| Country | Changeset | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|
 | 188542545 (Comments: 13) | JoukeD (Discussed changesets: 2) | .. en bij hapert de 't' helaas commented 2026-09-04 21:04:55 UTC by eggie ♦46,961 |
 | 187712732 (Comments: 11) | Beau Jonckers (Discussed changesets: 2) | Die durch Aliasing Effekte möglichen alternativen Muster werden dabei ausgeschlossen, weil wir die Grenze über sehr viele aufeinanderfolgende Pixel betrachten, die zugrunde liegende Geometrie als eine kontinuierliche Kurve mit konstanter Kr... commented 2026-09-04 21:03:50 UTC by Beau Jonckers ♦25 |
 | 188311641 (Comments: 1) | galil1980 (Discussed changesets: 1) | You should probably square the building with the "Q" shortcut, right right click and "square" commented 2026-09-04 21:02:05 UTC by SafwatHalaby ♦777 |
| 188539065 (Comments: 1) | Dima Haslavsky (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, it looks like you partly changed the road to a motorway. What were you trying to do here? Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188545537 commented 2026-09-04 21:01:06 UTC by SafwatHalaby ♦777 |
 | 188544926 (Comments: 1) | civ2mapper (Discussed changesets: 9) | Sind die Wege zu den Hauseingängen nicht erhaltenswert gewesen? commented 2026-09-04 20:59:36 UTC by osmmapper222 ♦113 |
| 188284991 (Comments: 1) | Mosh39 (Discussed changesets: 1) | These are not apartments and are in the middle of the road. Removed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188545413 commented 2026-09-04 20:58:11 UTC by SafwatHalaby ♦777 |
| 188543581 (Comments: 2) | JoukeD (Discussed changesets: 2) | https://www.gld.nl/lokaal/8474523/gemeente-ziet-af-van-eenrichtingsverkeer-kerkstraat-harreveld commented 2026-09-04 20:53:58 UTC by eggie ♦46,961 |
 | 188538243 (Comments: 2) | frspp import (Discussed changesets: 2) | The hospital that was supposed to be marked by node 14150897140 was also demolished over a year ago. Only a pile of rubble remains. commented 2026-09-04 20:46:52 UTC by Tuplanolla ♦19 |
| 188539784 (Comments: 1) | TG-map4 (Discussed changesets: 16) | Hi TG-map4 please do NOT delete a POI to create a new one. The versiob-history of "Bistro Möhren und Tulpen" is now lost. Next time Just chage the tags OSM loves history ;-) --- ... commented 2026-09-04 20:46:05 UTC by HirschKauz ♦293 |
| 133884182 (Comments: 1) | Langlaeufer (Discussed changesets: 138) | Im östlichen Teil der Hansastraße sind der Rad/Fußweg beidseitig mit oneway=yes getaggt. War oneway:bicycle=yes gemeint? Eine Einbahnregelung für Fußgänger wäre verwunderlich. commented 2026-09-04 20:40:17 UTC by osmmapper222 ♦113 |
 | 188450179 (Comments: 1) | dknelson9876 (Discussed changesets: 13) | I updated the office tag to "office=it", as that matches the closest. TaxHawk is a software company that runs tax prep websites, you're correct that they don't expect public visitors. commented 2026-09-04 20:37:34 UTC by WarnerK ♦1 |
 | 188521774 (Comments: 2) | Adam Vlčko (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ahoj, nevedel som o takej možnosti. Áno, išlo iba o to, že pôvodne obrysy neboli zhodné s tým, čo tam skutočne stojí a ich manuálna oprava ma stála väčšiu náma... commented 2026-09-04 20:34:02 UTC by Adam Vlčko ♦1 |
 | 188451746 (Comments: 1) | Pete77754 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Por favor, ¿Podrías ser más concreto a la hora de describir tus cambios? Describir tu changeset como "Actualización de elementos" no aporta información útil sobre tus cambios. Adem&aac... commented 2026-09-04 20:32:14 UTC by Jordi MF ♦1,872 |
| 187493114 (Comments: 4) | Matthew Grund (Discussed changesets: 27) | Hi Matthew, thanks for getting back to us. A zero-hour block is put in place when a mapper is making errors and not responding to comments or communications trying to establish a dialog. The block is immediately lifted once communication is establish... commented 2026-09-04 20:25:31 UTC by b-jazz ♦942 |
 | 187258390 (Comments: 1) | iav (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hi! Please don't delete places that are closed. Since premise still exists after closure, there is usually a high likelihood that something new will be open at the same place, like it happened here. Consider using `disused:*=*` (or `shop=... commented 2026-09-04 20:24:12 UTC by markalex- ♦38 |
| 188544217 (Comments: 1) | osmmapper222 (Discussed changesets: 73) | Den HAZ-Artikel zusammengefasst: Das Tempolimit gilt zwischen An der Neuen Bult und Robert-Koch-Straße. Tempo 30 nun nur werktags, Mo-Fr 07:00-17:00 Uhr. Entsprechende Schilder sind bereits angebracht. Tempo 30 von 22-6 Uhr zwisc... commented 2026-09-04 20:23:32 UTC by osmmapper222 ♦113 |
 | 188486978 (Comments: 2) | afrank4436 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Nt all of them are, all of the internal ones aren't, only the ones linking the gates are. commented 2026-09-04 20:18:24 UTC by afrank4436 ♦1 |
 | 188542014 (Comments: 1) | cuzi (Discussed changesets: 29) | Thanks for that. This seems to be the correct path of the border based on cadastral and addess maps commented 2026-09-04 20:06:44 UTC by karlottobenz ♦3 |
| 188522272 (Comments: 1) | SoulCover (Discussed changesets: 4) | Ich nehme an "surface=asphalttraffic_sign=DE:244.1,"Kfz-Verkehr frei",1026-36;350.1" auf dem Weg https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1418879698 ist ein Fehler? commented 2026-09-04 20:05:59 UTC by A35K ♦51 |
 | 183228545 (Comments: 2) | phodgkin (Discussed changesets: 39) | Good spot - It was meant to be `name=Oak Tree`. Fixed! commented 2026-09-04 20:02:58 UTC by phodgkin ♦88 |
| 188500816 (Comments: 1) | gregcrago (Discussed changesets: 42) | Though the road continous "below" the block and therefore should also do so in OSM. The block has proper access-tags, so that's a router-issue. I will revert your change. --- Published usin... commented 2026-09-04 20:00:59 UTC by aighes ♦58 |
| 188543300 (Comments: 1) | Flap Slimy Outward (Discussed changesets: 286) | I completely forgot to add a source 🤦 Anyway, here it is: https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=SHC§ionNum=311. commented 2026-09-04 19:59:21 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦352 |
 | 188533256 (Comments: 3) | NaufalFarras (Discussed changesets: 34) | Based on field data, there are still many roads with "provincial road" status that do not meet the requirements to be classified as highway=primary because it is not a main connecting route between cities. In fact, we often find similar roa... commented 2026-09-04 19:53:15 UTC by Gaung Tebono ♦51 |
| 188542595 (Comments: 2) | NL2ghd (Discussed changesets: 3) | Gebouw verwijderd. Info staat op adresnode commented 2026-09-04 19:49:58 UTC by eggie ♦46,961 |
| 187594823 (Comments: 1) | mehlkorn (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo mehlkorn, danke für's eintragen des wiedereröffneten Gasthauses. Ich war heute kurz vor Ort und habe ein paar Daten ergänzt und mit Deinen Inhalten in's building bzw. amenity geschoben und den separaten, weil üb... commented 2026-09-04 19:45:48 UTC by Steube ♦46 |
| 188534573 (Comments: 4) | JanJaapJoris (Discussed changesets: 6) | Kijk hier eens goed wat je werkelijk hebt gedaan https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=188534573#8/52.501/5.768 commented 2026-09-04 19:45:12 UTC by eggie ♦46,961 |
| 188476209 (Comments: 1) | Khellhound (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks for the contribution, and welcome! A couple comments. First, if these are truly not Flock cameras, please remove the "Flock" brand and wiki-data (theres a trashcan at the bottom of the panel in ID, next to the 'wikidata&... commented 2026-09-04 19:42:18 UTC by PuddlesMapping ♦3 |
| 188540713 (Comments: 1) | Piootje (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hoi, review_requested \tyes Lastig te checken... Wat is je bron? Wellicht heb je hier iets aan. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building:levels MVG eggie commented 2026-09-04 19:41:23 UTC by eggie ♦46,961 |
| 188539467 (Comments: 1) | aevw (Discussed changesets: 7) | De info heb ik samengevoegd met de adresnode. MVG eggie commented 2026-09-04 19:38:48 UTC by eggie ♦46,961 |
| 188514749 (Comments: 1) | AmineAusAlbuquerque (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hallo, ich zitiere mal aus dem Wiki zu leisure=park: "Ein Park ist eine offene Grünfläche, die zur Erholung dient, z.B. Stadtpark, Kurpark. Die Park-Landschaft ist üblicherweise gestaltet und bietet oft einen Wechsel von off... commented 2026-09-04 19:37:40 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,614 |
| 188540344 (Comments: 1) | aevw (Discussed changesets: 7) | Graag op de adresnode bijtaggen. Je krijgt zo vervuiling van de data. MVG eggie commented 2026-09-04 19:37:30 UTC by eggie ♦46,961 |
| 188540534 (Comments: 2) | Piootje (Discussed changesets: 3) | De landuse retail had je verbonden met het gebouw. commented 2026-09-04 19:36:15 UTC by eggie ♦46,961 |
| 188541824 (Comments: 2) | NL2ghd (Discussed changesets: 3) | Info verplaatst naar adresnode. naam ingekort commented 2026-09-04 19:35:06 UTC by eggie ♦46,961 |
 | 188497831 (Comments: 1) | Beli22 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188542109 commented 2026-09-04 19:32:43 UTC by rajdhani ♦424 |
 | 183141983 (Comments: 4) | Hervé TUC (Discussed changesets: 41) | I was actually searching for that hotel recently, but because it had been deleted, I couldn't find it. Using lifecycle tags (like disused:tourism=hotel or construction:tourism=hotel) makes things much easier. Once work is finished, someone can s... commented 2026-09-04 19:32:35 UTC by MatthiasMatthias ♦18 |
| 188529649 (Comments: 1) | Skinkos (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OpenStreetMap and many thanks for spotting and removing that little bit of vandalism. commented 2026-09-04 19:31:11 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,918 |
| 188502555 (Comments: 1) | PuddlesMapping (Discussed changesets: 1) | Re: Possible Import flag. Guaranteed human; just bored. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/188502555 commented 2026-09-04 19:29:59 UTC by PuddlesMapping ♦3 |
| 188540683 (Comments: 2) | Piootje (Discussed changesets: 3) | ele verwijderd. commented 2026-09-04 19:29:33 UTC by eggie ♦46,961 |
 | 188537351 (Comments: 2) | YvesB (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thanks for your comments, but are you sure about this ? The canal areas I have tagged were precisely the only one not having water:canal on the enclosing area. The linear features have the tag waterway:canal (and not water:canal). But you are much... commented 2026-09-04 19:29:05 UTC by YvesB ♦2 |
| 151789544 (Comments: 3) | Aldeyde (Discussed changesets: 22) | I have reverted the change of the boundary between Italy and San Marino commented 2026-09-04 19:28:07 UTC by cuzi ♦183 |
| 188540117 (Comments: 2) | YvesB (Discussed changesets: 2) | thanks for your explanations. Sorry, it was not vandalism. It is my first edits... I'll read your document osm-addresses.pdf. Looks very interesting. commented 2026-09-04 19:22:39 UTC by YvesB ♦2 |
| 188493168 (Comments: 1) | gouranga63 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Bonjour, c'est mieux, sauf que la relation est toujours là : du coup tu as une relation définissant un building composé d'autres buildings, dit autrement un bâtiment sur des bâtiments. J'ai corrig... commented 2026-09-04 19:21:05 UTC by Yunan973 ♦156 |
| 188518594 (Comments: 4) | meeuw (Discussed changesets: 3) | Ik denk dat knooppunt 86 beter iets verplaatst kan worden. commented 2026-09-04 19:16:48 UTC by meeuw ♦3 |
 | 188312978 (Comments: 4) | Classicness (Discussed changesets: 35) | Hi SomeoneElse_Revert, Thank you for your feedback. I will analyze the situation and come back to you. commented 2026-09-04 18:59:41 UTC by Wildsharky ♦926 |
 | 181507803 (Comments: 4) | murattas6 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Merhaba. @murattas6 , Kastettiğim yollar üniversitenin içindeki yollardan ziyade çevresindeki yollardı(liselere giden yollar, Ankaragücü tesislerine giden yollar vb.). Ben değişiklik açıklamanıza bakarak ... commented 2026-09-04 18:56:57 UTC by HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi ♦267 |
| 188497714 (Comments: 1) | Rocap (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188540119 commented 2026-09-04 18:51:57 UTC by Wildsharky ♦926 |
 | 188306404 (Comments: 3) | Tivadar Pongó (Discussed changesets: 1) | Szia! Köszi az utánajárást, az automatákkal még nem tudom mi legyen, még 1-2 forrást meg kell nézni ez ügyben. Tamás commented 2026-09-04 18:51:53 UTC by vasony ♦600 |
 | 188465074 (Comments: 1) | foodstreet (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188539868 commented 2026-09-04 18:51:23 UTC by Wildsharky ♦926 |
| 188465649 (Comments: 1) | Manasvi Kadam (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188538686 commented 2026-09-04 18:50:41 UTC by Wildsharky ♦926 |
| 188390510 (Comments: 1) | Tuwewanzi (Discussed changesets: 6) | Great work! Couple follow-up questions: Would the name for the lake Clear Lake also apply to the town Clear Lake? Should the name for the Dells go on the (currently-unmapped) geographic feature rather than the city-run recreation area? ... commented 2026-09-04 18:49:40 UTC by SD Mapman ♦93 |
| 188529984 (Comments: 2) | Aethonatic (Discussed changesets: 18) | Apologies, I do intend on doing so in the future. commented 2026-09-04 18:47:35 UTC by Aethonatic ♦81 |
 | 188535690 (Comments: 1) | Swingman7000 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Your edit has been reverted. See the discussion on the Community Forum for help in tagging Lake Ontario. https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/lake-ontario-lake-america/146975/8 --- Published using OSMCha... commented 2026-09-04 18:37:12 UTC by Glassman ♦6,031 |
 | 181530825 (Comments: 3) | M3th04 (Discussed changesets: 2) | (上面发重了) 官方报道: https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/RcqQbUmJrRWQOSCW3ZAJIA commented 2026-09-04 18:37:11 UTC by Kiana_Kaslana ♦21 |
 | 188522752 (Comments: 1) | Blackbird765 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Co jest powodem dodania access=permissive do tej drogi. Nie przesadziłeś trochę z rozmiarem tej pętelki po lewej stronie ? Patrząc na orto to nie robił bym pętli. commented 2026-09-04 18:33:27 UTC by grzegorz75jan ♦699 |
| 188495238 (Comments: 2) | bwbuz (Discussed changesets: 54) | Moin hier wurde ledigliche die fehlerhafte Schreibweise des fixme-tags korrigiert, da es so für die Software "nicht zuordenbar/nicht übertragbar" war. Eine inhaltliche Bearbeitung geht damit nicht einher - kannst du abe... commented 2026-09-04 18:23:30 UTC by bwbuz ♦64 |
| 188521105 (Comments: 1) | Blackbird765 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Znacznik foot=yes jest błędny jak i niepotrzebny https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:highway=footway Ten chodnik warto też połączyć z drogą od lewej strony. commented 2026-09-04 18:15:59 UTC by grzegorz75jan ♦699 |
| 188533699 (Comments: 1) | SamChi (Discussed changesets: 2) | Ahoj, zopar pripomienok k tejto zmene: 1) adresu moze mat jedine budova, prideluje ju urad pri kolaudacii stavby. Navyse obec Horna Marikova nepouziva ulice, takze "addr:street" je uplne mimo realitu. 2) do tagu "name" pa... commented 2026-09-04 18:15:33 UTC by t_ja ♦298 |
| 187082370 (Comments: 1) | Térképszerkesztő (Discussed changesets: 38) | Szia. A jövőben kérlek source:name=* címkét használj, ha az utcanév forrását szeretnéd jelölni. További jó szerkesztést! commented 2026-09-04 18:10:59 UTC by qstep ♦192 |
| 185674950 (Comments: 2) | Flap Slimy Outward (Discussed changesets: 286) | Oh, no, it's not! The addr:street=* of this node is absolutely incorrect! The closest street is "Inner Circle." I honestly have no idea how I didn't catch that 😅 Thanks for fixing this anyway! commented 2026-09-04 18:07:02 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦352 |
| 188474373 (Comments: 1) | PeterThiel6 (Discussed changesets: 1) | thanks peter commented 2026-09-04 18:04:39 UTC by schobbish ♦80 |
| 188536604 (Comments: 2) | PTSB (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thanks, it's the first time I added a new place 👍 commented 2026-09-04 18:02:32 UTC by PTSB ♦1 |
| 187377369 (Comments: 3) | FrankBroux (Discussed changesets: 1) | wat je had verwijderd was iets over het landgebruik, niet een eigenschap van dat gedeelte meerstraat. let er gewoon in het vervolg op commented 2026-09-04 17:53:50 UTC by Joske1020 ♦53 |
| 161289920 (Comments: 2) | sis651 (Discussed changesets: 15) | @MisturJoestur Çok *_link olayına girmiyorum ben de, JOSM uyarı verdiği için düzenliyorum daha çok. Düzeltebilirsiniz gördüğünüz sorunlu yerleri. commented 2026-09-04 17:53:24 UTC by sis651 ♦16 |
| 158531284 (Comments: 3) | Tom Ameye (Discussed changesets: 117) | best laag natuurbeheerplannen gebruiken op geopunt. commented 2026-09-04 17:51:00 UTC by Joske1020 ♦53 |
| 181556853 (Comments: 2) | Goofball5388 (Discussed changesets: 3) | I'm not attached to it. I was just trying to clean up the mess that existed. I think around the coast I took some minor liberties anyway because the coastline in OSM and in the Boston dataset didn't align perfectly anyway and it was a lot o... commented 2026-09-04 17:42:17 UTC by Goofball5388 ♦1 |
| 180484935 (Comments: 1) | PedestrianMapping_CartoBypass (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hi! Please be more careful: "cycleway:both=shared_parking_lane" broke the bike lane rendering on this roadway in both CyclOSM and OpenCycleMap. That tag is not compatible with these rendering services. commented 2026-09-04 17:39:19 UTC by BPTT ♦96 |
| 188314144 (Comments: 1) | Pomorze Zachodnie (Discussed changesets: 15) | Fajnie, że dodałeś brakujące semafory i tarcze, natomiast poważna uwaga - błędnie użyłeś niektórych tagów. Schemat jest dostępny tutaj: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:OpenRailwayMap/Tagging_in_Poland/Signals_an... commented 2026-09-04 17:39:14 UTC by Anas masuris ♦209 |
| 188497607 (Comments: 1) | Elizabeth Cortez (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188537317 commented 2026-09-04 17:37:09 UTC by rajdhani ♦424 |
| 186061248 (Comments: 1) | Julien1990 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Julien, thank you for adding the new route to Sasc Furä. As you were obviously there in person, you might perhaps add a few more details, such as sac_scale and surface? That would be helpful. Thanks, geow commented 2026-09-04 17:35:34 UTC by geow ♦452 |
| 188536804 (Comments: 2) | SemKl (Discussed changesets: 2) | Ik heb het bedrijf verwijderd. commented 2026-09-04 17:35:04 UTC by eggie ♦46,961 |
| 188531933 (Comments: 3) | twobeers2026 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Two benches is okay, but a bank? Why? commented 2026-09-04 17:30:49 UTC by eggie ♦46,961 |
| 188532546 (Comments: 1) | Röllingser (Discussed changesets: 16) | Dag Röllinger . Het beste kun je die footbalclub met naam combineren met dat clubhuis en dan het liefst op een adresnode. MVG eggie commented 2026-09-04 17:29:28 UTC by eggie ♦46,961 |
| 188536947 (Comments: 1) | dcapillae (Discussed changesets: 123) | Corregido etiquetado wikipedia y wikidata. Véase discusión en conjunto de cambios nr. 188532470 commented 2026-09-04 17:28:46 UTC by dcapillae ♦455 |
| 188202682 (Comments: 9) | Gessen (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hallo Gessen, Danke für die Erklärung! Ich hätte ja für access=no noch emergency=yes vorgeschlagen, aber wenn ich "Zugang über eine alte Odelgrube" lese... Will man vielleicht doch kein Löschfahrz... commented 2026-09-04 17:27:42 UTC by Metzor ♦424 |
| 188531069 (Comments: 1) | Lisapple (Discussed changesets: 75) | Hi LIsapple, I noticed one thing, it seems like your software is cutting off some zeros. For example: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11262646006 the number on the website is +390110468534 while you added +39110468534 ... commented 2026-09-04 17:26:34 UTC by ivanbranco ♦2,936 |
 | 184407380 (Comments: 1) | Valter Muller (Discussed changesets: 2) | Neste changeset você mapeou o Guaíba como um corpo d'água pequeno com menos de metade da área do lago, mas o lago Guaíba já estava completamente mapeado desde 2009 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/... commented 2026-09-04 17:25:52 UTC by ftrebien ♦277 |
 | 188392244 (Comments: 2) | czebureks (Discussed changesets: 95) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only Widzę, że kilka(naście) lat temu w lokalnych mediach funkcjonował pomysł na projekt rewitalizacyjny "Stara Kaflarnia" - jeżeli w końcu wszedłby w fazę realizacj... commented 2026-09-04 17:24:24 UTC by czebureks ♦184 |
| 188532470 (Comments: 1) | uma_caruma (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola. La Avenida Obispo Ángel Herrera Oria y el obispo Ángel Herrera Oria no son la misma cosa. Cada uno tiene su propio código wikidata. Si lo que quiere es indicar la etimología del nombre de la avenida, us... commented 2026-09-04 17:24:05 UTC by dcapillae ♦455 |
 | 188399631 (Comments: 2) | MountFuji (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi Zh9567, Thanks for reaching out! I reviewed the available ground level imagery along with other associated tags for these ways and agree that motorway makes more sense so I have made those changes. commented 2026-09-04 17:18:07 UTC by MountFuji ♦1 |
| 188536274 (Comments: 2) | SomeoneElse_Revert (Discussed changesets: 1938) | 2 were excluded from the revert: interim modification by user ion_chi on way 461219677 - skipping this interim modification by user iandees on way 1465615143 - skipping this They match addresses and had already been move... commented 2026-09-04 17:17:30 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,865 |
| 188531705 (Comments: 3) | JanJaapJoris (Discussed changesets: 6) | Schade hersteld zelfkruisende wegen. commented 2026-09-04 17:13:24 UTC by eggie ♦46,961 |
| 188449890 (Comments: 2) | GongolaRiver (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi BerryTrails, Thank you for making that correction. I will be more mindful of my edits in the future. commented 2026-09-04 16:58:25 UTC by GongolaRiver ♦2 |
| 188496732 (Comments: 4) | BernyRich (Discussed changesets: 1) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/395368830 und https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/325413272 müssten das gewesen sein commented 2026-09-04 16:55:35 UTC by limes11 ♦1,090 |
| 188463746 (Comments: 4) | SzilágyiGyula (Discussed changesets: 3) | Szia Rendben. Még új vagyok ebben, de korrigálom. Köszönöm hogy jelezted! commented 2026-09-04 16:51:08 UTC by SzilágyiGyula ♦2 |
| 188532346 (Comments: 1) | JanJaapJoris (Discussed changesets: 6) | En dat was dus correct. Nu schuif je weer met alles wat er aan vastzit. Dat is niet de bushalte, maar de stopposition. Ik heb het hersteld. commented 2026-09-04 16:45:01 UTC by eggie ♦46,961 |
| 188525553 (Comments: 1) | yasminehabra (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Unfortunately, your test mapping upload dragged Euston Road out of alignment. I've reverted the changes, so all is now OK. OSM is a live worldwide database from which maps are compiled. Please don'... commented 2026-09-04 16:38:23 UTC by BCNorwich ♦5,356 |
| 116243797 (Comments: 1) | Fischkopp0815 (Discussed changesets: 52) | Ist da etwas mit way/967281618 schiefgegangen oder kann man über diese Parkgasse mitten ins Meer fahren? commented 2026-09-04 16:36:32 UTC by sdicke ♦39 |
| 188530748 (Comments: 1) | JanJaapJoris (Discussed changesets: 6) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-09-04 16:34:45 UTC by eggie ♦46,961 |
 | 188432760 (Comments: 2) | Samantam Narasimha Reddy (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Apologies for the confusion. I accidentally created a node on Segment and uploaded it with the comment “As per evidence, we need to allow the vehicle; DRDO allows taxi vehicles to pick up or drop off in that phase.” I will avoid suc... commented 2026-09-04 16:34:24 UTC by Samantam Narasimha Reddy ♦1 |
| 188533644 (Comments: 1) | JanJaapJoris (Discussed changesets: 6) | Dag jjj, Probeer de amenity op de adresnode bij te taggen Misschien heeft het ook een naam? Mvg, eggie commented 2026-09-04 16:30:22 UTC by eggie ♦46,961 |
| 188521059 (Comments: 2) | zsolt d (Discussed changesets: 221) | Javítottam ezeket: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188534239 commented 2026-09-04 16:29:05 UTC by infeeeee ♦718 |
| 188532685 (Comments: 2) | JanJaapJoris (Discussed changesets: 6) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:emergency%3Dlifeguard commented 2026-09-04 16:28:49 UTC by eggie ♦46,961 |
| X | 188499642 (Comments: 2) | KevinPilliza (Discussed changesets: 2) | esta exelente commented 2026-09-04 16:28:47 UTC by leslie romero ♦1 |
 | 186067245 (Comments: 10) | Vektor_567 (Discussed changesets: 88) | ich habe die namen von den punkten entfernt. commented 2026-09-04 16:27:50 UTC by Vektor_567 ♦79 |
| 188534228 (Comments: 1) | NoctZan (Discussed changesets: 13) | Wrong source, should be this: https://www.a2gov.org/parks-and-recreation/parks-and-places/garden-homes-park/ commented 2026-09-04 16:26:12 UTC by NoctZan ♦12 |
| 188492392 (Comments: 6) | tijgerhaai (Discussed changesets: 7) | 👍 commented 2026-09-04 16:18:49 UTC by eggie ♦46,961 |
| 188533654 (Comments: 1) | NaufalFarras (Discussed changesets: 34) | As indicated by narrow link road in Jenderal Basuki Rachmat-Sukowati junction, traffic from the east is directed towards newer road and bridge. Through intercity traffic from the west also does not pass this road as it is more efficient to go straigh... commented 2026-09-04 16:17:52 UTC by NaufalFarras ♦59 |
| 183055732 (Comments: 5) | TornadoFang (Discussed changesets: 24) | Alles gut. Ich hätte mich ja auch irren können commented 2026-09-04 16:17:47 UTC by Langlaeufer ♦1,583 |
| 182424077 (Comments: 2) | drlellinger (Discussed changesets: 122) | Hi, ja. Weil es Sinn macht. Ich werde nach bester Möglichkeit die Informationen harmonisieren. Es steht jedem natürlich frei dabei zu unterstützen :) commented 2026-09-04 16:09:01 UTC by drlellinger ♦104 |
 | 188462625 (Comments: 1) | Ionut Paduretu (Discussed changesets: 28) | Hello! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1554725282 (one of five hundred ten objects). What is the mean of the tag has_parts = false? commented 2026-09-04 16:08:11 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,833 |
| 187816176 (Comments: 3) | GA_Kevin (Discussed changesets: 18) | Hello @GA_Kevin, Sorry for the late reply, I didn't get a notification that you had replied. Yeah, I just noticed that I had incorrectly set `capacity=2` on each of the ones I'd created but I just fixed it. They are also live ... commented 2026-09-04 16:06:00 UTC by MacOSMapper ♦3 |
| 188529940 (Comments: 1) | Gessen (Discussed changesets: 2) | Einfach alles auf no setzen, wenn das nicht mal ein gültiger Wert ist (z.B. highway=no), nur damit die Wege gar nicht mehr angezeigt werden, ist aber auch nicht die feine englische Art. Ich habe jetzt in https://osm.org/changeset/18853277... commented 2026-09-04 15:58:03 UTC by flo2154 ♦68 |
| 188525009 (Comments: 1) | PDMMDP (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi, I’ve seen a lot of edits like this from you recently. They look useful, but I’d like to double check your sources, as they need to be compatible with OSM’s licensing in order to be used on the map. Which street view servi... commented 2026-09-04 15:56:09 UTC by gurglypipe ♦1,109 |
| 62636430 (Comments: 3) | smarties (Discussed changesets: 96) | In der App steht dass war vor 8 Jahren. Mach es so wie Du es für richtig hältst. commented 2026-09-04 15:45:56 UTC by smarties ♦43 |
| 188524018 (Comments: 1) | Dem9426 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Benvenuti e grazie per la modifica! Non ho trovato nessun errore evidente. In futuro se puoi cerca di non attaccare le strade alle aree perché sono cose diverse ;) Buon mapping, Marco. --- ... commented 2026-09-04 15:44:54 UTC by MarcoR ♦630 |
| 185802741 (Comments: 4) | Vektor_567 (Discussed changesets: 88) | habe mal ein fixme darüber gelegt commented 2026-09-04 15:42:49 UTC by Vektor_567 ♦79 |
| 188135427 (Comments: 1) | rittoch (Discussed changesets: 17) | Hi rittoch, thanks for your contribution. However, there are a few significant issues here: By de-facto local convention, the directional suffix isn't currently in any of the Blacksburg street name=* s nor addr:street=* (except for Turner... commented 2026-09-04 15:37:09 UTC by CAM-Gerlach ♦304 |
| 188489349 (Comments: 2) | Digitaleo (Discussed changesets: 33) | Bonjour, les informations ont été mises à jour, le POI pointe désormais sur le bon Node. Merci à vous commented 2026-09-04 15:35:29 UTC by Digitaleo ♦37 |
| 188512038 (Comments: 4) | marcmarti (Discussed changesets: 12) | No estic d'acord en treure detalls, per a mi són voreres i per a la Guàrdia Urbana també, si no s'emeten més receptes és per acord entre alguns veïns i el districte, però com que només s... commented 2026-09-04 15:32:38 UTC by aTarom ♦981 |
| 188530024 (Comments: 2) | IamJesse (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted. commented 2026-09-04 15:23:11 UTC by Glassman ♦6,031 |
| 185660598 (Comments: 5) | eagle314 (Discussed changesets: 4) | I have asked the other members of the French outdoors community to come and comment. commented 2026-09-04 15:20:27 UTC by StC ♦518 |
| 188447867 (Comments: 4) | wcedmisten (Discussed changesets: 14) | doing landuse as multipolygon vs single polygon is not a settled debate and I prefer multipolygon's so I do not see the problem. If there wasn't any landuse bordering the hospital then yes a single polygon is better but in cases like this w... commented 2026-09-04 15:14:30 UTC by Udarian ♦918 |
| 188489718 (Comments: 1) | JudGer (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hallo, Christoph, so passt's doch! Habe eben noch die Einzahlmöglichkeit am ATM eingetragen und den Brunnen vor dem Tore detailliert. Grüße aus Herborn und schönes WE! Andreas commented 2026-09-04 15:13:40 UTC by Herwescheluc ♦197 |
| 188496993 (Comments: 30) | Vektor_567 (Discussed changesets: 88) | Die Stadt Salzburg führt die anderen Straßen offiziell als Einbahnstraße. Bei der Linzergasse - was ich repariert habe - ist die Einbahnstraße eindeutig on the ground markiert commented 2026-09-04 15:12:28 UTC by Vektor_567 ♦79 |
| 188141820 (Comments: 5) | 544848455241 (Discussed changesets: 11) | Rückgängig gemacht mit cs188530399, da sich der Initiator aus der Runde verabschiedet hat. commented 2026-09-04 15:11:28 UTC by welzheimerwald ♦107 |
| 188448928 (Comments: 1) | Dayanna12 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188514354 commented 2026-09-04 15:10:18 UTC by Wildsharky ♦926 |
| 188396025 (Comments: 1) | Jhonatan chavez (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188529531 commented 2026-09-04 15:09:15 UTC by Wildsharky ♦926 |
| 188427978 (Comments: 1) | Janine Jimenez (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188529343 commented 2026-09-04 15:08:30 UTC by Wildsharky ♦926 |
 | 188395823 (Comments: 1) | rideNfix (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188528722 commented 2026-09-04 15:07:47 UTC by Wildsharky ♦926 |
| 182217292 (Comments: 1) | volkan goc (Discussed changesets: 2) | Bir gel bir git iki şeritli yolu neden motorway olarak belirttiniz anlamış değilim. Trunk olarak geri değiştiriyorum. commented 2026-09-04 15:07:22 UTC by MisturJoesturr ♦14 |
| 188525783 (Comments: 1) | wcedmisten (Discussed changesets: 14) | In my head since I was a kid if you asked me if that grass and trees by the canal where part of the hospital I would tell you they are but I can accept the new alignment, but in Miami Dade landuse when attached to other landuse is done as multipolygo... commented 2026-09-04 15:07:08 UTC by Udarian ♦918 |
| 188397433 (Comments: 1) | Turuntuwi (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188530030 commented 2026-09-04 15:07:07 UTC by Wildsharky ♦926 |
| 188399097 (Comments: 1) | Beiris (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188511165 commented 2026-09-04 15:06:23 UTC by Wildsharky ♦926 |
| 188396750 (Comments: 1) | Scarlet1919 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188510997 commented 2026-09-04 15:05:39 UTC by Wildsharky ♦926 |
 | 188439480 (Comments: 1) | Ulianova (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188510404 commented 2026-09-04 15:04:43 UTC by Wildsharky ♦926 |
 | 188434676 (Comments: 1) | XishWho (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188528267 commented 2026-09-04 15:04:05 UTC by Wildsharky ♦926 |
| 188411761 (Comments: 1) | abinudumbanattu1 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188509932 commented 2026-09-04 15:03:28 UTC by Wildsharky ♦926 |
 | 188435009 (Comments: 1) | aqnefo (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188528912 commented 2026-09-04 15:02:54 UTC by Wildsharky ♦926 |
| 187680663 (Comments: 2) | Vektor_567 (Discussed changesets: 88) | danke für den Hinweis, hätte iD-Editor machen sollen. commented 2026-09-04 14:57:34 UTC by Vektor_567 ♦79 |
| 188528741 (Comments: 2) | Heerlijk Heuvelrug (Discussed changesets: 1) | Adresnode 12 heb ik ontdaan van de lunchroomtag. Anders niet eenduidig. commented 2026-09-04 14:57:27 UTC by eggie ♦46,961 |
| 159746660 (Comments: 1) | Penka457 (Discussed changesets: 13) | Devlet yolları belirtilmediği sürece dönel kavşak/dairesel olarak çizilmez commented 2026-09-04 14:56:55 UTC by MisturJoesturr ♦14 |
| 188036241 (Comments: 3) | Anrijs Terauds (Discussed changesets: 98) | A, jā pamanīju. Tagad ir OK. commented 2026-09-04 14:55:01 UTC by Anrijs Terauds ♦53 |
| 188461619 (Comments: 5) | 9_tab (Discussed changesets: 22) | Sorry, autocorrect: "subareas“… commented 2026-09-04 14:54:13 UTC by habi ♦2,248 |
| 188448452 (Comments: 1) | Chris4856 (Discussed changesets: 0) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188529622 commented 2026-09-04 14:53:51 UTC by rajdhani ♦424 |
| 188473205 (Comments: 1) | sleet2412 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Please don't add 'Station' to the station's name. You've now made operator:website the same as nettwork:website. commented 2026-09-04 14:51:24 UTC by DaveF ♦1,683 |
| 188011098 (Comments: 4) | Vektor_567 (Discussed changesets: 88) | erledigt commented 2026-09-04 14:47:14 UTC by Vektor_567 ♦79 |
 | 188449254 (Comments: 2) | Bryan Casanelli (Discussed changesets: 2) | Buenos días Felipe. Mi intención era traducir todos los departamentos de la universidad, ya que las universidades son entornos altamente internacionales, desde estudiantes, investigadores, cuerpo docente, y visitas. Antes ... commented 2026-09-04 14:46:25 UTC by Bryan Casanelli ♦2 |
| 188152695 (Comments: 6) | Vektor_567 (Discussed changesets: 88) | Fehlerkorrektur wurde durchgeführt commented 2026-09-04 14:38:07 UTC by Vektor_567 ♦79 |
| 188527054 (Comments: 1) | larsman (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. Feedback Hier liepen de wegen wel heel willekeurig. Ik heb wat gefatsoeneerd. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM ... commented 2026-09-04 14:34:35 UTC by eggie ♦46,961 |
 | 185906123 (Comments: 4) | Vektor_567 (Discussed changesets: 88) | ist KEIN Fehler von mir commented 2026-09-04 14:30:32 UTC by Vektor_567 ♦79 |
| 186670580 (Comments: 6) | Vektor_567 (Discussed changesets: 88) | bei HOT OSM arbeitet man in vordefinierten Sektoren. logisch, dass dann mit Wegen was nicht passt. bitte ignoriere die HOT OSM Fehler. ich mache auch nichts mehr für HOT OSM, weil das nervt commented 2026-09-04 14:29:58 UTC by Vektor_567 ♦79 |
| 188527901 (Comments: 2) | Mapsfromtheancient (Discussed changesets: 4) | Dat bedrijf heb ik verplaatst. Op dat nummer zit ook een cafe. commented 2026-09-04 14:29:41 UTC by eggie ♦46,961 |
| 186241993 (Comments: 1) | MathGon (Discussed changesets: 6) | Salut ! Je me permets jus signaler un petit soucis sur ce changeset : il manque plusieurs passages piétons par endroits, notamment dans la rue Dufour, ce qui crée des soucis de routage. J'en ai rajouté quelques-uns avec les ... commented 2026-09-04 14:28:30 UTC by rezemika ♦27 |
 | 156079476 (Comments: 2) | Boogier (Discussed changesets: 7) | hi, sure, fixed commented 2026-09-04 14:27:41 UTC by Boogier ♦7 |
| 84961165 (Comments: 3) | gregorisan (Discussed changesets: 8) | Jest jeszcze tabliczka "Droga wywozu drewna z lasu", czyli forestry=yes ? commented 2026-09-04 14:26:09 UTC by VA00 ♦656 |
| 186807348 (Comments: 2) | Vektor_567 (Discussed changesets: 88) | erledigt. keine Ahnung warum der nicht automatisch verbunden wurde. normal macht das iD-Editor automatisch. commented 2026-09-04 14:25:18 UTC by Vektor_567 ♦79 |
| 188528282 (Comments: 1) | cstromw (Discussed changesets: 3) | More updates needed to add new city hall building and other features as construction finished commented 2026-09-04 14:24:54 UTC by cstromw ♦3 |
| 188527294 (Comments: 1) | Mapsfromtheancient (Discussed changesets: 4) | Dat kan inderdaad op meer manieren... Meestal taggen we amenity=icecream Dat geeft dat ijsjes-symbool MVG eggie commented 2026-09-04 14:23:42 UTC by eggie ♦46,961 |
 | 188505424 (Comments: 2) | Kri_ttt (Discussed changesets: 43) | แก้ไขกลับเป็นทางรถแล้วครับ ใน changeset/188528129 ขอบคุณครับ commented 2026-09-04 14:21:16 UTC by Kri_ttt ♦27 |
| 188527072 (Comments: 1) | Mapsfromtheancient (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hoi, Als het zo'n kleiner gebeuren is wellicht https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=convenience Ten minste als ze een breder assortment hebben. Een lekkernijenwinkel wordt getagd met =Deli Maar als het echt een supermar... commented 2026-09-04 14:21:09 UTC by eggie ♦46,961 |
| 188526243 (Comments: 6) | RobbyS63 (Discussed changesets: 8) | Tja en Google kunnen we eigenlijk niet als bron noemen. Die Upstairs zit rechtboven de pizzeria. In die steden verandert nog wel eens wat.. op het laatst weet niemand meer hoe het precies zit. Die winkel van Slaap Totaal die niet meer besta... commented 2026-09-04 14:16:57 UTC by eggie ♦46,961 |
| 187983686 (Comments: 2) | Vektor_567 (Discussed changesets: 88) | da ist ein Datenfehler passiert. Beim Kopieren der Gebäudeform commented 2026-09-04 14:12:26 UTC by Vektor_567 ♦79 |
| 188374271 (Comments: 2) | Vektor_567 (Discussed changesets: 88) | wtf, den bach habe ich nicht gesehen. erledigt commented 2026-09-04 14:07:05 UTC by Vektor_567 ♦79 |
| 188527090 (Comments: 2) | Fizzie-DWG (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🤣🤣🤣 commented 2026-09-04 14:06:06 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦1 |
| 186425135 (Comments: 2) | Vektor_567 (Discussed changesets: 88) | danke für den Hinweis. erledigt commented 2026-09-04 13:58:44 UTC by Vektor_567 ♦79 |
| 157855403 (Comments: 5) | valhikes (Discussed changesets: 11) | oh right, I thought about something closer to https://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plik:Outhouse_cm01.jpg commented 2026-09-04 13:54:20 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 188462667 (Comments: 1) | legeolartois (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188526845 commented 2026-09-04 13:53:21 UTC by rajdhani ♦424 |
| 186655438 (Comments: 2) | Vektor_567 (Discussed changesets: 88) | vielen dank für den hinweis. erledigt und zusätzlich verweis zu mapillary hinzugefügt. :) commented 2026-09-04 13:51:31 UTC by Vektor_567 ♦79 |
 | 188448857 (Comments: 1) | Hans Jürgen von Lengerke (Discussed changesets: 3) | Do you have any sources? commented 2026-09-04 13:48:35 UTC by ClaveScottPH ♦13 |
| 188375808 (Comments: 2) | Vektor_567 (Discussed changesets: 88) | das ist die Grundstückszufahrt?! commented 2026-09-04 13:46:14 UTC by Vektor_567 ♦79 |
| 188521130 (Comments: 1) | Bravo Romeo (Discussed changesets: 30) | review_requested \tyes Hoi, Lijkt me oke.. Die verschillende percelen komen uit de import van de 3dshapes. Soms is het juist weer handig ze gescheiden te houden omdat je de boomsoorten van een bos ook kunt taggen. En die kunnen per p... commented 2026-09-04 13:42:40 UTC by eggie ♦46,961 |
| 182139005 (Comments: 2) | FlamingoOSM (Discussed changesets: 44) | Sorry, my mistake. Added correct phone number. commented 2026-09-04 13:41:15 UTC by FlamingoOSM ♦15 |
| 188525221 (Comments: 1) | Marco Ubaghs (VRZL) (Discussed changesets: 18) | Dag Marco... Eigenlijk niet, want je voegt motor_vehicle=no toe aan het fietspad en dat is niet correct. Het houdt moped en mofa tegen. Auto's e.d. routeren nooit over een fietspad. Er is steeds opnieuw discussie over emergency=yes en ... commented 2026-09-04 13:36:20 UTC by eggie ♦46,961 |
| 188520587 (Comments: 2) | Access Claims (komoot) (Discussed changesets: 94) | Thank you for taking a look. Comments have been noted. commented 2026-09-04 13:33:18 UTC by Access Claims (komoot) ♦84 |
| 188429066 (Comments: 2) | Access Claims (komoot) (Discussed changesets: 94) | Thank you! I've applied the changes. commented 2026-09-04 13:32:00 UTC by Access Claims (komoot) ♦84 |
| 185883668 (Comments: 1) | Dark Phantom (Discussed changesets: 3) | You already removed it, but I believe the claim that this camera is operated by Acton Police to be entirely incorrect. I have seen no evidence that Acton has any flock relationship. More importantly, it's not a Flock camera; it's Vu... commented 2026-09-04 13:26:46 UTC by gdt ♦59 |
| 188523906 (Comments: 1) | RobbyS63 (Discussed changesets: 8) | review_requested \tyes Lijkt me oke. gr eggie commented 2026-09-04 13:26:19 UTC by eggie ♦46,961 |
 | 184719471 (Comments: 1) | lee_bei (Discussed changesets: 7) | hi, could you please use changeset comments to describe your changes? it makes it much easier for other people to understand why you made a change. i don't think renaming node/9725500420 is correct. Semicolon Cafe still exists afaik. Nev... commented 2026-09-04 13:25:50 UTC by ❤️🔥 ♦505 |
| 188476031 (Comments: 3) | sahshoor (Discussed changesets: 19) | Nice! commented 2026-09-04 13:25:47 UTC by sahshoor ♦25 |
| 188524239 (Comments: 1) | RobbyS63 (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hoi, Goed om adressen te bewaren....... maarrrrrrrr.. ik heb de adresnode verwijderd. Nr 125 is niet hier. Wel iets noordelijker. Mapse, eggie commented 2026-09-04 13:25:01 UTC by eggie ♦46,961 |
| 188437570 (Comments: 1) | DanySpeedy (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap! Maybe I'm wrong but the image you provided for the AED seems to belong to the Hu Montescudaio camping site which is 2km to the East. Is it really the case? Happy mapping, Marco commented 2026-09-04 13:11:54 UTC by MarcoR ♦630 |
 | 188524590 (Comments: 1) | s777n (Discussed changesets: 17) | Исправлено commented 2026-09-04 13:01:34 UTC by s777n ♦335 |
| 188392572 (Comments: 3) | Joseph R P (Discussed changesets: 230) | Look bud, I live here. Do us a favor and focus on your own town's neighborhoods. All I have to say is if you delete any more of ours you'll be reported. I created the exact boundaries of the neighborhoods starting with the neighborhoods aro... commented 2026-09-04 12:55:55 UTC by Lionturtledisciple ♦1 |
| 182653276 (Comments: 3) | hacraft (Discussed changesets: 4) | Ich meine erstmal nur in eine richtung oder? Ich fahre vielleicht am Wochenende mal vorbei und gucke. commented 2026-09-04 12:55:49 UTC by flohoff ♦2,566 |
| 181870472 (Comments: 5) | MattGPS (Discussed changesets: 9) | Planfeststellung könnte nutzbar sein. Wie ein Kollege aus der Gegend schon sagte "nur weil es Andere so eintragen ist es noch nicht richtig" ;) Hast du dir den Artikel zu name=* mal durchgelesen? commented 2026-09-04 12:51:12 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦4,302 |
| 141907183 (Comments: 1) | Kabads (Discussed changesets: 2) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/706074809/history is restaurant also disused? commented 2026-09-04 12:45:38 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 188523026 (Comments: 1) | Ejderhan (Discussed changesets: 1) | Doğrulanmamış etiketi ben eklemiştim eskiden. Bir hataydı, düzelttim. commented 2026-09-04 12:25:46 UTC by Ejderhan ♦6 |
| 188506118 (Comments: 1) | Tunibal (Discussed changesets: 5) | Opening hours bitte immer mit englischen Abkürzungen eintragen - passiert mir aber auch manchmal... --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/188506118 commented 2026-09-04 12:24:19 UTC by FroschMapper ♦5 |
| 187978930 (Comments: 8) | benoitdd (Discussed changesets: 39) | pour le transfert des photos de mapillary vers panoramax, tu peux demander @tykayn sur le forum, https://forum.openstreetmap.fr/t/exportez-en-masse-vos-sequences-mapillary/22160 et je crois que les photos stockées en local avec l'a... commented 2026-09-04 12:19:28 UTC by benoitdd ♦95 |
| 188050560 (Comments: 2) | VRNHN Johnie Garstenveld (Discussed changesets: 6) | Dankjewel! commented 2026-09-04 12:17:36 UTC by VRNHN Johnie Garstenveld ♦4 |
 | 147518517 (Comments: 2) | rhhs (Discussed changesets: 92) | I was there to survey the opening hours, but that was 2 years ago. It has been added by a user with the same name as the shop, so at that time the location was reliable. Maybe it has changed in the meantime? commented 2026-09-04 12:16:37 UTC by rhhs ♦236 |
| 188486322 (Comments: 10) | Vektor_567 (Discussed changesets: 88) | + Zaun (Barriere) + gesamtes Gebäude ist Konsulat, daher soll auch Fläche getaggt werden, nicht der Punkt + Sitzbank commented 2026-09-04 12:12:45 UTC by Vektor_567 ♦79 |
| 187934915 (Comments: 1) | ⇄ john paul jones & gringo (Discussed changesets: 29) | Hi, I agree that adding and correcting the postal city is helpful, I'm just not so sure that addr:county is. It's not really part of addresses any more since the abolition of postal counties some 30 years ago. Do you have a particular use c... commented 2026-09-04 11:50:53 UTC by confusedbuffalo ♦445 |
| 188516457 (Comments: 4) | Ruud Mulder (Discussed changesets: 1) | No problem... commented 2026-09-04 11:49:31 UTC by eggie ♦46,961 |
 | 188094714 (Comments: 3) | danv_grab (Discussed changesets: 1) | về sau bạn muốn xóa chỉnh sửa của người khác thì nên kiểm tra thực tế trước nhé commented 2026-09-04 11:41:58 UTC by Hung Tran 9x0 ♦54 |
| 122015861 (Comments: 3) | kkkiap (Discussed changesets: 1) | Va bene, capitalizzo giusto il nome e sistemo commented 2026-09-04 11:39:28 UTC by giopera ♦29 |
| 184937736 (Comments: 1) | flappiegrrr (Discussed changesets: 8) | Die basemap.de wurde nicht als Quelle genutzt. commented 2026-09-04 11:31:00 UTC by flappiegrrr ♦8 |
| 184935647 (Comments: 1) | flappiegrrr (Discussed changesets: 8) | Die basemap.de wurde nicht als Quelle genutzt. commented 2026-09-04 11:30:49 UTC by flappiegrrr ♦8 |
| 188520764 (Comments: 1) | Dima News nyc Cancun (Discussed changesets: 1) | im a designer not a hacker I work with the MTA. I'm helping them. I'm a technician. Please not block me again thank you. Have a happy Labor Day. commented 2026-09-04 11:30:45 UTC by Dima News nyc Cancun ♦1 |
| 184934649 (Comments: 1) | flappiegrrr (Discussed changesets: 8) | Die basemap.de wurde nicht als Quelle genutzt. commented 2026-09-04 11:30:37 UTC by flappiegrrr ♦8 |
| 184933052 (Comments: 1) | flappiegrrr (Discussed changesets: 8) | Die basemap.de wurde nicht als Quelle genutzt. commented 2026-09-04 11:30:23 UTC by flappiegrrr ♦8 |
| 184813636 (Comments: 1) | flappiegrrr (Discussed changesets: 8) | Die basemap.de wurde nicht als Quelle genutzt. commented 2026-09-04 11:29:47 UTC by flappiegrrr ♦8 |
| 184813539 (Comments: 1) | flappiegrrr (Discussed changesets: 8) | Die basemap.de wurde nicht als Quelle genutzt. commented 2026-09-04 11:29:30 UTC by flappiegrrr ♦8 |
| 188519930 (Comments: 2) | frox77 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Dag eggie, Bedankt voor je tip. mvg martin commented 2026-09-04 11:26:38 UTC by frox77 ♦2 |
| 188519722 (Comments: 2) | HowlingHusky (Discussed changesets: 3) | Please use the present addressnode to tag on. commented 2026-09-04 11:16:51 UTC by eggie ♦46,961 |
| 188519427 (Comments: 1) | Tahacicek (Discussed changesets: 4) | Tam ben düzenliyordum. Umarım çakışma olmaz. commented 2026-09-04 11:15:11 UTC by Ejderhan ♦6 |
| 188477751 (Comments: 4) | toemke (Discussed changesets: 4) | rendben, ennek megfelelően fogok eljárni commented 2026-09-04 11:10:49 UTC by toemke ♦4 |
| 187259318 (Comments: 4) | Arturo Francisco Barbero (Discussed changesets: 65) | Perfecto así lo añado aquí y en https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13134732429/ con características análogas. commented 2026-09-04 11:06:01 UTC by Arturo Francisco Barbero ♦69 |
| 188280437 (Comments: 1) | Jennifer Vera (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188519512 commented 2026-09-04 11:03:47 UTC by ajmat ♦418 |
| 188517697 (Comments: 2) | Los Cinco (Discussed changesets: 1) | aangepast naar We-Sa 17:00-21:00 commented 2026-09-04 11:01:56 UTC by eggie ♦46,961 |
| 188516973 (Comments: 1) | vj1234 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. Feedback De hoofdag voor zo'n drinkwaterpunt is amenity=drinking_water. Je ziet anders niets op de kaart. Tip. Niet s... commented 2026-09-04 10:56:44 UTC by eggie ♦46,961 |
| 188512073 (Comments: 3) | Affandy Murad (Discussed changesets: 1) | Sudah diperbaiki ya. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/120390239 commented 2026-09-04 10:56:44 UTC by FajrAl ♦757 |
| 183771787 (Comments: 3) | 9_tab (Discussed changesets: 22) | Thanks for removing the empty website key. mueschel generally catches them before I notice I have to fix them. Must have forgotten to remove it when adding tags. The other tag's use appears consistent with the tag description. commented 2026-09-04 10:47:39 UTC by 9_tab ♦129 |
| 172403416 (Comments: 2) | enterprise1995 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Nachträglich, gerne! Freut mich, dass ein Kenner das bemerkt. commented 2026-09-04 10:47:24 UTC by enterprise1995 ♦10 |
 | 188404552 (Comments: 1) | stephanodic (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! You added `height_m = 136.5` to the entry, in addition to `height = 54`. Now, the default unit for the "height" key is meters, so both keys should have the same value. Can you resolve this inconsistency? commented 2026-09-04 10:46:13 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,833 |
| 188453801 (Comments: 8) | Userinexile (Discussed changesets: 14) | 我觉得道路的长度是可以粗略的体现道路在路网的重要程度的（一般情况下） commented 2026-09-04 10:37:41 UTC by Userinexile ♦15 |
| 168989612 (Comments: 1) | Jackso (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, thanks for adding more details to this area! Just a friendly note that we shouldn't use name tags to describe features that don't have names. I've removed some of the name="Tunnel" tags for the underpasses on th... commented 2026-09-04 10:37:39 UTC by ohmanger ♦48 |
| 186873938 (Comments: 4) | LakeTorrens (Discussed changesets: 2) | The only edit I made in this changeset was a remodel of the intersection at [https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/14134757939]. However I did review the nearby area and found these changesets from other members of my team that seem to match some of the... commented 2026-09-04 10:34:44 UTC by LakeTorrens ♦2 |
 | 188502587 (Comments: 1) | maurotorres22 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola, gracias por el aporte. Unos detalles: * Has agregado la calle dos veces. Creo que podés borrar https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1554916917 * El nombre no va TODO EN MAYÚSCULAS sino En Estilo Título. Cualqu... commented 2026-09-04 10:34:34 UTC by Marcos Dione ♦72 |
| 187066131 (Comments: 1) | MR1992OE (Discussed changesets: 1) | User PM bzgl. Taggingfehler erstellt. commented 2026-09-04 10:33:44 UTC by pitfire ♦748 |
 | 188408701 (Comments: 1) | Arszul123 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1554425997. What is the mean of the tag National Address = RHAA4035? commented 2026-09-04 10:33:21 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,833 |
| 188283114 (Comments: 1) | Reactore_Dev (Discussed changesets: 28) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188518223 commented 2026-09-04 10:28:56 UTC by ajmat ♦418 |
| 188515594 (Comments: 3) | YouCantStopMe Fizzie-DWG (Discussed changesets: 1) | Gladly https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21241 commented 2026-09-04 10:28:31 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,812 |
| 181947488 (Comments: 2) | ohmanger (Discussed changesets: 28) | I agree they can over complicate things. I'll keep this in mind in the future. Thanks for the nudge and doing the work! commented 2026-09-04 10:19:30 UTC by ohmanger ♦48 |
| 186119015 (Comments: 2) | Robmrt (Discussed changesets: 2) | Un exemple plus parlant, est le croisement entre la rue des Bas fossés et la rue Michel Fauvet. Vous avez ajouté trottoirs et passages piétons, ce qui pourrait suggérer que les piétons doivent travers ici, or... commented 2026-09-04 10:18:45 UTC by Aloade ♦9 |
| 188113409 (Comments: 8) | Mtsmec052 (Discussed changesets: 10) | Thanks, @CAM-Gerlach_Repair! Sounds like a solid plan. We’ll also keep an eye out for any similar activity on our side. Thanks again for your support and vigilance! Happy mapping! commented 2026-09-04 10:13:04 UTC by IreneAlkh ♦1 |
| 188468406 (Comments: 1) | brunnerd (Discussed changesets: 1) | Regarding https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1547424784. amenity=parking_space should not be used on its own. It should be inside amenity=parking. P.S. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/390230054 is a bit of an out-layer. It would be better ... commented 2026-09-04 10:09:30 UTC by Kees 59 ♦117 |
 | 188430196 (Comments: 2) | KavirDesert (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi muralito, thanks for letting me know! commented 2026-09-04 09:54:15 UTC by KavirDesert ♦1 |
| 188478770 (Comments: 5) | YouCantStopMe1 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Vandalism is fun too! commented 2026-09-04 09:44:40 UTC by YouCantStopMe Fizzie-DWG ♦2 |
| 188483075 (Comments: 1) | Tahacicek (Discussed changesets: 4) | Kırmızıbaş dolmuş rotasında bazı kopukluklar fark ettim. Onları sizin için JOSM'da düzeltiyorum. Eğer istemezseniz veya rahatsız olursanız söyleyebilirsin. commented 2026-09-04 09:43:04 UTC by Ejderhan ♦6 |
| 188424088 (Comments: 1) | DARIO LAINEZ (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188516248 commented 2026-09-04 09:42:24 UTC by rajdhani ♦424 |
| 188194002 (Comments: 2) | Guyroscope (Discussed changesets: 3) | I’m assuming it was accidental and have removed it in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188516207, let me know if that’s not correct, thanks! commented 2026-09-04 09:40:38 UTC by gurglypipe ♦1,109 |
 | 188176902 (Comments: 1) | 3D打印 (Discussed changesets: 10) | The Salween River is an international river; only the Chinese section can use the tagged with Chinese Wikipedia. Do not tag the relation of the whole river. commented 2026-09-04 09:36:05 UTC by DetectiveConan ♦25 |
| 171634015 (Comments: 1) | Huber Web Media GmbH (Discussed changesets: 2) | Föger wurde bereits vor 11 Jahren angelegt (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/166856621); deshalb älteres Element belassen und neueres (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13127958250) wieder gelöscht; commented 2026-09-04 09:35:33 UTC by fs_LT ♦207 |
| 163206073 (Comments: 1) | mobileGEO (Discussed changesets: 32) | Strommasten haben keine addr:*; https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7333093989 commented 2026-09-04 09:31:13 UTC by fs_LT ♦207 |
| 188514197 (Comments: 1) | KylesWeb-ID (Discussed changesets: 2) | Untuk jalan di kebun yang bisa dilalui roda empat, gunakan "Trek" (highway=track). Untuk judul perubahan, bisa diubah jadi lebih spesifik seperti "menambahkan jalan di X" daripada hanya satu huruf. commented 2026-09-04 09:31:07 UTC by FajrAl ♦757 |
| 188457845 (Comments: 2) | Faristoteles (Discussed changesets: 11) | Sudah bagus. Mungkin tambahin alt_name atau short_name=Polsek Tulangan, karena nama "Polsek" lebih kita sering gunakan, kan. commented 2026-09-04 09:23:13 UTC by FajrAl ♦757 |
| 188515018 (Comments: 1) | softcake (Discussed changesets: 14) | Korrektur, nicht Korektur ;-) commented 2026-09-04 09:15:40 UTC by softcake ♦14 |
| 188248614 (Comments: 4) | rblldnk (Discussed changesets: 6) | I appreciate that :) commented 2026-09-04 09:12:09 UTC by FajrAl ♦757 |
| 188385488 (Comments: 9) | Adam Haba (Discussed changesets: 140) | Przywróciłem tagi na przejściach dla pieszych/przejazdach rowerowych, które usunąłeś, skoro sam tego nie zamierzasz poprawić. commented 2026-09-04 09:11:51 UTC by YomanNH ♦535 |
| 188508833 (Comments: 1) | lxndrl (Discussed changesets: 5) | Moin lxndrl, was sind das für Änderungen bzw. wie machst Du die? Hast Du das Vorgehen vorher mit der Community besprochen? Viele Grüße Roger Wilco commented 2026-09-04 09:11:08 UTC by OSM_RogerWilco ♦825 |
| 183606420 (Comments: 1) | bridgeburner (Discussed changesets: 4) | Bitte die amtlichen Adressen belassen; addr:city=Weitgries-Alm ist nicht korrekt commented 2026-09-04 09:10:21 UTC by fs_LT ♦207 |
 | 188411505 (Comments: 4) | silveragestum (Discussed changesets: 42) | You can at least redraw it even if deleting it, which you should avoid as seen from the possibility of forgetting to do it commented 2026-09-04 09:10:05 UTC by Kovoschiz ♦3,022 |
| 187024214 (Comments: 7) | ticki_52 (Discussed changesets: 200) | Dann such mir doch mal raus, wo im Wiki "verboten" wird ein Geschäft zusätlich mit einer Adresse zu taggen. Ja, "gelebte Praxis" kann auch viel Schrott produzieren. Wenn du jedoch anfängst im großen Sti... commented 2026-09-04 09:03:51 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦4,302 |
| 188436575 (Comments: 1) | Map307 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188514491 commented 2026-09-04 09:03:09 UTC by rajdhani ♦424 |
| 188382558 (Comments: 4) | confusedbuffalo (Discussed changesets: 113) | What other uses of addr:county are there or could there be? We are not referring to is_in here, but a property of the address I don't seem to be able to see any thread in the forum yet commented 2026-09-04 08:58:43 UTC by confusedbuffalo ♦445 |
 | 188513637 (Comments: 1) | Jacob Rosendal Kristensen (Discussed changesets: 85) | Skiv en artikel i wikien og lav en link til objektet. https://da.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forside commented 2026-09-04 08:55:18 UTC by osmviborg ♦1,904 |
| 188193054 (Comments: 3) | Muijz (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Muijz, , i have just reverted this changeset. So you can cleanly start from the beginning now. Guido commented 2026-09-04 08:49:30 UTC by gscholz ♦2,960 |
| 188439853 (Comments: 3) | SamBouwer (Discussed changesets: 4) | Top! commented 2026-09-04 08:47:51 UTC by eggie ♦46,961 |
| 188513014 (Comments: 1) | wouterd (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-09-04 08:46:17 UTC by eggie ♦46,961 |
| 188411162 (Comments: 3) | silveragestum (Discussed changesets: 42) | Ok commented 2026-09-04 08:44:37 UTC by silveragestum ♦3 |
| 188512866 (Comments: 1) | RM de Wagenaar (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-09-04 08:44:34 UTC by eggie ♦46,961 |
| 188446468 (Comments: 1) | Paulina🤎 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188513454 commented 2026-09-04 08:40:30 UTC by MappingMore ♦685 |
| 184045120 (Comments: 3) | ClearCarbon (Discussed changesets: 2) | Brilliant thank you, yeah StreetComplete is brilliant but obvs a limited interface. Will do interpolation ways soon. commented 2026-09-04 08:39:00 UTC by fisherthewol ♦1 |
 | 188465791 (Comments: 1) | JMJB (Discussed changesets: 22) | Relace autobusových linek jsem teď opravil, pří příštích podobných editacích prosím pozor na relace! commented 2026-09-04 08:32:18 UTC by adamos ♦74 |
| 188508114 (Comments: 2) | Melvin-A (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hier heb ik het aangepast. commented 2026-09-04 08:26:03 UTC by eggie ♦46,961 |
| 188395304 (Comments: 1) | Madelyne Bajaña (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188512785 commented 2026-09-04 08:24:04 UTC by rajdhani ♦424 |
| 187800799 (Comments: 3) | Digitaleo (Discussed changesets: 33) | Merci pour votre retour, j'ai fusionné les deux nodes commented 2026-09-04 08:22:00 UTC by Digitaleo ♦37 |
| 99697073 (Comments: 2) | Maclemo (Discussed changesets: 2) | "denn" (nicht "senn") hätte das heißen sollen commented 2026-09-04 08:21:02 UTC by kuhni74 ♦478 |
| 50895129 (Comments: 2) | Ionut Paduretu (Discussed changesets: 28) | Hello! This is a very old edit from nine years ago. I haven’t used that tag since, and I believe this is an isolated case anyway. I checked with Overpass Turbo and couldn’t find any other instances where I used this tag. I’ll correc... commented 2026-09-04 08:19:10 UTC by Ionut Paduretu ♦18 |
| 188100401 (Comments: 2) | Digitaleo (Discussed changesets: 33) | Bonjour, Merci pour votre retours et le changement ! commented 2026-09-04 08:19:08 UTC by Digitaleo ♦37 |
| 188100956 (Comments: 2) | Digitaleo (Discussed changesets: 33) | Bonjour, Merci pour votre retours, c'est corrigé https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188512601 commented 2026-09-04 08:17:36 UTC by Digitaleo ♦37 |
| 188439113 (Comments: 1) | Leangroen (Discussed changesets: 8) | Dag Lean, Lijkt me oke voor het hek. Of de rest dat op private staat ook routeert... geen idee. MVG eggie commented 2026-09-04 08:16:39 UTC by eggie ♦46,961 |
| 188278887 (Comments: 1) | Deybi_Pozo (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188512223 commented 2026-09-04 08:06:09 UTC by ajmat ♦418 |
| 188470284 (Comments: 2) | Linus W Frische (Discussed changesets: 25) | Hej Pelle. Vi kan for min skyld godt omtagge til leisure=park nu. Du har jo været på stedet så du ved bedst. Det vigtige for mig er egentlig bare at vi bruger den samme polygon som n har landuse=construction, sådan at historik... commented 2026-09-04 08:04:18 UTC by Linus W Frische ♦61 |
| 188509117 (Comments: 1) | Conradm (Discussed changesets: 3) | Dag Conrad.. Ik heb het pad en water uitgelijnd. Op een voetpad hoeft geen foot=yes en bicycle=no (default) Op een highway=path is het wel handig. Mapse, eggie commented 2026-09-04 07:55:04 UTC by eggie ♦46,961 |
 | 188501480 (Comments: 1) | Crisko64 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Gracias por Colaborar con este proyecto. Por favor recordar Escuadrar las edificaciones apretando la letra Q o en el Mouse click derecho. Las imágenes pueden distorsionar las edificaciones pero el 99% de ellas tienen ángulos a 90... commented 2026-09-04 07:51:55 UTC by JJIglesias ♦1,565 |
| 188472813 (Comments: 2) | flo2154 (Discussed changesets: 14) | Bei mir zeigt StreetComplete dort unter der Frage den Zusatztext „auf Ebene -1: Fahrradparkgarage“ an. commented 2026-09-04 07:51:48 UTC by flo2154 ♦68 |
| 188444390 (Comments: 2) | Fd206 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188511490 commented 2026-09-04 07:49:20 UTC by rajdhani ♦424 |
| 172402354 (Comments: 1) | votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale (Discussed changesets: 518) | Bonjour, Il semble que la localisation soit incorrecte. D'après le site, l'agence est située "Avenue de la Margeride" et non "Rue Georges Clemenceau". Pouvez-vous confirmer ces informations et la lo... commented 2026-09-04 07:46:01 UTC by pzachee ♦4 |
 | 159809079 (Comments: 1) | toponymia (Discussed changesets: 4) | Alakkariaq is not the cape. It is the coast at the immediate south. The name of the cape is Issungua... commented 2026-09-04 07:39:19 UTC by andershl ♦107 |
| 188508511 (Comments: 5) | Melvin-A (Discussed changesets: 2) | Als bovenstaand aangepast.. Schade hersteld. Tip.. Wanneer je een node gaat verplaatsen en die zit ergens aan vast... dan komt alles mee. Mapse commented 2026-09-04 07:35:30 UTC by eggie ♦46,961 |
| 188498654 (Comments: 4) | Vektor_567 (Discussed changesets: 88) | erledigt commented 2026-09-04 07:34:13 UTC by Vektor_567 ♦79 |
| 25707262 (Comments: 5) | katpatuka (Discussed changesets: 128) | I have done revert now! There is still plenty of building=dam waterway=dam but these were there for start it would be easy to mass-edit them but I am scared of a potential harm/bad edits commented 2026-09-04 07:33:06 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 188437317 (Comments: 1) | barjs (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188510611 commented 2026-09-04 07:32:58 UTC by rajdhani ♦424 |
| 188497547 (Comments: 4) | Vektor_567 (Discussed changesets: 88) | Ja, da ist eine Baustelle. Sieht man auf verknüpften Mapillary commented 2026-09-04 07:31:12 UTC by Vektor_567 ♦79 |
| 188493888 (Comments: 3) | Vektor_567 (Discussed changesets: 88) | faktisch ist es eine verkehrberuhigte Zone, aber anders beschildert. sollte bei kraftfahrzeugen access=no mit ausnahmendefinition sein commented 2026-09-04 07:27:47 UTC by Vektor_567 ♦79 |
| 188471956 (Comments: 1) | Josemph041298 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Saludos. Que es exactamente este elemento que agregaste? porque una agencia de viajes (travel_agency) no creo que sea. Aparte te sugiero cambiar de maps.me a Comaps q es una version muy mejorada de maps.me Gracias por tu interés commented 2026-09-04 07:26:57 UTC by JJIglesias ♦1,565 |
| 188479687 (Comments: 1) | Josemph041298 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Saludos. Que es exactamente este elemento que agregaste? porque una agencia de viajes (travel_agency) no creo que sea. Aparte te sugiero cambiar de maps.me a Comaps q es una version muy mejorada de maps.me Gracias por tu interes commented 2026-09-04 07:26:34 UTC by JJIglesias ♦1,565 |
| 188488830 (Comments: 1) | Josemph041298 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Saludos. Que es exactamente este elemento que agregaste? porque una agencia de viajes (travel_agency) no creo que sea. Aparte te sugiero cambiar de maps.me a Comaps q es una version muy mejorada de maps.me Gracias por tu interes commented 2026-09-04 07:24:45 UTC by JJIglesias ♦1,565 |
| 188330770 (Comments: 1) | AnaCristina04 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188510427 commented 2026-09-04 07:22:16 UTC by ajmat ♦418 |
| 188392508 (Comments: 1) | NIKITICH_Z (Discussed changesets: 2) | Ninieda commented 2026-09-04 07:21:57 UTC by Twd2005 ♦2 |
| 188390616 (Comments: 4) | _Shootz (Discussed changesets: 1) | Move the node back to the original position. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188510280 commented 2026-09-04 07:17:01 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,833 |
| 188497863 (Comments: 1) | Random996 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. Feedback Heeft Bar pizza geen adres? Dat heb je verwijderd? Je hebt de busbaan verwijderd, maar die worden ook gebruik... commented 2026-09-04 07:16:51 UTC by eggie ♦46,961 |
| 188508262 (Comments: 1) | Goodmayes Pharmacy (Discussed changesets: 1) | Address tweaked. commented 2026-09-04 07:13:54 UTC by BCNorwich ♦5,356 |
| 188470818 (Comments: 2) | OSMchik (Discussed changesets: 39) | Приветствую! Насчет первых двух пунктов ошибку понял, затупил, по третьему буду иметь ввиду, спасибо! commented 2026-09-04 07:12:18 UTC by OSMchik ♦25 |
| 188494937 (Comments: 1) | Jossssie (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-09-04 07:11:50 UTC by eggie ♦46,961 |
| 188471832 (Comments: 3) | Robot8A (Discussed changesets: 83) | I made a Mapillary sequence, it should be uploaded soon commented 2026-09-04 07:08:59 UTC by Robot8A ♦91 |
| 188492342 (Comments: 1) | Rafaella123 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Unfortunately, you made many mistakes here, too many to list them all. Building-part tags removed, many school and building tags altered incorrectly, duplicated Battersea Park outline to state a few. I thin... commented 2026-09-04 07:08:16 UTC by BCNorwich ♦5,356 |
| 188460696 (Comments: 1) | Елена Мурашкина (Discussed changesets: 3) | Здравствуйте. Вы поставили запрет на проезд по автодороге. "Этот тег указывает на то, что доступ для автотранспорта запрещён." http... commented 2026-09-04 06:56:32 UTC by pesec ♦323 |
| 188323329 (Comments: 1) | Choupom (Discussed changesets: 3) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188509727 commented 2026-09-04 06:56:01 UTC by ajmat ♦418 |
| 188493688 (Comments: 1) | WEAwalker (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi WEAwalker kleiner Hinweis - das name tag ist für solche Zwecke nicht gedacht .. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Namen#name_ist_nur_der_Name https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:power=generator?uselang=de#Windkra... commented 2026-09-04 06:51:02 UTC by tux67 ♦2,066 |
| 188325309 (Comments: 1) | PamelaVasquez (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188508034 commented 2026-09-04 06:50:05 UTC by Wildsharky ♦926 |
| 188329060 (Comments: 1) | Michael_rag (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188506117 commented 2026-09-04 06:49:28 UTC by Wildsharky ♦926 |
| 188329279 (Comments: 1) | Heyyotag (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188491376 commented 2026-09-04 06:48:52 UTC by Wildsharky ♦926 |
 | 188286191 (Comments: 1) | Tahiz Rubio (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188490467 commented 2026-09-04 06:47:23 UTC by Wildsharky ♦926 |
| 188330127 (Comments: 1) | Steve Johnny Narváez Cocha (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188489906 commented 2026-09-04 06:46:54 UTC by Wildsharky ♦926 |
| 188329965 (Comments: 1) | Egdapalacios (Discussed changesets: 3) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188488947 commented 2026-09-04 06:46:23 UTC by Wildsharky ♦926 |
| 188294295 (Comments: 1) | Rory Roldan (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188487505 commented 2026-09-04 06:45:48 UTC by Wildsharky ♦926 |
| 188283045 (Comments: 1) | ClaveScottPH (Discussed changesets: 10) | The data was good, just the location has changed and I fixed that in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188448857 --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/18828... commented 2026-09-04 06:34:11 UTC by Hans Jürgen von Lengerke ♦1 |
 | 188507708 (Comments: 1) | Dnyaneshwarisolanke (Discussed changesets: 18) | Are these just copied and pasted? We have pretty good Bing imagery you don't seem to be using... commented 2026-09-04 06:33:19 UTC by Joel Koen ♦62 |
| 188499651 (Comments: 1) | On the Go J (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi - this appears to relate to a new housing estate off Hill Top Road which will need various survey data adding: roads, actual houses, construction area polygon. Do you need a hand? commented 2026-09-04 06:27:35 UTC by no details provided here ♦58 |
| 188490004 (Comments: 5) | Mookie66 (Discussed changesets: 2) | No problem... commented 2026-09-04 06:06:50 UTC by eggie ♦46,961 |
| 188482331 (Comments: 1) | Digitaleo (Discussed changesets: 33) | Bonjour, le SIRET que vous avez mis n'est pas le bon. commented 2026-09-04 05:58:22 UTC by Syl ♦1,102 |
 | 188436359 (Comments: 1) | sanihon2 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188508081 commented 2026-09-04 05:57:20 UTC by ajmat ♦418 |
| 188484394 (Comments: 1) | Digitaleo (Discussed changesets: 33) | Bonjour, vous n'avez pas modifié le bon nœud. Paris-Tokyo a déménagé un peu plus au sud dans la même rue. commented 2026-09-04 05:54:52 UTC by Syl ♦1,102 |
| 188468595 (Comments: 2) | Palitu (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Joel - I followed the tagging guidelines for Australian addr (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Australian_features#Addresses), i can see that there is conjecture whether addr:suburb should be included or not howeve... commented 2026-09-04 05:53:51 UTC by Palitu ♦1 |
| 182459935 (Comments: 2) | openblogger (Discussed changesets: 64) | Ah, da sind noch ein paar mehr der Sorte. Ich hoffe, ich hab die jetzt alle gefunden. In Zukunft vielleicht ein wenig aufpassen. Am Ende kommt es nicht nur darauf an, daß es auf der Webseite hübsch aussieht, sondern daß die Daten auc... commented 2026-09-04 05:42:19 UTC by Ygramul ♦88 |
 | 188421976 (Comments: 1) | cafunewr (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188507745 commented 2026-09-04 05:41:38 UTC by MappingMore ♦685 |
| 188454332 (Comments: 2) | OHClNaMg (Discussed changesets: 1) | Understood. Apologies for the rookie mistake, and thanks for the guidance! commented 2026-09-04 05:40:19 UTC by OHClNaMg ♦1 |
| 188419574 (Comments: 1) | JcxOsm (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188507677 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188507666 commented 2026-09-04 05:39:19 UTC by ajmat ♦418 |
| 180215445 (Comments: 3) | Ekeefoof (Discussed changesets: 10) | Meine Befürchtung wäre nur tor von süden aber normaler Zugang von norden? commented 2026-09-04 05:27:53 UTC by Langlaeufer ♦1,583 |
| 188444234 (Comments: 1) | Kenzie pflaum (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188507307 commented 2026-09-04 05:25:00 UTC by ajmat ♦418 |
| 188396193 (Comments: 1) | Alex Villafuerte (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188507357 commented 2026-09-04 05:24:07 UTC by ajmat ♦418 |
| 188430499 (Comments: 1) | iliketrainsandplanes (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188506945 commented 2026-09-04 05:02:05 UTC by MappingMore ♦685 |
| 188438990 (Comments: 1) | rideNfix (Discussed changesets: 2) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188506825 commented 2026-09-04 04:56:29 UTC by MappingMore ♦685 |
 | 188425890 (Comments: 1) | Bartal dzs Andras (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188506536 commented 2026-09-04 04:40:14 UTC by MappingMore ♦685 |
| 153913166 (Comments: 1) | hwierzbicki (Discussed changesets: 25) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12052073514/history has building = no that was added in this edit if something is not a building, then not adding building key is enough... No need for building=no commented 2026-09-04 04:31:27 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 166503210 (Comments: 3) | EuleKC (Discussed changesets: 8) | thanks! commented 2026-09-04 04:29:57 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 188458366 (Comments: 1) | Adam Ferreira (Discussed changesets: 8) | Further block due to CoMaps problem: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21240 commented 2026-09-04 04:24:38 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,812 |
