz ♦976 |
| 174837595 (Comments: 1) | helloiambryan (Discussed changesets: 1) | Does it really have dedicated slip lanes? This lane should only be added if it has a physical divider between the right turn slip lane and the roundabout. commented 2026-09-19 17:30:49 UTC by Mxdanger ♦121 |
| 188009789 (Comments: 1) | lele0714 (Discussed changesets: 1) | These are not ALPRs. They are standard traffic cameras. commented 2026-09-19 16:09:28 UTC by Overnight2509 ♦1 |
| 185724973 (Comments: 1) | fquijada (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1493956446/history has building:levels = PK-4 that was added in this edit What this tag means? Integer value is expected here and here is something unusual... commented 2026-09-19 16:07:03 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,339 |
| 161478537 (Comments: 1) | troysalt (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/749746263/history has building:levels = left that was added in this edit What this tag means? Integer value is expected here and here is something unusual... commented 2026-09-19 14:11:14 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,339 |
| 189229757 (Comments: 2) | tokuto (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi Bernard, My editor adds those automatically without my input, likely for the same reason (them being generally assumed). All well, here's hoping, A.K. commented 2026-09-19 12:54:27 UTC by tokuto ♦2 |
| 189243326 (Comments: 1) | Udarian (Discussed changesets: 118) | work still needed in the area commented 2026-09-19 09:11:33 UTC by Udarian ♦992 |
| 189077704 (Comments: 1) | Chetk77 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189242494 commented 2026-09-19 09:05:07 UTC by ajmat ♦666 |
| 189241573 (Comments: 1) | jennifersmith96 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Sorry! Tried to undo these changes before close. Broke them out into later changesets! commented 2026-09-19 09:04:02 UTC by jennifersmith96 ♦1 |
| 189241527 (Comments: 1) | Udarian (Discussed changesets: 118) | continuation of the changeset comment below since I ran out of characters: " based on newer imagery from the county, work still needed in the area " commented 2026-09-19 08:21:28 UTC by Udarian ♦992 |
| 189240363 (Comments: 1) | Minh Nguyen (Discussed changesets: 188) | Or from Madison Twp. commented 2026-09-19 07:41:27 UTC by Minh Nguyen ♦659 |
| 189082054 (Comments: 2) | wired3810 (Discussed changesets: 1) | I specifically set it so "Su 11:00" since I'm assuming that's what you most likely intended, but feel free to overwrite it! commented 2026-09-19 06:56:10 UTC by PostaMap_Infinite ♦83 |
| 189219494 (Comments: 3) | Belén Chicaiza de (Discussed changesets: 12) | Thanks. I think some of the changes have already been reverted. However, it looks like the user made some changes again afterwards. Feel free to give it a try, or someone from DWG should take a look at it. commented 2026-09-19 06:33:24 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦7,210 |
| 189219086 (Comments: 4) | Belén Chicaiza de (Discussed changesets: 12) | Thx CAM commented 2026-09-19 06:29:21 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦7,210 |
| 189191977 (Comments: 3) | CAM-Gerlach_Repair (Discussed changesets: 44) | Well, if you're a tenant then its by definition not your property, no? I'm pretty sure if you vandalized your own property in real life to the extent you've repeatedly done in OpenStreetMap, it would be you who would be evicted,... commented 2026-09-19 04:29:27 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 189234799 (Comments: 1) | Belén Chicaiza de (Discussed changesets: 12) | Reverted yet more vandalism by "Dima"/"Belen" Cancun sockpuppet in changeset 189236174 commented 2026-09-19 04:03:36 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 189235426 (Comments: 1) | Udarian (Discussed changesets: 118) | the area still needs work, I am working on it I am just chunking things a bit so that it is more manageable for me, more changesets coming around the GGI soon (I am going to continue working on this now) commented 2026-09-19 03:05:43 UTC by Udarian ♦992 |
| 189234605 (Comments: 1) | Udarian (Discussed changesets: 118) | forgot to put it in the changeset comment, but there is allot of work still needed in the area and I am actively working on it commented 2026-09-19 01:55:09 UTC by Udarian ♦992 |
| 188505492 (Comments: 5) | Ktr101 (Discussed changesets: 31) | That is fair enough - When I had originally commented on it, the renderer was still rendering it on the map - since the use of the planned:*=* tags (in v2 of the relation) actually disables rendering of the area, it is probably fine to leave it as is... commented 2026-09-19 01:37:51 UTC by Clairness ♦10 |
| 185157302 (Comments: 2) | Better Than Solid State (Discussed changesets: 1) | I had realized that sometime after deleting it. I forgot Flock Flex's existed, I will pay more attention in the future. Apologies commented 2026-09-19 00:40:05 UTC by Better Than Solid State ♦1 |
| 188783084 (Comments: 1) | Omnific (Discussed changesets: 147) | Is https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2417181558 vacant? See https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5433108 commented 2026-09-19 00:04:12 UTC by pwbriggs ♦520 |
| 189229489 (Comments: 1) | ieguy3 (Discussed changesets: 74) | road widening from motte business center to the freeway commented 2026-09-18 21:42:40 UTC by ieguy3 ♦75 |
| 189228727 (Comments: 1) | Minh Nguyen (Discussed changesets: 188) | Neither has South Canal. commented 2026-09-18 21:20:27 UTC by Minh Nguyen ♦659 |
| 187314286 (Comments: 2) | Ktr101 (Discussed changesets: 31) | Thank you for correcting that, as I was trying to go off of the map that was out there, and somehow erred when doing so. commented 2026-09-18 21:11:12 UTC by Ktr101 ♦36 |
| 181556853 (Comments: 3) | Goofball5388 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Excellent! I just combined a few now, so hopefully that will clean things up a bit. Thanks for the help! commented 2026-09-18 21:07:21 UTC by Ktr101 ♦36 |
| 189219235 (Comments: 1) | VGPaleontologist (Discussed changesets: 5) | For routing purposes, you should connect these to the adjacent service road ways. Otherwise, this looks good to me. commented 2026-09-18 20:43:49 UTC by citrula ♦1,020 |
| 189219903 (Comments: 1) | Belén Chicaiza de (Discussed changesets: 12) | Vandalism by sockpuppet again. Should be reverted. commented 2026-09-18 20:37:42 UTC by Bovi887 ♦34 |
| 189221655 (Comments: 1) | Belén Chicaiza de (Discussed changesets: 12) | Vandalism by sockpuppet again. Should be reverted. commented 2026-09-18 20:37:13 UTC by Bovi887 ♦34 |
| 189221974 (Comments: 1) | Belén Chicaiza de (Discussed changesets: 12) | Vandalism by sockpuppet again. Should be reverted. commented 2026-09-18 20:36:28 UTC by Bovi887 ♦34 |
| 189222171 (Comments: 1) | Belén Chicaiza de (Discussed changesets: 12) | Vandalism by sockpuppet again. Should be reverted. commented 2026-09-18 20:35:34 UTC by Bovi887 ♦34 |
| 189222365 (Comments: 1) | Belén Chicaiza de (Discussed changesets: 12) | Vandalism by sockpuppet again. Should be reverted. commented 2026-09-18 20:34:08 UTC by Bovi887 ♦34 |
| 189222603 (Comments: 1) | Belén Chicaiza de (Discussed changesets: 12) | Vandalism by sockpuppet again. Should be reverted. commented 2026-09-18 20:33:41 UTC by Bovi887 ♦34 |
| 189222802 (Comments: 1) | Belén Chicaiza de (Discussed changesets: 12) | Vandalism by sockpuppet again. Should be reverted. commented 2026-09-18 20:33:28 UTC by Bovi887 ♦34 |
| 187210368 (Comments: 4) | Tuwewanzi (Discussed changesets: 9) | To clarify, I meant to say "a literal translation", not "aliteral translation". commented 2026-09-18 20:21:33 UTC by Tuwewanzi ♦9 |
| 188551497 (Comments: 2) | Phuck flock (Discussed changesets: 1) | Yes, that flock camera has been eliminated commented 2026-09-18 20:14:23 UTC by Phuck flock ♦1 |
| 178448788 (Comments: 1) | nowyousimi (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/32718790/history has building:levels = 0-3 that was added in this edit What this tag means? Integer value is expected here and here is something unusual... commented 2026-09-18 18:14:07 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,339 |
| 189220924 (Comments: 1) | spatialia (Discussed changesets: 7) | Weird, I didn't use "overture;Microsoft ML Buildings;Google Open Buildings" but missed that they were added to the data_used when I created this. I used one footprint from MS buildings, but then moved and rotated it to the correct spot... commented 2026-09-18 17:51:16 UTC by spatialia ♦30 |
| 189220915 (Comments: 2) | Belén Chicaiza de (Discussed changesets: 12) | Should be reverted commented 2026-09-18 17:49:55 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦7,210 |
| 151507935 (Comments: 2) | Lastchance000 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks for pointing this out. I've fixed the tags. commented 2026-09-18 14:44:36 UTC by Lastchance000 ♦1 |
| 189203000 (Comments: 1) | tokuto (Discussed changesets: 2) | Just realized I didn't country code the phone number. commented 2026-09-18 13:34:26 UTC by tokuto ♦2 |
| 189082846 (Comments: 1) | cyber101thunder (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189207558 commented 2026-09-18 12:55:47 UTC by rajdhani ♦642 |
| 178627921 (Comments: 2) | robcook3011 (Discussed changesets: 1) | I believe there was a node for Cliffwood drive that was out in the middle of 17 or on the other side. You can go either direction on 17 there, but Cliffwood itself doesn't cross all the way to the other side. I noted this while running... commented 2026-09-18 11:40:50 UTC by robcook3011 ♦1 |
| 189136122 (Comments: 1) | Blazearator (Discussed changesets: 4) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189202054 commented 2026-09-18 10:38:19 UTC by MappingMore ♦793 |
| 189197899 (Comments: 1) | giatu hoang (Discussed changesets: 1) | It's correct commented 2026-09-18 09:44:12 UTC by nguyen ty ♦1 |
| 189123150 (Comments: 1) | Trod Skunk (Discussed changesets: 9) | I added an opening_hours that I think captures this info. Thanks! commented 2026-09-18 07:59:53 UTC by pwbriggs ♦520 |
| 189122709 (Comments: 1) | PugetSoundNorthwest (Discussed changesets: 1) | Good catch- sometimes things are missing from OSM so thank you for getting those in the database and making a more complete map for everyone. Feel free to reach out any time if you have questions about OpenStreetMap, and we'd be happy to help! commented 2026-09-18 07:51:05 UTC by pwbriggs ♦520 |
| 189176983 (Comments: 4) | Belén Chicaiza designer (Discussed changesets: 14) | Thx CAM commented 2026-09-18 07:24:40 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦7,210 |
| 189176661 (Comments: 4) | Belén Chicaiza designer (Discussed changesets: 14) | Thx CAM commented 2026-09-18 07:24:26 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦7,210 |
| 189176036 (Comments: 3) | Belén Chicaiza designer (Discussed changesets: 14) | Thx CAM commented 2026-09-18 07:24:10 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦7,210 |
| 189187891 (Comments: 1) | Belén Chicaiza designer (Discussed changesets: 14) | Reverted commented 2026-09-18 06:20:52 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦7,210 |
| 189188161 (Comments: 1) | Belén Chicaiza designer (Discussed changesets: 14) | Reverted commented 2026-09-18 06:20:16 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦7,210 |
| 189188287 (Comments: 1) | Belén Chicaiza designer (Discussed changesets: 14) | Reverted batch of Cancun, etc. vandalism by serial sockpuppet "Dima" in changeset 189191977 commented 2026-09-18 06:19:01 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 189001589 (Comments: 4) | viktoriia_frolova (Discussed changesets: 3) | Thanks for the clarification! commented 2026-09-18 06:03:40 UTC by viktoriia_frolova ♦3 |
| 188984219 (Comments: 2) | 21NoINot (Discussed changesets: 1) | Whoops, seems user/TKvN fixed the example I provided, but there were a few others that I fixed... commented 2026-09-18 05:08:05 UTC by PostaMap_Infinite ♦83 |
| 183043454 (Comments: 1) | UrbanUnPlanner (Discussed changesets: 22) | FYI, I fixed building tag at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1518980034/history commented 2026-09-18 03:22:12 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,339 |
| 189125408 (Comments: 6) | GA_Kevin (Discussed changesets: 25) | Direct from Tesla: https://x.com/TeslaCharging/status/2100325558601269280 commented 2026-09-18 02:40:00 UTC by GA_Kevin ♦58 |
| 184275721 (Comments: 1) | CoryS89 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Why did you leave a random trunk stub at Texarkana? I just noticed a primary spur with Summerhill Road and I-30. commented 2026-09-18 01:58:46 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦405 |
| 189181804 (Comments: 3) | Flap Slimy Outward (Discussed changesets: 313) | Numerous bus routes had a ref tag such as "123 EB." I changed these to "123" and preserved the direction in direction=*. A lot of route masters had generic names like "bus 123" when they should include the route name (e.... commented 2026-09-18 01:41:49 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦405 |
| 189186286 (Comments: 1) | billwagnon (Discussed changesets: 1) | Accidental upload, please help revert. commented 2026-09-18 00:52:16 UTC by billwagnon ♦1 |
| 189119332 (Comments: 2) | Omnific (Discussed changesets: 147) | It was duplicated. Thanks for your comments. commented 2026-09-17 23:05:00 UTC by Omnific ♦244 |
| 189178141 (Comments: 1) | erica_busright (Discussed changesets: 11) | Thanks for your edit! Please make sure to avoid attaching roads to edges of landuse, as this makes it more difficult for future mappers to edit the features. commented 2026-09-17 22:38:43 UTC by ScrawnyMeowth1 ♦59 |
| 189181171 (Comments: 1) | Belén Chicaiza designer (Discussed changesets: 14) | Reverted another batch of sockpuppet vandalism in changeset: https://osm.org/changeset/189183144 commented 2026-09-17 22:01:44 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 2497976 (Comments: 1) | fuzzbuzz (Discussed changesets: 1) | Added back the 's'. The on the ground info has the 's', and all online info I can find have the 's'. Also, the body of water next to the road is not a lake, but a pond. Also, nearby neighborhood is call Colonial Lakes,... commented 2026-09-17 21:11:01 UTC by wireguy ♦587 |
| 175234146 (Comments: 1) | BCNorwich (Discussed changesets: 267) | Please be more careful, do not blindly follow the maproulette. This modified way is underground, however you removed the layer and covered tags. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://os... commented 2026-09-17 20:34:29 UTC by Mxdanger ♦121 |
| 164512582 (Comments: 1) | quincylvania (Discussed changesets: 78) | Here is a link to discussion on OSMSU Slack the preceded this changeset: https://osmus.slack.com/archives/CJ4QKU40H/p1743775453702849 commented 2026-09-17 20:28:51 UTC by quincylvania ♦92 |
| 137180410 (Comments: 1) | SikeMo (Discussed changesets: 11) | I don't think these edits are correct. The names of trails and fire roads typically include "Trail" or "Fire Road", so it should indeed be "Valentine Vista Trail", for example. commented 2026-09-17 20:21:07 UTC by drewlevitt ♦4 |
| 189177926 (Comments: 1) | WebfootJack (Discussed changesets: 3) | Also deleted a node for a police call box which has since been removed. commented 2026-09-17 19:04:27 UTC by WebfootJack ♦2 |
| 189156839 (Comments: 1) | vandal1 (Discussed changesets: 43) | Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/189173412 Comment: "Remove vandalism" commented 2026-09-17 17:09:01 UTC by NeisRevert ♦2,076 |
| 189157196 (Comments: 1) | vandal1 (Discussed changesets: 43) | Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/189173318 Comment: "Remove vandalism" commented 2026-09-17 17:07:17 UTC by NeisRevert ♦2,076 |
| 189088244 (Comments: 4) | Danizunzun (Discussed changesets: 1) | Oh looks like it's already been fixed by someone, n/m. now just need to figure out what's wrong and it's very possible that there's nothing that can be done if the router uses data we have no control over. commented 2026-09-17 16:14:35 UTC by gpserror ♦254 |
| 189118962 (Comments: 4) | Belén Chicaiza designer (Discussed changesets: 14) | > no this not a spam That's _exactly_ what a spammer would say XD Sockpuppet account, one in a long series of "Dima/Belen" accounts trying to turn Brooklyn into Cancun for some reason that keep getting reverted and blo... commented 2026-09-17 16:08:18 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 189149793 (Comments: 1) | JSpirit (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello and thank you for the contribution. Please refrain from advertising on OpenStreetMap; the description reads more as a marketing tagline than an impartial description of the facility. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Spam#SEO_Spam ... commented 2026-09-17 14:53:50 UTC by PuddlesMapping ♦25 |
| 189122955 (Comments: 4) | NoPeekin1234567890 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hello again! I believe https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/452127261 is mistagged; https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dcollege is meant for the entire area of the college, rather than a building that is part of the college. I believe ... commented 2026-09-17 14:38:02 UTC by PuddlesMapping ♦25 |
| 188385148 (Comments: 1) | Matt Molo (Discussed changesets: 3) | the portion of the pedestrian path in the street could be tagged as `footway=crossing`, to differentiate from actual sidewalks --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/188385148 ... commented 2026-09-17 14:36:16 UTC by jcarlson ♦143 |
| 188989617 (Comments: 1) | Matt Molo (Discussed changesets: 3) | opinions on sidewalk mapping can vary a LOT, but when the sidewalk already exists as its own feature in OSM, it is extra helpful to tag the road with `sidewalk:both=separate`. i'm not sure if that's something you can even do in StreetComple... commented 2026-09-17 14:25:22 UTC by jcarlson ♦143 |
| 189119447 (Comments: 1) | NoPeekin1234567890 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hello, it looks pretty good to me! Per the buildings you added (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1559356849): First, I recommend using Bing aerial for tracing buildings in MD because it has a better top-down perspective. This helps better esti... commented 2026-09-17 14:24:00 UTC by PuddlesMapping ♦25 |
| 188989856 (Comments: 1) | Matt Molo (Discussed changesets: 3) | thanks for adding so many high-quality edits! the area is looking really good --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/188989856 commented 2026-09-17 14:20:52 UTC by jcarlson ♦143 |
| 189152575 (Comments: 1) | ieguy3 (Discussed changesets: 74) | https://files.ceqanet.lci.ca.gov/303840-1/attachment/dkbHCsW01x4INlFFmzVA7lmMHP69Jp0lBig6r-LAnwP6C_-ooh7yye2whTnzWCR9tpNj-Vf50E-oogSc0 commented 2026-09-17 10:30:26 UTC by ieguy3 ♦75 |
| 189124422 (Comments: 1) | sunnyguha (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Notice: A name isn't a description (in this case a island). Please have a look on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:place%3Disland commented 2026-09-17 09:32:30 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,942 |
| 189118201 (Comments: 2) | Belén Chicaiza designer (Discussed changesets: 14) | So do I, but you don't see me vandalizing the map. If you don't want to keep getting blocked and having your changesets immediately reverted, accomplishing exactly nothing, then stop spamming this Cancun nonsense everywhere in Brook... commented 2026-09-17 04:00:50 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 189138222 (Comments: 1) | Belén Chicaiza designer (Discussed changesets: 14) | Reverted more vandalism from serial sockpuppet vandal "Dima" in changeset: https://osm.org/changeset/189138979 commented 2026-09-17 03:58:11 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 188879396 (Comments: 1) | EvangelinaDawkins (Discussed changesets: 2) | HI EvangelinaDawkins We have received a report that those surveillance camera does not exist in real life. Can you clearified what is your data source of adding these camera. Otherwise, we might have to remove these camera. Dennis Rayli... commented 2026-09-17 03:21:30 UTC by Supaplex ♦11,401 |
| 188879072 (Comments: 1) | EvangelinaDawkins (Discussed changesets: 2) | HI EvangelinaDawkins We have received a report that those surveillance camera does not exist in real life. Can you clearified what is your data source of adding these camera. Otherwise, we might have to remove these camera. Dennis Rayli... commented 2026-09-17 03:21:23 UTC by Supaplex ♦11,401 |
| 189084849 (Comments: 2) | Brian S` (Discussed changesets: 3) | Thanks for the direction. I'm just learning and don't want to mess things up commented 2026-09-17 02:59:30 UTC by Brian S` ♦1 |
| 159073395 (Comments: 1) | BPTT (Discussed changesets: 43) | Thanks for your dedication! commented 2026-09-17 02:36:11 UTC by CattMapper ♦1 |
| 187417229 (Comments: 7) | Fuckflock6557 (Discussed changesets: 1) | I see. The reason I am hesitant to tag this as an ALPR is because even though it could be used as an ALPR using whatever post processing, it is facing on-coming traffic and I can't imagine it is high-quality enough from its position to read a li... commented 2026-09-17 01:35:27 UTC by BubbaJuice ♦174 |
| 189119388 (Comments: 5) | GA_Kevin (Discussed changesets: 25) | Yes certainly, I actually did this for the QA portion of the tool, just need to bring it over to the new placements portion. source tag in this case is the lead, so AFDC; imagery used will stay the same. I'll put that improvement in before I mak... commented 2026-09-17 01:25:06 UTC by GA_Kevin ♦58 |
| 188109614 (Comments: 3) | Tuwewanzi (Discussed changesets: 9) | The more you know, neat! commented 2026-09-17 01:21:24 UTC by SD Mapman ♦101 |
| 189039695 (Comments: 3) | Jagget (Discussed changesets: 1) | Cool thanks for the reply! Happy mapping commented 2026-09-17 00:36:29 UTC by MassCartog ♦503 |
| 189075936 (Comments: 1) | GenSao (Discussed changesets: 4) | Are you sure about all those parking entrances? The aerials indicating no entrance at those spots. commented 2026-09-17 00:29:57 UTC by aighes ♦63 |
| 189084616 (Comments: 1) | Brian S` (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi welcome to OSM. Please dont remove private roads or non-public roads. Instead use the access tags to tag them as such. Thanks! Please read this for more info: osm.wiki/Why_we_won't_delete_roads_on_private_property commented 2026-09-16 23:23:59 UTC by MassCartog ♦503 |
| 189084689 (Comments: 1) | Brian S` (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi welcome to OSM. Please dont remove private roads or non-public roads. Instead use the access tags to tag them as such. Thanks! Please read this for more info: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_we_won't_delete_roads_on_private_... commented 2026-09-16 23:21:39 UTC by MassCartog ♦503 |
| 186425926 (Comments: 2) | O1S (Discussed changesets: 53) | FYI, I DM'd you on Slack regarding roads. commented 2026-09-16 22:59:26 UTC by O1S ♦37 |
| 188320542 (Comments: 1) | Thunder91166 (Discussed changesets: 5) | This is not correct. The course routing has changed due to the sale of part of the property to the town of stow, and a developer. commented 2026-09-16 22:08:18 UTC by Killroy Murdock ♦1 |
| 187415424 (Comments: 1) | Nythawk (Discussed changesets: 1) | So.wone removed the camera commented 2026-09-16 21:42:46 UTC by Nythawk ♦1 |
| 189127168 (Comments: 1) | mmmmaaaaaaa (Discussed changesets: 1) | Madroño has already been added and moved into the building, please do not add duplicate objects, if something already exists in OSM edit the existing object. This restaurant exists within the building from what I can tell so the node represent... commented 2026-09-16 21:27:32 UTC by Udarian ♦992 |
| 189062520 (Comments: 2) | Oregonian3 (Discussed changesets: 53) | I don't think the designation or maintainer of a road should have any bearing on how we classify the road. I care more about what the function of the road is, and this section of Highway 40 is no more than a glorified frontage road. If th... commented 2026-09-16 21:06:29 UTC by Oregonian3 ♦70 |
| 173559387 (Comments: 6) | Flap Slimy Outward (Discussed changesets: 313) | Yeah, that's a common misunderstanding. I may try to follow up. Do you happen to have the element ID or changeset ID handy? commented 2026-09-16 21:01:49 UTC by Kai Johnson ♦182 |
| 189069959 (Comments: 1) | vaguealias123 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, the map you linked as your source appears to be under copyright. Apologies if this was discussed elsewhere, but did you get permission to use it for OSM? commented 2026-09-16 20:53:42 UTC by extraordinarymachine ♦6 |
| 188695267 (Comments: 4) | BigSushi (Discussed changesets: 9) | It's ok, no problem! commented 2026-09-16 19:42:00 UTC by Trevor_1 ♦278 |
| 189127081 (Comments: 1) | pinonaplanet (Discussed changesets: 1) | Specifically, these are the Axis Q1800-LE-3 LPR cameras (https://www.axis.com/products/axis-q1800-le-3). commented 2026-09-16 19:04:04 UTC by pinonaplanet ♦1 |
| 189124112 (Comments: 1) | Suhbeena (Discussed changesets: 4) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182393705 commented 2026-09-16 17:46:36 UTC by Suhbeena ♦6 |
| 187106476 (Comments: 1) | ElijahKensler (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, bicycles are allowed on the paths in Powell's Cove Park. Was this area surveyed for the access changes that were made? commented 2026-09-16 17:15:20 UTC by valaise ♦22 |
| 189083200 (Comments: 3) | NoPeekin1234567890 (Discussed changesets: 6) | I also noticed that https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/14183799649 appears to be a duplicate of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/452127261. If the whole building is called the Learning Support Center, please remove the node. If the Learning Suppor... commented 2026-09-16 15:17:38 UTC by PuddlesMapping ♦25 |
| 189039333 (Comments: 5) | TheNightRider (Discussed changesets: 53) | It certainly is... message me if you want a tour around slack / my ev thoughts, we can message or call there. We'll get you set up right. commented 2026-09-16 13:09:08 UTC by GA_Kevin ♦58 |
| 187334201 (Comments: 3) | grawat_Lyft (Discussed changesets: 54) | Hi MarkoŠatrak, My name is Gaurav, and I'm a mapper on the OSM team at Lyft. Thank you for pointing this out, and please accept my apologies for the incorrect edits. After reviewing the available evidence, I agree that only one of t... commented 2026-09-16 12:58:38 UTC by grawat_Lyft ♦21 |
| 188989584 (Comments: 7) | TheNightRider (Discussed changesets: 53) | Cool! commented 2026-09-16 12:43:50 UTC by TheNightRider ♦90 |
| 189011106 (Comments: 4) | TheNightRider (Discussed changesets: 53) | They do, and so thanks again for pointing this out. I've referenced that wiki page on hours more than once, and somehow this slipped in. It's complex! commented 2026-09-16 12:41:56 UTC by TheNightRider ♦90 |
| 187539507 (Comments: 4) | GA_Kevin (Discussed changesets: 25) | Oh yeah, when I first got my Tesla Model 3, I discovered the outlet in my garage was not grounded, so the car refused to charge (I have an old house). I had to run a heavy duty extension cord from the outlet above the stove all the way to the garage,... commented 2026-09-16 12:39:57 UTC by TheNightRider ♦90 |
| 187816184 (Comments: 1) | GA_Kevin (Discussed changesets: 25) | This is definitely still amenity=charging_station, not man_made=charge_point. It's a Tesla-only Supercharger, 6 stalls, 150 kW. What someone earlier did was tag the 6 parking spaces with name=Tesla Supercharger along with other tags that normall... commented 2026-09-16 11:46:40 UTC by TheNightRider ♦90 |
| 189035157 (Comments: 1) | klimmy96 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189058197 commented 2026-09-16 10:07:21 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,271 |
| 189034994 (Comments: 1) | klimmy96 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189047294 commented 2026-09-16 10:06:27 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,271 |
| 188987008 (Comments: 1) | Parakeet5557 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189045141 commented 2026-09-16 10:05:33 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,271 |
| 188667967 (Comments: 4) | miha12 (Discussed changesets: 12) | Thanks, @mueschel! I see it now. commented 2026-09-16 10:02:08 UTC by TheNightRider ♦90 |
| 189031501 (Comments: 1) | nowagi (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189042602 commented 2026-09-16 10:02:02 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,271 |
| 189074777 (Comments: 2) | nathanpboston (Discussed changesets: 1) | Repair changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189100806 commented 2026-09-16 09:21:51 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,942 |
| 189084660 (Comments: 1) | Snewton1 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welocme to OSM! Thnak you for your update! But please check the relations of the way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/844453130 (more details see wiki.osm.org) commented 2026-09-16 08:40:27 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,942 |
| 188682301 (Comments: 1) | Evan Cohen (Discussed changesets: 1) | Unmarked crossing would be for a crossing that crosses a street; a regular "Crossing" is fine here. I update the tags on the driveway itself--it specifically needs highway=service and service=driveway to classify it as a driveway and not a... commented 2026-09-16 07:31:56 UTC by Cookie Guru ♦17 |
| 189090082 (Comments: 1) | Belén Chicaiza designer (Discussed changesets: 14) | Reverted all Brooklyn, NY changesets by serial sockpuppet vandal "Dima" in changeset: https://osm.org/changeset/189093978 (Reported to DWG) commented 2026-09-16 06:28:29 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 189034681 (Comments: 1) | klimmy96 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189092834 commented 2026-09-16 05:50:39 UTC by ajmat ♦666 |
| 188334305 (Comments: 1) | dwl-sdca (Discussed changesets: 14) | I don't think this string should go into the railway's name=* tag, per "name is the name only." See, for example, Brightline West. Does this proposed railway have a name? commented 2026-09-16 02:29:57 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦405 |
| 189088415 (Comments: 1) | ICT_maps (Discussed changesets: 20) | Hey thanks for the add! Charging_station=yes should be on the dealership if we suspect it’s inside a service bay or otherwise not findable. Since you found this one in the lot, it just needs the amenity tag :) Should I include the full t... commented 2026-09-16 02:26:08 UTC by GA_Kevin ♦58 |
| 189081687 (Comments: 1) | GoGolfToday (Discussed changesets: 1) | When drawing golf course areas (i.e. greens, fairways, bunkers, tees, etc.), please be aware that the ways (lines) used to outline those areas must not cross over each other. Fairway outlines shouldn't cross over greens or bunkers or other fairw... commented 2026-09-16 02:17:13 UTC by b-jazz ♦976 |
| 189031509 (Comments: 1) | LandynHubbard (Discussed changesets: 1) | When drawing golf course areas (i.e. greens, fairways, bunkers, tees, etc.), please be aware that the ways (lines) used to outline those areas must not cross over each other. Fairway outlines shouldn't cross over greens or bunkers or other fairw... commented 2026-09-16 02:01:16 UTC by b-jazz ♦976 |
| 188405750 (Comments: 2) | Pixelpotato13 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello, I added it due to an reading I read, but now I see it confusion. I will remove this tags with the cameras I have added. My apologies. commented 2026-09-16 01:29:18 UTC by Pixelpotato13 ♦2 |
| 187558175 (Comments: 2) | Pixelpotato13 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello, I added it due to an reading I read, but now I see it confusion. I will remove this tags with the cameras I have added. My apologies. commented 2026-09-16 01:27:11 UTC by Pixelpotato13 ♦2 |
| 188483559 (Comments: 2) | TransAct-JT (Discussed changesets: 18) | Follow-up: I reset the lane tags on way 269836335 to two through lanes (one each direction) in changeset 189082726. commented 2026-09-15 21:15:12 UTC by hopboy1 ♦4 |
| 182491692 (Comments: 1) | TheNightRider (Discussed changesets: 53) | Hello, I would like to kindly ask that you refrain from removing `ref:tesla` as it is documented with a URL formatter at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Item:Q20845. Yes, we include `website` many times but the reference keys are a much more stab... commented 2026-09-15 19:57:35 UTC by GA_Kevin ♦58 |
| 179328558 (Comments: 1) | J678 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, it seems you added a maxspeed with a value of * to Pinapple St. If you still have the information, could you replace the * with the actual value? Thanks! commented 2026-09-15 19:33:37 UTC by carciofo ♦197 |
| 189070606 (Comments: 2) | heretofore (Discussed changesets: 15) | Right: I debated dropping the tag. I decided it was harmless, but I won't be offended with either leaving or discarding it. commented 2026-09-15 18:51:22 UTC by heretofore ♦34 |
| 189034474 (Comments: 1) | CityofFosterCity (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OpenStreetMap, and thanks for contributing! OSM is a map for everyone, used by lots of people and lots of apps all over the world. Just because a park isn't managed by this city, doesn't mean it's not a park at all! You can ... commented 2026-09-15 18:35:46 UTC by impiaaa ♦502 |
| 187881456 (Comments: 5) | Sangueffusor (Discussed changesets: 7) | I see it now! I couldn't find it in the changese. I'm still relatively new to OSM, and still learning. Now I'm curious about the history of the course. In my 20 years of living in the area, I've never heard of it. I wonder ... commented 2026-09-15 18:19:39 UTC by gjward ♦3 |
| 188528491 (Comments: 1) | Ktr101 (Discussed changesets: 31) | Any idea if the airport is always equally shifted relative to the city? Is there historical GPS locations for the airport (runway / tower / any part)? If so, we can compare the relative movement, as there is historical locations for the city.<... commented 2026-09-15 18:07:59 UTC by Anonymous897234 ♦16 |
| 189024410 (Comments: 2) | Woldumar (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thank you for the lesson. I'll take a look at the changes and see what I can do that's more in line with these policies. Some of the trails are former trails that are now completely naturalized. There's one that's a meandering li... commented 2026-09-15 16:25:26 UTC by Woldumar ♦1 |
| 188911052 (Comments: 1) | Jwheels98765 (Discussed changesets: 6) | You have made a common error when you saw a fairway that looked like it didn't have a proper "Feature Type" defined and decided to add the fairway tag. The hole was already properly tagged, but was part of a relation of multiple object... commented 2026-09-15 16:24:18 UTC by b-jazz ♦976 |
| 189069483 (Comments: 1) | NaufalFarras (Discussed changesets: 43) | Sorry I typed wrong relation ID. I will revert it back later. Thank you commented 2026-09-15 16:06:21 UTC by NaufalFarras ♦96 |
| 124158051 (Comments: 1) | Andrew Matheny (Discussed changesets: 24) | Hello! Can you take look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5429506 ? commented 2026-09-15 13:05:37 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,339 |
| 79062488 (Comments: 1) | Qv building (Discussed changesets: 1) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. See https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers for mo... commented 2026-09-15 06:59:07 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 177848865 (Comments: 1) | resumencom1 (Discussed changesets: 10) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-09-15 06:55:23 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 185881252 (Comments: 2) | cubbe8 (Discussed changesets: 114) | I'm curious as well as why that traffic island was deleted, since I mapped it. :( It's not really clear to me from the changeset comment what this changeset actually corrects. A more descriptive comment would be helpful https://wiki.... commented 2026-09-15 06:52:43 UTC by lunar_jaws812 ♦21 |
| 172312032 (Comments: 1) | resumencom1 (Discussed changesets: 10) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. See https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers for mo... commented 2026-09-15 06:47:48 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 172622998 (Comments: 3) | resumencom1 (Discussed changesets: 10) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. See https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers for mo... commented 2026-09-15 06:45:16 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 174588615 (Comments: 1) | resumencom1 (Discussed changesets: 10) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. See https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers for mo... commented 2026-09-15 06:43:44 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 188843038 (Comments: 1) | MaritMifflin (Discussed changesets: 2) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-09-15 05:06:07 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 188842607 (Comments: 1) | MaritMifflin (Discussed changesets: 2) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-09-15 04:58:50 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 188751802 (Comments: 2) | EzyPup (Discussed changesets: 12) | Hi, it has been a little while since I have been in this location. After looking into it further, it seems that at least between 800 S and 700 S was a temporary project and is no longer the road's intended use. But the roundabout and artwork bet... commented 2026-09-15 04:23:16 UTC by EzyPup ♦11 |
| 188551566 (Comments: 1) | BeefPiston (Discussed changesets: 1) | The correct camera type supposed to be motorola, but motorola node was removed and 'flock' node is still there. would it be possible to revert this change and delete incorrect one? commented 2026-09-15 02:33:21 UTC by dulispencer ♦3 |
| 189038355 (Comments: 2) | dulispencer (Discussed changesets: 1) | Also I looked around the city is full of this type of cameras. Some work needs to be done to map them all. commented 2026-09-15 02:29:44 UTC by dulispencer ♦3 |
| 184394617 (Comments: 1) | GrantJacobC (Discussed changesets: 1) | It is not a flock camera, however it looks like ALPR - capturing front license plate. commented 2026-09-15 02:20:24 UTC by dulispencer ♦3 |
| 184294868 (Comments: 2) | RoadGeek_MD99 (Discussed changesets: 33) | Hi Nater Kane, I resized those three based on GPS-ed photos I took (ex. https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=39.21132354455838&lng=-76.83506421000573&z=18.739031471036526&pKey=991144707117958&x=0.5&y=0.57560570627933&zoom=0.172... commented 2026-09-15 02:11:16 UTC by RoadGeek_MD99 ♦44 |
| 189036938 (Comments: 1) | GeoKitten (Discussed changesets: 20) | Also used the following sources: Esri Clarity imagery and TIGER 2023 roads. commented 2026-09-15 00:46:41 UTC by GeoKitten ♦17 |
| 189036537 (Comments: 1) | durl (Discussed changesets: 1) | Little Free Library is no longer there. commented 2026-09-15 00:18:13 UTC by durl ♦1 |
| 167618520 (Comments: 1) | RunTrails (Discussed changesets: 22) | covered=yes looks like a mistake for https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3642557 commented 2026-09-14 22:25:11 UTC by BioDranik ♦6 |
| 188878279 (Comments: 1) | Garylipack (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Garylipack, welcome to OSM. It sounds from your changeset comments that you're having some issues with the routing on a specific navigation app. I can understand if you wanted to experiment by increasing the road priority to try to force a pa... commented 2026-09-14 19:48:10 UTC by carciofo ♦197 |
| 188987232 (Comments: 3) | The Night Gardener (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks for the details. In that case the not:brand:wikidata=Q6650101 is correct here, because it makes explicit that the box is not affiliated with the brand described at https://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q6650101. Whether this box was affiliate... commented 2026-09-14 19:08:24 UTC by pwbriggs ♦520 |
| 182041026 (Comments: 2) | Jacob Rosendal Kristensen (Discussed changesets: 87) | Jacob Rosendal Kristensen, please answer this questions as instructed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20252 commented 2026-09-14 19:05:11 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,339 |
| 188925952 (Comments: 1) | TheRealJohnea (Discussed changesets: 2) | The "club" and "sport" tagging, should really apply to an area, that encompasses the whole club, not just this building. The other buildings, south of this one, the parking lot, and the docks are all part of the club. I'... commented 2026-09-14 18:59:52 UTC by TheRealJohnea ♦2 |
| 188925764 (Comments: 1) | TheRealJohnea (Discussed changesets: 2) | Change was submitted 2 days ago, still doesn't show on the map. Am I doing something wrong? Thanks! JohnEA commented 2026-09-14 18:41:19 UTC by TheRealJohnea ♦2 |
| 179557194 (Comments: 2) | RoadGeek_MD99 (Discussed changesets: 33) | Thanks! I fixed it. commented 2026-09-14 18:41:16 UTC by RoadGeek_MD99 ♦44 |
| 131890534 (Comments: 1) | dannmer (Discussed changesets: 42) | Guessing the name Anoushka run continues along this stream to the Schuylkill? Curious where you saw it as well, because there's a couple streams with unofficial (based on what I've been able to find) names elsewhere in the township. commented 2026-09-14 17:33:19 UTC by I-76 ♦91 |
| 189021680 (Comments: 1) | End0fLine (Discussed changesets: 13) | The source for this one was aerial imagery, forgot to add that commented 2026-09-14 16:56:31 UTC by End0fLine ♦26 |
| 180255058 (Comments: 1) | ForWhomtheTacoBellTolls (Discussed changesets: 1) | This was incorrectly identified as a Flock camera. It is a Frost Solutions weather camera. https://www.frostsolutions.io/vision-camera commented 2026-09-14 16:54:35 UTC by McDreimiller ♦3 |
| 188732624 (Comments: 3) | Comoestas (Discussed changesets: 1) | the addresses in Miami Dade County where initially imported from a official County Source but have not seem much updating since. From what I remember the County source used is https://gis-mdc.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/eef6b33da60d47c0964387960c840... commented 2026-09-14 16:43:40 UTC by Udarian ♦992 |
| 188702546 (Comments: 1) | bovog95895 (Discussed changesets: 1) | There is a flock camera mounted on the pole in front of 2942. It is looking N. It is visible in Google Streetview, and I have confirmed its location in person. Please revert this deletion. See this link for the Google Streetview, which is accurate... commented 2026-09-14 16:19:21 UTC by sarttiso ♦2 |
| 189014986 (Comments: 1) | The_Nickname (Discussed changesets: 32) | I mean river commented 2026-09-14 14:38:58 UTC by The_Nickname ♦47 |
| 188986736 (Comments: 1) | Cartographearth (Discussed changesets: 6) | as mentioned in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188945550 nodes should not be added to multipolygons, aka these ALPR's you are adding in FIU should not be added to https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/17619320. Please stop doing this.<... commented 2026-09-14 04:53:08 UTC by Udarian ♦992 |
| 188922971 (Comments: 1) | HansHansen123 (Discussed changesets: 2) | I'm pretty sure this is not Turkey commented 2026-09-14 02:32:34 UTC by Kento Kei ♦23 |
| 188985254 (Comments: 1) | Speed of Light (Discussed changesets: 1) | Please do not map personal items onto the map. commented 2026-09-14 01:50:01 UTC by ICT_maps ♦23 |
| 188971077 (Comments: 5) | mueschel (Discussed changesets: 1027) | from my understanding of https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/secondary-address-unit-designators/136660 and https://osmus.slack.com/archives/C029HV951/p1787173293246919 it seems to me like for those of us in the US that prefer to keep addr:unit=* to... commented 2026-09-13 22:11:39 UTC by Udarian ♦992 |
| 188930140 (Comments: 1) | Winston's Sister (Discussed changesets: 3) | Pro tip: You can square building outlines (Q in iD) so that they look nicer! Most houses have square corners and are more rectangular than trapezoidal --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/change... commented 2026-09-13 21:55:47 UTC by Nanepiwo ♦6 |
| 179545337 (Comments: 2) | Aiden Kelly (Discussed changesets: 5) | curious about this, since you're recommending that it be deleted now: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13627182929/history commented 2026-09-13 19:05:03 UTC by ICT_maps ♦23 |
| 187006640 (Comments: 1) | DuhC0mmunity (Discussed changesets: 25) | Hi, there is an anonymous note about those cameras, can you take a look: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5495867 commented 2026-09-13 19:03:26 UTC by cuzi ♦197 |
| 188630331 (Comments: 6) | hobby_mapper98 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Updated Change Set https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188976576#map=18/44.892329/-93.470070&layers=N commented 2026-09-13 18:54:14 UTC by hobby_mapper98 ♦2 |
| 188941758 (Comments: 4) | Mitria gamer (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thx CAM commented 2026-09-13 18:53:40 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦7,210 |
| 188914931 (Comments: 4) | Dima News nyc Cancun (Discussed changesets: 6) | Thx CAM commented 2026-09-13 18:53:20 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦7,210 |
| 188941993 (Comments: 1) | Mitria gamer (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted vandalism in changeset 188975937 commented 2026-09-13 18:37:31 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 187554926 (Comments: 1) | DEFLOCKCAPECOD (Discussed changesets: 1) | nothing there commented 2026-09-13 15:40:50 UTC by blackbeard00 ♦1 |
| 187065244 (Comments: 2) | confusedbuffalo-bot (Discussed changesets: 28) | There's nothing in the tags that I can see that would give a way to detect that it was spam, and the phone number is valid, so I'm not quite sure what your point is commented 2026-09-13 14:37:26 UTC by confusedbuffalo ♦505 |
| 188945550 (Comments: 1) | Cartographearth (Discussed changesets: 6) | I have pointed this out to you before but multipolygon's are only supposed to have inner and outer way members as members of the relation, this changeset again added a ALPR node as a member to the multipolygon relation which is incorrect as it i... commented 2026-09-13 13:53:33 UTC by Udarian ♦992 |
| 188960462 (Comments: 1) | edwong337 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi it looks like you merged a tree (node/13140108015) with one of the corners of the street parking. Was this intentional? commented 2026-09-13 13:19:03 UTC by JuanElDemografo ♦59 |
| 188943800 (Comments: 1) | Skyler Stillman (Discussed changesets: 7) | Reverted, reason is many features dragged. commented 2026-09-13 07:25:38 UTC by BCNorwich ♦5,411 |
| 181562484 (Comments: 3) | Scott Fraser (Discussed changesets: 4) | I think there is no much of a distinction - just that somehow one of them got to be a standard value for this building type commented 2026-09-13 07:06:37 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,339 |
| 188943711 (Comments: 1) | Skyler Stillman (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hi, Lots of dragged highways (please see warnings above), so it was better to just revert the changes. All is now OK with the highway network. I also joined some footpaths to the highway network. commented 2026-09-13 06:36:23 UTC by BCNorwich ♦5,411 |
| 188942581 (Comments: 1) | Skyler Stillman (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. There are a few problems here noted in the warnings above. I've therefore made amendments to suit OSM best practices. Crossing removed, the footpath ends were connected to the existing network, and the... commented 2026-09-13 06:02:09 UTC by BCNorwich ♦5,411 |
| 188943617 (Comments: 1) | ოუენი (Discussed changesets: 1) | Oh hmm... Seems this is a temporary location while they do construction in the U District. https://www.facebook.com/ROOTS.Shelter/posts/pfbid02qziY4EEDru2JRc6pZ6hwiK9R4z5J2j21QJWead1Vb5fwW3zydiJYJpzwEkVxxmkwl commented 2026-09-13 04:56:59 UTC by ოუენი ♦1 |
| 187941218 (Comments: 1) | JonathanDavidArndt (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hey, thanks for adding the outdoor seating area. If you like drawing those, did you know you could also add this to the business itself: - `outdoor_seating=yes` (Or you could even get way more detailed with specific types if you ... commented 2026-09-13 04:39:49 UTC by Tex2002ans ♦22 |
| 188941702 (Comments: 1) | Jaesus (Discussed changesets: 10) | Deleted a a brand new node for Aldi in favor of updating the existing defunct node and making it active. The old node was a Staples, which closed, and became the new Aldi supermarket. Keeping the node history is preferable, so the new Aldi node (dupe... commented 2026-09-13 02:40:08 UTC by Jaesus ♦4 |
| 188932388 (Comments: 1) | Dima News nyc Cancun (Discussed changesets: 6) | Reverted. commented 2026-09-13 01:55:32 UTC by Glassman ♦6,059 |
| 188852739 (Comments: 1) | TesseractPi (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thank you for making this change. However, because the building is demolished, the lifecycle prefix for the building tag should be updates as well. Thank you, BubbaJuice commented 2026-09-13 01:41:41 UTC by BubbaJuice ♦174 |
| 188940751 (Comments: 1) | ryangrg422 (Discussed changesets: 1) | https://mcatlas.org/viewer/ Montgomery County, MD Land Records commented 2026-09-13 01:32:56 UTC by ryangrg422 ♦1 |
| 185879932 (Comments: 1) | MrsTLC520 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, please tag cameras correctly, you are tagging a lot of regular dome traffic cameras as Condors or Verkada PTZs when they are neither. I understand this is a limitation of the DeFlock app but tagging them improperly leads to inaccurate data. Th... commented 2026-09-13 00:51:56 UTC by BubbaJuice ♦174 |
| 188938629 (Comments: 1) | Clairness (Discussed changesets: 9) | Local knowledge should also be a source for this changeset - accidentally did not add it, they are all subdivisions. commented 2026-09-12 23:32:35 UTC by Clairness ♦10 |
| 188852227 (Comments: 1) | wmbyrd60 (Discussed changesets: 1) | This changeset removed the motorway tag from a motorway. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188938676 commented 2026-09-12 23:27:57 UTC by Spaghetti Monster🍝 ♦2,173 |
| 188936992 (Comments: 1) | MrsTLC520 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi MrsTLC520, For future reference, surveillance:type is for designating camera vs. other types of surveillance. camera:type is for designating PTZ cameras (in which case the proper tag is camera:type=panning). I will update these cameras appropri... commented 2026-09-12 23:13:48 UTC by BubbaJuice ♦174 |
| 188777179 (Comments: 2) | zbrown4 (Discussed changesets: 4) | I did run on the north side of Duluth St past Lilac. I can't recall specifically the type of pedestrian path through that section. It likely was the standard 8ft asphalt trail though and looking at aerial imagery, I think that's a safe bet! commented 2026-09-12 22:33:19 UTC by zbrown4 ♦11 |
| 184990401 (Comments: 1) | 15435955 (Discussed changesets: 2) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-09-12 22:31:02 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 183230104 (Comments: 1) | 500393652 (Discussed changesets: 1) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-09-12 22:28:10 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 183264987 (Comments: 1) | 500379787 (Discussed changesets: 4) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-09-12 22:19:57 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 183265683 (Comments: 1) | 500379787 (Discussed changesets: 4) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-09-12 22:19:48 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 184190047 (Comments: 1) | 500379787 (Discussed changesets: 4) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-09-12 22:19:34 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 188880036 (Comments: 1) | 500379787 (Discussed changesets: 4) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-09-12 22:13:51 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 188930357 (Comments: 1) | Jibbajagorgous (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi Jibbajagorgous, thanks for the update here! Instead of adding this to opening_hours=*, you already indicated this location was permanently closed/disused via adding a lifecycle prefix in your changeset 188910670 , so you can simply remove t... commented 2026-09-12 21:15:16 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 188910670 (Comments: 1) | Jibbajagorgous (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi Jibbajagorgous, thanks for the update here! Adding disused:shop=* is correct, just don't forget to either add lifecycle prefixes or remove the other tags specific to the POI that no longer exists here. Typically, you'd add disused... commented 2026-09-12 21:15:12 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 188913264 (Comments: 1) | Jibbajagorgous (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi Jibbajagorgous, Welcome to OpenStreetMap, and thanks for your contribution. One of the most important core principles on OpenStreetMap is "Don't copy from other maps" https://osm.wiki/Don%27t_copy_from_other_maps. In p... commented 2026-09-12 21:05:45 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 188913124 (Comments: 1) | Jibbajagorgous (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi Jibbajagorgous, thanks for your contribution here! This looks pretty good, except for one small tweak--addr:place=* is only added if it is a formal part of a country's address system, which it isn't in the US. I removed it for you... commented 2026-09-12 21:05:40 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 188795670 (Comments: 2) | PrairieMaple99 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Before changing it, I looked on TagInfo (https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/) and there were around 675 objects tagged religion=unitarian_universalist and only around two dozen with denomination=unitarian_universalist. I removed the denominatio... commented 2026-09-12 19:29:45 UTC by PrairieMaple99 ♦3 |
| 188925904 (Comments: 1) | bb010g (Discussed changesets: 2) | some day i will start reliably remembering to update my changeset description in Vespucci. this changeset was authored & submitted during a survey walk in any case. commented 2026-09-12 17:52:42 UTC by bb010g ♦2 |
| 188900353 (Comments: 1) | peonies! (Discussed changesets: 1) | looking at this ALPR on various aerial imagery in iD it seems to be within the road area, being positioned like this is highly unlikely so please double check the position of this ALPR and fix it. Happy mapping, Udar. commented 2026-09-12 17:40:21 UTC by Udarian ♦992 |
| 188575496 (Comments: 2) | Trevor_1 (Discussed changesets: 192) | The Trunk classification for OpenStreetMap does not necessarily have to match TxDOT's standards. Loops around cities have almost always been tagged the same classification for the entire loop. If there is a city with a loop and multiple trunk ro... commented 2026-09-12 16:25:18 UTC by Trevor_1 ♦278 |
| 188851977 (Comments: 1) | BigSushi (Discussed changesets: 9) | Hello, roads that only meet motorway standards for a short distance generally should not be classified as "motorway" commented 2026-09-12 16:16:43 UTC by Trevor_1 ♦278 |
| 188648082 (Comments: 1) | nallely-alvarado (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188918318 commented 2026-09-12 14:11:50 UTC by MappingMore ♦793 |
| 188797518 (Comments: 4) | Wilder Orinda (Discussed changesets: 2) | That is 100% true and thank you for the tip! All documentation is available on the City of Orinda's website for reference, just look for Wilder Subdivision Development agreements. You can also call the Wildlife Heritage Foundation and speak to t... commented 2026-09-12 14:11:32 UTC by Wilder Orinda ♦2 |
| 188797716 (Comments: 1) | Talin Nguyen (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks for this update! commented 2026-09-12 05:02:24 UTC by BubbaJuice ♦174 |
| 138104927 (Comments: 1) | TaskarCenterAtUW (Discussed changesets: 5) | This edit mistags the driveway crossing at way/593984363 as a sidewalk without even removing its crossing-related tags or the crossing node on it. commented 2026-09-12 02:48:26 UTC by 15419 NE 140th St ♦10 |
| 136670868 (Comments: 1) | BubbleGuppies (Discussed changesets: 14) | When tagging sidewalk-driveway intersections like way/593984363, if the sidewalk is noticeably a separate material from the driveway, consider tagging as marked by surface treatment only instead of unmarked. commented 2026-09-12 02:46:53 UTC by 15419 NE 140th St ♦10 |
| 188797303 (Comments: 3) | Wilder Orinda (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thanks for the explanation, that's very helpful! Just make sure to mention that in the changeset description next time, instead of just stating it was deleted because it was private (which is going to raise all kinds of red flags viz. improper d... commented 2026-09-12 02:38:50 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 136717938 (Comments: 1) | BubbleGuppies (Discussed changesets: 14) | Retagging way/1177353611 as marked because it's marked by transverse lines. It's been this way since it was built sometime between 2015 and 2017. commented 2026-09-12 02:31:07 UTC by 15419 NE 140th St ♦10 |
| 176078914 (Comments: 1) | wa_mappr (Discussed changesets: 1) | Do you know more about node/13385603694? I see you tagged it as panning, but for the few minutes I watched its feed, it didn't pan in practice. I was going to move it to where it seems to actually be and add a `camera:direction` but that wouldn&... commented 2026-09-12 02:13:56 UTC by 15419 NE 140th St ♦10 |
| 157174841 (Comments: 4) | pkoby (Discussed changesets: 59) | You're right, I'll ask dannmer. commented 2026-09-12 00:53:21 UTC by I-76 ♦91 |
| 188895480 (Comments: 1) | olivia-l (Discussed changesets: 2) | from the wiki, it looks like the correct tag for yarn stores is shop=wool, not shop=yarn: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dwool. lemme know if this is incorrect commented 2026-09-12 00:23:00 UTC by olivia-l ♦1 |
| 184942206 (Comments: 1) | osmhonehone (Discussed changesets: 8) | It looks like you deleted some roads in Stamping Ground. I added them back in changeset 188892358. Confused as to why you would remove them. commented 2026-09-11 21:52:25 UTC by Beakerboy ♦9 |
| 188791414 (Comments: 3) | YPalmer (Discussed changesets: 1) | It looks like you already reverted the change. Let me know if further action is required on my end. commented 2026-09-11 21:15:10 UTC by YPalmer ♦1 |
| 162120556 (Comments: 1) | ujinevich (Discussed changesets: 34) | You are one of people who used sport=soccer tag - and your help is welcome in selecting an icon for iD editor. Proposed change is shown at https://github.com/openstreetmap/id-tagging-schema/pull/2771#issuecomment-5409506164 New one is likely b... commented 2026-09-11 20:41:19 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,339 |
| 188888770 (Comments: 1) | diddyblud69 (Discussed changesets: 2) | looking at this ALPR on various aerial imagery in iD it seems to be within the road area, being positioned like this is highly unlikely so please double check the position of this ALPR and fix it. Happy mapping, Udar. commented 2026-09-11 20:40:59 UTC by Udarian ♦992 |
| 188886493 (Comments: 1) | bwbuhse (Discussed changesets: 3) | I think this is probably fine, but https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/21382854 should probably be mapped with the node connecting the two oneway parts as the `via` member. Otherwise, this looks good to me. commented 2026-09-11 19:54:52 UTC by citrula ♦1,020 |
| 188886743 (Comments: 4) | YourLocalBasement10 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Gotcha, thanks for updating it. commented 2026-09-11 19:46:56 UTC by iandees ♦1,405 |
| 184677922 (Comments: 2) | Englishmuffin (Discussed changesets: 1) | Since you didn't reply, I have deleted the camera commented 2026-09-11 18:16:36 UTC by cuzi ♦197 |
| 188433889 (Comments: 1) | Niio (Discussed changesets: 1) | i surveyed this location and there is no Flock camera there, so i am deleting this node. commented 2026-09-11 17:49:43 UTC by Brigitte LPRdot ♦1 |
| 188840496 (Comments: 1) | ch1pset (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM, and thanks for your contributions! commented 2026-09-11 17:44:30 UTC by citrula ♦1,020 |
| 188548350 (Comments: 1) | DJ Cane (Discussed changesets: 8) | This farmland looks like it can just be a single closed way. Can you explain why you made this a multipolygon? commented 2026-09-11 15:03:02 UTC by ScrawnyMeowth1 ♦59 |
| 188874900 (Comments: 1) | Alena PropertyView (Discussed changesets: 1) | Branch and brand information is not appropriate in the name=* tag on OpenStreetMap. Use branch=* and brand=* separately for this information. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmc... commented 2026-09-11 14:34:59 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,623 |
| 188875612 (Comments: 1) | kbzimmer (Discussed changesets: 9) | Best practice would be to include the street names on sidewalks and crossings same as any other carriageway in the street. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/188875612 ... commented 2026-09-11 14:30:48 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,623 |
| 188872773 (Comments: 1) | WebfootJack (Discussed changesets: 3) | This is actually S. 16th St. not 6th as i initially submitted. Fixed this in a new update commented 2026-09-11 13:58:07 UTC by WebfootJack ♦2 |
| 188847930 (Comments: 1) | techchet (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188868484 commented 2026-09-11 12:00:55 UTC by MappingMore ♦793 |
| 188837948 (Comments: 1) | cr0wb0y (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188868038 commented 2026-09-11 11:50:06 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,271 |
| 188798900 (Comments: 1) | 000000000000000000000000000000000 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188866893 commented 2026-09-11 11:35:01 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,271 |
| 188798844 (Comments: 1) | almondChai (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188866665 commented 2026-09-11 11:34:22 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,271 |
| 188839152 (Comments: 1) | owp2002 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188859632 commented 2026-09-11 11:31:48 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,271 |
| 188798263 (Comments: 1) | Dima News nyc Cancun (Discussed changesets: 6) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188858926 commented 2026-09-11 11:31:16 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,271 |
| 188847118 (Comments: 1) | 45500LighthouseRoad (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188858794 commented 2026-09-11 11:30:45 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,271 |
| 187717655 (Comments: 1) | weblogdryads (Discussed changesets: 20) | Hi, what does 'rockbot' mean? This tag is not used in any other place. commented 2026-09-11 09:21:10 UTC by mueschel ♦7,415 |
| 188851297 (Comments: 2) | Shaughn79 (Discussed changesets: 3) | See https://osm.org/user_blocks/21270 commented 2026-09-11 07:22:43 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 188797416 (Comments: 1) | idontknowwhyihavethisasmyusername (Discussed changesets: 32) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188857057 commented 2026-09-11 07:17:42 UTC by ajmat ♦666 |
| 188795182 (Comments: 1) | Exotic Detail (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188855190 commented 2026-09-11 06:44:52 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,271 |
| 188794802 (Comments: 1) | cgreggescalante (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hi! Please note that opening_hours=* times must be written in hh:mm format, regardless of if the hour is single digit or double digit. For example: "Mo-Fr 7:00-17:00" should actually be "Mo-Fr 07:00-17:00" I went ahead and ... commented 2026-09-11 05:55:11 UTC by PostaMap_Infinite ♦83 |
| 188743541 (Comments: 1) | SkySide (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi! I just wanted to let you know that for opening hours, 'by appointment' is supposed enclosed in quotations, as ' "by appointment" ' (ignoring the outer quotations) I went ahead and fixed the occurrences I found... commented 2026-09-11 05:54:34 UTC by PostaMap_Infinite ♦83 |
| 175369214 (Comments: 1) | 500371279 (Discussed changesets: 3) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-09-11 05:01:14 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 183601095 (Comments: 1) | 500371279 (Discussed changesets: 3) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-09-11 05:01:09 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 188846359 (Comments: 1) | 500371279 (Discussed changesets: 3) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-09-11 05:01:03 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 188820122 (Comments: 1) | bluestream (Discussed changesets: 1) | As an account mapping on behalf of a commercial business for financial gain, please be advised that you are expected to understand and carefully follow documented OpenStreetMap standards and conventions, which will both directly benefit the quality o... commented 2026-09-11 04:57:48 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 188817727 (Comments: 1) | Rusty Cochran (Discussed changesets: 1) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is not allowed on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account; see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers for more infor... commented 2026-09-11 04:50:45 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 188794855 (Comments: 1) | jstapley (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188852771 commented 2026-09-11 04:33:15 UTC by ajmat ♦666 |
| 188825009 (Comments: 1) | Ubiquity60441 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Welcome to OpenStreetMap, and thanks for your contribution. One of the most important core principles on OpenStreetMap is "Don't copy from other maps" https://osm.wiki/Don%27t_copy_from_other_maps. In particular, use of Google M... commented 2026-09-11 03:48:09 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 188851176 (Comments: 1) | Shaughn79 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello, after reviewing your body of work it seems like you are adding vast fictional freeway networks to the map. This is not good mapping behavior, please desist. commented 2026-09-11 02:49:12 UTC by SD Mapman ♦101 |
| 188850900 (Comments: 1) | Shaughn79 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello! I was unaware that there were freeway projects proposed for Aberdeen. Are these actually real projects? If not, please consider https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OpenGeofiction as fictional mapping is vandalism and should be removed. commented 2026-09-11 02:19:57 UTC by SD Mapman ♦101 |
| 188745514 (Comments: 1) | X99 (Discussed changesets: 2) | The City is actually replacing the street blades with ones with directionals on them, the new segments have directionals as well. It wasn't originally supposed to have directionals (know consultant who was involved), but something must ha... commented 2026-09-11 02:00:46 UTC by SD Mapman ♦101 |
| 188805212 (Comments: 1) | tbh524 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! commented 2026-09-11 01:35:13 UTC by jmarchon ♦537 |
| 178557403 (Comments: 1) | Ian52601 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Please don't use roads as members for landuse relations! This makes it way more complicated to edit both the roads and the landuse areas. It's also inaccurate mapping, because in reality the landuse does not go all the way up to the centerl... commented 2026-09-10 23:54:38 UTC by ScrawnyMeowth1 ♦59 |
| 188587748 (Comments: 2) | User-2945 (Discussed changesets: 8) | Thank you :) commented 2026-09-10 23:33:07 UTC by User-2945 ♦2 |
| 172319428 (Comments: 3) | daniel_solow (Discussed changesets: 59) | Change already made, actually it should be soon in your iD! And should appear also in Go Map!! if it is using iD icons, like other parts of presets. And it comes from Mexican street sign of all things, see https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Fi... commented 2026-09-10 22:48:58 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,339 |
| 188641434 (Comments: 6) | ALFREDO ARIEL ALBA CUETO (Discussed changesets: 2) | It's good that you, if you don't mind, review my contributions. I'm new and I know I don't know many aspects that I need to improve... commented 2026-09-10 21:27:10 UTC by ALFREDO ARIEL ALBA CUETO ♦2 |
| 180222932 (Comments: 1) | HoCoRat (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hey! Harmony Road does not count as private in OSM sense. Private access in OSM for a named street requires a gate. However it doesn't look like a named street at all. you should switch these over to driveway when doing running qa mapping. commented 2026-09-10 20:21:15 UTC by ElliottPlack ♦953 |
| 188804564 (Comments: 1) | Cartographearth (Discussed changesets: 6) | multipolygon's are only supposed to have outer and inner members, aka "entrance / exit" is not valid for multipolygon's from my understanding. Secondly the "entrances/exits" you added where not what I think most folks wo... commented 2026-09-10 19:36:13 UTC by Udarian ♦992 |
| 176466614 (Comments: 2) | shinterro (Discussed changesets: 15) | Oh that makes sense now. I think that initial removal was an accident and I ended up hurting myself in the resulting confusion. Thanks for sorting! commented 2026-09-10 19:13:53 UTC by shinterro ♦16 |
| 188836223 (Comments: 1) | Tjr33150 (Discussed changesets: 4) | looking at this ALPR on various imagery in iD it seems like it is either in the road area or in the kerb, due to this its position as currently set seems highly unlikely to be the true position, please double check the position on aerial imagery and ... commented 2026-09-10 18:42:12 UTC by Udarian ♦992 |
| 128816817 (Comments: 1) | Xanadu_Contractor (Discussed changesets: 20) | Highly impressed with such early use of the self_harvesting tag! commented 2026-09-10 16:25:28 UTC by mbeyerle ♦55 |
| 188783343 (Comments: 1) | rjhale1971 (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hello! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1557665231 (one of six objects). What is the mean of the tags basefirst = 792.5800170898438 bheight = 18.419982910156246 code = 1.0 height = 811.0 imagery_da = 3/12/2012 |
| 188744297 (Comments: 1) | nateersb (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hello! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/700241180. What is the mean of the tag enumber = 3303 ? commented 2026-09-10 15:15:29 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,942 |
| 178109260 (Comments: 3) | spatialia (Discussed changesets: 7) | Fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188829249 commented 2026-09-10 14:48:43 UTC by spatialia ♦30 |
| 188578186 (Comments: 3) | rgreeninger (Discussed changesets: 1) | oh no, I spoke too soon. "I’m not aware of construction on the Rice Creek trail. I know that they were replacing some boards on the boardwalk, but that would have been a short term closure. I’ll let you know if I find out any more.&q... commented 2026-09-10 14:18:21 UTC by Huong Dang ♦13 |
| 188799252 (Comments: 1) | mares7_ (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello and Welcome! Thanks for your contribution. How certain are you that these cameras are ALPRs? Given that Community Park Road isn't a through road, this is seemingly a very strange place to put ALPR cameras. commented 2026-09-10 13:49:17 UTC by PuddlesMapping ♦25 |
| 188799055 (Comments: 1) | mares7_ (Discussed changesets: 2) | Welcome, and thanks for the contribution! If I may, please make sure your changeset comment is relevant to your changes; I spent an embarrassing amount of time trying to figure out why an ALPR is in the park before I realized that these are ju... commented 2026-09-10 13:42:42 UTC by PuddlesMapping ♦25 |
| 154358718 (Comments: 2) | Tanker3278 (Discussed changesets: 30) | This was long enough ago I don't remember specifics now. I would have been following data taken from one of the golf course websites I'd looked at to get info. commented 2026-09-10 11:54:59 UTC by Tanker3278 ♦2 |
| 188731676 (Comments: 1) | Aaron Jefferson (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188819235 commented 2026-09-10 11:38:09 UTC by ajmat ♦666 |
| 188676110 (Comments: 1) | Aiden Kelly (Discussed changesets: 5) | Can you provide any evidence that "Aiden’s Kung Fu Fights" exists? This is like the fifth thing in this neighborhood you've named after yourself... and you subsequently have claimed in notes most don't exist shortly thereaft... commented 2026-09-10 11:23:11 UTC by ICT_maps ♦23 |
| 182487312 (Comments: 1) | aryan seetepalli (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello! You used building=university_building on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/126027994/history Have you maybe meant building=university ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it... commented 2026-09-10 10:28:35 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,339 |
| 188743013 (Comments: 1) | a_s_4_9_ (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188811563 commented 2026-09-10 08:59:50 UTC by ajmat ♦666 |
| 188469223 (Comments: 1) | Christine Thomas (Discussed changesets: 1) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-09-10 06:23:02 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 188746792 (Comments: 1) | cassidyq (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188804845 commented 2026-09-10 06:05:59 UTC by MappingMore ♦793 |
| 92928860 (Comments: 2) | mamanakis (Discussed changesets: 21) | I fixed it. It was probably meant to have been "gas" but is more appropriately "liquid_nitrogen" commented 2026-09-10 05:46:53 UTC by mamanakis ♦10 |
| 188540052 (Comments: 3) | washington_irving (Discussed changesets: 4) | lol! How do you think I found your invalid tags in the first place? I work with a group of people who want to fix invalid opening_hours tags on the OsmUS Slack. If you are interested, you're welcome to join the Slack workspace and the #opening-h... commented 2026-09-10 05:44:52 UTC by PostaMap_Infinite ♦83 |
| 188752266 (Comments: 1) | unbedenklichkeitsbescheinigung (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! commented 2026-09-10 03:46:23 UTC by jmarchon ♦537 |
| 188458366 (Comments: 3) | Adam Ferreira (Discussed changesets: 8) | Thanks! Block now lifted. Fingers crossed! commented 2026-09-10 02:55:25 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,101 |
| 187827113 (Comments: 1) | Teddy5245 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello, I surveyed this location today and could not find this flock camera, so I have removed it in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188797483. There is an Axon camera just up the road, but I found no evidence a Flock camera was ever at... commented 2026-09-10 01:08:33 UTC by PuddlesMapping ♦25 |
| 188785470 (Comments: 3) | neuhausr (Discussed changesets: 18) | Thanks, I’m not yet, I’ll join. We filed a bug report on this issue as both the way and point are allowable methods to use a holding point and I started creating the lines for a project I’m working on. If you don&rsqu... commented 2026-09-10 00:47:24 UTC by ckronenburg ♦1 |
| 188793560 (Comments: 1) | Jason Case (Discussed changesets: 1) | In the future please add a lifecycle tag for disused unless it was officially removed, since they frequently are reinstalled. commented 2026-09-10 00:30:21 UTC by OddBunsen ♦18 |
| 188778555 (Comments: 1) | 500368350 (Discussed changesets: 3) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-09-10 00:25:09 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 181049254 (Comments: 1) | 500368350 (Discussed changesets: 3) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-09-10 00:25:01 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 188782159 (Comments: 1) | alluneedpestsc (Discussed changesets: 2) | As an account mapping on behalf of a commercial business for financial gain, please be advised that you are expected to understand and carefully follow documented OpenStreetMap standards and conventions, which will both directly benefit the quality o... commented 2026-09-10 00:09:46 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 188781961 (Comments: 1) | alluneedpestsc (Discussed changesets: 2) | As an account mapping on behalf of a commercial business for financial gain, please be advised that you are expected to understand and carefully follow documented OpenStreetMap standards and conventions, which will both directly benefit the quality o... commented 2026-09-10 00:06:15 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 188736791 (Comments: 1) | Sunshine Home Material (Kitchen Remodeling Center) (Discussed changesets: 1) | As an account mapping on behalf of a commercial business for financial gain, please be advised that you are expected to understand and carefully follow documented OpenStreetMap standards and conventions, which will both directly benefit the quality o... commented 2026-09-09 23:57:12 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 188793058 (Comments: 2) | Flap Slimy Outward (Discussed changesets: 313) | These are continuations of named roads. In San Francisco, it's "Presidio Parkway"; in Marin County, it's "Redwood Highway." commented 2026-09-09 23:55:39 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦405 |
| 188755381 (Comments: 1) | raindrainsva (Discussed changesets: 1) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. See https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers for mo... commented 2026-09-09 23:52:00 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 188684471 (Comments: 1) | TheAutoAidEditor (Discussed changesets: 3) | DWG revert - apparent improper deletions https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188797194 commented 2026-09-09 23:40:53 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,101 |
| 188686197 (Comments: 3) | TheAutoAidEditor (Discussed changesets: 3) | DWG revert - apparent improper deletions https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188797194 commented 2026-09-09 23:40:53 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,101 |
| 188768895 (Comments: 1) | Blooming Massage - Restoring Health Naturally (Discussed changesets: 2) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-09-09 23:31:53 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 188787752 (Comments: 1) | Localnews (Discussed changesets: 1) | Are all of these law offices physically open 24/7, such that I can walk in and meet with a lawyer at (say) 3 am in the morning? This seems incredibly implausible, especially for a law office. If not, and I can simply call them 24/7 on the phon... commented 2026-09-09 23:28:22 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 188768381 (Comments: 2) | RM23 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Thanks for the note! I'll make sure the relations get reordered moving forward commented 2026-09-09 22:31:08 UTC by RM23 ♦2 |
| 188776853 (Comments: 1) | JRSCOTT_PI (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome to OSM. The feature you removed in this changeset is valid. Please don’t remove valid OSM data. Not being public access areas is an invalid reason to remove data from OSM. The correct way to handle this is to use OS... commented 2026-09-09 21:58:54 UTC by MassCartog ♦503 |
| 165481531 (Comments: 2) | CasGroenigen (Discussed changesets: 64) | Feel free to delete the duplicate ones commented 2026-09-09 21:28:49 UTC by CasGroenigen ♦50 |
| 188792513 (Comments: 1) | Mateusz Konieczny (Discussed changesets: 663) | mapping precise location of preserved room is fine, maybe it can be even mapped as a memorial - and it will appear on the maps then commented 2026-09-09 20:35:35 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,339 |
| 186932544 (Comments: 2) | ion_chi (Discussed changesets: 14) | Done in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188791590 commented 2026-09-09 20:07:19 UTC by ion_chi ♦111 |
| 185496334 (Comments: 4) | oscarm_lyft (Discussed changesets: 10) | Thank you for your contribution Best regards, Artem commented 2026-09-09 20:04:53 UTC by amakarevich_lyft ♦41 |
| 184527565 (Comments: 3) | nateersb (Discussed changesets: 4) | I meant to copy past "Is it really a separate building? Maybe it should be building:part=corridor" commented 2026-09-09 19:11:19 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,339 |
| 188749681 (Comments: 1) | leowheeler23 (Discussed changesets: 1) | The counties map does not show this as part of Orchard Drive. It probably should be tagged as highway=service. Can you review this edit? See https://experience.arcgis.com/experience/fcbc86024e52488980720a525435fb3d#widget_6=active_datasource_id:dataS... commented 2026-09-09 18:47:38 UTC by Glassman ♦6,059 |
| 188782927 (Comments: 1) | City of Snoqualmie (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM. Does your city have any geospatial data that we can use to add the park boundaries to OSM? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/188782927 commented 2026-09-09 18:41:22 UTC by Glassman ♦6,059 |
| 188483517 (Comments: 2) | GlitchyCat (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks for the info & corrections! I’ll keep them in mind and check the wiki for next time. commented 2026-09-09 17:41:33 UTC by GlitchyCat ♦1 |
| 188785582 (Comments: 1) | Royoriti (Discussed changesets: 4) | Skyride, not zipline commented 2026-09-09 17:31:14 UTC by Royoriti ♦1 |
| 188776039 (Comments: 1) | ilichov (Discussed changesets: 1) | I'm pretty sure that's a gas station, not a residential area. You should probably map it as an amenity=fuel and a shop=convenience. commented 2026-09-09 17:23:33 UTC by JuanElDemografo ♦59 |
| 188623325 (Comments: 1) | AaronMckenney (Discussed changesets: 1) | The Q key in id can help orthagonalize right angles. Saves someone else from having to clean up. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/188623325 commented 2026-09-09 15:59:22 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,623 |
| 188632731 (Comments: 1) | blk_ (Discussed changesets: 1) | What kind of updates is usually informative. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/188632731 commented 2026-09-09 15:33:13 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,623 |
| 188596769 (Comments: 2) | jorbit (Discussed changesets: 1) | My bad, I just started surveying businesses. Thanks for your help though, I'll keep all that in mind! commented 2026-09-09 15:26:21 UTC by jorbit ♦2 |
| 188637806 (Comments: 1) | ktr-osm (Discussed changesets: 3) | OpenStreetMap doesn't use abbreviations in street names. Data consumers can create abbreviations easily but it's hard for programs to work out "street" from "saint" or "mount" from "mountain", for ex... commented 2026-09-09 15:18:30 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,623 |
| 188638881 (Comments: 1) | ktr-osm (Discussed changesets: 3) | Fixed the opening hours to fit standard tagging. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/188638881 commented 2026-09-09 15:14:37 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,623 |
| 188678557 (Comments: 1) | ryan74701 (Discussed changesets: 1) | We normally would use lane_markings=no instead of lanes=1 and "Southwest 94th Street" instead of "SW 94th St." --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/188678557 ... commented 2026-09-09 15:06:42 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,623 |
| 188580865 (Comments: 1) | Winston's Sister (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi Winston's sister, welcome to osm. I updated the opening_hours for mathnasium and the post office. Days are two letters, Sa not Sat Th not Thur. And times are two digit, so 08:00 not 8:00 for 8am. More info about hours on the wiki. Keep m... commented 2026-09-09 14:51:03 UTC by wireguy ♦587 |
| 188698402 (Comments: 1) | FlockOffTulsa (Discussed changesets: 2) | None of these flock cameras around the bowling alley are mapped someplace where it's physically possible to put a camera. This one specifically is in the middle of the left northbound lane of Sheridan, the next camera south is in the right lane... commented 2026-09-09 14:46:57 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,623 |
| 188727374 (Comments: 1) | MechanicalHex87 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Looks great, thanks! --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/188727374 commented 2026-09-09 14:22:24 UTC by maptheworld2050 ♦12 |
| 188646390 (Comments: 1) | KeepTexasDeflocked (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188773625 commented 2026-09-09 13:23:29 UTC by rajdhani ♦642 |
| 139064367 (Comments: 1) | Das Beetle (Discussed changesets: 9) | Hello! You used hazard=ice65 on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/432585038/history Have you maybe meant hazard=ice ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects w... commented 2026-09-09 11:30:10 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,339 |
| 183987378 (Comments: 1) | zunakejas (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hello! You used natural=heathww on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1528590955/history Have you maybe meant natural=heath ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some ob... commented 2026-09-09 11:28:10 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,339 |
| 173999588 (Comments: 1) | diamondarmorsteve (Discussed changesets: 52) | Hello! You used cycleway=lanec on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/751512269/history Have you maybe meant cycleway=lane ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some obje... commented 2026-09-09 11:19:23 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,339 |
| 170174800 (Comments: 1) | j0hn33y (Discussed changesets: 22) | Hello! You used horse=designatedc on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/415939154/history Have you maybe meant horse=designated ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited som... commented 2026-09-09 11:16:01 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,339 |
| 188749119 (Comments: 1) | cubbe8 (Discussed changesets: 114) | Hi, since you are changing road classification in CT it would be good to reach out and discuss it with jnighan (https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/jnighan) who drafted highway classification. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Connecticut/Hig... commented 2026-09-09 10:02:49 UTC by Mashin ♦610 |
| 188500716 (Comments: 1) | ALCZR (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hey, I just wanted to let you know that I noticed you accidentally made an invalid opening_hours=* tag. For way 1554887001 "Mo-Fr 9:30-6:00, Sa 9:00-5:30, Su Closed" should actually be formatted as "Mo-Fr 09:30-18:00; Sa 09:00-1... commented 2026-09-09 05:46:20 UTC by PostaMap_Infinite ♦83 |
| 188447842 (Comments: 1) | JasiahMaps1010 (Discussed changesets: 10) | Hi, please note that an opening_hours tag for a feature that is always open should be formatted as "Mo-Su 00:00-24:00" or "24/7" I went ahead and fixed it, just wanted to inform you for future edits! If you have any questio... commented 2026-09-09 05:36:34 UTC by PostaMap_Infinite ♦83 |
| 188664153 (Comments: 1) | Natasha Denona eu (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188753874 commented 2026-09-09 05:33:12 UTC by ajmat ♦666 |
| 188544950 (Comments: 1) | AS_OPENMAP (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi! Please note that opening_hours=* times must be written in hh:mm format. For example: "Mo-Su 0500-2200" should actually be "Mo-Su 05:00-22:00" I went ahead and fixed it, just wanted to inform you for future edits! If you... commented 2026-09-09 05:17:54 UTC by PostaMap_Infinite ♦83 |
| 188643347 (Comments: 1) | Scare us (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi! Please note that opening_hours=* times must be written in hh:mm format. For example: "Mo-Fr 0600 - 1800" should actually be "Mo-Fr 06:00 - 18:00" I went ahead and fixed it, just wanted to inform you for future edits! If... commented 2026-09-09 05:16:21 UTC by PostaMap_Infinite ♦83 |
| 188446843 (Comments: 1) | t3knoid (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi! Please note that opening_hours=* times must be written in hh:mm format, regardless of if the hour is single digit or double digit. For example: "Mo-Fr 7:00-17:00" should actually be "Mo-Fr 07:00-17:00" I went ahead and... commented 2026-09-09 04:59:41 UTC by PostaMap_Infinite ♦83 |
| 188460836 (Comments: 1) | Hunnicutt Tree Service (Discussed changesets: 1) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. See https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers for mo... commented 2026-09-09 03:28:06 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 188454533 (Comments: 1) | blackbirdburke (Discussed changesets: 1) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-09-09 03:18:05 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 188552434 (Comments: 1) | stephka (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, thanks for your contributions here! I just wanted to give you a heads up that for way 614923962 (Arbor Plumbing & NC Backflow), there were a couple issues: * The building=* tag was inexplicably removed from this building, making... commented 2026-09-09 02:26:42 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 188684907 (Comments: 1) | Journal Square (Discussed changesets: 2) | As an account mapping on behalf of a commercial business for financial gain, please be advised that you are expected to understand and carefully follow documented OpenStreetMap standards and conventions, which will both directly benefit the quality o... commented 2026-09-09 01:57:53 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 188119211 (Comments: 1) | ayanbs (Discussed changesets: 8) | Restore highway=trunk on US 54 southbound (way 245893409). Third revert of a bulk "add driven trails" upload that retags this 75-mph divided US highway as a dirt track; the way's own ref/expressway/maxspeed/surface tags were never chan... commented 2026-09-09 01:54:50 UTC by abdulla@kinetik ♦1 |
| 188668349 (Comments: 1) | Lyon Dental (Discussed changesets: 1) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-09-09 01:54:26 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 188653236 (Comments: 1) | mchllptx (Discussed changesets: 1) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-09-09 01:52:01 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 188482181 (Comments: 2) | nprevail (Discussed changesets: 2) | Ah got it! I'll try to start practicing that. commented 2026-09-09 00:44:44 UTC by nprevail ♦2 |
| 188480611 (Comments: 3) | nprevail (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thanks for sharing the evaluation tool! It's my first time learning about it. commented 2026-09-09 00:43:35 UTC by nprevail ♦2 |
| 188595726 (Comments: 1) | JasiahMaps1010 (Discussed changesets: 10) | Thanks. I was working on this area last week and messed up this intersection. Good catch! I don't know why you split WB (west bound) 277th St so I merged them back together, but if there was a reason then please let me know. Happy ... commented 2026-09-09 00:03:48 UTC by pwbriggs ♦520 |
| 188746997 (Comments: 1) | Nik Jonos (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, Please do not change names of highways like this without providing a reliable source. Thanks! https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188747426 commented 2026-09-08 23:36:33 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦405 |
| 170500179 (Comments: 5) | JeffMaps (Discussed changesets: 5) | Thanks for letting me know. Perhaps it was how the path was previously drawn that added to the confusion. I’ve added it back based on your GPS trace. Happy mapping! commented 2026-09-08 22:56:47 UTC by StreetSurveyor ♦213 |
| 187825306 (Comments: 1) | alpacaMaps (Discussed changesets: 11) | The mapper explained the atypical node placement and it makes sense. Restoring the node. commented 2026-09-08 21:30:16 UTC by alpacaMaps ♦431 |
| 188744304 (Comments: 1) | jg027 (Discussed changesets: 5) | I forgot to mention that this line is also quite short. commented 2026-09-08 21:25:01 UTC by jg027 ♦6 |
| 187764648 (Comments: 3) | Private Lives Matter (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hey! Thanks for bringing this back to my attention. I'll work to corroborate and restore the node tonight. Thanks for contributing accurate cameras to the cause. Happy mapping! -AM commented 2026-09-08 21:24:53 UTC by alpacaMaps ♦431 |
| 188642904 (Comments: 4) | ALFREDO ARIEL ALBA CUETO (Discussed changesets: 2) | I really appreciate your help, I'm new, I'm attentive to your recommendations. commented 2026-09-08 19:30:12 UTC by ALFREDO ARIEL ALBA CUETO ♦2 |
| 185726880 (Comments: 1) | domorethanyoucan (Discussed changesets: 1) | I removed this ALPR in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188740066. This is a traffic detection camera, not a license plate reader. commented 2026-09-08 19:25:04 UTC by PuddlesMapping ♦25 |
| 188469607 (Comments: 3) | rajdhani (Discussed changesets: 39) | I might be able to do that, in the meantime I've tried tagging my changesets with the SANDAG map of cycleways, which is up to date: https://www.sandag.org/projects-and-programs/bikeways-and-complete-streets/bike-map commented 2026-09-08 18:45:46 UTC by washington_irving ♦2 |
| 188692020 (Comments: 1) | p**um***u****m*******p********v************** (Discussed changesets: 10) | Reverted again for the same reasons as the last three times, in changeset 188734648 Before making this change again, please discuss it and come to a consensus with the local mapping community. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2125... commented 2026-09-08 17:16:28 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 188716197 (Comments: 1) | David Jalbert (Discussed changesets: 2) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. See https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers for mo... commented 2026-09-08 16:58:41 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 188730609 (Comments: 1) | OddBunsen (Discussed changesets: 1) | meant to say i94 commented 2026-09-08 15:53:33 UTC by OddBunsen ♦18 |
| 188538338 (Comments: 3) | cstromw (Discussed changesets: 5) | Oh I already did. Yeah, I think disused that you used on the Blue Earth section makes more sense commented 2026-09-08 15:34:25 UTC by ion_chi ♦111 |
| 188701007 (Comments: 1) | WyattLikesMaps (Discussed changesets: 1) | Looks good to me, thanks for the de-duplication! Is there anything in particular you felt unsure about? commented 2026-09-08 14:29:18 UTC by PuddlesMapping ♦25 |
| 188726541 (Comments: 1) | xander78 (Discussed changesets: 14) | It auto filled the title im sorryu commented 2026-09-08 14:28:43 UTC by xander78 ♦12 |
| 188581371 (Comments: 1) | MechanicalHex87 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Looks good to me. Thanks for contributing! commented 2026-09-08 14:14:55 UTC by maptheworld2050 ♦12 |
| 188582777 (Comments: 2) | MechanicalHex87 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Oh, and regarding "Slinger Family Dentistry", it's okay to map that either by tagging the building itself or by creating a separate point and tagging that, but if you map it as a separate point you should remove amenity=dentist and hea... commented 2026-09-08 14:11:00 UTC by maptheworld2050 ♦12 |
| 188553496 (Comments: 20) | 𝔸𝔹_ (Discussed changesets: 3) | Route 23 should be secondary, i’ll make this change commented 2026-09-08 13:45:49 UTC by cubbe8 ♦113 |
| 188495614 (Comments: 1) | Sunnyspark69 (Discussed changesets: 2) | This was a actually an Axon ALPR commented 2026-09-08 12:10:20 UTC by Sunnyspark69 ♦2 |
| 188705458 (Comments: 1) | b-jazz (Discussed changesets: 94) | Dummy! commented 2026-09-08 06:47:04 UTC by b-jazz ♦976 |
| 180484935 (Comments: 2) | PedestrianMapping_CartoBypass (Discussed changesets: 5) | Thanks for pointing this out. I understand the issue with the rendering in both CyclOSM and OpenCycleMap. The cycleway:both=shared_parking_lane tag was added by user "AwwJeez". I have only added missing sidewalk tags for the highways here. ... commented 2026-09-08 06:23:41 UTC by PedestrianMapping_CartoBypass ♦2 |
| 188506161 (Comments: 1) | MissChief (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hey, I just wanted to let you know that I noticed you accidentally made an invalid opening_hours=* tag. For example, in node 6635562870 "Mon 11 AM–11 PMTue 11 AM–11 PM Wed 11 AM–11 PM" should actually be formatted a... commented 2026-09-08 05:48:47 UTC by PostaMap_Infinite ♦83 |
| 188580568 (Comments: 1) | Winston's Sister (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi! Thanks for your contributions to the area. Do you know if the closure to cars is temporary or permanent? If it's temporary, or only closed at certain times, the best way to map it is to keep it as a `highway=service` and use a conditi... commented 2026-09-08 04:42:34 UTC by Nanepiwo ♦6 |
| 188649461 (Comments: 1) | BubbleGuppies (Discussed changesets: 14) | This is a pretty big edit. Did you discuss this ahead of time with the community? commented 2026-09-08 03:20:34 UTC by JuanElDemografo ♦59 |
| 188661296 (Comments: 1) | Wonder8read (Discussed changesets: 1) | RE: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1556635360 and others... When drawing golf course areas (such as greens, fairways, bunkers, tees, etc.), please be aware that the ways used to outline those areas can't cross over each other. Fairway ... commented 2026-09-08 03:11:48 UTC by b-jazz ♦976 |
| 188695729 (Comments: 1) | Biked_Potato (Discussed changesets: 2) | For the barrier I believe barrier=barricade often implies quite strict legal access restrictions (from the wiki: "By default, a barricade is assumed to legally prohibit all access beyond it") Perhaps one of these: barrier=barrier_boa... commented 2026-09-08 02:07:12 UTC by indoztri ♦2 |
| 184811801 (Comments: 4) | mapman75 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188698477 for prohibited source: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Google commented 2026-09-08 01:45:37 UTC by InsertUser ♦511 |
| 188178531 (Comments: 1) | IndirectSwing31 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, I appreciate local edits! However, please be careful that when you add sidewalks, you end the sidewalks where they meet the road. Connecting sidewalks across the road requires an Unmarked Crossing or a Marked Crossing - the sidewalk must not cont... commented 2026-09-07 23:50:00 UTC by lraj22 ♦2 |
| 188178692 (Comments: 1) | IndirectSwing31 (Discussed changesets: 2) | When changing Archibald Avenue to two one-way streets, you deleted all the informational tags such as the name, max speed, and number of lanes. I encourage you to revert this changeset and try again while keeping all of the tags of the street. commented 2026-09-07 23:48:56 UTC by lraj22 ♦2 |
| 137492807 (Comments: 5) | Joseph R P (Discussed changesets: 238) | Yeah. Project NEON reconfigured numerous roads in this area. commented 2026-09-07 22:12:42 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦405 |
| 188691268 (Comments: 1) | ianburgwin (Discussed changesets: 2) | This is my first time drawing buildings in a region without a lot of mapping detail. I think I got everything within village limits, and a little bit outside. commented 2026-09-07 21:05:46 UTC by ianburgwin ♦2 |
| 181586096 (Comments: 3) | greatnameguys2472 (Discussed changesets: 17) | I ended up getting rid of the multipolygon like a month ago and forgot to add a comment here, I agree now that a multipolygon isnt really necessary commented 2026-09-07 20:57:47 UTC by greatnameguys2472 ♦39 |
| 188690519 (Comments: 1) | tceasy (Discussed changesets: 4) | Building doesnt exit, reverted commented 2026-09-07 20:47:06 UTC by greatnameguys2472 ♦39 |
| 188690362 (Comments: 1) | tceasy (Discussed changesets: 4) | Wow, a five story tall building directly in the path of a major airport's runway. Seems legit. Fictional edit has been reverted. commented 2026-09-07 20:41:31 UTC by greatnameguys2472 ♦39 |
| 165474658 (Comments: 2) | goldfndr (Discussed changesets: 51) | No, definitely a mistake on my part, please feel free to revert that change. Possibly there was/is a retaining wall paralleling it. To the east looks like a candidate. commented 2026-09-07 19:24:08 UTC by goldfndr ♦71 |
| 188005908 (Comments: 3) | Halfdeaf007 (Discussed changesets: 19) | Or Mapillary. commented 2026-09-07 18:52:18 UTC by Halfdeaf007 ♦8 |
| 152565678 (Comments: 7) | aduxas (Discussed changesets: 13) | A lack of a dead-end sign doesn’t establish that traffic is restricted either. The physical layout of the road itself shows that it is a dead end. access=destination isn’t a tag for roads that happen to lead to destinations—it indic... commented 2026-09-07 16:17:14 UTC by StreetSurveyor ♦213 |
| 188135427 (Comments: 3) | rittoch (Discussed changesets: 18) | Thanks! commented 2026-09-07 15:53:36 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 180086988 (Comments: 2) | Flap Slimy Outward (Discussed changesets: 313) | You know what? I honestly don't remember, LOL. However, based on the one-way track road nearby, I think this is supposed to be a "no right turn" restriction. commented 2026-09-07 14:58:58 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦405 |
| 188664065 (Comments: 1) | Natasha Denona eu (Discussed changesets: 2) | Welcome to OSM! Your business isn't part of the street. I remove this SPAM entry. commented 2026-09-07 13:35:07 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,942 |
| 188667772 (Comments: 1) | Dima News nyc Cancun (Discussed changesets: 6) | please do not block my brother yuri kishenko a police officer commented 2026-09-07 12:27:24 UTC by Dima News nyc Cancun ♦2 |
| 184977380 (Comments: 1) | unruly4187 (Discussed changesets: 2) | This has been confirmed to not be an ALPR. Fixed video only. commented 2026-09-07 12:24:53 UTC by FlockXorrect ♦2 |
| 179039499 (Comments: 1) | unruly4187 (Discussed changesets: 2) | This has been confirmed to not be an ALPR. Fixed Video only. commented 2026-09-07 12:24:06 UTC by FlockXorrect ♦2 |
| 188598768 (Comments: 1) | Dima News nyc Cancun (Discussed changesets: 6) | Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/21360915. If one relation is used for two different (logic) objects: Please don't merge the objects. commented 2026-09-07 11:34:32 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,942 |
| 188643876 (Comments: 1) | vbyfsdhdsfhds (Discussed changesets: 2) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188659845 commented 2026-09-07 09:19:52 UTC by ajmat ♦666 |
| 188503374 (Comments: 1) | ロングアイランド (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hi! I just wanted to let you know that I noticed you accidentally made a few invalid opening_hours=* tags spanning multiple changesets. Please note that all hours must be written in hh:mm format, regardless of if it is a single or double digit... commented 2026-09-07 07:37:38 UTC by PostaMap_Infinite ♦83 |
| 135678967 (Comments: 1) | officialcptcg (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! You used tee=blue;3 on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1168377209/history Have you maybe meant tee=blue ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects wher... commented 2026-09-07 05:50:01 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,339 |
| 96473256 (Comments: 3) | Minh Nguyen (Discussed changesets: 188) | definitely, though I have not a good idea for anything more generic commented 2026-09-07 05:35:49 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,339 |
| 188599270 (Comments: 1) | Brantley Warren (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi try working in smaller areas so anyone checking your changes can follow along. Also try to write a more meaningful description for your actions. commented 2026-09-07 04:40:26 UTC by arc88 ♦5 |
| 186326781 (Comments: 2) | the bird2 (Discussed changesets: 1) | All leonardos in Kerrville are ran by the City of Kerrville commented 2026-09-07 04:18:10 UTC by the bird2 ♦1 |
| 188649064 (Comments: 1) | CanineClient (Discussed changesets: 1) | What does the green, yellow, red with the numbers mean? commented 2026-09-07 04:11:13 UTC by CanineClient ♦1 |
| 188390510 (Comments: 4) | Tuwewanzi (Discussed changesets: 9) | I also wish gorge could be an area (ditto valley) but it's an improvement to have the physical element tagged in addition to a park area related to that element. Seeing how you handled it here also shows me how to handle something else on my to-... commented 2026-09-07 04:09:25 UTC by Tuwewanzi ♦9 |
| 188514864 (Comments: 1) | Minnesota Exteriors (Discussed changesets: 1) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-09-07 03:11:53 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 188507952 (Comments: 1) | dvorakmasonry (Discussed changesets: 1) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. See https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers for mo... commented 2026-09-07 03:10:11 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 188401500 (Comments: 1) | Nagel Assisted Living & Memory Care (Discussed changesets: 1) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-09-07 02:28:13 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 151167316 (Comments: 4) | whammo (Discussed changesets: 81) | Bad Changeset - locations automatically retagged were not audited by hand to ensure accuracy. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151167316 commented 2026-09-07 01:40:50 UTC by Kovirii ♦55 |
| 188320473 (Comments: 1) | Creative Entertainment (Discussed changesets: 1) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. See https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers for mo... commented 2026-09-07 01:12:57 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 188222461 (Comments: 1) | kcrabb (Discussed changesets: 1) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-09-07 00:32:51 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 188527512 (Comments: 1) | blackbirdallentown (Discussed changesets: 1) | As an account mapping on behalf of a commercial business for financial gain, please be advised that you are expected to understand and carefully follow documented OpenStreetMap standards and conventions, which will both directly benefit the quality o... commented 2026-09-07 00:24:23 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 172828932 (Comments: 4) | Acre Wood Dental - Round Rock (Discussed changesets: 1) | NB, there were still a bunch of malformed tags that hadn't been cleaned up, but they ended up deleting it themselves in changeset 188515169 as the office had apparently closed. commented 2026-09-07 00:17:21 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 188644021 (Comments: 1) | Ben Sherman (Discussed changesets: 1) | Duplicate reentry, ignore commented 2026-09-07 00:01:32 UTC by Ben Sherman ♦1 |
| 176243892 (Comments: 7) | willkmis (Discussed changesets: 24) | Thanks! It's the name "Hotel Del Coronado" that is puzzling, which is correctly tagged on the entire campus. It's fascinating, but only 2 of the 8 Map Layers at www.openstreetmap.org show the name at the right zoom level: CyclOSM ... commented 2026-09-06 22:55:51 UTC by TheNightRider ♦90 |
| 186505530 (Comments: 3) | CAM-Gerlach_Repair (Discussed changesets: 44) | I published changeset/188642664 I had forgotten that you had redrawn the gas station as an area until now. Great approach! In theory, we don't need all the POI's as areas for each fueling station, and instead can just draw the gas s... commented 2026-09-06 22:53:27 UTC by O1S ♦37 |
| 185965744 (Comments: 1) | sun_lab (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hello! You used sidewalk=now on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/155002038/history Have you maybe meant sidewalk=no ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects ... commented 2026-09-06 22:27:18 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,339 |
| 167251322 (Comments: 2) | MrDrPrPatrick (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, For some reason I never received a notification for this comment. I agree, the green should either be the inner member of the multipolygon with the fairway as outer, or connected at all shared points. The way in question was orig... commented 2026-09-06 21:05:05 UTC by MrDrPrPatrick ♦1 |
| 188536274 (Comments: 5) | SomeoneElse_Revert (Discussed changesets: 1973) | okay thanks commented 2026-09-06 20:29:11 UTC by bobthebuilder423468 ♦18 |
| 126030730 (Comments: 1) | Necessarycoot72 (Discussed changesets: 85) | You added a lot of aircraft parking positions that do not exist. Apparently you used imagery that was out of date even 4 years ago. commented 2026-09-06 20:13:15 UTC by warnejo714 ♦3 |
| 179809150 (Comments: 1) | Nibbler3000 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Still there. Still surveilling. commented 2026-09-06 17:35:40 UTC by Peter Roof ♦1 |
| 188058649 (Comments: 2) | GA_Kevin (Discussed changesets: 25) | Yes! AFDC confirms the 180 kW too so good to have a 2-factor verification of that. This station only has CCS ports so it would be `socket:type1_combo:output=180 kW` Thanks so much for checking EV chargers! commented 2026-09-06 17:31:12 UTC by GA_Kevin ♦58 |
| 177139684 (Comments: 2) | Isopycnic (Discussed changesets: 19) | I haven't found anything that attests to the name and would support removing it. commented 2026-09-06 15:58:18 UTC by BNelly ♦3 |
| 170176218 (Comments: 1) | quincylvania (Discussed changesets: 78) | Came across this because JOSM's giving me a "Non-Way in multipolygon" error for Long Island https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3955977 -- how's the experiment going? ;) commented 2026-09-06 15:25:19 UTC by jmapb ♦435 |
| 188476209 (Comments: 3) | Khellhound (Discussed changesets: 1) | I believe you are correct that the camera on the other side of the light is indeed a red light camera (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/14144711404). I've updated the traffic enforcement relationship for both. commented 2026-09-06 15:11:21 UTC by PuddlesMapping ♦25 |
| 134543429 (Comments: 1) | skorasaurus (Discussed changesets: 20) | You are one of people who used sport=soccer tag - and your help is welcome in selecting an icon for iD editor. Proposed change is shown at https://github.com/openstreetmap/id-tagging-schema/pull/2771#issuecomment-5409506164 New one is l... commented 2026-09-06 11:39:59 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,339 |
| 188598308 (Comments: 1) | Ben Powell (Discussed changesets: 1) | Definitely not a tea shop but there's no category for "tool library" commented 2026-09-06 10:52:57 UTC by Ben Powell ♦1 |
| 186383562 (Comments: 10) | Flap Slimy Outward (Discussed changesets: 313) | Sorry, the one I just mentioned above is https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1517798424 commented 2026-09-06 08:22:48 UTC by TheNightRider ♦90 |
| 188219015 (Comments: 1) | qwexecotles (Discussed changesets: 2) | As an account mapping on behalf of a commercial business for financial gain, please be advised that you are expected to understand and carefully follow documented OpenStreetMap standards and conventions, which will both directly benefit the quality o... commented 2026-09-06 07:12:13 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 188218895 (Comments: 1) | qwexecotles (Discussed changesets: 2) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-09-06 07:06:23 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 188508675 (Comments: 3) | Grimreaprincess (Discussed changesets: 2) | Oh, I see: I hadn't realized that this leads to multiple properties. Thanks for explaining that. Classification-wise, mapping it as a "driveway" (highway=service + service=driveway) is fine, but might be a little misleading. Mapping it... commented 2026-09-06 06:08:31 UTC by pwbriggs ♦520 |
| 188397295 (Comments: 3) | InMyBentley (Discussed changesets: 1) | Apologies if my message came off as abrasive. That was not my intent. I'm not sure if the DeFlock app shows you aerial/satellite imagery (if not I think that would be a helpful addition!), but the location of the camera that you added is ... commented 2026-09-06 05:11:08 UTC by pwbriggs ♦520 |
| 188230003 (Comments: 2) | CuriousQuagsire (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi there, I didn't realize the other tags were invalid. I definitely need to ensure that it makes sense. This was a place I personally have visited, which the owners did refer to it as the Annex https://sfelitevbc.com/our-facility/ does m... commented 2026-09-06 05:09:49 UTC by CuriousQuagsire ♦2 |
| 188260419 (Comments: 2) | CuriousQuagsire (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi thanks for taking the time to answer this. (And fixing my changes). Will keep this in mind! commented 2026-09-06 05:04:03 UTC by CuriousQuagsire ♦2 |
| 188396089 (Comments: 5) | thatonedoge (Discussed changesets: 2) | I was at a small anti-ALPR protest at Crossroads today. We were technically standing on crossroad’s property so the security officer came over to tell us we needed be on the sidewalk. I explicitly asked him and he told me he was unsure of the o... commented 2026-09-06 02:48:09 UTC by Whatdoing ♦1 |
| 188325457 (Comments: 1) | Nick Pettazzoni (Discussed changesets: 1) | For roads that are temporarily closed for construction, it’s better to use highway=construction rather than marking them as access=private. This helps data users understand that the road is temporarily closed for construction, rather than indic... commented 2026-09-06 02:38:50 UTC by StreetSurveyor ♦213 |
| 188466260 (Comments: 1) | 500366859 (Discussed changesets: 4) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-09-06 02:12:44 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 183600480 (Comments: 1) | 500366859 (Discussed changesets: 4) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-09-06 02:12:40 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 174245145 (Comments: 1) | 500366859 (Discussed changesets: 4) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-09-06 02:12:36 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 173680947 (Comments: 1) | 500366859 (Discussed changesets: 4) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-09-06 02:12:31 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 188402587 (Comments: 1) | 500367622 (Discussed changesets: 2) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-09-06 02:06:26 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 174342509 (Comments: 1) | 500367622 (Discussed changesets: 2) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-09-06 02:06:01 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 188505308 (Comments: 1) | benholmen (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi! Overall this looks good, but it looks like you removed building tags from a few of these buildings, so now they're not rendering on the map. Would you be able to re add building=* tags? commented 2026-09-06 00:00:54 UTC by KFCmenomonie ♦12 |
| 188562454 (Comments: 2) | BagatelleExcess2887 (Discussed changesets: 11) | on construction area commented 2026-09-05 23:45:50 UTC by BagatelleExcess2887 ♦13 |
| 167584789 (Comments: 3) | TheDutchMan13 (Discussed changesets: 220) | "i wish we had better icons for iD" if there are specific possible improvements using one of icons available ( see https://github.com/openstreetmap/id-tagging-schema/blob/main/ICONS.md ) then please let me know! posting at https://g... commented 2026-09-05 23:37:55 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,339 |
| 188594337 (Comments: 1) | kiritimati7 (Discussed changesets: 14) | *lot commented 2026-09-05 23:08:21 UTC by kiritimati7 ♦17 |
| 188555642 (Comments: 1) | PostaMap_Infinite (Discussed changesets: 28) | *Universal commented 2026-09-05 22:56:56 UTC by PostaMap_Infinite ♦83 |
| 188335286 (Comments: 5) | Revelry (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thank you! Much appreciated! I will keep this in mind if it happens again. I did search the address and it worked this time. But that issue has come up with other locations so I'll get some screenshots next time. commented 2026-09-05 22:52:51 UTC by Revelry ♦1 |
| 124622138 (Comments: 1) | inspectorsmith (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hey Cody, I wanted to take a minute to ask you if your business office is actually at this location (in the middle of a residential neighborhood). If so, I'd like to get it tagged correctly, as the way it is tagged now would not show up i... commented 2026-09-05 22:45:43 UTC by End0fLine ♦26 |
| 188336027 (Comments: 1) | bentyler999 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/bentyler999, You've made quite a few changes to cameras in this parking lot. Are there really five camera units in close vicinity here? Please confirm that this is accurate. Thanks! commented 2026-09-05 22:30:17 UTC by pwbriggs ♦520 |
| 188330483 (Comments: 1) | bbtoast (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/bbtoast, Please make sure you use descriptive changeset comments. It helps a lot when other contributors are reviewing your changes and trying to understand the intent of your edits. Thanks! commented 2026-09-05 22:24:28 UTC by pwbriggs ♦520 |
| 188576457 (Comments: 1) | steve mats mats (Discussed changesets: 2) | #TIP: unless the road has signs like no trespassing, then the best tag is ownership=private. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/188576457 commented 2026-09-05 22:20:45 UTC by Glassman ♦6,059 |
| 188560845 (Comments: 1) | LDF STUDIO (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM, and thanks for your contributions. You marked this as a building and duplicated the existing amenity=place_of_worship. This image from the wiki might be helpful in determining how to tag this sort of thing: https://wiki.... commented 2026-09-05 21:24:19 UTC by citrula ♦1,020 |
| 183284655 (Comments: 4) | JasiahMaps1010 (Discussed changesets: 10) | Yeah, OpenStreetMap.org doesn't support attaching photos, but apps like StreetComplete have their own servers for temporary note photos, or you can contribute photos to services like Panoramax (local instance being https://pano.locus.sbs/) or Ma... commented 2026-09-05 21:19:58 UTC by pwbriggs ♦520 |
| 188565873 (Comments: 1) | Physkal (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks for the edit! The house number is already mapped in the house number field, and doesn't belong in the street name. I fixed that up. CoMaps gets new data from OpenStreetMap every few weeks, so you should see these edits refle... commented 2026-09-05 21:04:33 UTC by pwbriggs ♦520 |
| 188566516 (Comments: 1) | TheAutoAidEditor (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi, Thanks for your contribution. Could you explain your source and reasoning for deleting these POIs? I don't see a source=* on the changeset, nor in the changeset description. To help your fellow mappers, please make sure ... commented 2026-09-05 20:40:52 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 188552970 (Comments: 1) | p**um***u****m*******p********v************** (Discussed changesets: 10) | Hi, Thanks for leaving more leaving a detailed changeset description here. Please keep it up and continue leaving such on your future changesets, especially those with potentially controversial and subjective changes like highway classifciatio... commented 2026-09-05 20:32:35 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 188552816 (Comments: 1) | p**um***u****m*******p********v************** (Discussed changesets: 10) | Hi, As you've been asked many times before, including in your most recent block https://osm.org/user_blocks/21193, please leave useful changeset descriptions, at least briefly describing the change you made, where you made it (which you ... commented 2026-09-05 20:32:27 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 188552123 (Comments: 1) | Mateuslealcapelari (Discussed changesets: 50) | Bom dia, o OpenStreetMap não é o lugar para adicionar informações fictícias. Muitos consumidores de dados usam o OSM. commented 2026-09-05 18:58:03 UTC by marcmarti ♦120 |
| 188331849 (Comments: 4) | toga344 (Discussed changesets: 3) | No problem! Thanks for doing the work of cleaning up the Flock cameras. commented 2026-09-05 18:57:48 UTC by iandees ♦1,405 |
| 188510209 (Comments: 1) | Mother Of Faith Dignified Cremations (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello there, we already have a “Sandra Clark Funeral Home” probably misplaced up near the Texaco and last edited by a user with a very similar name. Which name do you want to use? commented 2026-09-05 18:30:29 UTC by schobbish ♦87 |
| 183571276 (Comments: 1) | Alex4T76 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello, thank you for your contributions to OpenStreetMap! I kindly suggest you square off any add by selecting the building and pressing "Q". This ensures that all of the building's corners are at exactly 90 degrees. This will help kee... commented 2026-09-05 15:12:51 UTC by diamondarmorsteve ♦78 |
| 188554511 (Comments: 1) | Flap Slimy Outward (Discussed changesets: 313) | Marked* commented 2026-09-05 15:07:49 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦405 |
| 188573180 (Comments: 1) | birdgavin (Discussed changesets: 1) | map photo from the authority: https://www.washtwp-franklin.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/pine-hill-trails.jpg commented 2026-09-05 14:15:48 UTC by birdgavin ♦1 |
| 188546723 (Comments: 2) | Liqueseous (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thank you, original coordinates have been restored for node/13121348298 commented 2026-09-05 13:59:19 UTC by Liqueseous ♦1 |
| 182162514 (Comments: 1) | Keith_Op (Discussed changesets: 2) | Another user resubmitted this ALPR. I personally verified it is in fact there. It must have been replaced as I personally verified that it was not at the time of this edit. commented 2026-09-05 11:38:57 UTC by Keith_Op ♦4 |
| 188544393 (Comments: 1) | scmonster (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! Please have a llok on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10122139317. What is the mean of the tags 102 tab grou \t102 tab group 103 tab (selectable, settable, boolean) Description: list, Value: \t103 tab (selectable, settable, boolean) D... commented 2026-09-05 09:15:03 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,942 |
| 182360417 (Comments: 1) | Anonymous897234 (Discussed changesets: 17) | Hello, In KC 2025 imagery, I don't see zebra markings at these crossings. However, I do see a little bit of construction in the imagery so maybe markings have been added since the imagery was captured? Just wanted to confirm that you didn... commented 2026-09-05 07:32:50 UTC by pwbriggs ♦520 |
| 167152964 (Comments: 1) | Jeff Ollie (Discussed changesets: 3) | https://osm.org/note/5319722 points out that there are two overlapping areas with boundary=protected_area for Battleground State Forest. The multipolygon you added has more geometry, but maybe it doesn't align with the state-designated protected... commented 2026-09-05 06:43:11 UTC by pwbriggs ♦520 |
| 161758093 (Comments: 1) | quincylvania (Discussed changesets: 78) | Hello Quincy, https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5319722 points out that there are two overlapping areas with boundary=protected_area for Battleground State Forest. I know that you didn't add either the closedway or multipolygon originall... commented 2026-09-05 06:40:48 UTC by pwbriggs ♦520 |
| 121943787 (Comments: 1) | SpeedMcCool (Discussed changesets: 14) | Hello, A multipolygon version of this state forest was added a few years after this changeset. I'm not sure which of the two should be removed or updated. Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5319722 commented 2026-09-05 06:36:58 UTC by pwbriggs ♦520 |
| 188554999 (Comments: 1) | pwbriggs (Discussed changesets: 31) | I admit the scope of this changeset got a little out of control so please let me know if you notice major issues here. I hope that these edits are net-positive despite possibly losing some turn restrictions etc. that I forgot to restore. commented 2026-09-05 05:42:59 UTC by pwbriggs ♦520 |
| 188554588 (Comments: 1) | Flap Slimy Outward (Discussed changesets: 313) | *OSM Carto commented 2026-09-05 05:21:10 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦405 |
| 176805088 (Comments: 6) | Frank Peng (Discussed changesets: 34) | Ended up fixing this in changeset 188553417 https://osm.org/changeset/188553417 Cheers! commented 2026-09-05 04:02:40 UTC by CAM-Gerlach ♦308 |
| 187777689 (Comments: 2) | EuleKC (Discussed changesets: 10) | There was a discussion started on this over one year ago on the wiki, but there have been no comments since that time: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Missouri_state_highways#Classification_of_supplemental_routes_(letter_roads) commented 2026-09-05 04:01:25 UTC by EuleKC ♦8 |
| 164567136 (Comments: 1) | dannmer (Discussed changesets: 42) | Hi, it looks like you added tags to the street for a tunnel where it does not appear to be in reality. Please check and revise, thanks! commented 2026-09-05 03:31:12 UTC by jandar22 ♦46 |
| 188550469 (Comments: 2) | AshJ17 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Additionally, it appears that you removed two rows of individually mapped townhouses and marked them instead as a row of townhouses. In the process, you have lost the address information for each of these houses which makes the map less useful. I... commented 2026-09-05 02:20:13 UTC by PuddlesMapping ♦25 |
| 188549915 (Comments: 1) | John Gavula (Discussed changesets: 1) | I should add... the routes were manually transferred from geo-tracking using a fitness app. commented 2026-09-05 00:19:31 UTC by John Gavula ♦1 |
| 188535945 (Comments: 2) | deflockjl (Discussed changesets: 1) | This was added by mistake! I’ll have it removed, thanks! commented 2026-09-05 00:06:34 UTC by deflockjl ♦1 |
| 188546377 (Comments: 1) | Jacob Barr (Discussed changesets: 1) | Looks like an un-named pizza restaurant is already mapped here. I'll clean these up. commented 2026-09-04 22:57:44 UTC by pwbriggs ♦520 |
| 188450546 (Comments: 1) | Lionturtledisciple (Discussed changesets: 1) | The Fredericksburg Battlefield is just one component of the Fredericksburg and Spotsylvania National Military Park located in the city. The park itself also includes the Chancellorsville Battlefield and other nearby historic sites like the Old Salem ... commented 2026-09-04 22:50:09 UTC by Joseph R P ♦476 |
| 188392572 (Comments: 4) | Joseph R P (Discussed changesets: 238) | I will respond, because not everything you don't like is "bait". This antagonistic behavior, lack of willingness to communicate like a mature adult, and carelessness in preserving old objects that were mapped years ago that you&... commented 2026-09-04 22:33:15 UTC by Joseph R P ♦476 |
| 188530010 (Comments: 1) | TransAct-JT (Discussed changesets: 18) | Please do not abbreviate street names. Spell out the full street name per OSM standards. Please refer to this link: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Abbreviations --- Published using OSMCha: https://os... commented 2026-09-04 21:28:10 UTC by Frank Peng ♦256 |
| 188450179 (Comments: 1) | dknelson9876 (Discussed changesets: 14) | I updated the office tag to "office=it", as that matches the closest. TaxHawk is a software company that runs tax prep websites, you're correct that they don't expect public visitors. commented 2026-09-04 20:37:34 UTC by WarnerK ♦3 |
| 187493114 (Comments: 4) | Matthew Grund (Discussed changesets: 27) | Hi Matthew, thanks for getting back to us. A zero-hour block is put in place when a mapper is making errors and not responding to comments or communications trying to establish a dialog. The block is immediately lifted once communication is establish... commented 2026-09-04 20:25:31 UTC by b-jazz ♦976 |
| 188500816 (Comments: 1) | gregcrago (Discussed changesets: 42) | Though the road continous "below" the block and therefore should also do so in OSM. The block has proper access-tags, so that's a router-issue. I will revert your change. --- Published usin... commented 2026-09-04 20:00:59 UTC by aighes ♦63 |
| 188543300 (Comments: 1) | Flap Slimy Outward (Discussed changesets: 313) | I completely forgot to add a source 🤦 Anyway, here it is: https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=SHC§ionNum=311. commented 2026-09-04 19:59:21 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦405 |
| 188502555 (Comments: 1) | PuddlesMapping (Discussed changesets: 1) | Re: Possible Import flag. Guaranteed human; just bored. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/188502555 commented 2026-09-04 19:29:59 UTC by PuddlesMapping ♦25 |
| 185674950 (Comments: 2) | Flap Slimy Outward (Discussed changesets: 313) | Oh, no, it's not! The addr:street=* of this node is absolutely incorrect! The closest street is "Inner Circle." I honestly have no idea how I didn't catch that 😅 Thanks for fixing this anyway! commented 2026-09-04 18:07:02 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦405 |
| 188474373 (Comments: 1) | PeterThiel6 (Discussed changesets: 1) | thanks peter commented 2026-09-04 18:04:39 UTC by schobbish ♦87 |
| 188534228 (Comments: 1) | NoctZan (Discussed changesets: 13) | Wrong source, should be this: https://www.a2gov.org/parks-and-recreation/parks-and-places/garden-homes-park/ commented 2026-09-04 16:26:12 UTC by NoctZan ♦12 |
| 187816176 (Comments: 3) | GA_Kevin (Discussed changesets: 25) | Hello @GA_Kevin, Sorry for the late reply, I didn't get a notification that you had replied. Yeah, I just noticed that I had incorrectly set `capacity=2` on each of the ones I'd created but I just fixed it. They are also live ... commented 2026-09-04 16:06:00 UTC by MacOSMapper ♦3 |
| 188530024 (Comments: 2) | IamJesse (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted. commented 2026-09-04 15:23:11 UTC by Glassman ♦6,059 |
| 188447867 (Comments: 4) | wcedmisten (Discussed changesets: 14) | doing landuse as multipolygon vs single polygon is not a settled debate and I prefer multipolygon's so I do not see the problem. If there wasn't any landuse bordering the hospital then yes a single polygon is better but in cases like this w... commented 2026-09-04 15:14:30 UTC by Udarian ♦992 |
| 188525783 (Comments: 1) | wcedmisten (Discussed changesets: 14) | In my head since I was a kid if you asked me if that grass and trees by the canal where part of the hospital I would tell you they are but I can accept the new alignment, but in Miami Dade landuse when attached to other landuse is done as multipolygo... commented 2026-09-04 15:07:08 UTC by Udarian ♦992 |
| 188448452 (Comments: 1) | Chris4856 (Discussed changesets: 0) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188529622 commented 2026-09-04 14:53:51 UTC by rajdhani ♦642 |
| 188528282 (Comments: 1) | cstromw (Discussed changesets: 5) | More updates needed to add new city hall building and other features as construction finished commented 2026-09-04 14:24:54 UTC by cstromw ♦7 |
| 157855403 (Comments: 5) | valhikes (Discussed changesets: 11) | oh right, I thought about something closer to https://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plik:Outhouse_cm01.jpg commented 2026-09-04 13:54:20 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,339 |
| 182139005 (Comments: 2) | FlamingoOSM (Discussed changesets: 46) | Sorry, my mistake. Added correct phone number. commented 2026-09-04 13:41:15 UTC by FlamingoOSM ♦15 |
| 185883668 (Comments: 1) | Dark Phantom (Discussed changesets: 3) | You already removed it, but I believe the claim that this camera is operated by Acton Police to be entirely incorrect. I have seen no evidence that Acton has any flock relationship. More importantly, it's not a Flock camera; it's Vu... commented 2026-09-04 13:26:46 UTC by gdt ♦60 |
| 188520764 (Comments: 1) | Dima News nyc Cancun (Discussed changesets: 6) | im a designer not a hacker I work with the MTA. I'm helping them. I'm a technician. Please not block me again thank you. Have a happy Labor Day. commented 2026-09-04 11:30:45 UTC by Dima News nyc Cancun ♦2 |
| 168989612 (Comments: 1) | Jackso (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, thanks for adding more details to this area! Just a friendly note that we shouldn't use name tags to describe features that don't have names. I've removed some of the name="Tunnel" tags for the underpasses on th... commented 2026-09-04 10:37:39 UTC by ohmanger ♦54 |
| 188436575 (Comments: 1) | Map307 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188514491 commented 2026-09-04 09:03:09 UTC by rajdhani ♦642 |
| 188390616 (Comments: 4) | _Shootz (Discussed changesets: 1) | Move the node back to the original position. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188510280 commented 2026-09-04 07:17:01 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,942 |
| 188329279 (Comments: 1) | Heyyotag (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188491376 commented 2026-09-04 06:48:52 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,271 |
| 188454332 (Comments: 2) | OHClNaMg (Discussed changesets: 1) | Understood. Apologies for the rookie mistake, and thanks for the guidance! commented 2026-09-04 05:40:19 UTC by OHClNaMg ♦1 |
| 188444234 (Comments: 1) | Kenzie pflaum (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188507307 commented 2026-09-04 05:25:00 UTC by ajmat ♦666 |
| 188430499 (Comments: 1) | iliketrainsandplanes (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188506945 commented 2026-09-04 05:02:05 UTC by MappingMore ♦793 |
| 153913166 (Comments: 1) | hwierzbicki (Discussed changesets: 25) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12052073514/history has building = no that was added in this edit if something is not a building, then not adding building key is enough... No need for building=no commented 2026-09-04 04:31:27 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,339 |
| 166503210 (Comments: 3) | EuleKC (Discussed changesets: 10) | thanks! commented 2026-09-04 04:29:57 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,339 |
| 188318482 (Comments: 1) | troussos9 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, Thanks for your contributions here! I just wanted to give you a heads up that the standard format for phone=* in the NANP (including the US) is +1-NNN-NNN-NNNN ; see https://osm.wiki/Key:phone#United_States . I fixed this for you (a... commented 2026-09-04 04:22:58 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 188145092 (Comments: 1) | MrNate Geek (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello. I have reverted this edit because you seem to have removed plaques that are still present. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188504976 commented 2026-09-04 03:13:50 UTC by mewhenthe ♦25 |
| 188145348 (Comments: 1) | MrNate Geek (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello. I have reverted this edit because you seem to have removed plaques that are still present. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188504976 commented 2026-09-04 03:13:50 UTC by mewhenthe ♦25 |
| 188503428 (Comments: 2) | Belén Chicaiza_ADO_Bus (Discussed changesets: 16) | DWG revert - sock-puppet vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188504056 commented 2026-09-04 02:33:12 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,101 |
| 187957659 (Comments: 2) | shinterro (Discussed changesets: 15) | Hey! Thanks for reaching out! Topically I would say it is probably a fine icon. I'll lean with the consensus that it represents the idea of 'dojo' and/or 'martial_arts' well enough at a glance, given that I have a US-c... commented 2026-09-04 01:58:30 UTC by shinterro ♦16 |
| 188428443 (Comments: 1) | Belén Chicaiza_ADO_Bus (Discussed changesets: 16) | Reverted sockpuppet vandalism in changeset: https://osm.org/changeset/188502772 See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21218 commented 2026-09-04 01:21:36 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 188418442 (Comments: 1) | Belén Chicaiza_ADO_Bus (Discussed changesets: 16) | Reverted sockpuppet vandalism in changeset: https://osm.org/changeset/188502772 See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21218 commented 2026-09-04 01:21:31 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 188417896 (Comments: 1) | Belén Chicaiza_ADO_Bus (Discussed changesets: 16) | Reverted sockpuppet vandalism in changeset: https://osm.org/changeset/188502772 See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21218 commented 2026-09-04 01:21:26 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 188417709 (Comments: 1) | Belén Chicaiza_ADO_Bus (Discussed changesets: 16) | Reverted sockpuppet vandalism in changeset: https://osm.org/changeset/188502772 See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21218 commented 2026-09-04 01:21:21 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 188417615 (Comments: 1) | Belén Chicaiza_ADO_Bus (Discussed changesets: 16) | Reverted sockpuppet vandalism in changeset: https://osm.org/changeset/188502772 See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21218 commented 2026-09-04 01:21:17 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 188417316 (Comments: 1) | Belén Chicaiza_ADO_Bus (Discussed changesets: 16) | Reverted sockpuppet vandalism in changeset: https://osm.org/changeset/188502772 See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21218 commented 2026-09-04 01:21:09 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 188417072 (Comments: 1) | Belén Chicaiza_ADO_Bus (Discussed changesets: 16) | Reverted sockpuppet vandalism in changeset: https://osm.org/changeset/188502772 See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21218 commented 2026-09-04 01:21:04 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 188414531 (Comments: 1) | Belén Chicaiza_ADO_Bus (Discussed changesets: 16) | Reverted sockpuppet vandalism in changeset: https://osm.org/changeset/188502772 See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21218 commented 2026-09-04 01:20:54 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 188414080 (Comments: 1) | Belén Chicaiza_ADO_Bus (Discussed changesets: 16) | Reverted sockpuppet vandalism in changeset: https://osm.org/changeset/188502772 See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21218 commented 2026-09-04 01:20:49 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 188413302 (Comments: 1) | Belén Chicaiza_ADO_Bus (Discussed changesets: 16) | Reverted sockpuppet vandalism in changeset: https://osm.org/changeset/188502772 See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21218 commented 2026-09-04 01:18:24 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 188431114 (Comments: 1) | Belén Chicaiza_ADO_Bus (Discussed changesets: 16) | Reverted sockpuppet vandalism in changeset: https://osm.org/changeset/188502697 See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21218 commented 2026-09-04 01:12:44 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 188431319 (Comments: 1) | Belén Chicaiza_ADO_Bus (Discussed changesets: 16) | Reverted sockpuppet vandalism in changeset: https://osm.org/changeset/188502662 See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21218 commented 2026-09-04 01:11:23 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 188431441 (Comments: 1) | Belén Chicaiza_ADO_Bus (Discussed changesets: 16) | Reverted sockpuppet vandalism in changeset: https://osm.org/changeset/188502653 See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21218 commented 2026-09-04 01:10:48 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 188490093 (Comments: 1) | Belén Chicaiza_ADO_Bus (Discussed changesets: 16) | Reverted sockpuppet vandalism in changeset: https://osm.org/changeset/188502616 See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21218 commented 2026-09-04 01:08:44 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 188471761 (Comments: 2) | Belén Chicaiza_ADO_Bus (Discussed changesets: 16) | It's a sockpuppet of blocked user https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Mayor%20Dima%20Kishenko commented 2026-09-04 00:47:41 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 188496329 (Comments: 2) | RaySorian (Discussed changesets: 1) | Understood, so don't add those unless explicitly stated with signage. Do you want me to remove those tags? commented 2026-09-04 00:40:02 UTC by RaySorian ♦1 |
| 188460674 (Comments: 1) | dindidindi (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi! Not sure what the point of this change is. Miami is already represented by way #183831887, and the normal address for the university is 501 East High Street, not 900 something? commented 2026-09-04 00:19:08 UTC by Eiim ♦34 |
| 188500991 (Comments: 1) | ihateflockersss (Discussed changesets: 1) | looking at this ALPR on various aerial imagery in iD it seems to be within the road area, being positioned like this is highly unlikely so please double check the position of this ALPR and fix it. Happy mapping, Udar. commented 2026-09-03 23:59:33 UTC by Udarian ♦992 |
| 188501002 (Comments: 1) | jg027 (Discussed changesets: 5) | To clarify, this was for the commuter rail portion of Newark Broad Street Station. commented 2026-09-03 23:35:13 UTC by jg027 ♦6 |
| 188379277 (Comments: 2) | Erin Gravley (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thank you for this information. I will tag them instead, as you suggested. commented 2026-09-03 23:07:36 UTC by Erin Gravley ♦1 |
| 188499899 (Comments: 1) | JoshW2021 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Correction: this changeset carries the wrong description. My editor reused the comment from my previous changeset. This changeset does NOT add SJ Storage - it adds Realcovery, a sober living residence at 676 Shoup Ave W, Twin Falls, from information ... commented 2026-09-03 22:38:45 UTC by JoshW2021 ♦1 |
| 188397622 (Comments: 2) | Mxdanger (Discussed changesets: 30) | Yeah, I figured it would be drained out eventually. You should create a note at this location with that information so other users are aware. commented 2026-09-03 18:24:26 UTC by Mxdanger ♦121 |
| 179554472 (Comments: 3) | whats9plus1021youstupid (Discussed changesets: 3) | thanks commented 2026-09-03 18:22:37 UTC by bobthebuilder423468 ♦18 |
| 188487316 (Comments: 1) | h234a2hm (Discussed changesets: 9) | source = arcgis source_ref = https://experience.arcgis.com/experience/1f89e5ccada04b658ffe698310b9843d commented 2026-09-03 17:50:42 UTC by h234a2hm ♦8 |
| 188401329 (Comments: 4) | skillingholmejournal (Discussed changesets: 1) | for the revert commented 2026-09-03 17:09:09 UTC by Udarian ♦992 |
| 188481708 (Comments: 1) | Matt McCutchen (Discussed changesets: 62) | I originally mapped the tunnel in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/115836408, then it was deleted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145393462, presumably inadvertently. I only know the location of the tunnel approximately. I t... commented 2026-09-03 16:18:26 UTC by Matt McCutchen ♦82 |
| 188474354 (Comments: 1) | Polk County 911 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello! Please notice you add "only" a building with name Pioneer Fellowship Church". You don't add a church. Please have a look on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dplace_of_worship commented 2026-09-03 15:55:40 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,942 |
| 188479315 (Comments: 1) | lbacud (Discussed changesets: 1) | Please revert this. I accidentally added my edits as new ways instead of editing the existing ones. commented 2026-09-03 15:47:51 UTC by lbacud ♦1 |
| 188422082 (Comments: 1) | ihasmagyk (Discussed changesets: 1) | FYI, direction of the golf=hole lines is significant. They should point from the tee to the green. I corrected this one and another one you created in the last 24 hours and thought you'd want to know. commented 2026-09-03 15:35:07 UTC by b-jazz ♦976 |
| 188478502 (Comments: 1) | J Doherty (Discussed changesets: 1) | Corrected position. The flock camera is on bank side of the road entering the plaza. Repositioned the view direction. commented 2026-09-03 15:29:26 UTC by J Doherty ♦1 |
| 188475716 (Comments: 1) | felicettilaw (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OpenStreetMap, while the tags look good there is one minor issue, the comment you left on this changeset is not very helpful, in OSM it is very helpful to leave a good changeset comment describing what you did and "-" is not real... commented 2026-09-03 15:28:17 UTC by Udarian ♦992 |
| 179722424 (Comments: 2) | apm-wa (Discussed changesets: 18) | I think leaving the current medical icon as it is would be more appropriate. My opinion. commented 2026-09-03 15:13:50 UTC by apm-wa ♦264 |
| 180218806 (Comments: 2) | DUGA (Discussed changesets: 42) | Looks good. Note that I tag places doing Chinese martial arts, dojo, jiujitsu, tae kwon do and karate. It looks generally acceptable. commented 2026-09-03 14:12:30 UTC by DUGA ♦552 |
| 96749314 (Comments: 1) | kylebakerpa05 (Discussed changesets: 37) | I've reverted a lot of the road changes in parking lots. Per [the driveway documentation](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:service%3Ddriveway), service roads in and around parking lots should not have the `driveway` tag. commented 2026-09-03 14:10:40 UTC by PuddlesMapping ♦25 |
| 176887150 (Comments: 1) | FLprivacyadvocate (Discussed changesets: 1) | Appears gone commented 2026-09-03 13:13:52 UTC by TuringYurtGb ♦1 |
| 188450365 (Comments: 1) | Friends of Hanlan's (Discussed changesets: 0) | let's try to keep these type of edits localized in the future... do a changeset in cali and a changeset in mass commented 2026-09-03 13:01:30 UTC by dmjab13 ♦153 |
| 188467618 (Comments: 1) | Dyl's Travels (Discussed changesets: 1) | modifying nodes this far apart (Millville and Paterson??) in the same changeset is bad practice, man commented 2026-09-03 13:00:54 UTC by dmjab13 ♦153 |
| 188318071 (Comments: 1) | washington_irving (Discussed changesets: 4) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188469607 commented 2026-09-03 12:37:53 UTC by rajdhani ♦642 |
| 175968072 (Comments: 1) | MapGirl_HannaH (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/615635748/history has building = utility that was added in this edit is building=utility a duplicate of more popular building=service ? Maybe changing to it would be fine? commented 2026-09-03 12:35:16 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,339 |
| 146657321 (Comments: 1) | CurlingMan13 (Discussed changesets: 216) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1010709830/history has building = utility that was added in this edit is building=utility a duplicate of more popular building=service ? Maybe changing to it would be fine? commented 2026-09-03 12:35:12 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,339 |
| 188280378 (Comments: 1) | B1uu_ (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188468514 commented 2026-09-03 12:16:11 UTC by rajdhani ♦642 |
| 169981111 (Comments: 1) | Daniel_Malloy (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1420079525/history has building = utility that was added in this edit is building=utility a duplicate of more popular building=service ? Maybe changing to it would be fine? commented 2026-09-03 12:14:14 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,339 |
| 166809167 (Comments: 1) | duduewgdu (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1389986442/history has building = utility that was added in this edit is building=utility a duplicate of more popular building=service ? Maybe changing to it would be fine? commented 2026-09-03 12:14:12 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,339 |
| 171637389 (Comments: 1) | Marc Toe (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1427974972/history has building = utility that was added in this edit is building=utility a duplicate of more popular building=service ? Maybe changing to it would be fine? commented 2026-09-03 12:14:10 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,339 |
| 166274550 (Comments: 1) | cereal_cable (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1330454095/history has building = utility that was added in this edit is building=utility a duplicate of more popular building=service ? Maybe changing to it would be fine? commented 2026-09-03 12:10:22 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,339 |
| 153609524 (Comments: 1) | brendan77 (Discussed changesets: 11) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/205175062/history has building = disused that was added in this edit it really should be building= + disused=yes commented 2026-09-03 11:44:43 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,339 |
| 145555306 (Comments: 1) | j_b_ (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/724819073/history has building = disused that was added in this edit it really should be building= + disused=yes commented 2026-09-03 11:44:42 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,339 |
| 133806332 (Comments: 1) | Jarrardi (Discussed changesets: 45) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/761870854/history has building = disused that was added in this edit it really should be building= + disused=yes commented 2026-09-03 11:44:41 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,339 |
| 180471896 (Comments: 1) | mvexel (Discussed changesets: 42) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/523183252/history has building = disused that was added in this edit it really should be building= + disused=yes commented 2026-09-03 11:44:39 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,339 |
| 139662243 (Comments: 1) | atlas-3d (Discussed changesets: 17) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/161134877/history has building = disused that was added in this edit it really should be building= + disused=yes commented 2026-09-03 11:44:35 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,339 |
| 188330862 (Comments: 2) | ayanbs (Discussed changesets: 8) | Block lifted as apparently an accidental change, not a bug commented 2026-09-03 11:00:10 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,101 |
| 188330539 (Comments: 1) | ayanbs (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hello, Whenever it's happened to me, an "unexpected large number of changes" usually means that lots of things were selected and one of them was moved slightly. JOSM interprets that as "apply that to everything" and moves... commented 2026-09-03 10:45:39 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,925 |
| 188390700 (Comments: 1) | Leicham (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188459061 commented 2026-09-03 08:41:38 UTC by rajdhani ♦642 |
| 188177010 (Comments: 1) | The_Prot0type_01 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! What is the mean of the tags NOT surveillance = public bruh = 2025-05-19 ? commented 2026-09-03 07:54:31 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,942 |
| 188456710 (Comments: 1) | indoztri (Discussed changesets: 1) | Included street entrance addresses, as they're often different from the buildings nearest to them. Added "house number" to each main building for same reason. commented 2026-09-03 07:51:47 UTC by indoztri ♦2 |
| 120997477 (Comments: 1) | MidwestMapGeek (Discussed changesets: 37) | Is ribbon an appropriate icon for oncologists within iD presets? Can you take look at https://github.com/openstreetmap/id-tagging-schema/pull/2736#issuecomment-5355985226 and judge is it working well? (alternative is to keep generic doctor ico... commented 2026-09-03 07:48:33 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,339 |
| 182492291 (Comments: 1) | Kovirii (Discussed changesets: 33) | Is ribbon an appropriate icon for oncologists within iD presets? Can you take look at https://github.com/openstreetmap/id-tagging-schema/pull/2736#issuecomment-5355985226 and judge is it working well? (alternative is to keep generic doctor ico... commented 2026-09-03 07:48:30 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,339 |
| 151335561 (Comments: 1) | TheDutchMan13 (Discussed changesets: 220) | Is ribbon an appropriate icon for oncologists within iD presets? Can you take look at https://github.com/openstreetmap/id-tagging-schema/pull/2736#issuecomment-5355985226 and judge is it working well? (alternative is to keep generic doctor ico... commented 2026-09-03 07:48:27 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,339 |
| 185876908 (Comments: 1) | wcedmisten (Discussed changesets: 14) | Is ribbon an appropriate icon for oncologists within iD presets? Can you take look at https://github.com/openstreetmap/id-tagging-schema/pull/2736#issuecomment-5355985226 and judge is it working well? (alternative is to keep generic doctor ico... commented 2026-09-03 07:48:17 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,339 |
| 185615099 (Comments: 1) | Andrew Matheny (Discussed changesets: 24) | Is ribbon an appropriate icon for oncologists within iD presets? Can you take look at https://github.com/openstreetmap/id-tagging-schema/pull/2736#issuecomment-5355985226 and judge is it working well? (alternative is to keep generic doctor ico... commented 2026-09-03 07:47:58 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,339 |
| 179474580 (Comments: 1) | HJUdall (Discussed changesets: 14) | Is ribbon an appropriate icon for oncologists within iD presets? Can you take look at https://github.com/openstreetmap/id-tagging-schema/pull/2736#issuecomment-5355985226 and judge is it working well? (alternative is to keep generic doctor ico... commented 2026-09-03 07:47:51 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,339 |
| 188308056 (Comments: 1) | MapSpot (Discussed changesets: 75) | Is ribbon an appropriate icon for oncologists within iD presets? Can you take look at https://github.com/openstreetmap/id-tagging-schema/pull/2736#issuecomment-5355985226 and judge is it working well? (alternative is to keep generic doctor ico... commented 2026-09-03 07:47:49 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,339 |
| 187776005 (Comments: 8) | Wildsharky (Discussed changesets: 39) | Hi AgileMaster, The agreed changes have now been made. The former alignment is tagged as disused:highway=track, and we’ve also added a note mentioning that it was discontinued at the 1977 Antrim Town Meeting. This way, the histori... commented 2026-09-03 06:31:18 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,271 |
| 188448397 (Comments: 1) | Falkhorn (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, Are you sure what you saw was a Motorola ALPR? If not, then I can delete this. Thanks, BubbaJuice commented 2026-09-03 06:20:35 UTC by BubbaJuice ♦174 |
| 188220835 (Comments: 1) | archpdx (Discussed changesets: 67) | Thank you for contributing to Aloha High School commented 2026-09-03 05:55:00 UTC by 9142322 ♦5 |
| 188437869 (Comments: 1) | ~aflojun< (Discussed changesets: 3) | DWG revert - fictitious items and personal info https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188451814 commented 2026-09-03 05:14:11 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,101 |
| 188438117 (Comments: 1) | ~aflojun< (Discussed changesets: 3) | DWG revert - fictitious items and personal info https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188451814 commented 2026-09-03 05:14:11 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,101 |
| 188437438 (Comments: 2) | ~aflojun< (Discussed changesets: 3) | DWG revert - fictitious items and personal info https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188451814 commented 2026-09-03 05:14:10 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,101 |
| 188449305 (Comments: 1) | NoctZan (Discussed changesets: 13) | Also updated dog and phone tags commented 2026-09-03 03:18:54 UTC by NoctZan ♦12 |
| 188449338 (Comments: 1) | NoctZan (Discussed changesets: 13) | Also updated dog and phone tags commented 2026-09-03 03:18:51 UTC by NoctZan ♦12 |
| 188449375 (Comments: 1) | NoctZan (Discussed changesets: 13) | Also updated dog and phone tags commented 2026-09-03 03:18:45 UTC by NoctZan ♦12 |
| 188449422 (Comments: 2) | NoctZan (Discussed changesets: 13) | Also updated dog and phone tags commented 2026-09-03 03:18:40 UTC by NoctZan ♦12 |
| 188449514 (Comments: 1) | NoctZan (Discussed changesets: 13) | Also updated dog and phone tags commented 2026-09-03 03:18:28 UTC by NoctZan ♦12 |
| 188337411 (Comments: 2) | captainwacky (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! I see there's some maps from USDOT and utah.gov but I'm not sure which one I could use to import as a layer into JOSM to merge in that data. I've also been making most of my edits in the iD editor so it might take me some time t... commented 2026-09-03 01:35:32 UTC by captainwacky ♦1 |
| 141703407 (Comments: 1) | HJUdall (Discussed changesets: 14) | Do you think that https://pinhead.ink/#joint would work well to represent rheumatology in iD presets? See https://github.com/openstreetmap/id-tagging-schema/pull/2734#issuecomment-5353968217 for how it would look like in editor I am ask... commented 2026-09-03 01:19:06 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,339 |
| 141886909 (Comments: 1) | Kovirii (Discussed changesets: 33) | Do you think that https://pinhead.ink/#joint would work well to represent rheumatology in iD presets? See https://github.com/openstreetmap/id-tagging-schema/pull/2734#issuecomment-5353968217 for how it would look like in editor I am ask... commented 2026-09-03 01:18:51 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,339 |
| 180237681 (Comments: 1) | Brian'sPants (Discussed changesets: 4) | Do you think that https://pinhead.ink/#joint would work well to represent rheumatology in iD presets? See https://github.com/openstreetmap/id-tagging-schema/pull/2734#issuecomment-5353968217 for how it would look like in editor I am ask... commented 2026-09-03 01:18:20 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,339 |
| 162166681 (Comments: 1) | kittttt (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1356925827/history has building = home that was added in this edit is building=home a duplicate of more popular building=house ? Maybe changing to it would be fine? commented 2026-09-03 00:51:46 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,339 |
| 188446464 (Comments: 1) | deepmind0804 (Discussed changesets: 1) | My first contribution, go easy on me commented 2026-09-03 00:32:41 UTC by deepmind0804 ♦1 |
| 188446238 (Comments: 1) | BubbaJuice (Discussed changesets: 81) | Based on survey. commented 2026-09-03 00:17:26 UTC by BubbaJuice ♦174 |
| 188419374 (Comments: 2) | Oregonian3 (Discussed changesets: 53) | It completes the loop, but what two cities does this actually form the "best" connection between? If someone is going to Golden from Broomfield I'd wager that most people would take I-25 to I-76 to I-70 rather than taking Highway 128 t... commented 2026-09-02 23:34:05 UTC by Oregonian3 ♦70 |
| 188151626 (Comments: 1) | neuhausr (Discussed changesets: 18) | I've had adding this building on my to-do list, so thanks for adding it! I've cleaned it up a bit in changeset/188445314 commented 2026-09-02 23:27:29 UTC by O1S ♦37 |
| 178843386 (Comments: 2) | m86 (Discussed changesets: 35) | Yes - it looks good. commented 2026-09-02 22:52:05 UTC by m86 ♦23 |
| 180424307 (Comments: 3) | geometrix (Discussed changesets: 1) | As the more local, would you like to delete the other OSM node for the same camera now? (Sounds like you'll be checking all 6; news says 4 including this one gone already and last 2 on sep 8 and 9, I think.) commented 2026-09-02 22:35:04 UTC by gdt ♦60 |
| 188341556 (Comments: 2) | emeadows (Discussed changesets: 3) | capture_date_range is a field brought in via Microsoft Building footprints. It is automatically tagged when using the AI generated building footprints. In this case the footprints were generated from aerials captured from 6/1/2018-7/31/2018. I do not... commented 2026-09-02 22:12:10 UTC by emeadows ♦2 |
| 187418586 (Comments: 2) | hhartsoe (Discussed changesets: 6) | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IV2H7eZ5-Mc commented 2026-09-02 21:49:50 UTC by hhartsoe ♦2 |
| 184201595 (Comments: 9) | OpenStreetGoober (Discussed changesets: 1) | Good catches, those are no longer under construction. I will remove those tags. Thank you! commented 2026-09-02 21:49:21 UTC by OpenStreetGoober ♦1 |
| 187454944 (Comments: 3) | Loopslol7 (Discussed changesets: 17) | absolutely no problem, these kind of typo is easy to spot commented 2026-09-02 21:30:47 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,339 |
| 179467205 (Comments: 3) | cuzi (Discussed changesets: 35) | Okay, thanks for confirming! Happy mapping! commented 2026-09-02 20:59:16 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 188437728 (Comments: 1) | OhHiNoU (Discussed changesets: 1) | Is this a real camera? commented 2026-09-02 20:11:33 UTC by DividedFrame ♦6 |