| 188318482 (Comments: 1) | troussos9 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, Thanks for your contributions here! I just wanted to give you a heads up that the standard format for phone=* in the NANP (including the US) is +1-NNN-NNN-NNNN ; see https://osm.wiki/Key:phone#United_States . I fixed this for you (a... commented 2026-09-04 04:22:58 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,008 |
| 180698371 (Comments: 2) | ChicoXXX (Discussed changesets: 5) | Thank you very much for the help regarding that inadvertent move. I’ve checked, and you are correct. I will heed your advice and be more careful in the future. Thanks :-) commented 2026-09-04 04:17:36 UTC by ChicoXXX ♦1 |
| 186227081 (Comments: 2) | pangoSE (Discussed changesets: 46) | Yes, beaches are currently not present in Wikidata. Would you be willing to fix that way? commented 2026-09-04 04:13:36 UTC by pangoSE ♦415 |
| 188475631 (Comments: 1) | Vasapol (Discussed changesets: 2) | As an account mapping on behalf of a commercial business for financial gain, please be advised that you are expected to understand and carefully follow documented OpenStreetMap standards and conventions, which will both directly benefit the quality o... commented 2026-09-04 03:31:24 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,008 |
| 188481353 (Comments: 1) | Мар'яна Sh (Discussed changesets: 29) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-09-04 03:16:15 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,008 |
| 188145348 (Comments: 1) | MrNate Geek (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello. I have reverted this edit because you seem to have removed plaques that are still present. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188504976 commented 2026-09-04 03:13:50 UTC by mewhenthe ♦25 |
| 188145092 (Comments: 1) | MrNate Geek (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello. I have reverted this edit because you seem to have removed plaques that are still present. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188504976 commented 2026-09-04 03:13:50 UTC by mewhenthe ♦25 |
| 188504707 (Comments: 1) | jmarchon (Discussed changesets: 161) | La verdad me parecen muy interesante commented 2026-09-04 03:04:51 UTC by Jordyn Piza ♦2 |
| 188450881 (Comments: 2) | TheRattyGirl (Discussed changesets: 1) | Oh thanks! That makes things a lot easier :) commented 2026-09-04 03:03:01 UTC by RatGirl ♦1 |
| 185842269 (Comments: 3) | mueschel (Discussed changesets: 1008) | Danke! So etwas entzieht schon langsam meiner Sehkraft! commented 2026-09-04 02:38:06 UTC by Pathumthani ♦44 |
| 188503428 (Comments: 2) | Belén Chicaiza_ADO_Bus (Discussed changesets: 16) | DWG revert - sock-puppet vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188504056 commented 2026-09-04 02:33:12 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,812 |
| 188501298 (Comments: 1) | Crisko64 (Discussed changesets: 2) | hola, bienvenid@! De dónde sacas los nombres? Oficialmente el parque industrial maneja los nombres que estaban... commented 2026-09-04 02:23:32 UTC by 5m4u9 ♦1,699 |
| 188437846 (Comments: 1) | Torey360 (Discussed changesets: 59) | hola, la ruta "D4265" no tiene sentido en este sector, ya que en la región las rutas son D43XX, las D42xx son de la región del trópico (colomi al este). commented 2026-09-04 02:19:11 UTC by 5m4u9 ♦1,699 |
| 187957659 (Comments: 2) | shinterro (Discussed changesets: 12) | Hey! Thanks for reaching out! Topically I would say it is probably a fine icon. I'll lean with the consensus that it represents the idea of 'dojo' and/or 'martial_arts' well enough at a glance, given that I have a US-c... commented 2026-09-04 01:58:30 UTC by shinterro ♦13 |
| 188428443 (Comments: 1) | Belén Chicaiza_ADO_Bus (Discussed changesets: 16) | Reverted sockpuppet vandalism in changeset: https://osm.org/changeset/188502772 See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21218 commented 2026-09-04 01:21:36 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,008 |
| 188418442 (Comments: 1) | Belén Chicaiza_ADO_Bus (Discussed changesets: 16) | Reverted sockpuppet vandalism in changeset: https://osm.org/changeset/188502772 See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21218 commented 2026-09-04 01:21:31 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,008 |
| 188417896 (Comments: 1) | Belén Chicaiza_ADO_Bus (Discussed changesets: 16) | Reverted sockpuppet vandalism in changeset: https://osm.org/changeset/188502772 See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21218 commented 2026-09-04 01:21:26 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,008 |
| 188417709 (Comments: 1) | Belén Chicaiza_ADO_Bus (Discussed changesets: 16) | Reverted sockpuppet vandalism in changeset: https://osm.org/changeset/188502772 See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21218 commented 2026-09-04 01:21:21 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,008 |
| 188417615 (Comments: 1) | Belén Chicaiza_ADO_Bus (Discussed changesets: 16) | Reverted sockpuppet vandalism in changeset: https://osm.org/changeset/188502772 See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21218 commented 2026-09-04 01:21:17 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,008 |
| 188417316 (Comments: 1) | Belén Chicaiza_ADO_Bus (Discussed changesets: 16) | Reverted sockpuppet vandalism in changeset: https://osm.org/changeset/188502772 See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21218 commented 2026-09-04 01:21:09 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,008 |
| 188417072 (Comments: 1) | Belén Chicaiza_ADO_Bus (Discussed changesets: 16) | Reverted sockpuppet vandalism in changeset: https://osm.org/changeset/188502772 See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21218 commented 2026-09-04 01:21:04 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,008 |
| 188414531 (Comments: 1) | Belén Chicaiza_ADO_Bus (Discussed changesets: 16) | Reverted sockpuppet vandalism in changeset: https://osm.org/changeset/188502772 See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21218 commented 2026-09-04 01:20:54 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,008 |
| 188414080 (Comments: 1) | Belén Chicaiza_ADO_Bus (Discussed changesets: 16) | Reverted sockpuppet vandalism in changeset: https://osm.org/changeset/188502772 See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21218 commented 2026-09-04 01:20:49 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,008 |
| 188413302 (Comments: 1) | Belén Chicaiza_ADO_Bus (Discussed changesets: 16) | Reverted sockpuppet vandalism in changeset: https://osm.org/changeset/188502772 See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21218 commented 2026-09-04 01:18:24 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,008 |
| 188431114 (Comments: 1) | Belén Chicaiza_ADO_Bus (Discussed changesets: 16) | Reverted sockpuppet vandalism in changeset: https://osm.org/changeset/188502697 See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21218 commented 2026-09-04 01:12:44 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,008 |
| 188431319 (Comments: 1) | Belén Chicaiza_ADO_Bus (Discussed changesets: 16) | Reverted sockpuppet vandalism in changeset: https://osm.org/changeset/188502662 See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21218 commented 2026-09-04 01:11:23 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,008 |
| 188431441 (Comments: 1) | Belén Chicaiza_ADO_Bus (Discussed changesets: 16) | Reverted sockpuppet vandalism in changeset: https://osm.org/changeset/188502653 See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21218 commented 2026-09-04 01:10:48 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,008 |
| 188490093 (Comments: 1) | Belén Chicaiza_ADO_Bus (Discussed changesets: 16) | Reverted sockpuppet vandalism in changeset: https://osm.org/changeset/188502616 See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21218 commented 2026-09-04 01:08:44 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,008 |
| 188471761 (Comments: 2) | Belén Chicaiza_ADO_Bus (Discussed changesets: 16) | It's a sockpuppet of blocked user https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Mayor%20Dima%20Kishenko commented 2026-09-04 00:47:41 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,008 |
| 188496329 (Comments: 2) | RaySorian (Discussed changesets: 1) | Understood, so don't add those unless explicitly stated with signage. Do you want me to remove those tags? commented 2026-09-04 00:40:02 UTC by RaySorian ♦1 |
| 188460674 (Comments: 1) | dindidindi (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi! Not sure what the point of this change is. Miami is already represented by way #183831887, and the normal address for the university is 501 East High Street, not 900 something? commented 2026-09-04 00:19:08 UTC by Eiim ♦33 |
| 188500991 (Comments: 1) | ihateflockersss (Discussed changesets: 1) | looking at this ALPR on various aerial imagery in iD it seems to be within the road area, being positioned like this is highly unlikely so please double check the position of this ALPR and fix it. Happy mapping, Udar. commented 2026-09-03 23:59:33 UTC by Udarian ♦918 |
| 188449663 (Comments: 6) | AF NHVR (Discussed changesets: 3) | No worries thank you so much commented 2026-09-03 23:37:45 UTC by AF NHVR ♦1 |
| 188501002 (Comments: 1) | jg027 (Discussed changesets: 4) | To clarify, this was for the commuter rail portion of Newark Broad Street Station. commented 2026-09-03 23:35:13 UTC by jg027 ♦5 |
| 185973248 (Comments: 3) | simon04 (Discussed changesets: 20) | In den `url` tags fehlt auch noch ein "gesundheitsfoerderung-und-praevention", der jetzige Wert führt zu 404 Fehlermeldungen. commented 2026-09-03 23:19:28 UTC by Jofban ♦17 |
| 188406755 (Comments: 2) | Paul Berry (Discussed changesets: 60) | That's OK. When you want to use a postcode as a geolocator only, use postal_code. commented 2026-09-03 23:17:01 UTC by Paul Berry ♦143 |
| 188379277 (Comments: 2) | Erin Gravley (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thank you for this information. I will tag them instead, as you suggested. commented 2026-09-03 23:07:36 UTC by Erin Gravley ♦1 |
| 188475634 (Comments: 1) | Znaika (Discussed changesets: 51) | Gut gesehen, danke dir --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/188475634 commented 2026-09-03 22:56:13 UTC by FroschMapper ♦5 |
 | 188489533 (Comments: 1) | Renas Azad (Discussed changesets: 73) | love it commented 2026-09-03 22:52:47 UTC by Rawaz ♦7 |
| 188499899 (Comments: 1) | JoshW2021 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Correction: this changeset carries the wrong description. My editor reused the comment from my previous changeset. This changeset does NOT add SJ Storage - it adds Realcovery, a sober living residence at 676 Shoup Ave W, Twin Falls, from information ... commented 2026-09-03 22:38:45 UTC by JoshW2021 ♦1 |
| 188490324 (Comments: 1) | Digitaleo (Discussed changesets: 33) | Bonjour, La page du contact:linkedin semble périmée, la personne mentionnée ne travaille visiblement plus pour Ritm. Je suis aussi perplexe vis-à-vis de rajouter des pages personnelles LinkedIn (du dirigeant par exe... commented 2026-09-03 22:28:11 UTC by jcnl44 ♦45 |
 | 188055492 (Comments: 1) | zorillette (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12857881710/ maxwidth:physical=0.14 seems small. This gate seems to be about maxwidth:physical=0.80 commented 2026-09-03 22:15:57 UTC by VictorIE ♦1,245 |
| 188494717 (Comments: 2) | aevw (Discussed changesets: 7) | Ik zal erop letten 👍 commented 2026-09-03 22:02:13 UTC by aevw ♦2 |
| 188383961 (Comments: 2) | Dan2020 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Viel ist es nicht, aber ich habe die 10m zur Lichtung und auch die zum Weiher (bis zur Absperrung - privat) mit einem weiteren Changeset ergänzt commented 2026-09-03 21:56:19 UTC by Dan2020 ♦1 |
| 186921116 (Comments: 3) | loremaps (Discussed changesets: 10) | Che poi non è solo ciclabile ma ciclopedonale, Se vuoi, questo sarebbe un tratto di strada dove mi sembra utile la mappatura separata dei maciapiedi che sono effettivamente un po' distinti dalla strada e diversi nel lato destro e sinistro... commented 2026-09-03 21:55:02 UTC by loremaps ♦10 |
| 188496180 (Comments: 1) | Fabricio Lima (Discussed changesets: 2) | Maps? Que Maps? commented 2026-09-03 21:40:17 UTC by ftrebien ♦277 |
| 188497891 (Comments: 1) | Grot G (Discussed changesets: 1) | Na podstawie mojej własnej wiedzy jako częste bywalca sklepu dokonałem zmiany odnośnie płatności w sklepie commented 2026-09-03 21:34:40 UTC by Grot G ♦1 |
| 188469607 (Comments: 1) | rajdhani (Discussed changesets: 35) | Hello! I was wondering why this was reverted? It is a separate cycleway that has a barrier in between the road and the bike path. commented 2026-09-03 21:24:01 UTC by washington_irving ♦1 |
| 187747544 (Comments: 2) | reileis (Discussed changesets: 1) | O tramo desde Oroso ata unha zona intermedia entre Busto e Berdía está completada e finalizada, por outra parte, desde a estación da Sionlla ata os dous túneles estaba en obras polo menos hai 1 mes máis ou menos, e ... commented 2026-09-03 21:20:50 UTC by reileis ♦1 |
| 188484635 (Comments: 1) | afrank4436 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi afrank4436, welcome to OpenStreetMap (OSM) and thanks for mapping. There a couple of issues with your contribution: 1. Bing Aerial imagery is very out-of-date in Ghana and should currently not be used as the only source for mapping building... commented 2026-09-03 21:14:26 UTC by Enock4seth ♦663 |
| 171024821 (Comments: 1) | Ludwig Stein (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1424987734/history has building = balcony that was added in this edit that should be building:part=balcony, right? Without building=balcony as surely it is not a separate building commented 2026-09-03 21:12:22 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 188416964 (Comments: 1) | Tahacicek (Discussed changesets: 4) | Bu yolun adı var mı? Benim bildiğim yok. commented 2026-09-03 21:07:03 UTC by Ejderhan ♦6 |
| 167447313 (Comments: 6) | ticho2 (Discussed changesets: 23) | Aha, diskusie k tomu clanku som nepozeral. Skoda ze za tie tri roky to nikto dalej neriesil, a samotny wiki clanok, vratane fotografie v nom, naznacuje ze tento tag riesi len konce prechodu. Dobre vediet, dam si na to pozor. commented 2026-09-03 21:04:32 UTC by ticho2 ♦44 |
| 158853692 (Comments: 1) | James waichoka (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1331593986/history has building = 2 that was added in this edit What this tag means? Numeric value is unexpected here and it is unclear what it means commented 2026-09-03 21:01:27 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
 | 180875383 (Comments: 1) | ks1v (Discussed changesets: 41) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1459960916/history has building = 2 that was added in this edit What this tag means? Numeric value is unexpected here and it is unclear what it means commented 2026-09-03 21:01:24 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
 | 101531890 (Comments: 1) | Wilmer Osario (Discussed changesets: 58) | Can you take look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5495707 ? commented 2026-09-03 20:55:52 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 188495333 (Comments: 2) | RobbyS63 (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hoi Robby.. Commentaar was voor iemand anders bedoeld. Krijg je als je twee dingen tegelijk doet. Mapse, eggie commented 2026-09-03 20:52:20 UTC by eggie ♦46,961 |
| 186472706 (Comments: 1) | jeyvargas (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1545154652/history has building = residentialq that was added in this edit building=residentialq ? Maybe intention was to use building=residential and then square area? commented 2026-09-03 20:51:27 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 181251623 (Comments: 5) | ydrgbjo (Discussed changesets: 32) | @ydrgbjo Statt `addr:full` wäre es auch möglich, die Standart-Tags `addr:street`, addr:housenumber`, addr:postcode` und `addr:city` zu verwenden. Und wenn die postalische Adresse schon anderswo in der Nähe ist, wird das auch durch d... commented 2026-09-03 20:48:34 UTC by habi ♦2,248 |
 | 188443293 (Comments: 1) | Konstantinos Lamas (Discussed changesets: 1) | Καλησπέρα, Να είσαι καλά για τις βελτιώσεις στ... commented 2026-09-03 20:48:12 UTC by 0000FF berries ♦142 |
| 188413022 (Comments: 1) | Tahacicek (Discussed changesets: 4) | Yaya yolunu ve bisiklet yolunu oraya yan yana mı koyalım? Orada sadece bisiklet yolu yok sonuçta. commented 2026-09-03 20:31:45 UTC by Ejderhan ♦6 |
| 188494705 (Comments: 1) | RobbyS63 (Discussed changesets: 8) | Dag Robby.. Welk adres? commented 2026-09-03 20:27:45 UTC by eggie ♦46,961 |
| 188264487 (Comments: 12) | ZB_BN (Discussed changesets: 37) | Gut, dann mache ich das beizeiten. Viele Grüße commented 2026-09-03 20:12:52 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,614 |
| 188195905 (Comments: 5) | eireidium (Discussed changesets: 57) | Seems to cater to the wider community, but it's a kinda nice situation amongst industrial surroundings. commented 2026-09-03 19:59:13 UTC by eireidium ♦39 |
| 188490987 (Comments: 1) | Lisapple (Discussed changesets: 75) | Hi Lisapple, something is wrong with all the phone numbers, could you fix them please? Also it's seems like the data comes from the official websites or ATP? In such case could you indicate them as the source instead of "know... commented 2026-09-03 19:59:08 UTC by ivanbranco ♦2,936 |
| 187486474 (Comments: 1) | NikoJorj (Discussed changesets: 25) | https://x.com/TeslaCharging/status/2087600358235500776/photo/1 may be useful :-) commented 2026-09-03 19:58:33 UTC by stillhart ♦252 |
| 188393661 (Comments: 1) | rezerwa (Discussed changesets: 156) | Nie rozumiem niektórych edytujących. Po co dodawać do kaplicy cmentarnej, cmentarza fragmentaryczny adres jak miejscowość, kod pocztowy skoro obiekt nie ma pełnoprawnego adresu z numerem a to że jest w Kłaju czy gdziekolwiek indziej i ... commented 2026-09-03 19:53:34 UTC by grzegorz75jan ♦699 |
| 188486711 (Comments: 1) | viver (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hola viver, Gracias de nuevo por tus aportaciones. En este caso, como puedes ver en la wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Objetos_que_generan_dudas_en_Espa%C3%B1a#C), un centro de salud se etiqueta como amenity=clinic y no como hospi... commented 2026-09-03 19:46:52 UTC by Jordi MF ♦1,872 |
| 186990802 (Comments: 3) | onetux (Discussed changesets: 1) | Javítva https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188493499 commented 2026-09-03 19:38:41 UTC by qstep ♦192 |
| 188490951 (Comments: 1) | MapperReses (Discussed changesets: 6) | MapperReses, Considere aprender as regras de classificação viária antes de seguir suas edições. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Brazil/Classifica%C3%A7%C3%A3o_das_rodovias_do_Brasil commented 2026-09-03 19:30:11 UTC by santamariense ♦864 |
| 183121829 (Comments: 1) | Telluris (Discussed changesets: 5) | Dit creëert twee verschillende elementen met public_transport=platform commented 2026-09-03 19:11:06 UTC by Molenweg ♦1 |
| 188335823 (Comments: 1) | Harle_y (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188491441 commented 2026-09-03 19:00:20 UTC by rajdhani ♦424 |
| 188491143 (Comments: 1) | Tatfahren (Discussed changesets: 86) | + Saxony latest aerial Imagery commented 2026-09-03 18:54:08 UTC by Tatfahren ♦379 |
| 188481607 (Comments: 1) | Huntsman8338 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hej Huntsman8338, Tak for dine bidrag til OSM! Vær opmærksom på, at light_rail tagges på en anden måde end tram (det ligner mere tagging for normale jernbaner). For light_rail-stationer bør der v&ael... commented 2026-09-03 18:48:59 UTC by Bovi887 ♦18 |
| 183644742 (Comments: 2) | Yuliya_Petrash (Discussed changesets: 9) | Hi rskedgel! Thank you for pointing this out and for checking the imagery! You're completely right — I missed the existing `highway=stop` tag on the node. I've separated the `highway=stop` from `highway=crossing` and updated the... commented 2026-09-03 18:44:10 UTC by Yuliya_Petrash ♦10 |
| 188430028 (Comments: 4) | rusjanis (Discussed changesets: 24) | Sveiks, Jā, tur kas pārklājas, vajag pielabot. Ja vari pielabo! Jā nē pēc pāris dienām tik varešu. commented 2026-09-03 18:43:50 UTC by rusjanis ♦31 |
| 186892916 (Comments: 1) | antigerme (Discussed changesets: 35) | Revertido commented 2026-09-03 18:32:09 UTC by ftrebien ♦277 |
| 188489722 (Comments: 1) | Alex_457 (Discussed changesets: 63) | Mapbox commented 2026-09-03 18:31:14 UTC by Alex_457 ♦83 |
| 188185215 (Comments: 4) | JudGer (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hallo Andreas, schau mal über meine letzte Änderung drüber, ob das Tagging so stimmt. Bei der Sparkasse gibt es einen Geldautomaten, über den man auch einzahlen kann, genau. Danke für die Qualitätssich... commented 2026-09-03 18:29:44 UTC by JudGer ♦1 |
| 188488906 (Comments: 1) | artenovis_9020 (Discussed changesets: 4) | So EuroVelo route also was lit bit upgraded commented 2026-09-03 18:28:03 UTC by artenovis_9020 ♦4 |
| 184694369 (Comments: 1) | ricmaco (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ciao ricmaco, sei sicuro che questo alimentari abbia chiuso? https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5483773 commented 2026-09-03 18:27:13 UTC by ivanbranco ♦2,936 |
| 188397622 (Comments: 2) | Mxdanger (Discussed changesets: 29) | Yeah, I figured it would be drained out eventually. You should create a note at this location with that information so other users are aware. commented 2026-09-03 18:24:26 UTC by Mxdanger ♦111 |
| 183492368 (Comments: 3) | squeaker_andrus (Discussed changesets: 16) | We have no objection at all if you or the local community choose to revert or adjust any of the separate sidewalks from our changesets that impact pedestrian routing. Please check your inbox for the full email response! Best regards, squeak... commented 2026-09-03 18:23:27 UTC by squeaker_andrus ♦16 |
| 179554472 (Comments: 3) | whats9plus1021youstupid (Discussed changesets: 3) | thanks commented 2026-09-03 18:22:37 UTC by bobthebuilder423468 ♦14 |
| 188484817 (Comments: 1) | SlimStorm (Discussed changesets: 8) | Beste SlimStorm, Probeer als het kan op de adresnodes bij te taggen. MVG eggie commented 2026-09-03 18:19:31 UTC by eggie ♦46,961 |
| 181731932 (Comments: 1) | Jakaka2222 (Discussed changesets: 16) | Is de fietsbeperking al voorbij? commented 2026-09-03 18:16:28 UTC by Allroads ♦461 |
| 188331575 (Comments: 4) | aceman444 (Discussed changesets: 132) | Presiel som si tu hornu cast, az po zastavku Drobneho, odkial linka uz pokracuje po hlavnej ceste, a zdiela zastavky s dlhodobo existujucimi linkami. Jedna zastavka je posunuta o par desiatok metrov (Moyšova), zvysne su umiestnene dobre... commented 2026-09-03 18:14:23 UTC by ticho2 ♦44 |
| 188475437 (Comments: 5) | eadvanbeek (Discussed changesets: 2) | Je hebt de weg aangepast naar woonerf. Dat is oke als het een woonerf is. Wanneer ik valideer kijk ik ook meteen naar de rest en zag dat de wijk nog getagd stond als 'in aanbouw'. Dat heb ik aangepast. CTRL-F5 voor versneld effect. |
| 188473570 (Comments: 1) | City Clinics Injectables (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OSM, Ik heb clinic toegevoegd ander niet op de kaart zichtbaar. Of de navigatie anders wordt is maar de vraag. Meestal volgens routers de kortste weg en dan krijg je dit effect. MVG, eggie commented 2026-09-03 18:01:48 UTC by eggie ♦46,961 |
| 188379163 (Comments: 1) | bernardo60 (Discussed changesets: 10) | You broken the trail CAI 162 Sentiero della Fede commented 2026-09-03 18:01:06 UTC by micheleOSM3 ♦188 |
| 188330451 (Comments: 1) | AndersonVergara (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188487568 commented 2026-09-03 17:59:25 UTC by ajmat ♦418 |
| 188450415 (Comments: 1) | gamerbene19 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Der zweite Link aus den Quellen ist abgeschnitten. Gemeint war https://www.destatis.de/DE/Themen/Laender-Regionen/Regionales/Gemeindeverzeichnis/Administrativ/Archiv/GV100ADQ/GV100AD3108.html commented 2026-09-03 17:56:53 UTC by gamerbene19 ♦1 |
| 188400241 (Comments: 3) | gscholz (Discussed changesets: 144) | More detailed information can be transferred to an older line and then the newer one deleted. Of course, for OpenStreetMap, it's more important to avoid duplicates than to preserve data history. Thanks for these improvements. commented 2026-09-03 17:54:39 UTC by Marek-M ♦1,111 |
| 176260211 (Comments: 1) | YukinoLR (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1460242300/history has building:roof:shape = courtyard that was added in this edit Maybe roof:shape was intended here? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roof:shape See also https://t... commented 2026-09-03 17:53:01 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
 | 46931499 (Comments: 1) | Splasher (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/481055667/history has building:roof:shape = gabled that was added in this edit Maybe roof:shape was intended here? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roof:shape See also https://tagin... commented 2026-09-03 17:52:55 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 47515114 (Comments: 1) | Bufnita (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/264798859/history has building:roof:shape = hipped that was added in this edit Maybe roof:shape was intended here? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roof:shape See also https://tagin... commented 2026-09-03 17:51:48 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 138863214 (Comments: 1) | Basstoelpel (Discussed changesets: 49) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1041627204/history has building:roof:shape = 3dr that was added in this edit Maybe roof:shape was intended here? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roof:shape See also https://taginfo... commented 2026-09-03 17:51:46 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 136958421 (Comments: 1) | solugeo (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/65655103/history has building:roof:shape = gabled that was added in this edit Maybe roof:shape was intended here? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roof:shape See also https://taginf... commented 2026-09-03 17:51:43 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 188487316 (Comments: 1) | h234a2hm (Discussed changesets: 6) | source = arcgis source_ref = https://experience.arcgis.com/experience/1f89e5ccada04b658ffe698310b9843d commented 2026-09-03 17:50:42 UTC by h234a2hm ♦6 |
| 188433726 (Comments: 1) | m787 (Discussed changesets: 3) | deleteme if I cannot find how commented 2026-09-03 17:46:36 UTC by m787 ♦3 |
| 188434798 (Comments: 1) | m787 (Discussed changesets: 3) | deleteme if I cannot find how commented 2026-09-03 17:46:00 UTC by m787 ♦3 |
| 188338871 (Comments: 1) | PatricioCerda (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188485943 commented 2026-09-03 17:43:28 UTC by Wildsharky ♦926 |
 | 188366518 (Comments: 1) | Zambez (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188485546 commented 2026-09-03 17:42:34 UTC by Wildsharky ♦926 |
| 188343228 (Comments: 1) | José Luis Tamayo (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188485216 commented 2026-09-03 17:41:53 UTC by Wildsharky ♦926 |
 | 188199061 (Comments: 3) | Atlas401 (Discussed changesets: 1) | I now see that you had set it as abandoned=highway, more appropriate would be abandoned:highway=* See the wiki page: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key%3Aabandoned%3Ahighway I have updated it here commented 2026-09-03 17:41:34 UTC by confusedbuffalo ♦445 |
| 188351120 (Comments: 1) | Bedreddin Şahbaz (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188485075 commented 2026-09-03 17:41:16 UTC by Wildsharky ♦926 |
| 188364474 (Comments: 1) | Repairman_kh (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188484859 commented 2026-09-03 17:40:13 UTC by Wildsharky ♦926 |
| 188386113 (Comments: 1) | Paulep (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188484353 commented 2026-09-03 17:39:29 UTC by Wildsharky ♦926 |
| 188381940 (Comments: 1) | Damaris Pincay (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188484114 commented 2026-09-03 17:38:55 UTC by Wildsharky ♦926 |
| 188366441 (Comments: 2) | Jimena Valenzuela (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188469039 commented 2026-09-03 17:38:15 UTC by Wildsharky ♦926 |
| 188349683 (Comments: 1) | Lamvanductanan (Discussed changesets: 7) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188468830 commented 2026-09-03 17:37:31 UTC by Wildsharky ♦926 |
| 188280109 (Comments: 1) | MORALESGAINZA (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188463131 commented 2026-09-03 17:36:08 UTC by Wildsharky ♦926 |
| 188329111 (Comments: 1) | Viviana Tomala (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188463655 commented 2026-09-03 17:35:14 UTC by Wildsharky ♦926 |
| 188335286 (Comments: 1) | Revelry (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188464071 commented 2026-09-03 17:34:10 UTC by Wildsharky ♦926 |
| 188298079 (Comments: 1) | Neptunchik (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188466785 commented 2026-09-03 17:33:30 UTC by Wildsharky ♦926 |
| 188284529 (Comments: 1) | Edgar Leonardo (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188467196 commented 2026-09-03 17:32:48 UTC by Wildsharky ♦926 |
| 188334756 (Comments: 1) | Ian_Zorrilla (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188485495 commented 2026-09-03 17:24:05 UTC by MappingMore ♦685 |
 | 188273212 (Comments: 3) | Aleki37 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Does it have to tho? commented 2026-09-03 17:12:08 UTC by Vodka Bears ♦3 |
| 187800594 (Comments: 1) | Digitaleo (Discussed changesets: 33) | Bonjour, Attention, mauvaise correction de addr:street de la valeur correcte (Rue des Chantiers) à une typographie incorrecte (Rue Des Chantiers). Aussi, contact:tiktok, contact:twitter, et contact:youtube renvoient aux pages de la marq... commented 2026-09-03 17:11:49 UTC by Everteal ♦14 |
| 188401329 (Comments: 4) | skillingholmejournal (Discussed changesets: 1) | for the revert commented 2026-09-03 17:09:09 UTC by Udarian ♦918 |
| 188335527 (Comments: 1) | Rober2007 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188484503 commented 2026-09-03 17:06:38 UTC by ajmat ♦418 |
| 188476145 (Comments: 1) | andershl (Discussed changesets: 111) | HELP! This change set has to be reverted. TYPO: Coordinates are terribly wrong. Tried to revert myself, but got different variations of time out / quota exceeded.... commented 2026-09-03 16:59:57 UTC by andershl ♦107 |
| 188368601 (Comments: 1) | WGT46 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo WGT-46, willkommen bei openstreetmap! Zwei kleine Hinweise für den Anfang: 1. Straßensperrungen von wenigen Tagen werden nicht als "construction" getaggt. Siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag... commented 2026-09-03 16:52:27 UTC by Akkurator ♦306 |
| 183011572 (Comments: 1) | Cesca Brint (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi, This style of tagging for a crossing with an island has been deprecated for a while. For the crossing node, it should be: highway=crossing + crossing:island=yes And for the crossing way: highway=footway + footway=crossi... commented 2026-09-03 16:52:09 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,918 |
| 173719614 (Comments: 2) | CiconiaOSM (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hello, thank you for your enquiry. I think a joint made up of bones is generally a very suitable choice. However, it would be even better if one of the bone heads showed signs of inflammation. This is because inflammation of the bones and joints help... commented 2026-09-03 16:50:35 UTC by CiconiaOSM ♦4 |
| 188466932 (Comments: 2) | carloabayon (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi Bernard, thanks for your comment. This was intended to map locations in the UK where acro yoga jams are regularly held. I'll review the tagging in light of OSM guidelines. commented 2026-09-03 16:49:22 UTC by carloabayon ♦3 |
| 188466631 (Comments: 2) | carloabayon (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi Bernard, thanks for your comment. This was intended to map locations in the UK where acro yoga jams are regularly held. I'll review the tagging in light of OSM guidelines. commented 2026-09-03 16:48:58 UTC by carloabayon ♦3 |
| 188465060 (Comments: 2) | carloabayon (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi Bernard, thanks for your comment. This was intended to map locations in the UK where acro yoga jams are regularly held. I'll review the tagging in light of OSM guidelines. commented 2026-09-03 16:45:22 UTC by carloabayon ♦3 |
| 188478855 (Comments: 1) | one_electro_dan (Discussed changesets: 21) | The bicycle information was duplicated. It was mapped on the sidewalk way, the street way, and also as a separate highway=cycleway. I kept and updated the cycleway tags on the street because the bicycle lane is part of the street. I removed th... commented 2026-09-03 16:36:19 UTC by one_electro_dan ♦25 |
| 188382458 (Comments: 1) | confusedbuffalo (Discussed changesets: 113) | Hi, Can I ask why you are removing perfectly valid address data from multiple locations? I fundamentally disagree that addr:county is not part of an address. Have you discussed the mass edit with the community please? Thanks,<... commented 2026-09-03 16:34:49 UTC by James Derrick ♦90 |
| 188382903 (Comments: 1) | confusedbuffalo (Discussed changesets: 113) | Hi, Can I ask why you are removing perfectly valid address data from multiple locations? Have you discussed the mass edit with the community please? Thanks, James commented 2026-09-03 16:34:38 UTC by James Derrick ♦90 |
| 188382538 (Comments: 1) | confusedbuffalo (Discussed changesets: 113) | Hi, Can I ask why you are removing perfectly valid address data from multiple locations? I fundamentally disagree that addr:county is not part of an address. Have you discussed the mass edit with the community please? Thanks,<... commented 2026-09-03 16:33:53 UTC by James Derrick ♦90 |
| 188413024 (Comments: 4) | orenfl (Discussed changesets: 4) | אני מניח שהבנתי שאתה מדבר על הדרך לצד נחל עמוד, קרוב למשאבה של מקורות, מצפון למצפה עירא גורביץ'. אם זה המקום, לא היה שם שער ולא דרך. סימ... commented 2026-09-03 16:32:00 UTC by orenfl ♦3 |
| 188472288 (Comments: 1) | kigpo (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello. Thanks for your edit. Unfortunately, you merely added a name to an existing building. This is not a correct way to edit OpenStreetMap. Adding a name to a building is only if the building itself has a name (very few buildings do) and if... commented 2026-09-03 16:22:49 UTC by bxl-forever ♦3,058 |
| 172666845 (Comments: 1) | Ludwig Stein (Discussed changesets: 7) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1434399978/history that should be building:part=balcony, right? Without building=balcony as surely it is not a separate building commented 2026-09-03 16:18:41 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 188481708 (Comments: 1) | Matt McCutchen (Discussed changesets: 61) | I originally mapped the tunnel in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/115836408, then it was deleted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145393462, presumably inadvertently. I only know the location of the tunnel approximately. I t... commented 2026-09-03 16:18:26 UTC by Matt McCutchen ♦81 |
| 105507167 (Comments: 1) | mc85eu (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hello! Can you take look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5496892 ? commented 2026-09-03 16:16:56 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 188281614 (Comments: 1) | György Balássy (Discussed changesets: 1) | Üdv. Mi van helyettük? commented 2026-09-03 16:14:26 UTC by qstep ♦192 |
| 173161686 (Comments: 2) | Cello_Bello (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo, glaub mir, das ist ein Pfad, ich war da. commented 2026-09-03 16:11:45 UTC by Cello_Bello ♦1 |
| 188405750 (Comments: 1) | Pixelpotato13 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! You add 18 nodes with the tags ALPR = yes NonCarTracking = yes What is the mean of the tags? Did you known the tag surveillance:type = ALPR? We also prefer keywords that are written in lowercase letters. commented 2026-09-03 16:09:40 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,833 |
| 153089126 (Comments: 1) | caierith (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi, do you have a source for the field names used here? A few of them don't seem to line up with the modern land parcels so I'm not sure how valid they are. Thanks commented 2026-09-03 16:00:13 UTC by ohmanger ♦48 |
| 188432689 (Comments: 3) | Mond00 (Discussed changesets: 83) | Das „sollte keine“ mit gefettetem „keine“ würde ich schon als sanft gesprochenes „darf nicht“ verstehen. Direkt danach steht aber ja auch, wie zitiert, dass maxspeed=walk angegeben werden _kann_, weil e... commented 2026-09-03 15:59:14 UTC by PattaFeuFeu ♦21 |
| 188474354 (Comments: 1) | Polk County 911 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello! Please notice you add "only" a building with name Pioneer Fellowship Church". You don't add a church. Please have a look on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dplace_of_worship commented 2026-09-03 15:55:40 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,833 |
| 185733231 (Comments: 1) | Claudius Henrichs (Discussed changesets: 182) | Thanks for this edit. As a casual Nice tram user on this line, it's much appreciated :) commented 2026-09-03 15:55:25 UTC by Lisapple ♦77 |
| 170383111 (Comments: 1) | A67-A67 (Discussed changesets: 400) | Aldi verwijderd, dit filiaal is gesloten commented 2026-09-03 15:55:00 UTC by donux-nl ♦31 |
| 188479224 (Comments: 1) | RobbyS63 (Discussed changesets: 8) | Dag Robby.. Tip.. wanneer je een bedrijf verwijdert denk er dan aan om de adresnode intact te houden. Die heb je nu ook verwijderd. Mvg, eggie commented 2026-09-03 15:54:56 UTC by eggie ♦46,961 |
| 188383330 (Comments: 2) | Lisapple (Discussed changesets: 75) | That is also my opinion. I just wanted to wait for the Executive Order number, making it completely official. I've updated `source:official_name:en-US` with it in case the website would change. And great work with your 3D buildings ;) commented 2026-09-03 15:52:31 UTC by Lisapple ♦77 |
| 188479315 (Comments: 1) | lbacud (Discussed changesets: 1) | Please revert this. I accidentally added my edits as new ways instead of editing the existing ones. commented 2026-09-03 15:47:51 UTC by lbacud ♦1 |
| 172561097 (Comments: 1) | A67-A67 (Discussed changesets: 400) | Top1Toys in Udenhout bestaat niet meer. Hier zit een andere winkel inmiddels. commented 2026-09-03 15:46:54 UTC by donux-nl ♦31 |
| 182620363 (Comments: 1) | maaxy_ (Discussed changesets: 9) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1513188017 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1513188036 jedna z nich jest wyżej? Czy się one spotykaja na jednym poziomie? commented 2026-09-03 15:44:25 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 187927048 (Comments: 1) | snackattack (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi snackattack, There is already a building on this spot. Are you able to add additional details to that building instead and remove this one you've added? commented 2026-09-03 15:43:42 UTC by Slartibartfast141 ♦2 |
| 188437085 (Comments: 7) | abcdefghijklmnopxyz (Discussed changesets: 1) | Blocks in osm is useless commented 2026-09-03 15:42:28 UTC by YouCantStopMe1 ♦3 |
| 188478263 (Comments: 1) | Huntsman8338 (Discussed changesets: 2) | *** Meant to write: Updated CPH Light Rail from Tram to Light Rail *** commented 2026-09-03 15:41:55 UTC by Huntsman8338 ♦1 |
| 188422082 (Comments: 1) | ihasmagyk (Discussed changesets: 1) | FYI, direction of the golf=hole lines is significant. They should point from the tee to the green. I corrected this one and another one you created in the last 24 hours and thought you'd want to know. commented 2026-09-03 15:35:07 UTC by b-jazz ♦942 |
| X | 188415842 (Comments: 3) | Gorger (Discussed changesets: 29) | Hi dmjab13, I accidentally created orphan nodes in the USA, but I have now corrected the data. I’ll be more careful with my future edits to avoid such issues. commented 2026-09-03 15:32:38 UTC by Gorger ♦58 |
| 188466024 (Comments: 1) | Jessi—Quita (Discussed changesets: 1) | Changeset is too big. Please split map changes like this into separate changesets. commented 2026-09-03 15:31:04 UTC by artenovis_9020 ♦4 |
| 188478502 (Comments: 1) | J Doherty (Discussed changesets: 1) | Corrected position. The flock camera is on bank side of the road entering the plaza. Repositioned the view direction. commented 2026-09-03 15:29:26 UTC by J Doherty ♦1 |
| 188475716 (Comments: 1) | felicettilaw (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OpenStreetMap, while the tags look good there is one minor issue, the comment you left on this changeset is not very helpful, in OSM it is very helpful to leave a good changeset comment describing what you did and "-" is not real... commented 2026-09-03 15:28:17 UTC by Udarian ♦918 |
| 188447415 (Comments: 2) | MaestroKissaki (Discussed changesets: 10) | Saludos todos los cambios son basado en Mapbox Satellite, estaba des tildado el campo que lo reporta, ya lo corregí, gracias por la nota. commented 2026-09-03 15:27:59 UTC by MaestroKissaki ♦10 |
| 172881895 (Comments: 1) | livmakesmaps (Discussed changesets: 5) | In this changeset, you changed two pelican crossings correctly tagged as crossing=traffic_signals + crossing:signals=yes to crossing=marked (removing the crossing:signals=* tag ). The UK's pelican, puffin, toucan and pegasus pedestrian cr... commented 2026-09-03 15:20:29 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,918 |
| 179722424 (Comments: 2) | apm-wa (Discussed changesets: 18) | I think leaving the current medical icon as it is would be more appropriate. My opinion. commented 2026-09-03 15:13:50 UTC by apm-wa ♦262 |
| 188413456 (Comments: 1) | mchtshn (Discussed changesets: 1) | Otobüs durağını taşıdığınız konum özel site içerisi ve otobüs girecek bir yer değil. commented 2026-09-03 15:12:26 UTC by yitimox ♦40 |
| 188475274 (Comments: 1) | herbalist_78 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OSM, Tip... Probeer op de bestaande adresnode bij te taggen. Het adres is nu niet compleet. Mvg, eggie commented 2026-09-03 15:10:39 UTC by eggie ♦46,961 |
| 188477319 (Comments: 1) | Aethonatic (Discussed changesets: 18) | Hold on, clearing up these conflicts... commented 2026-09-03 15:08:47 UTC by Aethonatic ♦81 |
| 128076661 (Comments: 1) | cjl6 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hello! Can you take look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5496893 ? commented 2026-09-03 15:04:08 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 105360175 (Comments: 1) | craghead (Discussed changesets: 19) | hello! can you take look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5496891 ? commented 2026-09-03 15:03:01 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 188461493 (Comments: 2) | tbo47 (Discussed changesets: 31) | Bonjour, merci, je vais regarder commented 2026-09-03 15:00:19 UTC by tbo47 ♦24 |
| 188443400 (Comments: 11) | Vektor_567 (Discussed changesets: 88) | - commented 2026-09-03 14:50:43 UTC by Vektor_567 ♦79 |
| 60508648 (Comments: 1) | Niels Elgaard Larsen (Discussed changesets: 402) | Jeg kan ikke se node/5747081776 på luftfoto, men hvis den stadig eksisterer, så er de korrekte mærkater vist: amenity=recycling recycling:glass_bottles=yes recycling_type=container commented 2026-09-03 14:47:29 UTC by cyclist789 ♦113 |
| 188458428 (Comments: 2) | marcmarti (Discussed changesets: 12) | Bon dia, buscant el nom no trobava resultats a internet així que el vaig treure. No sé si el nom és rellevant, etiquetaria l'edifici com a building=rectory o englobaria ela edificis dins dels terrenys de l'esglés... commented 2026-09-03 14:40:44 UTC by marcmarti ♦68 |
| 188445075 (Comments: 1) | BeepSheep (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola. Por favor no mover todo unos pocos metros. La foto que está viendo es bastante circunstancial. Hay otros proveedores de fotos y todos tienen sus desviaciones. Esto que hizo no está necesariamente mal, pero mover toda una ciudad es... commented 2026-09-03 14:29:30 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦3,334 |
 | 104868888 (Comments: 2) | pesuan (Discussed changesets: 2) | Jeg satte foot=no fordi dette er en 70-vei uten fortau, og jeg vurderte strekningen som lite egnet og potensielt utrygg for ferdsel til fots. Jeg tenkte også praktisk på ruteplanlegging – at gående og løpende ikke b&osl... commented 2026-09-03 14:28:46 UTC by pesuan ♦2 |
| 188474688 (Comments: 1) | transsister (Discussed changesets: 1) | Sorry, I clicked on a wrong POI. This change shall be deleted. commented 2026-09-03 14:21:04 UTC by transsister ♦1 |
| 188467470 (Comments: 2) | Joe1406 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo Flo, erstmal Danke für deinen Hinweis und gut, dass jemand aufpasst. Die Ampel an dieser Stelle ist tatsächlich eine Anforderungsampel und regelt den Fußgängerverkehr zum angrenzenden Friedhof. Ich habe die von mir... commented 2026-09-03 14:20:37 UTC by Joe1406 ♦1 |
| 188458109 (Comments: 1) | rajdhani (Discussed changesets: 35) | Hi rajdhani, Thanks for correcting possible tagging errors, but I don't understand why I am considered to have incorrectly removed the address of an item in this changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188389970 I unders... commented 2026-09-03 14:15:09 UTC by anglacesc ♦1 |
| 180218806 (Comments: 2) | DUGA (Discussed changesets: 40) | Looks good. Note that I tag places doing Chinese martial arts, dojo, jiujitsu, tae kwon do and karate. It looks generally acceptable. commented 2026-09-03 14:12:30 UTC by DUGA ♦552 |
| 188344847 (Comments: 4) | skfd (Discussed changesets: 23) | ahhh, validator being triggered by it is a good point, i will setup the expention of names commented 2026-09-03 14:12:20 UTC by skfd ♦293 |
| 187038648 (Comments: 3) | Lisapple (Discussed changesets: 75) | J'ai corrigé https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188474282 Je vais vérifier avec une version antérieure si c'est cohérent commented 2026-09-03 14:11:13 UTC by pyrog ♦458 |
| 96749314 (Comments: 1) | kylebakerpa05 (Discussed changesets: 37) | I've reverted a lot of the road changes in parking lots. Per [the driveway documentation](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:service%3Ddriveway), service roads in and around parking lots should not have the `driveway` tag. commented 2026-09-03 14:10:40 UTC by PuddlesMapping ♦3 |
| 188470762 (Comments: 1) | LinoHammer (Discussed changesets: 13) | Hallo LinoHammer, seid wann hat diese Abbiegespur https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/40236578 einen Fahrradschutzstreifen ? Gruß Zrop commented 2026-09-03 14:06:13 UTC by Zrop ♦163 |
| 188471491 (Comments: 1) | Arnaud Vanroose (Discussed changesets: 15) | ## REVERTED CHANGESET Again, please do not duplicate information. The address (street name + house number) is already on the map, in this case on the container building. Duplicating an identical address to the restaurant itself is not ... commented 2026-09-03 14:06:04 UTC by bxl-forever ♦3,058 |
| 188470636 (Comments: 1) | Arnaud Vanroose (Discussed changesets: 15) | Hello, I regret to tell you that we’ll have to reject your edit again. A node with all the relevant information has been on the map since 2024. On OpenStreetMap, information must only be written once. Duplicating all... commented 2026-09-03 14:03:52 UTC by bxl-forever ♦3,058 |
| 129416601 (Comments: 1) | KBSO (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, Please do not put access no for a Santa parade. If you do, you need to remove the tag after the fact. Thank you! commented 2026-09-03 13:53:50 UTC by chinook17 ♦48 |
| 181538410 (Comments: 3) | Harald Hetzner (Discussed changesets: 66) | Ich hab's mal entfernt. commented 2026-09-03 13:43:25 UTC by mcliquid ♦2,100 |
| 188266579 (Comments: 1) | Yngva (Discussed changesets: 2) | Der Fahrradkeller existiert meines Wissens noch https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188472813 commented 2026-09-03 13:40:22 UTC by flo2154 ♦68 |
| 188447952 (Comments: 1) | TvCauquenes (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola. Pero la dirección sigue existiendo. No borrar todo. Saludos --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/188447952 commented 2026-09-03 13:40:17 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦3,334 |
| 155200624 (Comments: 2) | OSMDoudou (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hello, Thanks for reaching out. Given the small size and monochromatic icon, I can't think of something better. Had there been multiple colors, the icon could have displayed red hotspots on white bones (e.g. white hand or foot skeleton with join... commented 2026-09-03 13:39:19 UTC by OSMDoudou ♦21 |
| 188469907 (Comments: 1) | Kar90 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Tip.. Kwaad kan het natuurlijk niet, maar die accesstags zijn bij een footway niet nodig.. Dat routeert alleen voor wandelaars. wel bij een highway=path. Die laatste routeert ook voor fietsers... behalve bij bicycle=no. Access is ... commented 2026-09-03 13:38:09 UTC by eggie ♦46,961 |
 | 188415236 (Comments: 2) | Kayo_33 (Discussed changesets: 22) | The building still exists in OpenStreetMap. It's a matter of how it is shown. Moved the prefixes to tags inhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188472620 commented 2026-09-03 13:37:44 UTC by Kayo_33 ♦20 |
| 184630278 (Comments: 2) | 5m4u9 (Discussed changesets: 120) | Hi, I saw ribbons on flyers, presentations, and picket signs in my country, Bolivia. I think that's fine. https://lapatria.bo/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/69c6f65144910.jpg https://www.scribd.com/document/712803012/CANCER commented 2026-09-03 13:32:09 UTC by 5m4u9 ♦1,699 |
 | 188373008 (Comments: 1) | elnappo (Discussed changesets: 7) | Please split your changes - a boundary box spanning all the way from Germany to Australia would not be very helpful. commented 2026-09-03 13:31:14 UTC by ljc_jlyb ♦61 |
| 188471635 (Comments: 1) | KMG Group (Discussed changesets: 1) | Czy działalność jest jakkolwiek oznaczona na tym budynku? commented 2026-09-03 13:27:53 UTC by VJMK ♦23 |
| 188465036 (Comments: 1) | Gaczoo (Discussed changesets: 1) | Czy działalność tego sklepu jest jakkolwiek oznaczona na budynku? commented 2026-09-03 13:26:56 UTC by VJMK ♦23 |
| 186285563 (Comments: 1) | Calasanz (Discussed changesets: 28) | És una piscina privada. commented 2026-09-03 13:22:57 UTC by rogerpueyo ♦6 |
| 188467838 (Comments: 7) | tbo47 (Discussed changesets: 31) | Indeed. Missed that. My related diary entry: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/9_tab/diary/408971 commented 2026-09-03 13:21:04 UTC by 9_tab ♦129 |
| 174480348 (Comments: 5) | Manuel H (Discussed changesets: 28) | Manuel, ich stelle nur Tatsachen fest. Ich begehe den Weg seit etwa 8 Jahren alle paar Wochen auf einer Rundroute. Er war in dieser Zeit nie in einem Zustand, den man als abandoned hätte bezeichnen können, nicht mal als disused. Wenn Du vo... commented 2026-09-03 13:19:25 UTC by Map_HeRo ♦113 |
| 188444379 (Comments: 1) | 0xmorte (Discussed changesets: 1) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Good_changeset_comments commented 2026-09-03 13:19:17 UTC by DressyPear4 ♦1,631 |
 | 188460281 (Comments: 3) | Rublistoi (Discussed changesets: 11) | Já corrigi. commented 2026-09-03 13:16:02 UTC by JoaoPaixao ♦21 |
| 176887150 (Comments: 1) | FLprivacyadvocate (Discussed changesets: 1) | Appears gone commented 2026-09-03 13:13:52 UTC by TuringYurtGb ♦1 |
 | 188463779 (Comments: 1) | Siuntos autobusais (Discussed changesets: 1) | Jau yra pažymėta greta kaip amenity=post_deposit commented 2026-09-03 13:12:55 UTC by Tomas Straupis ♦2,112 |
| 188382150 (Comments: 1) | apitura (Discussed changesets: 2) | Trying to reverse using OSM-Revert but it wont let me commented 2026-09-03 13:09:30 UTC by apitura ♦2 |
| 186804915 (Comments: 5) | Ajudaire (Discussed changesets: 1) | Actully, the source seems to be here: https://openstreetmap-oc.org/bdtopoc/ . Google's rendering of that Occitan into English suggests that the source data is https://www.data.gouv.fr/datasets/basa-de-donadas-noms-de-lespaci-occitan-ba... commented 2026-09-03 13:07:36 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,865 |
| 188450365 (Comments: 1) | Friends of Hanlan's (Discussed changesets: 0) | let's try to keep these type of edits localized in the future... do a changeset in cali and a changeset in mass commented 2026-09-03 13:01:30 UTC by dmjab13 ♦143 |
| 188467618 (Comments: 1) | Dyl's Travels (Discussed changesets: 1) | modifying nodes this far apart (Millville and Paterson??) in the same changeset is bad practice, man commented 2026-09-03 13:00:54 UTC by dmjab13 ♦143 |
| 188457702 (Comments: 2) | Mkem9 (Discussed changesets: 1) | OK. Korzystam z aplikacji Citrystrides, w której ulice są zaciągane z OSM według granic administracyjnych, i te krótkie ogryzki są wkurzające, bo de facto te ulice nie należą do danej gminy. Ale skoro nie można tego zmienić w ... commented 2026-09-03 12:53:01 UTC by Mkem9 ♦1 |
| 100159924 (Comments: 1) | kkklllppp (Discussed changesets: 12) | Ciao kkklllppp, questo place era già mappato: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4433553027 commented 2026-09-03 12:49:15 UTC by ivanbranco ♦2,936 |
| 188404911 (Comments: 1) | pelleg (Discussed changesets: 13) | Jeg har gendannet polygonen som blev slettet i dette ændringssæt. Byggepladsen og hegnene er endnu ikke helt væk, og desuden skal polygonen ikke slettes, men omtagges med leisure=park når parken er åben. https://w... commented 2026-09-03 12:48:32 UTC by Linus W Frische ♦61 |
| 104115206 (Comments: 1) | PacerCZ (Discussed changesets: 27) | Hello! Can you take look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5496890 ? commented 2026-09-03 12:43:11 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 186749577 (Comments: 10) | flohoff (Discussed changesets: 83) | > Du bist unbelehrbar. Hier spricht Andy von der DWG. Bei euch beiden ist Hopfen und Malz verloren, was die gegenseitige Verständigung angeht – und doch ist genau das etwas, das wir alle in einem gemeinsamen Projekt tun müss... commented 2026-09-03 12:40:41 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,865 |
| 117222320 (Comments: 1) | mc85eu (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hello! Can you take look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5496901 ? commented 2026-09-03 12:39:27 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 188469184 (Comments: 1) | pzachee (Discussed changesets: 3) | The changeset comment is actually incorrect as I was working on another task in my browser. The changeset comment should be: "Added SIRET, SIREN, NAF info from INSEE source" commented 2026-09-03 12:39:27 UTC by pzachee ♦4 |
| 188469541 (Comments: 1) | samjcorbin (Discussed changesets: 3) | See changeset comment here for further context: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177906899 commented 2026-09-03 12:38:33 UTC by samjcorbin ♦6 |
| 188318071 (Comments: 1) | washington_irving (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188469607 commented 2026-09-03 12:37:53 UTC by rajdhani ♦424 |
| 116758397 (Comments: 1) | ⇄ john paul jones & gringo (Discussed changesets: 29) | Hello! Can you take look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5496895 ? commented 2026-09-03 12:35:46 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 175968072 (Comments: 1) | MapGirl_HannaH (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/615635748/history has building = utility that was added in this edit is building=utility a duplicate of more popular building=service ? Maybe changing to it would be fine? commented 2026-09-03 12:35:16 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 27497519 (Comments: 1) | Greying_Geezer (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/288646919/history has building = utility that was added in this edit is building=utility a duplicate of more popular building=service ? Maybe changing to it would be fine? commented 2026-09-03 12:35:15 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 164226036 (Comments: 1) | GullibleMappazo (Discussed changesets: 24) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/243560758/history has building = utility that was added in this edit is building=utility a duplicate of more popular building=service ? Maybe changing to it would be fine? commented 2026-09-03 12:35:14 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 146657321 (Comments: 1) | CurlingMan13 (Discussed changesets: 216) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1010709830/history has building = utility that was added in this edit is building=utility a duplicate of more popular building=service ? Maybe changing to it would be fine? commented 2026-09-03 12:35:12 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 188456833 (Comments: 2) | rajdhani (Discussed changesets: 35) | https://www.fairwaymapper.com/map/miskanaw-golf-club-ca commented 2026-09-03 12:33:32 UTC by apitura ♦2 |
| 188466479 (Comments: 3) | Kar90 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hoi, Als het duidelijk voor wandelaars is bedoeld dan highway=footway. Dat routeert niet voor iets met wielen behalve nauurlijk rolstoelen. Je zou nog wheelchair=designated kunnen zeten. Wanneer het onduidelijk is dan highway=pah, maar ... commented 2026-09-03 12:21:18 UTC by eggie ♦46,961 |
| 188280378 (Comments: 1) | B1uu_ (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188468514 commented 2026-09-03 12:16:11 UTC by rajdhani ♦424 |
| 188403082 (Comments: 1) | gouranga63 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Idem ici https://demo.f4map.com/#lat=45.7553488&lon=3.2381481&zoom=20&camera.phi=6.875 (3 maisons devenues des toits, à réparer) commented 2026-09-03 12:16:08 UTC by Yunan973 ♦156 |
| 125583506 (Comments: 1) | Mal_B (Discussed changesets: 3) | hello! Can you take look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5496850 ? commented 2026-09-03 12:14:46 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 188463902 (Comments: 1) | Dimkave (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. Feedback Je info heb ik samengevoegd met de adresnode. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-09-03 12:14:46 UTC by eggie ♦46,961 |
| 181562484 (Comments: 1) | Scott Fraser (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/825715450/history has building = utility that was added in this edit is building=utility a duplicate of more popular building=service ? Maybe changing to it would be fine? commented 2026-09-03 12:14:15 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 169981111 (Comments: 1) | Daniel_Malloy (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1420079525/history has building = utility that was added in this edit is building=utility a duplicate of more popular building=service ? Maybe changing to it would be fine? commented 2026-09-03 12:14:14 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 166809167 (Comments: 1) | duduewgdu (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1389986442/history has building = utility that was added in this edit is building=utility a duplicate of more popular building=service ? Maybe changing to it would be fine? commented 2026-09-03 12:14:12 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 171637389 (Comments: 1) | Marc Toe (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1427974972/history has building = utility that was added in this edit is building=utility a duplicate of more popular building=service ? Maybe changing to it would be fine? commented 2026-09-03 12:14:10 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 188438157 (Comments: 1) | gouranga63 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Idem ici https://demo.f4map.com/#lat=45.7531488&lon=3.2398280&zoom=20&camera.phi=6.875 commented 2026-09-03 12:13:40 UTC by Yunan973 ♦156 |
| 188277655 (Comments: 1) | Drael123 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188468489 commented 2026-09-03 12:13:02 UTC by ajmat ♦418 |
| 188465171 (Comments: 1) | Gally Fondo (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-09-03 12:12:53 UTC by eggie ♦46,961 |
| 188468196 (Comments: 1) | Versa_Welzijn (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OSM, office=hoofdkantoor_van_versa_welzijn is geen officiële tag binnen osm. Geef de aard van de instelling aan. Zie https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:office MVG eggie commented 2026-09-03 12:12:19 UTC by eggie ♦46,961 |
| 174481925 (Comments: 4) | Manuel H (Discussed changesets: 28) | 'source' kann und wird auch bei einzelnen Objekten angegeben werden. Gerade wenn man ein Objekt anhand solcher Quellen, die auf absehbare Zeit kaum in ihrer Genauigkeit geschlagen werden dürften, ausrichtet, wäre die Angabe hilfre... commented 2026-09-03 12:11:28 UTC by Manuel H ♦87 |
| 166274550 (Comments: 1) | cereal_cable (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1330454095/history has building = utility that was added in this edit is building=utility a duplicate of more popular building=service ? Maybe changing to it would be fine? commented 2026-09-03 12:10:22 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 188466303 (Comments: 1) | Erwin Dokter (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-09-03 12:10:01 UTC by eggie ♦46,961 |
| 188421498 (Comments: 3) | JRojas (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ok, gracias. La muevo ligeramente al norte para que quede un poco más claro. commented 2026-09-03 12:09:23 UTC by pantufla ♦312 |
| 188418141 (Comments: 1) | gouranga63 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Bonjour, peux tu arrêter de fusionner des bâtiments corrects pour créer des bâtiments erronés ? Voilà le résultat que cela donne https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=1.46010&l... commented 2026-09-03 12:04:41 UTC by Yunan973 ♦156 |
| 188467399 (Comments: 1) | Super Villain (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, welcome to OpenStreetMap. It’s a map which needs to be useful to everyone, so please refrain from adding personal notes/games to it, thanks. commented 2026-09-03 12:03:00 UTC by gurglypipe ♦1,109 |
| 188466427 (Comments: 1) | carloabayon (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. If there is no feature 'on the ground' here that any passerby can verify, then the meeting place should not be mapped to OSM. If its not a visible feature the node should be removed. Regards Berna... commented 2026-09-03 11:52:33 UTC by BCNorwich ♦5,356 |
| 185596859 (Comments: 3) | mors_tyrannis (Discussed changesets: 1) | To pawilon handlowy i dawno tam nie byłem, jedynie pozdejmowałem ten dziwny tag w opening_hours: off "Not open to the public". Ale szukając informacji na temat punktów to kwiaciarnia jest obecnie zamknięta (remont) - tak podaje s... commented 2026-09-03 11:50:10 UTC by Krystek ♦15 |
| 179310378 (Comments: 2) | Kukunoor (Discussed changesets: 1) | Palautin edellisen version kun ei perusteluja kuulunut. Polun päät olivat edelleen kelkkareiteiksi merkitty, niin sikäli tuo polku oli aika omituinen. commented 2026-09-03 11:48:01 UTC by rle32795 ♦42 |
| 187033858 (Comments: 1) | Szymson (Discussed changesets: 309) | Cześć dostajemy zgłoszenia od użytkowników, że organizacja ruchu nie uległa jeszcze zmianie. Sprawdziłem ślady z wczoraj (https://ibb.co/hF5N1qt1) i rzeczywiście ruch nie odbywa się jeszcze po wprowadzonym przebiegu. commented 2026-09-03 11:47:19 UTC by Artur | Yanosik ♦28 |
| 153609524 (Comments: 1) | brendan77 (Discussed changesets: 11) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/205175062/history has building = disused that was added in this edit it really should be building= + disused=yes commented 2026-09-03 11:44:43 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 145555306 (Comments: 1) | j_b_ (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/724819073/history has building = disused that was added in this edit it really should be building= + disused=yes commented 2026-09-03 11:44:42 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 133806332 (Comments: 1) | Jarrardi (Discussed changesets: 45) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/761870854/history has building = disused that was added in this edit it really should be building= + disused=yes commented 2026-09-03 11:44:41 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 180471896 (Comments: 1) | mvexel (Discussed changesets: 42) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/523183252/history has building = disused that was added in this edit it really should be building= + disused=yes commented 2026-09-03 11:44:39 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 139662243 (Comments: 1) | atlas-3d (Discussed changesets: 17) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/161134877/history has building = disused that was added in this edit it really should be building= + disused=yes commented 2026-09-03 11:44:35 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 188281568 (Comments: 1) | Michael Carhua (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188467190 commented 2026-09-03 11:43:58 UTC by ajmat ♦418 |
| 188459772 (Comments: 3) | Figsontoast (Discussed changesets: 3) | Then it's a service road, access=private which means all access is private. Tags amended. commented 2026-09-03 11:42:29 UTC by BCNorwich ♦5,356 |
 | 173577430 (Comments: 1) | LukaOSM (Discussed changesets: 2) | hello! can you take look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5496797 ? commented 2026-09-03 11:42:08 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 174259724 (Comments: 1) | w_djatmiko (Discussed changesets: 25) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13249338888/history has building = 113 that was added in this edit What this tag means? Numeric value is unexpected here and it is unclear what it means commented 2026-09-03 11:41:28 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 40062694 (Comments: 1) | maheshika (Discussed changesets: 15) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/406715057/history has building = other that was added in this edit what was meant by this value? commented 2026-09-03 11:41:11 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 38113483 (Comments: 1) | raxchana (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/406138612/history has building = other that was added in this edit what was meant by this value? commented 2026-09-03 11:41:10 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 39996918 (Comments: 1) | Suthakaran (Discussed changesets: 9) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/390935622/history has building = other that was added in this edit what was meant by this value? commented 2026-09-03 11:41:08 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 40249839 (Comments: 1) | Eranga123 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/406723865/history has building = other that was added in this edit what was meant by this value? commented 2026-09-03 11:41:07 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 38972008 (Comments: 1) | Nandana Mahakumarage (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/377949765/history has building = other that was added in this edit what was meant by this value? commented 2026-09-03 11:41:05 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 187587140 (Comments: 5) | VELODB (Discussed changesets: 24) | Et du temps pour les annoter pour les voir avec un outil du type https://umap.openstreetmap.fr/fr/map/balisage-de-randonnee-dans-panoramax_1364170#14/44.118268/4.277882 Est-ce-qu’il y a déjà des photos spécifiques de... commented 2026-09-03 11:38:27 UTC by pyrog ♦458 |
| 181934276 (Comments: 2) | Elarayn (Discussed changesets: 12) | I wouldn’t say no, since the current icon is already used for several types of sports facilities. A bit of variety wouldn’t hurt. commented 2026-09-03 11:37:15 UTC by Elarayn ♦7 |
| 188465958 (Comments: 1) | eadvanbeek (Discussed changesets: 2) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. Feedback Een woonerf heeft een bord woonerf vooraan en ook meestal een straatnaam. Is dit niet een toegangsweg/achterom? ... commented 2026-09-03 11:25:35 UTC by eggie ♦46,961 |
| 188375918 (Comments: 1) | Krystek (Discussed changesets: 7) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5070402 to głupie healthcare=pharmacy też trzeba zdjąć zrobię to commented 2026-09-03 11:23:28 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 188466272 (Comments: 1) | czdawes (Discussed changesets: 9) | *slovak ortophoto looks more updated (2024) to others, because of that, it was used to trace the layouts, where other options look that they still has older farm photos (fences). commented 2026-09-03 11:23:09 UTC by czdawes ♦6 |
| 188453796 (Comments: 1) | Theydon Bois Pharmacy Epping (Discussed changesets: 1) | Address tweaked commented 2026-09-03 11:20:22 UTC by BCNorwich ♦5,356 |
| 188459443 (Comments: 1) | Figsontoast (Discussed changesets: 3) | Access beyond the gate is private. commented 2026-09-03 11:16:51 UTC by BCNorwich ♦5,356 |
| 188433738 (Comments: 3) | Protoxenus (Discussed changesets: 138) | Vielen Dank! Gruß @Erik - commented 2026-09-03 11:16:41 UTC by Erik - ♦15 |
| 188459479 (Comments: 1) | Figsontoast (Discussed changesets: 3) | All access beyond the gate is private commented 2026-09-03 11:16:12 UTC by BCNorwich ♦5,356 |
| 188438527 (Comments: 2) | Drachenkutscher (Discussed changesets: 6) | Der Betreiberwechsel liegt schon länger zurück. commented 2026-09-03 11:06:49 UTC by Drachenkutscher ♦4 |
| 188442120 (Comments: 2) | Drachenkutscher (Discussed changesets: 6) | Moin, bei https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Stolpersteine steht es unter optionalen Informationen. Ich kann artwork und tourism weglassen, mir ist es gleichgültig. commented 2026-09-03 11:04:55 UTC by Drachenkutscher ♦4 |
| 188312716 (Comments: 1) | Belenchis (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188465504 commented 2026-09-03 11:04:51 UTC by rajdhani ♦424 |
| 188330862 (Comments: 2) | ayanbs (Discussed changesets: 6) | Block lifted as apparently an accidental change, not a bug commented 2026-09-03 11:00:10 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,812 |
| 40317485 (Comments: 1) | sulakshi (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/406910336/history has building = other that was added in this edit what was meant by this value? commented 2026-09-03 10:57:15 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 40472878 (Comments: 1) | Eric Xavier (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/401163726/history has building = other that was added in this edit what was meant by this value? commented 2026-09-03 10:57:14 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 188326707 (Comments: 1) | DanielTito (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188465072 commented 2026-09-03 10:56:34 UTC by rajdhani ♦424 |
| 93013238 (Comments: 1) | Lakshmee Madhushani (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/806726044/history has building = other that was added in this edit what was meant by this value? commented 2026-09-03 10:56:30 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 92619339 (Comments: 1) | sunali madushika (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/858466073/history has building = other that was added in this edit what was meant by this value? commented 2026-09-03 10:56:27 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 93636885 (Comments: 1) | NIROSHANI WARNAKULASOORIYA (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/820858644/history has building = other that was added in this edit what was meant by this value? commented 2026-09-03 10:56:26 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 92450903 (Comments: 1) | Madushani Ganga (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/823112767/history has building = other that was added in this edit what was meant by this value? commented 2026-09-03 10:56:25 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 92678975 (Comments: 1) | Pramith SCC (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/824103115/history has building = other that was added in this edit what was meant by this value? commented 2026-09-03 10:56:23 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 92928525 (Comments: 1) | Dulasha Darshani (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/829924840/history has building = other that was added in this edit what was meant by this value? commented 2026-09-03 10:56:22 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 93362861 (Comments: 1) | Thushani (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/864949452/history has building = other that was added in this edit what was meant by this value? commented 2026-09-03 10:56:18 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 93266452 (Comments: 1) | shashikala dilrukshi (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/864930002/history has building = other that was added in this edit what was meant by this value? commented 2026-09-03 10:56:14 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 188247743 (Comments: 3) | turbopixel (Discussed changesets: 5) | Na dann ist das leisure=horse_riding da wohl auch falsch reingerutscht, vgl. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:How_to_map_a/R#Reitstall commented 2026-09-03 10:52:29 UTC by Hufkratzer ♦910 |
| 187910204 (Comments: 2) | schreibtisch (Discussed changesets: 14) | Ich bewege mich an den Stellen entlang und die Wege gibt’s halt teilweise nicht mehr, weil zugewachsen o.ä. Aber auch da hast Du recht, könnte ich ja genau so dokumentieren. commented 2026-09-03 10:52:08 UTC by schreibtisch ♦12 |
| 188461397 (Comments: 1) | Ethlered (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Unfortunately, you added this building on top of the existing building, duplicated building. Thus, I've reverted the changeset, adding your new info to the existing building outline. Regards Ber... commented 2026-09-03 10:51:48 UTC by BCNorwich ♦5,356 |
| 188333086 (Comments: 1) | boonuz (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188464801 commented 2026-09-03 10:46:38 UTC by ajmat ♦418 |
| 188330539 (Comments: 1) | ayanbs (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hello, Whenever it's happened to me, an "unexpected large number of changes" usually means that lots of things were selected and one of them was moved slightly. JOSM interprets that as "apply that to everything" and moves... commented 2026-09-03 10:45:39 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,865 |
| 176711241 (Comments: 3) | vladislav_les (Discussed changesets: 1) | Если не будете отвечать на обращения сообщества, рискуете потерять всю вашу работу. commented 2026-09-03 10:45:27 UTC by Wise_Turtle ♦19 |
| 50785956 (Comments: 2) | osmviborg (Discussed changesets: 371) | Fint med mig hvis du selv sletter noget der er så gammelt. commented 2026-09-03 10:41:57 UTC by osmviborg ♦1,904 |
| 188409624 (Comments: 4) | openstreethippy (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ja, dingen blijven veranderen. Kan best wel lastig zijn. Pas jij de tijden aan of zal ik dat doen? commented 2026-09-03 10:39:36 UTC by Kees 59 ♦117 |
| 188455118 (Comments: 1) | The king of dyrka (Discussed changesets: 2) | зачем вы создаете фейковые объекты? там нет никаких пещер. пользуйтесь заметками commented 2026-09-03 10:38:58 UTC by literan ♦7,214 |
| 167105602 (Comments: 4) | StKe (Discussed changesets: 56) | Danke dir für die Erklärung commented 2026-09-03 10:37:41 UTC by Znaika ♦213 |
| 188279371 (Comments: 1) | marctebo (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188464154 commented 2026-09-03 10:34:34 UTC by rajdhani ♦424 |
| 188279391 (Comments: 1) | Evelyn56A (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188463904 commented 2026-09-03 10:29:35 UTC by rajdhani ♦424 |
 | 188337524 (Comments: 1) | Nafisa Nandini (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello. Thanks for mapping. A remark. Don't let nodes of a residential area connect to other objects like highways and buildings. Use the ctrl key pushed down while drawing the residential area , Best regards commented 2026-09-03 10:29:16 UTC by Frans S ♦10,936 |
| 188114351 (Comments: 1) | blue1205 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi, ich habe mich gestern gewundert, warum mein Auto mich auf der oberen Hauptstraße ständig zum Wenden aufgefordert hat und heute sehe ich das Elend hier. Was hat dich denn hier bewogen, dass Stück obere Hauptstraße a... commented 2026-09-03 10:29:00 UTC by cyankahly ♦9 |
| 188419230 (Comments: 1) | maxlax (Discussed changesets: 14) | За такую нумерацию строений надо давать пожизненные срока, даже если этот человек уже мёртв плюньте ему на могилу что ли 🫤 commented 2026-09-03 10:27:02 UTC by maxlax ♦12 |
| 188454664 (Comments: 1) | rafalp1 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Witaj, czy ulica Andersena na pewno służy tylko za dojazd do posesji? Oznaczyłeś ją "access=no" (wstęp wzbroniony dla wszystkich); powinna być ona "access=destination" (zakaz ruchu, nie dotyczy dojazdu do posesji) czy &q... commented 2026-09-03 10:25:34 UTC by Kamil Kalata ♦123 |
| 153475293 (Comments: 3) | syntex (Discussed changesets: 301) | o, dzięki commented 2026-09-03 10:21:35 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 136177476 (Comments: 3) | Piagno (Discussed changesets: 147) | that is already very helpful! Thanks for reply! commented 2026-09-03 10:20:40 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 188114420 (Comments: 1) | blue1205 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hey, wie kommst du darauf, dass hier ein Radweg ist ? Wenn du dir das mal live angeschaut hast, ist da an der Verbindung zwischen Stollberger Straße und oberer Hauptstraße nicht mal ein abgesenkter Bordstein. Der Weg ist so in der ... commented 2026-09-03 10:20:34 UTC by cyankahly ♦9 |
| 188331635 (Comments: 1) | Mariaarmijos (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188463498 commented 2026-09-03 10:20:27 UTC by rajdhani ♦424 |
| 183276160 (Comments: 1) | RafaBoski (Discussed changesets: 55) | rozumiem że są prace budowlane, bez zamknięcia drogi? może construction=minor by bardziej pasowało? commented 2026-09-03 10:14:04 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 173564153 (Comments: 2) | RahilPasha (Discussed changesets: 24) | Hi, I acknowledge and appreciate your feedback and the corrections. Thank you. I will take greater care to avoid these errors going forward. commented 2026-09-03 10:08:43 UTC by RahilPasha ♦21 |
| 188325656 (Comments: 1) | michaelReal (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188460075 commented 2026-09-03 10:03:03 UTC by Wildsharky ♦926 |
| 188287484 (Comments: 1) | Richard Centeno (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188456004 commented 2026-09-03 10:02:15 UTC by Wildsharky ♦926 |
| 188335885 (Comments: 1) | EirenVale (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188455324 commented 2026-09-03 10:01:25 UTC by Wildsharky ♦926 |
| 188304970 (Comments: 1) | julls2004 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188416334 commented 2026-09-03 10:00:29 UTC by Wildsharky ♦926 |
| 188288981 (Comments: 1) | JohnyboyWill (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188415890 commented 2026-09-03 09:59:21 UTC by Wildsharky ♦926 |
| 188278414 (Comments: 1) | ISSAC12 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188415388 commented 2026-09-03 09:58:28 UTC by Wildsharky ♦926 |
| 188435537 (Comments: 1) | Alberto-V (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ciao, ho visto che hai usato sidewalk:left=separate. Questo tag si usa quando il marciapiede è mappato come una way a parte parallela alla strada, ma al momento non c'è. Se vuoi usare questo tag ti consiglio di aggiungere una way, ... commented 2026-09-03 09:58:23 UTC by Nicola Smaniotto ♦2 |
| 188279101 (Comments: 1) | Deybi_Pozo (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188415201 commented 2026-09-03 09:57:36 UTC by Wildsharky ♦926 |
| 187635489 (Comments: 4) | squob (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ok, allora non le segno. L'ho fatto tramite oganic maps e mi pare che non venga specificata li la differenza. C'è un generico "area di sosta" commented 2026-09-03 09:56:18 UTC by squob ♦1 |
| 188366936 (Comments: 1) | Zambez (Discussed changesets: 2) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188461936 commented 2026-09-03 09:53:52 UTC by ajmat ♦418 |
| 181526048 (Comments: 8) | Claudius Henrichs (Discussed changesets: 182) | Any feedback on whether we can reach a tagging consensus here to prevent power plant duplication in the database? commented 2026-09-03 09:51:07 UTC by Claudius Henrichs ♦227 |
| 168389371 (Comments: 3) | Mathias_ADAV (Discussed changesets: 31) | Bonjour ,j'ai supprimé une partie du chemin commented 2026-09-03 09:50:36 UTC by Mathias_ADAV ♦202 |
| 188138057 (Comments: 1) | tfoubert1 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Bonjour, ce changeset a brisé la continuité de plusieurs itinéraires pédestres qui passent par là. Je vais tenter la réparation. commented 2026-09-03 09:47:17 UTC by StC ♦518 |
| 188370525 (Comments: 1) | Ariana Andrade (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188461881 commented 2026-09-03 09:44:59 UTC by rajdhani ♦424 |
| 183884136 (Comments: 3) | Tischlehr (Discussed changesets: 4) | Nein, das war ein Fehler, hatte in Vespucci ausversehen noch auf die Adressen Eigenschaft geklickt. Ist jetzt behoben. commented 2026-09-03 09:42:39 UTC by Tischlehr ♦3 |
| 188460121 (Comments: 1) | wpmsc (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-09-03 09:31:17 UTC by eggie ♦46,961 |
| 188459207 (Comments: 2) | ajbruyne (Discussed changesets: 1) | Beste ajbruyne, Je kunt zoiets het beste doorgeven middels een terugmelding. Je hebt anders kans dat iemand het weer aanpast op grond van BGT/Kadaster. Een terugmelding kun je hier doen. https://www.verbeterdekaart.nl/#?geometry.x=... commented 2026-09-03 09:30:50 UTC by eggie ♦46,961 |
| 188399789 (Comments: 1) | Tunibal (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hi Tunibal :) ich habe die Tags der Bushaltestelle mit "ferry=no" etc. wieder entfernt. Nicht jede Bushaltestelle braucht explizite tags, die sagen, dass keine Fähren, Bahnen etc dort halten. Was nicht getagt ist, hält nicht. M... commented 2026-09-03 09:29:32 UTC by FroschMapper ♦5 |
| 188454286 (Comments: 1) | Alfred000 (Discussed changesets: 5) | El conjunto de cambios fue revertido! No agregues la numeración a los edificios! La misma ya se encuentra sobre la línea de vereda. commented 2026-09-03 09:27:58 UTC by guillemmal ♦60 |
| 188454290 (Comments: 1) | Alfred000 (Discussed changesets: 5) | El conjunto de cambios fue revertido! No agregues la numeración a los edificios! La misma ya se encuentra sobre la línea de vereda. commented 2026-09-03 09:26:35 UTC by guillemmal ♦60 |
| 188454303 (Comments: 1) | Alfred000 (Discussed changesets: 5) | El conjunto de cambios fue revertido, los edificios se encuentran bien etiquedos, evita cambialos! Cualquier duda a disposición! Saludos! commented 2026-09-03 09:24:08 UTC by guillemmal ♦60 |
| 188448010 (Comments: 1) | Alfred000 (Discussed changesets: 5) | El conjunto de cambios fue revertido, los edificios se encuentran bien etiquetados! Gracias! Cualquier duda a disposición! Saludos! commented 2026-09-03 09:22:17 UTC by guillemmal ♦60 |
| 188448697 (Comments: 1) | Alfred000 (Discussed changesets: 5) | El conjunto de cambios fue revertido, la numeración ya se encuentra en la línea de la vereda, evita repetir el dato! Gracias! Cualquier duda a disposición! Saludos! commented 2026-09-03 09:21:39 UTC by guillemmal ♦60 |
| 188160384 (Comments: 1) | padvinder (Discussed changesets: 237) | Beste padvinder, details omg Made Dat zegt toch niemand iets. Zou je een keer kunnen overschakelen naar concrete commentaren bij je uploads. Good practice https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Good_practice De w... commented 2026-09-03 09:14:43 UTC by eggie ♦46,961 |
| 188357713 (Comments: 1) | Fraport AG (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188460651 commented 2026-09-03 09:13:17 UTC by ajmat ♦418 |
| X | 169393267 (Comments: 1) | jcr83 (Discussed changesets: 21) | Bonjour, je trouve la relation 18872944 avec plusieurs discontinuités, sans être capable de facilement voir de quand cela date ni quelle était l'intention. Dans la mesure où tu es l'auteur de la plupart des... commented 2026-09-03 09:08:45 UTC by StC ♦518 |
| 188430798 (Comments: 1) | MrksH (Discussed changesets: 1) | Kannst Du hier nochmal nachsehen? Öffnungszeiten an disused:tourism=hotel? commented 2026-09-03 09:04:48 UTC by Senihtu ♦188 |
| 182129321 (Comments: 2) | TygoFRS (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hoi, Klein puntje, het telefoonnummer is te lang. Vanaf de 6 (inbegrepen) tot einde nummer zou 9 posities moeten zijn commented 2026-09-03 09:02:53 UTC by Kees 59 ♦117 |
 | 188336302 (Comments: 1) | 민돌맹이 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188460047 commented 2026-09-03 09:00:52 UTC by ajmat ♦418 |
| 188393891 (Comments: 1) | Andivera (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188459886 commented 2026-09-03 09:00:14 UTC by rajdhani ♦424 |
| 188403373 (Comments: 2) | mohamedd_ahmed (Discussed changesets: 5) | مرحبا 𒂼𒄄; شكرا لك علي تواصلك معنا, لقد قمت فقط بحذف هذا التاج "oneway" ولم اقم بتعديل اي تاجات للاسم "name". ولكن قد تقصد اليوزر &... commented 2026-09-03 08:57:16 UTC by mohamedd_ahmed ♦5 |
| 187594092 (Comments: 3) | JeroenvanderGun (Discussed changesets: 160) | Moeite waard om aangaande Zeeweg provincie NH in de gaten te blijven houden ! “Deze proef wordt binnenkort geëvalueerd. Op basis van de resultaten besluiten de provincie en de kustgemeenten in december 2026 of en hoe de Strandbus verder... commented 2026-09-03 08:56:54 UTC by Dillen GJ ♦57 |
| 188363349 (Comments: 2) | Reisinformatiegroep (Discussed changesets: 86) | foot=yes toegevoegd.. Hoe kom je anders bij de bushalte? commented 2026-09-03 08:56:38 UTC by eggie ♦46,961 |
| 188266746 (Comments: 2) | OSM-XXXXXX (Discussed changesets: 35) | Ja mihin tarkoitukseen jokin erikoinen tagi on. commented 2026-09-03 08:54:45 UTC by rle32795 ♦42 |
| 187192200 (Comments: 1) | DeBigC (Discussed changesets: 56) | Hi, This doesn't look like maxheight=7.5. Is there a sign somewhere? commented 2026-09-03 08:51:32 UTC by VictorIE ♦1,245 |
| 188372896 (Comments: 1) | Gingeeeeeeer19 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188459530 commented 2026-09-03 08:50:41 UTC by rajdhani ♦424 |
| 187578884 (Comments: 5) | ToprakM (Discussed changesets: 19) | Hello. I have no relationship with ToprakM. I don’t know him or her. I first saw this discussion in the OSM Turkey Telegram group. It later appeared in my RSS reader as well. The page https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussions-feed?c=Turke... commented 2026-09-03 08:45:26 UTC by HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi ♦267 |
| 188390700 (Comments: 1) | Leicham (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188459061 commented 2026-09-03 08:41:38 UTC by rajdhani ♦424 |
| 188455548 (Comments: 1) | K12230LF (Discussed changesets: 41) | Bonjour, les liens ajoutés n'ont pas l'air pertinents, ils renvoient vers l'annuaire de l'administration et non pas vers les pages officiels de France Travail. commented 2026-09-03 08:40:41 UTC by Syl ♦1,102 |
| 188456800 (Comments: 1) | K12230LF (Discussed changesets: 41) | Bonjour, les sites web ajoutés n'ont pas l'air pertinents. Ils renvoient tous à la même carte. commented 2026-09-03 08:38:10 UTC by Syl ♦1,102 |
| 69775258 (Comments: 2) | sebastic (Discussed changesets: 85) | This changeset was part of the Jochem Topf's area fixing project, I was fixing polygons per the changeset comment, not mapping healthcare facilities. The tags were likely moved from the relation to the single outer way. You can change the... commented 2026-09-03 08:37:10 UTC by sebastic ♦108 |
| 188358561 (Comments: 1) | Usmmu (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188458808 commented 2026-09-03 08:35:24 UTC by ajmat ♦418 |
| 179255496 (Comments: 4) | lubaum (Discussed changesets: 22) | Now, it's corrected. Thanks! commented 2026-09-03 08:35:23 UTC by lubaum ♦11 |
| 188351627 (Comments: 1) | Ro-vrzhz (Discussed changesets: 18) | Dag Ro colour=groen>green aangepast. MVG eggie commented 2026-09-03 08:34:16 UTC by eggie ♦46,961 |
| 188372801 (Comments: 1) | Ayush Khandale (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188458599 commented 2026-09-03 08:31:07 UTC by ajmat ♦418 |
| 187034505 (Comments: 3) | chris66 (Discussed changesets: 128) | Das klingt nach: tourism = artwork artwork_type=mural artist_name = Lackaffen artwork_subject = * commented 2026-09-03 08:29:20 UTC by mueschel ♦7,309 |
| 188389970 (Comments: 1) | anglacesc (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188458109 commented 2026-09-03 08:20:59 UTC by rajdhani ♦424 |
| 188414960 (Comments: 1) | Reinhard12 (Discussed changesets: 19) | Moin, ich bin hier über den changeset gestolpert weil der eine routing änderung zur folge hatte: Rot alt - Grün neu https://osm.zz.de/routeqa/?rid=1292398,1336477#51.6415,7.10122,13z Grundsätzlich ist die r... commented 2026-09-03 08:11:12 UTC by flohoff ♦2,566 |
| 188218805 (Comments: 1) | JordanJNN (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1553508734. I a ssume the tag camino al rio=camino al rio is a copy & paste error. But notice a name is nothing! Is this way a street or a waterway or ... ? (there a also... commented 2026-09-03 07:57:40 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,833 |
| 188381761 (Comments: 1) | apitura (Discussed changesets: 2) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188456833 commented 2026-09-03 07:55:04 UTC by rajdhani ♦424 |
| 188177010 (Comments: 1) | The_Prot0type_01 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! What is the mean of the tags NOT surveillance = public bruh = 2025-05-19 ? commented 2026-09-03 07:54:31 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,833 |
| 188084530 (Comments: 1) | TheSwavu (Discussed changesets: 316) | Copilot said: Please keep the population value on node/13766899 as well. It does not cause any issues there, and it is helpful when we classify cities according to their importance. Other smaller cities also have population data attached to th... commented 2026-09-03 07:53:04 UTC by fukejs ♦29 |
| 188447132 (Comments: 1) | bigmanbusman (Discussed changesets: 15) | Please stop creating non-existent `=crossing` commented 2026-09-03 07:52:15 UTC by Kovoschiz ♦3,022 |
| 188456710 (Comments: 1) | indoztri (Discussed changesets: 1) | Included street entrance addresses, as they're often different from the buildings nearest to them. Added "house number" to each main building for same reason. commented 2026-09-03 07:51:47 UTC by indoztri ♦1 |
| 188454383 (Comments: 2) | Deknotsaap (Discussed changesets: 6) | Maar als je er elke dag fietst is de bron source=survey Het is oke. commented 2026-09-03 07:51:22 UTC by eggie ♦46,961 |
| 188420791 (Comments: 2) | flightwastaken (Discussed changesets: 1) | (You should only move them if they are positioned wrongly) commented 2026-09-03 07:50:36 UTC by Kovoschiz ♦3,022 |
| 137393207 (Comments: 1) | adrianojbr (Discussed changesets: 76) | Is ribbon an appropriate icon for oncologists within iD presets? Can you take look at https://github.com/openstreetmap/id-tagging-schema/pull/2736#issuecomment-5355985226 and judge is it working well? (alternative is to keep generic doctor ico... commented 2026-09-03 07:48:47 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 129759511 (Comments: 1) | trichocereus (Discussed changesets: 14) | Is ribbon an appropriate icon for oncologists within iD presets? Can you take look at https://github.com/openstreetmap/id-tagging-schema/pull/2736#issuecomment-5355985226 and judge is it working well? (alternative is to keep generic doctor ico... commented 2026-09-03 07:48:45 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 184850346 (Comments: 1) | Vedanti Sonparote (Discussed changesets: 2) | Is ribbon an appropriate icon for oncologists within iD presets? Can you take look at https://github.com/openstreetmap/id-tagging-schema/pull/2736#issuecomment-5355985226 and judge is it working well? (alternative is to keep generic doctor ico... commented 2026-09-03 07:48:42 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
 | 86275993 (Comments: 1) | maripogoda (Discussed changesets: 5) | Is ribbon an appropriate icon for oncologists within iD presets? Can you take look at https://github.com/openstreetmap/id-tagging-schema/pull/2736#issuecomment-5355985226 and judge is it working well? (alternative is to keep generic doctor ico... commented 2026-09-03 07:48:37 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 157245944 (Comments: 1) | kjon (Discussed changesets: 168) | Is ribbon an appropriate icon for oncologists within iD presets? Can you take look at https://github.com/openstreetmap/id-tagging-schema/pull/2736#issuecomment-5355985226 and judge is it working well? (alternative is to keep generic doctor ico... commented 2026-09-03 07:48:35 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 120997477 (Comments: 1) | MidwestMapGeek (Discussed changesets: 36) | Is ribbon an appropriate icon for oncologists within iD presets? Can you take look at https://github.com/openstreetmap/id-tagging-schema/pull/2736#issuecomment-5355985226 and judge is it working well? (alternative is to keep generic doctor ico... commented 2026-09-03 07:48:33 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 182492291 (Comments: 1) | Kovirii (Discussed changesets: 33) | Is ribbon an appropriate icon for oncologists within iD presets? Can you take look at https://github.com/openstreetmap/id-tagging-schema/pull/2736#issuecomment-5355985226 and judge is it working well? (alternative is to keep generic doctor ico... commented 2026-09-03 07:48:30 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 151335561 (Comments: 1) | TheDutchMan13 (Discussed changesets: 220) | Is ribbon an appropriate icon for oncologists within iD presets? Can you take look at https://github.com/openstreetmap/id-tagging-schema/pull/2736#issuecomment-5355985226 and judge is it working well? (alternative is to keep generic doctor ico... commented 2026-09-03 07:48:27 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 162218781 (Comments: 1) | Alexander Burrola (Discussed changesets: 2) | Is ribbon an appropriate icon for oncologists within iD presets? Can you take look at https://github.com/openstreetmap/id-tagging-schema/pull/2736#issuecomment-5355985226 and judge is it working well? (alternative is to keep generic doctor ico... commented 2026-09-03 07:48:20 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 185876908 (Comments: 1) | wcedmisten (Discussed changesets: 14) | Is ribbon an appropriate icon for oncologists within iD presets? Can you take look at https://github.com/openstreetmap/id-tagging-schema/pull/2736#issuecomment-5355985226 and judge is it working well? (alternative is to keep generic doctor ico... commented 2026-09-03 07:48:17 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 179048240 (Comments: 1) | AjBelnuovo (Discussed changesets: 76) | Is ribbon an appropriate icon for oncologists within iD presets? Can you take look at https://github.com/openstreetmap/id-tagging-schema/pull/2736#issuecomment-5355985226 and judge is it working well? (alternative is to keep generic doctor ico... commented 2026-09-03 07:48:15 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 134370096 (Comments: 1) | solenoid jam (Discussed changesets: 180) | Is ribbon an appropriate icon for oncologists within iD presets? Can you take look at https://github.com/openstreetmap/id-tagging-schema/pull/2736#issuecomment-5355985226 and judge is it working well? (alternative is to keep generic doctor ico... commented 2026-09-03 07:48:09 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
 | 173093121 (Comments: 1) | Acimut (Discussed changesets: 9) | Is ribbon an appropriate icon for oncologists within iD presets? Can you take look at https://github.com/openstreetmap/id-tagging-schema/pull/2736#issuecomment-5355985226 and judge is it working well? (alternative is to keep generic doctor ico... commented 2026-09-03 07:48:06 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 169053232 (Comments: 1) | Valery Visciglia Aleinik 244854 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Is ribbon an appropriate icon for oncologists within iD presets? Can you take look at https://github.com/openstreetmap/id-tagging-schema/pull/2736#issuecomment-5355985226 and judge is it working well? (alternative is to keep generic doctor ico... commented 2026-09-03 07:48:01 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 185615099 (Comments: 1) | Andrew Matheny (Discussed changesets: 22) | Is ribbon an appropriate icon for oncologists within iD presets? Can you take look at https://github.com/openstreetmap/id-tagging-schema/pull/2736#issuecomment-5355985226 and judge is it working well? (alternative is to keep generic doctor ico... commented 2026-09-03 07:47:58 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 163325455 (Comments: 1) | Robert Whittaker (Discussed changesets: 156) | Is ribbon an appropriate icon for oncologists within iD presets? Can you take look at https://github.com/openstreetmap/id-tagging-schema/pull/2736#issuecomment-5355985226 and judge is it working well? (alternative is to keep generic doctor ico... commented 2026-09-03 07:47:55 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 179474580 (Comments: 1) | HJUdall (Discussed changesets: 14) | Is ribbon an appropriate icon for oncologists within iD presets? Can you take look at https://github.com/openstreetmap/id-tagging-schema/pull/2736#issuecomment-5355985226 and judge is it working well? (alternative is to keep generic doctor ico... commented 2026-09-03 07:47:51 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 188308056 (Comments: 1) | MapSpot (Discussed changesets: 75) | Is ribbon an appropriate icon for oncologists within iD presets? Can you take look at https://github.com/openstreetmap/id-tagging-schema/pull/2736#issuecomment-5355985226 and judge is it working well? (alternative is to keep generic doctor ico... commented 2026-09-03 07:47:49 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
 | 58719796 (Comments: 1) | maxerickson (Discussed changesets: 34) | Is ribbon an appropriate icon for oncologists within iD presets? Can you take look at https://github.com/openstreetmap/id-tagging-schema/pull/2736#issuecomment-5355985226 and judge is it working well? (alternative is to keep generic doctor ico... commented 2026-09-03 07:47:46 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 188398230 (Comments: 1) | thetornado76 (Discussed changesets: 161) | Is ribbon an appropriate icon for oncologists within iD presets? Can you take look at https://github.com/openstreetmap/id-tagging-schema/pull/2736#issuecomment-5355985226 and judge is it working well? (alternative is to keep generic doctor ico... commented 2026-09-03 07:47:44 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| X | 188336171 (Comments: 1) | The Sovereign EMPIRE (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188456133 commented 2026-09-03 07:43:26 UTC by rajdhani ♦424 |
| 188393453 (Comments: 1) | Andrea2002j (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188455958 commented 2026-09-03 07:39:46 UTC by ajmat ♦418 |
| 188403525 (Comments: 6) | daf59 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Autant pour moi... Je n'ai pas mis de "trou" dans la zone boisée, d'où l'effet « arbre dans l'eau ». commented 2026-09-03 07:39:19 UTC by daf59 ♦1 |
| 188339027 (Comments: 1) | Kerlyni (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188455289 commented 2026-09-03 07:25:50 UTC by ajmat ♦418 |
| 27327271 (Comments: 1) | kkafp (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/316333623/history has building = home that was added in this edit is building=home a duplicate of more popular building=house ? Maybe changing to it would be fine? commented 2026-09-03 07:22:00 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 188454885 (Comments: 1) | Fischkopp0815 (Discussed changesets: 52) | ref an Trafostationen aktualisiert/ergänzt commented 2026-09-03 07:16:14 UTC by Fischkopp0815 ♦280 |
| 188451816 (Comments: 2) | floogy (Discussed changesets: 1) | I remapped these and tagged as houses. This area already has the residential boundary mapped so there is no need to add those tags to the houses. The addr:state, postcode and suburb is optional and does not need to be mapped as these are already m... commented 2026-09-03 07:14:32 UTC by nevw ♦2,320 |
| 188341788 (Comments: 1) | Yordy Romero (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188454739 commented 2026-09-03 07:11:17 UTC by rajdhani ♦424 |
| 188380230 (Comments: 1) | JOSELYN RAMIREZ (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188454648 commented 2026-09-03 07:08:25 UTC by ajmat ♦418 |
| 188454601 (Comments: 1) | voltairovicz (Discussed changesets: 279) | Link do forum: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/kategorie-drog/57996/668 commented 2026-09-03 07:06:10 UTC by voltairovicz ♦251 |
| 188385800 (Comments: 1) | Jair Elian Arias (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188454436 commented 2026-09-03 07:01:16 UTC by ajmat ♦418 |
| 172409270 (Comments: 1) | jordann6531 (Discussed changesets: 3) | When you added a separate sidewalk on the N side of Snow Hill ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1432619398 ), was there any particular reason why you drew it across, and mostly on the wrong side of, the kerb line which was already mapped? commented 2026-09-03 06:59:22 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,918 |
| 188379793 (Comments: 1) | Viviana Ortiz (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188454327 commented 2026-09-03 06:58:22 UTC by MappingMore ♦685 |
| 188351648 (Comments: 1) | Lamvanductanan (Discussed changesets: 7) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188454285 commented 2026-09-03 06:57:05 UTC by ajmat ♦418 |
| 188044254 (Comments: 5) | TMWilschut (Discussed changesets: 1) | Als bovenstaand uitgevoerd. Groet, eggie commented 2026-09-03 06:56:49 UTC by eggie ♦46,961 |
| 188389693 (Comments: 1) | dayana moreira (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188454004 commented 2026-09-03 06:50:10 UTC by rajdhani ♦424 |
| 188371162 (Comments: 1) | Antho_Mero (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188453778 commented 2026-09-03 06:42:11 UTC by MappingMore ♦685 |
| 188351985 (Comments: 1) | Lamvanductanan (Discussed changesets: 7) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188453733 commented 2026-09-03 06:39:57 UTC by ajmat ♦418 |
| X | 188411608 (Comments: 2) | AmyCupcake (Discussed changesets: 17) | thanks, first time doing a nested multi like this, so i was unsure on how best to do it, iD was not being the most cooperative commented 2026-09-03 06:39:53 UTC by AmyCupcake ♦41 |
| 187776005 (Comments: 8) | Wildsharky (Discussed changesets: 29) | Hi AgileMaster, The agreed changes have now been made. The former alignment is tagged as disused:highway=track, and we’ve also added a note mentioning that it was discontinued at the 1977 Antrim Town Meeting. This way, the histori... commented 2026-09-03 06:31:18 UTC by Wildsharky ♦926 |
| 188443403 (Comments: 1) | Wersekilth (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-09-03 06:31:05 UTC by eggie ♦46,961 |
| 188442576 (Comments: 1) | Mathijsmapt (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-09-03 06:30:23 UTC by eggie ♦46,961 |
| 188439031 (Comments: 1) | Kruin (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-09-03 06:28:40 UTC by eggie ♦46,961 |
| 188438679 (Comments: 1) | Beejeedebee (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-09-03 06:28:00 UTC by eggie ♦46,961 |
| 188303008 (Comments: 1) | JPE72 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188453270 commented 2026-09-03 06:21:00 UTC by ajmat ♦418 |
| 188448397 (Comments: 1) | Falkhorn (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, Are you sure what you saw was a Motorola ALPR? If not, then I can delete this. Thanks, BubbaJuice commented 2026-09-03 06:20:35 UTC by BubbaJuice ♦170 |
| 119970281 (Comments: 1) | brinno (Discussed changesets: 1) | Moin brinno, was genau ist das: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1053426326 ? Sieht auf dem Luftbild nach einer Brücke aus, aber Du hast Breite=0m angegeben. Viele Grüße Roger Wilco commented 2026-09-03 06:15:12 UTC by OSM_RogerWilco ♦825 |
| 188449134 (Comments: 3) | Pheonix Karnasuta (Discussed changesets: 3) | Thanks! commented 2026-09-03 06:06:00 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,812 |
| 188344214 (Comments: 2) | MacDony (Discussed changesets: 46) | Bonjour Marc, J'utilise ID et sans lien vers le segment concerné, je ne vois pas ce qui est cassé. Denis commented 2026-09-03 06:02:34 UTC by MacDony ♦39 |
| 188220835 (Comments: 1) | archpdx (Discussed changesets: 67) | Thank you for contributing to Aloha High School commented 2026-09-03 05:55:00 UTC by 9142322 ♦5 |
| 188405462 (Comments: 2) | Znaika (Discussed changesets: 51) | Danke für die Korrektur, mein Fehler. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/188405462 commented 2026-09-03 05:54:36 UTC by FroschMapper ♦5 |
| 188117688 (Comments: 6) | mcbax (Discussed changesets: 6) | OK, Vielen Dank commented 2026-09-03 05:52:32 UTC by mcbax ♦4 |
| 188405982 (Comments: 1) | Znaika (Discussed changesets: 51) | Ja, ich hatte mich auch gewundert. Das war noch aus dem bestehenden Eintrag der schon in der Bauphase erstellt wurde. Da ich nicht sicher wusste wofür die 102 Capacity stehen soll hatte ich sie sicherheitshalber dringelassen. ---<... commented 2026-09-03 05:49:50 UTC by FroschMapper ♦5 |
| 186929916 (Comments: 1) | MosheMadlan (Discussed changesets: 11) | Hi, there is no דרך תורה ועבודה nearby, can you tag appropriate street? commented 2026-09-03 05:49:33 UTC by Sanniu ♦689 |
| 187671482 (Comments: 2) | geozeisig (Discussed changesets: 345) | Im Moment ist der Status wohl im Umbruch. Ich habe den Status von Key:aeroway:model_aerodrome als in use gekennzeichnet. Aber im Prinzip gebe ich dir recht. commented 2026-09-03 05:42:16 UTC by geozeisig ♦246 |
| 86550077 (Comments: 6) | Alban37 (Discussed changesets: 13) | C’est ma circo. Je vais essayer d’y passer samedi et de faire les deux sites + verifier la chambre d’hôte commented 2026-09-03 05:27:02 UTC by Alban37 ♦8 |
| 188451890 (Comments: 1) | OMME-OSM (Discussed changesets: 75) | HACER UNA CANCHA DE BASKETBALL commented 2026-09-03 05:24:50 UTC by brillune ♦1 |
| 188438117 (Comments: 1) | ~aflojun< (Discussed changesets: 3) | DWG revert - fictitious items and personal info https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188451814 commented 2026-09-03 05:14:11 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,812 |
| 188437869 (Comments: 1) | ~aflojun< (Discussed changesets: 3) | DWG revert - fictitious items and personal info https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188451814 commented 2026-09-03 05:14:11 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,812 |
| 188437438 (Comments: 2) | ~aflojun< (Discussed changesets: 3) | DWG revert - fictitious items and personal info https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188451814 commented 2026-09-03 05:14:10 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,812 |
| 188331346 (Comments: 1) | Cristhian García (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188451660 commented 2026-09-03 05:06:39 UTC by MappingMore ♦685 |
| 188429353 (Comments: 1) | Pheonix Karnasuta (Discussed changesets: 3) | DWG revert - poor quality mapping https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188451578 commented 2026-09-03 05:01:41 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,812 |
| 188449576 (Comments: 2) | Pheonix Karnasuta (Discussed changesets: 3) | DWG revert - poor quality mapping https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188451578 commented 2026-09-03 05:01:41 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,812 |
| 188382407 (Comments: 1) | sixfoureight (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hi, your long path line Way: 1554311821 self-intersected several times with unconnected crossing points. I've corrected it; OK now. Regards Bernard. commented 2026-09-03 04:55:56 UTC by BCNorwich ♦5,356 |
 | 188433538 (Comments: 3) | RandomMapGuy (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hi Yes. That's what I mean. People documented the reasoning here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets Cheers commented 2026-09-03 04:46:08 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦4,302 |
| 188291660 (Comments: 1) | Miche_92 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188451171 commented 2026-09-03 04:44:07 UTC by ajmat ♦418 |
| 188323395 (Comments: 1) | Choupom (Discussed changesets: 3) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188450984 commented 2026-09-03 04:35:20 UTC by ajmat ♦418 |
| 188449646 (Comments: 1) | BagatelleExcess2887 (Discussed changesets: 9) | landuse* commented 2026-09-03 03:21:49 UTC by BagatelleExcess2887 ♦9 |
| 188449305 (Comments: 1) | NoctZan (Discussed changesets: 13) | Also updated dog and phone tags commented 2026-09-03 03:18:54 UTC by NoctZan ♦12 |
| 188449338 (Comments: 1) | NoctZan (Discussed changesets: 13) | Also updated dog and phone tags commented 2026-09-03 03:18:51 UTC by NoctZan ♦12 |
| 188449375 (Comments: 1) | NoctZan (Discussed changesets: 13) | Also updated dog and phone tags commented 2026-09-03 03:18:45 UTC by NoctZan ♦12 |
| 188449422 (Comments: 2) | NoctZan (Discussed changesets: 13) | Also updated dog and phone tags commented 2026-09-03 03:18:40 UTC by NoctZan ♦12 |
| 188449514 (Comments: 1) | NoctZan (Discussed changesets: 13) | Also updated dog and phone tags commented 2026-09-03 03:18:28 UTC by NoctZan ♦12 |
| 171662521 (Comments: 2) | gs3§zba (Discussed changesets: 18) | See https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q607241 "clergy house, also known as parish house" commented 2026-09-03 03:01:58 UTC by gs3§zba ♦65 |
| 188447451 (Comments: 1) | Victoria Vaca Pereira Barbieri (Discussed changesets: 1) | Gracias por tu colaboracion con el Mapa. Hemos hecho algunas correcciones. Ten en cuenta que un valor Muy Importante para el Mapa es el NUMERO de identificacion que se pregunta como addr:housenumber (ejem 123) bajo el grupo Address Saludos<... commented 2026-09-03 02:36:53 UTC by JJIglesias ♦1,565 |
| 188438573 (Comments: 1) | KaraiskakisArachova227 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21229 commented 2026-09-03 02:33:04 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,812 |
| 188337411 (Comments: 2) | captainwacky (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! I see there's some maps from USDOT and utah.gov but I'm not sure which one I could use to import as a layer into JOSM to merge in that data. I've also been making most of my edits in the iD editor so it might take me some time t... commented 2026-09-03 01:35:32 UTC by captainwacky ♦1 |
| 166767383 (Comments: 1) | thetornado76 (Discussed changesets: 161) | Do you think that https://pinhead.ink/#joint would work well to represent rheumatology in iD presets? See https://github.com/openstreetmap/id-tagging-schema/pull/2734#issuecomment-5353968217 for how it would look like in editor I am ask... commented 2026-09-03 01:19:08 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 141703407 (Comments: 1) | HJUdall (Discussed changesets: 14) | Do you think that https://pinhead.ink/#joint would work well to represent rheumatology in iD presets? See https://github.com/openstreetmap/id-tagging-schema/pull/2734#issuecomment-5353968217 for how it would look like in editor I am ask... commented 2026-09-03 01:19:06 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 141269224 (Comments: 1) | kjon (Discussed changesets: 168) | Do you think that https://pinhead.ink/#joint would work well to represent rheumatology in iD presets? See https://github.com/openstreetmap/id-tagging-schema/pull/2734#issuecomment-5353968217 for how it would look like in editor I am ask... commented 2026-09-03 01:19:03 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 168392404 (Comments: 1) | Valery Visciglia Aleinik 244854 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Do you think that https://pinhead.ink/#joint would work well to represent rheumatology in iD presets? See https://github.com/openstreetmap/id-tagging-schema/pull/2734#issuecomment-5353968217 for how it would look like in editor I am ask... commented 2026-09-03 01:19:00 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 144998338 (Comments: 1) | ygorre (Discussed changesets: 7) | Do you think that https://pinhead.ink/#joint would work well to represent rheumatology in iD presets? See https://github.com/openstreetmap/id-tagging-schema/pull/2734#issuecomment-5353968217 for how it would look like in editor I am ask... commented 2026-09-03 01:18:55 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 167584789 (Comments: 1) | TheDutchMan13 (Discussed changesets: 220) | Do you think that https://pinhead.ink/#joint would work well to represent rheumatology in iD presets? See https://github.com/openstreetmap/id-tagging-schema/pull/2734#issuecomment-5353968217 for how it would look like in editor I am ask... commented 2026-09-03 01:18:53 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 141886909 (Comments: 1) | Kovirii (Discussed changesets: 33) | Do you think that https://pinhead.ink/#joint would work well to represent rheumatology in iD presets? See https://github.com/openstreetmap/id-tagging-schema/pull/2734#issuecomment-5353968217 for how it would look like in editor I am ask... commented 2026-09-03 01:18:51 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 169332114 (Comments: 1) | Sukkoria (Discussed changesets: 4) | Do you think that https://pinhead.ink/#joint would work well to represent rheumatology in iD presets? See https://github.com/openstreetmap/id-tagging-schema/pull/2734#issuecomment-5353968217 for how it would look like in editor I am ask... commented 2026-09-03 01:18:49 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 75097104 (Comments: 1) | Clemclar (Discussed changesets: 3) | Do you think that https://pinhead.ink/#joint would work well to represent rheumatology in iD presets? See https://github.com/openstreetmap/id-tagging-schema/pull/2734#issuecomment-5353968217 for how it would look like in editor I am ask... commented 2026-09-03 01:18:47 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 115656713 (Comments: 1) | WAM_SNZ144_ZCH (Discussed changesets: 26) | Do you think that https://pinhead.ink/#joint would work well to represent rheumatology in iD presets? See https://github.com/openstreetmap/id-tagging-schema/pull/2734#issuecomment-5353968217 for how it would look like in editor I am ask... commented 2026-09-03 01:18:41 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 139658723 (Comments: 1) | rene78 (Discussed changesets: 125) | Do you think that https://pinhead.ink/#joint would work well to represent rheumatology in iD presets? See https://github.com/openstreetmap/id-tagging-schema/pull/2734#issuecomment-5353968217 for how it would look like in editor I am ask... commented 2026-09-03 01:18:39 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 74274166 (Comments: 1) | Spoony (Discussed changesets: 8) | Do you think that https://pinhead.ink/#joint would work well to represent rheumatology in iD presets? See https://github.com/openstreetmap/id-tagging-schema/pull/2734#issuecomment-5353968217 for how it would look like in editor I am ask... commented 2026-09-03 01:18:37 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 177728516 (Comments: 1) | mapperich (Discussed changesets: 40) | Do you think that https://pinhead.ink/#joint would work well to represent rheumatology in iD presets? See https://github.com/openstreetmap/id-tagging-schema/pull/2734#issuecomment-5353968217 for how it would look like in editor I am ask... commented 2026-09-03 01:18:32 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 112070690 (Comments: 1) | Novosalus (Discussed changesets: 1) | Do you think that https://pinhead.ink/#joint would work well to represent rheumatology in iD presets? See https://github.com/openstreetmap/id-tagging-schema/pull/2734#issuecomment-5353968217 for how it would look like in editor I am ask... commented 2026-09-03 01:18:25 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 158077484 (Comments: 1) | Yui2 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Do you think that https://pinhead.ink/#joint would work well to represent rheumatology in iD presets? See https://github.com/openstreetmap/id-tagging-schema/pull/2734#issuecomment-5353968217 for how it would look like in editor I am ask... commented 2026-09-03 01:18:23 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 180237681 (Comments: 1) | Brian'sPants (Discussed changesets: 4) | Do you think that https://pinhead.ink/#joint would work well to represent rheumatology in iD presets? See https://github.com/openstreetmap/id-tagging-schema/pull/2734#issuecomment-5353968217 for how it would look like in editor I am ask... commented 2026-09-03 01:18:20 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 32302865 (Comments: 1) | NZGraham (Discussed changesets: 3) | Do you think that https://pinhead.ink/#joint would work well to represent rheumatology in iD presets? See https://github.com/openstreetmap/id-tagging-schema/pull/2734#issuecomment-5353968217 for how it would look like in editor I am ask... commented 2026-09-03 01:18:13 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 188352605 (Comments: 1) | llemington (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello llemington, just letting you know that adding the postcode to a feature is optional in Australia as we have various postcode boundaries that will automatically fill these in. You don't need to specify them in Every Door. commented 2026-09-03 01:16:38 UTC by Joel Koen ♦62 |
| 150013617 (Comments: 3) | bruceas (Discussed changesets: 5) | This location is in Australia - so I guess the "u" wins. :) And from my recollection when I was there a couple of years ago - there was ... "a decorative wooden/metal archway used to ... create a welcoming entrance or passageway&quo... commented 2026-09-03 01:01:44 UTC by bruceas ♦4 |
| 187165682 (Comments: 1) | Kugelbaum (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hello! Can you take look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5495986 ? commented 2026-09-03 00:53:57 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 141363049 (Comments: 1) | harshanimadu (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1208395826/history has building = home that was added in this edit is building=home a duplicate of more popular building=house ? Maybe changing to it would be fine? commented 2026-09-03 00:52:15 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 141713659 (Comments: 1) | MHF HIFLA (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1189115482/history has building = home that was added in this edit is building=home a duplicate of more popular building=house ? Maybe changing to it would be fine? commented 2026-09-03 00:52:12 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 162166681 (Comments: 1) | kittttt (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1356925827/history has building = home that was added in this edit is building=home a duplicate of more popular building=house ? Maybe changing to it would be fine? commented 2026-09-03 00:51:46 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 168545816 (Comments: 1) | tastycrackers (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1412641184/history has building = home that was added in this edit is building=home a duplicate of more popular building=house ? Maybe changing to it would be fine? commented 2026-09-03 00:51:43 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 161055362 (Comments: 1) | Theopensky (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1348983538/history has building = home that was added in this edit is building=home a duplicate of more popular building=house ? Maybe changing to it would be fine? commented 2026-09-03 00:51:41 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 188446464 (Comments: 1) | deepmind0804 (Discussed changesets: 1) | My first contribution, go easy on me commented 2026-09-03 00:32:41 UTC by deepmind0804 ♦1 |
| 188446238 (Comments: 1) | BubbaJuice (Discussed changesets: 81) | Based on survey. commented 2026-09-03 00:17:26 UTC by BubbaJuice ♦170 |
| 188444976 (Comments: 1) | Djdunord993 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello "Brussels environnement" is an invented name. Make sure to always use the official name. This keep the OSM database consistent, we need this to query all the objects run by the same operator. The name used everywhere on... commented 2026-09-03 00:09:57 UTC by bxl-forever ♦3,058 |
| 188445457 (Comments: 1) | Djdunord993 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Bonjour et bienvenue sur OSM. Attention : sur OpenStreetMap les tags sont toujours en anglais, pas en français. Mercredi se dit Wednesday → "We" dans les opening hours. Ne pas ajouter des doublons d'adr... commented 2026-09-02 23:56:13 UTC by bxl-forever ♦3,058 |
| 188419374 (Comments: 2) | Oregonian3 (Discussed changesets: 47) | It completes the loop, but what two cities does this actually form the "best" connection between? If someone is going to Golden from Broomfield I'd wager that most people would take I-25 to I-76 to I-70 rather than taking Highway 128 t... commented 2026-09-02 23:34:05 UTC by Oregonian3 ♦60 |
| 188151626 (Comments: 1) | neuhausr (Discussed changesets: 17) | I've had adding this building on my to-do list, so thanks for adding it! I've cleaned it up a bit in changeset/188445314 commented 2026-09-02 23:27:29 UTC by O1S ♦34 |
| 188171995 (Comments: 1) | RandomThighsEnjoyer (Discussed changesets: 19) | Hi, folgende Flächen hast du als Reitanlagen getaggt: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1553313230 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1553313231 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1553313233 Das sind aber keine Reitanlagen im Si... commented 2026-09-02 23:14:51 UTC by Hufkratzer ♦910 |
| 178843386 (Comments: 2) | m86 (Discussed changesets: 35) | Yes - it looks good. commented 2026-09-02 22:52:05 UTC by m86 ♦22 |
| 180424307 (Comments: 3) | geometrix (Discussed changesets: 1) | As the more local, would you like to delete the other OSM node for the same camera now? (Sounds like you'll be checking all 6; news says 4 including this one gone already and last 2 on sep 8 and 9, I think.) commented 2026-09-02 22:35:04 UTC by gdt ♦59 |
| 152565678 (Comments: 1) | aduxas (Discussed changesets: 12) | In OSM, access=private indicates a legal restriction on public access and should only be added when supported by verifiable evidence, such as gates, access control, “No Trespassing” signs, or other documented restrictions. In instances wh... commented 2026-09-02 22:20:40 UTC by StreetSurveyor ♦188 |
| 188341556 (Comments: 2) | emeadows (Discussed changesets: 2) | capture_date_range is a field brought in via Microsoft Building footprints. It is automatically tagged when using the AI generated building footprints. In this case the footprints were generated from aerials captured from 6/1/2018-7/31/2018. I do not... commented 2026-09-02 22:12:10 UTC by emeadows ♦2 |
| 147192307 (Comments: 2) | Herzi Pinki (Discussed changesets: 10) | thanks for pointing it out. Don't remember. Read docu and changed to presbytery. commented 2026-09-02 22:10:47 UTC by Herzi Pinki ♦10 |
| 188395926 (Comments: 4) | Aringa Ora (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hello! thanks for your control and explaination - I will keep using that practice in streets like that one commented 2026-09-02 21:56:49 UTC by Aringa Ora ♦2 |
| X | 188439234 (Comments: 4) | Totalmedx (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted. If @Totalmedx still wishes to add their business to the map, they must do so without replacing any others, especially those that aren't in Saint Petersburg, Florida. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188442812 commented 2026-09-02 21:50:43 UTC by Aethonatic ♦81 |
| 187418586 (Comments: 2) | hhartsoe (Discussed changesets: 6) | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IV2H7eZ5-Mc commented 2026-09-02 21:49:50 UTC by hhartsoe ♦2 |
| 184201595 (Comments: 9) | OpenStreetGoober (Discussed changesets: 1) | Good catches, those are no longer under construction. I will remove those tags. Thank you! commented 2026-09-02 21:49:21 UTC by OpenStreetGoober ♦1 |
| 186091374 (Comments: 1) | Rola_PL (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/303168617/history has building = parish that was added in this edit what was meant by building=parish ? commented 2026-09-02 21:46:43 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 14121266 (Comments: 1) | Walter Schlögl (Discussed changesets: 72) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/165491529/history has building = parish that was added in this edit what was meant by building=parish ? commented 2026-09-02 21:46:40 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 132088234 (Comments: 1) | mk2k22 (Discussed changesets: 22) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/197392557/history has building = parish that was added in this edit what was meant by building=parish ? commented 2026-09-02 21:46:36 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 131976472 (Comments: 1) | rokeg (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/200083361/history has building = parish that was added in this edit what was meant by building=parish ? commented 2026-09-02 21:46:26 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 188073751 (Comments: 1) | Alexis Xicón (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1494499015/history has building = parish that was added in this edit what was meant by building=parish ? commented 2026-09-02 21:46:18 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 102447205 (Comments: 1) | solenoid jam (Discussed changesets: 180) | hello! Can you take look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5495708 ? commented 2026-09-02 21:46:08 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 188437069 (Comments: 1) | Mich2019 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola el tag ya estaba agregado (name="..."). Todas las etiquetas en Openstreetmap se escriben en inglés por lo tanto no existe la etiqueta "nombre". Revisa esta página te ayudara a aprender más sobre como ... commented 2026-09-02 21:43:43 UTC by Eduardo17172 ♦22 |
| 188441632 (Comments: 2) | Rubenke (Discussed changesets: 79) | Die heb ik dan ook niet verwijderd en staan er nog gewoon in commented 2026-09-02 21:42:46 UTC by Rubenke ♦54 |
| 188399894 (Comments: 3) | Liongrass (Discussed changesets: 5) | Thank you for the explanation and for fixing it Leo! Edwin commented 2026-09-02 21:41:21 UTC by Comino ♦401 |
| 172473220 (Comments: 1) | Lola Fox (Discussed changesets: 27) | Ciao Lola Fox, sono state create due note riguardo dei passaggi a livello che hai mappati. Riusciresti a dare riscontro all'utente? Grazie! https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5478403 commented 2026-09-02 21:36:07 UTC by ivanbranco ♦2,936 |
| 176998269 (Comments: 1) | Peter Hanecak (Discussed changesets: 14) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/892546853/history has demolished:building = 33 that was added in this edit What this tag means? Numeric value is unexpected here and it is unclear what it means commented 2026-09-02 21:30:54 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 187454944 (Comments: 3) | Loopslol7 (Discussed changesets: 16) | absolutely no problem, these kind of typo is easy to spot commented 2026-09-02 21:30:47 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 176199893 (Comments: 2) | Wilmer Osario (Discussed changesets: 58) | Hi, thanks for letting me know. I'll fix it 😅. commented 2026-09-02 21:30:09 UTC by Wilmer Osario ♦219 |
| 185695274 (Comments: 3) | Peter-OG-C (Discussed changesets: 1) | Weil die offizielle Bezeichnung "Bahnstrecke Brackwede–Osnabrück" ist. "Haller Willem" bezieht sich eher auf die Zugverbindung/Relation RB75. Wie willst die Namensgebung konsequent weiter fortführen wo mehr... commented 2026-09-02 21:26:45 UTC by DeFra85 ♦298 |
| 188390407 (Comments: 1) | fark_ozdmr924 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Merhaba. Değişikliklerinize hiçbir açıklama yazmadan bazı doğa koruma alanlarını silmişsiniz. Bu alanların bu niteliklerinin kaldırıldığına dair bir kaynak bulamadım. Lütfen gerçeğe aykırı değişiklikler y... commented 2026-09-02 21:13:06 UTC by HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi ♦267 |
| 179467205 (Comments: 3) | cuzi (Discussed changesets: 29) | Okay, thanks for confirming! Happy mapping! commented 2026-09-02 20:59:16 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,008 |
| 187941674 (Comments: 3) | Vektor_567 (Discussed changesets: 88) | hängt zusammen mit Anpassung von Gebäuden. Falls der Kapuzinerberg ein Import war, soll der Import wiederhergestellt werden. war er kein Import, sehe ich darin jetzt kein Drama. War zwischen Hoher Weg und Eberhard-Fugger-Straße am Fu... commented 2026-09-02 20:51:56 UTC by Vektor_567 ♦79 |
| 185997946 (Comments: 1) | Żakub (Discussed changesets: 3) | T6? A nie T2? commented 2026-09-02 20:43:49 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 188436174 (Comments: 3) | Dogann (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thank you! Happy mapping :) commented 2026-09-02 20:31:33 UTC by PattaFeuFeu ♦21 |
| 188396089 (Comments: 2) | thatonedoge (Discussed changesets: 2) | they're owned by Crossroads, although i haven't been able to get them to admit that yet. Scheels has told me over the phone that they don't own them. thanks for keeping the map accurate with me :) if you are able to confirm ownership, ... commented 2026-09-02 20:30:49 UTC by thatonedoge ♦3 |
| 184893729 (Comments: 1) | lee_bei (Discussed changesets: 7) | This changeset has created a series of POIs with names "Level 1 - *". Is this the actual name as on the ground or an attempt to indicate the POI is on level 1? If the later "Level 1 - " should be removed form the name and level=... commented 2026-09-02 20:30:29 UTC by ralley ♦650 |
| 188379037 (Comments: 1) | Cat_Mac (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hey, welcome to Open Street Map! I'd just like to draw your attention to some house numbers you've added. You have put them in "name", but there is a dedicated tag for house numbers which is "addr:housenumber". Just thou... commented 2026-09-02 20:29:07 UTC by Jack_Regan ♦3 |
| 141003009 (Comments: 3) | okwithmydecay (Discussed changesets: 40) | I am a bit surprised that arbour counts as a building or is this one more buildingy? commented 2026-09-02 20:23:54 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 85100849 (Comments: 3) | KiaaTiX (Discussed changesets: 200) | Heb de fixme verwijderd. Paden zijn duidelijk zichtbaar op luchtfoto's. Vanaf de poort aan de Gossecstraat is een deel van de paden ook echt zichtbaar. commented 2026-09-02 20:23:17 UTC by donux-nl ♦31 |
| 188437728 (Comments: 1) | OhHiNoU (Discussed changesets: 1) | Is this a real camera? commented 2026-09-02 20:11:33 UTC by DividedFrame ♦5 |
| 188436620 (Comments: 1) | chr_jorgensen (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hej. Undlad venligst at tilføje adresseoplysninger på dine redigeringer. Adresser importeres og vedligeholdes automatisk, på separate punkter, fra Danmarks Adresseregister. På forhånd tak. commented 2026-09-02 20:08:31 UTC by osmviborg ♦1,904 |
| 186621937 (Comments: 1) | Globetrotter118 (Discussed changesets: 50) | Hi, what is that "Dragon attraction" again ? And you should not describe the bus into the name of a bus stop. It seems the whole stop was nonsense, someone else already deleted it. commented 2026-09-02 19:59:37 UTC by aceman444 ♦3,011 |
| 186127712 (Comments: 1) | Globetrotter118 (Discussed changesets: 50) | Thanks, however this is not how you make a wall painting. This is no attraction, you put tourism=artwork and artwork_type=painting . And you put real name into the 'name' tag, not your personal description of the object. Anyway, the paintin... commented 2026-09-02 19:57:15 UTC by aceman444 ♦3,011 |
| 188437231 (Comments: 1) | SilviaCremia (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ciao Silvia, Ci sarebbero da inserire altre informazioni su questo B&B. Tipo accessibilità, tipi di pagenti, immagini, pagina instagram, contatti come numero di telefono e-mail ecc. Prendi ad esempio questo appartamento che ... commented 2026-09-02 19:47:50 UTC by Gh0stz0x ♦351 |
| 55449689 (Comments: 1) | Biker69 (Discussed changesets: 45) | Hi, wenn ich das richtig sehe sind durch deine Bearbeitung an der Tegernseer Hütte die Tags restaurant und alpine_hut verloren gegangen? commented 2026-09-02 19:41:56 UTC by chris66 ♦501 |
| 188352019 (Comments: 2) | Jaldert (Discussed changesets: 1) | Wanneer het te overzien is sluiten we geen wegen af. Beetje twijfelgeval om het met conditional te taggen. . commented 2026-09-02 19:33:41 UTC by eggie ♦46,961 |
| 188425511 (Comments: 1) | rolfdieter (Discussed changesets: 15) | Moin :) hast du sehr genaue GPX-tracks oder Luftbilder, die ich nicht kenne? Wenn nicht, sollte mein fixme=imprecise noch nicht entfernt werden, da du an der Präzision nichts geändert hast und auch keine neuen Quellen vorhande... commented 2026-09-02 19:33:31 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦4,302 |
| 188437581 (Comments: 1) | osmmapper222 (Discussed changesets: 73) | @Nortix08 dies könnte für Wikipedia / Wikidata von Interesse sein. commented 2026-09-02 19:32:44 UTC by osmmapper222 ♦113 |
| 160765836 (Comments: 4) | hulk77 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Rendben, köszi hogy megnézted. commented 2026-09-02 19:31:19 UTC by AndreasTUHU ♦73 |
| 188188149 (Comments: 6) | AnHub426 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Old_name:de = Worms in Veltlin is correct as I assume that Old means the name which was used ages before. What I wanted to change was the name:de attribute. And this was not changed to Bormio as far as I can see right now. commented 2026-09-02 19:25:54 UTC by AnHub426 ♦1 |
| 173002614 (Comments: 1) | Popolon (Discussed changesets: 38) | Bonjour Popolon, J'ai des interrogations sur tes modifications de lanes, comme celle-ci : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/61689900 Tu as ajouté un turn:lanes:forward alors que c'est un sens unique ! Celle-ci : https... commented 2026-09-02 19:25:09 UTC by Le Petit Léo ♦34 |
| 188437144 (Comments: 1) | Friendly_Ghost (Discussed changesets: 184) | Incorrect comment. Should be "updating buildings & streets". commented 2026-09-02 19:22:23 UTC by Friendly_Ghost ♦661 |
| 187729326 (Comments: 2) | Aleksandar Matejevic (Discussed changesets: 91) | Hi ZeLonewolf, if you were referring to https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1887736 it is now fixed, thanks for the input. Happy mapping, Aleksandar Matejevic commented 2026-09-02 19:17:59 UTC by Aleksandar Matejevic ♦239 |
| 188241145 (Comments: 3) | 544848455241 (Discussed changesets: 11) | revertiert mit cs188436542 LG commented 2026-09-02 19:07:49 UTC by welzheimerwald ♦107 |
| 188412830 (Comments: 4) | Yog Sot (Discussed changesets: 111) | generalnie wszystkie argumenty za i przeciw są znane. Ja się zamierzam zaangazować w zbudowanie odpowiednich tagów i odpowiednie renderowanie. W końcu do tego dojdzie, może nie szybko, ale może prędzej jak odpowiednie osoby się... commented 2026-09-02 19:05:54 UTC by Yog Sot ♦556 |
| 188036435 (Comments: 1) | Joshua Leclair (Discussed changesets: 1) | I do not believe this is accurate. There is no flock camera at this location on the side of the highway. There is no building or business here and Michigan is not putting up 1 camera in the middle of nowhere for some random reason. This Joshua person... commented 2026-09-02 19:02:06 UTC by A Michigan Resident ♦1 |
| 183783199 (Comments: 1) | PlainJane999 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM; I see you are pretty new. In june you added an ALPR here, and there is also one added in March: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180424307#map=19/42.556006/-71.485602&layers=N It seems likely there is only 1 c... commented 2026-09-02 19:00:52 UTC by gdt ♦59 |
| 187608410 (Comments: 1) | Jer spark (Discussed changesets: 1) | This is not a Flock ALPR camera. This is a Frost Solutions weather monitoring camera. https://www.frostsolutions.io/mini-weather-station commented 2026-09-02 19:00:02 UTC by McDreimiller ♦2 |
| 188424762 (Comments: 2) | i4Mark (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bitte schau auch wegen der Adressdublette an https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/42463043 bzw. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/42463042 commented 2026-09-02 18:59:24 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,614 |
| 163625803 (Comments: 3) | Karol1310 (Discussed changesets: 14) | A jak https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12663407810 istnieje i ten import nie łamał licencji - to trzeba będzie nazwy oprawić na prawdziwe i zdjąć kody z nazw commented 2026-09-02 18:53:45 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 160972677 (Comments: 1) | oncemore (Discussed changesets: 4) | 哪来的路？ commented 2026-09-02 18:51:25 UTC by 旧加卷 ♦94 |
| 163626663 (Comments: 1) | Karol1310 (Discussed changesets: 14) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12663412946/history w OSM nie dodajemy rzeczy które nie istnieją już commented 2026-09-02 18:48:42 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 139498497 (Comments: 3) | geogidon (Discussed changesets: 38) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188435531 commented 2026-09-02 18:44:19 UTC by hatul ♦520 |
| 187593284 (Comments: 4) | niggi_over9000 (Discussed changesets: 10) | Great, I will do the changes, thanks for the confirmation :) commented 2026-09-02 18:36:04 UTC by Joxit ♦9 |
| 188424506 (Comments: 15) | Wim52 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Volgens mij is het allemaal oke nu. commented 2026-09-02 18:23:29 UTC by eggie ♦46,961 |
| 187810783 (Comments: 2) | lukepfarrar (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, I haven't passed again yet to check I have it correct. Will get a photo the next time I'm there. commented 2026-09-02 18:22:52 UTC by lukepfarrar ♦1 |
| 188274147 (Comments: 1) | CAPT JB (Discussed changesets: 1) | Does the shed really have an address? The address you added looks the same as the one on the house. commented 2026-09-02 18:20:19 UTC by pwbriggs ♦470 |
| 187110962 (Comments: 3) | josmougn (Discussed changesets: 88) | Could you explain what these tags mean? "BOYSHP" or "topmar" are not used in any other place. commented 2026-09-02 18:16:40 UTC by mueschel ♦7,309 |
| 188427768 (Comments: 1) | jkrift (Discussed changesets: 6) | looking at this ALPR on various aerial imagery in iD it seems to be within the road area, being positioned like this is highly unlikely so please double check the position of this ALPR and fix it. Happy mapping, Udar. commented 2026-09-02 18:16:23 UTC by Udarian ♦918 |
| 188427603 (Comments: 1) | jkrift (Discussed changesets: 6) | looking at this ALPR on various aerial imagery in iD it seems to be within the road area, being positioned like this is highly unlikely so please double check the position of this ALPR and fix it. Happy mapping, Udar. commented 2026-09-02 18:15:20 UTC by Udarian ♦918 |
| 188065370 (Comments: 5) | ivanruiz (Discussed changesets: 14) | Em sembla bé, si ho pots corregir t'ho agraeixo. commented 2026-09-02 18:14:54 UTC by ivanruiz ♦14 |
| 188420219 (Comments: 7) | Vektor_567 (Discussed changesets: 88) | Die Position beider Wege/Stiegen ist korrekt. Nach dem basemap Orthofoto. habe gesehen, dass dort Mapbox Satellit genauer ist. werde ich mir anschauen. Stimmt schon, dass der Parkplatz nicht stimmt, da nur einseitig. Ich glaube nicht, dass ich den Pa... commented 2026-09-02 18:05:25 UTC by Vektor_567 ♦79 |
| 188404874 (Comments: 2) | musvida (Discussed changesets: 1) | Sok tau commented 2026-09-02 18:03:55 UTC by musvida ♦1 |
| 188382349 (Comments: 1) | thisisfranklin (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks for the contribution! The format +1-206-322-1717 is correct here in OpenStreetMap. I changed it back. commented 2026-09-02 18:00:14 UTC by pwbriggs ♦470 |
| 187801046 (Comments: 4) | Vektor_567 (Discussed changesets: 88) | ich weiß jetzt nicht, welche Gebäude in diesem Changelog dabei sind, aber ich habe in dieser Gegend einiges ergänzt wie Una's Genusswelt, Neustart, etc. Wo besteht da eine Notwendigkeit etwas zu reverten? Was soll am Kapuzinerber... commented 2026-09-02 17:57:00 UTC by Vektor_567 ♦79 |
| 188432420 (Comments: 4) | dvdhoven (Discussed changesets: 253) | Top! commented 2026-09-02 17:56:28 UTC by eggie ♦46,961 |
| 188432694 (Comments: 1) | Wim52 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hoi... Zo kan het, maar het is gebruikelijk om het als vlak te taggen. Ik zet jou info even over op een vlak en dan 'moet 'je maar even kijken. Paar keer CTRL-F5 voor het effect. Mapse commented 2026-09-02 17:54:31 UTC by eggie ♦46,961 |
| 188412483 (Comments: 1) | Userinexile (Discussed changesets: 14) | 镇明路感觉还是可以给二级的吧 commented 2026-09-02 17:54:16 UTC by minusmajorityhh ♦18 |
| 179155730 (Comments: 3) | gpserror (Discussed changesets: 61) | no, Carto is not influenced by that this is purely about how it shows up in editor commented 2026-09-02 17:54:01 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 188270292 (Comments: 1) | Mateusz Konieczny (Discussed changesets: 638) | mapped from the Eiffel Tower :) commented 2026-09-02 17:51:04 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 188427424 (Comments: 1) | wheelmap_visitor (Discussed changesets: 116) | I’m not sure I understand. This should be visible from the sidewalk? commented 2026-09-02 17:45:43 UTC by Ltrlg ♦241 |
 | 188214663 (Comments: 5) | mos_next_door (Discussed changesets: 7) | Agree, this tagging would be ideal. I'll retag if I find an end date somewhere. The news says 18 months but I'm not sure roads will be closed for the full term bc this is not roadworks only https://en.philenews.com/local/strovolos-historic-... commented 2026-09-02 17:39:05 UTC by mos_next_door ♦47 |
| 164121879 (Comments: 2) | Powlii (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, das scheint dann ein versehen gewesen zu sein. Ich werde es abändern. commented 2026-09-02 17:37:05 UTC by Powlii ♦1 |
| 188381638 (Comments: 1) | Suvai Kitchen UG (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo! Sind die veganen Gericht auch in der Karte als vegane Gerichte gekennzeichnet? Viele Grüße Roger Wilco commented 2026-09-02 17:31:24 UTC by OSM_RogerWilco ♦825 |
| 188424698 (Comments: 1) | GERARDOSANTAFE (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola! buenas tardes! quería comentarte que entre las convenciones de OpenStreetMap está la de no utilizar abreviaturas en los nombres. Voy a cambiar el de la avenida. Y te consulto sobre el nombre C. Ceibos. ¿Qué significa... commented 2026-09-02 17:27:03 UTC by AndresDuhour ♦163 |
| 188431288 (Comments: 1) | LITO 75 (Discussed changesets: 7) | La nuova segnaletica orizzontale disegnata dal comune impone la rampa di sola uscita, l'ingresso nel parcheggio si effettua quindi obbligatoriamente passando sul marciapiede a raso presente sul lato opposto. commented 2026-09-02 17:23:26 UTC by LITO 75 ♦8 |
| 188431315 (Comments: 1) | m787 (Discussed changesets: 3) | ääh commented 2026-09-02 17:23:08 UTC by m787 ♦3 |
| 138500802 (Comments: 2) | Kurosawa06 (Discussed changesets: 19) | Bonjour, En effet, je viens de corriger. Cdt commented 2026-09-02 17:20:51 UTC by Kurosawa06 ♦21 |
| 186075853 (Comments: 2) | Waaslander (Discussed changesets: 57) | Ik heb het rudimentair gereconstrueerd aan de hand van een MER kaartbijlage commented 2026-09-02 17:18:37 UTC by Waaslander ♦66 |
| 188415899 (Comments: 1) | Rayİst (Discussed changesets: 1) | Merhaba bu alan tarım alanıysa lütfen landuse=farmland etiketi girin. Mevcut kullandığınız etiket ticari bölge/çarşı anlamına gelmektedir. Lütfen trafolara ve gayriresmi yollara isim (örn. Evlerin ve arsanın aras... commented 2026-09-02 17:18:32 UTC by marmara_editor ♦15 |
| 183208454 (Comments: 1) | SaPatz (Discussed changesets: 11) | Die Orientierung im Ortsteil Venekoten erfolgt meistens über die Nummerierung der Stichwege. Diese Aussage ging durch die Umbenennung verloren. commented 2026-09-02 17:02:13 UTC by Z-Net ♦4 |
| 188430434 (Comments: 1) | onlyJak0b (Discussed changesets: 1) | *add path iD did an autocomplete while I click un upload :/ commented 2026-09-02 16:58:52 UTC by onlyJak0b ♦1 |
| 188305470 (Comments: 1) | nbargolf (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hey nbar, I noticed your changes on this course, and I see that they can use a lot of improvement. Take a look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1553866095 for instance. Granted, the satellite imagery and course quality is really low for th... commented 2026-09-02 16:56:23 UTC by b-jazz ♦942 |
| 188370722 (Comments: 1) | Agustín! (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hola! Antes que nada te felicito por el detalle que estás agregando al mapa! Te hice unas correcciones teniendo en cuenta las etiquetas y convenciones utilizadas en la comunidad. Por ejemplo el nombre. Corresponde usar name="Municipalidad... commented 2026-09-02 16:52:10 UTC by AndresDuhour ♦163 |
| 188416809 (Comments: 1) | tooeasy (Discussed changesets: 6) | because half of the lehigh valley wasn't mapped properly until this decade commented 2026-09-02 16:50:53 UTC by dmjab13 ♦143 |
| 188407285 (Comments: 3) | brsh (Discussed changesets: 1) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188429714 commented 2026-09-02 16:49:58 UTC by brsh ♦1 |
| 188423778 (Comments: 1) | opendcc (Discussed changesets: 148) | Grüß dich. Bei diesem Winzling hier braucht's bitte noch ne Optimierung hinsichtlich Radl: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1554530226 commented 2026-09-02 16:47:42 UTC by Geo-Tobi ♦315 |
 | 57988567 (Comments: 4) | unmaperomas (Discussed changesets: 54) | max gpain, de acuerdo commented 2026-09-02 16:47:27 UTC by carfog81 ♦142 |
| 187914091 (Comments: 9) | aachso (Discussed changesets: 32) | Die Sperrung des Bürgersteigs/Radwegs ist nun auch Thema in der Aachener Zeitung vom 03.09. Die Stadt stellt hier klar, dass Radfahrer vorerst die Franzstraße bergauf nicht benutzen dürfen - auch nicht auf der Straße. Die Umleit... commented 2026-09-02 16:39:56 UTC by aixbrick ♦933 |
| 104334685 (Comments: 2) | FM2441 (Discussed changesets: 98) | Beste Peter, Dank voor de mail. Mijn bron (NWB) heb ik er bij gepakt en heet het fietspad Boezemkade. Ik weet niet of het een foutje is geweest, is best lang geleden, kan ook dat de NWB is aangepast. Voor nu is het aangepast in Boezemka... commented 2026-09-02 16:37:56 UTC by FM2441 ♦47 |
| 187716608 (Comments: 1) | Paul Scriven (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hi Paul, In this changeset you added the tag: * defibrillator:location="is there a defibrillator or just a bl ed kit?" to the amenity=defibrillator node at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/14018174476 which you had pr... commented 2026-09-02 16:36:54 UTC by Robert Whittaker ♦341 |