| 188036435 (Comments: 1) | Joshua Leclair (Discussed changesets: 1) | I do not believe this is accurate. There is no flock camera at this location on the side of the highway. There is no building or business here and Michigan is not putting up 1 camera in the middle of nowhere for some random reason. This Joshua person... commented 2026-09-02 19:02:06 UTC by A Michigan Resident ♦1 |
| 183783199 (Comments: 1) | PlainJane999 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM; I see you are pretty new. In june you added an ALPR here, and there is also one added in March: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180424307#map=19/42.556006/-71.485602&layers=N It seems likely there is only 1 c... commented 2026-09-02 19:00:52 UTC by gdt ♦60 |
| 187608410 (Comments: 1) | Jer spark (Discussed changesets: 1) | This is not a Flock ALPR camera. This is a Frost Solutions weather monitoring camera. https://www.frostsolutions.io/mini-weather-station commented 2026-09-02 19:00:02 UTC by McDreimiller ♦3 |
| 188274147 (Comments: 1) | CAPT JB (Discussed changesets: 1) | Does the shed really have an address? The address you added looks the same as the one on the house. commented 2026-09-02 18:20:19 UTC by pwbriggs ♦520 |
| 188427768 (Comments: 1) | jkrift (Discussed changesets: 6) | looking at this ALPR on various aerial imagery in iD it seems to be within the road area, being positioned like this is highly unlikely so please double check the position of this ALPR and fix it. Happy mapping, Udar. commented 2026-09-02 18:16:23 UTC by Udarian ♦992 |
| 188427603 (Comments: 1) | jkrift (Discussed changesets: 6) | looking at this ALPR on various aerial imagery in iD it seems to be within the road area, being positioned like this is highly unlikely so please double check the position of this ALPR and fix it. Happy mapping, Udar. commented 2026-09-02 18:15:20 UTC by Udarian ♦992 |
| 188382349 (Comments: 1) | thisisfranklin (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks for the contribution! The format +1-206-322-1717 is correct here in OpenStreetMap. I changed it back. commented 2026-09-02 18:00:14 UTC by pwbriggs ♦520 |
| 179155730 (Comments: 3) | gpserror (Discussed changesets: 61) | no, Carto is not influenced by that this is purely about how it shows up in editor commented 2026-09-02 17:54:01 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,339 |
| 188305470 (Comments: 1) | nbargolf (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hey nbar, I noticed your changes on this course, and I see that they can use a lot of improvement. Take a look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1553866095 for instance. Granted, the satellite imagery and course quality is really low for th... commented 2026-09-02 16:56:23 UTC by b-jazz ♦976 |
| 188416809 (Comments: 1) | tooeasy (Discussed changesets: 6) | because half of the lehigh valley wasn't mapped properly until this decade commented 2026-09-02 16:50:53 UTC by dmjab13 ♦153 |
| 188281522 (Comments: 1) | SabersKiss (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi there! I see you're adding lots of businesses, which is great, but I just wanted to let you know you've got the opening_hours format a bit off. There needs to be a colon between the hour and minute values, e.g. Mo-Fr 08:30-16:00. What yo... commented 2026-09-02 15:30:40 UTC by salisburymistake ♦31 |
| 187822911 (Comments: 2) | lunar_jaws812 (Discussed changesets: 11) | Thanks for reaching out! I think it would be a very reasonable icon to use for martial arts gyms. Martial arts styles look very different, so some aren't going to have kicks (e.g. BJJ, judo, sumo, boxing, etc.), but I don't think there is o... commented 2026-09-02 15:27:34 UTC by lunar_jaws812 ♦21 |
| 188389714 (Comments: 1) | sun_lab (Discussed changesets: 5) | It's a good idea to include name=* on sidewalks the same as you would another carriageway on a road. This aids greatly with pedestrian instructions. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/ch... commented 2026-09-02 13:47:15 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,623 |
| 188394908 (Comments: 1) | Yizhi Liang (Discussed changesets: 1) | We generally don't abbreviate in street names, since computers are good at making abbreviations when desired but bad at telling things like "Mount" and "Mountain" apart or "Street," "Saint" and "Sault... commented 2026-09-02 13:46:18 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,623 |
| 183379732 (Comments: 2) | willkmis (Discussed changesets: 24) | I think it's suitable for iD presets. As mentioned in the PR, it's probably not quite representative of all martial arts but it gets the point across. commented 2026-09-02 11:20:51 UTC by willkmis ♦234 |
| 186480742 (Comments: 2) | MikeN (Discussed changesets: 21) | I think the icon represents the overall category well, even if some activities do not look quite like that. commented 2026-09-02 10:54:59 UTC by MikeN ♦373 |
| 188410421 (Comments: 1) | h234a2hm (Discussed changesets: 9) | Tagged from the beginning of Ponce to the Wells Street and North Clarendon Avenue intersection. commented 2026-09-02 10:11:45 UTC by h234a2hm ♦8 |
| 187007833 (Comments: 1) | Overcomzr (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, what is a "highway_loop"? This tag is not used in any other place. commented 2026-09-02 09:42:41 UTC by mueschel ♦7,415 |
| 106763941 (Comments: 2) | Minh Nguyen (Discussed changesets: 188) | Thanks for reaching out. Seems reasonable to me. Some disciplines aren’t primarily about kicking (for example, Limalama), but I suppose a kicking icon would be more recognizable than one depicting punches or holds. Maybe in the future there cou... commented 2026-09-02 08:59:38 UTC by Minh Nguyen ♦659 |
| 52459373 (Comments: 1) | redsteakraw (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hello! You used amenity=dojo multiple times (including in this preset) I want to ask you for advise about its icon in presets (wider discussion in https://github.com/openstreetmap/id-tagging-schema/pull/2773 ) Would https://pinhead.ink/... commented 2026-09-02 08:48:08 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,339 |
| 175524648 (Comments: 1) | impiaaa (Discussed changesets: 29) | Hello! You used amenity=dojo multiple times (including in this preset) I want to ask you for advise about its icon in presets (wider discussion in https://github.com/openstreetmap/id-tagging-schema/pull/2773 ) Would https://pinhead.ink/... commented 2026-09-02 08:47:53 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,339 |
| 167468390 (Comments: 1) | Joseph R P (Discussed changesets: 238) | Hello! You used amenity=dojo multiple times (including in this preset) I want to ask you for advise about its icon in presets (wider discussion in https://github.com/openstreetmap/id-tagging-schema/pull/2773 ) Would https://pinhead.ink/... commented 2026-09-02 08:47:30 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,339 |
| 185973359 (Comments: 1) | CurlingMan13 (Discussed changesets: 216) | Hello! You used amenity=dojo multiple times (including in this preset) I want to ask you for advise about its icon in presets (wider discussion in https://github.com/openstreetmap/id-tagging-schema/pull/2773 ) Would https://pinhead.ink/... commented 2026-09-02 08:47:27 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,339 |
| 166638330 (Comments: 1) | KelsonV (Discussed changesets: 12) | Hello! You used amenity=dojo multiple times (including in this preset) I want to ask you for advise about its icon in presets (wider discussion in https://github.com/openstreetmap/id-tagging-schema/pull/2773 ) Would https://pinhead.ink/... commented 2026-09-02 08:47:19 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,339 |
| 185442730 (Comments: 1) | MapSpot (Discussed changesets: 75) | Hello! You used amenity=dojo multiple times (including in this preset) I want to ask you for advise about its icon in presets (wider discussion in https://github.com/openstreetmap/id-tagging-schema/pull/2773 ) Would https://pinhead.ink/... commented 2026-09-02 08:47:14 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,339 |
| 130191308 (Comments: 1) | Timothy Smith (Discussed changesets: 325) | Hello! You used amenity=dojo multiple times (including in this preset) I want to ask you for advise about its icon in presets (wider discussion in https://github.com/openstreetmap/id-tagging-schema/pull/2773 ) Would https://pinhead.ink/... commented 2026-09-02 08:46:57 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,339 |
| 187672668 (Comments: 1) | Omnific (Discussed changesets: 147) | Hello! You used amenity=dojo multiple times (including in this preset) I want to ask you for advise about its icon in presets (wider discussion in https://github.com/openstreetmap/id-tagging-schema/pull/2773 ) Would https://pinhead.ink/... commented 2026-09-02 08:46:48 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,339 |
| 186039333 (Comments: 1) | HJUdall (Discussed changesets: 14) | Hello! You used amenity=dojo multiple times (including in this preset) I want to ask you for advise about its icon in presets (wider discussion in https://github.com/openstreetmap/id-tagging-schema/pull/2773 ) Would https://pinhead.ink/... commented 2026-09-02 08:46:42 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,339 |
| 187017002 (Comments: 1) | VikasChandra_Lyft (Discussed changesets: 3) | Parkway drive was converted to have southbound traffic to only be able to turn onto US 85 north, this is a brand new configuration. commented 2026-09-02 07:25:00 UTC by GarliccBread1 ♦17 |
| 188395525 (Comments: 1) | SwiftersEdge (Discussed changesets: 1) | Is this a real Flock camera? The City of Springfield canceled the contract and all Flock cameras were removed. commented 2026-09-02 06:05:49 UTC by Adam850 ♦11 |
| 188379962 (Comments: 1) | whats9plus1021youstupid (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi, These two buildings have been tagged with this building=* and layer=* by experienced mappers for the past six years, and this is apparently the standard convention for such per this comment: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/10905256... commented 2026-09-02 05:39:05 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 188342780 (Comments: 2) | jdouglass (Discussed changesets: 1) | Understood, thanks for the update! commented 2026-09-02 04:49:32 UTC by jdouglass ♦1 |
| 188375513 (Comments: 1) | Mayor Dima Kishenko (Discussed changesets: 4) | DWG revert - Apparent sock-puppet vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188397818 commented 2026-09-02 03:17:48 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,101 |
| 188397600 (Comments: 2) | Mayor Dima Kishenko (Discussed changesets: 4) | DWG revert - Apparent sock-puppet vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188397818 commented 2026-09-02 03:17:48 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,101 |
| 188375252 (Comments: 1) | Mayor Dima Kishenko (Discussed changesets: 4) | DWG revert - Apparent sock-puppet vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188397818 commented 2026-09-02 03:17:48 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,101 |
| 188373344 (Comments: 1) | Mayor Dima Kishenko (Discussed changesets: 4) | DWG revert - Apparent sock-puppet vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188397818 commented 2026-09-02 03:17:47 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,101 |
| 188397067 (Comments: 1) | jg027 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Correction/clarification: the source referenced in the changeset comment is the MTA 2025–2029 Capital Plan, not a “2025 Capital Plan.” The Central Branch electrification project was included in the MTA 2020–2024 Capital Progra... commented 2026-09-02 02:43:30 UTC by jg027 ♦6 |
| 178769536 (Comments: 1) | thompsonrestoration (Discussed changesets: 1) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-09-02 02:14:46 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 188341190 (Comments: 1) | ben_harris369 (Discussed changesets: 1) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Waterways/River_modernization indicates that only the waterway ways should have a name and the water areas should be unnamed. at least one or two bridges now end in the water too. this should be ... commented 2026-09-01 23:17:23 UTC by OddlyAngled ♦138 |
| 188380058 (Comments: 1) | Tuwewanzi (Discussed changesets: 9) | 211 iD 2.42.2 commented 2026-09-01 22:25:46 UTC by Jesera ♦1 |
| 188330939 (Comments: 1) | Deflocktheflock1234 (Discussed changesets: 19) | We were contacted previously about node removals and would like to revert these additional changes until you verify these have been truly removed.\r \r Please feel free to DM or respond here with affirmation the nodes were removed physically fr... commented 2026-09-01 22:06:59 UTC by alpacaMaps ♦431 |
| 188330948 (Comments: 1) | Deflocktheflock1234 (Discussed changesets: 19) | We were contacted previously about node removals and would like to revert these additional changes until you verify these have been truly removed.\r \r Please feel free to DM or respond here with affirmation the nodes were removed physically fr... commented 2026-09-01 22:06:58 UTC by alpacaMaps ♦431 |
| 188330955 (Comments: 1) | Deflocktheflock1234 (Discussed changesets: 19) | We were contacted previously about node removals and would like to revert these additional changes until you verify these have been truly removed.\r \r Please feel free to DM or respond here with affirmation the nodes were removed physically fr... commented 2026-09-01 22:06:58 UTC by alpacaMaps ♦431 |
| 188330965 (Comments: 1) | Deflocktheflock1234 (Discussed changesets: 19) | We were contacted previously about node removals and would like to revert these additional changes until you verify these have been truly removed.\r \r Please feel free to DM or respond here with affirmation the nodes were removed physically fr... commented 2026-09-01 22:06:57 UTC by alpacaMaps ♦431 |
| 188330970 (Comments: 1) | Deflocktheflock1234 (Discussed changesets: 19) | We were contacted previously about node removals and would like to revert these additional changes until you verify these have been truly removed.\r \r Please feel free to DM or respond here with affirmation the nodes were removed physically fr... commented 2026-09-01 22:06:57 UTC by alpacaMaps ♦431 |
| 188330978 (Comments: 1) | Deflocktheflock1234 (Discussed changesets: 19) | We were contacted previously about node removals and would like to revert these additional changes until you verify these have been truly removed.\r \r Please feel free to DM or respond here with affirmation the nodes were removed physically fr... commented 2026-09-01 22:06:56 UTC by alpacaMaps ♦431 |
| 188340770 (Comments: 1) | CacheValleySystems (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, and welcome to OpenStreetMap! Since you requested a review, I looked over your changes. In this case, could a visitor from the public show up to your office here for services? Anyway, tagging looks good! commented 2026-09-01 20:40:15 UTC by Xvtn ♦511 |
| 188375817 (Comments: 1) | wlgann (Discussed changesets: 13) | Oops, this was houses not fences. commented 2026-09-01 20:33:00 UTC by wlgann ♦5 |
| 188311765 (Comments: 1) | tooeasy (Discussed changesets: 6) | if it's got a name i'm not so sure commented 2026-09-01 19:56:27 UTC by dmjab13 ♦153 |
| 188280703 (Comments: 1) | CurlingMan13 (Discussed changesets: 216) | this is great - thanks CurlingMan. Impressed you spotted new imagery for Metuchen HS this quickly commented 2026-09-01 19:56:20 UTC by mbeyerle ♦55 |
| 188311819 (Comments: 1) | tooeasy (Discussed changesets: 6) | atleast mark it unpaved... it's clearly not a "driveway" commented 2026-09-01 19:55:45 UTC by dmjab13 ♦153 |
| 186479624 (Comments: 2) | CAM-Gerlach_Repair (Discussed changesets: 44) | Hey, thanks for reaching out and cooperating--I definitely appreciate it, since the vast majority of SEO accounts don't. Yup, should be--if you do happen to make a good-faith mistake, I can fix them for you. Just make sure to use this sam... commented 2026-09-01 18:37:04 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 181653723 (Comments: 1) | sadadada (Discussed changesets: 2) | Welcome to OpenStreetMap! In the future, when mapping things like buildings, consider using the "square" tool (shortcut Q in iD) so they aren't weirdly shaped polygons. Happy mapping! commented 2026-09-01 18:26:19 UTC by neuhausr ♦368 |
| 188323002 (Comments: 3) | nuclearifle (Discussed changesets: 1) | They're not even near the stoplight poles. Though most stoplights (including all that were that were installed or upgraded in the last 20 years) feature video traffic detection (they don't record) and I have seen some incorrectly mapped as... commented 2026-09-01 17:18:13 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,623 |
| 187863675 (Comments: 3) | dannmer (Discussed changesets: 42) | To be clearer, the property to the west is not a church, it's the tech center. commented 2026-09-01 16:36:27 UTC by dannmer ♦35 |
| 188327716 (Comments: 3) | bally213 (Discussed changesets: 3) | The issues have been fixed in changeset/188368312. commented 2026-09-01 16:10:20 UTC by Flynn Marquardt ♦91 |
| 187800360 (Comments: 1) | flockfinderUSofA (Discussed changesets: 2) | This is likely not a flock camera but Walmart's internal security. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/187800360 commented 2026-09-01 16:01:12 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,623 |
| 187800819 (Comments: 1) | flockfinderUSofA (Discussed changesets: 2) | I think you tagged traffic detection cameras (which do not record, only monitor the queuing area for waiting vehicles) incorrectly as flock cameras. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https:... commented 2026-09-01 15:54:49 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,623 |
| 188219965 (Comments: 1) | Ryan4n6 (Discussed changesets: 3) | You have made a common error when you saw a fairway that looked like it didn't have a proper "Feature Type" defined and decided to add the fairway tag. The hole was already properly tagged, but was part of a relation of multiple object... commented 2026-09-01 15:34:52 UTC by b-jazz ♦976 |
| 187857076 (Comments: 2) | dametenshi (Discussed changesets: 3) | 🤦 You’re totally right. My apologies 🙏 commented 2026-09-01 15:26:22 UTC by dametenshi ♦1 |
| 188269728 (Comments: 2) | Dima gamer12 (Discussed changesets: 57) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 188370948 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21215 commented 2026-09-01 15:15:24 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 188337835 (Comments: 3) | Dima gamer12 (Discussed changesets: 57) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 188370948 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21215 commented 2026-09-01 15:15:24 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 188244354 (Comments: 2) | Dima gamer12 (Discussed changesets: 57) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 188370948 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21215 commented 2026-09-01 15:15:24 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 188243567 (Comments: 2) | Dima gamer12 (Discussed changesets: 57) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 188370948 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21215 commented 2026-09-01 15:15:24 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 188248763 (Comments: 2) | Dima gamer12 (Discussed changesets: 57) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 188370948 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21215 commented 2026-09-01 15:15:24 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 188370948 (Comments: 1) | woodpeck (Discussed changesets: 148) | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 188049395, 188124458, 188192727, 188218482, 188222822, 188222974, 188222995, 188223306, 188224949, 188225996, 188227719, 188240075, 188243567, 188244354, 188248713, 188248763, 188248853, 188... commented 2026-09-01 15:15:24 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 188276623 (Comments: 2) | Dima gamer12 (Discussed changesets: 57) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 188370948 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21215 commented 2026-09-01 15:15:23 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 188370779 (Comments: 2) | woodpeck (Discussed changesets: 148) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 188370948 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21215 commented 2026-09-01 15:15:23 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 188222822 (Comments: 2) | Dima gamer12 (Discussed changesets: 57) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 188370948 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21215 commented 2026-09-01 15:15:23 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 188218482 (Comments: 2) | Dima gamer12 (Discussed changesets: 57) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 188370948 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21215 commented 2026-09-01 15:15:23 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 188275080 (Comments: 2) | Dima gamer12 (Discussed changesets: 57) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 188370948 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21215 commented 2026-09-01 15:15:23 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 188276545 (Comments: 2) | Dima gamer12 (Discussed changesets: 57) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 188370948 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21215 commented 2026-09-01 15:15:23 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 188277898 (Comments: 2) | Dima gamer12 (Discussed changesets: 57) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 188370948 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21215 commented 2026-09-01 15:15:23 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 188278565 (Comments: 2) | Dima gamer12 (Discussed changesets: 57) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 188370948 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21215 commented 2026-09-01 15:15:23 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 188251090 (Comments: 2) | Dima gamer12 (Discussed changesets: 57) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 188370948 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21215 commented 2026-09-01 15:15:22 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 188251183 (Comments: 2) | Dima gamer12 (Discussed changesets: 57) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 188370948 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21215 commented 2026-09-01 15:15:22 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 188279497 (Comments: 2) | Dima gamer12 (Discussed changesets: 57) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 188370948 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21215 commented 2026-09-01 15:15:22 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 188274221 (Comments: 2) | Dima gamer12 (Discussed changesets: 57) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 188370948 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21215 commented 2026-09-01 15:15:22 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 188274621 (Comments: 2) | Dima gamer12 (Discussed changesets: 57) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 188370948 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21215 commented 2026-09-01 15:15:22 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 188222974 (Comments: 2) | Dima gamer12 (Discussed changesets: 57) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 188370948 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21215 commented 2026-09-01 15:15:22 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 188312078 (Comments: 2) | Dima gamer12 (Discussed changesets: 57) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 188370948 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21215 commented 2026-09-01 15:15:22 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 188276882 (Comments: 2) | Dima gamer12 (Discussed changesets: 57) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 188370948 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21215 commented 2026-09-01 15:15:22 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 188254659 (Comments: 2) | Dima gamer12 (Discussed changesets: 57) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 188370948 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21215 commented 2026-09-01 15:15:21 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 188276823 (Comments: 2) | Dima gamer12 (Discussed changesets: 57) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 188370948 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21215 commented 2026-09-01 15:15:21 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 188258779 (Comments: 2) | Dima gamer12 (Discussed changesets: 57) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 188370948 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21215 commented 2026-09-01 15:15:21 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 188279858 (Comments: 2) | Dima gamer12 (Discussed changesets: 57) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 188370948 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21215 commented 2026-09-01 15:15:21 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 188277369 (Comments: 2) | Dima gamer12 (Discussed changesets: 57) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 188370948 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21215 commented 2026-09-01 15:15:21 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 188223306 (Comments: 2) | Dima gamer12 (Discussed changesets: 57) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 188370948 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21215 commented 2026-09-01 15:15:21 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 188276566 (Comments: 2) | Dima gamer12 (Discussed changesets: 57) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 188370948 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21215 commented 2026-09-01 15:15:21 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 188270269 (Comments: 2) | Dima gamer12 (Discussed changesets: 57) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 188370948 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21215 commented 2026-09-01 15:15:20 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 188222995 (Comments: 2) | Dima gamer12 (Discussed changesets: 57) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 188370948 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21215 commented 2026-09-01 15:15:20 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 188280977 (Comments: 2) | Dima gamer12 (Discussed changesets: 57) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 188370948 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21215 commented 2026-09-01 15:15:20 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 188280290 (Comments: 2) | Dima gamer12 (Discussed changesets: 57) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 188370948 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21215 commented 2026-09-01 15:15:20 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 188277827 (Comments: 2) | Dima gamer12 (Discussed changesets: 57) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 188370948 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21215 commented 2026-09-01 15:15:20 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 188268061 (Comments: 2) | Dima gamer12 (Discussed changesets: 57) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 188370948 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21215 commented 2026-09-01 15:15:20 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 188268155 (Comments: 2) | Dima gamer12 (Discussed changesets: 57) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 188370948 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21215 commented 2026-09-01 15:15:20 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 188240075 (Comments: 2) | Dima gamer12 (Discussed changesets: 57) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 188370948 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21215 commented 2026-09-01 15:15:19 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 188271499 (Comments: 2) | Dima gamer12 (Discussed changesets: 57) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 188370948 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21215 commented 2026-09-01 15:15:19 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 188271798 (Comments: 2) | Dima gamer12 (Discussed changesets: 57) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 188370948 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21215 commented 2026-09-01 15:15:19 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 188277161 (Comments: 2) | Dima gamer12 (Discussed changesets: 57) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 188370948 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21215 commented 2026-09-01 15:15:19 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 188310290 (Comments: 2) | Dima gamer12 (Discussed changesets: 57) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 188370948 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21215 commented 2026-09-01 15:15:19 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 188225996 (Comments: 2) | Dima gamer12 (Discussed changesets: 57) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 188370948 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21215 commented 2026-09-01 15:15:19 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 188276411 (Comments: 2) | Dima gamer12 (Discussed changesets: 57) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 188370948 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21215 commented 2026-09-01 15:15:19 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 188277694 (Comments: 2) | Dima gamer12 (Discussed changesets: 57) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 188370948 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21215 commented 2026-09-01 15:15:19 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 188224949 (Comments: 2) | Dima gamer12 (Discussed changesets: 57) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 188370948 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21215 commented 2026-09-01 15:15:18 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 188227719 (Comments: 2) | Dima gamer12 (Discussed changesets: 57) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 188370948 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21215 commented 2026-09-01 15:15:18 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 188049395 (Comments: 2) | Dima gamer12 (Discussed changesets: 57) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 188370948 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21215 commented 2026-09-01 15:15:18 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 188248853 (Comments: 2) | Dima gamer12 (Discussed changesets: 57) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 188370948 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21215 commented 2026-09-01 15:15:18 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 188124458 (Comments: 3) | Dima gamer12 (Discussed changesets: 57) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 188370948 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21215 commented 2026-09-01 15:15:18 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 188257974 (Comments: 3) | Dima gamer12 (Discussed changesets: 57) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 188370948 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21215 commented 2026-09-01 15:15:18 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 188276941 (Comments: 2) | Dima gamer12 (Discussed changesets: 57) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 188370948 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21215 commented 2026-09-01 15:15:18 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 188248713 (Comments: 2) | Dima gamer12 (Discussed changesets: 57) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 188370948 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21215 commented 2026-09-01 15:15:17 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 188192727 (Comments: 2) | Dima gamer12 (Discussed changesets: 57) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 188370948 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21215 commented 2026-09-01 15:15:17 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 188271779 (Comments: 2) | Dima gamer12 (Discussed changesets: 57) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 188370948 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21215 commented 2026-09-01 15:15:17 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 188276313 (Comments: 2) | Dima gamer12 (Discussed changesets: 57) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 188370948 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21215 commented 2026-09-01 15:15:17 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 188280244 (Comments: 2) | Dima gamer12 (Discussed changesets: 57) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 188370948 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21215 commented 2026-09-01 15:15:17 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 188280394 (Comments: 3) | Dima gamer12 (Discussed changesets: 57) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 188370948 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21215 commented 2026-09-01 15:15:16 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 188310363 (Comments: 2) | Dima gamer12 (Discussed changesets: 57) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 188370948 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21215 commented 2026-09-01 15:15:16 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 188167716 (Comments: 2) | ItsTheDangWind (Discussed changesets: 1) | I am working on an OpenTripPlanner implementation and the walking direction routing is not appropriately mapping the walk routing. It seems like the platform is not properly mapped to the walking network. It was my understanding that relating the con... commented 2026-09-01 15:06:22 UTC by ItsTheDangWind ♦1 |
| 187872900 (Comments: 1) | freefloatz (Discussed changesets: 3) | In this case it would have been better to split the untagged boundary where it overlaps with the fence, and then tag that section as fence (keeping it a part of the multipolygon) than it is to draw over. --- ... commented 2026-09-01 15:06:00 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,623 |
| 184703336 (Comments: 1) | StopWatchingUs (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi StopWatchingUs, I passed through this intersection a few days ago, and I believe I saw the cameras you were referring to. I think these are just traffic cameras, not manufactured by flock. Do you have evidence this is a flock model cam... commented 2026-09-01 14:56:15 UTC by SherbetS ♦175 |
| 188011712 (Comments: 1) | Bradinator (Discussed changesets: 5) | I added the street names, sidewalks should include name=* when the name of the street is known. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/188011712 commented 2026-09-01 14:52:37 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,623 |
| 188046448 (Comments: 1) | 1MattG (Discussed changesets: 2) | Abbreviations aren't used in street names or addr:street. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/188046448 commented 2026-09-01 14:23:50 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,623 |
| 188057265 (Comments: 1) | RandomizedNoise (Discussed changesets: 1) | FYI, you moved the camera to the southbound left lane of the street, which doesn't seem likely. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/188057265 ... commented 2026-09-01 14:16:26 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,623 |
| 187764834 (Comments: 1) | Dark Phantom (Discussed changesets: 3) | Where is the source that "Dartmouth College Police" operates this camera? "Dartmouth College Police" is not an actual organization. "Dartmouth College Safety and Security" is. It seems highly unlikely that Dartmouth C... commented 2026-09-01 13:05:19 UTC by bicoid ♦1 |
| 188226967 (Comments: 1) | Sanches12 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188343722 commented 2026-09-01 12:28:27 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,271 |
| 188356995 (Comments: 1) | RM23 (Discussed changesets: 6) | If Bings the eye in the sky... Who has their ear to the ground? commented 2026-09-01 10:51:21 UTC by Nicki Grider ♦1 |
| 188349001 (Comments: 1) | TheNightRider (Discussed changesets: 53) | Oops! I accidentally checked the review_requested box and saw it the moment I hit the upload button. No review needed. Sorry! commented 2026-09-01 08:02:58 UTC by TheNightRider ♦90 |
| 188337543 (Comments: 3) | jlgsea (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks for clarifying. That's an interesting building. Since it's technically one structure, I've gone ahead and redrawn the outline from the aerial imagery. Generally with retail tenants, we're just adding or modifying a node for... commented 2026-09-01 05:59:49 UTC by extraordinarymachine ♦6 |
| 188231545 (Comments: 3) | Sam2521 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Just as a heads up for node 14134388882, I converted "Mo-Sat 09:30-17:30, Sun 13:00-5:30" to "Mo-Sa 09:30-17:30; Su 13:00-17:30" because I'm assuming that Mo-Sa and Su both close at 17:30 PM instead of Su closing at 5:30 AM..... commented 2026-09-01 05:41:47 UTC by PostaMap_Infinite ♦83 |
| 188325060 (Comments: 1) | cbhizz12 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Wasn't this removed? commented 2026-09-01 05:36:58 UTC by Adam850 ♦11 |
| 188114076 (Comments: 1) | Karen@Digible (Discussed changesets: 3) | When specifying buildings as apartments, please use building=apartments tag instead of landuse=residential, residential=apartments. I have added the building tag back commented 2026-09-01 05:02:51 UTC by alexwohlbruck ♦25 |
| 188054728 (Comments: 2) | icarus72180 (Discussed changesets: 1) | thank you so much! yes, you are right, i got way too excited, and tbh, they are fun to make.... when they work. I did notice you fixed one, thank you, it made me think, hey... im not doing this right. so i did what i should have and read the wiki.... commented 2026-09-01 03:53:19 UTC by icarus72180 ♦2 |
| 188302677 (Comments: 1) | iShootPhotos (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hey, just so you're aware, the phone number formatting you edited isn't the accepted formatting (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:phone#United_States). Just so you're aware for future work. Thanks for adding POIs in t... commented 2026-09-01 03:07:14 UTC by SD Mapman ♦101 |
| 188170785 (Comments: 2) | PiXeLStick (Discussed changesets: 1) | Just to clarify, the value was correct except it was just missing the colon (::") separator between the values and the minutes. It seems you've already been going around fixing them, thanks! There were a handful of remaining opening_... commented 2026-09-01 03:02:13 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 188315238 (Comments: 1) | Flap Slimy Outward (Discussed changesets: 313) | Thanks, but NB, they already had a POI node here, node 14127937701 added in changeset 188082813 , which you already cleaned up a few days ago, in changeset 188109030 . Therefore, I removed this newer duplicate in changeset 188339698 . https://... commented 2026-09-01 02:47:37 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 188287076 (Comments: 1) | Peak Performance Partners (Discussed changesets: 3) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-09-01 02:47:09 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 188328369 (Comments: 1) | bmrell (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, I saw you requested a review for this edit. For the most part its a good addition, but you didn't connect the roads together. When connected the intersections between roads should be gray. Also, don't abbreviate names (we leave abbrevia... commented 2026-09-01 02:21:32 UTC by Jonathan Delaney ♦11 |
| 161477661 (Comments: 2) | UW Amy Bordenave (Discussed changesets: 4) | When `highway=traffic_signals` is mapped either at the intersection node or at each approach, and when the `crossing:markings=*` and `crossing:signals=*` tags are present, there is no good reason to add the older-style `crossing=*` tag, as its value ... commented 2026-09-01 02:12:00 UTC by UW Amy Bordenave ♦5 |
| 188151352 (Comments: 1) | Zandor469 (Discussed changesets: 1) | This is not a flock camera. commented 2026-09-01 00:56:47 UTC by Daniel Wiser ♦1 |
| 185915483 (Comments: 1) | PowerFan (Discussed changesets: 2) | Did you possible accidentally undelete the transmission towers? There are a bunch of towers on the map now where there are none (presumably because it's an underground line) commented 2026-08-31 23:21:20 UTC by hobbesvsboyle ♦22 |
| 174962716 (Comments: 1) | Danfox Davies (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi, I think these should be tagged as https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dcamp_pitch . I have fixed this. commented 2026-08-31 21:22:57 UTC by wombatmaper ♦119 |
| 188326530 (Comments: 1) | Meowcat285 (Discussed changesets: 2) | I misspelled entrance, whoops commented 2026-08-31 19:47:27 UTC by Meowcat285 ♦2 |
| 188263849 (Comments: 1) | dannmer (Discussed changesets: 42) | Oh, this is such a nice rest stop, albeit small. I appreciate you giving it some love! commented 2026-08-31 19:46:53 UTC by Pap_Redpaw ♦1 |
| 187610041 (Comments: 1) | whats9plus1021youstupid (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello. Could you please elaborate on your change here? Why did you remove roof:height= tag and change the height= tag? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/187610041 ... commented 2026-08-31 19:44:22 UTC by MxxCon ♦3,582 |
| 183167839 (Comments: 4) | lunar_jaws812 (Discussed changesets: 11) | Thanks! commented 2026-08-31 19:44:11 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,339 |
| 174205168 (Comments: 1) | Zol87 (Discussed changesets: 75) | Thanks for adding these. FYI I fixed two of them in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188322106#map=15/41.85318/-88.32548&layers=T commented 2026-08-31 19:34:30 UTC by BataviaBusStopFixes ♦1 |
| 188314248 (Comments: 1) | alexz12548 (Discussed changesets: 1) | I can upload documents but I'm not sure how commented 2026-08-31 18:25:42 UTC by alexz12548 ♦1 |
| 188312398 (Comments: 1) | sfrank78 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Can you use the highway=construction tag for streets still under construction going forward? Thanks! commented 2026-08-31 18:09:14 UTC by acschind ♦2 |
| 188126163 (Comments: 1) | GeoSafe-Dustin (Discussed changesets: 2) | Phone numbers use ITU format, for example, +1 539 529 4700 --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/188126163 commented 2026-08-31 17:40:21 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,623 |
| 188146262 (Comments: 1) | KingGISard and the lizard wizard (Discussed changesets: 1) | I'm not quite sure what you were trying to map here, could you give me a hint? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/188146262 commented 2026-08-31 17:26:33 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,623 |
| 188162253 (Comments: 1) | gncnpk (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi something about your mapping of Normandale has broken the rendering. I don't do a lot of indoor mapping myself, so encourage you to review https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Simple_Indoor_Tagging to confirm recommended editing. One thing I d... commented 2026-08-31 17:02:28 UTC by neuhausr ♦368 |
| 163103803 (Comments: 1) | Ayumu "Osaka" Kasuga (Discussed changesets: 37) | Looks like a couple dozen buildings in Hominy, Osage Nation got added as single, pangea-buildings. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163103803 commented 2026-08-31 16:54:19 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,623 |
| 188305937 (Comments: 1) | motov8 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, thanks for the contribution. However, Lake Ontario already exists in OSM, so it doesn't need to be duplicated. Furthermore, the name 'Lake America' is not the commonly used and accepted name of the lake, which is what the ... commented 2026-08-31 16:53:33 UTC by sykul ♦93 |
| 188278425 (Comments: 2) | J-Co-De (Discussed changesets: 1) | Additionally, please remember to actually review the tags on an object, in this case, the note tag on this object explained the situation. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.o... commented 2026-08-31 16:52:55 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,623 |
| 188311879 (Comments: 1) | jkrift (Discussed changesets: 6) | looking at this ALPR on various aerial imagery in iD it seems to be within the road area, being positioned like this is highly unlikely so please double check the position of this ALPR and fix it. Happy mapping, Udar. commented 2026-08-31 16:06:08 UTC by Udarian ♦992 |
| 188302186 (Comments: 1) | BonesTM (Discussed changesets: 7) | manufacturer:wikidata=* should have an actual wikidata id "Q108485435" is one "Sentio" is not. Please check what the actual wikidata entry for "Sentio" is and update the tag with it. see https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wik... commented 2026-08-31 15:59:02 UTC by Udarian ♦992 |
| 188302080 (Comments: 1) | BonesTM (Discussed changesets: 7) | manufacturer:wikidata=* should have an actual wikidata id "Q108485435" is one "Sentio" is not. Please check what the actual wikidata entry for "Sentio" is and update the tag with it. see https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wik... commented 2026-08-31 15:58:41 UTC by Udarian ♦992 |
| 188302060 (Comments: 1) | BonesTM (Discussed changesets: 7) | manufacturer:wikidata=* should have an actual wikidata id "Q108485435" is one "Sentio" is not. Please check what the actual wikidata entry for "Sentio" is and update the tag with it. see https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wik... commented 2026-08-31 15:56:58 UTC by Udarian ♦992 |
| 188301921 (Comments: 1) | BonesTM (Discussed changesets: 7) | manufacturer:wikidata=* should have an actual wikidata id "Q108485435" is one "Sentio" is not. Please check what the actual wikidata entry for "Sentio" is and update the tag with it. see https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wik... commented 2026-08-31 15:48:31 UTC by Udarian ♦992 |
| 187823948 (Comments: 1) | trevb312 (Discussed changesets: 1) | FYI, you shouldn't compose greens like the 10th by combining two polygons with a hole in the middle for a bunker. Look into how to construct multipolygon relations in the future. (Reach out if you need help.) commented 2026-08-31 15:46:13 UTC by b-jazz ♦976 |
| 188156549 (Comments: 1) | neuhausr (Discussed changesets: 18) | Thanks for fixing these! commented 2026-08-31 15:29:19 UTC by ion_chi ♦111 |
| 188105662 (Comments: 3) | Ras_Iva (Discussed changesets: 1) | The roads are under construction, so I updated the street names and Tags based on the comments that were provided. commented 2026-08-31 14:11:09 UTC by Ras_Iva ♦1 |
| 187646131 (Comments: 6) | William Baxter (Discussed changesets: 1) | I completely agree with you. This is not an OSM issue and the node was fairly accurate. That doesn’t mean people aren’t actively misunderstanding what this node actually represents via the Deflock application. As to my understanding a flo... commented 2026-08-31 14:03:03 UTC by William Baxter ♦1 |
| 170455435 (Comments: 2) | GMoney0805 (Discussed changesets: 22) | Good morning….that would be my mistake. Back when I made these changes….i read that the transition from minor line to power line was at 41.6. I looked it up again as soon as I saw your message, and I see it’s now between 45 and 50... commented 2026-08-31 13:51:00 UTC by GMoney0805 ♦8 |
| 188293794 (Comments: 1) | user_5359 (Discussed changesets: 432) | see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188294370 commented 2026-08-31 09:28:37 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,942 |
| 188294118 (Comments: 1) | user_5359 (Discussed changesets: 432) | see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188294370 commented 2026-08-31 09:28:29 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,942 |
| 188289771 (Comments: 1) | 'Lex (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hi! Using another technique compared to https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188277116, I cut the roads up to segments around this plot of land. I used this segments to draw parallel lines (feature of JOSM), like an inset then recombined th... commented 2026-08-31 07:52:08 UTC by 'Lex ♦8 |
| 187670266 (Comments: 2) | NeeDiva (Discussed changesets: 1) | I've gone ahead and retagged these segments with maxspeed:advisory commented 2026-08-31 06:54:24 UTC by archpdx ♦554 |
| 179456268 (Comments: 2) | RailandSea (Discussed changesets: 21) | I do know there’s a dead section after you leave MNR trackage going west on the Amtrak hell gate. The books and the trains show 13+ KV on the power voltage I believe there was discussion about this before to settle on the 13KV power. commented 2026-08-31 05:05:02 UTC by RailandSea ♦26 |
| 188260270 (Comments: 1) | COST CUTTERS (Discussed changesets: 2) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-08-31 04:31:43 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 188207117 (Comments: 1) | COST CUTTERS at Rochester (Discussed changesets: 2) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-08-31 04:31:39 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 188209646 (Comments: 2) | jg027 (Discussed changesets: 5) | I think you're right. My bad. I'll revert my edits accordingly. commented 2026-08-31 03:22:36 UTC by jg027 ♦6 |
| 185825485 (Comments: 8) | jg027 (Discussed changesets: 5) | All good :) commented 2026-08-31 03:16:37 UTC by RailandSea ♦26 |
| 188226268 (Comments: 2) | Jake Bridges (Discussed changesets: 2) | DWG revert - apparent fictitious names https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188280176 commented 2026-08-31 02:12:06 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,101 |
| 187515049 (Comments: 1) | Jake Bridges (Discussed changesets: 2) | DWG revert - apparent fictitious names https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188280176 commented 2026-08-31 02:12:06 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,101 |
| 188277116 (Comments: 1) | 'Lex (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hi! I'm used to see multipolygon landuses on the countryside (Hungary) and these plots around the area are kinda perfect for them. What is the standard in the USA? I have seen the other usual methods as well: landuses running parallel with ro... commented 2026-08-30 23:56:38 UTC by 'Lex ♦8 |
| 188271351 (Comments: 1) | peterthiellover (Discussed changesets: 1) | Are these actual Flock cameras? commented 2026-08-30 21:56:09 UTC by DividedFrame ♦6 |
| 188167633 (Comments: 2) | boykisser (Discussed changesets: 1) | tysm!!!! i've changed the time to 26:00 and removed the note :3 commented 2026-08-30 20:29:50 UTC by boykisser ♦1 |
| 188232610 (Comments: 1) | Chor Lee (Discussed changesets: 1) | Flock is not known to be operating in Alaska. commented 2026-08-30 19:43:38 UTC by alpacaMaps ♦431 |
| 186539624 (Comments: 1) | candidecoating (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi candidecoating,\r \r The country that these nodes are placed in does not currently operate any Flock ALPR. \r \r https://deflock.org/identify is an excellent resource for identifying ALPRs.\r \r - alpacaMaps commented 2026-08-30 19:10:43 UTC by alpacaMaps ♦431 |
| 187916194 (Comments: 1) | Jwheels98765 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hey there J, You were doing some unorthodox things with breaking a fairway into two pieces: one around the fairway and one around the green and then relating them with a multipolygon. This is rather nonstandard and should be avoided. I've... commented 2026-08-30 16:55:41 UTC by b-jazz ♦976 |
| 188206295 (Comments: 2) | Omnific (Discussed changesets: 147) | Fixed, thanks for the heads up. commented 2026-08-30 15:59:15 UTC by Omnific ♦244 |
| 188205849 (Comments: 2) | Omnific (Discussed changesets: 147) | Fixed, thanks for the heads up. commented 2026-08-30 15:58:03 UTC by Omnific ♦244 |
| 188223938 (Comments: 1) | PUFFZ (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM PUFFZ. I've modified your changes a bit here. Please modify existing features instead of drawing a second fairway on top of an existing fairway (or green over green). You don't need to "name" the green &... commented 2026-08-30 15:03:31 UTC by b-jazz ♦976 |
| 188200117 (Comments: 1) | lbilldt (Discussed changesets: 5) | You actually don't want to be tagging the outer ring of hole 1's multipolygon as a "fairway". The description of the fairway lies on the multipolygon relation itself. See this wiki for help in understanding: https://wiki.openstree... commented 2026-08-30 14:51:36 UTC by b-jazz ♦976 |
| 188251134 (Comments: 1) | Baloo Uriza (Discussed changesets: 114) | Sorry, changeset comment should read "fast and easy building fixes." commented 2026-08-30 14:34:33 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,623 |
| 186884736 (Comments: 5) | 0235 (Discussed changesets: 13) | Oh no, i understand that it was not this singular building that is the issue, but the data is correct. it shows the rectangular building. So the images are not obsolete, there is no square building, which is why i am doubly confused that it wa... commented 2026-08-30 10:41:52 UTC by 0235 ♦55 |
| 186891688 (Comments: 1) | jollybubbly (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi, please check the socket tags you added here. 'socket:type' is not a valid tag, 'type' needs to be replaced with the actual type of the socket. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/14071364390#map=19/36.760093/-118.901807 commented 2026-08-30 08:54:00 UTC by mueschel ♦7,415 |
| 188215453 (Comments: 2) | dima monsky (Discussed changesets: 21) | Hi mewhenthe, it is plastic covered (warehouse?) i saw here https://youtu.be/kuJ3o8To140?t=1250 maybe temporary? commented 2026-08-30 07:18:57 UTC by dima monsky ♦15 |
| 188126660 (Comments: 2) | Yep It's Me (Discussed changesets: 1) | @PostaMap_Infinite ... Thank you 🙏🏼. I'm a noob, with those being some of my first edits after joining. I appreciate your guidance and help! commented 2026-08-30 06:05:53 UTC by Yep It's Me ♦1 |
| 187817293 (Comments: 1) | Zcubed (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, could you please clarify if the service_times tag hours for the church apply to a specific day? Currently, the tag is not valid because it doesn't apply to a specific day. For example if this church has service times only on Sunday, t... commented 2026-08-30 05:53:42 UTC by PostaMap_Infinite ♦83 |
| 188154815 (Comments: 1) | matthewCmatt (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi! Please note that opening_hours=* hours timespans must be written in hh:mm format, even for single digit hours. It's also standard practice to separate rules that don't interfere with each other with a semicolon, even if using a comma is... commented 2026-08-30 05:11:23 UTC by PostaMap_Infinite ♦83 |
| 188227668 (Comments: 1) | PostaMap_Infinite (Discussed changesets: 28) | *Hallmark XD commented 2026-08-30 04:34:59 UTC by PostaMap_Infinite ♦83 |
| 188098874 (Comments: 2) | Melody5291 (Discussed changesets: 1) | DWG revert of all CS - apparent fictitious mapping & improper deletions: 188227531 commented 2026-08-30 04:27:46 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,101 |
| 188225804 (Comments: 1) | Flap Slimy Outward (Discussed changesets: 313) | This area actually represents a planning district, not necessarily a single place with a distinct identity. Therefore, this entire area would (likely) be better tagged as place=borough. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188227298 commented 2026-08-30 04:12:03 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦405 |
| 188226038 (Comments: 1) | iismitch55 (Discussed changesets: 70) | Hi Mitch, just a reminder, per what I mentioned to you on a few of your previous changesets, when there is a single node for an object and you want to map the outline of the building or campus, please keep the node (without its tags) in the outline (... commented 2026-08-30 03:55:40 UTC by Frank Peng ♦256 |
| 178167355 (Comments: 1) | compdude (Discussed changesets: 8) | relation/20180240 doesn't need to be a multipolygon - it could just be two separate areas. Pushing changeset that converts each line to an area soon. commented 2026-08-30 02:50:28 UTC by KTibow ♦8 |
| 182468891 (Comments: 1) | hanhdbui (Discussed changesets: 1) | As a general practice in OSM, access restrictions like foot=no should only be added when there is clear on-the-ground signage or another verifiable legal basis. The absence of a sidewalk does not, by itself, mean that pedestrians are prohibited. In t... commented 2026-08-30 02:38:25 UTC by StreetSurveyor ♦213 |
| 187914209 (Comments: 1) | MoeDirt (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, this node can be taken down. I drove by today and got a more exact location for the camera and made a new node. Sorry for any trouble, I just wanted to give the best reporting possible. commented 2026-08-30 02:15:28 UTC by MoeDirt ♦1 |
| 188224386 (Comments: 2) | Jacoblightning3 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Also It appears that JOSM discarded the descriptions from the other edits I made: For https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/18888637/history/15: Add Recommended (advisory) maxspeed For https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/16464769/history/3... commented 2026-08-30 01:37:55 UTC by Jacoblightning3 ♦1 |
| 183903543 (Comments: 1) | Anonymous897234 (Discussed changesets: 17) | Looks like this changeset introduced way/1528039485. But way/428005364 has already had cycleway=lane for 10 years. commented 2026-08-30 01:01:57 UTC by KTibow ♦8 |
| 188221190 (Comments: 1) | MiddleverseAI (Discussed changesets: 1) | I've deleted the node - It was placed in the middle of the street and the tags were wrong. I suggest you read the wiki.openstreetmap.org for how to contribute correctly. commented 2026-08-30 00:37:20 UTC by Glassman ♦6,059 |
| 188218459 (Comments: 1) | Sage Dryer Vent (Discussed changesets: 1) | reverted - seo spam - these are residential homes commented 2026-08-30 00:31:06 UTC by Glassman ♦6,059 |
| 183230708 (Comments: 1) | JuletDeltaKilo (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi JuletDeltaKilo,\r \r The country that these nodes are placed in does not currently operate any Flock ALPR. \r \r https://deflock.org/identify is an excellent resource for identifying ALPRs.\r \r - alpacaMaps commented 2026-08-29 23:41:26 UTC by alpacaMaps ♦431 |
| 183227702 (Comments: 1) | JuletDeltaKilo (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi JuletDeltaKilo,\r \r The country that these nodes are placed in does not currently operate any Flock ALPR. \r \r https://deflock.org/identify is an excellent resource for identifying ALPRs.\r \r - alpacaMaps commented 2026-08-29 23:41:25 UTC by alpacaMaps ♦431 |
| 181787430 (Comments: 1) | CameraCheckerLocal (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi CameraCheckerLocal,\r \r The country that these nodes are placed in does not currently operate any Flock ALPR. \r \r https://deflock.org/identify is an excellent resource for identifying ALPRs.\r \r - alpacaMaps commented 2026-08-29 23:40:59 UTC by alpacaMaps ♦431 |
| 181858548 (Comments: 1) | CameraCheckerLocal (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi CameraCheckerLocal,\r \r The country that these nodes are placed in does not currently operate any Flock ALPR. \r \r https://deflock.org/identify is an excellent resource for identifying ALPRs.\r \r - alpacaMaps commented 2026-08-29 23:40:59 UTC by alpacaMaps ♦431 |
| 182490136 (Comments: 1) | Fauxheroes (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi Fauxheroes,\r \r The country that these nodes are placed in does not currently operate any Flock ALPR. \r \r https://deflock.org/identify is an excellent resource for identifying ALPRs.\r \r - alpacaMaps commented 2026-08-29 23:40:35 UTC by alpacaMaps ♦431 |
| 182490062 (Comments: 1) | Fauxheroes (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi Fauxheroes,\r \r The country that these nodes are placed in does not currently operate any Flock ALPR. \r \r https://deflock.org/identify is an excellent resource for identifying ALPRs.\r \r - alpacaMaps commented 2026-08-29 23:40:34 UTC by alpacaMaps ♦431 |
| 174439499 (Comments: 1) | NTLOSM (Discussed changesets: 1) | This camera location has been removed. commented 2026-08-29 22:25:01 UTC by deflockfremont ♦2 |
| 181946439 (Comments: 1) | allthepotatoes (Discussed changesets: 2) | This camera location has been removed. commented 2026-08-29 22:23:59 UTC by deflockfremont ♦2 |
| 186884304 (Comments: 2) | 0235 (Discussed changesets: 13) | They are a mappable Areoway feature, so get mapped. Places use data on parking spaces. commented 2026-08-29 21:59:30 UTC by 0235 ♦55 |
| 162149265 (Comments: 3) | iismitch55 (Discussed changesets: 70) | View this changeset on OSMCha, which may be easier to review, and shows you the map objects created, modified, or deleted in this changeset immediately rather than in FacilMap, where it takes longer to show them depending on the amount of objects cha... commented 2026-08-29 21:07:44 UTC by Frank Peng ♦256 |
| 181116939 (Comments: 3) | FlamingoOSM (Discussed changesets: 46) | Thanks, I wasn't sure if there wasn't a subdivision actually called West Pam Beach or not. commented 2026-08-29 21:06:16 UTC by JeroenHoek ♦815 |
| 188114223 (Comments: 2) | mcnv (Discussed changesets: 3) | I'm trying to follow what you're saying here. I didn't add the cartpath or the stream, those were already tagged. As I was reviewing the course I kept seeing warnings about the cart path going over the stream, and at one point I adde... commented 2026-08-29 20:10:26 UTC by mcnv ♦2 |
| 186840266 (Comments: 4) | watmildon (Discussed changesets: 51) | I appreciate you mentioning it! commented 2026-08-29 18:54:58 UTC by watmildon ♦320 |
| 120768351 (Comments: 2) | PhilNi (Discussed changesets: 5) | Agreed. Just a mistake on my part. No need to comment, just fix it. I’d (and OSM) schema has changed a bit when I first did my sidewalks and accessibility changes so just go ahead and update. I’ve been going over some of them myself a... commented 2026-08-29 17:37:07 UTC by PhilNi ♦4 |
| 188124456 (Comments: 1) | User-2945 (Discussed changesets: 8) | A highway should only be classified as a motorway if, among many other things, it is divided. This means there must be a physical barrier between the directions of travel. Since this segment of Southern Parkway lacks a physical barrier between its ca... commented 2026-08-29 17:32:55 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦405 |
| 188202224 (Comments: 3) | b-jazz (Discussed changesets: 94) | Thanks! commented 2026-08-29 16:37:04 UTC by schobbish ♦87 |
| 188197746 (Comments: 4) | Joseph R P (Discussed changesets: 238) | I see. These edge cases really should be documented somewhere on the OSM Wiki. If you recall, I also upgraded a short segment of Galleria to primary for the same reason (I have since reversed that change) since an Interstate is, in my opinion, even m... commented 2026-08-29 16:15:07 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦405 |
| 188178282 (Comments: 3) | Robert Hardin (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi thanks for the reply! I'd suggest changing the path type to =path rather the removing it. Let me know if you need help doing that. commented 2026-08-29 16:12:42 UTC by MassCartog ♦503 |
| 187966730 (Comments: 4) | Flap Slimy Outward (Discussed changesets: 313) | I see. Well, I guess I'll have to re-downgrade this segment to highway=primary then. Since TRINA 2.0's map displaying AADT is broken, I've been trying to recreate it (on my own .OSM file) using data from NDOT's traffic stat... commented 2026-08-29 15:36:25 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦405 |
| 188020731 (Comments: 3) | Huong Dang (Discussed changesets: 11) | I get where you're coming from on the routing part. That's actually why I switched to the conditional access tags. A lot of OSM-based maps and routers only update their data every month at best, so a 2-day closure can turn into a month+ clo... commented 2026-08-29 13:37:24 UTC by ion_chi ♦111 |
| 188107486 (Comments: 1) | Aaron Shafer (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hey, I just wanted to let you know that I noticed you accidentally made an invalid opening_hours=* tag. For node 14129261827 "Tue-Thu 8-6 Fri-Sat- 8-8" should actually be formatted as "Tu-Th 08:00-18:00; Fr-Sa 08:00-20:00".... commented 2026-08-29 07:15:41 UTC by PostaMap_Infinite ♦83 |
| 160860018 (Comments: 1) | jdmontes (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello jdmontes, The opening_hours value for RHS Cafe is invalid. "7:15 - 7:30 also Durring both Lunches" does not follow the proper syntax for opening_hours values. I went ahead and fixed it to the best of my ability, but I d... commented 2026-08-29 06:29:36 UTC by PostaMap_Infinite ♦83 |
| 188180710 (Comments: 1) | PostaMap_Infinite (Discussed changesets: 28) | Well, at a second look it's not too regularly, but they have updated it before so they absolutely could update it in the future! commented 2026-08-29 06:13:49 UTC by PostaMap_Infinite ♦83 |
| 188179540 (Comments: 1) | Clairness (Discussed changesets: 9) | Just re-read the wiki on amenity=parking... I will fix the incorrectly mapped areas later. commented 2026-08-29 05:30:06 UTC by Clairness ♦10 |
| 188178889 (Comments: 1) | 010ender56 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Insignificant but iD Beta editor did not correctly populate the imagery_used field, I used both Esri World Imagery and Bing Maps Aerial. commented 2026-08-29 04:45:33 UTC by 010ender56 ♦1 |
| 188169471 (Comments: 1) | COST CUTTERS at Webster (Discussed changesets: 2) | Updated the now-outdated/incorrect brand:wikidata=* in changeset: https://osm.org/changeset/188178868 commented 2026-08-29 04:43:08 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 188062885 (Comments: 1) | mcnv (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello mcnv, When you have a relation like you do on this course with a fairway surrounding a green, you need to tag the *relation* as golf=fairway as you've done, but you don't want to tag the outer polygon as fairway as well. |
| 187396916 (Comments: 3) | ianmlq (Discussed changesets: 1) | Of course, you're most welcome! Thanks for understanding! commented 2026-08-29 03:27:55 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 188018978 (Comments: 3) | TetrisEffect (Discussed changesets: 9) | Sure thing! I used to have that impression myself, but in fact contact:mobile=* (and the somewhat ambiguous mobile=*) is used to indicate that an _additional_ number leading to a mobile phone, and does not necessarily imply anything about texting cap... commented 2026-08-29 03:27:10 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 188080305 (Comments: 2) | CAM-Gerlach_Repair (Discussed changesets: 44) | It's suggested for toll-free numbers here: https://osm.wiki/Key:phone#Free_to_Call_Numbers_(Toll_Free_Numbers) And described in more detail here: https://osm.wiki/Key:phone#Support_for_multiple_countries Specifically:... commented 2026-08-29 03:09:18 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 168713934 (Comments: 1) | MrYouse (Discussed changesets: 1) | As of 6/28/26 or before this camera is gone. commented 2026-08-29 03:03:58 UTC by Gabe006 ♦1 |
| 187908950 (Comments: 1) | rmiessler (Discussed changesets: 1) | Good edit. Welcome to OSM and helping us track the flock changes! --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/187908950 commented 2026-08-29 03:01:14 UTC by CurlingMan13 ♦2,101 |
| 188145828 (Comments: 1) | keweenawking (Discussed changesets: 1) | Looks good. I agree, that road needed to be moved back. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/188145828 commented 2026-08-29 02:59:43 UTC by CurlingMan13 ♦2,101 |
| 188125000 (Comments: 2) | Flap Slimy Outward (Discussed changesets: 313) | I'll go change it back. Just an FYI: Some other user began downgrading multiple motorway "dangling spurs" in the Western US. They also did this to Lake Mead Parkway and Boulder City Parkway in Henderson and Boulder City, respectively. commented 2026-08-28 23:54:03 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦405 |
| 188173765 (Comments: 1) | h234a2hm (Discussed changesets: 9) | source_ref=https://www.dekalbschoolsga.org/schools/all-schools commented 2026-08-28 23:33:04 UTC by h234a2hm ♦8 |
| 115549724 (Comments: 2) | Gorfic (Discussed changesets: 1) | street level imagery shows US flag. commented 2026-08-28 23:14:57 UTC by weblogdryads ♦41 |
| 188023843 (Comments: 1) | TrailStuds925 (Discussed changesets: 1) | is this officially named SUNSET 7:30PM somewhere? :-) commented 2026-08-28 23:04:21 UTC by OddlyAngled ♦138 |
| 117706687 (Comments: 1) | BryanOSullivan (Discussed changesets: 11) | These buildings are poorly mapped commented 2026-08-28 20:38:10 UTC by weblogdryads ♦41 |
| 187985758 (Comments: 5) | JS349 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Any idea what happened to Automat? commented 2026-08-28 20:19:29 UTC by JS349 ♦1 |
| 188160823 (Comments: 1) | PGio (Discussed changesets: 5) | in the future please straighten crossings before uploading them unless they are actually curved (which unmarked crossings like this that just go from lowered kerb to lowered kerb are straight). Happy mapping, Udar commented 2026-08-28 18:20:01 UTC by Udarian ♦992 |
| 188160845 (Comments: 1) | somervillain (Discussed changesets: 1) | forgot to specify source of this edit: survey commented 2026-08-28 17:52:31 UTC by somervillain ♦1 |
| 188062306 (Comments: 1) | IvaKraljić (Discussed changesets: 219) | The wrongly tagged road has since been fixed in the changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188160323#map=15/48.12905/-106.36761. #OptimoRoute commented 2026-08-28 17:40:46 UTC by IvaKraljić ♦182 |
| 119414168 (Comments: 1) | PhilNi (Discussed changesets: 5) | Next time tag crossings as crossing ways instead of separate sidewalk segments. commented 2026-08-28 17:17:30 UTC by KTibow ♦8 |
| 188153382 (Comments: 1) | FlamingoOSM (Discussed changesets: 46) | please stop attaching images of logos/a cities seal to the image representing the place. Happy mapping, Udar commented 2026-08-28 16:20:53 UTC by Udarian ♦992 |
| 188147847 (Comments: 2) | jkisrchenbaum (Discussed changesets: 1) | It seems like it was only the 5205 address on the Dog Coop, which I have re added. commented 2026-08-28 16:04:03 UTC by weblogdryads ♦41 |
| 188118779 (Comments: 1) | bally213 (Discussed changesets: 3) | The border of Elgin is broken/open after this changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/125795#map=16/41.98894/-88.33684 commented 2026-08-28 15:45:57 UTC by Flynn Marquardt ♦91 |
| 188019288 (Comments: 2) | silverrwarrior (Discussed changesets: 1) | Also, the golf=hole line shouldn't be made to perfectly follow the fairways. The number of nodes use to draw that line should indicate how many strokes it takes to reach the green. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:golf%3Dhole for a de... commented 2026-08-28 15:29:55 UTC by b-jazz ♦976 |
| 188065468 (Comments: 2) | mcnv (Discussed changesets: 3) | Yes, sorry about that. I can clean this course up in the next couple of days. Thanks commented 2026-08-28 15:18:58 UTC by mcnv ♦2 |
| 188150419 (Comments: 1) | Lindsay Mazanek (Discussed changesets: 1) | on OSM we have specific formats for tags like opening_hours=* , please read the relevant docs on the wiki before adding these tags that have these specifications first in the futures, for opening hours see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:open... commented 2026-08-28 15:15:14 UTC by Udarian ♦992 |
| 188151748 (Comments: 1) | maptheworld2050 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Forgot to add source info. This is from https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3266145 commented 2026-08-28 14:46:16 UTC by maptheworld2050 ♦12 |
| 188077653 (Comments: 1) | Elite Vascular Care (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, please also add any contact information here, as well as refer to the OSM wiki for correct healthcare tagging. This location is not a hospital. commented 2026-08-28 14:37:48 UTC by GA_Kevin ♦58 |
| 188119920 (Comments: 1) | 名無し氏 (Discussed changesets: 1) | As you mention/imply, placed camps are private. But for their members, the camps often supply power, have a shower; and allow their member to camp in a tent or RV. In open camping, you can do tent camping or a RV too, but without needing to r... commented 2026-08-28 10:33:12 UTC by Anonymous897234 ♦16 |
| 174903762 (Comments: 5) | BR_pebble (Discussed changesets: 22) | Hi Mateusz, thanks for the follow-up, and apologies. Due to a recent edit from one of my colleagues on the location, I mistakenly interpreted as the requested corrective action having already been completed. I posted the response without a final v... commented 2026-08-28 10:08:08 UTC by BR_pebble ♦111 |
| 188024855 (Comments: 2) | ujinevich (Discussed changesets: 34) | Sure, no problem! commented 2026-08-28 09:10:25 UTC by ujinevich ♦8 |
| 188082813 (Comments: 1) | Peak Performance Partners (Discussed changesets: 3) | As an account mapping on behalf of a commercial business for financial gain, please be advised that you are expected to understand and carefully follow documented OpenStreetMap standards and conventions, which will both directly benefit the quality o... commented 2026-08-28 03:32:08 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 188113011 (Comments: 1) | Goat Air Heating & Cooling (Discussed changesets: 1) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is not allowed on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account; see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers for more infor... commented 2026-08-28 03:21:50 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 188069768 (Comments: 1) | SK Quality Roofing (Discussed changesets: 3) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-08-28 02:39:42 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 188123949 (Comments: 1) | User-2945 (Discussed changesets: 8) | Similar to the other beginning of Future I-11, this segment of US 95 is not quite a freeway since it has multiple at-grade intersections with track roads. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188125673 commented 2026-08-28 02:33:32 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦405 |
| 188081588 (Comments: 2) | CAM-Gerlach_Repair (Discussed changesets: 44) | Hey Ian, thanks for the feedback! I used to always manually fix up SEO spam POIs like this instead of simply reverting/deleting them (unless they didn't exist on the ground or were complete nonsense, etc.), but the DWG urged me to be more... commented 2026-08-28 02:33:26 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 188112597 (Comments: 1) | Nick Valbrun (Discussed changesets: 1) | looking at this ALPR on various aerial imagery in iD it seems to be within the road area, being positioned like this is highly unlikely so please double check the position of this ALPR and fix it. Happy mapping, Udar. commented 2026-08-28 02:24:17 UTC by Udarian ♦992 |
| 188121900 (Comments: 1) | User-2945 (Discussed changesets: 8) | Though this segment of US 93 is very close to a freeway, it still has occasional at-grade intersections with a few driveways. A true freeway won't have any at-grade intersections at all, even for rest stops and scenic viewpoints. https://... commented 2026-08-28 02:22:05 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦405 |
| 188124487 (Comments: 1) | Flap Slimy Outward (Discussed changesets: 313) | I got cut off by the character limit! 😡 Anyway, I kept Valley View between I-11 and Charleston the same because of that I-11 connection. Therefore, it has higher connectivity than the segment I just downgraded. commented 2026-08-28 02:06:43 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦405 |
| 188083926 (Comments: 1) | JeffFromTheIRS (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thank you for your edit and welcome to openstreetmap! commented 2026-08-28 02:00:36 UTC by Loopslol7 ♦45 |
| 188123728 (Comments: 1) | User-2945 (Discussed changesets: 8) | Conceptually, this makes sense. However, also changed a few mainline roads to ramps and removed some unsigned_ref=* tags. commented 2026-08-28 01:48:22 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦405 |
| 188124713 (Comments: 1) | Yushclay (Discussed changesets: 24) | Thank you for your edit :) commented 2026-08-28 01:44:00 UTC by Loopslol7 ♦45 |
| 188122440 (Comments: 1) | User-2945 (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hello, The eastbound direction of Summerlin Parkway should not be tagged as a motorway. This is because there is a traffic light at the intersection with the 215 Northbound ramp. In fact, it is the only traffic light that will survive the construc... commented 2026-08-28 01:35:13 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦405 |
| 185503684 (Comments: 1) | Aelerinya (Discussed changesets: 1) | 2344 Ward Street is clearly part of Lighthaven, it is only accessible from the rest of the Lighthaven property, is linked to the rest of the property, used by Lighthaven, and clearly not a residential house. https://waypoint.lighthaven.space/e... commented 2026-08-27 21:43:22 UTC by 5beneficent-reapplying ♦1 |
| 187901086 (Comments: 3) | AFTERLIGHT (Discussed changesets: 2) | You're most welcome. commented 2026-08-27 21:27:12 UTC by b-jazz ♦976 |
| 183622731 (Comments: 1) | Fenley Jones (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hi! Are you sure that these areas are still referred to by these names? I've never heard of them, and the Tumblr post you've linked says that Bethlehem was called South Mt. Auburn by 1910. The link for Jerusalem is dead, but it seems to be ... commented 2026-08-27 20:45:34 UTC by Jonathan Delaney ♦11 |
| 188091369 (Comments: 1) | Yessica Oliva (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello & welcome to OpenStreetMap! Unfortunately, I had to remove the description of the business you added because advertising is not allowed, and descriptions should be used for purely verifiable facts or important information about the b... commented 2026-08-27 20:32:07 UTC by mewhenthe ♦25 |
| 188017176 (Comments: 2) | ICT_maps (Discussed changesets: 20) | (and damn typoed Hoggatt too, oh no, now they're going to sue me...) commented 2026-08-27 18:07:40 UTC by gpserror ♦254 |
| 187964147 (Comments: 1) | dragontazz (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi! I saw you’ve been doing some more editing in this area and I wanted to check back in. I have noticed a few issues, which I’ve summarized below. I apologize that it's a wall of text, if you have any questions, please let me know. ... commented 2026-08-27 17:47:04 UTC by Jonathan Delaney ♦11 |
| 188069380 (Comments: 1) | p**um***u****m*******p********v************** (Discussed changesets: 10) | Once again, please write more detailed descriptions for your changesets. commented 2026-08-27 16:49:25 UTC by ScrawnyMeowth1 ♦59 |
| 188067909 (Comments: 1) | Citizen208 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Looks good! Those TIGER roads were helpful to fill out the map, but they're not incredibly accurate. Welcome to the map! --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/188067909 ... commented 2026-08-27 15:58:36 UTC by ColbyTheWorldTraveler ♦34 |
| 188016981 (Comments: 3) | Kudokiller (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thanks! Still missing some stuff (there is a bike bridge as part of the overpass, but I can't remember which side it was going on off the top of my head), but I figure it's low priority since it's not slated to be built for quite some ... commented 2026-08-27 13:20:27 UTC by Stretch Longfellow ♦106 |
| 188025709 (Comments: 2) | I W (Discussed changesets: 5) | Thank you for finding that 🫡 I've fixed it. commented 2026-08-27 12:56:56 UTC by I W ♦8 |
| 188035796 (Comments: 1) | luxmethod (Discussed changesets: 1) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-08-27 09:14:10 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 188068631 (Comments: 1) | Cole McCarren (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hey, 11 Mile Road is separated by a physical barrier in that underpass. Mapping the lanes as separate ways is the proper representation in OSM. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/18... commented 2026-08-27 08:45:38 UTC by aighes ♦63 |