| 188171540 (Comments: 2) | SpecializedRider (Discussed changesets: 18) | Just convert the imagery link on the page into a TMS link commented 2026-09-02 16:36:05 UTC by SpecializedRider ♦25 |
| 188349124 (Comments: 2) | Olifc (Discussed changesets: 23) | nemapuj od oka, zase jsi udelal dalnici ze silnice, ktera dalnice neni https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188428600 commented 2026-09-02 16:23:53 UTC by Piskvor ♦512 |
| 188219461 (Comments: 1) | scdhin (Discussed changesets: 25) | OSM is only for mapping what is actually on the ground. The camera no longer exists so has been deleted. commented 2026-09-02 16:21:42 UTC by SpecializedRider ♦25 |
| 188287736 (Comments: 2) | OkeechobeeLake (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello MiLorde, Thanks for reaching out! The imagery I cited in my changeset is from August 2026 and shows vehicles using both these sections of road. Apple has an agreement with Vantor to use their more recent imagery to edit OpenStreetMap, which... commented 2026-09-02 16:17:25 UTC by OkeechobeeLake ♦1 |
| 187977088 (Comments: 3) | [at]AJYTO (Discussed changesets: 6) | Sepertinya kamu gak nangkep komentar saya. Bangunan2 di sini terlihat telah memiliki addr:housenumber, jadi apakah itu riil? Bila tidak ya sebaiknya jangan dikasih dulu. Lebih baik gunakan OSM Notes untuk yang masih indikatif. Serta, bisa bol... commented 2026-09-02 16:13:45 UTC by FajrAl ♦757 |
| 187956513 (Comments: 2) | Kirstukas (Discussed changesets: 17) | Manyčiau geriau viską turėti pagal faktą. Šiaip kažkada reikės užvesti diskusiją dėl kitų miestų gatvių žymėjimo, nes ten iš vis belekaip commented 2026-09-02 16:06:12 UTC by Kirstukas ♦14 |
| 187799875 (Comments: 2) | Access Claims (komoot) (Discussed changesets: 94) | Thank you for looking into this. We'll keep this approach for future cases. commented 2026-09-02 16:06:05 UTC by Access Claims (komoot) ♦84 |
| 188371022 (Comments: 16) | AJCHurkens (Discussed changesets: 7) | De lus is in feite een (overbodige maar mooie) omweg (linksom de kerk, niet rechtsom zoals in de huidige versie 14). Wanneer we de kerk (3398620620) als knooppunt toevoegen, dan hebben we in feite routes 55-kerk en 67-kerk die zonder problemen afzond... commented 2026-09-02 16:02:14 UTC by AJCHurkens ♦8 |
| 188426999 (Comments: 1) | Vektor_567 (Discussed changesets: 88) | es ging mir hierbei weniger um den Baum, als zu schauen ob Vespucci funktioniert commented 2026-09-02 16:00:08 UTC by Vektor_567 ♦79 |
| 188421796 (Comments: 1) | Anna_C_ (Discussed changesets: 1) | Se sei d'accordo, più che cancellare il NAME ed abbreviarlo, io il nome lungo lo metterei nel tag official name. Va bene ? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/188421796 |
| 185113989 (Comments: 2) | emmelcee (Discussed changesets: 2) | A little late, but, hello :) commented 2026-09-02 15:52:52 UTC by emmelcee ♦1 |
| 188420422 (Comments: 1) | lucia rigonat (Discussed changesets: 4) | Attenzione che hai "stirato" troppo un angolo di questo edificio e lo stesso ora è finito sotto (o sopra) l'altro edificio adiacente sovrapponendosi. Non va bene, da sistemare --- Pu... commented 2026-09-02 15:52:39 UTC by fabiotofy ♦325 |
| 188364687 (Comments: 4) | geozeisig (Discussed changesets: 345) | Danke für die Hilfe. Wo genau du Änderungen gemacht hast, kann ich nicht einschätzen. Aber das spielt keine Rolle. Nur ein kleines Stück bei Oeversee fehlt noch. https://cycling.waymarkedtrails.org/#route?id=19753994&type=r... commented 2026-09-02 15:50:15 UTC by geozeisig ♦246 |
| 188416798 (Comments: 1) | lucia rigonat (Discussed changesets: 4) | attenzione che quì hai cancellato il tag highway=residential che permette di riconoscere quella linea come una via di tipo residenziale. Senza quel tag la stessa non viene più riconosciuta come una strada percorribile, da sistemare. Qua... commented 2026-09-02 15:50:01 UTC by fabiotofy ♦325 |
| 188407258 (Comments: 1) | lucia rigonat (Discussed changesets: 4) | Ciao, attenzione che su OSM i nomi non vanno mai tutti maiuscoli (PIAZZETTA SOLARA) ma piuttosto come titoli, ovvero con la prima lettera Maiuscola (Piazzetta Solara). Se puoi correggere, grazie --- Publi... commented 2026-09-02 15:45:42 UTC by fabiotofy ♦325 |
| 164790089 (Comments: 1) | A-dg6 (Discussed changesets: 18) | Hoi, je hebt geen gelijk dat dit het enige restant is van de stamlijn. Achter het Intratuin-depot, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1554542737#map=19/52.158582/6.195234 is nog een stukje! Ik heb het toegevoegd! commented 2026-09-02 15:45:27 UTC by IIVQ ♦149 |
| 174619480 (Comments: 3) | mcliquid (Discussed changesets: 229) | Es ist ein boundary=administrative mit einem admin_level zwischen 5 und 6. Mit AL5 sind die Regierungsbezirke getaggt, mit AL6 die Land- und Stadtkreise. Für den Regionalverband gibt es keinen verfügbaren Admin-Level mehr. commented 2026-09-02 15:42:48 UTC by welzheimerwald ♦107 |
| X | 188402286 (Comments: 2) | Nuni idrisa (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Nuni idrisa, apart from the comment by Aethonatic I would like to offer some advice on how make your buildings better: Please use the key "Q" after you mapped the building to make it square. This is only needed when a building is ... commented 2026-09-02 15:40:39 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦4,302 |
| 63171678 (Comments: 5) | Andreas Binder (Discussed changesets: 97) | Die Relation https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3190325 ist die Radroute (route=bicycle) Die zweite Relation ist https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/8769648 die Wanderweg (route = hiking) commented 2026-09-02 15:39:04 UTC by Andreas Binder ♦264 |
| 166914374 (Comments: 2) | ohmanger (Discussed changesets: 28) | Hi, a fair question. The details for Woodlands Outdoor Education Centre were duplicated on both the main building and the surrounding area. I removed the details from the building to keep to the "One feature, one OSM element" rule. |
| 186780897 (Comments: 4) | ivanruiz (Discussed changesets: 14) | Because I misunderstood its meaning, and it's a mistake. If you could review it and fix it correctly, I would greatly appreciate it. commented 2026-09-02 15:34:49 UTC by ivanruiz ♦14 |
| 187785492 (Comments: 1) | Shl-EF (Discussed changesets: 14) | Wie kommst Du darauf, dass es die Tank24-Tankstelle nicht mehr geben würde? commented 2026-09-02 15:31:23 UTC by Andreas Binder ♦264 |
| 188281522 (Comments: 1) | SabersKiss (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi there! I see you're adding lots of businesses, which is great, but I just wanted to let you know you've got the opening_hours format a bit off. There needs to be a colon between the hour and minute values, e.g. Mo-Fr 08:30-16:00. What yo... commented 2026-09-02 15:30:40 UTC by salisburymistake ♦31 |
| 187822911 (Comments: 2) | lunar_jaws812 (Discussed changesets: 10) | Thanks for reaching out! I think it would be a very reasonable icon to use for martial arts gyms. Martial arts styles look very different, so some aren't going to have kicks (e.g. BJJ, judo, sumo, boxing, etc.), but I don't think there is o... commented 2026-09-02 15:27:34 UTC by lunar_jaws812 ♦18 |
| 188424823 (Comments: 3) | Wim52 (Discussed changesets: 3) | reverted by changeset #188425593 commented 2026-09-02 15:25:51 UTC by eggie ♦46,961 |
| 188368433 (Comments: 2) | TallebudgeraValley (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi Eduardo17172, thank you for clarifying! commented 2026-09-02 15:24:26 UTC by TallebudgeraValley ♦2 |
| 188414222 (Comments: 2) | Vektor_567 (Discussed changesets: 88) | erledigt commented 2026-09-02 15:10:32 UTC by Vektor_567 ♦79 |
| 187796556 (Comments: 2) | Gwen_ch (Discussed changesets: 5) | thank you for noticing, it was a mistake while editing on JOSM. I meant level=1;2. Just changed it. commented 2026-09-02 15:10:07 UTC by Gwen_ch ♦2 |
| 188413549 (Comments: 2) | Vektor_567 (Discussed changesets: 88) | wieso apartment??? Beispiel: https://www.oerag.at/immobilie/gewerbepark-vogelweiderstrasse/ commented 2026-09-02 15:08:16 UTC by Vektor_567 ♦79 |
| 188422585 (Comments: 4) | Feths (Discussed changesets: 2) | Nou.. Dat was geen originele BAG import node.. dus al geen adres. Dus no problem. commented 2026-09-02 15:06:34 UTC by eggie ♦46,961 |
| 188424014 (Comments: 1) | Feths (Discussed changesets: 2) | Feedback.. Lijkt me oke. Normaal gesproken is er al een adresnode, maar die is hier ook ooit verdwenen. Zo kan het ook. Mapse commented 2026-09-02 15:03:40 UTC by eggie ♦46,961 |
| 188325868 (Comments: 3) | danctc (Discussed changesets: 53) | Unfortunately, you've only edited one out of thirty-six objects (see https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/2vRM) commented 2026-09-02 14:54:34 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,833 |
 | 188359966 (Comments: 2) | Antisida (Discussed changesets: 2) | თხილნარი მდინარის აღმოსავლეთით commented 2026-09-02 14:51:37 UTC by Antisida ♦1 |
| 188416363 (Comments: 2) | thegeo_vol (Discussed changesets: 1) | Siehe Version 5 commented 2026-09-02 14:43:29 UTC by thegeo_vol ♦1 |
| 188265824 (Comments: 2) | ikiliki (Discussed changesets: 2) | I commute that road cpl times per week so i saw it. I should have put "local knowledge" as a source, but ig i forgot. commented 2026-09-02 14:39:15 UTC by ikiliki ♦1 |
| 188314598 (Comments: 2) | Sarah Joubert (Discussed changesets: 1) | Opening hours are not in the right syntax. Please fix. commented 2026-09-02 14:36:33 UTC by Comino ♦401 |
| 59952451 (Comments: 1) | fab&nich (Discussed changesets: 2) | Ciao fab&nich, relativamente a questo: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/598993657 cosa intendevi esattamente ? 😊 commented 2026-09-02 14:31:10 UTC by dp7 ♦96 |
| 188393344 (Comments: 14) | Vektor_567 (Discussed changesets: 88) | *mit weiß* soll "nicht weiß" bedeuten :) commented 2026-09-02 14:29:24 UTC by Vektor_567 ♦79 |
| 188415666 (Comments: 1) | LovelyPL (Discussed changesets: 10) | W połowie za szybko o jakieś dwa tygodnie https://www.radiokrakow.pl/aktualnosci/tarnow/ulica-batorego-w-tarnowie-po-remoncie-na-pelne-otwarcie-trzeba-jeszcze-poczekac/ https://tarnow.naszemiasto.pl/remont-batorego-wreszcie-zakonczon... commented 2026-09-02 14:26:09 UTC by grzegorz75jan ♦699 |
| 188057010 (Comments: 1) | giorgilomidze (Discussed changesets: 1) | გამარჯობა, აქ სახანძროა ნამდვილად - ხომ არ შეგეშალათ ტეგი ? :) commented 2026-09-02 14:19:05 UTC by dav23r ♦20 |
| 54844115 (Comments: 2) | Baconcrisp (Discussed changesets: 127) | Hello Mateusz! I like your suggested icon for dojo better than the current one. It makes it clear that its a place for martial arts whereas the current one just looks like someone is running. I hope this helps! commented 2026-09-02 14:18:58 UTC by Baconcrisp ♦145 |
| 185154352 (Comments: 1) | Carto'Cité (Discussed changesets: 84) | La signalisation n'est pas hyper cohérente, mais j'ai plus l'impression qu'il s'agit d'une zone de rencontre, sens unique Ouest-Est, avec un DSC https://api.panoramax.xyz/fr/index?s=fp;s2;p24a87ca3-baff-4650-bb... commented 2026-09-02 14:18:40 UTC by LaTêteDansLeGuidon ♦4 |
| 188408524 (Comments: 5) | AvNVRZL (Discussed changesets: 58) | Oke.. dan zal het nu kloppen. Groet, eggie commented 2026-09-02 14:14:53 UTC by eggie ♦46,961 |
| 29998168 (Comments: 1) | Hjart (Discussed changesets: 194) | Efter at have kigget på højdekort mistænker jeg, at vandløbet way/335298519 ikke eksisterer, og at vandet i stedet løbet vest ind ad node/14140741775. commented 2026-09-02 14:11:23 UTC by cyclist789 ♦113 |
| 188228286 (Comments: 1) | Israel Centeno Guasmo (Discussed changesets: 1) | "papi burguer 3" appears to be in the middle of the road? commented 2026-09-02 14:07:21 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,134 |
| 187319371 (Comments: 1) | kortgodt (Discussed changesets: 189) | Hvad er det, sådan et "heatmap" viser? Kan det fortælle, om der går en bro nord-vest fra node/14089095315 ? commented 2026-09-02 13:59:22 UTC by cyclist789 ♦113 |
| 186019269 (Comments: 13) | DRiveR39 (Discussed changesets: 48) | Поправлю коллегу. Не тысячи пользователей, а сотни. Примерно 250 000 пользователей в год вносят правки в OSM. Если каждый будет вносить собств... commented 2026-09-02 13:59:05 UTC by Mikola Sankin ♦3 |
| 188389714 (Comments: 1) | sun_lab (Discussed changesets: 4) | It's a good idea to include name=* on sidewalks the same as you would another carriageway on a road. This aids greatly with pedestrian instructions. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/ch... commented 2026-09-02 13:47:15 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,560 |
| 188394908 (Comments: 1) | Yizhi Liang (Discussed changesets: 1) | We generally don't abbreviate in street names, since computers are good at making abbreviations when desired but bad at telling things like "Mount" and "Mountain" apart or "Street," "Saint" and "Sault... commented 2026-09-02 13:46:18 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,560 |
| 183305024 (Comments: 2) | blu256 (Discussed changesets: 4) | While not representative of all possible martial arts, I think it conveys the message clearly enough. commented 2026-09-02 13:43:52 UTC by blu256 ♦5 |
| 187132330 (Comments: 2) | AurélienQ (Discussed changesets: 77) | Autant pour moi. Je pensais que c'était le terminal fret car la position et l'aspect en chantier correspondait. Merci d'avoir corrigé commented 2026-09-02 13:31:47 UTC by AurélienQ ♦174 |
| 87163282 (Comments: 1) | ChrisB999 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/819301634/history has building = arbour that was added in this edit What was meant by building=arbour ? commented 2026-09-02 13:29:35 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 188387974 (Comments: 8) | Vektor_567 (Discussed changesets: 88) | @fs_LT es wurden auch Geschäfte aktualisiert commented 2026-09-02 13:29:06 UTC by Vektor_567 ♦79 |
| 188391913 (Comments: 13) | Vektor_567 (Discussed changesets: 88) | aber ich schau mir die situation nochmal digital an... commented 2026-09-02 13:27:40 UTC by Vektor_567 ♦79 |
| 179742480 (Comments: 2) | Roberta111 (Discussed changesets: 1) | L'annullamento è in changeset/188419114 commented 2026-09-02 13:19:24 UTC by Mannivu ♦289 |
| 188370274 (Comments: 1) | marczoutendijk (Discussed changesets: 315) | Highways -> Landuse commented 2026-09-02 13:14:27 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦3,090 |
| 188319545 (Comments: 1) | marczoutendijk (Discussed changesets: 315) | Highways -> Landuse commented 2026-09-02 13:13:55 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦3,090 |
| 188320585 (Comments: 1) | marczoutendijk (Discussed changesets: 315) | Highways -> Landuse commented 2026-09-02 13:13:36 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦3,090 |
| 188417961 (Comments: 1) | marczoutendijk (Discussed changesets: 315) | Highways -> landuse commented 2026-09-02 13:13:17 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦3,090 |
| 183867225 (Comments: 1) | Marek-M (Discussed changesets: 205) | zerkniesz na https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5494734 ? commented 2026-09-02 13:11:53 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 188289963 (Comments: 1) | wlad_p (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour wlad_p Attention, tu as ajouté des pistes cyclables inexistantes sur le terrain. Une piste cyclable n'est pas une voie fermée à la circulation générale. Je corrige. Bonne continuati... commented 2026-09-02 13:07:52 UTC by Benoît C MdP ♦219 |
| 188418226 (Comments: 1) | Mannivu (Discussed changesets: 49) | re https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5494696 - thanks for fix! commented 2026-09-02 13:06:30 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 188416448 (Comments: 2) | Victorvk (Discussed changesets: 6) | Straatnaam verwijderd. Het zal toch niet een bepaalde breedte hebben? Gr eggie commented 2026-09-02 13:04:24 UTC by eggie ♦46,961 |
| 187999454 (Comments: 5) | gioc3 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Clearly not* commented 2026-09-02 12:56:15 UTC by gioc3 ♦1 |
| 188391684 (Comments: 2) | theDM (Discussed changesets: 159) | Poprawiłem te przejazdy przy rondzie: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188417813 commented 2026-09-02 12:53:53 UTC by Marek-M ♦1,111 |
| 188361817 (Comments: 3) | Sonja Emilie (Discussed changesets: 6) | Yes, I understand, what I'm referring to is that if you are removing the segregated=yes tag, you could add another similar tag so that people and data consumers can distinguish that this is a true cycleway instead of a shared cycle and foot way.... commented 2026-09-02 12:47:14 UTC by marcmarti ♦68 |
| 188386216 (Comments: 1) | pesquisasg (Discussed changesets: 1) | Não copie dados de outros mapas. Este changeset foi revertido com changeset/188417363 commented 2026-09-02 12:44:56 UTC by DressyPear4 ♦1,631 |
| 171423249 (Comments: 3) | sanzay (Discussed changesets: 9) | Ok pour les modifs : Changement d'activité dans le même batiment commented 2026-09-02 12:44:52 UTC by sanzay ♦7 |
| 188417140 (Comments: 1) | Faristoteles (Discussed changesets: 11) | Bro, that’s a real road I mapped out in this area; I live in this village and know the back roads—I swear I’m not lying, and I’d be willing to get struck by lightning if I were. It’s admittedly hard to prove—you co... commented 2026-09-02 12:44:36 UTC by Faristoteles ♦11 |
| 188366036 (Comments: 1) | fernandomodus (Discussed changesets: 1) | Não crie edições fictíceas no mapa, nem geometrias exageradas. Este changeset foi revertido com changeset/188417086 commented 2026-09-02 12:39:22 UTC by DressyPear4 ♦1,631 |
| 186656474 (Comments: 1) | €liz (Discussed changesets: 29) | Bonjour, je vois que tu as renommé le parc (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1258372289). Le nom "Forêt urbaine Général Morand" correspond à ce que j'ai constaté sur le terrain, ainsi que sur l... commented 2026-09-02 12:34:02 UTC by LaTêteDansLeGuidon ♦4 |
| 188410193 (Comments: 1) | Brownie19 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Szia. A technikum bejáratát ráraktad a Váci útra. Óvatosabban kérlek. Javítottam: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188416727 commented 2026-09-02 12:32:38 UTC by qstep ♦192 |
| 188273254 (Comments: 1) | Eliézer Abreu (Discussed changesets: 15) | Este changeset foi revertido com changeset/188416746 commented 2026-09-02 12:31:58 UTC by DressyPear4 ♦1,631 |
| 188273779 (Comments: 1) | Eliézer Abreu (Discussed changesets: 15) | Este changeset foi revertido com changeset/188416746 commented 2026-09-02 12:31:57 UTC by DressyPear4 ♦1,631 |
| 188273841 (Comments: 1) | Eliézer Abreu (Discussed changesets: 15) | Este changeset foi revertido com changeset/188416746 commented 2026-09-02 12:31:56 UTC by DressyPear4 ♦1,631 |
| 188273878 (Comments: 1) | Eliézer Abreu (Discussed changesets: 15) | Este changeset foi revertido com changeset/188416746 commented 2026-09-02 12:31:56 UTC by DressyPear4 ♦1,631 |
| 188273894 (Comments: 1) | Eliézer Abreu (Discussed changesets: 15) | Este changeset foi revertido com changeset/188416746 commented 2026-09-02 12:31:55 UTC by DressyPear4 ♦1,631 |
| 188274319 (Comments: 2) | Eliézer Abreu (Discussed changesets: 15) | Este changeset foi revertido com changeset/188416746 commented 2026-09-02 12:31:54 UTC by DressyPear4 ♦1,631 |
| 188274501 (Comments: 1) | Eliézer Abreu (Discussed changesets: 15) | Este changeset foi revertido com changeset/188416746 commented 2026-09-02 12:31:53 UTC by DressyPear4 ♦1,631 |
| 188281613 (Comments: 1) | Eliézer Abreu (Discussed changesets: 15) | Este changeset foi revertido com changeset/188416746 commented 2026-09-02 12:31:52 UTC by DressyPear4 ♦1,631 |
| 188274661 (Comments: 1) | Eliézer Abreu (Discussed changesets: 15) | Este changeset foi revertido com changeset/188416746 commented 2026-09-02 12:31:52 UTC by DressyPear4 ♦1,631 |
| 188281643 (Comments: 1) | Eliézer Abreu (Discussed changesets: 15) | Este changeset foi revertido com changeset/188416746 commented 2026-09-02 12:31:51 UTC by DressyPear4 ♦1,631 |
| 188281650 (Comments: 1) | Eliézer Abreu (Discussed changesets: 15) | Este changeset foi revertido com changeset/188416746 commented 2026-09-02 12:31:51 UTC by DressyPear4 ♦1,631 |
| 188281666 (Comments: 1) | Eliézer Abreu (Discussed changesets: 15) | Este changeset foi revertido com changeset/188416746 commented 2026-09-02 12:31:50 UTC by DressyPear4 ♦1,631 |
| 188281674 (Comments: 1) | Eliézer Abreu (Discussed changesets: 15) | Este changeset foi revertido com changeset/188416746 commented 2026-09-02 12:31:49 UTC by DressyPear4 ♦1,631 |
| 188281685 (Comments: 1) | Eliézer Abreu (Discussed changesets: 15) | Este changeset foi revertido com changeset/188416746 commented 2026-09-02 12:31:49 UTC by DressyPear4 ♦1,631 |
| 188281695 (Comments: 2) | Eliézer Abreu (Discussed changesets: 15) | Este changeset foi revertido com changeset/188416746 commented 2026-09-02 12:31:48 UTC by DressyPear4 ♦1,631 |
| 172474213 (Comments: 1) | PedestrianMapping_GeoRelay (Discussed changesets: 6) | Drawing way/1433254414 as a sidewalk of Camomile Street so that it twice crosses the main road of which it is a sidewalk was unhelpful. I have now seen so much low quality pedestrian mapping from PedstrianMapping_* that I am inclined to propo... commented 2026-09-02 12:30:48 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,918 |
| 187045294 (Comments: 2) | tintinmaster (Discussed changesets: 7) | Siehe dazu auch https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/access-destination-mit-angeschlossenen-full-access-inseln/83398/19 und folgende Beiträge. commented 2026-09-02 12:28:23 UTC by Vinzenz Mai ♦49 |
| 188251862 (Comments: 2) | Bernhard W (Discussed changesets: 17) | Danke für den Hinweis. Ich war am So. dort, habe aber nur Fotos der Geschäfte (von außen) und der Tiefgaragen-Einfahrt gemacht und in OSM ergänzt. Dabei habe ich noch ältere Handnotizen ergänzt, die offensichtlich nicht... commented 2026-09-02 12:19:14 UTC by Bernhard W ♦83 |
| 159934972 (Comments: 1) | sheldonelectric (Discussed changesets: 75) | Bonjour Sheldoneletric, Tu as ajouté sur des voies le tag maxspeed=FR:urban, mais le bon tag et maxspeed:type=FR:urban. Voir le wiki : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:maxspeed:type maxspeed=xx doit généralement &... commented 2026-09-02 12:09:34 UTC by Le Petit Léo ♦34 |
| 12230659 (Comments: 3) | Patchi (Discussed changesets: 40) | Merci de ton retour, J'ai donc déclassé la voie Est de la voir par Oppède-le-Vieux en was:ref=D 178 commented 2026-09-02 11:58:55 UTC by JLZIMMERMANN ♦123 |
| 187990303 (Comments: 4) | maraf24 (Discussed changesets: 636) | Zawsze jest taki problem z tymi datami - nie wiadomo, czy się odnosi do wykonania rzeźby, postawienia jej w terenie czy uroczystości. commented 2026-09-02 11:44:27 UTC by maraf24 ♦5,373 |
| 186664090 (Comments: 8) | Kamerijker (Discussed changesets: 9) | Je hebt misschien wel een punt. Als je hier door de geschiedenis https://historical.osm.be/#14/50.7057/4.3029/MostrecentNGIBasemap-OpenStreetMapRoads rolt, dan zie je inderdaad eerste Bois de Hal veel meer richting zuid-oost van het bos. Later schuif... commented 2026-09-02 11:44:22 UTC by joost schouppe ♦1,553 |
| 186847188 (Comments: 3) | ThomasDu (Discussed changesets: 45) | OK merci, j'ai fait le necessaire! commented 2026-09-02 11:40:45 UTC by joost schouppe ♦1,553 |
| 188385931 (Comments: 1) | Dimitar155 (Discussed changesets: 198) | То и стойността за типа сграда би могла да се промени на sports_hall/sports_centre. По кадастър е "Спортна сграда, база" commented 2026-09-02 11:28:24 UTC by Fraxi ♦498 |
| 188410693 (Comments: 4) | IagoGV (Discussed changesets: 2) | Feito! commented 2026-09-02 11:21:18 UTC by IagoGV ♦2 |
| 183379732 (Comments: 2) | willkmis (Discussed changesets: 24) | I think it's suitable for iD presets. As mentioned in the PR, it's probably not quite representative of all martial arts but it gets the point across. commented 2026-09-02 11:20:51 UTC by willkmis ♦229 |
| 172468499 (Comments: 1) | PedestrianMapping_HopMapper (Discussed changesets: 4) | Please don't split highway=footway + footway=crossing ways either side of a crossing island unless you also split the road. This leaves a single highway=crossing node intersecting a non-crossing way and two crossing ways without crossing nodes.<... commented 2026-09-02 11:14:53 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,918 |
| 188279488 (Comments: 1) | JeffersonJJAT (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188411507 commented 2026-09-02 11:13:20 UTC by Wildsharky ♦926 |
| 188293477 (Comments: 1) | ChrisTHOUGHTS_tots (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188411175 commented 2026-09-02 11:12:45 UTC by Wildsharky ♦926 |
| 188334062 (Comments: 2) | SaeidRSad (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188410130 commented 2026-09-02 11:11:59 UTC by Wildsharky ♦926 |
| 188279906 (Comments: 1) | CINTHYA ERAS (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188409576 commented 2026-09-02 11:11:07 UTC by Wildsharky ♦926 |
 | 188320887 (Comments: 1) | MK 1 (Discussed changesets: 37) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188408794 commented 2026-09-02 11:10:30 UTC by Wildsharky ♦926 |
| 188290493 (Comments: 1) | Vaizauto786 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188407355 commented 2026-09-02 11:09:50 UTC by Wildsharky ♦926 |
| 188330158 (Comments: 1) | Betzabeth Vivas (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188402656 commented 2026-09-02 11:08:10 UTC by Wildsharky ♦926 |
| 188325802 (Comments: 1) | Alex Espin Muzo (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188400467 commented 2026-09-02 11:07:20 UTC by Wildsharky ♦926 |
| 188304923 (Comments: 1) | julls2004 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188400106 commented 2026-09-02 11:06:24 UTC by Wildsharky ♦926 |
| 188304905 (Comments: 1) | julls2004 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188400068 commented 2026-09-02 11:05:48 UTC by Wildsharky ♦926 |
| 188281032 (Comments: 1) | DAYANA ANDINO (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188399908 commented 2026-09-02 11:04:47 UTC by Wildsharky ♦926 |
| 188279519 (Comments: 1) | josscm (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188399800 commented 2026-09-02 11:03:46 UTC by Wildsharky ♦926 |
| 188308989 (Comments: 1) | Emily_W (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188399713 commented 2026-09-02 11:03:04 UTC by Wildsharky ♦926 |
| 188279887 (Comments: 1) | kevinponce2007 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188398751 commented 2026-09-02 11:00:44 UTC by Wildsharky ♦926 |
| 188327244 (Comments: 1) | Jhon Micael Garcia Parra (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188361340 commented 2026-09-02 10:59:55 UTC by Wildsharky ♦926 |
| 188312028 (Comments: 1) | Marlith Tumailla (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188360493 commented 2026-09-02 10:58:37 UTC by Wildsharky ♦926 |
| 188331959 (Comments: 1) | Ximena Granda (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188360187 commented 2026-09-02 10:58:04 UTC by Wildsharky ♦926 |
| 188329709 (Comments: 1) | Infojef (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188359879 commented 2026-09-02 10:57:23 UTC by Wildsharky ♦926 |
| 186480742 (Comments: 2) | MikeN (Discussed changesets: 19) | I think the icon represents the overall category well, even if some activities do not look quite like that. commented 2026-09-02 10:54:59 UTC by MikeN ♦370 |
| 188308372 (Comments: 1) | HarrisonOchoa (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188356968 commented 2026-09-02 10:53:44 UTC by Wildsharky ♦926 |
| 188389233 (Comments: 3) | Vektor_567 (Discussed changesets: 88) | zur ersten Frage: ich habe den Straßennamen für Fußgängeransage hinterlegt und dabei auch geschaut dass das mit Straßenverlauf übereinstimmt. zum zweiten Punkt: ich setze Hausnummer auf den Haupteingang, weil d... commented 2026-09-02 10:53:06 UTC by Vektor_567 ♦79 |
| 188281978 (Comments: 4) | 18 Vinaydeep Singh (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188356086 commented 2026-09-02 10:52:43 UTC by Wildsharky ♦926 |
| 188324082 (Comments: 1) | RedLotusSpaAbbotsford (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188355457 commented 2026-09-02 10:51:45 UTC by Wildsharky ♦926 |
| 188379272 (Comments: 1) | Villao (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11268423932. What is the mean of the tags (on the highway crossing)? ALISON TABATA VILLAO COELLO = principal name = calle urbana Please see https://www.openstreetma... commented 2026-09-02 10:48:30 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,833 |
| 188372013 (Comments: 4) | Adam Haba (Discussed changesets: 140) | Już nie ma commented 2026-09-02 10:45:01 UTC by Adam Haba ♦41 |
| 188401298 (Comments: 1) | Artur | Yanosik (Discussed changesets: 83) | dzieki za source. na zdjęciu widzę 4 pasy ruchu, :forward=1 :backward=3 jeden do skrętu w lewo, na wprost i w prawo, ale ty zmapowałes 5 pasów ruchu? commented 2026-09-02 10:38:58 UTC by Yog Sot ♦556 |
 | 182314986 (Comments: 2) | Joachim_0 (Discussed changesets: 7) | Thanks, will do! commented 2026-09-02 10:27:11 UTC by Joachim_0 ♦5 |
| 188404155 (Comments: 1) | OlasMapy (Discussed changesets: 27) | Reverted: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188410779 commented 2026-09-02 10:20:07 UTC by infeeeee ♦718 |
| 188404288 (Comments: 2) | OlasMapy (Discussed changesets: 27) | Reverted: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188410779 commented 2026-09-02 10:20:00 UTC by infeeeee ♦718 |
| 188410421 (Comments: 1) | h234a2hm (Discussed changesets: 6) | Tagged from the beginning of Ponce to the Wells Street and North Clarendon Avenue intersection. commented 2026-09-02 10:11:45 UTC by h234a2hm ♦6 |
| 188408317 (Comments: 1) | KAZUT0 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Dear user KAZUT0, in this changeset you have uploaded a large amount of sidewalks which appear to be automatically generated and do not reflect reality on the ground. Many have duplicated existing sidewalks, or crossed them without any intersection n... commented 2026-09-02 10:11:00 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,134 |
| 188196324 (Comments: 1) | R Bonilla (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hola R Bonilla: los cementerios municipales no tienen adscripción religiosa, tal como recoge la ley de cementerios. https://www.boe.es/diario_boe/txt.php?id=BOE-A-1978-27612 commented 2026-09-02 10:02:52 UTC by MarinoBM ♦181 |
| 188195802 (Comments: 1) | R Bonilla (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hola R Bonilla: los cementerios municipales no tienen adscripción religiosa, tal como recoge la ley de cementerios. https://www.boe.es/diario_boe/txt.php?id=BOE-A-1978-27612 commented 2026-09-02 10:02:46 UTC by MarinoBM ♦181 |
| 188298474 (Comments: 3) | Timmy_Tesseract (Discussed changesets: 39) | *Should be three or more barangays, I think. commented 2026-09-02 09:59:55 UTC by ClaveScottPH ♦13 |
| 179128547 (Comments: 3) | ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (Discussed changesets: 55) | thanks! commented 2026-09-02 09:52:09 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 188395679 (Comments: 2) | SilverKnight (Discussed changesets: 16) | Já corrigi, obrigado. commented 2026-09-02 09:49:39 UTC by SilverKnight ♦9 |
| 183307310 (Comments: 1) | €liz (Discussed changesets: 29) | J'ai annulé certaines de tes modifications du Bâtiment Bienvenüe dans https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188409024 pour mieux correspondre à ce que j'observe sur le terrain : cours/puits de lumière qui p... commented 2026-09-02 09:44:21 UTC by LaTêteDansLeGuidon ♦4 |
| 187007833 (Comments: 1) | Overcomzr (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, what is a "highway_loop"? This tag is not used in any other place. commented 2026-09-02 09:42:41 UTC by mueschel ♦7,309 |
| 188242962 (Comments: 4) | Davidos64 (Discussed changesets: 13) | Je viens de faire les modification nécessaire: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188409157 commented 2026-09-02 09:41:41 UTC by Cayenne17 ♦43 |
| 188401980 (Comments: 3) | bierBoy (Discussed changesets: 1) | Der Verweis gilt aber nur für die nächstgelegene Trasse. In diesem Fall ist dazwischen noch Abbiegespur secondary_link mit Verweis. Der von mir angesprochene Trassenabschnitt braucht nach meiner Meinung nur sidewalk:both=no & cycleway:... commented 2026-09-02 09:38:14 UTC by pitfire ♦748 |
| 188404447 (Comments: 1) | Nezaloth (Discussed changesets: 2) | nice work, thanks for this ! commented 2026-09-02 09:37:30 UTC by ❤️🔥 ♦505 |
| 188408572 (Comments: 1) | jhg21 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Please refrain from adding addresses to buildings or POIs. Within DK, addresses reside solely on imported nodes. commented 2026-09-02 09:37:06 UTC by osmviborg ♦1,904 |
| 181674867 (Comments: 1) | Satiz125 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Undiscussed and low quality edits removed #UberUnhelpful Please don't edit OSM unless you know and care what you are doing. commented 2026-09-02 09:35:19 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,918 |
| 188293649 (Comments: 2) | changchun_1 (Discussed changesets: 54) | Hallo Jochen, bei meiner Bildauswertung habe ich die Bänke gesehen, dass die hinter einem Zaun stehen habe ich nicht beachtet. https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=2191026918387009&focus=photo&lat=49.7115754&lng=9.2647972&z=17<... commented 2026-09-02 09:30:36 UTC by changchun_1 ♦103 |
| 83409862 (Comments: 1) | Wand04 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hi Wand04, a note has been created about a path you created 6 years ago, maybe you do have more info about it? https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4908558 commented 2026-09-02 09:24:29 UTC by ivanbranco ♦2,936 |
| 188289249 (Comments: 6) | Mohammad_farhani (Discussed changesets: 1) | I appreciate the correction. I’ll be more careful with similar changes going forward. commented 2026-09-02 09:24:21 UTC by Mohammad_farhani ♦1 |
| 188407906 (Comments: 1) | Roosj (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OSM, Bedankt voor uw bijdrage. Dit zal vast geen computershop zijn. Ik heb het aangepast naar office=it en de info verplaatst naar de adresnode. MVG eggie commented 2026-09-02 09:21:26 UTC by eggie ♦46,961 |
| 188332587 (Comments: 1) | Jesus1603 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188407844 commented 2026-09-02 09:13:49 UTC by ajmat ♦418 |
 | 187686212 (Comments: 6) | Barefoot Runner (Discussed changesets: 8) | כן, כמובן שאם יש שם מקובל אז לכתוב אותו. לא הבנתי לגבי מעיין לילי. מהתמונה נראה שיש שם נביעה. node/6220533386 commented 2026-09-02 09:09:34 UTC by hatul ♦520 |
| 188279168 (Comments: 1) | Hellen Sanchez Delis (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188407339 commented 2026-09-02 09:02:38 UTC by ajmat ♦418 |
| 106763941 (Comments: 2) | Minh Nguyen (Discussed changesets: 184) | Thanks for reaching out. Seems reasonable to me. Some disciplines aren’t primarily about kicking (for example, Limalama), but I suppose a kicking icon would be more recognizable than one depicting punches or holds. Maybe in the future there cou... commented 2026-09-02 08:59:38 UTC by Minh Nguyen ♦653 |
| 188406924 (Comments: 1) | java-637486 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Dag Java.. Het heeft de voorkeur om op de bestaande adresnode bij te taggen. Adres is onvolledig. (Plaatsnaam) In osm zetten we geen spatie in de postcode. Mvg, eggie commented 2026-09-02 08:59:02 UTC by eggie ♦46,961 |
| 178043336 (Comments: 3) | Megadyptes (Discussed changesets: 2) | Ah, grand. Sounds like a little more investigation might be needed then. I'll have a look next time I'm in the area. commented 2026-09-02 08:58:55 UTC by mstrbrid ♦62 |
| 186479652 (Comments: 2) | uvi (Discussed changesets: 27) | Das sind selbstverständlich nur "Wartestellen". Falls du eine bessere Variante hast, das zu erfassen, ändere es gerne. Ich kannte keine andere. Das Liegeverbot bezieht sich (auch logisch) auf den Kanal! VG Uwe commented 2026-09-02 08:57:30 UTC by uvi ♦150 |
| 188298630 (Comments: 2) | Flynn Marquardt (Discussed changesets: 25) | Hi, I use JOSM to merge "nodes without tags". Sometimes I also fix warning from JOSM, that are obvious to me, in this case: - area=yes in relations does not make any sense, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Area - ... commented 2026-09-02 08:48:18 UTC by Flynn Marquardt ♦82 |
| 179170115 (Comments: 1) | empty_child (Discussed changesets: 47) | Hello! You used amenity=dojo multiple times (including in this preset) I want to ask you for advise about its icon in presets (wider discussion in https://github.com/openstreetmap/id-tagging-schema/pull/2773 ) Would https://pinhead.ink/... commented 2026-09-02 08:48:14 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 188314663 (Comments: 1) | Panzergruppe (Discussed changesets: 5) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188406798 commented 2026-09-02 08:48:12 UTC by ajmat ♦418 |
| 158406695 (Comments: 1) | JakeRC (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! You used amenity=dojo multiple times (including in this preset) I want to ask you for advise about its icon in presets (wider discussion in https://github.com/openstreetmap/id-tagging-schema/pull/2773 ) Would https://pinhead.ink/... commented 2026-09-02 08:48:10 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 52459373 (Comments: 1) | redsteakraw (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hello! You used amenity=dojo multiple times (including in this preset) I want to ask you for advise about its icon in presets (wider discussion in https://github.com/openstreetmap/id-tagging-schema/pull/2773 ) Would https://pinhead.ink/... commented 2026-09-02 08:48:08 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 51623886 (Comments: 1) | bpowell1 (Discussed changesets: 37) | Hello! You used amenity=dojo multiple times (including in this preset) I want to ask you for advise about its icon in presets (wider discussion in https://github.com/openstreetmap/id-tagging-schema/pull/2773 ) Would https://pinhead.ink/... commented 2026-09-02 08:48:04 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 162939356 (Comments: 1) | dobongchi (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello! You used amenity=dojo multiple times (including in this preset) I want to ask you for advise about its icon in presets (wider discussion in https://github.com/openstreetmap/id-tagging-schema/pull/2773 ) Would https://pinhead.ink/... commented 2026-09-02 08:48:01 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 181592982 (Comments: 1) | sheldonelectric (Discussed changesets: 75) | Hello! You used amenity=dojo multiple times (including in this preset) I want to ask you for advise about its icon in presets (wider discussion in https://github.com/openstreetmap/id-tagging-schema/pull/2773 ) Would https://pinhead.ink/... commented 2026-09-02 08:47:59 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 41471851 (Comments: 1) | BlueSombra (Discussed changesets: 10) | Hello! You used amenity=dojo multiple times (including in this preset) I want to ask you for advise about its icon in presets (wider discussion in https://github.com/openstreetmap/id-tagging-schema/pull/2773 ) Would https://pinhead.ink/... commented 2026-09-02 08:47:57 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 175524648 (Comments: 1) | impiaaa (Discussed changesets: 29) | Hello! You used amenity=dojo multiple times (including in this preset) I want to ask you for advise about its icon in presets (wider discussion in https://github.com/openstreetmap/id-tagging-schema/pull/2773 ) Would https://pinhead.ink/... commented 2026-09-02 08:47:53 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 158460081 (Comments: 1) | Benji1994 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hello! You used amenity=dojo multiple times (including in this preset) I want to ask you for advise about its icon in presets (wider discussion in https://github.com/openstreetmap/id-tagging-schema/pull/2773 ) Would https://pinhead.ink/... commented 2026-09-02 08:47:45 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 165387574 (Comments: 1) | ig4map (Discussed changesets: 18) | Hello! You used amenity=dojo multiple times (including in this preset) I want to ask you for advise about its icon in presets (wider discussion in https://github.com/openstreetmap/id-tagging-schema/pull/2773 ) Would https://pinhead.ink/... commented 2026-09-02 08:47:39 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 184717088 (Comments: 1) | andrewpmk (Discussed changesets: 87) | Hello! You used amenity=dojo multiple times (including in this preset) I want to ask you for advise about its icon in presets (wider discussion in https://github.com/openstreetmap/id-tagging-schema/pull/2773 ) Would https://pinhead.ink/... commented 2026-09-02 08:47:37 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 163962775 (Comments: 1) | ptarac (Discussed changesets: 46) | Hello! You used amenity=dojo multiple times (including in this preset) I want to ask you for advise about its icon in presets (wider discussion in https://github.com/openstreetmap/id-tagging-schema/pull/2773 ) Would https://pinhead.ink/... commented 2026-09-02 08:47:35 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 167468390 (Comments: 1) | Joseph R P (Discussed changesets: 230) | Hello! You used amenity=dojo multiple times (including in this preset) I want to ask you for advise about its icon in presets (wider discussion in https://github.com/openstreetmap/id-tagging-schema/pull/2773 ) Would https://pinhead.ink/... commented 2026-09-02 08:47:30 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 185973359 (Comments: 1) | CurlingMan13 (Discussed changesets: 216) | Hello! You used amenity=dojo multiple times (including in this preset) I want to ask you for advise about its icon in presets (wider discussion in https://github.com/openstreetmap/id-tagging-schema/pull/2773 ) Would https://pinhead.ink/... commented 2026-09-02 08:47:27 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 162467543 (Comments: 1) | Alexander Burrola (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello! You used amenity=dojo multiple times (including in this preset) I want to ask you for advise about its icon in presets (wider discussion in https://github.com/openstreetmap/id-tagging-schema/pull/2773 ) Would https://pinhead.ink/... commented 2026-09-02 08:47:24 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 166638330 (Comments: 1) | KelsonV (Discussed changesets: 12) | Hello! You used amenity=dojo multiple times (including in this preset) I want to ask you for advise about its icon in presets (wider discussion in https://github.com/openstreetmap/id-tagging-schema/pull/2773 ) Would https://pinhead.ink/... commented 2026-09-02 08:47:19 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 185442730 (Comments: 1) | MapSpot (Discussed changesets: 75) | Hello! You used amenity=dojo multiple times (including in this preset) I want to ask you for advise about its icon in presets (wider discussion in https://github.com/openstreetmap/id-tagging-schema/pull/2773 ) Would https://pinhead.ink/... commented 2026-09-02 08:47:14 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 148729431 (Comments: 1) | Patchanka (Discussed changesets: 49) | Hello! You used amenity=dojo multiple times (including in this preset) I want to ask you for advise about its icon in presets (wider discussion in https://github.com/openstreetmap/id-tagging-schema/pull/2773 ) Would https://pinhead.ink/... commented 2026-09-02 08:47:12 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 137163993 (Comments: 1) | LJcwh4A (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hello! You used amenity=dojo multiple times (including in this preset) I want to ask you for advise about its icon in presets (wider discussion in https://github.com/openstreetmap/id-tagging-schema/pull/2773 ) Would https://pinhead.ink/... commented 2026-09-02 08:47:08 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 187853454 (Comments: 1) | benoitdd (Discussed changesets: 39) | Hello! You used amenity=dojo multiple times (including in this preset) I want to ask you for advise about its icon in presets (wider discussion in https://github.com/openstreetmap/id-tagging-schema/pull/2773 ) Would https://pinhead.ink/... commented 2026-09-02 08:46:58 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 130191308 (Comments: 1) | Timothy Smith (Discussed changesets: 325) | Hello! You used amenity=dojo multiple times (including in this preset) I want to ask you for advise about its icon in presets (wider discussion in https://github.com/openstreetmap/id-tagging-schema/pull/2773 ) Would https://pinhead.ink/... commented 2026-09-02 08:46:57 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 186985106 (Comments: 1) | Lisapple (Discussed changesets: 75) | Hello! You used amenity=dojo multiple times (including in this preset) I want to ask you for advise about its icon in presets (wider discussion in https://github.com/openstreetmap/id-tagging-schema/pull/2773 ) Would https://pinhead.ink/... commented 2026-09-02 08:46:54 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 187843783 (Comments: 1) | AjBelnuovo (Discussed changesets: 76) | Hello! You used amenity=dojo multiple times (including in this preset) I want to ask you for advise about its icon in presets (wider discussion in https://github.com/openstreetmap/id-tagging-schema/pull/2773 ) Would https://pinhead.ink/... commented 2026-09-02 08:46:52 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 172319428 (Comments: 1) | daniel_solow (Discussed changesets: 59) | Hello! You used amenity=dojo multiple times (including in this preset) I want to ask you for advise about its icon in presets (wider discussion in https://github.com/openstreetmap/id-tagging-schema/pull/2773 ) Would https://pinhead.ink/... commented 2026-09-02 08:46:50 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 187672668 (Comments: 1) | Omnific (Discussed changesets: 138) | Hello! You used amenity=dojo multiple times (including in this preset) I want to ask you for advise about its icon in presets (wider discussion in https://github.com/openstreetmap/id-tagging-schema/pull/2773 ) Would https://pinhead.ink/... commented 2026-09-02 08:46:48 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 187749993 (Comments: 1) | ThomasDu (Discussed changesets: 45) | Hello! You used amenity=dojo multiple times (including in this preset) I want to ask you for advise about its icon in presets (wider discussion in https://github.com/openstreetmap/id-tagging-schema/pull/2773 ) Would https://pinhead.ink/... commented 2026-09-02 08:46:44 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 186039333 (Comments: 1) | HJUdall (Discussed changesets: 14) | Hello! You used amenity=dojo multiple times (including in this preset) I want to ask you for advise about its icon in presets (wider discussion in https://github.com/openstreetmap/id-tagging-schema/pull/2773 ) Would https://pinhead.ink/... commented 2026-09-02 08:46:42 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 169132909 (Comments: 1) | DannyMcD (Discussed changesets: 94) | Hello! You used amenity=dojo multiple times (including in this preset) I want to ask you for advise about its icon in presets (wider discussion in https://github.com/openstreetmap/id-tagging-schema/pull/2773 ) Would https://pinhead.ink/... commented 2026-09-02 08:46:37 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 49013434 (Comments: 1) | zerpou (Discussed changesets: 52) | Hello! You used amenity=dojo multiple times (including in this preset) I want to ask you for advise about its icon in presets (wider discussion in https://github.com/openstreetmap/id-tagging-schema/pull/2773 ) Would https://pinhead.ink/... commented 2026-09-02 08:46:13 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 187986790 (Comments: 3) | SzilágyiGyula (Discussed changesets: 3) | Szia Ákos, Kerékpáros hírdól nem tudok. Ha ezt állítottam be, akkor valamit félrenyomtam. A bicikliút és a volt vasút nem párhuzamosan fut, hanem ahogy a le... commented 2026-09-02 08:45:38 UTC by SzilágyiGyula ♦2 |
| 188404736 (Comments: 1) | RobertsLuks1 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Drawing a road on top of a road isnt going to solve anything. Look into https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:surface https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:tracktype And split th... commented 2026-09-02 08:38:53 UTC by Colbertson ♦169 |
| 188355274 (Comments: 1) | Stanley1111 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 镇江枫叶国际学校和你标注的EDG总部是什么关系？ commented 2026-09-02 08:38:14 UTC by BG4WDV ♦3 |
| 188390764 (Comments: 1) | Liskwartier (Discussed changesets: 9) | Hier voor geldt het zelfde Je kunt een terugmelding doen dat het Kadaster achterloopt. https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/?searchQuery=bergselaan+90a&objectId=0599100000608253&theme=BRT+Achtergrond&geometry.x=92313.9895&... commented 2026-09-02 08:25:41 UTC by eggie ♦46,961 |
| 188390710 (Comments: 1) | Liskwartier (Discussed changesets: 9) | Dag Liskwartier. Beter een terugmelding doen naar de BAG, want anders komt het schuurtje bij herimport gewoon weer terug. https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/?searchQuery=lisstraat+9b&objectId=0599100010038816&theme=BRT+A... commented 2026-09-02 08:23:15 UTC by eggie ♦46,961 |
| 188238581 (Comments: 2) | Amitabha07 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Yes, Thank you. commented 2026-09-02 08:19:51 UTC by Amitabha07 ♦1 |
 | 188314425 (Comments: 1) | Rokhsar Rahimi (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188405640 commented 2026-09-02 08:18:26 UTC by MappingMore ♦685 |
| 188400863 (Comments: 1) | BCNorwich (Discussed changesets: 263) | Thank you for these fixes, very much appreciated! I'm trying to spot them as I edit but it's not always clear commented 2026-09-02 08:14:51 UTC by ceirios ♦145 |
| 130650515 (Comments: 4) | Stephan van Helden (Discussed changesets: 14) | Hi redd, Tatsache. Ja, die Daten hatte ich damals importiert, es handelt sich um OpenData-Daten vom LfU ("Landesamt für Umwelt"). FFH[-Gebiet] = Fauna-Flora-Habitat-Gebiet. commented 2026-09-02 08:10:50 UTC by Stephan van Helden ♦16 |
| 188332465 (Comments: 1) | Egdapalacios (Discussed changesets: 3) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188405012 commented 2026-09-02 08:00:08 UTC by MappingMore ♦685 |
| 188296159 (Comments: 2) | MacDony (Discussed changesets: 46) | Bonjour Marc, Il ne faut pas hésiter à corriger si j'ai commis une erreur. J'en corrige des quantités sans contacter le fautif... Un lien vers le segment concerné, merci Denis commented 2026-09-02 07:59:07 UTC by MacDony ♦39 |
| 188210470 (Comments: 1) | Tunibal (Discussed changesets: 5) | Der Name "Tankstellendach" wird nicht eingetragen und deswegen gelöscht https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/356260080 commented 2026-09-02 07:58:44 UTC by Znaika ♦213 |
| 188353270 (Comments: 1) | Flobestin (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ciao Flobestin Grazie per il tuo contributo alla mappa. Per favore, per le future modifiche inserisci un commento descrittivo prima di caricarle. commented 2026-09-02 07:58:19 UTC by dp7 ♦96 |
| 188388398 (Comments: 1) | ArjanO (Discussed changesets: 21) | Curious. In changesets https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188320072 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188332028 you added the wikipedia tag conform the wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:wikipedia) However in t... commented 2026-09-02 07:51:10 UTC by Kees 59 ♦117 |
| 188403392 (Comments: 2) | DRiveR39 (Discussed changesets: 48) | Добрый Я в курсе, по другому мне непонятно как на карте обозначить и потом найти где грузовая стоянка, где парковка, где большая, где ог... commented 2026-09-02 07:51:08 UTC by DRiveR39 ♦34 |
| 70843889 (Comments: 2) | MapMakerGal (Discussed changesets: 31) | Só repliquei no seu momento (hai case unha década) o nome que puxeran os usuarios nun treito, para que teña sentido en toda a vía. A Veiga queda na fronteira Asturias-Galiza, chámase Vegadeo en español. commented 2026-09-02 07:49:19 UTC by MapMakerGal ♦128 |
| 188386639 (Comments: 1) | Kaloan-koko (Discussed changesets: 76) | Здравей! За контейнерите за рециклиране няма нужда да вписваш какво се предава, след като вече си отбелязал бройката и цветовете. Ботът... commented 2026-09-02 07:43:34 UTC by Fraxi ♦498 |
| 188404295 (Comments: 1) | TriangleMaple (Discussed changesets: 15) | *Using Aerial Imagery commented 2026-09-02 07:38:57 UTC by TriangleMaple ♦13 |
| 188280307 (Comments: 1) | Jennifer Vera (Discussed changesets: 2) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188404235 commented 2026-09-02 07:38:31 UTC by ajmat ♦418 |
| 187787432 (Comments: 2) | votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale (Discussed changesets: 518) | Bonjour, Merci pour cette alerte. Le Réseau de partenaires CarGo, sont des professionnels de l’automobile ou futurs entrepreneurs qui développent une seconde activité. C'.est un service (agence) qui s'appuie sur ... commented 2026-09-02 07:35:47 UTC by votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale ♦337 |
| 188351531 (Comments: 2) | Digitaleo (Discussed changesets: 33) | Effectivement, il a privilégié le bâtiment plutôt que le nœud qui existe déjà, je corrige ça. commented 2026-09-02 07:31:33 UTC by Digitaleo ♦37 |
| 187017002 (Comments: 1) | VikasChandra_Lyft (Discussed changesets: 2) | Parkway drive was converted to have southbound traffic to only be able to turn onto US 85 north, this is a brand new configuration. commented 2026-09-02 07:25:00 UTC by GarliccBread1 ♦9 |
| 187590069 (Comments: 1) | Oli vdB B-Fr (Discussed changesets: 2) | Bonjour! Je me suis permis de corriger votre ajout sur un cabinet de kiné à Rochefort. En effet, vous aviez uniquement mis le nom du cabinet sur le batiment, sans ajouter le tag qui renseigne que c'est un cabinet de kin&eacu... commented 2026-09-02 07:10:55 UTC by juminet ♦110 |
| 188401711 (Comments: 1) | Arianghavidel (Discussed changesets: 2) | :-D commented 2026-09-02 07:08:47 UTC by Nasrollahtabar ♦1 |
| 187399633 (Comments: 6) | zackrossdino2 (Discussed changesets: 1) | I highly apologise for everything I did, I will leave OSM for a while and slowly understand it before coming back, thanks for making me realise what I did commented 2026-09-02 07:04:16 UTC by zackrossdino2 ♦2 |
| 188367969 (Comments: 1) | sanzay (Discussed changesets: 9) | Vue la proximité de node/6360574993, est-ce que node/14140236122 ne serait pas plutôt access=customers que access=private ? commented 2026-09-02 06:58:40 UTC by Ltrlg ♦241 |
| 188402629 (Comments: 1) | Agroqirax (Discussed changesets: 1) | Misspelled tag, should be #piuspark commented 2026-09-02 06:50:38 UTC by Agroqirax ♦1 |
| 187922580 (Comments: 2) | EUMapper (Discussed changesets: 42) | Hello, Osmose indicates that https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:cycleway=opposite_lane should not be used anymore and suggested cycleway=lane. That the simple reason I changed it. I will ignore it in future edits. commented 2026-09-02 06:49:25 UTC by EUMapper ♦20 |
| 188399801 (Comments: 1) | vink13 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-09-02 06:33:49 UTC by eggie ♦46,961 |
| 187296152 (Comments: 1) | OSM-XXXXXX (Discussed changesets: 35) | Hi, what is this parking spot used for during weekdays? I can't make sense of the translated description https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1547613702 Also: It's not necessary to add a dozen access tags. A single one like access... commented 2026-09-02 06:29:58 UTC by mueschel ♦7,309 |
| 188359311 (Comments: 2) | LiudmilaBareika (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hello flohoff, thanks for the feedback and for getting in touch! Best regards, Liudmila commented 2026-09-02 06:22:42 UTC by LiudmilaBareika ♦8 |
| 188363875 (Comments: 1) | Tyoma14 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi! You can press Q to make buildings rectangular. Also, better to use Esri imagery instead of Bing, because it has fewer errors in adjusting to real coordinates. commented 2026-09-02 06:07:35 UTC by evgenykatyshev ♦296 |
| 188395525 (Comments: 1) | SwiftersEdge (Discussed changesets: 1) | Is this a real Flock camera? The City of Springfield canceled the contract and all Flock cameras were removed. commented 2026-09-02 06:05:49 UTC by Adam850 ♦10 |
 | 188374194 (Comments: 2) | Saudhullah (Discussed changesets: 2) | Clarification of source: The data in this changeset was traced with explicit permission from above specifed company using their provided map layer. commented 2026-09-02 06:04:30 UTC by Saudhullah ♦2 |
| 188367410 (Comments: 1) | Saudhullah (Discussed changesets: 2) | Clarification of source: The data in this changeset was traced with explicit permission from Charrette Studio Pvt Ltd using their provided map layer. commented 2026-09-02 06:02:42 UTC by Saudhullah ♦2 |
| 188379962 (Comments: 1) | whats9plus1021youstupid (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi, These two buildings have been tagged with this building=* and layer=* by experienced mappers for the past six years, and this is apparently the standard convention for such per this comment: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/10905256... commented 2026-09-02 05:39:05 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,008 |
| 188397531 (Comments: 1) | huntsman2832 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Streets don’t have addr tags. There is no need to add oneway=no as that is the default without the tag. Addr:state, suburb and postcode are not need in AU as these are already mapped by area. commented 2026-09-02 05:31:14 UTC by nevw ♦2,320 |
| 188330261 (Comments: 1) | ericka14 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188400392 commented 2026-09-02 05:27:11 UTC by ajmat ♦418 |
| 188386198 (Comments: 1) | liveistikhara (Discussed changesets: 1) | Removed online business that has no presence on Oxford Street commented 2026-09-02 05:07:16 UTC by BCNorwich ♦5,356 |
| X | 187992221 (Comments: 5) | dnohr (Discussed changesets: 1) | See if it's possible to upload one change at a time. commented 2026-09-02 05:03:40 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦352 |
| 188120378 (Comments: 3) | Vladislav Grechannik_import (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thanks for your quick response. I never experienced such errors in JOSM. Guido commented 2026-09-02 05:02:37 UTC by gscholz ♦2,960 |
| 188312970 (Comments: 4) | curt1us (Discussed changesets: 17) | Thanks, I understand now. I wasn’t aware that place=city at the county seat is an established Chinese OSM convention. The confusing part for me is cases such as Gyirong, where the actual settlement at the county seat is Zongga/Dzongka, while Gy... commented 2026-09-02 05:00:08 UTC by curt1us ♦10 |
| 186023242 (Comments: 2) | esmenard (Discussed changesets: 4) | Il y avait un jalonnement pendant les travaux. Si ce jalonnement a disparu, effectivement on peut le supprimer. commented 2026-09-02 04:55:35 UTC by esmenard ♦15 |
| 188311802 (Comments: 1) | Dennys Malla (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188399601 commented 2026-09-02 04:50:11 UTC by ajmat ♦418 |
| 188342780 (Comments: 2) | jdouglass (Discussed changesets: 1) | Understood, thanks for the update! commented 2026-09-02 04:49:32 UTC by jdouglass ♦1 |
| 188281896 (Comments: 1) | Reactore_Dev (Discussed changesets: 28) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188399100 commented 2026-09-02 04:28:33 UTC by ajmat ♦418 |
| 188208168 (Comments: 1) | JennyRosero (Discussed changesets: 1) | Buen día. He revertido los cambios hechos en esta zona debido a errores e inconsistencias. Le he enviado un mensaje más detallado a su buzón de mensajes. Por favor revisar. commented 2026-09-02 03:57:34 UTC by Finalist1172 ♦3 |
| 188070694 (Comments: 1) | Melita Flor (Discussed changesets: 1) | Buen día. He revertido los cambios hechos en esta zona debido a errores e inconsistencias. Le he enviado un mensaje más detallado a su buzón de mensajes. Por favor revisar. commented 2026-09-02 03:55:43 UTC by Finalist1172 ♦3 |
| 188304299 (Comments: 1) | julls2004 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188398471 commented 2026-09-02 03:55:12 UTC by ajmat ♦418 |
| 188375252 (Comments: 1) | Mayor Dima Kishenko (Discussed changesets: 4) | DWG revert - Apparent sock-puppet vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188397818 commented 2026-09-02 03:17:48 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,812 |
| 188375513 (Comments: 1) | Mayor Dima Kishenko (Discussed changesets: 4) | DWG revert - Apparent sock-puppet vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188397818 commented 2026-09-02 03:17:48 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,812 |
| 188397600 (Comments: 2) | Mayor Dima Kishenko (Discussed changesets: 4) | DWG revert - Apparent sock-puppet vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188397818 commented 2026-09-02 03:17:48 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,812 |
| 188373344 (Comments: 1) | Mayor Dima Kishenko (Discussed changesets: 4) | DWG revert - Apparent sock-puppet vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188397818 commented 2026-09-02 03:17:47 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,812 |
| 188327795 (Comments: 1) | Ali Hardi Ali Jaff (Discussed changesets: 1) | This look OK keep it up. commented 2026-09-02 02:51:47 UTC by Rawaz ♦7 |
| 188393473 (Comments: 1) | EvelynQuiñonez (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola, lamentablemente tuve que revertir estos cambios. No sé si fueron un error o una edición de prueba. Como sea, te pedimos que cuides el mapa. Gracias! Por cualquier consulta o aclaración podés responder este com... commented 2026-09-02 02:50:32 UTC by caprieldeluca ♦75 |
| 188397067 (Comments: 1) | jg027 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Correction/clarification: the source referenced in the changeset comment is the MTA 2025–2029 Capital Plan, not a “2025 Capital Plan.” The Central Branch electrification project was included in the MTA 2020–2024 Capital Progra... commented 2026-09-02 02:43:30 UTC by jg027 ♦5 |
| 188396122 (Comments: 1) | KaraiskakisArachova227 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Your intent is not to add information, but to create controversy over a nonsense nostalgia. If you were truly trying to improve the map, you would add the old name into the official border tag of city of İstanbul. commented 2026-09-02 02:40:20 UTC by yitimox ♦40 |
| 188368658 (Comments: 1) | Brawlstars thiago (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hola, gracias por la contribución! La capilla ya estaba mapeada: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/531280616 Eliminé las dos capillas que agregaste e incluí la etiqueta wikidata en la original. Una capilla en la realidad... commented 2026-09-02 02:28:07 UTC by caprieldeluca ♦75 |
| 178769536 (Comments: 1) | thompsonrestoration (Discussed changesets: 1) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-09-02 02:14:46 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,008 |
| 161156945 (Comments: 1) | Brayat Mentaok (Discussed changesets: 7) | Halo pak, ini jalannya kok belum sesuai dengan citra satelit Esri ya? soalnya nabrak bangunan commented 2026-09-02 02:06:33 UTC by FajrAl ♦757 |
| X | 188087718 (Comments: 1) | la_nenemini (Discussed changesets: 9) | Hola, espero estes bien! Te informo que en Osmose me salió un aviso de que se están duplicando algunas construcciones. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/188087718 ... commented 2026-09-02 01:26:07 UTC by yamille29 ♦1 |
| 188223337 (Comments: 1) | Tao Zixian (Discussed changesets: 1) | ehh...I made some mistakes... commented 2026-09-02 00:21:18 UTC by Tao Zixian ♦1 |
| 69473063 (Comments: 2) | BC168 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Du liebe Zeit, das ist sieben Jahre her – wie gut, dass ich immer alles dokumentiere. Siehe Kommentar dort. :) commented 2026-09-02 00:12:29 UTC by BC168 ♦38 |
| 188394257 (Comments: 1) | RonaldLaniz (Discussed changesets: 1) | Sendero que une a moradores con la calle principal commented 2026-09-02 00:09:03 UTC by RonaldLaniz ♦1 |
| 165683046 (Comments: 4) | OscarBrownbread (Discussed changesets: 4) | :) commented 2026-09-01 23:50:16 UTC by VictorIE ♦1,245 |
| 188341190 (Comments: 1) | ben_harris369 (Discussed changesets: 1) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Waterways/River_modernization indicates that only the waterway ways should have a name and the water areas should be unnamed. at least one or two bridges now end in the water too. this should be ... commented 2026-09-01 23:17:23 UTC by OddlyAngled ♦137 |
| 188392403 (Comments: 1) | Vinny's Workshop (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hello, I have reverted this changeset as "alt_name" is not to be used in this case, as per the discussion on the forum: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/lake-ontario-lake-america/146975 As it is only the United States that recog... commented 2026-09-01 23:10:16 UTC by maxwellward ♦35 |
| 188359719 (Comments: 1) | Fraport AG (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hallo Fraport AG, bei Bearbeitungen auf Veranlassung Dritter gelten die Richtlinien für organisierte Bearbeitungen [1]. Der Account ist nach einem bekannten Unternehmen benannt, aber das hier bearbeitete Gebiet ist räumlich recht wei... commented 2026-09-01 23:03:30 UTC by DD1GJ ♦2,454 |
| 188353487 (Comments: 5) | Ventricle8668 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Transit n' est pas à jour sur Arras. J'ai trouvé des données à jour pour les citadines sur l'application Pysea. Je me déplace à vélo dans Arras. commented 2026-09-01 22:59:41 UTC by Max-Kritic ♦263 |
| 187417229 (Comments: 1) | Fuckflock6557 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Fuckflock6557, I observed this intersection today and I saw no ALPR present. Are you sure what you saw was an ALPR? Reference https://deflock.org/identify for future identifications. Thank you, BubbaJuice commented 2026-09-01 22:57:41 UTC by BubbaJuice ♦170 |
| 188276689 (Comments: 4) | EditorFromItaly (Discussed changesets: 6) | Yep, all looks good now! commented 2026-09-01 22:53:07 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,812 |
| 188078191 (Comments: 2) | justinsenemy (Discussed changesets: 11) | Oh definitely a misclick, will fix now. Thanks! commented 2026-09-01 22:50:38 UTC by justinsenemy ♦5 |
| 188326743 (Comments: 26) | Vektor_567 (Discussed changesets: 88) | hmm... ja, wenn über parkplatz commented 2026-09-01 22:33:40 UTC by Vektor_567 ♦79 |
| 188333035 (Comments: 1) | Pechas7367111 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi Pechas7367111,\r \r The country that these nodes are placed in does not currently operate any Flock ALPR. \r \r https://deflock.org/identify is an excellent resource for identifying ALPRs.\r \r - alpacaMaps commented 2026-09-01 22:30:40 UTC by alpacaMaps ♦339 |
| 188332979 (Comments: 1) | Pechas7367111 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi Pechas7367111,\r \r The country that these nodes are placed in does not currently operate any Flock ALPR. \r \r https://deflock.org/identify is an excellent resource for identifying ALPRs.\r \r - alpacaMaps commented 2026-09-01 22:30:39 UTC by alpacaMaps ♦339 |
| 188333001 (Comments: 1) | Pechas7367111 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi Pechas7367111,\r \r The country that these nodes are placed in does not currently operate any Flock ALPR. \r \r https://deflock.org/identify is an excellent resource for identifying ALPRs.\r \r - alpacaMaps commented 2026-09-01 22:30:39 UTC by alpacaMaps ♦339 |
| 174939351 (Comments: 1) | SNY01 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Non, il y avait plusieurs erreurs: - l'adresse etait sur un point du trottoir au lieu d'être un point flottant - ps besoin des tags addr:city corrigé: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188392038 commented 2026-09-01 22:28:42 UTC by BaboucheVerte ♦63 |
| 188241759 (Comments: 6) | HellMap (Discussed changesets: 110) | The best I could get from Mapillary is this https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=56.66956030300011&lng=24.143979587567856&z=19.9&pKey=279936030496601&focus=photo&x=0.8351293759535949&y=0.8599267969485379&zoom=1.8282109706875... commented 2026-09-01 22:27:15 UTC by kaposts ♦19 |
| 188358278 (Comments: 1) | RenardMalin (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted commented 2026-09-01 22:25:48 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,700 |
| 188380058 (Comments: 1) | Tuwewanzi (Discussed changesets: 6) | 211 iD 2.42.2 commented 2026-09-01 22:25:46 UTC by Jesera ♦1 |
| 188333890 (Comments: 8) | Vektor_567 (Discussed changesets: 88) | Ich habe nie behauptet, dass ich ein Profi sei commented 2026-09-01 22:25:01 UTC by Vektor_567 ♦79 |
| 188391411 (Comments: 1) | Dwells24 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Old North neighborhood, my bad. commented 2026-09-01 22:21:19 UTC by Dwells24 ♦1 |
| 188390501 (Comments: 1) | Ozgurarya (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi Ozgurarya,\r \r The country that these nodes are placed in does not currently operate any Flock ALPR. \r \r https://deflock.org/identify is an excellent resource for identifying ALPRs.\r \r - alpacaMaps commented 2026-09-01 22:07:32 UTC by alpacaMaps ♦339 |
| 188390462 (Comments: 1) | Ozgurarya (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi Ozgurarya,\r \r The country that these nodes are placed in does not currently operate any Flock ALPR. \r \r https://deflock.org/identify is an excellent resource for identifying ALPRs.\r \r - alpacaMaps commented 2026-09-01 22:07:31 UTC by alpacaMaps ♦339 |
| 188390489 (Comments: 1) | Ozgurarya (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi Ozgurarya,\r \r The country that these nodes are placed in does not currently operate any Flock ALPR. \r \r https://deflock.org/identify is an excellent resource for identifying ALPRs.\r \r - alpacaMaps commented 2026-09-01 22:07:31 UTC by alpacaMaps ♦339 |
| 188330939 (Comments: 1) | Deflocktheflock1234 (Discussed changesets: 19) | We were contacted previously about node removals and would like to revert these additional changes until you verify these have been truly removed.\r \r Please feel free to DM or respond here with affirmation the nodes were removed physically fr... commented 2026-09-01 22:06:59 UTC by alpacaMaps ♦339 |
| 188330948 (Comments: 1) | Deflocktheflock1234 (Discussed changesets: 19) | We were contacted previously about node removals and would like to revert these additional changes until you verify these have been truly removed.\r \r Please feel free to DM or respond here with affirmation the nodes were removed physically fr... commented 2026-09-01 22:06:58 UTC by alpacaMaps ♦339 |
| 188330955 (Comments: 1) | Deflocktheflock1234 (Discussed changesets: 19) | We were contacted previously about node removals and would like to revert these additional changes until you verify these have been truly removed.\r \r Please feel free to DM or respond here with affirmation the nodes were removed physically fr... commented 2026-09-01 22:06:58 UTC by alpacaMaps ♦339 |
| 188330965 (Comments: 1) | Deflocktheflock1234 (Discussed changesets: 19) | We were contacted previously about node removals and would like to revert these additional changes until you verify these have been truly removed.\r \r Please feel free to DM or respond here with affirmation the nodes were removed physically fr... commented 2026-09-01 22:06:57 UTC by alpacaMaps ♦339 |
| 188330970 (Comments: 1) | Deflocktheflock1234 (Discussed changesets: 19) | We were contacted previously about node removals and would like to revert these additional changes until you verify these have been truly removed.\r \r Please feel free to DM or respond here with affirmation the nodes were removed physically fr... commented 2026-09-01 22:06:57 UTC by alpacaMaps ♦339 |
| 188330978 (Comments: 1) | Deflocktheflock1234 (Discussed changesets: 19) | We were contacted previously about node removals and would like to revert these additional changes until you verify these have been truly removed.\r \r Please feel free to DM or respond here with affirmation the nodes were removed physically fr... commented 2026-09-01 22:06:56 UTC by alpacaMaps ♦339 |
| 188391143 (Comments: 1) | 544848455241 (Discussed changesets: 11) | Dies war mein letzter Edit. commented 2026-09-01 22:01:04 UTC by 544848455241 ♦7 |
| 187651982 (Comments: 1) | mp04 (Discussed changesets: 1) | El ancho ya está establecido, por lo que es responsabilidad de las aplicaciones de navegación aplicar restricciones. De todos modos, he cambiado la vía a "residential", por lo que tendrá menos prioridad que como ... commented 2026-09-01 21:51:06 UTC by Rodrigo Rega ♦372 |
| 174568709 (Comments: 2) | nejakytypco (Discussed changesets: 5) | Opravil na 0.5m https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1450073101/history/3 , skoda, ze nenapisal. commented 2026-09-01 21:23:17 UTC by aceman444 ♦3,011 |
| 183092598 (Comments: 1) | nejakytypco (Discussed changesets: 5) | Napr. ceste https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/408855703 podla coho tam smu cyklisti a nemozu kone ci vozidla? Aka je tam dopravna znacka? commented 2026-09-01 21:21:48 UTC by aceman444 ♦3,011 |
| 175504754 (Comments: 1) | nejakytypco (Discussed changesets: 5) | Zdravim, aky je tu zdroj? Co znamena "podla mesta stupava "male projekty II""? To su nejake plany mesta? commented 2026-09-01 21:20:16 UTC by aceman444 ♦3,011 |
| 188269253 (Comments: 1) | nejakytypco (Discussed changesets: 5) | Dakujem za doplnenie zastavky aj jej pridanie do relacie MHD. Treba ju vsak umiestnit na spravne miesto v poradi zastavok. Tiez povodnu zastavku bolo potrebne odobrat. Skoda tiez, ze ste namiesto posunutia doprava odbocujucej kolaje vytvorili ... commented 2026-09-01 21:17:41 UTC by aceman444 ♦3,011 |