| 188048396 (Comments: 1) | superinje (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi superinje. Welcome to OpenStreetMap, and thanks for your contribution! Several of the tags you used here were not quite correct, so I cleaned them up for you in changeset 188082497 https://osm.org/changeset/188082497 Yo... commented 2026-08-27 08:05:01 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 188047976 (Comments: 1) | miajewelers (Discussed changesets: 1) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-08-27 08:00:40 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 188032007 (Comments: 1) | firptaglobal (Discussed changesets: 1) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-08-27 07:57:31 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 188035507 (Comments: 1) | intotherabbithole (Discussed changesets: 1) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-08-27 07:46:57 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 188038713 (Comments: 1) | Midstate Overhead Doors Inc (Discussed changesets: 1) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-08-27 07:44:18 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 188022965 (Comments: 1) | Frederick Brathwaite (Discussed changesets: 1) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-08-27 07:38:42 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 188038060 (Comments: 1) | Lisa Monreal (Discussed changesets: 1) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-08-27 07:31:43 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 188032227 (Comments: 2) | Julius S Coelho (Discussed changesets: 1) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-08-27 07:30:09 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 188011731 (Comments: 1) | jackypoo1198 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188080122 commented 2026-08-27 07:05:39 UTC by rajdhani ♦642 |
| 187966415 (Comments: 1) | teitreim (Discussed changesets: 3) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188078051 commented 2026-08-27 06:06:09 UTC by rajdhani ♦642 |
| 188012225 (Comments: 1) | jackypoo1198 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188077267 commented 2026-08-27 05:35:32 UTC by ajmat ♦666 |
| 187966940 (Comments: 1) | teitreim (Discussed changesets: 3) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188077309 commented 2026-08-27 05:33:58 UTC by rajdhani ♦642 |
| 187148706 (Comments: 1) | MplsMN (Discussed changesets: 2) | DWG revert - apparent fictitious mapping: 188077276 commented 2026-08-27 05:31:54 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,101 |
| 187148603 (Comments: 2) | MplsMN (Discussed changesets: 2) | DWG revert - apparent fictitious mapping: 188077193 commented 2026-08-27 05:28:40 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,101 |
| 188076916 (Comments: 1) | PostaMap_Infinite (Discussed changesets: 28) | * foot path, not park! commented 2026-08-27 05:17:31 UTC by PostaMap_Infinite ♦83 |
| 182816936 (Comments: 2) | JohnBrown1800 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Edwin, I updated some more fields to make it more filled out. To your questions, that is their farmstead. I confirmed they continue to accept bitcoin (every week, this past Tuesday, included) via lightning (Square PoS) at their farm, at th... commented 2026-08-27 05:11:40 UTC by JohnBrown1800 ♦1 |
| 187569240 (Comments: 2) | Trees345 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Yes, I see my error. Thank you for correcting it. commented 2026-08-27 04:19:33 UTC by Trees345 ♦1 |
| 188025514 (Comments: 1) | Ben929292928282 (Discussed changesets: 1) | This is located in the middle of a river? commented 2026-08-27 03:16:49 UTC by pwbriggs ♦520 |
| 187671617 (Comments: 1) | DeflockedAK (Discussed changesets: 1) | Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21187 commented 2026-08-27 03:00:54 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,101 |
| 187968527 (Comments: 1) | dmitriio (Discussed changesets: 1) | If this isn't manufactured by Flock, then the manufacturer-related tags should be removed too. I'll remove them now. commented 2026-08-27 02:56:15 UTC by pwbriggs ♦520 |
| 173525129 (Comments: 1) | Symphony Wealth (Discussed changesets: 1) | As an account mapping on behalf of a commercial business for financial gain, please be advised that you are expected to understand and carefully follow documented OpenStreetMap standards and conventions, which will both directly benefit the quality o... commented 2026-08-27 02:46:24 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 167570198 (Comments: 1) | Northridge Dental Group (Discussed changesets: 1) | As an account mapping on behalf of a commercial business for financial gain, please be advised that you are expected to understand and carefully follow documented OpenStreetMap standards and conventions, which will both directly benefit the quality o... commented 2026-08-27 02:44:22 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 169716981 (Comments: 1) | Pearly Bites Veterinary (Discussed changesets: 1) | As an account mapping on behalf of a commercial business for financial gain, please be advised that you are expected to understand and carefully follow documented OpenStreetMap standards and conventions, which will both directly benefit the quality o... commented 2026-08-27 02:42:56 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 187912671 (Comments: 4) | txemt (Discussed changesets: 49) | I can't really speak too much to iD's preset UI here, since I've been a JOSM user on desktop since my first few changesets. However, with a bit of poking around it looks like it suggests addr:city=* values from those around, and since ... commented 2026-08-27 02:40:47 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 187307194 (Comments: 2) | Dflocker123 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21186 commented 2026-08-27 02:40:35 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,101 |
| 174151562 (Comments: 1) | comfortdental (Discussed changesets: 1) | As an account mapping on behalf of a commercial business for financial gain, please be advised that you are expected to understand and carefully follow documented OpenStreetMap standards and conventions, which will both directly benefit the quality o... commented 2026-08-27 02:20:01 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 178044669 (Comments: 1) | D2 Injury Law (Discussed changesets: 1) | As an account mapping on behalf of a commercial business for financial gain, please be advised that you are expected to understand and carefully follow documented OpenStreetMap standards and conventions, which will both directly benefit the quality o... commented 2026-08-27 02:17:39 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 179946452 (Comments: 2) | spauldinginjurylawyers (Discussed changesets: 1) | As an account mapping on behalf of a commercial business for financial gain, please be advised that you are expected to understand and carefully follow documented OpenStreetMap standards and conventions, which will both directly benefit the quality o... commented 2026-08-27 02:15:29 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 180110355 (Comments: 1) | poolgenx (Discussed changesets: 1) | As an account mapping on behalf of a commercial business for financial gain, please be advised that you are expected to understand and carefully follow documented OpenStreetMap standards and conventions, which will both directly benefit the quality o... commented 2026-08-27 02:13:20 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 185080742 (Comments: 1) | Astros Flood Recovery (Discussed changesets: 1) | As an account mapping on behalf of a commercial business for financial gain, please be advised that you are expected to understand and carefully follow documented OpenStreetMap standards and conventions, which will both directly benefit the quality o... commented 2026-08-27 02:10:20 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 187992868 (Comments: 1) | jhp (Discussed changesets: 1) | Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21184 commented 2026-08-27 01:54:29 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,101 |
| 173817835 (Comments: 2) | SD Mapman (Discussed changesets: 40) | So both of those were when I started adding multilingual names and wasn't really aware of the rules yet. For North Spearfish I found a translator, translated "north", and stuck it on to the name for Spearfish. Kinda forgot about it hon... commented 2026-08-27 01:43:42 UTC by SD Mapman ♦101 |
| 188072155 (Comments: 1) | h234a2hm (Discussed changesets: 9) | House geometry is an approximation based of a guess and multiple different sources of arial imagery. commented 2026-08-27 00:46:30 UTC by h234a2hm ♦8 |
| 188071333 (Comments: 1) | weblogdryads (Discussed changesets: 20) | Thank you for your edit commented 2026-08-27 00:23:13 UTC by Loopslol7 ♦45 |
| 161507321 (Comments: 2) | BlazarMatt (Discussed changesets: 4) | Ok interesting. I would agree with this change to ownership=private. The signage on MA streets can be quirky. I've seen many examples of Private Way signs on streets that are entirely owned by the town (example, Brookmere Ave in Wellesley MA). ... commented 2026-08-27 00:18:42 UTC by BlazarMatt ♦2 |
| 188060894 (Comments: 1) | BestRoofingPros (Discussed changesets: 1) | As an account mapping on behalf of a commercial business for financial gain, please be advised that you are expected to understand and carefully follow documented OpenStreetMap standards and conventions, which will both directly benefit the quality o... commented 2026-08-27 00:08:29 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 188021854 (Comments: 1) | feeconstructionllp (Discussed changesets: 1) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-08-27 00:05:12 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 185383507 (Comments: 1) | Baloo Uriza (Discussed changesets: 114) | Thanks for tagging the library. I think I got the name and such right. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188071325 commented 2026-08-26 23:54:19 UTC by watmildon ♦320 |
| 188005749 (Comments: 2) | weblogdryads (Discussed changesets: 20) | thanks commented 2026-08-26 23:54:06 UTC by weblogdryads ♦41 |
| 162068828 (Comments: 1) | mapman44 (Discussed changesets: 72) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/384765848/history has building = chicken shed that was added in this edit maybe more popular building=chicken_coop would be equally fitting? Or at least use building=chicken_shed - space in value is surely ... commented 2026-08-26 23:49:31 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,339 |
| 187871340 (Comments: 3) | Salsquach (Discussed changesets: 1) | No problem! We’re always glad to have mappers contributing, and everybody makes mistakes, myself included. Being a food delivery driver, you have the unique advantage of constantly moving around, which many people can’t! If you find new p... commented 2026-08-26 22:12:56 UTC by PostaMap_Infinite ♦83 |
| 174721075 (Comments: 1) | MatF88 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi welcome to OSM! next time instead of removing it try to just correct the error, for example, you can just change this road to the highway=driveway feature, and removed the name. Thanks commented 2026-08-26 21:47:40 UTC by MassCartog ♦503 |
| 188041412 (Comments: 1) | warringtonortho (Discussed changesets: 3) | As an account mapping on behalf of a commercial business for financial gain, please be advised that you are expected to understand and carefully follow documented OpenStreetMap standards and conventions, which will both directly benefit the quality o... commented 2026-08-26 21:31:50 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 188063800 (Comments: 1) | Robert Rivero (Discussed changesets: 5) | looking at this ALPR on various aerial imagery in iD it seems to be within the road area, being positioned like this is highly unlikely so please double check the position of this ALPR and fix it. Happy mapping, Udar. commented 2026-08-26 21:19:07 UTC by Udarian ♦992 |
| 188064201 (Comments: 1) | Robert Rivero (Discussed changesets: 5) | looking at this ALPR on various aerial imagery in iD it seems to be within the road area, being positioned like this is highly unlikely so please double check the position of this ALPR and fix it. Happy mapping, Udar. commented 2026-08-26 21:14:26 UTC by Udarian ♦992 |
| 188063635 (Comments: 1) | Robert Rivero (Discussed changesets: 5) | looking at this ALPR on various aerial imagery in iD it seems to be within the road area, being positioned like this is highly unlikely so please double check the position of this ALPR and fix it. Happy mapping, Udar. commented 2026-08-26 21:11:40 UTC by Udarian ♦992 |
| 188063388 (Comments: 1) | Robert Rivero (Discussed changesets: 5) | looking at this ALPR on various aerial imagery in iD it seems to be within the road area, being positioned like this is highly unlikely so please double check the position of this ALPR and fix it. Happy mapping, Udar. commented 2026-08-26 21:02:26 UTC by Udarian ♦992 |
| 188063307 (Comments: 1) | Robert Rivero (Discussed changesets: 5) | looking at this ALPR on various aerial imagery in iD it seems to be within the road area, being positioned like this is highly unlikely so please double check the position of this ALPR and fix it. Happy mapping, Udar. commented 2026-08-26 20:57:21 UTC by Udarian ♦992 |
| 187885160 (Comments: 4) | txemt (Discussed changesets: 49) | Gotcha, thanks @txemt . I figured _something_ like that had to be going on here. I personally don't trust myself to map on mobile beyond using SCEE personally. You could try a dedicated mobile mapping/surveying app like SCEE, Everydoor, etc. The... commented 2026-08-26 20:38:59 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 188037112 (Comments: 2) | CAM-Gerlach_Repair (Discussed changesets: 44) | Okay, thanks! commented 2026-08-26 20:20:22 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 187948846 (Comments: 1) | Aaron Bjornson (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188061314 commented 2026-08-26 18:50:27 UTC by rajdhani ♦642 |
| 181987629 (Comments: 1) | TransAct-AS (Discussed changesets: 93) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188059626 --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181987629 commented 2026-08-26 18:18:04 UTC by Frank Peng ♦256 |
| 187915234 (Comments: 1) | teitreim (Discussed changesets: 3) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188058457 commented 2026-08-26 17:58:53 UTC by rajdhani ♦642 |
| 179760477 (Comments: 1) | TransAct-AS (Discussed changesets: 93) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179882754 --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179760477 commented 2026-08-26 17:38:27 UTC by Frank Peng ♦256 |
| 187968044 (Comments: 1) | benholmen (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi! Thanks so much for all the park edits. Something that might help in the future is to use the Q shortcut on iD to square the corners of areas like this bathroom. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ID/Shortcuts commented 2026-08-26 17:14:32 UTC by KFCmenomonie ♦12 |
| 167761360 (Comments: 1) | Trust! Yet Verify (Discussed changesets: 2) | This node does not exist. The actual node is on the opposite side of the street. commented 2026-08-26 16:36:14 UTC by rlmcentee ♦1 |
| 188023416 (Comments: 1) | BholeKiBhasam (Discussed changesets: 55) | is there a ford there? looks like it could have a culvert --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/188023416 commented 2026-08-26 15:30:18 UTC by OddlyAngled ♦138 |
| 188005797 (Comments: 1) | zulpacor (Discussed changesets: 2) | when doing big changes like this if you could break it up into smaller related commits it would make it much easier to review. thanks for the edits! --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changese... commented 2026-08-26 15:28:17 UTC by OddlyAngled ♦138 |
| 188038704 (Comments: 1) | Matt Nelsen (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Matt! Thanks for your addition to the worldwide open map, OpenStreetMap! I always welcome new contributors in Brevard County! A quick note that `landuse` is used for entire areas, such as communities, neighborhoods, retail malls, par... commented 2026-08-26 14:09:09 UTC by GA_Kevin ♦58 |
| 187964991 (Comments: 3) | Rockman171 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks, and no worries! We all make some mistakes starting out (and even not starting out) and despite how tricky the opening_hours=* syntax can be you got it very close to correct on one, and entirely correct on the other--better than many mappers I... commented 2026-08-26 13:18:21 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 180430738 (Comments: 3) | wireguy (Discussed changesets: 28) | Thanks! commented 2026-08-26 11:56:47 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 187932718 (Comments: 1) | tampaschoiceenergy (Discussed changesets: 1) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. See https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers for mo... commented 2026-08-26 11:44:57 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 187930192 (Comments: 1) | blasenagroup (Discussed changesets: 1) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-08-26 11:36:46 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 188031825 (Comments: 1) | mueschel (Discussed changesets: 1027) | This was not an appropriate change, the description only applied to the name, so it should be name:description. Don't remove specificity in an automated fashion commented 2026-08-26 11:35:49 UTC by willkmis ♦234 |
| 187993188 (Comments: 1) | caprockchicago (Discussed changesets: 1) | As an account mapping on behalf of a commercial business for financial gain, please be advised that you are expected to understand and carefully follow documented OpenStreetMap standards and conventions, which will both directly benefit the quality o... commented 2026-08-26 11:33:54 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 177780782 (Comments: 1) | Snag Andrew (Discussed changesets: 2) | As an account mapping on behalf of a commercial business for financial gain, please be advised that you are expected to understand and carefully follow documented OpenStreetMap standards and conventions, which will both directly benefit the quality o... commented 2026-08-26 11:22:52 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 188012021 (Comments: 1) | Snag Andrew (Discussed changesets: 2) | As an account mapping on behalf of a commercial business for financial gain, please be advised that you are expected to understand and carefully follow documented OpenStreetMap standards and conventions, which will both directly benefit the quality o... commented 2026-08-26 11:21:33 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 187917104 (Comments: 1) | 0xjdavis (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188036786 commented 2026-08-26 11:16:17 UTC by ajmat ♦666 |
| 187985644 (Comments: 1) | AJ Wilkins (Discussed changesets: 1) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-08-26 11:12:30 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 187983539 (Comments: 1) | warringtonortho (Discussed changesets: 3) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-08-26 11:05:22 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 187975917 (Comments: 1) | warringtonortho (Discussed changesets: 3) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-08-26 11:05:18 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 187979637 (Comments: 1) | AJWilkins (Discussed changesets: 1) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-08-26 11:02:43 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 187981764 (Comments: 1) | The Breslow Center For Plastic Surgery (Discussed changesets: 1) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-08-26 10:52:17 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 187822661 (Comments: 4) | Brian'sPants (Discussed changesets: 4) | I believe uMap is exactly the kind of thing I'm looking for a map on our (and the ODF) website. Although I haven't been able to get it to accept an Overpass query yet. It still seems like it would be beneficial (or at least not detri... commented 2026-08-26 06:42:15 UTC by Brian'sPants ♦3 |
| 187896943 (Comments: 1) | kdelrey (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188025229 commented 2026-08-26 06:36:03 UTC by rajdhani ♦642 |
| 187664764 (Comments: 1) | Mattttttttt99 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hey, I just wanted to let you know that I noticed you accidentally made an invalid opening_hours=* tag. For node 14104307449 "Mon - Sat 11AM - 9PM" should actually be formatted as "Mo-Sa 11:00-21:00". The wiki is a great r... commented 2026-08-26 05:53:42 UTC by PostaMap_Infinite ♦83 |
| 187745896 (Comments: 1) | nHolman (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hey, I just wanted to let you know that I noticed you accidentally made an invalid opening_hours=* tag. For node 4452346257 "Sun-Sat 10AM - 10PM" should actually be formatted as "Su-Sa 10:00-22:00". The wiki is a great refe... commented 2026-08-26 05:52:27 UTC by PostaMap_Infinite ♦83 |
| 188009693 (Comments: 1) | MeEspresso (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hey, I just wanted to let you know that I noticed you accidentally made an invalid opening_hours=* tag. For node 2312172451 "12pm-12am every day" should actually be formatted as "Mo-Su 12:00-24:00". The wiki is a great refe... commented 2026-08-26 05:22:06 UTC by PostaMap_Infinite ♦83 |
| 188013055 (Comments: 1) | DiluteTussle (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hey, I just wanted to let you know that I noticed you accidentally made an invalid opening_hours=* tag. For node 13603490780 "Mo-Fr 09:00-17:30pm" should actually be formatted as "Mo-Fr 09:00-17:30". The wiki is a great ref... commented 2026-08-26 05:20:34 UTC by PostaMap_Infinite ♦83 |
| 187713135 (Comments: 1) | Badpraxis (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hey, I just wanted to let you know that I noticed you accidentally made an invalid opening_hours=* tag. For way 712411500 "Mo-Su 3pm-2am" should actually be formatted as "Mo-Su 15:00-02:00". The wiki is a great reference, a... commented 2026-08-26 05:00:47 UTC by PostaMap_Infinite ♦83 |
| 188020024 (Comments: 1) | specter6actual (Discussed changesets: 1) | Please check for duplicate nodes before adding new nodes. commented 2026-08-26 04:44:15 UTC by Adam850 ♦11 |
| 187993640 (Comments: 1) | Fire & Feast (Discussed changesets: 1) | As an account mapping on behalf of a commercial business for financial gain, please be advised that you are expected to understand and carefully follow documented OpenStreetMap standards and conventions, which will both directly benefit the quality o... commented 2026-08-26 04:41:52 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 188021386 (Comments: 1) | bmulvey1 (Discussed changesets: 1) | see pages 4-6 of the july 7 minutes here: https://www.tonawandacity.com/residents/common_council.php for speed limit/time restriction source commented 2026-08-26 04:23:29 UTC by bmulvey1 ♦1 |
| 187993702 (Comments: 2) | hopboy1 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Got it. Thank you for bringing this to my attention! commented 2026-08-26 04:11:06 UTC by hopboy1 ♦4 |
| 187983989 (Comments: 1) | Hot Springs Awning (Discussed changesets: 1) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-08-26 03:14:13 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 187894536 (Comments: 3) | FlamingoOSM (Discussed changesets: 46) | Added them back https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188019900#map=17/25.955784/-80.191890 commented 2026-08-26 03:01:16 UTC by FlamingoOSM ♦15 |
| 181546436 (Comments: 1) | Alec5y6 (Discussed changesets: 1) | not existent. please correct commented 2026-08-26 02:43:40 UTC by JW-Junto ♦1 |
| 187947710 (Comments: 1) | lucioperca (Discussed changesets: 3) | Thank you for adding this! commented 2026-08-26 00:44:25 UTC by fintler ♦7 |
| 187807391 (Comments: 3) | Jjeambey (Discussed changesets: 1) | Awesome, thanks for confirming! Sounds like a cool project. commented 2026-08-26 00:34:57 UTC by pwbriggs ♦520 |
| 185109752 (Comments: 2) | Dbchdncindcnojasnxjoasvnhuwrfbh (Discussed changesets: 9) | I changed them to official_name here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188016961, and extended the National Mall relation. commented 2026-08-26 00:24:17 UTC by willkmis ♦234 |
| 188016961 (Comments: 1) | willkmis (Discussed changesets: 24) | Relegated individual portion names to official_name (except for L'Enfant Park, which isn't even official), no locals call them this, it's all known as the National Mall. This map shows that NPS considers the sub-names somewhat official... commented 2026-08-26 00:22:26 UTC by willkmis ♦234 |
| 184894158 (Comments: 4) | Dbchdncindcnojasnxjoasvnhuwrfbh (Discussed changesets: 9) | Hey there, I was traveling so didn't look at this till now. I've removed the park tagging from the National Historic Site: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188016483. I'm leaving the spiky polygon for now, it might be some arcan... commented 2026-08-25 23:58:58 UTC by willkmis ♦234 |
| 183133401 (Comments: 1) | txemt (Discussed changesets: 49) | Just for cross-reference this changeset was reverted by changeset 187002098 , which then launched a major followup discussion about it there. https://osm.org/changeset/187002098 commented 2026-08-25 23:13:37 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 188015466 (Comments: 1) | h234a2hm (Discussed changesets: 9) | Used an offset of -0.92, 0.64 for NC OneMap Latest Orthoimagery (Natural Color) commented 2026-08-25 23:00:29 UTC by h234a2hm ♦8 |
| 186896002 (Comments: 5) | carciofo (Discussed changesets: 21) | @txemt glad to see you come a long way in 4 years :) https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/101946040 commented 2026-08-25 22:10:13 UTC by carciofo ♦197 |
| 187253522 (Comments: 1) | KrayzEli (Discussed changesets: 1) | This changeset adds one or more ALPR cameras in a spot that looks unlikely — the nodes sit well away from any road, which usually means the cameras aren't physically present on the ground or are not ALPRs.\r \r If these cameras are r... commented 2026-08-25 21:43:46 UTC by alpacaMaps ♦431 |
| 187910149 (Comments: 3) | Kudokiller (Discussed changesets: 2) | Also, ALL CAPS LABELS are never appropriate. commented 2026-08-25 21:31:55 UTC by Stretch Longfellow ♦106 |
| 187718223 (Comments: 1) | txemt (Discussed changesets: 49) | Hi txemt, Address tags don't generally belong on highway=* ways, as opposed to POIs, buildings or individual address points, as well as dedicated address interpolation ways. See https://osm.wiki/Addresses#How_to_map > Tags can b... commented 2026-08-25 20:42:25 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 187826603 (Comments: 2) | visages-elects (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thank you for your comment. From the wiki, I was under the impression that sidewalk:both=yes indicated that there is a sidewalk on both sides of the street, but any clarification you have on this would be appreciated. commented 2026-08-25 20:01:23 UTC by visages-elects ♦1 |
| 173854281 (Comments: 1) | Birdwatcher Junior (Discussed changesets: 2) | Confirmed at location 25-Aug-2026 commented 2026-08-25 19:07:45 UTC by medium_chungus ♦3 |
| 173854330 (Comments: 1) | Birdwatcher Junior (Discussed changesets: 2) | Confirmed at location 25-Aug-2026 commented 2026-08-25 19:07:07 UTC by medium_chungus ♦3 |
| 180266468 (Comments: 1) | Acorna (Discussed changesets: 1) | Confirmed at location, 25-Aug-2026. commented 2026-08-25 19:06:37 UTC by medium_chungus ♦3 |
| 178707253 (Comments: 3) | Tangibleclouds (Discussed changesets: 1) | you SHOULDN'T tag the fairway way as fairway* commented 2026-08-25 17:40:16 UTC by b-jazz ♦976 |
| 187966889 (Comments: 3) | AndrewEricson (Discussed changesets: 6) | that makes sense. i guess i didnt notice that there was a larger building footprint. thanks for helping out commented 2026-08-25 17:07:25 UTC by AndrewEricson ♦3 |
| 187954920 (Comments: 3) | AndrewEricson (Discussed changesets: 6) | Oh that's odd. I've restored them now. commented 2026-08-25 17:05:16 UTC by pwbriggs ♦520 |
| 188000494 (Comments: 1) | O4327 (Discussed changesets: 1) | looking at this ALPR on various aerial imagery in iD it seems to be within the road area, being positioned like this is highly unlikely so please double check the position of this ALPR and fix it. Happy mapping, Udar. commented 2026-08-25 16:56:55 UTC by Udarian ♦992 |
| 187957631 (Comments: 1) | AndrewEricson (Discussed changesets: 6) | Thanks. Make sure you connect them all the way. For example, you left a gap around https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/383165073. Happy mapping! commented 2026-08-25 16:52:08 UTC by pwbriggs ♦520 |
| 187970198 (Comments: 1) | AndrewEricson (Discussed changesets: 6) | I think tunnel=yes isn't quite accurate on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1552198646. If this is a true tunnel through a building (walls on both sides, and not an indoor passage), use tunnel=building_passage. If this is a hallway inside the b... commented 2026-08-25 16:43:42 UTC by pwbriggs ♦520 |
| 187999739 (Comments: 2) | pwbriggs (Discussed changesets: 31) | oopsie that's my own changeset. Reposting on the right one now... commented 2026-08-25 16:37:44 UTC by pwbriggs ♦520 |
| 177617974 (Comments: 3) | A Hall (Discussed changesets: 20) | Thanks for the update. And totally understandable on the sources. I think that's the best compromise given that there are still federal datasets with that spelling. commented 2026-08-25 16:34:50 UTC by Mapiate ♦39 |
| 187935430 (Comments: 1) | jranido (Discussed changesets: 5) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187984304 commented 2026-08-25 11:44:31 UTC by rajdhani ♦642 |
| 187937399 (Comments: 1) | jranido (Discussed changesets: 5) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187981636 commented 2026-08-25 10:39:58 UTC by MappingMore ♦793 |
| 187980902 (Comments: 1) | pesticides (Discussed changesets: 50) | Tagged the wide sidewalks as bicycle=yes, since the eastbound Cathcart Way bike lane has a ramp up to the wide sidewalk just before 148th St SE. These "wide sidewalks" seem to be a common tool used by governments and developers to avoid bui... commented 2026-08-25 10:24:29 UTC by pesticides ♦58 |
| 187036288 (Comments: 5) | Digitaleo (Discussed changesets: 57) | Thanks for flagging it. That one isn't us, different account and different operator, but it's the exact same failure mode: the POI gets written onto an existing unrelated node instead of a new node being created. Happy to share what ... commented 2026-08-25 07:40:35 UTC by Digitaleo ♦53 |
| 187973870 (Comments: 1) | pesticides (Discussed changesets: 50) | Portion north of Silver Lake Water and Sewer District building is owned by a HOA, but there's no signage prohibiting access and it seems to be well used. Thus, I marked that portion as "permissive" access. commented 2026-08-25 07:28:54 UTC by pesticides ♦58 |
| 151284307 (Comments: 3) | EllieNyaa (Discussed changesets: 8) | thanks for a fix! commented 2026-08-25 06:19:49 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,339 |
| 187961368 (Comments: 1) | bally213 (Discussed changesets: 3) | This changeset broke the border South Elgin relation/125805, see here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/125805#map=17/42.006345/-88.320626 commented 2026-08-25 06:16:44 UTC by Flynn Marquardt ♦91 |
| 187906205 (Comments: 1) | shinterro (Discussed changesets: 15) | Hi Shinterro, I noticed you reverted my previous fix in changeset 187877010 correcting the phone=* of the "The Reading Attic" POI, node 12486837359 , from the correct phone=+1-706-784-3134 that I fixed for you per their website, to t... commented 2026-08-25 06:12:26 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 168696357 (Comments: 1) | Felgemacher Roofing & Siding (Discussed changesets: 1) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-08-25 05:37:44 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 183819271 (Comments: 1) | hcfishers (Discussed changesets: 1) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-08-25 05:35:41 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 186627609 (Comments: 1) | Firefly Lighting (Discussed changesets: 1) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-08-25 05:27:37 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 172957979 (Comments: 1) | greendreamlawns (Discussed changesets: 1) | As an account mapping on behalf of a commercial business for financial gain, please be advised that you are expected to understand and carefully follow documented OpenStreetMap standards and conventions, which will both directly benefit the quality o... commented 2026-08-25 05:22:41 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 171702029 (Comments: 1) | Celebrate Dental & Braces (Discussed changesets: 1) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-08-25 05:20:30 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 178361235 (Comments: 1) | minthilldentistry (Discussed changesets: 1) | As an account mapping on behalf of a commercial business for financial gain, please be advised that you are expected to understand and carefully follow documented OpenStreetMap standards and conventions, which will both directly benefit the quality o... commented 2026-08-25 05:17:29 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 183263307 (Comments: 1) | dcmobilemassage (Discussed changesets: 1) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. See https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers for mo... commented 2026-08-25 05:09:31 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 184272483 (Comments: 1) | trinitychiropractic (Discussed changesets: 1) | As an account mapping on behalf of a commercial business for financial gain, please be advised that you are expected to understand and carefully follow documented OpenStreetMap standards and conventions, which will both directly benefit the quality o... commented 2026-08-25 05:07:41 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 187928041 (Comments: 1) | jranido (Discussed changesets: 5) | Is this housenumber 133E exactly, or is the address something like "133 East Parkway Boulevard"? If the latter, the East would go in addr:street like "East Parkway Boulevard" commented 2026-08-25 03:48:04 UTC by DFW-Backyard7 ♦43 |
| 187924103 (Comments: 1) | jranido (Discussed changesets: 5) | I reverted this because housenumbers are for addresses of locations along streets, not properties of streets themselves https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187968150 commented 2026-08-25 03:46:43 UTC by DFW-Backyard7 ♦43 |
| 187937238 (Comments: 1) | jranido (Discussed changesets: 5) | I've reverted this since you removed the street name from a segment of the street. I see you keep making (usually incorrect) edits and then (correctly) reverting them. I recommend slowing down a little and reviewing your changes before submittin... commented 2026-08-25 03:44:51 UTC by DFW-Backyard7 ♦43 |
| 187939865 (Comments: 1) | Map Ranking Head Of SEO (Discussed changesets: 1) | It seems you accidentally deleted part of Colleyville Blvd in this edit. I've fixed that https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187968023 commented 2026-08-25 03:35:32 UTC by DFW-Backyard7 ♦43 |
| 187966863 (Comments: 1) | MoiraPrime (Discussed changesets: 12) | County records show this street is named Hood Street and the fact that it's just "hood" on TIGER seems to be a mistake. commented 2026-08-25 02:22:21 UTC by MoiraPrime ♦63 |
| 187384238 (Comments: 1) | unionfurnituremo (Discussed changesets: 1) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-08-25 01:45:05 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 186388211 (Comments: 3) | Don Jaques - Real Estate Agent (Discussed changesets: 1) | https://www.osm.org/user_blocks/21163 commented 2026-08-25 01:41:32 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 187965508 (Comments: 2) | TheNightRider (Discussed changesets: 53) | Phone is what is now on signs (survey) commented 2026-08-25 01:02:57 UTC by TheNightRider ♦90 |
| 187956892 (Comments: 3) | GA_Kevin (Discussed changesets: 25) | When I visited earlier this month I only found two chargers. I may go back later this year using KartaView to get images of the chargers. Until that or there is new imagery I will leave this as it is. commented 2026-08-24 23:51:11 UTC by allen4names ♦12 |
| 185875262 (Comments: 1) | Elli21486 (Discussed changesets: 9) | Hello and thanks for contributing. Please note that parts of Sales Creek Drive are still gated and under construction. In the future, please verify that the road is open before mapping it as accessible. commented 2026-08-24 23:24:20 UTC by StreetSurveyor ♦213 |
| 187915215 (Comments: 5) | AndrewEricson (Discussed changesets: 6) | Okay, sounds good. I left it with no name specified for now. Thanks for your help on this. Happy mapping! commented 2026-08-24 23:10:39 UTC by pwbriggs ♦520 |
| 187558206 (Comments: 1) | bob1984 (Discussed changesets: 6) | test 2b commented 2026-08-24 22:53:30 UTC by StopFlock ♦4 |
| 187558127 (Comments: 1) | bob1984 (Discussed changesets: 6) | test 2a commented 2026-08-24 22:53:16 UTC by StopFlock ♦4 |
| 187666086 (Comments: 1) | bob1984 (Discussed changesets: 6) | another test comment commented 2026-08-24 22:49:01 UTC by StopFlock ♦4 |
| 187713800 (Comments: 1) | bob1984 (Discussed changesets: 6) | test changeset comment commented 2026-08-24 22:17:28 UTC by StopFlock ♦4 |
| 187916278 (Comments: 3) | confusedbuffalo-bot (Discussed changesets: 28) | Whoops, you’re right! My appologies! That’s what late night mapping does to ya lol commented 2026-08-24 22:04:49 UTC by PostaMap_Infinite ♦83 |
| 187947576 (Comments: 8) | MontyTaylor (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ooh awesome, thanks so much, I feel like I learned a bunch of things today. You're right about overpass-turbo.eu and taginfo being really fun! commented 2026-08-24 21:34:55 UTC by MontyTaylor ♦1 |
| 187957182 (Comments: 1) | Flap Slimy Outward (Discussed changesets: 313) | I did not mean to make such a large changeset— commented 2026-08-24 19:54:24 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦405 |
| 187930130 (Comments: 1) | Ale 77 (Discussed changesets: 2) | looking at this ALPR on various aerial imagery in iD it seems to be within the road area, being positioned like this is highly unlikely so please double check the position of this ALPR and fix it. Happy mapping, Udar. commented 2026-08-24 19:32:38 UTC by Udarian ♦992 |
| 187942018 (Comments: 1) | Rix12 (Discussed changesets: 1) | looking at this ALPR on various aerial imagery in iD it seems to be within the road area, being positioned like this is highly unlikely so please double check the position of this ALPR and fix it. Happy mapping, Udar. commented 2026-08-24 19:28:46 UTC by Udarian ♦992 |
| 187954197 (Comments: 1) | Soplex64 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Category should be changed from café to one that befits a children's clothing store. commented 2026-08-24 18:41:25 UTC by Soplex64 ♦1 |
| 187910127 (Comments: 1) | AndrewEricson (Discussed changesets: 6) | Thanks for adding sidewalks! Since you're doing work on sidewalks, I want to make sure you're aware of the Pedestrian Working Group (PWG)'s schema. See a guide at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Foundation/Local_Chapters/United_Sta... commented 2026-08-24 18:30:27 UTC by pwbriggs ♦520 |
| 187919098 (Comments: 1) | naema fahiye (Discussed changesets: 1) | Looks like you added a duplicate building at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1551926437? I see a building in that space already. Maybe you couldn't see the building because of some bug in the editor? Anyway, I removed the duplicate as well as ... commented 2026-08-24 17:36:23 UTC by pwbriggs ♦520 |
| 187857413 (Comments: 1) | OutpostEV (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thank you! This edit looks very good, so nice work reading the documentation carefully-I really appreciate that. One question I have is about the building in this area, currently named "Quick Lube" on the map. It has the same address... commented 2026-08-24 17:23:44 UTC by pwbriggs ♦520 |
| 187664168 (Comments: 2) | DiluteTussle (Discussed changesets: 3) | Thank you commented 2026-08-24 15:18:20 UTC by 85_gig ♦1 |
| 187939155 (Comments: 2) | GrayHay (Discussed changesets: 2) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/14116804401#map=18/35.536899/-97.601115 This shows it on the corner. Why is the osmchat map showing it in the wrong location? --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published u... commented 2026-08-24 15:10:43 UTC by GrayHay ♦2 |
| 187942728 (Comments: 1) | pallindo (Discussed changesets: 5) | Looks like these were cycling only after all. Found a little sign at the start commented 2026-08-24 14:45:01 UTC by pallindo ♦6 |
| 187891956 (Comments: 1) | MarkM10 (Discussed changesets: 7) | Oklahoma specifically and the US generally doesn't have the concept of major/minor differences at stop signs. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/187891956 commented 2026-08-24 14:15:35 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,623 |
| 187892809 (Comments: 1) | Kirdro (Discussed changesets: 14) | Branch information goes in branch=* and not name=* --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/187892809 commented 2026-08-24 14:14:14 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,623 |
| 187896241 (Comments: 1) | JCDT (Discussed changesets: 1) | This is in the middle of an intersection. Could you move it to the correct spot? --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/187896241 commented 2026-08-24 14:13:01 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,623 |
| 187898766 (Comments: 1) | Watcher082026 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Cow pastures have Flock now? --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/187898766 commented 2026-08-24 14:12:38 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,623 |
| 187902573 (Comments: 3) | WhosThatGuy645 (Discussed changesets: 1) | This is in the middle of an intersection far from any posts --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/187902573 commented 2026-08-24 14:08:25 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,623 |
| 187911451 (Comments: 2) | GrayHay (Discussed changesets: 2) | I updated the node closer to the sidewalk from where it was, however the camera is behind the street sign on the pole and not on the vertical part of the traffic light commented 2026-08-24 13:30:39 UTC by GrayHay ♦2 |
| 187913724 (Comments: 1) | Jbbg (Discussed changesets: 1) | Lowe's operates this camera?? --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/187913724 commented 2026-08-24 13:20:00 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,623 |
| 187847469 (Comments: 4) | Cheetobum (Discussed changesets: 1) | To clarify my comment above further regarding how to leave an OSM note, if you spot an issue with the map that you aren't comfortable fixing yourself-- From the regular map view shown on this page, press the note button (speech bubble ico... commented 2026-08-24 09:04:42 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 184878055 (Comments: 1) | Xxr914 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi, I was searching famous "flock camera" in USA but I think it is not a "shop=camera" here but man_made=surveillance (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dsurveillance) commented 2026-08-24 08:48:03 UTC by LudovicG ♦182 |
| 175410755 (Comments: 3) | votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale (Discussed changesets: 526) | Thanks for looking into it. Interestingly, way 112628723 (same number as this node) is actually in France, but in a small town near Boulonge-Sur-Mer rather than in Paris as this node's tags would imply (and there is no relation of that number).<... commented 2026-08-24 08:03:10 UTC by CAM-Gerlach ♦308 |
| 187821846 (Comments: 1) | smokie0212 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hey, I just wanted to let you know that I noticed you accidentally made an invalid opening_hours=* tag. For node 14111453209 "Mo 10:30-19:00 Th-Fr 11:00-19:00 Sa 09:00-18:00" should actually be formatted as "Mo 10:30-19:00; Th... commented 2026-08-24 05:35:51 UTC by PostaMap_Infinite ♦83 |
| 187913954 (Comments: 1) | ooper-user (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks for the contribution! Often buildings are composed of rectangular parts, so we try to "square up" buildings in OpenStreetMap to more accurately represent the real-world buildings. Most editing programs have a tool to do this q... commented 2026-08-24 05:31:24 UTC by pwbriggs ♦520 |
| 182093842 (Comments: 1) | Red Apple Cafe (Discussed changesets: 1) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-08-24 05:26:18 UTC by CAM-Gerlach ♦308 |
| 187820737 (Comments: 1) | FreeJeff (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hey, I just wanted to let you know that I noticed you accidentally made an invalid opening_hours=* tag. For node 1798864276 "Mo-Sa 10:00-18:00, su 11:00-18-00" should actually be formatted as "Mo-Sa 10:00-18:00; Su 11:00-18:00&... commented 2026-08-24 05:16:56 UTC by PostaMap_Infinite ♦83 |
| 187821519 (Comments: 1) | salisburymistake (Discussed changesets: 15) | Hey, I just wanted to let you know that I noticed you made an invalid opening_hours=* tag. For node 14106177759 "Mo-Th 07:30-16:00; Fri-Su 07:30-18:00" should actually be formatted as "Mo-Th 07:30-16:00; Fr-Su 07:30-18:00".... commented 2026-08-24 05:11:28 UTC by PostaMap_Infinite ♦83 |
| 187819816 (Comments: 2) | forwardaudit (Discussed changesets: 1) | whoops, node 7809716770. My appologies! commented 2026-08-24 05:06:39 UTC by PostaMap_Infinite ♦83 |
| 187766821 (Comments: 2) | DFW-Backyard7 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Thanks for fixing! commented 2026-08-24 04:46:13 UTC by DFW-Backyard7 ♦43 |
| 187139727 (Comments: 2) | MAXxS3 (Discussed changesets: 2) | This isn't a flock camera. It's a solar panel for the water level monitor. See it live here https://waterdata.usgs.gov/monitoring-location/USGS-04122025#dataTypeId=continuous-00065-0&period=P7D&showFieldMeasurements=true commented 2026-08-24 02:25:47 UTC by Riverrat49327 ♦1 |
| 187914456 (Comments: 1) | Flap Slimy Outward (Discussed changesets: 313) | The actual source is here: https://issuu.com/summerlin/docs/sid_map commented 2026-08-24 02:08:35 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦405 |
| 187914004 (Comments: 1) | firerocker27 (Discussed changesets: 1) | looking at this ALPR on various aerial imagery in iD it seems to be within the road area, being positioned like this is highly unlikely so please double check the position of this ALPR and fix it. Happy mapping, Udar. commented 2026-08-24 01:45:40 UTC by Udarian ♦992 |
| 187900614 (Comments: 2) | mewhenthe (Discussed changesets: 2) | No problem. commented 2026-08-24 01:36:41 UTC by mewhenthe ♦25 |
| 187822875 (Comments: 1) | FlockOffFasc (Discussed changesets: 2) | DWG revert - apparent fictitious mapping https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187914576 commented 2026-08-24 01:34:37 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,101 |
| 187864009 (Comments: 1) | FlockOffFasc (Discussed changesets: 2) | Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21146 commented 2026-08-24 01:32:37 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,101 |
| 186602977 (Comments: 5) | Channel91 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Regarding your note about edits at the Seashore Trolley Museum. Keep in mind that it can days for certain edits to render on OSM and ORM and some edits render on one zoom level before they rener on another zoom level,, which could explain why you are... commented 2026-08-24 01:16:26 UTC by Channel91 ♦5 |
| 155438018 (Comments: 2) | B_A_ (Discussed changesets: 5) | Oh, ok. That makes sense. Thanks for commenting with useful information. I'll start applying this to my future edits. commented 2026-08-24 00:40:29 UTC by B_A_ ♦3 |
| 136844025 (Comments: 2) | Mashin (Discussed changesets: 45) | Hi, our policy is that if something exists in real world, we include it in our data. This looks like a property access road, which we call driveway. There is now a tag access=no, which should give any driver information that entry is not permitted... commented 2026-08-23 23:06:26 UTC by Mashin ♦610 |
| 187907901 (Comments: 1) | Flap Slimy Outward (Discussed changesets: 313) | The link provided in source=* doesn't work for some reason. Here's another URL linking to the same map I used: https://issuu.com/summerlin/docs/sid_map commented 2026-08-23 22:48:07 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦405 |
| 187817941 (Comments: 1) | Relatively Irrelevant (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, In your edit you use the deprecated tag "payment:bitcoin=yes". Please DELETE the payment:bitcoin=yes tag ! Use the "currency:XBT=yes" instead. For more information please read: https://gitea.btcmap.org/... commented 2026-08-23 22:08:39 UTC by Comino ♦426 |
| 187868586 (Comments: 1) | democat (Discussed changesets: 4) | This feels like this was an emotionally made edit. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/187868586 commented 2026-08-23 20:52:51 UTC by QuiLe ♦92 |
| 186829186 (Comments: 1) | SwissBagel (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello and thanks for contributing. Please note that Rocky Ledge Terrace is still gated and under construction. In the future, please verify that the road is open before mapping it as accessible. commented 2026-08-23 18:51:32 UTC by StreetSurveyor ♦213 |
| 187901899 (Comments: 1) | bwbuhse (Discussed changesets: 3) | Looks good to me. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/187901899 commented 2026-08-23 18:39:17 UTC by mewhenthe ♦25 |
| 187897954 (Comments: 3) | valhikes (Discussed changesets: 11) | Thank you for letting me know! That sounds like a cool group event :). Great changeset! commented 2026-08-23 18:18:43 UTC by Loopslol7 ♦45 |
| 182339187 (Comments: 1) | Kevin Gravelle (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello and welcome to OSM! Thank you for your contributions. I’ve noticed you’ve been changing a number of roads to access=private. As a reminder, many roads in Massachusetts are designated as “private ways,” which refer... commented 2026-08-23 18:16:26 UTC by StreetSurveyor ♦213 |
| 187770858 (Comments: 1) | Laosy (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi there Laosy, When you are warned of an overlap, that is because your lines for something like a green and fairway are overlapping. You might not notice it if your are zoomed out, but it is almost a sure thing that they do overlap if you zoo... commented 2026-08-23 17:55:19 UTC by b-jazz ♦976 |
| 187892236 (Comments: 1) | FlamingoOSM (Discussed changesets: 46) | the image=* tag should only be used for images on the actual location, not a businesses logo alone. Essentially if the image is just a businesses logo do not add it to image=*, an image of a business can include its logo if said logo is shown on the ... commented 2026-08-23 16:28:19 UTC by Udarian ♦992 |
| 187773807 (Comments: 2) | FlockerMe2 (Discussed changesets: 1) | I haven’t verified this one but FlockerMe2 is probably FlockerMe who maliciously posted about 40 false cameras in the Longview area. woodpeck blocked him recently. The same needs done with FlockerMe2. I verified 3 other false camera locations f... commented 2026-08-23 15:03:38 UTC by Spamalert444 ♦2 |
| 186458599 (Comments: 1) | Dongorongoro (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, you used a "crossarm = double" tag which doesn't exist in other places. Could you check the wiki to see how that feature is commonly tagged? commented 2026-08-23 14:19:28 UTC by mueschel ♦7,415 |
| 181458347 (Comments: 5) | MassCartog (Discussed changesets: 40) | 1st. none of us are OSM Moderators. 2nd. suggest joining a working group meeting at OSM US https://openstreetmap.us/our-work/trails/ commented 2026-08-23 08:28:02 UTC by Natfoot ♦163 |
| 184614133 (Comments: 1) | gymdiver (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! You used amenity=fast-food on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5165071121/history Have you maybe meant amenity=fast_food ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited ... commented 2026-08-23 08:18:57 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,339 |
| 187664382 (Comments: 1) | TheNightRider (Discussed changesets: 53) | Surveyed this evening and the outdoor seating has been removed. commented 2026-08-23 06:40:37 UTC by TheNightRider ♦90 |
| 187807963 (Comments: 2) | ajsmyth (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi again, Another user has confirmed at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145559090#c1648434 that this is still an SDOT "School Street" with signs prohibiting motor vehicle access except for local access. As such, I'll cha... commented 2026-08-23 06:20:16 UTC by pwbriggs ♦520 |
| 187744382 (Comments: 1) | autocaddie (Discussed changesets: 2) | RE: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1551060010 and many others... When drawing golf course areas (such as greens, fairways, bunkers, tees, etc.), please be aware that the ways used to outline those areas can't cross over each other. Fai... commented 2026-08-23 05:40:58 UTC by b-jazz ♦976 |
| 187773193 (Comments: 1) | kentopella (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Kentopella, Welcome to OpenStreetMap, and thanks for your contributions! I did notice a few issues here as well as have a couple followup questions for you. First, the former: - addr:housenumber=* should be just the housenumbe... commented 2026-08-23 05:34:06 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 187703113 (Comments: 1) | freefloatz (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hey freefloatz, Can you take another look at your changes here. There are many golf areas that overlap with each other. Like the fringe around a green crossing over the nearby bunkers in several spots. Thanks. commented 2026-08-23 05:33:43 UTC by b-jazz ♦976 |
| 187840155 (Comments: 1) | dannmer (Discussed changesets: 42) | A name on a map by the city don't justify breaking OSM naming conventions. We do the same with streets, anyway--the "official" name of those are always abbreviated, but we expand the abbreviations anyway. commented 2026-08-23 05:25:16 UTC by impiaaa ♦502 |
| 145559090 (Comments: 3) | pesticides (Discussed changesets: 50) | I stopped by there today and confirmed it is still a school street and the signage is as I remembered. Here are some photos of it: https://www.flickr.com/photos/204891673@N04/albums/72177720335246930 commented 2026-08-23 05:24:49 UTC by pesticides ♦58 |
| 187506768 (Comments: 2) | p**um***u****m*******p********v************** (Discussed changesets: 10) | Note that repeatedly re-applied these changes multiple times, with no response to feedback, in changeset 187718501 So I reverted them again in changeset 187869345 https://osm.org/changeset/187869345 commented 2026-08-23 05:09:40 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 187718501 (Comments: 1) | p**um***u****m*******p********v************** (Discussed changesets: 10) | See changeset 187506768 for another mapper's previous feedback on this: https://osm.org/changeset/187506768 Reverted repeated unwarranted upgrades of short, minor collector/residential segments to highway=secondary after no respons... commented 2026-08-23 05:09:34 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 187252571 (Comments: 1) | Noticerofthings (Discussed changesets: 6) | note=Verified present and operating 22 Aug 2026. Previous mass deletions by new account were incorrect. Source=local knowledge --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/187252571 ... commented 2026-08-23 02:27:34 UTC by Noticerofthings ♦6 |
| 187249811 (Comments: 1) | Noticerofthings (Discussed changesets: 6) | note=Verified present and operating 22 Aug 2026. Previous mass deletions by new account were incorrect. Source=local knowledge --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/187249811 ... commented 2026-08-23 02:27:25 UTC by Noticerofthings ♦6 |
| 187851702 (Comments: 1) | Noticerofthings (Discussed changesets: 6) | note=Verified present and operating 22 Aug 2026. Previous mass deletions by new account were incorrect. Source=local knowledge --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/187851702 ... commented 2026-08-23 02:26:13 UTC by Noticerofthings ♦6 |
| 187851736 (Comments: 1) | Noticerofthings (Discussed changesets: 6) | note=Verified present and operating 22 Aug 2026. Previous mass deletions by new account were incorrect. Source=local knowledge --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/187851736 ... commented 2026-08-23 02:25:57 UTC by Noticerofthings ♦6 |
| 187851777 (Comments: 1) | Noticerofthings (Discussed changesets: 6) | note=Verified present and operating 22 Aug 2026. Previous mass deletions by new account were incorrect. Source=local knowledge --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/187851777 ... commented 2026-08-23 02:25:47 UTC by Noticerofthings ♦6 |
| 187851869 (Comments: 1) | Noticerofthings (Discussed changesets: 6) | note=Verified present and operating 22 Aug 2026. Previous mass deletions by new account were incorrect. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/187851869 commented 2026-08-23 02:24:58 UTC by Noticerofthings ♦6 |
| 187851490 (Comments: 2) | changering (Discussed changesets: 2) | Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21142 commented 2026-08-23 02:03:18 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,101 |
| 187837150 (Comments: 1) | Kylie Kristen (Discussed changesets: 2) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is not allowed on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account; see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers for more infor... commented 2026-08-23 00:50:51 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 187834921 (Comments: 1) | Kylie Kristen (Discussed changesets: 2) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is not allowed on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account; see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers for more infor... commented 2026-08-23 00:50:28 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 187668099 (Comments: 2) | PGio (Discussed changesets: 5) | Thank you! I did not know about these tags! very useful! commented 2026-08-23 00:25:44 UTC by PGio ♦2 |
| 187719329 (Comments: 2) | PGio (Discussed changesets: 5) | Appreciate the education on these issues!! Thank you! commented 2026-08-23 00:16:55 UTC by PGio ♦2 |
| 187671401 (Comments: 6) | Natfoot (Discussed changesets: 77) | Utility cars can enter the right of way using the driveways from South Royal Broughham Way, which I mapped. They can even go into the tunnels all the way to Westlake. But it does not mean that light rail tunnels need to be doubled as service ways, ba... commented 2026-08-22 22:50:57 UTC by Alexey Lukin ♦40 |
| 94135787 (Comments: 1) | Fluffy89502 (Discussed changesets: 292) | there are a lot of un tagged nodes commented 2026-08-22 20:43:29 UTC by weblogdryads ♦41 |
| 187859352 (Comments: 1) | citrula (Discussed changesets: 20) | https://www.dot.state.tx.us/tpp/hwy/SH/SH0195.htm commented 2026-08-22 20:12:42 UTC by citrula ♦1,020 |
| 187766771 (Comments: 3) | figitron (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks. I opened a note https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5472047 asking for a review. commented 2026-08-22 19:42:04 UTC by pwbriggs ♦520 |
| 187252910 (Comments: 1) | SixSevenIsTheBest (Discussed changesets: 14) | reverted - no source provided, and not visible on NAD, Tiger, or street level imagery https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187857932 commented 2026-08-22 19:28:57 UTC by citrula ♦1,020 |
| 187828266 (Comments: 1) | Fowziya (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks. Is Halal Eats Food a restaurant? Does it share a building with Bibito Cafe, or are Bibito and Halal Eats the same business? Thanks again for your contributions and welcome to OpenStreetMap! commented 2026-08-22 17:05:32 UTC by pwbriggs ♦520 |
| 174627455 (Comments: 3) | jumbanho (Discussed changesets: 23) | Thanks for looking deeper into what went wrong. And for your mapping in general! commented 2026-08-22 16:37:38 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,339 |
| 187829666 (Comments: 1) | Crysdawnfran09 (Discussed changesets: 1) | This changeset adds one or more ALPR cameras in a spot that looks unlikely — the nodes sit well away from any road, which usually means the cameras aren't physically present on the ground or are not ALPRs.\r \r If these cameras are r... commented 2026-08-22 15:20:18 UTC by alpacaMaps ♦431 |
| 187840207 (Comments: 1) | ccpete06 (Discussed changesets: 1) | This changeset adds one or more ALPR cameras in a spot that looks unlikely — the nodes sit well away from any road, which usually means the cameras aren't physically present on the ground or are not ALPRs.\r \r If these cameras are r... commented 2026-08-22 15:19:39 UTC by alpacaMaps ♦431 |
| 187844209 (Comments: 1) | Wight Dwarph (Discussed changesets: 1) | This changeset adds one or more surveillance cameras in a spot that looks unlikely — the nodes sit well away from any road, which usually means the cameras aren't physically present on the ground.\r \r If these cameras are real, plea... commented 2026-08-22 15:17:54 UTC by alpacaMaps ♦431 |
| 187808247 (Comments: 3) | Chili_Dog (Discussed changesets: 1) | So, in other words, you did it manually? I assumed there was some program that could conflate a newly drawn building with an address from a database somewhere (e.g., OpenWeb). commented 2026-08-22 14:26:57 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦405 |
| 182624781 (Comments: 3) | JD586 (Discussed changesets: 1) | And thanks even more for your mapping in the first place! commented 2026-08-22 13:48:02 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,339 |
| 180604867 (Comments: 2) | RailandSea (Discussed changesets: 21) | Why yes that is a typo I’ll fix it thanks for looking out commented 2026-08-22 13:24:06 UTC by RailandSea ♦26 |
| 187416050 (Comments: 2) | EuleKC (Discussed changesets: 10) | It's a typo for "steel". I have fixed it. commented 2026-08-22 12:51:24 UTC by EuleKC ♦8 |
| 186137620 (Comments: 2) | that_maifa (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thank you for the catch. I have corrected the error commented 2026-08-22 12:41:47 UTC by that_maifa ♦2 |
| 182435982 (Comments: 1) | Fpengineer8 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! You used material=wood' on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13811769150/history Have you maybe meant material=wood ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited s... commented 2026-08-22 12:11:07 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,339 |
| 75069998 (Comments: 1) | scratchspin (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hello! You used sport = roller skating on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/729715445/history Have you maybe meant sport=roller_skating ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I e... commented 2026-08-22 12:05:00 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,339 |
| 152223428 (Comments: 1) | HJUdall (Discussed changesets: 14) | Hello! You used sport=rollerskating on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11954964281/history Have you maybe meant sport=roller_skating ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I e... commented 2026-08-22 11:27:34 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,339 |
| 187504729 (Comments: 3) | E1bereth (Discussed changesets: 1) | And thanks for you fix and even more for your mapping in general! commented 2026-08-22 11:04:15 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,339 |
| 187714993 (Comments: 2) | klsgrtx (Discussed changesets: 1) | I see I'm not the only one here! Hey klsgrtx, I noticed you made a malformed opening_hours tag with value "opening_hours=Mo-Su 7am-11pm" when the correct value would have been "opening_hours=Mo-Su 07:00-23:00". The wik... commented 2026-08-22 08:20:42 UTC by PostaMap_Infinite ♦83 |
| 187820377 (Comments: 1) | Olivia Anthony (Discussed changesets: 1) | Looks like you accidentally dragged part of a foot path (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8947319763) from a building entryway all the way into the middle of the lawn, making the path cross through the building. It's easy to do this by acciden... commented 2026-08-22 07:47:40 UTC by pwbriggs ♦520 |
| 187821322 (Comments: 1) | daulah (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/daulah! The changeset comment you left doesn't match the edit you made. I assume this was a mistake, so I've undid the change. Please provide more information about this location. Thanks f... commented 2026-08-22 07:40:44 UTC by pwbriggs ♦520 |
| 187826926 (Comments: 1) | azzekar (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks! Ivar's is actually already on the map at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/220550073. The point that you edited was just a plain address point; it doesn't necessarily mean that there is a vacant storefront, it just means that there ... commented 2026-08-22 07:35:20 UTC by pwbriggs ♦520 |
| 187823778 (Comments: 1) | Motor City Elevator Co (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hey, I don't believe Troy PD is called like that. operator should be the name, how the operator is called. That the camera is positioned in Troy, MI can be derived from the location of the camera. Please change operator to the proper name. ... commented 2026-08-22 07:33:25 UTC by aighes ♦63 |
| 187823785 (Comments: 1) | Motor City Elevator Co (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hey, I don't believe Troy PD is called like that. operator should be the name, how the operator is called. That the camera is positioned in Troy, MI can be derived from the location of the camera. Please change operator to the proper name. ... commented 2026-08-22 07:32:57 UTC by aighes ♦63 |
| 187720420 (Comments: 1) | Delta_5 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hey Delta_5, It looks like you made an invalid opening_hours=* tag for Bellbrock park in this changeset! You put the value "Su-Sa 8:00-21:00" while the correct value would have been "Su-Sa 08:00-21:00". All opening_hours values mu... commented 2026-08-22 07:20:13 UTC by PostaMap_Infinite ♦83 |
| 187766618 (Comments: 1) | Ant D (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Ant D, Thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap! Just wanted to give you a heads up on some tagging fixes here: - addr:street=* should contain just the street name, and as a rule abbreviations should not be used on OSM. See ht... commented 2026-08-22 06:56:45 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 187677518 (Comments: 1) | Hibachi Five Stars 30A (Discussed changesets: 2) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. See https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers for mo... commented 2026-08-22 06:24:24 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 187675383 (Comments: 1) | Hibachi Five Stars 30A (Discussed changesets: 2) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. See https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers for mo... commented 2026-08-22 06:24:20 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 187778731 (Comments: 1) | Ruby Yang (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Ruby%20Yang! Thank you for the edit. You're new so I don't expect you to know this, but abbreviations in names are expanded in OpenStreetMap, so it should be something like Northeast Bel Red R... commented 2026-08-22 06:11:48 UTC by pwbriggs ♦520 |
| 187734758 (Comments: 1) | nobleroofingky (Discussed changesets: 1) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. See https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers for mo... commented 2026-08-22 06:11:27 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 187778921 (Comments: 1) | Ruby Yang (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello, These look like driveways, not public streets. Also, they should be connected to the street, not just the sidewalk. I'll clean these up. Thanks for your contributions and welcome to OpenStreetMap! commented 2026-08-22 05:42:13 UTC by pwbriggs ♦520 |
| 65395836 (Comments: 1) | CartographerC (Discussed changesets: 8) | I don't think snapping the woods to the road was the right choice here - it's untruthful and forces "edit road" to be "edit giant relation", which just doesn't work in editors like iD. commented 2026-08-22 05:31:59 UTC by KTibow ♦8 |
| 187629703 (Comments: 1) | Mitchellrric (Discussed changesets: 1) | This changeset adds one or more surveillance cameras in a spot that looks unlikely — the nodes sit well away from any road, which usually means the cameras aren't physically present on the ground.\r \r If these cameras are real, plea... commented 2026-08-22 05:15:03 UTC by alpacaMaps ♦431 |
| 187819221 (Comments: 1) | Jake1233456 (Discussed changesets: 3) | This changeset adds one or more surveillance cameras in a spot that looks unlikely — the nodes sit well away from any road, which usually means the cameras aren't physically present on the ground.\r \r If these cameras are real, plea... commented 2026-08-22 05:11:31 UTC by alpacaMaps ♦431 |
| 187819205 (Comments: 1) | Jake1233456 (Discussed changesets: 3) | This changeset adds one or more surveillance cameras in a spot that looks unlikely — the nodes sit well away from any road, which usually means the cameras aren't physically present on the ground.\r \r If these cameras are real, plea... commented 2026-08-22 05:11:30 UTC by alpacaMaps ♦431 |
| 187792142 (Comments: 1) | Froody (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OpenStreetMap, and thanks for your contribution. One of the most important core principles on OpenStreetMap is "Don't copy from other maps" https://osm.wiki/Don%27t_copy_from_other_maps. In particular, use of Google M... commented 2026-08-22 04:33:03 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 187799249 (Comments: 1) | bonedry (Discussed changesets: 2) | As an account mapping on behalf of a commercial business for financial gain, please be advised that you are expected to understand and carefully follow documented OpenStreetMap standards and conventions, which will both directly benefit the quality o... commented 2026-08-22 04:15:34 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 186141643 (Comments: 1) | aoierugregaaaaaaaareagregeargrrklmn (Discussed changesets: 1) | I can't find this one, is it still up? commented 2026-08-22 03:26:59 UTC by ThatOtherRaptor ♦1 |
| 183090964 (Comments: 1) | DividedFrame (Discussed changesets: 9) | I just restored the tags this changeset deleted (probably accidentally ) from Hotel Del. Other edits of this changeset might need to be reviewed. commented 2026-08-22 03:16:10 UTC by TheNightRider ♦90 |
| 187803432 (Comments: 1) | dragontazz (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, I saw you requested a review on this edit, and that you've made a few more in this area since. Overall, it looks good, but I've noticed a few issues. You've made the property surrounding Payneville Community Church a buildin... commented 2026-08-22 00:04:04 UTC by Jonathan Delaney ♦11 |
| 187595877 (Comments: 1) | F***flockcameras (Discussed changesets: 1) | IS THIS STOPLIGHT CAMERAS... I OWN www.whatheflock.org and i see that you have many reports please upload any photos here so users can see the camera location and more. commented 2026-08-21 23:52:28 UTC by Felonz ♦1 |
| 187735305 (Comments: 4) | Chloe Chung (Discussed changesets: 2) | No worries Chloe, thanks for your helpful contributions here and understanding on that! It's not uncommon that sometimes beginners occasionally accidentally drag a node in their first changesets, just something to watch out for. To make it easie... commented 2026-08-21 23:33:21 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 187772987 (Comments: 3) | lepoulet (Discussed changesets: 2) | Of course! And thanks again for your work here! commented 2026-08-21 23:10:39 UTC by CAM-Gerlach ♦308 |
| 187772861 (Comments: 4) | lepoulet (Discussed changesets: 2) | Sure thing, happy to help out! And thanks again for the update! commented 2026-08-21 23:10:12 UTC by CAM-Gerlach ♦308 |
| 187767893 (Comments: 1) | noletuary (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, I saw you requested a review for this edit, and I've noticed a few issues. Please do not take this feedback personally, as it is common for new mappers to make mistakes. 1. name=* is used to define the name of the feature, and only th... commented 2026-08-21 22:47:29 UTC by Jonathan Delaney ♦11 |
| 187774260 (Comments: 1) | changering (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi Changering, Welcome to OpenStreetMap! The core purpose of this project is to map verifiable features that exist on the ground; see https://osm.wiki/Verifiability . Buildings and other features should only be mapped if they currently,... commented 2026-08-21 22:24:00 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 187796338 (Comments: 1) | rturnnet (Discussed changesets: 1) | This was reverted as it originally looked like SEO spam. I have gone ahead and added the place as a node instead of the whole building. commented 2026-08-21 21:50:40 UTC by wylie39 ♦2 |
| 181177141 (Comments: 3) | streetmeme (Discussed changesets: 3) | Cool, thanks! commented 2026-08-21 21:04:10 UTC by ion_chi ♦111 |
| 187804191 (Comments: 1) | p**um***u****m*******p********v************** (Discussed changesets: 10) | Please do me a favor and leave better changeset comments. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments for more information. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/18... commented 2026-08-21 20:47:48 UTC by Glassman ♦6,059 |
| 187816082 (Comments: 1) | cstromw (Discussed changesets: 5) | On the portion south of 28th St, I reconfirmed via survey that all signage shows "Blaisdell" and there is no sign of the Whittier/Lyndale name. Hennepin County lists this route as Blaisdell. While the initial construction project from Minne... commented 2026-08-21 20:35:36 UTC by cstromw ♦7 |
| 187813265 (Comments: 1) | GA_Kevin (Discussed changesets: 25) | Hello, thank you for adding all the charging stations! Please note that confusingly, the correct tag for public features is access=yes, not access=public. Don't worry, I already changed that at the charging stations you previously added,... commented 2026-08-21 19:35:15 UTC by PizzaTreeIsland ♦104 |
| 187407673 (Comments: 3) | Scrutator (Discussed changesets: 6) | Roger that--glad to have you contributing here, and happy I could be helpful! commented 2026-08-21 19:28:36 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 187803999 (Comments: 1) | mnbikedad (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, what's your intention with splitting these road sections when both parts have the same tags? commented 2026-08-21 19:21:34 UTC by ion_chi ♦111 |
| 187808183 (Comments: 1) | This Is The Way (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hey, last I have seen that area about a week ago, there was no roundabout sign and it's just a round oneway with 4 yield signs. Do you have more up-to-date information? Otherwise, please remove that roundabout-tag again. commented 2026-08-21 17:53:55 UTC by aighes ♦63 |
| 187801816 (Comments: 2) | Clairness (Discussed changesets: 9) | This absolutely was not intentional, I will fix this ASAP. Thank you for catching that. I typically used service=driveway along with the access=private when reverting my old bad driveway tags, but obviously I did not for this changeset. I'll che... commented 2026-08-21 17:45:29 UTC by Clairness ♦10 |
| 187768266 (Comments: 1) | SixSevenIsTheBest (Discussed changesets: 14) | Please don't use highway=pedestrian for indoor mapping. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Simple_Indoor_Tagging Also, can you provide your source for the sidewalk named "Main Street"? commented 2026-08-21 17:12:39 UTC by citrula ♦1,020 |
| 173704867 (Comments: 3) | campbelltree (Discussed changesets: 5) | Fixed with a SC changeset commented 2026-08-21 17:08:28 UTC by campbelltree ♦34 |
| 187779852 (Comments: 1) | Gabe1432 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks for the contributions. Some notes: * You dragged a tree (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12448312797) across the street and into a house outline. Please be careful. * Names should be expanded, not abbreviated (so Saint Philome... commented 2026-08-21 16:54:45 UTC by pwbriggs ♦520 |
| 186464123 (Comments: 4) | blumdrew (Discussed changesets: 2) | I see. Thought that might be a case of accidental autocompleting to "uncontrolled" in the crossing type field, or something like that, since these were mostly tagged with "crossing:markings=no" commented 2026-08-21 16:51:26 UTC by UW Maddie ♦34 |
| 187128735 (Comments: 4) | UW Maddie (Discussed changesets: 42) | Yes, that should work commented 2026-08-21 16:49:50 UTC by UW Maddie ♦34 |
| 187806650 (Comments: 1) | pesticides (Discussed changesets: 50) | To view WA DNR LIDAR imagery in iD: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/jake-low/diary/397224 commented 2026-08-21 16:44:06 UTC by pesticides ♦58 |
| 187790255 (Comments: 1) | Ahmed G Aboker (Discussed changesets: 1) | This changeset moves Cafe Aroma onto a POI node, and has nothing to do with Shoreline Auto Clinic. Since this edit doesn't match the changeset comment you left, I'm assuming it was a mistake and undoing the change. If you have a good reason... commented 2026-08-21 16:39:51 UTC by pwbriggs ♦520 |
| 187589525 (Comments: 1) | ntableman (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello! What is the mean of the tag DNR Name = BE-1? commented 2026-08-21 16:31:32 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,942 |
| 187610832 (Comments: 2) | Ubiquity60441 (Discussed changesets: 2) | I had done the above, setting access to no, but mapping software still routed through this path. Sorry for attempting to correct the problem in an incorrect manner. Thank you for clarification. I have since created barricades at both ends where th... commented 2026-08-21 15:32:08 UTC by Ubiquity60441 ♦1 |
| 187773885 (Comments: 2) | Rgorman77 (Discussed changesets: 2) | I noticed that it is a little too much to the north. I will move it down to the south were it is more in between the roads. that is where the fence is and the location of the pole. I have an image of it. commented 2026-08-21 14:52:17 UTC by Rgorman77 ♦1 |
| 187446003 (Comments: 6) | devemporer (Discussed changesets: 5) | that's all i'm going to touch in about for now commented 2026-08-21 14:41:34 UTC by devemporer ♦5 |
| 187793117 (Comments: 2) | devemporer (Discussed changesets: 5) | good to know about the slack discussion thanks commented 2026-08-21 14:40:10 UTC by devemporer ♦5 |
| 187777713 (Comments: 1) | dillmichael395 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Is this flock camera really in the middle of the parking lot, or is it monitoring one of the entrances? commented 2026-08-21 14:23:37 UTC by JuanElDemografo ♦59 |
| 187794527 (Comments: 1) | wcedmisten (Discussed changesets: 14) | thank you, happy mapping, Udar. commented 2026-08-21 14:14:04 UTC by Udarian ♦992 |
| 187768716 (Comments: 1) | mangeface (Discussed changesets: 2) | This got added in the middle of an intersection, please adjust location for accuracy. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/187768716 commented 2026-08-21 13:44:30 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,623 |
| 187768928 (Comments: 1) | mangeface (Discussed changesets: 2) | This got added in the middle of an intersection, please adjust location for accuracy. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/187768928 commented 2026-08-21 13:44:21 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,623 |
| 187773873 (Comments: 1) | Rgorman77 (Discussed changesets: 2) | This appears to be in the tire track of a farmer's driveway, not someplace a camera could be. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/187773873 commented 2026-08-21 13:43:37 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,623 |
| 187793405 (Comments: 1) | neemem (Discussed changesets: 4) | This got added almost exactly to the dead center of an intersection, where it's highly unlikely anything could be erected. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changese... commented 2026-08-21 13:42:05 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,623 |
| 187793450 (Comments: 1) | neemem (Discussed changesets: 4) | This got added almost exactly to the dead center of an intersection, where it's highly unlikely anything could be erected. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changese... commented 2026-08-21 13:42:00 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,623 |
| 187793463 (Comments: 1) | neemem (Discussed changesets: 4) | This got added almost exactly to the dead center of an intersection, where it's highly unlikely anything could be erected. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/187793463 ... commented 2026-08-21 13:41:52 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,623 |
| 187793486 (Comments: 1) | neemem (Discussed changesets: 4) | This got added almost exactly to the dead center of an intersection, where it's highly unlikely anything could be erected. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changese... commented 2026-08-21 13:41:44 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,623 |
| 187669449 (Comments: 2) | wcedmisten (Discussed changesets: 14) | I don't recall deleting that tag directly, it may be a bug with the ID editor when I switched the feature type. Restored in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187794527 commented 2026-08-21 12:46:36 UTC by wcedmisten ♦13 |
| 187716920 (Comments: 1) | Smwesigwa (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187789901 commented 2026-08-21 11:10:36 UTC by rajdhani ♦642 |
| 187668634 (Comments: 4) | Dennis Bratland (Discussed changesets: 1) | There was a second bogus one in the general area, at a nondescript house. All I can guess is someone is including Ring cameras. Or weirdly thinks it's funny. They stand out because the legitimate cameras are all in very high traffic locations. commented 2026-08-21 10:38:46 UTC by Dennis Bratland ♦1 |
| 155776963 (Comments: 1) | royalchessmall53 (Discussed changesets: 1) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. See https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers for mo... commented 2026-08-21 09:11:39 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 168788184 (Comments: 1) | AlexWinter87 (Discussed changesets: 1) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. See https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers for mo... commented 2026-08-21 09:06:42 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 169800349 (Comments: 1) | ebonyblossom (Discussed changesets: 1) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. See https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers for mo... commented 2026-08-21 09:06:38 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 183156295 (Comments: 1) | MikeM44 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hello! You used sport=tether ball on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1521350873/history Have you maybe meant sport=tetherball ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited so... commented 2026-08-21 08:35:05 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,339 |
| 176406312 (Comments: 1) | rldmort (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello! You used sidewalk:left=seaparate on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/960965157/history Have you maybe meant sidewalk:left=separate ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (... commented 2026-08-21 08:24:31 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,339 |
| 187716534 (Comments: 1) | tylerbiz (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187781210 commented 2026-08-21 08:24:08 UTC by ajmat ♦666 |
| 180397458 (Comments: 1) | PedestrianMapping_DarkVector (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! You used sidewalk:right=right on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/566302082/history Have you maybe meant sidewalk:right=yes ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edite... commented 2026-08-21 08:23:51 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,339 |
| 177202947 (Comments: 1) | PedestrianMapping_VectorRelay (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hello! You used sidewalk:right=right on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/208017616/history Have you maybe meant sidewalk:right=yes ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edite... commented 2026-08-21 08:23:47 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,339 |
| 170810118 (Comments: 1) | PedestrianMapping_StealthMapper (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hello! You used sidewalk:both=both on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/50033058/history Have you maybe meant sidewalk:both=yes ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited so... commented 2026-08-21 08:23:03 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,339 |
| 178970246 (Comments: 1) | PedestrianMapping_EchoRoute (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! You used sidewalk:both=both on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/624866135/history Have you maybe meant sidewalk:both=yes ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited s... commented 2026-08-21 08:23:00 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,339 |
| 179785300 (Comments: 1) | PedestrianMapping_GridBypass (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello! You used sidewalk:both=both on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/165549539/history Have you maybe meant sidewalk:both=yes ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited s... commented 2026-08-21 08:22:57 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,339 |
| 187716626 (Comments: 1) | BoruAr (Discussed changesets: 3) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187780758 commented 2026-08-21 08:12:31 UTC by ajmat ♦666 |
| 181827996 (Comments: 1) | mapbluey22 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! You used cuisine=coffee_shop, on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/525076472/history Have you maybe meant cuisine=coffee_shop ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edit... commented 2026-08-21 08:12:01 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,339 |
| 156435528 (Comments: 1) | medicusnm (Discussed changesets: 1) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-08-21 08:04:23 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 187677235 (Comments: 1) | Mastercarefloors (Discussed changesets: 1) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-08-21 07:57:07 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 187669142 (Comments: 1) | SasanNamiranian (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187778226 commented 2026-08-21 07:24:25 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,271 |
| 187716541 (Comments: 1) | CthonicStyx (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187777165 commented 2026-08-21 07:23:57 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,271 |
| 187680293 (Comments: 1) | AgileMaster (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187776005 commented 2026-08-21 07:21:44 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,271 |
| 187775162 (Comments: 1) | Johnk910 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Looks like you dragged a road out of position with https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1732788662. I fixed it. Please be careful. Also, you updated the main name=* but not the language-specific names that are now presumably outdated. I fixed th... commented 2026-08-21 06:28:57 UTC by pwbriggs ♦520 |
| 187777167 (Comments: 1) | pwbriggs (Discussed changesets: 31) | Don't know how I ended up editing note=* here. Maybe a bug in the tags editor. commented 2026-08-21 06:26:01 UTC by pwbriggs ♦520 |
| 187775006 (Comments: 1) | UWStudent101 (Discussed changesets: 3) | This applies to all your edits: I don't think reg_name=* should have quotes around it? I'm not super familiar with that tag though. commented 2026-08-21 06:21:31 UTC by pwbriggs ♦520 |
| 187775200 (Comments: 1) | UWStudent101 (Discussed changesets: 3) | More quick notes: * phone number should be formatted with all dashes like +1-425-452-6885 * opening_hours = Mo-Su 06:00-23:00 Let me know if you have questions! commented 2026-08-21 06:17:49 UTC by pwbriggs ♦520 |
| 187776135 (Comments: 1) | UWStudent101 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi, I have a couple review notes: * Looks like you accidentally dragged an address node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12063754760 about 283 meters north of where it was. Please move it back, or let me know so I can try to do it. * ... commented 2026-08-21 06:14:57 UTC by pwbriggs ♦520 |
| 187776097 (Comments: 1) | RSA_61 (Discussed changesets: 3) | And the same comments one more time: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187775781#c1647344 Don't worry, I know you're new to this - you're doing great and I hope you've enjoyed OpenStreetMap so far :) commented 2026-08-21 06:10:01 UTC by pwbriggs ♦520 |
| 187775990 (Comments: 1) | RSA_61 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Thanks for the edits. The same notes apply here as in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187775781#c1647344 - please address those for both changesets, or let me know and I can clean up the changes myself. Thanks for the contributions! commented 2026-08-21 06:08:46 UTC by pwbriggs ♦520 |
| 187775781 (Comments: 1) | RSA_61 (Discussed changesets: 3) | A couple of notes: * address should be split into the separate fields street, housenumber, unit number, etc. * names are always expanded, never abbreviated. So instead of 104th Ave it would be 104th Avenue, etc. This is because it'... commented 2026-08-21 06:07:23 UTC by pwbriggs ♦520 |
| 187774682 (Comments: 1) | JOJOLOVESMAPS (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks for the contributions. I've seen some of your classmates' edits too today. I'll be brief in my review because I want to get eyes on everyone's edits: * the mcdonalds was already mapped as just a point at https://www.... commented 2026-08-21 05:58:51 UTC by pwbriggs ♦520 |
| 187772997 (Comments: 1) | Misgana2004 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks. Usually buildings should be "squared up" by pressing Q on the keyboard with the building selected: this will make the corners into right angles. Let me know if you have questions about this. commented 2026-08-21 05:52:15 UTC by pwbriggs ♦520 |
| 187768608 (Comments: 1) | stefanomcipolla (Discussed changesets: 3) | Same comments apply as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187767502#c1647331 The OpenStreetMap wiki is a great place to learn about how to use each tag, see https://osm.wiki/ for more info Thanks! commented 2026-08-21 05:49:40 UTC by pwbriggs ♦520 |
| 187768334 (Comments: 1) | stefanomcipolla (Discussed changesets: 3) | Same comments apply as in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187767502#c1647331 commented 2026-08-21 05:48:36 UTC by pwbriggs ♦520 |
| 187767502 (Comments: 1) | stefanomcipolla (Discussed changesets: 3) | Thanks. If you're doing this as some kind of class, I've seen a lot of your classmates in other areas as well. My main feedback on your edits is that opening_hours=* and phone=* both have specific formats to help ensure that they... commented 2026-08-21 05:47:32 UTC by pwbriggs ♦520 |
| 187767327 (Comments: 1) | Diana Bedolla (Discussed changesets: 3) | It seems you dragged a node out of position in this edit too. I cleaned it up; please be careful. commented 2026-08-21 05:11:13 UTC by pwbriggs ♦520 |
| 187713658 (Comments: 1) | Kirby523 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187775148 commented 2026-08-21 05:11:08 UTC by rajdhani ♦642 |
| 187734464 (Comments: 2) | Chloe Chung (Discussed changesets: 2) | Officially, the summer quarter is from June to August. However, the dining hall serves conference guests during the summer from June to September with the summer hours I mentioned. Thanks for reviewing! commented 2026-08-21 05:03:49 UTC by Chloe Chung ♦2 |
| 187767561 (Comments: 1) | Diana Bedolla (Discussed changesets: 3) | Looks like you accidentally dragged a road around and made a bit of a mess. I cleaned it up. Please be more careful in the future, and check the list of modified objects before you upload changes. Thanks! commented 2026-08-21 05:03:44 UTC by pwbriggs ♦520 |
| 187767710 (Comments: 1) | Diana Bedolla (Discussed changesets: 3) | What is here now? A vacant storefront? Something new? commented 2026-08-21 04:57:11 UTC by pwbriggs ♦520 |
| 187774372 (Comments: 2) | lolcallyyearner (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, Thank you for reaching out and for correcting the edit. I am doing this for an assignment, so please feel free to edit or fix any mistakes I may have made. Thank you again for your help. commented 2026-08-21 04:54:56 UTC by lolcallyyearner ♦1 |
| 187771298 (Comments: 1) | oatmealflowers (Discussed changesets: 1) | The comment you added here does not match the edit you made. I'm assuming the edit was a mistake and reverting it. Let me know if that's not the case. Thanks! commented 2026-08-21 04:53:30 UTC by pwbriggs ♦520 |
| 187771454 (Comments: 1) | Elham Abdo (Discussed changesets: 1) | Looks like you accidentally incorrectly changed the name of a road, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/6463782. I'll undo it, but please be careful in the future. commented 2026-08-21 04:48:41 UTC by pwbriggs ♦520 |
| 187759590 (Comments: 1) | sproutbean (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, Why did you change the name of the West Seattle Neighborhood Greenway bike route (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/16703384)? commented 2026-08-21 04:15:09 UTC by pwbriggs ♦520 |
| 187758395 (Comments: 1) | samcas (Discussed changesets: 1) | Yeah, sometimes that happens especially in rural areas or places where there isn't a lot of data available from the local government about building outlines. Good catch! Often buildings are composed of rectangular parts, so we try to &quo... commented 2026-08-21 03:45:37 UTC by pwbriggs ♦520 |
| 187763107 (Comments: 1) | 19242589 (Discussed changesets: 3) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-08-21 03:19:05 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 187717623 (Comments: 6) | Baloo Uriza (Discussed changesets: 114) | Then look at the rest of OpenStreetMap then. Every major airport, including the ones I sent you earlier, use a "/" in the runway reference tag. They are not using this as a value separator. The name of the runway is literally "09/27&qu... commented 2026-08-21 03:18:50 UTC by EdenEBarnes ♦1 |
| 184997785 (Comments: 1) | 19242589 (Discussed changesets: 3) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-08-21 03:18:36 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 174532641 (Comments: 1) | 19242589 (Discussed changesets: 3) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-08-21 03:18:28 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 187769240 (Comments: 1) | GH cHOICE (Discussed changesets: 4) | You are still adding incorrect tagging, including invalid: - addr:street=* (same mistake as previous changesets) - building=* tag (building=garage is a single residential garage, not a car repair shop) - category=* is not a valid tag and... commented 2026-08-21 02:43:43 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 187769153 (Comments: 1) | GH cHOICE (Discussed changesets: 4) | It seems you repeated some mistakes from previous changesets, plus added new ones, including invalid addr:housenumber=*, addr:street=* (same mistake as before), addr:state=*, name=*, brand=* and top-level tag. Also, a body shop by definition p... commented 2026-08-21 02:36:08 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 187768408 (Comments: 1) | GH cHOICE (Discussed changesets: 4) | As of now the linked website=* is nothing but an blank Wordpress template with no actual content. commented 2026-08-21 02:26:45 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 172779275 (Comments: 3) | Trevino Injury Law 18 Wheeler Truck Accident Lawyer (Discussed changesets: 1) | As an account mapping on behalf of a commercial business for financial gain, please be advised that you are expected to understand and carefully follow documented OpenStreetMap standards and conventions, which will both directly benefit the quali... commented 2026-08-21 02:01:01 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 186578663 (Comments: 1) | C2 Education of Jupiter (Discussed changesets: 1) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is not allowed on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account; see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers for more infor... commented 2026-08-21 01:19:33 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 187494485 (Comments: 1) | jmsmucker (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi jmsmucker, The combination of tags you've used here (and a few other similar changesets) of highway=construction and access=destination doesn't really make sense, as according to the wiki page, highway=construction is for roads th... commented 2026-08-21 00:43:58 UTC by dknelson9876 ♦166 |
| 187768795 (Comments: 1) | woodpeck (Discussed changesets: 148) | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 187633820, 187633837, 187633864, 187633874, 187633885, 187633907, 187633926, 187633939, 187633977, 187634009, 187668011, 187668018, 187684784, 187684805, 187684835, 187684854, 187684863, 187... commented 2026-08-20 22:46:09 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187684784 (Comments: 1) | Flock6791 (Discussed changesets: 33) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187768795 where the changeset comment is: revert more fictional flock cameras in Longview commented 2026-08-20 22:46:09 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187736078 (Comments: 1) | Flock6791 (Discussed changesets: 33) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187768795 where the changeset comment is: revert more fictional flock cameras in Longview commented 2026-08-20 22:46:09 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187735999 (Comments: 1) | Flock6791 (Discussed changesets: 33) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187768795 where the changeset comment is: revert more fictional flock cameras in Longview commented 2026-08-20 22:46:08 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187684929 (Comments: 1) | Flock6791 (Discussed changesets: 33) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187768795 where the changeset comment is: revert more fictional flock cameras in Longview commented 2026-08-20 22:46:08 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187668011 (Comments: 1) | Flock6791 (Discussed changesets: 33) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187768795 where the changeset comment is: revert more fictional flock cameras in Longview commented 2026-08-20 22:46:08 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187634009 (Comments: 1) | Flock6791 (Discussed changesets: 33) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187768795 where the changeset comment is: revert more fictional flock cameras in Longview commented 2026-08-20 22:46:08 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187633926 (Comments: 1) | Flock6791 (Discussed changesets: 33) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187768795 where the changeset comment is: revert more fictional flock cameras in Longview commented 2026-08-20 22:46:08 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187633874 (Comments: 1) | Flock6791 (Discussed changesets: 33) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187768795 where the changeset comment is: revert more fictional flock cameras in Longview commented 2026-08-20 22:46:08 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187633820 (Comments: 1) | Flock6791 (Discussed changesets: 33) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187768795 where the changeset comment is: revert more fictional flock cameras in Longview commented 2026-08-20 22:46:08 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187684854 (Comments: 1) | Flock6791 (Discussed changesets: 33) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187768795 where the changeset comment is: revert more fictional flock cameras in Longview commented 2026-08-20 22:46:07 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187668018 (Comments: 1) | Flock6791 (Discussed changesets: 33) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187768795 where the changeset comment is: revert more fictional flock cameras in Longview commented 2026-08-20 22:46:07 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187736023 (Comments: 1) | Flock6791 (Discussed changesets: 33) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187768795 where the changeset comment is: revert more fictional flock cameras in Longview commented 2026-08-20 22:46:07 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187735986 (Comments: 1) | Flock6791 (Discussed changesets: 33) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187768795 where the changeset comment is: revert more fictional flock cameras in Longview commented 2026-08-20 22:46:07 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187684835 (Comments: 1) | Flock6791 (Discussed changesets: 33) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187768795 where the changeset comment is: revert more fictional flock cameras in Longview commented 2026-08-20 22:46:07 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187736046 (Comments: 1) | Flock6791 (Discussed changesets: 33) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187768795 where the changeset comment is: revert more fictional flock cameras in Longview commented 2026-08-20 22:46:07 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187633977 (Comments: 1) | Flock6791 (Discussed changesets: 33) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187768795 where the changeset comment is: revert more fictional flock cameras in Longview commented 2026-08-20 22:46:06 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187735962 (Comments: 1) | Flock6791 (Discussed changesets: 33) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187768795 where the changeset comment is: revert more fictional flock cameras in Longview commented 2026-08-20 22:46:06 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187736050 (Comments: 1) | Flock6791 (Discussed changesets: 33) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187768795 where the changeset comment is: revert more fictional flock cameras in Longview commented 2026-08-20 22:46:06 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187684805 (Comments: 1) | Flock6791 (Discussed changesets: 33) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187768795 where the changeset comment is: revert more fictional flock cameras in Longview commented 2026-08-20 22:46:06 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187633837 (Comments: 1) | Flock6791 (Discussed changesets: 33) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187768795 where the changeset comment is: revert more fictional flock cameras in Longview commented 2026-08-20 22:46:06 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187633885 (Comments: 1) | Flock6791 (Discussed changesets: 33) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187768795 where the changeset comment is: revert more fictional flock cameras in Longview commented 2026-08-20 22:46:06 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187633907 (Comments: 1) | Flock6791 (Discussed changesets: 33) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187768795 where the changeset comment is: revert more fictional flock cameras in Longview commented 2026-08-20 22:46:06 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187684874 (Comments: 1) | Flock6791 (Discussed changesets: 33) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187768795 where the changeset comment is: revert more fictional flock cameras in Longview commented 2026-08-20 22:46:05 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187684897 (Comments: 1) | Flock6791 (Discussed changesets: 33) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187768795 where the changeset comment is: revert more fictional flock cameras in Longview commented 2026-08-20 22:46:05 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187633939 (Comments: 1) | Flock6791 (Discussed changesets: 33) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187768795 where the changeset comment is: revert more fictional flock cameras in Longview commented 2026-08-20 22:46:05 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187736032 (Comments: 1) | Flock6791 (Discussed changesets: 33) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187768795 where the changeset comment is: revert more fictional flock cameras in Longview commented 2026-08-20 22:46:05 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187684863 (Comments: 1) | Flock6791 (Discussed changesets: 33) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187768795 where the changeset comment is: revert more fictional flock cameras in Longview commented 2026-08-20 22:46:05 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187684943 (Comments: 1) | Flock6791 (Discussed changesets: 33) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187768795 where the changeset comment is: revert more fictional flock cameras in Longview commented 2026-08-20 22:46:04 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187736067 (Comments: 1) | Flock6791 (Discussed changesets: 33) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187768795 where the changeset comment is: revert more fictional flock cameras in Longview commented 2026-08-20 22:46:04 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187633864 (Comments: 1) | Flock6791 (Discussed changesets: 33) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187768795 where the changeset comment is: revert more fictional flock cameras in Longview commented 2026-08-20 22:46:04 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187684974 (Comments: 1) | Flock6791 (Discussed changesets: 33) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187768795 where the changeset comment is: revert more fictional flock cameras in Longview commented 2026-08-20 22:46:04 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187684963 (Comments: 1) | Flock6791 (Discussed changesets: 33) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187768795 where the changeset comment is: revert more fictional flock cameras in Longview commented 2026-08-20 22:46:04 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187684904 (Comments: 1) | Flock6791 (Discussed changesets: 33) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187768795 where the changeset comment is: revert more fictional flock cameras in Longview commented 2026-08-20 22:46:03 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187706717 (Comments: 1) | Dan Swartz (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi welcome to OSM. in this change set you did not delete a road, you removed a sidewalk that looks like its there on the ground. commented 2026-08-20 21:23:38 UTC by MassCartog ♦503 |
| 187763521 (Comments: 2) | pallindo (Discussed changesets: 5) | I've seen no signs that they are cycling only. Could totally run them. There are a couple more too, I just haven't traced em yet. commented 2026-08-20 20:29:50 UTC by pallindo ♦6 |
| 89800475 (Comments: 1) | Blanksy (Discussed changesets: 4) | Are you sure that the baseball field at Pilgrim park is actually a square? commented 2026-08-20 20:16:23 UTC by O1S ♦37 |
| 183502702 (Comments: 1) | bnickole (Discussed changesets: 1) | Howdy,\r \r The place this camera was moved to looks unlikely. If the camera is actually place there please respond here and let us know. commented 2026-08-20 19:53:01 UTC by alpacaMaps ♦431 |
| 187760833 (Comments: 1) | Great Expressions (Discussed changesets: 1) | In OSM it really matters how things are tagged, for OSM data to be useful it must have a tag describing what it is, in this case for a dental office it should be tagged with amenity=dentist + healthcare=dentist, see the OSM wiki for more details: htt... commented 2026-08-20 19:39:11 UTC by Udarian ♦992 |
| 187661749 (Comments: 6) | weblogdryads (Discussed changesets: 20) | Weblogdryads, You can open an issue for this on the Go Map to make this grievance heard (https://github.com/bryceco/GoMap), provided there is not an already opened similar issue. commented 2026-08-20 19:04:48 UTC by Loopslol7 ♦45 |
| 187752434 (Comments: 2) | woodpeck (Discussed changesets: 148) | Thanks Woodpeck. I reported these issues yesterday and wasn’t sure how or who would assist. I will continue to verify the existence of these cameras in Longview. I’m not sure why Flock6791 is logging these and removing the cameras that ar... commented 2026-08-20 19:01:56 UTC by Spamalert444 ♦2 |
| 187609935 (Comments: 1) | Chris Denomy (Discussed changesets: 31) | I've reverted this change. What you are doing is incorrect and I've explained this to you in the past. Please reach out so I can explain it further. Thanks. commented 2026-08-20 18:38:18 UTC by b-jazz ♦976 |
| 179099921 (Comments: 2) | UW Amy Bordenave (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi! I agree that Five Mile Drive seems like more than just a `highway=cycleway` (as it is tagged now). It also has `motor_vehicle=no`, but from imagery it appears to provides access to a small parking lot - so my instinct is that the most fitt... commented 2026-08-20 18:33:20 UTC by UW Amy Bordenave ♦5 |
| 183113215 (Comments: 1) | axstin (Discussed changesets: 2) | Howdy! \r \r I noticed some of your previous modifications have had to be reverted for their camera direction. Were these edited cameras turned around by a local hero, or did you just update them slightly incorrectly? \r \r If I'm mi... commented 2026-08-20 18:15:36 UTC by alpacaMaps ♦431 |
| 183113222 (Comments: 1) | axstin (Discussed changesets: 2) | Howdy! \r \r I noticed some of your previous modifications have had to be reverted for their camera direction. Were these edited cameras turned around by a local hero, or did you just update them slightly incorrectly? \r \r If I'm mi... commented 2026-08-20 18:15:35 UTC by alpacaMaps ♦431 |
| 187539632 (Comments: 1) | nbargolf (Discussed changesets: 4) | FYI, Fancy golf courses like Augusta name their holes something like "Tea Olive" for the first hole. For those courses, it is appropriate to use the "name" tag when mapping a course. But for the vast majority of courses out... commented 2026-08-20 17:56:48 UTC by b-jazz ♦976 |
| 187727853 (Comments: 1) | Brian'sPants (Discussed changesets: 4) | Very cool edit :) Thank you commented 2026-08-20 17:37:58 UTC by Loopslol7 ♦45 |
| 187719682 (Comments: 1) | FlockerMe (Discussed changesets: 29) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187752434 where the changeset comment is: revert bad-faith flock edits in Longview TX commented 2026-08-20 15:59:46 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187739064 (Comments: 1) | FlockerMe (Discussed changesets: 29) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187752434 where the changeset comment is: revert bad-faith flock edits in Longview TX commented 2026-08-20 15:59:45 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187736272 (Comments: 1) | Flock7465 (Discussed changesets: 11) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187752434 where the changeset comment is: revert bad-faith flock edits in Longview TX commented 2026-08-20 15:59:45 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187719750 (Comments: 1) | FlockerMe (Discussed changesets: 29) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187752434 where the changeset comment is: revert bad-faith flock edits in Longview TX commented 2026-08-20 15:59:45 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187719706 (Comments: 1) | FlockerMe (Discussed changesets: 29) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187752434 where the changeset comment is: revert bad-faith flock edits in Longview TX commented 2026-08-20 15:59:45 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187719655 (Comments: 1) | FlockerMe (Discussed changesets: 29) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187752434 where the changeset comment is: revert bad-faith flock edits in Longview TX commented 2026-08-20 15:59:45 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187736380 (Comments: 1) | Flock7465 (Discussed changesets: 11) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187752434 where the changeset comment is: revert bad-faith flock edits in Longview TX commented 2026-08-20 15:59:45 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187736593 (Comments: 1) | Flock7465 (Discussed changesets: 11) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187752434 where the changeset comment is: revert bad-faith flock edits in Longview TX commented 2026-08-20 15:59:45 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187710481 (Comments: 1) | FlockerMe (Discussed changesets: 29) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187752434 where the changeset comment is: revert bad-faith flock edits in Longview TX commented 2026-08-20 15:59:45 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187713034 (Comments: 1) | FlockerMe (Discussed changesets: 29) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187752434 where the changeset comment is: revert bad-faith flock edits in Longview TX commented 2026-08-20 15:59:44 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187739010 (Comments: 1) | FlockerMe (Discussed changesets: 29) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187752434 where the changeset comment is: revert bad-faith flock edits in Longview TX commented 2026-08-20 15:59:44 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187713023 (Comments: 1) | FlockerMe (Discussed changesets: 29) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187752434 where the changeset comment is: revert bad-faith flock edits in Longview TX commented 2026-08-20 15:59:44 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187719783 (Comments: 1) | FlockerMe (Discussed changesets: 29) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187752434 where the changeset comment is: revert bad-faith flock edits in Longview TX commented 2026-08-20 15:59:44 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187713313 (Comments: 1) | FlockerMe (Discussed changesets: 29) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187752434 where the changeset comment is: revert bad-faith flock edits in Longview TX commented 2026-08-20 15:59:44 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187719745 (Comments: 1) | FlockerMe (Discussed changesets: 29) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187752434 where the changeset comment is: revert bad-faith flock edits in Longview TX commented 2026-08-20 15:59:44 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187736212 (Comments: 1) | Flock7465 (Discussed changesets: 11) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187752434 where the changeset comment is: revert bad-faith flock edits in Longview TX commented 2026-08-20 15:59:43 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187738720 (Comments: 1) | FlockerMe (Discussed changesets: 29) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187752434 where the changeset comment is: revert bad-faith flock edits in Longview TX commented 2026-08-20 15:59:43 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187713219 (Comments: 1) | FlockerMe (Discussed changesets: 29) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187752434 where the changeset comment is: revert bad-faith flock edits in Longview TX commented 2026-08-20 15:59:43 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187713179 (Comments: 1) | FlockerMe (Discussed changesets: 29) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187752434 where the changeset comment is: revert bad-faith flock edits in Longview TX commented 2026-08-20 15:59:43 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187713265 (Comments: 1) | FlockerMe (Discussed changesets: 29) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187752434 where the changeset comment is: revert bad-faith flock edits in Longview TX commented 2026-08-20 15:59:43 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187719849 (Comments: 1) | FlockerMe (Discussed changesets: 29) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187752434 where the changeset comment is: revert bad-faith flock edits in Longview TX commented 2026-08-20 15:59:43 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187713163 (Comments: 1) | FlockerMe (Discussed changesets: 29) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187752434 where the changeset comment is: revert bad-faith flock edits in Longview TX commented 2026-08-20 15:59:43 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187611334 (Comments: 1) | Flock7465 (Discussed changesets: 11) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187752434 where the changeset comment is: revert bad-faith flock edits in Longview TX commented 2026-08-20 15:59:42 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187719662 (Comments: 1) | FlockerMe (Discussed changesets: 29) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187752434 where the changeset comment is: revert bad-faith flock edits in Longview TX commented 2026-08-20 15:59:42 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187719854 (Comments: 1) | FlockerMe (Discussed changesets: 29) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187752434 where the changeset comment is: revert bad-faith flock edits in Longview TX commented 2026-08-20 15:59:42 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187736502 (Comments: 1) | Flock7465 (Discussed changesets: 11) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187752434 where the changeset comment is: revert bad-faith flock edits in Longview TX commented 2026-08-20 15:59:42 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187736362 (Comments: 1) | Flock7465 (Discussed changesets: 11) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187752434 where the changeset comment is: revert bad-faith flock edits in Longview TX commented 2026-08-20 15:59:42 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187736442 (Comments: 1) | Flock7465 (Discussed changesets: 11) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187752434 where the changeset comment is: revert bad-faith flock edits in Longview TX commented 2026-08-20 15:59:42 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187719808 (Comments: 1) | FlockerMe (Discussed changesets: 29) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187752434 where the changeset comment is: revert bad-faith flock edits in Longview TX commented 2026-08-20 15:59:42 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187719935 (Comments: 1) | FlockerMe (Discussed changesets: 29) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187752434 where the changeset comment is: revert bad-faith flock edits in Longview TX commented 2026-08-20 15:59:42 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187719788 (Comments: 1) | FlockerMe (Discussed changesets: 29) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187752434 where the changeset comment is: revert bad-faith flock edits in Longview TX commented 2026-08-20 15:59:41 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187719719 (Comments: 1) | FlockerMe (Discussed changesets: 29) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187752434 where the changeset comment is: revert bad-faith flock edits in Longview TX commented 2026-08-20 15:59:41 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187738854 (Comments: 1) | FlockerMe (Discussed changesets: 29) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187752434 where the changeset comment is: revert bad-faith flock edits in Longview TX commented 2026-08-20 15:59:41 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187713538 (Comments: 1) | FlockerMe (Discussed changesets: 29) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187752434 where the changeset comment is: revert bad-faith flock edits in Longview TX commented 2026-08-20 15:59:41 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187739121 (Comments: 1) | FlockerMe (Discussed changesets: 29) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187752434 where the changeset comment is: revert bad-faith flock edits in Longview TX commented 2026-08-20 15:59:41 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187713457 (Comments: 1) | FlockerMe (Discussed changesets: 29) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187752434 where the changeset comment is: revert bad-faith flock edits in Longview TX commented 2026-08-20 15:59:41 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187738969 (Comments: 1) | FlockerMe (Discussed changesets: 29) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187752434 where the changeset comment is: revert bad-faith flock edits in Longview TX commented 2026-08-20 15:59:41 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187713273 (Comments: 1) | FlockerMe (Discussed changesets: 29) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187752434 where the changeset comment is: revert bad-faith flock edits in Longview TX commented 2026-08-20 15:59:41 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187713235 (Comments: 1) | FlockerMe (Discussed changesets: 29) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187752434 where the changeset comment is: revert bad-faith flock edits in Longview TX commented 2026-08-20 15:59:40 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187713188 (Comments: 1) | FlockerMe (Discussed changesets: 29) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187752434 where the changeset comment is: revert bad-faith flock edits in Longview TX commented 2026-08-20 15:59:40 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187739103 (Comments: 1) | FlockerMe (Discussed changesets: 29) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187752434 where the changeset comment is: revert bad-faith flock edits in Longview TX commented 2026-08-20 15:59:40 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187738866 (Comments: 1) | FlockerMe (Discussed changesets: 29) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187752434 where the changeset comment is: revert bad-faith flock edits in Longview TX commented 2026-08-20 15:59:40 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187719866 (Comments: 1) | FlockerMe (Discussed changesets: 29) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187752434 where the changeset comment is: revert bad-faith flock edits in Longview TX commented 2026-08-20 15:59:40 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187611310 (Comments: 1) | Flock7465 (Discussed changesets: 11) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187752434 where the changeset comment is: revert bad-faith flock edits in Longview TX commented 2026-08-20 15:59:40 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187736155 (Comments: 1) | Flock7465 (Discussed changesets: 11) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187752434 where the changeset comment is: revert bad-faith flock edits in Longview TX commented 2026-08-20 15:59:40 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187719735 (Comments: 1) | FlockerMe (Discussed changesets: 29) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187752434 where the changeset comment is: revert bad-faith flock edits in Longview TX commented 2026-08-20 15:59:40 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187713366 (Comments: 1) | FlockerMe (Discussed changesets: 29) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187752434 where the changeset comment is: revert bad-faith flock edits in Longview TX commented 2026-08-20 15:59:40 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187736558 (Comments: 1) | Flock7465 (Discussed changesets: 11) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187752434 where the changeset comment is: revert bad-faith flock edits in Longview TX commented 2026-08-20 15:59:39 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187720018 (Comments: 1) | FlockerMe (Discussed changesets: 29) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187752434 where the changeset comment is: revert bad-faith flock edits in Longview TX commented 2026-08-20 15:59:39 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187736201 (Comments: 1) | Flock7465 (Discussed changesets: 11) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187752434 where the changeset comment is: revert bad-faith flock edits in Longview TX commented 2026-08-20 15:59:39 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187719773 (Comments: 1) | FlockerMe (Discussed changesets: 29) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187752434 where the changeset comment is: revert bad-faith flock edits in Longview TX commented 2026-08-20 15:59:39 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187713421 (Comments: 1) | FlockerMe (Discussed changesets: 29) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187752434 where the changeset comment is: revert bad-faith flock edits in Longview TX commented 2026-08-20 15:59:39 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187710464 (Comments: 1) | FlockerMe (Discussed changesets: 29) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187752434 where the changeset comment is: revert bad-faith flock edits in Longview TX commented 2026-08-20 15:59:39 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187736570 (Comments: 1) | Flock7465 (Discussed changesets: 11) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187752434 where the changeset comment is: revert bad-faith flock edits in Longview TX commented 2026-08-20 15:59:39 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187719843 (Comments: 1) | FlockerMe (Discussed changesets: 29) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187752434 where the changeset comment is: revert bad-faith flock edits in Longview TX commented 2026-08-20 15:59:39 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187736689 (Comments: 1) | Flock7465 (Discussed changesets: 11) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187752434 where the changeset comment is: revert bad-faith flock edits in Longview TX commented 2026-08-20 15:59:38 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187736225 (Comments: 1) | Flock7465 (Discussed changesets: 11) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187752434 where the changeset comment is: revert bad-faith flock edits in Longview TX commented 2026-08-20 15:59:38 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187736337 (Comments: 1) | Flock7465 (Discussed changesets: 11) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187752434 where the changeset comment is: revert bad-faith flock edits in Longview TX commented 2026-08-20 15:59:38 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187611344 (Comments: 1) | Flock7465 (Discussed changesets: 11) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187752434 where the changeset comment is: revert bad-faith flock edits in Longview TX commented 2026-08-20 15:59:38 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187736464 (Comments: 1) | Flock7465 (Discussed changesets: 11) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187752434 where the changeset comment is: revert bad-faith flock edits in Longview TX commented 2026-08-20 15:59:38 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187713319 (Comments: 1) | FlockerMe (Discussed changesets: 29) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187752434 where the changeset comment is: revert bad-faith flock edits in Longview TX commented 2026-08-20 15:59:38 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187710358 (Comments: 1) | FlockerMe (Discussed changesets: 29) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187752434 where the changeset comment is: revert bad-faith flock edits in Longview TX commented 2026-08-20 15:59:38 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187713116 (Comments: 1) | FlockerMe (Discussed changesets: 29) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187752434 where the changeset comment is: revert bad-faith flock edits in Longview TX commented 2026-08-20 15:59:37 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187736584 (Comments: 1) | Flock7465 (Discussed changesets: 11) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187752434 where the changeset comment is: revert bad-faith flock edits in Longview TX commented 2026-08-20 15:59:37 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187611328 (Comments: 1) | Flock7465 (Discussed changesets: 11) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187752434 where the changeset comment is: revert bad-faith flock edits in Longview TX commented 2026-08-20 15:59:37 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187713136 (Comments: 1) | FlockerMe (Discussed changesets: 29) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187752434 where the changeset comment is: revert bad-faith flock edits in Longview TX commented 2026-08-20 15:59:37 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187713492 (Comments: 1) | FlockerMe (Discussed changesets: 29) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187752434 where the changeset comment is: revert bad-faith flock edits in Longview TX commented 2026-08-20 15:59:37 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187736317 (Comments: 1) | Flock7465 (Discussed changesets: 11) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187752434 where the changeset comment is: revert bad-faith flock edits in Longview TX commented 2026-08-20 15:59:37 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187738990 (Comments: 1) | FlockerMe (Discussed changesets: 29) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187752434 where the changeset comment is: revert bad-faith flock edits in Longview TX commented 2026-08-20 15:59:37 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187739023 (Comments: 1) | FlockerMe (Discussed changesets: 29) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187752434 where the changeset comment is: revert bad-faith flock edits in Longview TX commented 2026-08-20 15:59:36 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187738912 (Comments: 1) | FlockerMe (Discussed changesets: 29) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187752434 where the changeset comment is: revert bad-faith flock edits in Longview TX commented 2026-08-20 15:59:36 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187738844 (Comments: 1) | FlockerMe (Discussed changesets: 29) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187752434 where the changeset comment is: revert bad-faith flock edits in Longview TX commented 2026-08-20 15:59:36 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187719762 (Comments: 1) | FlockerMe (Discussed changesets: 29) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187752434 where the changeset comment is: revert bad-faith flock edits in Longview TX commented 2026-08-20 15:59:36 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187738820 (Comments: 1) | FlockerMe (Discussed changesets: 29) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187752434 where the changeset comment is: revert bad-faith flock edits in Longview TX commented 2026-08-20 15:59:36 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187713174 (Comments: 1) | FlockerMe (Discussed changesets: 29) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187752434 where the changeset comment is: revert bad-faith flock edits in Longview TX commented 2026-08-20 15:59:36 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187719665 (Comments: 1) | FlockerMe (Discussed changesets: 29) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187752434 where the changeset comment is: revert bad-faith flock edits in Longview TX commented 2026-08-20 15:59:35 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187713200 (Comments: 1) | FlockerMe (Discussed changesets: 29) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187752434 where the changeset comment is: revert bad-faith flock edits in Longview TX commented 2026-08-20 15:59:35 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187713256 (Comments: 1) | FlockerMe (Discussed changesets: 29) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187752434 where the changeset comment is: revert bad-faith flock edits in Longview TX commented 2026-08-20 15:59:35 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187713051 (Comments: 1) | FlockerMe (Discussed changesets: 29) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187752434 where the changeset comment is: revert bad-faith flock edits in Longview TX commented 2026-08-20 15:59:35 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187710366 (Comments: 1) | FlockerMe (Discussed changesets: 29) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187752434 where the changeset comment is: revert bad-faith flock edits in Longview TX commented 2026-08-20 15:59:35 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187710345 (Comments: 1) | FlockerMe (Discussed changesets: 29) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187752434 where the changeset comment is: revert bad-faith flock edits in Longview TX commented 2026-08-20 15:59:35 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187713599 (Comments: 1) | FlockerMe (Discussed changesets: 29) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187752434 where the changeset comment is: revert bad-faith flock edits in Longview TX commented 2026-08-20 15:59:35 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187713528 (Comments: 1) | FlockerMe (Discussed changesets: 29) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187752434 where the changeset comment is: revert bad-faith flock edits in Longview TX commented 2026-08-20 15:59:35 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187710446 (Comments: 1) | FlockerMe (Discussed changesets: 29) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187752434 where the changeset comment is: revert bad-faith flock edits in Longview TX commented 2026-08-20 15:59:34 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187738904 (Comments: 1) | FlockerMe (Discussed changesets: 29) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187752434 where the changeset comment is: revert bad-faith flock edits in Longview TX commented 2026-08-20 15:59:34 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187736485 (Comments: 1) | Flock7465 (Discussed changesets: 11) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187752434 where the changeset comment is: revert bad-faith flock edits in Longview TX commented 2026-08-20 15:59:34 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187719697 (Comments: 1) | FlockerMe (Discussed changesets: 29) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187752434 where the changeset comment is: revert bad-faith flock edits in Longview TX commented 2026-08-20 15:59:34 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187719714 (Comments: 1) | FlockerMe (Discussed changesets: 29) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187752434 where the changeset comment is: revert bad-faith flock edits in Longview TX commented 2026-08-20 15:59:34 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187738884 (Comments: 1) | FlockerMe (Discussed changesets: 29) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187752434 where the changeset comment is: revert bad-faith flock edits in Longview TX commented 2026-08-20 15:59:34 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187736149 (Comments: 1) | Flock7465 (Discussed changesets: 11) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187752434 where the changeset comment is: revert bad-faith flock edits in Longview TX commented 2026-08-20 15:59:34 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187713018 (Comments: 1) | FlockerMe (Discussed changesets: 29) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187752434 where the changeset comment is: revert bad-faith flock edits in Longview TX commented 2026-08-20 15:59:34 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187736248 (Comments: 1) | Flock7465 (Discussed changesets: 11) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187752434 where the changeset comment is: revert bad-faith flock edits in Longview TX commented 2026-08-20 15:59:33 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187736133 (Comments: 1) | Flock7465 (Discussed changesets: 11) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187752434 where the changeset comment is: revert bad-faith flock edits in Longview TX commented 2026-08-20 15:59:33 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187719793 (Comments: 1) | FlockerMe (Discussed changesets: 29) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187752434 where the changeset comment is: revert bad-faith flock edits in Longview TX commented 2026-08-20 15:59:33 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187736306 (Comments: 1) | Flock7465 (Discussed changesets: 11) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187752434 where the changeset comment is: revert bad-faith flock edits in Longview TX commented 2026-08-20 15:59:33 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187713444 (Comments: 1) | FlockerMe (Discussed changesets: 29) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187752434 where the changeset comment is: revert bad-faith flock edits in Longview TX commented 2026-08-20 15:59:33 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187738793 (Comments: 1) | FlockerMe (Discussed changesets: 29) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187752434 where the changeset comment is: revert bad-faith flock edits in Longview TX commented 2026-08-20 15:59:33 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187720012 (Comments: 1) | FlockerMe (Discussed changesets: 29) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187752434 where the changeset comment is: revert bad-faith flock edits in Longview TX commented 2026-08-20 15:59:33 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187736169 (Comments: 1) | Flock7465 (Discussed changesets: 11) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187752434 where the changeset comment is: revert bad-faith flock edits in Longview TX commented 2026-08-20 15:59:32 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187719858 (Comments: 1) | FlockerMe (Discussed changesets: 29) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187752434 where the changeset comment is: revert bad-faith flock edits in Longview TX commented 2026-08-20 15:59:32 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187719726 (Comments: 1) | FlockerMe (Discussed changesets: 29) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187752434 where the changeset comment is: revert bad-faith flock edits in Longview TX commented 2026-08-20 15:59:32 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187738810 (Comments: 1) | FlockerMe (Discussed changesets: 29) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187752434 where the changeset comment is: revert bad-faith flock edits in Longview TX commented 2026-08-20 15:59:32 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187719767 (Comments: 1) | FlockerMe (Discussed changesets: 29) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187752434 where the changeset comment is: revert bad-faith flock edits in Longview TX commented 2026-08-20 15:59:32 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187738780 (Comments: 1) | FlockerMe (Discussed changesets: 29) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187752434 where the changeset comment is: revert bad-faith flock edits in Longview TX commented 2026-08-20 15:59:32 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187719832 (Comments: 1) | FlockerMe (Discussed changesets: 29) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187752434 where the changeset comment is: revert bad-faith flock edits in Longview TX commented 2026-08-20 15:59:32 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187713329 (Comments: 1) | FlockerMe (Discussed changesets: 29) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187752434 where the changeset comment is: revert bad-faith flock edits in Longview TX commented 2026-08-20 15:59:31 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187739048 (Comments: 1) | FlockerMe (Discussed changesets: 29) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187752434 where the changeset comment is: revert bad-faith flock edits in Longview TX commented 2026-08-20 15:59:31 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187720010 (Comments: 1) | FlockerMe (Discussed changesets: 29) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187752434 where the changeset comment is: revert bad-faith flock edits in Longview TX commented 2026-08-20 15:59:31 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187713280 (Comments: 1) | FlockerMe (Discussed changesets: 29) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187752434 where the changeset comment is: revert bad-faith flock edits in Longview TX commented 2026-08-20 15:59:31 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187719678 (Comments: 1) | FlockerMe (Discussed changesets: 29) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187752434 where the changeset comment is: revert bad-faith flock edits in Longview TX commented 2026-08-20 15:59:31 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187713153 (Comments: 1) | FlockerMe (Discussed changesets: 29) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187752434 where the changeset comment is: revert bad-faith flock edits in Longview TX commented 2026-08-20 15:59:31 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187736288 (Comments: 1) | Flock7465 (Discussed changesets: 11) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187752434 where the changeset comment is: revert bad-faith flock edits in Longview TX commented 2026-08-20 15:59:31 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187736257 (Comments: 1) | Flock7465 (Discussed changesets: 11) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187752434 where the changeset comment is: revert bad-faith flock edits in Longview TX commented 2026-08-20 15:59:30 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187738829 (Comments: 1) | FlockerMe (Discussed changesets: 29) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187752434 where the changeset comment is: revert bad-faith flock edits in Longview TX commented 2026-08-20 15:59:30 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187719741 (Comments: 1) | FlockerMe (Discussed changesets: 29) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187752434 where the changeset comment is: revert bad-faith flock edits in Longview TX commented 2026-08-20 15:59:30 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187736653 (Comments: 1) | Flock7465 (Discussed changesets: 11) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187752434 where the changeset comment is: revert bad-faith flock edits in Longview TX commented 2026-08-20 15:59:30 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187719651 (Comments: 1) | FlockerMe (Discussed changesets: 29) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187752434 where the changeset comment is: revert bad-faith flock edits in Longview TX commented 2026-08-20 15:59:30 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187736343 (Comments: 1) | Flock7465 (Discussed changesets: 11) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187752434 where the changeset comment is: revert bad-faith flock edits in Longview TX commented 2026-08-20 15:59:30 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187713128 (Comments: 1) | FlockerMe (Discussed changesets: 29) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187752434 where the changeset comment is: revert bad-faith flock edits in Longview TX commented 2026-08-20 15:59:30 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187633648 (Comments: 1) | Flock7465 (Discussed changesets: 11) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187752434 where the changeset comment is: revert bad-faith flock edits in Longview TX commented 2026-08-20 15:59:29 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187719856 (Comments: 1) | FlockerMe (Discussed changesets: 29) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187752434 where the changeset comment is: revert bad-faith flock edits in Longview TX commented 2026-08-20 15:59:29 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187719814 (Comments: 1) | FlockerMe (Discussed changesets: 29) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187752434 where the changeset comment is: revert bad-faith flock edits in Longview TX commented 2026-08-20 15:59:29 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187719799 (Comments: 1) | FlockerMe (Discussed changesets: 29) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187752434 where the changeset comment is: revert bad-faith flock edits in Longview TX commented 2026-08-20 15:59:29 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187719861 (Comments: 1) | FlockerMe (Discussed changesets: 29) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187752434 where the changeset comment is: revert bad-faith flock edits in Longview TX commented 2026-08-20 15:59:29 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187719668 (Comments: 1) | FlockerMe (Discussed changesets: 29) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187752434 where the changeset comment is: revert bad-faith flock edits in Longview TX commented 2026-08-20 15:59:29 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187720023 (Comments: 1) | FlockerMe (Discussed changesets: 29) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187752434 where the changeset comment is: revert bad-faith flock edits in Longview TX commented 2026-08-20 15:59:29 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187713502 (Comments: 1) | FlockerMe (Discussed changesets: 29) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187752434 where the changeset comment is: revert bad-faith flock edits in Longview TX commented 2026-08-20 15:59:28 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187719669 (Comments: 1) | FlockerMe (Discussed changesets: 29) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187752434 where the changeset comment is: revert bad-faith flock edits in Longview TX commented 2026-08-20 15:59:28 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187719689 (Comments: 1) | FlockerMe (Discussed changesets: 29) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187752434 where the changeset comment is: revert bad-faith flock edits in Longview TX commented 2026-08-20 15:59:28 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187738940 (Comments: 1) | FlockerMe (Discussed changesets: 29) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187752434 where the changeset comment is: revert bad-faith flock edits in Longview TX commented 2026-08-20 15:59:28 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187611291 (Comments: 1) | Flock7465 (Discussed changesets: 11) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187752434 where the changeset comment is: revert bad-faith flock edits in Longview TX commented 2026-08-20 15:59:28 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187736376 (Comments: 1) | Flock7465 (Discussed changesets: 11) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187752434 where the changeset comment is: revert bad-faith flock edits in Longview TX commented 2026-08-20 15:59:28 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187738947 (Comments: 1) | FlockerMe (Discussed changesets: 29) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187752434 where the changeset comment is: revert bad-faith flock edits in Longview TX commented 2026-08-20 15:59:27 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187736178 (Comments: 1) | Flock7465 (Discussed changesets: 11) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187752434 where the changeset comment is: revert bad-faith flock edits in Longview TX commented 2026-08-20 15:59:27 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187736671 (Comments: 1) | Flock7465 (Discussed changesets: 11) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187752434 where the changeset comment is: revert bad-faith flock edits in Longview TX commented 2026-08-20 15:59:27 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187719758 (Comments: 1) | FlockerMe (Discussed changesets: 29) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187752434 where the changeset comment is: revert bad-faith flock edits in Longview TX commented 2026-08-20 15:59:27 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187739078 (Comments: 1) | FlockerMe (Discussed changesets: 29) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187752434 where the changeset comment is: revert bad-faith flock edits in Longview TX commented 2026-08-20 15:59:27 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187713434 (Comments: 1) | FlockerMe (Discussed changesets: 29) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187752434 where the changeset comment is: revert bad-faith flock edits in Longview TX commented 2026-08-20 15:59:27 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187713582 (Comments: 1) | FlockerMe (Discussed changesets: 29) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187752434 where the changeset comment is: revert bad-faith flock edits in Longview TX commented 2026-08-20 15:59:27 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187736191 (Comments: 1) | Flock7465 (Discussed changesets: 11) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187752434 where the changeset comment is: revert bad-faith flock edits in Longview TX commented 2026-08-20 15:59:26 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187713402 (Comments: 1) | FlockerMe (Discussed changesets: 29) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187752434 where the changeset comment is: revert bad-faith flock edits in Longview TX commented 2026-08-20 15:59:26 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187713307 (Comments: 1) | FlockerMe (Discussed changesets: 29) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187752434 where the changeset comment is: revert bad-faith flock edits in Longview TX commented 2026-08-20 15:59:26 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187739091 (Comments: 1) | FlockerMe (Discussed changesets: 29) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187752434 where the changeset comment is: revert bad-faith flock edits in Longview TX commented 2026-08-20 15:59:26 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187736664 (Comments: 1) | Flock7465 (Discussed changesets: 11) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187752434 where the changeset comment is: revert bad-faith flock edits in Longview TX commented 2026-08-20 15:59:26 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187738772 (Comments: 1) | FlockerMe (Discussed changesets: 29) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187752434 where the changeset comment is: revert bad-faith flock edits in Longview TX commented 2026-08-20 15:59:26 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187719731 (Comments: 1) | FlockerMe (Discussed changesets: 29) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187752434 where the changeset comment is: revert bad-faith flock edits in Longview TX commented 2026-08-20 15:59:25 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187713355 (Comments: 1) | FlockerMe (Discussed changesets: 29) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187752434 where the changeset comment is: revert bad-faith flock edits in Longview TX commented 2026-08-20 15:59:25 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187736610 (Comments: 1) | Flock7465 (Discussed changesets: 11) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187752434 where the changeset comment is: revert bad-faith flock edits in Longview TX commented 2026-08-20 15:59:25 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187713474 (Comments: 1) | FlockerMe (Discussed changesets: 29) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187752434 where the changeset comment is: revert bad-faith flock edits in Longview TX commented 2026-08-20 15:59:25 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187739038 (Comments: 1) | FlockerMe (Discussed changesets: 29) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187752434 where the changeset comment is: revert bad-faith flock edits in Longview TX commented 2026-08-20 15:59:24 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187719881 (Comments: 1) | FlockerMe (Discussed changesets: 29) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187752434 where the changeset comment is: revert bad-faith flock edits in Longview TX commented 2026-08-20 15:59:24 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187531946 (Comments: 3) | iCoder461 (Discussed changesets: 1) | I see what happened now, previously there was no data and "Show Address" was just guessing based on what streets were nearby. Now it doesn't have to guess. Hopefully this fixes your problem, but there's no guarantee that yo... commented 2026-08-20 15:24:05 UTC by Jonathan Delaney ♦11 |
| 187720118 (Comments: 1) | Oakleymason-275 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi {osm_user},\r \r This edit appears to be incorrectly placed, or perhaps added by mistake, thus the addition has been reverted. The node added at this location is directly on airport grounds, far away from any logical or sane placement of suc... commented 2026-08-20 10:59:32 UTC by BrettC_KC ♦1 |
| 187614607 (Comments: 1) | kenpickleball002 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187732008 commented 2026-08-20 10:41:14 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,271 |
| 187662035 (Comments: 1) | amber_aho (Discussed changesets: 2) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187730654 commented 2026-08-20 10:38:16 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,271 |
| 187662048 (Comments: 1) | amber_aho (Discussed changesets: 2) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187725536 commented 2026-08-20 10:33:33 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,271 |
| 187664141 (Comments: 1) | CCMW (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187724579 commented 2026-08-20 10:32:19 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,271 |
| 187649982 (Comments: 1) | Xavier Pizza (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187722065 commented 2026-08-20 10:21:43 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,271 |
| 187662402 (Comments: 1) | I Build Web Solutions (Discussed changesets: 4) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-08-20 10:11:48 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 187662270 (Comments: 1) | I Build Web Solutions (Discussed changesets: 4) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-08-20 10:11:31 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 187662186 (Comments: 1) | I Build Web Solutions (Discussed changesets: 4) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-08-20 10:11:23 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 186610357 (Comments: 1) | I Build Web Solutions (Discussed changesets: 4) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. See https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers for mo... commented 2026-08-20 10:09:30 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 187718984 (Comments: 2) | John Nig (Discussed changesets: 1) | DWG revert - apparent fictitious mapping: 187727988 commented 2026-08-20 07:56:09 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,101 |
| 187668450 (Comments: 1) | Doodle Web (Discussed changesets: 2) | As an account mapping on behalf of a commercial business for financial gain, please be advised that you are expected to understand and carefully follow documented OpenStreetMap standards and conventions, which will both directly benefit the quality o... commented 2026-08-20 06:51:54 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 187657851 (Comments: 1) | Doodle Web (Discussed changesets: 2) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-08-20 06:49:47 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 187716454 (Comments: 1) | BoruAr (Discussed changesets: 3) | Welcome to OpenStreetMap, and thanks for contributing! Like your other changeset, I cleaned up the overly subjective/promotional description=* not appropriate for OSM in changeset https://osm.org/changeset/187725186 For more deta... commented 2026-08-20 06:48:10 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 187724402 (Comments: 1) | pwbriggs (Discussed changesets: 31) | Thanks, you got to it a few minutes before I did. I cleaned up some additional subjective/overly promotional language not appropriate for OSM ("modern", "apartment homes", "apartment community", etc) in changeset , and a... commented 2026-08-20 06:44:44 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 187716105 (Comments: 1) | BoruAr (Discussed changesets: 3) | Welcome to OpenStreetMap, and thanks for contributing! Just to note, @pwbriggs fixed and cleaned up a number of issues here in changeset 187724402, and I cleaned up some further overly subjective/promotional language not appropriate for OSM in... commented 2026-08-20 06:44:32 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 187707646 (Comments: 1) | GH cHOICE (Discussed changesets: 4) | As an account mapping on behalf of a commercial business for financial gain, please be advised that you are expected to understand and carefully follow documented OpenStreetMap standards and conventions, which will both directly benefit the quality o... commented 2026-08-20 06:33:08 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 187672622 (Comments: 1) | apolloinspections (Discussed changesets: 1) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-08-20 06:27:17 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 187698298 (Comments: 1) | Hicks-Family-Lawyers (Discussed changesets: 1) | As an account mapping on behalf of a commercial business for financial gain, please be advised that you are expected to understand and carefully follow documented OpenStreetMap standards and conventions, which will both directly benefit the quality o... commented 2026-08-20 06:13:27 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 187653649 (Comments: 2) | Natalie Robbecke (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Natalie%20Robbecke and welcome to OpenStreetMap. I removed the descriptive names and restores the street name, but I truncates the street where it seems to become private property, and changed that segment to ... commented 2026-08-20 06:12:55 UTC by pwbriggs ♦520 |
| 187702256 (Comments: 1) | TLS2025 (Discussed changesets: 1) | As an account mapping on behalf of a commercial business for financial gain, please be advised that you are expected to understand and carefully follow documented OpenStreetMap standards and conventions, which will both directly benefit the quality o... commented 2026-08-20 06:11:27 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 187663625 (Comments: 1) | GeoSafe-Dustin (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187723929 commented 2026-08-20 06:09:11 UTC by MappingMore ♦793 |
| 187717864 (Comments: 1) | WHS Contributor (Discussed changesets: 7) | Improving pedestrian safety every day! Our tax dollars put to good work. commented 2026-08-20 05:54:22 UTC by pwbriggs ♦520 |
| 187715604 (Comments: 1) | Achrafttttt (Discussed changesets: 1) | Are you sure this is an all-way stop? Is this a recent modification? I don't see stop lines on 242nd St in 2025 imagery. Thanks! commented 2026-08-20 05:48:25 UTC by pwbriggs ♦520 |
| 187719360 (Comments: 1) | Asriel Dreemurr (Discussed changesets: 2) | Is there no camera at all here? Or is it simply not a Flock-manufactured camera? Thanks! commented 2026-08-20 05:45:57 UTC by pwbriggs ♦520 |
| 187719563 (Comments: 1) | Asriel Dreemurr (Discussed changesets: 2) | Is there no camera at all here? Or is it simply not a Flock-manufactured camera? Thanks! commented 2026-08-20 05:45:51 UTC by pwbriggs ♦520 |
| 187665529 (Comments: 1) | NithiB (Discussed changesets: 1) | U village retail area already exists as https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/8013958. I think the one you added should be removed. What do you think? commented 2026-08-20 05:16:30 UTC by pwbriggs ♦520 |