| 99299382 (Comments: 2) | Rhön-Map (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hallo Rhön-Map, ich bitte nochmals um Löschung dieser Flurnamen oder um Deinen Kommentar zu der Erfassung. Solltest Du eine andere Quelle für die Flurnamen haben, lass es mich bitte wissen. Siehe dazu auch meine PN vom 23.08. Gru&sz... commented 2026-09-01 21:10:20 UTC by Map_HeRo ♦113 |
| 188172874 (Comments: 5) | ZB_BN (Discussed changesets: 37) | Es gibt allerdings 2 Schilder. commented 2026-09-01 20:54:02 UTC by ZB_BN ♦19 |
| 184435800 (Comments: 1) | nejakytypco (Discussed changesets: 5) | Zdravim, mate overene, ze tie potoky boli aj takto naozaj zrealizovane? A tiez pozor na pouzitie takychto zdrojov, vo vseobecnosti nie je povolene obkreslovanie z inych map. commented 2026-09-01 20:45:33 UTC by aceman444 ♦3,011 |
| 188340770 (Comments: 1) | CacheValleySystems (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, and welcome to OpenStreetMap! Since you requested a review, I looked over your changes. In this case, could a visitor from the public show up to your office here for services? Anyway, tagging looks good! commented 2026-09-01 20:40:15 UTC by Xvtn ♦507 |
| 188383980 (Comments: 1) | michele111 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-09-01 20:37:51 UTC by eggie ♦46,961 |
| 188376896 (Comments: 3) | Jessey_26 (Discussed changesets: 2) | reverted by changeset #188388464 commented 2026-09-01 20:37:20 UTC by eggie ♦46,961 |
| 188377133 (Comments: 1) | Jessey_26 (Discussed changesets: 2) | reverted by changeset #188388464 commented 2026-09-01 20:36:58 UTC by eggie ♦46,961 |
| 188375817 (Comments: 1) | wlgann (Discussed changesets: 13) | Oops, this was houses not fences. commented 2026-09-01 20:33:00 UTC by wlgann ♦5 |
| 188369454 (Comments: 1) | mab88 (Discussed changesets: 1) | I have changed official_name:en-US back to Lake America as per community consensus, please discuss on the forums if you think this is incorrect https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/lake-ontario-lake-america/146975 commented 2026-09-01 20:30:21 UTC by LordGarySugar ♦377 |
| 188362282 (Comments: 3) | carton_box (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thanks commented 2026-09-01 20:13:44 UTC by carton_box ♦2 |
| 40207604 (Comments: 2) | dieterdreist (Discussed changesets: 40) | thank you ;-) commented 2026-09-01 20:11:27 UTC by dieterdreist ♦919 |
 | 79421759 (Comments: 2) | dieterdreist (Discussed changesets: 40) | grazie :-) commented 2026-09-01 20:10:31 UTC by dieterdreist ♦919 |
| 165234710 (Comments: 2) | dieterdreist (Discussed changesets: 40) | thank you! commented 2026-09-01 20:07:43 UTC by dieterdreist ♦919 |
| 188360925 (Comments: 1) | Alvinearthworm8 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi there. I'm about half a mile away and last time I checked, at least part of Hell Nook has asphalt so can be labelled as such until it veers on to fields (it's now down as unpaved throughout). OSM doesn't include all the designatio... commented 2026-09-01 20:07:30 UTC by no details provided here ♦58 |
| 188374046 (Comments: 3) | matze089 (Discussed changesets: 51) | No problem, ich wollte sowieso ein paar Sachen an der Lindenstraße ergänzen, die schon länger auf einem Zettel standen. Ich hab nur nicht verstanden, was da eigentlich passiert ist. Gruß Mikke commented 2026-09-01 20:00:49 UTC by Map_HeRo ♦113 |
| 188311765 (Comments: 1) | tooeasy (Discussed changesets: 6) | if it's got a name i'm not so sure commented 2026-09-01 19:56:27 UTC by dmjab13 ♦143 |
| 188280703 (Comments: 1) | CurlingMan13 (Discussed changesets: 216) | this is great - thanks CurlingMan. Impressed you spotted new imagery for Metuchen HS this quickly commented 2026-09-01 19:56:20 UTC by mbeyerle ♦51 |
| 188311819 (Comments: 1) | tooeasy (Discussed changesets: 6) | atleast mark it unpaved... it's clearly not a "driveway" commented 2026-09-01 19:55:45 UTC by dmjab13 ♦143 |
| 188379694 (Comments: 6) | aevw (Discussed changesets: 7) | Pdok wordt ook regelmatig vernieuwd. In editor josm meestal sneller. Bovendien kun daarin ook andere recentere pdoks kiezen als je die bij je achtergronden installeert. commented 2026-09-01 19:44:10 UTC by eggie ♦46,961 |
| 185050598 (Comments: 1) | VA00 (Discussed changesets: 151) | Zerkniesz na https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5493083 commented 2026-09-01 19:39:41 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 187777132 (Comments: 2) | EfreetSK (Discussed changesets: 16) | Hmm chyba, nebolo to úmeslne. Pozerám že to zrejme spôsobil iD editor ktorý pri zmene typu budovy na "Pamätník" odstráni tagy adresy. Nevšimol som si že zmizli, ďakujem za opravu commented 2026-09-01 19:32:10 UTC by EfreetSK ♦30 |
| 188371277 (Comments: 2) | vlakos555 (Discussed changesets: 94) | Oprav to prosím. V chodníkoch nie som veľmi doma. Je to jednoducho napojené na prechod pre chodcov. Fotku miesta som ti poslal do e-mailu. commented 2026-09-01 19:26:33 UTC by vlakos555 ♦64 |
| 186574344 (Comments: 4) | Jvitegem (Discussed changesets: 37) | Nee dat is niet gek. Als er zaken aan het pand vast zitten, zoals een ingang en een hekwerk dan werkt "replace geometrie" niet. De juiste werkwijze is dan eerst alles handmatig los maken maar dat is veel werk en soms is het heel moeil... commented 2026-09-01 19:20:06 UTC by Jvitegem ♦25 |
| 188332639 (Comments: 2) | julijlucssij (Discussed changesets: 3) | Kérdeztem már tőle, oeny.hu-ra és "más adatbázisokra" hivatkozott: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184198487 commented 2026-09-01 19:19:23 UTC by qstep ♦192 |
| 188327241 (Comments: 1) | t_korth (Discussed changesets: 8) | Guten Tag t_korth, Du hast hier ein Passwort im Klartext eingetragen. Kannst Du bitte einmal unter Berücksichtigung von https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:internet%20access:password dazu Stellung nehmen? Danke und beste Grüße, Ro... commented 2026-09-01 19:08:37 UTC by Romwriter ♦219 |
| 188308145 (Comments: 1) | GGZALAM (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hola GGZALAM: OpenStreetMap es un proyecto que hacemos entre todos. Mis ediciones se pueden mejorar, pero elemento que eliminas es elemento que se pierde. Espero que mejores los que has eliminado en esta edición. Un saludo. commented 2026-09-01 19:06:51 UTC by MarinoBM ♦181 |
| 188364499 (Comments: 1) | LukášBelica (Discussed changesets: 5) | Ahoj, mohol by si prosim strucne popisat, co by malo byt vysledkom tychto zmien (vratane tvojich predchadzajucich uprav)? Lebo mam z nich zmiesane pocity: 1) popis sady zmien je "cyklotrasa", co je virtualny objekt a znaci sa v OSM... commented 2026-09-01 19:01:08 UTC by t_ja ♦298 |
| 188380189 (Comments: 1) | tbo47 (Discussed changesets: 31) | Bonjour, merci pour ces imports. Je n'ai pas trouvé de discussion à ce sujet ni de documentation sur le wiki. Où puis-je les trouver ? commented 2026-09-01 18:56:58 UTC by Syl ♦1,102 |
| 188184578 (Comments: 1) | ABDULLAH AL WERFALLI (Discussed changesets: 59) | Please stop deleting the Amazigh language from the map. In this changeset you deleted the name:ber tags from Bani Walid (node/1160881649) and Bani Walid Center (node/1565509138) — the third and fourth time you remove the same tags from t... commented 2026-09-01 18:56:58 UTC by Libya-truth ♦23 |
| 184528533 (Comments: 1) | Finn1518 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo Finn1518, kannst du das fehlende Wegstück (siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5457502#map=18/52.465784/13.542363&layers=N ) reparieren? Gruß, Slaven commented 2026-09-01 18:55:39 UTC by eserte ♦176 |
| 188382035 (Comments: 2) | Röllingser (Discussed changesets: 16) | Die overkapping lijken verkeerd, maar weet je nog.. Schuin genomen luchtfoto's. Nu weer uitgelijnd met de Kadasterdata commented 2026-09-01 18:47:14 UTC by eggie ♦46,961 |
| 188383379 (Comments: 1) | Fraxi (Discussed changesets: 182) | Погледната и на Bing Streetside commented 2026-09-01 18:44:35 UTC by Fraxi ♦498 |
| 188380195 (Comments: 1) | HRosa (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-09-01 18:37:44 UTC by eggie ♦46,961 |
| 186479624 (Comments: 2) | CAM-Gerlach_Repair (Discussed changesets: 38) | Hey, thanks for reaching out and cooperating--I definitely appreciate it, since the vast majority of SEO accounts don't. Yup, should be--if you do happen to make a good-faith mistake, I can fix them for you. Just make sure to use this sam... commented 2026-09-01 18:37:04 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,008 |
| 188380224 (Comments: 1) | Röllingser (Discussed changesets: 16) | Lijkt me oke als het gedenkteken een steen is. Gr eggie commented 2026-09-01 18:35:38 UTC by eggie ♦46,961 |
| 188381445 (Comments: 3) | Röllingser (Discussed changesets: 16) | reverted by changeset #188382481 Es sieht falsch aus, ist aber eigentlich richtig. Luftbilder sind Aufnahmen mit einem bestimmter Winkel. Grüss eggie commented 2026-09-01 18:29:42 UTC by eggie ♦46,961 |
| 181653723 (Comments: 1) | sadadada (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OpenStreetMap! In the future, when mapping things like buildings, consider using the "square" tool (shortcut Q in iD) so they aren't weirdly shaped polygons. Happy mapping! commented 2026-09-01 18:26:19 UTC by neuhausr ♦364 |
| 188376417 (Comments: 1) | Luque (Discussed changesets: 10) | il faudrait remettre le nom en breton :-) commented 2026-09-01 18:26:14 UTC by josmougn ♦275 |
| 182364910 (Comments: 3) | Flap Slimy Outward (Discussed changesets: 286) | I think this is a broken duplication of r13994662 I personally would delete it. commented 2026-09-01 18:23:26 UTC by OldManCelli ♦103 |
| 188365877 (Comments: 2) | FinixFighter (Discussed changesets: 67) | Accidenti, hai ragione, non l'avevo proprio notato. Grazie mille, ho corretto! commented 2026-09-01 18:19:59 UTC by FinixFighter ♦68 |
| 188381150 (Comments: 1) | Röllingser (Discussed changesets: 16) | Review request.. Sieht gut aus. ..hamlet denke ich auch. commented 2026-09-01 18:14:00 UTC by eggie ♦46,961 |
| 188078003 (Comments: 1) | Matmat-25 (Discussed changesets: 13) | Bravo pour la réactivité Matthieu, top ! commented 2026-09-01 18:12:26 UTC by Julien39 ♦41 |
| 188370338 (Comments: 1) | Mauls (Discussed changesets: 132) | Hi Mauls, What have you added here? Just "South Wales" isn't very helpful Cheers, Ceirios commented 2026-09-01 18:12:05 UTC by ceirios ♦145 |
| 188322708 (Comments: 2) | rezerwa (Discussed changesets: 156) | Na dodatek nie jestem pewien czy w tym przypadku należy oznaczać drogę jako alejkę parkingową ponieważ choć nie jestem pewien przez mdłe orto to zdaje się że miejsca parkingowe są tylko po lewej stronie przynajmniej do poziomu ogrodzenia p... commented 2026-09-01 18:05:30 UTC by grzegorz75jan ♦699 |
| 188362074 (Comments: 2) | Aurelijus Visagurskis (Discussed changesets: 17) | Čia Kauno miesto bėda ir gėda. Kadangi dviračių takas Laisvės al. žemėlapiuose nežymėtas, dviratinės navigacijos kaip Strava, Komoot, Hammerhead, Megane... atvykusius dviratininkus, turistus, miesto svečius važiuojančius dviračiais su... commented 2026-09-01 18:04:34 UTC by Aurelijus Visagurskis ♦14 |
| 185210799 (Comments: 1) | GulhMaster (Discussed changesets: 7) | Es inaceptable eliminar información más completa como los edificios con número de portal y volver a dibujar los edificios genéricos sin esa información. Deberían de revertirse todos estos cambios. commented 2026-09-01 17:50:29 UTC by Jordi MF ♦1,872 |
| 185213272 (Comments: 1) | GulhMaster (Discussed changesets: 7) | En este changeset se han eliminado edificios con etiquetas específicas de apartamento con el número de portal y se han sustituido erróneamente por edificios genéricos building=yes y sin el número de portal. commented 2026-09-01 17:48:22 UTC by Jordi MF ♦1,872 |
| 185333026 (Comments: 1) | GulhMaster (Discussed changesets: 7) | De este changeset se han modificado los leisure=park a "natural=grassland". commented 2026-09-01 17:45:57 UTC by Jordi MF ♦1,872 |
| 186007049 (Comments: 1) | GulhMaster (Discussed changesets: 7) | Changeset revertido por errores en la creación de una relación multipolígono en la plaza: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/usuarios-editando-en-espana-bajo-sospecha-vandalismo-malas-practicas-y-otros/2510/161 commented 2026-09-01 17:43:23 UTC by Jordi MF ♦1,872 |
| 188154446 (Comments: 1) | GulhMaster (Discussed changesets: 7) | Changeset revertido por creación irreal de parques: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/usuarios-editando-en-espana-bajo-sospecha-vandalismo-malas-practicas-y-otros/2510/161 commented 2026-09-01 17:43:03 UTC by Jordi MF ♦1,872 |
| 185588869 (Comments: 1) | GulhMaster (Discussed changesets: 7) | Changeset revertido por creación irreal de parques: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/usuarios-editando-en-espana-bajo-sospecha-vandalismo-malas-practicas-y-otros/2510/161 commented 2026-09-01 17:42:57 UTC by Jordi MF ♦1,872 |
| 188283173 (Comments: 2) | LuvuaRiver (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi muralito, Thank you for the information you provided. I have restored the oneway on way 1553766095. commented 2026-09-01 17:34:18 UTC by LuvuaRiver ♦3 |
| 186980979 (Comments: 2) | Timmy_Tesseract (Discussed changesets: 39) | Fixed in changeset/188379704. Thanks! commented 2026-09-01 17:33:12 UTC by Timmy_Tesseract ♦196 |
| 188323002 (Comments: 3) | nuclearifle (Discussed changesets: 1) | They're not even near the stoplight poles. Though most stoplights (including all that were that were installed or upgraded in the last 20 years) feature video traffic detection (they don't record) and I have seen some incorrectly mapped as... commented 2026-09-01 17:18:13 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,560 |
| 188269164 (Comments: 2) | JanezPavelZebovec_import (Discussed changesets: 1) | I'm truly sorry, this was not intentional. This import was badly done – I shouldn't import all Slovenia at once. Because of that I've been doing it for multiple days and some elements have been changed during his time and there w... commented 2026-09-01 17:17:10 UTC by JanezPavelZebovec ♦39 |
| 188239808 (Comments: 2) | JoshuaR (Discussed changesets: 6) | Thanks for the info, I'm still learning. commented 2026-09-01 17:15:11 UTC by JoshuaR ♦5 |
| 188345238 (Comments: 4) | JoshuaR (Discussed changesets: 6) | What a coincidence, thanks for the heads-up! commented 2026-09-01 17:10:12 UTC by JoshuaR ♦5 |
| 188378277 (Comments: 1) | Eduardo17172 (Discussed changesets: 12) | Corrección a usuario: Las carreteras involucradas son bienes nacionales (es decir, de uso público), no propiedad privada. Se han añadido pasos de peatones. commented 2026-09-01 17:06:14 UTC by Eduardo17172 ♦22 |
| 188160316 (Comments: 2) | EditorFromItaly (Discussed changesets: 6) | Thank you for the notice, the problem was a common issue for CoMaps/iOS. It should be solved with the last update commented 2026-09-01 16:57:53 UTC by EditorFromItaly ♦5 |
| 188220546 (Comments: 2) | EditorFromItaly (Discussed changesets: 6) | Thank you, I will have a look into it commented 2026-09-01 16:56:40 UTC by EditorFromItaly ♦5 |
| 188268805 (Comments: 2) | EditorFromItaly (Discussed changesets: 6) | I think it was a problem with my app, on comaps you cannot control when the changeset is sent, but I always have internet on and I hope that giving 5 minutes break will make it upload. I will try to close the application when editing places far a... commented 2026-09-01 16:55:33 UTC by EditorFromItaly ♦5 |
| 188348840 (Comments: 6) | Coucou Germaine (Discussed changesets: 1) | Cool, thanks a lot. And my apologies for the inconvenience commented 2026-09-01 16:54:51 UTC by Coucou Germaine ♦1 |
| 187863675 (Comments: 3) | dannmer (Discussed changesets: 39) | To be clearer, the property to the west is not a church, it's the tech center. commented 2026-09-01 16:36:27 UTC by dannmer ♦34 |
| 188260389 (Comments: 2) | miscosm (Discussed changesets: 33) | Thanks for pointing this out. I was using backcountry=yes to indicate that this is a primitive, non-vehicle campsite. However, looking at the current OSM definition, backcountry=yes is now intended for genuinely remote/backcountry sites, rather than ... commented 2026-09-01 16:27:01 UTC by miscosm ♦27 |
| 188357474 (Comments: 2) | MTBWilli134 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hallo Silversurfer Ich habe bei der Tourist-Info nachgefragt, die wissen angeblich nichts von einer Sperrung in diesem Bereich die haben sich auch noch nie mit Openstreetmaps beschäftigt. Der Weg war ein Rückeweg wurde vor 10 Jahren... commented 2026-09-01 16:23:11 UTC by MTBWilli134 ♦3 |
| 188113496 (Comments: 2) | James Liber (Discussed changesets: 12) | Feitas as correções. Os radares operam normalmente em ambos os sentidos, gerando notificações aos usuários. commented 2026-09-01 16:14:09 UTC by James Liber ♦3 |
| 187288798 (Comments: 1) | pLoskutov (Discussed changesets: 36) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/query?lat=-0.473297&lon=100.375139 Bustanil Arifin PDIKM is in Minang Fantasi Water Park. So which one is in the current state? commented 2026-09-01 16:10:37 UTC by FajrAl ♦757 |
| 188327716 (Comments: 3) | bally213 (Discussed changesets: 3) | The issues have been fixed in changeset/188368312. commented 2026-09-01 16:10:20 UTC by Flynn Marquardt ♦82 |
| 188368001 (Comments: 4) | FajrAl (Discussed changesets: 155) | Iya begitu saja, karena kalau di note menurut saya redundan. Meskipun tidak masalah jika tetap ditambahkan karena sifatnya tidak merusak. commented 2026-09-01 16:09:12 UTC by NaufalFarras ♦59 |
| 188357382 (Comments: 2) | MTBWilli134 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hallo Silversurfer, der Weg wo ich geschrieben habe existiert nicht mehr ist wirklich nicht mehr vorhanden man sieht ihn nicht mehr und kann diesen eingezeichneten Weg auch noch nicht mal erahnen. Es kann natürlich sein das das ein Rückeweg... commented 2026-09-01 16:08:52 UTC by MTBWilli134 ♦3 |
| 188151662 (Comments: 2) | James Liber (Discussed changesets: 12) | Feitas as correções. Os radares operam normalmente em ambos os sentidos, gerando notificações aos usuários. commented 2026-09-01 16:07:58 UTC by James Liber ♦3 |
| 188234238 (Comments: 1) | wurzl_sepp (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo, wurzl_sepp, hier mische ich mich mal ein, denn dieses Tagging ist so sicher nicht richtig. Du solltest den Fahrbahnen mit oneway:yes eine Richtung aus, bzw. in den Kreisel geben. Damit entfällt dann auch jedes forward. Zudem fi... commented 2026-09-01 16:06:18 UTC by Herwescheluc ♦197 |
| 187800360 (Comments: 1) | flockfinderUSofA (Discussed changesets: 2) | This is likely not a flock camera but Walmart's internal security. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/187800360 commented 2026-09-01 16:01:12 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,560 |
| 188326345 (Comments: 1) | mux0815 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ciao, vedo che mappi da poco. La tua modifica ha "rotto" la "relation" del sentiero CAI 625. Ho annullato le tue modifiche. Qui puoi trovare informazioni sulle "relation": https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Relaz... commented 2026-09-01 15:56:29 UTC by micheleOSM3 ♦188 |
| 187800819 (Comments: 1) | flockfinderUSofA (Discussed changesets: 2) | I think you tagged traffic detection cameras (which do not record, only monitor the queuing area for waiting vehicles) incorrectly as flock cameras. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https:... commented 2026-09-01 15:54:49 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,560 |
| 58257968 (Comments: 1) | C2oc4 (Discussed changesets: 488) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5459521#map=19/50.318355/19.152938&layers=N commented 2026-09-01 15:49:44 UTC by olo81 ♦755 |
| 187590496 (Comments: 2) | LakePoopó (Discussed changesets: 18) | Hello FajrAl. I removed https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1549907628 because it was an overlapping way created by Fitra ladjaharia, when https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/600035366 already existed. Thank you and happy mapping! commented 2026-09-01 15:41:20 UTC by LakePoopó ♦14 |
| 186786563 (Comments: 2) | James Liber (Discussed changesets: 12) | Boa tarde... O radar identificado existe, ele está sinalizado, e ele faz notificações normalmente. Não sei a razão de não haver registro mas posso dizer que consultei agentes públicos sobre os rada... commented 2026-09-01 15:39:33 UTC by James Liber ♦3 |
| 188219965 (Comments: 1) | Ryan4n6 (Discussed changesets: 3) | You have made a common error when you saw a fairway that looked like it didn't have a proper "Feature Type" defined and decided to add the fairway tag. The hole was already properly tagged, but was part of a relation of multiple object... commented 2026-09-01 15:34:52 UTC by b-jazz ♦942 |
| 106317283 (Comments: 1) | АндрейДэтхов (Discussed changesets: 1) | гугл((( commented 2026-09-01 15:31:07 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,700 |
| 188349031 (Comments: 2) | NaufalFarras (Discussed changesets: 34) | Saya meninggalkan pesan di changeset terbaru commented 2026-09-01 15:30:12 UTC by NaufalFarras ♦59 |
| 188350018 (Comments: 1) | roehni (Discussed changesets: 4) | hab da nochmal was geändert :) https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/14137460426 wenn du die Eigenschaften (tags) eines Objekts so im Klartext sehen möchtest, wie sie im Wiki auch beschrieben werden, dann kannst du, wenn du im Br... commented 2026-09-01 15:30:09 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦4,302 |
| 188347266 (Comments: 3) | reki (Discussed changesets: 3) | thank you very much. i've fixed something. should be ok :) commented 2026-09-01 15:28:17 UTC by GiovanniPen ♦33 |
| 187857076 (Comments: 2) | dametenshi (Discussed changesets: 3) | 🤦 You’re totally right. My apologies 🙏 commented 2026-09-01 15:26:22 UTC by dametenshi ♦1 |
| 188330666 (Comments: 4) | Vektor_567 (Discussed changesets: 88) | OSM macht das, wie gesagt, im iD-Editor dann offensichtlich automatisch. Es steht auch wenn zwei Straßen zusammengefügt werden, dass eine gelöscht wurde, wenn ich das richtig sehe commented 2026-09-01 15:17:55 UTC by Vektor_567 ♦79 |
| 188370948 (Comments: 1) | woodpeck (Discussed changesets: 119) | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 188049395, 188124458, 188192727, 188218482, 188222822, 188222974, 188222995, 188223306, 188224949, 188225996, 188227719, 188240075, 188243567, 188244354, 188248713, 188248763, 188248853, 188... commented 2026-09-01 15:15:24 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,134 |
| 188269728 (Comments: 2) | Dima gamer12 (Discussed changesets: 57) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 188370948 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21215 commented 2026-09-01 15:15:24 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,134 |
| 188337835 (Comments: 3) | Dima gamer12 (Discussed changesets: 57) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 188370948 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21215 commented 2026-09-01 15:15:24 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,134 |
| 188248763 (Comments: 2) | Dima gamer12 (Discussed changesets: 57) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 188370948 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21215 commented 2026-09-01 15:15:24 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,134 |
| 188244354 (Comments: 2) | Dima gamer12 (Discussed changesets: 57) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 188370948 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21215 commented 2026-09-01 15:15:24 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,134 |
| 188243567 (Comments: 2) | Dima gamer12 (Discussed changesets: 57) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 188370948 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21215 commented 2026-09-01 15:15:24 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,134 |
| 188277898 (Comments: 2) | Dima gamer12 (Discussed changesets: 57) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 188370948 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21215 commented 2026-09-01 15:15:23 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,134 |
| 188278565 (Comments: 2) | Dima gamer12 (Discussed changesets: 57) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 188370948 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21215 commented 2026-09-01 15:15:23 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,134 |
| 188370779 (Comments: 2) | woodpeck (Discussed changesets: 119) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 188370948 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21215 commented 2026-09-01 15:15:23 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,134 |
| 188222822 (Comments: 2) | Dima gamer12 (Discussed changesets: 57) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 188370948 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21215 commented 2026-09-01 15:15:23 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,134 |
| 188276623 (Comments: 2) | Dima gamer12 (Discussed changesets: 57) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 188370948 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21215 commented 2026-09-01 15:15:23 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,134 |
| 188276545 (Comments: 2) | Dima gamer12 (Discussed changesets: 57) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 188370948 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21215 commented 2026-09-01 15:15:23 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,134 |
| 188218482 (Comments: 2) | Dima gamer12 (Discussed changesets: 57) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 188370948 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21215 commented 2026-09-01 15:15:23 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,134 |
| 188275080 (Comments: 2) | Dima gamer12 (Discussed changesets: 57) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 188370948 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21215 commented 2026-09-01 15:15:23 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,134 |
| 188251090 (Comments: 2) | Dima gamer12 (Discussed changesets: 57) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 188370948 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21215 commented 2026-09-01 15:15:22 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,134 |
| 188274221 (Comments: 2) | Dima gamer12 (Discussed changesets: 57) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 188370948 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21215 commented 2026-09-01 15:15:22 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,134 |
| 188274621 (Comments: 2) | Dima gamer12 (Discussed changesets: 57) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 188370948 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21215 commented 2026-09-01 15:15:22 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,134 |
| 188279497 (Comments: 2) | Dima gamer12 (Discussed changesets: 57) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 188370948 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21215 commented 2026-09-01 15:15:22 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,134 |
| 188312078 (Comments: 2) | Dima gamer12 (Discussed changesets: 57) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 188370948 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21215 commented 2026-09-01 15:15:22 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,134 |
| 188276882 (Comments: 2) | Dima gamer12 (Discussed changesets: 57) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 188370948 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21215 commented 2026-09-01 15:15:22 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,134 |
| 188251183 (Comments: 2) | Dima gamer12 (Discussed changesets: 57) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 188370948 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21215 commented 2026-09-01 15:15:22 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,134 |
| 188222974 (Comments: 2) | Dima gamer12 (Discussed changesets: 57) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 188370948 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21215 commented 2026-09-01 15:15:22 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,134 |
| 188254659 (Comments: 2) | Dima gamer12 (Discussed changesets: 57) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 188370948 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21215 commented 2026-09-01 15:15:21 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,134 |
| 188258779 (Comments: 2) | Dima gamer12 (Discussed changesets: 57) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 188370948 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21215 commented 2026-09-01 15:15:21 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,134 |
| 188223306 (Comments: 2) | Dima gamer12 (Discussed changesets: 57) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 188370948 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21215 commented 2026-09-01 15:15:21 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,134 |
| 188276823 (Comments: 2) | Dima gamer12 (Discussed changesets: 57) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 188370948 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21215 commented 2026-09-01 15:15:21 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,134 |
| 188279858 (Comments: 2) | Dima gamer12 (Discussed changesets: 57) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 188370948 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21215 commented 2026-09-01 15:15:21 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,134 |
| 188276566 (Comments: 2) | Dima gamer12 (Discussed changesets: 57) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 188370948 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21215 commented 2026-09-01 15:15:21 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,134 |
| 188277369 (Comments: 2) | Dima gamer12 (Discussed changesets: 57) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 188370948 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21215 commented 2026-09-01 15:15:21 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,134 |
| 188277827 (Comments: 2) | Dima gamer12 (Discussed changesets: 57) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 188370948 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21215 commented 2026-09-01 15:15:20 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,134 |
| 188222995 (Comments: 2) | Dima gamer12 (Discussed changesets: 57) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 188370948 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21215 commented 2026-09-01 15:15:20 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,134 |
| 188268155 (Comments: 2) | Dima gamer12 (Discussed changesets: 57) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 188370948 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21215 commented 2026-09-01 15:15:20 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,134 |
| 188280290 (Comments: 2) | Dima gamer12 (Discussed changesets: 57) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 188370948 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21215 commented 2026-09-01 15:15:20 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,134 |
| 188268061 (Comments: 2) | Dima gamer12 (Discussed changesets: 57) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 188370948 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21215 commented 2026-09-01 15:15:20 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,134 |
| 188270269 (Comments: 2) | Dima gamer12 (Discussed changesets: 57) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 188370948 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21215 commented 2026-09-01 15:15:20 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,134 |
| X | 188277344 (Comments: 2) | Dima gamer12 (Discussed changesets: 57) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 188370948 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21215 commented 2026-09-01 15:15:20 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,134 |
| 188280977 (Comments: 2) | Dima gamer12 (Discussed changesets: 57) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 188370948 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21215 commented 2026-09-01 15:15:20 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,134 |
| 188310290 (Comments: 2) | Dima gamer12 (Discussed changesets: 57) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 188370948 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21215 commented 2026-09-01 15:15:19 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,134 |
| 188277694 (Comments: 2) | Dima gamer12 (Discussed changesets: 57) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 188370948 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21215 commented 2026-09-01 15:15:19 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,134 |
| 188276411 (Comments: 2) | Dima gamer12 (Discussed changesets: 57) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 188370948 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21215 commented 2026-09-01 15:15:19 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,134 |
| 188277161 (Comments: 2) | Dima gamer12 (Discussed changesets: 57) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 188370948 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21215 commented 2026-09-01 15:15:19 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,134 |
| 188271499 (Comments: 2) | Dima gamer12 (Discussed changesets: 57) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 188370948 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21215 commented 2026-09-01 15:15:19 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,134 |
| 188271798 (Comments: 2) | Dima gamer12 (Discussed changesets: 57) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 188370948 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21215 commented 2026-09-01 15:15:19 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,134 |
| 188240075 (Comments: 2) | Dima gamer12 (Discussed changesets: 57) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 188370948 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21215 commented 2026-09-01 15:15:19 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,134 |
| 188225996 (Comments: 2) | Dima gamer12 (Discussed changesets: 57) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 188370948 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21215 commented 2026-09-01 15:15:19 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,134 |
| 188257974 (Comments: 3) | Dima gamer12 (Discussed changesets: 57) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 188370948 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21215 commented 2026-09-01 15:15:18 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,134 |
| 188049395 (Comments: 2) | Dima gamer12 (Discussed changesets: 57) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 188370948 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21215 commented 2026-09-01 15:15:18 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,134 |
| 188224949 (Comments: 2) | Dima gamer12 (Discussed changesets: 57) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 188370948 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21215 commented 2026-09-01 15:15:18 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,134 |
| 188227719 (Comments: 2) | Dima gamer12 (Discussed changesets: 57) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 188370948 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21215 commented 2026-09-01 15:15:18 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,134 |
| 188124458 (Comments: 3) | Dima gamer12 (Discussed changesets: 57) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 188370948 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21215 commented 2026-09-01 15:15:18 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,134 |
| 188248853 (Comments: 2) | Dima gamer12 (Discussed changesets: 57) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 188370948 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21215 commented 2026-09-01 15:15:18 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,134 |
| 188276941 (Comments: 2) | Dima gamer12 (Discussed changesets: 57) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 188370948 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21215 commented 2026-09-01 15:15:18 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,134 |
| 188280244 (Comments: 2) | Dima gamer12 (Discussed changesets: 57) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 188370948 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21215 commented 2026-09-01 15:15:17 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,134 |
| 188192727 (Comments: 2) | Dima gamer12 (Discussed changesets: 57) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 188370948 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21215 commented 2026-09-01 15:15:17 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,134 |
| 188248713 (Comments: 2) | Dima gamer12 (Discussed changesets: 57) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 188370948 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21215 commented 2026-09-01 15:15:17 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,134 |
| 188271779 (Comments: 2) | Dima gamer12 (Discussed changesets: 57) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 188370948 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21215 commented 2026-09-01 15:15:17 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,134 |
| 188276313 (Comments: 2) | Dima gamer12 (Discussed changesets: 57) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 188370948 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21215 commented 2026-09-01 15:15:17 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,134 |
| 188280394 (Comments: 3) | Dima gamer12 (Discussed changesets: 57) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 188370948 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21215 commented 2026-09-01 15:15:16 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,134 |
| 188310363 (Comments: 2) | Dima gamer12 (Discussed changesets: 57) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 188370948 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21215 commented 2026-09-01 15:15:16 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,134 |
| 29643665 (Comments: 16) | gmbo (Discussed changesets: 98) | Bezüglich: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3362297824 ist das wirklich ein öffentlicher Trinkwasser-Spender oder eher eine Auffüllstation (amenity=water_point)? Jedenfalls wird er auf der watrify.com App mit ein... commented 2026-09-01 15:13:21 UTC by chris66 ♦501 |
| 188167716 (Comments: 2) | ItsTheDangWind (Discussed changesets: 1) | I am working on an OpenTripPlanner implementation and the walking direction routing is not appropriately mapping the walk routing. It seems like the platform is not properly mapped to the walking network. It was my understanding that relating the con... commented 2026-09-01 15:06:22 UTC by ItsTheDangWind ♦1 |
| 187872900 (Comments: 1) | freefloatz (Discussed changesets: 3) | In this case it would have been better to split the untagged boundary where it overlaps with the fence, and then tag that section as fence (keeping it a part of the multipolygon) than it is to draw over. --- ... commented 2026-09-01 15:06:00 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,560 |
| 188129203 (Comments: 5) | Wikilux (Discussed changesets: 54) | Did they? How do you know? In any case, it's just a different spelling and not a different name. The nodes are not for addresses but for a https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:place=locality , a single farm. https://wiki.openstreetmap.... commented 2026-09-01 15:05:22 UTC by 9_tab ♦129 |
| 188370063 (Comments: 1) | SlimStorm (Discussed changesets: 8) | Dag SlimStorm, Meestal hebben laadpalen geen naam en is operator voldoende. Sons heeft een laadstation een naam, maar die palen in de wijken niet. MVG eggie commented 2026-09-01 15:03:55 UTC by eggie ♦46,961 |
| 188354637 (Comments: 1) | Cosmin-Mihai (Discussed changesets: 1) | Salut! Aloooo!! opreste-te! alea nu sunt indicatvine de blocuri. Iti vor fi sterse toate! Alea sunt puncte de turism cum ar fi pensiunile. Te rog nu mai eidta cu map.me. Aplicatia de navigatie nu este pentru asa ceva. DAca vrei sa adaugi nume/denu... commented 2026-09-01 14:58:48 UTC by rarad74 ♦564 |
| 186946811 (Comments: 1) | philipcullen (Discussed changesets: 48) | Hey just to make sure you know, some of these changes were fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188294982 due to a copy+paste error commented 2026-09-01 14:58:45 UTC by ntzm ♦73 |
| 184748090 (Comments: 1) | emilio4 (Discussed changesets: 1) | #mapycom user report #3193382 - locality position should be 48.4177700N, 18.6975900E commented 2026-09-01 14:57:38 UTC by Filip009CZ ♦51 |
| 184703336 (Comments: 1) | StopWatchingUs (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi StopWatchingUs, I passed through this intersection a few days ago, and I believe I saw the cameras you were referring to. I think these are just traffic cameras, not manufactured by flock. Do you have evidence this is a flock model cam... commented 2026-09-01 14:56:15 UTC by SherbetS ♦172 |
| 188011712 (Comments: 1) | Bradinator (Discussed changesets: 5) | I added the street names, sidewalks should include name=* when the name of the street is known. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/188011712 commented 2026-09-01 14:52:37 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,560 |
| 188364364 (Comments: 3) | carolien987 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Pfoe, daar hebben we geluk. Alleen naar rwn gezet en geen network:type erbij. Als dat laatste was gebeurt, had knooppunt er een spookroute van gemaakt en was het de vraag of dat goed te krijgen is. Toelichting: een route met network=rwn en network... commented 2026-09-01 14:50:47 UTC by dvdhoven ♦987 |
| 188364057 (Comments: 1) | luhmannian (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap :) danke, dass du hilfst die Datenbank aktuell zu halten. Bei Fragen immer raus damit :) Grüße aus Korbach silversurfer83 --- ... commented 2026-09-01 14:50:46 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦4,302 |
| 172422432 (Comments: 1) | PedestrianMapping_GeoRelay (Discussed changesets: 6) | Please don't split a highway=footway footway=crossing way into two separate crossing ways unless you have also split the road and added two separate highway=crossing nodes . Doing half a job is not actually helpful for pedestrian routing and pot... commented 2026-09-01 14:49:31 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,918 |
| 188367269 (Comments: 1) | CharlieSery (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-09-01 14:38:53 UTC by eggie ♦46,961 |
| 185784803 (Comments: 1) | Olyon (Discussed changesets: 171) | Ce n'est pas necessaire de mettre source sur tous les objets, beaucoup mieux de le mettre a niveau du changeset commented 2026-09-01 14:35:48 UTC by joost schouppe ♦1,553 |
| 188332237 (Comments: 1) | Fernando Campos 7 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188368269 commented 2026-09-01 14:26:59 UTC by MappingMore ♦685 |
| 188046448 (Comments: 1) | 1MattG (Discussed changesets: 2) | Abbreviations aren't used in street names or addr:street. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/188046448 commented 2026-09-01 14:23:50 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,560 |
| 186669292 (Comments: 1) | RandomThighsEnjoyer (Discussed changesets: 19) | After your edit, there are now two railway=station for this location... commented 2026-09-01 14:23:40 UTC by joost schouppe ♦1,553 |
| 188361785 (Comments: 1) | ballerup-kommune (Discussed changesets: 15) | Adresser importeres, og vedligeholdes, på punkter, af en automatisk proces. Undlad at tagge andre punkter & polygoner med adresse oplysninger. commented 2026-09-01 14:22:10 UTC by osmviborg ♦1,904 |
| 187899322 (Comments: 1) | mitchi (Discussed changesets: 2) | On essaye toujours d'eviter de dupliquer l'information. Dans ce cas, j'ai fais un seule site de sport (avec nom, dans le futur peut etre encore des autres infos) et j'ai supprimé les noms des terrains de jeu eu meme. commented 2026-09-01 14:21:25 UTC by joost schouppe ♦1,553 |
| 188324475 (Comments: 2) | martien-176 (Discussed changesets: 40) | You can find more info about this here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dresidential --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/188324475 commented 2026-09-01 14:20:29 UTC by martien-176 ♦368 |
| 188362528 (Comments: 2) | Zarrink (Discussed changesets: 7) | I changed it because an A7 section opened parallel to it and this has been done everywhere on the previously opened sections. commented 2026-09-01 14:17:40 UTC by Zarrink ♦4 |
| 188057265 (Comments: 1) | RandomizedNoise (Discussed changesets: 1) | FYI, you moved the camera to the southbound left lane of the street, which doesn't seem likely. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/188057265 ... commented 2026-09-01 14:16:26 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,560 |
| 188350327 (Comments: 1) | Andrew Marshandy (Discussed changesets: 1) | namanya memang seperti itu? commented 2026-09-01 14:16:20 UTC by FajrAl ♦757 |
| 188362131 (Comments: 1) | dellpapua023 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Sebaiknya diskusi dulu dengan komunitas minta tolong kepada komunitas, karena hasil suntinganmu kurang bagus dan berpotensi merusak batas administrasinya, commented 2026-09-01 14:13:22 UTC by FajrAl ♦757 |
| 187326292 (Comments: 1) | putman122 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Je hebt hier de manage toegevoegd https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/14089272642 die reeds bestond https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/269142962. Ik heb je dubbel weer verwijderd. commented 2026-09-01 14:12:33 UTC by joost schouppe ♦1,553 |
| 188317378 (Comments: 1) | PiguaveRodríguezAdrianaElizabeth (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188367263 commented 2026-09-01 14:09:49 UTC by MappingMore ♦685 |
| 188323248 (Comments: 2) | banderas191 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hola, si, los revisé el sábado pasado. Siempre actualizo analizando previamente el terreno, y en raras ocasiones cuando tengo muy claro un cambio. Este sendero/camino de paso es muy interesante para conectar el Torrent de Rocamora ... commented 2026-09-01 14:05:08 UTC by banderas191 ♦2 |
| 187716764 (Comments: 1) | TaurusCB (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hallo, opening_date beschreibt ein Eröffnungsdatum in der Zukunft, start_date etwas, was in der Vergangenheit liegt. Wenn möglich bitte anpassen, danke commented 2026-09-01 14:01:26 UTC by sembelst134 ♦63 |
| 188352697 (Comments: 5) | rogerpueyo (Discussed changesets: 1) | Queda estrany però no tinc alternativa en ment, ho poso a https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/nuevas-etiquetas-que-aparecen-en-espana-bienvenido-mister-tag-bmt/98218/885 per si algú te millor tag. Gràcies per respondre, s... commented 2026-09-01 13:45:45 UTC by aTarom ♦981 |
| 185933516 (Comments: 7) | Kamil_Piwowarski (Discussed changesets: 4) | To nie jest „ciąg pieszo-rowerowy”, tylko dwa odrębne elementy infrastruktury: droga dla rowerów i droga dla pieszych. Ich połączenie w jedną linię oznacza utratę informacji o rzeczywistym przebiegu i topologii. Zamia... commented 2026-09-01 13:38:42 UTC by Kamil_Piwowarski ♦14 |
| 164223891 (Comments: 4) | eerib (Discussed changesets: 102) | Yes, reception is probably a better choice instead of recreation_desk. commented 2026-09-01 13:36:26 UTC by eerib ♦375 |
| 188304101 (Comments: 1) | SmithyScotland (Discussed changesets: 26) | Thank you! commented 2026-09-01 13:30:46 UTC by jayaddison ♦49 |
| 188334621 (Comments: 1) | yasmin25 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Foi adicionado um padaria que não havia no mapa commented 2026-09-01 13:27:59 UTC by yasmin25 ♦1 |
| 186549743 (Comments: 1) | xx yyy19 (Discussed changesets: 7) | If you're working on this, make sure to respect the on the ground rule (street signs are in Arab according to my sources). If you spot streets with name in English, that should be changed to name in Arab and the English name in name:en commented 2026-09-01 13:26:07 UTC by joost schouppe ♦1,553 |
| 188346284 (Comments: 1) | Nomo2010 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Nomo2010, willkommen bei OSM. Hier ist eine Fahrbahn mit zwei Spuren. Es wird nicht gesplittet. Deine Änderung wird zurück gesetzt. Viele Grüße, Znaika commented 2026-09-01 13:25:14 UTC by Znaika ♦213 |
| 187693038 (Comments: 1) | MosheMadlan (Discussed changesets: 11) | Hi, there is no זאב רווח street marked nearby, can you mark it? commented 2026-09-01 13:23:35 UTC by Sanniu ♦689 |
| 187871331 (Comments: 1) | MosheMadlan (Discussed changesets: 11) | Hi, there is no סמטת פולג nearby, only פולג - is the street name wrong? commented 2026-09-01 13:17:54 UTC by Sanniu ♦689 |
| 188315177 (Comments: 3) | 98Ujm (Discussed changesets: 32) | Mas nuevas y gratuitas (hay que registrarse) tenes en Copernicus, el proyecto europeo, https://s2gm.land.copernicus.eu/ lo que no se si se pueden usar directamente como capa para dibujarle arriba. Por ejemplo, la fecha en las zonas que vi tiene menos... commented 2026-09-01 13:05:56 UTC by muralito ♦2,179 |
| 188362267 (Comments: 1) | Huw Ants (Discussed changesets: 1) | Prynhawn da, and croeso mawr i OpenStreetMap! Thank you for your edit and for adding this information. It is generally correct, however, the `name` tag is only used for places, object, roads etc. with a recognised name, while `addr:housename`... commented 2026-09-01 13:05:52 UTC by Preben Vangberg ♦9 |
| 187764834 (Comments: 1) | Dark Phantom (Discussed changesets: 3) | Where is the source that "Dartmouth College Police" operates this camera? "Dartmouth College Police" is not an actual organization. "Dartmouth College Safety and Security" is. It seems highly unlikely that Dartmouth C... commented 2026-09-01 13:05:19 UTC by bicoid ♦1 |
| 188182465 (Comments: 3) | ZB_BN (Discussed changesets: 37) | siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185295679 commented 2026-09-01 13:03:27 UTC by Zrop ♦163 |
| 187658498 (Comments: 3) | ZB_BN (Discussed changesets: 37) | ja, das gilt für alle Wege. Die Bewohner der Häuser dürfen doch bestimmt mit dem Fahrrad dort bis zur Haustüre fahren. commented 2026-09-01 12:59:59 UTC by Zrop ♦163 |
| 188363192 (Comments: 1) | wheelmap_visitor (Discussed changesets: 116) | Change the earth to Cancún quintana roo Me xico united sates of America new york zip code +998 --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/188363192 ... commented 2026-09-01 12:58:57 UTC by Dima gamer12 ♦1 |
| 182438927 (Comments: 1) | Tom Landlord (Discussed changesets: 3) | Moin Tom Landlord, leider hast Du keine Quelle angegeben, ich vermute Du kennst Dich vor Ort aus? Heißt die Kreuzung wirklich "Kreuzung mit sechs Straßen"? Viele Grüße Roger Wilco commented 2026-09-01 12:52:53 UTC by OSM_RogerWilco ♦825 |
| 187683900 (Comments: 1) | Hansiepanzie (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hi Hansiepanzie, Don't forget to add your source for edits commented 2026-09-01 12:52:30 UTC by joost schouppe ♦1,553 |
| 186890937 (Comments: 3) | tesp (Discussed changesets: 34) | Kiitos lisäyksistä, palautin nämä uudet to= ja from= tägit muutoksessa 188361418. Nuo on hyvä olla, koska dataa käyttävä sovellus voi itse generoida oman nimiformaatin. Mitä tulee tuohon nimitä... commented 2026-09-01 12:50:54 UTC by Toni100 ♦31 |
| 187001580 (Comments: 1) | 225kV (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thanks for these additions. As underground cables are not visible from imagery nor easily in the field, please state your sources! commented 2026-09-01 12:50:17 UTC by joost schouppe ♦1,553 |
| 188318636 (Comments: 1) | David at Large (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thanks for adding a restaurant. Does it have a Georgian name as well? commented 2026-09-01 12:48:31 UTC by evgenykatyshev ♦296 |
| 187679088 (Comments: 1) | Samleof (Discussed changesets: 1) | When you create the police station on the whole site like you did here https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1550765046, that's totally fine - but don't create duplicates! In this case, the police station was already mapped on the building, so ... commented 2026-09-01 12:46:04 UTC by joost schouppe ♦1,553 |
| 188320563 (Comments: 1) | jlmarx89 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi! Thanks for adding the railway crossing. Don't forget to add a node at every intersection between path and rails. commented 2026-09-01 12:45:00 UTC by evgenykatyshev ♦296 |
| 188246578 (Comments: 2) | GiovanniPen (Discussed changesets: 5) | we've been there and there were some children playing, so i added landuse=recreation_ground i wanted to specify the surface aswell but wasn't sure of the material commented 2026-09-01 12:44:41 UTC by GiovanniPen ♦33 |
| 188033018 (Comments: 1) | HellMap (Discussed changesets: 110) | Čau, sāku domāt varbūt tiešām vajadzēja atstāt kā bija, jo tagad = private un saliktie ierobežojumi ir tikai daļēji pārbaudīti, bet ne uz faktiem 🤔 Ko tu ieteiktu un varbūt arī vari tur visu salabot , piemēram uz highway=ser... commented 2026-09-01 12:39:17 UTC by rusjanis ♦31 |
| 187758525 (Comments: 1) | Kugelbaum (Discussed changesets: 8) | Based on the history of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/577091141, I'd say it's a building=church but not an amenity=church. I'll change it, let me know if you think I'm wrong commented 2026-09-01 12:38:28 UTC by joost schouppe ♦1,553 |
| 188360770 (Comments: 1) | Tresch (Discussed changesets: 18) | Ta droga: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1152950505 nagle też przestała być ulicą Łowińskiego? Mam wątpliwości co do fragmentu przebiegającego po przyszłej jezdni S7, ale jeśli rzeczywiście uważasz, że powinno to być oznaczone jako ... commented 2026-09-01 12:35:28 UTC by YomanNH ♦535 |
| 188272882 (Comments: 1) | KartoGrapHiti (Discussed changesets: 85) | Hallo 👋, KartoGrapHiti, Du hast hier einen leeren node (14135856149, v1) eingefügt. War das Absicht? Grüße aus Herborn Andreas commented 2026-09-01 12:33:02 UTC by Herwescheluc ♦197 |
| 188226967 (Comments: 1) | Sanches12 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188343722 commented 2026-09-01 12:28:27 UTC by Wildsharky ♦926 |
| 188235205 (Comments: 1) | Planko87 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188343529 commented 2026-09-01 12:27:50 UTC by Wildsharky ♦926 |
| 188260744 (Comments: 1) | Bretzelou (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188343043 commented 2026-09-01 12:27:08 UTC by Wildsharky ♦926 |
 | 188274171 (Comments: 1) | ALLO BY CONTACT™ (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188342307 commented 2026-09-01 12:26:35 UTC by Wildsharky ♦926 |
| 188352211 (Comments: 1) | Tyoma14 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi! Thanks for adding addresses. I spotted that you added street names in Russian and English as well. Please check the translation convention by link below. We usually use a bit different approach across Georgia https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/W... commented 2026-09-01 12:26:05 UTC by evgenykatyshev ♦296 |
| 188265829 (Comments: 1) | Vanduo_Šviesoje (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188304704 commented 2026-09-01 12:25:51 UTC by Wildsharky ♦926 |
| 188300942 (Comments: 2) | tbo47 (Discussed changesets: 31) | I bought a icecream at this place yesterday. I'm pretty sure they are open all days of the week. I will double check. Thank you for your message commented 2026-09-01 12:25:31 UTC by tbo47 ♦24 |
| 188260641 (Comments: 1) | johnmaciast (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188341934 commented 2026-09-01 12:24:49 UTC by Wildsharky ♦926 |
| 188240325 (Comments: 1) | CartyDirty (Discussed changesets: 3) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188304369 commented 2026-09-01 12:24:17 UTC by Wildsharky ♦926 |
| 160537844 (Comments: 1) | Buendig (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo, ich möchte fragen wie die Information zustande gekommen ist. Hast du dort selbst Wasser zapfen können? Meiner Erinnerung nach ist es nicht öffentlich bzw. eingezäunt und auch nicht als Trinkwasserstelle gedacht, sondern ... commented 2026-09-01 12:22:51 UTC by sembelst134 ♦63 |
| 188225564 (Comments: 1) | Diagoperalta (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188297752 commented 2026-09-01 12:22:38 UTC by Wildsharky ♦926 |
| 188222925 (Comments: 1) | tanline4u (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188297272 commented 2026-09-01 12:21:05 UTC by Wildsharky ♦926 |
| 188223167 (Comments: 1) | mapafeito (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188295640 commented 2026-09-01 12:19:48 UTC by Wildsharky ♦926 |
| 188277191 (Comments: 1) | Franklin ya (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188289036 commented 2026-09-01 12:19:02 UTC by Wildsharky ♦926 |
| 188263003 (Comments: 1) | Cara Membatalkan Pengajuan Spinjam Shopee (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188287497 commented 2026-09-01 12:18:23 UTC by Wildsharky ♦926 |
| 188360692 (Comments: 5) | Langlaeufer (Discussed changesets: 138) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/18301058 commented 2026-09-01 12:17:17 UTC by OSM_RogerWilco ♦825 |
| 188304215 (Comments: 1) | julls2004 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188361025 commented 2026-09-01 12:09:38 UTC by ajmat ♦418 |
| 188044808 (Comments: 2) | Sandonin (Discussed changesets: 7) | Bonjour red fox, merci pour votre retour ! Je me suis permis par ce changeset d’ajouter les principales lignes de désir - explicitement en tant que chemins informels, ce qui me semble le tag le plus pertinent ici. La pratique est tout &a... commented 2026-09-01 12:07:59 UTC by Sandonin ♦12 |
| 188317954 (Comments: 1) | Валерий Тютюнник (Discussed changesets: 1) | Не питьевая то есть? commented 2026-09-01 11:59:24 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,700 |
| 188207460 (Comments: 3) | mbenntll (Discussed changesets: 1) | No worries, I understand you were using StreetComplete and what its limitations are. It’s a great tool! I’ve edited the map to add that detail in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188360494, thanks for your help! :) commented 2026-09-01 11:56:51 UTC by gurglypipe ♦1,109 |
| 186449977 (Comments: 2) | adreamy (Discussed changesets: 16) | To @dpolovinkin. I’m not familiar with the situation at that location (such as whether the buildings actually exist or not). In my previous work, I mistakenly thought that location was somewhere else and deleted the existing buildings whi... commented 2026-09-01 11:54:40 UTC by adreamy ♦64 |
| 188277884 (Comments: 1) | Nicoll_05 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188360135 commented 2026-09-01 11:50:42 UTC by ajmat ♦418 |
| 188359655 (Comments: 1) | Klepschgar (Discussed changesets: 2) | Dag Klepschgar, In OSM voegen niet nogmaals het adres aan een gebouwomtrek toe. Er zijn al adresnodes. ip.. oneway=no hoef je niet toe te voegen. Het is default op wegen. MVG eggie commented 2026-09-01 11:49:46 UTC by eggie ♦46,961 |
| 185251276 (Comments: 1) | liljaadeliina (Discussed changesets: 101) | Tässä on muutetut parkkipaikan sisäisiä väyliä service=driveway, vaikka service=parking_aisle on ollut aivan oikea. Jälleen kerran, älä muuta olemassa olevaa, jos et ole varma että muutos on oikea. commented 2026-09-01 11:49:31 UTC by Scalarik ♦22 |
| 188316602 (Comments: 1) | amplejev1987 (Discussed changesets: 8) | Na stipriai sugadinta poligonų topologija ir taškų tankis per didelis - gerokai didesnis nei realus duomenų tikslumas. commented 2026-09-01 11:48:02 UTC by Tomas Straupis ♦2,112 |
| 168133118 (Comments: 2) | Lokalfuerst (Discussed changesets: 97) | Ist zwar schon ein Jahr her aber ich kann aus Ortskenntnis sagen, dass Auf dem Lüppen auch quasi eine Sackgasse ist. Da ist reiner Anliegerverkehr zu den Firmen und vielleicht mal ein Anwohner, der aus dem südlichen Wohngebiet herausfä... commented 2026-09-01 11:43:12 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦4,302 |
| 188176534 (Comments: 2) | Hiki is railing (Discussed changesets: 1) | we've elaborated a bit about the sourcing in the second section of this post about the project; https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Hiki%20is%20railing/diary/409302 - and further, simply, we believe this information is sufficie... commented 2026-09-01 11:37:54 UTC by Hiki is railing ♦1 |
| 186220045 (Comments: 1) | liljaadeliina (Discussed changesets: 101) | Kantopuisto ja Juuripuisto eivät yllä noin pitkälle, koko metsät eivät ole puistoa. Korjasin puistot takaisin oikeaan kokoonsa. Vähän tarkkuutta näiden kanssa jatkossa, älä muuta asioita jos et ole va... commented 2026-09-01 11:24:13 UTC by Scalarik ♦22 |
| 188260202 (Comments: 1) | BadWolf0081 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Please review: https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-65.06658&lat=45.97106&zoom=12&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&opacity=0.95&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_ri... commented 2026-09-01 11:22:41 UTC by kartler175 ♦585 |
| 188297952 (Comments: 3) | silversurfer83 (Discussed changesets: 42) | > Ich habe mit dem auslösenden user auch ausführlich per DM kommuniziert Ah, top! commented 2026-09-01 11:21:53 UTC by PattaFeuFeu ♦21 |
| 174297987 (Comments: 4) | fmc_5 (Discussed changesets: 21) | Danke, ich habe sie entfernt. Dort ist ein Grünstreifen, der zwar hier und da gelegentlich zum Parken missbraucht zu werden scheint (Lücken in der Grasnarbe), aber kein regulärer Parkraum. commented 2026-09-01 11:19:56 UTC by Supaplex030 ♦464 |
| 188294737 (Comments: 3) | Gert4321 (Discussed changesets: 11) | Thx! commented 2026-09-01 11:19:21 UTC by eggie ♦46,961 |
| 188356903 (Comments: 2) | Duncan van Dijk (Discussed changesets: 11) | Wegen aangepast conform foto 2de week augustus. Wellicht heb je daar wat aan. https://viewer.satellietdataportaal.nl/@51.57771,4.576208,18/?datastrip=20260808_SVNEO3-01&sensorname=SuperView-NEO3 Mapse commented 2026-09-01 11:18:51 UTC by eggie ♦46,961 |
| 188104891 (Comments: 1) | Stevenmnnm (Discussed changesets: 1) | hi! thanks for your contribution to the openstreetmap. the changeset 188104891 was revertedreverted due to added spam names to roads please provide the reasons for your edits and the sources --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSM... commented 2026-09-01 11:12:59 UTC by mikita_paloika ♦24 |
| 187606127 (Comments: 1) | openmonheim (Discussed changesets: 10) | Hi, welche Hinweise sind behoben? Hier ist ein Gebäude und du hast building=yes gelöscht. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1336471867/history Gruß, Znaika commented 2026-09-01 11:06:35 UTC by Znaika ♦213 |
| 188355466 (Comments: 6) | Timmie Hen (Discussed changesets: 2) | Tim, Laat je niet ontmoedigen. Gewoon gaan mappen. Voorzichtig beginnen. Dus niet random over half Branbant. Begin met simpele zaken. Ga nog geen busroutes bewerken of kruispunten aanpassen. Probeer er in te groeien. In je 2de changes... commented 2026-09-01 11:06:19 UTC by eggie ♦46,961 |
| 188325675 (Comments: 2) | Marek-M (Discussed changesets: 205) | Dzięki za info. Poprawiłem w relacjach i w stop_position. commented 2026-09-01 11:00:28 UTC by Marek-M ♦1,111 |
| 188284269 (Comments: 5) | Tunibal (Discussed changesets: 5) | Dem schließe ich mich an 👍🏻 commented 2026-09-01 10:58:24 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦4,302 |
| 188342141 (Comments: 1) | Janis Stiga RM (Discussed changesets: 2) | Ceļš uzzīmēts virs jau esoša ceļa un galā jocīgs ķeksis Sakārtoju https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188357553 commented 2026-09-01 10:55:37 UTC by Colbertson ♦169 |
| 178805004 (Comments: 1) | fghifnh (Discussed changesets: 3) | Cześć, skąd masz informację nazwie tego stawiku https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/165455568 - masz jakieś źródło, że jego nazwa to jezioro czarne? commented 2026-09-01 10:52:21 UTC by Marek-M ♦1,111 |
| 188356995 (Comments: 1) | RM23 (Discussed changesets: 5) | If Bings the eye in the sky... Who has their ear to the ground? commented 2026-09-01 10:51:21 UTC by Nicki Grider ♦1 |
| 188325628 (Comments: 1) | tva63 (Discussed changesets: 13) | Ciao tva63 Du hast hier bei https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/122951636/history/3 die Gemeindegrenzen von Nods und Cormoret verschlechtert. Das ist an sich kein Problem, das Grenzprüf-Tool https://boundaries.osm.ch/ dies gemeldet hat (... commented 2026-09-01 10:50:10 UTC by habi ♦2,248 |
| 188353755 (Comments: 2) | Timmie Hen (Discussed changesets: 2) | Feedback Geef svp concreet aan wat je hebt aangepast. Schuiven met de kaart in editmodus levert vaak schade op. Beter niet doen. Breda Int Airport staat toch al op de kaart. Waarom die naam nogmaals op her gebouw? MVG eggie commented 2026-09-01 10:48:28 UTC by eggie ♦46,961 |
| 188353495 (Comments: 1) | Windows101 BV (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OSM, Bedankt voor uw bijdrage. De info heb ik samengevoegd met de bestaande adresnode. MVG eggie commented 2026-09-01 10:44:43 UTC by eggie ♦46,961 |
| 187788005 (Comments: 1) | Oli vdB B-Fr (Discussed changesets: 2) | S'il y a deja un polygone pour un objet, c'est certainment pas necessaire de le dupliquer avec un point! Je supprime. La Maison du Lac a l'air d'etre une maison de vacance, je change le type d'objet commented 2026-09-01 10:40:30 UTC by joost schouppe ♦1,553 |
| 186916025 (Comments: 1) | liljaadeliina (Discussed changesets: 101) | Heippa, natural=sand ei kuulu käyttää rakennustyömaiden kohdalla. Ymmärrän tavoitteen täyttää kartta, mutta tämä on "mapping for the renderer"-periaatteen vastaista. Nämä on j... commented 2026-09-01 10:39:52 UTC by Scalarik ♦22 |
| 188108344 (Comments: 1) | WhiskyMacK (Discussed changesets: 18) | The relation is completely invalid, with lots of outer polygons enclosed by the site's outer boundary - see https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-3.21831&lat=56.18021&zoom=17&baselayer=OSM%20Carto%20(OSMF)&opacity=... commented 2026-09-01 10:37:01 UTC by tms13 ♦91 |
| 188311869 (Comments: 1) | Mikkorivas (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188356197 commented 2026-09-01 10:33:32 UTC by ajmat ♦418 |
| 188005503 (Comments: 3) | mueschel (Discussed changesets: 1008) | Thanks for the quick response and clarification. That makes sense, and I understand the situation now. Just for reference, the Wiki currently recommends using limited_service:mail=yes together with opening_hours:limited_service=* to specify what t... commented 2026-09-01 10:31:40 UTC by gc27 ♦27 |
| 187678214 (Comments: 1) | Ty_XLV1K (Discussed changesets: 1) | This hospital already exists: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/944752309 I'll delete your version commented 2026-09-01 10:27:46 UTC by joost schouppe ♦1,553 |
| 188278897 (Comments: 1) | Hellen Sanchez Delis (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188355836 commented 2026-09-01 10:24:30 UTC by ajmat ♦418 |
| 188313967 (Comments: 1) | Roy Diego (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188355402 commented 2026-09-01 10:15:13 UTC by ajmat ♦418 |
| 187372130 (Comments: 1) | plicploc (Discussed changesets: 4) | Je m'imagine que StreetComplete ne te dis grand chose sur les objets que tu as edité ici - mais amenity=hospital n'est surement pas correct pour un maison médicale! Je corrige. commented 2026-09-01 10:13:51 UTC by joost schouppe ♦1,553 |
| 187757100 (Comments: 1) | fredlenoir (Discussed changesets: 17) | Pourtant, la policlinique a besoin d'un tag amenity=clinic. Je l'ajoute! commented 2026-09-01 10:10:49 UTC by joost schouppe ♦1,553 |
| 185467809 (Comments: 3) | Kalepom (Discussed changesets: 72) | Effectivement, en plus le délai avant la régénération des tuiles ne facilite pas les review (de mon côté ça n'apparait toujours pas). Je ne suis pas du coin mais j'y repasserai peut-être... commented 2026-09-01 10:08:35 UTC by rezemika ♦27 |
 | 188268320 (Comments: 4) | Mirditor22 (Discussed changesets: 19) | Bruh i am just informing you in a neutral state. commented 2026-09-01 10:07:04 UTC by 5mister7 ♦15 |
| 188228949 (Comments: 1) | YKYash (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM. Please visit Andhra Pradesh page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Andhra_Pradesh) and join OSM Andhra Pradesh Telegram channel (https://t.me/osmandhra). This software requires that I review everything as either good... commented 2026-09-01 09:57:40 UTC by arjunaraoc ♦823 |
| 188100860 (Comments: 1) | thoshishkrishna (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM. Please visit Andhra Pradesh page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Andhra_Pradesh) and join OSM Andhra Pradesh Telegram channel (https://t.me/osmandhra). This software requires that I review everything as either good... commented 2026-09-01 09:55:47 UTC by arjunaraoc ♦823 |
| 188354193 (Comments: 1) | snapp-map-editor (Discussed changesets: 1) | Please provide proper changeset comments. What did you change, why did you change it, and based on what information? You cannot name hundreds of streets across the country and just say this is based on "information available to the Snapp mapping... commented 2026-09-01 09:52:37 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,134 |
| 188349866 (Comments: 2) | autostatic (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hallo eggie, Bedankt voor het reviewen! Jeremy commented 2026-09-01 09:46:46 UTC by autostatic ♦3 |
| 188263008 (Comments: 3) | zorun (Discussed changesets: 6) | En fait, je croyais même que tu faisais partie du groupe d'une dizaine de personnes qui est venue faire de la "carto de plein air" dans ce parc dimanche après-midi (RTK, Panoramax). C'est super intéressant comm... commented 2026-09-01 09:43:18 UTC by StC ♦518 |
| 188332111 (Comments: 1) | Popolon (Discussed changesets: 38) | Hello! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/936612551. What is the mean of the tag IDFM:482148zone:maxspeed = FR:30? commented 2026-09-01 09:32:20 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,833 |
 | 188301475 (Comments: 1) | sulriograndense (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hello! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1553841134 (one of four ways). What is the meanof the tags HRname = Kore HRparent = ET0417 HRpcode = ET041705 OBJECTID = 483 REGIONNAME = Oromia REG_P_CODE = 04 REG_P... commented 2026-09-01 09:30:40 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,833 |
| 188232380 (Comments: 1) | Ronikshbc (Discussed changesets: 3) | HI. You have mapped this feature as a place=village https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1553568570/history#map=18/27.859412/85.048900 I think this should probably be a landuse=* or natural=* area. Place=* is usually assigned to a node. commented 2026-09-01 09:22:15 UTC by Adrian Shobrooke ♦27 |
 | 188228331 (Comments: 2) | TheSwavu (Discussed changesets: 316) | Greetings, Two things: 1. Address components beyond addr:street=* are optional in AU (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Australian_features). 2. Not adding them reduces the chance that you'... commented 2026-09-01 09:11:57 UTC by TheSwavu ♦677 |
| 188281753 (Comments: 2) | TheSwavu (Discussed changesets: 316) | Greetings, Two things: 1. Address components beyond addr:street=* are optional in AU (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Australian_features). 2. Not adding them reduces the chance that you'... commented 2026-09-01 09:11:19 UTC by TheSwavu ♦677 |
| 188281745 (Comments: 2) | TheSwavu (Discussed changesets: 316) | Greetings, Two things: 1. Address components beyond addr:street=* are optional in AU (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Australian_features). 2. Not adding them reduces the chance that you'... commented 2026-09-01 09:10:57 UTC by TheSwavu ♦677 |
| 188180569 (Comments: 2) | Firefishy (Discussed changesets: 47) | Wow. Nuts. Doesn't feel like it. commented 2026-09-01 09:04:26 UTC by Firefishy ♦304 |
| 188350753 (Comments: 1) | borishag (Discussed changesets: 50) | Hello, You (again) duplicated existing address in Belgium, actual concensus is not to do that. In this precise case , the address of the store is incorrect : Housenumber 100 is not on this building it's on another side of the road ... commented 2026-09-01 09:01:50 UTC by RaphaelPasloin ♦143 |
| 188346231 (Comments: 1) | Iwouldneverkillmyself (Discussed changesets: 2) | There may be a CCTV installation here, but it's not Flock ANPR as they don't operate in the UK. commented 2026-09-01 08:52:54 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,918 |
| 188347045 (Comments: 1) | Iwouldneverkillmyself (Discussed changesets: 2) | There may be a CCTV installation here, but it's not Flock ANPR as they don't operate in the UK. commented 2026-09-01 08:52:17 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,918 |
| 188308395 (Comments: 3) | roehni (Discussed changesets: 4) | 👍🏻 commented 2026-09-01 08:44:03 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦4,302 |
| 188349888 (Comments: 2) | Lamvanductanan (Discussed changesets: 7) | Please explain your relationship with user/Lamvanduchason. commented 2026-09-01 08:39:14 UTC by DetectiveConan ♦25 |
| 185895973 (Comments: 3) | BromBrom (Discussed changesets: 7) | Top! commented 2026-09-01 08:37:26 UTC by eggie ♦46,961 |
 | 188343666 (Comments: 2) | Ishwor er (Discussed changesets: 3) | I see that the buildings deleted in this changeset have been originally created by you. Still it would have been better to write: "Remove buildings that I have wrongly created" or so. commented 2026-09-01 08:30:53 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,134 |
| 188314943 (Comments: 1) | MS0623 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo, MS0623, 👋 willkommen bei OSM! Eine Anmerkung: In der Marburger Straße hast Du die Einbahnstraße umgedreht. Gilt das dann nicht auch für den Teil Richtung Hauptstraße? Grüße aus Herborn<... commented 2026-09-01 08:30:45 UTC by Herwescheluc ♦197 |
| 188275052 (Comments: 1) | Patrick Correa (Discussed changesets: 9) | According to Deped Lumbo Integrated School is located in Purok 2. is this address incorrect? Or maybe Purok 3 is at the back of the school while Purok 2 is to the right? commented 2026-09-01 08:25:01 UTC by Timmy_Tesseract ♦196 |
| 188275240 (Comments: 1) | Patrick Correa (Discussed changesets: 9) | Hi Patrick. Please don't use name tag for descriptions (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Good_practice). For subdivisions that are still in planning stage you can use landuse=proposed + proposed=residential or if construction... commented 2026-09-01 08:18:03 UTC by Timmy_Tesseract ♦196 |
| 177086357 (Comments: 1) | EncoreFrenchFood (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour, merci d'avoir ajouté votre restaurant ! J'ai ajouté le numéro de téléphone affiché sur votre site et fait une légère modification en gardant les informations que vous avez ren... commented 2026-09-01 08:03:12 UTC by barley383 ♦5 |
| 188349001 (Comments: 1) | TheNightRider (Discussed changesets: 41) | Oops! I accidentally checked the review_requested box and saw it the moment I hit the upload button. No review needed. Sorry! commented 2026-09-01 08:02:58 UTC by TheNightRider ♦75 |
| 187908604 (Comments: 2) | autostatic (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hallo eggie, Bedankt voor de tip, ga ik in het vervolg doen! Groet, Jeremy commented 2026-09-01 07:59:59 UTC by autostatic ♦3 |
| 188346817 (Comments: 1) | clsunny (Discussed changesets: 2) | Please only remove the `name=` , not delete the entire `building=` commented 2026-09-01 07:59:34 UTC by Kovoschiz ♦3,022 |
| 69477907 (Comments: 2) | jaap de vries (Discussed changesets: 137) | je mag het ook zelf doen, ik kom niet zo vaak meer in Hoorn om het ter plekke te controleren. commented 2026-09-01 07:59:12 UTC by jaap de vries ♦677 |
| 188333347 (Comments: 1) | clsunny (Discussed changesets: 2) | 1. Please only remove the `name=` if the names are wrong, not delete the `=bare_rock` 2. `name=` doesn't need to be official. It only needs to be commonly known. If it's not, it can be `loc_name=` etc. commented 2026-09-01 07:56:35 UTC by Kovoschiz ♦3,022 |
| 188306140 (Comments: 3) | squeaker_andrus (Discussed changesets: 16) | Yes. I get that. I still ask you to have a look at the CS that caused the problem your fixing before you fix things. cheers --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/188306140 ... commented 2026-09-01 07:50:20 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦4,302 |
| 188330095 (Comments: 1) | RAV Gooi en Vechtstreek (Discussed changesets: 6) | Dag RAV , Wellicht service=driveway toevoegen. access=? permissive, private ? commented 2026-09-01 07:40:27 UTC by eggie ♦46,961 |
| 188347315 (Comments: 1) | RobbieRob F (Discussed changesets: 15) | Vergeten Leggerkaart Waterschap Limburg op te geven als bron voor beargumentatie en naamgeving commented 2026-09-01 07:31:08 UTC by RobbieRob F ♦12 |
| 187718033 (Comments: 1) | lampronessa (Discussed changesets: 11) | blank commented 2026-09-01 07:27:17 UTC by Soaps12 ♦1 |
| 187846702 (Comments: 1) | Pilot_Kiril4ik (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello, I added #188347128 because I guess it is not possible to access the petrol station from the opposite lanes (i.e. southbound). Feel free to remove my changes if this is not correct. commented 2026-09-01 07:20:27 UTC by brunesto ♦14 |
| 187456444 (Comments: 4) | Alexey_ND (Discussed changesets: 34) | Я думал subarea должен быть внутри границы мультиполигона. А зачем тогда нужен этот subarea... commented 2026-09-01 07:19:59 UTC by HantDX ♦70 |
| 187989941 (Comments: 1) | delineatorix (Discussed changesets: 20) | FYI ich habe den Lade-Stellplatz etwas präzsiert in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188346940#map=19/52.534936/13.272846&layers=N Eine gute Referenz sind die Lade-Stellplätze in Neukölln, zum Beispiel https://www.openstr... commented 2026-09-01 07:12:14 UTC by tordans ♦440 |
| 188345917 (Comments: 2) | Globtroter1111 (Discussed changesets: 1) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism=chalet commented 2026-09-01 07:11:09 UTC by eggie ♦46,961 |
| 188289257 (Comments: 1) | Lamvanductanan (Discussed changesets: 7) | Ngày 24 tháng 12 năm 2025, Ủy ban Thường vụ Quốc hội ban hành Nghị quyết số 111/2025/UBTVQH15 về phân loại đô thị[15]. Căn cứ theo Nghị quyết trên, từ ngày 01 thán... commented 2026-09-01 07:00:48 UTC by DetectiveConan ♦25 |
| 188260073 (Comments: 22) | RAV Gooi en Vechtstreek (Discussed changesets: 6) | De apart ingetekende emergency_access heb ik verwijderd. De tagging zit in de fietspaden met emergency=yes en in de busbaan tegen het verkeer in met oneway:emergency=no Ik denk dat het wel werkt, maar er zijn meer routers die moeite hebben met de ... commented 2026-09-01 07:00:27 UTC by eggie ♦46,961 |
| 188343095 (Comments: 1) | DzENOc (Discussed changesets: 1) | Tolong suntingannya per daerah, jangan AKAP commented 2026-09-01 06:52:36 UTC by FajrAl ♦757 |
| 186390516 (Comments: 1) | Arch (Discussed changesets: 4) | Highway intersecting highway way/208761717 way/1544780121 Is it deliberate? or some road should be removed here? commented 2026-09-01 06:50:17 UTC by Sanniu ♦689 |
| 183359465 (Comments: 2) | Flayer (Discussed changesets: 81) | Sorry, wrong changeset, ignore commented 2026-09-01 06:50:04 UTC by Sanniu ♦689 |
| 183863700 (Comments: 1) | Oliver Lüpke (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hallo Oliver, warum hast Du den Weg von path auf footway geändert? Laut WIKI ist ein footway mit dem Schild DE:239 gekennzeichnet. Siehe: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:highway#Pfade Viele Grüße gino-52 commented 2026-09-01 06:49:07 UTC by Gino-52 ♦84 |
| 186089212 (Comments: 3) | Holic_Kuro (Discussed changesets: 2) | man_made=storage_tank location=underground content=fuel The individual access covers could be tagged as https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:manhole commented 2026-09-01 06:40:23 UTC by mueschel ♦7,309 |
| 188268426 (Comments: 4) | ChrisFromRV (Discussed changesets: 149) | Und wo ist das Radweg Schild von Airbus aus? commented 2026-09-01 06:34:07 UTC by mcliquid ♦2,100 |
| 179721501 (Comments: 1) | wingRAVEN (Discussed changesets: 2) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=51.589204&mlon=39.401574#map=19/51.589204/39.401574 На М4 эти изгибы для чего? commented 2026-09-01 06:23:10 UTC by zlyh ♦6 |
| 188334570 (Comments: 1) | Leidyolguin (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188344380 commented 2026-09-01 06:01:20 UTC by ajmat ♦418 |
| 188337543 (Comments: 3) | jlgsea (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks for clarifying. That's an interesting building. Since it's technically one structure, I've gone ahead and redrawn the outline from the aerial imagery. Generally with retail tenants, we're just adding or modifying a node for... commented 2026-09-01 05:59:49 UTC by extraordinarymachine ♦1 |
| 188330306 (Comments: 1) | Egdapalacios (Discussed changesets: 3) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188344154 commented 2026-09-01 05:53:10 UTC by ajmat ♦418 |
| 188333285 (Comments: 1) | Röllingser (Discussed changesets: 16) | Dag Röllinger, De info heb ik samengevoegd op de adresnode op het gebouw. MVG eggie commented 2026-09-01 05:44:53 UTC by eggie ♦46,961 |
| 188231545 (Comments: 3) | Sam2521 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Just as a heads up for node 14134388882, I converted "Mo-Sat 09:30-17:30, Sun 13:00-5:30" to "Mo-Sa 09:30-17:30; Su 13:00-17:30" because I'm assuming that Mo-Sa and Su both close at 17:30 PM instead of Su closing at 5:30 AM..... commented 2026-09-01 05:41:47 UTC by PostaMap_Infinite ♦62 |
| 188295116 (Comments: 4) | Mercanto123 (Discussed changesets: 28) | Kamil, masz rację, zmieniłem na highway=unclassified :) Ta droga łączy Kaleje z ul Brylantową w Zbrudzewie. commented 2026-09-01 05:41:12 UTC by Mercanto123 ♦19 |
| 188325060 (Comments: 1) | cbhizz12 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Wasn't this removed? commented 2026-09-01 05:36:58 UTC by Adam850 ♦10 |
| 188333394 (Comments: 1) | Röllingser (Discussed changesets: 16) | Hoi, Dit is oke. MVG, eggie commented 2026-09-01 05:33:12 UTC by eggie ♦46,961 |
| 188334206 (Comments: 1) | Pastafariër (Discussed changesets: 2) | Dag Pastafarier, De tandartspraktijk stond al op de kaart. Svp niet dubbelmappen. MVG eggie commented 2026-09-01 05:31:31 UTC by eggie ♦46,961 |
| 188333225 (Comments: 1) | Gunk2169 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188343329 commented 2026-09-01 05:29:50 UTC by ajmat ♦418 |
| 188336924 (Comments: 1) | Aziiz Suleiman (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted by changeset #188343516 due to vandalism commented 2026-09-01 05:27:50 UTC by eggie ♦46,961 |
| 177213288 (Comments: 4) | cyberatlas (Discussed changesets: 115) | I also restored it here https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1934495. And probably whole changeset should be reverted because of tagging for renderer. commented 2026-09-01 05:15:54 UTC by Filip009CZ ♦51 |
| 187172418 (Comments: 3) | Aurelien1685 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Thanks for your quick response. Guido commented 2026-09-01 05:06:23 UTC by gscholz ♦2,960 |
| 188114076 (Comments: 1) | Karen@Digible (Discussed changesets: 1) | When specifying buildings as apartments, please use building=apartments tag instead of landuse=residential, residential=apartments. I have added the building tag back commented 2026-09-01 05:02:51 UTC by alexwohlbruck ♦24 |
| 188339360 (Comments: 1) | UnFlockMeNow (Discussed changesets: 1) | looking at this ALPR on various aerial imagery in iD it seems to be within the road area, being positioned like this is highly unlikely so please double check the position of this ALPR and fix it. Happy mapping, Udar. commented 2026-09-01 04:39:12 UTC by Udarian ♦918 |
| 188185675 (Comments: 1) | LEDFlighter (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hallo LEDFlighter, in der Hebbel-, Storm- und Krohnstr. gibt es keine beidseitigen Radwege, Fahrradsymbole auf der Straße. Die tags „cycleway:xx“ sind deshalb nicht korrekt. Gruß Svalbard commented 2026-09-01 04:39:05 UTC by Svalbard ♦174 |
| 188076600 (Comments: 5) | MappingMore (Discussed changesets: 16) | Hi Vijomar, No problem at all, and thank you for checking the street name again. I’m glad it is now correct. Thank you for your help and for contributing to the map. Happy mapping! commented 2026-09-01 04:34:37 UTC by MappingMore ♦685 |
| 188054728 (Comments: 2) | icarus72180 (Discussed changesets: 1) | thank you so much! yes, you are right, i got way too excited, and tbh, they are fun to make.... when they work. I did notice you fixed one, thank you, it made me think, hey... im not doing this right. so i did what i should have and read the wiki.... commented 2026-09-01 03:53:19 UTC by icarus72180 ♦2 |
| 188214885 (Comments: 5) | ڕاستی (Discussed changesets: 188) | see osm.org/user_blocks/21208 commented 2026-09-01 03:33:08 UTC by Gitasaleh Virast ♦42 |
| 178046709 (Comments: 5) | ❤️🔥 (Discussed changesets: 148) | Thanks for those examples. That's why I didn't just change it. My main issue is I feel the expressway tag gives the impression the road is of a much higher standard than reality, especially when it comes up on a navigation app. I'll wo... commented 2026-09-01 03:10:50 UTC by Mappo99 ♦5 |
| 188302677 (Comments: 1) | iShootPhotos (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hey, just so you're aware, the phone number formatting you edited isn't the accepted formatting (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:phone#United_States). Just so you're aware for future work. Thanks for adding POIs in t... commented 2026-09-01 03:07:14 UTC by SD Mapman ♦93 |
| 188170785 (Comments: 2) | PiXeLStick (Discussed changesets: 1) | Just to clarify, the value was correct except it was just missing the colon (::") separator between the values and the minutes. It seems you've already been going around fixing them, thanks! There were a handful of remaining opening_... commented 2026-09-01 03:02:13 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,008 |
| 188315238 (Comments: 1) | Flap Slimy Outward (Discussed changesets: 286) | Thanks, but NB, they already had a POI node here, node 14127937701 added in changeset 188082813 , which you already cleaned up a few days ago, in changeset 188109030 . Therefore, I removed this newer duplicate in changeset 188339698 . https://... commented 2026-09-01 02:47:37 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,008 |
| 188287076 (Comments: 1) | Peak Performance Partners (Discussed changesets: 3) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-09-01 02:47:09 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,008 |
| 188277749 (Comments: 1) | Benja777 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola, lamentablemente tuve que revertir este cambio, ya que incorpora un edificio que ocupa por sí solo varias manzanas y un parque. Si quiso representar alguna característica de la realidad y necesita ayuda sobre cómo etique... commented 2026-09-01 02:30:22 UTC by caprieldeluca ♦75 |
| 188328369 (Comments: 1) | bmrell (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, I saw you requested a review for this edit. For the most part its a good addition, but you didn't connect the roads together. When connected the intersections between roads should be gray. Also, don't abbreviate names (we leave abbrevia... commented 2026-09-01 02:21:32 UTC by Jonathan Delaney ♦11 |
| 161477661 (Comments: 2) | UW Amy Bordenave (Discussed changesets: 4) | When `highway=traffic_signals` is mapped either at the intersection node or at each approach, and when the `crossing:markings=*` and `crossing:signals=*` tags are present, there is no good reason to add the older-style `crossing=*` tag, as its value ... commented 2026-09-01 02:12:00 UTC by UW Amy Bordenave ♦5 |
| 188336658 (Comments: 1) | tallman_125 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, and welcome to OSM! To get straight to the point, there are unfortunately many issues with this edit, including disconnected paths, highways/paths that intersect each other but don't have crossing nodes, and tagging of non-permanent featu... commented 2026-09-01 02:08:47 UTC by Solaris07 ♦25 |
| 188308405 (Comments: 1) | Brawlstars thiago (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hola, muchas gracias por contribuir con el mapa! Revisé sus cambios. Dejo algunas observaciones y enlaces de interés: - Los nombres de las escuelas no llevan comillas ni la sigla "Nº". Las principales convenciones e... commented 2026-09-01 01:59:17 UTC by caprieldeluca ♦75 |
| 188337773 (Comments: 1) | Shrinks99 (Discussed changesets: 12) | Data referenced: https://www.toronto.ca/city-government/planning-development/construction-new-facilities/parks-facility-plans-strategies/toronto-island-park-projects/ commented 2026-09-01 01:28:41 UTC by Shrinks99 ♦25 |
| 188337669 (Comments: 1) | ndf_maypole (Discussed changesets: 9) | *part ii commented 2026-09-01 01:20:43 UTC by ndf_maypole ♦17 |
| 188151352 (Comments: 1) | Zandor469 (Discussed changesets: 1) | This is not a flock camera. commented 2026-09-01 00:56:47 UTC by Daniel Wiser ♦1 |
| 188274001 (Comments: 6) | Josh Rodeheaver (Discussed changesets: 1) | Josh, I am still after an answer regarding United States Executive Order 14420 that you mentioned - what has this got to do with Lake names please? - Please respond commented 2026-09-01 00:49:16 UTC by Ewen Hill ♦512 |
| 185959945 (Comments: 1) | Adventurize (Discussed changesets: 8) | ref:CN 不是正确的标签，行政区代码多了7位。 commented 2026-09-01 00:26:48 UTC by 旧加卷 ♦94 |
| 188336106 (Comments: 1) | yitimox (Discussed changesets: 5) | source: https://tr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ontario_G%C3%B6l%C3%BC commented 2026-09-01 00:08:52 UTC by yitimox ♦40 |
| 185915483 (Comments: 1) | PowerFan (Discussed changesets: 2) | Did you possible accidentally undelete the transmission towers? There are a bunch of towers on the map now where there are none (presumably because it's an underground line) commented 2026-08-31 23:21:20 UTC by hobbesvsboyle ♦21 |
| 188331266 (Comments: 1) | Vektor_567 (Discussed changesets: 88) | Dieses Changeset war ein ändern der bestehenden Daten ohne Mehrwert. Ich habs reverted. commented 2026-08-31 23:02:21 UTC by Negreheb ♦404 |
| 177846822 (Comments: 3) | Tann blev (Discussed changesets: 2) | Bon courage pour la vérification. En attendant, j'ai supprimé ce point où je suis passé récemment : https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13509396091/ commented 2026-08-31 22:57:30 UTC by josmougn ♦275 |
| 188312768 (Comments: 1) | Ishwor er (Discussed changesets: 3) | Unfortunately the buildings you created here in the Philippines do not match anything in the real world, and with the tags mentioning Nigeria and Cameroon, I'm wondering if they were supposed to be placed in an entirely different part of the wor... commented 2026-08-31 22:35:14 UTC by sqrlfish ♦2 |
| 188296144 (Comments: 1) | Denis_Sergeevich (Discussed changesets: 1) | Что за столб? ЛЭП или какой-то другой? commented 2026-08-31 22:33:32 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,700 |
| 188333703 (Comments: 1) | ika-chan! (Discussed changesets: 117) | Revert of changesets 188331283, 188331373, 188332258, 188332342 and 188332524 (vandalism, the last one added a Nazi swastika). commented 2026-08-31 22:31:25 UTC by ika-chan! ♦428 |
| 187864236 (Comments: 2) | AMICA-SB (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo Metzor, danke für den Hinweis. Wir schreiben in jeder Kommunikation nach außen AMICA, um den Teil des Namens vom Betreibername zu differenzieren. Wo könnten oder sollten wir das diskutieren? commented 2026-08-31 22:30:53 UTC by AMICA-SB ♦1 |
 | 188310287 (Comments: 1) | Ishwor er (Discussed changesets: 3) | It seems a mistake was made here. The 7 large rectangles created are not buildings, but the small ones are. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/188310287 ... commented 2026-08-31 22:26:37 UTC by sqrlfish ♦2 |
| 188252900 (Comments: 2) | A67-A67 (Discussed changesets: 400) | De tag name wordt gebruikt voor de gebruikelijke naam, de naam die in het dagelijks spraakgebruik wordt gebruikt. De tag official_name is de officiële naam inclusief rechtsvorm. commented 2026-08-31 22:13:05 UTC by A67-A67 ♦1,194 |
| 188332719 (Comments: 1) | Vektor_567 (Discussed changesets: 88) | Warum verschiebst du weiterhin die addr:? Was soll das bringen? Wie oft wurde dir versucht zu erklären, dass ein entrance reicht? commented 2026-08-31 22:01:45 UTC by fs_LT ♦207 |
| 186078881 (Comments: 5) | vlakos555 (Discussed changesets: 94) | Ano, pri Petrzalskej stanici bolo tlacidlo uz davno. Ale tie ostatne neviem, neskusal som ich. Hovorim o celej Bratislave, kde poznam tak mozno 4 z hlavy, ktore maju naozaj dopytove tlacidla, pre vidiacich chodcov. Ale krabiciek su stovky a sluzia... commented 2026-08-31 21:57:23 UTC by aceman444 ♦3,011 |
| 188324684 (Comments: 6) | Vektor_567 (Discussed changesets: 88) | Die Sperre war eindeutig zu kurz. Geholfen hat sie jedenfalls nicht commented 2026-08-31 21:53:52 UTC by fs_LT ♦207 |
| 188311006 (Comments: 2) | Röllingser (Discussed changesets: 16) | ich wohne dort also weiß ich es ;) commented 2026-08-31 21:50:56 UTC by Röllingser ♦1 |
| 187691648 (Comments: 3) | eliyahu bowers 𐤀𐤋𐤉𐤄𐤅 𐤁𐤅𐤅𐤓𐤎 (Discussed changesets: 9) | Thanks! commented 2026-08-31 21:43:35 UTC by Harel M ♦68 |
 | 188331607 (Comments: 2) | SomeoneElse_Revert (Discussed changesets: 1938) | See https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=10163474 for more information. commented 2026-08-31 21:29:32 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,865 |
| 174962716 (Comments: 1) | Danfox Davies (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi, I think these should be tagged as https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dcamp_pitch . I have fixed this. commented 2026-08-31 21:22:57 UTC by wombatmaper ♦115 |
| 188326509 (Comments: 1) | Puschel80 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Ein etwas aussagekräftigerer CS-Kommentar wäre hilfreich. commented 2026-08-31 21:13:38 UTC by wolfbert ♦190 |
| 186415852 (Comments: 3) | Joachim Müller (Discussed changesets: 23) | Ich habe nirgendwo behauptet, Du hättest die Sperrung erfunden. Ich halte nur wenig vom Taggen von Sperrungen in OSM, wenn man den Status nicht regelmäßig überprüfen kann, dann würde ich persönlich die Baustelle ni... commented 2026-08-31 21:06:35 UTC by hwb ♦6 |
| 179056760 (Comments: 1) | trastevereromastyleapartment (Discussed changesets: 1) | potential vandalism commented 2026-08-31 21:02:40 UTC by dieterdreist ♦919 |
| 188300198 (Comments: 8) | Röllingser (Discussed changesets: 16) | Hi Röllingser und willkommen auf OSM! eggie hat ja schon einiges geschrieben, auch von mir nochmal der hinweis, dass der Name eines Objektes nie beschreibend sein sollte. "Name ist nur der Name", sagt man auch. Siehe: https://wi... commented 2026-08-31 21:00:53 UTC by Marvk ♦111 |
| 188330423 (Comments: 1) | eggie (Discussed changesets: 413) | commentaar moest zijn .. hulp aan VR mapper commented 2026-08-31 20:55:52 UTC by eggie ♦46,961 |
| 187577873 (Comments: 1) | drohhyn (Discussed changesets: 1) | Der Radweg parallel zur K9751 zwischen Mannheim-Franklin und Viernheim hat auf einem längeren Stück keine bauliche Trennung zur Fahrbahn, sondern nur eine weiße Linie. Nach den OSM-Regeln soll das nicht als getrennter Weg erfasst werd... commented 2026-08-31 20:51:43 UTC by Bernhard W ♦83 |
| 185295679 (Comments: 2) | ZB_BN (Discussed changesets: 37) | Ja er darf auch von Fußgängern genutzt werden. commented 2026-08-31 20:51:36 UTC by ZB_BN ♦19 |
| 188330219 (Comments: 1) | Vi2727 (Discussed changesets: 8) | Note 5491095 * commented 2026-08-31 20:50:19 UTC by Vi2727 ♦15 |
| 187552872 (Comments: 3) | ZB_BN (Discussed changesets: 37) | Ich habe es wieder hinzugefügt. commented 2026-08-31 20:46:44 UTC by ZB_BN ♦19 |
| 188272102 (Comments: 1) | Choupom (Discussed changesets: 3) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188329852 commented 2026-08-31 20:43:25 UTC by rajdhani ♦424 |
| 188328289 (Comments: 1) | jazzja (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. Feedback.. Wellicht heb je hier iets aan.. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course MVG, Eggie |
| 188321943 (Comments: 16) | Vektor_567 (Discussed changesets: 88) | Danke, ich weis wie reverts funktionieren und hab mir das schon gut überlegt. commented 2026-08-31 20:37:22 UTC by Negreheb ♦404 |
| 188248110 (Comments: 2) | ZB_BN (Discussed changesets: 37) | Weiß ich nicht, sie sind jedenfalls durch ein Tor verschlossen. Wer den Schlüssel hierzu hat, keine Ahnung. Es führt jedenfalls auf eine Wiese hinterm Haus. commented 2026-08-31 20:32:04 UTC by ZB_BN ♦19 |
 | 187496582 (Comments: 1) | R_A (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello, I saw your contribution in North Korea, thanks for contributing on this country, but I don't see any helpful comments in your changesets, it's always just "NK". The problem is that this prevents me and other mappers from... commented 2026-08-31 20:31:30 UTC by Koreller ♦63 |
| 188323373 (Comments: 5) | Vektor_567 (Discussed changesets: 88) | ich habe wie gesagt immer wieder was verbessert, ergänzt und auf begradigen gedrückt commented 2026-08-31 20:16:03 UTC by Vektor_567 ♦79 |
| 188303470 (Comments: 1) | liljaadeliina (Discussed changesets: 101) | Miksi muutit parkkikäytäviä drivewayksi? commented 2026-08-31 20:13:13 UTC by TuomoSe ♦7 |
| 183369364 (Comments: 4) | Jørn-osm (Discussed changesets: 40) | Recreated and updated. commented 2026-08-31 19:59:49 UTC by Jørn-osm ♦81 |
| 188230800 (Comments: 3) | Solarisphere (Discussed changesets: 5) | Done! commented 2026-08-31 19:58:20 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,833 |
| 188208725 (Comments: 3) | ddukk (Discussed changesets: 2) | Top. In Hessen ist es noch in vielen Orten so, dass die Gebäudeformen noch aus Zeiten vergleichsweise schlechter Luftbilder stammen. Diese waren schlechter aufgelöst und auch nicht so aufwändig geopositioniert wie die amtlichen ... commented 2026-08-31 19:52:03 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦4,302 |
| 188326530 (Comments: 1) | Meowcat285 (Discussed changesets: 2) | I misspelled entrance, whoops commented 2026-08-31 19:47:27 UTC by Meowcat285 ♦2 |
| 188263849 (Comments: 1) | dannmer (Discussed changesets: 39) | Oh, this is such a nice rest stop, albeit small. I appreciate you giving it some love! commented 2026-08-31 19:46:53 UTC by Pap_Redpaw ♦1 |
| 187610041 (Comments: 1) | whats9plus1021youstupid (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello. Could you please elaborate on your change here? Why did you remove roof:height= tag and change the height= tag? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/187610041 ... commented 2026-08-31 19:44:22 UTC by MxxCon ♦3,581 |
| 183167839 (Comments: 4) | lunar_jaws812 (Discussed changesets: 10) | Thanks! commented 2026-08-31 19:44:11 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 188225476 (Comments: 1) | Sarah Hidalgo (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188326002 commented 2026-08-31 19:38:28 UTC by rajdhani ♦424 |
| 187633354 (Comments: 8) | hatul (Discussed changesets: 43) | צודק ממש, תוקן פה. תודה! #188325877 commented 2026-08-31 19:35:35 UTC by joshnolan ♦12 |
| 174205168 (Comments: 1) | Zol87 (Discussed changesets: 75) | Thanks for adding these. FYI I fixed two of them in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188322106#map=15/41.85318/-88.32548&layers=T commented 2026-08-31 19:34:30 UTC by BataviaBusStopFixes ♦1 |
| 186976956 (Comments: 1) | EfreetSK (Discussed changesets: 16) | Prečo si vymazal adresu z pomníka keď ju má pridelenú? https://zbgis.skgeodesy.sk/mapka/sk/kataster/detail/kataster/parcela-c/810886/1254_2?pos=49.322561,21.292816,21 commented 2026-08-31 19:29:46 UTC by Dodko ♦1,368 |
| 188269697 (Comments: 1) | Sandy Chongo (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188324985 commented 2026-08-31 19:21:31 UTC by rajdhani ♦424 |
| 188145881 (Comments: 1) | holubekp (Discussed changesets: 41) | Treba dávať pozor na ref pri kopírovaní adries. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188324640 commented 2026-08-31 19:20:14 UTC by Dodko ♦1,368 |
| 188317647 (Comments: 2) | WalterERumi (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola Felipe, entendido, gracias por la corrección, saludos. commented 2026-08-31 19:14:52 UTC by WalterERumi ♦1 |
| 188321447 (Comments: 1) | avbn (Discussed changesets: 1) | שלום, המלון כבר מופיע במפה. אין סיבה למפות שוב. way/209266507 commented 2026-08-31 19:11:06 UTC by hatul ♦520 |
| 181272899 (Comments: 5) | Pavol33 (Discussed changesets: 77) | Aha, tak to by slo. Asi ma mylilo, ze ked som zapol fotky, tak ukazovalo vsetky ine, len nie tieto Vase. Nenapadlo ma klikat niekde mimo tych zobrazenych fotiek, na ine objekty. Ale tu na tych lodiach/pontonoch neviem kam kliknut, ziadny objek... commented 2026-08-31 19:08:38 UTC by aceman444 ♦3,011 |
| 188266753 (Comments: 1) | Katherine Chalco (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188324008 commented 2026-08-31 19:05:07 UTC by rajdhani ♦424 |
| 185186526 (Comments: 1) | d_berger (Discussed changesets: 91) | Ciao d Bei https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13991968974/ ist highway=D und local_ref=C erfasst. Ich find' grad nicht raus, was für ein highway-Wert da richtig wäre, um den Tippfehler zu korrigieren. Kannst du das noch na... commented 2026-08-31 19:01:40 UTC by habi ♦2,248 |
| 180040491 (Comments: 11) | Pavol33 (Discussed changesets: 77) | https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=188260781 by Vam malo ukazat aj presne objekty, ktore som zmenil a aj co som na nich zmenil (ked na ne prejdete mysou). Ak je oblast prazdna, nacitajte to znovu, niekedy to blbne. commented 2026-08-31 18:56:28 UTC by aceman444 ♦3,011 |
| 184232047 (Comments: 2) | HenriqueCT (Discussed changesets: 16) | Oké het is geen Nederland, maar het klopte toch niet. Uit Mapillary-beelden blijkt dat de winkel Louis Delhaize heet en de beheerder EG Group is. commented 2026-08-31 18:55:13 UTC by A67-A67 ♦1,194 |
| 188312281 (Comments: 1) | RicardoQA (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hola. Esos no son nombres, son descripciones. además un camino unclassified es un camino vecinal local, esos son caminos de servicio, que, si son para inspeccionar torres de alta tensión, entonces está bien que sean tracks. |
| 188271388 (Comments: 1) | ivis silvestre (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188323145 commented 2026-08-31 18:49:56 UTC by rajdhani ♦424 |
| 184013096 (Comments: 1) | HenriqueCT (Discussed changesets: 16) | Hier wordt de naam Shell toegevoegd aan de winkel bij het tankstation. De winkels hebben niet de merknaam Shell maar Shell Shop, Shell Select, Shell Café of een formule van een franchisenemer. Ik zal deze foutieve wijziging teru... commented 2026-08-31 18:46:44 UTC by A67-A67 ♦1,194 |
| 184012790 (Comments: 1) | HenriqueCT (Discussed changesets: 16) | Hier wordt de naam Shell toegevoegd aan de winkel bij het tankstation. De winkels hebben niet de merknaam Shell maar Shell Shop, Shell Select, Shell Café of een formule van een franchisenemer. Ik zal deze foutieve wijziging teru... commented 2026-08-31 18:45:37 UTC by A67-A67 ♦1,194 |
| 184012585 (Comments: 1) | HenriqueCT (Discussed changesets: 16) | Hier wordt de naam TotalEnergies toegevoegd aan de winkel bij het tankstation. De winkels hebben niet de merknaam TotalEnergies maar Café Bonjour, Circle K of een formule van een franchisenemer. Ik zal deze foutieve wijziging te... commented 2026-08-31 18:45:05 UTC by A67-A67 ♦1,194 |
| 184012387 (Comments: 1) | HenriqueCT (Discussed changesets: 16) | Hier wordt de naam TotalEnergies toegevoegd aan de winkel bij het tankstation. De winkels hebben niet de merknaam TotalEnergies maar Café Bonjour, Circle K of een formule van een franchisenemer. Ik zal deze foutieve wijziging te... commented 2026-08-31 18:40:34 UTC by A67-A67 ♦1,194 |
| 188253786 (Comments: 1) | Ignacio Lorenzo (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188322483 commented 2026-08-31 18:39:03 UTC by rajdhani ♦424 |
| 184012589 (Comments: 1) | HenriqueCT (Discussed changesets: 16) | Hier wordt de naam Shell toegevoegd aan de winkel bij het tankstation. De winkels hebben niet de merknaam Shell maar Shell Shop, Shell Select, Shell Café of een formule van een franchisenemer. Ik zal deze foutieve wijziging teru... commented 2026-08-31 18:39:03 UTC by A67-A67 ♦1,194 |
| 188000310 (Comments: 3) | cyclxplorer (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi cyclexplorer No problem. I never assumed that the person that did the optimization did it and it has not been necessary. I checked it if someone deleted a bus stop. I never saw that it was deleted by error. This can easy be checked. The fli... commented 2026-08-31 18:36:12 UTC by Thomaso58 ♦48 |
| 188321518 (Comments: 1) | vdWijngaard (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. Feedback Een klein stukje officieel fietspad zal niet. Ik heb het aangepast aan de rest van de MTB paden. MVG, |
| 140766723 (Comments: 1) | alan1209 (Discussed changesets: 37) | Hi, siehe: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5490667 möchtest Du das korrigieren? commented 2026-08-31 18:30:52 UTC by chris66 ♦501 |
| 184012580 (Comments: 1) | HenriqueCT (Discussed changesets: 16) | Hier wordt de naam Shell toegevoegd aan de winkel bij het tankstation. De winkels hebben niet de merknaam Shell maar Shell Shop, Shell Select, Shell Café of een formule van een franchisenemer. Ik zal deze foutieve wijziging teru... commented 2026-08-31 18:26:40 UTC by A67-A67 ♦1,194 |
| 184223089 (Comments: 1) | HenriqueCT (Discussed changesets: 16) | Hier wordt de naam Shell toegevoegd aan de winkel bij het tankstation. De winkels hebben niet de merknaam Shell maar Shell Shop, Shell Select, Shell Café of een formule van een franchisenemer. Ik zal deze foutieve wijziging teru... commented 2026-08-31 18:26:12 UTC by A67-A67 ♦1,194 |
| 188314248 (Comments: 1) | alexz12548 (Discussed changesets: 1) | I can upload documents but I'm not sure how commented 2026-08-31 18:25:42 UTC by alexz12548 ♦1 |
| 184223657 (Comments: 1) | HenriqueCT (Discussed changesets: 16) | Hier wordt de naam Shell toegevoegd aan de winkel bij het tankstation. De winkels hebben niet de merknaam Shell maar Shell Shop, Shell Select, Shell Café of een formule van een franchisenemer. Ik zal deze foutieve wijziging teru... commented 2026-08-31 18:24:20 UTC by A67-A67 ♦1,194 |
| 184012568 (Comments: 1) | HenriqueCT (Discussed changesets: 16) | Esso beheert geen tankstations in Nederland en is dus geen operator. De Nederlandse Esso-tankstations worden beheerd door EG Group of franchisenemers. De winkels hebben niet de merknaam Esso maar Esso Snack & Shop, Esso Shop, SPAR express... commented 2026-08-31 18:22:38 UTC by A67-A67 ♦1,194 |
| 187848391 (Comments: 1) | mpistora (Discussed changesets: 1) | https://gazetalubuska.pl/kiedys-gorowala-nad-okolica-strzezono-stad-granicy-wieza-obserwacyjna-w-gorzycy-to-juz-historia-zostala-rozebrana/ar/c1p2-29249183 commented 2026-08-31 18:21:10 UTC by mpistora ♦1 |
| 188058266 (Comments: 3) | HiddeWie (Discussed changesets: 20) | I wasn't aware of there being two different openrailwaymaps. The problem I noticed (and described earlier) is on the ".org" version. I'm not yet familiar enough with the ".app" version to give serious comments. commented 2026-08-31 18:20:59 UTC by pe1aqp ♦7 |
| 184012583 (Comments: 1) | HenriqueCT (Discussed changesets: 16) | Dit tankstation is niet van Shell, maar van een franchisenemer. Dat is te zien aan de website. Daarnaast heten de winkels bij Shell-tankstation geen 'Shell', maar Shell Shop, Shell Select, Shell Café of een formule van een fr... commented 2026-08-31 18:15:19 UTC by A67-A67 ♦1,194 |
| 169925973 (Comments: 3) | Glassman (Discussed changesets: 84) | The revert was the result of a complaint received by DWG that the edit was wrong. commented 2026-08-31 18:14:50 UTC by Glassman ♦6,031 |
| 184223623 (Comments: 1) | HenriqueCT (Discussed changesets: 16) | Esso beheert geen tankstations in Nederland en is dus geen operator. De Nederlandse Esso-tankstations worden beheerd door EG Group of franchisenemers. De winkels hebben niet de merknaam Esso maar Esso Snack & Shop, Esso Shop, SPAR express... commented 2026-08-31 18:12:27 UTC by A67-A67 ♦1,194 |
| 184023612 (Comments: 1) | GabiruX_ (Discussed changesets: 51) | Este changeset foi revertido com changeset/188321057 commented 2026-08-31 18:10:59 UTC by DressyPear4 ♦1,631 |
| 183896415 (Comments: 1) | GabiruX_ (Discussed changesets: 51) | Este changeset foi revertido com changeset/188321057 commented 2026-08-31 18:10:58 UTC by DressyPear4 ♦1,631 |
| 184023409 (Comments: 1) | GabiruX_ (Discussed changesets: 51) | Este changeset foi revertido com changeset/188321057 commented 2026-08-31 18:10:57 UTC by DressyPear4 ♦1,631 |
| 188312398 (Comments: 1) | sfrank78 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Can you use the highway=construction tag for streets still under construction going forward? Thanks! commented 2026-08-31 18:09:14 UTC by acschind ♦2 |
| 188319949 (Comments: 1) | Killian Bath (Discussed changesets: 3) | These seem more like access=private than foot=no, being random farm tracks. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/188319949 commented 2026-08-31 18:07:02 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,560 |
| 188320590 (Comments: 1) | Killian Bath (Discussed changesets: 3) | Is this prohibition posted anywhere? Under state law, if it's not posted as prohibiting pedestrians, and there's no minimum speed limit, it is open to pedestrians. --- Published using OSMCha: h... commented 2026-08-31 18:06:09 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,560 |
| 188215705 (Comments: 1) | Kuniorz1 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Jak już sam bierzesz udział w dyskusji pod uwagą i potem dodajesz zestaw zmian rozwiązujący ją, to z łaski swojej zamknij również tą uwagę: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4516967 commented 2026-08-31 17:57:19 UTC by Szymson ♦551 |
| 188052276 (Comments: 2) | Aurelien1685 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Done. Thanks for informing me of the mistake commented 2026-08-31 17:55:47 UTC by Aurelien1685 ♦7 |
| 187702998 (Comments: 2) | Aurelien1685 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Done. Please tell me if there are remaining errors commented 2026-08-31 17:53:56 UTC by Aurelien1685 ♦7 |
| 188288675 (Comments: 2) | rempshaener (Discussed changesets: 54) | Hallo, ja, das soll so. Drumherum ist keine Baustelle mehr, drinnen wird aber noch gearbeitet, sieht halb fertig aus. Viele Grüße commented 2026-08-31 17:52:00 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,614 |
| 187999967 (Comments: 2) | Aurelien1685 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Corrected. Please tell me if there are remaining mistakes https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188320070#map=19/50.696895/2.893376&layers=N commented 2026-08-31 17:50:07 UTC by Aurelien1685 ♦7 |
| 188313407 (Comments: 1) | Kuniorz1 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Fałszywa informacja, ten numer jest potwierdzony commented 2026-08-31 17:49:46 UTC by Szymson ♦551 |
| 188276178 (Comments: 1) | Scarlet Briggite Garcia Parra (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188319790 commented 2026-08-31 17:44:38 UTC by rajdhani ♦424 |
| 187920424 (Comments: 2) | Aurelien1685 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hello, I've corrected it. Thanks for pointing out the error. I won't do future paths this way I'll correct the others you've commented now. Aurélien commented 2026-08-31 17:42:29 UTC by Aurelien1685 ♦7 |
| 188126163 (Comments: 1) | GeoSafe-Dustin (Discussed changesets: 2) | Phone numbers use ITU format, for example, +1 539 529 4700 --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/188126163 commented 2026-08-31 17:40:21 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,560 |
| 182276112 (Comments: 4) | wogle (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo Moritz ich habe mir noch mal die Karte angeschaut und jetzt verstehe ich was du meinst. Hier war d_berger etwas voreilig und hat die Haltestelle schon mit Klettgaustrasse benannt und den Rheinhof und Rhytech wieder an die alte Stellen versch... commented 2026-08-31 17:40:01 UTC by wogle ♦1 |
| 188146262 (Comments: 1) | KingGISard and the lizard wizard (Discussed changesets: 1) | I'm not quite sure what you were trying to map here, could you give me a hint? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/188146262 commented 2026-08-31 17:26:33 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,560 |
| 188040759 (Comments: 1) | tovdi (Discussed changesets: 3) | Чому ви змінюєте нумерацію яка звірялася з даними держкадастру та особистими спостереженнями на ту, яка повністю збігається з картою Visi... commented 2026-08-31 17:17:39 UTC by sdvm ♦15 |
| 188081925 (Comments: 1) | tovdi (Discussed changesets: 3) | Чому ви змінюєте нумерацію яка звірялася з даними держкадастру та особистими спостереженнями на ту, яка повністю збігається з картою Visi... commented 2026-08-31 17:16:41 UTC by sdvm ♦15 |
| 188041749 (Comments: 1) | tovdi (Discussed changesets: 3) | Чому ви змінюєте нумерацію яка звірялася з даними держкадастру та особистими спостереженнями на ту, яка повністю збігається з картою Visi... commented 2026-08-31 17:13:49 UTC by sdvm ♦15 |
| 188299456 (Comments: 5) | niallain (Discussed changesets: 1) | Yep, sadly, at least the ones you've got from the postcode finder. There are some threads on the forums where people have got postcodes from UPRN data - it's not something I do but it may help you. https://community.openstreet... commented 2026-08-31 17:12:03 UTC by ceirios ♦145 |
| 188162253 (Comments: 1) | gncnpk (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi something about your mapping of Normandale has broken the rendering. I don't do a lot of indoor mapping myself, so encourage you to review https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Simple_Indoor_Tagging to confirm recommended editing. One thing I d... commented 2026-08-31 17:02:28 UTC by neuhausr ♦364 |
| 187982905 (Comments: 1) | bazsu (Discussed changesets: 1) | Szia. Felesleges az épületen is megadni az iskola nevét, már fel volt véve az egész területre: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/565312590 Frissítettem rajta kicsit a honlap alapján. commented 2026-08-31 16:56:17 UTC by qstep ♦192 |
| 163103803 (Comments: 1) | Ayumu "Osaka" Kasuga (Discussed changesets: 37) | Looks like a couple dozen buildings in Hominy, Osage Nation got added as single, pangea-buildings. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163103803 commented 2026-08-31 16:54:19 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,560 |
| 188305937 (Comments: 1) | motov8 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, thanks for the contribution. However, Lake Ontario already exists in OSM, so it doesn't need to be duplicated. Furthermore, the name 'Lake America' is not the commonly used and accepted name of the lake, which is what the ... commented 2026-08-31 16:53:33 UTC by sykul ♦93 |
| 188278425 (Comments: 2) | J-Co-De (Discussed changesets: 1) | Additionally, please remember to actually review the tags on an object, in this case, the note tag on this object explained the situation. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.o... commented 2026-08-31 16:52:55 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,560 |
| 166521916 (Comments: 1) | ReinholdR (Discussed changesets: 24) | Moin ReinholdR, genau, und die waren schon richtig erfasst. Du hast daraus shared_lane gemacht, die es in D gar nicht gibt. Ich ändere das wieder zurück. Viele Grüße Roger Wilco commented 2026-08-31 16:40:37 UTC by OSM_RogerWilco ♦825 |
| 188257369 (Comments: 3) | davide020382 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Specifically Osmose flags AC numbers higher than boundary. If it is higher on AC, remove it in absence of core residential fresh data as now we have bad data. OTOH, why even enter it in OSM. Last place i look for train, bus routes, offial stats and m... commented 2026-08-31 16:38:12 UTC by SekeRob ♦1,524 |
| 186451390 (Comments: 5) | Uanraf (Discussed changesets: 6) | Actually, with the site relation, the name doesn’t appear and the search doesn’t find it either, even with your change. Do you want that I remove it and replace with the multipolygon you created? commented 2026-08-31 16:24:58 UTC by RodrigoVi ♦27 |
| 127627619 (Comments: 1) | Winschu (Discussed changesets: 22) | Da handelte es sich leider um eine Verwechslung mit der Gemeinde im Kreis Plön node/240037225. Das hier ist ja gar keine Gemeinde. commented 2026-08-31 16:22:01 UTC by kadiwa ♦128 |
| 187361246 (Comments: 1) | Bolololof (Discussed changesets: 1) | Jaki sens ma zmiana nazwy "Komunikacja Miejska w Krakowie" na mało zrozumiały skrót "KMK"? skrót jest dodany w osobnym kodzie network:short\tKMK commented 2026-08-31 16:20:38 UTC by Bartek444 ♦68 |
| 188231604 (Comments: 1) | 123mehdimehdi (Discussed changesets: 1) | بازگردانده شد: changeset/188315323 commented 2026-08-31 16:20:08 UTC by Gitasaleh Virast ♦42 |
| 188252841 (Comments: 1) | Adri8898 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hola Adri8898. Por favor revisa bien los cambios es estuviste haciendo en esta zona. Los nombre no van abreviados https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Abbreviation_(do_not) . Hay un pedazo de la calle, a la mitad de Beruti , a la que no le cambi... commented 2026-08-31 16:16:13 UTC by lalluby6782 ♦7 |
| 170354707 (Comments: 1) | Tttgpp (Discussed changesets: 1) | لا تخرب حدود العراقية، الحدود الدولية المثبتة هذي لا تلعب بيها ياولد! اذا اكو تجاوز على حدود بشارع او طريق، لا تغير الحدود علمودة! الحدود ... commented 2026-08-31 16:12:39 UTC by 𒂼𒄄 ♦62 |
| 188287726 (Comments: 1) | Johan de Ruiter (Discussed changesets: 9) | Dag Joha, Lijkt me oke. MVG eggie commented 2026-08-31 16:12:24 UTC by eggie ♦46,961 |
| 188311879 (Comments: 1) | jkrift (Discussed changesets: 6) | looking at this ALPR on various aerial imagery in iD it seems to be within the road area, being positioned like this is highly unlikely so please double check the position of this ALPR and fix it. Happy mapping, Udar. commented 2026-08-31 16:06:08 UTC by Udarian ♦918 |
| 188302186 (Comments: 1) | BonesTM (Discussed changesets: 7) | manufacturer:wikidata=* should have an actual wikidata id "Q108485435" is one "Sentio" is not. Please check what the actual wikidata entry for "Sentio" is and update the tag with it. see https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wik... commented 2026-08-31 15:59:02 UTC by Udarian ♦918 |
| 188302080 (Comments: 1) | BonesTM (Discussed changesets: 7) | manufacturer:wikidata=* should have an actual wikidata id "Q108485435" is one "Sentio" is not. Please check what the actual wikidata entry for "Sentio" is and update the tag with it. see https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wik... commented 2026-08-31 15:58:41 UTC by Udarian ♦918 |
| 188275770 (Comments: 2) | Adam Haba (Discussed changesets: 140) | Już poprawione commented 2026-08-31 15:57:39 UTC by Adam Haba ♦41 |
| 186568540 (Comments: 2) | Darac Marjal (Discussed changesets: 1) | sorry meant temporary as in not permanent... commented 2026-08-31 15:57:18 UTC by Tim Grose ♦15 |
| 188302060 (Comments: 1) | BonesTM (Discussed changesets: 7) | manufacturer:wikidata=* should have an actual wikidata id "Q108485435" is one "Sentio" is not. Please check what the actual wikidata entry for "Sentio" is and update the tag with it. see https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wik... commented 2026-08-31 15:56:58 UTC by Udarian ♦918 |
| 187974970 (Comments: 5) | RandomMapGuy (Discussed changesets: 6) | Nachtrag: Nach Augenmaß würde ich es auch jetzt wieder mit iD gut genug rückgängig machen. Aber die alte Geometrie war ja schon in Ordung, deshalb wollte ich die mittels revert behalten. commented 2026-08-31 15:56:24 UTC by 0xb7767000 ♦27 |
| 188301754 (Comments: 3) | HJGroenVRFR (Discussed changesets: 42) | ik zie nu dat er helemaal geen hek meer zit. een hek geeft een blokkade. op een klein terrein niet zo veel last maar groter terreinen wel. zoms heb je ook hekken er in staan en daar kan je helemaal niet langs. daarom hek met emergency=yes commented 2026-08-31 15:51:45 UTC by HJGroenVRFR ♦28 |
| 188301921 (Comments: 1) | BonesTM (Discussed changesets: 7) | manufacturer:wikidata=* should have an actual wikidata id "Q108485435" is one "Sentio" is not. Please check what the actual wikidata entry for "Sentio" is and update the tag with it. see https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wik... commented 2026-08-31 15:48:31 UTC by Udarian ♦918 |
| 188309024 (Comments: 5) | Adonet (Discussed changesets: 2) | Het staat er nu in ieder geval goed in. Dank voor je hulp. commented 2026-08-31 15:47:27 UTC by Adonet ♦1 |
| 187823948 (Comments: 1) | trevb312 (Discussed changesets: 1) | FYI, you shouldn't compose greens like the 10th by combining two polygons with a hole in the middle for a bunker. Look into how to construct multipolygon relations in the future. (Reach out if you need help.) commented 2026-08-31 15:46:13 UTC by b-jazz ♦942 |
| 188231309 (Comments: 6) | kartoittaa (Discussed changesets: 8) | Lisäsin nyt good_conveyor tägeillä nuo. Ja pilareille pistin https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:bridge:support https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188313403 commented 2026-08-31 15:44:45 UTC by Juupero ♦6 |
| 188247311 (Comments: 3) | wirabdillah (Discussed changesets: 1) | Fixed in changeset/188312675 @Flynn Marquardt commented 2026-08-31 15:38:19 UTC by wirabdillah ♦5 |
| 188308327 (Comments: 1) | YounesSaadatikian (Discussed changesets: 5) | رجاءا اكتب تعليق لتعديلاتك حتى المحررين يعرفون شنو عدلت وليش. commented 2026-08-31 15:36:41 UTC by 𒂼𒄄 ♦62 |
| 188313008 (Comments: 1) | MarkusHD (Discussed changesets: 34) | maxweight=3.5t on Route du Refrain, missing properties added at section in the middle commented 2026-08-31 15:36:34 UTC by MarkusHD ♦181 |
| 187951137 (Comments: 2) | Aquila70 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Javítva. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188312871 commented 2026-08-31 15:33:17 UTC by qstep ♦192 |
| 188156549 (Comments: 1) | neuhausr (Discussed changesets: 17) | Thanks for fixing these! commented 2026-08-31 15:29:19 UTC by ion_chi ♦91 |
| 188308661 (Comments: 1) | TheLaPappa (Discussed changesets: 2) | Szia. Átnevezted a Bagoly utcát, majd törölted, majd újra létrehoztad. A HÉSZ 42. szelvénye szerint ezek saját használatú utak és nincs nevük: https://njt.jog.gov.hu... commented 2026-08-31 15:09:06 UTC by qstep ♦192 |
| 188309143 (Comments: 1) | Röllingser (Discussed changesets: 16) | Tag Röllinger. Das hier im Wiki ist ein switschgear. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:power=switchgear?uselang=nl Ist das hier nicht ein Trafo? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:power=transformer Ich weis... commented 2026-08-31 15:04:29 UTC by eggie ♦46,961 |
| 188308980 (Comments: 1) | Röllingser (Discussed changesets: 16) | Hoi, Sieht gut aus. Grüss, eggie commented 2026-08-31 15:01:37 UTC by eggie ♦46,961 |
| 188258807 (Comments: 2) | chrisb2 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks for the comments. This is my first go at updating data. I take the point about the private tags, and will remove the tags for bicycle, foot, horse and motor vehicle. I live locally and the riverside path is a current topic of interest. I wa... commented 2026-08-31 14:57:47 UTC by chrisb2 ♦1 |
| 188284525 (Comments: 2) | Marien99 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hoi, Volgens mij gaat het allemaal goed. Veel plezier met mappen. MVG, eggie commented 2026-08-31 14:54:38 UTC by eggie ♦46,961 |
| 188309719 (Comments: 2) | TheLaPappa (Discussed changesets: 2) | De elég annyi, hogy addr:unit=A commented 2026-08-31 14:53:07 UTC by qstep ♦192 |
| 188304856 (Comments: 1) | RicardoQA (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hola. El Camino se llama Arenales y este es el segmento final? Para aclarar. Saludos --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/188304856 commented 2026-08-31 14:48:21 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦3,334 |
| 188252287 (Comments: 2) | Aim311_ (Discussed changesets: 84) | Dodałem motor_vehicle=forestry commented 2026-08-31 14:44:35 UTC by Aim311_ ♦157 |
| 188273076 (Comments: 1) | marco de mutiis (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ciao e benvenuti su OpenStreetMap! Purtroppo se si tratta di un evento limitato nel tempo non si dovrebbe mappare su OpenStreetMap. Per maggiori informazioni leggi https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Good_practice#Non_mappare_eventi... commented 2026-08-31 14:36:34 UTC by MarcoR ♦630 |
| 188307961 (Comments: 1) | kadiwa (Discussed changesets: 13) | Nö :) commented 2026-08-31 14:34:35 UTC by kadiwa ♦128 |
| 187524420 (Comments: 1) | map0er (Discussed changesets: 5) | Jakie jest źródło tej nazwy? commented 2026-08-31 14:31:52 UTC by NieWnen ♦1,451 |
| 163141198 (Comments: 3) | totera (Discussed changesets: 19) | Grazie, ho modificato i ref sul tracciato preesistente con Changeset 188309470 commented 2026-08-31 14:30:44 UTC by f_gonella ♦68 |
| 188304613 (Comments: 1) | roehni (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi :) auch hier das Feedback: Der Punkt, den du verschoben hast, hat allgemein auch die Adresse Gebäudes beschrieben, in dem er sich befand (bin selbst Freund davon, die Adresse bei Gebäuden, die nur eine Adresse haben, auf de... commented 2026-08-31 14:24:43 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦4,302 |
| 188160556 (Comments: 5) | BrayanDíazA (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hola Brayan. Buenos días. Varias respuestas. 1)\tEstá bien que use esri si es el mas nítido y actualizado, pero otra cosa es usar su alineación. Puede usar Esri, no hay problemas, pero para la alineación, usan... commented 2026-08-31 14:24:40 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦3,334 |
| 188304950 (Comments: 1) | roehni (Discussed changesets: 4) | Moin :) du hast darum gebeten, dass sich jemand deine Änderung ansieht. Mach ich mal. Du schreibst, dass die Anlage in Planung ist. Dann müssen die Eigenschaften über das Feld "Eigenschaften", welches du ... commented 2026-08-31 14:20:59 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦4,302 |
| 188305604 (Comments: 1) | OSMthechallenger (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi there, you're pretty new so I'll offer some help in shape of links to the wiki. I ask you to read them carefully and apply them in your mapping. Also: No, what you added is not the alt_name:ru= of Lake Ontario, is it? It is... commented 2026-08-31 14:15:22 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦4,302 |
| 188302643 (Comments: 1) | 44Leandro44 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hi, du hast hier teils mehrere Fusswege/Treppen auf derselben Stelle hinzugefügt, die quasi jetzt doppelt gelegt sind (als Treppe und als Fussweg – eins reicht jeweils), z.B. hier: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1553847614 ist stel... commented 2026-08-31 14:14:05 UTC by Mister Kanister ♦57 |
| 188105662 (Comments: 3) | Ras_Iva (Discussed changesets: 1) | The roads are under construction, so I updated the street names and Tags based on the comments that were provided. commented 2026-08-31 14:11:09 UTC by Ras_Iva ♦1 |
| 187395469 (Comments: 5) | LiudmilaBareika (Discussed changesets: 6) | "Hola, Sanchi. Dado que ya había justificado mi edición con datos verificables y que la reversión parece incorrecta, voy a restaurar mi edición original. Si tienes alguna objeción concreta que contradiga mis fu... commented 2026-08-31 14:06:35 UTC by LiudmilaBareika ♦8 |
| 187646131 (Comments: 6) | William Baxter (Discussed changesets: 1) | I completely agree with you. This is not an OSM issue and the node was fairly accurate. That doesn’t mean people aren’t actively misunderstanding what this node actually represents via the Deflock application. As to my understanding a flo... commented 2026-08-31 14:03:03 UTC by William Baxter ♦1 |
| 188308129 (Comments: 1) | wolfbert (Discussed changesets: 22) | Oops, sorry, das CS sollte nicht so groß werden. Rückwirkend zerstückeln hat aber auch keinen Sinn mehr. commented 2026-08-31 14:02:34 UTC by wolfbert ♦190 |
| 186858532 (Comments: 2) | groen_duiven (Discussed changesets: 4) | Yep, but somebody already changed it for me. commented 2026-08-31 13:56:58 UTC by groen_duiven ♦2 |
| 170455435 (Comments: 2) | GMoney0805 (Discussed changesets: 22) | Good morning….that would be my mistake. Back when I made these changes….i read that the transition from minor line to power line was at 41.6. I looked it up again as soon as I saw your message, and I see it’s now between 45 and 50... commented 2026-08-31 13:51:00 UTC by GMoney0805 ♦8 |
| 105770463 (Comments: 2) | eireidium (Discussed changesets: 57) | Thanks for flagging; I think it was inadvertent. Should be fixed now. Lots of detail work to be done in that area. Thanks, Shawn commented 2026-08-31 13:48:57 UTC by eireidium ♦39 |
| 188233612 (Comments: 3) | Wald-Jörg (Discussed changesets: 1) | Danke für die schnelle Rückmeldung :) in der Zwischenzeit ist schon jemand anderem aufgefallen, was du hier gemacht hast und der von dir verlegte "Pfad" ist erstmal gelöscht. https://www.openstreetmap.org/chang... commented 2026-08-31 13:48:11 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦4,302 |
| 188254479 (Comments: 1) | lebergougnoux (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hello! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/342799172. Please use ref:FR:FANTOIR instead of ref:REF:FANTOIR. commented 2026-08-31 13:46:57 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,833 |
| 188241572 (Comments: 2) | Mastrocom (Discussed changesets: 2) | @totera @Mastrocom già sistemata la challenge commented 2026-08-31 13:45:06 UTC by davide020382 ♦5 |
| 188118330 (Comments: 3) | BartHanssens (Discussed changesets: 7) | Inderdaad, die "aan een muur" functie is specifiek om je punt te plakken aan de outline van een reeds bestaand gebouw. Moest de binnenkant van het ziekenhuis gemapped zijn, zou het misschien wel correct gewerkt hebben commented 2026-08-31 13:44:34 UTC by joost schouppe ♦1,553 |
| 188240134 (Comments: 2) | davide020382 (Discussed changesets: 4) | sistemato commented 2026-08-31 13:40:37 UTC by davide020382 ♦5 |
| 188023471 (Comments: 3) | palycka (Discussed changesets: 40) | Here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/54965786 commented 2026-08-31 13:29:53 UTC by YomanNH ♦535 |
| 188252353 (Comments: 1) | Evelyn09dnfij (Discussed changesets: 0) | Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/14135093172. What is the mean of the tag CODIGO POSTAL = EC120750? Did you mean addr:postcode (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr:* for more information). Pleas... commented 2026-08-31 13:28:55 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,833 |
| 188262280 (Comments: 1) | Schneider004 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188306513 commented 2026-08-31 13:28:24 UTC by rajdhani ♦424 |
| 188303563 (Comments: 3) | tux67 (Discussed changesets: 133) | ist aktualisiert .. btw. commented 2026-08-31 13:15:37 UTC by tux67 ♦2,066 |
| 188124370 (Comments: 2) | Armin5 (Discussed changesets: 2) | متاسفانه در صورت عدم توجه مجبور به بازگردانی ویرایش ها هستم تشکر commented 2026-08-31 13:14:44 UTC by elsy1 ♦211 |
| 187910252 (Comments: 1) | 𝘑𝘢𝘧𝘢𝘳 ⇲ 𝘒𝘩𝘰𝘳𝘢𝘴𝘢𝘯𝘪 (Discussed changesets: 2) | درود، لطفا در ویرایش های خود دقت بفرمایید، ادیت های شما اکثرا با استانداردها و قوانین اپن استریت مپ همخوانی ندارد و حتی به نوعی خرابکاری ا... commented 2026-08-31 13:11:18 UTC by elsy1 ♦211 |
| 178942728 (Comments: 1) | 𝘑𝘢𝘧𝘢𝘳 ⇲ 𝘒𝘩𝘰𝘳𝘢𝘴𝘢𝘯𝘪 (Discussed changesets: 2) | دورد، دوست گرامی لطفا در ویرایش های خود دقت بفرمایید اکثر ادیت های شما اشتباه و با دقتی انجام شده و باعث خطا در نقشه شده. تشکر commented 2026-08-31 13:06:12 UTC by elsy1 ♦211 |
| 188268664 (Comments: 1) | Carlos Tapia26 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188304897 commented 2026-08-31 12:59:28 UTC by rajdhani ♦424 |
| 188265011 (Comments: 2) | David__D (Discussed changesets: 4) | Ik had de cache gewist dacht ik, maar blijkbaar niet dus. Dank voor het meekijken! commented 2026-08-31 12:59:06 UTC by David__D ♦1 |
| 188297932 (Comments: 6) | elnappo (Discussed changesets: 7) | This is a problem of the data consumer, not the data provider (osm.org). As I do not use or support the slopmachine at github I can't open an issue. Please do not add data into tags that are not documented for that data. commented 2026-08-31 12:55:11 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦4,302 |
| 188186911 (Comments: 4) | Polfi (Discussed changesets: 2) | Akzeptiert, man lernt aus diesen Feinheiten immer wieder dazu. VG commented 2026-08-31 12:52:54 UTC by Polfi ♦2 |
| 188225590 (Comments: 1) | kimberly_gavi (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188304226 commented 2026-08-31 12:47:48 UTC by rajdhani ♦424 |
| 188303710 (Comments: 1) | Brick Cartographer (Discussed changesets: 2) | Please don’t tag buildings or POI’s with addresses. In DK addresses are kept on the imported nodes only. commented 2026-08-31 12:36:58 UTC by osmviborg ♦1,904 |
| 178198734 (Comments: 1) | Popolon (Discussed changesets: 38) | Bonjour Popolon, Je vois que tu ajoutes pas mal de gtfs:stop_id pour l'instant on a pas encore de consensus dessus mais l'identifiant futur pour l'Île-de-France est défini ici https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/France/... commented 2026-08-31 12:36:40 UTC by tintou ♦3 |
| 188253452 (Comments: 2) | Tobalab-a (Discussed changesets: 4) | Edición reversada por temas de calidad. Por favor tomarse su tiempo y no hacer mapeos esquemáticos. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/188253452 commented 2026-08-31 12:22:37 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦3,334 |
| 188274733 (Comments: 1) | MapperReses (Discussed changesets: 6) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188302756 commented 2026-08-31 12:16:13 UTC by rajdhani ♦424 |
| 188277626 (Comments: 3) | Röllingser (Discussed changesets: 16) | Das hier war ein grosses Gebäude geworden über ganz Neustadt. gr eggie commented 2026-08-31 12:09:15 UTC by eggie ♦46,961 |
| 188293602 (Comments: 1) | palycka (Discussed changesets: 40) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2026-08-31 12:09:12 UTC by YomanNH ♦535 |
| 188275874 (Comments: 2) | Röllingser (Discussed changesets: 16) | Das Gartenzentrum habe wieder auf der Karte gespeichert. Das war dein erster Edit.. Gr eggie commented 2026-08-31 12:07:39 UTC by eggie ♦46,961 |
| 163954902 (Comments: 5) | Anas masuris (Discussed changesets: 167) | Na ten moment chodzi mi o usunięcie błędnych proposali i construction, jesli wiemy że perony i infrastruktura miejska powstaną ok 200m na południe commented 2026-08-31 11:59:43 UTC by db-ak ♦84 |
| 188293205 (Comments: 1) | Oxeelix (Discussed changesets: 18) | Thank you commented 2026-08-31 11:58:56 UTC by VictorIE ♦1,245 |
| 187810102 (Comments: 1) | M1LAYER1 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Будь ласка, ніколи не роби такі зміни. Роби їх як більши малими. Одне редагування для кількох країн зазвичай роблять для маппінгу митниць... commented 2026-08-31 11:57:48 UTC by artenovis_9020 ♦4 |
| 188297601 (Comments: 2) | Röllingser (Discussed changesets: 16) | Your edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=188300198 commented 2026-08-31 11:55:00 UTC by eggie ♦46,961 |
| 186056757 (Comments: 4) | matze089 (Discussed changesets: 51) | Nachtrag. Für Citybus ist es Haltepunktnummer H6. Wie kann man es als eins eintragen? commented 2026-08-31 11:45:47 UTC by matze089 ♦41 |
| 188300436 (Comments: 1) | LaTêteDansLeGuidon (Discussed changesets: 7) | merci commented 2026-08-31 11:38:38 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦4,302 |
| 188245058 (Comments: 2) | elnappo (Discussed changesets: 7) | aus den DMs: "Wegen deinem “name=* “ Kommentar. Ich halte mich dabei an das Wiki osm.wiki/Climbing unter Basic Tags. Es ist wichtig dort einen Namen zu haben. Klettermöglichkeiten werden oft nach Gipfeln oder Namen der St... commented 2026-08-31 11:31:23 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦4,302 |
| 185337713 (Comments: 2) | Artur | Yanosik (Discussed changesets: 83) | Dziękuję za informację, dodałem access=destination commented 2026-08-31 11:29:04 UTC by Artur | Yanosik ♦28 |
| 174456330 (Comments: 3) | fmc_5 (Discussed changesets: 21) | Nevermind, ich hab übersehen, dass einige Parkstellen auch direkt auf der Straße gemappt sind und nicht als eigene Parkfläche commented 2026-08-31 11:23:37 UTC by peterjeschke ♦2 |
| 186926675 (Comments: 3) | CH_HHH (Discussed changesets: 11) | Da die Kantsteine hier zu einer Fußgängerquerungsstelle gehören, kann man sie z. B. einfach als kerb=* an einem highway=crossing eintragen (ohne barrier=kerb). commented 2026-08-31 11:23:33 UTC by kadiwa ♦128 |
| 47559276 (Comments: 1) | b-holdet (Discussed changesets: 85) | Den vestlige ende af hegnet way/485456625 ser ud til (på luftfoto og 2025-skråfoto) nu at løbe syd-vest om Strødam Engsø. (Den nord-østlige ende løber omtrent som før.) Er det fint, hvis je... commented 2026-08-31 11:22:07 UTC by cyclist789 ♦113 |
| 188293660 (Comments: 3) | jvanhienen (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-08-31 11:18:16 UTC by eggie ♦46,961 |
| 187492689 (Comments: 1) | GolfCaddie (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bitte nicht mehrere Gebäude ineinander eintragen! commented 2026-08-31 11:12:46 UTC by kadiwa ♦128 |
| 188265531 (Comments: 1) | one_electro_dan (Discussed changesets: 21) | Niego (incorect a fost scris Neigo) commented 2026-08-31 11:12:41 UTC by ATLAS Jr ♦2 |
| 182767347 (Comments: 2) | M V Ramana (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, I acknowledge and appreciate your feedback and the corrections. Thank you. I will take greater care to avoid these errors going forward. commented 2026-08-31 11:00:34 UTC by M V Ramana ♦1 |
| 181462101 (Comments: 2) | MapMT (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ach, sorry, ich habe mich vertan. Wollte ein Hinweis kommentieren. Dann kann ich bei der Gelegenheit darauf hinweisen, dass Du hier versehentlich ein Waldgebiet in ein Feuchtgebiet verändert hast. Ich habe das vorhin korrigiert. Vi... commented 2026-08-31 10:45:01 UTC by OSM_RogerWilco ♦825 |
| 188287896 (Comments: 1) | Solaris07 (Discussed changesets: 3) | I swear I was about to get around to it : D commented 2026-08-31 10:41:09 UTC by SPLATPLAYS ♦8 |
| 188258856 (Comments: 1) | cayenne11 (Discussed changesets: 21) | Gude ist hier https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/250785217 der Name auch so ausgeschildert? Ansonsten bitte in description=* oder ggf. loc_name=* verschieben. Danke --- Published using OSMCha: https... commented 2026-08-31 10:40:44 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦4,302 |
| 188261993 (Comments: 1) | elnappo (Discussed changesets: 7) | revert in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188298241 bitte sieh dir die Dokumentation im Wiki noch einmal genau an und dann arbeite die Objekte, die dir komisch vorkommen noch einmal genauer ab. commented 2026-08-31 10:37:56 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦4,302 |
 | 188260595 (Comments: 4) | elnappo (Discussed changesets: 7) | Moin hab grad schon einen anderen Edit dieser Art reverted. Schaue mir diesen nun auch genauer an. commented 2026-08-31 10:34:35 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦4,302 |
| 188263508 (Comments: 2) | elnappo (Discussed changesets: 7) | Here's the revert: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188297952 I had a quick look and the objects you editet were whole playgrounds. The sport=climbing can be added to those if they feature extensive climbing experiences so d... commented 2026-08-31 10:32:41 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦4,302 |
| 188289596 (Comments: 1) | Timmy_Tesseract (Discussed changesets: 39) | Try not adding "(Philippines)" next time. commented 2026-08-31 10:21:25 UTC by ClaveScottPH ♦13 |
| 188289569 (Comments: 2) | JaggeP (Discussed changesets: 1) | Kiitos asiallisesta kommentista. Yleensä olen merkinnytkin hiipuvan polun asteittain katoavaksi "vegetation" ja "trail_visibility" määreitä hyödyntäen... Ko. kohta vaikutti niin satavarmalta kadonneel... commented 2026-08-31 10:20:06 UTC by JaggeP ♦1 |
| 168567936 (Comments: 1) | Kurosawa06 (Discussed changesets: 19) | Bonjour Le marquage a été supprimé mais il y a toujours le panneau B54 "aire piétonne" à l'entrée ouest, ce qui laisse penser que l'aménageur a voulu autoriser les vél... commented 2026-08-31 10:07:12 UTC by Louis Amiot ♦6 |
| 188287526 (Comments: 2) | Yan Bakhmat (Discussed changesets: 11) | Also: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Collaboration_with_Wikipedia "Do not copy any information from Wikipedia into OSM." commented 2026-08-31 10:06:05 UTC by JeroenHoek ♦797 |
| 188291504 (Comments: 1) | Gemeinde Diemelsee (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo und Herzlich willkommen bei OSM :) Schön, dass Ihr (?) helft die Datenbank aktuell zu halten. Schaut mal im Wiki unter amenity=kindergarten für mehr Details Bei Fragen immer raus damit Grüße aus ... commented 2026-08-31 10:00:34 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦4,302 |
| 187715365 (Comments: 13) | GA_Kevin (Discussed changesets: 18) | @:BHSPitMonkey This changeset was done with JOSM, not iD, which starts to warn you when the number of changes gets too large. Also, it would not be good practice to do a continent-wide edit in one changeset, unless it was an automated edit that was p... commented 2026-08-31 09:58:45 UTC by TheNightRider ♦75 |
| 187574535 (Comments: 3) | MaxWipfli (Discussed changesets: 2) | Prima, mersi commented 2026-08-31 09:56:21 UTC by habi ♦2,248 |
| 188294519 (Comments: 3) | Gert4321 (Discussed changesets: 11) | 👍 commented 2026-08-31 09:54:45 UTC by eggie ♦46,961 |
| 188294859 (Comments: 1) | Gert4321 (Discussed changesets: 11) | Yep... zo werkt het weer voor tweewielers. Groet, eggie commented 2026-08-31 09:51:04 UTC by eggie ♦46,961 |
| 184577225 (Comments: 5) | Pucciotrex30 (Discussed changesets: 70) | Pucciotrex30 hai cancellato la rotatoria sbagliata! La rotatoria tra Corso Genova e Via Tacito esiste da mesi, è terminata e funzionale. Era correttamente disegnata in OSM. L'articolo che citi si riferisce a una rotatoria che è dur... commented 2026-08-31 09:46:45 UTC by alpiliguri ♦4 |
| 186938110 (Comments: 1) | Oisjos (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, could you check this way, it seems there is a highway=* tag missing. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1547291077 commented 2026-08-31 09:35:14 UTC by mueschel ♦7,309 |
| 188288317 (Comments: 3) | Hans Nieuwenhuis (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hoi Hans, Ik denk dat Maps.me heel beperkt is. Leuk voor onderweg, maar voor het 'echte mappingwerk' niet geschikt. Mapse, eggie commented 2026-08-31 09:34:59 UTC by eggie ♦46,961 |
| 185972917 (Comments: 2) | Derkoenig (Discussed changesets: 35) | Also `building=transpormtation` on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/960073164 is wrong. I corrected this to `building=transportation` commented 2026-08-31 09:31:52 UTC by habi ♦2,248 |
| 188270002 (Comments: 1) | Jeniffer Punina R18 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/14135751666. What is the mean of the tag PAPELERIA = VARIEDADES JALYES? commented 2026-08-31 09:29:46 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,833 |
| 188293794 (Comments: 1) | user_5359 (Discussed changesets: 428) | see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188294370 commented 2026-08-31 09:28:37 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,833 |
| 188294118 (Comments: 1) | user_5359 (Discussed changesets: 428) | see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188294370 commented 2026-08-31 09:28:29 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,833 |
| 188215486 (Comments: 1) | Pasha Hubin (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi - I would suggest to evaluate the situation for all types of traffic before deleting. I re-added the deleted part as path to allow foot and cycle traffic to re-enable their access to the main street. BR tux67 commented 2026-08-31 09:12:15 UTC by tux67 ♦2,066 |
| 79984201 (Comments: 2) | Dean Woodhouse (Discussed changesets: 3) | Yes. Will do. Thanks commented 2026-08-31 09:05:56 UTC by Dean Woodhouse ♦1 |
| 166482552 (Comments: 1) | Janjko (Discussed changesets: 44) | Na navedenoj adresi internetski izvornici ne pronalaze nikakvu informacija o studentskom ili učeničkom domu. Zamolio bih dopunjavanje baze OSM-a nazivom unesenog objekta - podatak u ovom obliku nije vjerodostojan. commented 2026-08-31 09:01:01 UTC by Karlinho_s ♦2 |
| 166482679 (Comments: 1) | Janjko (Discussed changesets: 44) | Na navedenoj adresi internetski izvornici ne pronalaze nikakvu informacija o studentskom ili učeničkom domu. Zamolio bih dopunjavanje baze OSM-a nazivom unesenog objekta - podatak u ovom obliku nije vjerodostojan. commented 2026-08-31 09:00:33 UTC by Karlinho_s ♦2 |
| 188174643 (Comments: 1) | toponomastica_comune_arenzano (Discussed changesets: 46) | Scusa toponomastica_comune_arenzano, con quali immagini satellitari hai verificato questa rotatoria: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1335954414 ? commented 2026-08-31 08:54:36 UTC by totera ♦359 |
| 186959598 (Comments: 2) | SG86 (Discussed changesets: 51) | Hallo, das stimmt. Dort sind in der Kreisstraße Schranken vorhanden. Diese sind allerdings geöffnet und können bei Bedarf (vielleicht Überfüllung des Parks) geschlossen werden. Ich habe sie jetzt angepasst: locke... commented 2026-08-31 08:52:16 UTC by SG86 ♦28 |
| 185711500 (Comments: 3) | mrjonesza (Discussed changesets: 1) | This spesific tag is the main bus stop, you can pay using bitcoin when you get on the bus. commented 2026-08-31 08:49:08 UTC by mrjonesza ♦1 |
| 188128763 (Comments: 3) | SG86 (Discussed changesets: 51) | Danke commented 2026-08-31 08:48:45 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦4,302 |
| 164449002 (Comments: 2) | Anonim 777 (Discussed changesets: 19) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5488754 commented 2026-08-31 08:43:33 UTC by rundot77 ♦1 |
| 184869939 (Comments: 1) | mrpacmanmap (Discussed changesets: 55) | It seems wrong that https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/osm-deep-history/#/way/667468130 has been changed to a living_street yet foot=no and bicycle=no? commented 2026-08-31 08:36:24 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,865 |
| 185327165 (Comments: 1) | Sylvain (Tisséo) (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour Sylvain, est-ce que tu es sûr qu'il y a un banc, une poubelle et une bande podotactile au niveau de la descente du Téléo à UPS ? J'y passe régulièrement et ça ne me dit rien, ma... commented 2026-08-31 08:32:58 UTC by roptat ♦103 |
| 188284129 (Comments: 1) | Kaloan-koko (Discussed changesets: 76) | Тук е станало малко дублиране на обекти, понеже съм те изпреварил с два дена :) Обединих дубликатите. commented 2026-08-31 08:25:39 UTC by Dimitar155 ♦1,025 |