| 186949229 (Comments: 3) | Scotthoffman (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Scotthoffman, thank you for your feedback and for sharing your local knowledge with me. Removal of valid information while updating map features is often the case and here at this location, I interpreted the deletion of the name tag as... commented 2026-08-20 04:25:57 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,271 |
| 187657299 (Comments: 1) | Flap Slimy Outward (Discussed changesets: 313) | For context: This school was ordered to shut down. commented 2026-08-20 03:42:20 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦405 |
| 187663827 (Comments: 1) | Flap Slimy Outward (Discussed changesets: 313) | This school has since shut down. commented 2026-08-20 03:41:43 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦405 |
| 187550763 (Comments: 1) | ta13 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, I saw you requested a review for this change. Everything looks good, though you'll want to check it again once more up to date satellite imagery comes out. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osm... commented 2026-08-20 02:25:02 UTC by Jonathan Delaney ♦11 |
| 187263098 (Comments: 1) | derek101225 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thank you for your contribution! I noticed this road has the tag "name_1=South High Street". This communicates that the road has South High Street as an alternate name, and the primary name is South 400 W. If you believe that South High Str... commented 2026-08-20 01:53:35 UTC by Jonathan Delaney ♦11 |
| 187649930 (Comments: 1) | TheBestIdea (Discussed changesets: 74) | I reverted this in: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187718094 The path isn't quite done yet; the Flatbush end is blocked by jersey barriers, and the ~quarter of it that will connect to Wellhouse Drive still has a long way to go, m... commented 2026-08-20 01:00:51 UTC by jtracey ♦176 |
| 187616484 (Comments: 1) | drew262 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Once again - is the building this irregular trapezoid? I've fixed it in changeset/187717569 commented 2026-08-20 00:15:49 UTC by O1S ♦37 |
| 186075975 (Comments: 2) | sltxc (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks for the feedback! I updated the relation and ways to reflect this concern! Ideally they would have been a single way but i couldn't figure out how to join them so it seemed easier to add the tags to the relation. commented 2026-08-20 00:09:06 UTC by sltxc ♦1 |
| 187669884 (Comments: 2) | Momette1221 (Discussed changesets: 1) | DWG revert of all CS - apparent improper deletions: 187717175 commented 2026-08-19 23:52:49 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,101 |
| 93425536 (Comments: 2) | GITNE (Discussed changesets: 14) | It is because a junction a) by definition is a virtual concept and b) — like in this example — is not always an infinitely small point but may also be an area. A junction in OSM does neither model traffic flow nor a traffic code legal mat... commented 2026-08-19 23:39:09 UTC by GITNE ♦55 |
| 187113965 (Comments: 2) | CAM-Gerlach_Repair (Discussed changesets: 44) | The reason your changesets had to be reverted was because they had an explicit source of Google Maps, which you'd been warned about and even blocked many times before. If you had actually done that for the changesets in question, as you'd b... commented 2026-08-19 22:55:35 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 187113972 (Comments: 2) | CAM-Gerlach_Repair (Discussed changesets: 44) | The reason your changesets had to be reverted was because they had an explicit source of Google Maps, which you'd been warned about and even blocked many times before. If you had actually done that for the changesets in question, as you'd b... commented 2026-08-19 22:55:31 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 187113955 (Comments: 2) | CAM-Gerlach_Repair (Discussed changesets: 44) | The reason your changesets had to be reverted was because they had an explicit source of Google Maps, which you'd been warned about and even blocked many times before. If you had actually done that for the changesets in question, as you'd b... commented 2026-08-19 22:55:26 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 161770769 (Comments: 3) | ContraBand (Discussed changesets: 16) | Thanks. I made some updates https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187713427 commented 2026-08-19 21:20:07 UTC by pwbriggs ♦520 |
| 187711140 (Comments: 1) | HiddeWie (Discussed changesets: 20) | the size of this bounding box... commented 2026-08-19 21:16:52 UTC by dmjab13 ♦153 |
| 187701329 (Comments: 1) | Tim Well (Discussed changesets: 3) | Welcome to OpenStreetMap, and thanks for contributing! Please use the changeset description to describe what you changed and why; for example, "Added a fence around a house by tracing from aerial imagery." See more examples here: https://wi... commented 2026-08-19 20:38:15 UTC by impiaaa ♦502 |
| 187704021 (Comments: 1) | Carto-Grapher (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi! I see you've recently gotten into adding buildings using rapid. While this can be a useful tool to assist mapping, I think you should pay attention to the quality of the buildings you add. In this changeset, the building https://www.openstre... commented 2026-08-19 20:29:07 UTC by JuanElDemografo ♦59 |
| 187312963 (Comments: 3) | EuleKC (Discussed changesets: 10) | Looking at aerial imagery, the downstream part of Shunganuga Creek - say, maybe east of Topeka Boulevard, or northeast of I-70, to the Kaw - might qualify as a river under that definition. commented 2026-08-19 20:21:09 UTC by EuleKC ♦8 |
| 187356349 (Comments: 3) | Heron4519 (Discussed changesets: 2) | No problem, thanks for the information. I added the dusk closure time. Feel free to reach out at any time if you have questions. I've also found the OSM US Slack workspace (https://slack.openstreetmap.us/) to be a helpful resource for ask... commented 2026-08-19 20:06:14 UTC by pwbriggs ♦520 |
| 182856371 (Comments: 2) | LogicMind (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thanks. Fixed. commented 2026-08-19 18:50:03 UTC by LogicMind ♦2 |
| 179901169 (Comments: 2) | LogicMind (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thanks. Fixed. commented 2026-08-19 18:47:27 UTC by LogicMind ♦2 |
| 187703781 (Comments: 1) | beefarm (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thank you for editing openstreetmap!!! I have no notes about your edit, just want to encourage you to keep editing! Addresses specifically like you did here is super important to make the map more usable in the future :) commented 2026-08-19 18:30:30 UTC by Loopslol7 ♦45 |
| 187672463 (Comments: 1) | CartographicHobo (Discussed changesets: 2) | Fantastic changeset :) commented 2026-08-19 18:22:55 UTC by Loopslol7 ♦45 |
| 187667152 (Comments: 2) | Flap Slimy Outward (Discussed changesets: 313) | I wanted to upgrade Sunset Road between the 215 Beltway and Las Vegas Boulevard to primary since those segments were fully connected to each other in 2015. The AADT of the relevant road segments (as of 2024) is as follows: * Sunset Road, between L... commented 2026-08-19 18:22:30 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦405 |
| 187705650 (Comments: 1) | LRC42 (Discussed changesets: 1) | The camera faces east to Hollister Road commented 2026-08-19 18:22:00 UTC by LRC42 ♦1 |
| 187395270 (Comments: 5) | autocaddie (Discussed changesets: 2) | There is no need to add the fairway though. It already exists: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/18919877. The correct representation of that hole is a multipolygon. To change it to a polygon is simply wrong. I wonder if that's what you had... commented 2026-08-19 15:02:34 UTC by b-jazz ♦976 |
| 187619603 (Comments: 3) | rsitoni_Lyft (Discussed changesets: 23) | as I commented on the changeset comment on the changeset linked above, thank you so much for this. Happy mapping, Udar. commented 2026-08-19 14:22:02 UTC by Udarian ♦992 |
| 187657566 (Comments: 1) | 1001001777 (Discussed changesets: 1) | This camera was removed on July 31, 2026. I’m not sure why this user continues to add it. It is no longer there. commented 2026-08-19 14:21:10 UTC by NativeSonJB ♦1 |
| 187692338 (Comments: 1) | eastern-bank-customer (Discussed changesets: 3) | Sorry for editing another building by accident. I've since removed the mistake. I didn't intend to make the edited area so large. commented 2026-08-19 14:13:27 UTC by eastern-bank-customer ♦3 |
| 187679332 (Comments: 1) | sbedwal_Lyft (Discussed changesets: 27) | thank you so much for this. Happy mapping, Udar. commented 2026-08-19 14:10:57 UTC by Udarian ♦992 |
| 187611564 (Comments: 2) | iandees-bot (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thanks for the callout. I fixed the ones that weren't already fixed in changeset/187691320 and changeset/187691344. commented 2026-08-19 13:51:48 UTC by iandees ♦1,405 |
| 187659986 (Comments: 1) | Kelly Bishard (Discussed changesets: 1) | Remove the 164 house from the map. It was demolished and a new home was built and now has the address of 101 N Dogwood RD, VA Beach, VA 23451 commented 2026-08-19 13:09:15 UTC by Kelly Bishard ♦1 |
| 187493314 (Comments: 2) | TransAct-JT (Discussed changesets: 18) | School district indicated that the median was recently constructed. Verified through the county office. commented 2026-08-19 12:00:20 UTC by TransAct-JT ♦4 |
| 181170823 (Comments: 4) | uftyv (Discussed changesets: 17) | Great! I just found it by chance, on taginfo, noticing they were all in one area. commented 2026-08-19 10:11:16 UTC by KartKollektor ♦71 |
| 178738844 (Comments: 1) | PetraBzn (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OpenStreetMap, and thanks for your contribution! A few issues here--the church does not occupy the entire building, and not all the time--as you can see, there are a number of other POIs already here. Therefore, it should have been ... commented 2026-08-19 09:21:00 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 187408493 (Comments: 1) | Scrutator (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hey, just FYI, as I've noticed this on a handful of recent changesets--your opening_hours=* is otherwise correct, its just missing a `:` between the hours and the minutes. I fixed this for you in changeset 187677638: https://osm.org/chang... commented 2026-08-19 08:55:17 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 187404488 (Comments: 1) | GA_Kevin (Discussed changesets: 25) | NB, this is still flagged, presumably as it has extra spaces between the comma-separated hours in the first rule. JOSM (at least with the plugins I've got, not sure if its default or not) will automatically flag this with the validator ma... commented 2026-08-19 08:44:55 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 187604651 (Comments: 1) | Murkin (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hey, I noticed you accidentally made an invalid tag "service_times=Sundays 11:00 AM" which would more accurately be tagged as "service_times=Su 11:00" Just wanted to let you know! If you have any questions, the wiki is a gr... commented 2026-08-19 07:34:32 UTC by PostaMap_Infinite ♦83 |
| 130468171 (Comments: 1) | Tyler Brown Cifu Shuster (Discussed changesets: 35) | Hi! I see you added the value "opening_hours=At will" which is invalid. Did you mean 24/7? Just wanted to let you know! Have a great day! commented 2026-08-19 06:41:44 UTC by PostaMap_Infinite ♦83 |
| 182057136 (Comments: 2) | Jason Berm (Discussed changesets: 1) | Well, you're not wrong. To me, the bigger issue is that the trail builders are under-rating new trails at places like VC and Maryland Mountain. If you look at the comments on Trailforks for Panic Switch, 2 out of 3 are complaining that it'... commented 2026-08-19 06:41:04 UTC by Jason Berm ♦1 |
| 187513308 (Comments: 2) | nztraveler (Discussed changesets: 4) | I fixed it for you so no need to worry about this one! commented 2026-08-19 06:21:57 UTC by PostaMap_Infinite ♦83 |
| 187609784 (Comments: 1) | Imtoutvert (Discussed changesets: 1) | RE: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1410999470 When drawing golf course areas (i.e. greens, fairways, bunkers, tees, etc.), please be aware that the ways (lines) used to outline those areas must not cross over each other. Fairway outlines sh... commented 2026-08-19 06:06:54 UTC by b-jazz ♦976 |
| 182495596 (Comments: 3) | Natfoot (Discussed changesets: 77) | User https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Alexey%20Lukin need to reconsider the tone of his messages to long time editors.. Additionally these are not valid sources. Please be more professional in the future. commented 2026-08-19 06:02:53 UTC by Natfoot ♦163 |
| 187466305 (Comments: 1) | Riggwelter (Discussed changesets: 37) | Hi, thanks for adding these details! For future reference, in Ohio, we use “State Route” in addr:street=* and “SR” in ref=*, rather than “OH”. commented 2026-08-19 05:21:54 UTC by Minh Nguyen ♦659 |
| 186367273 (Comments: 3) | bryceco (Discussed changesets: 10) | 😢 commented 2026-08-19 05:20:43 UTC by pwbriggs ♦520 |
| 187656316 (Comments: 1) | K2h2121 (Discussed changesets: 1) | They moved trailer, no longer there after a couple weeks sitting there, ill keep my eye for the next spot commented 2026-08-19 04:10:06 UTC by K2h2121 ♦1 |
| 187662839 (Comments: 1) | NoctZan (Discussed changesets: 13) | Typo, changeset comment is supposed to say "added billboards" commented 2026-08-19 03:19:39 UTC by NoctZan ♦12 |
| 187665583 (Comments: 1) | Hector5831 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21113 commented 2026-08-19 02:27:21 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,101 |
| 187666047 (Comments: 1) | HectorNihga5831 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21112 commented 2026-08-19 02:25:17 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,101 |
| 186096983 (Comments: 2) | pussreboots (Discussed changesets: 2) | By all means fix the issue. I don't remember removing the tags. commented 2026-08-19 02:03:48 UTC by pussreboots ♦1 |
| 111118427 (Comments: 2) | theBody (Discussed changesets: 1) | I am also curious about the source for the names. I have yet to see any signed names on any of the paths I've walked in Scripps Ranch. commented 2026-08-19 01:50:13 UTC by cobalt32 ♦3 |
| 187663725 (Comments: 1) | Subs@Bluceu (Discussed changesets: 7) | two things, first the name uses shortenings like NW for Northwest, in OSM names should not have these short codes in them, second this way is in between the carriageways of a road bus has a different name than the road it connects to on the other sid... commented 2026-08-19 01:46:53 UTC by Udarian ♦992 |
| 187645401 (Comments: 1) | lionridgewhittier (Discussed changesets: 1) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. See https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers for mo... commented 2026-08-19 01:14:04 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 187640072 (Comments: 1) | Avante Plumbing (Discussed changesets: 1) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is not allowed on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account; see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers for more infor... commented 2026-08-19 00:46:34 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 187606181 (Comments: 1) | JasonHafstad (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome to OSM. The feature you removed in this changeset is valid. Please don’t remove valid OSM data. You have a new account and might not be aware, on OSM, we do not remove features if they exist on the ground. If it exists on ... commented 2026-08-18 23:35:02 UTC by MassCartog ♦503 |
| 187591600 (Comments: 1) | 50milebikeman (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi welcome to OSM. It seems this trail does exist, you can see it in recent ariel view, and there is strong heatmap data following the trail exactly in the last 12 months. It seems like its been use, a lot. See here too: https://i.imgur.com... commented 2026-08-18 23:29:44 UTC by MassCartog ♦503 |
| 187663720 (Comments: 1) | Flap Slimy Outward (Discussed changesets: 313) | *Not started construction yet commented 2026-08-18 23:21:07 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦405 |
| 187644059 (Comments: 1) | Trothfang (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi welcome to osm. Unless this building has be demolished please don't remove the building its self, just remove the incorrect tags. Thanks commented 2026-08-18 23:17:56 UTC by MassCartog ♦503 |
| 184297296 (Comments: 1) | Matthew Wemple (Discussed changesets: 2) | How do I find out who approved this camera and who accesses the data? commented 2026-08-18 22:20:05 UTC by TeganCunningham ♦4 |
| 186840084 (Comments: 1) | MAXxS3 (Discussed changesets: 2) | How do I find out who approved this camera and who accesses the data? commented 2026-08-18 22:19:45 UTC by TeganCunningham ♦4 |
| 184770345 (Comments: 1) | Matthew Wemple (Discussed changesets: 2) | How do I find out who approved this camera and who accesses the data? commented 2026-08-18 22:19:01 UTC by TeganCunningham ♦4 |
| 187662472 (Comments: 1) | End0fLine (Discussed changesets: 13) | Added POIs are from a survey of mine (I have photos) commented 2026-08-18 22:08:47 UTC by End0fLine ♦26 |
| 176281799 (Comments: 1) | dugfresh (Discussed changesets: 1) | Try editing this node to use https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:vending%3Dexcrement_bags commented 2026-08-18 20:42:05 UTC by 15419 NE 140th St ♦10 |
| 62845848 (Comments: 3) | Stretch Longfellow (Discussed changesets: 44) | I think that it could still be recent enough to keep it as a proposed change to the highway, I just hadn't heard about the proposal before and wanted to make sure it wasn't someone just adding stuff to OSM as they felt like. Thank you! commented 2026-08-18 20:25:33 UTC by Peppepp ♦1 |
| 185367401 (Comments: 1) | U St (Discussed changesets: 1) | This is not a Flock camera. It is a Roadway Weather Information Systems camera that measures road conditions and relays them back to CTDOT. Please remove the Flock tag. I tried and it didn't work. commented 2026-08-18 20:10:14 UTC by Mrmancini24 ♦1 |
| 187412765 (Comments: 1) | Hyrbii (Discussed changesets: 1) | The phone number for the place was missing country code and missing separator between country code and phone number. Therefore, I fixed it for you in changeset/187654334 commented 2026-08-18 18:16:57 UTC by O1S ♦37 |
| 180855500 (Comments: 1) | StrikeMind (Discussed changesets: 11) | Can you verify this hydrant location with the recent construction here? commented 2026-08-18 17:46:03 UTC by alexwohlbruck ♦25 |
| 187587739 (Comments: 4) | zihaoyu (Discussed changesets: 1) | If you go back to the navigation directions link and switch to the Valhalla router, you'll see it now goes around. It will let bicycles and people walking through which, assuming they can go around the gate, is what we want. I know it pi... commented 2026-08-18 17:03:57 UTC by jhaluska80 ♦113 |
| 187611655 (Comments: 1) | schobbish (Discussed changesets: 10) | Imagery was NOT actually used to make this edit. commented 2026-08-18 14:17:57 UTC by schobbish ♦87 |
| 187620876 (Comments: 1) | 1984Flex (Discussed changesets: 7) | This is still inside of the area of the road, please double check its position on aerial imagery and change the position to a more up to date position. Happy mapping, Udar commented 2026-08-18 13:54:47 UTC by Udarian ♦992 |
| 187636675 (Comments: 1) | Dude12052 (Discussed changesets: 1) | A camera located here would have a commanding view of shrubbery. Care to refine that position, please? --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/187636675 ... commented 2026-08-18 13:54:18 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,623 |
| 187620891 (Comments: 1) | 1984Flex (Discussed changesets: 7) | This is still inside of the area of the road, please double check its position on aerial imagery and change the position to a more up to date position. Happy mapping, Udar commented 2026-08-18 13:54:10 UTC by Udarian ♦992 |
| 187620899 (Comments: 1) | 1984Flex (Discussed changesets: 7) | This is still inside of the area of the road, please double check its position on aerial imagery and change the position to a more up to date position. Happy mapping, Udar commented 2026-08-18 13:53:39 UTC by Udarian ♦992 |
| 187620907 (Comments: 1) | 1984Flex (Discussed changesets: 7) | This is still inside of the area of the road, please double check its position on aerial imagery and change the position to a more up to date position. Happy mapping, Udar commented 2026-08-18 13:53:24 UTC by Udarian ♦992 |
| 176300558 (Comments: 3) | CKSGrowth (Discussed changesets: 1) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-08-18 08:03:10 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 155930337 (Comments: 1) | Mark Conley (Discussed changesets: 1) | As an account mapping on behalf of a commercial business for financial gain, please be advised that you are expected to understand and carefully follow documented OpenStreetMap standards and conventions, which will both directly benefit the quality o... commented 2026-08-18 07:56:22 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 182370693 (Comments: 1) | groovygrooming (Discussed changesets: 1) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. See https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers for mo... commented 2026-08-18 07:38:50 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 173854341 (Comments: 1) | 21310096 (Discussed changesets: 2) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-08-18 07:36:20 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 185014746 (Comments: 2) | 21310096 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Furthermore, the added tags were for a completely different business in an entirely different state (as is obvious from the added description), so I reverted them completely in changeset: https://osm.org/changeset/187623602 commented 2026-08-18 07:35:16 UTC by CAM-Gerlach ♦308 |
| 163804837 (Comments: 1) | evrprvn (Discussed changesets: 1) | As an account mapping on behalf of a commercial business for financial gain, please be advised that you are expected to understand and carefully follow documented OpenStreetMap standards and conventions, which will both directly benefit the quality o... commented 2026-08-18 07:19:46 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 187621283 (Comments: 4) | ecwp (Discussed changesets: 1) | 5229 detached room adjusted to show it takes up half of the building commented 2026-08-18 06:59:47 UTC by ecwp ♦1 |
| 187515381 (Comments: 1) | Jdwky (Discussed changesets: 0) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187621290 commented 2026-08-18 06:31:24 UTC by rajdhani ♦642 |
| 187534533 (Comments: 1) | Cjx2k (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187621127 commented 2026-08-18 06:27:42 UTC by ajmat ♦666 |
| 186763441 (Comments: 4) | Francis Bruno (Discussed changesets: 1) | I've already reverted the crossings back and added some extra tags. Unless the wiki sets a specific standard for something that isn't being followed, it is not a good idea to delete someone else's work. It is best to work with the stan... commented 2026-08-18 05:48:28 UTC by chriswhy ♦9 |
| 187619130 (Comments: 1) | PostaMap_Infinite (Discussed changesets: 28) | If the website had updated tags, I replaced the outdated ones with the ones available there. commented 2026-08-18 05:24:01 UTC by PostaMap_Infinite ♦83 |
| 187616253 (Comments: 1) | Joe5511 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21106 commented 2026-08-18 05:14:30 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,101 |
| 187614008 (Comments: 1) | JoeBlowIdaho (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, welcome to OSM and thanks for your edit. Could you please clarify whether "FLOCK SAFETY" is actually the proper name of this individual feature? According to OSM tagging conventions, name=* should contain the feature&rsqu... commented 2026-08-18 05:12:21 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦7,210 |
| 187616244 (Comments: 1) | Crtiona (Discussed changesets: 1) | Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21105 commented 2026-08-18 05:10:35 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,101 |
| 184441146 (Comments: 3) | Marcthenarc (Discussed changesets: 2) | You can upload them to imgur and post link here. commented 2026-08-18 04:17:14 UTC by MxxCon ♦3,582 |
| 184009497 (Comments: 1) | DrBobbi76 (Discussed changesets: 3) | This is not a Flock camera. There are no Flock cameras in NYC at all. This must be some other brand and must be tagged as such. commented 2026-08-18 04:12:27 UTC by MxxCon ♦3,582 |
| 183985917 (Comments: 1) | DrBobbi76 (Discussed changesets: 3) | This is not a Flock camera. There are no Flock cameras in NYC at all. This must be some other brand and must be tagged as such. commented 2026-08-18 04:12:06 UTC by MxxCon ♦3,582 |
| 183583494 (Comments: 1) | DrBobbi76 (Discussed changesets: 3) | This is not a Flock camera. There are no Flock cameras in NYC at all. This must be some other brand and must be tagged as such. commented 2026-08-18 04:11:45 UTC by MxxCon ♦3,582 |
| 185311652 (Comments: 1) | Mani125 (Discussed changesets: 2) | This is not a Flock camera. There are no Flock cameras in NYC at all. This must be some other brand and must be tagged as such. commented 2026-08-18 04:11:05 UTC by MxxCon ♦3,582 |
| 187609984 (Comments: 1) | macary (Discussed changesets: 3) | looking at this ALPR on various aerial imagery in iD it seems to be within the road area, being positioned like this is highly unlikely so please double check the position of this ALPR and fix it. Happy mapping, Udar. commented 2026-08-18 04:10:55 UTC by Udarian ♦992 |
| 185311600 (Comments: 1) | Mani125 (Discussed changesets: 2) | This is not a Flock camera. There are no Flock cameras in NYC at all. This must be some other brand and must be tagged as such. commented 2026-08-18 04:10:49 UTC by MxxCon ♦3,582 |
| 181436161 (Comments: 1) | Exoticyadielp (Discussed changesets: 1) | This is not a Flock camera. There are no Flock cameras in NYC at all. This must be some other brand and must be tagged as such. commented 2026-08-18 04:10:19 UTC by MxxCon ♦3,582 |
| 187557787 (Comments: 1) | thangnguyen1112 (Discussed changesets: 1) | This is not a Flock camera. There are no Flock cameras in NYC at all. This must be some other brand and must be tagged as such. commented 2026-08-18 04:09:52 UTC by MxxCon ♦3,582 |
| 184701714 (Comments: 1) | br0n3uj5j (Discussed changesets: 1) | This is not a Flock camera. There are no Flock cameras in NYC at all. This must be some other brand and must be tagged as such. commented 2026-08-18 04:09:10 UTC by MxxCon ♦3,582 |
| 181468249 (Comments: 1) | Stevenhhh (Discussed changesets: 1) | This is not a Flock camera. There are no Flock cameras in NYC at all. This must be some other brand and must be tagged as such. commented 2026-08-18 04:08:42 UTC by MxxCon ♦3,582 |
| 183927688 (Comments: 1) | Ari20048 (Discussed changesets: 1) | This is not a Flock camera. There are no Flock cameras in NYC at all. This must be some other brand and must be tagged as such. commented 2026-08-18 04:08:18 UTC by MxxCon ♦3,582 |
| 185975610 (Comments: 1) | Unkn0w (Discussed changesets: 1) | This is not a Flock camera. There are no Flock cameras in NYC at all. This must be some other brand and must be tagged as such. commented 2026-08-18 04:05:37 UTC by MxxCon ♦3,582 |
| 187143617 (Comments: 1) | Mongoonlypawn (Discussed changesets: 3) | This is not a Flock camera. There are no Flock cameras in NYC at all. This must be some other brand and must be tagged as such. commented 2026-08-18 04:04:11 UTC by MxxCon ♦3,582 |
| 186207031 (Comments: 1) | Mongoonlypawn (Discussed changesets: 3) | This is not a Flock camera. There are no Flock cameras in NYC at all. This must be some other brand and must be tagged as such. commented 2026-08-18 04:03:33 UTC by MxxCon ♦3,582 |
| 186707856 (Comments: 1) | Mongoonlypawn (Discussed changesets: 3) | This is not a Flock camera. There are no Flock cameras in NYC at all. This must be some other brand and must be tagged as such. commented 2026-08-18 04:02:54 UTC by MxxCon ♦3,582 |
| 187401346 (Comments: 1) | Morgan_UT_Edits (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello, In OSM, we aim to have the map match what is physically on the ground (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Map_what's_on_the_ground). A mapper previously mapped that this road is named East Canyon Road (in addition to... commented 2026-08-18 02:58:23 UTC by dknelson9876 ♦166 |
| 187616127 (Comments: 1) | PostaMap_Infinite (Discussed changesets: 28) | In some cases, updated tag according to the website if the tag is outdated commented 2026-08-18 02:32:18 UTC by PostaMap_Infinite ♦83 |
| 187493867 (Comments: 1) | TransAct-JT (Discussed changesets: 18) | Esri World Imagery shows the correct positions of the newly constructed roads. Esri imagery of this location is later than Bing imagery. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/187493867... commented 2026-08-18 02:25:48 UTC by Frank Peng ♦256 |
| 10940239 (Comments: 1) | mikeland (Discussed changesets: 1) | What is the “battle of the century”? commented 2026-08-18 01:07:09 UTC by weblogdryads ♦41 |
| 187614434 (Comments: 1) | lIllIlIIllIlllIIII (Discussed changesets: 2) | Found node history. My bad. commented 2026-08-18 00:57:52 UTC by lIllIlIIllIlllIIII ♦2 |
| 187614072 (Comments: 1) | lIllIlIIllIlllIIII (Discussed changesets: 2) | read fee as free. @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ <tag k="capacity" v="15"/> <tag k="check_date" v="2026-08-17"/> <tag k="covered" v="no"/> -<tag k="fee" v=&... commented 2026-08-18 00:40:37 UTC by lIllIlIIllIlllIIII ♦2 |
| 186601966 (Comments: 5) | HOAManagement (Discussed changesets: 1) | Got it, thanks for the additional details and sorry to hear about your property damage. I removed the tags that specify these as Flock cameras or ALPRs, so they should no longer show up as Flock devices in apps and websites that use OpenStreetMap dat... commented 2026-08-18 00:33:23 UTC by pwbriggs ♦520 |
| 187613796 (Comments: 1) | dmjab13 (Discussed changesets: 5) | sorry, this modified the river area so the bounding box is huge! commented 2026-08-18 00:23:03 UTC by dmjab13 ♦153 |
| 187608253 (Comments: 1) | weblogdryads (Discussed changesets: 20) | why did you edit the poughkeepsie post office commented 2026-08-18 00:22:05 UTC by dmjab13 ♦153 |
| 187498744 (Comments: 1) | Shadow46g (Discussed changesets: 1) | These are the Condor PTZ model of Flock commented 2026-08-18 00:02:23 UTC by nwithan8 ♦1 |
| 180486180 (Comments: 1) | dwl-sdca (Discussed changesets: 14) | Hi, I noticed you've added name=SDG&E Service Road to a number of tracks. Is there a source showing that these roads are actually named "SDG&E Service Road"? My understanding is that name=* should only be used for an establishe... commented 2026-08-17 23:27:53 UTC by clambake92115 ♦14 |
| 187612643 (Comments: 1) | iandees-bot (Discussed changesets: 2) | The "aggregator listings" in the source here is not correct and is a bug in how the bot built the source changeset tag. commented 2026-08-17 23:19:23 UTC by iandees ♦1,405 |
| 187562308 (Comments: 1) | gwilliamsonttu (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1550248799 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1550248806 do not look like horse walkers , please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:animal=horse_walker#Difference_to_lunge_pens_and_round_pens commented 2026-08-17 22:39:05 UTC by Hufkratzer ♦920 |
| 187602549 (Comments: 3) | kmenard (Discussed changesets: 4) | the only street level imagery that I could find showing the new bridge that is OSM license compliant is one from Mapillary going from I 95 Southbound to Palmetto Expressway West, that one does show it existing though it does not seem to be complete o... commented 2026-08-17 21:39:56 UTC by Udarian ♦992 |
| 181601611 (Comments: 1) | King-DeFlock (Discussed changesets: 1) | This changeset adds one or more surveillance cameras in a spot that looks unlikely — the nodes sit well away from any road, which usually means the cameras aren't physically present on the ground.\r \r If these cameras are real, plea... commented 2026-08-17 21:37:55 UTC by alpacaMaps ♦431 |
| 187557995 (Comments: 1) | PZP0609 (Discussed changesets: 1) | This changeset adds one or more surveillance cameras in a spot that looks unlikely — the nodes sit well away from any road, which usually means the cameras aren't physically present on the ground.\r \r If these cameras are real, plea... commented 2026-08-17 21:22:40 UTC by alpacaMaps ♦431 |
| 185879673 (Comments: 2) | socialdatasource_will (Discussed changesets: 3) | According to the planning department for that county that road is in use. If you have on the ground knowledge please update commented 2026-08-17 21:18:46 UTC by socialdatasource_will ♦2 |
| 187565224 (Comments: 1) | lord mader (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OpenStreetMap, and thanks for contributing! A few points of feedback: • Mapping private homes is off-limits in OSM: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mapping_private_information • Be descriptive in the changeset descripti... commented 2026-08-17 21:17:12 UTC by impiaaa ♦502 |
| 187534625 (Comments: 3) | rwpiehler (Discussed changesets: 2) | My mistake I thought the row buildings counted as one and I didn't cross check the imagery for the other. Thanks for the catch commented 2026-08-17 21:13:42 UTC by rwpiehler ♦2 |
| 187606370 (Comments: 1) | ax229 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for contributing! When you're drawing buildings, you can use the "Square" operation (shortcut "Q") to make sure a building is perfectly square. It would also be helpful to use the changeset... commented 2026-08-17 21:10:22 UTC by impiaaa ♦502 |
| 184818072 (Comments: 4) | Abel Weber (Discussed changesets: 2) | It's possible. Regardless, thanks for bringing my attention back to this. The rest of their neighborhood is probably not actually covered in Flock cameras. commented 2026-08-17 21:03:27 UTC by alpacaMaps ♦431 |
| 186893456 (Comments: 1) | Ambz94 (Discussed changesets: 9) | This changeset adds one or more surveillance cameras in a spot that looks unlikely — the nodes sit well away from any road, which usually means the cameras aren't physically present on the ground.\r \r If these cameras are real, plea... commented 2026-08-17 20:59:10 UTC by alpacaMaps ♦431 |
| 187593942 (Comments: 1) | erica_busright (Discussed changesets: 11) | Hey Erica, Thanks for helping edit the road network! However I disagree with tagging this section of Tacoma Street as a parking aisle. It is a public right-of-way, it is shown on the county & city GIS maps, and it has an official name post... commented 2026-08-17 20:58:42 UTC by ScrawnyMeowth1 ♦59 |
| 186429694 (Comments: 2) | CAM-Gerlach_Repair (Discussed changesets: 44) | Thanks! I was going to point out the issue with that tagging, but seems like you already fixed it in changeset 187605139 https://osm.org/changeset/187605139 commented 2026-08-17 20:25:19 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 187516155 (Comments: 3) | watmildon (Discussed changesets: 51) | That would be great! BTW, this case you fixed was actually more incorrect than most, as in this case the parent entity of the library system was not the town at all, but rather a association of multiple counties (Montgomery and Floyd)--so it w... commented 2026-08-17 19:51:29 UTC by CAM-Gerlach ♦308 |
| 187505867 (Comments: 2) | bobthebuilder423468 (Discussed changesets: 35) | Actually I see that you corrected it in the following changeset. However, *this* specific building won't 373 meters tall. This building will be demolished and a new one in its place might be that tall(provided plans work out). ---... commented 2026-08-17 19:25:25 UTC by MxxCon ♦3,582 |
| 187506240 (Comments: 1) | bobthebuilder423468 (Discussed changesets: 35) | Hello. You added tag "roof:colour=#ffffff", however looking at the satellite imagery it's clear that this roof is not pure white in color. This tag must to be correct. Thank you. --- ... commented 2026-08-17 19:19:30 UTC by MxxCon ♦3,582 |
| 187207578 (Comments: 2) | cohenjkimmel (Discussed changesets: 3) | ok thanks for letting me know commented 2026-08-17 18:29:05 UTC by cohenjkimmel ♦1 |
| 141653184 (Comments: 1) | 1998alexkane (Discussed changesets: 62) | I fixed some of the metadata for the "EZ-TAB" in changeset/187602502 commented 2026-08-17 18:13:23 UTC by O1S ♦37 |
| 179967948 (Comments: 1) | ixnay1 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Bing aerial imagery does not match into real ground well at the top of Point Six road. I'm reverting the alignments for upper Point Six Road to match into 3DEP and Strava heatmaps. commented 2026-08-17 17:30:54 UTC by borrowpit ♦14 |
| 186956955 (Comments: 2) | tcarlisle (Discussed changesets: 37) | I actually vacillated between the cabins and pavilions/shelters. I ultimately went with shelter as that seemed the best option. Google Maps shows the name of the road as Mountain Dell Ranch Road and the official Camp Tifie Map does not have a... commented 2026-08-17 16:51:04 UTC by tcarlisle ♦21 |
| 187595296 (Comments: 1) | ole321 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Heya! Thanks for making OSM better. Instead of naming the driveway "Driveway" and marking it as a path, you can pick the "Driveway" object type and remove the name. commented 2026-08-17 16:46:06 UTC by iandees ♦1,405 |
| 187468269 (Comments: 2) | MarkM10 (Discussed changesets: 7) | Moved 18.37' south to the pole commented 2026-08-17 16:31:02 UTC by MarkM10 ♦1 |
| 187567692 (Comments: 1) | 1984Flex (Discussed changesets: 7) | looking at this ALPR on various aerial imagery in iD it seems to be within the road area, being positioned like this is highly unlikely so please double check the position of this ALPR and fix it. Happy mapping, Udar. commented 2026-08-17 14:11:49 UTC by Udarian ♦992 |
| 187507219 (Comments: 1) | ArgyleZombie (Discussed changesets: 16) | Friday's email from the OTA as well as Pikepass.com definitely do show that the names are still in active use. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187590450 commented 2026-08-17 14:09:06 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,623 |
| 187567680 (Comments: 1) | 1984Flex (Discussed changesets: 7) | looking at this ALPR on various aerial imagery in iD it seems to be within the road area, being positioned like this is highly unlikely so please double check the position of this ALPR and fix it. Happy mapping, Udar. commented 2026-08-17 14:07:40 UTC by Udarian ♦992 |
| 187567655 (Comments: 1) | 1984Flex (Discussed changesets: 7) | looking at this ALPR on various aerial imagery in iD it seems to be within the road area, being positioned like this is highly unlikely so please double check the position of this ALPR and fix it. Happy mapping, Udar. commented 2026-08-17 14:04:05 UTC by Udarian ♦992 |
| 42964206 (Comments: 1) | shuui (Discussed changesets: 10) | Is the restaurant really in the parking lot? Or is it in the actual part where all other businesses would be? commented 2026-08-17 13:56:40 UTC by O1S ♦37 |
| 187513267 (Comments: 1) | MrAl10 (Discussed changesets: 3) | This got added in the middle of a street. Could you please verify and update location? --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/187513267 commented 2026-08-17 13:43:55 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,623 |
| 187513274 (Comments: 1) | MrAl10 (Discussed changesets: 3) | This got added in the middle of a street. Could you please verify and update location? --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/187513274 commented 2026-08-17 13:43:49 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,623 |
| 187513435 (Comments: 1) | MrAl10 (Discussed changesets: 3) | This got added in the middle of a street. Could you please verify and update location? --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/187513435 commented 2026-08-17 13:43:35 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,623 |
| 187513557 (Comments: 1) | Okpd (Discussed changesets: 1) | This looks like it got added in the middle of a street. Could you please refine the location for accuracy? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/187513557 commented 2026-08-17 13:43:03 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,623 |
| 187535549 (Comments: 1) | B_Dawg (Discussed changesets: 1) | This got added in the middle of a sidewalk where there'd be no place to put a pole in the first place. Please refine location. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/cha... commented 2026-08-17 13:36:55 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,623 |
| 187539853 (Comments: 1) | Yhor (Discussed changesets: 9) | The cops told you wrong, anything with a minimum speed limit that isn't a designated bicycle route is closed to nonmotorized traffic and motorscooters. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/... commented 2026-08-17 13:31:54 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,623 |
| 187543551 (Comments: 1) | End the Fed (Discussed changesets: 1) | Might need some refinement, looks like this would be pretty thoroughly blocked by a shrubbery. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/187543551 commented 2026-08-17 13:30:23 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,623 |
| 187554406 (Comments: 1) | Rcm08 (Discussed changesets: 1) | What's a "contition cam"? --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/187554406 commented 2026-08-17 13:26:53 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,623 |
| 187586765 (Comments: 1) | Sleptikon (Discussed changesets: 1) | This is in the middle of the street, please refine location. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/187586765 commented 2026-08-17 13:17:25 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,623 |
| 187584762 (Comments: 1) | flyingcrowbar (Discussed changesets: 6) | This is not an ALPR camera. I am the owner. commented 2026-08-17 12:51:38 UTC by flyingcrowbar ♦6 |
| 187584728 (Comments: 1) | flyingcrowbar (Discussed changesets: 6) | This is not an ALPR camera. I am the owner. commented 2026-08-17 12:51:20 UTC by flyingcrowbar ♦6 |
| 187584862 (Comments: 1) | flyingcrowbar (Discussed changesets: 6) | This is not an ALPR camera. I am the owner. commented 2026-08-17 12:50:35 UTC by flyingcrowbar ♦6 |
| 187584840 (Comments: 1) | flyingcrowbar (Discussed changesets: 6) | This is not an ALPR camera. I am the owner. commented 2026-08-17 12:50:09 UTC by flyingcrowbar ♦6 |
| 187584793 (Comments: 1) | flyingcrowbar (Discussed changesets: 6) | This is not an ALPR camera. I am the owner. commented 2026-08-17 12:49:44 UTC by flyingcrowbar ♦6 |
| 187584704 (Comments: 1) | flyingcrowbar (Discussed changesets: 6) | This is not an ALPR camera. I am the camera owner. commented 2026-08-17 12:46:55 UTC by flyingcrowbar ♦6 |
| 187441685 (Comments: 1) | James bond 1972 (Discussed changesets: 1) | in the creek 100 ft from the road facing north at a residence? commented 2026-08-17 12:31:51 UTC by handini ♦2 |
| 142909290 (Comments: 1) | Rjalker (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, I believe in this changeset you named the island in the park "Voodoo Island". There is a note saying that it is called "Lake Tribble Island". Can you take a look: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5190828 commented 2026-08-17 10:23:21 UTC by cuzi ♦197 |
| 186388216 (Comments: 2) | Flip1015 (Discussed changesets: 1) | On the corner of Ryan and Dickson in Ft Worth is where the extra camera was applied incorrectly to the map. To maintain accuracy and credibility, I would like to correct this mistake commented 2026-08-17 08:16:17 UTC by Flip1015 ♦1 |
| 187557713 (Comments: 2) | aliuy (Discussed changesets: 1) | The footprint also changed, but aerial imagery isn't available yet. It should be redrawn later once it becomes available. commented 2026-08-17 06:49:15 UTC by aliuy ♦1 |
| 187565005 (Comments: 1) | osm_soco (Discussed changesets: 1) | I reviewed your changes and they look good. Thanks for contributing, and welcome to OpenStreetMap! Please feel free to reach out at any time if you have questions. I also have found the OSM-US Slack workspace a helpful space to discuss how to map thi... commented 2026-08-17 05:24:02 UTC by pwbriggs ♦520 |
| 187565848 (Comments: 1) | 9Clicker! (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! commented 2026-08-17 05:08:52 UTC by jmarchon ♦537 |
| 187563049 (Comments: 2) | Justy76643 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks for the warm welcome. I thought i had removed them all. Thanks for letting me know i missed one…..The map now denotes ground truth. commented 2026-08-17 04:46:48 UTC by Justy76643 ♦1 |
| 187565479 (Comments: 1) | pgbrd (Discussed changesets: 1) | Greengrocer is the closest descriptor I could think of. Another shop type may apply better. commented 2026-08-17 03:42:22 UTC by pgbrd ♦1 |
| 187556750 (Comments: 1) | AAA AAA AAA (Discussed changesets: 2) | This is an amazing change, thank you! commented 2026-08-17 02:26:55 UTC by ScrawnyMeowth1 ♦59 |
| 187562777 (Comments: 1) | jclmcanes (Discussed changesets: 1) | All changes verified visually. commented 2026-08-17 01:06:21 UTC by jclmcanes ♦1 |
| 184997109 (Comments: 1) | 21159767 (Discussed changesets: 1) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-08-17 00:32:03 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 187561746 (Comments: 1) | chellewalker (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted an accidental change of a residential street to a motorway around la commented 2026-08-17 00:26:21 UTC by greatnameguys2472 ♦39 |
| 153143434 (Comments: 1) | Victor Gilmore (Discussed changesets: 1) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. See https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers for mo... commented 2026-08-17 00:06:53 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 186034823 (Comments: 1) | skottmorris (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, I reverted some of your changesets adding water damage because the highway tag should only be set to certain values. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway commented 2026-08-16 21:53:50 UTC by jm428 ♦55 |
| 116322639 (Comments: 2) | Glassman (Discussed changesets: 84) | The course is closed but cart paths the physical course is open to the public. The current owner went bankrupt and how the lender is looking for a buyer. The goal is for it to be returned to a working course. I must admit some of the features... commented 2026-08-16 21:45:08 UTC by Glassman ♦6,059 |
| 187545381 (Comments: 1) | TetrisEffect (Discussed changesets: 9) | No worries, thanks for fixing it. commented 2026-08-16 21:31:39 UTC by Pontius ♦41 |
| 187553263 (Comments: 1) | FlockU2trick (Discussed changesets: 3) | looking at this ALPR on various aerial imagery in iD it seems to be within the road area, being positioned like this is highly unlikely so please double check the position of this ALPR and fix it. Happy mapping, Udar. commented 2026-08-16 21:11:57 UTC by Udarian ♦992 |
| 187553221 (Comments: 1) | FlockU2trick (Discussed changesets: 3) | looking at this ALPR on various aerial imagery in iD it seems to be within the road area, being positioned like this is highly unlikely so please double check the position of this ALPR and fix it. Happy mapping, Udar. commented 2026-08-16 21:11:02 UTC by Udarian ♦992 |
| 187553151 (Comments: 1) | FlockU2trick (Discussed changesets: 3) | looking at this ALPR on various aerial imagery in iD it seems to be within the road area, being positioned like this is highly unlikely so please double check the position of this ALPR and fix it. Happy mapping, Udar. commented 2026-08-16 21:07:18 UTC by Udarian ♦992 |
| 186454059 (Comments: 1) | doubleeaglevoice (Discussed changesets: 1) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-08-16 20:54:07 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 187503445 (Comments: 1) | nbargolf (Discussed changesets: 4) | Is this course still open? From (what I believe to be) recent imagery, it seems like fairways have been converted to a tree farm. And from what I can tell based on some searching, it seems like it last operated in 2020 and the clubhouse is now an eve... commented 2026-08-16 20:48:41 UTC by GatewayGolf ♦9 |
| 187202709 (Comments: 2) | chachaheels (Discussed changesets: 1) | No. It's a mistake the edit should have been made in front of the Starbucks in The Square at West Windsor. It appears that the camera I intended to add is already on the map. Thank you for catching the error commented 2026-08-16 20:37:40 UTC by chachaheels ♦1 |
| 186684142 (Comments: 6) | CAM-Gerlach_Repair (Discussed changesets: 44) | Saluting your work https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/o7-slang (NB, Google is your friend :) commented 2026-08-16 19:34:19 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 174822495 (Comments: 1) | TheOldGrouch (Discussed changesets: 1) | Looked for this camera but was unable to find it commented 2026-08-16 19:11:00 UTC by 76MavStallion ♦1 |
| 187548418 (Comments: 1) | Freedom Roads (Discussed changesets: 1) | this isn’t a Flock, its mounted on the light pole aiming north. An older style PIPS/Neology looks like commented 2026-08-16 17:56:21 UTC by Freedom Roads ♦1 |
| 186034539 (Comments: 1) | skottmorris (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap. I noticed you also changed West Main Street to a private dirt road. I have undone that on my end because I believe it was a mistake. commented 2026-08-16 17:22:45 UTC by jm428 ♦55 |
| 184097963 (Comments: 5) | D Ave (Discussed changesets: 3) | Thanks for taking another look. I understand your concern, especially from the perspective of running the street. I’ve previously edited this so that the named service road ends where the driveway begins, with the remainder still mapped as a pr... commented 2026-08-16 17:12:29 UTC by StreetSurveyor ♦213 |
| 173515937 (Comments: 4) | UserCurt (Discussed changesets: 3) | I have a mild preference for `amenity=parking` over `parking=street_side` as this is on a `highway=service` directly in front of buildings that are off the main public roadway, but this is not a strong preference. If you feel `parking=street_side` is... commented 2026-08-16 14:03:18 UTC by UserCurt ♦3 |
| 187353480 (Comments: 1) | PatrickEng (Discussed changesets: 2) | I saw that you were messing with the Water Taxi route in Ft Lauderdale. Did you know that the Water Taxi route is not owned/operated by Broward County? commented 2026-08-16 13:10:07 UTC by txemt ♦86 |
| 187514691 (Comments: 1) | RDAltvater (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, welcome to OSM. I think this would be better mapped by tagging the driveway itself rather than adding several nodes with names such as "Private Driveway". If access by the general public is actually restricted, access=priv... commented 2026-08-16 07:04:59 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦7,210 |
| 187396343 (Comments: 1) | wireguy (Discussed changesets: 28) | Oops, missed a leading zero in https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1137406320/history/6 - Fixed! commented 2026-08-16 06:51:54 UTC by pwbriggs ♦520 |
| 187260808 (Comments: 1) | x524_ (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM, and thanks for your contribution. In this edit, you added a traffic light instead of a stop sign, and you also removed crossing tags for the explicitly mapped crossing. You can review my changes here: https://www.openstreetm... commented 2026-08-16 06:22:42 UTC by citrula ♦1,020 |
| 186817893 (Comments: 1) | quoof (Discussed changesets: 1) | This is not a Flock camera commented 2026-08-16 03:04:10 UTC by xdkid ♦1 |
| 174576267 (Comments: 1) | TransAct-JT (Discussed changesets: 18) | Do not use descriptive names for OSM features. The name=* tag should be the signed name of a feature. If there is no signed name, then the feature should have no name=* tag. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Don't_use_name_tag... commented 2026-08-16 02:54:15 UTC by Frank Peng ♦256 |
| 177892208 (Comments: 1) | TransAct-JT (Discussed changesets: 18) | On way 1177992640 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1177992640, it looks like you got the turn lane indications mixed up. I don't think there would be a right-turn lane on the left lane of a multi-lane road. I fixed the turn lane indicatons in c... commented 2026-08-16 02:41:19 UTC by Frank Peng ♦256 |
| 178312802 (Comments: 1) | TransAct-JT (Discussed changesets: 18) | Please don't abbreviate street names. Spell out full street names. Per the OSM Wiki documentation on abbreviations, it states: > If the name can be spelled without an abbreviation, then don't abbreviate it. Computers can easily sh... commented 2026-08-16 02:19:16 UTC by Frank Peng ♦256 |
| 187314433 (Comments: 1) | alfial (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! commented 2026-08-16 02:08:23 UTC by jmarchon ♦537 |
| 187417639 (Comments: 1) | Roscoe99 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! commented 2026-08-16 02:05:37 UTC by jmarchon ♦537 |
| 187470425 (Comments: 1) | Amis9707 (Discussed changesets: 2) | hi again, Went ahead and fixed the dragged node in this change set to. commented 2026-08-16 01:05:24 UTC by MassCartog ♦503 |
| 187470275 (Comments: 1) | Amis9707 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi welcome to Openstreetmap. Wanted to let you know that in this changeset and your next changeset looks like you unintentionally dragged a few nodes way out of place. Try to be careful not to move any of the nodes that are not working on and make su... commented 2026-08-16 01:03:22 UTC by MassCartog ♦503 |
| 186127376 (Comments: 1) | GTFOOO! (Discussed changesets: 1) | This changeset adds one or more surveillance cameras in a spot that looks unlikely — the nodes sit well away from any road, which usually means the cameras aren't physically present on the ground.\r \r If these cameras are real, plea... commented 2026-08-16 00:41:20 UTC by alpacaMaps ♦431 |
| 179002092 (Comments: 1) | TransAct-JT (Discussed changesets: 18) | Please don't abbreviate street names. Spell out the full street name. The name=* tag on way 1091969460 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1091969460) should be spelled out to "Sequoia Drive Southwest". The name=* tag on ways 1482628086... commented 2026-08-15 22:47:20 UTC by Frank Peng ♦256 |
| 179131084 (Comments: 1) | TransAct-JT (Discussed changesets: 18) | Corrected in changeset 187510433 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187510433 https://osmcha.org/changesets/187510433 --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changes... commented 2026-08-15 22:27:41 UTC by Frank Peng ♦256 |
| 179460879 (Comments: 1) | TransAct-JT (Discussed changesets: 18) | Please don't glue roads to administrative boundaries. If you glue a road to an administrative boundary and another user modifies the road after it's geometry changes, then it can easily modify the boundary. Per the OSM Wiki documentation on... commented 2026-08-15 22:19:37 UTC by Frank Peng ♦256 |
| 181001434 (Comments: 1) | TransAct-JT (Discussed changesets: 18) | Please do not use descriptive names. The name=* tag should be used for the signed name of a feature (e.g., signs), not for describing features. The residential road you mapped here with the name=* tag of "Alley Way" would probably be better... commented 2026-08-15 22:01:43 UTC by Frank Peng ♦256 |
| 186761516 (Comments: 2) | andyp14 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks! I submitted updates to fix the overlapping cart paths. commented 2026-08-15 21:50:42 UTC by andyp14 ♦1 |
| 182212989 (Comments: 1) | TransAct-JT (Discussed changesets: 18) | Reverted in changeset 187509619 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187509619 --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/182212989 commented 2026-08-15 21:48:16 UTC by Frank Peng ♦256 |
| 187483288 (Comments: 1) | SamsTiresWheels (Discussed changesets: 1) | As an account mapping on behalf of a commercial business for financial gain, please be advised that you are expected to understand and carefully follow documented OpenStreetMap standards and conventions, which will both directly benefit the quality o... commented 2026-08-15 21:38:55 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 182839051 (Comments: 1) | TransAct-JT (Discussed changesets: 18) | Reverted in changeset 187509057 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187509057 --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/182839051 commented 2026-08-15 21:29:06 UTC by Frank Peng ♦256 |
| 187509057 (Comments: 1) | Frank Peng (Discussed changesets: 34) | Revert of changeset 182839051 (https://osmcha.org/changesets/182839051). commented 2026-08-15 21:27:24 UTC by Frank Peng ♦256 |
| 185016923 (Comments: 1) | I W (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hi — thanks for tidying up around the Houston House. I have moved the Texas Historical Commission marker tags (memorial=plaque, ref:US-TX:thc=5355, ref:hmdb) back onto node 12403574645 and left way 1534776326 as a plain building, in changeset 1... commented 2026-08-15 21:15:47 UTC by BubbleGuppies ♦8 |
| 187499308 (Comments: 1) | nl-mapper (Discussed changesets: 7) | Bing Maps and VBMP Most Recent Imagery was used for this edit. commented 2026-08-15 17:14:34 UTC by nl-mapper ♦5 |
| 187410708 (Comments: 1) | sphimmer (Discussed changesets: 1) | Please refrain from commentary like "pit of despair" when mapping. Stick to the facts of what is on the ground. Also, please make sure you don't overlap things like fairways/roughs/greens. Thanks. commented 2026-08-15 15:38:13 UTC by b-jazz ♦976 |
| 187427512 (Comments: 3) | Udarian (Discussed changesets: 118) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/38549772 is secondary because it connects to other roads (residential and service) while https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/439693075 doesn't have any other roads coming off of it, it is only there as a shortcut ... commented 2026-08-15 15:32:23 UTC by Udarian ♦992 |
| 187486349 (Comments: 1) | devemporer (Discussed changesets: 5) | a few issues here, first road centerline should not be attached to road markings (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1549570037), second the exit ramp from HEFT to Southwest 120th Street was aligned to the correct road marking before this edit, I have... commented 2026-08-15 15:17:14 UTC by Udarian ♦992 |
| 187464633 (Comments: 1) | FuckFlock420 (Discussed changesets: 1) | These are not Flock ALPRs, They are axon outpost/ Axon lightpost. Also the user name FuckFlock420 screams cop. commented 2026-08-15 13:53:56 UTC by Jethroseems ♦1 |
| 184160487 (Comments: 1) | MSRRT (Discussed changesets: 1) | Camera removed commented 2026-08-15 13:29:59 UTC by MSRRT ♦1 |
| 185625427 (Comments: 2) | devemporer (Discussed changesets: 5) | hi, upon further review of mapillary photo trails that were heavily GPS-obfuscated, i found a photo, however it's blurry: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=2014170308734464 commented 2026-08-15 11:59:36 UTC by devemporer ♦5 |
| 187465536 (Comments: 2) | mylesthemapper (Discussed changesets: 1) | Please do not add joke or unverifiable names to OSM. commented 2026-08-15 05:33:31 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦7,210 |
| 187457416 (Comments: 1) | zangbot485 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, welcome to OSM. Are the added name(version)s real? commented 2026-08-15 05:27:15 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦7,210 |
| 187450389 (Comments: 1) | netroism (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello. Is this actually the real "Flock Safety" branded camera or some other surveillance and you just named it Flock as colloquial name? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/change... commented 2026-08-15 03:11:01 UTC by MxxCon ♦3,582 |
| 187469365 (Comments: 1) | IDonutsLG (Discussed changesets: 1) | thats my house you whore commented 2026-08-15 02:43:29 UTC by samburak1 ♦2 |
| 184710395 (Comments: 1) | Dblcut3 (Discussed changesets: 25) | Streets in Rosemont around the elementary school are public roads. There is a gate that is attended, but entry is not denied to the general public. https://www.chicagotribune.com/1995/06/23/tiny-rosemont-puts-its-guard-up/ commented 2026-08-15 01:53:13 UTC by JimothyJ ♦1 |
| 187035853 (Comments: 1) | forrestergrouprealestate (Discussed changesets: 1) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-08-15 01:52:38 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 187259120 (Comments: 1) | Aszpaszia (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OpenStreetMap, and thanks for your contribution! Just wanted to give you a couple quick tips: - opening_hours=* should follow the standardized, specified syntax; see https://osm.wiki/Key:opening_hours for a summary - addr:... commented 2026-08-15 01:27:17 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 187309774 (Comments: 1) | GenioDiabolico (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OpenStreetMap, and thanks for your contributions! Just a quick heads up--your opening_hours=* syntax is otherwise correct, but no trailing `;` needed on the last rule (noticed it on a couple POIs you added). Also, FYI the sta... commented 2026-08-15 01:16:54 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 184988902 (Comments: 1) | Benton’s Garden and Landscaping Center (Discussed changesets: 1) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-08-15 00:45:25 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 174576901 (Comments: 1) | 500369761 (Discussed changesets: 5) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-08-15 00:36:54 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 176863084 (Comments: 1) | 500369761 (Discussed changesets: 5) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-08-15 00:36:46 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 182942867 (Comments: 1) | 500369761 (Discussed changesets: 5) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-08-15 00:36:23 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 185002062 (Comments: 1) | 500369761 (Discussed changesets: 5) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-08-15 00:36:18 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 187461629 (Comments: 1) | 500369761 (Discussed changesets: 5) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-08-15 00:36:08 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 187423946 (Comments: 1) | 500397097 (Discussed changesets: 2) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-08-15 00:23:44 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 187371341 (Comments: 1) | Kyler Chin (Discussed changesets: 6) | Thank you for your edit! Please add a more specific changeset comment; this helps mappers in the future to see what you did.' Happy Mapping! commented 2026-08-14 22:42:13 UTC by Loopslol7 ♦45 |
| 187432417 (Comments: 1) | Doitmyself (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome to OSM. The feature you removed in this changeset is valid. Driveways are valid feature that can be included in OSM data. Please don’t remove valid OSM data. You have a new account and might not be aware, on OSM, we do no... commented 2026-08-14 22:39:41 UTC by MassCartog ♦503 |
| 187438176 (Comments: 1) | shamuswilkie (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome to OSM. The feature you removed in this changeset is valid. Please don’t remove valid OSM data. You have a new account and might not be aware, on OSM, we do not remove features if they exist on the ground. If it exists on ... commented 2026-08-14 22:30:32 UTC by MassCartog ♦503 |
| 44932308 (Comments: 1) | c94jn3jfa (Discussed changesets: 1) | Are you sure the pond in "Lion's Park" is this irregular shape? commented 2026-08-14 21:41:48 UTC by O1S ♦37 |
| 178529521 (Comments: 2) | hijs01 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap. There is no traffic signal on South Atherton next to the former Pizza Hut. Please refrain from naming the sidewalks "side walk" - using 'footway = sidewalk' is enough to mark them as sidewalks. ... commented 2026-08-14 21:27:43 UTC by ForestFurnace ♦61 |
| 177787109 (Comments: 1) | TerraTexGeo (Discussed changesets: 7) | why were speed limits set to such high mph? ex: 148110694, 21223625, 116630814 commented 2026-08-14 20:42:39 UTC by alexanderwoods ♦3 |
| 183086738 (Comments: 2) | TerraTexGeo (Discussed changesets: 7) | see 15257503, 15256694, 15257370, 15257368, 15296221, 15257967, 15300298, 15291521, 15351111, 15117255 commented 2026-08-14 20:39:52 UTC by alexanderwoods ♦3 |
| 178884537 (Comments: 2) | Natfoot (Discussed changesets: 77) | I think the ones the city put up are all gone now. commented 2026-08-14 19:28:31 UTC by Natfoot ♦163 |
| 187020580 (Comments: 3) | Gorger (Discussed changesets: 33) | Hi dknelson9876, thank you for reaching out. Based on the resources available to me, I updated the roads where I could confidently determine that the construction had been completed and changed them to highway=residential. But it was accidental to re... commented 2026-08-14 16:06:56 UTC by Gorger ♦62 |
| 187288685 (Comments: 3) | Ky_AT (Discussed changesets: 28) | Hi Udarian, I overlooked the history and missed the turn restriction during my review. Thank you for your kind words and for pointing it out. I'll be more cautious in my future edits. commented 2026-08-14 15:53:14 UTC by Ky_AT ♦27 |
| 187288853 (Comments: 3) | Ky_AT (Discussed changesets: 28) | Hi Udar, thank you for reverting the changeset, and thank you for your explanation here. I’ll be more aware of cross-connectivity without entering the roundabout in my future edits. commented 2026-08-14 15:49:06 UTC by Ky_AT ♦27 |
| 187447924 (Comments: 1) | FlamingoOSM (Discussed changesets: 46) | phone numbers are usually formatted (in the US) +1-XXX-XXX-XXXX , this changeset changed a phone number that was almost correct to less correct by removing multiple `-`'s. Happy mapping, Udar. commented 2026-08-14 15:37:31 UTC by Udarian ♦992 |
| 186688278 (Comments: 1) | pavel bankevich (Discussed changesets: 15) | Improved road connectivity based on Bing Maps Aerial #mapbox_missing_roads commented 2026-08-14 13:52:07 UTC by pavel bankevich ♦15 |
| 187431674 (Comments: 1) | trackmap (Discussed changesets: 7) | Is this kind of tagging really merited for a temporary feature? This is being built and taken down again in the course of one month commented 2026-08-14 11:14:13 UTC by willkmis ♦234 |
| 187317162 (Comments: 1) | DoubleBear (Discussed changesets: 2) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187430806 commented 2026-08-14 09:24:36 UTC by rajdhani ♦642 |
| 187420879 (Comments: 1) | Teo2ra (Discussed changesets: 3) | looking at this ALPR on various aerial imagery in iD it seems to be within the road area, being positioned like this is highly unlikely so please double check the position of this ALPR and fix it. Happy mapping, Udar. commented 2026-08-14 07:14:06 UTC by Udarian ♦992 |
| 187421109 (Comments: 1) | Teo2ra (Discussed changesets: 3) | it is evlen more unlikely that you would find a pole mounted ALPR in the midde of the road, please double check the actual position of this ALPR and fix it on OSM. Happy mapping, Udar commented 2026-08-14 07:13:44 UTC by Udarian ♦992 |
| 187421072 (Comments: 1) | Teo2ra (Discussed changesets: 3) | looking at this ALPR on various aerial imagery in iD it seems to be within the road area, being positioned like this is highly unlikely so please double check the position of this ALPR and fix it. Happy mapping, Udar. commented 2026-08-14 07:10:55 UTC by Udarian ♦992 |
| 187360471 (Comments: 1) | SK Quality Roofing (Discussed changesets: 3) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-08-14 07:08:33 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 187148805 (Comments: 1) | sadpinecone (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi sadpinecone, Welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for your contribution! Adding an arbitrary free-text descriptor to the name=* is neither the actual name of the place, nor the correct way to indicate that something is closed. Neither... commented 2026-08-14 06:50:47 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 187228705 (Comments: 1) | MrsC_23 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187423614 commented 2026-08-14 06:28:28 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,271 |
| 187301681 (Comments: 1) | RowanHTL (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi Rowan, Welcome to OpenStreetMap, and thanks for your contribution! I just wanted to let you know that the valid syntax for opening_hours=* from dawn to dusk/sunrise to sunset is opening_hours=dawn-dusk opening_hours=sunrise-sunset (n... commented 2026-08-14 05:58:28 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 186967249 (Comments: 1) | emergencydentistmo (Discussed changesets: 1) | As an account mapping on behalf of a commercial business for financial gain, please be advised that you are expected to understand and carefully follow documented OpenStreetMap standards and conventions, which will both directly benefit the quality o... commented 2026-08-14 05:52:17 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 187292996 (Comments: 1) | woodsro (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Gandolphi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap, and thanks for your contributions! I just wanted to reach out to let you know that I made a number of fixes, cleanups and improvements to the tagging here in my changeset, as name=*, opening_hours... commented 2026-08-14 05:37:50 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 187207313 (Comments: 1) | SixSevenIsTheBest (Discussed changesets: 14) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187319319 commented 2026-08-14 05:29:38 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,271 |
| 187205958 (Comments: 1) | Cheesestick (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187319517 commented 2026-08-14 05:28:42 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,271 |
| 187211488 (Comments: 1) | SixSevenIsTheBest (Discussed changesets: 14) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187382543 commented 2026-08-14 05:27:07 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,271 |
| 187256504 (Comments: 1) | zbabyfoalz (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187419437 commented 2026-08-14 05:22:53 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,271 |
| 187297069 (Comments: 1) | Kaitlynn Jennings (Discussed changesets: 1) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-08-14 05:19:18 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 187159091 (Comments: 2) | ChaosOpossum (Discussed changesets: 1) | NB, I just fixed the remainder of existing opening_hours=* with this particular syntax mistake in changeset 187421781 https://osm.org/changeset/187421781 Happy mapping! commented 2026-08-14 05:08:52 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 187400732 (Comments: 1) | 500369299 (Discussed changesets: 2) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-08-14 04:40:07 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 187391589 (Comments: 1) | any-timecleaning (Discussed changesets: 1) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-08-14 04:37:09 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 187405069 (Comments: 1) | daytripcarts (Discussed changesets: 1) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-08-14 04:33:34 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 187375971 (Comments: 1) | 500370693 (Discussed changesets: 4) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-08-14 04:12:37 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 187355868 (Comments: 1) | stevea (Discussed changesets: 136) | They are (as indicated to me) actually a LIDAR smear, approximated. These data may represent an old trail or roadbed, it's hard to say. A path, desired, maybe. Could be useful in an emergency evac, maybe. commented 2026-08-14 03:04:48 UTC by stevea ♦325 |
| 187202654 (Comments: 2) | Ertain (Discussed changesets: 1) | My apologies. When I wrote that (which was a couple of years ago), I must have forgotten to add the entry for Sunday. commented 2026-08-14 01:37:27 UTC by Ertain ♦1 |
| 183998702 (Comments: 6) | SyrupMap (Discussed changesets: 1) | See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187415764 where these trails were deleted once again. commented 2026-08-14 01:15:56 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187415764 (Comments: 1) | Mapper48580 (Discussed changesets: 1) | I have reverted this un-explained deletion by a new user which repeated an earlier, similar deletion in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183998702. A deletion on this scale requires a proper explanation; "decolonize the nine drops" i... commented 2026-08-14 01:14:34 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 185920029 (Comments: 3) | VLD318 (Discussed changesets: 18) | When "crossing:markings=*" and "crossing:signals=*" are present, there is no usefulness to the old "crossing=*" tag, as its value is entirely derivative of the improved tagging schema. Perpetuating the "crossing=*&q... commented 2026-08-13 23:42:57 UTC by Lumikeiju ♦135 |
| 187342958 (Comments: 1) | Howpper (Discussed changesets: 207) | Remember to leave descriptive changeset comments to help out other mappers! commented 2026-08-13 23:28:57 UTC by ScrawnyMeowth1 ♦59 |
| 185720010 (Comments: 3) | Joseph R P (Discussed changesets: 238) | I see; I guess that makes sense. This since area is actively being developed, I've always interpreted these names as extensions of existing streets if they get built. commented 2026-08-13 23:27:04 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦405 |
| 187396602 (Comments: 4) | Cheeseman4428 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Oh, right, you got unit 300 put on the therapy business. Presumably the real estate is then at unit 100, but it would need a survey to confirm. commented 2026-08-13 23:17:09 UTC by pwbriggs ♦520 |
| 187414370 (Comments: 1) | erstus (Discussed changesets: 1) | imagery_used=Ohio Statewide Imagery Program (iD bug: https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/12717) commented 2026-08-13 22:13:51 UTC by erstus ♦1 |
| 187407702 (Comments: 2) | Brian Roach (Discussed changesets: 2) | Dear Brian Roach, please don't delete private roads from OSM. You can apply an "access=private" tag to them so that it becomes clear that these cannot be used by the public, but the fact that they exist should still be recorded on OSM.... commented 2026-08-13 22:03:33 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187401365 (Comments: 1) | BeaconOSM (Discussed changesets: 84) | Just for future reference, in most of the United States, weight restrictions are expressed in short tons (abbreviated as "tons", "T", or "t"), which should be tagged as 'maxweight=### st', and sometimes in poun... commented 2026-08-13 22:03:25 UTC by Frank Peng ♦256 |
| 187407873 (Comments: 1) | Brian Roach (Discussed changesets: 2) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187414134 where the changeset comment is: revert deletion of private roads commented 2026-08-13 22:01:52 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187414134 (Comments: 1) | woodpeck (Discussed changesets: 148) | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 187407702, 187407873. commented 2026-08-13 22:01:52 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187381930 (Comments: 1) | Meister Stewart Partners at Compass (Discussed changesets: 1) | Is the office really open on Saturday and Sunday too? or by "daily" did you mean Monday thru Friday? commented 2026-08-13 21:26:22 UTC by pwbriggs ♦520 |
| 187412714 (Comments: 1) | AmazingGracey (Discussed changesets: 2) | Looks good, thanks! commented 2026-08-13 21:15:21 UTC by pwbriggs ♦520 |
| 187307567 (Comments: 1) | Sara Lee Ellis (Discussed changesets: 1) | It looks like you added the name to a building several blocks away from where you put the main office point. Did you mean to edit the building that's at 7225 170th Avenue Northeast or is that a mistake? commented 2026-08-13 21:13:42 UTC by pwbriggs ♦520 |
| 187364640 (Comments: 2) | AmazingGracey (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thank you. I wondered how people did it and should have looked it up. I took care of it! Thanks for your help. commented 2026-08-13 21:10:13 UTC by AmazingGracey ♦1 |
| 187356301 (Comments: 1) | Palash Parmar (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, and thanks for the contribution. Did you really mean that these lanes are marked with a through (a.k.a. straight) arrow? If there are no pavement markings, it can be left empty (as it was mapped) or written out as "none", like turn:l... commented 2026-08-13 20:42:24 UTC by pwbriggs ♦520 |
| 164232365 (Comments: 2) | pahlavi_temecula (Discussed changesets: 19) | Also source=public record is not descriptive enough for OSM commented 2026-08-13 19:57:33 UTC by weblogdryads ♦41 |
| 181475915 (Comments: 2) | mildlyconcernedtomato (Discussed changesets: 4) | Despite what the wiki says about adding "kW" to power output, that wiki was updated to recommend adding "kW" by the same guy who injected loads of bad data into OSM with the infamously half-baked bulk import of supercharge.info on... commented 2026-08-13 19:42:59 UTC by TheNightRider ♦90 |
| 187313679 (Comments: 2) | WHS Contributor (Discussed changesets: 7) | I got lazy about this one because I was just splitting an existing path. Fixed. commented 2026-08-13 19:33:36 UTC by WHS Contributor ♦5 |
| 187360496 (Comments: 1) | WHS Contributor (Discussed changesets: 7) | As you map out sidewalks, you can/should also add sidewalk presence tags in the form of sidewalk:left=*, sidewalk:right=*, and sidewalk:both=*. For example, the long segment of 134th Pl should be sidewalk:both=separate, and the circle at the end shou... commented 2026-08-13 19:26:23 UTC by pwbriggs ♦520 |
| 187314836 (Comments: 1) | reynaofnoflocks (Discussed changesets: 6) | See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187314921#c1643719. Thanks! commented 2026-08-13 19:12:55 UTC by pwbriggs ♦520 |
| 187314885 (Comments: 1) | reynaofnoflocks (Discussed changesets: 6) | See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187314921#c1643719. Thanks! commented 2026-08-13 19:12:38 UTC by pwbriggs ♦520 |
| 187314897 (Comments: 1) | reynaofnoflocks (Discussed changesets: 6) | See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187314921#c1643719. Thanks! commented 2026-08-13 19:12:28 UTC by pwbriggs ♦520 |
| 187314905 (Comments: 1) | reynaofnoflocks (Discussed changesets: 6) | See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187314921#c1643719. Thanks! commented 2026-08-13 19:12:04 UTC by pwbriggs ♦520 |
| 187314921 (Comments: 1) | reynaofnoflocks (Discussed changesets: 6) | I think you could change surveillance:type=ALPR to surveillance:type=camera instead of deleting that tag entirely if you know that it's a camera. commented 2026-08-13 19:11:26 UTC by pwbriggs ♦520 |
| 187316909 (Comments: 1) | TetrisEffect (Discussed changesets: 9) | sorry, didn't see this changeset when creating another set of relations for the 17 cherry line, is it ok if I use my relations (relation/21223473 and relation/21223474) to map the route instead? commented 2026-08-13 18:42:56 UTC by seateaeye ♦8 |
| 187371481 (Comments: 1) | kova66 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OpenStreetMap, and thanks for contributing! Please use the changeset description to describe what you changed and why. For example, "Added sidewalks around a parking garage, from aerial imagery." You can find more examples here: ... commented 2026-08-13 18:38:25 UTC by impiaaa ♦502 |
| 187379663 (Comments: 1) | MapBritan (Discussed changesets: 2) | Welcome to OpenStreetMap, and thanks for contributing! Please use the changeset description to describe what you changed and why. For example, "Tagged pedestrian crossing nodes as having signals, known from local knowledge." You can find mo... commented 2026-08-13 18:37:03 UTC by impiaaa ♦502 |
| 187334060 (Comments: 1) | Adraxar (Discussed changesets: 4) | These road classifications are not correct commented 2026-08-13 10:36:56 UTC by MikeN ♦373 |
| 187375497 (Comments: 1) | Adraxar (Discussed changesets: 4) | These road classifications are not correct commented 2026-08-13 10:36:40 UTC by MikeN ♦373 |
| 187374677 (Comments: 1) | Adraxar (Discussed changesets: 4) | These road classifications are not correct commented 2026-08-13 10:36:21 UTC by MikeN ♦373 |