 | 188119955 (Comments: 3) | BlinkMaps (Discussed changesets: 2) | Based on Wikipedia: https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%9A%D0%B8%D1%88%D0%B8%D0%BD%D1%91%D0%B2 commented 2026-08-31 08:15:14 UTC by BlinkMaps ♦2 |
| 172681767 (Comments: 1) | osmandino (Discussed changesets: 1) | QA tool suggestions should be checked before making changes, the central section of the link is effectively a single road. commented 2026-08-31 08:13:30 UTC by totera ♦359 |
| 162776255 (Comments: 1) | rovingmedic (Discussed changesets: 2) | Kia ora, this prevents Komoot from routing for foot & bicycle access. Mind fixing please @rovingmedic? Thanks! commented 2026-08-31 08:10:49 UTC by hirschirsch ♦1 |
 | 188289014 (Comments: 1) | Jan Herr (Discussed changesets: 2) | Erratum: Current legislation for nature reserve Brucherbierg-Lalléngerbierg and on-the-ground trail blocks and signs: https://legilux.public.lu/eli/etat/leg/rgd/2016/03/29/n7/jo commented 2026-08-31 08:06:59 UTC by Jan Herr ♦2 |
| 188290529 (Comments: 1) | Jan Herr (Discussed changesets: 2) | Erratum: Current legislation for nature reserve Brucherbierg-Lalléngerbierg and on-the-ground trail blocks and signs: https://legilux.public.lu/eli/etat/leg/rgd/2016/03/29/n7/jo commented 2026-08-31 08:06:07 UTC by Jan Herr ♦2 |
| 141696214 (Comments: 1) | Антон-1983 (Discussed changesets: 61) | откуда данные по этой памятной табличке? на месте не обнаружил (может, плохо искал) commented 2026-08-31 08:06:05 UTC by pooh79 ♦16 |
| 187402903 (Comments: 1) | D8729 (Discussed changesets: 2) | בבקשה לא לשנות סתם שמות של מקומות ולא להתעלם מהערות https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188290179 commented 2026-08-31 07:55:01 UTC by hatul ♦520 |
| 188289771 (Comments: 1) | 'Lex (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi! Using another technique compared to https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188277116, I cut the roads up to segments around this plot of land. I used this segments to draw parallel lines (feature of JOSM), like an inset then recombined th... commented 2026-08-31 07:52:08 UTC by 'Lex ♦6 |
| 175791556 (Comments: 2) | LakeKhanka (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi FajrAl, Yes, newer imagery shows the construction along this section is complete and I will update the area accordingly. Thanks for reaching out! commented 2026-08-31 07:48:28 UTC by LakeKhanka ♦1 |
| 188149738 (Comments: 4) | schermpeter (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hoi Peter, Duidelijk. Ik weet zeker dat ie er nu niet meer staat, dus heb hem weer verwijderd. Groet, Jelle commented 2026-08-31 07:44:01 UTC by Poretsew ♦29 |
| 148690158 (Comments: 1) | Kesapaiva Rent & Adventures (Discussed changesets: 1) | Onko tämä kohde ihan kaikkien sääntöjen mukaisesti luotu? commented 2026-08-31 07:38:37 UTC by MikaKoi ♦1 |
| 188259052 (Comments: 1) | laflovver (Discussed changesets: 9) | шчыры дзякуй за гэта commented 2026-08-31 07:33:48 UTC by san0r ♦1 |
| 188136892 (Comments: 3) | r0xj980g4zmd3g5c (Discussed changesets: 4) | Dat klopt.. In zo'n geval kun je gewoon adresnodes bijmaken. Dat is geen probleem. De samenvoeging is ondertussen al weer bijgewerkt door een medemapper. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188252930#map=19/52.256029/4.788596 M... commented 2026-08-31 07:27:59 UTC by eggie ♦46,961 |
| 188234904 (Comments: 1) | Lamvanductanan (Discussed changesets: 7) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188288966 commented 2026-08-31 07:24:40 UTC by rajdhani ♦424 |
| 188269305 (Comments: 1) | Björn Andres (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo Björn, heißt Schillerplatz 7 tatsächlich Industrie- und Handelskammer oder hast du den Namen nur vergeben, weil die IHK RH dort ihr Büro hat? Bei OSM gilt eine allgemeine Trennung zwischen Gebäuden und die da... commented 2026-08-31 07:21:52 UTC by ManuelB701 ♦273 |
| 188284306 (Comments: 2) | Kalebarrie (Discussed changesets: 1) | Vraag: Is dit een serieuze bijdrage of alleen een probeersel? MVG eggie commented 2026-08-31 07:18:21 UTC by eggie ♦46,961 |
| 188283790 (Comments: 1) | RkRs21 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-08-31 07:13:23 UTC by eggie ♦46,961 |
| 184420305 (Comments: 1) | jensationell (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo, ich bin den Weg gestern von Süden mal ein Stück rein gefahren, konnte allerdings keine entsprechende Beschilderung entdecken, die eine Ausweisung und Beschränkung als Privatweg rechtfertigen würden. Was für eine ... commented 2026-08-31 07:07:58 UTC by disc24 ♦39 |
| 188246092 (Comments: 2) | FinixFighter (Discussed changesets: 67) | Perfect, well done! Thank you very much! commented 2026-08-31 07:04:29 UTC by FinixFighter ♦68 |
| 188277668 (Comments: 2) | Röllingser (Discussed changesets: 16) | edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=188277668 commented 2026-08-31 07:04:19 UTC by eggie ♦46,961 |
| 188266219 (Comments: 2) | Jakka (Discussed changesets: 250) | It’s quite possible that this might not have been necessary. But you haven undermined someone's efforts, whether intentionally or unintentionally. With this large changeset, you can be sure that you haven’t affected anything else, as... commented 2026-08-31 07:01:44 UTC by Jakka ♦1,878 |
| 187605425 (Comments: 4) | gFido (Discussed changesets: 7) | Czyli są ścieżki, ale dostęp do nich jest niemożliwy? Bo nie odpowiedziałeś na moje pytanie. commented 2026-08-31 06:58:39 UTC by YomanNH ♦535 |
| 188174151 (Comments: 1) | user352007 (Discussed changesets: 6) | DWG revert - apparent sock-puppet vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188287874 commented 2026-08-31 06:58:21 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,812 |
| 188142984 (Comments: 1) | user352007 (Discussed changesets: 6) | DWG revert - apparent sock-puppet vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188287874 commented 2026-08-31 06:58:21 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,812 |
| 188156357 (Comments: 1) | user352007 (Discussed changesets: 6) | DWG revert - apparent sock-puppet vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188287874 commented 2026-08-31 06:58:21 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,812 |
| 188255808 (Comments: 1) | user352007 (Discussed changesets: 6) | DWG revert - apparent sock-puppet vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188287874 commented 2026-08-31 06:58:21 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,812 |
| 188092535 (Comments: 1) | user352007 (Discussed changesets: 6) | DWG revert - apparent sock-puppet vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188287874 commented 2026-08-31 06:58:21 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,812 |
| 188088962 (Comments: 2) | user352007 (Discussed changesets: 6) | DWG revert - apparent sock-puppet vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188287874 commented 2026-08-31 06:58:21 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,812 |
| 188277675 (Comments: 2) | Röllingser (Discussed changesets: 16) | reverted by changeset #188287692 due to vandalism commented 2026-08-31 06:55:20 UTC by eggie ♦46,961 |
| 187670266 (Comments: 2) | NeeDiva (Discussed changesets: 1) | I've gone ahead and retagged these segments with maxspeed:advisory commented 2026-08-31 06:54:24 UTC by archpdx ♦554 |
| 188127806 (Comments: 1) | Try harder (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, and welcome to OSM! I'm just writing this to let you know that we map roads at the centreline (rather than at the border). Kind regards, Solaris commented 2026-08-31 06:53:25 UTC by Solaris07 ♦25 |
| 188117828 (Comments: 3) | Adam Haba (Discussed changesets: 140) | Widzę, że zignorowałeś moje pierwsze pytanie. Poprawiłem samodzielnie to, co zepsułeś. commented 2026-08-31 06:36:48 UTC by YomanNH ♦535 |
| 188170880 (Comments: 1) | Ornits (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, can you add some meaningful name for your submissions? commented 2026-08-31 06:24:56 UTC by Sanniu ♦689 |
| 187993294 (Comments: 2) | artofact (Discussed changesets: 1) | effectivement... merci pour la vigilance commented 2026-08-31 06:21:23 UTC by artofact ♦1 |
| 187137463 (Comments: 3) | caistk (Discussed changesets: 20) | Poza tym teraz na jednym z przyblizeń mamy Wiolinów a znika Sielanka. Nie wiem nawet czy nie powinien to być poziom niżej (bo dzielnica muzyczna jest jednak "częścią" Śródmieścia. commented 2026-08-31 06:05:57 UTC by adas ♦86 |
| 188275313 (Comments: 1) | Coen Wagemakers (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-08-31 06:02:28 UTC by eggie ♦46,961 |
| 188243322 (Comments: 1) | Simonsson20 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188284806 commented 2026-08-31 05:49:46 UTC by rajdhani ♦424 |
| 188262815 (Comments: 1) | james74949 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, I've reduced the volume of the names. commented 2026-08-31 05:47:27 UTC by BCNorwich ♦5,356 |
| 188284588 (Comments: 1) | GerdP (Discussed changesets: 198) | Korrektur: Radtour am 30.8. commented 2026-08-31 05:43:15 UTC by GerdP ♦2,864 |
| 188284552 (Comments: 1) | GerdP (Discussed changesets: 198) | Korrektur: Radtour am 30.8. commented 2026-08-31 05:43:01 UTC by GerdP ♦2,864 |
| 188226778 (Comments: 1) | Anahi2001 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188284499 commented 2026-08-31 05:40:55 UTC by rajdhani ♦424 |
| 188235253 (Comments: 1) | Lamvanductanan (Discussed changesets: 7) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188284113 commented 2026-08-31 05:26:43 UTC by rajdhani ♦424 |
| 186986889 (Comments: 4) | dieterdreist (Discussed changesets: 40) | Thanks for the quick response. Guido commented 2026-08-31 05:25:15 UTC by gscholz ♦2,960 |
| 186993434 (Comments: 7) | in2itivity (Discussed changesets: 5) | I've paused this road reclassification work for now pending possible changes to our BC tagging guidelines for classifying roads and highways. If you're interested, you can join the discussion here: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/r... commented 2026-08-31 05:22:57 UTC by in2itivity ♦9 |
| 179456268 (Comments: 2) | RailandSea (Discussed changesets: 20) | I do know there’s a dead section after you leave MNR trackage going west on the Amtrak hell gate. The books and the trains show 13+ KV on the power voltage I believe there was discussion about this before to settle on the 13KV power. commented 2026-08-31 05:05:02 UTC by RailandSea ♦26 |
| 188283399 (Comments: 1) | SiljeKS (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, and welcome to OSM! I'm just letting you know that you don't need to make a separate changeset for every building you edit. Doing this clogs up the area's history. Kind regards, Solaris commented 2026-08-31 05:01:22 UTC by Solaris07 ♦25 |
| 187786560 (Comments: 1) | Vossy1995 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Vielen Dank, dass Du den Weg wieder eingezeichnet hast :-) commented 2026-08-31 04:38:36 UTC by MikeKausB ♦1 |
| 188260270 (Comments: 1) | COST CUTTERS (Discussed changesets: 2) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-08-31 04:31:43 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,008 |
| 188207117 (Comments: 1) | COST CUTTERS at Rochester (Discussed changesets: 2) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-08-31 04:31:39 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,008 |
| 188264091 (Comments: 1) | Merceria Lenceria Susana (Discussed changesets: 2) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is not allowed on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account; see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers for more infor... commented 2026-08-31 04:21:32 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,008 |
| 188264337 (Comments: 2) | MapperReses (Discussed changesets: 6) | Vandalismo. Remoção em massa de etiquetas de restrição de acesso ao interior do complexo petroquímico, cujo acesso é de fato restrito. Além disso, mudou o código de uma via (https://www.openstre... commented 2026-08-31 04:16:26 UTC by ftrebien ♦277 |
| 188281740 (Comments: 1) | 旧加卷 (Discussed changesets: 15) | 电子版香港法例文件A207与内地流传的《中华人民共和国国务院令第221号》文本针对附件《中华人民共和国香港特别行政区行政区域界线文字表述》中“10号点”的描述存在差异，在此... commented 2026-08-31 04:08:46 UTC by 旧加卷 ♦94 |
| 188270832 (Comments: 2) | MapperReses (Discussed changesets: 6) | Vandalismo. A Rodovia do Sol (ES-050) fica bem longe da via que foi mapeada como ES-060 neste changeset. https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3904464 commented 2026-08-31 04:00:41 UTC by ftrebien ♦277 |
| 188209646 (Comments: 2) | jg027 (Discussed changesets: 4) | I think you're right. My bad. I'll revert my edits accordingly. commented 2026-08-31 03:22:36 UTC by jg027 ♦5 |
| 185825485 (Comments: 8) | jg027 (Discussed changesets: 4) | All good :) commented 2026-08-31 03:16:37 UTC by RailandSea ♦26 |
| 188278010 (Comments: 1) | Totalawe (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! Please join us on the community forum where there's a topic about Toronto road classifications. (You log in with your OSM account, no extra account needed.) https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/southern-ontario-road-classification-ongoin... commented 2026-08-31 02:48:45 UTC by Jarek 🚲 ♦396 |
| 186515848 (Comments: 2) | Christian Dier (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hallo! Auch hier leider seit mehr als 14 Tagen keine Antwort (siehe auch https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/186516693). Habe es nach einer weiteren Recherche daher jetzt geändert (reg_name beim „Brunnenhaus“ wiede... commented 2026-08-31 02:45:30 UTC by goodidea ♦149 |
| 187515049 (Comments: 1) | Jake Bridges (Discussed changesets: 2) | DWG revert - apparent fictitious names https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188280176 commented 2026-08-31 02:12:06 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,812 |
| 188226268 (Comments: 2) | Jake Bridges (Discussed changesets: 2) | DWG revert - apparent fictitious names https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188280176 commented 2026-08-31 02:12:06 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,812 |
| 186516693 (Comments: 2) | Christian Dier (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hallo! Da es nun seit mehr als 14 Tagen keine Antwort gab (schade), habe ich es nach einer Recherche nochmal geändert. Siehe changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188278474. Mein Ergebnis: ursprünglicher Name war &... commented 2026-08-31 01:25:54 UTC by goodidea ♦149 |
| 188137800 (Comments: 3) | George-jetson (Discussed changesets: 1) | Could be Axion? commented 2026-08-31 01:17:55 UTC by George-jetson ♦1 |
| 188050451 (Comments: 1) | bigarcia (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thank you for your regular contributions to the #ChasingWaterways project! In case you missed it, we have an FAQ, and the pointers for the Hidden Waterways campaign may be specially interesting for you: https://hackmd.io/@osmph/H1ZB1J9Tle#Hidd... commented 2026-08-31 00:47:28 UTC by GOwin ♦894 |
| 187688004 (Comments: 1) | duckschickens (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello there! Thank you for contributing to the #ChasingWaterways project. If the waterway is clearly visible from the aerial imagery, do not add the fixme=waterway tag. That tag is only used for the "hidden waterways" that needs a se... commented 2026-08-31 00:43:56 UTC by GOwin ♦894 |
| 188277116 (Comments: 1) | 'Lex (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi! I'm used to see multipolygon landuses on the countryside (Hungary) and these plots around the area are kinda perfect for them. What is the standard in the USA? I have seen the other usual methods as well: landuses running parallel with ro... commented 2026-08-30 23:56:38 UTC by 'Lex ♦6 |
| 188230518 (Comments: 2) | MapBroker (Discussed changesets: 1) | OpenStreetMap uses a local-use, multilingual tagging convention. One orange man in a white house does not define local use of international bodies of water where the USA has a minority of the coastline and population. commented 2026-08-30 23:17:31 UTC by DareDevi1 ♦4 |
| 188240933 (Comments: 4) | Ewen Hill (Discussed changesets: 99) | OpenStreetMap uses a local-use, multilingual tagging convention. One orange man in a white house does not define local use of international bodies of water where the USA has a minority of the coastline and population. commented 2026-08-30 23:17:15 UTC by DareDevi1 ♦4 |
| 188270798 (Comments: 1) | fueled_by_boba (Discussed changesets: 1) | OpenStreetMap uses a local-use, multilingual tagging convention. One orange man in a white house does not define local use of international bodies of water where the USA has a minority of the coastline and population. commented 2026-08-30 23:16:42 UTC by DareDevi1 ♦4 |
| 188263383 (Comments: 1) | Tobalab-a (Discussed changesets: 4) | Estimado. Se nota un progreso, pero por favor vaya mas lento dándole la figura a las casas, hay casas en las que agrega un rectángulo sobre ellas cuando es evidente que no son un rectángulo. por favor no mapear para rellenar espa... commented 2026-08-30 23:07:55 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦3,334 |
| 188264666 (Comments: 1) | Tobalab-a (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hola. En mi experiencia en Huentelauquén, esas son rejas (fence) no paredes. O hay pareces ahora? saludos --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/188264666 commented 2026-08-30 23:06:39 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦3,334 |
| 170562284 (Comments: 1) | Occasional Cartographer (Discussed changesets: 1) | This website is for the Határcsárda ferry North from here. I've reverted the changeset. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188275913 commented 2026-08-30 22:52:56 UTC by gymate ♦61 |
| 141893650 (Comments: 1) | Evpac (Discussed changesets: 26) | Erroneous and fantasy features from this changeset have been reverted in changeset/188261624. commented 2026-08-30 22:49:16 UTC by deneben ♦8 |
| 187002098 (Comments: 35) | carciofo (Discussed changesets: 21) | To answer the question, no. With the previous version of this intersection (the one you reverted it back to), there were no turn restrictions needed for the intersection. When FDot put plastic bollards in, creating 2 separate turn lanes, then a turn ... commented 2026-08-30 22:42:29 UTC by txemt ♦86 |
| 188148970 (Comments: 1) | Jpcec (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola, gracias por contribuir con el mapa! Por favor, tenemos que solicitarle encarecidamente que deje de escribir los nombres de las calles con mayúsculas. Tenemos convenciones de mapeo. Los nombres se escriben sólo la primera le... commented 2026-08-30 22:28:13 UTC by caprieldeluca ♦75 |
| 188218831 (Comments: 1) | Elizabeth152 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola, gracias por contribuir con el mapa! Revisé el cambio, pero no conozco la zona. Cambié el comercio a panadería. Se supone que la lotería que represenatba ese nodo no está más? Si podés actu... commented 2026-08-30 22:12:19 UTC by caprieldeluca ♦75 |
| 188274459 (Comments: 1) | berketrker (Discussed changesets: 2) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments commented 2026-08-30 22:11:55 UTC by yitimox ♦40 |
| 188273134 (Comments: 1) | berketrker (Discussed changesets: 2) | zeminde olan bir yolu "layer=1" olarak işaretlemek yanıltıcı olabilir. commented 2026-08-30 22:11:47 UTC by yitimox ♦40 |
| 188273017 (Comments: 1) | MapperReses (Discussed changesets: 6) | Este changeset foi revertido com changeset/188274375 commented 2026-08-30 22:05:32 UTC by DressyPear4 ♦1,631 |
| 188273953 (Comments: 1) | MapperReses (Discussed changesets: 6) | Este changeset foi revertido com changeset/188274375 commented 2026-08-30 22:05:32 UTC by DressyPear4 ♦1,631 |
| 188271351 (Comments: 1) | peterthiellover (Discussed changesets: 1) | Are these actual Flock cameras? commented 2026-08-30 21:56:09 UTC by DividedFrame ♦5 |
| 187914514 (Comments: 1) | ReScQ (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hallo ReScQ! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1985648325#map=20/48.5397317/9.2887782&layers=YN Die heißt nicht Marktplatz. Muss wohl ein copy/paste Fehler sein. Viele Grüße Metzor Ps: Siehe auch: <... commented 2026-08-30 21:42:32 UTC by Metzor ♦424 |
| 188265718 (Comments: 1) | Kaloan-koko (Discussed changesets: 76) | Славия реферира към старото име на хотел Форум, а не към квартала. От тази гледна точка бих сложил Славия на магазина им на ул. Житница, а т... commented 2026-08-30 21:38:54 UTC by Dimitar155 ♦1,025 |
| 176307047 (Comments: 1) | openblogger (Discussed changesets: 64) | Hallo openblogger, zunächst erst einmal vielen Dank für deine Mitarbeit bei OpenStreetMap. Ich würde mich freuen wenn du deine Changesets etwas kleiner gestalten und übersichtlicher gestalten würdest. Es ist... commented 2026-08-30 21:35:55 UTC by redd ♦493 |
| 188201915 (Comments: 3) | ndf_maypole (Discussed changesets: 9) | Bonsoir, Effectivement... Je n'étais pas remonté si loin. Merci à vous en tout cas. Il serait temps que le spw mette à jour les orthophotos 😅 Jim commented 2026-08-30 21:26:29 UTC by SFGJimStreet ♦16 |
| 188269923 (Comments: 1) | B_2624 (Discussed changesets: 16) | Hallo B_2624, warum änderst Du hier an den Straßenabschnitten - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/667519411 - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1192737006 - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/86121592 - https://www.openst... commented 2026-08-30 21:25:03 UTC by Zrop ♦163 |
| 186173847 (Comments: 1) | Jens Ken (Discussed changesets: 1) | This shop has moved 200 m south in March 2026. I will delete this incorrect node. commented 2026-08-30 21:21:48 UTC by YraFyra ♦60 |
| 9684899 (Comments: 2) | rurseekatze (Discussed changesets: 36) | Hallo, nach inzwischen 15 Jahren weiß ich leider nicht mehr, was ich damals dort genau eingetragen habe. Ich vermute, dass damit die einzelnen Stationen des Lehrpfades gemeint sein könnten. Vermutlich war die Intention dahinter, die... commented 2026-08-30 21:15:10 UTC by rurseekatze ♦168 |
| 183836383 (Comments: 2) | stasiu512 (Discussed changesets: 92) | Cześć, faktycznie o linii szkolnej nie miałem pojęcia co usprawiedliwia dodanie wcześniej przez Ciebie tych przystanków, jeśli autobusy faktycznie tam się zatrzymywały w tamtym czasie. Przy mojej ostatniej wizycie w tym miejscu nie zau... commented 2026-08-30 21:10:47 UTC by stasiu512 ♦310 |
| 188271430 (Comments: 1) | Yog Sot (Discussed changesets: 111) | concept independly on https://scontent-waw2-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t39.30808-6/486240810_962736762706727_6099968960775796355_n.jpg?stp=cp6_dst-jpg_tt6&cstp=mx2048x1140&ctp=s2048x1140&_nc_cat=108&ccb=1-7&_nc_sid=833d8c&_nc_ohc=gB... commented 2026-08-30 20:57:05 UTC by Yog Sot ♦556 |
| 188264225 (Comments: 1) | ch0meji (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, Can you please add an address like you did with the other 34 listings? Happy mapping, Edwin Comino BTC Map commented 2026-08-30 20:53:23 UTC by Comino ♦401 |
| 188266346 (Comments: 1) | Dan 9 (Discussed changesets: 18) | Si cu ce te deranjeaza? Acea zona chiar este stiuta ca si cartier Semanataorea. Deci pentru ultima data, nu mai sterge informatii de pe harta. Nu esti la tine in calculator aic. N-ai decat sa iti faci curatenie in trebuirle tale, dar nu aici. commented 2026-08-30 20:41:43 UTC by rarad74 ♦564 |
| 188268696 (Comments: 1) | Dan 9 (Discussed changesets: 18) | Salut. Te rog nu mai modifica de capul tau. Nu aglomereaza nimic si pe nimeni. Poate doar pe tine. Lasa denumirile la NAME ca sa fie vazute pe harta. Alea chiar sunt denumiri, nu niste note in josul paginii Iar ai inceput ca data trecuta sa faci fara... commented 2026-08-30 20:37:11 UTC by rarad74 ♦564 |
| 121297106 (Comments: 4) | 4r65th6 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Corrigé, merci (avec un peu de retard !) commented 2026-08-30 20:32:21 UTC by 4r65th6 ♦5 |
| 188167633 (Comments: 2) | boykisser (Discussed changesets: 1) | tysm!!!! i've changed the time to 26:00 and removed the note :3 commented 2026-08-30 20:29:50 UTC by boykisser ♦1 |
| 187453482 (Comments: 1) | addr: (Discussed changesets: 38) | зачем создано отношение https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/21229236 населенные пункты через боундари не отмечаются. commented 2026-08-30 20:26:00 UTC by pfg21 ♦134 |
| 129140629 (Comments: 1) | StefanB (Discussed changesets: 10) | Hi, you've mapped a road which has been reported as nonexistant. I also can't see any signs of construction on aerial imagery. Can you help with this note? https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5473562 commented 2026-08-30 20:21:15 UTC by martianfreeloader ♦196 |
| 188264145 (Comments: 1) | elnappo (Discussed changesets: 7) | As well as random wall in Bulgaria commented 2026-08-30 19:59:06 UTC by VJMK ♦23 |
| 188147750 (Comments: 1) | ErnSim (Discussed changesets: 1) | jak droga jest na prywatnej posesji i np. odgrodzona bramą można też dodać access=private commented 2026-08-30 19:58:30 UTC by lukabułka ♦47 |
| 174242392 (Comments: 7) | uk1967 (Discussed changesets: 1) | So, habe alles gefixt, so gut es ging. CS #188268531 commented 2026-08-30 19:50:57 UTC by krza ♦32 |
| 188232610 (Comments: 1) | Chor Lee (Discussed changesets: 1) | Flock is not known to be operating in Alaska. commented 2026-08-30 19:43:38 UTC by alpacaMaps ♦339 |
| 188025513 (Comments: 1) | Леська (Discussed changesets: 1) | Здравствуйте. Данный пакет правок и последующие https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188034196, https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188091712 и https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188091785 до... commented 2026-08-30 19:41:37 UTC by Danil Moiseenko ♦24 |
| 188241889 (Comments: 1) | B_2624 (Discussed changesets: 16) | Your modifications span a wide area and hundreds of thematically entirely different POIs while just tagged “Fixes”. After a cursory check of some of your changes, the few I looked at seem fine. Please still try to limit changes and... commented 2026-08-30 19:38:34 UTC by PattaFeuFeu ♦21 |
| 188253929 (Comments: 3) | PCK46 (Discussed changesets: 17) | Zdarza się commented 2026-08-30 19:37:29 UTC by Adam Haba ♦41 |
| 188178817 (Comments: 1) | CC_Simon (Discussed changesets: 218) | 不要移动港方口岸区边界的节点 commented 2026-08-30 19:35:54 UTC by 旧加卷 ♦94 |
| 184171449 (Comments: 7) | Chemnitzer13 (Discussed changesets: 20) | És kérlek, semmi okod sincs ilyen agresszív hangnemre a részedről. Csak udvarias vagyok, és már elnézést kértem, ha a módosításom valóban helytelen volt. commented 2026-08-30 19:28:02 UTC by Chemnitzer13 ♦10 |
| 188043869 (Comments: 2) | tracestrack-edits (Discussed changesets: 4) | Bonjour ! Je n'ai rien supprimé. Il s'agit uniquement d'ajouter une relation. Je vois qu'elle a été mise à jour par quelqu'un d'autre : https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/21284095. Pourrie... commented 2026-08-30 19:27:19 UTC by tracestrack-edits ♦4 |
| 188267314 (Comments: 1) | pennant133 (Discussed changesets: 9) | Top! commented 2026-08-30 19:27:16 UTC by eggie ♦46,961 |
| 188243731 (Comments: 6) | adam020 (Discussed changesets: 1) | De hoofdrijbaan heb ik weer opgewaardeerd naar tertiary. Dat is geen residential ook gezien het verder verloop als tertiary. Alle begin is moeilijk :) commented 2026-08-30 19:21:05 UTC by eggie ♦46,961 |
| 188265572 (Comments: 2) | B_2624 (Discussed changesets: 16) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/94878423, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/967340551: Wieso hast du das industrial=gas entfernt? Das war meines Erachtens richtig. commented 2026-08-30 19:17:56 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,614 |
| 155412483 (Comments: 2) | TMMM (Discussed changesets: 3) | Nope :( Nicht mehr. Aber ja, im Zweifel gibt es das nicht mehr. commented 2026-08-30 19:12:44 UTC by TMMM ♦3 |
| 151709732 (Comments: 1) | foreigner037 (Discussed changesets: 42) | Виж тази бележка, моля ти се, че не разбирам. https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5488629 commented 2026-08-30 19:12:15 UTC by Fraxi ♦498 |
| 186539624 (Comments: 1) | candidecoating (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi candidecoating,\r \r The country that these nodes are placed in does not currently operate any Flock ALPR. \r \r https://deflock.org/identify is an excellent resource for identifying ALPRs.\r \r - alpacaMaps commented 2026-08-30 19:10:43 UTC by alpacaMaps ♦339 |
| 186099888 (Comments: 2) | OdinTakoy (Discussed changesets: 1) | Понятно, вы решили проставить всему альтернативные написания. Это не требуется и скорее всего вы наоборот сделаете хуже, потому что таки... commented 2026-08-30 19:02:01 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,700 |
| 188264087 (Comments: 2) | JR-04 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ik zie het, bedankt voor de berichten! commented 2026-08-30 18:54:01 UTC by JR-04 ♦1 |
| 188261002 (Comments: 1) | SlimStorm (Discussed changesets: 8) | Info samengevoegd commented 2026-08-30 18:53:42 UTC by eggie ♦46,961 |
| 188264005 (Comments: 1) | pennant133 (Discussed changesets: 9) | Info samengevoegd commented 2026-08-30 18:52:43 UTC by eggie ♦46,961 |
| 188264117 (Comments: 1) | pennant133 (Discussed changesets: 9) | Info samengevoegd. Je krijgt anders allemaal dubbele adressen. gr eggie commented 2026-08-30 18:52:06 UTC by eggie ♦46,961 |
| 188264271 (Comments: 1) | pennant133 (Discussed changesets: 9) | De info heb ik samengevoegd met de adresnode. gr eggioe commented 2026-08-30 18:50:32 UTC by eggie ♦46,961 |
| 188262216 (Comments: 1) | Anne mobile (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. Feedback name=picknictable heb ik verwijderd. Dat hoort niet op de kaart. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community ... commented 2026-08-30 18:47:22 UTC by eggie ♦46,961 |
| 187709181 (Comments: 4) | kesäpäivä (Discussed changesets: 3) | Kiitos, pahoittelut asian viivästymisestä. commented 2026-08-30 18:47:05 UTC by kesäpäivä ♦5 |
| 188147895 (Comments: 1) | سایا اپتیک (Discussed changesets: 1) | بازگردانده شد: changeset/188265489 commented 2026-08-30 18:45:41 UTC by Gitasaleh Virast ♦42 |
| 188120447 (Comments: 2) | LaLinea (Discussed changesets: 39) | Level 1 ist korrekt. Habs geändert. Decathlon nimmt einen Teil der "heiligen Hallen" vom Mediamarkt mit ein. commented 2026-08-30 18:44:29 UTC by Strubbl ♦614 |
| 188265073 (Comments: 1) | Bus5top (Discussed changesets: 1) | so far I have only edited the northern part of HS2 above Birmingham, however when/if this gets approved I can do the rest. commented 2026-08-30 18:40:41 UTC by Bus5top ♦1 |
| 186786705 (Comments: 1) | James Liber (Discussed changesets: 12) | Olá, James! Não há radar de velocidade validado pelo Inmetro (https://psie.inmetro.gov.br/Instrumento?tipo=322&uf=RJ&municipio=525) nesse local. Esse com certeza verifica/verificava o trânsito pela faixa de &... commented 2026-08-30 18:39:19 UTC by adrianojbr ♦580 |
| 186786728 (Comments: 1) | James Liber (Discussed changesets: 12) | Olá, James! Não há radar de velocidade validado pelo Inmetro (https://psie.inmetro.gov.br/Instrumento?tipo=322&uf=RJ&municipio=525) nesse local. Talvez seja para trânsito indevido na faixa de ônibus. Ma... commented 2026-08-30 18:36:47 UTC by adrianojbr ♦580 |
| 186786452 (Comments: 1) | James Liber (Discussed changesets: 12) | Olá, James! Não há radares validados pelo Inmetro (https://psie.inmetro.gov.br/Instrumento?tipo=322&uf=RJ&municipio=525) nesse local. commented 2026-08-30 18:32:47 UTC by adrianojbr ♦580 |
| 186652390 (Comments: 1) | yitimox (Discussed changesets: 5) | Yoldan fiziksel ayrılmış otobüs durakları highway=service şeklinde çizilmeli. Busway olarak değiştirme lütfen. commented 2026-08-30 18:32:27 UTC by MisturJoesturr ♦14 |
| 188264759 (Comments: 1) | MagicPocketbook462 (Discussed changesets: 9) | Paper advertisement leaflet and the legal address in the website privacy policy points to Lagness Road, while FHRS seems to incorrectly list Pagham Road. commented 2026-08-30 18:29:46 UTC by MagicPocketbook462 ♦16 |
| 188264687 (Comments: 1) | habi (Discussed changesets: 464) | Notiz https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5486190 erledigt, nicht die im Kommentar angegebene. commented 2026-08-30 18:27:18 UTC by habi ♦2,248 |
| 188130316 (Comments: 2) | DerAdrian (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hey Metzor, you are right I had edit a note a while a go in Italy but never finished it. I thought that I delete my changes before uploading my changes in Denmark but I guess not. The two notes can be delete. Sorry I didn't noticed this k... commented 2026-08-30 18:22:48 UTC by DerAdrian ♦1 |
| 187601205 (Comments: 1) | James Liber (Discussed changesets: 12) | Olá, James! Não há radar validado pelo Inmetro (https://psie.inmetro.gov.br/Instrumento?tipo=322&uf=RJ&municipio=525) nesse local. commented 2026-08-30 18:22:30 UTC by adrianojbr ♦580 |
| 188256932 (Comments: 1) | Diego Gino (Discussed changesets: 1) | Saludos y gracias por editar el mapa. Infelizmente tus ediciones movieron accidentalmente varias vias produciendo multiples errores que hemos corregido ya. Por favor antes de seguir editando, te sugerimos los tutoriales de learnosm.org ... commented 2026-08-30 18:22:29 UTC by JJIglesias ♦1,565 |
| 187653238 (Comments: 5) | Harald Hetzner (Discussed changesets: 66) | Hallo nochmal, gibt es hier eine Erklärung bzw. eine Dokumentation ? Wie kann ein Mapper nachvollziehen, worauf die Änderung beruht, wenn unter "source" lediglich ein Eintrag hinterlegt wird, der nicht als Quelle verwendet ... commented 2026-08-30 18:22:13 UTC by limes11 ♦1,090 |
| 186786657 (Comments: 1) | James Liber (Discussed changesets: 12) | Olá, James! Não há radar validado pelo Inmetro (https://psie.inmetro.gov.br/Instrumento?tipo=322&uf=RJ&municipio=525) nesse local. commented 2026-08-30 18:21:40 UTC by adrianojbr ♦580 |
| 188248241 (Comments: 1) | B_2624 (Discussed changesets: 16) | network=VRS ist seit vielen Jahren so einheitlich gemapped. Du hast das einheitliche Mapping massenhaft geändert. commented 2026-08-30 18:08:51 UTC by bernward1 ♦47 |
| 188258992 (Comments: 1) | BigKev97 (Discussed changesets: 114) | Buenos dias, viendo los comentarios en tu perfil sin respuesta, te recuerdan que no intentes arreglar algo que no está roto. seguramente muchos cambios de tildes que estás haciendo en otros países son incorrectos, donde la topon&... commented 2026-08-30 18:06:44 UTC by marcmarti ♦68 |
| 153784723 (Comments: 1) | scdhin (Discussed changesets: 25) | 您好，感谢您为osm作出的贡献~不过有一个小问题：台骀山在火灾后一直处于关停状态，因此在绘制时应当加上生命周期前缀。我已经修正了。 commented 2026-08-30 18:03:40 UTC by 真中あお ♦55 |
| 182299306 (Comments: 1) | Martin868 (Discussed changesets: 70) | I would beg to differ, since this construction is not really temporary, since it will be for 2 more years. As written on the Wikipedia : "As OSM data is often used offline (and therefore may be several months old), only tag construction site... commented 2026-08-30 17:57:33 UTC by Chui Cocoette ♦1 |
| 186694105 (Comments: 2) | Sébastien Chopin (Discussed changesets: 34) | Ce bâtiment est la cantine de l’école (j’y ai croisé le cuisinier qui me l’a confirmé). Les salles de classe sont dans les autres bâtiments. commented 2026-08-30 17:44:29 UTC by Sébastien Chopin ♦19 |
| 188151944 (Comments: 1) | James Liber (Discussed changesets: 12) | Olá, James! Não há radar validado pelo Inmetro (https://psie.inmetro.gov.br/Instrumento?tipo=322&uf=RJ&municipio=525) nesse local. commented 2026-08-30 17:38:15 UTC by adrianojbr ♦580 |
| 187602614 (Comments: 1) | James Liber (Discussed changesets: 12) | Olá, James! Esse radar já estava mapeado no local correto: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13980220675 commented 2026-08-30 17:36:51 UTC by adrianojbr ♦580 |
| 188251736 (Comments: 4) | Krisz76 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Köszönöm szépen. commented 2026-08-30 17:29:06 UTC by Krisz76 ♦1 |
| 186786750 (Comments: 1) | James Liber (Discussed changesets: 12) | Olá, James! Esse radar já estava mapeada como relação: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/21051553/ Inclusive, também está mapeado o controle de avanço de sinal vermelho: https://www.... commented 2026-08-30 17:25:23 UTC by adrianojbr ♦580 |
| 179956677 (Comments: 1) | gianni55 (Discussed changesets: 9) | Hi gianni55, I think to have told you before about farm track, not being paths. Stop reclassing them to path, they are for designated motor vehicles farm, forestry, guardia forestale. The next time you do it I will ask the DWG to give you a block ... commented 2026-08-30 17:22:06 UTC by SekeRob ♦1,524 |
| 188261274 (Comments: 1) | cyton (Discussed changesets: 39) | Für die Haltestellen Donnersmarckplatz und U Kurt-Schumacher-Platz fehlt mir das Wissen wo die (ersatz-)Haltestellen sind, also hab ich die vorigen beibehalten, das meckert der Validator in JOSM natürlich an. commented 2026-08-30 17:13:52 UTC by cyton ♦225 |
| 188260529 (Comments: 1) | SlimStorm (Discussed changesets: 8) | Er is al een adresnode. Daar graag op bijtaggen. Mvg, eggie commented 2026-08-30 17:13:51 UTC by eggie ♦46,961 |
| 181921590 (Comments: 1) | jimz17 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Die Stelle ist blöd. Ich freue mich jedesmal, wenn ich mit dem Rad zum Hornbach fahre. Wenn man von Osten kommt, muss man bis zur Hugo-Junkers vor und dann über den Übergang. Dass man direkt dort abbiegt, ist meiner Meinung nach nicht ... commented 2026-08-30 17:13:07 UTC by GUFSZ ♦175 |
| 188260621 (Comments: 1) | SlimStorm (Discussed changesets: 8) | Beste.. In osm hoef je geen adressen aan te maken. Selecteer de adresnode en dan gewoon bijtaggen. Dat voorkomt al die dubbele adressen. Mvg, eggie commented 2026-08-30 17:11:38 UTC by eggie ♦46,961 |
| 187429560 (Comments: 2) | IEyes (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ok c'est bon je suis passé sur place et j'ai compris et modifié. Vos horaires sont les horaires d'été et ceux de l'autre contributeurice les horaires classiques commented 2026-08-30 17:04:37 UTC by nuitsfauves ♦17 |
| 188254719 (Comments: 7) | RAV Gooi en Vechtstreek (Discussed changesets: 6) | 👍 commented 2026-08-30 17:01:11 UTC by eggie ♦46,961 |
| 187916194 (Comments: 1) | Jwheels98765 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hey there J, You were doing some unorthodox things with breaking a fairway into two pieces: one around the fairway and one around the green and then relating them with a multipolygon. This is rather nonstandard and should be avoided. I've... commented 2026-08-30 16:55:41 UTC by b-jazz ♦942 |
| 183345914 (Comments: 1) | dellared (Discussed changesets: 3) | Ciao, ma a passo Tanamea ci sono dei cartelli fisici di fermata dell'autobus? Se non ci sono, forse il name=* non va messo e va' messo noname=yes. commented 2026-08-30 16:36:24 UTC by micheleOSM3 ♦188 |
| 188129148 (Comments: 1) | Wikilux (Discussed changesets: 54) | Discussion at https://osm.org/changeset/188129203 commented 2026-08-30 16:31:51 UTC by 9_tab ♦129 |
| 184136460 (Comments: 1) | Терентьев83 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Проблемы вашего приложения не должны решаться тем, что вы растягиваете здание на нужную вам территорию. commented 2026-08-30 16:30:32 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,700 |
| 188257627 (Comments: 1) | SlimStorm (Discussed changesets: 8) | Dag Slim... Gebruik svp de adresnodes om op bij te taggen. Je krijgt anders dubbele adresinfo. MVG eggie commented 2026-08-30 16:29:16 UTC by eggie ♦46,961 |
| 188258674 (Comments: 1) | pennant133 (Discussed changesets: 9) | Van het noordelijke gebouw heb ik het dubbele adres verwijderd. De overgebleven node samengevoegd. In principe alleen de adresnode gebruiken. MVG eggie commented 2026-08-30 16:27:40 UTC by eggie ♦46,961 |
| 116035705 (Comments: 2) | englu (Discussed changesets: 33) | 4 lata temu, sporo się mogło zmienić od tego czasu. Są jakieś ślady na Stravie (https://www.strava.com/maps/global-heatmap?style=standard&terrain=false&sport=All&gColor=mobileblue&gOpacity=90&labels=true&poi=true&cPh... commented 2026-08-30 16:19:52 UTC by englu ♦197 |
 | 188234468 (Comments: 3) | sedrubal (Discussed changesets: 6) | I have deleted the node with change #188258635 commented 2026-08-30 16:19:23 UTC by sedrubal ♦6 |
| 188206295 (Comments: 2) | Omnific (Discussed changesets: 138) | Fixed, thanks for the heads up. commented 2026-08-30 15:59:15 UTC by Omnific ♦237 |
| 188205849 (Comments: 2) | Omnific (Discussed changesets: 138) | Fixed, thanks for the heads up. commented 2026-08-30 15:58:03 UTC by Omnific ♦237 |
| 188255326 (Comments: 1) | SlimStorm (Discussed changesets: 8) | Dag Slim, Wanneer een bedrijf is verhuisd zal toch het adres achterblijven. Da heb je nu helaas ook verwijderd. MVG eggie commented 2026-08-30 15:55:44 UTC by eggie ♦46,961 |
| 188254414 (Comments: 1) | A_Tze (Discussed changesets: 1) | https://www.mapillary.com/app/user/atze02?lat=49.526176957351&lng=8.174074371465736&z=13.275977511350883&tab=feed&pKey=4116841021785664&focus=map&username%5B%5D=atze02&username%5B%5D=atze02&dateFrom=2026-08-30&date... commented 2026-08-30 15:46:16 UTC by A_Tze ♦1 |
| X | 186755431 (Comments: 8) | Acccount (Discussed changesets: 1) | @Acccount Thanks for replying and admitting your mistakes! To learn the rules and standards of editing, a good place to start are the wiki pages that I commented earlier: osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments osm.wiki/Editing_Standards_and_Co... commented 2026-08-30 15:31:34 UTC by deneben ♦8 |
| 188202868 (Comments: 2) | demon_box (Discussed changesets: 35) | Sorry Thomas, it"s my fault. I"ll make better attention next time. Thanks very much for your fix and sorry again. Ciao commented 2026-08-30 15:30:10 UTC by demon_box ♦411 |
| 7681297 (Comments: 1) | drcoffee (Discussed changesets: 1) | did you end up exporting this? commented 2026-08-30 15:27:03 UTC by zackrossdino2 ♦2 |
| 188192541 (Comments: 5) | DainiusJU (Discussed changesets: 2) | Akei, tai nuo trijų objektų (pastatų) nuėmiau ISM žymas: ISM inovacijų bazė, ISM II rūmai, ISM III rūmai. commented 2026-08-30 15:20:56 UTC by Tomas Straupis ♦2,112 |
| 176186863 (Comments: 3) | Yunan973 (Discussed changesets: 28) | Wikipédia neutre ? Le bon gag. Par définition, la page dans la langue X sera le reflet de ce qui ce dit dans cette langue. Ici les Français diront naturellement que le Mont Blanc est en France, et les Italiens que le Monte ... commented 2026-08-30 15:19:45 UTC by trial ♦1,206 |
| 188203405 (Comments: 1) | Molko (Discussed changesets: 11) | Ciao, grazie per il tuo contributo. Ho dato una occhiata alle modifiche che hai effettuato, soprattutto alle fonti che hai indicato nel commento del changeset ed ho notato che queste informazioni sono obsolete in quanto ad oggi l'accesso agli... commented 2026-08-30 15:15:01 UTC by Antonino_Faro ♦17 |
| 188165236 (Comments: 2) | OlasMapy (Discussed changesets: 27) | Moldovan law works the same on Russian names as on Polish names. It doesn't. Nice sockpuppet btw commented 2026-08-30 15:03:52 UTC by OlasMapy ♦77 |
| 188223938 (Comments: 1) | PUFFZ (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM PUFFZ. I've modified your changes a bit here. Please modify existing features instead of drawing a second fairway on top of an existing fairway (or green over green). You don't need to "name" the green &... commented 2026-08-30 15:03:31 UTC by b-jazz ♦942 |
| 188056906 (Comments: 1) | Raman preet (Discussed changesets: 1) | You already fixed it yourself, didn't you? However, there are now 2 Ralhan labels. Which one is correct? And please feel free to add more detail around the area, since the map is made by people like you! Most of the features around he... commented 2026-08-30 14:57:46 UTC by Seyruun ♦27 |
| 188102666 (Comments: 3) | jo5210 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Vielen Dank! :) commented 2026-08-30 14:55:39 UTC by jo5210 ♦3 |
| 188239273 (Comments: 3) | mcbax (Discussed changesets: 6) | p.s.: Alle Benachrichtigungsmails mit Ihrem Nick im Betreff wandern ab jetzt direkt in den Spam-Ordner meines Mail-Clients und werden dort auch sofort gelöscht, ohne dass ich überhaupt Gelegenheit habe, diese zu sehen.… commented 2026-08-30 14:54:32 UTC by mcbax ♦4 |
| 188200117 (Comments: 1) | lbilldt (Discussed changesets: 4) | You actually don't want to be tagging the outer ring of hole 1's multipolygon as a "fairway". The description of the fairway lies on the multipolygon relation itself. See this wiki for help in understanding: https://wiki.openstree... commented 2026-08-30 14:51:36 UTC by b-jazz ♦942 |
| 113172167 (Comments: 1) | df9ik (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi, can you help with this note? https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5138163 commented 2026-08-30 14:49:37 UTC by martianfreeloader ♦196 |
| 188251134 (Comments: 1) | Baloo Uriza (Discussed changesets: 109) | Sorry, changeset comment should read "fast and easy building fixes." commented 2026-08-30 14:34:33 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,560 |
| 187936677 (Comments: 1) | Sophie8249 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Le commentaire de modification ne sert pas à faire la publicité de votre structure, mais à indiquer aux autres contributeurs ce que vous avez modifié (cf. cette documentation : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bons_c... commented 2026-08-30 14:10:12 UTC by Ltrlg ♦241 |
| 188049976 (Comments: 1) | Dwaalgast (Discussed changesets: 11) | Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project, A remark. A ford (crosses waterway -highway are on the same level. No need to add a layer-1 to it. layer-1 is to be used on a crossing with a culvert. Best regards commented 2026-08-30 14:09:33 UTC by Frans S ♦10,936 |
| 188248936 (Comments: 1) | Vektor_567 (Discussed changesets: 88) | so unerwartet ist die Kritik wohl kaum, wenn du wieder einmal was gegen die Regeln und Community durchsetzt commented 2026-08-30 13:57:19 UTC by fs_LT ♦207 |
| 188216658 (Comments: 1) | Vektor_567 (Discussed changesets: 88) | reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188248916 commented 2026-08-30 13:55:28 UTC by fs_LT ♦207 |
| 188212064 (Comments: 2) | Vektor_567 (Discussed changesets: 88) | reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188248696 commented 2026-08-30 13:51:33 UTC by fs_LT ♦207 |
| 188232255 (Comments: 2) | Philster741 (Discussed changesets: 1) | For villa, it's tourism=chalet or tourism=guest_house commented 2026-08-30 13:46:58 UTC by FajrAl ♦757 |
| 188236780 (Comments: 1) | Faristoteles (Discussed changesets: 11) | Tag lainnya sudah bagus, untuk shop saya ubah ke eggs. commented 2026-08-30 13:44:04 UTC by FajrAl ♦757 |
| 188032679 (Comments: 5) | Cowboy79 (Discussed changesets: 37) | 👍🏻 commented 2026-08-30 13:25:56 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦4,302 |
| 188210838 (Comments: 3) | Vektor_567 (Discussed changesets: 88) | 1. man taggt nicht für den Renderer; nach den zahlreichen Hinweisen im Forum solltest du das irgendwann kapieren! 2. man taggt auch nicht für den Renderer; addr: am Gebäudeumriss NEBEN den entrance sind sinnlos und nicht vorgesehen<... commented 2026-08-30 13:25:35 UTC by fs_LT ♦207 |
| 173417091 (Comments: 1) | Andrea de Natale Sifola Galiani (Discussed changesets: 3) | Ciao Andrea, esistono due cartolerie vicine, con nomi simili? Riferito a Cartaria Appia https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7111691337 commented 2026-08-30 13:25:31 UTC by dieterdreist ♦919 |
| 188205357 (Comments: 3) | Vektor_567 (Discussed changesets: 88) | Wieder ein ausgedachtes "Problem", welches kein Problem ist. Die Adresse gehört entweder auf die Gebäudefläche, als eigener Punkt auf dem Gebäude wenn mehrere Adressen auf einem Gebäude sind oder auf die Eingang... commented 2026-08-30 13:25:28 UTC by Negreheb ♦404 |
| 188242892 (Comments: 1) | Desa Sailal (Discussed changesets: 1) | di situ sudah ada bangunannya, jadi jangan ditimpa bangunannya atau lebih baik dihapus dan buat baru commented 2026-08-30 13:24:29 UTC by FajrAl ♦757 |
| 188211584 (Comments: 3) | Vektor_567 (Discussed changesets: 88) | nein, ist es nicht! du zerstörst damit u.a. die Historie commented 2026-08-30 13:23:42 UTC by fs_LT ♦207 |
| 188218990 (Comments: 5) | Vektor_567 (Discussed changesets: 88) | *GEGEN commented 2026-08-30 13:22:41 UTC by fs_LT ♦207 |
| 188203793 (Comments: 2) | Vektor_567 (Discussed changesets: 88) | ich verweise auf meine anderen antworten commented 2026-08-30 13:21:15 UTC by Vektor_567 ♦79 |
| 188243260 (Comments: 2) | Vektor_567 (Discussed changesets: 88) | Vandalism; DWG informed; see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/kombination-von-haupteingang-und-anschrift-zur-genauen-zielfindung-in-verwinkelten-umgebungen and other discussions; reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188246812 commented 2026-08-30 13:18:59 UTC by fs_LT ♦207 |
| 186874849 (Comments: 8) | Dillen GJ (Discussed changesets: 69) | Ok, top ! commented 2026-08-30 13:15:29 UTC by Dillen GJ ♦57 |
| 188204428 (Comments: 1) | Tobalab-a (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hola. Se dibujan las casas tal como aparecen en la foto satelital, no hacems dibujos esquemáticos con polígonos para ser puestos sobre donde hay una casa.. básicamente nada de lo que agregó coincide con lo que está ... commented 2026-08-30 13:15:10 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦3,334 |
 | 188030920 (Comments: 1) | AhmedMohamedAli (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hallo! AhmedMohamedAli Thanks for your contributions to OpenStreetMap. I noticed that using the alt_name tag to add variations of the same name without generic words like "Street" or "شارع", or to add informal, loc... commented 2026-08-30 13:10:25 UTC by salma_z ♦27 |
| 187528363 (Comments: 3) | Cyrille37 (Discussed changesets: 23) | Je ne trouve pas le doublon. Vous l'avez probablement corrigé. 💌 commented 2026-08-30 13:09:16 UTC by Cyrille37 ♦55 |
| 188222182 (Comments: 1) | Vektor_567 (Discussed changesets: 88) | Was genau machst du da bitte? Warum die ganzen addr: NEBEN die entrance? Wie kommst du darauf? commented 2026-08-30 12:55:18 UTC by fs_LT ♦207 |
| 188243742 (Comments: 1) | Stigg85 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Stigg.... Please no need for name=verbootje (perhaps veerbootje?) on a terminal. .. route=ferry will do. I removed the name= Greetz, eggie commented 2026-08-30 12:47:03 UTC by eggie ♦46,961 |
| 185352799 (Comments: 4) | SpaghettiMapper (Discussed changesets: 2) | ok 谢谢你 commented 2026-08-30 12:46:58 UTC by 窓辺いちか ♦2 |
| 188129179 (Comments: 2) | 窓辺いちか (Discussed changesets: 1) | 至少看起来只有这一个name,可能哪些是并不能考察，因为gov公开的来看是多个水塘都是，具体是哪些：不知道 commented 2026-08-30 12:46:12 UTC by 窓辺いちか ♦2 |
| 188206162 (Comments: 4) | srkbrmx (Discussed changesets: 5) | The main purpose of this changeset was resolving the incorrect (foot=no / bicycle=no) restrictions that break real-world navigation. Feel free to refine the access hierarchy as you see fit. commented 2026-08-30 12:39:02 UTC by srkbrmx ♦1 |
| 187903508 (Comments: 7) | Lexmmm (Discussed changesets: 2) | Bedankt voor al je aanpassingen. Bij een volgende wijziging zal ik dit in acht nemen. commented 2026-08-30 12:36:19 UTC by Lexmmm ♦2 |
| 187848740 (Comments: 3) | spiezmaestro (Discussed changesets: 1) | Danke für die Klarstellung. Dann stimmt ja jetzt bei https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/14112519501 alles soweit. commented 2026-08-30 12:35:39 UTC by habi ♦2,248 |
| 188237558 (Comments: 1) | FreeToWonder (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-08-30 12:31:19 UTC by eggie ♦46,961 |
| 174763460 (Comments: 2) | 10-NHN-DKraijer (Discussed changesets: 15) | Kan deze worden verwijderd? commented 2026-08-30 12:30:34 UTC by Allroads ♦461 |
| 188169053 (Comments: 3) | Cowboy79 (Discussed changesets: 37) | Dann ist ein fixme=stub auf dem node wohl angebracht commented 2026-08-30 12:29:37 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦4,302 |
| 188205653 (Comments: 1) | Vektor_567 (Discussed changesets: 88) | Warum sind die ganzen addr: nun NEBEN den entrance? Bitte lasse das und mache es rückgängig, das ist nicht so vorgesehen! Wie kommst du darauf und was soll das bringen (außer, dass es auf der Karte schön aussieht)? commented 2026-08-30 12:28:01 UTC by fs_LT ♦207 |
| 188241627 (Comments: 1) | GlobalWiki-net (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi GlobalWiki-net, I added this name recently. Which approved records are you referring to? commented 2026-08-30 12:20:06 UTC by Sammyhawkrad ♦181 |
| 188242023 (Comments: 1) | RandomThighsEnjoyer (Discussed changesets: 19) | Schließt folgenden Hinweis: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5486891 commented 2026-08-30 12:13:30 UTC by RandomThighsEnjoyer ♦15 |
| 186240241 (Comments: 1) | altairb (Discussed changesets: 14) | Wenn der Name der Straße bereits (scheinbar) richtig eingetragen ist, kann man ihn auch einfach mal so lassen, wie er ist, anstatt nacheinander 4 verschiedene fehlerhafte Varianten vom Namen einzutragen. Achso, und eine Quellenangabe w&a... commented 2026-08-30 12:12:20 UTC by kadiwa ♦128 |
| 158635097 (Comments: 1) | mike140 (Discussed changesets: 43) | Підстава: https://smr.gov.ua/images/documents/Rishennia/Sesii/2024/52_ses_10.04.2024/4709.doc commented 2026-08-30 12:01:12 UTC by mike140 ♦392 |
| 188140030 (Comments: 1) | Odedshilo (Discussed changesets: 4) | שלום עודד הסכר כבר ממופה, אין צורך ליצור עוד נקודה. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7628494385 commented 2026-08-30 11:56:38 UTC by hatul ♦520 |
| 188235672 (Comments: 2) | Ravenacre (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, I can’t see what changes you made. It looks like you out the wrong path in again? The one I took off. KU11 and KU19 are the ones you’re referring to, which I am aware of. KU19 leaded up the field and then back down again. Th... commented 2026-08-30 11:52:15 UTC by Ravenacre ♦1 |
| 188223320 (Comments: 1) | Gabryel ofck (Discussed changesets: 30) | Este changeset foi revertido com changeset/188242397 commented 2026-08-30 11:46:36 UTC by DressyPear4 ♦1,631 |
| 188223372 (Comments: 1) | Gabryel ofck (Discussed changesets: 30) | Este changeset foi revertido com changeset/188242397 commented 2026-08-30 11:46:35 UTC by DressyPear4 ♦1,631 |
| 188223331 (Comments: 1) | Gabryel ofck (Discussed changesets: 30) | Este changeset foi revertido com changeset/188242397 commented 2026-08-30 11:46:35 UTC by DressyPear4 ♦1,631 |
| 188223862 (Comments: 1) | Gabryel ofck (Discussed changesets: 30) | Este changeset foi revertido com changeset/188242397 commented 2026-08-30 11:46:34 UTC by DressyPear4 ♦1,631 |
| 188223869 (Comments: 1) | Gabryel ofck (Discussed changesets: 30) | Este changeset foi revertido com changeset/188242397 commented 2026-08-30 11:46:33 UTC by DressyPear4 ♦1,631 |
| 188129289 (Comments: 1) | evdence (Discussed changesets: 86) | You were already asked to not change small streams into rivers. This is not a river, it's barely a stream. commented 2026-08-30 11:35:05 UTC by HellMap ♦986 |
| 188208240 (Comments: 2) | DaL33T (Discussed changesets: 1) | The new name is not official. It needs to go through the USA Board on Geographic Names prior to it becoming official. The board has 30 days to implement this according to Executive Order 14172. The key part is below.. ... "(b) Within 3... commented 2026-08-30 11:31:41 UTC by Ewen Hill ♦512 |
| 183773089 (Comments: 3) | ViceCityStories (Discussed changesets: 3) | Added description and link to Wikimedia Commons commented 2026-08-30 11:27:25 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,700 |
| 184907594 (Comments: 1) | tomcat83 (Discussed changesets: 319) | Este changeset contiene errores graves como haber modificado el nombre de una calle urbana por el nombre genérico del catálogo oficial de carreteras. Este tipo de cambios se considera una mala práctica. Ejemplo: Calle de Don Pedr... commented 2026-08-30 11:26:40 UTC by Jordi MF ♦1,872 |
| 180835288 (Comments: 1) | Timmy_Tesseract (Discussed changesets: 39) | It's still used as a district. (Source: https://lgumalibcong.ph/) commented 2026-08-30 11:20:35 UTC by ClaveScottPH ♦13 |
| 188229251 (Comments: 9) | Vikingen på cykel (Discussed changesets: 2) | Tryk på linken https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/987414797 commented 2026-08-30 11:17:17 UTC by osmviborg ♦1,904 |
| 188024259 (Comments: 1) | evdence (Discussed changesets: 86) | Why was this deleted https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1289608569 ? commented 2026-08-30 11:13:19 UTC by HellMap ♦986 |
| 183780556 (Comments: 1) | kashalotjbi (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👋 В правом меню редактора есть кнопка «Настройки фонового изображения». Выберите там спутниковые снимки ESRI — они свежее. |
| 188240412 (Comments: 1) | kutukola (Discussed changesets: 6) | irrelevant tapu ada parsel bilgisini kaldırdım commented 2026-08-30 11:02:32 UTC by kutukola ♦6 |
| 187812783 (Comments: 3) | 309_308_307 (Discussed changesets: 21) | in this case it was tho, theyve added a relation for the leo express from Przemyśl to Frankfurt commented 2026-08-30 10:51:20 UTC by lukabułka ♦47 |
| 186884736 (Comments: 5) | 0235 (Discussed changesets: 11) | Oh no, i understand that it was not this singular building that is the issue, but the data is correct. it shows the rectangular building. So the images are not obsolete, there is no square building, which is why i am doubly confused that it wa... commented 2026-08-30 10:41:52 UTC by 0235 ♦51 |
| 188237683 (Comments: 1) | JonBron (Discussed changesets: 7) | Dag JonBron, Door in iD met de kaart te gaan schuiven heb je het kruispunt verplaatst. Ik heb die schade hersteld. TIP: wees voorzichtig met schuiven in iD; zorg dat je geen object hebt geselecteerd (klik in een leeg gedeelte) voordat je met d... commented 2026-08-30 10:34:35 UTC by jb54osm ♦227 |
| 173213333 (Comments: 1) | Louis3000 (Discussed changesets: 7) | Jeg vil gerne foreslå at bruge SDFI Terrain Shadow Map til at placere stier bedre i skove. (Dette terrænskyggekort kan dog ikke se, om en sti er tilgroet eller ej, så man skal være lidt forsigtig med det.) commented 2026-08-30 10:33:06 UTC by cyclist789 ♦113 |
| 187963624 (Comments: 1) | Pedro Castela (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188238124 commented 2026-08-30 10:17:51 UTC by rajdhani ♦424 |
| 188012468 (Comments: 1) | PowerFlo12 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Bitte verwende besser Changesetkommentare, mit ein bisschen mehr erklärung. Das macht es einfacher zu kontrollieren, was in dem Changeset so passiert :) Und zur Info, deine Changes werden im Forum besprocehn https://community.openstreetma... commented 2026-08-30 09:54:37 UTC by Negreheb ♦404 |
| 187923174 (Comments: 1) | ANKITAAGHOSH___007 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188236754 commented 2026-08-30 09:45:38 UTC by rajdhani ♦424 |
| 188214856 (Comments: 2) | 'Lex (Discussed changesets: 4) | Szia! Jogos, azt hiszem a dark_store tag-et a description megírása után találtam meg, így az véletlen rajta maradt. Javítva: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188236625 commented 2026-08-30 09:42:35 UTC by 'Lex ♦6 |
| 188042935 (Comments: 8) | L4PSA (Discussed changesets: 4) | @kaposts: I generally agree with you and would not add unmarked parking "spaces" like this, but the difference here is that a different section had different surface. I don't really know how else to show this information. Yes, capacity... commented 2026-08-30 09:28:53 UTC by HellMap ♦986 |
| 182751729 (Comments: 1) | copossum (Discussed changesets: 2) | Servus, ich kann verstehen, dass du hier bicycle=no hinzugefügt hast, aber woher hast du die Infos? Und selbst wenn das korrekt ist, ist das kein grund mtb:scale=* zu löschen. Vor allem hast du z. B. explizite bicycle=yes geändert ... commented 2026-08-30 09:21:44 UTC by Negreheb ♦404 |
| 188205038 (Comments: 1) | srkbrmx (Discussed changesets: 5) | Are you sure `emergency=yes` + `locked=yes` ? commented 2026-08-30 09:15:09 UTC by Kovoschiz ♦3,022 |
| 188188431 (Comments: 2) | Scriba_di_Torrebruma (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ciao Marco, grazie del benvenuto, ti confermo che si tratta del Palazzetto dello Sport. All'interno della struttura non c'è una piscina ma un pavimento di parquet adatto a varie discipline, fra cui calcetto, pallavolo, danza e... commented 2026-08-30 09:06:00 UTC by Scriba_di_Torrebruma ♦1 |
| 54504958 (Comments: 1) | Arnebius (Discussed changesets: 69) | W okolicy ładnie naładowałeś dróg polnych jako prowadzące do domów mieszkalnych i wisi to tak skromne osiem lat. Nawigacje nie przepadają za drogami typu track a drogi które prowadzą do zabudowań to residential, se... commented 2026-08-30 09:05:06 UTC by grzegorz75jan ♦699 |
| 188234437 (Comments: 1) | Ewen Hill (Discussed changesets: 99) | Not enough room to say this is in regard to Note 5480263 by Oysterbay who stated Green Point road north of the roundabout was private access. No Mapillary or Bing to confirm commented 2026-08-30 09:02:34 UTC by Ewen Hill ♦512 |
| 186891688 (Comments: 1) | jollybubbly (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi, please check the socket tags you added here. 'socket:type' is not a valid tag, 'type' needs to be replaced with the actual type of the socket. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/14071364390#map=19/36.760093/-118.901807 commented 2026-08-30 08:54:00 UTC by mueschel ♦7,309 |
| 188101738 (Comments: 2) | santon (Discussed changesets: 48) | Siehe https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/radwegenetz-ebe-aus-cartomap-verschwunden/147009/6 commented 2026-08-30 08:51:47 UTC by santon ♦48 |
| 188022396 (Comments: 1) | Mozmailuser123 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188234046 commented 2026-08-30 08:48:27 UTC by ajmat ♦418 |
| 188231338 (Comments: 1) | Pawcio85 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Opis zmiany nie mówi nic. Wytrzyszczka w adresie powinna być z dużej litery. Według podkładu numerów czy nawet https://polska.e-mapa.net?userview=234746 nr 159 znajduje się na innym budynku. commented 2026-08-30 08:45:30 UTC by grzegorz75jan ♦699 |
| 188017635 (Comments: 1) | honeymoon1718 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188233406 commented 2026-08-30 08:32:14 UTC by ajmat ♦418 |
| 188225633 (Comments: 1) | Alejandro Martinez F (Discussed changesets: 7) | Gracias por Colaborar con este proyecto. Por favor recordar Escuadrar las edificaciones apretando la letra Q o en el Mouse click derecho. Las imágenes pueden distorsionar las edificaciones, pero el 99% de ellas tienen ángulos a 9... commented 2026-08-30 08:23:39 UTC by JJIglesias ♦1,565 |
| 188226078 (Comments: 1) | Alejandro Martinez F (Discussed changesets: 7) | Gracias por Colaborar con este proyecto. Por favor recordar Escuadrar las edificaciones apretando la letra Q o en el Mouse click derecho. Las imágenes pueden distorsionar las edificaciones, pero el 99% de ellas tienen ángulos a 9... commented 2026-08-30 08:23:18 UTC by JJIglesias ♦1,565 |
| 188226582 (Comments: 1) | Alejandro Martinez F (Discussed changesets: 7) | Gracias por Colaborar con este proyecto. Por favor recordar Escuadrar las edificaciones apretando la letra Q o en el Mouse click derecho. Las imágenes pueden distorsionar las edificaciones, pero el 99% de ellas tienen ángulos a 9... commented 2026-08-30 08:22:59 UTC by JJIglesias ♦1,565 |
| 187039837 (Comments: 3) | TraumRa (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hallo TraumRa, ich habe mir die Straße einmal vor Ort angeschaut und dementsprechend korrigiert. Wahrscheinlich ändert sich hier in der nächsten Zeit aber noch etwas. Gruß commented 2026-08-30 08:06:48 UTC by KHFRT ♦4 |
| 188212615 (Comments: 2) | Slartibartfast141 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thank you! It's nice to see the town up to date. commented 2026-08-30 08:02:14 UTC by Slartibartfast141 ♦2 |
| 187549517 (Comments: 13) | bchrubas (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bazując tylko na źródle na podstawie którego to podejrzane połączenie zostało wyrysowane to powinna to być highway=cycleway + informal=yes lub highway=path + bicycle=designated + informal + visibility=no commented 2026-08-30 07:55:14 UTC by Aim311_ ♦157 |
| 188230150 (Comments: 4) | JGRTZN (Discussed changesets: 2) | Klopt.. Hier is de winkel immers weg. Op de nieuwe locatie zal die wel verschijnen. Op een PC ctrl f5 toetsen .. cache leegmaken. Op een mobiel geduld. Groet eggie commented 2026-08-30 07:48:41 UTC by eggie ♦46,961 |
| 188141542 (Comments: 3) | LeoBardonaro (Discussed changesets: 23) | Hello, thank you, fixed. commented 2026-08-30 07:48:12 UTC by LeoBardonaro ♦14 |
| 165945056 (Comments: 1) | Piz Pachific (Discussed changesets: 26) | Hi, regarding this path are you sure that it exists? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1384383098/history/1 It appears that almost nobody is taking it and I surveyed the region and no path was visible. Based on strava heatmap, th... commented 2026-08-30 07:25:00 UTC by Glyphe ♦13 |
| 149539463 (Comments: 3) | Tatfahren (Discussed changesets: 86) | Danke! commented 2026-08-30 07:20:47 UTC by tkansgar ♦18 |
| 188215453 (Comments: 2) | dima monsky (Discussed changesets: 19) | Hi mewhenthe, it is plastic covered (warehouse?) i saw here https://youtu.be/kuJ3o8To140?t=1250 maybe temporary? commented 2026-08-30 07:18:57 UTC by dima monsky ♦14 |
| 188211164 (Comments: 1) | daglella (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ciao e benvenuti su OpenStreetMap! Se si tratta di una fontanella di acqua potabile (anche nel caso di una "casa dell'acqua") puoi usare amenity=drinking_water (amenity=fountain è per le fontane "artistiche"); v... commented 2026-08-30 07:18:45 UTC by MarcoR ♦630 |
| 188230320 (Comments: 1) | JGRTZN (Discussed changesets: 2) | De Kringloop had ik verplaatst naar de nieuwe locatie. Hier heb ik het adres hersteld. Een bedrijf floept niet ergens anders heen op de kaart als je het adres aanpast. Zie commentaar op changeset 1. Mapse, eggie commented 2026-08-30 07:06:53 UTC by eggie ♦46,961 |
| 188217888 (Comments: 2) | overzuid (Discussed changesets: 6) | typo aangepast commented 2026-08-30 07:04:10 UTC by eggie ♦46,961 |
| 188217853 (Comments: 1) | overzuid (Discussed changesets: 6) | Dag overzuid.. Tip.. De eindnodes van het wegdeel horen deel uit e maken van de brug. Ik heb het aangepast. MVG eggie commented 2026-08-30 06:59:09 UTC by eggie ♦46,961 |
| 187964377 (Comments: 1) | Mayerli Shondo (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188230338 commented 2026-08-30 06:49:01 UTC by rajdhani ♦424 |
| 188215335 (Comments: 1) | Skartz (Discussed changesets: 4) | Reverted in Changeset/188229894 commented 2026-08-30 06:32:12 UTC by one_electro_dan ♦25 |
| 188215239 (Comments: 1) | Skartz (Discussed changesets: 4) | Reverted in Changeset/188229894 commented 2026-08-30 06:32:03 UTC by one_electro_dan ♦25 |
| 188215028 (Comments: 1) | Skartz (Discussed changesets: 4) | Reverted in Changeset/188229894 commented 2026-08-30 06:31:56 UTC by one_electro_dan ♦25 |
| 188214690 (Comments: 1) | Skartz (Discussed changesets: 4) | Reverted in Changeset/188229894 commented 2026-08-30 06:31:45 UTC by one_electro_dan ♦25 |
| 188229894 (Comments: 1) | one_electro_dan (Discussed changesets: 21) | Changeset/188214690, Changeset/188215028, Changeset/188215239, Changeset/188215335 commented 2026-08-30 06:31:05 UTC by one_electro_dan ♦25 |
| 185481029 (Comments: 1) | ڕاستی (Discussed changesets: 188) | فسر هذا التعديل؟؟؟؟؟ commented 2026-08-30 06:30:13 UTC by 𒂼𒄄 ♦62 |
| 188229780 (Comments: 1) | 5R-MFT (Discussed changesets: 106) | Habe es noch leicht angepasst :) commented 2026-08-30 06:26:46 UTC by 5R-MFT ♦90 |
| 188179595 (Comments: 6) | beeeohhh (Discussed changesets: 1) | Erledigt! So war's gemeint oder? Danke Dir! commented 2026-08-30 06:12:56 UTC by beeeohhh ♦1 |
| 188126660 (Comments: 2) | Yep It's Me (Discussed changesets: 1) | @PostaMap_Infinite ... Thank you 🙏🏼. I'm a noob, with those being some of my first edits after joining. I appreciate your guidance and help! commented 2026-08-30 06:05:53 UTC by Yep It's Me ♦1 |
| 188228952 (Comments: 1) | Vikingen på cykel (Discussed changesets: 2) | Fejlen er rettet. Der går tid før ændringen rammer div. navigationsprogrammer. commented 2026-08-30 06:03:30 UTC by osmviborg ♦1,904 |
| 187805431 (Comments: 1) | ڕاستی (Discussed changesets: 188) | فسر هذا التعديل؟؟؟؟ commented 2026-08-30 06:02:02 UTC by 𒂼𒄄 ♦62 |
| 187817293 (Comments: 1) | Zcubed (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, could you please clarify if the service_times tag hours for the church apply to a specific day? Currently, the tag is not valid because it doesn't apply to a specific day. For example if this church has service times only on Sunday, t... commented 2026-08-30 05:53:42 UTC by PostaMap_Infinite ♦62 |
| 188123926 (Comments: 1) | ڕاستی (Discussed changesets: 188) | هناك العديد من الطرق خارج الاقليم، لماذا قمت بتغيير اسمها من العربية الى الكردية في هذا التعديل؟ مثل https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/14527551 و |
| 188154815 (Comments: 1) | matthewCmatt (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi! Please note that opening_hours=* hours timespans must be written in hh:mm format, even for single digit hours. It's also standard practice to separate rules that don't interfere with each other with a semicolon, even if using a comma is... commented 2026-08-30 05:11:23 UTC by PostaMap_Infinite ♦62 |
 | 187963992 (Comments: 1) | Iris Nathalia Rios Esteche (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188227965 commented 2026-08-30 04:55:19 UTC by rajdhani ♦424 |
| 175572500 (Comments: 2) | 8051 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Use SHIFT+Y to 1 m commented 2026-08-30 04:51:10 UTC by 8051 ♦2 |
| 187147361 (Comments: 1) | Gendov (Discussed changesets: 9) | Die access=no was overbodig, ik had access=no op de veerstoepen gezet omdat op de pont zelf, access=no wordt opgeheven door de andere access bepalingen oa bicycle=yes Volgens de site van de voetveren vaart de WUTA weer, dus ik heb access=no ve... commented 2026-08-30 04:41:22 UTC by dvdhoven ♦987 |
| 188227668 (Comments: 1) | PostaMap_Infinite (Discussed changesets: 26) | *Hallmark XD commented 2026-08-30 04:34:59 UTC by PostaMap_Infinite ♦62 |
| 188098874 (Comments: 2) | Melody5291 (Discussed changesets: 1) | DWG revert of all CS - apparent fictitious mapping & improper deletions: 188227531 commented 2026-08-30 04:27:46 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,812 |
| 188127848 (Comments: 2) | rohitmg (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hey Frans, thanks for the feedback. that was the first mapping task i attempted and wasnt aware of the squaring option at the time. commented 2026-08-30 04:12:20 UTC by rohitmg ♦1 |
| 188225804 (Comments: 1) | Flap Slimy Outward (Discussed changesets: 286) | This area actually represents a planning district, not necessarily a single place with a distinct identity. Therefore, this entire area would (likely) be better tagged as place=borough. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188227298 commented 2026-08-30 04:12:03 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦352 |
| 186216539 (Comments: 2) | Ewen Hill (Discussed changesets: 99) | Thanks @alpacaMaps commented 2026-08-30 04:08:15 UTC by Ewen Hill ♦512 |
| 188226038 (Comments: 1) | iismitch55 (Discussed changesets: 66) | Hi Mitch, just a reminder, per what I mentioned to you on a few of your previous changesets, when there is a single node for an object and you want to map the outline of the building or campus, please keep the node (without its tags) in the outline (... commented 2026-08-30 03:55:40 UTC by Frank Peng ♦228 |
| 187930831 (Comments: 1) | Simon112321 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188226949 commented 2026-08-30 03:53:32 UTC by rajdhani ♦424 |
| 188226922 (Comments: 1) | bodayw (Discussed changesets: 4) | I deleted a few buildings that were just added in changeset 188226575 to resolve the conflicts commented 2026-08-30 03:52:48 UTC by bodayw ♦4 |
| 185376734 (Comments: 1) | Mountain6077 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, addr:country tags are redundant when the value matches what country a feature is physically located in. They don't need to be added. Also, you shouldn't duplicate addresses for every school building. It only needs be tagged on... commented 2026-08-30 03:33:42 UTC by Joel Koen ♦62 |
| 188225600 (Comments: 1) | cartographique (Discussed changesets: 2) | Height and speed sign (respectively) to the right of the entrance. https://www.google.com/maps/@59.9236156,10.646882,3a,15y,15.58h,84.64t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sXDPEjSaPk1ZGJyp2C1kE6Q!2e0!6shttps:%2F%2Fstreetviewpixels-pa.googleapis.com%2Fv1%2Fth... commented 2026-08-30 02:59:02 UTC by cartographique ♦2 |
| 188225898 (Comments: 1) | cartographique (Discussed changesets: 2) | Sign can be seen here: https://www.google.com/maps/@59.9235912,10.6471684,3a,28.6y,10.69h,90.65t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1siDlx191B6ZTOvu3hGr9QBA!2e0!6shttps:%252F%252Fstreetviewpixels-pa.googleapis.com%252Fv1%252Fthumbnail%253Fcb_client%253Dmaps_sv... commented 2026-08-30 02:56:19 UTC by cartographique ♦2 |
| 188225229 (Comments: 1) | zmcaleer (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello zmcaleer, the work you're doing looks pretty cool - was just wondering if there's a meaning behind the R1 and R2 name you've put on the edge of the garden beds here? Also, the QLD Imagery layer in Background settings is m... commented 2026-08-30 02:53:46 UTC by Joel Koen ♦62 |
| 178167355 (Comments: 1) | compdude (Discussed changesets: 8) | relation/20180240 doesn't need to be a multipolygon - it could just be two separate areas. Pushing changeset that converts each line to an area soon. commented 2026-08-30 02:50:28 UTC by KTibow ♦8 |
| 188220557 (Comments: 1) | pqnonwba (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo pqnonwba, wenn Parkbuchten ausschließlich für Elektroautos zur Nutzung gekennzeichnet sind, ist es im Regelfall in Verbindung mit einer Ladestation zu verstehen. In diesem Fall sollte es: Key:parking_space=charging hei&s... commented 2026-08-30 02:48:01 UTC by pitfire ♦748 |
| 182468891 (Comments: 1) | hanhdbui (Discussed changesets: 1) | As a general practice in OSM, access restrictions like foot=no should only be added when there is clear on-the-ground signage or another verifiable legal basis. The absence of a sidewalk does not, by itself, mean that pedestrians are prohibited. In t... commented 2026-08-30 02:38:25 UTC by StreetSurveyor ♦188 |
| 187664162 (Comments: 4) | Goldstandard64 (Discussed changesets: 1) | If you can, that would be great! I followed a guide on how to add it so that's why that stuff is in there. Thank you! commented 2026-08-30 02:35:16 UTC by Goldstandard64 ♦1 |
| 187914209 (Comments: 1) | MoeDirt (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, this node can be taken down. I drove by today and got a more exact location for the camera and made a new node. Sorry for any trouble, I just wanted to give the best reporting possible. commented 2026-08-30 02:15:28 UTC by MoeDirt ♦1 |
| 188166385 (Comments: 1) | Joe Helten (Discussed changesets: 1) | Wow, I can't believe we're still cleaning up all the vandalism of Evpac/GregHeffley275/Wimpy_Kid/etc. commented 2026-08-30 02:08:19 UTC by deneben ♦8 |
| 188224386 (Comments: 2) | Jacoblightning3 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Also It appears that JOSM discarded the descriptions from the other edits I made: For https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/18888637/history/15: Add Recommended (advisory) maxspeed For https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/16464769/history/3... commented 2026-08-30 01:37:55 UTC by Jacoblightning3 ♦1 |
| 188181858 (Comments: 2) | cimelek (Discussed changesets: 1) | Eine gute Sache muss unterstützt werden...👌 commented 2026-08-30 01:18:15 UTC by cimelek ♦1 |
| 165474658 (Comments: 1) | goldfndr (Discussed changesets: 51) | Did you mean to make way/6462234 into a retaining wall? Not editing since I don't want to destroy any tags that should be moved elsewhere. commented 2026-08-30 01:17:42 UTC by KTibow ♦8 |
| 187489780 (Comments: 3) | mappinglander (Discussed changesets: 27) | You're welcome. Thanks for your contribution! commented 2026-08-30 01:12:55 UTC by wuys ♦11 |
| 183903543 (Comments: 1) | Anonymous897234 (Discussed changesets: 16) | Looks like this changeset introduced way/1528039485. But way/428005364 has already had cycleway=lane for 10 years. commented 2026-08-30 01:01:57 UTC by KTibow ♦8 |
| 188221190 (Comments: 1) | MiddleverseAI (Discussed changesets: 1) | I've deleted the node - It was placed in the middle of the street and the tags were wrong. I suggest you read the wiki.openstreetmap.org for how to contribute correctly. commented 2026-08-30 00:37:20 UTC by Glassman ♦6,031 |
| 188218459 (Comments: 1) | Sage Dryer Vent (Discussed changesets: 1) | reverted - seo spam - these are residential homes commented 2026-08-30 00:31:06 UTC by Glassman ♦6,031 |
| 183230708 (Comments: 1) | JuletDeltaKilo (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi JuletDeltaKilo,\r \r The country that these nodes are placed in does not currently operate any Flock ALPR. \r \r https://deflock.org/identify is an excellent resource for identifying ALPRs.\r \r - alpacaMaps commented 2026-08-29 23:41:26 UTC by alpacaMaps ♦339 |
| 183227702 (Comments: 1) | JuletDeltaKilo (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi JuletDeltaKilo,\r \r The country that these nodes are placed in does not currently operate any Flock ALPR. \r \r https://deflock.org/identify is an excellent resource for identifying ALPRs.\r \r - alpacaMaps commented 2026-08-29 23:41:25 UTC by alpacaMaps ♦339 |
| 181858548 (Comments: 1) | CameraCheckerLocal (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi CameraCheckerLocal,\r \r The country that these nodes are placed in does not currently operate any Flock ALPR. \r \r https://deflock.org/identify is an excellent resource for identifying ALPRs.\r \r - alpacaMaps commented 2026-08-29 23:40:59 UTC by alpacaMaps ♦339 |
| 181787430 (Comments: 1) | CameraCheckerLocal (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi CameraCheckerLocal,\r \r The country that these nodes are placed in does not currently operate any Flock ALPR. \r \r https://deflock.org/identify is an excellent resource for identifying ALPRs.\r \r - alpacaMaps commented 2026-08-29 23:40:59 UTC by alpacaMaps ♦339 |
| 182490136 (Comments: 1) | Fauxheroes (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi Fauxheroes,\r \r The country that these nodes are placed in does not currently operate any Flock ALPR. \r \r https://deflock.org/identify is an excellent resource for identifying ALPRs.\r \r - alpacaMaps commented 2026-08-29 23:40:35 UTC by alpacaMaps ♦339 |
| 182490062 (Comments: 1) | Fauxheroes (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi Fauxheroes,\r \r The country that these nodes are placed in does not currently operate any Flock ALPR. \r \r https://deflock.org/identify is an excellent resource for identifying ALPRs.\r \r - alpacaMaps commented 2026-08-29 23:40:34 UTC by alpacaMaps ♦339 |
| 181162389 (Comments: 1) | Fades100 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi Fades100,\r \r The country that these nodes are placed in does not currently operate any Flock ALPR. \r \r https://deflock.org/identify is an excellent resource for identifying ALPRs.\r \r - alpacaMaps commented 2026-08-29 23:40:08 UTC by alpacaMaps ♦339 |
| 181162304 (Comments: 1) | Fades100 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi Fades100,\r \r The country that these nodes are placed in does not currently operate any Flock ALPR. \r \r https://deflock.org/identify is an excellent resource for identifying ALPRs.\r \r - alpacaMaps commented 2026-08-29 23:40:07 UTC by alpacaMaps ♦339 |
| 185555652 (Comments: 1) | Flockfucker69 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Flockfucker69,\r \r The country that these nodes are placed in does not currently operate any Flock ALPR. \r \r https://deflock.org/identify is an excellent resource for identifying ALPRs.\r \r - alpacaMaps commented 2026-08-29 23:39:01 UTC by alpacaMaps ♦339 |
| 187782025 (Comments: 2) | Mohamad3521 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Mohamad3521,\r \r The country that these nodes are placed in does not currently operate any Flock ALPR. \r \r https://deflock.org/identify is an excellent resource for identifying ALPRs.\r \r - alpacaMaps commented 2026-08-29 23:38:50 UTC by alpacaMaps ♦339 |
| 187794520 (Comments: 1) | Yellowellohello (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Yellowellohello,\r \r The country that these nodes are placed in does not currently operate any Flock ALPR. \r \r https://deflock.org/identify is an excellent resource for identifying ALPRs.\r \r - alpacaMaps commented 2026-08-29 23:38:26 UTC by alpacaMaps ♦339 |
| 187824148 (Comments: 1) | The flocker (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi The flocker,\r \r The country that these nodes are placed in does not currently operate any Flock ALPR. \r \r https://deflock.org/identify is an excellent resource for identifying ALPRs.\r \r - alpacaMaps commented 2026-08-29 23:38:16 UTC by alpacaMaps ♦339 |
| 187922850 (Comments: 1) | Bastinax (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi Bastinax,\r \r The country that these nodes are placed in does not currently operate any Flock ALPR. \r \r https://deflock.org/identify is an excellent resource for identifying ALPRs.\r \r - alpacaMaps commented 2026-08-29 23:37:59 UTC by alpacaMaps ♦339 |
| 187984367 (Comments: 1) | Mathis Loudram (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Mathis Loudram,\r \r The country that these nodes are placed in does not currently operate any Flock ALPR. \r \r https://deflock.org/identify is an excellent resource for identifying ALPRs.\r \r - alpacaMaps commented 2026-08-29 23:37:40 UTC by alpacaMaps ♦339 |
| 188016246 (Comments: 1) | Toxiiita (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Toxiiita,\r \r The country that these nodes are placed in does not currently operate any Flock ALPR. \r \r https://deflock.org/identify is an excellent resource for identifying ALPRs.\r \r - alpacaMaps commented 2026-08-29 23:37:28 UTC by alpacaMaps ♦339 |
 | 177079648 (Comments: 1) | Dean Leichtle (Discussed changesets: 4) | Pozdrav; vidim da si postavio sidewalk:bicycle=yes na razne ceste, no na wikiju nedostaje dokumentacija što taj tag zapravo znači? Da li je to isto što i cycleway=track (tj. da je biciklistička staza pored ceste) ? Ili ima neko... commented 2026-08-29 22:28:32 UTC by Matija Nalis ♦142 |
| 188201005 (Comments: 2) | PatGT (Discussed changesets: 13) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21199 commented 2026-08-29 22:25:48 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,134 |
| 174439499 (Comments: 1) | NTLOSM (Discussed changesets: 1) | This camera location has been removed. commented 2026-08-29 22:25:01 UTC by deflockfremont ♦2 |
| 181946439 (Comments: 1) | allthepotatoes (Discussed changesets: 2) | This camera location has been removed. commented 2026-08-29 22:23:59 UTC by deflockfremont ♦2 |
| 188193691 (Comments: 3) | -fru- (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks for this information, I change it. commented 2026-08-29 22:17:52 UTC by Syl ♦1,102 |
| 188219698 (Comments: 2) | tracestrack-edits (Discussed changesets: 4) | Thanks. Will do in following changes. commented 2026-08-29 22:16:54 UTC by tracestrack-edits ♦4 |
| 187907084 (Comments: 8) | L4PSA (Discussed changesets: 4) | I think there are theoretically some hazards that can be identified unambiguously and mappers can agree on rare exceptions to tag such places. But in general, it's pretty much always some variation of "signed": https://wiki.open... commented 2026-08-29 22:08:02 UTC by HellMap ♦986 |
| 187864499 (Comments: 2) | Rafael RPM (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hello friend, good evening. Thanks for the help; I'm new here. commented 2026-08-29 22:03:44 UTC by Rafael RPM ♦4 |
| 186884304 (Comments: 2) | 0235 (Discussed changesets: 11) | They are a mappable Areoway feature, so get mapped. Places use data on parking spaces. commented 2026-08-29 21:59:30 UTC by 0235 ♦51 |
| 188218064 (Comments: 1) | bdenis02 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-08-29 21:32:24 UTC by eggie ♦46,961 |
| 188115474 (Comments: 3) | L4PSA (Discussed changesets: 4) | On OSM, it's not always a parking lot just because cars park there. There are many ways cars can technically park that don't make a location a parking lot. An obvious example is something like parking along a street. It's not a separat... commented 2026-08-29 21:28:09 UTC by HellMap ♦986 |
| 187839682 (Comments: 3) | shxisbxhgwjwtr26272 (Discussed changesets: 2) | No reaction, reverted with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188218441. commented 2026-08-29 21:16:43 UTC by aixbrick ♦933 |
| 158576076 (Comments: 1) | DorneyLake123 (Discussed changesets: 35) | Thank you! commented 2026-08-29 21:10:22 UTC by HandyHat ♦6 |
| 162149265 (Comments: 3) | iismitch55 (Discussed changesets: 66) | View this changeset on OSMCha, which may be easier to review, and shows you the map objects created, modified, or deleted in this changeset immediately rather than in FacilMap, where it takes longer to show them depending on the amount of objects cha... commented 2026-08-29 21:07:44 UTC by Frank Peng ♦228 |
| 181116939 (Comments: 3) | FlamingoOSM (Discussed changesets: 44) | Thanks, I wasn't sure if there wasn't a subdivision actually called West Pam Beach or not. commented 2026-08-29 21:06:16 UTC by JeroenHoek ♦797 |
| 169408308 (Comments: 2) | jSeke (Discussed changesets: 24) | Hello, here is the Scottish Government's Gaelic names authority's page for the street: https://www.ainmean-aite.scot/?id=39210 which says the name has been used since the 1890s. I don't have records from them but I did find on the seco... commented 2026-08-29 21:02:50 UTC by jSeke ♦32 |
| 188189349 (Comments: 1) | cnvery (Discussed changesets: 51) | 见 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188159152#c1651237 commented 2026-08-29 21:02:34 UTC by 旧加卷 ♦94 |
| 188163035 (Comments: 3) | L4PSA (Discussed changesets: 4) | Yeah, "replace geometry" is basically the way to go if the new contour is very different. I don't personally think it's faster for simple shapes, but I guess it depends on what you find faster/easier. commented 2026-08-29 20:59:29 UTC by HellMap ♦986 |
| 188211228 (Comments: 1) | mueschel (Discussed changesets: 1008) | Danke! commented 2026-08-29 20:53:34 UTC by ToniE ♦1,283 |
| 188216812 (Comments: 4) | PHavik (Discussed changesets: 1) | typo.. Houd het gebied van je edits klein. Svp niet schuiven met de kaart in editmodus. Dan schuif je niet, maar verplaatst objecten. commented 2026-08-29 20:47:56 UTC by eggie ♦46,961 |
| 187992706 (Comments: 5) | toboz (Discussed changesets: 3) | Sziasztok! Köszi a magyarázatot és a segítséget. Igen, én is láttam a többféle elnevezést. Én úgy értelmeztem, hogy amíg a Külső kerületi k... commented 2026-08-29 20:43:14 UTC by toboz ♦3 |
| 186809401 (Comments: 4) | Everteal (Discussed changesets: 11) | Good point. I didn't know about board_type=welcome_sign, thanks for the tip! It doesn't really match this sign though, it isn't really a 'board'. I've swapped to a man_made=sign with sign=name and indication:place=neighb... commented 2026-08-29 20:37:54 UTC by Everteal ♦14 |
| 188194206 (Comments: 5) | dudone (Discussed changesets: 102) | It’s nothing to do with my opinion of the wiki, it’s to do with the need for a way to document and achieve community consensus on what tags mean. Not everyone’s interpretation of “one feature, one element” is always goin... commented 2026-08-29 20:37:35 UTC by gurglypipe ♦1,109 |
| 188216440 (Comments: 1) | NielsM_ (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hiet zie je wat je hebt gedaan.. https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=188216440 commented 2026-08-29 20:37:02 UTC by eggie ♦46,961 |
| 188213767 (Comments: 9) | NielsM_ (Discussed changesets: 5) | Dit zijn nu je changesets.. https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/NielsM_/history#map=14/52.02547/4.29324&layers=N commented 2026-08-29 20:35:03 UTC by eggie ♦46,961 |
| 188210070 (Comments: 1) | B_2624 (Discussed changesets: 16) | Hallo B_2624, nochmal: Hier steheh keine Verkehrszeichen 259, daher ist "foot=no" nicht korrekt. "foot=no" wird nur verwendet wenn ein solches Verbot auch entsprechend ausgeschildert ist. Gruß Zrop commented 2026-08-29 20:31:00 UTC by Zrop ♦163 |
| 188212020 (Comments: 5) | NielsM_ (Discussed changesets: 5) | Ja maar ieder was ooit beginner.... In het begin was de kaart wit en ledig. Een blind paard kon geen kwaad. Nu is van alles verder ontwikkeld en daardoor ook iets gecompliceerder geworden. Daar groei je van zelf in. Mapse commented 2026-08-29 20:30:15 UTC by eggie ♦46,961 |
| 188210088 (Comments: 1) | B_2624 (Discussed changesets: 16) | Hallo B_2624, wie kommst Du darauf das es bei den Straßenabschnitten - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/8196637 - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/32621361 auf beiden Seiten ein separater Gehweg ist ? Das ist leider nicht ... commented 2026-08-29 20:24:29 UTC by Zrop ♦163 |
| 188214666 (Comments: 4) | NielsM_ (Discussed changesets: 5) | Wanneer je in de changeset onderin waar knooppunten staat de winkels aanklikt en er komt dan iets van verwijderd door eggie... dan heb ik al samengevoegd. Wanneer ik dat nog niet heb gedaan kun je de nodes gewoon aan elkaar plakken. Wel dan eerst ... commented 2026-08-29 20:23:52 UTC by eggie ♦46,961 |
| 188115080 (Comments: 3) | adamsc (Discussed changesets: 50) | Dokładnie, nie wiem jaka była w dokumentacji sor, ale nie wygląda jakby coś sie miało zmienić, szkoda bo oznakowanie jest dziwne i niepoprawne. commented 2026-08-29 20:11:25 UTC by adamsc ♦65 |
| 188114223 (Comments: 2) | mcnv (Discussed changesets: 3) | I'm trying to follow what you're saying here. I didn't add the cartpath or the stream, those were already tagged. As I was reviewing the course I kept seeing warnings about the cart path going over the stream, and at one point I adde... commented 2026-08-29 20:10:26 UTC by mcnv ♦2 |
| 187826197 (Comments: 2) | KONOR1 (Discussed changesets: 1) | A Máltai szeretszolgálat honlapján még itt van az intézmény: https://www.maltai.hu/tevekenyseg/intezmeny/162 Facebook-juk is aktív, szintén erre a címre szól: https://www.fa... commented 2026-08-29 20:05:26 UTC by 'Lex ♦6 |
| 187760805 (Comments: 3) | Vl-Sher (Discussed changesets: 8) | а для прокладывающего маршрут для фуры тогда будет способ донести информацию о полицейских засадах или плохом качестве покрытия - напис... commented 2026-08-29 20:01:42 UTC by literan ♦7,214 |
| 188093411 (Comments: 1) | GylesLee (Discussed changesets: 3) | 您好呀，感谢您的编辑！不过，似乎 relation/12733508 在本次编辑后不能被正常渲染了，目前地图上这片森林变成了空白。请问您可以对这个relation稍作调整以让它能够被正常渲染吗？谢谢 :) commented 2026-08-29 19:56:23 UTC by SpaghettiMapper ♦12 |
| 188199713 (Comments: 4) | Aleksandar Lukač (Discussed changesets: 13) | Bedankt voor de tips en het nakijken van mijn voorgestelde aanpassing. Groet, Aleksandar commented 2026-08-29 19:51:08 UTC by Aleksandar Lukač ♦6 |
| 188139601 (Comments: 3) | Herwescheluc (Discussed changesets: 40) | 👋 Alle klar! ;) (Ich suche inzwischen gelegentlich per Google News bundesweit nach neuen Defis.) commented 2026-08-29 19:36:58 UTC by bigbug21 ♦169 |
| 171699244 (Comments: 1) | Flo0510 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hej Flo, der Hydrant (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13131477063/history#map=19/52.158512/8.265608&layers=N) wie er gerade so ohne jegliche Eigenschaften dort steht, steht er gefühlt ziemlich im Weg. Schau dir doch mal das an https... commented 2026-08-29 19:35:37 UTC by DeFra85 ♦298 |
| 188211028 (Comments: 1) | Fraxi (Discussed changesets: 182) | За тази промяна също използвах снимки на Bing за няколко сгради. commented 2026-08-29 19:18:32 UTC by Fraxi ♦498 |
| 182616527 (Comments: 1) | Popiesch (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hallo Popiesch, laut https://www.meier-magazin.de/public/epaper/2026_august/2/ soll der von dir erfasste Defibrillator nicht innen, sondern im Außenbereich angebracht und rund um die Uhr zugänglich sein. Könntest du bitte nochmal s... commented 2026-08-29 19:16:35 UTC by bigbug21 ♦169 |
| 188091009 (Comments: 1) | OSM-XXXXXX (Discussed changesets: 35) | Moi, service=emergency_access -tagia kuuluu käyttää highway=service :n kanssa koska se on service roadin alatyyppi. Nyt kyse on vain virheellisestä datasta, eikä mikään palvelu ymmärrä mitä t&a... commented 2026-08-29 19:12:26 UTC by Sakari_N ♦161 |
| 183064648 (Comments: 1) | groen_sb (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hey groen_sb, Bedankt voor je bijdragen. Gebruik in Vespucci de lagen (toevoegen) / (add) layers knop in het menu rechtsboven om bijvoorbeeld de PDOK luchtfoto voor Nederland toe te voegen. Deze heeft een scherper beeld, is nieuwer en nauwk... commented 2026-08-29 19:06:27 UTC by danieldegroot2 ♦736 |
| 188140782 (Comments: 2) | ptrckmrch (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thanks 4 the information 🙏🏼 commented 2026-08-29 19:01:05 UTC by ptrckmrch ♦2 |
| 188083959 (Comments: 4) | ptrckmrch (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi. Sorry for the mistakes I made. Opening hours are from the linked URL, not in the restaurant. And yes, I used german day names. My fault. The URL was copy/paste. Don't know how it go wrong. Sorry! commented 2026-08-29 18:59:18 UTC by ptrckmrch ♦2 |
| 183415139 (Comments: 2) | YBau (Discussed changesets: 6) | Merci pour ta modif, je pense que c'est tout à fait le tag approprié selon le wiki. C'est en effet un parcours d'initiation au code de la route pour les enfants à bord de mini-voiturettes électriques. commented 2026-08-29 18:57:08 UTC by ThomCJ ♦7 |
| 186840266 (Comments: 4) | watmildon (Discussed changesets: 51) | I appreciate you mentioning it! commented 2026-08-29 18:54:58 UTC by watmildon ♦318 |
| 188207239 (Comments: 4) | tbo47 (Discussed changesets: 31) | Oui, désolé commented 2026-08-29 18:54:34 UTC by tbo47 ♦24 |
| 188160221 (Comments: 1) | OSM-XXXXXX (Discussed changesets: 35) | Osaatko kertoa näistä: lane_markings=yes ja lanes=1 kaksisuuntaisella kaksikaistaisella tiellä. traffic_calming=mäkäri jokaisella tiellä, ei liity hidastetöyssyjen todellisiin sijainteihin. Mielestäni... commented 2026-08-29 18:48:29 UTC by Sakari_N ♦161 |
| 188142601 (Comments: 2) | TG-map4 (Discussed changesets: 16) | 😁 interesting commented 2026-08-29 18:36:37 UTC by TG-map4 ♦27 |
| 186197631 (Comments: 1) | ChezFrogLegs (Discussed changesets: 34) | Hi chez, the links onto/off New Airport Way (for buses and taxis) should not have motor_vehicle=designated added, as this implies that all motor vehicles are permitted, when they are not. commented 2026-08-29 18:30:46 UTC by LordGarySugar ♦377 |
| 188186758 (Comments: 5) | 544848455241 (Discussed changesets: 11) | Dankeschön commented 2026-08-29 18:19:31 UTC by icestormy ♦12 |
| 188211054 (Comments: 1) | NielsM_ (Discussed changesets: 5) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. Feedback... Lijkt me oke zo. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-08-29 18:15:34 UTC by eggie ♦46,961 |
| 188207482 (Comments: 1) | Mapikids (Discussed changesets: 12) | Hiya, thanks for the additions. This changeset spans four countries; please split your edits up in future so that local mappers can review them without having to review changes for different countries which they’re not familiar with. Thi... commented 2026-08-29 18:15:26 UTC by gurglypipe ♦1,109 |
| 168134636 (Comments: 3) | Gubomi (Discussed changesets: 1) | https://panoramax.openstreetmap.fr/images/d6/bc/77/4b/205c-4466-918a-3f36b3da369b.jpg commented 2026-08-29 18:14:30 UTC by gitouche ♦44 |
| 90457158 (Comments: 3) | rhhs (Discussed changesets: 92) | According to http://veroizpovedania.government.bg/register, it is Молитвен дом на СЦАСД (Съюз на църквите на адвентистите от седмия ден) Tagged accordingly. commented 2026-08-29 18:13:16 UTC by Dimitar155 ♦1,025 |
| 188175364 (Comments: 1) | ivrohi (Discussed changesets: 1) | Saludos. Cuando un lugar debe ser reubicado, NO SE LO BORRA, se lo mueve. La posición de Arampampa estaba puesta según el CNPV2012, y esta reubicada al NorOeste de esa posición según el CPV2024. commented 2026-08-29 18:05:54 UTC by JJIglesias ♦1,565 |
| 187854307 (Comments: 2) | Bartek444 (Discussed changesets: 86) | widać na zdjęciach, a numery ze stron operatrów commented 2026-08-29 18:02:22 UTC by Bartek444 ♦68 |
| 188199264 (Comments: 1) | Zilversteen (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. Feedback... Tweewielers zijn vaak uitgezonderd van oneway=yes We taggen dan bij oneway:bicycle=no eb vaak ook voor mofa en mo... commented 2026-08-29 17:50:26 UTC by eggie ♦46,961 |
| 188190317 (Comments: 1) | dontonio (Discussed changesets: 6) | Saludos, los nodos si requieren ser reubicados NO se borran sino se mueven. Las vias y areas NO se hacen con líneas rectas y ángulos crudos, sino siguiendo el contorno y geometría de lo existente en el terreno. El Mapa no es ESQU... commented 2026-08-29 17:42:27 UTC by JJIglesias ♦1,565 |
| 120768351 (Comments: 2) | PhilNi (Discussed changesets: 5) | Agreed. Just a mistake on my part. No need to comment, just fix it. I’d (and OSM) schema has changed a bit when I first did my sidewalks and accessibility changes so just go ahead and update. I’ve been going over some of them myself a... commented 2026-08-29 17:37:07 UTC by PhilNi ♦4 |
| 186117414 (Comments: 2) | ydrgbjo (Discussed changesets: 32) | Hello eginhard, OK, I'll try do do better and to add understandable comments. Best, ydrgbjo Note: Mainly I add WD (Wikidata Items) to often existing OSM objects. And mainly I improve building outlines according to ModPubBE (Kant... commented 2026-08-29 17:36:58 UTC by ydrgbjo ♦18 |
| 188124456 (Comments: 1) | User-2945 (Discussed changesets: 6) | A highway should only be classified as a motorway if, among many other things, it is divided. This means there must be a physical barrier between the directions of travel. Since this segment of Southern Parkway lacks a physical barrier between its ca... commented 2026-08-29 17:32:55 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦352 |
| 139891695 (Comments: 4) | archie (Discussed changesets: 309) | Tillägg: busslinje 753 "angör" fortfarande denna hållplats på vardagar. Så gör även linje 754 som inte finns med i osm - ännu. commented 2026-08-29 17:22:46 UTC by archie ♦1,371 |
| 188175504 (Comments: 1) | RoBsx97 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Olá, salve suas edições em grupos menores. Não ignore alertas de validação, como vias sobrepostas e desconectadas, evite enviar erros para o servidor. --- Publ... commented 2026-08-29 17:11:21 UTC by DressyPear4 ♦1,631 |
| 188146145 (Comments: 5) | davide020382 (Discussed changesets: 4) | @SekeRob Perfetto, grazie mille! 👍 Se ti va di dare un'occhiata, questa è la challenge MapRoulette: mpr.lt/c/56565 commented 2026-08-29 17:04:32 UTC by davide020382 ♦5 |
| 185983957 (Comments: 1) | Marlo Voss (Discussed changesets: 9) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Good_changeset_comments commented 2026-08-29 17:03:59 UTC by DressyPear4 ♦1,631 |
| 185983622 (Comments: 1) | Marlo Voss (Discussed changesets: 9) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Good_changeset_comments commented 2026-08-29 17:03:55 UTC by DressyPear4 ♦1,631 |
| 188121798 (Comments: 1) | Marlo Voss (Discussed changesets: 9) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Good_changeset_comments commented 2026-08-29 17:03:50 UTC by DressyPear4 ♦1,631 |
| 188125357 (Comments: 1) | UenoCarlos (Discussed changesets: 2) | Este changeset foi revertido com changeset/188208037 commented 2026-08-29 17:01:31 UTC by DressyPear4 ♦1,631 |
| 152172513 (Comments: 2) | archie (Discussed changesets: 309) | Även jag skulle föredra highway=service eftersom dessa vägar inte är "genomfartsvägar". Har för mig att ha sett argumentet att "service" på något sätt (har inte undersökt detta) ... commented 2026-08-29 16:49:41 UTC by archie ♦1,371 |
| 141851195 (Comments: 5) | Okahkonen (Discussed changesets: 3) | Kiitos. commented 2026-08-29 16:44:54 UTC by Okahkonen ♦5 |
| 184242316 (Comments: 2) | 6totheworld (Discussed changesets: 3) | Not sure, will revert. commented 2026-08-29 16:44:43 UTC by 6totheworld ♦1 |
| 187662944 (Comments: 3) | PatGT (Discussed changesets: 13) | I wanted to follow up on this in case my previous discussion message was overlooked and to ask whether you could provide further clarification or elaboration for why you added the description text "Best not to linger" and renamed the shelte... commented 2026-08-29 16:44:41 UTC by eerib ♦375 |
| 188206431 (Comments: 1) | Adam Neil Baker (Discussed changesets: 4) | Thanks for adding these buildings! Please make sure to use 'Q' to square each building, this will make them look neater and will be more accurate :) commented 2026-08-29 16:39:43 UTC by LordGarySugar ♦377 |
| 188202224 (Comments: 3) | b-jazz (Discussed changesets: 93) | Thanks! commented 2026-08-29 16:37:04 UTC by schobbish ♦80 |
| 188083010 (Comments: 2) | ddukk (Discussed changesets: 2) | Vielen Dank!!! commented 2026-08-29 16:32:46 UTC by ddukk ♦2 |
| 188192561 (Comments: 1) | GianniMartorana (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ciao e benvenuti su OpenStreetMap! Hai mappato nel fiume due volte il Parco del Valentino che però mi risulta sia stato già mappato come area: way/549096612 Buon mapping, Marco. commented 2026-08-29 16:32:31 UTC by MarcoR ♦630 |
| 188137965 (Comments: 3) | coatix (Discussed changesets: 7) | Fixed commented 2026-08-29 16:28:24 UTC by coatix ♦46 |
| 187962704 (Comments: 2) | diegoGimenez (Discussed changesets: 54) | Este changeset foi revertido com changeset/188205765 commented 2026-08-29 16:16:31 UTC by DressyPear4 ♦1,631 |
| 187962735 (Comments: 2) | diegoGimenez (Discussed changesets: 54) | Este changeset foi revertido com changeset/188205765 commented 2026-08-29 16:16:30 UTC by DressyPear4 ♦1,631 |
| 188006251 (Comments: 2) | diegoGimenez (Discussed changesets: 54) | Este changeset foi revertido com changeset/188205765 commented 2026-08-29 16:16:30 UTC by DressyPear4 ♦1,631 |
| 188007952 (Comments: 2) | diegoGimenez (Discussed changesets: 54) | Este changeset foi revertido com changeset/188205765 commented 2026-08-29 16:16:29 UTC by DressyPear4 ♦1,631 |
| 188006466 (Comments: 1) | diegoGimenez (Discussed changesets: 54) | Este changeset foi revertido com changeset/188205765 commented 2026-08-29 16:16:29 UTC by DressyPear4 ♦1,631 |
| 188055362 (Comments: 1) | diegoGimenez (Discussed changesets: 54) | Este changeset foi revertido com changeset/188205765 commented 2026-08-29 16:16:28 UTC by DressyPear4 ♦1,631 |
| 188055584 (Comments: 1) | diegoGimenez (Discussed changesets: 54) | Este changeset foi revertido com changeset/188205765 commented 2026-08-29 16:16:27 UTC by DressyPear4 ♦1,631 |
| 188055748 (Comments: 1) | diegoGimenez (Discussed changesets: 54) | Este changeset foi revertido com changeset/188205765 commented 2026-08-29 16:16:26 UTC by DressyPear4 ♦1,631 |
| 188056245 (Comments: 1) | diegoGimenez (Discussed changesets: 54) | Este changeset foi revertido com changeset/188205765 commented 2026-08-29 16:16:26 UTC by DressyPear4 ♦1,631 |
| 188056254 (Comments: 1) | diegoGimenez (Discussed changesets: 54) | Este changeset foi revertido com changeset/188205765 commented 2026-08-29 16:16:25 UTC by DressyPear4 ♦1,631 |
| 188197746 (Comments: 4) | Joseph R P (Discussed changesets: 230) | I see. These edge cases really should be documented somewhere on the OSM Wiki. If you recall, I also upgraded a short segment of Galleria to primary for the same reason (I have since reversed that change) since an Interstate is, in my opinion, even m... commented 2026-08-29 16:15:07 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦352 |
| 188109779 (Comments: 1) | h4rdhelm3t (Discussed changesets: 8) | Szia! Légy szíves ne töröld a POI címeket. Ha egy POI egy házon belül van, attól még a címe nem duplikátum. Tamás commented 2026-08-29 16:14:03 UTC by vasony ♦600 |
| 188178282 (Comments: 3) | Robert Hardin (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi thanks for the reply! I'd suggest changing the path type to =path rather the removing it. Let me know if you need help doing that. commented 2026-08-29 16:12:42 UTC by MassCartog ♦465 |
| 188056325 (Comments: 1) | diegoGimenez (Discussed changesets: 54) | Este changeset foi revertido com changeset/188205532 commented 2026-08-29 16:11:56 UTC by DressyPear4 ♦1,631 |
| 188056433 (Comments: 1) | diegoGimenez (Discussed changesets: 54) | Este changeset foi revertido com changeset/188205532 commented 2026-08-29 16:11:55 UTC by DressyPear4 ♦1,631 |
| 188058815 (Comments: 3) | diegoGimenez (Discussed changesets: 54) | Este changeset foi revertido com changeset/188205450 commented 2026-08-29 16:10:14 UTC by DressyPear4 ♦1,631 |
| 188059625 (Comments: 2) | diegoGimenez (Discussed changesets: 54) | Este changeset foi revertido com changeset/188205450 commented 2026-08-29 16:10:13 UTC by DressyPear4 ♦1,631 |
| 188060746 (Comments: 2) | diegoGimenez (Discussed changesets: 54) | Este changeset foi revertido com changeset/188205450 commented 2026-08-29 16:10:12 UTC by DressyPear4 ♦1,631 |
| 188060964 (Comments: 1) | diegoGimenez (Discussed changesets: 54) | Este changeset foi revertido com changeset/188205450 commented 2026-08-29 16:10:11 UTC by DressyPear4 ♦1,631 |
| 188064190 (Comments: 1) | diegoGimenez (Discussed changesets: 54) | Este changeset foi revertido com changeset/188205165 commented 2026-08-29 16:03:44 UTC by DressyPear4 ♦1,631 |
| 188064650 (Comments: 2) | diegoGimenez (Discussed changesets: 54) | Este changeset foi revertido com changeset/188205112 commented 2026-08-29 16:02:28 UTC by DressyPear4 ♦1,631 |
| 188065192 (Comments: 2) | diegoGimenez (Discussed changesets: 54) | Este changeset foi revertido com changeset/188205112 commented 2026-08-29 16:02:27 UTC by DressyPear4 ♦1,631 |
| 188065843 (Comments: 2) | diegoGimenez (Discussed changesets: 54) | Este changeset foi revertido com changeset/188205112 commented 2026-08-29 16:02:26 UTC by DressyPear4 ♦1,631 |
| 188066540 (Comments: 1) | diegoGimenez (Discussed changesets: 54) | Este changeset foi revertido com changeset/188205041 commented 2026-08-29 16:00:48 UTC by DressyPear4 ♦1,631 |
| 188066668 (Comments: 1) | diegoGimenez (Discussed changesets: 54) | Este changeset foi revertido com changeset/188205041 commented 2026-08-29 16:00:47 UTC by DressyPear4 ♦1,631 |
| 188067118 (Comments: 1) | diegoGimenez (Discussed changesets: 54) | Este changeset foi revertido com changeset/188205041 commented 2026-08-29 16:00:46 UTC by DressyPear4 ♦1,631 |
| 188070118 (Comments: 1) | diegoGimenez (Discussed changesets: 54) | Este changeset foi revertido com changeset/188204964 commented 2026-08-29 15:58:57 UTC by DressyPear4 ♦1,631 |
| 188070139 (Comments: 1) | diegoGimenez (Discussed changesets: 54) | Este changeset foi revertido com changeset/188204964 commented 2026-08-29 15:58:56 UTC by DressyPear4 ♦1,631 |
| 188070218 (Comments: 1) | diegoGimenez (Discussed changesets: 54) | Este changeset foi revertido com changeset/188204964 commented 2026-08-29 15:58:55 UTC by DressyPear4 ♦1,631 |
| 188070176 (Comments: 1) | diegoGimenez (Discussed changesets: 54) | Este changeset foi revertido com changeset/188204964 commented 2026-08-29 15:58:55 UTC by DressyPear4 ♦1,631 |
| 188147889 (Comments: 1) | diegoGimenez (Discussed changesets: 54) | Este changeset foi revertido com changeset/188204865 commented 2026-08-29 15:56:46 UTC by DressyPear4 ♦1,631 |
| 188147810 (Comments: 1) | diegoGimenez (Discussed changesets: 54) | Este changeset foi revertido com changeset/188204865 commented 2026-08-29 15:56:46 UTC by DressyPear4 ♦1,631 |
| 188148100 (Comments: 1) | diegoGimenez (Discussed changesets: 54) | Este changeset foi revertido com changeset/188204865 commented 2026-08-29 15:56:45 UTC by DressyPear4 ♦1,631 |
| 188148181 (Comments: 1) | diegoGimenez (Discussed changesets: 54) | Este changeset foi revertido com changeset/188204865 commented 2026-08-29 15:56:44 UTC by DressyPear4 ♦1,631 |
| 188148272 (Comments: 1) | diegoGimenez (Discussed changesets: 54) | Este changeset foi revertido com changeset/188204865 commented 2026-08-29 15:56:43 UTC by DressyPear4 ♦1,631 |
| 188151340 (Comments: 1) | diegoGimenez (Discussed changesets: 54) | Este changeset foi revertido com changeset/188204724 commented 2026-08-29 15:53:22 UTC by DressyPear4 ♦1,631 |
| 188151858 (Comments: 2) | diegoGimenez (Discussed changesets: 54) | Este changeset foi revertido com changeset/188204724 commented 2026-08-29 15:53:22 UTC by DressyPear4 ♦1,631 |
| 188154555 (Comments: 1) | diegoGimenez (Discussed changesets: 54) | Este changeset foi revertido com changeset/188204581 commented 2026-08-29 15:50:19 UTC by DressyPear4 ♦1,631 |
| 188154081 (Comments: 2) | diegoGimenez (Discussed changesets: 54) | Este changeset foi revertido com changeset/188204581 commented 2026-08-29 15:50:19 UTC by DressyPear4 ♦1,631 |
| 188154588 (Comments: 1) | diegoGimenez (Discussed changesets: 54) | Este changeset foi revertido com changeset/188204581 commented 2026-08-29 15:50:18 UTC by DressyPear4 ♦1,631 |
| 188154827 (Comments: 1) | diegoGimenez (Discussed changesets: 54) | Este changeset foi revertido com changeset/188204581 commented 2026-08-29 15:50:17 UTC by DressyPear4 ♦1,631 |
| 188166909 (Comments: 1) | diegoGimenez (Discussed changesets: 54) | Este changeset foi revertido com changeset/188204581 commented 2026-08-29 15:50:16 UTC by DressyPear4 ♦1,631 |
| 188166304 (Comments: 1) | diegoGimenez (Discussed changesets: 54) | Este changeset foi revertido com changeset/188204581 commented 2026-08-29 15:50:16 UTC by DressyPear4 ♦1,631 |
| 188167040 (Comments: 1) | diegoGimenez (Discussed changesets: 54) | Este changeset foi revertido com changeset/188204581 commented 2026-08-29 15:50:15 UTC by DressyPear4 ♦1,631 |
| 188168441 (Comments: 1) | diegoGimenez (Discussed changesets: 54) | Este changeset foi revertido com changeset/188204430 commented 2026-08-29 15:47:26 UTC by DressyPear4 ♦1,631 |
| 188167492 (Comments: 1) | diegoGimenez (Discussed changesets: 54) | Este changeset foi revertido com changeset/188204430 commented 2026-08-29 15:47:26 UTC by DressyPear4 ♦1,631 |
| 188168663 (Comments: 1) | diegoGimenez (Discussed changesets: 54) | Este changeset foi revertido com changeset/188204430 commented 2026-08-29 15:47:25 UTC by DressyPear4 ♦1,631 |
| 188168928 (Comments: 1) | diegoGimenez (Discussed changesets: 54) | Este changeset foi revertido com changeset/188204430 commented 2026-08-29 15:47:24 UTC by DressyPear4 ♦1,631 |
| 188174080 (Comments: 2) | diegoGimenez (Discussed changesets: 54) | Este changeset foi revertido com changeset/188204430 commented 2026-08-29 15:47:23 UTC by DressyPear4 ♦1,631 |
| 188173665 (Comments: 1) | diegoGimenez (Discussed changesets: 54) | Este changeset foi revertido com changeset/188204238 commented 2026-08-29 15:44:45 UTC by DressyPear4 ♦1,631 |
| 185255300 (Comments: 4) | GHISLAINE NOPPER (Discussed changesets: 2) | All duplicates has been removed commented 2026-08-29 15:37:40 UTC by jbcharron ♦184 |
| 187966730 (Comments: 4) | Flap Slimy Outward (Discussed changesets: 286) | I see. Well, I guess I'll have to re-downgrade this segment to highway=primary then. Since TRINA 2.0's map displaying AADT is broken, I've been trying to recreate it (on my own .OSM file) using data from NDOT's traffic stat... commented 2026-08-29 15:36:25 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦352 |
| 188203743 (Comments: 1) | Alex_457 (Discussed changesets: 63) | source also bustimes.org commented 2026-08-29 15:36:24 UTC by Alex_457 ♦83 |
| 188174668 (Comments: 1) | maro21 (Discussed changesets: 319) | Ale sam adres był na domu od pierwszej wersji 11 lat temu, można było zostawić :) commented 2026-08-29 15:30:33 UTC by dzamper ♦278 |
| 166420180 (Comments: 1) | user786812 (Discussed changesets: 2) | hi, please don't leave "no comment" edits on OSM, read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Good_changeset_comments commented 2026-08-29 15:22:29 UTC by dpolovinkin ♦411 |
| 188180426 (Comments: 1) | KylesWeb-ID (Discussed changesets: 2) | perubahan ini telah dipulihkan https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188202626 commented 2026-08-29 15:13:17 UTC by FajrAl ♦757 |
| 188169006 (Comments: 1) | AnaVitorinha_ufpimappers (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! Please notice we use british english for the keys. commented 2026-08-29 15:11:40 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,833 |
| 176449186 (Comments: 2) | mapman555 (Discussed changesets: 1) | dunno what the best practice is but it looks like it's a separate way now, I walked by the other day and I've got no complaints about how it looks! commented 2026-08-29 15:11:14 UTC by mapman555 ♦1 |
| 188184645 (Comments: 1) | kaarloss9 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Una pregunta son dos barrios? O intentas agregar el Barrio Berno que se ubica en la localidad El Carmen? Saludos commented 2026-08-29 15:10:22 UTC by Eduardo17172 ♦22 |
| 188131988 (Comments: 1) | Eric V (Discussed changesets: 26) | Hello! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1553128106. What is the mean of the tag xall = no? commented 2026-08-29 14:52:32 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,833 |
| 186783904 (Comments: 1) | AjBelnuovo (Discussed changesets: 76) | Hi, Rua Cação got a strange turn tag - what is actually prohibited here? commented 2026-08-29 14:48:35 UTC by mueschel ♦7,309 |
| 188199978 (Comments: 1) | Rubi shrestha1 (Discussed changesets: 2) | this create duplicate building commented 2026-08-29 14:47:42 UTC by FajrAl ♦757 |
| 188199992 (Comments: 1) | Rubi shrestha1 (Discussed changesets: 2) | this create duplicate building commented 2026-08-29 14:47:37 UTC by FajrAl ♦757 |
| 187832030 (Comments: 5) | Cartophilic (Discussed changesets: 9) | 返信ありがとうございます、問題ありません。 これらの内容はJapan Taggingに関することですし、私自身も細部まで十分に整理できていないため、やはりこの場での議論ではなくコミ... commented 2026-08-29 14:35:49 UTC by ffff23 ♦14 |
| 187797361 (Comments: 8) | Krillle (Discussed changesets: 7) | Yes, 26 after I just added my 19 ways. So let's see, if it will be adopted by other editors. commented 2026-08-29 14:08:49 UTC by Krillle ♦4 |
| 179544184 (Comments: 1) | Chemnitzer13 (Discussed changesets: 20) | Ez a rész is tökéletesen megvolt csinálva eddig, nem értem, miért kellett rontani rajta. A note nem viccből volt rajta azokon a vonalakon, amikbe belerontottál. commented 2026-08-29 14:07:41 UTC by balint36 ♦297 |
| 179632698 (Comments: 1) | Chemnitzer13 (Discussed changesets: 20) | A 64-es vonal címkéibe is belerontottál. commented 2026-08-29 14:05:02 UTC by balint36 ♦297 |
| 185565146 (Comments: 1) | sleet2412 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Not sure about adding small driveways (major task & cluttersome), but would at least need private tags. commented 2026-08-29 13:58:39 UTC by RunningSeeds ♦3 |
| 188137277 (Comments: 1) | lorenzo310 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello you added "Acqua=Non potabile" to a "amenity=drinking_water" (Node:14130767130) If this is correct, then a "description=..." would clarify the facts "Acqua=Non potabile" does not exist. be... commented 2026-08-29 13:58:05 UTC by HirschKauz ♦293 |
| 187978185 (Comments: 2) | noam15A (Discussed changesets: 5) | Got it, thank you! commented 2026-08-29 13:52:25 UTC by noam15A ♦4 |
 | 173717357 (Comments: 2) | Maurine Oyugi (Discussed changesets: 3) | She did a small talk on these on SOTM https://2026.stateofthemap.org/sessions/L9CZPJ/ They were surveyed and I gave some feedback on common tags commented 2026-08-29 13:50:38 UTC by Pieter Vander Vennet ♦471 |
| 119296206 (Comments: 2) | JOYCE MARY (Discussed changesets: 7) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9635326339 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9635326329 probably quite wrong, I've deleted them commented 2026-08-29 13:49:47 UTC by Pieter Vander Vennet ♦471 |
| 188115532 (Comments: 2) | chriz_osm (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hallo JochenOSM, das ist natürlich korrekt. Ich habe "nur" die vorhandenen Angaben des Punktes auf das von mir stattdessen eingezeichnete Gebäude übertragen. Ich habe das nun auf "Apr 22-Sep 30: We 16:00-21:00&quo... commented 2026-08-29 13:47:16 UTC by chriz_osm ♦4 |
| 187359871 (Comments: 1) | Menschenrechtverteidiger (Discussed changesets: 1) | Änderung mit cs/188197741 entfernt (DWG Ticket#2026082910000285, Spam/Advertisement). Das alleinige Vorhandensein einer Webseite deren Impressum auf diese Adresse zeigt, ohne dass eine physische Eigenschaft existiert, ist gem. on the ground-r... commented 2026-08-29 13:45:08 UTC by kmpoppe_repair ♦474 |
| 188020731 (Comments: 3) | Huong Dang (Discussed changesets: 9) | I get where you're coming from on the routing part. That's actually why I switched to the conditional access tags. A lot of OSM-based maps and routers only update their data every month at best, so a 2-day closure can turn into a month+ clo... commented 2026-08-29 13:37:24 UTC by ion_chi ♦91 |
| 41812097 (Comments: 4) | PeerVis (Discussed changesets: 1) | Jeg tror at det var en skild met "Havrenåstoppen" pa start av stien, men jeg har ikke tatt bild fra det, sa er jeg ikke helt sikker (10 ar...). Jeg vet ikke hvordan a vise at den Havrenåstoppen stien er mye litere enn den "... commented 2026-08-29 13:22:31 UTC by PeerVis ♦1 |
| 188195698 (Comments: 1) | AEZw (Discussed changesets: 6) | 👍 commented 2026-08-29 13:20:02 UTC by eggie ♦46,961 |
| 188148992 (Comments: 1) | NightH (Discussed changesets: 19) | Helló! Úgy tűnik hosszú idő után végre sikerült javítani. :) Gratulálok a precíz beavatkozáshoz! :) commented 2026-08-29 13:11:49 UTC by RolandHUN_Mapper ♦20 |
| 188021006 (Comments: 1) | Maria Antonella Pincay (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188196024 commented 2026-08-29 12:58:03 UTC by rajdhani ♦424 |
| 186581859 (Comments: 1) | sleet2412 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello, you may wish to check if the use of relations of footpaths and school building is appropriate here at West End Primary School. What happens in some route planners is that a dotted 'named walking route' (like Leeds Country Way)... commented 2026-08-29 12:51:37 UTC by RunningSeeds ♦3 |
| 188193988 (Comments: 1) | Bike Lover (Discussed changesets: 4) | hello. Please read my direct message to you. Your validating skills are below par. Best regards commented 2026-08-29 12:37:06 UTC by Frans S ♦10,936 |
| 188025412 (Comments: 1) | Drahvidan Chittarasan (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188194897 commented 2026-08-29 12:36:51 UTC by rajdhani ♦424 |
| 188193154 (Comments: 1) | LittleRedQuinn (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. Feedback Kleine stukken groen vallen niet onder de definitie van park. Je zou ook de landuse kunnen mappen. leisure=park... commented 2026-08-29 12:35:35 UTC by eggie ♦46,961 |
| 188192058 (Comments: 3) | HJMVR (Discussed changesets: 2) | Har først set dit anden bemærkning nu. commented 2026-08-29 12:32:05 UTC by Vi2727 ♦15 |
| 188191180 (Comments: 1) | HJMVR (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hej bare til info, i Danmark skal man ikke sætte addr:*-tags på fx POI’er eller bygninger. Adresserne bliver automatisk importeret og løbende vedligeholdt som separate adressepunkter ud fra det officielle Danmarks Adresseregi... commented 2026-08-29 12:06:58 UTC by Vi2727 ♦15 |
| 188184390 (Comments: 4) | Vkvrfgv (Discussed changesets: 4) | Eggie. Zeker. Navigatie vanuit de auto is liveNav. Ons alarmeringsbord toont tijdjes een melding een kaart met locatie en de ETA tijden van de eenheden die gealarmeerd zijn. Echter gebaseerd op normale wegen. Juist willen we dit finetunen om ... commented 2026-08-29 12:05:08 UTC by Vkvrfgv ♦2 |
| 187882798 (Comments: 3) | bmplxp (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👌🏼, thanks for correcting it. commented 2026-08-29 11:53:12 UTC by habi ♦2,248 |
| 188016751 (Comments: 1) | Israel Valenzuela (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188192071 commented 2026-08-29 11:40:53 UTC by rajdhani ♦424 |
| 184093707 (Comments: 1) | clemmsi74 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour, Je supprime la piste cyclable que tu as créée malheureusement. Lorsqu'aucun élément physique ne sépare deux voies de circulation, celles-ci sont liées. Je t'invite à regarder les ... commented 2026-08-29 11:38:10 UTC by Toto2642 ♦13 |
| 178869361 (Comments: 4) | balint36 (Discussed changesets: 38) | Szuper, az egyesület és a szövetség értesítését extrán köszönöm! Sajnos több eset van, amikor OSM-en lehetetlen helyzetekben van jelölve egy-egy útvonal, vagy ... commented 2026-08-29 11:31:44 UTC by balint36 ♦297 |
| 188191243 (Comments: 1) | AEZw (Discussed changesets: 6) | Tip.. In dat geval taggen als disused:shop=.. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:disused:shop ..anders blijf je de winkel po de kaart zien. Mvg, eggie commented 2026-08-29 11:25:36 UTC by eggie ♦46,961 |
| 187310649 (Comments: 6) | Hungerburg (Discussed changesets: 44) | "nice to have" klingt nicht so schlecht. 540 Einträge von etwas von so marginaler Bedeutung gar nicht wenig. Man kann sich in osmand auch Karten nach eigenen Vorlieben bauen. PS: Ich versteh nicht wirklich, was die Auswerter sic... commented 2026-08-29 11:22:56 UTC by Hungerburg ♦424 |
| 188026142 (Comments: 4) | mapperue (Discussed changesets: 320) | Většina měst nebo recyklačních společností běžně informuje občany, co do jednotlivých nádob patří a co ne. commented 2026-08-29 11:16:18 UTC by mapperue ♦245 |
| 188159243 (Comments: 2) | random_guy287 (Discussed changesets: 12) | Jeśli zaś idzie o kładkę pieszo-rowerową https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1530193385/ to zalecam zapoznanie się z artykułami niżej i wyciągnięcie wniosków: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:building=bridge?uselang=pl |
| 188187561 (Comments: 8) | Syl (Discussed changesets: 63) | I understand your point of view and kind of agree, in the sense that OSM tagging doesn't perfectly match table tennis information needs, also in terms of material of table and surface of the area where the table is. Maybe would it be more "... commented 2026-08-29 10:58:16 UTC by alesarrett ♦131 |
| 179045161 (Comments: 1) | ollphéist (Discussed changesets: 2) | Obair shár-mhaith! commented 2026-08-29 10:53:25 UTC by smeòrach ♦41 |
| 186790151 (Comments: 3) | craigray59 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Okay understood. The service roads do appear on all the available overhead imagery in id, but I guess it has all changed since. Cheers/Thanks. commented 2026-08-29 10:51:16 UTC by bob3bob3 ♦63 |
| 188020401 (Comments: 2) | HK Bitcoin City (Discussed changesets: 1) | I am unable to verify the acceptance of Bitcoin. No Bitcoin sign on their website or social media. commented 2026-08-29 10:42:56 UTC by Comino ♦401 |
| 185365279 (Comments: 3) | mrkslrnz (Discussed changesets: 1) | Die Seite ist leider nicht ganz korrekt.. "Landwirtschaftlicher Verkehr frei" ist ein zusatzschild und drückt immer nur eine Ausnahme vom Schild drüber aus. Es bedeutet nie acces=agricultural. Bei zeichen 260 sind nur Kraftf... commented 2026-08-29 10:35:11 UTC by Langlaeufer ♦1,583 |
| 187813773 (Comments: 1) | BikeBazi (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi BikeBazi, sind die Straßen vor Ort auch als Privatstraßen ausgeschildert? Andernfalls ist das Tagging als motor_vehicle=private vermutlich falsch. Was war denn die Intention hinter der Änderung? Bei den highway=servi... commented 2026-08-29 10:29:19 UTC by flo2154 ♦68 |
| 187813962 (Comments: 1) | BikeBazi (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hallo BikeBazi, willkommen bei OpenStreetMap! Danke für die hinzugefügte Straßenlaterne! Leider hast du auch einen Baum aus dem Biberweg in den Wald verschoben. Ich habe das in https://osm.org/changeset/188188948 korrigiert. Bi... commented 2026-08-29 10:19:07 UTC by flo2154 ♦68 |
| 188107828 (Comments: 1) | OSM-XXXXXX (Discussed changesets: 35) | Hei, service=alley on väärin, tagin oikea käyttötarkoitus on kuvattu wikissä sillan surface=wood oli oikea arvo, tai ainakin kuukausi sitten siinä oli vielä puukansi, oletko varmistanut että se olisi ... commented 2026-08-29 10:17:41 UTC by Sakari_N ♦161 |
| 188154315 (Comments: 2) | confusedbuffalo (Discussed changesets: 113) | Thanks for the report, it was an incorrect copy/paste of a postcode. Removed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188188804 commented 2026-08-29 10:13:49 UTC by confusedbuffalo ♦445 |
| 188187573 (Comments: 1) | NL2ghd (Discussed changesets: 3) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. Feedback Je kunt het ook als vlak intekenen.. Dan wordt het duidelijker. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community <... commented 2026-08-29 10:05:31 UTC by eggie ♦46,961 |
| 187973976 (Comments: 4) | vectorial8192 (Discussed changesets: 210) | The modifications focus on the Lau Fau Shan "eat fish" area. We know Bing and Mapbox have different imagery, generally in separate years. We see a consistent "carved" coastline from both sources. We also see there is extra ... commented 2026-08-29 10:04:30 UTC by vectorial8192 ♦209 |
| 187973771 (Comments: 3) | vectorial8192 (Discussed changesets: 210) | So far I see the market names are not formalized names. Dockyard area doesn't seem likely to have names. We could still use the proper "Lau Fau Shan" suburb node outside to address the whole neighbourhood. commented 2026-08-29 09:58:27 UTC by vectorial8192 ♦209 |
| 188186574 (Comments: 1) | mainsprinter (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hi, die Trafostation in (über?) einem anderen Gebäude ist irgendwie seltsam. An anderen Stellen gibt es Duplikate wie node/12745655526 Außerdem ist bei solchen service-Gebäude von name abzuraten, das ist ja schon durch powe... commented 2026-08-29 09:42:59 UTC by onterof ♦63 |
| 186810144 (Comments: 1) | bremanu (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hallo bremanu, die Öffnungszeiten vom Imbiss sind so nicht auswertbar, siehe https://openingh.openstreetmap.de/evaluation_tool/?EXP=nur%20bei%20Spielbetrieb&lat=50.1397513&lon=9.9661821&mode=0&DATE=1787995759484 Und hat de... commented 2026-08-29 09:36:28 UTC by JochenOSM ♦143 |
| 188182535 (Comments: 3) | Vkvrfgv (Discussed changesets: 4) | Volgens mij is er een 'dingetje' met bruggen en moet bij sommige bruggen de maxweight worden toegevoegd. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:maxweight emergency=yes zal alles wel overrulen. Dat is zo. Wij zijn niet bekend met ... commented 2026-08-29 09:36:05 UTC by eggie ♦46,961 |
| 187380882 (Comments: 3) | KarlReintsch (Discussed changesets: 1) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12302378950 ist jetzt `amenity=restaurant` *und* `tourism=alpine_hut` erfasst. `tourism=alpine_hut` ist auch bei der Ringelspitzhütte (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/218924350) so, dort aber nicht `am... commented 2026-08-29 09:35:29 UTC by habi ♦2,248 |
| 116334170 (Comments: 2) | benoitdd (Discussed changesets: 39) | Non, aucune idée, je ne suis pas sur place commented 2026-08-29 09:28:07 UTC by benoitdd ♦95 |
| 188131272 (Comments: 2) | Xernro (Discussed changesets: 1) | Oh Entschuldigung dachte nicht, dass sich da so viel ändert. Klar werde ich machen commented 2026-08-29 09:23:55 UTC by Xernro ♦1 |
| 87093604 (Comments: 3) | Tntdruid (Discussed changesets: 76) | 100% hvad? Præcise? Hvad findes ikke? Jeg siger ikke, at skyggekortet er perfekt. Jeg siger at GPS-spor ikke er præcise overhovedet, så de skal ikke følges særligt præcist. Skyggekort er bare et sjov... commented 2026-08-29 09:13:07 UTC by cyclist789 ♦113 |
| 181316567 (Comments: 5) | somehundred (Discussed changesets: 34) | ,👍 commented 2026-08-29 09:12:18 UTC by rusjanis ♦31 |
| 188090438 (Comments: 5) | silveragestum (Discussed changesets: 42) | Also from past problems with you, it's unclear whether you mean there's no longer any road here, or the alignment has changed. If it's the latter, you should be editing its shape, not deleting entirely. From the remaining short section... commented 2026-08-29 09:11:03 UTC by Kovoschiz ♦3,022 |
| 180305955 (Comments: 11) | osmviborg (Discussed changesets: 371) | > Tunnel er ikke et rør. tunnel=culvert er ofte et rør og tunnel=flooded foreslås med en diameter=* på wiki'et, så jo, tunnel kan godt være et rør. På OSM bruges tunnel=* og bridge=... commented 2026-08-29 09:02:47 UTC by cyclist789 ♦113 |
| 187529787 (Comments: 3) | HAL_Study (Discussed changesets: 1) | `=unclassified` means minor road, not non-identified roads commented 2026-08-29 08:51:25 UTC by Kovoschiz ♦3,022 |
| 188035190 (Comments: 1) | Supt_of_Printing (Discussed changesets: 103) | Hello! area=yes is generally implied, and is not needed on four_square courts or on parking commented 2026-08-29 08:40:17 UTC by Ethan Grobin ♦15 |
| 182124370 (Comments: 1) | PetraDieJa (Discussed changesets: 2) | Dag Petra, Busbaan is geen straatnaam en hoort dus niet op de kaart. De tagging busway is voldoende. MVG eggie commented 2026-08-29 08:27:32 UTC by eggie ♦46,961 |
| 188183250 (Comments: 4) | Bentway (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bedankt voor de feedback. Barney's is permanent gesloten. commented 2026-08-29 08:25:29 UTC by Bentway ♦1 |
| 188032738 (Comments: 1) | silveragestum (Discussed changesets: 42) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188184446 commented 2026-08-29 08:24:52 UTC by rajdhani ♦424 |
| 186666462 (Comments: 3) | SalliSiiri45 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello! Sorry for the late reply! Sure, thank you for updating it! commented 2026-08-29 08:24:20 UTC by SalliSiiri45 ♦2 |
| 188136723 (Comments: 3) | Langlaeufer (Discussed changesets: 138) | Ist jetzt behoben. commented 2026-08-29 07:46:53 UTC by Langlaeufer ♦1,583 |
| 188059783 (Comments: 2) | diegoGimenez (Discussed changesets: 54) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188183309 commented 2026-08-29 07:45:22 UTC by rajdhani ♦424 |
| 184689446 (Comments: 2) | Sébastien Pi (Discussed changesets: 27) | Salut, Non, ce sont des notes qui sont là principale source (en plus de jeter un œil aérien). Ici, c'est https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2926865 qui parlait d'un sentier plus difficile que sa note préc&e... commented 2026-08-29 07:37:39 UTC by Sébastien Pi ♦159 |
| 185500252 (Comments: 4) | osmmapper222 (Discussed changesets: 73) | Danke fürs reparieren commented 2026-08-29 07:35:34 UTC by Langlaeufer ♦1,583 |
| 188182738 (Comments: 1) | kevbold (Discussed changesets: 5) | *Sorry i meant Jl Tjilik Riwut not RTA Milono commented 2026-08-29 07:27:38 UTC by kevbold ♦5 |
| 188107486 (Comments: 1) | Aaron Shafer (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hey, I just wanted to let you know that I noticed you accidentally made an invalid opening_hours=* tag. For node 14129261827 "Tue-Thu 8-6 Fri-Sat- 8-8" should actually be formatted as "Tu-Th 08:00-18:00; Fr-Sa 08:00-20:00".... commented 2026-08-29 07:15:41 UTC by PostaMap_Infinite ♦62 |
| 188182120 (Comments: 2) | Vkvrfgv (Discussed changesets: 4) | Schade op drie plaatsen hersteld. emergency=yes is default op een busway en hoeft dus niet te worden bijgetagd. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dbusway Implies... (dus default) access=no bus=designated |
 | 128992216 (Comments: 1) | BeatrixL (Discussed changesets: 1) | DWG revert - remove invalid street names: 188182277 commented 2026-08-29 07:12:23 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,812 |
| 188085810 (Comments: 8) | Ah yeah (Discussed changesets: 2) | Please use another means of communication. commented 2026-08-29 07:08:37 UTC by 9_tab ♦129 |
| 188181612 (Comments: 1) | omeci (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. Feedback.. Maakt 'Zwolle' ook deel uit van de naam? Meestal latten we de plaatsnaam weg. MVG, Eggie |
| 188056264 (Comments: 2) | YETSABEL (Discussed changesets: 1) | Something went wrong with this import. - It's missing the mandatory link to documentation - Many nodes have only foreign tags - There are duplicates of existing places - There are hamlets in the middle of lakes I'm go... commented 2026-08-29 07:05:02 UTC by mueschel ♦7,309 |
| 187964023 (Comments: 1) | Agustín! (Discussed changesets: 2) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188182092 commented 2026-08-29 07:04:53 UTC by ajmat ♦418 |
| 188150549 (Comments: 5) | Ah yeah (Discussed changesets: 2) | Vreemd.. Gisteren klopte de sortering niet. Maar .. het is nu weer oke. Bedankt voor het checken. commented 2026-08-29 07:01:11 UTC by eggie ♦46,961 |
| 188136890 (Comments: 6) | AEZw (Discussed changesets: 6) | Volgens mij heb je nooit de welkomstmail ontvangen van de 'Dutch Community' .. bij deze alsnog .... Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie... commented 2026-08-29 06:51:00 UTC by eggie ♦46,961 |
| 182194772 (Comments: 2) | tkotnala_lyft (Discussed changesets: 12) | Hi Adam Dunn , My name is Tanya, and I’m a mapper on the OSM team at Lyft. Thanks for reaching out. The changes to the bus route tags were made automatically by the system while adding missing road(https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way... commented 2026-08-29 06:44:13 UTC by tkotnala_lyft ♦11 |
| 188030943 (Comments: 3) | CjMalone (Discussed changesets: 114) | Hopefully JOSM will add a validation rule. https://josm.openstreetmap.de/ticket/24877#ticket commented 2026-08-29 06:37:02 UTC by CjMalone ♦255 |
| 160860018 (Comments: 1) | jdmontes (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello jdmontes, The opening_hours value for RHS Cafe is invalid. "7:15 - 7:30 also Durring both Lunches" does not follow the proper syntax for opening_hours values. I went ahead and fixed it to the best of my ability, but I d... commented 2026-08-29 06:29:36 UTC by PostaMap_Infinite ♦62 |
| 188176731 (Comments: 1) | Fred van Zwieten (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-08-29 06:28:32 UTC by eggie ♦46,961 |
| 188173933 (Comments: 2) | lephan (Discussed changesets: 7) | a node was deleted. nodes can be attached to more the one entity (line, polygon). should the node be deleted (accidentally), it destroys all the items that are attached to it. As sewerage line extending many kms is broken. accidental deletion of the ... commented 2026-08-29 06:27:43 UTC by lephan ♦4 |
| 188133603 (Comments: 6) | vojtechzaboril (Discussed changesets: 168) | I fixed the wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:route%3Dvia_ferrata The relation can also have name=*, description=*, access=*, fee=* and other common tags as appropriate. Note that via_ferrata_scale=* should be applied directly ... commented 2026-08-29 06:19:44 UTC by micheleOSM3 ♦188 |
| 187822249 (Comments: 1) | Rivai Sigit (Discussed changesets: 9) | belum sempurna https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/21261450 commented 2026-08-29 06:15:24 UTC by FajrAl ♦757 |
| 188180710 (Comments: 1) | PostaMap_Infinite (Discussed changesets: 26) | Well, at a second look it's not too regularly, but they have updated it before so they absolutely could update it in the future! commented 2026-08-29 06:13:49 UTC by PostaMap_Infinite ♦62 |
| 185892990 (Comments: 5) | Thomas-Munichways (Discussed changesets: 8) | Danke! commented 2026-08-29 06:08:23 UTC by Flian ♦1 |
| 187974529 (Comments: 3) | Christos RH (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Christos RH, thank you for the context. Since the feature remains visible in the imagery, it is possible that some other user would re-add it to the map if deleted. In those cases, OSM guidelines suggest using lifecycle prefixes to define the curr... commented 2026-08-29 05:53:28 UTC by ajmat ♦418 |
| 188179540 (Comments: 1) | Clairness (Discussed changesets: 6) | Just re-read the wiki on amenity=parking... I will fix the incorrectly mapped areas later. commented 2026-08-29 05:30:06 UTC by Clairness ♦5 |
| 179299889 (Comments: 3) | MDOLF (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo MDOLF, du hast diesen Weg von surface asphalt auf surface dirt geändert. Das ist ok. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/64540666 Aber: Den tracktype hast du dabei auf grade1 belassen. Das ist nicht ok. Grade1 sind ausschließ... commented 2026-08-29 05:21:50 UTC by Geo-Tobi ♦315 |
| 188017859 (Comments: 2) | KIMGGONG2 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Edits using improper source reverted by DWG: 188179193 & 188179197 commented 2026-08-29 05:03:48 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,812 |
| 188133869 (Comments: 1) | pepitob (Discussed changesets: 4) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see http://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers ... commented 2026-08-29 04:55:40 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,008 |
| 188133582 (Comments: 1) | pepitob (Discussed changesets: 4) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-08-29 04:54:17 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,008 |
| 188133260 (Comments: 1) | pepitob (Discussed changesets: 4) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-08-29 04:54:12 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,008 |
| 188133560 (Comments: 1) | pepitob (Discussed changesets: 4) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-08-29 04:54:04 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,008 |
| 188178889 (Comments: 1) | 010ender56 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Insignificant but iD Beta editor did not correctly populate the imagery_used field, I used both Esri World Imagery and Bing Maps Aerial. commented 2026-08-29 04:45:33 UTC by 010ender56 ♦1 |
| 188169471 (Comments: 1) | COST CUTTERS at Webster (Discussed changesets: 2) | Updated the now-outdated/incorrect brand:wikidata=* in changeset: https://osm.org/changeset/188178868 commented 2026-08-29 04:43:08 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,008 |
| X | 188137957 (Comments: 1) | Peak Performance Partners (Discussed changesets: 3) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-08-29 04:40:09 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,008 |
| 187460776 (Comments: 3) | Yorvik Prestigitator (Discussed changesets: 91) | Ok, well I have removed it in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188178805 commented 2026-08-29 04:39:40 UTC by confusedbuffalo ♦445 |
| 188012325 (Comments: 3) | philipcullen (Discussed changesets: 48) | Thanks, that looks better now commented 2026-08-29 04:36:27 UTC by confusedbuffalo ♦445 |
| 188060092 (Comments: 1) | chickenswoup (Discussed changesets: 1) | Kalau hanya mobil yang tidak bisa lewat, cukup motorcar=no. Seharusnya kamu pahami dulu arti tiap tag akses. Selain itu ubah saja pengaturan aplikasinya jadi bahasa Indonesia bila kurang mengerti bahasa Inggris; mencari label juga akan lebih mudah. commented 2026-08-29 04:16:35 UTC by FajrAl ♦757 |
| 188108909 (Comments: 2) | OpenStreetMap sejong (Discussed changesets: 2) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1244881#map=14/47.37748/8.45821 이 지물을 참고하셨으면 합니다. 도로 지물의 역할은 route가 아닌 빈칸이고 정류장 자체를 나타내는 지물의 역할은 platform, 버스가 ... commented 2026-08-29 04:09:26 UTC by 대전맨 ♦8 |
| 188136588 (Comments: 3) | AEZw (Discussed changesets: 6) | Niet helemaal correct, het Ei is een gemeenschappelijke ruimte van de bewoners van CPO Groene Mient. Het wordt ook gebruikt voor activiteiten van en in de buurt. commented 2026-08-29 04:06:09 UTC by AEZw ♦3 |
| 188136477 (Comments: 2) | AEZw (Discussed changesets: 6) | er stonden paden als publieke doorgang wat niet klopt met de werkelijkheid commented 2026-08-29 03:58:21 UTC by AEZw ♦3 |
| 188062885 (Comments: 1) | mcnv (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello mcnv, When you have a relation like you do on this course with a fairway surrounding a green, you need to tag the *relation* as golf=fairway as you've done, but you don't want to tag the outer polygon as fairway as well. |
| 188177665 (Comments: 1) | andri88 (Discussed changesets: 1) | belum dikasih label jalannya itu commented 2026-08-29 03:47:21 UTC by FajrAl ♦757 |
| 188017150 (Comments: 2) | amalpeyre (Discussed changesets: 2) | Rusde's. Same like jhuana homestay 50m in NE. But différent name. Keep the 2 places Épicerie : grocery store. commented 2026-08-29 03:33:38 UTC by amalpeyre ♦1 |
| 187396916 (Comments: 3) | ianmlq (Discussed changesets: 1) | Of course, you're most welcome! Thanks for understanding! commented 2026-08-29 03:27:55 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,008 |
| 188018978 (Comments: 3) | TetrisEffect (Discussed changesets: 8) | Sure thing! I used to have that impression myself, but in fact contact:mobile=* (and the somewhat ambiguous mobile=*) is used to indicate that an _additional_ number leading to a mobile phone, and does not necessarily imply anything about texting cap... commented 2026-08-29 03:27:10 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,008 |
| 188080305 (Comments: 2) | CAM-Gerlach_Repair (Discussed changesets: 38) | It's suggested for toll-free numbers here: https://osm.wiki/Key:phone#Free_to_Call_Numbers_(Toll_Free_Numbers) And described in more detail here: https://osm.wiki/Key:phone#Support_for_multiple_countries Specifically:... commented 2026-08-29 03:09:18 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,008 |
| 168713934 (Comments: 1) | MrYouse (Discussed changesets: 1) | As of 6/28/26 or before this camera is gone. commented 2026-08-29 03:03:58 UTC by Gabe006 ♦1 |
| 187908950 (Comments: 1) | rmiessler (Discussed changesets: 1) | Good edit. Welcome to OSM and helping us track the flock changes! --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/187908950 commented 2026-08-29 03:01:14 UTC by CurlingMan13 ♦2,100 |
| 188145828 (Comments: 1) | keweenawking (Discussed changesets: 1) | Looks good. I agree, that road needed to be moved back. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/188145828 commented 2026-08-29 02:59:43 UTC by CurlingMan13 ♦2,100 |
| 188149852 (Comments: 2) | ddmp (Discussed changesets: 1) | Perubahan ini telah dipulihkan https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188177168 commented 2026-08-29 02:58:35 UTC by FajrAl ♦757 |
| 188152212 (Comments: 1) | GARRY RAIFAN (Discussed changesets: 3) | Tidak perlu semua namanya kapital commented 2026-08-29 02:51:12 UTC by FajrAl ♦757 |
| 188153540 (Comments: 1) | Arif Sunanto (Discussed changesets: 5) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1553222774 jalan yang ada di tengah ladang/sawah yang tidak menghubungkan dengan permukiman sebaiknya dilabeli sebagai path atau track commented 2026-08-29 02:48:27 UTC by FajrAl ♦757 |
| 188102831 (Comments: 1) | Franklin_pin_tumbaco (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188176670 commented 2026-08-29 02:34:37 UTC by MappingMore ♦685 |
| 188158632 (Comments: 1) | andri-by (Discussed changesets: 1) | Kalau persimpangan, bisa pakai junction=yes. Mungkin itu maksud tag sebelumnya commented 2026-08-29 02:28:43 UTC by FajrAl ♦757 |
| 188163296 (Comments: 1) | Line225 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks for mapping the Aba 1000/500 kV substation! I had located the site before, but the available satellite imagery had not yet been updated to show the substation, so I couldn't map it reliably. Really glad to see someone finally add it and i... commented 2026-08-29 02:22:59 UTC by GlavkomLVO ♦6 |
| 183910766 (Comments: 3) | Хелен 123 (Discussed changesets: 7) | Интерсно что это была за эпидемия переделываний дорог в строящиеся commented 2026-08-29 01:31:49 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,700 |
| 183813119 (Comments: 1) | Хелен 123 (Discussed changesets: 7) | Reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188175705 commented 2026-08-29 01:31:01 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,700 |
| 183873520 (Comments: 1) | Хелен 123 (Discussed changesets: 7) | Reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188175689 commented 2026-08-29 01:30:27 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,700 |
| 183873584 (Comments: 1) | Хелен 123 (Discussed changesets: 7) | Reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188175685 commented 2026-08-29 01:30:14 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,700 |
| 183873624 (Comments: 1) | Хелен 123 (Discussed changesets: 7) | Reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188175661 commented 2026-08-29 01:29:08 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,700 |
| 183907526 (Comments: 1) | Хелен 123 (Discussed changesets: 7) | Reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188175653 commented 2026-08-29 01:28:42 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,700 |
| 183908777 (Comments: 1) | Хелен 123 (Discussed changesets: 7) | Reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188175647 commented 2026-08-29 01:28:23 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,700 |
| 188172662 (Comments: 4) | lephan (Discussed changesets: 7) | nothing further needs to be done here. commented 2026-08-29 01:24:54 UTC by lephan ♦4 |
| 188175328 (Comments: 1) | Berdly (Discussed changesets: 20) | I accidentally hit upload while trying to select the proper text to change the changeset name. That’s why it’s a false duplicate of my last summary :p commented 2026-08-29 01:09:39 UTC by Berdly ♦21 |
| 188132129 (Comments: 1) | stdima31 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👋 Необязательно отправлять каждое здание в отдельной правке. Можно нарисовать несколько домиков и отправить их разом commented 2026-08-29 01:07:52 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,700 |
| 188055512 (Comments: 1) | arvubixer (Discussed changesets: 1) | Nie, droga nie ma takiej nazwy. commented 2026-08-29 00:32:52 UTC by maro21 ♦931 |
| 188125000 (Comments: 2) | Flap Slimy Outward (Discussed changesets: 286) | I'll go change it back. Just an FYI: Some other user began downgrading multiple motorway "dangling spurs" in the Western US. They also did this to Lake Mead Parkway and Boulder City Parkway in Henderson and Boulder City, respectively. commented 2026-08-28 23:54:03 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦352 |
 | 178967972 (Comments: 1) | Ella Reyngoudt (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Features such as grasslands, forests, and farmland shouldn't be given descriptive names (such as "Grassland"). They should be left unnamed. Thank you commented 2026-08-28 23:42:02 UTC by Solaris07 ♦25 |
| 188173765 (Comments: 1) | h234a2hm (Discussed changesets: 6) | source_ref=https://www.dekalbschoolsga.org/schools/all-schools commented 2026-08-28 23:33:04 UTC by h234a2hm ♦6 |
| 188158403 (Comments: 1) | Sagya Dhungel (Discussed changesets: 2) | This edit was reverted in changeset/188173662 commented 2026-08-28 23:29:43 UTC by Solaris07 ♦25 |
| 188157889 (Comments: 2) | Sagya Dhungel (Discussed changesets: 2) | This edit was reverted in changeset/188173687 commented 2026-08-28 23:29:01 UTC by Solaris07 ♦25 |
| 115549724 (Comments: 2) | Gorfic (Discussed changesets: 1) | street level imagery shows US flag. commented 2026-08-28 23:14:57 UTC by weblogdryads ♦41 |
| 188114012 (Comments: 1) | Olli O (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hallo Olli, kann man von diesem Weg wirklich nicht auf die Straße gelangen? Wenn doch, dann sollten Weg und Straße verbunden werden, damit Nutzer und Router dies erkennen können :-) Lass mich gerne wissen, wenn d... commented 2026-08-28 23:13:37 UTC by Marvk ♦111 |
| 188005908 (Comments: 1) | Halfdeaf007 (Discussed changesets: 19) | I see that on this changeset you only listed Bing aerial imagery as a source, but you changed speed limits along a decent portion of some roads, which you cannot find on aerial imagery (except in very rare cases). Can you tell me what source ... commented 2026-08-28 23:12:27 UTC by dknelson9876 ♦141 |
| 188126778 (Comments: 1) | Juan Sebastian Martinez García (Discussed changesets: 1) | Atención de calidad commented 2026-08-28 23:12:11 UTC by Brithnie12 ♦1 |