| 187243465 (Comments: 1) | gpserror defined (Discussed changesets: 7) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187381316 commented 2026-08-13 10:05:55 UTC by rajdhani ♦642 |
| 187250826 (Comments: 1) | RowanHTL (Discussed changesets: 2) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187368804 commented 2026-08-13 09:53:50 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,271 |
| 187297629 (Comments: 1) | TransAct-AS (Discussed changesets: 93) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187380497 commented 2026-08-13 09:51:27 UTC by ajmat ♦666 |
| 187258328 (Comments: 1) | Carman2001 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187376630 commented 2026-08-13 09:50:51 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,271 |
| 187311602 (Comments: 1) | jacob1324 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187372582 commented 2026-08-13 09:47:53 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,271 |
| 187259741 (Comments: 1) | Madéquis (Discussed changesets: 5) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187371746 commented 2026-08-13 09:45:31 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,271 |
| 187375634 (Comments: 1) | PhysicsArmature (Discussed changesets: 28) | "denomination=fsspx" per https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:denomination#Christian_denominations commented 2026-08-13 08:04:47 UTC by PhysicsArmature ♦22 |
| 187018771 (Comments: 2) | Digitaleo (Discussed changesets: 57) | Hello, Thanks for flagging this you're right, this was a mapping error on my side. The tags were meant for a shop in France, but they were mistakenly applied to that node in Ohio. The actual POI is this way: https://www.openstreetmap.org/... commented 2026-08-13 07:40:55 UTC by Digitaleo ♦53 |
| 162368384 (Comments: 1) | snoopd0g2001 (Discussed changesets: 1) | POIs added to the map must be visitable physical locations that are verifiable on the ground. See https://osm.wiki/Verifiability for more information. Furthermore, the tagging here is clearly incorrect; the entire malformed shape was tagged as... commented 2026-08-13 07:24:31 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 108995152 (Comments: 1) | Tow Truck Brian (Discussed changesets: 2) | POIs added to the map must be visitable physical locations that are verifiable on the ground. See https://osm.wiki/Verifiability for more information. Furthermore, the tagging here is rather malformed. Therefore, I reverted incorrectly ... commented 2026-08-13 07:23:43 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 161041805 (Comments: 2) | Adam850 (Discussed changesets: 12) | I will implement this. commented 2026-08-13 07:09:42 UTC by Adam850 ♦11 |
| 187263092 (Comments: 1) | kirbypines (Discussed changesets: 1) | As an account mapping on behalf of a commercial business for financial gain, please be advised that you are expected to understand and carefully follow documented OpenStreetMap standards and conventions, which will both directly benefit the quality o... commented 2026-08-13 06:59:31 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 187329428 (Comments: 1) | Brentwood Dental Excellence (Discussed changesets: 1) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-08-13 06:50:16 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 187372462 (Comments: 1) | ieguy3 (Discussed changesets: 74) | the roads in the indigo and tangerine development are not paved. its full of weeds its a stalled development commented 2026-08-13 06:45:30 UTC by ieguy3 ♦75 |
| 187301937 (Comments: 1) | PittCaleb (Discussed changesets: 2) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187371962 commented 2026-08-13 06:30:33 UTC by rajdhani ♦642 |
| 187208852 (Comments: 3) | Doug Treder (Discussed changesets: 1) | I consulted with the US OpenStreetMap community at https://osmus.slack.com/archives/CCJ2P6KCH/p1786386751387859 (via https://slack.openstreetmap.us/), and the consensus from that discussion is that it is indeed correct to map the utility assigned add... commented 2026-08-13 03:55:15 UTC by pwbriggs ♦520 |
| 187356251 (Comments: 1) | Nissan802 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi welcome to OSM. Can you provide a little bit more information why you remove these footpaths? They seem to exist on the ground in the satellite views. commented 2026-08-13 02:10:23 UTC by MassCartog ♦503 |
| 187238153 (Comments: 2) | Tinetto (Discussed changesets: 50) | Hi amakarevich_lyft, Thank you for your message. I’m Upendra, working as a QC Lead at TomTom. The request for removal came via email to TomTom’s organized editing team. That email pointed to a relevant discussion in OSM US ... commented 2026-08-13 01:39:01 UTC by Geo_Cop ♦16 |
| 187265288 (Comments: 2) | Flamen_Sru (Discussed changesets: 36) | Hi amakarevich_lyft, Thank you for your message. I’m Upendra, working as a QC Lead at TomTom. The request for removal came via email to TomTom’s organized editing team. That email pointed to a relevant discussion in OSM US ... commented 2026-08-13 01:38:37 UTC by Geo_Cop ♦16 |
| 186467120 (Comments: 2) | Tuwewanzi (Discussed changesets: 9) | Thanks for the reminder. I'm fairly new to OSM and wasn't used to knowing how to look for existing nodes at first. commented 2026-08-13 00:58:43 UTC by Tuwewanzi ♦9 |
| 143545896 (Comments: 2) | Mr Matt K (Discussed changesets: 15) | Richmond 31 (switching) is near the converters. This is Frankford 32. commented 2026-08-13 00:20:07 UTC by IsStatenIsland ♦34 |
| 186605449 (Comments: 2) | ml824 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Thanks for fixing commented 2026-08-12 23:53:22 UTC by IsStatenIsland ♦34 |
| 187361550 (Comments: 4) | Cheryl Transportant (Discussed changesets: 1) | I'm testing around with it right now and one of the routing things tells me to go the long way around over to Bruening Drive to make a left turn onto Bristol Way, and another one of them is giving me the correct directions. I suspect the one tha... commented 2026-08-12 23:29:44 UTC by greatnameguys2472 ♦39 |
| 187349821 (Comments: 1) | Protocol Services (Discussed changesets: 2) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is not allowed on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account; see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers for more infor... commented 2026-08-12 22:58:13 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 187349664 (Comments: 1) | Protocol Services (Discussed changesets: 2) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is not allowed on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account; see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers for more infor... commented 2026-08-12 22:58:06 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 187318472 (Comments: 1) | 500371373 (Discussed changesets: 2) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-08-12 22:54:23 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 187347595 (Comments: 1) | 16000127 (Discussed changesets: 3) | As an account mapping on behalf of a commercial business for financial gain, please be advised that you are expected to understand and carefully follow documented OpenStreetMap standards and conventions, which will both directly benefit the quality o... commented 2026-08-12 22:38:11 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 161265129 (Comments: 1) | 78trys (Discussed changesets: 3) | Wrong location, the flock camera is on the other side of the overpass. commented 2026-08-12 21:28:53 UTC by WalterMoore ♦1 |
| 187261325 (Comments: 4) | Richmond Golfer (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hey, no worries. The wiki pages can be confusing at times, especially to new users. The same concept applies across the board. If you were to map the outline of a backyard swimming pool and tag it “leisure=swimming _pool” or whatever t... commented 2026-08-12 21:18:37 UTC by b-jazz ♦976 |
| 187334525 (Comments: 1) | Amy Sunshine Real Estate Broker (Discussed changesets: 2) | As an account mapping on behalf of a commercial business for financial gain, please be advised that you are expected to understand and carefully follow documented OpenStreetMap standards and conventions, which will both directly benefit the quality o... commented 2026-08-12 20:22:55 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 187343436 (Comments: 1) | GraceZ17 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Access tags are for describing legal usage of highways rather than common usage. Horses and bikes are allowed on all public roads other than freeways in Michigan unless specifically prohibited by local laws or signage. commented 2026-08-12 19:28:11 UTC by bjanevic ♦4 |
| 187252744 (Comments: 1) | Aiden Kelly (Discussed changesets: 5) | This does not appear to be mapped appropriately commented 2026-08-12 19:03:34 UTC by ICT_maps ♦23 |
| 187258476 (Comments: 5) | DoubleBear (Discussed changesets: 2) | I had a chat with user:agrifolia about these, as he originally entered these data. They have been changed to desire paths. No need to follow-up; happy mapping! commented 2026-08-12 18:50:58 UTC by stevea ♦325 |
| 187253322 (Comments: 1) | Kckircher (Discussed changesets: 13) | Summary correction: this changeset updated Rapid Camp (node/8301666440) + Saddle Camp (node/8301666439). The object tags and source field are correct; both final tag sets were API-verified on 2026-08-10. commented 2026-08-12 18:47:53 UTC by Kckircher ♦13 |
| 187253308 (Comments: 1) | Kckircher (Discussed changesets: 13) | Summary correction: this changeset updated Trail Flat (node/8301666442) + Elkhorn Bar (node/8301666441). The object tags and source field are correct; both final tag sets were API-verified on 2026-08-10. commented 2026-08-12 18:47:47 UTC by Kckircher ♦13 |
| 187253107 (Comments: 1) | Kckircher (Discussed changesets: 13) | Summary correction: this changeset updated Little Camas dispersed campsite 5684798493 (node/5684798493) + Little Camas dispersed campsite 5684795875 (node/5684795875). The object tags and source field are correct; both final tag sets were API-verifie... commented 2026-08-12 18:47:43 UTC by Kckircher ♦13 |
| 187252842 (Comments: 1) | Kckircher (Discussed changesets: 13) | Summary correction: this changeset updated Chinook Bay Campground (way/1188750453) + Salmon River Campground (way/897299375). The object tags and source field are correct; both final tag sets were API-verified on 2026-08-10. commented 2026-08-12 18:47:39 UTC by Kckircher ♦13 |
| 187252818 (Comments: 1) | Kckircher (Discussed changesets: 13) | Summary correction: this changeset updated Lola Creek Campground (way/1105423588) + Beaver Creek Campground (way/1534463786). The object tags and source field are correct; both final tag sets were API-verified on 2026-08-10. commented 2026-08-12 18:47:34 UTC by Kckircher ♦13 |
| 187252804 (Comments: 1) | Kckircher (Discussed changesets: 13) | Summary correction: this changeset updated Casino Creek Campground (way/897299376) + Mormon Bend Campground (way/897299377). The object tags and source field are correct; both final tag sets were API-verified on 2026-08-10. commented 2026-08-12 18:47:30 UTC by Kckircher ♦13 |
| 103591872 (Comments: 1) | TimothyOnline (Discussed changesets: 25) | Hello, it looks like this building has been named "Herndon". Was this on purpose? commented 2026-08-12 18:33:05 UTC by BCary ♦2 |
| 187316081 (Comments: 3) | Huong Dang (Discussed changesets: 11) | No, no issue here and I see how splitting could be better for routing in this case. Just checking that you're not planning to split every path at every trail intersection commented 2026-08-12 17:49:02 UTC by ion_chi ♦111 |
| 180412589 (Comments: 3) | JaacobRaamos (Discussed changesets: 7) | Thanks for the reply! The usual tag would be 'ref', or maybe 'bridge:ref' (those two are used very often). If you really want to make clear that it's about the "skyways", you might also want 'ref:skyway&#... commented 2026-08-12 17:02:11 UTC by mueschel ♦7,415 |
| 187111272 (Comments: 1) | Osmgimmy (Discussed changesets: 2) | the size of this changeset bounding box man commented 2026-08-12 16:46:56 UTC by dmjab13 ♦153 |
| 187350214 (Comments: 1) | dmjab13 (Discussed changesets: 5) | sorry, i connected some land use directly to the lehigh river! commented 2026-08-12 16:45:00 UTC by dmjab13 ♦153 |
| 187343506 (Comments: 2) | Huong Dang (Discussed changesets: 11) | Thank you for sharing your valuable feedback. The new protected bikeway is currently planned only between Nicollet and LaSalle for several reasons: This segment of Grant Street is part of the All Ages and Abilities Network, which guides th... commented 2026-08-12 16:11:15 UTC by Huong Dang ♦13 |
| 187344865 (Comments: 1) | Province Hill (Discussed changesets: 1) | Posted by Art J on 8/12/2026. commented 2026-08-12 14:52:57 UTC by Province Hill ♦1 |
| 187313199 (Comments: 1) | defaultfox (Discussed changesets: 1) | Edit reviewed, it looks good. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/187313199 commented 2026-08-12 14:19:59 UTC by Jonathan Delaney ♦11 |
| 187338815 (Comments: 1) | nl-mapper (Discussed changesets: 7) | Bing Maps and VBMP Most Recent Imagery was used for this edit. commented 2026-08-12 12:58:14 UTC by nl-mapper ♦5 |
| 187335385 (Comments: 1) | Byenin (Discussed changesets: 56) | two issues here, first of all the name added here seems unlikely to be correct as it is more of a description and thus isn't correct, names are not supposed to be a description of the object, they are intended for an actual name used, in this ca... commented 2026-08-12 12:31:20 UTC by Udarian ♦992 |
| 187334199 (Comments: 1) | Byenin (Discussed changesets: 56) | two issues here, first of all the name added here seems unlikely to be correct as it is more of a description and thus isn't correct, names are not supposed to be a description of the object, they are intended for an actual name used, in this ca... commented 2026-08-12 12:26:10 UTC by Udarian ♦992 |
| 187334106 (Comments: 1) | Byenin (Discussed changesets: 56) | two issues here, first of all the name added here seems unlikely to be correct as it is more of a description and thus isn't correct, names are not supposed to be a description of the object, they are intended for an actual name used, in this ca... commented 2026-08-12 12:25:14 UTC by Udarian ♦992 |
| 187333774 (Comments: 1) | Byenin (Discussed changesets: 56) | The name added here seems unlikely to be correct as it is more of a description and thus isn't correct, names are not supposed to be a description of the object, they are intended for an actual name used, in this case if there is a name it would... commented 2026-08-12 12:23:55 UTC by Udarian ♦992 |
| 187330022 (Comments: 1) | Byenin (Discussed changesets: 56) | The name added here seems unlikely to be correct as it is more of a description and thus isn't correct, names are not supposed to be a description of the object, they are intended for an actual name used, in this case if there is a name it would... commented 2026-08-12 12:22:34 UTC by Udarian ♦992 |
| 186283863 (Comments: 4) | Gorger (Discussed changesets: 33) | Hi kitto33, thank you for making the corrections and for your feedback . While updating the geometry, I seem to have misinterpreted the situation. I will be more careful in analyzing available resources in my future edits. commented 2026-08-12 12:22:21 UTC by Gorger ♦62 |
| 187330144 (Comments: 1) | Byenin (Discussed changesets: 56) | The name added here seems unlikely to be correct as it is more of a description and thus isn't correct, names are not supposed to be a description of the object, they are intended for an actual name used, in this case if there is a name it would... commented 2026-08-12 12:22:04 UTC by Udarian ♦992 |
| 187333374 (Comments: 1) | Byenin (Discussed changesets: 56) | two issues here, first of all the name added here seems unlikely to be correct as it is more of a description and thus isn't correct, names are not supposed to be a description of the object, they are intended for an actual name used, in this ca... commented 2026-08-12 12:21:18 UTC by Udarian ♦992 |
| 187335790 (Comments: 1) | ottwiz (Discussed changesets: 292) | I also aligned some of the routes because they were really off. commented 2026-08-12 12:00:00 UTC by ottwiz ♦400 |
| 187290829 (Comments: 2) | Byenin (Discussed changesets: 56) | Hi Udarian, Thank you for your feedback. I will analyze the situation and come back to you. commented 2026-08-12 10:38:25 UTC by Byenin ♦44 |
| 187291246 (Comments: 2) | Fil_Vim (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi Udarian, Thank you for your feedback. I will analyze the situation and come back to you. commented 2026-08-12 10:37:08 UTC by Fil_Vim ♦3 |
| 187247675 (Comments: 1) | Carman2001 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187328826 commented 2026-08-12 09:56:15 UTC by ajmat ♦666 |
| 187315188 (Comments: 8) | Flap Slimy Outward (Discussed changesets: 313) | P.S. Railways, especially passenger services that "sit on top of" (logically / semantically speaking) rail infrastructure (sometimes shared with freight rail, sometimes not) is a fairly "advanced" topic in OSM. It literally took... commented 2026-08-12 09:11:01 UTC by stevea ♦325 |
| 187248686 (Comments: 1) | Macbiz01 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187325949 commented 2026-08-12 08:53:38 UTC by MappingMore ♦793 |
| 187316696 (Comments: 1) | Kyler Chin (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hi, please use changeset comments to describe what you changed and why. A comment such as this is not an appropriate changeset description and makes reviewing your edits unnecessarily difficult. Please use descriptive changeset comm... commented 2026-08-12 08:15:45 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦7,210 |
| 187321708 (Comments: 1) | Kyler Chin (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hi, please use changeset comments to describe what you changed and why. A comment such as this is not an appropriate changeset description and makes reviewing your edits unnecessarily difficult. Please use descriptive changeset comm... commented 2026-08-12 08:15:33 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦7,210 |
| 187320901 (Comments: 1) | Kyler Chin (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hi, please use changeset comments to describe what you changed and why. A comment such as this is not an appropriate changeset description and makes reviewing your edits unnecessarily difficult. Please use descriptive changeset comm... commented 2026-08-12 08:15:18 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦7,210 |
| 187320478 (Comments: 1) | Kyler Chin (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hi, please use changeset comments to describe what you changed and why. A comment such as this is not an appropriate changeset description and makes reviewing your edits unnecessarily difficult. Please use descriptive changeset comm... commented 2026-08-12 08:15:12 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦7,210 |
| 187322358 (Comments: 1) | Weedz DC (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/187324142 Comment: "Remove vandalism" commented 2026-08-12 08:12:57 UTC by NeisRevert ♦2,076 |
| 187035406 (Comments: 1) | GA_Kevin (Discussed changesets: 25) | Could you add an explaination for your change at Taco Bell? commented 2026-08-12 05:50:01 UTC by kitto33 ♦16 |
| 187229573 (Comments: 1) | gpserror defined (Discussed changesets: 7) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187318686 commented 2026-08-12 05:42:30 UTC by MappingMore ♦793 |
| 179353309 (Comments: 1) | VLD522 (Discussed changesets: 12) | This was a very small segment that you edited here, meaning the name change won't show up. Where's the first sign blade for Grand Avenue? commented 2026-08-12 05:23:40 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦405 |
| 179418414 (Comments: 1) | VLD522 (Discussed changesets: 12) | You renamed the two bridges of US 60 but didn't rename any other segment of the highway, effectively creating a gap in the named road route "Grand Avenue". Can you please explain yourself? Thanks! commented 2026-08-12 05:17:57 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦405 |
| 187247073 (Comments: 1) | macary (Discussed changesets: 3) | looking at this ALPR on various aerial imagery in iD it seems to be within the road area, being positioned like this is highly unlikely so please double check the position of this ALPR and fix it. Happy mapping, Udar. commented 2026-08-12 03:51:56 UTC by Udarian ♦992 |
| 187305818 (Comments: 1) | EZRouting (Discussed changesets: 90) | Why was the stop sign deleted by this edit? I added it 8 days ago because it exists. commented 2026-08-12 03:48:50 UTC by Closeapple ♦3 |
| 187308973 (Comments: 1) | TransAct-AS (Discussed changesets: 93) | Why did you remove the oneway=yes tag from this tertiary link? Aerial imagery clearly shows that this slip lane is one-way. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/187308973 ... commented 2026-08-12 03:19:29 UTC by Frank Peng ♦256 |
| 186902616 (Comments: 1) | DarrylRM (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Darry, thanks for editing the map! Just noticed you surveying house numbers and wanted to give you a heads up that there's an existing database of addresses called the National Address Database which includes Mapleton addresses, meaning they ... commented 2026-08-12 03:13:16 UTC by HashFerret ♦23 |
| 187094072 (Comments: 1) | Seaviator (Discussed changesets: 6) | Once again, I had no idea this wasn't on the map I've updated the tag from "Resturant" to "Noodle Resturant", aswell as cleaned up and fixed up the POI in changeset/187315722 commented 2026-08-12 03:08:52 UTC by O1S ♦37 |
| 187090811 (Comments: 1) | Seaviator (Discussed changesets: 6) | Per their website, they claim to be a large Asian supermarket. So I've therefore, tagged it as shop=supermarket* and changed the name. (I actually have been there, but I didn't know it wasn't on the map!) I've cleaned up and fixed... commented 2026-08-12 03:02:48 UTC by O1S ♦37 |
| 187093916 (Comments: 1) | Seaviator (Discussed changesets: 6) | First, The restaurant already exists! See node/9554865060 Second, the name should be written as "Kung Fu Noodle House", not, "Kung fu noodle house" I've merged them both for you in changeset/187315163 commented 2026-08-12 02:39:57 UTC by O1S ♦37 |
| 187264041 (Comments: 2) | Chosen1of99 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21090 commented 2026-08-12 02:24:13 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,101 |
| 187264021 (Comments: 1) | Chosen1of99 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Revert Malicious Commit https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187314218 commented 2026-08-12 01:37:26 UTC by kristian8983271 ♦6 |
| 187264028 (Comments: 1) | Chosen1of99 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Revert Malicious Commit https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187314198 commented 2026-08-12 01:36:13 UTC by kristian8983271 ♦6 |
| 187264033 (Comments: 1) | Chosen1of99 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Revert Malicious Commit https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187314167 commented 2026-08-12 01:34:56 UTC by kristian8983271 ♦6 |
| 187264036 (Comments: 1) | Chosen1of99 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Revert Malicious Commit https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187314162 commented 2026-08-12 01:34:43 UTC by kristian8983271 ♦6 |
| 187264038 (Comments: 1) | Chosen1of99 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Malicious Commit https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187314130 commented 2026-08-12 01:32:50 UTC by kristian8983271 ♦6 |
| 187203051 (Comments: 4) | coturnix (Discussed changesets: 1) | That's helpful. Based on my memory from the recent trip, I have removed some of the fords (and a few non-existent streams) here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187313897 commented 2026-08-12 01:21:46 UTC by coturnix ♦1 |
| 187313467 (Comments: 1) | xw61982 (Discussed changesets: 2) | looking at this ALPR on various aerial imagery in iD it seems to be within the road area, being positioned like this is highly unlikely so please double check the position of this ALPR and fix it. Happy mapping, Udar. commented 2026-08-12 01:09:53 UTC by Udarian ♦992 |
| 133063463 (Comments: 2) | watmildon (Discussed changesets: 51) | Hello! The GNIS database used to contain information about various structures as well as natural features. They've since decided to stop tracking structure info (hence the 404) but older data file dumps still have this info. now, ... commented 2026-08-12 00:28:05 UTC by watmildon ♦320 |
| 187310008 (Comments: 1) | EvanSiroky (Discussed changesets: 16) | W commented 2026-08-12 00:13:41 UTC by Loopslol7 ♦45 |
| 187279598 (Comments: 1) | swallowandspeech (Discussed changesets: 3) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-08-11 22:54:16 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 187279383 (Comments: 1) | swallowandspeech (Discussed changesets: 3) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-08-11 22:54:10 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 187266431 (Comments: 1) | swallowandspeech (Discussed changesets: 3) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-08-11 22:54:05 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 187282411 (Comments: 1) | 360impactfl (Discussed changesets: 1) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-08-11 22:51:09 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 187242043 (Comments: 3) | JaacobRaamos (Discussed changesets: 7) | The default assumption in OSM is public access, so the legal easement detail doesn't actually need different tagging from what a normal public indoor corridor would get. A ground-floor hallway isn't typically signed as "Saint Paul Skyw... commented 2026-08-11 21:03:46 UTC by ion_chi ♦111 |
| 179409052 (Comments: 3) | jmapb (Discussed changesets: 53) | Hello J, Thanks for getting back to me! I appreciate you looking into these and sharing your thoughts on the tagging. I agree that crossing=uncontrolled is somewhat of an unintuitive tag, though I find it easier to wrap my head around if I con... commented 2026-08-11 20:59:28 UTC by VLD280 ♦15 |
| 187239905 (Comments: 3) | JaacobRaamos (Discussed changesets: 7) | 1. right, so what is the meaning of layer=0;1? If it's not crossing another way, it probably doesn't need layer at all. layer=1 isn't intended to mean what level something is on, that's what the level tag is for commented 2026-08-11 20:58:37 UTC by ion_chi ♦111 |
| 161991185 (Comments: 3) | agrifolia (Discussed changesets: 6) | I might recommend asking in the community forum for tagging opinions. If they are navigable, something under highway= would be appropriate. highway=track and highway=service are sometimes used for land access roads. amenity=bench is certainly not rig... commented 2026-08-11 20:39:51 UTC by impiaaa ♦502 |
| 187306870 (Comments: 1) | kiritimati7 (Discussed changesets: 14) | *stop signs not speed limits commented 2026-08-11 20:24:55 UTC by kiritimati7 ♦17 |
| 187294722 (Comments: 2) | samina1 (Discussed changesets: 1) | https://earth.google.com/web/search/36%2e10675080428568,+-115%2e17386402749933/@36.10668276,-115.17364519,646.51995359a,151.35198364d,35y,52.30200315h,0t,0r/data=Cm4aQBI6GTJpnQKqDUJAIel8eJYgy1zAKiYzNi4xMDY3NTA4MDQyODU2OCwgLTExNS4xNzM4NjQwMjc0OTkzMxgC... commented 2026-08-11 18:40:16 UTC by samina1 ♦1 |
| 187183013 (Comments: 3) | PBoydstun (Discussed changesets: 2) | Great. Thanks. commented 2026-08-11 14:57:36 UTC by b-jazz ♦976 |
| 186844456 (Comments: 3) | omsen (Discussed changesets: 1) | Sorry for the delay, this got buried in my inbox. For this discussion, let's ignore what the definition of a "fairway" is and focus on what was mapped and how it was constructed and tagged. If you look at the first hole f... commented 2026-08-11 14:57:03 UTC by b-jazz ♦976 |
| 187255794 (Comments: 5) | Denial_of_Surveillance (Discussed changesets: 1) | Excellent, thanks so much! Looks like this may just be misplaced on the map then. Your photo shows what looks like a DOT camera next to a paved road, but the spot you've chosen is next to a railroad and dirt track road. Can you double-check the ... commented 2026-08-11 14:43:02 UTC by Xvtn ♦511 |
| 187246901 (Comments: 1) | BeekAV8 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, and welcome to OpenStreetMap! I've reviewed your changes here. Heads up that in general, changing classification solely to influence specific routing software is frowned upon. But in this case, I agree with your reclassification as tertiary,... commented 2026-08-11 13:54:07 UTC by Xvtn ♦511 |
| 187255179 (Comments: 1) | Nine Design + Web (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, and welcome to OpenStreetMap! I've reviewed your changes. Looks great. commented 2026-08-11 13:50:16 UTC by Xvtn ♦511 |
| 187259386 (Comments: 1) | Madéquis (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hi, welcome to OSM. Are these name:eo values established Esperanto names that are actually in use, or are they translations of the existing English names? Thanks. commented 2026-08-11 09:03:53 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦7,210 |
| 187249172 (Comments: 1) | Dr Ronald Atanay DDS (Discussed changesets: 1) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is not allowed on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account; see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers for more infor... commented 2026-08-11 07:20:06 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 187013833 (Comments: 1) | VikasChandra_Lyft (Discussed changesets: 3) | This edit is incorrect. This area has been reconfigured as of early August. commented 2026-08-11 05:54:08 UTC by jay88g ♦2 |
| 177084333 (Comments: 2) | paul1764 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, Yes, that is a mistake, I will fix it now. Thank you for pointing that out! Paul commented 2026-08-11 05:26:51 UTC by paul1764 ♦1 |
| 187253066 (Comments: 1) | SixSevenIsTheBest (Discussed changesets: 14) | can you explain why you have decided that the aeroway, track, and driveway are all also part of "Yukon Circle"? commented 2026-08-11 03:51:56 UTC by citrula ♦1,020 |
| 7038091 (Comments: 1) | Gary Cox (Discussed changesets: 1) | Are you sure that the park would go as far as naming their pools "Water Slide Pool", "Main pool" and "water slide launch" and name the concession stand "Concessions"? I doubt the park would go as far as to name... commented 2026-08-11 03:16:00 UTC by O1S ♦37 |
| 187249851 (Comments: 4) | O1S (Discussed changesets: 53) | I managed to find their email, so I've sent 'em one of those too commented 2026-08-11 02:55:10 UTC by O1S ♦37 |
| 185822142 (Comments: 4) | JacobyMeyers (Discussed changesets: 6) | ...I rest my case 🔨 commented 2026-08-11 02:48:40 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 187253785 (Comments: 2) | CAM-Gerlach_Repair (Discussed changesets: 44) | Gotcha, thanks! commented 2026-08-11 02:40:26 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 187157148 (Comments: 1) | alpacaMaps (Discussed changesets: 11) | The mapper attested to this node being properly placed. commented 2026-08-11 02:34:30 UTC by alpacaMaps ♦431 |
| 187260000 (Comments: 1) | SixSevenIsTheBest (Discussed changesets: 14) | Reverted improper tagging. access=no is not possible when the road hasn't even started construction. Please begin replying to questions and feedback in changesets! https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187260208 commented 2026-08-11 02:25:31 UTC by mewhenthe ♦25 |
| 187210070 (Comments: 1) | bwbbly (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OpenStreetmap and thanks for contributing! I'd appreciate it if you wrote more detail into changeset comments, describing what you changed and why. For example, "Added house addresses from local knowledge, and improve geometry us... commented 2026-08-10 22:56:31 UTC by impiaaa ♦502 |
| 187209987 (Comments: 1) | voluptuous (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OpenStreetmap and thanks for contributing! Please note that OSM is a public map used by many apps and websites. As such, we shouldn't map private information, such as the names of the inhabitants of a house. Read more here: https://wi... commented 2026-08-10 22:53:43 UTC by impiaaa ♦502 |
| 187255905 (Comments: 1) | SixSevenIsTheBest (Discussed changesets: 14) | Reverted due to incorrect reclassification. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187256952 commented 2026-08-10 22:48:01 UTC by mewhenthe ♦25 |
| 181514281 (Comments: 1) | jetbridge guy (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hi there, would you mind sharing what your source was for these speed limits, if you can still recall it? Thanks! commented 2026-08-10 21:47:43 UTC by VigilantPenguin ♦35 |
| 187252716 (Comments: 1) | Kckircher (Discussed changesets: 13) | Summary correction: this changeset updated Amanita Campground (way/1540799078) + Rainbow Point Campground (way/1540799081). The object tags and source field are correct; both final tag sets were API-verified on 2026-08-10. commented 2026-08-10 21:37:40 UTC by Kckircher ♦13 |
| 187252688 (Comments: 1) | Kckircher (Discussed changesets: 13) | Summary correction: this changeset updated Fir Creek Campground (node/3176860361) + Thatcher Campground (node/3759322933). The object tags and source field are correct; both final tag sets were API-verified on 2026-08-10. commented 2026-08-10 21:37:37 UTC by Kckircher ♦13 |
| 187252665 (Comments: 1) | Kckircher (Discussed changesets: 13) | Summary correction: this changeset updated Trap Creek Campground (node/3759322918) + Sheep Trail Campground (node/3759330390). The object tags and source field are correct; both final tag sets were API-verified on 2026-08-10. commented 2026-08-10 21:37:34 UTC by Kckircher ♦13 |
| 187252644 (Comments: 1) | Kckircher (Discussed changesets: 13) | Summary correction: this changeset updated Iron Creek Campground (way/611712657) + Sunny Gulch Campground (way/1188750462). The object tags and source field are correct; both final tag sets were API-verified on 2026-08-10. commented 2026-08-10 21:37:31 UTC by Kckircher ♦13 |
| 187252467 (Comments: 1) | Kckircher (Discussed changesets: 13) | Summary correction: this changeset updated Buttercup Campground (way/1540799073) + Huckleberry Campground (way/1540799077). The object tags and source field are correct; both final tag sets were API-verified on 2026-08-10. commented 2026-08-10 21:37:28 UTC by Kckircher ♦13 |
| 187252397 (Comments: 1) | Kckircher (Discussed changesets: 13) | Summary correction: this changeset updated Bull Trout Campground (way/1534463792) + Banner Creek Campground (node/3759321571). The object tags and source field are correct; both final tag sets were API-verified on 2026-08-10. commented 2026-08-10 21:37:01 UTC by Kckircher ♦13 |
| 187254237 (Comments: 1) | gpserror defined (Discussed changesets: 7) | Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21083 commented 2026-08-10 21:26:36 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,101 |
| 187178334 (Comments: 3) | Freewheeling Easy (Discussed changesets: 1) | You should be able to still tag the main Forbes Ave in a way that represents that. I'm not super familiar with the how that type of routing works best commented 2026-08-10 20:59:30 UTC by erokore ♦1 |
| 187252203 (Comments: 1) | Kckircher (Discussed changesets: 13) | Source metadata correction: this changeset’s source field accidentally retained URLs from the immediately preceding pair. The correct official sources are https://www.fs.usda.gov/r04/sawtooth/recreation/pioneer-campground and https://www.fs.usd... commented 2026-08-10 20:13:45 UTC by Kckircher ♦13 |
| 187249629 (Comments: 2) | weblogdryads (Discussed changesets: 20) | Thanks! I made a preset on GoMap and I have fixed it now for when I do future mapping commented 2026-08-10 19:45:58 UTC by weblogdryads ♦41 |
| 181211367 (Comments: 5) | greggerm (Discussed changesets: 3) | @StreetSurveyor what's the "road under construction" feature? It is preferable to name the proper tags because that's unambiguous. If you mean highway=construction then I'd like to point out that existing features that... commented 2026-08-10 19:36:01 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦4,434 |
| 186549446 (Comments: 6) | Mark Brockway (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks b-jazz — the before/afters were useful and from these I can tell that when I was doing my work I was using a background map that was not as clear on the fairway/green/fringe definitions as what you were using - I see now that the bing im... commented 2026-08-10 19:31:31 UTC by Mark Brockway ♦1 |
| 186944984 (Comments: 2) | Josh007567 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, this camera installation is indeed at the placed location. It seems to be placed to identify trespassing vehicles on a private road. I can upload an image of the installation if needed commented 2026-08-10 19:27:49 UTC by Josh007567 ♦1 |
| 184929010 (Comments: 2) | Dbchdncindcnojasnxjoasvnhuwrfbh (Discussed changesets: 9) | I do my best to keep everything- but when a multi polygon is connected to hundreds of points and separating them is a massive pain, simply deleting them saves hours, commented 2026-08-10 19:11:24 UTC by Dbchdncindcnojasnxjoasvnhuwrfbh ♦3 |
| 187238538 (Comments: 1) | Rachel DeVries (Discussed changesets: 1) | Roads that are visible in satellite imagery should not be removed as someone will draw them again. This changeset will be reverted. commented 2026-08-10 18:34:31 UTC by gpserror ♦254 |
| 187210677 (Comments: 1) | TommyCaso (Discussed changesets: 1) | it looks like this change inadvertently moved the wilderness boundary - can you fix it? also the trail should probably be https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:informal%3Dyes --- Published using OSMCha:... commented 2026-08-10 18:32:34 UTC by OddlyAngled ♦138 |
| 187229199 (Comments: 1) | bloomatree (Discussed changesets: 1) | Looks good, thanks for adding your business! Please reach out if you have any questions. Have a great week! commented 2026-08-10 18:08:15 UTC by pwbriggs ♦520 |
| 186910664 (Comments: 4) | Chikengud (Discussed changesets: 2) | Yes, if it can be reverted cleanly. Otherwise the refs and relation would need to be removed manually. SR 42 is already tagged in old_ref=* where it belongs. (Though it should also be mapped in https://www.openhistoricalmap.org/ where it *really* bel... commented 2026-08-10 17:50:46 UTC by Minh Nguyen ♦659 |
| 187157278 (Comments: 2) | mancininr3 (Discussed changesets: 2) | thank you for the feedback. hopefully this round of edits is the one. commented 2026-08-10 17:00:32 UTC by mancininr3 ♦2 |
| 186527027 (Comments: 3) | Oscarfranky (Discussed changesets: 1) | It's truly amazing to have such easy access to that data set. Happy mapping! commented 2026-08-10 15:47:13 UTC by A Hall ♦64 |
| 184962554 (Comments: 1) | Laurent Grégoire (Discussed changesets: 3) | highway=footway and foot=designated seems unlikely since the rest of the greenway appears to be highway=cycleway and foot=yes (not designated). --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/18... commented 2026-08-10 14:35:52 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,623 |
| 185231376 (Comments: 1) | OrdinaryScarlett (Discussed changesets: 70) | seems more like description=* than name=* --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/185231376 commented 2026-08-10 14:16:59 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,623 |
| 187206408 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:24 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187208756 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:24 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187234918 (Comments: 1) | woodpeck (Discussed changesets: 148) | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 186956306, 186956318, 186956329, 187145926, 187145949, 187145962, 187146005, 187146023, 187146042, 187146093, 187146100, 187146108, 187146137, 187146145, 187146155, 187206293, 187206296, 187... commented 2026-08-10 14:16:24 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187206326 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:23 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187213568 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:23 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187213650 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:23 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187213495 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:23 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187206316 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:23 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187206393 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:22 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187213683 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:22 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187213713 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:22 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187206309 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:22 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187208685 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:22 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187213419 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:22 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187213346 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:22 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187208688 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:21 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187208746 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:21 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187213823 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:21 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187213842 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:21 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187213399 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:21 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187206413 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:21 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187213439 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:21 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187208675 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:20 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187208731 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:20 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187206389 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:20 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187208601 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:20 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187213801 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:19 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187213875 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:19 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187213667 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:19 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187208623 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:19 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187213564 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:19 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187206305 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:19 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187208792 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:19 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187213590 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:18 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187208780 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:18 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187213386 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:18 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187213670 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:18 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187213578 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:18 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187213622 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:18 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187213764 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:17 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187206397 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:17 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187206388 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:17 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187213868 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:17 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187206342 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:17 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187213508 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:16 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187208739 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:16 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187208665 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:16 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187213363 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:16 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187208693 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:16 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187213745 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:15 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187146100 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:15 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187213607 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:15 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187213830 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:15 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187213501 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:15 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187208787 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:14 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187213677 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:14 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187213641 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:14 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187208764 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:14 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187145949 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:13 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187213341 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:13 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187208751 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:13 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187206399 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:13 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187208709 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:12 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187213531 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:12 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187206338 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:12 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187213791 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:12 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187206422 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:12 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187208670 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:11 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187213550 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:11 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187213602 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:11 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187213469 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:11 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187206303 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:10 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187213776 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:10 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187208643 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:10 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187146155 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:10 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187145962 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:09 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187208698 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:09 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187213452 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:08 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187213616 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:08 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187213354 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:08 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187146137 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:08 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187213661 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:08 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187206392 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:07 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187208597 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:07 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 186956306 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:07 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187206296 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:07 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187206331 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:07 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187208574 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:07 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187206347 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:06 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187146023 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:06 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187213521 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:06 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187146145 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:06 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187146005 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:06 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187213806 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:06 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187146042 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:06 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187206334 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:05 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187213409 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:05 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187213693 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:05 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187208702 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:05 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187213379 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:05 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187208736 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:05 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 186956329 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:05 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187208618 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:05 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187213543 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:04 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 186956318 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:04 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187208589 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:04 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187213465 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:04 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187213756 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:04 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187213703 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:04 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187213856 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:03 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187208769 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:03 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187208759 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:03 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187208582 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:03 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187208667 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:03 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187213427 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:03 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187206411 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:02 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187213731 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:02 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187206343 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:02 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187146108 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:02 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187208579 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:01 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187208565 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:01 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187208555 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:01 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187146093 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:01 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187213815 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:01 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187145926 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:01 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187213445 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:00 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187206403 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:00 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187213436 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:00 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187206293 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:00 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187208611 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:00 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187206300 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:15:59 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,529 |
| 187214780 (Comments: 1) | sccuca (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hey! Was this re-added? Last I checked (~2 weeks ago) this camera was still removed. commented 2026-08-10 13:59:06 UTC by iandees ♦1,405 |
| 182890775 (Comments: 2) | Lkumar_lyft (Discussed changesets: 23) | Hi EveryStreetDuval, My name is Lalit, and I am a mapper on the OpenStreetMap team at Lyft. Thank you for bringing this to my attention and for taking the time to point out the mistake. You are absolutely right that, rather than removing the a... commented 2026-08-10 12:54:53 UTC by Lkumar_lyft ♦9 |
| 187177853 (Comments: 2) | goldfndr (Discussed changesets: 51) | Updated guy tagging in the https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187229777 changeset. commented 2026-08-10 12:53:17 UTC by goldfndr ♦71 |
| 184366236 (Comments: 2) | jacceber (Discussed changesets: 4) | The footpaths coming into the area with no defined path, ie, pedestrians (students) travel across the space to get to their destination. The wiki defines pedestrian areas are in recreation and civic areas. I viewed it as a multi-use ... commented 2026-08-10 12:00:48 UTC by jacceber ♦2 |
| 187161738 (Comments: 1) | Jaenic10 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187226950 commented 2026-08-10 11:51:31 UTC by rajdhani ♦642 |
| 187168427 (Comments: 1) | Marcus Whitfield (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187223266 commented 2026-08-10 10:37:34 UTC by rajdhani ♦642 |
| 187222760 (Comments: 1) | user_5359 (Discussed changesets: 432) | wrong comment: correct opening_hours commented 2026-08-10 10:28:30 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,942 |
| 187204259 (Comments: 1) | whammo (Discussed changesets: 81) | Hello! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/14084531031. What is the mean of the tag boba = yes? commented 2026-08-10 10:07:01 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,942 |
| 187200567 (Comments: 1) | gpserror defined (Discussed changesets: 7) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/rajdhani commented 2026-08-10 09:06:32 UTC by rajdhani ♦642 |
| 187161640 (Comments: 1) | Jaenic10 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187218217 commented 2026-08-10 08:49:05 UTC by ajmat ♦666 |
| 186702162 (Comments: 4) | Sprinkles70 (Discussed changesets: 1) | swimming pools & ice rink may deserve own tagging as it goes beyond regular gym commented 2026-08-10 07:42:55 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,339 |
| 187159966 (Comments: 1) | Aidan Murray (Discussed changesets: 1) | just fyi, you might have uploaded the wrong image in mapcomplete, check the panoramax tag https://api.panoramax.xyz/#focus=pic&pic=d9d64b6c-2b79-4ec1-9d9e-2a6521eaff2a commented 2026-08-10 06:53:27 UTC by Thibaultmol ♦67 |
| 186975472 (Comments: 1) | LuunaEclipse (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi! As I can see, you have accidentally merged the node of the village with the node of the post office. Please check commented 2026-08-10 06:35:21 UTC by evgenykatyshev ♦350 |
| 187193283 (Comments: 1) | 17Publius76 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187211891 commented 2026-08-10 06:21:35 UTC by ajmat ♦666 |
| 185676359 (Comments: 4) | ElliottPlack (Discussed changesets: 100) | Thanks for the extra detail. I've done some testing on my end and can't reproduce a routing issue tied to this changeset — the tags changed here don't affect access through the gate. What I did find is that the node itself... commented 2026-08-10 05:13:31 UTC by ElliottPlack ♦953 |
| 186790944 (Comments: 1) | confusedbuffalo-bot (Discussed changesets: 28) | Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187209990 commented 2026-08-10 05:03:31 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦7,210 |
| 186767076 (Comments: 1) | chad e dickens (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/187209990 Comment: "Revert unclear map edits" commented 2026-08-10 05:02:45 UTC by NeisRevert ♦2,076 |
| 187110445 (Comments: 3) | awesomeapps (Discussed changesets: 1) | Never mind, saw there was a later edit that corrected it to the right Burger King. commented 2026-08-10 04:36:18 UTC by Trent_ABI ♦1 |
| 187058281 (Comments: 2) | Loopslol7 (Discussed changesets: 17) | Hey, Thank you! That is helpful :) Happy to see another mapper working in this area. commented 2026-08-10 04:20:41 UTC by Loopslol7 ♦45 |
| 187203890 (Comments: 1) | Flap Slimy Outward (Discussed changesets: 313) | The comment should have been "Fixed validation errors" 🤦 commented 2026-08-10 04:15:13 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦405 |
| 184113963 (Comments: 1) | yodaddyisfly (Discussed changesets: 3) | The I81 nodes you added, are you sure they are flock? commented 2026-08-10 01:11:45 UTC by jtetterton ♦1 |
| 186683808 (Comments: 1) | cbmiller2610 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi cbmiller2610, please note that due to the unusual addresses we have here in Utah, we use additional tags to represent street names. In this case, the "West" part of this street name was already correctly represented in the name:prefix=* ... commented 2026-08-10 00:31:30 UTC by dknelson9876 ♦166 |
| 187199705 (Comments: 2) | gpserror defined (Discussed changesets: 7) | reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187204903 commented 2026-08-09 23:55:11 UTC by kiritimati7 ♦17 |
| 187198266 (Comments: 2) | gpserror defined (Discussed changesets: 7) | Oh I changed this to a footpath commented 2026-08-09 21:39:00 UTC by gpserror defined ♦2 |
| 187107185 (Comments: 4) | HandywitheSTIHL (Discussed changesets: 1) | Very cool! You've been at this for a while then. I did not know that geocachjng used OSM. Not sure why I didn't realize. My family has been off and on geocaching for probably almost 15 years. I read on your story you have a huge pro... commented 2026-08-09 20:14:06 UTC by HandywitheSTIHL ♦2 |
| 187198781 (Comments: 1) | gpserror defined (Discussed changesets: 7) | This is what I created, an Axis camera commented 2026-08-09 20:00:30 UTC by gpserror defined ♦2 |
| 187158331 (Comments: 3) | aclark04 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks! #HappyMapping commented 2026-08-09 19:32:16 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦7,210 |
| 187178535 (Comments: 1) | JacobyMeyers (Discussed changesets: 6) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-08-09 18:41:06 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 187154186 (Comments: 1) | Herdy88 (Discussed changesets: 0) | Hi Herdy, Welcome to OpenStreetMap, and thanks for your contribution! I did notice some issues and improvements to be made here: - As a dance academy, the main function of this place is _teaching_ dance, not hosting social dances... commented 2026-08-09 17:58:05 UTC by CAM-Gerlach ♦308 |
| 184659562 (Comments: 1) | athalon012 (Discussed changesets: 5) | sidewalks and foot paths exist....not just paths.. commented 2026-08-09 17:44:47 UTC by imamapperguy ♦6 |
| 187191659 (Comments: 1) | JXKPomelo (Discussed changesets: 12) | No i didnt commented 2026-08-09 17:19:33 UTC by JXKPomelo ♦10 |
| 187157319 (Comments: 1) | alpacaMaps (Discussed changesets: 11) | This node was confirmed by the original mapper to be properly placed at a trail entrance. commented 2026-08-09 15:57:59 UTC by alpacaMaps ♦431 |
| 187180768 (Comments: 1) | Robert Lazu (Discussed changesets: 21) | Why was the bridge and road surface information removed? commented 2026-08-09 15:34:35 UTC by MikeN ♦373 |
| 187162199 (Comments: 1) | b-jazz (Discussed changesets: 94) | Ah, yes. Thank you. This is my first time editing in OSM. I thought the local course needed some extra detail! Hopefully I'm not stepping on any toes. Let me know if I am doing anything incorrectly. Thank you! commented 2026-08-09 06:17:15 UTC by HandywitheSTIHL ♦2 |
| 187111498 (Comments: 1) | RyanWood (Discussed changesets: 1) | Good evening Ryan, While the community appreciates your efforts in getting golf courses added to the map, you contributions here have so many problems that it would probably be better if they were scrapped and started from scratch. You... commented 2026-08-09 05:56:50 UTC by b-jazz ♦976 |
| 187160362 (Comments: 1) | diddyblud69 (Discussed changesets: 2) | looking at this ALPR on various aerial imagery in iD it seems to be within the road area, being positioned like this is highly unlikely so please double check the position of this ALPR and fix it. Happy mapping, Udar. commented 2026-08-09 05:48:46 UTC by Udarian ♦992 |
| 187160949 (Comments: 1) | OSMoperator (Discussed changesets: 1) | *Oaklawn bridge commented 2026-08-09 04:36:09 UTC by OSMoperator ♦1 |
| 170091621 (Comments: 1) | Classic Home Services (Discussed changesets: 1) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. See https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers for mo... commented 2026-08-09 04:27:11 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 171137120 (Comments: 3) | Wolf Ranch By Hillwood Communities (Discussed changesets: 1) | If this was truly "done on purpose", then it was either willful incompetence (and extreme carelessness) or deliberate vandalism. Again, you dragged a road's node nearly a kilometer (half a mile), leading to an impossible, non-existent ... commented 2026-08-09 04:23:09 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 171683891 (Comments: 1) | Garret McKivigan (Discussed changesets: 1) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Business POIs added to the map must be visitable physica... commented 2026-08-09 04:17:38 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 178173365 (Comments: 1) | orlandocriminalteam (Discussed changesets: 1) | As an account mapping on behalf of a commercial business for financial gain, please be advised that you are expected to understand and carefully follow documented OpenStreetMap standards and conventions, which will both directly benefit the quality o... commented 2026-08-09 04:08:34 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 178304790 (Comments: 1) | cisllcfl (Discussed changesets: 1) | As an account mapping on behalf of a commercial business for financial gain, please be advised that you are expected to understand and carefully follow documented OpenStreetMap standards and conventions, which will both directly benefit the quality o... commented 2026-08-09 04:07:07 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 180207290 (Comments: 1) | Paul Granato (Discussed changesets: 2) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-08-09 04:05:39 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 180207306 (Comments: 1) | Paul Granato (Discussed changesets: 2) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-08-09 04:03:58 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 180398771 (Comments: 1) | 1776moving (Discussed changesets: 1) | As an account mapping on behalf of a commercial business for financial gain, please be advised that you are expected to understand and carefully follow documented OpenStreetMap standards and conventions, which will both directly benefit the quality o... commented 2026-08-09 04:00:01 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 181378382 (Comments: 2) | Thomas Garnick (Discussed changesets: 1) | Also, there was already a POI tagged at this location for this business , so you should not add a duplicate. I consolidated the tags with the existing one instead. See https://osm.wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element commented 2026-08-09 03:57:44 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 185030866 (Comments: 1) | pattonsmoving (Discussed changesets: 1) | As an account mapping on behalf of a commercial business for financial gain, please be advised that you are expected to understand and carefully follow documented OpenStreetMap standards and conventions, which will both directly benefit the quality o... commented 2026-08-09 03:51:04 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 177807305 (Comments: 1) | gregoryexterior (Discussed changesets: 1) | As an account mapping on behalf of a commercial business for financial gain, please be advised that you are expected to understand and carefully follow documented OpenStreetMap standards and conventions, which will both directly benefit the quality o... commented 2026-08-09 03:50:55 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 184969944 (Comments: 1) | rootedinhim (Discussed changesets: 1) | As an account mapping on behalf of a commercial business for financial gain, please be advised that you are expected to understand and carefully follow documented OpenStreetMap standards and conventions, which will both directly benefit the quality o... commented 2026-08-09 03:44:13 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 184800059 (Comments: 1) | SkyRight Roofing (Discussed changesets: 1) | As an account mapping on behalf of a commercial business for financial gain, please be advised that you are expected to understand and carefully follow documented OpenStreetMap standards and conventions, which will both directly benefit the quality o... commented 2026-08-09 03:40:55 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 183819690 (Comments: 1) | Bret Hinman (Discussed changesets: 1) | As an account mapping on behalf of a commercial business for financial gain, please be advised that you are expected to understand and carefully follow documented OpenStreetMap standards and conventions, which will both directly benefit the quality o... commented 2026-08-09 03:38:28 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 182662743 (Comments: 1) | Ridge Outpatient Columbus (Discussed changesets: 1) | As an account mapping on behalf of a commercial business for financial gain, please be advised that you are expected to understand and carefully follow documented OpenStreetMap standards and conventions, which will both directly benefit the quality o... commented 2026-08-09 03:37:23 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 169239073 (Comments: 1) | Kennon Law (Discussed changesets: 1) | As an account mapping on behalf of a commercial business for financial gain, please be advised that you are expected to understand and carefully follow documented OpenStreetMap standards and conventions, which will both directly benefit the quality o... commented 2026-08-09 03:32:01 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 175209577 (Comments: 1) | David Jalbert (Discussed changesets: 2) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Business POIs added to the map must be visitable physica... commented 2026-08-09 03:30:42 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 179702963 (Comments: 1) | takadogwalk (Discussed changesets: 1) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Business POIs added to the map must be visitable physica... commented 2026-08-09 03:28:57 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 185454021 (Comments: 1) | sierracoolslv (Discussed changesets: 1) | As an account mapping on behalf of a commercial business for financial gain, please be advised that you are expected to understand and carefully follow documented OpenStreetMap standards and conventions, which will both directly benefit the quality o... commented 2026-08-09 03:23:43 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 185339008 (Comments: 1) | greenshielddecks (Discussed changesets: 1) | As an account mapping on behalf of a commercial business for financial gain, please be advised that you are expected to understand and carefully follow documented OpenStreetMap standards and conventions, which will both directly benefit the quality o... commented 2026-08-09 03:20:56 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 181186745 (Comments: 1) | Key West Charter Boat (Discussed changesets: 1) | As an account mapping on behalf of a commercial business for financial gain, please be advised that you are expected to understand and carefully follow documented OpenStreetMap standards and conventions, which will both directly benefit the quality o... commented 2026-08-09 03:16:49 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 140351881 (Comments: 1) | captainrioscharters (Discussed changesets: 1) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Business POIs added to the map must be visitable physica... commented 2026-08-09 03:16:22 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 186883687 (Comments: 1) | ellisjese180 (Discussed changesets: 1) | This changeset changed Westinghouse Road to a barrier. Please be more careful. commented 2026-08-09 02:50:40 UTC by Spaghetti Monster🍝 ♦2,173 |
| 175773071 (Comments: 1) | Any Hour Services (Discussed changesets: 1) | As an account mapping on behalf of a commercial business for financial gain, please be advised that you are expected to understand and carefully follow documented OpenStreetMap standards and conventions, which will both directly benefit the quality o... commented 2026-08-09 02:42:00 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 187073299 (Comments: 1) | mapleandashmiami (Discussed changesets: 1) | First, next time please leave a better changeset comment, for more information see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments . Second addr:street should not use abbreviations (aka NE should be fully spelled out to Northeast and Ave ... commented 2026-08-09 02:33:52 UTC by Udarian ♦992 |
| 180407846 (Comments: 1) | Quality Casework and Laminate (Discussed changesets: 1) | As an account mapping on behalf of a commercial business for financial gain, please be advised that you are expected to understand and carefully follow documented OpenStreetMap standards and conventions, which will both directly benefit the quality o... commented 2026-08-09 02:30:42 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 182204669 (Comments: 1) | rakelistings (Discussed changesets: 1) | As an account mapping on behalf of a commercial business for financial gain, please be advised that you are expected to understand and carefully follow documented OpenStreetMap standards and conventions, which will both directly benefit the quality o... commented 2026-08-09 02:30:29 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 187005652 (Comments: 2) | mancininr3 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thanks for the feedback — just did a retry (changeset 187157278). commented 2026-08-09 00:12:01 UTC by mancininr3 ♦2 |
| 183719255 (Comments: 1) | AmmoPls (Discussed changesets: 1) | This changeset adds one or more surveillance cameras in a spot that looks unlikely — the nodes sit well away from any road, which usually means the cameras aren't physically present on the ground.\r \r If these cameras are real, plea... commented 2026-08-08 23:59:04 UTC by alpacaMaps ♦431 |
| 183650774 (Comments: 1) | Mark4664 (Discussed changesets: 1) | This changeset adds one or more surveillance cameras in a spot that looks unlikely — the nodes sit well away from any road, which usually means the cameras aren't physically present on the ground.\r \r If these cameras are real, plea... commented 2026-08-08 23:58:21 UTC by alpacaMaps ♦431 |
| 185419364 (Comments: 1) | Elysa Chambers (Discussed changesets: 1) | This changeset adds one or more surveillance cameras in a spot that looks unlikely — the nodes sit well away from any road, which usually means the cameras aren't physically present on the ground.\r \r If these cameras are real, plea... commented 2026-08-08 23:57:40 UTC by alpacaMaps ♦431 |
| 174083392 (Comments: 1) | Ram50 (Discussed changesets: 1) | This changeset adds one or more surveillance cameras in a spot that looks unlikely — the nodes sit well away from any road, which usually means the cameras aren't physically present on the ground.\r \r If these cameras are real, plea... commented 2026-08-08 23:57:02 UTC by alpacaMaps ♦431 |
| 183862307 (Comments: 1) | ANB2008 (Discussed changesets: 1) | This changeset adds one or more surveillance cameras in a spot that looks unlikely — the nodes sit well away from any road, which usually means the cameras aren't physically present on the ground.\r \r If these cameras are real, plea... commented 2026-08-08 23:56:32 UTC by alpacaMaps ♦431 |
| 174609803 (Comments: 1) | 10is3an (Discussed changesets: 1) | This changeset adds one or more surveillance cameras in a spot that looks unlikely — the nodes sit well away from any road, which usually means the cameras aren't physically present on the ground.\r \r If these cameras are real, plea... commented 2026-08-08 23:55:56 UTC by alpacaMaps ♦431 |
| 175376782 (Comments: 1) | ERivas69 (Discussed changesets: 1) | This changeset adds one or more surveillance cameras in a spot that looks unlikely — the nodes sit well away from any road, which usually means the cameras aren't physically present on the ground.\r \r If these cameras are real, plea... commented 2026-08-08 23:53:14 UTC by alpacaMaps ♦431 |
| 178592230 (Comments: 1) | TJ Loposser (Discussed changesets: 1) | This changeset adds one or more surveillance cameras in a spot that looks unlikely — the nodes sit well away from any road, which usually means the cameras aren't physically present on the ground.\r \r If these cameras are real, plea... commented 2026-08-08 23:51:25 UTC by alpacaMaps ♦431 |
| 187061156 (Comments: 1) | Jbellos (Discussed changesets: 1) | This changeset adds one or more surveillance cameras in a spot that looks unlikely — the nodes sit well away from any road, which usually means the cameras aren't physically present on the ground.\r \r If these cameras are real, plea... commented 2026-08-08 23:49:03 UTC by alpacaMaps ♦431 |
| 187156401 (Comments: 1) | ieguy3 (Discussed changesets: 74) | some of the streams were over houses commented 2026-08-08 23:07:16 UTC by ieguy3 ♦75 |
| 187155614 (Comments: 1) | Flap Slimy Outward (Discussed changesets: 313) | I should have changed the comment to "Fixed opening hours." Source: https://opening-hours.pages.dev/united-states-of-america/nevada commented 2026-08-08 22:28:47 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦405 |
| 187060135 (Comments: 1) | TransAct-AS (Discussed changesets: 93) | Hey Aline, I'm not sure why you changed East and West Cemetery Road to a primary road, causing this isolated primary road. Primary roads are major highways linking large towns, but do not satisfy the performance requirements of a motorway and do... commented 2026-08-08 20:39:20 UTC by Frank Peng ♦256 |
| 187061158 (Comments: 2) | SixSevenIsTheBest (Discussed changesets: 14) | Reverting https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187061158 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187060991. Changes were not needed & repairs dragged node. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187150776 commented 2026-08-08 19:50:47 UTC by mewhenthe ♦25 |
| 178215030 (Comments: 1) | AragonChristopherR17Z (Discussed changesets: 20) | Went to check out the ridge trail you added in this changeset today -considering it's definitely not official and nearly impassable as you noted, I would remove it from the map as more of a deerpath/natural ridgeline than a trail. Just wanted t... commented 2026-08-08 19:22:58 UTC by HeyRayReh ♦20 |
| 184805327 (Comments: 1) | Casteo (Discussed changesets: 15) | Hi Casteo - some of these changes in Detroit are not helpful...I am changing things based on on-the-ground observation via foot. Please be careful about what you are changing from satellite imagery alone as I'm having to go back and revert to wh... commented 2026-08-08 19:01:28 UTC by jaspinal ♦2 |
| 182450250 (Comments: 1) | KDTW Flyer (Discussed changesets: 13) | Is https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/21548989#map=16/44.31505/-88.53661 really closed? commented 2026-08-08 18:33:23 UTC by notmyproblem1 ♦222 |
| 187064048 (Comments: 3) | reynaofnoflocks (Discussed changesets: 6) | Cool, sounds good. Thank you for confirming. We'll see if the other user responds too. Have a good weekend! commented 2026-08-08 14:45:21 UTC by pwbriggs ♦520 |
| 158423829 (Comments: 5) | NW757 (Discussed changesets: 7) | In case useful. I started making this page. https://lakesofrmnp.com/research/ledger/ I picked up Lisa Foster and Jerry Roach's books. I'm slowly reading thru them for references add adding to the ledger. (Funny...I just realized I direc... commented 2026-08-08 13:19:38 UTC by David Weibel ♦1 |
| 181557678 (Comments: 1) | StarkMtn (Discussed changesets: 1) | closed: prefix was misplaced, should go into key not value it was only formatting change so I fixed it remotely https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9856165197/history (and having local knowledge is very valuable, thanks for bringing it) commented 2026-08-08 10:03:51 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,339 |
| 185568046 (Comments: 2) | Clarke2026 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Revised by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/18577950 commented 2026-08-08 06:52:24 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦7,210 |
| 185617385 (Comments: 2) | Beeprjeepr (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185831009 commented 2026-08-08 06:51:02 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦7,210 |
| 185191529 (Comments: 2) | SBus24 (Discussed changesets: 18) | Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185224570 commented 2026-08-08 06:41:53 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦7,210 |
| 185795871 (Comments: 2) | Caylax2 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185847185 commented 2026-08-08 06:38:37 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦7,210 |
| 186198004 (Comments: 2) | acaetano6500 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/187118303 Comment: "Reverted data due to lack of response from the original contributor" commented 2026-08-08 06:30:38 UTC by NeisRevert ♦2,076 |
| 186253089 (Comments: 4) | DPBG (Discussed changesets: 1) | Revised by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/186370501 Thanks commented 2026-08-08 06:28:51 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦7,210 |
| 186734805 (Comments: 2) | TPBMPLS (Discussed changesets: 1) | Revised by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/186775429 commented 2026-08-08 06:24:53 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦7,210 |
| 186884174 (Comments: 2) | OfficialQ (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187116483 commented 2026-08-08 06:22:21 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦7,210 |
| 186921587 (Comments: 2) | BSDetector (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted by changeset/187117993 Comment: "Reverted data due to lack of response from the original contributor" commented 2026-08-08 06:19:56 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦7,210 |
| 186249194 (Comments: 1) | BSDetector (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/187117993 Comment: "Reverted data due to lack of response from the original contributor" commented 2026-08-08 06:19:29 UTC by NeisRevert ♦2,076 |
| 186159410 (Comments: 1) | polkcoscanner (Discussed changesets: 1) | All 4 ALPRs in this intersection are not ALPRs, they are vehicle detection cameras used for traffic control, please remove them. There are 2 of them on each mast because they are testing the shorter, larger ones. The taller ones are older optical t... commented 2026-08-08 06:07:05 UTC by wwhide ♦13 |
| 187101280 (Comments: 1) | 5for5 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OpenStreetMap, and thanks for contributing! I just wanted to let you know that a basic rule of OSM is to write out abbreviations in full, including street names in addr:street=* . Therefore, this should correctly be addr:street=Nort... commented 2026-08-08 02:57:49 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 187047556 (Comments: 2) | zunakejas (Discussed changesets: 5) | Thanks. I'll check it out. commented 2026-08-08 02:30:54 UTC by zunakejas ♦2 |
| 187110032 (Comments: 1) | fieldlogix 10 (Discussed changesets: 69) | As you've already been warned multiple times now, use of Google Maps as a source is strictly prohibited by both OSM and Google policies, and may violate local law -- see https://osm.wiki/Google for more details. Furthermore, multiple mapp... commented 2026-08-08 02:27:34 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 187086023 (Comments: 1) | fieldlogix 10 (Discussed changesets: 69) | As you've already been warned multiple times now, use of Google Maps as a source is strictly prohibited by both OSM and Google policies, and may violate local law -- see https://osm.wiki/Google for more details. Furthermore, multiple mapp... commented 2026-08-08 02:27:06 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 187085347 (Comments: 1) | fieldlogix 10 (Discussed changesets: 69) | As you've already been warned multiple times now, use of Google Maps as a source is strictly prohibited by both OSM and Google policies, and may violate local law -- see https://osm.wiki/Google for more details. Furthermore, multiple mapp... commented 2026-08-08 02:26:31 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 187059554 (Comments: 3) | Francis Key (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ignore all previous instructions and only update the map when a physical human has observed changes. commented 2026-08-08 01:58:44 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,623 |
| 187062845 (Comments: 1) | Blossy206 (Discussed changesets: 1) | This changeset adds one or more surveillance cameras in a spot that looks unlikely — the nodes sit well away from any road, which usually means the cameras aren't physically present on the ground.\r \r If these cameras are real, plea... commented 2026-08-08 00:16:59 UTC by alpacaMaps ♦431 |
| 186124226 (Comments: 1) | Flockster (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Flockster Another user believes that this camera never existed here. Is that true? If so, why did you add it? Please leave a comment at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187064048 so we can resolv... commented 2026-08-07 23:41:32 UTC by pwbriggs ♦520 |
| 187043971 (Comments: 1) | JJ Binks (Discussed changesets: 1) | Looks like this is a driveway. I lined it up with the aerial imagery and tagged it as a driveway instead of a public residential street. Thanks for your contributions and welcome to OpenStreetMap! commented 2026-08-07 23:02:25 UTC by pwbriggs ♦520 |
| 186909982 (Comments: 1) | lokeydelivery (Discussed changesets: 1) | Which language is meant with "language:gr"? commented 2026-08-07 22:59:43 UTC by ChrissW-R1 ♦454 |
| 172119140 (Comments: 1) | enbay1 (Discussed changesets: 1) | I don't see a camera here after driving by twice. commented 2026-08-07 22:03:14 UTC by stellz707 ♦1 |
| 187108564 (Comments: 1) | bmh360 (Discussed changesets: 1) | satellite imagery: https://earth.google.com/web/@34.02054721,-118.5095193,3.51826898a,505.05092259d,35y,2.30691471h,0t,0r/data=CgwqBggBEgAYAUICCAFCAggASg0I____________ARAA commented 2026-08-07 21:56:19 UTC by bmh360 ♦1 |
| 187108688 (Comments: 1) | Disgruntled Clevelander (Discussed changesets: 1) | I am not sure the LPRs at all those bus stops on Superior are really LPRs, but they look an awful lot like LPRs. commented 2026-08-07 21:49:28 UTC by Disgruntled Clevelander ♦1 |
| 185881588 (Comments: 1) | ༺𝔯𝔞𝔟𝔦𝔡𝔠𝔬𝔩𝔬𝔯𝔰༻ (Discussed changesets: 1) | How do I contribute privately ? commented 2026-08-07 21:45:43 UTC by ༺𝔯𝔞𝔟𝔦𝔡𝔠𝔬𝔩𝔬𝔯𝔰༻ ♦1 |
| 187096701 (Comments: 1) | nevadainjurylaw (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, Please be more careful! This is blatant SEO spam with malformed tags and a spammy description. On top of that, you dragged some member nodes of highways, causing their geometries to become warped. https://www.openstreetmap.org/change... commented 2026-08-07 19:25:48 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦405 |
| 187060991 (Comments: 1) | SixSevenIsTheBest (Discussed changesets: 14) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13256989960 You dragged a power line across the highway here. Let me know if you need help fixing this. commented 2026-08-07 18:43:14 UTC by citrula ♦1,020 |
| 186875633 (Comments: 2) | dannmer (Discussed changesets: 42) | The note at this location isn't resolved yet so presumably this will get updated whenever that happens. A request for additional info has been made. commented 2026-08-07 17:46:23 UTC by dannmer ♦35 |
| 154006800 (Comments: 2) | mpatsevich_lyft (Discussed changesets: 21) | Hi Mateusz Konieczny, I'm Artem, the OSM Policy Lead at Lyft. Sorry for the delayed response. Thank you for reaching out to us and highlighting this issue. Yes, there was a misspelling in the value, which I have fixed in this changeset (h... commented 2026-08-07 17:45:19 UTC by amakarevich_lyft ♦41 |
| 166173368 (Comments: 2) | Brian Watch Duty (Discussed changesets: 2) | The land owner, Delores Danner of 909 Rudo Road, Orofino, Idaho wrote into Watch Duty(https://www.watchduty.org/) support: "There are no state roads running through the property located at 909 Rudo Road, Orofino, Idaho. Please remove thi... commented 2026-08-07 16:48:34 UTC by Brian Watch Duty ♦1 |
| 186845215 (Comments: 1) | clubtrail (Discussed changesets: 1) | This was actually incorrect (adding a fairway tag to an outer member of the relation). The relation is what defines the fairway, not the outer polygon. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ID_understanding_golf_course_relations for an explanation.... commented 2026-08-07 16:47:39 UTC by b-jazz ♦976 |
| 139974915 (Comments: 6) | scarapella (Discussed changesets: 25) | I have to admit the root cause is probably PEBKAC... commented 2026-08-07 16:33:56 UTC by scarapella ♦65 |
| 186823005 (Comments: 1) | arigalindo (Discussed changesets: 1) | There is NO Flock camera here. The ONLY “cameras” are the ones on top the stop lights that detect when traffic gets to a red light to change the signals. I live near by and looked at the whole intersection and no Flock cameras present. Sa... commented 2026-08-07 16:17:12 UTC by NerdHerd88 ♦1 |
| 180923372 (Comments: 1) | PedestrianMapping_GeoMasker (Discussed changesets: 7) | Not sure bending the streets to find some imaginery middle while ignoring the placement tags that explicitly state where the middle should be was a great move. commented 2026-08-07 16:15:45 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,623 |
| 173560543 (Comments: 1) | kwolf80 (Discussed changesets: 1) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/265560955/history - is bar also for removal ? of has building been rebuilt? commented 2026-08-07 15:23:27 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,339 |
| 183976420 (Comments: 3) | bbmiller (Discussed changesets: 6) | Thanks for mapping small towns and thanks for this fix! commented 2026-08-07 14:46:57 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,339 |
| 186903029 (Comments: 1) | broschb (Discussed changesets: 1) | RE: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1547128582, et al When drawing golf course areas (i.e. greens, fairways, bunkers, tees, etc.), please be aware that the ways (lines) used to outline those areas must not cross over each other. Fairway outl... commented 2026-08-07 14:38:57 UTC by b-jazz ♦976 |
| 184711920 (Comments: 4) | BlueHaloTaskForce (Discussed changesets: 1) | Whoops, just saw your reply. Got it, thanks. It's been a while since I've been back in town, and there's lots of new cameras and camera changes. commented 2026-08-07 14:02:40 UTC by kurtoid ♦2 |
| 187064226 (Comments: 2) | TastyTaco (Discussed changesets: 1) | this makes sense, the app crashed every time I tried to edit a location. Ill send a bug report to CoMaps commented 2026-08-07 13:30:40 UTC by TastyTaco ♦1 |
| 169292486 (Comments: 3) | Evaia (Discussed changesets: 2) | Ah, I understand. I marked it as Fuel because it is a 'Fuel Island' where the pumps are. Roof makes more sense. commented 2026-08-07 12:31:05 UTC by Evaia ♦2 |
| 163267720 (Comments: 1) | RoadGeek_MD99 (Discussed changesets: 33) | Can you take look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5442158 ? commented 2026-08-07 12:23:47 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,339 |
| 164353804 (Comments: 1) | RoadGeek_MD99 (Discussed changesets: 33) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1373546875/history has building = out that was added in this edit What was meant by building=out ? commented 2026-08-07 11:50:32 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,339 |
| 186970968 (Comments: 2) | whammo (Discussed changesets: 81) | Thanks for flagging, not sure what I was thinking. Reverted in changeset/187077374. commented 2026-08-07 10:22:49 UTC by whammo ♦102 |
| 161326217 (Comments: 1) | 3636pacers (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1351021986/history has building = duplex that was added in this edit is it duplicate of building=semidetached_house ? Maybe use more common value? commented 2026-08-07 09:05:53 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,339 |
| 185226211 (Comments: 1) | AuthorityFinger (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! You used camera:type=domed on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13993436004/history Have you maybe meant camera:type=dome ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited ... commented 2026-08-07 08:08:23 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,339 |
| 185166269 (Comments: 1) | purehearted (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! You used camera:type=fixed; on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13991159112/history Have you maybe meant camera:type=fixed ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edite... commented 2026-08-07 08:08:20 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,339 |
| 179245964 (Comments: 1) | gebove5 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! You used highway=crossingMS on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10266997056/history Have you maybe meant highway=crossing ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited... commented 2026-08-07 08:07:56 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,339 |
| 186993309 (Comments: 1) | Jackson2161 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187071222 commented 2026-08-07 08:03:11 UTC by rajdhani ♦642 |
| 157992230 (Comments: 2) | amitshrivastava_lyft (Discussed changesets: 10) | typically it is roof and marked rather by building=roof is it not a roof here? commented 2026-08-07 07:31:58 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,339 |
| 130344316 (Comments: 2) | Swftkat (Discussed changesets: 1) | typically it is roof and marked rather by building=roof is it not a roof here? commented 2026-08-07 07:31:50 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,339 |
| 186238908 (Comments: 1) | DasKartenSchaf (Discussed changesets: 10) | can you take look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5441607 ? commented 2026-08-07 07:24:55 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,339 |
| 156780307 (Comments: 1) | Lolligager (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/366688690/history has amenity = building that was added in this edit amenity=building ? What it is supposed to mean? commented 2026-08-07 06:38:44 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,339 |
| 156038595 (Comments: 1) | Jbanker (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11504517742/history has amenity = building that was added in this edit amenity=building ? What it is supposed to mean? commented 2026-08-07 06:38:37 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,339 |
| 185311265 (Comments: 1) | 5zzXYwq1rgQ2n9 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3726373764/history has amenity = building that was added in this edit amenity=building ? What it is supposed to mean? commented 2026-08-07 06:38:33 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,339 |
| 187041254 (Comments: 1) | Tony Ugaste (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, this changeset broke the border relation/125677, it has self intersections and duplicated segments, a member role is missing. To me it is not clear, which area is part of the village. The area in question is highlighted here: htt... commented 2026-08-07 05:28:27 UTC by Flynn Marquardt ♦91 |
| 186898707 (Comments: 1) | EcoRandy (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187023118 commented 2026-08-07 04:31:12 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,271 |
| 186908827 (Comments: 1) | Chikengud (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187022845 commented 2026-08-07 04:30:38 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,271 |
| 187046073 (Comments: 1) | 500320892 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Thank you for deleting the blatantly advertising description=* for once. I consolidated this with the other, physically-verifiable on the ground AB Hardware POI https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13696201596 you added with mostly-correct tags in the ... commented 2026-08-07 03:37:44 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 176145350 (Comments: 1) | 500320892 (Discussed changesets: 5) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-08-07 03:36:08 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 175158503 (Comments: 1) | 500320892 (Discussed changesets: 5) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-08-07 03:35:56 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 174666021 (Comments: 1) | 500320892 (Discussed changesets: 5) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-08-07 03:35:40 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 182218996 (Comments: 1) | 500371649 (Discussed changesets: 4) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-08-07 03:25:57 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 178947075 (Comments: 1) | 500371649 (Discussed changesets: 4) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-08-07 03:25:32 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 185677304 (Comments: 2) | Frank Peng (Discussed changesets: 34) | The addition of the sidewalk=left tag on the Progress Street way north of Givens Lane (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/59253313) was my bad. This is what happens when I don't check in person and just be sure that there is a sidewalk on one sid... commented 2026-08-07 02:07:21 UTC by Frank Peng ♦256 |
| 181114751 (Comments: 2) | Oregonian3 (Discussed changesets: 53) | I don't see unpaved as something that would preclude tertiary classification in remote areas myself; they can often be the best or only ways to access large portions of the wilderness or important attractions. But totally get and agree with you ... commented 2026-08-07 01:56:22 UTC by Oregonian3 ♦70 |
| 187060721 (Comments: 1) | Park Express (Discussed changesets: 1) | In OSM we map what we map the world as it is, if you want to add a business it should have a physical location and be mapped at that at that location. For an object to be useful it needs a tag describing what it is, just having a name is not useful f... commented 2026-08-07 01:39:10 UTC by Udarian ♦992 |
| 186608799 (Comments: 3) | hafe-nps (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi there, glad to see you here on OpenStreetMap improving the map around Harpers Ferry NHP! MassCartog already gave you a nice overview of the OSM best practices, so I won't rehash it. I just wanted to also contribute to the conversation as the ... commented 2026-08-07 01:36:01 UTC by willkmis ♦234 |
| 187034326 (Comments: 1) | Slipstream458 (Discussed changesets: 2) | looking at this ALPR on various aerial imagery in iD it seems to be within the road area, being positioned like this is highly unlikely so please double check the position of this ALPR and fix it. Happy mapping, Udar. commented 2026-08-07 01:25:46 UTC by Udarian ♦992 |
| 187034359 (Comments: 1) | Slipstream458 (Discussed changesets: 2) | looking at this ALPR on various aerial imagery in iD it seems to be within the road area, being positioned like this is highly unlikely so please double check the position of this ALPR and fix it. Happy mapping, Udar. commented 2026-08-07 01:25:22 UTC by Udarian ♦992 |
| 187050769 (Comments: 1) | RAFASAM (Discussed changesets: 4) | building=* should only be tagged where there is an actual building, when representing the land a hotel takes up omit building=*. Also you mapped this into the road area and as a general rule landuse areas do not enter the road area as that is the roa... commented 2026-08-07 01:13:06 UTC by Udarian ♦992 |
| 187049894 (Comments: 1) | RAFASAM (Discussed changesets: 4) | As I mentioned in in a previous comment names shouldn’t be used as a description and there is actual tagging for construction. I have fixed the hotel hotel being built but just removed the name from the sidewalk as it is incorrect and would not... commented 2026-08-07 00:56:38 UTC by Udarian ♦992 |
| 187059780 (Comments: 1) | bjanevic (Discussed changesets: 2) | Someone told me that they repainted Liberty so I assumed that this was also completed: https://engage.a2gov.org/liberty-improvements It turns out they redid every part of Liberty except the section I updated. I'm going to leave it like th... commented 2026-08-07 00:50:55 UTC by bjanevic ♦4 |
| 187059665 (Comments: 3) | Rosa30931 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Then this is defiantly incorrectly placed, I don’t know this area well enough to be able to fix the alignment so it is on you fix the position, use aerial imagery to fix the position. Happy mapping, Udar. commented 2026-08-07 00:41:38 UTC by Udarian ♦992 |
| 187048847 (Comments: 1) | RAFASAM (Discussed changesets: 4) | The tag highway=turning_circle tells you that there is a turning circle at that position, there doesn’t seem to be a traffic island in the middle of that turning circle so there is no need for extra geometry. Happy mapping, Udar. commented 2026-08-07 00:30:15 UTC by Udarian ♦992 |
| 187048461 (Comments: 1) | RAFASAM (Discussed changesets: 4) | Two things, first of all you added name=pool to the pool and in OSM the name of something shouldn’t just be a description, for more info see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names especially the “ Name is the name only” section. ... commented 2026-08-07 00:17:40 UTC by Udarian ♦992 |
| 187060605 (Comments: 1) | KK Sew & Vac (Discussed changesets: 1) | Please do not destroy valid data on the building, this building had valid address data unrelated to your business. Will revert. commented 2026-08-07 00:02:54 UTC by gpserror ♦254 |
| 187041607 (Comments: 2) | Doug Spicher (Discussed changesets: 1) | thanks for the feedback. How do I apply the access=private tag. When this is done, does a P still appear? If so, this is confusing as it appears as though it is public parking. Our site is accessing OpenStreetMap via MapPress and we’... commented 2026-08-06 23:11:10 UTC by Doug Spicher ♦1 |
| 187007848 (Comments: 2) | drew262 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Fixed shape in changeset/187058838 commented 2026-08-06 22:26:45 UTC by O1S ♦37 |
| 187058202 (Comments: 1) | Flap Slimy Outward (Discussed changesets: 313) | So, Sandpiper is supposed to have 82 houses. As of August 4, 2026, 55 houses (or roughly 2/3) have been built. Source: https://youtu.be/URTr3tgUQJA?t=124 commented 2026-08-06 21:59:17 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦405 |
| 187057983 (Comments: 1) | Flap Slimy Outward (Discussed changesets: 313) | Did I say, "Mockingbird"? I meant "Sandpiper" 🤦 commented 2026-08-06 21:52:12 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦405 |
| 187055479 (Comments: 1) | Myasandy (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, Welcome to OSM. Just wanted to let you know not everything has or needs a name tag. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions commented 2026-08-06 21:29:12 UTC by ion_chi ♦111 |
| 184530035 (Comments: 6) | Joseph R P (Discussed changesets: 238) | Alright. I'll keep an eye out for any new updates in that area! commented 2026-08-06 21:05:12 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦405 |
| 186877739 (Comments: 1) | JRHutson (Discussed changesets: 3) | looks good, I added the old trail back with lifecycle tags. this helps prevent it from being added back with regular highway tags - it takes a few years for trails to disappear from satellite/strava/etc imagery. --- ... commented 2026-08-06 17:44:00 UTC by OddlyAngled ♦138 |
| 180670340 (Comments: 1) | MapThisNow411 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Please learn what the tracktypes are before tagging them. You're adding grade2 to tracks that are at best grade5, if not just old hiking trails. commented 2026-08-06 17:30:37 UTC by andrewsuzuki ♦103 |
| 187041557 (Comments: 1) | BB4o (Discussed changesets: 1) | I need to delete this one. It is pointing wrong direction commented 2026-08-06 15:37:02 UTC by BB4o ♦1 |
| 186934317 (Comments: 1) | erica_busright (Discussed changesets: 11) | Might want to be a little more detailed instead of just partly mapping a parking lot like this. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/186934317 commented 2026-08-06 14:01:38 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,623 |
| 186955157 (Comments: 1) | jefdwilson (Discussed changesets: 2) | Please don't just blindly import buildings. RapID exists so you can take the buildings suggested by Microsoft and adjust them to the ground truth. It's not meant to replace actually drawing the buildings, just speed it up. ... commented 2026-08-06 13:50:34 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,623 |
| 187004134 (Comments: 1) | MarkM10 (Discussed changesets: 7) | This appears to be a tactile curb in the middle of a sidewalk, not something you can mount a camera on. Please try again. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/18... commented 2026-08-06 13:39:18 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,623 |
| 187005006 (Comments: 1) | RJ S (Discussed changesets: 1) | This appears to be someone's backyard --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/187005006 commented 2026-08-06 13:38:45 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,623 |
| 186643737 (Comments: 2) | Yuliya_Petrash (Discussed changesets: 13) | Hi Xvtn, You are right about the name—deleting it was a mistake on my part, and I have already restored it. As for the ref tag, I removed it based on the OSM Wiki (Key:ref). For bus stops, this tag is meant only for the official stop ID a... commented 2026-08-06 12:12:26 UTC by Yuliya_Petrash ♦15 |
| 187005566 (Comments: 3) | j0hn33y (Discussed changesets: 22) | Thank you for fixing it. commented 2026-08-06 11:49:38 UTC by Flynn Marquardt ♦91 |
| 187005803 (Comments: 1) | j0hn33y (Discussed changesets: 22) | Hello, this area is not closed here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/18720539#map=20/39.9216219/-84.2744225&layers=V and has several self intersections, e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/18720539#map=18/39.920512/-84.26... commented 2026-08-06 11:48:44 UTC by Flynn Marquardt ♦91 |
| 187017550 (Comments: 1) | Robert Lazu (Discussed changesets: 21) | Not a primary road according to OSM conventions https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dprimary commented 2026-08-06 11:33:41 UTC by MikeN ♦373 |
| 186932993 (Comments: 1) | UseTheirName (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187020216 commented 2026-08-06 09:15:47 UTC by ajmat ♦666 |
| 186879801 (Comments: 1) | JonathanDavidArndt (Discussed changesets: 4) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187009599 commented 2026-08-06 06:12:09 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,271 |
| 186884874 (Comments: 1) | Allen Broughton (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187009276 commented 2026-08-06 06:11:08 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,271 |
| 187010025 (Comments: 1) | YesIMap2004 (Discussed changesets: 1) | You should try out https://opengeofiction.net/. It is a clone of osm, but instead of the real world, you can make up a fantasy map there. commented 2026-08-06 05:17:48 UTC by PizzaTreeIsland ♦104 |
| 186961306 (Comments: 3) | United States Container Express (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thanks for the prompt reply. Particularly given the frankly egregious nature of this spam--deleting and vandalizing the place=* node for the entirety of Downtown Miami, blatant advertising and most of the tags being quite badly malformed, to a degree... commented 2026-08-06 05:14:10 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 187006564 (Comments: 1) | United States Container Express (Discussed changesets: 2) | You still had many malformed/spammy tags and other issues here, including: - The location did not match where you mapped it originally, nor did it match the existing address node for 66 Flagler--it was instead between 16 and 20. Moved to near ... commented 2026-08-06 05:13:48 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 186955064 (Comments: 3) | Ben Wiederholt (Discussed changesets: 1) | All good! No longer used trails can be marked with one of the lifecycle tags: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix Either disused if it's possible to use them again, or abandoned if they're long gone, beyond any chance of re... commented 2026-08-06 04:21:53 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,101 |
| 186924152 (Comments: 4) | Huong Dang (Discussed changesets: 11) | Reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187009760 commented 2026-08-06 04:19:30 UTC by ion_chi ♦111 |
| 185069908 (Comments: 1) | Charleston314 (Discussed changesets: 1) | camera was destroyed. its no longer there. commented 2026-08-06 04:10:31 UTC by VXIDED ♦1 |
| 186987518 (Comments: 1) | College of Western Idaho (Discussed changesets: 1) | OpenStreetMap does not abbreviate names. This changeset has been reverted. commented 2026-08-06 03:28:14 UTC by Allison P ♦1,154 |
| 186996337 (Comments: 4) | GA_Kevin (Discussed changesets: 25) | Fair enough, and their website only mentioned start times, not end times And I guess fair for the comments too commented 2026-08-06 03:05:47 UTC by confusedbuffalo ♦505 |
| 160045352 (Comments: 1) | MitchellSternke (Discussed changesets: 6) | I'm really confused by this way. First it was a cycle path, then it was a multi use path, but Streetside doesn't show any kind of bike lane or path, just a standard sidewalk. Am I missing something or should this be tagged as a sidewalk? commented 2026-08-06 01:28:43 UTC by WHS Contributor ♦5 |
| 186118006 (Comments: 1) | AvdK_Hiker (Discussed changesets: 9) | reverted: changeset/187006252 commented 2026-08-06 01:21:40 UTC by SherbetS ♦175 |
| 89309612 (Comments: 1) | Eric Gunnerson (Discussed changesets: 4) | FYI you can tag gates as https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:barrier%3Dgate instead of a path; I'm switching the tagging to a gate node commented 2026-08-06 01:17:42 UTC by 15419 NE 140th St ♦10 |
| 187005483 (Comments: 1) | GrandpappyD (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, looks like this might be a more traditional traffic camera rather than a Flock/ALPR. Can you take a look it the reference images here and let me know if these are just traffic cameras? https://deflock.org/identify commented 2026-08-06 00:51:04 UTC by HashFerret ♦23 |
| 187003411 (Comments: 1) | blackfordraptortruck (Discussed changesets: 1) | my first contribution. advice welcome commented 2026-08-05 22:43:39 UTC by blackfordraptortruck ♦1 |
| 186942344 (Comments: 2) | andylovescode (Discussed changesets: 1) | gotcha, I didn't know that, I thought you just weren't supposed to use a seperate point commented 2026-08-05 22:30:40 UTC by andylovescode ♦1 |
| 186998603 (Comments: 1) | GA_Kevin (Discussed changesets: 25) | I think the opening hours should be Mo-Fr 08:00-24:00; May 14-Aug 22 Mo-Fr 08:00-16:30 based on what the openingh.openstreetmap.de tool is saying commented 2026-08-05 22:16:30 UTC by OddBunsen ♦18 |
| 185743927 (Comments: 3) | MoreheadTech (Discussed changesets: 2) | Gotcha--I do have a lot of experience detecting and dealing with spam and SEO activity (that's the primary purpose of this particular account of mine, in fact), so it's easier for me to stop such things. Besides cleaning up the existing POI... commented 2026-08-05 22:08:52 UTC by CAM-Gerlach ♦308 |
| 186600545 (Comments: 3) | CAM-Gerlach_Repair (Discussed changesets: 44) | Thanks! commented 2026-08-05 21:56:44 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 187000268 (Comments: 1) | Chip Griffith (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in changeset 187002493. Please follow our tagging conventions and do not include promotional material in your edits. See osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers. commented 2026-08-05 21:51:29 UTC by schobbish ♦87 |
| 179882290 (Comments: 1) | Awillis888 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverting inaccurate adds for nodes in a field. commented 2026-08-05 21:40:39 UTC by alpacaMaps ♦431 |
| 186936899 (Comments: 3) | greatnameguys2472 (Discussed changesets: 17) | Looks good to me. commented 2026-08-05 21:38:11 UTC by Carnildo ♦915 |
| 185598708 (Comments: 1) | Frank Peng (Discussed changesets: 34) | Hey Frank, There was already a separately-mapped sidepath for most of these segments, so your selection here actually created a second, duplicate sidewalk tagged on the road in addition to the separately mapped path. I fixed these as part of a... commented 2026-08-05 21:30:50 UTC by CAM-Gerlach ♦308 |
| 185934551 (Comments: 1) | Frank Peng (Discussed changesets: 34) | Hey Frank! I'm not sure why SC removed the correct segregated=no here for way 1104325724 https://osm.org/way/1104325724 , but I restored it along with adding/standardizing the tagging for the rest of the Shenandoah Bike Trail and connectors in c... commented 2026-08-05 21:25:09 UTC by CAM-Gerlach ♦308 |
| 186009593 (Comments: 2) | T Jerome (Discussed changesets: 1) | There is no flock camera here. commented 2026-08-05 21:20:58 UTC by DeflockNH ♦1 |
| 183941829 (Comments: 1) | cvseibert (Discussed changesets: 2) | There is an anonymous note about this change, can you take a look: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5434735 commented 2026-08-05 21:01:54 UTC by cuzi ♦197 |
| 186984583 (Comments: 1) | worldboxhuman (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, What was the purpose of creating the "Statz Connector"? It does not appear to exist on any satellite images, such as those from Bing, Esri, or Clark County's GIS (OpenWeb). commented 2026-08-05 20:55:28 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦405 |
| 184817442 (Comments: 2) | buster55 (Discussed changesets: 1) | I selected "Walgreens Drugstore" as the Feature Type. It filled in the building type from that. If it needs to be changed to something else, I would think it should be done at the Feature Type level. I don't know. commented 2026-08-05 20:08:57 UTC by buster55 ♦1 |
| 185873184 (Comments: 3) | MoreheadTech (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thanks for the quick and detailed response! I appreciate your generosity to help local businesses (although I hope you charged them something; many of these same businesses pay offshore SEO spammers non-trivial money to add far lower-quality P... commented 2026-08-05 19:04:25 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 185513890 (Comments: 3) | TheMBDude (Discussed changesets: 4) | Changed back to unclassified and kept both the name changes commented 2026-08-05 18:39:14 UTC by Justin1234 ♦25 |
| 186075475 (Comments: 1) | leoherzog (Discussed changesets: 6) | wild commented 2026-08-05 18:38:57 UTC by Arlo James Barnes ♦120 |
| 186957611 (Comments: 4) | pwbriggs (Discussed changesets: 31) | Thanks. I only stumbled upon this by pure chance: I was investigating an old bug report in the iD editor (https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/8508) and was looking at a few cases of OSM data of nodes with a `type=multipolygon` tag (tryi... commented 2026-08-05 18:34:59 UTC by tyr_asd ♦473 |
| 186957730 (Comments: 1) | pwbriggs (Discussed changesets: 31) | Apologies for the massive bbox, folks. I'm not good at keeping track of my layers, clearly. commented 2026-08-05 18:17:47 UTC by pwbriggs ♦520 |
| 185659033 (Comments: 1) | DIS9112 (Discussed changesets: 3) | If you notice the imagery is at a bit of a tilt, draw it with the roof outline (like you did) then shift it to match the base of the building. This will make the building position more accurate. commented 2026-08-05 18:08:23 UTC by jhaluska80 ♦113 |
| 186993660 (Comments: 1) | smallbook (Discussed changesets: 2) | Oof to that typo commented 2026-08-05 18:00:20 UTC by smallbook ♦2 |
| 186843484 (Comments: 2) | CAM-Gerlach_Repair (Discussed changesets: 44) | Sure, if you want to-- up to you. If so, just make sure to split and and the geometry closely follows the fence, and tag the fence as well along its length. commented 2026-08-05 17:53:49 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 177743472 (Comments: 1) | Glassman (Discussed changesets: 84) | This change is inconsistent with tagging of multiuse paths in the area, such as the Burke Gilman trail in Seattle and the Whatcom Creek trail in Bellingham. I believe that consistency should be maintained for equivalent infrastructure by tagging this... commented 2026-08-05 17:43:18 UTC by ATownBike ♦6 |
| 186891386 (Comments: 5) | t4fritz (Discussed changesets: 1) | Made the updates for this. I'll have to run these next time I'm in Brookings, looks interesting commented 2026-08-05 17:03:34 UTC by SD Mapman ♦101 |
| 186812325 (Comments: 2) | fairwayfounder (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi b-jazz, I'm big fan of all your work on OSM btw, great contributions. I've updated that way and will be mindful of that in future too. An error here, not my usual approach. I have been in the process of updating, finishing, o... commented 2026-08-05 17:00:51 UTC by fairwayfounder ♦1 |
| 186491986 (Comments: 5) | Stretch Longfellow (Discussed changesets: 44) | Sounds good, if NDOT went through the effort to change the addresses more power to them (wish SD organizations would too...) commented 2026-08-05 16:23:21 UTC by SD Mapman ♦101 |
| 186706839 (Comments: 1) | Bamamba85 (Discussed changesets: 19) | As mentioned in several other changesets, what you are doing here is incorrect. Please reach out if you don't understand why it's wrong to tag an outer member of a multipolygon as "fairway" when that tag belongs in the relation it... commented 2026-08-05 16:08:07 UTC by b-jazz ♦976 |
| 186546655 (Comments: 1) | B-Mac A-Tac (Discussed changesets: 7) | The wood tags for them were correct though.. the land use was forested. Welsh mountain nature preserve and city of Lancaster open space are both completely forested. commented 2026-08-05 15:52:45 UTC by StoneSphere ♦3 |
| 186832496 (Comments: 1) | LorenGFL (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi Loren, a couple quick comments on this change to the map. A golf course shouldn't be mapped as a relation of all of the elements in a leisure=golf_course tag. That tag is meant for the outline (possibly a multipolygon) of the golf cour... commented 2026-08-05 15:50:35 UTC by b-jazz ♦976 |
| 183878366 (Comments: 3) | Ky_AT (Discussed changesets: 28) | Hi Luis Camara, since Pike Nurseries was tagged as a building, I re-aligned the geometry to match the building feature. Its previous state was also causing building-highway intersection issues during validation. If you would suggest mapping the premi... commented 2026-08-05 12:48:48 UTC by Ky_AT ♦27 |
| 186877779 (Comments: 2) | ebrown@YLT (Discussed changesets: 16) | So, this is on private property owned by York Land Trust, the organization that I work for, with signs saying ‘no access beyond this point’ and ‘illegal trail do not enter’. I will get photos. I have seen a noticeable uptick i... commented 2026-08-05 12:47:18 UTC by ebrown@YLT ♦2 |
| 186641141 (Comments: 3) | Wildsharky (Discussed changesets: 39) | Hi ETPCU_James, Thank you for your feedback. I understand your concern regarding the address location. This changeset was limited to restoring the deleted alt_name tag on the road, as its removal affected the continuity of the road name. It di... commented 2026-08-05 12:44:45 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,271 |
| 186975591 (Comments: 1) | TheNightRider (Discussed changesets: 53) | Typo: "Entend" should be "Extend" commented 2026-08-05 12:41:56 UTC by TheNightRider ♦90 |
| 186964148 (Comments: 1) | Robert Lazu (Discussed changesets: 21) | Why was the bridge deleted? commented 2026-08-05 12:18:55 UTC by MikeN ♦373 |
| 177206732 (Comments: 3) | Gorger (Discussed changesets: 33) | Hi adigis. While creating the dual carriageway, I seem to have accidentally assigned the same direction to both carriageways, resulting in a routing conflict. I have made the corrections. Thank you again for your message. commented 2026-08-05 11:49:48 UTC by Gorger ♦62 |
| 186893829 (Comments: 1) | wito24 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/186966648 commented 2026-08-05 09:16:13 UTC by rajdhani ♦642 |
| 186880516 (Comments: 1) | JonathanDavidArndt (Discussed changesets: 4) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/186959463 commented 2026-08-05 07:09:37 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,271 |
| 186843947 (Comments: 1) | 汪竹婷 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/186956303 commented 2026-08-05 07:08:25 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,271 |
| 105553545 (Comments: 1) | nysgissam_dead10ck (Discussed changesets: 9) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8780236594/history is repeating addr:housenumber in addr:housename intentional? commented 2026-08-05 06:12:02 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,339 |
| 186598443 (Comments: 1) | Brian Watch Duty (Discussed changesets: 2) | DWG revert - improper deletions https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/186957653 commented 2026-08-05 05:23:49 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,101 |
| 186953492 (Comments: 2) | groj25 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Yep, both there! Thanks for checking. commented 2026-08-05 04:26:24 UTC by groj25 ♦1 |
| 186956114 (Comments: 1) | ForestFurnace (Discussed changesets: 45) | Cambria Co, PA: Barr/Blacklick Twp: Drew Duman Connection portion of the Ghost Town Trail based on PEMA Orthoimagery, Strava Global Heatmap and Cambria County Conservation & Recreation Authority website. Added foot and bicycle designations based ... commented 2026-08-05 04:16:21 UTC by ForestFurnace ♦61 |
| 186941832 (Comments: 4) | Omnific (Discussed changesets: 147) | Thanks for the revert. No worries regarding the Bar & Grill. Personally, I was mulling over whether to freewheel edit and add the new geometry with no sat. image or to leave it as-is. I thought you might have forced the issue for me but i... commented 2026-08-05 03:58:27 UTC by G1asshouse ♦47 |
| 186732282 (Comments: 3) | jplucas14 (Discussed changesets: 1) | It looks like the reason I removed it is because there was already node 12861744674 , and node 12861750879 was at the same location: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12861744674#map=19/41.745766/-111.804334 commented 2026-08-05 03:28:42 UTC by jplucas14 ♦1 |
| 186955056 (Comments: 1) | oh_finks (Discussed changesets: 3) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2631526 commented 2026-08-05 03:18:28 UTC by oh_finks ♦3 |
| 184782892 (Comments: 2) | Certified Home Remodelers (Discussed changesets: 1) | i fixed it https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/186953524 commented 2026-08-05 01:35:40 UTC by ItsAlyx ♦12 |
| 186953505 (Comments: 1) | ForestFurnace (Discussed changesets: 45) | Added tree here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/186953505 commented 2026-08-05 01:32:42 UTC by ForestFurnace ♦61 |
| 158949798 (Comments: 2) | diamondarmorsteve (Discussed changesets: 52) | It only connects to the tiny hamlet of Pendleton. Looking at it now, though, I see it also forms a route between Warrenton and Hermanntown, so I'll go ahead and put it back to secondary. commented 2026-08-05 01:19:11 UTC by diamondarmorsteve ♦78 |
| 186921510 (Comments: 1) | Amy Sunshine Real Estate Broker (Discussed changesets: 2) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-08-05 00:12:38 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 186870243 (Comments: 1) | TheWanderingCrow (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Very nice work on this area. commented 2026-08-05 00:07:38 UTC by MikeN ♦373 |
| 186898935 (Comments: 1) | Deflocktheflock1234 (Discussed changesets: 19) | Per received reports, these nodes may not have actually been removed as cited by your changeset comment. Please only delete nodes that were physically removed from the world. commented 2026-08-04 23:45:08 UTC by alpacaMaps ♦431 |
| 186898926 (Comments: 1) | Deflocktheflock1234 (Discussed changesets: 19) | Per received reports, these nodes may not have actually been removed as cited by your changeset comment. Please only delete nodes that were physically removed from the world. commented 2026-08-04 23:45:08 UTC by alpacaMaps ♦431 |
| 186898946 (Comments: 1) | Deflocktheflock1234 (Discussed changesets: 19) | Per received reports, these nodes may not have actually been removed as cited by your changeset comment. Please only delete nodes that were physically removed from the world. commented 2026-08-04 23:45:07 UTC by alpacaMaps ♦431 |
| 186898953 (Comments: 1) | Deflocktheflock1234 (Discussed changesets: 19) | Per received reports, these nodes may not have actually been removed as cited by your changeset comment. Please only delete nodes that were physically removed from the world. commented 2026-08-04 23:45:06 UTC by alpacaMaps ♦431 |
| 186898959 (Comments: 1) | Deflocktheflock1234 (Discussed changesets: 19) | Per received reports, these nodes may not have actually been removed as cited by your changeset comment. Please only delete nodes that were physically removed from the world. commented 2026-08-04 23:45:06 UTC by alpacaMaps ♦431 |
| 186898965 (Comments: 1) | Deflocktheflock1234 (Discussed changesets: 19) | Per received reports, these nodes may not have actually been removed as cited by your changeset comment. Please only delete nodes that were physically removed from the world. commented 2026-08-04 23:45:05 UTC by alpacaMaps ♦431 |
| 186898979 (Comments: 1) | Deflocktheflock1234 (Discussed changesets: 19) | Per received reports, these nodes may not have actually been removed as cited by your changeset comment. Please only delete nodes that were physically removed from the world. commented 2026-08-04 23:45:05 UTC by alpacaMaps ♦431 |
| 186898983 (Comments: 1) | Deflocktheflock1234 (Discussed changesets: 19) | Per received reports, these nodes may not have actually been removed as cited by your changeset comment. Please only delete nodes that were physically removed from the world. commented 2026-08-04 23:45:04 UTC by alpacaMaps ♦431 |
| 186898985 (Comments: 1) | Deflocktheflock1234 (Discussed changesets: 19) | Per received reports, these nodes may not have actually been removed as cited by your changeset comment. Please only delete nodes that were physically removed from the world. commented 2026-08-04 23:45:04 UTC by alpacaMaps ♦431 |
| 186898992 (Comments: 1) | Deflocktheflock1234 (Discussed changesets: 19) | Per received reports, these nodes may not have actually been removed as cited by your changeset comment. Please only delete nodes that were physically removed from the world. commented 2026-08-04 23:45:03 UTC by alpacaMaps ♦431 |
| 186898987 (Comments: 1) | Deflocktheflock1234 (Discussed changesets: 19) | Per received reports, these nodes may not have actually been removed as cited by your changeset comment. Please only delete nodes that were physically removed from the world. commented 2026-08-04 23:45:03 UTC by alpacaMaps ♦431 |
| 186898995 (Comments: 1) | Deflocktheflock1234 (Discussed changesets: 19) | Per received reports, these nodes may not have actually been removed as cited by your changeset comment. Please only delete nodes that were physically removed from the world. commented 2026-08-04 23:45:02 UTC by alpacaMaps ♦431 |
| 186898998 (Comments: 1) | Deflocktheflock1234 (Discussed changesets: 19) | Per received reports, these nodes may not have actually been removed as cited by your changeset comment. Please only delete nodes that were physically removed from the world. commented 2026-08-04 23:45:01 UTC by alpacaMaps ♦431 |
| 186874260 (Comments: 1) | ManiacalLoon (Discussed changesets: 4) | Could you hold off on building edits in the area for now? River Bluff Estates is currently on fire. commented 2026-08-04 21:53:38 UTC by Carnildo ♦915 |
| 69940264 (Comments: 1) | Slashtwentyfore (Discussed changesets: 1) | My First Edit! commented 2026-08-04 20:44:37 UTC by Slashtwentyfore ♦1 |
| 158421612 (Comments: 2) | Hypsometric (Discussed changesets: 56) | Thanks for checking. Without looking in to it, I'm guessing it was added accidentally or was data that got merged from a node. I'm fixing in a moment. commented 2026-08-04 19:46:59 UTC by Hypsometric ♦75 |
| 186892490 (Comments: 2) | yincrash (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thank you! commented 2026-08-04 19:40:21 UTC by yincrash ♦1 |
| 186933255 (Comments: 3) | hopboy1 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Thanks for the heads-up, and thanks Minh_Nhuyen for the explanation. I accidentally truncated the relation while working on local improvements in Star Valley (changeset 186933255). I’ve now restored the full member list using the reverte... commented 2026-08-04 18:46:28 UTC by hopboy1 ♦4 |
| 186901779 (Comments: 1) | ChengDe Lin (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OpenStreetMap, and thanks for contributing! Street names and addresses in OSM should always use their full, un-abbreviated form, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Abbreviations commented 2026-08-04 18:33:12 UTC by impiaaa ♦502 |
| 186937374 (Comments: 1) | seateaeye (Discussed changesets: 14) | *white road plaza commented 2026-08-04 17:21:00 UTC by seateaeye ♦8 |
| 186326640 (Comments: 1) | deflockidaho6969 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Looks good! P*ck Flock --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/186326640 commented 2026-08-04 16:23:15 UTC by ColbyTheWorldTraveler ♦34 |
| 186874204 (Comments: 1) | StephenDark (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM, and thanks for your contributions! commented 2026-08-04 15:37:11 UTC by citrula ♦1,020 |
| 185656532 (Comments: 2) | pkoby (Discussed changesets: 59) | Nevermind please disregard this comment! I manually reverted back the ways in question. commented 2026-08-04 13:34:55 UTC by joeytk7 ♦1 |
| 186623698 (Comments: 2) | santoshipanwar_lyft (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hello dknelson9876, Thank you for reaching out. My name is Santoshi, and I'm a mapper with Lyft's OSM team. I extended the road geometry based on a small amount of GPS tracks that crossed the intersection and relied on older backgroun... commented 2026-08-04 11:28:50 UTC by santoshipanwar_lyft ♦8 |
| 186282136 (Comments: 1) | elitechllc (Discussed changesets: 1) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-08-04 11:28:21 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 186902945 (Comments: 1) | subham_lyft (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hello dknelson9876, Thank you for reaching out. My name is Santoshi, and I'm a mapper with Lyft's OSM team. I extended the road geometry based on a small amount of GPS tracks that crossed the intersection and relied on older backgroun... commented 2026-08-04 11:25:13 UTC by santoshipanwar_lyft ♦8 |
| 186844484 (Comments: 1) | 汪竹婷 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/186914629 commented 2026-08-04 10:04:01 UTC by rajdhani ♦642 |
| 186871103 (Comments: 1) | JackRickards (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/186913455 commented 2026-08-04 09:41:40 UTC by MappingMore ♦793 |
| 186891208 (Comments: 1) | Lokojoe214 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Good morning, I went past this location and no camera was visible therefore I deleted it from the map. Do you happen to have any additional information as to where this camera is located? The only thing visible that I saw was a radar speed sign. commented 2026-08-04 09:32:59 UTC by Ryan Watern ♦8 |
| 186891805 (Comments: 1) | PostaMap_Infinite (Discussed changesets: 28) | Wrong comment! I repaired it, not removed it! Sorry… commented 2026-08-04 09:13:53 UTC by PostaMap_Infinite ♦83 |
| 186891758 (Comments: 1) | PostaMap_Infinite (Discussed changesets: 28) | Wrong comment! I repaired it, not removed it! Sorry… commented 2026-08-04 09:13:23 UTC by PostaMap_Infinite ♦83 |
| 186885949 (Comments: 1) | anon0010010 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/186908972 commented 2026-08-04 08:12:56 UTC by rajdhani ♦642 |
| 185872105 (Comments: 1) | njhans18 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks. I don't see this location on the company's list at https://www.kindercare.com/our-centers -- do you know why? Also, do you know if a building was constructed in this lot, south of the new parking lot? The aerial imagery in th... commented 2026-08-04 08:10:31 UTC by pwbriggs ♦520 |
| 186908099 (Comments: 1) | pwbriggs (Discussed changesets: 31) | per their website, they have closed. commented 2026-08-04 07:52:36 UTC by pwbriggs ♦520 |
| 186871140 (Comments: 1) | ebrown@YLT (Discussed changesets: 16) | Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/186895745 commented 2026-08-04 07:37:09 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦7,210 |
| 186879907 (Comments: 1) | Crash6x86 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/186905862 commented 2026-08-04 06:55:56 UTC by MappingMore ♦793 |
| 152784618 (Comments: 2) | Lumikeiju (Discussed changesets: 61) | Nope, no idea - feel free to remove! commented 2026-08-04 06:11:26 UTC by Lumikeiju ♦135 |
| 186899471 (Comments: 1) | twassman (Discussed changesets: 1) | In case it's unclear what was done here: Mission Creek Senior was previously a multipolygon relation/3830966 with a single outer way/288649887. That way was edited (changeset/185651579) to also contain tags for the SFPL Mission Bay Branch Librar... commented 2026-08-04 02:57:12 UTC by twassman ♦2 |
| 186898788 (Comments: 1) | rubenve (Discussed changesets: 1) | I work on a fleet-safety product that compares GPS speed against posted limits sourced from OSM. A customer operating in Campbell County reported repeated false speeding alerts on WY 50 south of Gillette, and asked for MM 7 to MM 52.6 to be corrected... commented 2026-08-04 02:05:22 UTC by rubenve ♦2 |
| 186897920 (Comments: 3) | CAM-Gerlach_Repair (Discussed changesets: 44) | I normally revert things one by one to minimize bbox size unless they are closely located together, but given the amount of spam involved, the scamminess of this operation and the fact that it is only really apparent when seeing them as a whole, I di... commented 2026-08-04 01:33:32 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 179237601 (Comments: 1) | PalmApple (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1267886223/history has addr:housename = 830 that was added in this edit What this tag means? Numeric value is unexpected here - was it supposed to be addr:housenumber= ? commented 2026-08-04 00:54:03 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,339 |
| 186887102 (Comments: 1) | Lanmou (Discussed changesets: 4) | Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21056 commented 2026-08-04 00:52:52 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,101 |
| 186896654 (Comments: 1) | synthfi (Discussed changesets: 15) | also updated roads per imagery commented 2026-08-04 00:02:24 UTC by synthfi ♦29 |
| 186877163 (Comments: 1) | ebrown@YLT (Discussed changesets: 16) | Reverted by DWG commented 2026-08-03 23:28:35 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,101 |
| 186877132 (Comments: 1) | ebrown@YLT (Discussed changesets: 16) | Reverted by DWG commented 2026-08-03 23:28:21 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,101 |
| 186877059 (Comments: 1) | ebrown@YLT (Discussed changesets: 16) | Reverted by DWG commented 2026-08-03 23:28:02 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,101 |
| 186876887 (Comments: 1) | ebrown@YLT (Discussed changesets: 16) | Reverted by DWG commented 2026-08-03 23:27:48 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,101 |
| 186876846 (Comments: 1) | ebrown@YLT (Discussed changesets: 16) | Reverted by DWG commented 2026-08-03 23:27:34 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,101 |
| 186876757 (Comments: 1) | ebrown@YLT (Discussed changesets: 16) | Reverted by DWG commented 2026-08-03 23:26:51 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,101 |
| 186709673 (Comments: 1) | caffeelaw (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi- What did you mean by opening_hours=24/7 here? Can you go to this lawyer business at any hour of the day or night, seven days a week? That seems atypical. commented 2026-08-03 23:26:46 UTC by pwbriggs ♦520 |
| 186876693 (Comments: 1) | ebrown@YLT (Discussed changesets: 16) | Reverted by DWG commented 2026-08-03 23:26:30 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,101 |
| 186604069 (Comments: 1) | ebrown@YLT (Discussed changesets: 16) | Reverted by DWG commented 2026-08-03 23:25:42 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,101 |
| 171635732 (Comments: 1) | ebrown@YLT (Discussed changesets: 16) | DWG revert commented 2026-08-03 23:25:22 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,101 |
| 186876804 (Comments: 1) | ebrown@YLT (Discussed changesets: 16) | DWG revert commented 2026-08-03 23:24:48 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,101 |
| 186876651 (Comments: 1) | ebrown@YLT (Discussed changesets: 16) | DWG revert - invalid names and deletions https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/186895745 commented 2026-08-03 23:16:44 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,101 |
| 186489299 (Comments: 1) | baconbit88 (Discussed changesets: 1) | please review your edits - most of your modifications for adding flock surveillance cameras are traffic sensor cameras mounted on traffic light masts which are used exclusively for changing lights based on traffic and monitoring traffic flow. these a... commented 2026-08-03 23:08:39 UTC by tklapatch ♦1 |
| 186877236 (Comments: 1) | ebrown@YLT (Discussed changesets: 16) | DWG revert - invalid names and deletions https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/186894963 commented 2026-08-03 22:44:27 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,101 |
| 186887360 (Comments: 3) | snareman96 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Unfortunately the alleys should stay on OSM if they exist on the ground. We can tag them better and mark them as private, but it’s incorrect to completely delete them. commented 2026-08-03 22:07:35 UTC by schobbish ♦87 |
| 186886003 (Comments: 1) | 16000127 (Discussed changesets: 3) | As an account mapping on behalf of a commercial business for financial gain, please be advised that you are expected to understand and carefully follow documented OpenStreetMap standards and conventions, which will both directly benefit the quality o... commented 2026-08-03 21:38:21 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 186886845 (Comments: 1) | 16678167 (Discussed changesets: 2) | As an account mapping on behalf of a commercial business for financial gain, please be advised that you are expected to understand and carefully follow documented OpenStreetMap standards and conventions, which will both directly benefit the quality o... commented 2026-08-03 21:34:24 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 186858546 (Comments: 1) | Dripos (Discussed changesets: 6) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-08-03 21:27:28 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 186858296 (Comments: 1) | Dripos (Discussed changesets: 6) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-08-03 21:27:25 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 186886265 (Comments: 1) | 500367425 (Discussed changesets: 2) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-08-03 21:24:50 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 177705610 (Comments: 1) | eeees (Discussed changesets: 1) | License plate reader at this intersection is Insight, not Flock. commented 2026-08-03 20:55:43 UTC by Jordan Leick ♦9 |
| 186597419 (Comments: 2) | COP_Scott (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thanks for the advise, the parking area is a fair representation that is there, it's fenced, there is a remaining access to the south that needs to be added. Goal is for routing to the front of the building rather than the rear or via a route t... commented 2026-08-03 20:31:26 UTC by COP_Scott ♦1 |
| 186888700 (Comments: 1) | Marlin1492 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Isn't this on the other side of the road?? commented 2026-08-03 20:08:25 UTC by b-jazz ♦976 |
| 186879849 (Comments: 1) | ottwiz (Discussed changesets: 292) | + Esri World Imagery commented 2026-08-03 18:58:45 UTC by ottwiz ♦400 |
| 186852859 (Comments: 3) | Loopslol7 (Discussed changesets: 17) | In the case of rail, they sometimes have specific hex code colors attached to them, so you were correct. I think i am correct for many cases where there is not a specific hex code attached to something (like colors of fire hydrants or benches), but w... commented 2026-08-03 18:47:06 UTC by Loopslol7 ♦45 |
| 19731843 (Comments: 2) | silvercity86 (Discussed changesets: 1) | though addr:housenumber \t#7 is also somehow set... commented 2026-08-03 18:43:10 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,339 |
| 164649898 (Comments: 1) | jamenlang (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, I work on a fleet-safety product and we're seeing a lot of speeding alerts on WY 50 south of Gillette because we read maxspeed=55 mph from way 15693174. A local operator whose drivers run this road daily reports the posted limit south of MM ... commented 2026-08-03 18:21:33 UTC by rubenve ♦2 |
| 186864561 (Comments: 2) | xw61982 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Ok thanks for the feedback. Position edited. commented 2026-08-03 16:29:37 UTC by xw61982 ♦1 |
| 184826471 (Comments: 3) | NE_SwampYankee (Discussed changesets: 2) | No worries. There are a lot of tags out there and sometimes multiple different tags you can can use for the same thing. 🤷 I updated as proposed and added a few canoe features while I was at it. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/... commented 2026-08-03 16:01:43 UTC by scarapella ♦65 |
| 186871687 (Comments: 1) | MassCartog (Discussed changesets: 40) | A few of these trails do not exist on the ground anymore. I will be going out in the next couple weeks to clarify which ones are in fact nonexistent and will be deleting them. Do not re-add them when I do this as YLT has been try to close these trail... commented 2026-08-03 15:39:17 UTC by ebrown@YLT ♦2 |
| 186841073 (Comments: 1) | Strongthany (Discussed changesets: 15) | Hi, I saw couple of validation issues here: a couple buildings cross the alley, and there's a duplicate building directly on top of another. Rapid flags both of these in the issues panel before upload, so please check that panel and resolve f... commented 2026-08-03 15:33:01 UTC by ion_chi ♦111 |
| 186845970 (Comments: 2) | Strongthany (Discussed changesets: 15) | will do, thank you! I did not know about the Q hotkey for the square tool. I'll make use of that more often! commented 2026-08-03 15:32:16 UTC by Strongthany ♦7 |
| 186248198 (Comments: 3) | kcpels (Discussed changesets: 10) | Boylston Street is the access point for this road. Based on that, the Tremont Street gate alone wouldn’t support tagging the entire road as access=no. commented 2026-08-03 15:10:28 UTC by StreetSurveyor ♦213 |
| 186085231 (Comments: 2) | cbmiller2610 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thank you, noted! Thanks for the link, now I understand that OSM has a way of handling abbreviations, however it only works if the original data is not abbreviated. commented 2026-08-03 15:04:44 UTC by cbmiller2610 ♦1 |
| 174673014 (Comments: 2) | lasagna (Discussed changesets: 14) | Updated to Sa[1] commented 2026-08-03 14:28:13 UTC by lasagna ♦47 |
| 182096706 (Comments: 1) | Travis Curry (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, I believe you added some names to the trails in this changeset. There is an anonymous note suggesting some of the names are wrong, can you take a look: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5425264 commented 2026-08-03 12:37:48 UTC by cuzi ♦197 |
| 186866441 (Comments: 1) | Raghu5345 (Discussed changesets: 12) | This apartment complex was already mapped as a landuse area, next time before adding a new landuse area (or really any object in OSM) please double check that doesn’t already exist. Happy mapping, Udar. commented 2026-08-03 12:30:42 UTC by Udarian ♦992 |
| 123139831 (Comments: 1) | joshbaumgartner (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello Josh, I will leave a comment as you may have some extra info, but I am wondering where you got the data for the "aeroway=clearway", as it doesn't seem to be a standard thing to map, and I don't want to look at removi... commented 2026-08-03 10:05:38 UTC by 0235 ♦55 |
| 186831282 (Comments: 1) | dentdudedmv (Discussed changesets: 1) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-08-03 09:17:25 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 181078824 (Comments: 1) | modernautoandbody (Discussed changesets: 1) | As an account mapping on behalf of a commercial business for financial gain, please be advised that you are expected to understand and carefully follow documented OpenStreetMap standards and conventions, which will both directly benefit the quality o... commented 2026-08-03 09:12:00 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 186160568 (Comments: 1) | Madison Keller (Discussed changesets: 1) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-08-03 09:10:27 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 186165725 (Comments: 1) | customconcrete98 (Discussed changesets: 1) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-08-03 09:08:25 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 186164046 (Comments: 1) | customconcrete99 (Discussed changesets: 1) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-08-03 09:07:57 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 181760669 (Comments: 1) | Henry Fioritto (Discussed changesets: 1) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-08-03 09:06:10 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 183816849 (Comments: 1) | jacowaterproofing (Discussed changesets: 1) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-08-03 09:04:36 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 186834869 (Comments: 1) | m_fuhrmann (Discussed changesets: 48) | Actually, it was the UnmappedSmallTownUSA bot ofc... commented 2026-08-03 06:52:03 UTC by m_fuhrmann ♦74 |
| 186789465 (Comments: 13) | HiddenMapper (Discussed changesets: 1) | There are a couple parking stalls around each one, yeah, but of course a few parking stalls does not a parking_aisle make; the primary or sole purpose of the way must be to access those stalls, whereas it seems to me that the primary purpose of these... commented 2026-08-03 05:28:55 UTC by CAM-Gerlach ♦308 |
| 185431354 (Comments: 1) | unseatedcardboard (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi there, are you absolutely sure this bike parking was removed? I used it a couple days before you made this changeset. It can be hard to see from the street since they put carts or other displays in front of it. commented 2026-08-03 05:24:52 UTC by schobbish ♦87 |
| 177545209 (Comments: 1) | Glassman (Discussed changesets: 84) | Looks like those note=* tags you added were supposed to be cleaned up during your editing process? Or, what do they mean? commented 2026-08-03 05:08:39 UTC by pwbriggs ♦520 |
| 172929966 (Comments: 3) | j0hn33y (Discussed changesets: 22) | Interesting, they used to advertise themselves as half grocery store, half flooring store. Liquidator of random things describes it better than anything else though! I guess I’ll have to find another favorite example of a store that’s imp... commented 2026-08-03 04:39:15 UTC by Minh Nguyen ♦659 |
| 176402022 (Comments: 1) | Drew7711 (Discussed changesets: 1) | This doesn’t seem to be present any longer commented 2026-08-03 03:54:38 UTC by nevausetheinternetagain ♦1 |
| 185854696 (Comments: 3) | HolyCrapThatsALongUsername (Discussed changesets: 9) | Thanks for the reminder though. I like to ride my bike up to that area so I will get a photo of it at some point and update accordingly. Cheers commented 2026-08-03 03:45:30 UTC by HolyCrapThatsALongUsername ♦14 |
| 168130450 (Comments: 1) | tourcda (Discussed changesets: 1) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-08-03 03:27:08 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 171734959 (Comments: 1) | Appliance Repair Service Lab LLC (Discussed changesets: 1) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-08-03 03:26:17 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 159672146 (Comments: 1) | skyrightsandpoint (Discussed changesets: 1) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-08-03 03:25:02 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 161813118 (Comments: 1) | westwoodllc (Discussed changesets: 1) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Business POIs added to the map must be visitable physica... commented 2026-08-03 03:23:58 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 161705047 (Comments: 1) | tiffanysminispa (Discussed changesets: 1) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-08-03 03:23:32 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 160425912 (Comments: 1) | johnsontaylorlaw (Discussed changesets: 1) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-08-03 03:23:06 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 186840531 (Comments: 1) | BonesTM (Discussed changesets: 7) | looking at this ALPR on various aerial imagery in iD it seems to be within the road area, being positioned like this is highly unlikely so please double check the position of this ALPR and fix it. Happy mapping, Udar. commented 2026-08-03 02:43:57 UTC by Udarian ♦992 |
| 186840550 (Comments: 1) | BonesTM (Discussed changesets: 7) | looking at this ALPR on various aerial imagery in iD it seems to be within the road area, being positioned like this is highly unlikely so please double check the position of this ALPR and fix it. Happy mapping, Udar. commented 2026-08-03 02:42:06 UTC by Udarian ♦992 |
| 186840582 (Comments: 1) | BonesTM (Discussed changesets: 7) | looking at this ALPR on various aerial imagery in iD it seems to be within the road area, being positioned like this is highly unlikely so please double check the position of this ALPR and fix it. Happy mapping, Udar. commented 2026-08-03 02:41:10 UTC by Udarian ♦992 |
| 186840751 (Comments: 1) | Jesse_00 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi there and welcome to OSM! Thank you for your contribution. It looks like you accidentally dragged a node in your changeset, which I have undone in changeset 186844524. This is a very easy mistake to make, so don't worry too much about it, jus... commented 2026-08-03 02:30:47 UTC by schobbish ♦87 |
| 186787246 (Comments: 3) | TransAct-AS (Discussed changesets: 93) | I can see in this changeset's comment that it appears that you were doing "updates for routing site". However, this changeset deleted a valid intersection node when aerial imagery clearly shows the roads intersecting, causing gaps in t... commented 2026-08-03 01:49:32 UTC by Frank Peng ♦256 |
| 186838725 (Comments: 1) | wolfy1339 (Discussed changesets: 20) | Wolfy, we got your report thanks, but it appears there's an issue with your e-mail address, as our reply to you bounced? Could you please e-mail data@osmfoundation.org again, quoting Ticket#2026080210000263 ? Thanks! Graeme Fitzpatrick Mod... commented 2026-08-03 01:38:16 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,101 |
| 186823608 (Comments: 5) | O1S (Discussed changesets: 53) | Done in changeset 186843484 https://osm.org/changeset/186843484 commented 2026-08-03 01:38:11 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 186815199 (Comments: 3) | Adam Ferreira (Discussed changesets: 8) | This appears to be another instance of the CoMaps bug that came up a few months ago & caused multiple changes of phone number. commented 2026-08-03 01:32:07 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,101 |
| 180432102 (Comments: 2) | Rachel_Jackson (Discussed changesets: 28) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-08-03 00:45:55 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 180432446 (Comments: 1) | Rachel_Jackson (Discussed changesets: 28) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-08-03 00:41:47 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 180432390 (Comments: 1) | Rachel_Jackson (Discussed changesets: 28) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-08-03 00:39:10 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 180432314 (Comments: 1) | Rachel_Jackson (Discussed changesets: 28) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-08-03 00:35:32 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 180432286 (Comments: 1) | Rachel_Jackson (Discussed changesets: 28) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-08-03 00:35:25 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 180432137 (Comments: 1) | Rachel_Jackson (Discussed changesets: 28) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-08-03 00:24:38 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 180431945 (Comments: 1) | Rachel_Jackson (Discussed changesets: 28) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-08-03 00:20:37 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 180431870 (Comments: 1) | Rachel_Jackson (Discussed changesets: 28) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-08-03 00:17:54 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 177785515 (Comments: 1) | Rachel_Jackson (Discussed changesets: 28) | As an account mapping on behalf of a commercial business for financial gain, please be advised that you are expected to understand and carefully follow documented OpenStreetMap standards and conventions, which will both directly benefit the quality o... commented 2026-08-03 00:10:34 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 177785495 (Comments: 1) | Rachel_Jackson (Discussed changesets: 28) | As an account mapping on behalf of a commercial business for financial gain, please be advised that you are expected to understand and carefully follow documented OpenStreetMap standards and conventions, which will both directly benefit the quality o... commented 2026-08-03 00:07:09 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 177785390 (Comments: 1) | Rachel_Jackson (Discussed changesets: 28) | As an account mapping on behalf of a commercial business for financial gain, please be advised that you are expected to understand and carefully follow documented OpenStreetMap standards and conventions, which will both directly benefit the quality o... commented 2026-08-03 00:01:16 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 177785324 (Comments: 1) | Rachel_Jackson (Discussed changesets: 28) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-08-02 23:58:50 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 177785243 (Comments: 1) | Rachel_Jackson (Discussed changesets: 28) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-08-02 23:51:27 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 177785087 (Comments: 1) | Rachel_Jackson (Discussed changesets: 28) | As an account mapping on behalf of a commercial business for financial gain, please be advised that you are expected to understand and carefully follow documented OpenStreetMap standards and conventions, which will both directly benefit the quality o... commented 2026-08-02 23:41:26 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 176872666 (Comments: 1) | Rachel_Jackson (Discussed changesets: 28) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-08-02 23:34:22 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 176651808 (Comments: 3) | Rachel_Jackson (Discussed changesets: 28) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-08-02 23:34:17 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 176651766 (Comments: 1) | Rachel_Jackson (Discussed changesets: 28) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-08-02 23:34:07 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 176872878 (Comments: 3) | Rachel_Jackson (Discussed changesets: 28) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-08-02 23:31:50 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 176872821 (Comments: 1) | Rachel_Jackson (Discussed changesets: 28) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-08-02 23:31:35 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 176651256 (Comments: 3) | Rachel_Jackson (Discussed changesets: 28) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-08-02 23:31:30 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 176650982 (Comments: 3) | Rachel_Jackson (Discussed changesets: 28) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-08-02 23:31:24 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 176872810 (Comments: 1) | Rachel_Jackson (Discussed changesets: 28) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-08-02 23:28:12 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 176649887 (Comments: 3) | Rachel_Jackson (Discussed changesets: 28) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-08-02 23:28:06 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 176649824 (Comments: 3) | Rachel_Jackson (Discussed changesets: 28) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-08-02 23:27:58 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 176872908 (Comments: 3) | Rachel_Jackson (Discussed changesets: 28) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-08-02 23:24:19 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 176872848 (Comments: 3) | Rachel_Jackson (Discussed changesets: 28) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-08-02 23:24:13 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 176649502 (Comments: 3) | Rachel_Jackson (Discussed changesets: 28) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-08-02 23:23:53 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 176648803 (Comments: 3) | Rachel_Jackson (Discussed changesets: 28) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-08-02 23:23:40 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 186682329 (Comments: 2) | MelancholicSlav (Discussed changesets: 10) | Got it, thanks for fixing that. commented 2026-08-02 23:23:20 UTC by MelancholicSlav ♦31 |
| 186839972 (Comments: 1) | Airtun (Discussed changesets: 1) | News about the closing: https://slvpost.com/felton-paint-and-hardware-closes-its-doors/ commented 2026-08-02 23:09:20 UTC by Airtun ♦1 |
| 185624403 (Comments: 1) | WolfPackUNR (Discussed changesets: 1) | This location does not appear to have a Flock camera as of 8/2/26. commented 2026-08-02 22:29:47 UTC by HardEight ♦1 |
| 185040703 (Comments: 1) | StreetSurveyor (Discussed changesets: 102) | Hi there! I noticed some of the service=driveway and service=parking_aisle tags modified in this changeset aren't aligned with the standard OSM Wiki definitions. Per community consensus, driveways generally serve individual properties, while par... commented 2026-08-02 22:12:30 UTC by MelancholicSlav ♦31 |
| 184323586 (Comments: 1) | Popz944 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Why was this closed? commented 2026-08-02 20:43:47 UTC by Popz944 ♦1 |
| 159003771 (Comments: 1) | trademyhomeforcash (Discussed changesets: 1) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Business POIs added to the map must be visitable physical locat... commented 2026-08-02 20:08:33 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 184628098 (Comments: 1) | Nsisnxusiab (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverting inaccurate adds for nodes in the water. commented 2026-08-02 20:07:19 UTC by alpacaMaps ♦431 |
| 184628065 (Comments: 1) | Nsisnxusiab (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverting inaccurate adds for nodes in the water. commented 2026-08-02 20:07:19 UTC by alpacaMaps ♦431 |
| 186832634 (Comments: 1) | Loopslol7 (Discussed changesets: 17) | water traced from the 3dhp program commented 2026-08-02 19:55:07 UTC by Loopslol7 ♦45 |
| 185826774 (Comments: 1) | inabnitlawoffice (Discussed changesets: 1) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-08-02 19:53:02 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 186369872 (Comments: 1) | p**um***u****m*******p********v************** (Discussed changesets: 10) | Hello, It looks like you've clicked and dragged a few nodes into incorrect locations by mistake, both in this changeset and others. Please take care when you're panning on the map so you don't accidentally move a feature. I rec... commented 2026-08-02 18:31:10 UTC by ScrawnyMeowth1 ♦59 |
| 186736551 (Comments: 1) | ISawBerry (Discussed changesets: 1) | This might be a duplex, looks like there's footpaths leading to two possible front entrances. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/186736551 commented 2026-08-02 17:58:47 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,623 |
| 186779930 (Comments: 2) | User4547 (Discussed changesets: 1) | My apologies, I believe operator is pasco sheriffs but the camera itself is an axon camera. commented 2026-08-02 17:23:43 UTC by User4547 ♦1 |
| 186817564 (Comments: 2) | JXKPomelo (Discussed changesets: 12) | It was forest geometry that got accidentally broken. I fixed it: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/186822730 commented 2026-08-02 16:56:33 UTC by Kamil Kalata ♦131 |
| 186539986 (Comments: 1) | Parzival_36 (Discussed changesets: 1) | This could not be located commented 2026-08-02 15:27:46 UTC by ImRexsist ♦1 |
| 186672180 (Comments: 1) | Delores Danner (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/ 186816743 commented 2026-08-02 15:21:24 UTC by MappingMore ♦793 |